Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Sued By South Carolina Inmate

Benjamin Duranske writes "Jonathan Lee Riches, an inmate in South Carolina famous for filing long, handwritten, rambling screeds against celebrities, politicians, and even buildings, has filed a third-party motion in Federal Court in Arizona in the MDY v. Blizzard botting case claiming that Blizzard's World of Warcraft 'caused Riches mind to live in a virtual universe, where Riches explored the landscape committing identity theft and fighting cybermonster rival hacker gangs. Riches was addicted to video games and lost touch with reality because of defendants. This caused Riches to commit fraud to buy defendants video games. Riches chose World of Warcraft over working a legit job, Riches mind became a living video game.'"

193 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is another ridiculous lawsuit. I was first aware of this when he sued Michael Vick a while back. He is an attention whore, please do not give him anymore attention!

    Check out this recent lawsuit and its defendents:

    George W Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Condeleza Rice, Donald H Rumsfeld, John W Snow, Unknown Authors, Carlos M Gutierrez, Michael O Leavitt, Elaine Chao, Stephen L Johnson, Margaret Spellings, Samuel W Bodman, Norman Y Mineta, Hillary Rodham Clinton, James Hoffa, www.GOOGLE.com, Benedict, XVI, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Jerry West, www.ACCUWEATHER.com, Usama Bin Laden, William Gates, Hugo Chavez, John Deere, Adolf Hitler's National Socialist Party, Island Def Jam Music Group, Roc-A Fella Records, Shawn Carter, Queen of England, Jo Anne B Barnhart, Steven Spielberg, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Holdings Inc, Japan's Nikkei Stock Exchange, Gambino, Three Mile Island, Kofi Annaan, Tony Danza, Islamic Republic of Iran, Don King Productions Inc, Paris Hilton, Kingdom Hall of the Jehovah's Witness, Jose Padilla, University of Miami, Geico Insurance, Vienna Convention, Matt Drudge, Marion Blakey, Consulate General of Nigeria, The Salvation Army, Jewish State of "Israel", John E Potter, Soledad O'Brien, Miles O'Brien, Magna Carta, Tsunami victims, Alan Greenspan, American Red Cross, Mark Emerson, Jessica Alba, Sirius Satellite Radio, Charles Moose, Dalai Lama, Houston Chronicle, Al Qaeda Islamic Army, Fruit of A-Loom, American Civil Liberties Union, Out-Back Steakhouse, Donald J Trump, Chris Berman, Vatican, The, Shawn John Combs, Michael Brown, Vincent K McMahon, Taliban, The, Richard M Daley, Meals on Wheels, John Grisham, Columbine High School, Ariel Sharon, United Parcel Service, Tara Reid, Black Entertainment Television Inc, Saddam Hussein, Jewish Workers, Brad Pitt, Jack Welch, Elizabeth Smart, George E Pataki, Charlie Sheen, Surgeon General, The, Vladimir Putin, Oliver North, George Orwell, www.ASKJEEVES.com, Sean O'Keefe, Various Buddhist Monks, www.SECUREDPARTY.com, I Lewis Libby, Warren Buffett, Sierra Club, John D Negroponte, Christina Applegate, Jewish Mossad, National Vanguard Books, Air and Space Museum, Christopher Reeves, Gale A Norton, Halliburton Company, Kellogg Brown & Root, John Walsh, Mein Kampf, City of Crawford Texas, John P Abizaid, Venus Williams, www.DEFCON.org, John Dudas, Medieval Times, International Trade Commission, Anna Nichole Smith, United States Marine Corps, William F Buckley, Denny's, Brotherhood of the Snake, Larry King, Charles E Schumer, Rastafarian Natives, Spencer Abraham, Rollingstone Magazine, Monogram Bank of Georgia, Grace Jones, National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, Planet Hollywood, Joseph H Boardman, Marshall Bruce Mathers, III, Uliminati,Founder Adam Weishaupt, The Apollo Theater, David W Anderson, Assistant Secretary For Indian Affairs, Jason Society, Wu Tang Clan, Wu-Wear Inc, Philip Purcell, CEO Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Nordic Gods, Presidental Emergency Operation Center, Screen Actors Guild Inc, R James Nicholson, New York Stock Exchange Inc, The Da Vinci Code, Moorish Science Temple of America, Sears Tower, Mike Tyson, Native American Fish Society, Holocaust Survivors, Byzantine Republic Army, Dennis Hopper, Mt. Rushmore, Barbara Walters, First Presbyterian Church, Gordan R Sullivan, Yellow Cab Company, Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of North America, Michael Savage, Dennis Hastert, Green Bay's Lambeau Field, Slobodan Milosevic, Pizza Hut, King James Bible, Scott Peterson, Department of Housing and Urban Affiars, Smithsonian Institute, Robert C Bonner, Ming Dynasty, Ray Nagin, Barry Bonds, Thomas J Ridge, Jenna Bush, Gangs in Hong Kong, United Methodist Church, European Union, Porter Goss, Harrah's Las Vegas Inc, Grand Wizard of Ku Klux Klan, General Motors, Christopher Cox, Proctor & Gamble, Jewish Synagogue's, www.ebay.com, Knights of Malta, A

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, I always thought Al Jazeera and Bumble Bee Tuna were connected somehow.

      Finally, proof.

    2. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by nickheart · · Score: 3, Funny

      He also sued Hurricane Katrina

    3. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He must be lonely in prison.

    4. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's suing fruit of A-Loom rather than fruit of The Loom - that's how you know he's crazy.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    5. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Cocoa+Radix · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most people forget that important little "Home Depot" bridge between the two...

      Common mistake. Don't beat yourself up about it.

    6. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Da Vinci Code? Magna Carta? Statue of Liberty? Miles O'Brien? George W Bush?

      He's suing inanimate objects and fictional characters? Good luck with that!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by internerdj · · Score: 4, Funny

      George W Bush is a fictional character? That explains so much and is a great relief at the same time.

    8. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Itninja · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, that was one of the inanimate objects.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    9. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by firex726 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks like Pluto is off the hook. He calls it a "Planet".

