Slashdot Mirror


Firefox 3.1 Beta 2 Adds Private Browsing

CWmike was one of several readers to point out the release of Firefox 3.1 Beta 2, the first version of its flagship browser to switch on the much faster TraceMonkey JavaScript engine and sport a working privacy mode dubbed "Private Browsing." An ancillary addition to Private Browsing is a new addition to the "Clear Recent History" dialog box allowing users selectively to erase the last hour, the last two hours, the last four hours, today's, or all browsing history — previously, the wipe was all or nothing. This beta includes support for "web worker threads," a developing specification that will let Web-based application developers run background processes to speed up their apps. One feature present in Beta 1 is gone in the new beta: Ctrl-Tab switching. According to the developer, the UI needs more work; the feature probably won't be in the final 3.1.

216 comments

  1. Kudos for the improvements, but... by acid06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come on... no Ctrl+Tab switching?
    How could anyone possibly use it without that feature?

    Seems like a deal-breaker for me...

    1. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't know what the hell they were thinking with that. I hope there's still some method of switching between tabs without reaching for the mouse.

    2. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by auric_dude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The acid test is will it now pass the http://acid3.acidtests.org/ ?

    3. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by AlterRNow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Alt + [0-9] allows me to switch tabs without the mouse ( not sure on any limitations e.g. only up to 10th tab ).

      --
      The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    4. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dunno why this was modded funny... have they seriously disabled that? If so, why???

    5. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. Maybe Firefox 3.2. *shrug*

      More interesting that talking about numbers in the Acid3 test is about the features lacking though. And a major part lacking here would be SVG fonts.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by acid06 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Honestly, I have no idea why it was moderated funny either.
      If I had mod points and could mod myself, I would myself insightful.

      But, uhm, I guess you just can't predict Slashdot behavior.

    7. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by deniable · · Score: 1

      Next question, how the hell did they break it? The UI needs more work, WTF? Maybe they were trying to add some eye candy to it.

    8. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by nozzo · · Score: 1

      ctrl-tab is a feature I use often flicking between tabs. Now there's a usability bug as far as I'm concerned.

    9. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, works for me. I mean, I press Ctrl+Tab and I move to next tab. Pressing Ctrl+Shift+Tab takes me to previous tab, as always. Only difference is that they have removed eye-candy, which irritated me anyway. And in Beta 1 Ctrl+Tab used to switch me to most recently used tab instead of simply next tab at the right, which also was annoying. I hope they will let the user configure this behaviour in the final version.

    10. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chill guys. The ctrl+tab switching that they are referring to is a new flashy, graphics update of the feature we know and love. Sort of like alt tab, showing previews of the pages and the like.

      I doubt they're removing the entire feature.

    11. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by acid06 · · Score: 1

      Well, right now I have 23 opened tabs (including this one).
      Unfortunately, I don't see any key labeled "23" on my keyboard. :(

    12. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by evilNomad · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Ctrl+Tab functionality is still there, they just removed the new interface that they had added in beta 1..

    13. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Shining+Celebi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't know what the hell they were thinking with that. I hope there's still some method of switching between tabs without reaching for the mouse.

      You can still switch tabs with Ctrl+Tab, it's just the fancy effects to go along with it are gone, as well as it switching based on recency instead of order. It'll work the same way it does in Firefox 3. You can also switch between tabs with Ctrl+PageUp and Ctrl+PageDown.

    14. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Billhead · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ctrl + Page Up/Page Down navigates through tabs.

    15. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by chrisgeleven · · Score: 1

      Geez did you people actually download the beta and try it?

      CTRL-TAB still works. I am rotating through tabs as we speak.

      All that was removed was the fancy previews of the tabs as you hit CTRL-TAB. They removed it to work on the impli

    16. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by y5 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Ctrl+Tab functionality is still there, they just removed the new interface that they had added in beta 1..

      Mod parent up. I'm using the latest nightly, and you can still CTRL+TAB. It just removes the screen previews from the previous beta, which IMO were slow and annoying.

      I wish the summary were more clear.

    17. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Looks like they removed it to work on that accidental-posting bug...

    18. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by stonedcat · · Score: 0

      Well it's a good thing that I don't have other binding set in place for those keys outside firefox... oh wait.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    19. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Kelbear · · Score: 2, Informative

      I keep a "close" button on my mouse. This is really just Alt+F4 but in Firefox to close a tab it's CTRL+W. (I can address this in program-specific options though)

      I keep a "toss window" button on my mouse to "toss" a window from one screen to the other, but I can't use it on a tab.

      I've got a button to tile all the windows via Switchr (kinda like what they've got on a mac), but it doesn't help with tabs.

      In firefox I don't have a forward or back button. I use a Shift button and a Minimize button instead. Shift+Mousewheel up is Forward, and Shift+Mousewheeldown is Back, and Shift+Leftclick is Open new window. I could also work around this by finding a way to change Shift+Leftclick to opening a new tab instead.

      I can find a way to compromise my usage in order to use tabs, but windows already fill the role better. So it is possible to use firefox without using tabs.

      (However, at work, I do use tabs because I have far less screen real estate and just a basic mouse. )

    20. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      Why use screen previews which are bound to be slow and cumbersome. if you need some sort of indicator, why not just use favicons and page title and have something more like ATL+TAB under Linux, Windows, etc.

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    21. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by creepynut · · Score: 3, Informative
    22. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Pearlswine · · Score: 1

      Come on... no Ctrl+Tab switching? How could anyone possibly use it without that feature?

      Seems like a deal-breaker for me...

      Ctrl+tab switching still works, it's the same as in firefox 3.0. They took out the beta 1 feature where if you hit ctrl+tab a window with a picture of all your current open tabs would open up (much like alt-tab in vista).

    23. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by yfkar · · Score: 1

      And in Beta 1 Ctrl+Tab used to switch me to most recently used tab instead of simply next tab at the right, which also was annoying.

      Yeah, that's amazingly annoying. Normally, I can see straight from the tab bar how many Ctrl+Tabs (or Shift+Ctrl+Tabs) I need to get to a particular tab. When using recently used tabs (like the default in Opera) instead of the tab order I just become disoriented.

    24. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Phisbut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ctrl + Page Up/Page Down navigates through tabs.

      Ctrl+PgUp/PgDn requires the use of my right hand (either both hands with left on left-Ctrl and right on PgUp, or just the right with thumb on right-Ctrl). I still need to move my right hand from my mouse to the keyboard and back.

