Slashdot Mirror


It's Official, Australia Needs a Space Agency

Dante_J writes "In the final report published by the Australian Senate inquiry into 'The Current State of Australia's Space Science & Industry Sector' entitled 'Lost in Space? Setting a new direction for Australia's space science and industry sector,' it calls for the formation of a 'Space Industry Advisory Council' to oversee the creation of a fully-fledged Australian Space Agency. Of the top 20 GDP nations, Australia is the only one without a Space Agency, which impacts on many aspects of ordinary life, not to mention Research and Engineering endeavors. Every satellite operated by Australia is owned by another party and the costs of this alone are comparable to that of a Space Agency. The report is a tidy piece that drew upon submissions form Andy Thomas, and an impressive collection of Australian Academics and Space Science entities frustrated by successive generations of government apathy. While this report is welcome, lethargic Government action in a climate of competing concerns is not expected to stem the flow of Space Science brain drain out of Australia any time soon."

199 comments

  1. We're Aussies! by therufus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't be stuffed with that space stuff. 'slong as the cricket's on anyway ;)

    --
    You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    1. Re:We're Aussies! by Andr+T. · · Score: 4, Funny

      Australia is the only one without a Space Agency, which impacts on many aspects of ordinary life,

      So, how does the lack of a Space Agency impact your cricket matches?

      --

      Any life is made up of a single moment, the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all, who he is.

    2. Re:We're Aussies! by therufus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well there are those satellites up there that bounce the pictures to the TV right? They're in 'space'.

      Now someone get me another beer!

      --
      You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    3. Re:We're Aussies! by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can't be stuffed with that space stuff. 'slong as the cricket's on anyway ;)

      Yeah, um, have you seen that India has a killer space program? Just mentioning....

      --
      "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    4. Re:We're Aussies! by Swizec · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Nullifying my mod because you may be funny, but informative you are not.

    5. Re:We're Aussies! by Andr+T. · · Score: 4, Funny

      but informative you are not.

      Is that you, master Yoda?

      --

      Any life is made up of a single moment, the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all, who he is.

    6. Re:We're Aussies! by davester666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's really just a grassroots effort to develop a method to send the politician's who came up with the idea for their 'net' filter into space...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:We're Aussies! by Poorcku · · Score: 1

      crickets! :)

      --
      I take my children to see Madonna(..), but I never for once ever thought I was in the same business.Chris Rea.
    8. Re:We're Aussies! by wisty · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And China is building a carbon neutral city. Wind generators are $2000 / kW (actually $400/kW, but you need 3+ generators to produce the max output of one, since wind is unreliable). The 2 billion dollars to fund the space agency could be used instead to build 1000 GW of base capacity, which is almost the size of a big iron coal station. There are technical problems with distribution, smoothing and storage (can we use supercapacitors), which would be a great chance for our scientists to improve their technological prowess. Or we could try to knock off the US space program, gaining no new insight because NASA has already done the hard yards. Or better yet, lets use it to save the US car industry, because Komander Kevin wants to "build things". Can somebody buy him a Lego set?

    9. Re:We're Aussies! by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Wind cannot provide consistent power.
      It can supplement other forms of power, but you cant rely on it.

      You'd fry the power lines on a windy day and have massive brownouts on a still day if they did your plan.

    10. Re:We're Aussies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, how does the lack of a Space Agency impact your cricket matches?

      One word - Skylab. Takes friendly fire to a whole new level.

      (the key word being "impact")

    11. Re:We're Aussies! by Klucki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was wondering how long it would take for someone to bring that up ;-)

      I expect every article that mentions Australia to have a 'Great Firewall of China' joke within 5 minutes...

      --
      Stop Aussie internet censorship! Sign the petition.
    12. Re:We're Aussies! by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Surely there's been some ideas floating around to deal with this, right? Nuclear plants that can be throttled when wind is up or just having remote wind generators using all that energy to crack water into hydrogen and oxygen?

    13. Re:We're Aussies! by argiedot · · Score: 1

      And India just beat Australia hollow in a test match last week. Just mentioning...

    14. Re:We're Aussies! by argiedot · · Score: 1

      Well, one idea I heard was a combination of solar, nuclear and wind. Nuclear would provide base load, and with the new solar thermal stations you can very efficiently store heat in molten salt batteries. That should be enough for you to add power on days when wind doesn't quite cut it.

      Australia is quite well suited for solar, I'd think.

    15. Re:We're Aussies! by nschubach · · Score: 2, Funny

      but informative you are not.

      Master Yoda, you are?

      Fixed for you, I did.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    16. Re:We're Aussies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they suck at cricket.

    17. Re:We're Aussies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh well, so much for calling India a third world country...

    18. Re:We're Aussies! by chrome · · Score: 1

      Let me introduce you to this amazing technology we have; batteries.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_energy_storage

    19. Re:We're Aussies! by aaron+alderman · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine how far you could hit a ball on the moon!

    20. Re:We're Aussies! by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      it makes it very difficult to track the ball when Hussey tonks it.

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    21. Re:We're Aussies! by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      No where near as efficient as generating power directly as required.

    22. Re:We're Aussies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly our government/population is scared shitless of Nuclear, has done very little to promote solar and complains about wind farms 'destroying the view'.

      If the clean-feed internet filter/censorship shit goes through I'm seriously considering moving to Canada.

    23. Re:We're Aussies! by sr180 · · Score: 1

      The beauty of solar power, is that for most of Australia, our peak energy consumption is on our hottest days - and that is when the sun is out - making Solar an almost perfect form of energy for peak load!

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    24. Re:We're Aussies! by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Politicly at the moment there certainly are potential partnerships in the Space Science & Industry Sector that Australia can participate in. With the current growth in Russia it is likely that there will be a renewed impetus for a space program and they will likely be seeking the political benefits of taking on what a viewed as western partners. So now is a good time to start developing those space partnerships outside of the previous US centric bias. So partnerships with India, Russia or Europe would very likely be in Australia's interest and provide a means for extended political and social discourse.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. It needs a clue first by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe it should try to concentrate on getting rid of some of the laws that take away freedoms in that country. Stop trying to filter the Internet into the ground. I dunno, how bout generally pulling it's head out of its ass.

    I am speaking to the politicians of course, not the regular people. How can a government be so forward thinking as the people in this article desire it to be, when it so backwards thinking about the rest of it's policies?

    Of course, what the hell am I talking about. I live in America, the land of the free and the home of the brave! We have *none* of those same problems.

    The only reason NASA exists in my country is because it ALREADY EXISTS. If you have to convince politicians to fund it today, nothing would ever get done. It took a cold war, a charismatic President, and national pride to get our asses into space.

    1. Re:It needs a clue first by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're a troll but I'm going to feed you.

      I am speaking to the politicians of course, not the regular people.

      You fail. The voices of reason that you have been hearing here on Slashdot are the minority. The vast majority of Australians think the Internet needs filtering. They actually like the fact that certain films are banned in Australia. These are the people who had police intervene earlier this year to prevent a Bill Henson exhibition from showing images that were later given a PG rating by the Office of Film and Literature Classification. Had the classification board bowed to public pressure, Henson and the gallery could have been facing criminal charges.

      We have exactly the government that we deserve. For those of us who want better, we have to get out there and do something. No-one will do it for us.