    10. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by internerdj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Awww. Well at least it still explains alot.

    11. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Adriax · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lawyers don't play the Kevin Bacon game anymore, they play the 1 degree of separation to Jonathan Lee Riches game.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    12. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, sure. "Lonely bored crazy guy yells at squirrels in the park" is not a headline either.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    13. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Except for Christina Applegate, Bob Barker, Green Bay's Lambeau Field, and Denny's I agree it is frivolous. I've been after those bums for years. I'm not sure what "Jewish Mossad" is though. Is there a "Hindu Mossad"?

      His list of defendants reads like it was generated by the same program that generates spam.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    14. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by pcolaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess that's why he was suing GWB, since Bush used the weather machine to create Hurricane Katrina.

    15. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      Uliminati

      The secreter, shadowier even more scarier elite wing of the Illuminati? Maybe this guy is on to something! Or just on something.

    16. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 4, Funny

      He must be lonely in prison.

      Maybe we can arrange for him to get a new friend...

      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
    17. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I wonder if he could be transferred to an Alaska prison...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    18. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apparently he doesn't realize that when google lawbot indexes this, it is gonna toss out all these random keywords, right?

      Or is there some secret message in there somewhere?

    19. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by orielbean · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I like his style. Can we give him a TV show maybe?

    20. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      Like the inventor of perl?

    21. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      There's a journalist/reporter (CNN? NBC? Can't remember) named Miles O'Brien.

      I saw him on the news a few times. Always good for a laugh.

      Does GWB count as fictional or inanimate?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    22. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ouch. He will want to be careful suing those Norse Gods, thier counter-suit will smite him dearly.

    23. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not sure what "Jewish Mossad" is though. Is there a "Hindu Mossad"?

      Yes, there is. They are not as good at intelligence, but their song and dance routines are legendary.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    24. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by benicillin · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling they won't be able to locate "Elson John", "Area 69", or the "Kyoto Protocol", the first because it's spelled wrong, the second because its the wrong number, and the third because it's a treaty and you can't sue a treaty. i wonder whether this list has any rhyme or reason to it, or whether it's just nonsense he randomly thought of. HAHA "verne the mini me" that one just makes it for me.

      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
    25. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      I wonder if he could be transferred to an Alaska prison...

      Nah. Just put him in a cell with an ex-lawyer from Florida.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    26. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by monkeyman_67156 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like how he sues the article "The". He'd probably have a better chance going after the preposition, "around".

    27. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Bu11etmagnet · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if he could be transferred to an Alaska prison...

      Nah. Just put him in a cell with an ex-lawyer from Florida.

      That would be classified as cruel and unusual punishment...

      --
      Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
    28. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by mcbutterbuns · · Score: 1

      Oh my goodness. I feel bad for the person that had to type all of those in...

    29. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      He might have a little trouble getting Adolf Hitler's National Socialist Party into court, oh and Three Mile Island might be tricky, as would the Vienna Convention, Magna Carta, Tsunami victims, Jewish Workers, Various Buddhist Monks, Mein Kampf, Rastafarian Natives, Uliminati Founder Adam Weishaupt, Nordic Gods, The Da Vinci Code, Byzantine Republic Army, Mt. Rushmore, King James Bible, Ming Dynasty, Gangs in Hong Kong, Statue of Liberty, Geneva Convention, The World Court Hague, Yale Skull and Bones, City of Nadi, Roman Empire, Bloods and Crips of Detroit, Architecture of Fee Masonry, Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, Nostradamus, The Eiffel Tower, Plymouth Rock, Charles Dickens, Leaning Tower of Pisa, Guerilla's in the Mist, The International Space Station, Rand Corporation, Michealangelo, Aztec Pyramids, Viagara, Sumbionese Liberation Army, Kyoto Protocol, Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument, M.C. Hammer, Louis XV, Holy Grail, Planet of Pluto, Golden Gate Bridge, Chechen Rebels, Ninja Samurai Fighters, Hubble Space Telescope, Equal Opportunity Employer, World Wide Web, Area 69, Engine #9, Napoleon, Hannibal Lector, and the Statue of Felix Dzerzhinsky.

      On the bright side, I'm sure he'll get a countersuit from the Church of Scientology for his troubles at least.

    30. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      It all meshes, he's there at around the 300th defendant (counting the landmarks, armies, vague socio-political groups etc. as actual viable defendants)

    31. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's something suspicious about all those fish being down there in the dark. I'll bet that they're hiding secret refuges for terrorists!
       
      I hereby vote that Tom Ridge be immediately be put into a wetsuit and dropped into the Marianas Trench to investigate.

      --
      It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
    32. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by billcopc · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to know is why anyone allows this joke of a human wastebag to file lawsuits ?

      I'm all in support of a fair legal process, and inmates should be allowed the right to seek justice, but maybe they could have cut him off after the first dozen random suits, no ?

      He's not actually showing how fucked up the legal system is, because no one is taking him seriously.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    33. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Samah · · Score: 2, Funny

      The two criteria were not mutually exclusive, you know. ;)

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    34. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Or introduce him to mister shiv.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    35. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by ohtani · · Score: 1

      His case has to be thrown out! I mean... come on, he's trying to sue the planet of pluto. Everybody knows it's not a planet!

      Also I think somebody should take this list and do a remake of "We Didn't Start The Fire" using the list as lyrics.

      Also why in the HELL is Jack Thompson NOT on this list!

      --
      Pancakes. Oh I blew it.
    36. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling they won't be able to locate "Elson John", "Area 69", or the "Kyoto Protocol", the first because it's spelled wrong, the second because its the wrong number, and the third because it's a treaty and you can't sue a treaty. i wonder whether this list has any rhyme or reason to it, or whether it's just nonsense he randomly thought of. HAHA "verne the mini me" that one just makes it for me.

      You fool, of course the government don't want you to think area 69 is real. Area 51 is the decoy.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    37. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Look to a sibling reply above. The clerk was ordered to stop inputting the names. Which means that it was taking a long time to input if a judge had time to order a dismissal.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    38. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by ichthyoboy · · Score: 1
      Wait...let me get out my secret decoder ring!