      Ctrl+Tab, right next to Alt-Tab, lets me keep a hand on the mouse (which is very much in use during a browsing session, especially with mouse gestures), without the additional movement needed to click on tabs. Ctrl+Tab is a much better use of both hands than Ctrl+PgUp/PgDn will ever be.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    25. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless one mouses with the left hand. Dextrist!

    26. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by ion.simon.c · · Score: 0, Redundant

      *sigh*
      Mod clueless parent down, plz.
      Thx.

    27. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Vista uses a similar alt+tab thing, and XP did as well on some OEM versions (or if you installed the microsoft powertoy yourself). I actually prefer it to the old icon thing, useful if you have several windows of the same program open.

    28. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by louzerr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Firefox 3.1 beta ADDED NEW FEATURES to Ctrl+Tab. Those NEW FEATURES are buggy, and likely won't make it into the 3.1 final.

      They didn't BREAK anything ... just the opposite. Ctrl+Tab will behave in 3.1 just as it does in 3.0.

      --
      "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
    29. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Come on... no Ctrl+Tab switching?
      How could anyone possibly use it without that feature?

      Seems like a deal-breaker for me...

      Hardware is cheap these days. Why not buy a bunch of netbooks and open each tab on a different one?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    30. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by acid06 · · Score: 1

      Well, if you read the summary, you'll clearly read: "One feature present in Beta 1 is gone in the new beta: Ctrl-Tab switching."

      So maybe you might want to rephrase that as: "Mod clueless kdawson down, plz."

    31. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Foxtab:

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8879

      Coverflow styled ctrl+tab.

    32. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep forgetting about ctrl-tab ... don't use it

    33. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by redxxx · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+Tab, right next to Alt-Tab, lets me keep a hand on the mouse (which is very much in use during a browsing session, especially with mouse gestures), without the additional movement needed to click on tabs. Ctrl+Tab is a much better use of both hands than Ctrl+PgUp/PgDn will ever be.

      you use mouse gestures, why do you need to use the keyboard to change tabs? Set up next/previous/close/unclose after a week you'll never reach for the keyboard again, unless you're typing.

    34. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      if you're using mouse gestures already, why don't you just use them to navigate through tabs? Or if your hand is already on the mouse, just use the mouse?

    35. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by centuren · · Score: 1

      Firefox 3.1 beta ADDED NEW FEATURES to Ctrl+Tab. Those NEW FEATURES are buggy, and likely won't make it into the 3.1 final.

      They didn't BREAK anything ... just the opposite. Ctrl+Tab will behave in 3.1 just as it does in 3.0.

      This sounds like the definition of "breaking" somthing (in this beta release), rather than removing a feature.

    36. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      nah it scores 92 (at 100% page zoom, 89 at other zooms)but acid is just a pissing contest. Im much more worried about the way it fails most of css2.1 when not at 100% page zoom.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    37. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by nozzo · · Score: 1

      oh I didn't want NEW FEATURES to Ctrl+Tab, the old way worked JUST FINE.

    38. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl+Tab is no good if you are left-handed...

    39. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by mR.bRiGhTsId3 · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+Tab also cycles through tabs, even in firefox 3.1. I know you wanted the shiney animation, but Ctrl+Tab already does switch tabs.
      That being said, I want the animated tab switcher. THe little thumbnails you can get in IE 7 are in my mind about the only thing it got right.

    40. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by pizzach · · Score: 1

      Whipper snapper! You think you have it bad? Safari had Command-Shift-Left and Command-Shift-Right, and Camino has cmd-shift-[ and cmd-shift-]. It's like preforming a little dance with your fingers every time you want to switch a tab.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    41. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      Not on my beta2... Ctrl+Tabs works just fine (I like the Ctrl+, or Ctrl+. like on konqueror, because I can move more easier to both sides than just forward and back with Ctrl+Tab and Ctrl+Shift+Tab.

      Altough the Alt+0-9 does not work on me...

    42. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by FreeFull · · Score: 1

      Well, you won't get new features either.

      --
      No ascii art.
    43. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by deniable · · Score: 1

      Right, so there's more to it. They probably should have used a different name. It's like me making a new Windows Task Manager and calling it Alt+F4.

    44. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Well, right now I have 23 opened tabs (including this one).

      Umm. You have issues that can not be solved here. :)

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    45. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Mozk · · Score: 1

      I've never liked that feature. I've always preferred switching tabs based on how they are arranged in the tab bar, not by most recently viewed, and it's more logical that way (to me) anyway. The Tabs Open Relative addon makes the feature useless as well. The most recently viewed thing was probably intended to make up for the default behavior of opening new tabs WAY THE FUCK TO THE RIGHT OF EVERY OTHER TAB, which jumbles everything up when you're doing multiple things at once and therefore makes it necessary.

      --
      No existe.
    46. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Mozk · · Score: 1

      You mean taking screenshots of every tab, resampling them to a smaller size, resizing them again based on which one is selected, rendering their glossy reflections, and placing them in a translucent window over the current page is slow? Can't be!

      --
      No existe.
    47. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2

      Mouse Gestures?

      Also, I'm mousing left-handedly, you insensitive clod. Ctrl+Pg{Up,Dn} is fine ;)

    48. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by DeskLazer · · Score: 1

      have you ever been at a university and tried to mouse gesture with those hideous trackballs and separated mouse buttons that they have at kiosks?

      bring back ctrl+tab, for those of us who still are involved in places that use these things.

    49. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just highlight the tab's, uh, tab, and maybe center/widen/magnify it. Everything I need to know about the tab is already there: favicon and page title. (Can you tell Slashdot tabs apart by thumbnails?) Great advantage: keeping your spatial memory intact, instead of a detached representation with no relation to the position of the actual tab in your window.

    50. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      you use mouse gestures, why do you need to use the keyboard to change tabs? Set up next/previous/close/unclose after a week you'll never reach for the keyboard again, unless you're typing.

      Because there are things for which the keyboard is more efficient than a mouse gesture.

      Opening the third tab from the current is much faster with Ctrl+Tab+Tab+Tab than with MouseGesture+MouseGesture+MouseGesture.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    51. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by buchner.johannes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the explanation of what they want to do with Ctrl-Tab. It has nothing to do with the Control and Tab key sequence, it is a overview over all tabs.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    52. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Meh. We all know that kdawson needs to be drug out behind the woodshed and shot.

      Given this knowledge, *you* are doubly clueless to have relied in his summary! ;)

    53. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by beav007 · · Score: 1

      I regularly have 25-30 tabs open at a time. What are you trying to say?

    54. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by OutOnARock · · Score: 1


      Ctrl-F4 will close a tab.... on Windows....standard GUI navigation.