      Similarly, and to bring this back on-topic, the space activities sponsored by our government are a direct result of the work put in by academics to make the case that it is to the benefit of our country to do so.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The only reason NASA exists in my country is because it ALREADY EXISTS"

      brilliant deduction there, retard. oh and australia doesn't filter the internet, there are trails being conducted which will most likely shoot it down for obvious technical reasons (our communications minister is a little slow).

      how about you fix your own fucked, busted arse, country before you throw stones at other peoples.

    3. Re:It needs a clue first by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The vast majority of Australians think the Internet needs filtering.

      Citation needed. Because as an Australian the only time I hear about internet filtering is here at slashdot. I'd be surprised if the vast majority of Australians know about the government's plans, let alone have an opinion on them.

    4. Re:It needs a clue first by Andr+T. · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of Australians think the Internet needs filtering.

      Also, I've read a Scientific American issue about privacy in the computer age and many studies showed that Privacy in general is a dying concept. People just don't care about it anymore.

      --

      Any life is made up of a single moment, the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all, who he is.

    5. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of Australians think the Internet needs filtering. [citation needed]

    6. Re:It needs a clue first by EdIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not a troll, and I don't mean to deliberately offend anyone. My country is just as bad.

      I do see many of those laws and policies in Australia as dangerous towards freedoms. They are backwards, shortsighted and stupid. Australia is not alone either. I think there is a "race to the bottom" between the US, UK, and Australia as far as this goes anyways.

      Somehow I doubt there are really that many Australians that want to be censored and have their freedoms taken away in exchange for *anything*. If you are really right about that, then yes I guess in this case the government is actually representing the will of the people. You will have to forgive me, I just find that shocking and unusual.

      As for the academics making intelligent cases about policies that will actually benefit Australia it might be cynicism that makes me believe that a government so shortsighted and stupid with the rest of its policies could even listen and take action based on rational discourse.

      Once again, I am not trolling with those statements. I honestly have no faith left in most governments that they can do the right thing at this point and hearing about Australia trying to take such an ambitious step to benefit it's people just brought out the cynicism in me.

    7. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I think there is a "race to the bottom" between the US, UK, and Australia as far as this goes anyways."

      as apposed to countries like china or any asian or middle eastern country, which are just beacons of freedom.

    8. Re:It needs a clue first by simmee · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up

    9. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh and australia doesn't filter the internet, there are trails being conducted which will most likely shoot it down for obvious technical reasons

      So, you won't do it because you aren't able to do it, right?

      Maybe you need some foreign advice from China or something. They're just better at this.

    10. Re:It needs a clue first by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Maybe it should try to concentrate on getting rid of some of the laws that take away freedoms in that country. Stop trying to filter the Internet into the ground.

      To set up a decent Autralian Great Firewall, you need to put down all those pesky satellites that allow illegal pirate connections.

      Thus, the need for a space agency. How else would the autralian government put those intellectual property defending laser equipped sharks in orbit?

    11. Re:It needs a clue first by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Privacy in general is a dying concept. People just don't care about it anymore.

      That's just untrue. People don't understand it. Privacy to most people is still quite physical.

      If I go to pee in my bathroom can somebody see me? No? Then I have privacy.

      Do I have blinds and/or curtains on my windows? Yes? Than I have privacy.

      The average person cannot understand, visualize, and basically even begin to comprehend that there is another dimension of reality we have created called cyberspace. That information flows back and forth in this dimension and has very real effects and serious consequences in our real world, "meatspace". This is not hyperbole. It is an absolute fact of our existence right now.

      Unless you have experienced it directly, or have a more sophisticated understanding of it, you would have a very hard time understanding the interactions between your personal information in cyberspace and the "real world".

      When you do finally explain to this to them, their lack of privacy, and how this lack of privacy can have real negative effects on their lives.... it becomes important to them all of the sudden.

      You need to stop perpetuating this myth that people have an informed decision about privacy and still choose to look at is as antiquated and unimportant. I have met VERY few people that actually feel this way and ALL of them have a VERY sophisticated understanding of it and deliberately choose to live in a world with absolutely no privacy and/or anonymity. They make interesting and intelligent arguments about it's function in a higher society.

      They are the exception. Most people are just ignorant and think "Privacy" is about protecting their naughty bits.

    12. Re:It needs a clue first by Andr+T. · · Score: 1

      as apposed to countries like china or any asian or middle eastern country, which are just beacons of freedom

      No, they are 'the bottom'.

      --

      Any life is made up of a single moment, the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all, who he is.

    13. Re:It needs a clue first by Andr+T. · · Score: 2, Informative

      Australia is not alone either. I think there is a "race to the bottom" between the US, UK, and Australia as far as this goes anyways.

      I live in Brazil and there's a law being discussed to do almost the same thing they are doing in Australia. I might be wrong, but it seems to me there's a general race towards government control of the net (wich has been widely discussed here before).

      --

      Any life is made up of a single moment, the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all, who he is.

    14. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's been seeing a bit of press. Both the ABC and Sydney Morning Herald have had articles. The issue set a record in the ABC's comments section. It was the first time a story with any serious number of comments (100+) had not received a single dissenting comment. Every single commenter was against the filtering proposal. Also see the No Clean Feed website.

    15. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the "vast majority" of Australians you refer to is a bit of an overreaction. You're making sweeping generalisations based off of nothing. It's true that there are a lot of conservatives over here, but there are also a lot of die-hard civil rights groups.

      In fact, just yesterday, a "Sex Party" has announced that they are running for parliament. I am not kidding. They are focusing on freedoms such as net neutrality, no censorship on the net, more liberal attitudes towards sex and sexuality (including gay marriage) and those sorts of things.

      Of course, your assertions about people not caring about censorship are going to be very well tested, now that Senator Fielding has decided he wants all pornography banned by the filter.

      They may be able to ban child porn and pro-terrorist sites without much of a fight. Maybe even racial hatred websites. However... things change when you get between millions of men and their (non-child) porn.

      I hope Fielding's move proves the decisive error in this campaign and results in the long-overdue nail in the coffin of this festering turd of a bill.

    16. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually Kevin Rudd's plan to censor the internet is opposed by 80-90% of Australians the polls that I've seen, it's that unpopular. Rudd is quite conservative/religious and even though most Australian's aren't, the small religious population voted for him and he needs to repay the favour, by targetting porn

      Why the religious just leave everyone else the hell alone

    17. Re:It needs a clue first by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I don't base it on "nothing". I base it on living here. The closest we've ever had to a protest against the banning of books, films and other media is when Margaret Pomeranz from The Movie Show attempted to screen a DVD that had been refused classification and the police intervened, and she complied. The protest subsequently fizzled. That's it. That's the most successful protesting that has been done regarding film censorship in this country. It's pretty obvious that people either don't care or are in support of the legislation.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    18. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's pretty obvious that people either don't care or are in support of the legislation.

      and rather than go with the more obvious (and lazier) option, you think that people are in support of it? no poll run ANYWHERE has shown less than 90% against it

    19. Re:It needs a clue first by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Here's a poll for you, it's called voting. We've never made censorship an election issue. Maybe our next election will change that, but until it does, we've made our position pretty clear.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    20. Re:It needs a clue first by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The vast majority of Australians think the Internet needs filtering

      Complete bollocks. The vast majority of Australians couldn't give a flying fuck about internet filtering.

