Slashdot Mirror


Object Lights Night Sky Across Canadian Prairies

clarkn0va writes "Witnesses as far as 720 kilometers apart reported seeing what looked like a bright meteor falling somewhere on the Saskatchewan-Alberta boundary around 5:30 pm MT Thursday, according to the CBC. Here's video of the incident as seen from Edmonton."

125 comments

  1. Quick Poll by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Was it:

    1. An Autobot
    2. Precursor to an asteroid the size of Texas
    3. CowboyNeal
    1. Re:Quick Poll by kachakaach · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it reaches the ground, it's called a meteorite.

    2. Re:Quick Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. ???
      5. Profit!

    3. Re:Quick Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If is it written in /. , it's called either Funny, Informative or Interesting.

    4. Re:Quick Poll by dranga · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think it was somebody's tool bag burning up on re-entry.

      --
      Oh no, not again.
    5. Re:Quick Poll by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      4. A $2M tool belt

    6. Re:Quick Poll by nozzo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mod parent: (Score:5, Funny) Made me right chuckle :-)

    7. Re:Quick Poll by fyoder · · Score: 1

      If it reaches the ground, it's called a meteorite.

      Exactly. As the song says "Shooting star or meteor, whichever name you like, the minute it comes down to earth it's called a meteorite."

      What Is A Shooting Star?

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    8. Re:Quick Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of these. It was the Alberta Legislature's Christmas party.

    9. Re:Quick Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually used that line in the youtube video of it. Ah well.

    10. Re:Quick Poll by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      What do you call it if to hits the ground and comes out the other side back into space?

    11. Re:Quick Poll by kachakaach · · Score: 1

      What do you call it if to hits the ground and comes out the other side back into space?

      Dark Matter

      http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6933

    12. Re:Quick Poll by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      If you are referring to #2, note that the asteroid from Armageddon never reached the ground, although much debris did.

    13. Re:Quick Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is Obama's soul and power coming forth...some old name like Lucifer or something rather.
      Obama will now bring peace and prosperity to the world.

    14. Re:Quick Poll by tsa · · Score: 1

      Neutrino.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    15. Re:Quick Poll by Trogre · · Score: 1

      By that logic, every time a space shuttle lands it becomes a meteorite.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    16. Re:Quick Poll by Trogre · · Score: 1

      That would be the "precursor" part he mentioned :)

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    17. Re:Quick Poll by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    18. Re:Quick Poll by shawb · · Score: 1

      I was going to go with cheesecake jellybean...

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    19. Re:Quick Poll by Arboris+Clover · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, queue Steve Jablonsky's Arrival To Earth

      --
      Malignant Malevolent
    20. Re:Quick Poll by nozzo · · Score: 1

      Offtopic?! oh I see, english humour fails to impress ROW :-(

    21. Re:Quick Poll by kachakaach · · Score: 1

      By that logic, every time a space shuttle lands it becomes a meteorite.

      Not unless it started as an asteroid... but nice try.

  2. finally by steak · · Score: 5, Funny

    the aurora borealis shows its true face. the "northern lights" have lulled the canuckians into a false sense of security and now they are ready to attack.

    1. Re:finally by Kagura · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If anybody hasn't seen the video in the summary yet, watch it right away. My reaction was "holy CRAP". What a hell of a light show.

    2. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, let me just be the first to

      Welcome our new Aurora Borealian Overlords!

  3. Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meteor my ass. More cover-up about the fucking space bugs now running our world. Christ, as if GWB wassn't proof enough.

    1. Re:Bullshit. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't be retarded. Only a true human could be a dumb as GWB. I'm sure space bugs could do a much better job of running our country.

      I, for one, welcome our new space bug overlords.

    2. Re:Bullshit. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Meteor my ass. More cover-up about the fucking space bugs now running our world. Christ, as if GWB wassn't proof enough.

      FYI, Men In Black was not a documentary.

      "For Duty and Humanity!"

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  4. It's probably that tool bag by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Funny

    that what's-her-name dropped from the ISS.

    1. Re:It's probably that tool bag by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was thinking that missing spider, after being exposed to radiation from solar flares while in a hard vacuum, finally returned to earth.

      And it's mad.

    2. Re:It's probably that tool bag by owlnation · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that missing spider, after being exposed to radiation from solar flares while in a hard vacuum, finally returned to earth. And it's mad.

      And don't forget, it has tools too.