      It says, "Be sure to drink more Ovaltine"

    39. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but against which one?

    40. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by lordshipmayhem · · Score: 2, Funny

      Their guards

    41. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by beav007 · · Score: 1

      You people have such short memories. This is the same dude that asked to intervene in SCO vs Novell, and "take over part of the case via FRCP 24 because SCO [wasn't] competent".

    42. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      You mean the Doppler 2000?

    43. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      I was thinking a more catchy name would be the Dopplerfier 2000-ication.

    44. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to know is why anyone allows this joke of a human wastebag to file lawsuits ?

      I'm all in support of a fair legal process, and inmates should be allowed the right to seek justice, but maybe they could have cut him off after the first dozen random suits, no ?

      He's not actually showing how fucked up the legal system is, because no one is taking him seriously.

      Completely right. According to modern society he's a nutter, and there should be some space around him where he and society don't intermix. He should not be taken too seriously, have proper medication and twice a week a visit from a nice and understanding person.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    45. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      What the hell? Why is the first post in a slashdot thread rational? This doesn't make any sense!!!

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    46. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by fartrader · · Score: 1

      Wow how many defendants are you away from Kevin Bacon?

    47. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by lonesome_coder · · Score: 1

      What about the 5% nation of Casiotone?

      --
      If you'd just do what we tell you and quit yer gripin' everything would be chocolate sprinkles and rainbows! -AC
    48. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by valdis · · Score: 1

      "but maybe they could have cut him off after the first dozen random suits, no ?"

      Actually, there's provisions for that:

                          "Under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), the court is directed to dismiss a suit brought in forma pauperis at any
      time if the court determines that it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,
      or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.
                        The Supreme Court emphasized in Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989), that the term frivolous
      as used in 1915(d) "embraces not only the inarguable legal conclusion, but also the fanciful factual allegation."
      Federal courts are thus empowered to summarily dismiss as frivolous "claims describing fantastic or delusional
      scenarios." Id. at 328. Riches's complaint is obviously delusional.
                        This suit is accordingly dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Riches is
      warned that if a prisoner has had a total of three federal cases or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failing
      to state a claim, he may not file suit in federal court without prepaying the filing fee unless he is in imminent danger
      of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g)."

      http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/illinois/ilndce/1:2007cv04192/211173/5/

    49. Re:Please Don't Give This Man Attention! by Hans+T.+Reiser · · Score: 1

      You called?

  2. Guess What? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    Riches isn't rich anymore, he's poor!

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Guess What? by TinFoilMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't "poor riches" be an oxymoron?

      --
      In my other life, I eat cats.
  3. Same thing happened to me after Metroid by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Funny

    after I found out there may be a space-pirate-ass-kicking chick with a lazer and a "screw attack" out there, I couldn't stop masturbating.

    1. Re:Same thing happened to me after Metroid by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      I'm confused... who would you sue, and what exactly did you lose of value?

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    2. Re:Same thing happened to me after Metroid by RabidMoose · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sue Nintendo for loss of genetic material.

    3. Re:Same thing happened to me after Metroid by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Surely you mean the depletion of his "precious bodily fluids"

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    4. Re:Same thing happened to me after Metroid by Fumus · · Score: 1

      The vile game forced him to commit mass murder on unborn children thus damning his soul for eternity.
      Why doesn't anyone think of the children? ~

    5. Re:Same thing happened to me after Metroid by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I tried the same thing, but the court dismissed my suit calling it a "pre-existing condition". WTF, I thought that was just something my health insurance did!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:Same thing happened to me after Metroid by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      It took me far less...

    7. Re:Same thing happened to me after Metroid by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Just don't go up against the Coca Cola company.

  4. Miscategorized by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This belongs in stupidpeople.slashdot.org, attentionwhores.slashdot.org, or the catch-all idle.slashdot.org, not games.slashdot.org.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Miscategorized by lxs · · Score: 1

      Is there a schizophrenics-exploited-by-unscrupulous-lawyers.slashdot.org?

      Because after reading that summary I think that this guy is benefitted more by daily medication and a good psychiatrist.

    2. Re:Miscategorized by Rary · · Score: 1

      Is there a schizophrenics-exploited-by-unscrupulous-lawyers.slashdot.org?

      Actually, he writes (by hand) his own briefs. No lawyers are involved.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  5. Option past "dismissed" by Alcimedes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can a judge just say "fuck off already" to this kind of crap?

    1. Re:Option past "dismissed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can a judge just say "fuck off already" to this kind of crap?

      Talk about a campaign slogan. Vote Judge Common F. Sense in 2008! If you don't like it, fuck off!

      I'd sure as hell vote for him.

    2. Re:Option past "dismissed" by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 1

      I dunno about you lot, but in Britain someone can be declared a vexatious litigant and banned from suing people. Do you have anything similar?

      --
      If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    3. Re:Option past "dismissed" by Zwicky · · Score: 1
      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
  6. LittleBigPlanet by quibbs0 · · Score: 1

    Right - and LittleBigPlanet made me paint my friends with ducks and flowers.

    1. Re:LittleBigPlanet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That is cruel man... That is way worst than waterboarding.

  7. Counter-suit by Shotgun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can the judge sue Riches for being driven from having to read such drivel?

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:Counter-suit by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      From being driven INSANE from having to read such drivel.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    2. Re:Counter-suit by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Can I sue because I had to read the poorly written summary?

    3. Re:Counter-suit by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      Apparently, they have fined him a few hundred dollars for previous "delusional" suits, and he now has to pre-pay a fee to file any more lawsuits, unless in "immediate physical danger". It's not exactly a counter-lawsuit, but it's pretty close :).

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
  8. amazing how video games warp the mind but ads dont by GeezTheGeeza · · Score: 2, Insightful

    its amazing the continuing trend of folks using the 'my mind was warped by the normalisation and glamour of violence in video games and horror films' but these same people have sufficiently strong minds to not succumb to the continuous deluge of advertising thrust upon us every day. in the 90's we had advertising everywhere, the sidewalk, the urinals, the sky, but NEVER in our dreams

  9. I, for one, want his number... by kaizendojo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to sue the game Dead or Alive. I can no longer perform sexually unless my girlfriend wears tight clothes and high kicks me repeatedly in the groin.