      A vocal minority might be lobbying for filtering. The government probably knows it's an ineffectual waste of time but has a go anyway so that minority sees it as "doing something".

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    21. Re:It needs a clue first by wisty · · Score: 1

      I've been saying this for years. We have to lose the Victorian era hypocrisy of pretending normal people don't have sex lives. Or that some peoples sex lives are outside what was previously considered 'normal'.

    22. Re:It needs a clue first by Trentus · · Score: 1

      There was a short ~5 minute interview with Mark Newton on one of the morning TV programmes (the one on Nine... don't recall the name), and there have been a couple of radio shows about it here and there (a few on the ABC, there was a great discussion on a Triple M show the other night too).

      So word should hopefully be starting to spread around the general public about how bad this plan really is.

    23. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you truly are thick as shit

    24. Re:It needs a clue first by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      It takes a special breed of individual to get involved in politics for the long haul - now I'm not saying politicians aren't smart, some of them are exceedingly so in their own ways, but really, it's a job that requires no formal qualifications at all, and a good sized chunk of people involved fit that very definition. Some fit my own personal view of utterly crazy and mentally deficient (Look at how many crazies Pauline Hanson has quietly fended off and you'll get the idea, and she's generally thought of as being way 'out there' herself. No offence intended to the good lady.)

      There really isn't too much room for space unless it comes with some bargaining power that can be used and abused by the transients passing through Canberra for their elected terms.

    25. Re:It needs a clue first by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you are wrong.

      Trot out that "terrorism" bogyman and citizens will happily give up all freedoms for security and protection from the terrorists that are hiding in their bushes.

      I have many arguments with people that firmly believe that even checking in at checkpoints as they drive to work is worth it to fight terrorism.

      Then they get angry at me when I say, "Nice to see you are with us comrade." in my best Russian accent. They simply do not understand that they are incredibly stupid to give away freedom for security.

      Perceived safety is more important to the populace than being able to speak or think.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    26. Re:It needs a clue first by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Because as an Australian the only time I hear about internet filtering is here at slashdot."

      I second that, and most of those who have heard of it, will have also heard it all before. Our government has been planning to filter the net on and off since it 's conception. The reason for this is that with proportional voting we often have an independent that can hold the balance of power in either house on a split vote. In this case the senator in question is called Fielding from the "family first" party. KRuddy is buying Fielding's vote to pass funding for bigger fish throgh the senate by throwing money at a system he knows will never be implemented, Howard did the same thing by kissing up to Hanson and the "one nation" party.

      It's a quirk of the system that keeps morons busy and occasionally creates the wonderfully democratic irony of people who promote censorship demanding to be heard in parliment. The whole thing is nothing more than a "Yes minister" epsiode that has been repeated so often it's no longer funny.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    27. Re:It needs a clue first by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Unless you have experienced it directly, or have a more sophisticated understanding of it, you would have a very hard time understanding the interactions between your personal information in cyberspace and the "real world".

      When you do finally explain to this to them, their lack of privacy, and how this lack of privacy can have real negative effects on their lives.... it becomes important to them all of the sudden.

      Then explain people who, having had that explained, continue on with the 'nothing to hide, nothing to fear' mantra.

    28. Re:It needs a clue first by megrims · · Score: 1

      I agree. Autralia is a much cooler name.

    29. Re:It needs a clue first by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      It took a cold war, a charismatic President, and national pride to get our asses into space.

      You do realize the NASA was created by Eisenhower in 1958, not Kennedy? You do realize that Project Mercury started as a NACA project and thus predates NASA?

    30. Re:It needs a clue first by HJED · · Score: 1

      actual living in Australia I can tell you its more know one knows its happening!

      --
      null
    31. Re:It needs a clue first by HJED · · Score: 2, Informative

      actual the greens and some independents including Fielding have the balance of power in the senate.

      The greens are against the bill and all of the sentors not in the oposition would have to suport this

      --
      null
    32. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get Porn on the internet?

    33. Re:It needs a clue first by EdIII · · Score: 1

      You do realize the NASA was created by Eisenhower in 1958

      The Cold War did not exist in 1958? Had no effect on why NASA was created? Those early projects before NASA were not funded by Cold War pressures?

      I understand what you are saying, but it took Kennedy and a sense of national pride to accelerate the process to get us to the Moon by 69'. Not to mention significant Cold War pressures, as getting to the Moon was a statement about the power and benefits of our ideology versus the Commies.

      All the technology we use to get our satellites into space, both commercial and militarily, exists because of it. I am only stating that without those pressures, it was not as likely to exist.

    34. Re:It needs a clue first by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      "The vast majority of Australians think the Internet needs filtering."
      no, the vast majority don't... three people do... and unfortunately those three people are politicians and as such are trying to brainwash Aus into going along with it... Senator Conroy and SA's much loved premier Michael Atkinson (the douche who is single-handedly blocking an R rating for video games)... and of course the third is KRudd himself.
      I haven't had a single conversation about the Great Australian Filter (GAF) where the other person actually thought it was a good idea... even people who don't really give a damn know when their rights are being eroded and understand that the concept is flawed.
      If you honestly think that the vast majority of Australians are as empty in the head as you purport then I'd hate to see the world through your eyes.

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    35. Re:It needs a clue first by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Then get out of your little self-constructed world and listen. Turn on 4KQ or any of the other "mainstream" talk radio stations. Note: youth radio doesn't count. Have a talk to people who use words like "Americanized" with a straight face. There's plenty of people out there who think "decency" exists and should be protected. These are the crazies that populate our country. Just because you and I are hip cosmopolitans doesn't mean Australia is no longer a backwater. For fuck sake, gays still get their cars egged by their neighbours.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    36. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. What the pollies should do is hire someone to create an AdBlock Plus for IE and then simply maintain a list of officially undesirable sites and list it here: http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions

      eg. *.ru will filter all russian porn.

      It would also give us the ability to subscribe/unsubscribe as we see fit and/or change the filter, which is what is needed anyhow

      As it stands this filter of Rudd's is gonna suck. Don't worry, it won't get thru though.

    37. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Christian and I'm also completely and entirely opposed to filtering the Internet. It is the responsibility of parents to take adequate steps to bring up their children properly - not the role of the government. Your point about religion being the issue is moot, flamebait and downright ill-informed.

    38. Re:It needs a clue first by AnymouseCowhead · · Score: 1

      ... by targetting porn

      So, you're unhappy because of porn?

    39. Re:It needs a clue first by Etherael · · Score: 1

      Did you read the actual pdf report from the government on this?

      1) lots of name dropping, lots of this senator is pushing to get this stuff looked at.
      2) it was initially requested iirc in June to be completed no later than October and then pushed back to November (ie we don't really care about this and are dragging our feet)
      3) it is liberally interspersed with pop culture references and song lyrics (I shit you not) to keep the attention of the readers (idiot australian politicians) and to impress upon them the important of space, technology and science in general.

      These three points alone are enough to summarise the situation quite well, but the basic takeaway point for this entire debacle is that Australia is a shithole.

      I live here, I know this.

      We waste tons of money on shit like the australian institute of sport, provide inordinate amounts of media attention to useless shit, and basically ignore our entire sci/tech sector, about a year ago I heard one snippet from a US media source on a tech created in an australian labratory to drastically increase the production of energy producing refined uranium using lasers instead of the current contemporary gas centrifuge technology. I have hardly heard about it at all since, maybe five or six times, and never once has it even been mentioned in australian media.

