Slashdot Mirror


How a Rogue Geologist Discovered Diamonds

prone2tech writes "Both NPR and Wired are running stories about how nearly two decades ago, a dogged, absentminded Canadian geologist named Charles Fipke who was practically down to his last nickel when he discovered diamonds in the Northwest Territories. Back then there was no such thing as a Canadian diamond, and today, Canada is the world's third-largest producer. The story behind the addition of Canada to the ranks of diamond-producing nations leads back to this one man. His discovery started the largest staking rush in North America since George Carmack found gold in the Klondike a century earlier."

237 comments

  1. He's not really a rogue. by onion2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems a little unfair to call the guy a 'rogue' or 'absent minded'. He's an intelligent bloke who applied his knowledge and intellect to a problem, spent nearly a decade doing the necessary legwork, and eventually hit the big time when it all paid off. That's not 'rogue' behaviour, that's hard work. I'd have given up. Well done to him. He deserves it.

    1. Re:He's not really a rogue. by reovirus1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At the end of the article he sums it up in his own words:

      "Here's the thing. I learned that I did my best. I mean, I really tried my best. How many people can say that? I worked hard, and I mean really hard. I worked seven days a week from 8 am until 3 am. Every day. We drilled and drilled all winter when it was dark and the windchill was 80 below. Everyone thought I was crazy. But most people just never do their best, hey. And I did."

      Sad that society today would classify this kind of individual as a "rogue".

    2. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Americans love the cliché of "outcast made good".

      Here in North Korea we prefer the cliché of "outcast crushed by the omnipotent Party"

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:He's not really a rogue. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that the use of the term is stupid in this case; but in this genre, it is being used as a compliment of sorts. The popular press delights in stories of the "Rogue $PERSON, scorned by $POWERS_THAT_BE, shows them what's what through hard work, dedication, a little luck, and a heartwarming moral" flavor. Sometimes, things like this actually happen; often, simple professional disagreements, differences of opinion, the usual testing and discarding of hypotheses, etc. have to be bludgeoned into this mold.

      The reliance on this trope demonstrates, yet again, the rather miserable understanding of science of the popular press; but I don't think that it is intended as an aspersion on the scientists being written about.

    4. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed. I mean, for us Americans--isn't this the "American Dream?" Bust your ass for a risky but potentially massive payoff?
      This guy is part of a dying breed of explorers that laid the foundation of society as we know it.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $Pursuit of $Happyness

    6. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Seems a little unfair to call the guy a 'rogue'

      Then how would you explain his sneak attack bonus?

    7. Re:He's not really a rogue. by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      'absent minded', might be unfair. However, 'rogue' sounds fair. He went against the common belief.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    8. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarah Palin was considered "rogue" too; maybe that means you come from up North?

    9. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. You are not in North Korea. We all know North Koreans are all starving and eating grass and giant rabbits. Or if they are on the intarwebs, North Koreans are hacking the Pentagoon or farming on WoW. So, yeah. I call bullshit.

    10. Re:He's not really a rogue. by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      That's pretty inspiring. I hope he's rich from this, and it didn't get snatched away. Is he?

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    11. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Racist America, Racist Americans discriminate you!

    12. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought she was considered a "mav-rick."

    13. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      he's 'rogue' because he went off on his own for 10 years after the diamond prospector he used to work for gave up, and without the help of any of the big-name diamond prospectors at the time.

      don't be such pussies, i mean i know it's slashdot, but got-dam.

    14. Re:He's not really a rogue. by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rogue may have been a bad choice of word. I just assumed that the article had meant to call him unusual, since he is that.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    15. Re:He's not really a rogue. by SupplyMission · · Score: 5, Interesting

      He most certainly is rich.

      There is a darker side of the Charles Fipke story. After the Ekati diamond mine opened up, and he set himself up with a practically infinite supply of cash, he split from his wife Marlene, who had stuck by him while he worked from 8am to 3am seven days a week, in pursuit of his dream. In many ways she was his partner, working long hours helping analyze samples in the kitchen of their tiny apartment, while they were on the verge of being evicted due to non-payment of rent. Apparently their divorce settlement was the largest ever in Canada.