    1. Re:I, for one, want his number... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Move to germany.

      Thats normal over there.

    2. Re:I, for one, want his number... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >high kicks me repeatedly in the groin

      so how short is she? If it ain't on youtube it didn't happen.

    3. Re:I, for one, want his number... by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 2, Funny

      I recommend a rehabilitation program- play DOAX until you are comfortable with them wearing bikinis and jumping around.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    4. Re:I, for one, want his number... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      high kicks me repeatedly in the groin

      so how short is she? If it ain't on youtube it didn't happen.

      You've got it the wrong way round, you insensitive clod.

  10. Huh? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    South Carloina >/quote>

    Where is THIS place?

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Huh? by kaizendojo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Below NORTH Carloina and East of Goergia

  11. When the death penalty is appropriate by MosesJones · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm against the death penalty as I think its state sanctioned murder. I do however believe in the right to self-defence and therefore I'd say that this is where the courts should be able to use the death penalty, as a punishment to those who waste their time with ridiculous lawsuits.

    Imagine the scene.

    Judge: Trivial lawsuit, I'm finding for the plantiff, awarding him costs and sentencing you to death for wasting my time

    Its the self-defence of the justice system and would I think stop these cases very quickly. Especially if the appeal was only allowed to consider if the case was a complete waste of time.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by Oswald · · Score: 1

      Or if appeal was possible, but they didn't delay your execution waiting for a resolution.

    2. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by mapsjanhere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a bit extreme, simply write a bot program that can do "meaningful" judicial exchanges with the person in question. Let him have his fun writing long memos, and the program sends him back memoranda, motions and decision. He's happy, and no one else notices.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    3. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by k4mp3r · · Score: 1

      It might actually help him get better. In "Lars and the Real Girl" an entire town played along with one guy's delusion to help him get over it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lars_and_the_Real_Girl

    4. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      FOR SALE: Sense of humor.

      Mint condition - never been used.

    5. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by benicillin · · Score: 1

      well thats scientific proof right there, lets get on top of this, fellas!

      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
    6. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm against the death penalty as I think its state sanctioned murder

      I've always found this to be an amusing argument. Murder is "unlawful killing" - how can "state sanctioned" be unlawful?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    7. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      that's interesting. i wonder if AI could be used in other ways to improve the judicial system.

      oftentimes jobs that involved repetitive tasks in a narrow problem domain can be relegated to expert systems. expert systems are especially suited to jobs ordinarily difficult for human beings based on applying large lists of memorized rules. these include diagnosing medical illness based on the patent's symptoms, reviewing & processing mortgage loans which are based on hard and fast rules, and other jobs requiring a high level of expertise knowledge.

      so while the supreme court will probably never be replaced with AI systems, it should be relatively easy to create an expert system to handle straight-forward municipal/county court cases. for instance, traffic infractions, drug charges, petty crimes, etc. even more serious cases like corporate fraud, murder, etc. can benefit from an expert system that assists the judge/jury in finding the appropriate ruling or punishment.

      some of the advantages to using AI in the justice system are:

      • AI systems are inherently impartial, thus would not demonstrate bias based on the defendant's race, sex, age, religion, or socioeconomic stratum.
      • AI systems will not stray from protocol or procedure and can return consistent results every time, ensuring that everyone gets a fair trial and is treated equally in the eyes of the law.
      • AI systems are not prone to human error, such as failed memory, selective recall of legal statutes, selective reasoning, misinterpretation of legal precedents, etc.
      • AI systems can not be pressured politically/psychologically/financially. an expert system would not give Paris Hilton a lighter sentence just because her family has powerful connections.

      if the privileged elite are not being prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, then there's no real incentive for those with the actual power to change the system to repeal overly severe laws. the rich do not have to worry about our drug laws being too harsh because they'll never get the book thrown at them. this creates a system where laws are becoming increasingly severe for non-violent offenses because the politicians want to look "tough on crime," while only the lower class are being held to these maximum sentences.

    8. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Personally I'm against the death penalty as I think its state sanctioned murder."

      well duh, or course it is. The quetion IS state sanctioned murder justifiable?

      I don't support it becasue the judicial system is too flawed for that type of permanent justice.
      At the very least the state should use the federal system for determining the death penalty.

      Yes, it would stop all cases from anyone who doesn't have a team of lawyers, well done.
      How about a civilized solution? Yeah, I know it's hard and would require you to *gasp* think and understand the system.

      "An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi"

      More proof that Gandhi was a self rightous hypocritical ass.

      I mean, could he even have tried to understand that statement? hint: it is not literal.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      AI systems are inherently impartial

      Nice assumption you have there. Expert systems have to be written by non-impartial (is that just partial?) human programmers.

    10. Re:When the death penalty is appropriate by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      so do DMV scheduling systems. when you schedule a DMV appointment does the DMV website discriminate against you based on your race/age/sex/religion? an expert system doesn't have to be written by impartial programmers to be impartial.

      how would a programmer make an expert system discriminate based on someone's race when that isn't in the problem domain of the system? you think the developer is going to spend an extra 50 years programming their cultural prejudices into a system that's only designed to apply a list of legal codes to court cases? do bug testers and code review processes not exist in your imaginary world?

      theoretically a commercial jet's autopilot system could be programmed to kill everyone on board. it's written by fallible and imperfect human programmers, right? so do you avoid all air travel?

  12. Thank goodness the election is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we can get back to the quality stories that Slashdot is known for.

  13. Because it's fun? by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Riches chose World of Warcraft over working a legit job

    So he's suing because he'd prefer to play the game than have a legit job? There are tons of things I'd rather do than my job, and my job isn't even all that bad. But here at work, I'd rather be watching a movie than doing my job. Yet here I am, at work.

    ... posting on Slashdot. Can I sue Slashdot for being more interesting than my job?

