Slashdot Mirror


The Science of the Lightsaber

Smartcowboy writes "Chances are that you have seen a lightsaber at one time or another, whether on the evening news or down at the local cantina. Therefore you know that a lightsaber is an amazing and versatile device that is able to cut through nearly anything in a matter of milliseconds. Have you ever wondered how these remarkable weapons work? Where does the energy come from, and how are they able to contain that energy in a rod-like column of glowing power? In this article, you will have a chance to look inside a lightsaber and discover the source of its incredible characteristics." I was sure the blade was made from the focused hate and disappointment of the last three movies.

197 comments

  1. The Year Was 2005 ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    Do we really need to do this again? I mean, seriously guys, it's not the same URL but it resolves to the same damn page. Would you like an easy +5 Insightful response? Just point out the lightsaber is casting a shadow!

    On top of that, this has been erroneously filed under "Technology." Let's just pause and let that sink in.

    Now I'll quote the article:
    • # A lightsaber is normally about 30 centimeters long, about the size of a large flashlight.
    • # At one end is the hand grip, belt ring and on/off switch (a.k.a., the Activation Matrix).
    • # At the other end there is the blade arc tip and stabilizing ring.
    • # Somewhere on the case (generally near the blade end of the lightsaber) you find one or two adjusting knobs for blade power and blade length.

    You are putting that into the technology category? Seriously? I am sorry, normally I roll with the it and just play along when this stuff is under Idle on the frontpage but this is ridiculous. I know I'm just one of many Slashdotters in bitchbitchbitch mode but the next time you come across an article like this put it in your damned April Fools folder and don't revisit it until then!

    Next week: The Science of NBC's "Heroes" ... filed under Biotech!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Aeonite · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's a more appropriate lightsaber article to link to, which explores not the physical construction of the lightsaber, but rather it's mythical import.

      http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/issues/issue_156/5005-Lazer-Swords-and-Thundersabers

      Yes, I wrote it.

      It's also not a 3-year-old article.

    2. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Aeonite · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      its its its

      crap

      its

      why do we always spot the it's after we submit?

    3. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He has a grip. It just happens to be on his pecker. You see, he can't get laid so he has to masturbate.

    4. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny

      You see, he can't get laid so he has to masturbate

      The fact that you are posting on /. suggests that you probably aren't doing any better ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by JavaRob · · Score: 5, Funny

      You would of fixed it if you could of! But, I wouldn't loose any sleep over it. Most people here don't know how it's supposed to be written anyways, and the ones who do could care less.

      [heh; take that]

    6. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would you like an easy +5 Insightful response? Just point out the lightsaber is casting a shadow!

      (Stroking goatee ponderously)
      Hmmm, I say, the lightsaber *is* casting a shadow.

    7. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      My eyes.... my eyes....!

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    8. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by m.ducharme · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great article.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    9. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by rhyder128k · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't be so possessive.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    10. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      And here is an EXTREMELY exhaustive discussion on the physics of lightsabers, in a fun sort of way.

      http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=1406308

      "Can a lightsaber cut through adamantium?"

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    11. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Uh.. lighten up?

    12. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You would've fixed it if you could've...

      There, fixed that for you.

    13. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um... you got it right the first time.

      It's a nice car, but its high speed muffler belt needs replaced.

    14. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I know I'm just one of many Slashdotters in bitchbitchbitch mode"

      go under user options and select a different mode from the drop down. be sure to click apply and then save.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by IAmGarethAdams · · Score: 2, Funny

      WHOOOOSH!

    16. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's good to see there's still slashdotters out there who don't get humor....

    17. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by jggimi · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Michael, for that link to your article. Both interesting and insightful.

    18. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the article has a box on page 2 that says :

      "Well, that's how they would work.
      Lightsabers are only a figment of George Lucas' imagination, of course. This is an entirely fictional article, based on information in Star Wars movies and books. Learn more about lightsabers as a special effect."

      So they clearly acknowledge that this is just for fun.

      And, as "this is just for fun" goes, I loved reading that article. :)

      Gilles.

    19. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Endo13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't be sure, but I'd put money on it you just took the bait, hook line and sinker. The 'correction' was a joke my friend.

      WHOOOOSH! Indeed.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    20. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Penny-arcade has an interesting insight to your post. :P

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    21. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was a good article. I know that a lot of people interpret Star Wars through the "hero's journey" lens developed by Joseph Campbell. It's boring now. Somehow, though, your article wasn't - so, nice work!

    22. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goggles, they do NOTHING!

    23. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Spot what? The crap? ;-)

      --
      -- dnl
    24. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you don't hold it pointing backwards

      --
      -- dnl
    25. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      True.. true...

      But many times, life imitates art. Automatic doors, wrist communicators, virtual interfaces (which includes touchscreen devices that change on context rather than warping the task to fit the existing interface), moving walkways, holograms, etc., all were once just fantasy.

      Though I agree that it's the wrong category, there should at least be a "science fiction" section where this can go... (and I think there is one).

    26. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      I'm dismayed that they totally overlooked deeper discussions about what a lightsaber can and can't cut. Luckily Yahoo Answers is on the case

    27. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by doctorsdad · · Score: 0

      Have! dimwit! Have! Also, if you could care less, you must care quite a bit. The phrase you mis-remembered is 'couldn't care less'.

    28. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by syousef · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm, I say, the lightsaber *is* casting a shadow.

      I'm more interested in whether or not it has a reflection. Then I'll know if it's vampire technology or not. Just think the ultimate defence to a lightsaber might be wearing garlic around your neck!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    29. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      You would of fixed it if you could of! But, I wouldn't loose any sleep over it. Most people here don't know how its supposed to be written anyways, and the ones who do could care less.

      Fixed that for you.

    30. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by geobeck · · Score: 1

      Just think the ultimate defence to a lightsaber might be wearing garlic around your neck!

      Not wearing it, so much as eating it. Just chomp down a few cloves and your attacker won't be able to get close enough to use his lightsaber, and you just fry him with your blaster when the aroma makes him lose his concentration.

      The bonus is, it works whether or not the "vampire technology" hypothesis is correct.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    31. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      Would you like an easy +5 Insightful response? Just point out the lightsaber is casting a shadow!

      Even a lit light bulb casts a shadow. This is because it still interferes the passage of light through it from another light source. Even if you can't see the shadow, it is still there.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    32. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Excellent article. You did your homework.

    33. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You mod mine Troll but everyone's similar response is funny? FUCK YOU Slashdick. Bunch of fucking no-life having faggot mod fucks.

    34. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No you didn't. don't grammarfag unless you really mean it.

      You would have fixed it if you could have! But I wouldn't loose any sleep over it. Most people here don't know how it's supposed to be written anyway, and the ones who do could'nt care less.

      Did you also catch the removed comma, which was unnecessary? Learn some English before you correct anyone again.

    35. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by crndg · · Score: 1

      All that talk about the mythical importance, and you never once used the words "phallic" and "symbol?"

    36. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar cops must be union, since they appear to leave spelling to the spelling cops. In your flurry of pedantic corrections, you neglected to fix the spelling of 'loose.'