    55. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6366

      Or, if you can't even remember UDLR patterns (and therefore probably shouldn't be using gestures in the first place):
      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/29

    56. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by speed+of+lightx2 · · Score: 1

      you can also do alt+n to go to the nth tab (probably limited to 9 tabs though)

    57. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/380

      Set it for Q/E/alt+W and disable in input forms.

    58. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by redxxx · · Score: 1

      I suppose you have a point there, but it's not too much of a problem for me. I just click on the tab, but I typically run at least 1280x1024 and rarely have more than a dozen tabs open in a browser.

    59. Re:Kudos for the improvements, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which reminds me...

      You know your "enthusiasm" for your "interests" has gotten out of control when you wish that you could replace the keyboard and mouse with some handy foot controls.

      Ever get disgusted with yourself and feel the need to just hit delete and gain back 100GB of disk space?

  2. Think Same. by Xenex · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's taken over four years to copy Private Browsing from Safari, yet they didn't even bother coming up with a new name!

    1. Re:Think Same. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      And how long did it take for Safari to copy it from Opera?

    2. Re:Think Same. by theaveng · · Score: 4, Funny

      What is private browsing?

      Sometimes pegged with the catchy moniker of "porn mode", while in privacy mode..... URLs are not recorded in the browser history, cookies are not saved and other evidence is purged from the computer at the end of the session.

      This sounds like something I need.
      All the time.
      Every day.
      24/7.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    3. Re:Think Same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Private monkeying?

    4. Re:Think Same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have really strong hands.

    5. Re:Think Same. by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Buh? Why? Are you an uber liberal living in a fanatically conservative house or something?

    6. Re:Think Same. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps he's a Bart fan in Australia.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:Think Same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should really change it to= I don't want anyone to know I am watching this right now button.

  3. selective history deletion by Firkragg14 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No more suspicious empty history porn fans.

    1. Re:selective history deletion by maxume · · Score: 1

      My memory of managing history in 2.0 is that it was awkward and irritating. In 3.0, it is easy bring up the library and delete the bookmarks for an arbitrary amount of time, so empty history porn fans should have disappeared already.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:selective history deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Most distros, if you set up a user with a UID less than 1000, it doesn't show up anywhere on login screens, etc, but still functions normally. Name it something deceptive like httpdaemon and bury the home directory somewhere within /etc and tada, your own fully featured stealth pron user. No guarantees, but my SO hasn't found it after three years...

      Poisted AC for obvious reasons (ie, she reads /.)

    3. Re:selective history deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poisted AC for obvious reasons (ie, she reads /.)

      You have a female SO that reads slashdot?

      Sorry dude, you're already busted.

    4. Re:selective history deletion by ThePhilips · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To me, better feature would be to save history for only specified sites and/or to never save anything from specified sites.

      There are some sites I visit only to check something periodically - and I do not want them to be in history. Or sites which force you for every little thing to go to new page. I simply do not need them to clog my history.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    5. Re:selective history deletion by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      She reads slashdot, but she doesn't know how to do a "find / -iname *.jpg" ??

      Dude, she knows.

    6. Re:selective history deletion by zaxus · · Score: 1

      Better couple that with a loopback filesystem, to defeat random "find" and "locate" commands. Mount your loopback when you need access to your porn, make sure you unmount it when you're done. The worst thing your may have to do is migrate to a bigger loopback file if you run out of room. Has worked for me like a champ. :-)

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
    7. Re:selective history deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael we need to talk. Now.

    8. Re:selective history deletion by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      And now she's going to run find / -name '.bash_history'

    9. Re:selective history deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a little foolish. If she reads Slashdot, and is sufficiently proficient to check for a spurious user, she probably will, just for shits and giggles, especially if you have the kind of relationship where you're hiding pr0n use.

    10. Re:selective history deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a true crypt drive that contains all the date files for a VM (runs under VM Ware). It runs W2K and firefox.

      To get in, my girlfriend would have to get the password to my true crypt drive and then also how to load up the VM and also find a way to login.

      Search the native drive won't yield anything since A) it's encrypted and even if it wasn't B) it's all contained in VM's binary data files.

      That sounds complex in practice, but in reality, I just load it up, type in a password and *BAM* porn heaven. I just keep the encrypt drive connected. If it's powered off, then the encrypt drive is no longer available (till I log in, load true crypt, give it pass/key and then mount it)

  4. What's worse... by Tatarize · · Score: 1

    In the future they are going to invent the browser without bloat stealing it from Chrome and Firefox 1.0.

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  5. These features by mtarnovan · · Score: 1

    are already available in Chrome/Chromium, and I find them very useful. Good thing they found their way to Firefox. I always found it very annoying to have to delete the whole cache in Firefox, especially since you have to do so rather often when you are working on html/css.

    1. Re:These features by JuanCarlosII · · Score: 1

      Have you tried disabling cache using the web developer toolbar?

    2. Re:These features by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      ctrl-f5?

    3. Re:These features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen the result?

  6. Finally! by Rangu+Nikorasu · · Score: 1

    Finally I don't have to worry about clearing the history... wait, did I remember to enable the add-on...? Lol, good for the hardrive memory impaired, doesn't write all the useless crap to the disk!

    --
    "Bellum est Pacis. Licentia est Servitus. Ignarus est Vires."
  7. Seems top-heavy compared to Stealther by Eccles · · Score: 2, Informative

    Stealther did the same thing, but started a heck of a lot faster and could even delete downloads. It doesn't work completely with 3.1 though. Clearing the history for periods of time is a nice touch for those who forget to engage the private mode.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    1. Re:Seems top-heavy compared to Stealther by Auraiken · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or for those who want privacy in the engaged mode ;)

    2. Re:Seems top-heavy compared to Stealther by BZ · · Score: 1

      I believe the private browsing mode does delete downloads from the download manager (though not from your disk, of course).

  8. Previously the wipe wasn't what you wanted. by Rufty · · Score: 1

    Wipe private data doesn't always work, see bug:- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462831
    So how about fixing it before adding to it?

    --
    Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
  9. Javascript speed by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the new Javascript engine is turned on, does this mean that the new Firefox beta gives a larger e-penis than Chrome or the latest Safari?