    3. Re:It's probably that tool bag by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

              I was thinking that missing spider, after being exposed to radiation from solar flares while in a hard vacuum, finally returned to earth. And it's mad.

      And don't forget, it has tools too.

      Tools?

      Great! See if it can fix that '77 Chevette rusting in your backyard!

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  5. The Sky is Falling!!! The Sky is Falling!!! by rjshirts · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Chicken Little got it right after all.
    Off to my bomb shelter. Let me know when it's all over.

  6. UFO by jeffhenson · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is what I saw fly over Oklahoma.

    I thought it was jet but it lacked the familiar colored blinking lights, was much brighter white, and moved faster.

    It moved from the south-southwest to the north-northeast.

    1. Re:UFO by sexybomber · · Score: 1

      Could be, dude. The angle seems about right. I guess it would depend on the observed trajectory over Canada.

    2. Re:UFO by Kagura · · Score: 1

      You may have seen a bright satellite. Sometimes they appear about the same brightness as a star, they have no flashing lights, and they travel at the same speed or faster than planes appear to. It's not at all uncommon to see them.

    3. Re:UFO by sexybomber · · Score: 1

      I know it's bad form to reply to my own post, but I thought I should correct myself. I checked Google Maps, did a few back-of-the-napkin calculations, and figured out that given that trajectory and assuming the meteor was traveling at about 10 km/sec, the Earth wouldn't have rotated enough during the meteor's flight to put Edmonton under its path.

      Although, maybe it broke up between Oklahoma and Canada, with one fragment careening off west. Certainly a plausible theory.

    4. Re:UFO by Khyber · · Score: 1

      AKA Iridium Flare. I see them all the time out here in the desert where there's a nice lack of light.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:UFO by Kagura · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. I have never seen Iridium flares. The only satellites I have seen are constantly moving dots of light with non-varying brightness. They look exactly like a star moving in a straight line at around the speed you would imagine an airplane to move at high altitude a great distance away. Here is a random link showing 75 different satellites that happened to be observed over a nine-day period.

      Here is a video of a great Iridium flare, and here is a video of a not-quite-so-great Iridium flare.

  7. Triangulate! Triangulate! by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With many reports coming in about what direction the object was seen in, can't one simply disregard any wild guesses as to how close it was, and just draw vectors based on the directions of the observers? With this many observers, one should quickly be able to pinpoint the flash, and where to look for meteorites.

  8. thursday?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Filmed about 5:30pm Thursday November 20th 2008

    This happened 2 days ago and it's just now making it on /.?

    The world could have ended and we'd have to wait 2 days before it makes it on here.

    1. Re:thursday?? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      why else visit slashdot from cleveland? when the world ends it will take a couple of days to register with both hence adding several days to your life.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:thursday?? by penginkun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot never could get the hang of Thursdays.

    3. Re:thursday?? by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it's any consolation, it'll probably be posted several more times before next Thursday.

    4. Re:thursday?? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I guess they wanted to be really sure it wasn't an ICBM.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    5. Re:thursday?? by floydman · · Score: 1

      sounds familiar:

      "the world is gonna end because of global warming.."
      "when?"
      "the day after tomorrow"
      Another scientist walks in..
      "That was two days ago"
      "My God, this makes it...TODAY!!"

      --
      The lunatic is in my head
    6. Re:thursday?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot Slow news for nerds?

    7. Re:thursday?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world could have ended and we'd have to wait 2 days before it makes it on here.

      It did. I managed to get the reboot time down from 7 days to 2 days, you insensitive clod.

      God.

    8. Re:thursday?? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of Ernst Stavro Blofeld's quote: "The satellite is at present over... Kansas. Well, if we destroy Kansas the world may not hear about it for years."

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  9. Missed this completely by tzhuge · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I first saw video of this on the local news, I had a hard time figuring out how I missed the entire sky being lit up like that. Then I realized that, as a slashdotter, I was naturally indoors at that time in the afternoon. The basement habitat is not conductive to observing astronomical events.... I think I will have to put a webcam on the roof.

  10. Alienhunters know this tactic well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can create what looks like a meteor falling to Earth as your landing, then after the successful landing hide your ship and drop some space debris (rocks if you like) on the ground. Voila!

    1. Re:Alienhunters know this tactic well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can create what looks like a meteor falling to Earth as your landing, then after the successful landing hide your ship and drop some space debris (rocks if you like) on the ground. Voila!

      Unless it was just a teaser.