      Also, right before he had his major breakthrough, he had a falling out with his long-time close friend and ally Stu Blusson, a helicopter pilot who had also worked very hard with Fipke, many times without pay.

      To be fair, I don't know if it was the success, or something else, that drove apart Fipke and his wife. Divorce and separation are never simple. Just those little details made an impression on me, to see how one can enjoy massive material success yet still suffer in personal relationships.

      Essentially, the guy is now filthy rich, surrounded by gorgeous women, doing whatever he wants. His latest project, if I'm not mistaken, is to find the biblical lost treasures of King Solomon.

      An account of the whole story, beginning with Fipke's early days growing up in the Canadian prairies in Saskatchewan, can be found in the book Fire Into Ice, by Vernon Frolick. It is a very entertaining read, even if the book is somewhat biased in favour of Fipke.

    16. Re:He's not really a rogue. by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sort of. I'd argue that the "American Dream" is about busting your ass on something potentially risky but with a massive payoff. Busting your ass over a known risk is merely working hard and investing in lottery tickets. But, if you bust your ass on something because you believe in it (of course, assuming you're not imagining it), the only real limits should be flukishly bad luck and your willingness to work hard for the end goal. The "American Dream", then, is about the optimism in the belief that the only obstacle to success in one's life is one's willingess to pursue one's dreams. Of course, once you start with a rigged system, then hard work well likely just be idiocy. Perhaps that's the enduring reason why governmental intervention and societal-based progression is so frowned upon.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    17. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Kijori · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think you're disappointed? I read it as "rogue gynecologist".

      Once again reality has let me down.

    18. Re:He's not really a rogue. by interploy · · Score: 1

      "Rouge" makes for better copy. It's all about marketing mate.

    19. Re:He's not really a rogue. by dschl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He recently donated $7 million to UBC Okanagan. They asked for $5 million, but he wanted to make sure they had some of the best equipment available.

      Fipke's daughter went to the same high school as I did, graduating the year ahead of me, a few years before his diamond discoveries made him famous. Back in grade 9, half of the guys in my class had a crush on her.

      --
      Slashdot - the place where you can look like a genius by restating the obvious
    20. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Dramacrat · · Score: 1

      Nothing to do with the Korean people ("Racism"?) as a whole, only the ones unlucky enough to live under the auspices of the Dear Leader, who will hopefully croak soon.

      --
      There are over 36 million lines of COBOL code in the world, and they are all raping children.
    21. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Rogue+Ales · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of different definitions for the term Rogue. I would know. This guy stuck to his belief when everyone else thought he was nuts. He's a trailblazer and a bit of a bad boy. Works hard, plays hard, and puts it all on the line. He's our kinda Rogue.

    22. Re:He's not really a rogue. by nametaken · · Score: 1

      I think that sort of person has generally always been the societal "kook", until they got results. I'm not sure there's a fair statement, specific to modern society, in there at all.

    23. Re:He's not really a rogue. by severoon · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the defn of rogue they're using is: no longer obedient, belonging, or accepted and hence not controllable or answerable; deviating, renegade. Not the best word choice, but if you accept this defn and strip any negative value judgments from it, it is technically not far off.

      More to the point, though, who cares what other people say? Read his words, form your own judgments. If you do your part as the reader, then it doesn't make any difference what others want you to think...you've figured that out for yourself.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    24. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The article doesn't even mention how high hes backstabbing skill or agility score was. Could he even pick pockets?

    25. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Fizzl · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why is this troll, you cock sucking motherfuckers?

    26. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word 'queer' better applies to someone who is unusual.

    27. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Feanturi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd always thought that the American Dream was actually sitting around on your ass while someone hands you a massive payoff for no reason at all. Or at least, that's how people seem to behave.

