Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Achieve Mental Body-Swapping

SpaceAdmiral notes the news that scientists have succeeded in convincing experiment subjects that a mannequin's body is their own, and even feeling at home in the body of someone of the opposite sex. The effect could prove useful in virtual reality applications and in robot technology. Here's the paper on PLoS ONE.

297 comments

  1. Ghost in the Shell by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This experiment opens an interesting possibility in the field of full body replacements, so far a topic purely in the realm of sci-fi, anime and cyberpunk. At the same time, it makes me wonder even more if the Major's original organic body may in fact have been male, with little to no adaptation discomfort after the procedure...

    1. Re:Ghost in the Shell by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Funny

      /cry

      Please don't introduce thoughts like this into my brain when talking about hot female characters... I'll never be able to look at her the same way again!

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch GiTS:SAC Second Gig for the story on how the Major became who she is. ;-)

    3. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ghost in the Shell is trash.

      The first one is your typical hyper-complicated (to make it seem intelligent when it is in fact simply ridiculous) anime with ridiculous robots and sexy female combatants.

      It's great for action and style, but terrible for sci-fi. Anyone who says it's deep or has any meaning is either delusional, or has never seen any sci-fi ever.

      Everything after (Innocence, Stand Alone Complex, whatever else they crank out) is utter trash, on the level of SAW sequels.

      Sorry.

    4. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /cry

      Please don't introduce thoughts like this into my brain when talking about hot female characters... I'll never be able to look at her the same way again!

      Don't worry, an episode of GITS 2.0(?) showed she was in fact a girl.

    5. Re:Ghost in the Shell by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      You're right, I had forgot about that. Of course, it doesn't rule out the possibility that she had a male cybernetic body at some point... O.o

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    6. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or how about mind-controlled battlefield terminators? Where the soldiers have their minds linked up to robots and fight from a safe, remote location? And when everyone has this technology fighting wars would be just like a really expensive video game.

    7. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Ultra64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The first one is your typical hyper-complicated (to make it seem intelligent when it is in fact simply ridiculous)...

      You *could* just admit you didn't understand it rather than whining about it.

    8. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      Shagadelic baby! Pretty kinky!

      Don't hurt me now... Meeewoww!

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    9. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

      Because when you run out of "lives" they'll just send you out there in person. Or the facility you are 'playing' from will be nuked from orbit. Just to be sure.

    10. Re:Ghost in the Shell by hardburn · · Score: 1

      That's Stand Alone Complex, though. The earlier movies and the magna are all different universes that can and do contridict each other.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    11. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Thansal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      She repeatedly mentions she has no interest in a male body (generally when talking to Batou), we also get a couple flashbacks to various points in her past where she is still in a female cyber body.

      Don't worry, your fapping is perfectly safe from your homophobic fears :)

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    12. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Troll

      [...] your typical hyper-complicated (to make it seem intelligent when it is in fact simply ridiculous) anime[...]

      - hyper-complicated: What idiots say when they are unable to understand things that go a bit over the average Joe's head.
      - ridiculous: What idiots say when they lack the phantasy to understand how this is possible.

      Seriously. How many great movies god destroyed by retarded critics and watchers who did not get it?
      "Revolver" is one example. It's a brilliant movie. But you require a brain for it. And it did not even made it to german cinemas, because most british people did not understand it and therefore hated it (instead of themselves).
      Or Ju-On (1&2). You have to have phantasy to feel the horror in it. Someone with a numb mind (like a friend of mine) hated it. He told me that "nothing was happening", while in fact tons of shit was happening just above the subconcious level. He's more of a gore type.

      And then they praise total "explain everything and show it right in your face so you fuckin' get it" trash like Hellboy and Saw.
      Good thing you at least hated the Saw sequels

      .

      Let me make a quick judgement: From my standpoint and the information you gave me about you, you seem to be trash yourself. :P

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    13. Re:Ghost in the Shell by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't worry, your fapping is perfectly safe from your homophobic fears :)

      I'm guessing you were joking, since I certainly have been joking about this, but I do feel the need to point something out seriously. Not being comfortable with someone you were attracted to turning out to be male isn't homophobia in the least. Homophobia is having negative reactions towards other people who are gay. Not being comfortable with gayness for yourself, though, is perfectly acceptable. Why choose such a negative-laced word?

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    14. Re:Ghost in the Shell by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Read 'Gottlos' by Colin Kapp. It's an excellent short story covering exactly this topic.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    15. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      Crap. There goes my short story idea.

    16. Re:Ghost in the Shell by genner · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, your fapping is perfectly safe from your homophobic fears :)

      Good, I as worried for a moment.

    17. Re:Ghost in the Shell by genner · · Score: 1

      That's Stand Alone Complex, though. The earlier movies and the magna are all different universes that can and do contridict each other.

      They don't contradict. It's all a vast connection of flashbacks and dream sequences that only seem to contradict each other. Layers apon layers.

    18. Re:Ghost in the Shell by butterflysrage · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the term you are thinking of is 'internalized homophobia', and it too is incorrect in this case. Internalized homophobia would be if you felt bad about your attraction BECAUSE it was same-sex, male to female attraction, regardless of the bits involved, is heterosexual by its very nature and would therefor not fall under homophobia, internalized or otherwise.

      being uncomfortable/hostile/bad reaction of your choice about someone being a different gender or sex then you expected would be transphobia.

      the more you know (insert shooting_star.gif here)

      but I would dispute the "perfectly acceptable" part of your point too... many people commit suicide every year because they are unable to accept their sexuality, many more are assaulted, raped or murdered by others who lash out because of their internalized homophobia. Call me a leftist nutter, but anything that gets thousands of people killed yearly is not something I would tag as "perfectly acceptable".

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    19. Re:Ghost in the Shell by philspear · · Score: 1

      Anyone who says it's deep or has any meaning is either delusional, or has never seen any sci-fi ever.

      Or, they have, and have realized that far, far better than "real" sci fi are

      ...ridiculous robots and sexy female combatants.

    20. Re:Ghost in the Shell by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but I would dispute the "perfectly acceptable" part of your point too... many people commit suicide every year because they are unable to accept their sexuality, many more are assaulted, raped or murdered by others who lash out because of their internalized homophobia. Call me a leftist nutter, but anything that gets thousands of people killed yearly is not something I would tag as "perfectly acceptable".

      I won't call you a leftist nutter, but I will call you wrong. There are many things in our world which are "perfectly acceptable", but get people killed because people misuse them or react badly to them. I'm sure more than one person has committed suicide because of their unrequited love for someone, but that doesn't make being in love unacceptable, nor does it make non-reciprocity of love unacceptable. It just means that it's unfortunate that someone couldn't cope with something adequately, and made a bad choice about how to resolve the issue.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    21. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one question: WHEN can I have this for SecondLife?????? droooool....

    22. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Surreal+Puppet · · Score: 1

      In the TV series, she gets her first body at the hospital as a child after a plane crash. Swapping her cyborg body gender in that situation seems unlikely.

    23. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Nope. GitS does the classic ghost in the machine idea, and it does it completely wrong. It tries to delve into identity, self awareness, etc. as well, but pales in comparison to any serious attempts (such as DADoES?, and of course Blade Runner).

      Like a typical "sci-fi" anime, it over explains to cover up the ridiculousness. It's not on the level of NGE's retardedness, but it smacks of the classic piled higher and deeper strategy.

    24. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I do understand it.

      The problem is that it makes no sense, and in general, is bad science fiction.

    25. Re:Ghost in the Shell by hobbit · · Score: 1

      Not being comfortable with gayness for yourself, though, is perfectly acceptable.

      Specifically, it's the only acceptable form of homophobia.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    26. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      In the TV series, she gets her first body at the hospital as a child after a plane crash. Swapping her cyborg body gender in that situation seems unlikely.

      Ever read "Pretty Face"?

      ...Yeah, it's pretty unlikely. But your post reminded me of Pretty Face. :D

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    27. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, it's hyper complicated to cover for the fact that it's completely ridiculous. See NGE, any anime involving a futuristic military force, pretty much all of Star Trek, etc.

      The general trend is for sloppy / poorly planned sci-fi to get worse as it progresses as the writers have to change the rules of the universe, account for inconsistencies, and generally one-up previous episodes/movies. I'm willing to accept the twisted physics and lore in the SG-1 series, but at least keep it consistent.

      Ju-On is crap (yes, I've seen the originals).
      I'll never see Japanese horror in the same way that people who grew up in that culture did. I understand the take on ghosts and scary little girls with hair covering their face.

      But yeah, that's just not scary. Western horror films aren't any better (and haven't been for decades), especially since they've just been copying foreign films lately, and doing a bad job of it.

      Hellboy is horrible, as is SAW.
      I hated SAW. But you can at least give it credit for doing what it tried to do. While dumb and mindless, it's good for what it is. The sequels are pureed diarrhea in every sense, much like anything dealing with * Movie, American Pie */American *, etc.

      I like GitS as an action movie, but I cringe whenever it tries to get existential.

    28. Re:Ghost in the Shell by genner · · Score: 4, Funny

      I do understand it.

      The problem is that it makes no sense,

      Lol.
      Do you have that on a T-shirt?
      You could make a fortune selling them if you got Paris Hilton to model one.

    29. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      If that's your goal, what makes GitS better than any other anime featuring ridiculous robots and female combatants? (Which by my estimates is at least 30% of all anime.)

      If you want sci-fi, don't watch GitS.
      If you want action / generic anime stuff pretending to be deep, go for GitS.

    30. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention:

      I just got a PS3, (40 GB MGS4 bundle).
      The type of crap I'm talking about is abundant in the MGS series. MGS got a little ridiculous in terms of the story.

      MGS 2 and 3 were completely ludicrous.
      (Obligatory http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2001/11/30/ .)

      I did my best to avoid any spoilers for MGS 4, but let's just say I'm not exactly expecting it to excel story-wise.

    31. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Walpurgiss · · Score: 1

      You hate Bladerunner too I guess. Just because you dislike something, and don't take from it what others do, does not make them or you right on the matter.

    32. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      What doesn't make sense?

    33. Re:Ghost in the Shell by KillerBob · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I'd venture that being uncomfortable with your own homosexuality shouldn't be acceptable, either. Getting *way* off-topic here (and Mods, feel free to mod me down), but I think the world would be a much healthier place if people could just get past all the idiotic programming society puts in place. There's no earthly reason for people to feel discomfort with who they are, and yet that's exactly why issues like transgenderism have such a high suicide rate. Embrace who you are, and be comfortable with it. Be proud of it, and for crying out loud, if you're queer, come out of the damned closet and enjoy your life. (it's a bit of a personal issue... I've had trans and gay friends kill themselves because of that kind of personal discomfort and shame as a result of society's programming telling them that they're wrong.)

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    34. Re:Ghost in the Shell by BountyX · · Score: 1
      Speaking of Ghost in the Shell and body swapping, here is a good philosophical quote from the movie

      It can also be argued that DNA is nothing more than a program designed to preserve itself. Life has become more complex in the overwhelming sea of information and life, when organized into species, relies upon genes to be its memory system, so man is an individual only because of his intangible memoryâ¦and yet memory cannot be defined, but it defines mankind. The advent of computers and the subsequent accumulation of incalculable data has given rise to a new system of memory and thought parallel to your own. Humanity has underestimated to the consequences of computerization⦠And can you offer me proof of your existence? How can you, when neither modern science nor philosophy can explain what life is. Time has been on my side...but by acquiring a body I am now subject to possibility of dying.

      --
      Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
    35. Re:Ghost in the Shell by fx242 · · Score: 1

      I remember when i first saw GiTS (first movie). That silent 10m interlude with city scenes after the big bird plane starts to land... I still recall that scene as one of the TOP moments of the history of cinema/anime for me (really). The story is simple but the atmosphere/sound/feeling in top. TL

    36. Re:Ghost in the Shell by GotenXiao · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe Shirow has categorically stated that Ghost in the Shell and Ghost in the Shell: Innocence are operating in a completely different timeline to the events in Stand Alone Complex.

      Quite appropriately for a discussion on GitS, CAPTCHA is "identify".

      --
      Goten Xiao
    37. Re:Ghost in the Shell by velinion · · Score: 1

      I believe homophobia is the fear of homosexuality in general.
      Fearing it in yourself is a form of this, as is fearing it in others.