  11. War of the worlds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we correlate the various observations, we should be able to get an estimate on its exact location.

    I want to be the first to welcome our new martian overlords.

    Unless they are from Uranus.

    *cough*

  12. Flares to Illuminate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian planes,
    known as White Swans to deliver relief aid to collapsed United Gulags of America.

    Cordially,
    Kilgore Trout

  13. It was... by Tastecicles · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a weather balloon.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:It was... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      ...marsh gas.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    2. Re:It was... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      dude, you not only missed the boat, you watched it drift away /then/ you jumped in the fast-flowing river after it...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    3. Re:It was... by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Netcraft just confirmed that Cory Doctorow died in a blogging accident.

      Truely an American icon.

  14. PM? by DarrenBaker · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe 05:30 MT is 5:30 AM MT, not PM.

    1. Re:PM? by jeffhenson · · Score: 1

      FTFA

      "A bright light lit up the sky around 5:30 MT Thursday evening..."

    2. Re:PM? by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      Hrmm... You appear to be correct - although I did read the article, I missed the 'evening' qualifier. ...Slowly backs out of room, hat in hand...

    3. Re:PM? by Sanat · · Score: 1

      thats OK

      Montana is so far back in the sticks that they don't get the Grand Ole Opry till Monday morning so maybe the meteor did go through in the morning everywhere else.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  15. There's only one logical explanation... by SIR_Taco · · Score: 2, Funny

    The mutant space spiders have arrived much sooner than expected. NASA has doomed us all!

    I, for one, welcome our new mutant space arachnid overlords

    --
    I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    1. Re:There's only one logical explanation... by edalytical · · Score: 4, Funny

      Too bad they caught fire on atmospheric entry. But yeah.

      I, for one, welcome our new burnt-to-a-crisp-exploded-on-impact-mutant-space-arachnid-overlords.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    2. Re:There's only one logical explanation... by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      It was just another QANTAS jet having problems!

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    3. Re:There's only one logical explanation... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Too bad they caught fire on atmospheric entry. But yeah.

      I, for one, welcome our new burnt-to-a-crisp-exploded-on-impact-mutant-space-arachnid-overlords.

      You are whistling in the wind - it has the tools dropped by that astronaut. Using space junk to create a heat shield and an armored vehicle, it is even now advancing on Russia for its revenge. Then it will come to get those who mocked it.

      You have been warned.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  16. Hmm by lastomega7 · · Score: 1

    Now where's my tin-foil tuque when I need it??

    1. Re:Hmm by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      I prefer my tin-foil fedora. Or on warm days, my fez.

  17. It's the cop firing a flare gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geesh, you canadians are so gullable.
    Its obvious that it's a flare, likely fired from the cop's own flare gun.
    It was a really big flare gun, probably a yard wide because the flare obviously goes behind distant clouds. I guess at that distance it would have to be a big flare also... may a few feet in diameter and to sustain the G-force from being fired from the cop's big-ass flare gun, it would have to be made of stone or something...maybe iron. So the hick canadians when they find this hot stone or blob of iron, they'll probably say it's a meteorite, but you and I (and the cop) will all know it's just a spent-flare and we'll all have a good laugh and go out for donuts at the local Tim Horton's

    1. Re:It's the cop firing a flare gun by Bozzio · · Score: 1

      Hey! Get back under the stairs!

      --
      I just pooped your party.
  18. Deployment Imminent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unwitting test subjects in Edmonton, only question is, when full operation commences.

  19. I saw it from the SF Bay Area by Matt+Perry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in the San Francisco Bay Area and I saw it this past week. I was leaving work and turned north out of the parking lot and it was shooting across the sky to the west. It was very green. I remember that much. If this thing landed in Canada then it must have been huge for me to see it from California.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:I saw it from the SF Bay Area by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

      Matt, there was a forecast meteor shower that peaked on Tuesday morning. At about 5:40 AM Tuesday morning I saw a bright meteor over Oakland airport from the central parking lot. At about 6:45 PM Wednesday I saw another looking South in Las Vegas.

    2. Re:I saw it from the SF Bay Area by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, those were both on Tuesday.

    3. Re:I saw it from the SF Bay Area by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      Then I probably saw a different meteor altogether. It was still stunning!

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  20. smaller object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saw a small meteor go over the Ottawa area somewhere between 8h30pm local time, last night. Some fragment of or a smaller object traveling with this bigger object maybe?