    28. Re:He's not really a rogue. by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      It is sort of a rogue who defies the current professional opinions and hunts diamonds where supposedly none exist.
              There is a similar story of an individual convinced that he could find serious emeralds in N.Carolina. After many years of searching he hit upon a huge, high quality emerald which will provide several lifetimes of income for him.
              There remain a host of treasures to be found all around us. These days many are deposited in the earth by drug runners who bury gold coins and the like knowing full well that they may need money after long prison sentences that might come their way.

    29. Re:He's not really a rogue. by gryllotalpa · · Score: 0

      If John Lennon were still alive, he could have written a sketch "A Canadian in the Works".

    30. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pass me a Shakespeare, would ya?

    31. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:He's not really a rogue. (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 12, @10:07AM (#26092281)

      >Seems a little unfair to call the guy a 'rogue'

      Then how would you explain his sneak attack bonus?

      Re:He's not really a rogue. (Score:1)
      by Fizzl (209397) on Friday December 12, @11:47AM (#26093751)

      Indeed. The article doesn't even mention how high hes backstabbing skill or agility score was. Could he even pick pockets?

      you're a douchebag

    32. Re:He's not really a rogue. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The popular press delights in stories of the "Rogue $PERSON, scorned by $POWERS_THAT_BE, shows them what's what through hard work, dedication, a little luck, and a heartwarming moral" flavor. Sometimes, things like this actually happen; often, simple professional disagreements, differences of opinion, the usual testing and discarding of hypotheses, etc. have to be bludgeoned into this mold.

      The popular press? Hell, Slashdot publishes these kinds of stories on a daily basis - nothing [it seems] excites a Slashdotter more than $UNDERDOG against $BIGDOG.
       
      The story under discussion here is only notable because somebody actually noticed.

    33. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was talking historically, the current american dream mostly consists of a celebrity dipped in chocolate and shoved inside a burger bun.

    34. Re:He's not really a rogue. by cylcyl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back in grade 9, half of the guys in my class had a crush on her.

      And as we all know, if you crush her hard enough, she'll turn into a diamond

    35. Re:He's not really a rogue. by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Back in grade 9, half of the guys in my class had a crush on her.

      And as we all know, if you crush her hard enough, she'll turn into a diamond

      Regrettably, I have no mod points.... Thank you for the funniest line I have read today.

    36. Re:He's not really a rogue. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "After the Ekati diamond mine opened up, and he set himself up with a practically infinite supply of cash, he split from his wife Marlene...To be fair, I don't know if it was the success, or something else, that drove apart Fipke and his wife...Essentially, the guy is now filthy rich, surrounded by gorgeous women, doing whatever he wants. "

      Dude...I think you answered your own question in your post.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    37. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just ripped the headline out of Smithsonian Magazine. SM did a big article about this same guy a couple months ago. And they used the word "rogue".

      Damn lazy journalists...

    38. Re:He's not really a rogue. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      I can say with certainty that if I were to suddenly become a billionaire, my wife would not begrudge me a small harem. Now all I need are the billions, and I'm set...

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    39. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Suddenly I have a strange hankerin' for Queen Amidala.

    40. Re:He's not really a rogue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a fag

    41. Re:He's not really a rogue. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Considering his wife made off with a $123 million divorce settlement, I doubt she's complaining too much. It's not like he kicked her penniless out on the streets.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. I think... by HexaByte · · Score: 4, Funny

    he's a shining example of some who works really hard!

    --
    HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
    1. Re:I think... by LMacG · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed, he's a many-faceted, brilliant man.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    2. Re:I think... by Huntr · · Score: 5, Funny

      A real gem.

    3. Re:I think... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 3, Funny

      Almost a diamond in the rough you might say.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    4. Re:I think... by db10 · · Score: 4, Funny

      A stony fellow of flawless character.

    5. Re:I think... by BobReturns · · Score: 5, Funny

      Such a hard worker he's classified as 10 on Moh's scale. Too much of a geologist geek joke? Probably.