      This country exists to churn out petty bullshit about sport and celebrity and feel good about our half assed left wing touchy feely hug the environment protect the children ain't life in australia grand bullshit, expatriate me as soon as possible to Switzerland or someplace sensible.

      Oh, I forgot, no such place exists.

    40. Re:It needs a clue first by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      my self constructed little world? the kind of people who phone in and talk on talk radio are not in the vast majority of the population and the subset of those people doesn't neccesarily correlate with the subset who are opposed to internet filtering. i say this knowing full well that the previous statement also applies to my next one: if you check out any news story on news.com.au regarding internet filtering almost 100% of the comments are opposed to internet filtering and there are hundreds if not thousands of comments, talk radio gets you a subset of maybe a few dozen people... who as i mentioned are generally self absorbed oppinionites that are a few cookies short of the full jar.

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    41. Re:It needs a clue first by trawg · · Score: 1

      Citation needed. Because as an Australian the only time I hear about internet filtering is here at slashdot. I'd be surprised if the vast majority of Australians know about the government's plans, let alone have an opinion on them.

      I played some backyard cricket with some friends of mine on Sunday and mentioned the filter plan off just casually and was surprised when everyone gave me blank looks. I was with two lawyers, someone that works HR at a law firm, a systems architect - basically a bunch of people that read the news and lead active digital lifestyles and tend to know stuff like this, and they were blissfully unaware of the filter plan.

      So I think you're spot on.

    42. Re:It needs a clue first by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Dude. The majority of Australians don't even have internet access. Obviously the comments on a web site are going to be pro-internet.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    43. Re:It needs a clue first by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      again, posting falacies that are made up in your own "self constructed world", this study is from 2001 and at that stage (7 years ago) we had 48% internet penetration... so that could be anyware from 70-90% (note: pure speculation) by now: http://www.nielsenmedia.com.au/news.asp?newsID=125...
      As a fellow Australian I'm appalled that you consider the majority of your own country men to be such backward hicks that they would support internet filtering, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary.
      If you have such a passionate hatred for your own country then get on out
      anyway, on that note i'm done feeding the trolls for today.

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    44. Re:It needs a clue first by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I knew it was only a matter of time before you became all nationalist.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    45. Re:It needs a clue first by ozphx · · Score: 1

      The policy is the spawn of "Family" First Senator Fielding, who is the spawn of the Paradise Community Church.... but anyway...

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    46. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because you were pushing him to it.

      Nationalism in small doses is a perfectly admirable quality, and he didn't cross the line - he just pointed out that you're making a bunch of stuff up for the apparent sole purpose of making Australia look bad, and that he wondered why you were here if it's really that bad.

    47. Re:It needs a clue first by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I suspect even Fielding realises that it's going nowhere but by selling KRuddy his senate vote he can return to his constituents and say "I extracted $X million from the government to fight child porn. I'm the only candidate who is thinking of the children, so vote for me again and this time we will finish the job".

      Fielding will be dealt with in the same way as Hanson - exposed, ridiculed and then ignored.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    48. Re:It needs a clue first by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      "Somehow I doubt there are really that many Australians that want to be censored and have their freedoms taken away in exchange for *anything*. If you are really right about that, then yes I guess in this case the government is actually representing the will of the people. You will have to forgive me, I just find that shocking and unusual."

      I would give it up for more porn... but since the internet filter blocks porn it is diametrically opposed to what incentivises me most.

      PS: is incentivises a word, english nazis, help me out here

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    49. Re:It needs a clue first by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      "The Cold War did not exist in 1958"
      At least it didn't officially exist in 1958

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    50. Re:It needs a clue first by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      "if you don't like it leave" is the catch cry of the nationalist "my country, right or wrong" crowd. "if you don't like it, fix it" is the right attitude but it requires you to first accept that our country isn't perfect.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    51. Re:It needs a clue first by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      noone ever said our country was perfect. and i'm all for fixing it, as are the majority of australians according to opinion polls. the point i was making is that your view of what the majority think is quite obviously not what the majority actually think, and posting your opinion as fact without citations or any evidence to back it up (when it takes 30seconds on google to do so) just shows how closed minded and stuck inside a reality of your own creation you really are.

      if you want to step out of your bubble for a moment and be a part of the solution go here (if you haven't done so already): http://nocleanfeed.com/

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    52. Re:It needs a clue first by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      also... nice job on sidestepping the facts i presented regarding how many aussies actually have the internet by accusing me of being a nationalist.

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    53. Re:It needs a clue first by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      What facts? The only evidence you presented supported my assertion.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    54. Re:It needs a clue first by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      try searching "internet penetration australia" and find yourself some current figures instead of making them up.
      you are either trolling, or deluded. enjoy that. i'm out.

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    55. Re:It needs a clue first by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt you're right.. I just find it amusing that you're so high and mighty about the "facts" when all you have to back up your argument is a study from 2001 that says the opposite of what you're claiming.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    56. Re:It needs a clue first by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      ... try searching "internet penetration australia" ...

      Oh no, you're not going to catch me out again!

      I still remember the time I googled "Totally Wild" hoping to find out more about Ranger Stacey, and the first result was a pic of two guys fisting each other...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    57. Re:It needs a clue first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clarification above

      by targeting child porn

      something that does have universal support in all the polls I've seen. just saying.

      also majority of Australians are conservative/religious. just putting that out there

      and that just happened

    58. Re:It needs a clue first by jollyc · · Score: 1

      Rudd is quite conservative/religious

      WTF? I'm not defending Rudd here, but I can't imagine he makes all his decisions based on this...I mean didn't he get down at a New York strip club? Not that there's anything wrong with that :P

    59. Re:It needs a clue first by kramulous · · Score: 1

      That's certainly one way to lighten a conversation getting 'nasty'. Nice.

      --
      .
  3. who needs space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I drove 300 km yesterday without seeing another person.

  4. hey aussies! by cosmocain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looking for a way to burn money? I got a different idea...

    ...i'll contact you with my SWIFT-code.

    Truly yours and thanks in advance, cosmocain

  5. YES! They officially... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... need a space program, in order to get away from their disastrous government.

  6. I heard we had a fledgling agency in the 50's ... by The+Sith+Lord · · Score: 1

    ... until the US and the Brits told us "not to worry about it", and that was the end of that ...

  7. They still dont lauch satellites themselves? by iammani · · Score: 1

    hmmm, I am surprised they dont have a space agency yet, which means they pay and depend on other countries for launching sats.

    OTOH The implications are too many, like they cannot secret sats like the rest of the world.

    1. Re:They still dont lauch satellites themselves? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      hmmm, I am surprised they dont have a space agency yet, which means they pay and depend on other countries for launching sats.

      Yes, like 99% of the countries in the world.

      OTOH The implications are too many, like they cannot secret sats like the rest of the world.

      No, actually very few countries have secret satellites (I assume, anyway).

      Our defence strategy is to hang on the coat tails of the USA. When the US president says something insightful (or just anything) our prime minister says something like way to go, GB and thus our international relations are forged.

      The reality is that most countries can get by perfectly well without their own number plate resolving real time spy satellites and forward defence policies.

      I would love to see a debate on the actual need for a space program. It might put the whole idea on a better footing.