    Seriously, I am thinking it might be time to start learning Javascript (to a higher level than just being able to copy and paste snippets to autoscroll the page and other simple effects). It's not perfect but it has wide support and mindshare, which is more important than any technical criterion. What I want to do is display simple graphs in the browser of things like stock prices, based on information fetched over SOAP (yeah I know SOAP is a bit clunky, but it's the interface I have). Can more experienced programmers recommend Javascript tutorial sites (at a higher level than 'copy and paste this snippet of code to get cool smilies!') or a good set of libraries?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Javascript speed by Azeroth48 · · Score: 3, Informative

      learn jQuery.. one of the best lib ever made for javascript! http://jquery.com/

      --
      This is where we are, our rock we stand, among the world, looking forward, eternally.
    2. Re:Javascript speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to programmatically draw graphs you should check out the Canvas Tutorial

    3. Re:Javascript speed by maxume · · Score: 1

      Try Jquery. If you don't like it, try Prototype or the stuff from Yahoo. There are many dozens of other libraries to try if none of those are to your liking.

      Mozilla Developer Center is a decent place to start as far as learning the language:

      https://developer.mozilla.org/En/JavaScript

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Javascript speed by JuanCarlosII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      jQuery is probably good starting point if you want to be able to do simple things very quickly and easily. If you are interested in actually learning the language itself as opposed to just how to do things in one particular library then I'd also recommend looking at Prototype. Prototype reveals a little more of the native DOM than perhaps jQuery allows so IM(NS)HO is a better primer for someone looking to grasp the fundamentals of the language, whereas jQuery is probably the best for actually "getting stuff done". I also cant recommend John Resig's book Pro Javascript Techniques enough, although it may be pitched slightly high for a beginner. Reading it seriously changed the way I thought about JS (and subsequently my entire career/life/destiny) so if you're an enthusiastic amateur looking to progress then I think it's perfect.

    5. Re:Javascript speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Dojo's graphing control (under the dojox experimental namespace). It does what you ask and takes care of whether the browser supports svg, vrml, or whatever. The whole graph is rendered on the client-side.

      It does seem a bit slow, but for a single graph, it might be enough for you.

    6. Re:Javascript speed by JuanCarlosII · · Score: 1

      Another point worth making is that if you are purely interested in learning JS, as opposed to simply getting a job done, there's a lot to be said for taking the functionality you use most often from 3rd party libraries (and in some cases, the missing functionality you wish was in your favourite library) and attempting to write your own.

      I was forced into doing this a year or so ago by a client who refused to use any code that we couldn't fully support, and didn't own the IP of (they're a major financial institution, so there was some logic behind this stance, but they never grasped why it didn't need to apply to JS).

      As a result I've now got a stable library which is 1/4-1/3 the size of jQuery or Prototype and will allow me to accomplish 99% of what I do on a day-to-day basis quickly, easily, and is stable x-browser.

      I appreciate this isn't for everyone, and it's taken a year of near continual work to get to this stage, and there's still a lot of ongoing work.

      Before anyone asks, the original version of my home-rolled library is not mine to distirbute, but I am taking some of the things I've learned and working on my own version as and when I find time/motivation which I may well release into the wild if it ever gets mature enough - http://in.tellig.net/2008/11/21/elmojs-and-etherpad/.

    7. Re:Javascript speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oreilly books are quite excellent.
      And I've always liked javascript for one overpowering reason.
      It uses the client's clockcycles, not my servers'.
      I've also noted that there are always ways to do the things that javascript 'doesn't do' with some judicious, but minimal, server-side code.

    8. Re:Javascript speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could, you know, write your own with standard scripting knowledge instead of using someone else's copyrighted crap.

      Seriously, all that these libraries do is make Javascript more complex, bloated and difficult to understand for actual web developers.

    9. Re:Javascript speed by maxume · · Score: 1

      You and an AC reply both mention library size and IP concerns.

      The packed versions of Jquery and Prototype both result in serving about 30kb if the browser-server combo supports gzip (which it should...). 10kb is better than that, but not hugely, and that 10kb isn't all that likely to include a selector api (which, other than papering over browser differences, is why you use a library in the first place).

      Jquery is available under an MIT license (basically, copyright statement+disclaimer), so it isn't exactly complicated to deal with (no doubt a serious lawyer would wonder if the author of the library is trustworthy, so it doesn't take care of everything, but that's pretty fringe).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:Javascript speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're serious about learning Javascript, then I highly recommend you don't start on a framework. Yes it's 100x easier and quicker but you need to understand the core of Javascript to understand it properly. Jquery speeds things up but also makes it extremely easy to write in-efficient scripts.

    11. Re:Javascript speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought about JS (and subsequently my entire career/life/destiny)

      So you are a "web developer". I'm sorry for your career/life/destiny.

    12. Re:Javascript speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still think Firefox gives a greater e-penis than Safari though...

    13. Re:Javascript speed by gazbo · · Score: 1
      As a couple of ACs have already said, if you want to learn JS then don't start by learning a framework. Learn a framework/library once you've learned the language fully, and you've identified some functionality that the framework will provide and save you some time. Or alternatively never bother learning the framework because as a rule of thumb, JS frameworks are written by people who don't like JS and so try and rewrite it to be more like their favourite language. Oh, and writing cross-platform JS is now a piece of piss. Don't believe anyone who says otherwise, unless they're supporting some esoteric non-compliant embedded device (or Netscape 6).

      A good book, as mentioned earlier, is the O'Reilly book with the imaginative title "JavaScript". Other books I have seen are just downright wrong in places; there probably are other good ones out there, but that's the only one I've seen first-hand. Once familiar with the language, read all of this site: http://javascript.crockford.com/ He's got an O'Reilly book out too, linked from the page (I've never read it, but the guy knows his stuff).

      And for the love of God, install Firebug.

    14. Re:Javascript speed by bluej100 · · Score: 1

      You should check out Google Charts. Pretty easy to use and very visually appealing. Feel free to drop me a line (bluej100 gmail) if you'd like to see how I've used it.

      And yes, jQuery turns piss to wine.

    15. Re:Javascript speed by DougWebb · · Score: 1

      As a couple of ACs have already said, if you want to learn JS then don't start by learning a framework. Learn a framework/library once you've learned the language fully, and you've identified some functionality that the framework will provide and save you some time.

      I have to disagree with this advice, though only partially. When you're developing in javascript, you're dealing with two things:

      1. The Javascript language
      2. The DOM

      Browser support for the language is pretty consistent, so unless you want to use the very latest version (which many users won't have in their older browsers) you don't have to worry much about cross-browser issues. Crockford's "Good Parts" book is an excellent resource for teaching you which parts of the language shouldn't be used, and how to use the rest properly.

      When dealing with the DOM (the object tree that represents the browser window and everything within it) you've got a really poorly designed API that's inconsistently implemented across browser vendors and browser versions. Interacting with the DOM is what you want to use a framework for. It's a complete waste of your time as a javascript developer to learn the ins and outs of every browser-specific inconsistency and quirk, when the framework developers have devoted their time and expertise to figuring that stuff out for you. If you're interested in working at that level with them, great, learn the details, but if you want to develop applications, build on the consistent and solid foundation the framework developers have provided.