    6. Re:I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might say he's a man of colorless perfection with many carrots hanging from his belt.

    7. Re:I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's "Mohs scale", not "Moh's scale". Mohs was the name of the German bloke the thing's named after.

      So much for being a "geologist geek" (and shouldn't that be "geology geek", anyway?).

    8. Re:I think... by garcia · · Score: 1

      After all that digging at least he's now a woman's best friend! He deserves it.

    9. Re:I think... by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Funny

      You might in fact say that he is a Canadian diamond, discovered by Charles Fipke in the Northwest[ERROR: STACK OVERFLOW]

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    10. Re:I think... by kungfugleek · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You might say he gives +69% damage to undead.

    11. Re:I think... by Speare · · Score: 1

      Can you guys just baguette already?!

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    12. Re:I think... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      "Rock Nerd"

    13. Re:I think... by cencithomas · · Score: 1

      Okay, that was the first one of those I actually laughed at. :D

      --
      ...'tis easier to blame than to improve.
    14. Re:I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abrasive, though...

    15. Re:I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were on the net.....

      everybody had matching blogs...

    16. Re:I think... by BobReturns · · Score: 1

      You are of course, correct. My apologies. It is Mohs' Scale.
      And I think the geologist/geology geek works either way, but I could be wrong).

    17. Re:I think... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      No mohs puns, please!

    18. Re:I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A diamond in the rough.

    19. Re:I think... by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Cheesy diablo 2 references aside, how on earth was that a troll?

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    20. Re:I think... by kungfugleek · · Score: 1
      Thanks, Adam. I even used the stats of a Flawless diamond, for crying out loud.

      Maybe I should have gone with +19% to all resistances instead...

    21. Re:I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all that digging at least he's now a woman's best friend! He deserves it.

      That's funny because diamonds are a girl's best friend and he dug for them.

      Oh, wait. No. It's just retarded.

    22. Re:I think... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      And very polished.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Soon to be worthless by boristdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aaaaand now that we can make pretty much perfect diamonds as large as you want with a fairly inexpensive vapor deposition chamber, all this will soon be no more than a waste of money, time and energy.

    I love how the diamond industry used to derogate diamonds with flaws, but now they push them as evidence of "natural" diamonds.

    - I can add flaws to the diamonds in the vapor dep chamber, too!

    1. Re:Soon to be worthless by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Heheh... I wish.

      Soon the DeBeers of the world will start touting the benefits of their diamonds versus the Canadian diamonds. Maybe the Canadian diamonds are too pure, or too northern for diamonds to grow properly.. Or maybe traces of some rare element in the DeBeers mines leads to more beautiful diamonds. Or Canadians speak funny, so their diamonds are gauche.

      It's so funny to see when an empire based on marketing slowly crumbles ...

    2. Re:Soon to be worthless by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. But diamonds ALWAYS have been price controlled and Over valued.

      Anyone that ever thought that diamonds had real value is nuts. If DeBeers did not negotiate a deal with the russians they could have easily decimated the Diamond market to the point that Cubic Zirconias would be worth more.

      Diamonds are good for industrial uses. They are retarded for jewelery as they are not rare not valuable.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Soon to be worthless by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Aaaaand now that we can make pretty much perfect diamonds as large as you want with a fairly inexpensive vapor deposition chamber, all this will soon be no more than a waste of money, time and energy.

      Last I checked decent sized CVD diamonds were rather yellow. I'd say there's still some time before the likes of DeBeers get shut down, unfortunately.

    4. Re:Soon to be worthless by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Funny

      When your wife finds out you spent $5 on a perfect diamond that was made in a lab instead of by the Earths natural and loving embrace, you will find out how loving and warm your couch is...

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    5. Re:Soon to be worthless by wurble · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Never underestimate the marketing power of DeBeers. While eventually diamonds will be made worthless, the timeframe we are talking about here can be prolonged greatly by DeBeers' marketing department.