    2. Re:They still dont lauch satellites themselves? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      When the US president says something insightful (or just anything) our prime minister says something like way to go, GB and thus our international relations are forged.

      I thought Rudd didn't really like Bush all that much?

    3. Re:They still dont lauch satellites themselves? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's unfortunately the way every Australian leader behaves. Even Whitlam (who the US mistook for a dyed in the wool communist so badly it inspired some comically inept espionage, two US defectors and a bad movie) rolled over on the issue of dead Australians in East Timor under US pressure even when it was incredibly obvious that a very large donation from Indonesia to the Republican party that same day was the cause of the pressure from Nixon. Bush can not be shown to be as big of a crook as Nixon as yet if ever - and even if he was Australia would cave in to his demands. Unless of course that means upsetting China: trade partner number one is eventually going to override military ally numbner one who happens to have slipped to trade partner number seven.

    4. Re:They still dont lauch satellites themselves? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      at least 19 countries have space programs (according to the summery).

      Are you implying that there are 1900 countries in the world? or are you including other worlds?

      I can't find a list of the number of countries with space programs, but with at least 19, it is far closer to 10% than 1%.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:They still dont lauch satellites themselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't see the benefits of a space program, you are *very* near sighted. So much so, you can't watch TV, use the internet, dial an international phone number, see the weather forecast or many other things.
        You might say that you don't need your own space program for that, but then you depend on another country for what is critical infrastructure. I remind you that Australia is an island surrounded by tiny island (most of them poor countries that are not very reliable).

    6. Re:They still dont lauch satellites themselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Rudd didn't really like Bush all that much?

      Well, Rudd recently leaked a phonecall with him where Bush asked Rudd "What's the G20?".

      Needless to say, later at the G20, Bush was cold as ice to Rudd.

      The opposition wants Rudd to be charged for a "gross breach of national security" for it or something, but most Australians thought it was actually quite funny, and his approval ratings have since increased further (62% now).

      Obama and Rudd, on the other hand, are best of friends.

    7. Re:They still dont lauch satellites themselves? by deniable · · Score: 1

      East Timor was '75, so Ford, not Nixon, but pretty much. Then again, Timor is a bit of a side show compared to what the Indonesian army are doing in West Papua.

    8. Re:They still dont lauch satellites themselves? by deniable · · Score: 1

      No, it's supposed to be Bush doesn't like Rudd because of the 'leaked' conversation between Bush and Rudd. The whole thing looks like the usual farcical political games from Canberra.

  8. Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australia is generally a very disorganised place. This is somewhat surprising given the excessive tiers of government.

    It is well understood by most Australians that if you want to retire in comfort then you should get a job (for life) with the government.

    However despite all of the busy-bodies supposedly governing the place, nothing much works properly.

    Anyhow, I am hoping we might get decent broadband, proper roads, and reliable electricity, before trying for a Space Agency.

    1. Re:Wrong priorities by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      ForEach ($country as $local_country)
      {

      $local_country is generally a very disorganised place. This is somewhat surprising given the excessive tiers of government.

      It is well understood by most $local_country_citizens that if you want to retire in comfort then you should get a job (for life) with the government.

      However despite all of the busy-bodies supposedly governing the place, nothing much works properly.

      Anyhow, I am hoping we might get decent $arr_lacking_programs, before trying for a $unpopular_program.
      }

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    2. Re:Wrong priorities by deniable · · Score: 1

      Excessive tiers of government? There are three (Federal, State, Local) and they don't overlap much. Federal has tax and the military, the states handle police and education, and local handles parks and rubbish collection.

      Oh sorry, I didn't spot the poor troll attempt.

  9. Australian Space Research Institute by femto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The closest Australia has to a Space Agency is the Australian Space Research Institute. It falls into the category of a serious amateur effort, staffed by volunteers and funded by donations. Underfunded Australian research programs tend to hit above their weight with innovative solutions, simply because they don't have the money to pay for a more conventional solution.

    1. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The closest Australia has to a Space Agency is the Australian Space Research Institute. It falls into the category of a serious amateur effort, staffed by volunteers and funded by donations. Underfunded Australian research programs tend to hit above their weight with innovative solutions, simply because they don't have the money to pay for a more conventional solution.

      We should chuck them some money for some SpaceX launches.

    2. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet we have a government paid institution for athletes. Truly our country is fucked up.

    3. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by femto · · Score: 1

      There is a donation form on their website, with details of a bank account into which money can be deposited. Someone needs a paypal (or equivalent) account?

    4. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by level4 · · Score: 1

      And yet we have a government paid institution for athletes. Truly our country is fucked up.

      While I would agree that having the AIS but no Space Agency does indeed make our priorities look somewhat backwards, I have no ill will whatsoever towards the AIS - in fact I think it should be expanded. Obesity and diabetes are becoming major health problems in our society and we need to get them down.

      I would argue that the AIS does a wonderful job promoting sport and exercise in the community, and also provides a regular crop of "heroes" to inspire the kids. If anything it should be bigger, more swimming pools, more ovals, more participation. It probably pays for itself many times over in future health care cost reduction.

      It's not an either/or proposition. A Space Agency would be great, but the AIS is also good. We need both.

      --
      Let my new 7-digit UID be a lesson to all - write down your passwords.
    5. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Obesity and diabetes are becoming major health problems in our society and we need to get them down.

      And the professionalization of sport is no way to do that. When I was a kid we went out and played sport for fun - typically with little or no adult supervision. Now kids can't even kick a football around without some overzealous phys-ed teacher taking an unnatural interest in what could be their next big score. Even the once purely recreational codes such as "touch" football and indoor soccer/cricket have since become serious codes with commercial and nationalist interests.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      I think it's time for a more international effort in space exploration. Sure, we have the International Space Station, but why not go further? Develop a UN Space agency beyond UNOOSA. Everybody involved will benefit, especially countries like Australia.

      If China or India choose not to join, so be it.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    7. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Which begs the question: Does Australia need a government run space agency, or just a space agency in Australia? Since the main motivation for a space agency seems to be the money paid to other agencies, why not charter and pay a private space agency? You get all the benefits of keeping the payments in the country and avoid creating another government agency. Maybe save money. Maybe even attract business from other countries.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    8. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about "Australian Research into Space Exploration" ? ;)

    9. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by shogun · · Score: 1

      There also is or rather was the the Cooperative Research Centre for Satellite Systems who were responsible for the FedSat. However this group was shut down in 2005 after its funding was cut.

    10. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by Malekin · · Score: 1

      If anything [the AIS] should be bigger, more swimming pools, more ovals, more participation.

      How about instead of funnelling resources for all of that to one elite body in Canberra the ovals and pools are built in population centres where the public could actually use them?

      Mega sporting events and "heroes" encourage people to sit on their arses and watch them on TV. That's not going to help our health. The AIS and its already obscene funding level is part of the problem.

    11. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One advantage of ASRI being an amateur effort is that they can set up international ties, without having to run the gauntlet of nationalism. For example, their website says AUSROC IV will be a cooperation between a similar Swiss institute and Australia. The Swiss will provide one stage and Australia the other.

    12. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Most people have accounts with online banking functionality and there is no loss of privacy allowing others to INSERT money into your account (but not remove). I'd prefer organisations steer clear of pseudo financial institutions that offer no consumer protection. Or, perhaps you are a marketing drone? Everyone together now! PAYPAL... PAYPAL!