      My absolute favorite framework is jQuery, partly because it's easy to use, and partly because it's highly modular, and partly because the base library is almost entirely just a DOM interface. It doesn't force you to develop your application in any particular way, it just gives you the tools to make working with the DOM easier.

    16. Re:Javascript speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prototype (or jQuery if that's you flavour) as suggested. Have a look at quirksmode.org for DOM cross-browser quirks and how to avoid tripping over them. Later, take a look at http://jibbering.com/faq/faq_notes/closures.html and don't get scared :^)
      ~CamarÃn

    17. Re:Javascript speed by sootman · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing a reference to something like 'jsgraphs' that used javascripot (and probably css) to do graphs. I used to LOVE using PHP to create SVGs and was very happy when Firefox and Safari announced native support, but Safari's support does NOT extend to the iPhone so I'm looking for something new. I just looked for 'jsgraphs' and came up empty and paging through results for 'javascript graph' didn't yield anything that looked familiar. Anyone know what I'm talking about?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  10. Nothing new by fxkr · · Score: 4, Informative
    Isn't this what Distrust is for? And that one is even better:
    1. Activate it.
    2. Surf.
    3. Deactivate it.

    It then deletes everything that happened between 1. and 3., but keeps what happened before you activated it.

    1. Re:Nothing new by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but delete last hour is like distrust, but forgetting one.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Nothing new by fprintf · · Score: 1

      I need a "delete last 10 minutes" option.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    3. Re:Nothing new by MadKeithV · · Score: 3, Funny

      I need a "give me back the last 10 minutes" option!

    4. Re:Nothing new by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      If your network's backing up every file, then after you delete the history file, isn't it still on a backup tape somewhere?

    5. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everything. You'll still need to delete any Flash cookies that sites may drop in.

    6. Re:Nothing new by GoombaTroopa · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Stealther!

      That's what I've been using. For...um...nah I'm not even going to try.

    7. Re:Nothing new by RockWolf · · Score: 1

      That's what I've been using. For...um...nah I'm not even going to try.

      For buying your wife roses as a surprise?

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
  11. You know what this means! by Shivinski · · Score: 0

    allowing users selectively to erase the last hour, the last two hours, the last four hours, today's, or all browsing history

    I think I speak for every male here when I say, halleluja to private porn browsing without having to whipe out all your login cookies afterwards!

    1. Re:You know what this means! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like you'll be browsing for porn for an hour. Still waiting to delete individual entries.

  12. Can we disable this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    with IE7 via group policy you can stop the user from clearing history etc, can Firefox do the same ?
    or is Firefox going to be deemed a security threat by Administrators ? which is not good for corporate usage and compliance

    1. Re:Can we disable this ? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It is more common than you might think. I've heard people, network admin at decent sized site type people, talking about applying group policy to linux machines.

    2. Re:Can we disable this ? by miknix · · Score: 1

      I'm not a sysadmin myself so pardon my incorrect usage of terms.

      I know there are some group policy implementations for UNIX. Samba does a good job (much better than windows from what I've heard).
      Although, I only worked on systems with POSIX ACLs.

      I never saw a system that prevents users to clean their history (maybe because I avoid windows machines) but, IMHO, that's a privacy concern.

    3. Re:Can we disable this ? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      with IE7 via group policy you can stop the user from clearing history etc, can Firefox do the same?

      Maybe I'm just stupid, but how do you capture the history of the other browsers your users are running? I'm not entirely convinced that other browsers (such as safari, chrome, elinks, w3m-mode and others) play nice with group policy either.

      If you want to log browsing history, just do it at the border router(s), for your desired value of border. Then you can chill out and stop worrying about what browser people are using.

    4. Re:Can we disable this ? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm just stupid, but how do you capture the history of the other browsers your users are running?

      By not allowing them to execute because the program's SHA-256 value isn't on a whitelist maintained by the IT department. In Wikipedia, see Code signing.

  13. Re:WTF (Where not what) has my CTRL-TAB gone... by cushdan · · Score: 1

    ROFL (Regrettable Old Feature Loss)

  14. Because some people don't quite get it by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If your workplace has you going through a proxy, no amount of stealth in the browser is going to help.

    I have had a ton of people requesting I install Chrome for them ( which violates policy anyway ) because they mistakenly think that the privacy feature will hide their browsing habits from the logs.

    Oh, they try to be sneaky about it, sure. But that's what their after. I have half a mind to install it for them, then watch the logs to see what they don't want me to know about.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      I don't admin Windows boxes anymore, but I was under the impression that Chrome would install without admin privileges (i.e., not in "\Program Files\") if the user didn't have them. Is that not the case?

    2. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ideally, private browsing would default to https. If we were really wishing here, it would also have a "set your own proxy/proxies" mode so you could go through any third party proxy if the workplace (or wherever) has a proxy.

    3. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because then whoever you're trying to hide your browsing habits from will just look at this list and say, "why the hell would you need to block this site?"

    4. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they don't have you go through a proxy, its a fairly common feature in most switches to allow 1 port or IP address to receive copies of all activity. With the cost of a 1 terabyte drive being below $300 (if not below $200), most companies can afford to keep a couple weeks history of all internet touching network activity. And robust tools are available for processing it, even if you use SSL (remember man in the middle? if you record all traffic, you ARE the man in the middle)

      So ignore any browser that claims privacy. There is also a good chance that your computer runs software which takes snapshots every so many seconds...so just understand that nothing you do at work is private.

    5. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember man in the middle? if you record all traffic, you ARE the man in the middle

      That's what the certificate authorities are there for. If you use https and the evil man in the middle substitutes his own certificate, Firefox will scream at you.

    6. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by xant · · Score: 1

      > Oh, they try to be sneaky about it, sure. But that's what their after

      Why did you go into desktop support? You clearly have a career as a psychic. Or maybe a diplomat or a spy or something. You really know how to read people like a master.

      Or could it be that you're wrong, and most of them are actually just trying to install the most-hyped new browser?

      Also, you're wrong about the proxy. Tor fixes that just fine.

      --
      It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    7. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by Agripa · · Score: 1

      remember man in the middle? if you record all traffic, you ARE the man in the middle

      Only recording all of the traffic between two parties is not sufficient to be the man in the middle because the two parties have the option of exchanging public keys and then continuing with an encrypted session. Without breaking the encryption algorithm used, a third party relying only on complete interception of all traffic will have insufficient information to generate the encryption key.

      What the third party needs is to intercept and substitute traffic such that both parties can be impersonated. This is what certificate authorities and other forms of authentication prevent.