    37. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, shucks. I forgot the obligatory "Learn some English!" jab. Maybe next time.

    38. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by JavaRob · · Score: 1

      Come on now; you just make yourself look foolish if you see only two errors in that entire post. I promise you, there are more than half a dozen.

      And now that I review it, I wish I'd written "I wouldn't loose to much sleep over it".... That's another favorite that deserved to be included.

    39. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by JavaRob · · Score: 1

      Ah, sweet jebus, I got the most important one wrong. Okay; let's roll this whole sucker again for extra special bonus points:

      You would of fixed it if you could of! But, I wouldn't loose to much sleep over it. Most people here don't know how its suppose to be written anyways, and the ones who do could care less.

      Ah... glistening and perfect.

    40. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by hey! · · Score: 1

      By the way, notice that the article mentions the Volsunga Saga, and Lord of the Rings in the same sentence.

      Tolkien deliberately evoked the saga, in the scene where Bilbo gives Frodo Sting. Bilbo doesn't hand Sting to Frodo. Instead Bilbo casually drives Sting into a wooden post to demonstrate its virtues. This subtly echos the incident in the saga in which Odin leaves the sword in the tree, from which Sigmund alone is destined to draw it. Bilbo's way of giving Sting to Frodo turns the gift of Sting into a kind of ceremony in which the responsibility for the heroic quest is passed to the next generation.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    41. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      Indeed, garlic's odor alone is quite forceful.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    42. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by kandela · · Score: 1

      I feel you're pain.

      --
      Conservation of angular momentum makes the world go round.
    43. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by narcberry · · Score: 1

      Which one does he choose?

      Select what to bitch about:
      [ ]RIAA
      [ ]DMCA
      [ ]Creationists
      [ ]Above Post

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    44. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by narcberry · · Score: 1

      If you are trying to learn the science behind the fiction, goto star trek. Please leave our star wars world alone.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    45. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      I'm going to start adding something like [edit +2hrs later:] to my posts so that everyone else things that I have some sort of uber-master account that lets me edit.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    46. Re:The Year Was 2005 ... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      <python>Ah! He said it again! Aaah! I said it! Whhaaa!</python>

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  2. You know... by mdm-adph · · Score: 2

    ...I don't know why everyone wonders how a fictional lightsaber could work.

    "How does it contain the plasma in a rod? Why doesn't it just go everywhere?"

    From what I remember of the movies, I don't remember there being any mention of there not being some kind of mechanical core to a lightsaber -- almost like a control rod that extended at the same time that the rod of light did. You'd never know from watching it.

    For all we know, even as works of fiction, they could just be normal swords that glow.

    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    1. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not, though, there has been pseudo-science available from that universe's billions of information depositories that explain exactly how the special particles or electrons or whatever form a container for the plasma in the shape you see.

      And it's been available and solidified for -years-.

    2. Re:You know... by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Funny

      almost like a control rod that extended at the same time that the rod of light did

      If you watch Episode 4, right after Vader kills Obi Wan, he's holding a silver-colored stick. So, perhaps this mechanical core doesn't retract at the same time?

    3. Re:You know... by Bob-taro · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you watch Episode 4, right after Vader kills Obi Wan, he's holding a silver-colored stick. So, perhaps this mechanical core doesn't retract at the same time?

      Good eye. Once the Jedi were defeated, the few survivors had to make their lightsabers from spare parts. I think Obi Wan used one of those powered telescoping radio antennas from an old land speeder.

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    4. Re:You know... by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Or the handle of an old Heiland camera flash, either one works just as well.

    5. Re:You know... by AdamThor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...I don't know why everyone wonders how a fictional lightsaber could work.

      Neither do I. Lasers? Plasma? Mechanical core? Containment? Lenses and gyrsoscopes?

      THERE WAS NONE OF THAT. There was a guy and his typewriter and a bunch of words that, while compelling, were not true. There is no technology of the lightsaber. There is no "how it works". It doesn't work. It doesn't exist. The same is true of teleporters, holodecks, warp speed, etc.

      If someone wants to have some fun writing or reading this kind of stuff that's fine. But it's just fanfic. People seem to ascribe to it some sort of weight it doesn't have b/c of the science tone.

      Now get off my lawn!

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    6. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you watch Episode 4, right after Vader kills Obi Wan, he's holding a silver-colored stick. So, perhaps this mechanical core doesn't retract at the same time?

      Uh, actually it's just the way they created them in the movies. They didn't have massive CGI back in the original 3 days.

      If you watch an oft-passed around short film called "The Making of Star Wars" they explain that they used clear plastic rods that showed up nicely on the film (so they could enhance the light emitted), and when they wanted to "retract" the lightsaber, they just pointed the tip right at the camera, so it appeared to "vanish."

    7. Re:You know... by geobeck · · Score: 1

      +1, and why is it you never seem to have mod points when you need them?

      On the one hand, using science fantasy devices as a catalyst to ask "How might we be able to do that?" is a valuable exercise. On the other hand, asking "How did they do that?" makes you wonder about some people's grip on reality.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    8. Re:You know... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      "Double-Whooosh"? Considering you also posted almost 2 hours after a response to the parent that clearly got the joke, and made another joke on top of it.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    9. Re:You know... by hey! · · Score: 1

      If you accept anti-gravity, artificial gravity, FTL travel, telekinesis, clairvoyance, and especially force fields, then accepting that the plasma can be confined to some predefined shape isn't all that hard.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I don't know why everyone wonders how a fictional lightsaber could work.

      "How does it contain the plasma in a rod? Why doesn't it just go everywhere?"

      From what I remember of the movies...

      I always just assumed it used the Force.

    11. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why Lucas figured everybody wondered how the force worked, but didn't wonder how the lightsaber worked. Of the two, I'm much more prepared to accept a mystical force of unknown origin than an obviously technologically advanced device that every jackass with his Jedi degree can cobble together in a couple days.

      But I suppose this is part of why Lucas is now rated as a franchise-milking hack, and nothing more. Midichlorians, my ass.

    12. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o!

    13. Re:You know... by pacinpm · · Score: 1

      Now get off my lawn!

      Why so serious?

      People want to have real lightsaber so they want to make them real. They think how to develop one of them, how would one build lighsaber etc. Nothing wrong with it.

  3. Every-Day uses of the lightsaber by NecroBones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, at least they didn't show any household uses for the lightsaber that I've already covered. :)

    Lightsaber Uses for the Everyday Dark Lord

    --
    I have not lost my mind... it's backed up on disk somewhere!
    1. Re:Every-Day uses of the lightsaber by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      I've seen my fill of too many all-too-serious sabre videos. Folks, this is how it should be done! Have some fun with it! Most impressive!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  4. Honestly by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    I think the books and video games (particularly SW Battlefront 2) made for excellent expansion of the universe... WAAAY better than the movies. Should have left the movies to VG plot lines.