      Homo: From the Greek Homos, meaning 'Same'
      Phobia: From the Latin work for 'Fear'
      Literally, homophobic is "fear of the same", although it is probably best understood as "Fear [of sexual relationships between members of the] same [sex]."

      --
      In life, not all of your questions will be answered; all of your answers will be questioned.
    38. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Y.A.A.P. · · Score: 3, Informative

      At the same time, it makes me wonder even more if the Major's original organic body may in fact have been male, with little to no adaptation discomfort after the procedure...

      If you read the original manga and got the pages to fill in the abridged portions from the English version, then you wouldn't wonder about it. The Major was originally female.

      It's one of many themes about what defines our humanity amidst the cybernetic changes that the manga successfully explores (albeit circuitously in many cases) where all of the animated versions failed miserably (as in the original manga is not "hyper-complicated trash").

      The specific sequence for this is one in which the Major is enjoying some virtual vacation time with two female friends. Batou jumps into the Major's head to inform her about developments of an op-in-progress.

      The abridged version has the Major and her two friends enjoying time on a boat on the water. When Batou jumps in, the Major berates him for the serious interruption and back in the real world he looks appropriately beaten-down.

      In the un-abridged version, the Major and her two friends have moved into full-on girl-on-girl action. Batou jumps into the Major's head in the middle of this and almost loses his real-world lunch since the sensations are ones that a guy shouldn't be feeling and are rejected by his brain.

      And, oh yeah, the Major chews out Batou because he was told not to jump into her head during downtime. Back in the real world, Batou looks appropriately beaten down.

    39. Re:Ghost in the Shell by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      It tries to delve into identity, self awareness, etc. as well, but pales in comparison to any serious attempts (such as DADoES?, and of course Blade Runner).

      And, of course, if it's been done once it can't be done again. It reminds me of a local restaurant owner. He's always talking about how various aspects of modern culture are pale comparisons to when the Greeks did it first (although he is right that the mall booth gyros hold nothing on what he makes).

    40. Re:Ghost in the Shell by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If you're uncomfortable with gayness, I would submit that you aren't actually gay. Note that this means "The thought of myself doing those things is disgusting", not "My parents will be ashamed of me if they find this out". If it's what you are, you shouldn't have any issues about it... but it would be ludicrous to expect a straight person to be comfortable with the idea of themselves doing gay things, just as it would be ludicrous to expect a gay person to be comfortable with the idea of themselves doing straight things.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    41. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, boys (and obviously you *are* boys,) you missed a chance to be more obnoxiously otaku in your ramblings: you could have abbreviated Hellboy and Saw to 'H' and 'S' respectively, because, like, everyone knows what you're talking about, right?

    42. Re:Ghost in the Shell by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      good point.

      still say that internalized homophobia is a bad thing thing tho.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    43. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The major was in an airplane accident when she was between the ages of 4-6. She got a full body cyborg after the accident. Kuze was also on the plane and also got a full body cyborg body after the major.

      She was a female child.

      The watch. It's the watch that is the key. ;) (You'll get that if you are enough of a GITS geek)

    44. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I FORGOT 2 MENTION MY PYENIS IS BIGGER THEN YOURSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS MUWAHAHAHAHP;OAWJLA caaaaappppppssssssfiiillllltttteeeeeerrrrrrrrrasdasdasdasdasdasdasd

    45. Re:Ghost in the Shell by clone53421 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      If you're uncomfortable with gayness, I would submit that you aren't actually gay. [...] it would be ludicrous to expect a straight person to be comfortable with the idea of themselves doing gay things, just as it would be ludicrous to expect a gay person to be comfortable with the idea of themselves doing straight things.

      True and true. Too often people get accused of "homophobia" when they're just expressing the fact that they aren't gay and no, they don't want that creepy guy hitting on them any more than a woman would want a creepy straight guy hitting on her.

      I'm occasionally ok with giving other guys hugs – as long as it doesn't seem gay (there are a few people I can think of who this applies to). If it does seem gay to hug someone, then I won't hug them, because I'm not gay. IMHO this isn't any different than a girl not hugging a guy who she thinks is "creepy".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    46. Re:Ghost in the Shell by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Hmm...but, isn't masturbation a homosexual act in itself?

      If that is the case...pretty much everyone at one time or another....ewwwwwwww

      Never mind....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    47. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Pfhorrest · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Homophobia is having negative reactions towards other people who are gay. Not being comfortable with gayness for yourself, though, is perfectly acceptable. Why choose such a negative-laced word?

      Homophobia is the fear of (or more neutrally phrased, "aversion to") homosexuality simpliciter - no reference to whether it's in others or yourself. If you're afraid (worried, concerned, uncomfortable with the idea) that you might be gay, that's a form of homophobia.

      A man not being attracted to other men is perfectly fine; nobody is saying you have to be gay. But say a man is attracted to a woman and it turns out that the woman used to be a man, but you couldn't tell unless someone told you, like our Ghost in the Shell example here; and that makes him uncomfortable... why? Because "that's gay"? What's wrong with that? (This is different from, say, being attracted to someone who you thought was a woman, but then you find out "she" has a cock, and you're not into the cock; that's just an honest reaction, nothing wrong with that, and little different from being turned on by a girl and then being turned off to find she's on her period).

      What I'm basically saying is that while you're free to have or not have whatever attractions to whoever you want, if you want to not want someone, you're passing judgment (on yourself, but still) about wanting that someone. If that judgment is that it is bad to be gay, then that's a form of homophobia... just directed at oneself in particular.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    48. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe somewhere in the middle of the 2nd gig in GITS that there is a flashback episode where it shows the major as a young child in "her" new prosthetic body. This prosthetic body of hers was basically a younger version of the one you see earlier on in the series. I think it would be pretty messed up to take a child who barely survived an airplane crash which is implied in this episode and to stick them into the prosthetic body of another sex. it seems to me that that should be the decision of the individual not the hospital. I think if anything the major just probably doesn't have a rigidly defined sexual definitions of male and female considering she is like 99% robot

    49. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      No, I like Bladerunner, and have said as much.

    50. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      When somebody tells me to go [bleep] myself, I'll be able to take their request literally.

    51. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Really? You need it pointed out to you?

      Link to a transcript I can easily copy and paste from and I'll do so. But if you're just shitting on me because you think I'm a troll and don't know what I'm talking about, I won't spend any time on it. (Since it's obvious I've hit a nerve with some people regarding GitS. It's not uncommon, there are a lot of hardcore GitS fans that think it's the be-all, end-all pioneer.)

    52. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This experiment opens an interesting possibility in the field of full body replacements, so far a topic purely in the realm of sci-fi, anime and cyberpunk. At the same time, it makes me wonder even more if the Major's original organic body may in fact have been male, with little to no adaptation discomfort after the procedure...

      Thats not possible as in 2nd gig it pretty much shows the majors past (iirc she was cyberized as a girl after being totally paralyzed)

    53. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      If you haven't seen the sequel (Innocence), or Stand Alone Complex, do yourselves a favor and skip them. They completely lose the style and tone.

    54. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumbass, watch your damn shows.

      She always was a girl and got her injuries in a plane crash. It's in the second season.

    55. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The problem I have is that GitS does it poorly, and a lot of people see GitS without/before seeing Bladerunner/reading DADoES?. They then proclaim it to be the best, and think everything stole from it.

      This isn't limited to GitS, the ghost in the machine concept, or even sci-fi. It happens everywhere. But GitS fans tend to have some serious blinders on, and, as evidenced by some of the replies to my post, are extremely defensive of the movie/movies/series/manga/etc.

    56. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call it trash, but I would call it silly and say that its writers are guilty of cynicism about their audience and extreme laziness. Okay, I guess maybe I would call it trash.

    57. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm occasionally ok with giving other guys hugs - as long as it doesn't seem gay

      That sort of overblown concern about homosexuality in day-to-day interactions is exactly what you would expect from a closet queer.

    58. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyone who says it's deep or has any meaning is either delusional, or has never seen any sci-fi ever.

      Sorry. Sci-Fi is not limited to ponderous, arrogant prattling by over-educated shut-ins. It also includes flash, style, and simple characterization.

      GitS is as deep as anything in its media could possibly be. "A person who is not sure if she is a person but is becomes indisinguishable from another person who is not a person but wants to be."

      Hard to think of a deeper plot. If you can point to one, go ahead.

    59. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Ya, internalized homophobia is totally the gay.

    60. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      GitS does the classic ghost in the machine idea, and it does it completely wrong. It tries to delve into identity, self awareness, etc. as well, but pales in comparison to any serious attempts (such as DADoES?, and of course Blade Runner).

      Wait-- BLADE RUNNER?

      Editing mistakes are not deep. Now I'm sorry I responded at all.

    61. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Really? You need it pointed out to you?

      "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

      You are postulating a position against the commonly held wisdom. Thus, at the bare minimum, you should include an argument to that effect.

      I'm with the others -- I think you just don't understand GitS.

    62. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Saxerman · · Score: 1

      Whoa, slow down there cowboy. I don't know if you're a troll or not, but since you managed to pick up an Informative mod I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. Shirow is simply a giant in the 'cyperpunk' genre, and greatly influenced many who would come after. Yes, his stuff isn't as ground breaking as Philip K. Dick and Isaac Asimov, I would challenge that it's still quality stuff.

      First, to be fair, I will fully admit that GitS is overly flashy and stylized. Shirow has his faults, and if you're not into the fanboi service he caters to I won't fault you for it.

      And if you want to just challenge the movies... okay. The first one is good, but does tend to be overhyped. And the second one is just bad. I am actually surprised at how much I disliked Innocence.

      That said, I would challenge that the level of depth and detail across the Ghost in the Shell series rivals pretty much all the heavy hitters in that genre. Yes, both movies tend to give you watered down schlock, especially Innocence. But the detail in the manga is, at times, simply phenomenal. The geopolitical history, uses of both covert and extreme violence between super powers, the man/machine dilemma, the quest for consciousness and identity... and even just the raw covert bad-ass espionage is not just window dressing. And I think the Stand Alone Complex series captures a lot of those ideals. Yes, the story arcs in both are a little long and complicated, so if you're not into that I can mostly forgive you. But the individual story episodes mostly stand for themselves and aren't hard to follow at all.

      I would also hold up his earlier works as shining examples of real sci-fi. The plot in Black Magic M-66 is nothing special nor is the art very impressive. But I they completely blew me away with how they presented the androids. Rather than the overly anthropomorphized machine used by too many others, here he have raw robotic killing machines without any human mannerisms, traits, or emotions. Watching them move in completely inhuman ways to be more effective combat machines gave me chills back in the day.

      Dominion: Tank Police... okay, not so much. But it's suppose to be silly.

      And while I don't know that Appleseed covers a lot of ground that isn't also covered in GitS, to be far, it was created back in the 80s. And it also has a lot of detail and depth in how it details the rise of civilization from chaos, and what it means to be human.

      --

      A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    63. Re:Ghost in the Shell by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Day-to-day interactions? Anonymous Coward thinks he knows much any about my day-to-day interactions... that's cute. (Hint: I have to know someone pretty well before I feel comfortable hugging them, and off-hand I can only think of about 4 non-relatives who I would typically hug... one of those is someone I see a few times a year at most. Of those four, one is a guy, and he hugs everyone he knows.)

      Anyway, your statement is kind of offensive. You wouldn't go up to someone because she didn't want to hug someone and say "That sort of overblown concern about hugging a guy is exactly what you would expect from someone who was molested as a child." Not that I'm making a big deal about it, because you obviously knew this and that's why you posted anonymously. Just saying...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    64. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Plekto · · Score: 1


      GitS is as deep as anything in its media could possibly be. "A person who is not sure if she is a person but is becomes indistinguishable from another person who is not a person but wants to be."

      To a point, it is deep. But it also is a problem of the actual format in which it is seen. The Manga is far better at explaining things, IMO, and keeping true to the slightly "off" feeling of the entire world.(this was the actual inspiration of the Matrix)

      It's later explained that she was female originally(the very first full body transplant, in fact), though we don't know much about the intervening years and how many bodies she's swapped between(based upon the differences and comments, though, she's likely 50+ years old). I get the feeling from reading it that she tried being male for a while and gave up on it. But they never explain this.

      The animated sequels are a boring 5 or 6 out of 10. Nothing special, but not rubbish, either. Worth reading though, since it raises a lot of interesting questions. Since it's almost 15 years old, it is fun to compare the author's vision with how things are today and the likely future.