    8. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by Hatta · · Score: 1

      If your workplace has you going through a proxy, no amount of stealth in the browser is going to help.

      ssh -D 12345 user@home
      Use a socks proxy at 127.0.0.1:12345
      set network.proxy.socks_remote_dns in about:config

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Maybe. But if you were on my network, you wouldn't have any connectivity out except through the proxy.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    10. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Admin know thy user. My users don't give a rat's ass about the latest and greatest. They do care about hiding their pron and gambling habits from the IT division.

      Tor doesn't work on a network where the admin blocks all access out. Like any sane admin would do.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    11. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by Hatta · · Score: 2, Informative

      No problem.

      Not that I advocate violating company policy. Just pointing out that it can be done. After all, a false sense of security can be worse than no security at all.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Except we operate https on a white list basis.

      *shrug* We're kind of dicks.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    13. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by spandex_panda · · Score: 1

      I couldn't install it at uni ... so I think you must need some admin privileges. There is a 'portable apps' version of chrome, but it had issues too unfortunately.

      --
      like phosphorescent desert buttons singing one familiar song
    14. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I applaud your thoroughness.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the thought, but it's from bitter experience that we do this, not because we're especially clever.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    16. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by enoz · · Score: 1

      Uni is an extreme example. Those computers are often heavily locked down to prevent kids from running any kind of Torrent software.

    17. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by skastrik · · Score: 1

      If the proxy at work is optional then Chrome can be started with the flag --proxy-server to bypass it, otherwise it will just use the proxy settings from Windows/IE. That said, the flag does not seem to work in incognito mode.

    18. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      You said that you only white list https. The corkscrew solution that Hatta pointed to looks like it tunnels through http. Would this stuff get passed your proxy?

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
    19. Re:Because some people don't quite get it by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Depends. I'd have to look into it. We block octet byte streams going through the proxy, so maybe.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  15. Why don't they add an option... by y5 · · Score: 1

    to whitelist/blacklist storing items in your history/cache by URL? They have it for just about everything else!

    Right-click, go to "View Page Info", and click "Permissions". It should be right there. Any takers on writing an extension for this?

    1. Re:Why don't they add an option... by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

      Well, then there would be a record. If you have chickswithleukimia.com blacklisted, then your wife and kids could go into the blacklist list and see that you put it in. A record of the fact that you don't want people to know you look at that site is an admission that you go there.

    2. Re:Why don't they add an option... by Talar · · Score: 1

      If you don't want a certain URL in your history you probably don't want to have the same URL stored in your blacklist either.

    3. Re:Why don't they add an option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I already wrote an extension to do that.

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8622 :)

    4. Re:Why don't they add an option... by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Who'd have thought that chickswithleukaemia.com would be so popular it has typo squatters ....

      [no I didn't check if it exists]

    5. Re:Why don't they add an option... by y5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But isn't that why there's a master password? I'd use that feature and protect it.

  16. Mozilla Links by Bj�rn · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is a good article at Mozilla Links, about 3.1 beta 2.

    --
    Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think. --Niels Bohr
  17. Re:WTF (Where not what) has my CTRL-TAB gone... by chrisgeleven · · Score: 1

    Again, did you even use the beta? CTRL-TAB is still there and works as it did in 3.0. They just removed the fancy tab previews they had been experimenting with.

  18. Privacy Browsing in IE 8 Beta by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's interesting that IE actually had the private browsing feature with IE 8 Beta first. While I have no interest in going back to IE whatsoever, it's a very good thing that they're finally building innovative features, and it's also a good thing that Firefox is having to play catch-up feature-wise for the first time. Wow - real competition in the browser space - what is this, 1998???

    1. Re:Privacy Browsing in IE 8 Beta by HisMother · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Safari has had it for years.

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    2. Re:Privacy Browsing in IE 8 Beta by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      Opera has had it for yearser.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    3. Re:Privacy Browsing in IE 8 Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE didn't have it first, it just had it before FF. And besides, neither one has been officially released yet.

    4. Re:Privacy Browsing in IE 8 Beta by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Safari has had it for years.

      There are people who use Safari!?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  19. Background processes? by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

    I really do hope that the submitter is confused and that Firefox will not be spawning background processes, or else that would be the end of Firefox.

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
    1. Re:Background processes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the link or any of the numerous pages about web worker threads, you'd understand.

    2. Re:Background processes? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    3. Re:Background processes? by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm quite aware of threading and worker threads. I use them every day. However, thread and process are not a same thing. This is why I'm saying I hope Firefox does not start spawning worker processes (i.e. OS processes).

      Threads could be OK, but it will complicate the web programming model and it won't be uncommon to see deadlocks in web apps, leading you to kill your browser session.

      --
      As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
    4. Re:Background processes? by BZ · · Score: 1

      Some things need to be cleared up here:

      1) There are no locking primitives exposed to JavaScript. It is not possible to busy-wait
              in JavaScript (the browser will put up the slow script dialog). So at no point can a
              "deadlock" occur that causes you to have to kill your browser session.
      2) One can already "deadlock" a web app in the sense of parts of it waiting on each
              other. No threads needed for this; it can be done with timeouts on a single thread.
      3) Web workers exposes a message-passing, shared-nothing, messages delivered via the
              event loop concurrency model. There is no way to tell from the web page whether the
              worker threads are implemented as separate OS-level threads, or separate user-level
              threads, or OS-level processes, or simply via time-slicing on a single interpreter
              thread. Of course some of these implementations do a better job of utilizing modern
              multi-core processors than others do.

      People _have_ spent a good bit of time thinking about how to expose this stuff to web javascript without unduly complicating the programming model.

  20. Re:WTF (Where not what) has my CTRL-TAB gone... by y5 · · Score: 1

    Relax. CTRL+TAB is still there, only without the cute screen preview menu from the previous beta.

  21. Re:WTF (Where not what) has my CTRL-TAB gone... by oji-sama · · Score: 1

    I've got this setting disabled, not quite sure if there are any other relevant settings (you could try filtering with ctrlTab or Tab):

    about:config
    browser.ctrlTab.mostRecentlyUsed --> false

    --
    It is what it is.
  22. Use portable firefox then by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    on a memory stick. That way you can carry around your bookmarks etc. between machines. I'm doing that right now from a friend's internet cafe... See here

    Andy

    1. Re:Use portable firefox then by tepples · · Score: 1

      Use portable firefox then on a memory stick.

      How can I do this if the only Internet cafe around has filled the USB ports with epoxy as an anti-virus measure? Some Internet cafes in public libraries have been known to do this.