    --
    Looking for work, know someone who is? Keep on eye open on craigslist.com http://www.bigattichouse.com/oneeyeopen.html

    --
    meh
  5. 2005? by JavaRob · · Score: 1

    I recalled seeing this article at least a few years back, so I clicked the "citation" button on the site to check:

    Brain, Marshall. "How Lightsabers Work." 05 May 2005. HowStuffWorks.com.

    Ah.

    1. Re:2005? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      There are ten types of people in this world -- that's right; ten.

      Really? I thought there were one hundred seventeen.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  6. This is not news. by ChrisMounce · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously, how does stuff like this get on the front page?

  7. Welcome to the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What comes around once gets re-posted elsewhere a thousandfold. Eventually, it may just float around the tubes for a while and resurface on one of the posted websites.

    Slashdot isn't immune to this.

    Especially when the article in question involves lightsabers. (And wishing that they were real. *daydreams at work*)

    1. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Especially when the article in question involves lightsabers. (And wishing that they were real. *daydreams at work*)

      I'd rather have a working phaser than a lightsaber. The phaser is a ranged weapon -- works better for us geek weaklings who don't want to get our hands dirty. It also seems more versatile -- you can stun people, injure them, kill them or completely disappear them (let's see them CSI a vaporized corpse!).

      In short, the phaser slices, dices and makes julienne fries.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Jester'snotmynicknam · · Score: 1

      Phasers are actually a lot more doable if you ask me. Particles can be accelerated using laser radiation at the right frequency, and has been used for small scale particle accelerator experiments in the past. My biggest holdup with phasers, is they don't sound right, and neither do freaken lightsabers. To my mind, lethal futuristic superweapons just are not cool if it doesn't do the old school War Of the Worlds "FSZHUULZUZOOZOOZOOOO" sound. Thats a prerequisite for weaponry in my book.

    3. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know how doable phasers are as described in canon. They utilize a completely invented subatomic particle (the nadion) for their effects. The vaporization effect in particular seems far-fetched -- in Trek they explain it away because of the magical properties of the nadion -- in reality you'd need an awful lot of energy to vaporize the human body (imagine taking 100-200 pounds of water from 98 degrees to >212 degrees in under a second) and you wouldn't want to be standing nearby when it happened.

      The concept of a directed energy weapon that would be adjustable and which could stun/injure or kill seems doable in the future though.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Jester'snotmynicknam · · Score: 1

      oh yeah? well then FWAZZOOOOZOZOOZOOOZOOOOOO to you! :)

      yeah, i was letting the whole nadion's don't exist thing slide, since dumping around 4000kj/kgk*60 degrees + heat of fusion (big, don't remember what, but a big number) and the expansion of water to gas thing, and on and on.
      Not to mention that terrible terrible smell it would likely make.

      The energy question leaves me to think that accelerants packed into containers and accelerated through barrels is probably going to remain the "state of the art" in making dead people for some time to come.

    5. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Assuming the term 'vaporize' is truly meant and not disintegrated, which is more like what is shown (otherwise we'd see bones). Human perception would view them as roughly the same thing, so calling it vaporization could be human error. On the other hand, you'd probably have a sonic boom as elements expand in disintegration, so...

      screw it - it's pseudo-science - they MADE IT UP.

      Lightsabers are even more far-fetched - they would need a heated arcing plasma (or something like that) as well as a strong repulsive energy and one hell of a power source.

    6. Re:Welcome to the Internet by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      (let's see them CSI a vaporized corpse!)

      They may not be able to get DNA, but there'd still be some trace of vaporized matter residue (VMR), probably some directionality of VMR dispersal, and thus also void analysis. From that VMR they'd get an electromagnetic signature of the weapon that can be matched to your specific phaser.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the other hand, you'd probably have a sonic boom as elements expand in disintegration, so...

      I've always rationalized it in my mind as a conversion to neutrinos or some other particle that doesn't really interact with normal matter and which would allow the disintegration of objects as people stand right next to them with little to no ill effects.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that terrible terrible smell it would likely make.

      The smell would be the least of your problems. Vaporizing that much water (and other compounds in the human body) would probably produce an effect similar to a steam explosion at the very least. You wouldn't want to be standing next to someone who got vaporized.....

      The energy question leaves me to think that accelerants packed into containers and accelerated through barrels is probably going to remain the "state of the art" in making dead people for some time to come.

      Quite likely. Directed energy weapons could have some real world applications -- missile defense for example (imagine a laser replacement for this bad boy) -- but I doubt we'll see them as personal sidearms in our lifetimes.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Welcome to the Internet by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, at least it's not as bad as the "Zat" guns from Stargate SG1 and Stargate Atlantis.

      The writers got themselves stuck into a corner really early on when they introduced the "One shot stuns, two shots kills, three shots VAPORIZES" mechanic on that weapon. The first two make sense for a weapon that shoots something akin to lightning bolts, but the third mechanic is just DUMB.

      I remember watching the 10 year anniversary show and the producers and actors talking about how much they hated putting that into the show, and how the writers realized it was a dumb mistake almost immediately. (But not fast enough to prevent it becoming canon. DOH!)

      Oh well, I guess if we all had to wait until every single sci-fi weapon was completely vetted for scientific accuracy before it could be used in a show we would NEVER get any shows!

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    10. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they are SO uncivilized... oh wait, I'm thinking of blasters. BIG difference.

    11. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 2, Funny

      In true CSI fashion, they'd also have a program that would be able to analyze the residue and perform an exciting 3D reconstruction of what the person looked like, their position in the room at the time of vaporization, and the type of cereal they ate for breakfast that morning.

      --
      I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
    12. Re:Welcome to the Internet by hampton · · Score: 1

      But lightsabers can block phaser blasts!

    13. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they are SO uncivilized

      Any method of killing is uncivilized.... so it stands to reason that it's better to do it from a distance where it's harder for your foe to retaliate ;) Or to quote Garek:

      "Well, it's the safest way isn't it?" (when asked if he would shoot a man in the back)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    14. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      But lightsabers can block phaser blasts!

      True, but the number of people who can wield them effectively enough to actually do that is small.... and there's always tactical nuclear weapons for those occasions ;)

      "I sense a disturbance in the for....." [flash!]

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      Actually, they can't if the phaser is set for widebeam.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    16. Re:Welcome to the Internet by geobeck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, no smell and no mess. Here's what ya need to do. Ya gets all the nadions out to the target, where they act as subatomic dance choreographers. They signal to every quark, lepton, boson, and what have ya to turn sideways, on three; and-a-one, and-a-two, and-a-three, now!

      O' course, there's always some lag. The particles in the brain always have to think for a second, and the particles in the volcal cords are too busy yappin' to pay attention, so there's always a scream, but the final result is that the victim just kinda sidles out of time and space as we know them.

      No mess, no smell, and it's guaranteed to work less'n the immutable laws of narrative causality dictate that the shooter's gotta be taken prisoner and exposed to green Orion slave chicks, brains living in jars, or possibly tortured by spending the night with the jar-inhabitin' brain of a green Orion slave chick.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    17. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'd say it depends on your environment. A weapon whose penetration range is limited to arm's length is probably better when you have only that distressingly thin hull between you and deep space. Provided, of course, the lightsabre's deadman switch is in working order.