    6. Re:Soon to be worthless by Sosarian · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's just because it's relatively cheap to produce. You can make blue, orange or natural clear as well.

      For instance D.NEA
      http://d.neadiamonds.com/

    7. Re:Soon to be worthless by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Funny

      How long until carbon-neutral means depositing your factory's (or car's) exhaust as diamond?

      Actually, that would be kinda cool. Too bad DeBeers would assassinate anyone who even thought about develo

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    8. Re:Soon to be worthless by thue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is not a real diamond unless a pristine natural area has been destroyed while producing it.

      Ideally the production of a real diamond should also fund child soldiers conducting a small war in Africa.

      And of course the diamond should also have been resold by a monopolistic company.

      And finally the diamond should be flawed, to show that it is "real" and "natural".

      So keep your cheap flawless manufactured diamonds for yourself. You are suppressing the good old traditional ways with soulless technology!

    9. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      When you only spend $5 on the diamond you can afford a warm, loving couch.

    10. Re:Soon to be worthless by BethanyBoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, because I've already told my boyfriend I'd prefer a moissanite stone if he ever proposes. I think I'd be more upset that he threw his money away on a diamond. (Before anyone says it, yes.. a girl on slashdot!)

    11. Re:Soon to be worthless by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a service to the scumsucking cartel community, I have the following suggestion for marketing to preserve the value of natural diamonds:

      "Was your diamond worth dying for?"

      Some sort of subtle; but strategic, insinuation that (like the oh so glamorous Helen of Troy) every woman wants a war fought over her might also be in order.

    12. Re:Soon to be worthless by Kaeles · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When your wife finds out you spent $5 on a perfect diamond that was made in a lab instead of by the Earths natural and loving embrace, you will find out how loving and warm your couch is...

      If your wife is shallow enough to care about the price of a diamond instead of the fact that you thought enough to buy her one, you need a new wife.

    13. Re:Soon to be worthless by Kingrames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because women can't be happy unless they know that thousands of children in Africa died in slavery to produce the expensive ring on her finger?

      How about you offer her the flawless ring, and spend the rest of the money on something else.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    14. Re:Soon to be worthless by langelgjm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When your wife finds out you spent $5 on a perfect diamond that was made in a lab instead of by the Earths natural and loving embrace, you will find out how loving and warm your couch is...

      That's why you tell her in advance, like I have.

      Cultured diamonds (use the fancy word "cultured", like pearls, instead of "synthetic" which just sounds like a euphemism for "fake") are guaranteed to be conflict-free, which is also attractive. Besides, you can still spend the same amount of money, and just end up with a bigger, clearer, better quality diamond than what you'd get naturally.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    15. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I read an article recently about a new process to anneal diamonds to clarify them. They used to have to use high heat and pressure to produce clear diamonds, but now they can use microwave plasma. Since they don't have build the units to withstand high pressure, they can make them much larger at a far lower cost. Theoretically you could start producing football sized flawless diamonds. I can't find the original mainstream news article, but here's an more technical explanation of the process. http://ndnc.mingann.com/WWW/module/core/news/upload/126.pdf

    16. Re:Soon to be worthless by Strep · · Score: 1

      Nah. She's socially uppity and can't stand that so much blood has been spilt for such rocks. She knows that a diamond is just a stone and that what you're really paying for is Debeers to be profitable.

    17. Re:Soon to be worthless by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      based on marketing? Don't forget the slave workers and monopoly abuse.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    18. Re:Soon to be worthless by Rastl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow. I'd be wonderfully happy to receive a diamond that cost $5.00 if my husband thought the jewelry was pretty enough to buy for me. What do I care about the cost of the diamond?

      He knows I like shiny things and that I prefer fake over real, because I can get far more fake ones than real ones and I worry far less over wearing the fake ones. Most of my 'good' jewelry is kept in the safe anyway.

      I agree with the other posters. If your wife takes issue with the cost of the present then you have far worse problems. Such as a wife that needs an attitude adjustment.