    1. Re:Because it's fun? by matazar · · Score: 1

      Only one way to find out, let start a class action lawsuit!

    2. Re:Because it's fun? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Well, if he had been eligible to vote, I'm assuming he'd have voted for Obama. He could play World of Warcraft and get paid.

    3. Re:Because it's fun? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      So he's suing because he'd prefer to play the game than have a legit job?

      Legit job? The guy's an inmate. A criminal. I don't think this guy knows what "legit job" means. He's a parasite intent on taking the easy way out. (Yes, I'm making an enormous generalization here but I'm in a pissy mood so the outcome is I'm going to insult some dumbass crackpot criminal - sue me.)

    4. Re:Because it's fun? by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Of course, he's probably just a guy with a mental illness who got railroaded into the prison system instead of getting the treatment he needs, but don't let complications like that stop you from making enormous generalizations.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    5. Re:Because it's fun? by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      What is it with this libel from you asses?

      You're just fishing around for anything. Helping people is good; giving people what they don't deserve is bad. Even people who think we need to expand the welfare system think this. Get over it, moron.

    6. Re:Because it's fun? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      First, he's not mentally ill - he's a crook. Riches is incarcerated at Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg in Salters, South Carolina, for wire fraud under the terms of a plea bargain. He's a leach. He's a criminal who looks for the easy way to make a buck and is looking for any and every chance for comical self-promotion. Second, yes, I made an enormous generalization. I stated as much. Deal with it.

    7. Re:Because it's fun? by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      He may have a mental illness. But if he was competent enough to commit the fraud, I have a hard time believing he wasn't competent enough for his allocution to hold.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    8. Re:Because it's fun? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      *whoosh*----*boom*

      The sound of the joke flying at mach two above your head.

    9. Re:Because it's fun? by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      I think maybe, given his long record of frivolous and bizarre claims, that maybe there's some question as to whether he's competent enough to commit fraud, regardless of what a court has ruled on the matter.

      Now having said that, I don't know the man or his case, and won't commit one way or the other to what, if anything may be wrong with him, but I will suggest that maybe some meds would help this guy out a lot, and might at the very least eliminate these bizarre lawsuits. Certainly he deserves better than to be locked up for life, or executed, as some here have suggested.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    10. Re:Because it's fun? by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Of course I'm sorry. Everyone who's convicted of a crime in the US is of course guilty of that crime, and mentally ill people never get sent to jail when they should be sent to a hospital. I'm glad you cleared that up for me.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    11. Re:Because it's fun? by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      I can certainly agree with that last. :)

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    12. Re:Because it's fun? by Samah · · Score: 1

      What I think is funny is that for gold farmers and power levelers, World of Warcraft IS their job. I hate gold spammers as much as the next guy, but getting paid to play WoW sounds pretty sweet to me.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    13. Re:Because it's fun? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, but expect it to be declined by the judge.

      That's just as it should work. Yeah, this crazy loon is abusing it, but lets not through out the baby with the bath water.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Because it's fun? by Kaukomieli · · Score: 1

      If thats the case and you are located in europe you might sue your employer at the ECHR (http://www.echr.coe.int/echr/index.htm)

  14. Riches again? by yerktoader · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm starting to think that Riches must be related to Jack Thompson...

  15. throw a guy a bone here, will ya? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Jonathan Lee Riches filed a third-party motion claiming that Blizzard's World of Warcraft "caused Riches mind to live in a virtual universe, where Riches explored the landscape committing identity theft. Riches was addicted to video games and lost touch with reality because of defendants. Riches chose World of Warcraft over working a legit job, Riches mind became a living video game."
    Is the occasional apostrophe too much to ask for??

    1. Re:throw a guy a bone here, will ya? by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 3, Informative

      You bolded 6 instances of his name, but only two deserved apostrophes.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  16. If this "holds water" by HogGeek · · Score: 1

    It should probably be a class action...

    Not that I think it should...

  17. Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I feel sorry for the guy. He should be in a psychiatric ward, not a prison.

  18. Has he even played the game? by RichMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Given his history when would he have been not in jail and playing the game in the last 4 years?

    He gets out in 2012. I could not find the date he was committed.

    "Riches has court cases in Pennsylvania dating back to 1996. In 1996 he was arrested for a bomb threat to Conestoga High School."

    1. Re:Has he even played the game? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      He gets out in 2012
      Right in time to fulfill the prophecies.

    2. Re:Has he even played the game? by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't that when Sarah Palin will run for President? Perhaps she needs a running mate?

  19. legal system abuse by Atreide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    can't judge fine him for legal system abuse ?

    --
    The world belongs to those who get up early. - I'm far from being the king of Earth then :-(
    1. Re:legal system abuse by geekoid · · Score: 1

      To what gain?
      He isn't all there, and as such it won't really act like a deterrent to him, or anyone else this loopy.
      Plus he probably doesn't have much.

      No, just go on we don't want a world where legitimate victims are scared to file a lawsuit.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. virtual court by crakbone · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't he have to go to virtual court first then get it moved up to a court in reality?

  21. Obligatory by dedazo · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  22. reboot Riches by swschrad · · Score: 1

    see if he comes back normal.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  23. Re:Hahah, Oh wow. by compro01 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, I don't think any state besides California has a vexatious litigant status.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  24. Insanity... by dr_strang · · Score: 1

    It's a hell of a drug.

    --
    This is a sig. It is like every other sig in the world, except that it is mine, and it is different.
    1. Re:Insanity... by Corxeaus · · Score: 1

      Sanity is not all its cracked up to be..

    2. Re:Insanity... by Corxeaus · · Score: 1

      Who scored that?? That's a very funny quote. I can be funny, dammit.. I want to appeal that score!

  25. So a crazy person... by Itninja · · Score: 4, Informative

    ....does something crazy. Big deal. Why is this even on /.? Oh, I see, it marginally relates to video games. News? No. For nerds? Maybe. Stuff that matters? Not remotely. Epic fail.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  26. already happened elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If a Florida judge can bar Jack Thompson from filing without a real lawyer doing it for him, certainly one can order this loon to stop filing without a real lawyer too. If he's already in prison, he is probably destitute, so then the trick becomes assigning a pro-bono lawyer every time he gets a bug up his ass about something. Of course, IANAL so maybe (probably) in civil court you are not entitled to a lawyer, so what happens when a judge effectively bars a poor person from seeking legal redress because he can't file a grievance?

    stupid "it's been 15 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" filter. I get why there is a limit, but why is it .gt.5 minutes? What is the minimum time?