      Planetside, you don't need to worry about breathing space, but there are other perks and drawbacks of either weapon. If you want to terrorize the native primitives, a distance weapon is a big plus in establishing your godhood. If you just want to participate in that cantina brawl, a lightsabre's short range may be preferable, and as a bonus, it won't ignite the brothel next door.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    18. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I believe it simply shifts any reasonbly contiguous mass of particles into subspace (that's why it takes your body and your shoes, but leaves the floor behind), where they can explode if they wish and no one will notice.

      But this is also why people get stuck in transporters or in warp state whenever there is a subspace explostion -- all that incoming foreign matter screws stuff up.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good phaser at your side, kid?

      I find your lack of faith disturbing.

      -Viz

    20. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      In other words, hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good phaser at your side, kid?

      I dunno. Ranged weapons seemed to be pretty effective against Jedi not equipped with character shields... err I mean, not as well versed in the force ;)

      I'm with Han on this one. Gimme a good piece of technology over a biological process any day of the week.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    21. Re:Welcome to the Internet by g4b · · Score: 1

      I normally dont use a Phaser for attacking people, but for heating up stones. That's way better, than any stupid campfire.
      Also, Phasers are quite nice bombs if you overpower them, can be used as power cells, and come in handy for firework (with a variety of color combinations or forms)

      I must admit, searching your keys works better with a lightsaber though. But at least, you can use both weapons to cut through the door - except its made of ultraplastic. Darn you, ultraplastic. My phaser never cuts you.

    22. Re:Welcome to the Internet by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      True, but the number of people who can wield them effectively enough to actually do that is small.... and there's always tactical nuclear weapons for those occasions

      Since phasers use antimatter power cells and can be set to overload, they essentially are, in extremis, usable as tactical nuclear* weapons.

      (*Actually, not really "nuclear" but "matter-antimatter annihilation", like photon torpedoes, but that's really just one step more extreme.)

    23. Re:Welcome to the Internet by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      I believe it simply shifts any reasonbly contiguous mass of particles into subspace (that's why it takes your body and your shoes, but leaves the floor behind), where they can explode if they wish and no one will notice.

      But this is also why people get stuck in transporters or in warp state whenever there is a subspace explostion -- all that incoming foreign matter screws stuff up.

      I always thought that was how they worked. I'd never even heard of nadions.
      It's a "phaser" instead of a laser because it bends space. The beam causes things to twist out of "phase" with regular space. A small amount of phase shearing causes pain and neurological disruption (stunning), more shearing can cause heating (they cut metal and heat rocks with them) and still more can cause something to just disintegrate into subspace.

      It's not that hard to imagine if you can warp space to create artificial gravity and to fling starships to many times the speed of light that you could also bend space as a weapon.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    24. Re:Welcome to the Internet by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      On Bones there would also be a hologram of all of that.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    25. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That certainly explains how some of the more-advanced races manage to so-easily disappear ships, and sometimes entire planets.

      Something must be done; otherwise eventually we'll ALL wind up in subspace... and it's getting crowded in there!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    26. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Elrond,+Duke+of+URL · · Score: 1

      Lightsabers are even more far-fetched - they would need a heated arcing plasma (or something like that) as well as a strong repulsive energy and one hell of a power source.

      True, but something a little less magical might be available in the not to distant future. Larry Niven wrote about a weapon in the Ringworld books which was a molecule wide strand. I can't remember the name of it, though.

      Now, in his fiction, this invisible strand was made lethal by virtue of being contained within a Slaver stasis field. Little did he know that a few years down the road we would have strings of carbon nano-tubes. Braid a few of those together and you've got yourself an invisible cutting surface. I don't know how many strings you'd need to prevent it from breaking when you try to cut something, but it's probably not a huge number. The major difference between Niven's weapon and this is that his was rigid due to the field.

      Science: Invisible sword, please!

      --
      Elrond, Duke of URL
      "This is the most fun I've had without being drenched in the blood of my enemies!"-Sam&Max
    27. Re:Welcome to the Internet by narcberry · · Score: 1

      Trekkies can exit stage left.

      In here, you are free to discuss blaster rifles to your hearts content.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    28. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already exists. It's a briefcase sized device that uses a laser to ionize a path through the air to the target, then zaps the crap out of the target with a few hundred thousand volts. Currently, only the military is futzing around with it; they're calling it "less lethal".

      But, BOY! Does it look fun to use! Future models will be "adjustable"...

    29. Re:Welcome to the Internet by Vastad · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. The cyberpunk concept of a monomolecular-edged blade or whip (Johnny Mnemonic anyone?) isn't farfetched anymore with nanotech manufacturing processes around the corner and carbon nanotubes in today's science press.

      You'll see it on Ginsu kitchen knives as soon as someone figures out an efficient way to get carbon atoms to line up nicely on a ceramic substrate.

      I apologise for the Games Workshop geekiness but...if monomolecular edges become possible and railgun mass launcher technology soon after, then an Eldar Shuriken Cannon would be a distinct possibility. Place a molecular edge on an atoms-thick ferrous disc and accelerate it to 6 times the speed of sound. There won't be much left of whatever organic you point it at.

    30. Re:Welcome to the Internet by beav007 · · Score: 1

      This always got to me.

      Quick, we've killed them! Put your zat away and help me hide the body!

  8. NERDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    enough said

    1. Re:NERDS! by danieltdp · · Score: 2

      Parent should be tagget as redundant. It on the friking title: "NEWS FOR NERDS, STUFF THAT MATTERS". Nuf' said

      --
      -- dnl
  9. But does it run Linux? by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Jedi ones, I mean. Everyone knows the red ones run Windows.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:But does it run Linux? by zeromorph · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nah, it's NetBSD, the Jedi ones, I mean. Although the older ones are probably Lisp boxen.

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    2. Re:But does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the Purple one is Running on Leopard! ^_^

    3. Re:But does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Samuel L Jackson's purple light saber, is just a red one that blue screened?

    4. Re:But does it run Linux? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Does BSD stand for Blue Saber of Death?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  10. I have one.... by NiteShaed · · Score: 5, Funny

    and apparently there's a lot of trick photography involved in those movies. First of all, the blade is just plastic segments, and you kind of flick it to get the blade to extend. By the way, it doesn't cut worth a damn. It seems that the "light" part of the lightsaber is just a flashlight bulb embedded in the handle and shining through the tube. Pretty disappointing really.
    Now the sound effects on the other hand are pretty damn cool. Granted, they're a little tinny compared to the movies, but I figure that's just due to the way they mixed the audio in post-prod.

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    1. Re:I have one.... by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Might I suggest that the next one you get is not a knock off counterfeit. I know this is Slashdot, but the quality of lightsabers that you buy out of the back of a trunk is not of the same quality as those bootleg DVDs. I know that the DRM that the Jedi council is hideous, but still, best to go to a legitimate source and pay full retail.