      The one major thing wrong with it seems to be how easily it is accepted. I'd suspect that there would be a huge conflict as soon as the machines became aware. We'll likely see whether this is true or not in the next 30-40 years, though.

      Oh - an interesting point here is that this adds to the proof that our real "selves" are our brains. Everything else seems to be stuff/some sort of interface that's attached to it.(whole philosophical issue about mind versus body and identity)

    65. Re:Ghost in the Shell by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem I have is that GitS does it poorly, and a lot of people see GitS without/before seeing Bladerunner/reading DADoES?. They then proclaim it to be the best, and think everything stole from it.

      I don't agree that GitS is poorly done. But I do agree that folks need some perspective before they toss around terms like "steal." Not only should they have a better idea of history, but they should readdress the concept of inspiration and the very nature of story telling. On top of that, while I agree there's similarities in the two works (if you count DADoES and Bladerunner as the same), I find that they attack the theme from fairly different directions.

      But GitS fans tend to have some serious blinders on, and, as evidenced by some of the replies to my post, are extremely defensive of the movie/movies/series/manga/etc.

      It might have something to do with the inflammatory nature of your post. :) Using terms like "trash" and other subjective declarations are likely to invoke similarly emotional responses - whether the fan base is overly defensive or not.

    66. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Well known quotes don't mean shit.

      MOST people don't think GitS is very good.
      MOST people haven't even seen it, and dismiss it as a "Japanese cartoon".

      You also are postulating a position against the commonly held wisdom.

      Common beliefs are commonly incorrect.

    67. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Face, palm.

    68. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Are you fucking serious?

      You just fucking called GitS the deepest movie possible, summarized the core of the movie, and gave no respect to DADoES?.

      Sir, I contest that you have not read DADoES, nor much science fiction. You have either not seen Bladerunner, or have seen it only after seeing GitS and thought it to be boring, or a ripoff.

    69. Re:Ghost in the Shell by dasheiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually as I recall Batou asks the Major if she still uses a female body so that she can wear a watch she had received before she was lost her orginal body. In 2nd gig we also see her as a child recovering and getting used to her first new body and I don't think doctors would just randomly use a different gendered body. The real question is was Batou born a male. He once barrates the major for not /upgrading/ to a /stronger/ body.

    70. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Netsplitter · · Score: 1

      Sexconker is a troll. I recall that name quite vividly because he trolls many threads and somehow gets modded up (sockpuppets, perhaps). I used to get angry about how someone could be so bad, wrong. or disagreable with at so many different subjects, but then it became rather obvious that he enjoys the trolling. Just ignore him.

    71. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      You also are postulating a position against the commonly held wisdom.

      Common beliefs are commonly incorrect.

      Hee hee! "And that's why you're RIGHT! I mean 'WRONG!' Wrong! @#$%!"

      Could I chime in with a request that you get Paris Hilton to model a t-shirt with that one too?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    72. Re:Ghost in the Shell by el+americano · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why choose such a negative-laced word?

      Because everything is homophobia now. Didn't you get the memo?

      Did you vote against gay marriage? Homophobia.
      Do you hope your children are not gay? Homophobia.
      Are you Catholic? Big homophobe.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    73. Re:Ghost in the Shell by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      But yeah, that's just not scary. Western horror films aren't any better (and haven't been for decades), especially since they've just been copying foreign films lately, and doing a bad job of it.

      Hellboy is horrible,

      You know what else are awful horror movies?
      Blade Runner
      Harold and Kumar go to White Castle
      Citizen Cane
      The X-Men
      No Country for Old Men
      The 40 Year Old Virgin
      Of course, the main reason for this is that they're not horror movies either.....

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    74. Re:Ghost in the Shell by perp · · Score: 1

      Or how about mind-controlled battlefield terminators? Where the soldiers have their minds linked up to robots and fight from a safe, remote location?

      Forever Peace, incredible book.

      --
      There are two kinds of sysadmins: paranoids and losers. I'm both kinds.
    75. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      In a different direction, I agree completely with what you're saying about society's programming, but not only for gay people.

      There's a whole set of programming where society tells you "This is how to be a man", that is completely out to lunch. I started dating for the first time in my life, and was having huge problems until I realised that society's image of a sexually successful man isn't remotely connected to being either a real man or a real person.

      To be a man is far closer to being a hippy sage than to being a homophobic action hero who ignores women except to say insipid pick-up lines.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    76. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that as if I would want anything other than action and style.

    77. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bite this troll. You should be sorry. Ghost in the Shell is a masterpiece of animation. The story may not be as deep as... what? What's better in Science Fiction? Tell me, I'd like to know what *you* consider good, if Ghost in the Shell is trash. I'd love to point out for you how what you like is inferior to Ghost in the Shell, in so many ways.

      I think Ghost in the Shell compares favorably to Neuromancer in the cyber punk genre. Ever read that one? Yeah.. I thought so!

      Reading a book about cybernetics is nothing like visually depicting the nuances of an actual manufactured artificial body, which Ghost in the Shell does to an incredible degree. The quality of the animation is still brilliant by most any animator's standards. They did more for the imagination with plastic film and ink than all the Pixar films combined.

      And, I will invoke the name of CmdrTaco here, because you should respect his authori-tay. This is his site after all, and I bet you dollars to donuts he would disagree with you.

      So there!

    78. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ***AND** you diss hellboy? comic book guy pft's in your general direction.

    79. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what anime would you relate to this article?

    80. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I have to disagree with you a little. If you were perfectly comfortable with gayness, then the idea that yourself might be gay wouldn't be upsetting, right? By not being comfortable with such possibilities, you're showing some form of fear of teh gay, which is pretty much the definition of homophobia.

    81. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Stand Alone Complex was better than the original movie.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    82. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      Your post makes sense ... but I still get the feeling of a dog chasing its own tail in circles until it falls over dizzy. :)

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    83. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's unfortunate that someone couldn't cope with something adequately, and made a bad choice about how to resolve the issue.

      Hey. Don't knock it 'til you've tried it. :p

    84. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ghost in the Shell is trash.

      You mean "The Matrix", right?

      It's great for action and style, but terrible for sci-fi. Anyone who says it's deep or has any meaning is either delusional, or has never seen any sci-fi ever.

      Yep, you definitely mean "The Matrix".

    85. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story may not be as deep as... what? What's better in Science Fiction? Tell me, I'd like to know what *you* consider good, if Ghost in the Shell is trash.

      Dune, The Snow Queen, The Player of Games, everything by Alastair Reynolds, the Takeshi Kovacs books, everything M John Harrison ever wrote... the list goes on.

      I like quite a bit of anime, but anime is shallow, it can't help but be shallow. When it isn't shallow it's almost always pretentious twaddle. I think ghost in the shell goes too far in the pretentious twaddle direction. Cyborg commando babe killing baddies is all the series needs to be, to try to make an exploration of what it means to be human in the middle of an action-adventure/fanservice show is beyond silly - it's fundamentally misguided.

    86. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bladerunner does a very poor job presenting the theme of the book. It's a cinematographic masterpiece, so that can be forgiven, but I doubt many people who see it ever wonder what it means to be human. The deepest scifi movie I can think of is Solaris, which hardly touches the true depths in the book. It goes beyond what it means to be human and contemplates our interactions with a god like being.

      I know you mean well, but because you chose to attack instead of explain, people are going to jump on you.

    87. Re:Ghost in the Shell by genner · · Score: 1

      Yes amd that wooshing sound you hear is the wind blowing through the area were your sarcasim detector used to be.

    88. Re:Ghost in the Shell by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      But say a man is attracted to a woman and it turns out that the woman used to be a man, but you couldn't tell unless someone told you, like our Ghost in the Shell example here; and that makes him uncomfortable... why? Because "that's gay"?

      No, it's uncomfortable because it brings an undesirable mental image (she-formerly-as-a-he). Imagining gay sex, or worse imagining having gay sex, isn't exactly something that straight men enjoy. Now, if one could avoid picturing the man she used to be, it wouldn't be awkward, but it's hard to shut off images like that.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    89. Re:Ghost in the Shell by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Gay people acting suggestively toward me would offend me in the same way as a woman doesn't appreciate creepy guys hitting on her, but we haven't invented a word for her mental condition.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    90. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She'd be holding it, not wearing it, right?

    91. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Okay, now I've heard(/read/internetted) everything.

    92. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Hellboy is horrible was not connected to the horror movies. I mentioned it because the poster above me did.

      You'll notice the line breaks and even paragraph breaks that tend to separate things.

    93. Re:Ghost in the Shell by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      You'll notice the line breaks and even paragraph breaks that tend to separate things.

      Normally I'd agree, but you use them in such disjointed ways it's kind of hard to figure out what exactly you're trying to do. If you want to answer to specific points in another post it's helpful to blockquote those points as you respond to them as opposed to assuming the reader will scroll back and forth to figure out which of your comments match which of the previous poster's.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    94. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Block quotes? Meh.
      I just assume people have read the post I've replied to. If you cant pick up on key nouns (Hellboy in this case) and remember them being present in the parent post, then you've got yourself a personal problem.

      I rarely quote, and when I do, it's usually for the lulz - pointing out errors, changing wording for a joke/pun, etc.

    95. Re:Ghost in the Shell by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Wow, posts like that take me back. I remember when AOL users new to usenet used to say about the same thing...they always "corrected" longtime users about why they didn't need to follow established conventions too. Welcome to Slashdot Mr. UID-so-high-that-it-hurts-my-eyes.

      By the way, me mentioning the blockquote thing was intended as friendly advice. This nasty response is payment for your deuschy reply.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    96. Re:Ghost in the Shell by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I prefer <quote> over <blockquote>. It keeps the quoted text from showing up in the abbreviated comment line, so I can see the beginning of what they actually typed in response even before I expand it.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    97. Re:Ghost in the Shell by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      And that makes perfect sense as well.

      Quote, blockquote, itallics, bold...anything really, as long as you make it clear which lines are the original post and which are your comments. The point is that if you go point by point in a response (as opposed to responding to an entire post as we're doing now) without quoting the post you're responding to at all it makes it pretty difficult to follow. What sexconker is saying is that quoting is unnecessary:

      I just assume people have read the post I've replied to. If you cant pick up on key nouns (Hellboy in this case) and remember them being present in the parent post, then you've got yourself a personal problem.

      He's welcome to post however he likes, but whining when people don't track what he's talking about correctly seems a little stupid.
         

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    98. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Oh please, it was 6 points, in a deep thread, which only a few people are reading. Those people are the people I am directly replying to, or people like you who are actively trolling on me.

      I KNOW you're all paying attention.

    99. Re:Ghost in the Shell by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Oh please, it was 6 points,

      Which is why, if you want people to understand what you're saying, you quote.

      in a deep thread, which only a few people are reading. Those people are the people I am directly replying to,

      Slashdot is an open discussion board. If you want to pick and choose who you talk to, you're in the wrong place.

      or people like you who are actively trolling on me.

      I don't think that word means what you think it does. Then again, if you're still on Slashdot in a year I'll be pretty surprised, so I don't really care what you think. If you are still here by then, perhaps you'll learn how to express yourself coherently.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    100. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I'm not the one with the issue.
      People CAN pick and choose whether or not to reply to me, and they can do so having just read my post, after seeing whether or not I use quotes.

      Still on slashdot in a year?
      What are you insinuating?

      I've been here longer than you know.

    101. Re:Ghost in the Shell by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      People CAN pick and choose whether or not to reply to me, and they can do so having just read my post, after seeing whether or not I use quotes.

      And I did. And then since you were unable to convey what you meant the first time, you felt you had to return to clarify. 'Course, had you formatted the post in a way that was less ambiguous, you wouldn't have had to, but whatever.

      Still on slashdot in a year?
      What are you insinuating?

      That you'll probably go back to Digg, or 4chan.

      I've been here longer than you know.

      Oooooo, mysterious. If that's true, why do you need multiple accounts? Or are you one of those "I've been on here since there were only 6 users, but I only like to post as AC until recently" people? If you want people to think you're a longtime user, use an account with a UID that reflects it. Otherwise, don't be surprised if someone thinks you're new.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    102. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      'Course, had you had the reading comprehension of a 12 year old, you wouldn't think a point-by-point reply was ambiguous. Do you use a ruler to help you focus on the line you're reading? Or do you still do it one word at a time with your finger?

      "Or are you one of those "I've been on here since there were only 6 users, but I only like to post as AC until recently" people?"