    13. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that pretty much every (1st/2nd world) country has its own equivalent to the AIS? and our spending per capita on athletes is no more than the other 1st world countries.

      These two things really aren't related in any way, shape or form.

    14. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      So if the rest of the 1st world countries started rounding up the jews, should Australia do the same?

    15. Re:Australian Space Research Institute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bank account in Australian currency cannot accept international transactions. Hence the paypal or equivalent comment.

  10. I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by level4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I could not agree more that AU should establish and fund (well!) a proper space agency. I would fucking LOVE that. Perhaps we could start by redirecting all allocated funding for that ridiculous internet filtering scheme.

    But let's keep it in perspective. Australia has 21 million people. We're two thirds the population of California. The other city I spend a lot of time in, Tokyo, has more people than my whole god damn country. I think visitors and foreigners often get a mistaken impression about this country - sure, the cities are fairly large, but there's only fucking FIVE of them. It's a big country - I was born in South Australia, we have a military base there that is BIGGER THAN ENGLAND - but there's no people and kangaroos don't pay tax. Yet.

    We're rich enough per capita, sure, but the volume just isn't there. For fuck's sake, we're closing down the entire Navy for 2 months for Christmas. We can't get enough people to staff our fricking marine defences (the most important, since we're an island) - but we're going to build a space industry now? With who?

    What I would really like to see is some kind of cooperative effort. Why all this competition between nations, duplicated effort, and misplaced nationalism? We'd get so much more done if we pooled our resources and really worked together. And I don't mean in the manner of sclerotic, ineffective jaw-fests like the UN, I mean cooperate like allies in a war, which we're all pretty good at.

    We need a war, then. A War on Not Being In Space! Come on, you apes! Do you want to live forever?

    --
    Let my new 7-digit UID be a lesson to all - write down your passwords.
    1. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by Barny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For a country that still thinks "primary production" being their main industry is a good thing, I think we would be shooting ourselves economically in the foot.

      We are a country whose children are taught that sport is the be-all and end-all of their education, there are a few good universities for the hard sciences, sure, but we have a nationally funded Institute of Sport, a mecca for a generation of kids who spend 3.9 years waiting for the next Olympics to start, so they can see their hero...

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The other city I spend a lot of time in, Tokyo, has more people than my whole god damn country."

      Tokyo has a population of 12 million which is a bit over half of Australia.

      http://www.metro.tokyo.jp/ENGLISH/PROFILE/overview03.htm

    3. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by DerCed · · Score: 1

      Looks like Australia will soon found the AFSA, the Australian Fucking Space Agency!

    4. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I believe what we tell our kids these days is that students go to uni to get HECS debt when they could be earning big bucks doing trade jobs with just a high school education.. the suckers. The whole university = occupational training equation has been drummed into them so much that the current generation of university administrators believe it too. Our institutes of higher learning will soon be TAFE colleges.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by tg123 · · Score: 1

      For a country that still thinks "primary production" being their main industry is a good thing, I think we would be shooting ourselves economically in the foot.

      We are a country whose children are taught that sport is the be-all and end-all of their education, there are a few good universities for the hard sciences, sure, but we have a nationally funded Institute of Sport, a mecca for a generation of kids who spend 3.9 years waiting for the next Olympics to start, so they can see their hero...

      I hear you . However this is also a good thing at least Australias not pretentious like France or super serious like America. you need balance a healthy mind and body.

    6. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by level4 · · Score: 1

      That is just the 23 wards at the centre. The population of Greater Tokyo, which is what most people refer to when they say "Tokyo", is more like 35 million.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Tokyo_Area

      --
      Let my new 7-digit UID be a lesson to all - write down your passwords.
    7. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by wisty · · Score: 1

      Nope. TAFE colleges are practical.

    8. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there are a few good universities for the hard sciences, sure, but we have a nationally funded Institute of Sport

      Which is probably a good thing. The Americans don't, and it appears that all their colleges sell out academics in the name of sport. Why on earth do you get a scholarship for your sporting ability?

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    9. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Government will be buying most, if not all, of the hardware from the EU and not the US. We have so many export restrictions on aerospace that Australia could never buy from us. And I think that's a good think because hopefully it send a message to our idiot Congress that other people around the world are perfectly capable of developing their own space program without us. Our aerospace industry desperately needs the business, but because of Congress, they can't get it.

      Also, it may help with our F-22 sales to you guys. Australia wants them but we can't sell them to you and the project here also desperately needs the sales. And I know the Australian Air Force is sick of those clunky F-111 from the 1960s!

    10. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      "For fuck's sake, we're closing down the entire Navy for 2 months for Christmas. We can't get enough people to staff our fricking marine defences (the most important, since we're an island) - but we're going to build a space industry now? With who?"

      So what do you guys do?

      Post a sign stating, "dont attack, gone on holiday."

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by dkf · · Score: 1

      Why on earth do you get a scholarship for your sporting ability?

      Because colleges make a lot of money from their TV deals. Don't tell me you were thinking they were there to teach or carry out research, were you?

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    12. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by laughing_badger · · Score: 1
      Join the European Space Agency and a proportion of the work equal to the proportion of the funds supplied has to be done in your country. Could help to stop the brain-drain.

      See here for more info.

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
    13. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Close... Try FAFSFA

      Bruce "Who's on the phone?"
      Beryl "It's the Fucking Australian Fucking Space Fucking Agency again. They want to sell us some raffle tickets. They need $5000 to buy some hydrogen."
      Bruce "What for?"
      Beryl "I dunno!"
      Bruce "Tell them to take a walk."

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    14. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by caluml · · Score: 1

      I was born in South Australia, we have a military base there that is BIGGER THAN ENGLAND

      Really? Area: 130,395 km, 50,346 sq mi. Does it have anything meaningful in it, or is it just a large fenced off empty space? The base I mean, not England. :)

    15. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      No, we just get the flyboys to turn their F/A-18s into submarines for the holiday season...

    16. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about collaborating with some ASEAN-member nations? Syria and Turkey are forming an economic pact because the EU won't invite Turkey in. The EU is thinking of inviting some but not all north African nations to participate in a regional economic boom. why not invite the Singaporeans, Indons, Thais, Phillipinos and/or Malaysian scientists and give them a playground. Further encourage the next generation to participate via the internets...

    17. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it appears that all their colleges sell out academics in the name of sport.

      Even MIT. It's sad - they cut funding for the CS dept. to buy a new stadium for the football team. I hear Sussman doesn't even have an office anymore and has to work out of the library.

      A shame, really.

    18. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've often thought that Australia was uniquely situated socially politically and geographically for a truely international space centre.

      For starters, we're a pretty relaxed bunch who most people in the world love to come visit.
      I'm constantly surprised by any immigrant or foreign student/traveller that I meet. They always say they love this place and us crazy people.

      Politically, we've had a bit of damage done of late by our previous governments, but there's a lot of good will out there for us. We tend to avoid treading on toes, and for the most part seem to get along with everyone. Even Saddam loved us for our wheat - but that's another scandal :p

      I think if it were to be organised right, with no favour based on nationality, and no restrictions on intellectual property, regulations on communications etc, we could easily create an international campus where the great researchers congregate. The key to it being trusted in my opinion is that all of the research would have to be completely open and available to anyone.