    2. Re:I have one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ones in the movies are both plastic and Lighted. The Clone Wars Scene where Anakin and Count Dooku were fighting in the dark had florescent lighted sabers that would shatter if they hit one another. The scene kept changing so quickly that it looked like they were attacking but mostly just showing off light patterns from the blades.

    3. Re:I have one.... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's nothing, I have a millenium falcon in my basement, but as it turns out, the real thing is plastic and only a few feet in diameter. It also only goes about 50 mph, and that's if you throw it at 50 mph.

      --
      stuff |
    4. Re:I have one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ones in the movies are both plastic and Lighted. The Clone Wars Scene where Anakin and Count Dooku were fighting in the dark had florescent lighted sabers that would shatter if they hit one another. The scene kept changing so quickly that it looked like they were attacking but mostly just showing off light patterns from the blades.

      Well first of all WOOOOSH.

      Secondly, in the orignal series Lucas just had them use regular fencing foils, and they painted the film with the effects afterwards.

      No idea what they used in the newest trio, but I would hazard a guess they once again used fencing/sparring equipment and just CG'd the saber in place of the props.

    5. Re:I have one.... by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      but...but...it had the Lucasfilm logo on the package!

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    6. Re:I have one.... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      That's nothing, I have a millenium falcon in my basement

      Check out this guy's ride.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:I have one.... by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      dude, for some strange reason, looking at that picture, made my pants tight /don't take it personally

  11. if you dropped one... by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

    I've wondered before, what would happen if you dropped one?

    Remember the rash of pulp stories in the earlier years of tethered micro black holes that were accidentally released and orbited around the inside of a planet whilst slowly gaining mass and eating more and more.

    Would a lightsaber power itself from the mass it removes/cuts - would the "battery" die out. Unlike a micro blackhole it would not generate a gravitational field.

    Really, its a slow day at work - I cannot even believe I am thinking about this...

    Did anybody ever think of practical jokes you could play with a theoretical light saber...?

    And why is it lightsaber not lightsabre...?

    1. Re:if you dropped one... by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      In the EU the Lightsabers can be fitted with a safety cut out which turns the blade off if the saber isn't being held for a period of time (to let you do the cool throwy thing). Because they're completely individual items, made by each user, how they handle stuff like that is down to the wielder.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    2. Re:if you dropped one... by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      There appears to be a conspiracy to cover up the answer: http://www.rateitall.com/i-976337-lightsaber-drop.aspx

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    3. Re:if you dropped one... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Because they're completely individual items

      Don't worry -- eventually China will figure out how to stamp them out of plastic for three cents a unit ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:if you dropped one... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Remember the rash of pulp stories in the earlier years of tethered micro black holes that were accidentally released and orbited around the inside of a planet whilst slowly gaining mass and eating more and more.

      I liked both Thrice Upon a Time and Artifact. Are there more?

      If you haven't seen Indy Mogul's take on lightsabers, you should. I loved how they used the premise of having only one real lightsaber in existence set up the gag when two real lightsabers interact with each other.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:if you dropped one... by qzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you have to drop one to have it start eating everything?

      If the thing vaporizes everything, I wonder why the AIR around it survives, and you don't end up with a constant wind inwards towards the blade.

    6. Re:if you dropped one... by edge_gid · · Score: 1

      I've wondered before, what would happen if you dropped one?

      Am I the only one that have seen this? This is EXACTLY how I pictured it at least.

      Jedi Butter Fingers

      (Note: put the volume up and listen to the yelling in the background)

    7. Re:if you dropped one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've wondered before, what would happen if you dropped one?

      You must have never watches the movies because they dropped the things all the time. They conveniently turn off when not held and magically never hit anything when they go flying out of their hands.

      Remember the rash of pulp stories in the earlier years of tethered micro black holes that were accidentally released and orbited around the inside of a planet whilst slowly gaining mass and eating more and more.

      No.

      Would a lightsaber power itself from the mass it removes/cuts - would the "battery" die out. Unlike a micro blackhole it would not generate a gravitational field.

      In case you didn't know, LIGHT SABERS ARE NOT REAL. OMG you fucking nerds, stop going so far into your fandoms you start thinking this shit could exist somehow! No property of physics can even begin to explain how a lightsaber could work, and now you want it so the "blade" recharges the battery when it cuts through things?

      I'll tell you what. Explain to me how a weapon that can melt through blast doors can also be held inches from one's face and clothing without setting them ablaze (not to mention leaving the hilt cool enough to touch no matter how long it stays on, and then clip to a belt loop right after), and I'll tell you how a battery can power a lightsaber indefinitely.

      Really, its a slow day at work - I cannot even believe I am thinking about this...

      Go home then.

      Did anybody ever think of practical jokes you could play with a theoretical light saber...?

      There's this new site called YouTube.com that might help you in your search.

      And why is it lightsaber not lightsabre...?

      It's spelled "lightsaber" because George Lucas uses the American subset of English. You know, from having been born in America?

      Now get off my lawn, damn kids.

    8. Re:if you dropped one... by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other news, Ralph Nader has brought a suit against the Jedi Council for negligence in the design of proper safety features in such a dangerous device.

      Repeatedly he has brought to their attention several design flaws which they have consistently refused to take action on. Specifically the introduction of the timed dead man's switch to comply with EU regulations was done hastily and without forethought and has created a false sense of safety and resulted in more accidents with people who felt it was now safer to throw their lightsabers.

      Nader is asking that the Light Saber's safety devices be "Beefed Up" in a few simple ways. First, the removal of the timer from the safety switch. Clearly one who is force adept and capable of guiding a light saber, can use a little extra concentration and keep the kill switch depressed with his force power, while guiding the saber to its target and back.

      More controversial, is his request to move the switch entirely inside the light saber. This would effectively make it impossible for those who are not force adept to even activate a light saber, as constant force power would be required to keep the switch closed.

      The Lobbying group Galactic Lightsaber Buyers and Trainers Association (GLBTA) has come out against Mr Nader's recomendations citing that it would prevent law abiding citizens from obtaining a useful tool, and leaving them only in the hands of criminals.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    9. Re:if you dropped one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a little surprised that the EU doesn't flat-out require a safety cut-out. France, in particular, has some pretty stringent consumer safety standards.

    10. Re:if you dropped one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, Mitchell Sharpy, the engineer who originally designed the lightsaber, is suing the Jedi Council for misuse of his patent. Apparently one Yoda Schwartz feigned interest in licensing the patent, then stole the design documents and fled to a forest planet, where he used indigenous non-union labor to mass produce the item.

      Mr. Sharpy has developed counter-lightsaber technology including the LightShield(tm) and the LightSuit(tm), each of which are covered with emitters which surround the device with a magnetic field similar to the one that keeps a lightsaber's blade aligned. In a demonstration, Mr. Sharpy attempted to cut through one of his shields; the lightsaber he wielded bounced off the shield with great force, flying twenty meters away and destroying an astromech droid and two Jawa observers.

      Before leaving the area, Mr. Sharpy was heard to comment "well, you can't make an omlette without breaking some eggs". The owner of the droid was unavailable for comment. The families of the Jawas swore vengeance, causing nearby stormtroopers to laugh heartily and fire a few halfhearted blaster shots at them.