      There were at least 20 people.
      (See, I'm quoting now to point out the wording. This is necessary because my reply dismisses the bulk of what you said - because it's so dismissible. By keeping my reply short and punchy, and responding in a truthful yet exaggerated way, it becomes humorous.)

      I don't have multiple accounts.
      Nor do I use Digg or visit any of the chans.

    103. Re:Ghost in the Shell by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      'Course, had you had the reading comprehension of a 12 year old, you wouldn't think a point-by-point reply was ambiguous. Do you use a ruler to help you focus on the line you're reading? Or do you still do it one word at a time with your finger?

      C'mon Bri, high-school is over, time to put aside the childish attempts at insults. That was so weak and uncreative it's hard to believe you wasted the energy to type it. If you don't want to be misunderstood, post in a clear style. If you want to be incomprehensible, then just keep on doing what you're doing. I don't really care.

      There were at least 20 people.

      Oh, well, then you're a real long-termer! I stand corrected! Would you like to make any other unsubstantiated and unprovable claims? I'm in the mood to believe!

      (See, I'm quoting now to point out the wording. This is necessary because my reply dismisses the bulk of what you said - because it's so dismissible. By keeping my reply short and punchy, and responding in a truthful yet exaggerated way, it becomes humorous.)

      And you know what? If you just said "There were at least 20 people" without quoting, nobody would have the vaguest idea what you were yammering about. Since you quoted though, there was really no doubt. Apparently you can learn, good-boy! By the way, could you point out where you were being humorous? Normally I'd be able to tell, but since there's nothing actually clever, witty or even remotely funny in your post, it's kind of hard to find.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    104. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Durrrr
      Hurrrr durrrr.
      Derp derp derp.

    105. Re:Ghost in the Shell by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Wow, I was waaaaay off with the Digg comment before. You're more a YouTube comments kinda guy. There's hope for you though....sometimes people are just late-bloomers as far as maturity goes. With a little luck you won't always be like this, so keep that chin-up little-fella!

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    106. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Durrrr.
      Hurrrr.
      Hurrrr durrrr.
      Derp derp derp.

    107. Re:Ghost in the Shell by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Thanks for making my point for me Bri, you're a true gentleman

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    108. Re:Ghost in the Shell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Hurrrr
      Durrrr
      Derp derp derp.

  2. From the 'put-body-out-of-mind' department... by Smidge207 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I suppose out of body experiences are sort of like brain malfunctions. Perhaps fun if you experience one in the right state of mind (like really good weed). This might make an awesome VR game. Just 'a thought.'

    =Smidge=

    --
    Is it just my observation, or is eldavojohn an idiot?
    1. Re:From the 'put-body-out-of-mind' department... by Hordeking · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suppose out of body experiences are sort of like brain malfunctions. Perhaps fun if you experience one in the right state of mind (like really good weed). This might make an awesome VR game. Just 'a thought.'

      =Smidge=

      To be honest, I'd rather actually consume some really good weed than simulate it.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    2. Re:From the 'put-body-out-of-mind' department... by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I'd rather actually consume some really good weed than simulate it.

      You can somewhat simulate weed with binaural beats, but it's nowhere near as good as the real thing. That will get you feeling somewhat high.

      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    3. Re:From the 'put-body-out-of-mind' department... by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I suppose out of body experiences are sort of like brain malfunctions.

      If I understand it well, this is akin to the mechanisms that allow us to e.g. feel the pressure at the tip of the pencil instead of our fingertips. Or drivers expanding their perception of body to the size of their vehicle.

      Our brains allow us to feel our tools as parts of ourselves. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    4. Re:From the 'put-body-out-of-mind' department... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      "Side effect" sounds better. "Malfunction" implies that something isn't working as it should.

  3. Quite a letdown... by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, I was absolutely pumped because the subject line of this story made it sound like they successfully transplanted a brain or something...

    After reading the article they were just simultaneously poking people with sticks...

    perhaps now that you have that insight you can "mentally swap" the disappointment I'm feeling.

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    1. Re:Quite a letdown... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

      perhaps now that you have that insight you can "mentally swap" the disappointment I'm feeling.

      Hey, good news! You've succeeded!

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Quite a letdown... by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, good news! You've succeeded!

      I think we're on to something!

      Tomorrow's headline:
      Article misrepresenting "mental body swapping" leads to mental body swapping!

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    3. Re:Quite a letdown... by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Funny

      After reading the article they were just simultaneously poking people with sticks...

      One experiment involved using the researchers themselves. Another experiment used mannequins found in the dumpster behind a department store. They also mention using chairs and blocks of wood as test equipment. Is it just me, or does it sound like scientific research in Sweden is ridiculously underfunded?

    4. Re:Quite a letdown... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Wast not, want not. The effort of getting funding for a mannequins and other stuff even if it was simple is probably still more effort then just taking one out of the dumpster. Besides they can use the money for things they really need.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Quite a letdown... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      also mention using chairs and blocks of wood as test equipment. Is it just me, or does it sound like scientific research in Sweden is ridiculously underfunded?

      Ikea is Swedish, right?

    6. Re:Quite a letdown... by ninjackn · · Score: 1

      It's more of imagined physical response based on what you see than "mental body-swapping". It's like when you see a guy on TV get painfully hit in the balls and then you cover your own pair and let out a small gasp in imagined pain.

      Looks like we're sill a ways away from males knowing what it feels like to give birth to a child and from females knowing what it's let to get hit in the family jewels.

      --
      [FUCK BETA 2.6.2014]
    7. Re:Quite a letdown... by ejdmoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you've ever done an experiment like this (there are smaller scale versions), they are very weird. I can't imagine a full body experience.

      Example:
      The one I have done involves sitting behind someone, eyes closed, and having your nose stroked (by a third party) while you stroke someone else's nose in front of you. After a few seconds, your brain "clicks" and you feel like you have an incredibly long nose. This is because of the feedback loop where your brain feels something on your nose and your finger simultaneously, and your mental body image just changes instantly.

    8. Re:Quite a letdown... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Didn't the Swedes already achieve this?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Quite a letdown... by bughunter · · Score: 2, Funny

      After a few seconds, your brain "clicks" and you feel like you have an incredibly long nose.

      Just imagine the profitability of the pr0n applications of this technology!

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    10. Re:Quite a letdown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wast not, want not.

      Can't wast any lttrs in ths uncrtain conomic tims

    11. Re:Quite a letdown... by popeye44 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You just gave "Reach Around" a whole new meaning in my mental dictionary.

      Thanks!

      --
      Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
    12. Re:Quite a letdown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the biggest let down of a subject line compared to the actual article.

      For those who have not read the story....There is no mind-body swapping going on. At best I'd describe this as an interesting illusion or some insight into how senses work, but no one is mentally swapped in the article.

      It is about one person having their vision covered up by a screen that is displaying what a camera sees, they pointed that camera down while it was positioned where the mannequins head would be and some people were confused by this into fake feelings of that being their body. this is more of a psychology issue IMHO.

    13. Re:Quite a letdown... by HarvardAce · · Score: 2, Funny

      The one I have done involves sitting behind someone, eyes closed, and having your nose stroked (by a third party) while you stroke someone else's nose in front of you. After a few seconds, your brain "clicks" and you feel like you have an incredibly long nose. This is because of the feedback loop where your brain feels something on your nose and your finger simultaneously, and your mental body image just changes instantly.

      Are you sure it was a nose you were stroking?

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
    14. Re:Quite a letdown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Somebody should mod you insightful, even though you didn't intend that.

      It is pretty common for researchers to be this resourceful and scavenge test objects, lab equipment and sometimes research subjects in this way.

      First of all, the research budgets are tight and it is unbelievably difficult to get funding for anything not having a marketable product on the table already. The idea that research needs to be done *before* you can have an (ideally patentable) product is often lost to the bean counters.

      Second, funding often goes only to selected few "strategic" areas (aka what looks good on a governmental agenda) - here in Northern Europe it is mostly environment, green energy, oil, gas, agriculture, nanotech. The "unglamorous" majority has to scrounge for the funding elsewhere and fight for the very limited amount of public funding.

      Third, if you happen to work in the field that does not promise an immediate return on investment (typical EU project grants are for ~3 years, explicitly requiring specification of what exactly will be the benefit to the industry at the end), or the field is obscure, without an immediate applicability of the results (theoretical mathematics, virtual reality, ...) you can essentially forget about getting funded from public sources unless you are an established, well known and well connected figure.

      In the light of the above, getting mannequins from a dumpster (I didn't see that in the paper, though) is not such a bad idea - perhaps the saved money could pay for an extra month of the researcher's salary.

    15. Re:Quite a letdown... by SpaceAdmiral · · Score: 1

      And now you know the difference between 'mental body-swapping' and 'physical body-swapping'.

    16. Re:Quite a letdown... by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

      You'll know when this happens when you see the headline:
      "Full body replacement successful, scientists all get girlfriends and project folds"
       

    17. Re:Quite a letdown... by Cornflake917 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The one I have done involves sitting behind someone, eyes closed, and having your nose stroked (by a third party) while you stroke someone else's nose in front of you. After a few seconds, your brain "clicks" and you feel like you have an incredibly long nose.

      Now I know what to do to feel like I have an incredibly long penis. But I'm not quite sure if it's worth it.

    18. Re:Quite a letdown... by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      The one I have done involves sitting behind someone, eyes closed, and having your nose stroked (by a third party) while you stroke someone else's nose in front of you. After a few seconds, your brain "clicks" and you feel like you have an incredibly long nose. This is because of the feedback loop where your brain feels something on your nose and your finger simultaneously, and your mental body image just changes instantly.

      That example might be of the kinkiest innuendo's I've ever seen.

    19. Re:Quite a letdown... by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      The idea that research needs to be done *before* you can have an (ideally patentable) product is often lost to the bean counters.

      In my experience, "bean counters" just don't want to pay for research (or product development in general) - especially not before said research produces something that can be profitably marketed.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    20. Re:Quite a letdown... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Looks like we're sill a ways away from males knowing what it feels like to give birth to a child..."

      You know...I've lived my whole life so far, and never wondered ever what that felt like. And I never want to know..it looks painful.

      I have experienced a kidney stone...about the most painful thing I've ever gone through, and they told me it was probably similar to child birth at some level.

      If that is the case...I cannot imagine why a woman would EVER have more than one child!!!

      Not to mention...I didn't have to pay for my kidney stones expenses for 18 years, nor send it to college.

      :)

      But seriously, I never want to know what childbirth feels like...and I can only hypothesize that women are indeed masochistic by nature...as seen by them having multiple kids...and loyally staying with assholes that abuse them....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:Quite a letdown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by nose you mean...

    22. Re:Quite a letdown... by mdmkolbe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had my mind think an entire building was part of my body.

      The setup was that I took a nap in an awkward position so that when I woke up and looked "down" towards where I expected my body to be, I instead saw a beam that was part of the architecture. For a fraction of a second I had the sensation that that beam was part of my body.

      It was the briefest second, but it was one of the strangest things I've ever felt.

    23. Re:Quite a letdown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      punctuation you us punctuation you grdy rich bastard you dont hav to flaunt it

    24. Re:Quite a letdown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you! After reading the article, my first reaction was "duh" followed by "so what?" Meanwhile all of these other slashdotters are spinning in their own little a sci-fi gasms pointing to sentient machine movies and such here in the comments. The experiment seemed like the human equivalent of watching a dog bark at his own reflection in the mirror. What am I missing???

    25. Re:Quite a letdown... by Geminii · · Score: 1
      I'd just be scared that apparently Swedish scientists can make spectacular and potentially far-reaching discoveries for pocket change.

      If they ever got REAL funding, they'd probably ascend to another plane for their coffee breaks.

    26. Re:Quite a letdown... by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

      Yeah, reminds me of the time I did some viral pathology research on sheep. After the experiment was finished, we ate the negative controls.

      --
      Ni.
    27. Re:Quite a letdown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise this film is shown in feel-around, right?

  4. Amazing waste of time and money by baggins2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, how many of us guys haven't already realized that we're just lesbians trapped in male bodies.

    So I'm gay, get over it.

    --
    He who said 1,000,000 monkeys on 1,000,000 typewriters would eventually type the great novel, never saw an AOL chat room
    1. Re:Amazing waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So I'm gay, get over it."

      Wouldn't that make you a straight woman in a man's body?

    2. Re:Amazing waste of time and money by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm confused now...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  5. I thought I saw this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this a repost?