  27. Re:Has he even played the game? - No by RichMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    World of Warcraft Release date 2004-11-23

    JLR was convicted of fraud in 2004 and incarcerated.

    I can't find a date on it but unlikely he was caught and convicted between Nov 23 and the end of the year.

    His release date is 2012-03-23. And he was sentenced to 8 years.

  28. oh, and I forgot... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Have a nice day!

  29. Riches chose World of Warcraft... by Fezzick · · Score: 1

    Riches chose World of Warcraft over working a legit job

    Wait... people in prison get to play Warcraft all day? Gee... that sounds like a deal

    1. Re:Riches chose World of Warcraft... by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't WoW a prison unto itself?

    2. Re:Riches chose World of Warcraft... by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      It is? Shit, I'm off to murder a prostitute!

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  30. Hell yeah! by holychicken · · Score: 2, Funny

    He is just telling you what those fat-cats at Blizzard don't want you to know! This has got a chance! Go, go crazy prison dude!

  31. I'm a victim too. by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Funny

    I should sue /. for forcing me to live in a fantasy universe where my input is considered, alternately, funny, insightful or merely overrated.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  32. Alot of people should read that by Phiu-x · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice_theory Yes, sometimes (read: most of the time) if you commit a crime it IS your fault.

    --
    This is a stolen sig.
  33. I love this guy! by SpuriousLogic · · Score: 1

    Law needs more humor, and this guy has produced dozens, if not hundreds of these wonderful lawsuits. Maybe he is trying to atone for his crimes by trying to improve society by making judges laugh?

  34. Amazing... by ritcereal · · Score: 1

    "Riches chose World of Warcraft over working a legit job"

    Amazing...if I chose to use something of my own free will, it is suddenly the manufacturers fault for creating the product and myself ruining my life because I cannot exercise restraint/self control?

    He is miserable because he is in jail, who knows if he's just insane or actually thinks he can make some money but whatever. If this doesn't get thrown out of court I might move to another country.

  35. Some Legal Clarification by 314m678 · · Score: 2, Informative

    the inmate has attempted to join the suit even though his presence is not requested or required by the plaintiff or defendant. He can do this under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b), however the judge will quickly dismiss it because FRCP 24(b)1b requires that his claim shares a common question of law or fact as the main case.

    1. Re:Some Legal Clarification by benicillin · · Score: 1

      agreed, and this has nothing to do with the glider bot which is at issue in the case.. rule 42 would work the same way, had he brought this suit separately and then attempted to join with the mdy/blizzard case. the standard is the same though, and it wouldn't have worked thru either avenue. im wondering what happens to this suit though. does it get dismissed w/out prejudice so he can file again separately?

      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
    2. Re:Some Legal Clarification by benicillin · · Score: 1

      this would operate under 20(a)(1) as well, no?

      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
    3. Re:Some Legal Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      20(a)1 only applies if the two parties want to be co-plaintiffs. Rule 24 is when a plaintiff is asserting himself into a lawsuit that he is not invited to.

  36. check out the last order in this case by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 5, Informative

    "MINUTE entry before Judge Harry D. Leinenweber : It has come to the Court's attention that the docketing department of the Clerk's Office is still inputing the names of the hundreds of defendants named in this action. This action was dismissed on 8/17/07 for failure to state a claim, and the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on 10/31/07 for failure to pay the required docketing fee. It is a waste of judicial resources for the Clerk's Office to continue adding these names to a closed case that the Court determined was delusional in its order of 8/17/07. The Clerk is therefore directed to cease adding the defendants' names to this docket. As this is an internal housekeeping matter, the Clerk is directed not to send notice of this order to Plaintiff. No notice to be mailed (gcy, )"

    --
    In Liberty, Rene
    1. Re:check out the last order in this case by Pulzar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Poor judge who has to deal with it and waste time on actually writing a full motion to dismiss the case, including references to supreme court cases explaining what is delusional and what's not. A fun read nonetheless :).

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
  37. Better lawsuit against Blizzard by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

    If he wants to sue Blizzard at least sue them for a real crime, like the warcraft reputation system.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Better lawsuit against Blizzard by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Actually, he'd be better off getting Blizzard prosecuted for murder.

      After all, they've been killing Warcraft Lore for 4 years now.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  38. Hrmmm by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

    Sad as it sounds, I bet this isn't too far from really what goes on in the clowns head.

    Judging from his past litigation, it DOES look like this idiot lives in an alternate universe.

    --Toll_Free

  39. He sued the Magna Carta? by NastyNate · · Score: 1

    Magnificent.

  40. Job?? He's in Prison! by WiiVault · · Score: 1

    Playing WoW is keeping him from working? In jail? SHould this man even have access to a computer considering his history of suing anybody or anything?

    1. Re:Job?? He's in Prison! by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly he doesn't even have access to a typewriter which is why all of his law suits are handwritten.

  41. Re:Hahah, Oh wow. by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

    Don't know about the status angle, but when I took my current job, my old company brought up their non compete clause. My current firm's counsel called their attempts to block me from taking the new job, vexatious. This was in Virginia, they did stop harassing me shortly after receiving the letter.

    A quick google search turned up several cases where people in Virginia were found to be vexatious litigants, but I haven't found the statute.

    Florida seems to have one though.

  42. Oh great by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Now he'll sue /. for slander, for posting this article.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  43. Oblig. Idiocracy by Kemanorel · · Score: 1

    "If you don't smoke Tarrytons, fuck you!"

    and

    "Carl's Jr... Fuck you! I'm eating!"