      The Imperial Government has apparently decided to license the LightSuit for use with a future Stormtrooper unit.

    11. Re:if you dropped one... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      As far as I can remember from the movies, etc., when you drop one it skitters across the floor without cutting into it much. That's not terribly surprising - presumably the blade doesn't weigh anything. Oh, they also seem to turn themselves off (eventually) when they fly out of the owner's hand.

      It's a lightsaber because it was invented by an American.

  12. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I was sure the blade was made from the focused hate and disappointment of the last three movies."

    Weak.

  13. Chopping Firewood? by Zymergy · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one out there that thought a lightsaber would make chopping firewood a snap?

    1. Re:Chopping Firewood? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      You don't have to chop firewood when you have a lighsaber. You just stick that slice o' tree right into your fireplace, jam your lightsaber into the middle of it and wait for it to light on fire. Mission Accomplished.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:Chopping Firewood? by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      you can light it at the same time!

      --
      Balderdash!
    3. Re:Chopping Firewood? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1


      Am I the only one out there that thought a lightsaber would make chopping firewood a snap?

      ... and also lighting it.

    4. Re:Chopping Firewood? by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      And where pray, do you get that slice of tree from ?

    5. Re:Chopping Firewood? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      From the guy that cut the tree down and chopped it into slices with a chainsaw.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    6. Re:Chopping Firewood? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Ah, the chainsaw: an elegant weapon for a more civilised age.

  14. Why isn't this in Idle? by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Silly posts like this seem custom made for Idle, where they can be safely ignored...

    --
    $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  15. For those who hate to click next by mpdolan37 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Facts are useless, they can be used to prove anything.
  16. Flashlight beam or variable sword. by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 1

    Light sabers are boring...

    I'd much rather have a variable sword from known space which consists of a ultra-thin wire in a stasis field:

    http://www.freewebs.com/knownspace/uv.htm/#U

    Or a flashlight laser, which can be an awesome flash light, or can be narrowed into a cutting beam:

    http://www.freewebs.com/knownspace/f.htm/#F

  17. Star Wars retards by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

    Stop buying all the graflex flashguns! there are some of us out there who still use them for their intended purpose. douchenozzles.

  18. Just to point out... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    That the parent poster probably meant "Expanded Universe" not "European Union".

    But I guess it is a bit too late...
    Someone already mentioned China stamping out plastic ones for 3 cents per unit.
    In order to profit from the market demand for those EU and USA made lightsabers I guess.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  19. This is science? by krakround · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lightsabre is a magic sword. How about an article on the science of the One Ring.

    1. Re:This is science? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      How about an article on the science of the One Ring.

      Telepathic nanocircuitry.

      1. You can control people wearing the other rings
      2. It stimulates certain parts of the brain, thus leading to it's addictive nature.
      3. It doesn't actually turn you invisible. It just makes everyone else *think* you are invisible. :)

  20. MIT by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    Alert me when some hacker at MIT builds one. That is all.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  21. lightsabers are scarier than guns and table saws by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'd have to be a Jedi to use one of these things because any average Joe is likely to cut off his own foot. A light saber represents the awesome mutilating ability of power tools combined with a form factor that's even more prone to mischief. No weight in the blade, will cause major damage with fleeting contact. They're cool but you'll be losing fingers and limbs.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  22. Toast by joss · · Score: 1

    They are of course perfect for making toast, slice and cook together. Steaks are doable but they turn out a bit rare.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    1. Re:Toast by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a steak that's a bit rare.

      Toast is a problem. Especially bagels. The average lightsaber is wider than a bagel. You wouldn't get a sliced, toasted bagel, you'd get a vaporized bagel.

  23. Aproptiatley by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1
    My Quote of the day is coming up

    So this is how liberty dies. With thunderous applause.

    George Lukas

    How did the get on the fp?

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  24. Mental masturbation by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All the articles about the "tech" of Star Wars, Star Trek, etc (up to an including the old Star Trek 'Engineering Manual' are nothing but mental masturbation for geeks. They are great when your in your teens, but...

    Just enjoy the show/movie

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    1. Re:Mental masturbation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's got to be a Natalie Portman joke in there somewhere.

  25. lame tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where's the lame tag

  26. Re:lightsabers are scarier than guns and table saw by sydney+troz · · Score: 0

    You make a good point, but there's actually a reason only Jedis *can* use them: the gyroscope required for stabilizing the beam makes the lightsaber impossible to handle for anyone without superhuman strength. Read that in the The Visual Dictionary of Star Wars, Episodes IV, V, & VI: The Ultimate Guide to Star Wars Characters and Creatures.

  27. Re:lightsabers are scarier than guns and table saw by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    You know it:

    http://www.break.com/usercontent/2007/4/Lightsaber-for-Christmas-282297.html

  28. Crowdnews.eu by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 1

    If you want to read news for needs, stuff that matters.

    Then try. Crowdnews.

    1. Re:Crowdnews.eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that was fun. Especially all the interesting, funny and insightful discussions that followed every story.

  29. Geek mode on.... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > A lightsaber is a unique device, created by hand -- the controls will be slightly different on each individual lightsaber that you buy.

    Buy? I was under the impression that each Jedi fashioned his own.

    Geek mode off...

    That said, I don't think the article works even as a parody.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Geek mode on.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geek mode off...

      if only it were that easy, huh.

  30. using a Tricorder... by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

    one would be able to detect the remnants of the vaporized corpse and do a DNA analysis on the "vapor"[aerosol] particles.

  31. Re:lightsabers are scarier than guns and table saw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Han Solo used one one once to open up a Tan Tan. Luke was training with it before he had any force abilities at all. I don't habeeb it.

  32. It's a what-what exactly? by mfnickster · · Score: 1

    "Therefore you know that a lightsaber is an amazing prop and optical effect that is able to cut through diddley squat in a matter of milliseconds."

    There... broke that for you! :)

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  33. Re:lightsabers are scarier than guns and table saw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd have to be a Jedi to use one of these things because any average Joe is likely to cut off his own foot.

    Average Joes have been able to use swords for thousands of years.

  34. Enough already! by Itninja · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "A lightsaber is like a sword on steroids".

    OMG! Will people please stop using 'on steroids' this way?! I recently found that references to actual steroid use are becoming tertiary results when Googleing the term (among other things).

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Enough already! by Itninja · · Score: 1

      Check that. I should have said "I recently found that references..."

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  35. Actually it could cast a shadow by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, I don't know if you realize it, but super-heated plasma is actually opaque to light.

    The photons emited in the nuclear fusion in the sun's centre, are absorbed and re-emitted and take millions of years to reach the surface. The sun is actually very close to a black body, except, of course, it radiates so much energy of its own that you can't shine a beam at it and notice that it's actually absorbed.

    A nuclear bomb's fireball, for the first couple of moments is actually opaque too, which actually helps with converting more of that energy into temperature of the fireball, thus into more rapid expansion of that air, and thus into a bigger shockwave. That's how about 50% of the energy goes into the shockwave. If it weren't for that, i.e., if that super-heated air actually let radiation pass right through, the bomb would just scorch the ground and fry anyone close enough and standing in the open, but wouldn't cause the kind of shockwave that levels concrete buildings.