      If it were internationally funded and EVERY country were encouraged to participate, we might even see the start of some real global cooperation and technological advances that arent precipitated by war or ideology.

      Geographically, we have salt pans that rival the USA's. We have vast unpopulated areas to conduct whatever research is required. For example the British used our deserts for their nuclear testing in the 50's.

      I see no reason we couldnt create a truely world class research and launch facility connected to a major capital city via a high speed maglev train. After all, if you're going to research space, we should really try and use all of the best technologies on the ground to support the efforts.

      I think it's time that we start planning the international research and exploration centre.

      IREC. It has a gen Y ring to it doesnt it :p

    19. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by DarkEmpath · · Score: 1

      but we're going to build a space industry now? With who?

      Nauru? It could be our "Cosmic Solution".

    20. Re:I agree, but let's keep it in perspective by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      We just let the weather do the defending.

  11. Why do you 'need' a space agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Australia, or any country for that matter, need a space agency? In the absence of any space agencies in any country, wouldn't those interested in furthering space exploration bankroll projects in the market?

    1. Re:Why do you 'need' a space agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it has got lots of space?

  12. Re:I heard we had a fledgling agency in the 50's . by thermian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... until the US and the Brits told us "not to worry about it", and that was the end of that ...

    Well it was more that the UK was reluctant to spend too much money on their space program, even though they actually got Blue Streak rocket working as a space delivery system, which they launched from Woomera, Australia, which would have got all the business that Arianne now has.

    Since the Australian governments space program at the time was tied to the UK effort (they wanted to have their very own space port which other countries would use, primarily the UK), and they had no native spacecraft research program, that killed the Australian effort, regardless of what the Australian government wanted.

    On the other hand Australia has been and remains a critically important part of the NASA space exploration program through its radio telescopes. In fact it was they who captured the footage of Neil Armstrong stepping on to the Moon for the first time.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  13. Obligatory comparison to Canada. by chathamhouse · · Score: 1

    Canada: 30 Million people, has a Space Agency and "une agence spatiale".
    Australia: 21 Million people, no Space Agency

    Crikey, a project like the Canadarm would be cool, eh?

    1. Re:Obligatory comparison to Canada. by level4 · · Score: 4, Funny

      /Users/level4/projects/slashdot-reply/language/lib/parse_local_slang.rb:34: syntax error, unexpected 'eh', expecting 'mate'
           Crikey, a project like the Canadarm would be cool, eh?
                                                              ^
          from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
          from ./slashdot-reply.rb:46:in `discern_nationality_from_linguistic_traits'
          from ./slashdot-reply.rb:46:in `each'
          from ./slashdot-reply.rb:54:in `process_speech'
          from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require'
          from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
          from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/init.rb:253:in `load_modules'
          from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/init.rb:251:in `each'
          from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/init.rb:251:in `load_modules'
          from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/init.rb:21:in `setup'
          from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:54:in `start'
          from /usr/bin/irb:13

      --
      Let my new 7-digit UID be a lesson to all - write down your passwords.
    2. Re:Obligatory comparison to Canada. by CaptainDefragged · · Score: 1

      including lib_lang_nz may help!

      --
      Don't tailgate - the end is near!
    3. Re:Obligatory comparison to Canada. by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      choice!

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  14. First Aussie on the Moon by bazorg · · Score: 3, Funny

    "a small step for a man... Crikey! look at the size of that beauty!"

    1. Re:First Aussie on the Moon by glamb · · Score: 1

      Oh, for a +1 funny point!

    2. Re:First Aussie on the Moon by deniable · · Score: 1

      "Bloody hell, check out the size of this beach. Get some snags on the barbie."

  15. Re:I heard we had a fledgling agency in the 50's . by dbIII · · Score: 1
    And we really swore a blue streak about that. We've had a bit of space work over the last twenty years though since NASA told us to scram.

    To be serious, apparently a few useful things came out of early projects like blue streak. NASA contracts work out all over the world so there are Australian efforts in things like scramjets, skin tight spacesuits and hubble telescope parts. I had the luck to have a few classes presented by Ray Stalker so got to hear enough about orbital mechanics, hypersonic flight and scramjets to get excited about it (but not enough to remotely resemble a rocket scientist).

  16. Try public transport first by syousef · · Score: 1

    I'm all for space research but the Australian Federal and State Governments couldn't organize a pissup in a brewery. Sydney's public transport is awful and continually getting worse. Our roads are getting clogged and the solution proposed is to increase taxes, raise fares, decrease the size of the carriages on our trains, and split up the network. Space travel? We can't even get from the suburbs into town!!!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Try public transport first by caluml · · Score: 1

      Our roads are getting clogged and the solution proposed is to increase taxes, raise fares, decrease the size of the carriages on our trains, and split up the network. Space travel? We can't even get from the suburbs into town!!!

      That's the UK's answer too. Guess it's all part of the Anglo-Saxon economic model.

    2. Re:Try public transport first by HJED · · Score: 1

      Yes, there so organized we will probably have a NSW Space Agency and a WA Space Agency or something instead of a federal Agency.
      like our education system that is...

      --
      null
  17. Australian space filter by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    They want to remove the dirty parts from space, like Uranus, and the full moon. And not to speak of the dirty images that appear when you connect the right dots.

  18. Zero G barbie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA has piss recycling now and doesn't need help from Fosters. But maybe you could make a barbecue design for the space station...

  19. Re:I heard we had a fledgling agency in the 50's . by The+Sith+Lord · · Score: 1

    In fact it was they who captured the footage of Neil Armstrong stepping on to the Moon for the first time.

    Take THAT rest of the world !

  20. Press any key by andrikos · · Score: 0, Troll

    Do they also need an agency for each other key of the keyboard?

  21. Re:It needs a clue first - by tg123 · · Score: 1

    "I think there is a "race to the bottom" between the US, UK, and Australia as far as this goes anyways."

    as apposed to countries like china or any asian or middle eastern country, which are just beacons of freedom.

    I hope your being sarcastic. (Calm thoughts , Calm thoughts) Asian countries being beacons of freedom thats going to far !!! Someone might actually believe you. This is slashdot were everything typed is treated as fact after all. Australia is the type of country that follows other countries examples: Wars (1,2 ,Vietnam , Korea ,Iraq ) Tv Broadcasting (PAL). Internet filtering is no different . I think it would be the great for Australia to have a space program. The problem is that Australia's political system is not up to the task. Wheres the votes in a Space Program ? It would be too hard for the government of the day to explain why money is being spent on a Space program when it could be directed for example to the aged care or the health system. This will end up in the too hard basket.

  22. The UK govn was very short sighted by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't remember the exact quote but I think the government at the time saw no future in satellite comms. Another triumph for arts educated politicians with all the technical insight of Mr Bean and the foresight of a comatose goldfish.

    1. Re:The UK govn was very short sighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vote 1 Binky the Comatose Goldfish!

    2. Re:The UK govn was very short sighted by shplorb · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the Australian government back at the dawn of programmable digital computers. The CSIRO built one of the first in the world (I think they named it CSIRAC) but the government at the time basically said "Australia's future is in sheep". Australian governments have always had a tendency to shoot us in the foot when it comes to science and technology development.