  21. Fireballs better than piddly shooting stars. by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've seen a lot of "shooting stars" in my time, but they don't compare at all to seeing a meteor fireball like this.
    I managed to see two in a one month period back in 2001, when leaving the office at 330-430 at night. (London, Ontario, August 20th for the first one)

    One was silent, but the other one roared like a jet shortly after it passed. I assumed that the second one was smaller but appeared the same size because it was much closer, hence the sound.

    Moments like that make me wish we had the ability to capture our memories digitally for playback.

    1. Re:Fireballs better than piddly shooting stars. by gijoel · · Score: 1

      If you had lived in London, England, then I would have said it was another damn Christmass invasion.

      But as you're in Canada I'd say it's just a Soviet Nuclear sat, spreading radioactive joy over the Great White North.

    2. Re:Fireballs better than piddly shooting stars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah i live in western NSW, Australia and if i lay outside on a clear night (read most nights) i can see probably between 5-20 shooting stars a night. But those are just flashes that last from half a second to a few seconds. This is something entirely diffrent! Would have been amazing to see.

    3. Re:Fireballs better than piddly shooting stars. by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Just drive out to the countryside when a big meteor shower comes in. I drove out into the desert a few years back for one of the big Leonid events and I saw hundreds, although none was a big as this one of course. You could even hear a couple.

  22. Leonids by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
    The Leonids meteor shower peaked on the 17th. I saw two bright meteors just going about my day. One Tuesday morning 5:45 over Oakland airport, one that evening 6:45 PM looking Southward from Las Vegas. Both observations were from areas with bright street lighting, and were very bright nonetheless.

    Bruce

  23. Seconds 12-14 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pause and click through seconds 12 - 14 on the video. It flashes bright, then dim then bright... multiple explosions... first the left Nacell then the right.

  24. Better video by antikaos · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sv2Ozovf9Ls you can really see it fragmenting in some of those shots

    --
    I don't believe you, I'm here for a seat on the secret spaceship.
    1. Re:Better video by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except some of the shots are even from 1997

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  25. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With many reports coming in about what direction the object was seen in, can't one simply disregard any wild guesses as to how close it was, and just draw vectors based on the directions of the observers? With this many observers, one should quickly be able to pinpoint the flash, and where to look for meteorites.

    Ok, I'll start. It was traveling left to right and appeared to land, oh maybe, 100-150km away a little (10-20 degrees) to my right.

    With a few more reports like this we should be able to pinpoint the impact to within a few meters.

    ;-)

  26. Ob Quote by rlp · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our new bolide overlords.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  27. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    A couple of problems that are likely to crop up:

    Almost all of your observers are going to be located quite close together, in any urban centers. Particularly since there's going to be a lot of uncertainty in the direction they report.

    You might be able to get an approximate track by triangulation, but the point at the end of that track is going to have a huge uncertainty associated with it.

  28. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have pointed out, you're unlikely to get more than a general idea where it fell. That path is a 3D track, so you need more than a few observers. The police video is real nice, since you've got a compass reading and you might be able to sync up the time using flashes. Someway saying, over that way, isn't going to help much.

    Which reminds me of one of the problems with people sighting objects in the sky. They lack the usual reference points. When I hear people say, it was huge and flying really fast. I think, wasn't huge, but much closer and slower than you thought. Then they'll say, "It couldn't be man made. Something that large couldn't change directions at such high speeds." Yup, another kook.

  29. The aliens are here! ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The aliens are here! ... the aliens are here!! ... we interrupt this broadcast to bring you shocking news... "No one would have believed in the last years of...

    Seeing the YouTube video, I was reminded of the Orson Welles first radio broadcast of The War of the Worlds, that shocked a lot of people, almost exactly 70 years ago this month. The world at least seems to have moved on a bit from the reaction back then. Now its more like, oh cool, light show. :)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds_(radio)

    I guess now we have seen far worse in films, the world is a bit less scared of broadcasts like this. (In a way, I guess War of the Worlds was the first reality style story way before films like Cloverfield/Blair Witch made real broadcast like stories popular). Its interesting its almost exactly 70 years ago this month. :)

    1. Re:The aliens are here! ... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      Back in the radio days, it was actually quite common to deliver fiction in a "you're there" format. WotW actually changed all that, what with the mass panic, dozens of suicides, and general craziness that followed it. You'll notice that the format of WotW still isn't followed: they don't do live news coverage of fake events.