    So could a lightsaber cast a shadow? Well, in much as the same way as a fluorescent tube can cast one. If it's in the way of a beam of light that's brighter than the sword's own shine, it would most definitely cast a shadow. (But, ok, in some poorly lit rooms like in the movies that doesn't seem to be nearly the case.)

    Now that road is another minefield for other reasons, so I'm not going to claim that lightsabers are "realistic" or "possible." But just saying that technically, yes, a blade of super-heated plasma could technically be opaque.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  36. Slashdot's next tech article by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Coming up next on slashdot technology, "The Physics of Santa Claus".

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  37. Lightsabers are SO long, long ago. by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

    I prefer the possibility sword from China Miéville's The Scar. Imagine the Heart of Gold powering a sword so that every swing you make projects all the other swings you could have made. The more likely the swing, the more damaging the cut. The book is worth a read just for that IMO.

    --
    -=Bang Bang=-
    1. Re:Lightsabers are SO long, long ago. by plutoXL · · Score: 1

      ...every swing you make projects all the other swings you could have made. The more likely the swing, the more damaging the cut.

      With infinite number of swings being ones where you chop your other hand off, I can see the advantages a weapon like that would provide.

    2. Re:Lightsabers are SO long, long ago. by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is indeed a possibility, and that's part of the fun. It takes a skilled swordsman to be in control enough that the risk to themself is negligable, while still being out of control enough to put the "phantom blades" to good use.

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
    3. Re:Lightsabers are SO long, long ago. by plutoXL · · Score: 1

      Didn't read the book, but it sounds it doesn't give any advantages over a regular sword. A car^h^h^h gun analogy maybe works better, what is a difference between damage done with one actual shot and damage done by infinite number of shots averaged into one?

    4. Re:Lightsabers are SO long, long ago. by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

      Difference is you attempt to block the most visible/most likely strike and all of the other possible strikes disarm you, disleg you, and disembowel you. Rarity is a factor here, its the only known one in existance, with a limited power supply. So its user must mete it out judiciously. When turned off it is one of your standard fare unbreakable, never-dull blades. It helps that he is the best swordsman in the world of course. As well as being one of the quasi-bad guys.

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
  38. Re:lightsabers are scarier than guns and table saw by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Sure, back in the day lightsabers were the crude tools you describe, but that was a long, LONG time ago. These days, lightsabers don't arm unless they recognize the biometric signature of the person weilding them. Additionally, the factory default setting is "practice mode," and you have to do quite a bit of hacking to actually unleash their destructive potential. (No pun intended.) In "practice mode," the saber performs nearly instantaneous mass spectrometry on anything it comes in contact with, and reduces power output to "singe" mode in the event of contact with human biological material. (Yes, technically that means you can shield things by covering them with.. well.. let's just say my Real Do.. er, girlfriend is quite safe.)

  39. Uh, no by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Have you ever wondered how these remarkable weapons work?

    Being somewhat connected to reality, I'd have to say no.

  40. Re:lightsabers are scarier than guns and table saw by mycroft822 · · Score: 1

    So Gears of War is an accurate intermediate step for future weaponry design... guns with saws!

  41. And I almost thought I'd read something interestin by Caduceus1 · · Score: 1

    When I read the subject, I thought we'd at least get an intelligent discussion on how a Lightsaber could actually work...not this old crap with the guy lighting a cigarette again.

    I at least see the lightsaber as a variation of the Variable Sword from Larry Niven's Known Space universe, where the stasis field actually emits photons of a certain frequency, causing the colored light effect.

    --
    rm /dev/mem
    Sci-Fi Storm
  42. Wrong. Here's how it REALLY works. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Here's how it really works. . .

    You take a wooden stick, right? Or a piece of bamboo, I suppose will do. All things resonate with the force, right? Obi Wan said so. So in mundane terms, the stick has an auric signature. 'Kay. Now you record that living energetic signature into the crystal. --And yeah, sure they can do that. Everybody knows that crystals have woo-woo power.

    So now you have the auric Force signature of a wooden stick recorded in the crystal. Then through the wonders of Space Technology From A Galaxy FFA, you run power through the crystal so that the auric signature of the stick is multiplied to the point not just where the average space muggle can see it, but where it sizzles and pops and is like, you know, a lightsaber.

    And this is why it takes a Jedi to make one; you need to be able to see and manipulate the Force, otherwise you're just a regular Joe with a stick and a crystal looking foolish.

    But for the purist. . . Lucas actually got his scripts wrong. The Lightsaber, before the scripts got re-written, (or perhaps before Lucas first thought of it; it's hard to say), could only be operated by a Jedi; the blade was an extension of his/her own energy. (To be fair, this is actually how I thought of lightsabers when I was a kid, and I was mightily upset when Han used Luke's to cut open that Tonton (TawnTawn?)

    Of course, in the same way, I believed that Batman could fly because he had a cape. (Though, I was only like four when I thought that. Still, that kind of logic might be a good thing to listen to if you're directing movies for kids.)

    Anyway. . , it should be noted that these two ideas are way cooler than any nonsense about mechanical extending bits in lightsabers, or any other idea as to how the blade doesn't shoot off into infinity. I notice the article delicately danced around actually answering this, the ONLY question which really matters to any geek of any worth when it comes to lightsaber science.

    Shame on you, "How Stuff Works" people. Stick to dump trucks and CD players where you don't need any imagination.

    -FL

  43. I'd Prefer A Disruptor by maz2331 · · Score: 1

    Phasors are okay, and light sabers are cool, but a disruptor is where it's really at. There's just something about shooting the target and watching it glow for a couple of seconds before vaporizing into a cloud of neutrinos that's hard to beat.

    When they remake Dirty Harry in 200 years, he'll be using the most powerful disruptor out there. "Being this is a UCG-9002, the most powerful disruptor in the universe, and it will vaporize your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself a question..."

  44. Practicality by Detritus · · Score: 1

    I never understood why they were the chosen weapon of the Jedi. You can have your lightsaber. Just give me a H&K MP5. I'll collect your lightsaber from your bullet-riddled corpse.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Practicality by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I'd assumed, from the movies, that there had to be an advantage. And that the advantage was it would cut through stuff that was proof against most other weapons.

      Sample: The elephant-inspired, heavily-armored, large Imperial Walkers that were bouncing shots from ground-based heavy artillery. One fast swipe through the belly from a lightsaber and one of 'em comes apart in spectacular fashion.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:Practicality by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Bullets are vaporized by the lightsaber blade. Although at least they wouldn't bounce back.

      Of course, any Jedi should be able to stop the bullets with the force and throw them back at you.

    3. Re:Practicality by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Becasue it is a more elegant weapon.

      And using projectile to fight other Jedi would be...foolish.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  45. Someone give the editor a dictionary by acoster · · Score: 1

    He needs to understand what news and matters mean...