    Maybe my body double saw and I just think I saw it.

    This crap is lame -- we are subject to psychological trickery. Go figure.

    1. Re:I thought I saw this already by DeadManCoding · · Score: 4, Informative

      True, we are subject to psychological trickery. But the test are pretty conclusive, as I actually RTFA. If a human brain can perceive an artificial body as it's own in the psychological and physiological sense, it gives researchers a great deal of more research to do. This allows us to "place" a human brain inside an artificial body and still retain full abilities without major psychological damage. That's a serious trick to perform, as once we lose that ownership of the body, behavior can be significantly modified.

      --
      "The only constant in the universe is change." - Unknown author
    2. Re:I thought I saw this already by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I wonder how this would work on placing people into dummies with an amputated limb and placing amputated individuals into dummies with all their limbs.

      Maybe there could be some theraputic value to this mental trickery.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:I thought I saw this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why am I having visions of Futurama jar heads on robot bodies?

    4. Re:I thought I saw this already by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Once we get humaniform robots perfected, this could be a great boon to the disabled. Imagine being a quadraplegic, using a robot body you control with your brain to play baseball from the comfort of your basement.

      Of course, before robotics gets good enough for that, we'll have exoskeletons that the disabled can wear that will negate the need for a full robot. The world is already full of cyborgs (I'm one, so's Dick Cheney, so's your grandma if she has an artificial hip).

    5. Re:I thought I saw this already by ZygnuX · · Score: 1

      Well, it actually has been done before. And quite a long time ago. It is common to use this kind of "mental tricks" for helping people who lost a limb to adapt to the feeling of having something missing.

      Sometimes, when you lose a limb (say a hand), the brain re.adapts and the areas that control the feeling of another part of the body expand to the part that controlled the lost hand. Now what happens?

      You get touched on certain parts of your face, per example, but you actually feel you're being touched on your missing hand.

      So medics use this kind of tricks (sometimes with mirrors) to psychologically make you feel like you had your hand again.. but instead of using a puppet, they used the reflection of your remaining hand

      =)

    6. Re:I thought I saw this already by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      The Ship Who Sang?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  6. Simulation by kvezach · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this make anybody else think of the "sim-stims" of Neuromancer?

    1. Re:Simulation by LithiumX · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm! Nothing like some good sim-stim virtual tree rat sex! The future is bright...

      --
      Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    2. Re:Simulation by eredin · · Score: 1

      Does this make anybody else think of the "sim-stims" of Neuromancer?

      Yep. That and the squids from Strange Days

  7. Not exactly like TV by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just glanced through the study's report, and will read in detail later (it's rather long). There was an episode of The Prisoner where a scientist had a gizmo with funny metal hats that transferred consciousness to another person.

    This is nothing like that.

    There was another episode that was like that. In The Schizoid Man, as Wikipedia puts it, "Number Two replaces Number Six with a duplicate to weaken the real Six's sense of identity." Not exactly like this study, but closer.

    In this real-world study, one of the tests was that the subject is stimulated exactly like the "double"; the subject's abdomen is tickled exactly like the other person's body. I suspect that hypnosis plays a part in it, even if the researchers weren't aware they were hypnotizing the subject.

    You can hypnotize someone by (IIRC) having them lay on their backs with their eyes closed, and lightly touch their forehead. Ask "do you feel that?" Do this three or four times and without touching their forehead, if you ask if you did they will still say "yes".

    "There are four lights!" -Captain Picard

    1. Re:Not exactly like TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just simultaneous stimulation. The subject also has on a headset so that they are seeing through the camera eyes of the mannequin. Or in the case of two humans, one human is wearing a camera headset, the other is seeing what the camera sees.

    2. Re:Not exactly like TV by Zerth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm suprised this is news. Wasn't there just recently an article about the set of nerves that fire the same when seeing someone else perform an action as doing it yourself?

      Heck, I imagine anyone who has worked with waldos/tele-operated robotics has felt a sense of transference to the mechanical portion. After using a waldo for several hours a day for a few weeks, I swear I developed a sense of touch in a device with no force feedback, but it was most likely just my sympathetic reaction to seeing the waldo come into contact.

    3. Re:Not exactly like TV by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

      I think every geek to use a mouse has experienced this to some extent. If the cursor travels more slowly over one particular part of the screen, it always feels to me like there is a physical resistance even though there actually is none.

    4. Re:Not exactly like TV by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      You can hypnotize someone by (IIRC) having them lay on their backs with their eyes closed, and lightly touch their forehead. Ask "do you feel that?" Do this three or four times and without touching their forehead, if you ask if you did they will still say "yes".

      Something else that's fun is to have them close their eyes then hold your pointer finger 1/8-1/16" from their forehead directly between their eyes (at the very top of their nose). They'll feel it – although you're not touching them – even if they didn't know what you were going to do.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  8. Sensationalism at its best. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    Talk about sensational headlines. The headline builds up considerable excitement then the very first line of the article squashes it completely.

    I don't think it's a surprise that a person can be convinced to believe pretty much anything. I have a hard time believing how this research actually reveals any new insight.

    1. Re:Sensationalism at its best. by tgd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its actually important research where cognitive science is involved -- the precise mechanism that translates from a set of impulses entering the brain to the sense of self and awareness of both position and body isn't well understood.

      We know, sure, that the world we live in is a mental projection that our brains assemble from a lot of, frankly, very coarse and non-specific input. We mentally fill in a lot of details. Figuring out how much you have to simulate to cause perception to switch is important, as it gives clues as to what the actual triggers are that lead to a sense of self.

    2. Re:Sensationalism at its best. by Rayeth · · Score: 1

      The reddit-ization of slashdot?

  9. Malkovich by reginaldo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Malkovich? MALKOVICH!

    Do the test patients inexplicably end up at the New Jersey turnpike once the experiment has concluded?

    1. Re:Malkovich by xbytor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about any test, but I've ended inexplicably on the NJ turnpike more than once.

      But that was when I lived in NJ, so it's not as farfetched as it might at first sound.

  10. What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As reported, there have been a lot of bad moderations recently. It seems this is due to CmdrTaco and chums turning meta-moderation into a weird Digg clone.

    Please CmdrTaco, just bring the old meta-moderation system back. It worked, very well, by allowing people to vote on whether a moderation was fair. The new system simply asks the user to Agree/Disagree with a post (don't fool yourselves into thinking it will be used in any other way), ergo it cannot perform the job of meta-moderation.

    Brought to you by the: Discussions About Slashdot Itself are not Off-Topic, Troll, Flamebait or Redundant Dept.

    1. Re:What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seconded, the old metamod system and user pages were fast, simple, and very effective. I used to meta-mod every day, now the metamods and user pages have become so bloated and unwieldy I've lost all motivation to participate despite having excellent karma. I'm considering letting my subscription expire and becoming a full-time lurker.

      Please, head honchos of Slashdot, revert to the old style metamods and user pages or at least allow us the option to control what cruft is grafted to our user page. Slashdot would lose a lot of cred if it degenerated into digg.

    2. Re:What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by Walpurgiss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agree. The first time I was asked to meta-mod here, one of my own posts was the first in the list. That made no sense. I skipped it but I think rating moderations, rather than agree/disagree makes more sense.

    3. Re:What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what happened? I kinda felt it but could not understand cause. Thanks :-)

    4. Re:What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by multisync · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to meta-mod every day, now the metamods and user pages have become so bloated and unwieldy I've lost all motivation to participate

      I wasn't meta-moderating quite that frequently, but I did try to make time to do it at least once a week. Since the new system was put in place I hardly bother any more.

      As far as the moderation system, I abandoned that a couple of years ago. There is so much abuse that goes unchecked that I just browse at -1 and skip past the comments that I think are trolls or flame bait or whatever. I've also unchecked the "willing to moderate" box in my preferences, although that has more to do with just not having the time most days to skim the summaries and comments, let alone read the articles and make an honest attempt to do a good job of moderating.

      The user page changes are just bizarre, and the page is different every time I visit it (which isn't very often lately). They seem to be trying to get to the point where your comments appear with the summary of the article they were attached to (leading to the 'bloat' you noted). The last time I visited there were summaries from article that I never commented on, so they had no relevance to me. They seem to be still developing this new user page, but rather than wait until it is finished, they have essentially made us all beta testers.

      Why am I given the choice to rate my own comments '+' or '-'? Am I really going to rate my own comment '-'? Also, the style sheet seems to be messed up, at least in Firefox. Rather than the white text on a green background they were using when they first made the change (ala Idle), it is now white text on a two-tone background that fades from grey to white, making the text unreadable. In IE, it's white text on a green background. I don't know, maybe I've done something to Firefox, but it wasn't like this the other day.

      Maybe I'm just resistant to change, but I can't see anything positive about these changes.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    5. Re:What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by Kagura · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for metamoderation recently and couldn't find it. I didn't even know it had changed. Where can I find it?

    6. Re:What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Exactly. These new UI changes being made to Slashdot are HORRIBLE. They do not make the site look better. They do not make it easier to read (quite the opposite on the laptop I use as my daily work/home machine). They do not make the site load faster, and they do not make it easier to use. The new users page is just VILE, more obfuscatory than helpful -- you can't even tell if anyone has replied to your posts without clicking through to another page.

      However, this site is a labor of love in some ways for the creators, so after investing so much time and labor into creating all these new features, I give it less than a 1% chance that the "editors" of the site will reverse any of these changes. I've known too many people too invested in their personal creations to consider user feedback.

      Its being reminded again and again of how we can't keep nice things that makes one crotchety as they get older.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    7. Re:What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Bring back the old metamod system, please! The new one doesn't make sense.

    8. Re:What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by multisync · · Score: 1

      You can metamoderate here.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    9. Re:What the heck happened to meta-moderation? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      you can't even tell if anyone has replied to your posts without clicking through to another page.

      Typing "c" in my URL bar gives "http://slashdot.org/~clone53421/comments" as the first auto-completion result. I never use the link.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  11. Cyborg by Chatterton · · Score: 1

    Now that these scientists resolved the question of adaptability of the human psyche. Some must work on preserving the brain functionality over time and some other must work to develop the perfect cyborg container for it !!!!

    Finally i will be Immortal !

    1. Re:Cyborg by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      some other must work to develop the perfect cyborg container for it !!!!

      You don't have to replace the whole body, just the nonfunctional parts. There are already lots of cyborgs. My CrystaLens implant makes me a cyborg (I went from 20/400 vision to better than 20/20 in the eye with the implant), anybody with a pacemaker or an artificial hip or other joint is a cyborg.

      They're not likely to come up with replacements for most organs any time soon. So you're going to need your complete head and most of your guts.

  12. Perspective swapping, not mind swapping. by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's an important distinction here - this is not mind copying, it's just perspective swapping. Mind copying would be if you were able to copy the bits of one mind in one bit of hardware (example: brain) to another bit of hardware (example: computer disk), then be able to have the mind run somewhere else. What we have here is perceptive swapping, where you just overlay a new perspective in place of a brain's inputs/outputs, giving the limited sensory perception of acting in another place to that brain's mind.

    It's cool that we're making new ways for people to get new perspectives, but this ain't mind swapping by a long shot.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Perspective swapping, not mind swapping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that matter, Mirror's Edge, for all its brevity, does this better than any game I've seen. For the length of a run, Faith's body is your body.

      If there was more physical feedback, the experience would be terrifying -- since much of it involves falling from 30 stories up.

    2. Re:Perspective swapping, not mind swapping. by andrewd18 · · Score: 1

      Mind copying would be if you were able to copy the bits of one mind in one bit of hardware (example: brain) to another bit of hardware (example: computer disk), then be able to have the mind run somewhere else.

      I'm sorry, I don't quite get that analogy. Can you phrase it in terms of automobiles?

    3. Re:Perspective swapping, not mind swapping. by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      Well, if both parties change perspectives and are able to control the other body's action, wouldn't it be effectively the same as mind swapping? So, we have half the equation, we just need remote control now.

    4. Re:Perspective swapping, not mind swapping. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's like putting a Honda engine into a Ford chassis and STILL be able to power it on or do anything meaningful with it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Perspective swapping, not mind swapping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh.

  13. Aperture Science by KumquatOfSolace · · Score: 5, Funny
    "It did not work when a non-humanoid object -- such as a chair or large block -- was used."

    No hope for test subjects who over-identify with Weighted Companion Cube.