    --
    Mess not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup.
  44. They tried that by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    They tried that but the virtual courtroom was repeatedly invaded by swarms of giant flying penises.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  45. Why Give Him What He Wants? by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    The guy is clearly an attention whore who's trying to get all the media coverage he can for stupid lawsuits... Why don't we just ignore him and dismiss all cases he'd ever bring up?

    Heck, isn't there a law for uselessly costing the state money?

  46. What? by paniq · · Score: 1

    Who said lawsuit claims have to make any sense to be valid? Another lesson learned!

    --
    Do not trust this signature.
  47. You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by sgant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously, the guy is delusional. Insane. A nutter. Crazy. Over the rainbow. Bars in the window. Truly gone fishing. Out to lunch.

    He's apeshit mad, barmy, batty, berserk, bonkers, cracked, crazed, cuckoo, daft, delirious, demented, deranged, dingy, dippy, erratic, flaky, flipped, flipped out, freaked out, fruity, idiotic, kooky, lunatic, mad, maniacal, mental, moonstruck, nutty as fruitcake, of unsound mind, out of his tree, psycho, he's round the bend, a schizo, a screwball, he has a screw loose, silly, touched, unbalanced, unglued, unhinged, unzipped, wacky.

    (yes, much was copied and pasted from thesaurus.com)

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Seriously, the guy is delusional. Insane. A nutter. Crazy. Over the rainbow. Bars in the window. Truly gone fishing. Out to lunch.

      He's apeshit mad, barmy, batty, berserk, bonkers, cracked, crazed, cuckoo, daft, delirious, demented, deranged, dingy, dippy, erratic, flaky, flipped, flipped out, freaked out, fruity, idiotic, kooky, lunatic, mad, maniacal, mental, moonstruck, nutty as fruitcake, of unsound mind, out of his tree, psycho, he's round the bend, a schizo, a screwball, he has a screw loose, silly, touched, unbalanced, unglued, unhinged, unzipped, wacky."

      "This... is an ex-sane person!"

      Sorry, I couldn't help but read your whole post in the voice of John Cleese, and then I just had to finish it.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

      Just more proof that the legal system abuses the psychologically screwed up.
      Why give him medical treatment for a disease when you can just warehouse him and use him for prison labor.
      Then they call it a justice system.
      Lady justice is blind..but she's also stupid and a real malicious bitch.

    3. Re:You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by AceJohnny · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested in a variant of the Dead Parrot sketch around the "crazy" theme, and you seem to have a head-start on the idea. Care to complete it?

      --
      Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
    4. Re:You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "Toys in the attic"

      --
      This sig is false.
    5. Re:You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by bhsx · · Score: 1

      Funny, I read it as George Carlin. Either one works well though, as I ran through it a second time as Cleese. That then brought to mind Micheal Palin, leading me to think of our great Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin. To which I ran to the kitchen, grabbed a dirty soup spoon, and gave myself a lobotomy. Gave meself a labotowhat, what was I saying? Oh yes, George Palin, he was funny I think...

      --
      put the what in the where?
    6. Re:You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by eldorel · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that he's pretending to be nuts? It might just be an act to give an insanity plea a better shot during appeals for whatever he was arrested for.

    7. Re:You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by Meski · · Score: 1

      Seriously, the guy is delusional. Insane. A nutter. Crazy. Over the rainbow. Bars in the window. Truly gone fishing. Out to lunch.

      He's apeshit mad, barmy, batty, berserk, bonkers, cracked, crazed, cuckoo, daft, delirious, demented, deranged, dingy, dippy, erratic, flaky, flipped, flipped out, freaked out, fruity, idiotic, kooky, lunatic, mad, maniacal, mental, moonstruck, nutty as fruitcake, of unsound mind, out of his tree, psycho, he's round the bend, a schizo, a screwball, he has a screw loose, silly, touched, unbalanced, unglued, unhinged, unzipped, wacky.

      Right! Add all of them to the list of defendants as well!

    8. Re:You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by vliktor · · Score: 1

      You know what? I simply hate, detest, loathe, despise, and abhor redundancy.

    9. Re:You say "attention whore", I say "insane". by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He is X Ys short of a Z, where a Z normally contains more than X Ys.
      e.g,
      (2,pennies,shilling), (2,beers,sixpack), (3,sandwiches,picnic)

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  48. What a pathetic loser by GuyverDH · · Score: 1

    He's just another individual who chose to do something and now can't deal with the consequences of his choice and actions.

    Taking responsibility for your own actions appears to be something that more and more people cannot or will not do, not when it's easier to try and find someone else to blame for your own stupidity.

    --
    Who is general failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
  49. What's the problem? by Broken+Bottle · · Score: 1

    "Riches chose World of Warcraft over working a legit job, Riches mind became a living video game" It sounds like he got off light compared to some WOW addicts I've read about :)

    1. Re:What's the problem? by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      5,000 WoW addicts a minute lose their marriages and jobs because of WoW. True statistic.

      On the flip side, 20,000 people are saved from second-hand smoke per year because of smokers switching their addiction to WoW.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  50. It is not I who am Crazy! It is I Who am MAD!!!! by KozmoKramer · · Score: 1

    The Murlocks, they can drive a man to commit the most vicious of crimes!

    --
    My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my Father! Prepare to die!
  51. Next up for Mr. Jonathan Lee Riches: by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    He's going to Disneyland! :D

  52. Norse Gods! by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    Please tell me how I can find the part about the Norse Gods in some legal finding computer thingy !!
    This has got to be infinitely quotable....

    --
    music lover since 1969
    1. Re:Norse Gods! by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      Ok, I didn't find that but I did find his other law suit,
      George Steinbrenner made me Surrender my Mind, in which
      he says that he committed wire fraud with Steinbrenner's sons, and used the proceeds to finance A-Rod's contract purchase,
      and:
      Steinbrenner loves him, and calles him cake boy, sweet cheeks, and Jonny Choo Choo,
      made him eat a banana in front of the 1998 Yankees, and I quote the rest:
      "In a letter shaped as a heart, Steinbrenner wants me to replace Derick jeter at shortstop when I come home"
      "Steinbrenner wrote me and wants me to be his fabio and eat "I can't believe its not Butter" without a knife in front of him."
      "George Steinbrenner has been bribing and blackmailing me telling me he will pay for my federal appeal, in return, I have to catwalk
      and chippendales dance in the Yankees lockerroom before each game."