      There was a bad remake of WotW back in the late eighties or early nineties done in a live news format. There was a near-constant scroll at the bottom reminding viewers this was fiction and not to be alarmed. It ended with the world (presumably) getting destroyed by...umm...meteors.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    2. Re:The aliens are here! ... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      WotW actually changed all that, what with the mass panic, dozens of suicides, and general craziness that followed it.

      There were no suicides. There was one reported contemplated suicide (a husband finding his wife listening to show with a handful of sleeping pills, saying, "I'd rather go out this way than that!"), but no one actually committed suicide in response to the 1938 October 30th Orson Welles broadcast.

      In later adaptations for other countries (notably Peru), it had prompted outrage amongst listeners after the fact, prompting them to burn down a radio station in a riot, killing the people inside.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  30. Strange objects over Western Canada ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if they could just find three wise men and a virgin, they could do a nativity scene.

  31. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's not rocket science! Oh wait...

  32. 720 km? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    720 kilometers? How many football fields is that?

    1. Re:720 km? by konadelux · · Score: 1

      7200 Canadian football fields :)

  33. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by Shin-LaC · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily. Assuming the error made by people in reporting the direction is essentially random, by the law of large numbers the average of thousands or reports from a given city should be quite close to the actual direction of the impact point from that city.

  34. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Yes, but you're only going to get one reasonable vector per city. Take a look at a map of mid to northern Alberta. See all the cities? The meteor was visible over a wide area, but a given uncertainty in direction is going to give you a bigger uncertainty in location, the farther away you are, so nearby observations are much more valuable than far away ones. You'd also want to get some observations from north of the track as well.

  35. High or low altitude? by bpjk · · Score: 1
    I thought the consensus nowadays was that meteors stop burning/glowing ate dozens of kilometers of altitude (it's mentioned in some of the linked reports as well)

    However, in some of the footage the thing can be see to go through a layer of clouds.

    Is it possible for clouds to be that high up?

    1. Re:High or low altitude? by konadelux · · Score: 1

      Reading about it, it seems that it's a trick played by the curvature of the earth; the object looks a lot closer than it really is.

    2. Re:High or low altitude? by bpjk · · Score: 1
      If that was the case, the clouds would be subject to the same effect so there would be no difference between clouds and meteor.

      Also, even if that was an effect that played here, seeing the thing pass *through* a layer of cloud makes that point if relevant: if it passes through clouds, the clouds and the meteor must be at a similar altitude.

    3. Re:High or low altitude? by konadelux · · Score: 1

      For sure, but watching the video linked in the summary closely, it looks like it goes *below* the clouds but I can't actually see it go through them, which could be a trick of perspective.

      Other videos might show differently of course.

    4. Re:High or low altitude? by bpjk · · Score: 1

      Hmm, looking at several videos again, you're right. My mistake...

      * Note to self: brain before blab

    5. Re:High or low altitude? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      I saw the Sun "go through a layer of clouds" this evening, and its altitude was considerably higher.

      Look again at the video, thinking of it as a high-speed sunset. The meteor looked like it was heading more or less straight down, but it was likely heading mostly toward or away from the observer.

  36. FYI by edalytical · · Score: 1

    FYI: the world did end. I hope this doesn't interfere with any plans you may have made. I wouldn't count on /. posting a story though. Truth be told, no one seems to have noticed except me. Very strange.

    --
    Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
  37. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you reacting like you're living in the 18th century? Nowadays there are tons of weather/military satellites monitoring the Earth, you just have to ask their operators.

    A weather satellite captured a similar event in October:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Eumetsat-composite-2008TC3-impact.jpg

  38. And the video of that mishap: by CptnHarlock · · Score: 1
    --
    $HOME is where the .*shrc is
    -- silver_p
    1. Re:And the video of that mishap: by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      gets me why they couldn't just hitch one of the other astronauts up to one of those MMUs and go after it...? Or, maybe they don't have any anywhere on board the shuttle or the ISS. Might be a good plan to drop a couple off on the next mission...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  39. Someone at /. better check the code... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    from the front page a minute ago:

    Science: Object Lights Night Sky Across Canadian Prairies 75 of 70 comments

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  40. Just in time for Thanksgiving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roasted ET with Alfredo Sauce.

    Tastes just like chicken!

  41. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > Assuming the error made by people in reporting the direction is essentially random...

    I doubt that's a valid assumption. Besides, few, if any, are going to report the direction as anything more than "to the North" or "a little East of North".