    1. Re:Aperture Science by vux984 · · Score: 1

      No hope for test subjects who over-identify with Weighted Companion Cube.

      I apparently incinerated mine with the least hesitation ever recorded!

    2. Re:Aperture Science by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      So, no one thought they were Chairface Chipendale? Disappointing, I was looking forward to seeing "CHA" on the Moon, eventually...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  14. The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by VorlonFog · · Score: 1

    Robert Heinlein would be so proud....

  15. Good paper writing skills.. by Fireonyx · · Score: 1

    Don't you remember way back when, when you had to write papers? How the first paragraph is suppose to draw you in and give people a reason to keep reading it? Same thing here.. And it is more of a proof of concept. Can the mind accept another host instead of the body it is currently in or would it reject that body due to unfamiliar environs or even perhaps intrinsically know that the mannequin/other body is a fake? It seems the mind is pre-wired to accept this kind of situation. It is not a body-swap yet, but is just one step on a long road to body-swapping.

  16. So I posted this story to the discordian forum.. by telarus · · Score: 1

    I posted this story to the discordian forum yesterday morning. One of the first things to be brought up was what a great advancement this will be for the teledildonics industry.

    I guess that's what you get in a crowded room full of Popes. I'm glad most of us don't wear the hat all the time, that would be creepy.

    The following is commentary on the OP story.

    Quote from: LMNO on Today at 07:16:33 AM
    I think that one of the most important aspects of Discordia (and the BIP[Black Iron Prison narrative]) is to constantly remind ourselves that we are always fooling ourselves as to what's "really out there". Always.
    ALL THE TIME.

    EVEN RIGHT NOW.

    Quote from:Iptuous on Today at 07:23:08 AM
    Fooling ourselves?
    or, just limited in scope as to our perception of it?

    Quote from: LMNO on Today at 07:24:24 AM
    If it was just limited perception, we would see the gaps.

    We make shit up to create a cohesive worldview.

    Often, the shit we make up has nothing to do with anything.

  17. First Person Shooter by Reziac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nope, but it did occur to me that they've essentially reproduced the First Person Shooter -- what dedicated player hasn't "ducked" away from incoming fire, or tried to peer around the corner of the monitor when trying to see around a corner?? Same behaviour, really -- putting yourself in the place of your onscreen avatar's viewpoint to the point that you lose track of which body you actually inhabit, and react as if the avatar is real and YOU.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:First Person Shooter by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I've never played many first person shooters, but my wife thinks it's rather funny to watch me lean left or right in my chair while trying to complete a tight turn in a flight simulator. Basically, the same principle.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    2. Re:First Person Shooter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mirror Edge could be a good game to continu their works...

    3. Re:First Person Shooter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh. I may have been playing Left 4 Dead the other day, and I may have almost swung my arm at my monitor when a zombie latched onto me.

      Its also interesting how sometimes your stomach sort of jumps when you leap off a ledge in a game to a bloody death, similar to landing in a plane.

    4. Re:First Person Shooter by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      I don't even think it takes that level of immersion.

      I used to lean in various ways while playing super mario bros on the original nintendo, without even noticing that I was doing it until I leaned too far or something. Trying to make him jump just that little bit farther. Noticed other people doing it too, without being aware of it.

      My dad was a professional bowler. I'd see him 'become' the ball, trying to affect it's motion far after it left his hand. But on a sub-conscious level. I doubt he was at all aware of his body language.

      I've done quite the same as parent mentions playing battlefield2 and whatnot, but also think the above examples fall into the same category. I don't think it requires a first-person-shooter level of immersion.

    5. Re:First Person Shooter by philspear · · Score: 1

      Same behaviour, really -- putting yourself in the place of your onscreen avatar's viewpoint to the point that you lose track of which body you actually inhabit, and react as if the avatar is real and YOU.

      In soviet russia, avatar in first person shooter IS YOU!

      Sorry, that was mostly uncalled for.

    6. Re:First Person Shooter by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      Be glad you weren't playing as a Boomer on a Versus server.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    7. Re:First Person Shooter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes while playing QWOP I involuntarily kick my legs, and that's about the least complicated or immersive game in history.

    8. Re:First Person Shooter by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Great, you made my avatar spit on my monitor! :D

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:First Person Shooter by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree entirely -- I've even found myself leaning toward the home team's goalpost while watching football on TV. All it takes is involvement, and the body starts to follow the brain's desire. FPS's, and what these researchers are doing, just take it another step... I suppose the equivalent of watching the football game via helmetcam.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    10. Re:First Person Shooter by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Umm... in capitalist america, you are your avatar?

      I dunno, but the idea sends a chill down my spine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:First Person Shooter by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      You make a fantastic point. More than once in my life, a day after a long binge on a FPS, I've been hesitant to round corners without peeking around them first. And yes, I've looked up to see if there were snipers in a tall building/on a ridge before going out into the open.

      This really isn't all that impressive.

      Hell, we did a run of "Assassination" in college freshman year, and it took the better part of a week to get over that paranoia. Subject someone to an imaginary reality for long enough, and it becomes pretty real. This isn't all that surprising.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    12. Re:First Person Shooter by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I disconnect from the FPS readily enough (I don't do the real-life behaviours you mention, when not playing) BUT... DOOM made me much more *aware* of what's in my Real Life encounter-space, especially when driving. So it's been quite beneficial in the real world.

      But yeah, I think they've just rediscovered what we already knew :) OTOH now maybe they'll see some benefit to it, like I already have :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:First Person Shooter by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

      I've seen a few motion capture-based games in the arcade where moving your body is part of taking cover and looking around corners. It was all kinds of fun until those sofa-loving bastards bought out the local arcade and turned it into a Raymor & Flannagan.

      --
      This sig is false.
    14. Re:First Person Shooter by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting comment about Doom - I live in deer country, and have always paid attention to the sides of the road, looking for stuff that's about to jump out in front of me. I wonder how much of that is from Doom? Because I played a *lot* of Doom as a kid, living in a very rural area. Three-four of us would get together, and break up our weekend of gaming every 14 hours or so to get a few hours of sleep.

      I don't know that I can directly tie the two together, but I bet you're spot on about encounter-space awareness boosts.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    15. Re:First Person Shooter by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I found that I got the realworld awareness boost in tandem with the point where I really got good at DOOM, and could take on just about any map from a pistol start. I'd abruptly put together effective strafing and effectively-aggressive play, and changed my whole style from snipe-and-retreat to "turn everyone loose at once and run around the melee making them kill each other". Well, you can't survive that if you're not aware of stuff incoming from the sides! And I noticed how I was suddenly more aware (it was quite definite) of stuff to either side while driving, too -- yeah, having myself grown up in deer country, I've always been big on peering in both directions, but now it was more all of a piece without having to do so much actual looking. And since I'd been driving for over 20 years at the time, it wasn't just some big leap in my driving experience.

      Anyway, it's useful, and BTW I still kill a few hellspawn every day :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:First Person Shooter by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      lol. Me too... for a while I was spending so much time playing FPS that I found myself unconsciously scanning the sidewalks when I drove.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  18. Misleading title by fractalspace · · Score: 1

    Utterly misleading title, wasted precious 4 minutes of my life. Thankyouverymuch.

  19. Sensationalism by leonbloy · · Score: 1

    The title of the paper is just: "Perceptual Illusion of Body Swapping". It only remains to traverse the small gap from "illusion" to "fact" to render the title at Slashdot (and at the Washington Post) true.
    In other news: a person was triggered to have the illusion of having been transported to Jupiter. Hence, the sentence "A man was trasported to Jupiter" should be considered -at least approximately- true.
    The experiment might be of interest, I don't dispute that; but come on. Wake me up when the "swapped mind" is able to command the other body.

  20. at home? by lofoforabr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    > even feeling at home in the body of someone of the opposite sex

    I normally feel very very at home *in* the body of someone of the opposite sex :)

    1. Re:at home? by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      I was going to say that too. Then I remembered this isn't digg.

    2. Re:at home? by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      Related to this and the story, when I see someone of the opposite sex being sexually stimulated, I too tend to orgasm. It's amazing!

  21. WELCOME by AdamThor · · Score: 1

    I welcome myself as our new mannequin overlord!

    Stay away from me with that stick...

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
  22. Seriously kinky by mi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and even feeling at home in the body of someone of the opposite sex.

    After reading this I felt a hard-on, but then realized, it was my labia moistening... Oh, wait...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  23. Done Before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    British hypnotist Derren Brown did this to a guy, making him deeply believe his body was that of a ventriloquist's dummy. Freaky.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vd3dzTAALd8&feature=related

    1. Re:Done Before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also an interesting piece by him with an amputee. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWSvskyXu1o

  24. The technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like many people here was expecting to read an article describing some sort of elaborate brain scanning high technology. I, unlike most people posting so far, find it absolutely remarkable that the technology used to achieve this successful illusion was no more that sticks and cameras.

    This arguably simple achievement gives great insight into, and offers new debatable material for the murky subject of the mind\body relationship - which in itself may boil down to an illusion no more simple or complex than what we have been shown here.

  25. Over-reaching headline by frenchgates · · Score: 4, Funny

    On April fools day they should run only stories that would exist in a comic book world. The ones we slashdotters keep waiting for...

    "Scientist successfully places human brain in Ape"
    "Safe and inexpensive teleportation now available"

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    1. Re:Over-reaching headline by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

      "Scientist successfully places human brain in Ape"

      It's already been done

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
    2. Re:Over-reaching headline by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      No... that's an ape's brain in a human body, the inverse of what the parent is saying.

    3. Re:Over-reaching headline by arotenbe · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pretty sure it's an ape in an ape's body.

      --
      Tomato wedge sperm darts that are Republican.
    4. Re:Over-reaching headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant to mod you funny, but accidentally modded 'Overrated', so this is to undo that.

  26. I Will Fear No Evil by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've corrected the subject line of this post to the Heinlein reference you were looking for (instead of just modding you down, which would have been rude).

    --
    Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
    1. Re:I Will Fear No Evil by VorlonFog · · Score: 1

      many thanks. that's what I get for reading and posting while I'm supposed to be participating in a conference call ;)

  27. Re:Quite a liedown...? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    and even feeling at home in the body of someone of the opposite sex.

    After reading the article they were just simultaneously poking people with sticks...

    Hmmm . . . I think there might be joke in there somewhere, but I seem to be a little slow tonight.

    Or maybe I'm just not knowledgeable about the latest Fetish du Jour . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  28. Lame sex joke #3405 by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0, Troll

    even feeling at home in the body of someone of the opposite sex

    Feel at home? I'd never move out!

    Key word here is feel.

    Yeah, yeah. The low road.

  29. We're Almost There! by freemarklar · · Score: 1

    The day grows ever nearer that I may play with my very own set of boobies!

    1. Re:We're Almost There! by 6Yankee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just keep eating the junk food.

  30. Soul migration? Nah.... by Twinbee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Quote from the article:

    The researchers created the illusion of body-swapping by touching the stomach of both the mannequin and the volunteer with sticks

    What would have been far more interesting is if they achieved the same sensation without poking the participant as well. But even then, that could be be achieved with hypnosis anyway (?)

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  31. Its called empathy... by denzacar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nothing mythical, mysterious or mind blowing about it.
    The humans in the test are simply percepting something they see done to another as done to themselves.
    Its not even psychological - its neurological.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy#The_development_of_empathy

    The study of the neural underpinnings of empathy has received increased interest following the target paper published by Preston and De Waal,[39] following the discovery of mirror neurons in monkeys that fire both when the creature watches another perform an action as well as when they themselves perform it.
    In their paper, they argued that 'attended perception of the object's state automatically activates neural representations, and that this activation automatically primes or generate the associated autonomic and somatic responses, unless inhibited.

    That is also why "it did not work when a non-humanoid object -- such as a chair or large block -- was used."
    You can't empathize with a block of wood.

    Unless it is in a form of a Weighted Companion Cube.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Its called empathy... by philspear · · Score: 1

      Nothing mysterious about it eh? Have everything about empathy already figured out do we? Even if we knew about this before, it's still a fairly strange application of a strange phenomena, in my book.

    2. Re:Its called empathy... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Nothing mysterious about the effects of the so called "Mental Body-Swapping".

      As for empathy... see the Wikipedia link above.
      There are a shitload of theories, research and results about it.

      And "unknown" and "mysterious" don't mean exactly the same thing.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    3. Re:Its called empathy... by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      The humans in the test are simply percepting something they see done to another as done to themselves.