    --
    "Go forth, and be excellent to each other" --Bill & Ted
    1. Re:Someone give the editor a dictionary by msu320 · · Score: 1

      He needs to understand what news and matters mean...

      he got the nerd part right at least :b

      --
      New slashdot layout sucks.
  46. Jedi do die ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... often in circumstances where some "bad guys" get to pick over the remains. And there were quite a few Jedi in the past.

    It's well established in the StarWars universe that there is a big-time market in surplus/junk tech - especially items that were stolen or otherwise have chancy ownership history.

    So it seems reasonable that, along with other material picked off the losers on battlefields that isn't regulation for the winners, there would be quite a number of them for sale on various "military surplus" markets.

    Also Jedi weapons get handed down in families and the offspring don't necessarily become Jedi, so they may get lost in attics, sold (by mistake or otherwise) at housecleanings or estate sales, ... Additional (or used/borrowed) weapons are used for training before the "young Padawan" makes his own. So if the trainee is using a hand-me-down he'll retire it when he makes his own.

    Having learned to make them and making at least one for himself, why would a Jedi stop? Might be a good idea to have a spare, in case of trouble or burnout. Tinker up a variant design for better power/battery life/balance/handling characteristics. We've seen single-ended ones used in saber styles and a double-ended one used in a style like a quarterstaff. But there are two-sword styles in both Europe and Japan. Why shouldn't a Jedi adopt such a style? All these would make for more lightsabers lying about to end up on the market.

    (And that's assuming the Jedi don't make 'em for fundraisers. B-) )

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  47. How the sound was REALLY done. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    FYI:

    The sound was done by the Foley man going through the same motions as each actor, holding a directional microphone, in a room with a loudspeaker in the position corresponding to the camera. The speaker played a continuous drone with a lot of harmonics.

    Result: The microphone picked up a sound corresponding to what would be heard at the camera position if the lightsaber emitted such a buzz with the higher frequency components directed progressively more tipward.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  48. An Old Republic Lighter by revxul · · Score: 1

    It's worth the picture alone.

    --
    Truth, Just Us, And Hatred For All Mankind!
  49. Magnetic plasma bottle by dloflin · · Score: 1

    I've always figured a light saber would be a high energy plasma generated from within the hilt and contained in a magnetic bottle. The tricky part is getting the bottle to take the long cylindrical shape - hence the skill of a Jedi being needed to construct one. But that explains cutting through things quickly, and why (magnetic) shields can block them. Or why they can deflect blaster bolts (ie charged blasts of dense plasma, imo).

    The article doesn't explain how *anything* about this "arc wave energy field" works or how it is shaped into a long cylinder or how it is kept to a certain length. At least with a magnetic bubble containing plasma, it's a little more explainable (except how to keep it a cylinder, not a round bubble...haven't quite figured out how that would work).

  50. focused hate? by catdevnull · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ha! Focused hate. +2 funny.

    The real source of power is the same source of power worshipped by George Lucas. The one that sucked away his soul and creativity over the last 30 years. I think they call it "ego."

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  51. More for an April Fools day. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    This stuff is more for the fantasy (like girls in your life) and science fiction (like girls in your life).
    My son is into the Star Wars stuff so I have plenty of experience with this stuff. However I work in the DoD DARPA when I was in the Air Force and they have some interesting ideas and some "toys" out there but to make something like this real will take awhile at the current pace of technology.
    This device is like a open ended magnetically contained plasma device. However we haven't gotten good hold of fusion physics (if we have we, won't in this energy crisis now) so until they do and then make a super power portable energy source to drive this then you will have an "lightsaber".

  52. NOT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeks will make it all happen :-). Such is the power of SF to inspire people that some way will be found.

    1. Re:NOT!! by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Oh, we will - hence the full machine ship and (what was for 1990) a well setup electronics lab - but just coming up with "ideas" without real world testing = mental masturbation

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  53. ....and you all bitch about "WoW nerds" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... this site is a joke. Lightsabers? Fuck me.

  54. The lightsaber beam is contained by the FORCE by dj42 · · Score: 1

    You fools. The reason the beam is contained and extended is because the Jedi utilizes the force the manipulate the size of the beam.

    You don't need technology to do what the Force can.

    --
    We are one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. Back to you with the weather, Bob!
  55. Average Joe much more capable with lethal arms... by patio11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...than you give him credit for.

    We're able to give fairly unexceptional 16 year olds sticks which weigh about 12 ounces, fit in the palm of your hand, have exactly one button on them, and have the rule "anything extending in a ray from this hole to the horizon when the button is depressed dies". The overwhelming majority of them understand the safety precautions -- there are only four.

    1) Never point the stick at anything you do not intend to kill
    2) The stick has two states. In one, the ray coming out when the button is pressed is lethal. In the other, no ray will come out. Always assume the stick is in the lethal state.
    3) Anyone capable of pressing a button is capable of operating the stick. Accordingly, never let anyone who you don't trust to not kill someone touch your stick.
    4) You should receive additional instruction to use your stick in an effective manner.

    And we didn't need a High Holy Cult of Gun Safety to accomplish that, now did we?

    Although it might be kind of fun. You look like you have the makings of a great marksman, young one. For your first lesson, I'm going to hand you a lethal weapon and blindfold you, then put you within arm's reach of six people. You're going to learn to use that lethal weapon safely and effectively. Did I mention that you're under attack by a practice drone? *zap* Well, what are you waiting for, shoot him already. We can talk about the basic properties of your lethal weapon later, for now, either you'll have the right instincts or we'll all die horribly.

  56. Looking at the 'science' behind fictional by geekoid · · Score: 1

    items leads to bad places, see: medicloreans

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  57. Re:Wrong. Here's how it REALLY works. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "...could only be operated by a Jedi"
    That was never true. Luke wasn't a Jedi when he turned on his fathers blade.

    You core point is correct, don't explain you magical technology.
    The Force. Lightsaber, anti-gravity, hair buns. Just enjoy it.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  58. Re:Wrong. Here's how it REALLY works. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    That was never true. Luke wasn't a Jedi when he turned on his fathers blade.

    True. Like Batman being able to fly when I was four, however, to my then seven year-old brain, this distinction was confusing. Lightsabers worked for Luke in the same way Wart could pull that sword out of the stone. He was already magical, he just didn't know it yet. And that, right there, is many more times the rationalism I ever used as a kid. I just assumed it. In any case, as we all know, the most pure of the Star Wars purists are all suffering from (enjoying?) arrested development.

    You core point is correct, don't explain you magical technology.
    The Force. Lightsaber, anti-gravity, hair buns. Just enjoy it.

    That wasn't my core point at all, though it is one I do agree with sometimes. For the most part, one of the best ways to enjoy things in fact IS to think and ponder and puzzle. Of course, if you happen to be writing story worlds, one needs to make sure the flavor/mood of problem solving doesn't clash with the established environment. I think it is universally agreed that the Force was much happier without a bio-medical explanation. Though, if it had been a Star Trek film. . .

    -FL

  59. a way of it to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the light saber to work you have a quartz crystal in the centre and then shine a powerful laser through the crystal. The knobs on the side control the strength of the laser.