  23. Australia wasting talent by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I'm not the only one...

    After my IT degree, I considered enrolling in a space engineering degree at the University of Queensland. It's got a good reputation, as it hosts the famous, but criminally underfunded Centre for Hypersonics. Sadly, after doing my sums, I worked out that it wasn't going to be worth my while if after five years, I ended up on the mines rather than designing spacecraft.

    Agreed with other posters, Australia _DOES_ need to pull its head out of its arse and start making science and technology a priority. Sadly, I think that Australia's bias against anything clever is cultural and ingrained. This means that anybody with any ambition, and who wants to work with technology does what I did three years ago, and emigrate.

    1. Re:Australia wasting talent by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Thank you for spelling 'arse' properly.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    2. Re:Australia wasting talent by bds1986 · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, where'd you emigrate to?

    3. Re:Australia wasting talent by deniable · · Score: 1

      Talent is one of our big exports. I was watching an interview with Baz Luhrman last night and he mentioned film is the same way. Wherever you go in the world, you'll find Australians. All of our good people can find more work elsewhere. This is true in most fields.

  24. Does this mean we're getting nukes? by pnevin · · Score: 1

    Look out New Zealand!

  25. But at what cost? by PinkyDead · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even after they put all that money into a lunar mission, Australia still has a better cricket team.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:But at what cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, you didn't watch the last test series?

    2. Re:But at what cost? by citizen_senior · · Score: 0

      Was that not "Esc :wq!" Just a thought - excuse it please.

    3. Re:But at what cost? by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      Was that not "Esc :wq!" Just a though

      Like God wasn't already in command mode ... duh!

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    4. Re:But at what cost? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      ???

      Been hiding under a rock? The Indians just spanked us.

  26. Space Industry by Davemania · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Australia needs to expand its high tech industry. Currently we don't have the a internationally competitive aerospace or high-tech industry to support a space program and that's one our big problems. The majority of Australian export are primary goods that is eventually made into something that is sold at significant higher price than what we export because Australia doesn't have a significant industry that can manufacture the goods. I think a major into space industry with home grown technology will do more good than just putting satellites into space and this requires major investment not just at the space program.

    1. Re:Space Industry by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      This right here is why we should have a space agency and launch capabilities. At the very least, we have an equatorial strip of land on which we could put a space port for satellite launches. It is absurd that Australia lives as a 1st world country with the export profile of a 3rd world one and is going to bite us in the ass when our natural resource production inevitably starts to slow down - we desperately need high tech local production, and we kind of need it now. Space is good, because it requires a diverse range of high-tech innovative technology - if we could foster just a small portion of manufacturing capacity like this locally, we'd be in a better position to commercialize our innovations.

    2. Re:Space Industry by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure. I'm with you, but I'm very pessimistic about getting our act together and actually doing it.
      90% of our highly trained tech/science/computer grads and other highly skilled, get snapped up overseas.
      Who's going to do it? Sounds like a promise that's hard to keep. I hope I'm proved wrong though.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  27. For better spying on their people? by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    Of course they need a space program, that way they can keep the best eye from the sky on all their people all the time. Australia is one of the toughest police states in the western world now after the USA and Britain.

    Why is it that we techies just keep inventing better ways to be controlled by the masters of the universe?

    Just say no.

    If you are in a society that has the privilege just say no to your government's actions that cause evil (harm to others) in the world.

  28. Ordinary Aussie Life by ishnaf · · Score: 1

    "Australia is the only [first world country] without a Space Agency, which impacts on many aspects of ordinary life"

    Totally! I'm Australian and I'm *sick* of this not having a space agency! Every day, someone's all like "Can you launch this into orbit mate?" and I'm all bloody like "Nah, ya see, we don't have a space agency mate!", so they go "Throw another shrimp on the barbie then mate!". And then I ride my Kangaroo home, because my bloody spaceship is still in the bloody hangar. Strewth.

    1. Re:Ordinary Aussie Life by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Why not just ask Skippy? She seems to manage everything, launching a satellite into orbit wouldn't be too hard.

  29. ASRI vs. SIAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm. I think this Space Industry Advisory Council (SIAC) would be much cooler than ASRI.

    Especially if they had an additional branch, the Astral Manned-missions for Navigation and Exploration (AMNE).

  30. Australia should NOT have a space agency! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone's shooting stuff into space these days. Australia should be the one that does things differently. Instead of building a space program, they should use the money they would spend on shooting satellites into space on a program to build robots to drill to the center of the Earth.

    You know. Down under.

    1. Re:Australia should NOT have a space agency! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most clever :) Nice one!

  31. Do they have an aircraft industry yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, just asking. Seems like aircraft might come before space.

  32. Space Kangaroos? by Xphile101361 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that we'll have a successful launch of a Kangaroo into space? Maybe a Drop Bear?

  33. Commercial Spaceport by jaminJay · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and whatever happened to the proposed commercial spaceport based on Christmas Island? From years ago. Which was supposed to begin launches soon if not already.

    Seriously, WTF?

    --
    Leela: "Is all the work done by children?" Alien: "No, not the whipping."
    1. Re:Commercial Spaceport by nick79au · · Score: 0

      We turned it in to an immigration detention centre.

  34. NASA? by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey! Maybe they can call it the National Australian Space Agency! That'll be real confusing.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    1. Re:NASA? by deniable · · Score: 1

      Australian Research into Space Exploration.

    2. Re:NASA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more the Australian Space Service.

    3. Re:NASA? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      A.R.S.E. = Australian
      A.S.S. = US
      Get your regional settings right.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  35. Coordinated effort by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe they can cooperate with other countries? In a various cases some of the countries mentioned are rather crowded and lacking in the land for such things. Seems that far out in the remote outback deserts of Australia would be a really *good* location for a launchpad or something of the like. No people, not necessarily a lot of wildlife, but still fairly accessible by air, etc.

  36. Aussie rules re-entry by Schroedi · · Score: 1

    That means: none of that sissy heat-shield armor plating. Oi! Oi! Oi!

  37. HUMOR, not off-topic! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Jesus, some of you modders do not seem to HAVE any sense of humor.

  38. Space marsupials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will you do your first test runs with kangaroos and koalas?

  39. ABSOLUTELY Australia needs its own space agency! by mmell · · Score: 1

    Otherwise, how will they ever get the Farscape module into orbit?

  40. new space agency by Earthpaladin · · Score: 1

    Personally, I wish in U.S. we would filter more of the information that comes our way. I mean do we really need those nigeria email scams? By the way, I know someone who's computer got a virus by his friend looking at porn on the internet. Personally, I would rather they filter the stuff then have to see it and have to deal with it. I think it would good if they did form a space agency. I hope it would work with the NASA, and perhaps other ones as well. I think if a bunch of nations got together and shared the burden we could get into space a whole lot sooner.

  41. It's no longer the lesser of evils by xarium · · Score: 1

    Thank you. The Sex Party appear to be taking up the slack that the other parties are inexplicably leaving.

    Labor and Liberal both have their fingers firmly up their bums. Recently the Greens withdrew their preference vote for Labor as a show of no-confidence - I believe Labor lost every seat that Greens withdrew their preference on. It seems the torch may soon pass to a new top-dog party if Labor and Liberal continue to become more similar (and, ironically, less liberal).

    The Sex Party seem to believe that education is the key to most problems (and taboos). I agree. Hopefully a lot of others do too.

  42. Sovereignty? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    We've already got the CIA spying on the Asia Pacific region from Pine Gap.