      It's not even that. They put goggles on the person that showed them the mannequin body from their own POV, and then poked them both with a stick at the same time. What the subject felt was actually happening to him/her, they just accepted that the mannequin-body they were looking at was actually their own because all the external inputs (vision and touch) matched what they were actually experiencing.

      Another example of the same trick would be to blindfold someone. Give them a stick, and tell them to poke it forwards from time to time. Place a mattress in front of them. When they poke the mattress, poke them in the back at the same time with about the same amount of force. Their instinct will be to think they're somehow poking themselves even though logically it's impossible.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  32. I'm so GlaD!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was a triumph.

    I'm making a note here, huge success.

    It's hard to overstate my satisfaction.

    Aperture Science.

    We do what we must, because we can...

  33. Re:I'd feel right at home by Nathrael · · Score: 2

    Cue hot grits joke in 3..2..1..

    --
    A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
  34. Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why is this tagged with 'furries'?

    1. Re:Umm by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a good question.

      I suspect that if it can be done for one's sex, it can be done for one's "species".

    2. Re:Umm by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      The article said "humanoid" bodies, not "human" ones...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  35. Re:Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you think you are impressing whom exactly?

  36. The Girl Who Was Plugged In by opencity · · Score: 1

    Genius short story by James Tiptree Jr(who just had to be a male)

    This is a Tiptree thread troll.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    1. Re:The Girl Who Was Plugged In by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      You realize rthat James Tiptree Jr was actually a female? Her real name was Alice Sheldon.
      http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue22/tiptree.html

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:The Girl Who Was Plugged In by opencity · · Score: 1

      Yes that was the reference. Silverberg published an article on how Tiptree had to be male. ... doh! Which didn't make sense to this pre teen sci fi fan at the time as Forever on a Hudson Bay Blanket and Girl ... Plugged In both seemed ... uh .. female. Now that I know significantly less about women I wonder what I would think.

      --
      Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  37. Been there by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

    scientists have succeeded in [making subjects feel] at home in the body of someone of the opposite sex.

    I've been achieving the same via PornoTube for quite some time now.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  38. Implications for pornography and prostitution by SinGunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Prostitution just became an issue of how well the girl can mimic the actions of the pornography you're watching. Ugly prostitutes rejoiced.

  39. Re:Ghost in the Shell. Fyre in da HOLE? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Appropriately... fitting topic... "Hard Ware"

    I prefer to make LOVE, not WAR. So... Butt, Real-Doll... hear, I cum...

    Butt, an asside. (please refrain from "Hello Dolly"...)

    Does that mean we can have mind-body/booty transformayshun into a man-akin? Now, peephole can sex-spear-e-ence same-sex relay-shuns with or without, within and with out feeling or feeling shunned.

    Butt, also, if we can carry a dummy along, then when him/her-roids become un-bare-able, we can transfer our minds/sould (and hopefully our pain receptors, or perceptive/receptive pain receptors) and transfer our asses (minds) out of the body into the new receptacle.

    What becomes of two who become one? Will they be singing Hall & Oates' "Did It In a Minute" (..."And if TWO become ONE, who is the ONE TWO beCOME?")

    What if something leads to ... "loose screws..."?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  40. Re:First Person Shooter... FPS by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    "First Person Suckee"

    "what dedicated player hasn't "ducked" away from incoming fire, or tried to peer around the corner of the monitor when trying to see around a corner?? Same behaviour, really -- putting yourself in the place of your onscreen avatar's viewpoint to the point that you lose track of which body you actually inhabit, and react as if the avatar is real and YOU."

    What on-line pr0n add-dicked hasn't looked or felt around under the desk at work while looking around the monitor?

    Things will be interesting if kompooters and adult enter-stain-men-t venues merge. Will they be the new "Speakeasies" of our time?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  41. Re:First Person Shooter I wonder... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    How many pr0n stars "become" their ... counterpart... but we never see because its in the outtakes...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  42. The mind is funky! by Pedrito · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The mind can easily be tricked.

    Phantom limb syndrome is a common problem for amputees, where pain or discomfort is felt in the limb that no longer exists.

    One of the treatments for phantom limb syndrome involves using a mirror to make reflect you existing limb in such a way that it looks like you have both limbs. The person then performs certain actions such that it appears that the limb is restored and operating. Though one of the limbs doesn't exist, your brain is still wired as if it can move the limb. Once you actually view the missing limb performing these actions, the pain goes away.

    Seems to me that this experiment isn't much different than replacing a phantom limb with a mirror.

  43. Reserchers found that 100% of guys in the study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instantly started playing with thier boobs the second they were mind-melded to a female body?

  44. really not very new... by rkww · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have beside me a book entitled Phantoms in the Brain (VS Ramachandran, foreword Oliver Sachs) first published in 1998, which suggests you should "have your friend stroke identical locations on both your hand and the dummy hand synchronously while you look at the dummy. Within seconds you will experience the stroking sensations as arising from the dummy hand". It goes on to describe how you can also experience touch sensations as arising from tables and chairs.

    Incidentally I'd recommend this book for anybody interested in perception; it's a readable introduction into the very strange perceptual phenomena that can be encountered by people with rare forms of brain damage, some of which give valuable insights into the way the mind works.

  45. Hyper-complicated? Trash? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Well... yes. If you were expecting a quick action fix.
    GITS and Masamune Shirow's manga in general need to be watched/read with some concentration.
    Add to that Mamoru Oshii's direction who almost always goes of to a deep end of the psychology pool and it may seem unnecessarily complicated.

    As for trash..

    Try reading some of Shirow's manga. He would really get into particulars with every single little thing in his universe.
    That is, before he figured out he can live off the royalties and churning out a borderline hentai calendars and art-books here and there.
    There are no "beam guns" in Shirow's manga.
    If a piece of technology is used there is a neat description somewhere of how and why that particular piece of technology works and what are its underlying principles.
    There is almost no issue without some added bits of text with additional explanation for such cases.
    Original Ghost in the Shell manga is a great example. There are about 10 pages of "notes" at the end of the book.

    A great example of visionary "future tech" he also featured can be found in Ghost in the Shell 1.5: Human-Error Processor.
    In a story printed in 1992 (Drive Slave) he drew microrobots that travel through bloodstream using flagella for propulsion.
    Such robots are widely researched today.

     
    On other hand...
    I fear that you have no idea what Sci-Fi is. Or Science Fiction. Or that one is primarily read, and other mostly watched these days.

    GITS SAC 1, 2 and the movies are great sci-fi.
    GITS manga and movies are great Science Fiction.
    If nothing else, Hollywood hacks like Wachowskis ripping it off is a good indicator of its value.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      "If a piece of technology is used there is a neat description somewhere of how and why that particular piece of technology works and what are its underlying principles."

      This is what I have a problem with.
      99% of the time, the science/technology/explanations behind it is just complete bullshit, intentionally piled higher and deeper so people who call it out are labeled as "not getting it". I haven't read the manga of GitS, so I can't comment on that. But the general tendency for sci-fi anime (and sci-fi anything) is to over-explain to cover up flawed scientific reasoning.

      GitS also goes into the whole identity stuff in much the same way.

      I absolutely hate when people say "X stole from Y". GitS is a good example of this. You typically get people who have seen GitS and not Bladerunner (or before Bladerunner) and have not read DADoES?. They then see something else and say it was stolen from GitS. Everything steals from something else. Very few original ideas exist.

      I don't know what you're referring to about the Wachowski dipshits and them ripping it off, but I believe it. They truly are hacks.

      For the record, I think 99% of what's out there (hollywood or otherwise) as "sci-fi" is shit, and should not really be considered sci-fi.

    2. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      For the record, I think 99% of what's out there (hollywood or otherwise) as "sci-fi" is shit, and should not really be considered sci-fi.

      Then what is it instead? What *is* SF in your mind? Saying, "It has to meet my exacting standards of quality before I accept it as part of the genre," is meaningless unless you define what those standards are.

      Otherwise, you're just a living example of the No True Scotsman Fallacy.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    3. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      "If a piece of technology is used there is a neat description somewhere of how and why that particular piece of technology works and what are its underlying principles."

      This is what I have a problem with.
      99% of the time, the science/technology/explanations behind it is just complete bullshit, intentionally piled higher and deeper so people who call it out are labeled as "not getting it". I haven't read the manga of GitS, so I can't comment on that. But the general tendency for sci-fi anime (and sci-fi anything) is to over-explain to cover up flawed scientific reasoning.

      I was referring to the manga. Read some of Shirow's GITS and Appleseed works.
      If he says that a round from a GunTM goes through an ArmourTM it probably means that he did some extensive research about guns, calibers, materials and such before making that claim.
      Manga in general is mostly not like Marvel with its "fill in the bubbles". One guy is responsible for drawing AND writing.
      Yes, he may use helpers for manual labor, but in the end only one name is connected to the work.
      So, when they work on something - they pay attention. Any mistake is their own, and any expression relayed through the story is their own. There is no wizard.

      Also... dig up Mamoru Osii's Avalon and his Red Spectacles - Stray Dog: Kerberos Panzer Cops - Jin Roh: The Wolf Brigade trilogy.
      You should notice that in general - he makes more of an art/philosophical movie with SF taking the back seat or being just a setting.

      Put a layer of that over Shirow's detailed work - and you get what you call "piled higher and deeper".

      I don't know what you're referring to about the Wachowski dipshits and them ripping it off, but I believe it. They truly are hacks.

      I was referring to the GITS opening credits (letters and kanji forming words) which were lifted to create the "pure unconverted Matrix" and probably also the "jacking in". Although that can be traced to various other SF work.

      For the record, I think 99% of what's out there (hollywood or otherwise) as "sci-fi" is shit, and should not really be considered sci-fi.

      Check you terminology. Sci-fi is often considered a pejorative term.
      Then again, you ARE saying that 99% of X is not really X but Y.

      Wouldn't then the logic dictate that it be called Y and not X?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    4. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      For the record, I think 99% of what's out there (hollywood or otherwise) as "sci-fi" is shit, and should not really be considered sci-fi.

      So here's his point again, troll-question notwithstanding.

      Most of the stuff that is churned out *is* shit and I'm surprised the 'dot has been so hard on someone merely exhibiting a strong purist position. We're all purists! More than likely, everyone here has at least one topic we're known to be a little.. opinionated about.

      I'm no expert in the subject matter at hand but it does seem to be difficult to convey subtleties of thought between cultures. Perhaps this helps explain why so much stuff seems to miss whatever it was aiming for. Of course, Slashdot readers aren't a good example of big media's target audience.

      For what it's worth I don't agree with sexconker on a lot of his other points, but criticise the man for his choice of example, not his desire for quality!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    5. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      No, it wouldn't.

      I'd say about 90% of people would call spiders insects. It doesn't make them insects.

      About 65% of movies are deemed "gripping", 90% of action movies are related to a "thrill ride", and the supreme Court has declared the tomato is to be classified as a fruit (for tariff purposes).

      Classifications, even official ones, aren't always right. Logic would dictate that if most of what is called X is actually not X, but is Y, then most of what is called X should be called Y to rectify the situation. We shouldn't go and redefine X and Y.

    6. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      No, I'm living in the real world where 99% of everything out of hollywood or the media in general is pure, refined, feces.

      Random example of good sci-fi:
      Andromeda Strain.

      I'll give you another random example for every retarded reply you post. Figuring out what sci-fi is is left as an exercise for the reader.

    7. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classifications, even official ones, aren't always right. Logic would dictate that if most of what is called X is actually not X, but is Y, then most of what is called X should be called Y to rectify the situation. We shouldn't go and redefine X and Y.

      Speaking of which, two men living together isn't "marriage". Neither is two women. Frankly I don't care if they want to live together and I'm even willing to give them the same tax status as "married" couples, so no, I'm not some sort of radical anti-gay fundamentalist. It's not marriage though. Call it something else.

    8. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      No, I'm living in the real world where 99% of everything out of hollywood or the media in general is pure, refined, feces.

      So? What does quality have to do with genre? Sturgeon's Law, no matter how crudely put, doesn't eliminate the majority of bad SF from still being SF.

      Random example of good sci-fi:
      Andromeda Strain.