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  42. BLAME CANADA! by religious+freak · · Score: 2, Funny

    At last George Bush's final master stroke just weeks before his term ends - the invasion of Canada.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:BLAME CANADA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut the fuck up, bitch ass trick.

    2. Re:BLAME CANADA! by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      It was thought to be an ordinary falling star, but the next day there was a huge crater in the middle of the Common.

  43. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by MachDelta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're already working on it. Reports have come in from as far away as British Columbia. Lots of people saw it in cities all over Alberta and Saskatchewan. Assuming they can get a good vector from the two major population centers that saw it (Edmonton and Saskatoon), finding it should be possible given enough time. They already have it narrowed down to somewhere in the south of Lloydminster, east of Wainwright, north of Provost, west of Cut Knife area. Granted that is a massive area (something the size of Yellowstone National park) but with futher refinements they'll come closer and closer. The real problem at this point is racing against the first snowfall that sticks. The area is having an unusually warm start to winter and snow could come any week. Once that happens the chances of finding any meteorite remains diminish considerably.

  44. That would explain it... by captmonkey · · Score: 1

    I'm presently in Saskatoon, SK and I was out driving around with the gf. I noticed a flash in the sky that was as bright as day for a few seconds. We both wondered what it was and figured it couldn't be lightning - it was snowing at the time. I guess we found that missing spider from the ISS...

    --
    this is worse than the time a racoon got in the copier
  45. Obligatory Buckaroo Banzai quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perfect Tommy: "Space monsters, my ass."

  46. Ground support by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    If you had lived in London, England, then I would have said it was another damn Christmass invasion.

    Don't complain. --Since the Doctor is partly funded by the CBC, I rather hope Canada will have its turn at being invaded this Christmas. Not getting my hopes up, though. The CN Tower being cast into shadow by a monolithic space vessel might look cool, but wouldn't carry the same emotional impact as any one of a half dozen London landmarks. On the plus side, though, the happy-go-lucky-superhuman Mounties (the fictional ones, anyway), would grasp what the Doctor is all about instantly, so there'd be plenty of enthusiastic ground support.

    -FL

  47. No, no! It was. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Paper lanterns.

    Venus.

    Mass hallucination.

    A military jet.

    Lens flare.

    Two guys with planks.

    In a swamp.

    -FL

  48. This is hardly unique these days. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We've been having a lot of this sort of thing lately. --Not all of them get this much notice, or accurate coverage. --There was a report of a 'plane' going down over some American town a week or so back, creating a huge aerial show and loud bang, putting the residents and authorities into a tizzy. --The only thing was that no planes were reported missing and they didn't find any wreckage.

    I half suspect when we get one of the big ones that the PTB will have chutzpah to call it a terrorist nuke if they can get away with it.

    A skimming of noted events for October. . .

    Astronomy enthusiast Howard Edin reports that he was looking in the opposite direction at the time, but saw the whole observing field light up and at first thought someone had turned on their car headlights.

    Reports came from residents from Carmel Valley to Salinas of a fireball shooting through the Tuesday night sky and hitting the Earth. A sheriff's deputy patrolling Carmel Valley saw it and thought enough of it to call for reinforcements.

    IT appeared against the early evening sky like a flare - moments later roofs rattled and verandas shook as it crashed to earth.

    [...]The Evening Telegraph has been inundated with calls and e-mails from readers who saw a strange fireball cutting a swath across the heavens[...]

    For the second time this year, The University of Western Ontario Meteor Group has captured incredibly rare video footage of a meteor falling to Earth.

    A bright light sped across the sky, followed by a loud explosion. Osborne County Sheriff Curtis Miner tells KSAL News that it was not an unidentified flying object, or anything sinister. It was a large meteor.

    -FL

  49. Re:Triangulate! Triangulate! by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

    While the meteor was visible over a wide enough area that triangulation of its location at any single instant would be possible, unfortunately it was moving kind of fast, so the timing of the separate observations becomes critical. Unfortunately, the observers neither synchronized their watches beforehand, nor in most cases recorded the exact time of their observations.

    AIR, there was an ammonia tank cast off by the ISS recently that was expected to mostly burn up on reentry, but some pieces were probably going to make it to ground. Could this have been it?

  50. These were just basketballs and volkswagens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real deal must be the size of Texas!

    Cue Aerosmith and fly in Bruce Willis and his drilling team.