      I haven't even gotten to the lawsuit against Isaah Thomas yet, but there is clearly a grudge against New York sports teams.

      --
      music lover since 1969
  53. Cellmate? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    He must have a lawyer as a cellmate.

    Only a lawyer could come up with this shit.......

  54. Let's think about it seriously for a moment... by elex · · Score: 1

    What sort of thing grants alcohol distilleries immunity from lawsuits leveling similar charges? It might simply be a warning label? WoW has notes like that in the manual (and tips on the loading screens).

  55. Your kidding... by Valcrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Riches chose World of Warcraft over working a legit job

    If this works I'm going to quit my job to masturbate all the time. Then I will sue the Govt and the Porn industries of the world for causing me to quit my job and for the horrible calluses I would develop from constant fapping.

  56. The same thing is happening to my mind by sonciwind · · Score: 1

    But it's being caused by reading /.

  57. The official underwear of the A Team. by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

    No. He's just aware of the special secret underwear supplier for commando teams.

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
    1. Re:The official underwear of the A Team. by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      Whole new meaning to going commando...

    2. Re:The official underwear of the A Team. by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Commando teams don't wear underwear, hence the name.

  58. Re:Hahah, Oh wow. by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I don't think any state besides California has a vexatious litigant status.

    We have such laws in Australia. In this case, the action deemed most appropriate would probably be the standard two-syllable filing: "Shurrup (+elbow to teeth)"

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  59. Re: LegalBots FTW!! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    I'm No LegalBot, etc.

    I don't know how trained this guy really is given the quality of his motion, so this might really work.

    Write a specialized ChatterLaw bot that carefully signals to real justices that what it produces is not meant to stand as real law. ("Pursuant to 163 Sec. 242 P3..." which means "Ignore everything below this sentence.")

    Then it can just randomly shuffle prior legal opinions into glorious Walls O' Law. Then bill it as a service which costs less than an actual proceding, and file it under Placebo Effect.

    Medical/Law Crossover!!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  60. Why aren't we supporting him? by ajs · · Score: 1

    This man was clearly wronged. I suggest that we all write to the court, asking in polite terms that this defendant be awarded the sum of 1 million gold for his pain and stupidity, er suffering!

  61. Re: Many Values of Competent by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    You can be "competent to commit fraud" if you know "this is a bad thing but it is fun". You could be completely out in the post-twilight zone in other respects.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  62. Most Appropriate tag by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Most Appropriate tag I've seen on slashdot in a while: "Loser"

  63. Re:Blizzard settles this law suit by Kalriath · · Score: 1

    No, no. They'll settle by providing 3 days free play, THEN banning his account.

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  64. Maybe he's got a point by codeboost · · Score: 1

    I see this idea is not popular here, but still...

    If a dealer sells someone LSD and claims it's just a game (for the mind), then suing the seller wouldn't be that incredible. That, of course, if the experience is bad and leads to the person committing something under the influence or as a consequence of using the drug.

    The altered states of consciousness, which the video games create, are quite immersive and can easily suck all the player's senses into the virtual world.

    I have friends who are addicted to WOW and they have friends who are even more addicted (as in.. playing non-stop for months, losing jobs, ignoring health and hygiene, etc).

    You could say that it was not Blizzard's intention to create a game as addictive as illegal drugs, but actually, it was :), otherwise they would lose the 'addictive dollar'.

    They don't sell the 'substance', they sell the 'mental state generator', which releases the 'substance' in the gamer's brain, to which 'substance' the gamer can become addicted.

    True for many other games, as well (like Counter Strike or other MMOGs).

    So, although he's hardly going to win the case (which could mean disaster for Blizzard, because thousands others are going to sue), I think there are some valid points to consider in his case.

  65. Re:Maybe its because... by Wowlapalooza · · Score: 1

    But how do you tell the difference between a nutsoid Ret Pally and a "normal" one? I can't.

  66. Absolutely hilarious. by Greyor · · Score: 1

    It was nigh impossible for me to keep from falling over laughing when I read the summary. Didn't even need to read the article. Attention-seeker or not, this is pretty goddamn funny.

    Thanks, /.

  67. He's in the wrong institution, perhaps by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Apart from all the jokes, some of which are even funny, I think it a bit sad on several levels. It seems to me that he is clearly schizophrenic - he certainly acts as if he has paranoid delusions - so he shouldn't even be in prison, but in a mental institution. Prison is for punishing people, certainly in America, and punishing a mentally ill guy is simply an expensive exercise in pointlessness.

    I also think it is quite sad that people still, nowadays, enjoy being cruel to those unfortunate enough to suffer from mental illness. It it reminiscent of the time not too long ago when we had freak shows and people would go and look at the inmates of the local asylum for a good ol' laugh; we really should try to develop beyond that kind of heartless and callous attitudes.

  68. Dumbass by ilovecheese · · Score: 1

    You do the crime, you do the time, moron. Don't use the game as a crutch to try to weasel your way out of it.

  69. Aghhh! Ughhh! *gulp* by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Now I will have to shit in the backyard, you insensitive clod...and sift through it!

    *I think I guffawed my dentures down my throat*

    Egahds, this will eventually pass.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  70. meh!...that's SO old school! (USA-centric POV) by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Now days, everything is imported from China/Taiwan, Pakistan, and assembled in Mexico.

    "Have Sharpie(tm), will travel!" works here. (any permanent marker will do) Remove any labels, and you're good to go!

    Hell, go for broke, and use a loincloth that you have crafted yourself!
    *recommend the 'Groucho Glasses' disguise in addition to the loincloth for best results.*

    'Going Commando',(as a meaningful term) ended with the Vietnam conflict; hippies have been doing it for decades. (apply applicable puns as needed/wanted)

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  71. +5, Informative? by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 1

    And here I was going for +5, Funny as in a-complete-waste-of-the-court-clerk's-time. Sigh.

    --
    In Liberty, Rene