      You mean the book with the energy converting crystal "virus" that ended with a deus ex machina spontaneous conversion of the escaping threat which would supposedly wipe out all of humanity to a rubber-eating virus (all at once and with no worries of converting back)? Like most of Crichton's work, it was too impressed with itself, with the bits of research he'd done on the background material, ignorant of the gaping holes in its own science, and good at building up suspense but terrible at delivering a climax and satisfying resolution.

      Andromeda Strain was mediocre unless you stopped reading about 30 pages before the end.

      I'll give you another random example for every retarded reply you post. Figuring out what sci-fi is is left as an exercise for the reader.

      i.e. You're trolling. If you can't define what the genre is, then you're just engaging in the No True Scotsman's fallacy, and your opinions can safely be disregarded as ignorant posturing.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    9. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Man, you are mentally retarded.

      There are no "fallacies" in what I'm discussing, and pointing to a well-known "fallacy" that has a name is as much of a straw man as calling someone's argument a straw man.

      Random example of good Sci-Fi: The Thing

    10. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Man, you are mentally retarded.

      There are no "fallacies" in what I'm discussing, and pointing to a well-known "fallacy" that has a name is as much of a straw man as calling someone's argument a straw man.

      The No True Scotsman Fallacy is basically a fallacy of definition. You say that "X can never be Y." When someone shows you X being Y, you simply state, "No true X can be Y." This is simply what you are doing. People have challenged you to explain why Ghost in the Shell isn't SF (or "sci-fi" as you insist on calling it). Instead of providing any kind of definition, you just simply say GitS isn't true SF.

      And for reference, a straw man fallacy is when you present someone as making an argument that they aren't making (usually a parodied form of what they are saying), and then attack it in an attempt to discredit the other person. Since you're are clearly stating that GitS isn't true SF, that's not the case. Even if you are grossly ignorant of the meaning of the No True Scotsman fallacy. Just because you don't understand the argument doesn't make it a straw man.

      But, hey, way to change the subject. You still haven't bothered to try to define SF. Stop name-calling and do so. Otherwise, you're still just trolling.

      Random example of good Sci-Fi: The Thing

      I like Campbell's original short story better. It's aged better with time.

      Still, Carpenter's take on it was pretty good, so I'll play along. David Brin's "Kiln People."

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    11. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It's not very specific, but I think this was his explanation of why it's bad.

      No, it's hyper complicated to cover for the fact that it's completely ridiculous. See NGE, any anime involving a futuristic military force, pretty much all of Star Trek, etc.

      The general trend is for sloppy / poorly planned sci-fi to get worse as it progresses as the writers have to change the rules of the universe, account for inconsistencies, and generally one-up previous episodes/movies. I'm willing to accept the twisted physics and lore in the SG-1 series, but at least keep it consistent.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    12. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that has nothing to with why it's "not sci-fi." Saying it's "bad sci-fi" is different from "not sci-fi."

      And besides, if he considers inconsistencies and one-upsmanship bad and yet accepts SG-1, he's a bleeding hypocrite because GitS is at least *consistent* with its vision of technology, setting, and theme because it has a single creator (with some collaboration in the movies and anime, but drawing from a consistent pool of authors the whole time). SG-1 is written by committee, like most TV shows, and the members change over time.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    13. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I don't accept SG-1.
      I accept early SG-1. I specifically point out how shit tends to get worse as it goes on longer., and use SG-1 as an example. I also mention that it's not an issue of suspending disbelief / accepting the tech/science/physics/etc. in a given universe, it's much more of an issue of the universe being inconsistent, retconned, etc.

    14. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I don't accept SG-1.
      I accept early SG-1. I specifically point out how shit tends to get worse as it goes on longer., and use SG-1 as an example. I also mention that it's not an issue of suspending disbelief / accepting the tech/science/physics/etc. in a given universe, it's much more of an issue of the universe being inconsistent, retconned, etc.

      Then how is GitS inconsistent or retconned?

      And how is that relevant to whether or not something is SF or not?

      (BTW: "Lord of Light," by Roger Zelazny.)

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    15. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's not. It very well may be, but I didn't follow SAC much, and the less I think about Innocence, the better. I also never read the mangas, so I wouldn't know.

      Oh, and I never said it was.
      Oh, and I never said it was relevant to whether or not something was sci-fi or not.

      The parent above me stated "And besides, if he considers inconsistencies and one-upsmanship bad and yet accepts SG-1, ...". I reiterated myself, and said "I don't accept SG-1.". It is clear from context that the acceptance is about good/bad sci-fi. I have stated previously that I think the shit that happens when series run long is horrible, and I used SG-1 as an example of that. The parent who said I was "accepting" SG-1 did so erroneously. You then took my reiteration about SG-1 and somehow thought it was a claim that GitS was inconsistent or retconned. I then made this point, reiterating my initial statement about SG-1 for the second time.

      You're trying to poke holes in and make me defend arguments and positions I never made and never took. You're really stretching.

    16. Re:Hyper-complicated? Trash? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      It's not. It very well may be, but I didn't follow SAC much, and the less I think about Innocence, the better. I also never read the mangas, so I wouldn't know.

      Innocence was crap. I'd even agree to the "hyper-complicated trash" label there. SAC is very like the manga in terms of the mix between thought-provoking content and fan-pleasing action. The first movie is a little higher on the thought-provoking side (though a bit unsubtle about it). Innocence was just crap. (I thought it deserved to be mentioned twice.)

      Still, all of it was SF.

      It is clear from context that the acceptance is about good/bad sci-fi.

      So then, do you accept that bad SF exists and is still SF?

      If so, then why is GitS "not sci-fi" and not merely "bad sci-fi?"
      If not, then what is SF such that it can only be good?

      (Also, "The Stars My Destination" and "The Demolished Man," by Alfred Bester.)

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  46. Re:Dear Developers by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I strongly get the feeling that the Slashdot and/or Slashcode developers are succumbing to feature creep, and adding things to the system just for the sake of adding them, even when the system works fine. This seems to have started after the CSS redesign.

    Slashdot isn't perfect. However, it's a damn sight better than a lot of other discussion sites out there, especially the moderation system.

    Please don't fuck with it when it's not broken. There are things in it that are obviously broken, such as the fact that Funny mods don't grant karma. However, fundamentally changing a system that previously worked fine is, well, stupid.

    Someone in the development chain seems to have the notion that metamoderation was too hard. It wasn't. The reason for this is that the people doing metamod are already committed to making Slashdot better. They will deal with the compexities involved because due the system's limits on who can access mod / metamod, they're already used to them.

    Making it "easier" by removing features simply doesn't make sense.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  47. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...

    ...

    no.

    You should feel rather alone by now.

  48. dupe, dupe, dupe -- in all senses of the word by mccoyspace · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dr. Henrik Ehrsson sure is basing his research career around this topic. And every time he publishes a paper basically saying the same thing as the last, the press jumps all over it as the realization of some sci-fi dream. check out the google news archive. I think the research is fine as far as it goes, but it seems very much in the neighborhood of simulator rides and dummy head recording.

    1. Re:dupe, dupe, dupe -- in all senses of the word by Geminii · · Score: 1
      Dr. Henrik Ehrsson sure is basing his research career around this topic. And every time he publishes a paper basically saying the same thing as the last, the press jumps all over it as the realization of some sci-fi dream.

      Admittedly, if the media fawned over everything I ever published on my favorite topic and it made me enough money to live on, I'd be sorely tempted to keep writing "just one more" paper.

  49. belief that the mannequin's body was their own by lazynomer · · Score: 1

    "developed a strong belief that the mannequin's body was actually their own", says TFA. How is that determined/measured? Was there a test that showed people could not tell the two bodies apart? Without that information, TFA is meaningless to me who is not familiar with such experiments. Can this "belief" be described, or would I have to experience it myself?

    1. Re:belief that the mannequin's body was their own by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      From the 2nd link in TFS:

      To provide objective evidence for the illusion of owning a body, we threatened the mannequin and measured the evoked skin conductance response (SCR) as an objective measure of anxiety. [...] After a period of one minute of synchronous or asynchronous stimulation as described above, participants observed a knife 'cutting' the mannequin's abdomen. To control for a general effect of seeing an object approaching the body we also included a second control condition where we touched the mannequin's abdomen with a neutral object [...] The key observation was a significantly greater SCR when we threatened the artificial body with the knife in the synchronous condition than in either one of the two control conditions

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:belief that the mannequin's body was their own by lazynomer · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You motivated me to read the paper.

      "Swapping did not happen when the touches were dissimilar."
      "Increased stress was measured when threatening the foreign body with knives."

      If the Washington Post had included sth. like these at the appropriate places, it would have greatly improved the article. We often lament the public's lack of basic understanding of scientific methodology, don't we? (And we lament slashdotters who post before following links, I know.)

      If I understand the discussion in the paper correctly, they could trick the mind because it takes shortcuts (it uses historical information as presuppositions) when assembling the whole experience of the body image. I wonder how well the swapping works when they modify the foreign body (with longer legs, a tail, etc.), or the apparent laws/parameters of physics it is subjected to. My guess is the latter has the best chance of working.

      Still, I cannot imagine the experience of body-swapping. Sounds exciting.

  50. Re:Dear Developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny mods not granting karma isn't broken. +1 Funny, -1 Troll resulting in a net karma loss is broken.

  51. Re:Dear Developers by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    That's ultimately what I meant, though I think the quickest fix is to grant karma to funny mods. I don't agree that funny comments are somehow less valuable than others.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  52. I guess that make this...dare I say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Freaky Friday.

  53. Extension of the body by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

    This seems like a direct extension from the article a while ago explaining how tools are perceived by the brain to be an extension of the body. In this case, the mannequin is the tool in question. This is interesting, but it doesn't strike me as a huge breakthrough.

    1. Re:Extension of the body by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It's pretty interesting, though... the subjects exhibited anxiety when the mannequin was threatened with a knife. It's odd that we would "own" a tool to such a high degree that we're anxious when it's physically threatened.

      In another experiment, they had the subject shake hands with a second person who was wearing the camera for the subject's video feed. The subject felt like they actually were the other person. The illusion was so strong that the subject exhibited greater anxiety when the other person's hand was threatened with a knife than when their own hand was.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  54. This wont work for Phantom limb by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Just look at the guy:
    http://www.venturebroswiki.com/vbwiki/Phantom_Limb

    Do you really think rubbing his tummy will me him go away?

    What?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  55. A Minor Step Sideways by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The same things have been done with mirrors, the subjects' hands and the experimenter assistant's hands. It's so simple and common that it's been used to demonstrate cognitive mapping in undergrad classes. I did so 10 years ago.

    The only new item in TFA is use of video cameras placed at eye locations and equivalent ocular presentation. In TFA they manage to do the same as has been done before, except they use a lot more of very expensive equipment. Science marches on, though not necessarily forward.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  56. Re:Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4chan is an image board
    "an hero" is something they say a lot referring to suicide
    Do you think "an hero" is another site? You idiot AC?

  57. Hypnosis by Firrenzi · · Score: 1

    This is not new. This has been done by hypnosis and embedded commands for quite a while now

    --
    The Tao that can be named is not the Tao
  58. Phantom Limb Experiment! by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of Vilayanur Ramachandran's talk on TED: A journey to the center of your mind

    http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/vilayanur_ramachandran_on_your_mind.html

    If you don't recall the talk, it's the one about the phantom limbs and how a simple trick helped people who had their arms amputated to stop the pain from the phantom limb.

  59. Re:Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

    I think you a word there

  60. Descartes' Demon rises again? by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1

    Well, doesn't this bring up some philosophical questions. We're getting awfully close to figuring out how to really fool the brain, aren't we? Even if the input is a little "off", the brain seems willing to adapt to the new "normal". That's the interesting thing - it doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to be good enough. That trait, combined with technological improvements, will likely lead to some amazingly appalling applications and some horrific consequences within a couple of decades.

    1. Re:Descartes' Demon rises again? by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Haven't you figured it out yet? There is no such thing as planet earth or humans!

  61. Why not replace the whole thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Destroy the head, body and appendages of a person, and then replace them with a complete other human.

    This process is both simple and doable. Just look at Iraq. They took Saddam Hussein, destroyed him, then replaced him with another complete human being. Extraordinary. It has happened throughout history too - replaced Kennedy with LBJ, replaced John Smith with Tony Blair. There are endless possibilities. Really, why stop at replacement of just the body?

  62. Re:Dear Developers by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    +1 Funny, -1 Overrated resulting in a net karma loss is broken.

    Troll comments which happen to be funny are still trolls.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.