  23. I've been using a simpler solution for a few years by Skapare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My solution is that each time I start a web browser, it first runs through a script that creates a replica of the .mozilla directory in a unique place. The HOME environment variable is set to the unique directory. When it's done, I exit and just wipe out that directory.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  24. New tab button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great! They've removed the new tab button from the button bar (i.e. where the back, forward, and reload buttons are) and moved it to the other side of the screen! And the Go button is completely gone too (although its usability dropped after it was moved to the wrong side of the screen too).

    By the way, anyone know if the private browsing mode disables the disk cache completely? Snoopy people could dig out deleted cache items afterwards if disk cache is used.

  25. Safari mode by objekt · · Score: 1

    Since Safari has had the privacy mode feature for years.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  26. Seems like overkill by Steffylicious · · Score: 1

    "An ancillary addition to Private Browsing is a new addition to the "Clear Recent History" dialog box allowing users selectively to erase the last hour, the last two hours, the last four hours, today's, or all browsing history"

    Oh please, as if you need to erase any more the last 3 minutes when you're done with "Private Browsing"? Any longer than that and you're just wasting time.

  27. background thread? oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this won't make /. eat even more cpu... Btw, Ctrl-Tab is app switching in BeOS anyway :p

  28. Private browsing, great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    When will they implement http://www.squarefree.com/pornzilla/

  29. Re:I've been using a simpler solution for a few ye by JustinOpinion · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been using a simpler solution for a few years

    I love Slashdot.

    Only on Slashdot would it be "simpler" to code a custom script that automatically runs when starting a particular application, generates a new temporary profile, sets an environment variable to use that profile, and deletes the profile on exit; rather than sometimes click a menu item marked "private".

    I'm not disagreeing that your solution is simpler, by the way. It is actually a great way to force a particular behavior in a robust way, and is simple to use once implemented. But it's only "simpler" for Slashdotters!

  30. Re:I've been using a simpler solution for a few ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, your 'solution' still writes it to disk. Forensics could still retrieve it.

    If you are really paranoid the Firefox option is more secure as it doesn't even write to the disk in the first place.

  31. Stop Improving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it hilarious that the (perceived) loss of a feature has caused you to take a principled stand against improvements in general.

    Only on Slashdot!

  32. Oh thank god. by RulerOf · · Score: 1

    The Ctrl+Tab functionality is still there

    Phew. It would be such a shame for them to finally add the feature that prevents Firefox from suggesting your favorite porn site on the top every time you type a URL and simultaneously take away the option that allows you to switch tabs with only your left hand.

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
  33. 2 hands 2 mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    left hand on the mouse, right hand on the mouse

  34. How about threading? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    Does Firefox add threading for tabs yet?

    I still use SRWare Iron (the phone-home-free version of Chrome) because it runs each tab/window in a separate process, so I can load many tabs in the background while the foreground tab is unaffected and I'm able to use it.

    The fact that Firefox still lacks this usability feature (the ability to do things in one window while another is busy) blows my mind. Even IE does it.

    I mean, it's nice to see them steal - and expound on! - a feature from Chrome, but they're still missing one of the best ones: process isolation.

    --

    Question everything

    1. Re:How about threading? by NinthAgendaDotCom · · Score: 1

      It doesn't, and won't for some time. That would be a major architectural change. It's not a simple thing that will be in a point release.

      --
      -- http://ninthagenda.com/
    2. Re:How about threading? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I still use SRWare Iron (the phone-home-free version of Chrome) because it runs each tab/window in a separate process, so I can load many tabs in the background while the foreground tab is unaffected and I'm able to use it.

      Actually, it (Google Chrome, SRWare Iron etc.) doesn't. It only does so to a certain point, then it starts using threads.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:How about threading? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      I don't really care how Chrome does it.

      I don't care if FF uses threading or individual processes, as long as every freaking tab and window isn't waiting on every other tab before the one (that's doing nothing but waiting on me) will actually respond to my inputs.

      --

      Question everything

  35. 2hands1mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can plug in two mice, but they'll just fight over which one gets to control the cursor.

    1. Re:2hands1mouse by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://wearables.unisa.edu.au/mpx/ Multi-pointer X server. Next question!

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  36. Re:I've been using a simpler solution for a few ye by dasunt · · Score: 1

    If you are really paranoid the Firefox option is more secure as it doesn't even write to the disk in the first place.

    Still a problem, since memory can swap to disk, unless disabled.

    Ramdisk + wipe swap or encrypted swap would be a better solution.

    OTOH, you can also recover from RAM, so I guess the only solution is to thermite your computer after use.

  37. Parent: Mod Insightful by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

    Bwahahah.

    --
    Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
    "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
  38. Re:I've been using a simpler solution for a few ye by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    Post it.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  39. Usually, yes. by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

    and certainly libraries are overused...but sometimes they save time. ...and as everyone knows, Time=more time on /.

    --
    Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
    "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
  40. Javascript is slower? by Blood_PuP · · Score: 1

    While it seems do be doing quite well in their tests javascript seems to be slower for a bunch of tests.

    Its times in the jsBalls fight timedemo are a second or so slower than Firefox 3. And sites with a lot of animation done in javascript like http://www.dhteumeuleu.com seem to run slower.

  41. Oh goodie... by Terrorwrist · · Score: 0

    Now i can watch tons of porn without anything be saved in my pc. Oh Giggity giggity goo!

  42. Mod parent up by 777a · · Score: 1

    Mouse gestures really make life easier.

    I couldn't go back to a firefox without them.

    Mouse Gestures Redox for Firefox.

    My tip: install it, remove all gestures except:

    close tab, previous tab, next tab, reload.

    If you've only got a 3 button mouse set yourself some 'rocker' gestures (hold down right mouse button, then press left to go back a page).

    Gestures make life so much easier.

    For Windows there is also StrokeIt, which adds mouse gestures to anything.

  43. But there's always a little problem.... by Pollux · · Score: 1

    An ancillary addition to Private Browsing is a new addition to the "Clear Recent History" dialog box allowing users selectively to erase the last hour, the last two hours, the last four hours, today's, or all browsing history -- previously, the wipe was all or nothing.

    No matter how much or how little of the history you delete, there's always going to be that little "gaping hole." Clever parents know that when someone goes online, there's going to be a history trail. But when a parent checks the history and finds nothing there for that day, red flags will go off.

    Hopefully, in the next version, they include a "Generate Random History" option in the browser...and make sure it's intelligent enough to determine which sites you would regularly visit (sans porn, of course).

    1. Re:But there's always a little problem.... by daniorerio · · Score: 3, Informative

      or maybe just move out of the basement...

  44. Wooopie... how about adding something useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, this is great and all, but how about investing some time in adding decent printing support. FF is the only major browser these days that screws up when printing divs with absolute positioning.

  45. Acid Test 3 score by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got 93 when running 3.1b2, an improvement over the 89 for 3.1b1.

  46. This must be something we can disable! by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 1

    I occasionally help out a buddy who works at a private school as Network Administrator--one of the things strictly enforced is their network policies, and if this is not something he can disable I already know he's going to be removing Firefox and switching back to IE. He may dislike IE (as most admins who recognize its effect on system security) but he has to have it available any way for one of their mandatory programs, it'll be easier for him to simply go back to IE than fiddle with profiles and work arounds to disable the thing...

    The Firefox and Mozilla people need to really start thinking about security and administrative policies if they want to see Firefox continue to have the take up its had in the last few years!

    --bornagainpenguin

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
  47. Privacy and URLs by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this version resolve the privacy flaw in 3.0? Namely, the fact that the autocomplete history for the URL bar is not erased, even when the user manually clears all available privacy options?

  48. Re:selective history deletion My FATAL "logic" by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    But, for windows users, when sysadmins can use "$" related prompts to back up files, they can conceivably access your FF & Opera cache/history and other files. I wish those were encrypted based on an initial password & passphrase so that ONLY the user (unless an in-line keystroke logger is surreptitiously employed) can open the browser locally. It would be nice if Opera or Mozilla or Google built an end-to-end service using a hash tool like banks and "trusted sites" do. This way, you could set up a rotating password, force it to randomly or by schedule expire, and deprive some nosey admins or others from seeing EVERY site you go to via copying browser history and cache files.

    But, somehow, i feel i have fatal logic in this idea.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  49. Not totally private by tallredeye · · Score: 1

    You'll still need to manually delete any Flash cookies that sites may use.

  50. Re:WTF (Where not what) has my CTRL-TAB gone... by ardle · · Score: 1

    How many tabs do you need to have open before you forget what they contain?
    I would be pretty pissed if a "preview" feature caused a "responsiveness" hit, even if I disabled it.
    Ctrl-TAB "result" can lag behind what my fingers have done cos Firefox tries to briefly render intermediate pages: I already find this annoying (hadn't really thought about it, though).

  51. Not everything by tallredeye · · Score: 1

    Flash cookies aren't deleted

  52. Ctrl-Tab Switching by MC2000 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they're taking out the Ctrl-Tab switching. I use a logitech mouse with a tilting scroll wheel, which adds two extra buttons. I currently have one direction of the tilt mapped to CTRL+Tab and the other direction to Ctrl+Shift+tab, so that I can browse through my tabs just by flicking the side of my scroll wheel. The tab switching feature screwed this up because Ctrl-Tab would have swapped back and forth instead of always moving over to the tab to the right.

  53. Needs better visual indications of private mode by NinthAgendaDotCom · · Score: 1

    Chrome has a nice dark blue titlebar to indicate private browsing. With Firefox 3.1b2, it's difficult to tell which mode I'm in without opening a menu or reading the window bar. Also, it doesn't save state well. I was typing this reply, activated private mode, then de-activated it. It dumped me back to the right page, but all my form data was missing. Needs work.

    --
    -- http://ninthagenda.com/
  54. Ctrl-Tab switching by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    What? Won't be in the final? Come on now... that's way too basic to making excuses for.

  55. Sorry I didn't pick up the phone... by popmaker · · Score: 1

    ... I was doing some private browsing.

  56. Flash storage by glacote02 · · Score: 1
    WIth any kind of "Private Mode" you still need to go there manually: http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager04.html

    Creating a "Private Mode" guest account with $HOME in /tmpfs is the only possibly safe way. A few scripts can even make it icon-clickable for regular users (ssh -X, etc. ).

    But that won't prevent your ISP/Corporate admin to see traffic. Unless you use a Tor plugin - and even then you need to trust Tor exit node.

    Point being: it's easier to just not need a "Private Mode" to begin with. Sex is better in real life, anyway.

  57. You asked for the next question by tepples · · Score: 1

    http://wearables.unisa.edu.au/mpx/ Multi-pointer X server. Next question!

    Does it run in Windows?

  58. Mouse gestures on a laptop? by tepples · · Score: 1

    you use mouse gestures

    Have you tried using mouse gestures on a notebook computer's trackpad? If so, how well do they work for you?

    1. Re:Mouse gestures on a laptop? by redxxx · · Score: 1

      No I haven't. I do use them via VNC from my n810, and with some tweaking to the client(so the alt buttons that invoke mouse2/3 to be toggles rather than momentary action) it works pretty well. It works pretty great as a remote for controlling media players and browsing(but not posting tiny keyboards suck).

  59. web worker threads by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Will websites be able to take advantage of these parallel Javascript threads while remaining cross-browser-compatible, is what I'd like to know...

  60. Re:OH SHI- by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    When will people finally upgrade their Windows 98 machines?

  61. Forget the local disk, how about *Web* data leaks? by BillX · · Score: 1

    These recent privacy modes (Chrome's Incognito, FF Private Browsing) seem to miss the point. What's the great importance of keeping my browsing history off my local disk (I already know I surfed porn), when the evilclick.net advert in Window #2 can still read a cookie set by the evilclick.net advert in Window #1?

    There is a more detailed description elsewhere, but here is a brief description of the feature I really want to see in a good browser stealth mode: Each clickstream is its own session. For example, I create a new window/tab from scratch - it may as well be a brand new universe. In a proper 'privacy mode', it should not have access to data generated by any previous or subsequent surfing in other tabs (e.g. cookies, authenticated sessions). Same goes for clicking a link to a different domain, or being redirected by non-click means (meta-refresh, etc.).

    Quick example: In a moment of weakness sometime ago you signed up for a Gmail account. Today you open up your browser in privacy mode (fresh start; per-session cookies, whee!), and go surf some raunchy porn sites (ads served by AdSense; stores a session ID cookie pointing to the adserver's record of URL each ad appeared on). Later in the day (forgetting about the porn), you log in to Gmail. Whoops! Adserver's randomly-assigned SID (originator: google.com) is now readable by scripts in the Gmail window (originator: google.com), a strongly authenticated session - your midget horse porn addiction can now be linked to your email address. (But no deep-introspection ad relevance hivemind would actually store that data, right?)

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  62. and how about Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selective history deletion and privacy mode probably does not cover the data saved by plugins and addons.

    Especially Flash cookies.

    But no amount of local data deletion will cover everything, as any intermediate or destination can log all they want (such as your own router, your isp, or the destination).