    19. Re:Soon to be worthless by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      I believe we have found a diamond in the rough.

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    20. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Before anyone says it, yes.. a girl on slashdot!)

      Yes, this is a classic joke: a girl, with a boyfriend, on slashdot. It's up there with the other classic: a Somalian tourist, in Abu Dhabi, staying at the Emirates Palace, with money to spare.

      (Anonymously because I've already used points in the topic)

    21. Re:Soon to be worthless by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Last year my wife kept mentioning that she wanted a mother-child pendant. (Here's a photo of one, in case you don't know what it is: http://www.amazon.com/Sterling-Silver-Heart-Shaped-Pendant-Russell/dp/B000OZT53O ) Trying to be a good husband, I took the hint and bought her one. It cost around $250, but I figured that it was something that she wanted. Instead, when I presented her with it, she slapped me and told me that I shouldn't have spent so much on a piece of jewelry. I think she would welcome the opportunity to get nice looking diamonds at only $5 each.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    22. Re:Soon to be worthless by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      In fact, I believe that a technique was recently developed to make it quicker and cheaper to produce large, clear artificial diamonds.
      Previously, they had to use some sort of pressure chamber, which severely limited the size of the diamonds produced, and required more time for larger stones. There's a new method that I read about roughly a month ago that uses microwaves to do the purification. Unfortunately, I can't remember the details, and I can't find a link.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    23. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and .. natural yellow are worth the most

    24. Re:Soon to be worthless by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forget that diamond production is an energy-intensive process. You'd have to turn the diamond production station's power suppliers' exhaust into diamonds. Then you're set, albeit a little recursively. In fact I'm about to try oh shiiiiiiiiiii-

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    25. Re:Soon to be worthless by mrbobjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Too bad DeBeers would assassinate anyone who even thought about develo
      --
      They say a learning experience is anything we survive.

      Heh, so does this not count as a learning experience for you?

    26. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon the DeBeers of the world will start touting the benefits of their diamonds versus the Canadian diamonds.

      DeBeers does not like competition:

      http://www.debeerscanada.com/

    27. Re:Soon to be worthless by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      Human blood means the diamond is worth more. The Canadian Diamonds lack the required blood, so are only worth a fraction of a "real" diamond.

    28. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, everyone! Look over here! It's a girl on Slashdot!

    29. Re:Soon to be worthless by fprintf · · Score: 1

      I hope for your sake it was a "loving" slap, and you got to wear your leather chaps also. 'cause otherwise I'd say you have problems in your relationship if upsetting things are handled physically.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    30. Re:Soon to be worthless by thirty-seven · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Canadian diamonds sell for a premium, at least at jewellery stores, especially the government certified "Polar Ice" diamonds which are not only mined in the Northwest Territories but also cut and polished there.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    31. Re:Soon to be worthless by dschl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      DeBeers owns a Canadian mine already, Snap Lake. The other mines are pipes, and are being mined using open pits. Snap Lake is a dyke, and they are using conventional tunneling. Way less material to move, and less disturbance of the surrounding area.

      I visited Snap Lake in 2000 to work on problems they were having with their wastewater treatment plant, before DeBeers bought Snap Lake. It was only in exploration phase, but when I arrived on site, I was given a form to sign. They are rather paranoid about theft, as the options given to me were to either sign the form and agree to be searched (up to and including a body cavity search), or take the next plane out.

      They were still only in advanced exploration phase, but I was told to not look at or pick up rocks on the ground, or to take photos without authorization. I was told that the rules would get even tighter once they hit production.

      I got up there in early August, just after black fly season ended. I was the only person who didn't have scabs all over from insect bites. There was still over 20 hours of daylight, and it was quite pretty, although it could be viewed as a bleak and barren landscape compared to the areas south of 60.

      --
      Slashdot - the place where you can look like a genius by restating the obvious
    32. Re:Soon to be worthless by Godji · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, no. DeBeers and the like diamonds will continue to be highly demanded, not despite their price, but because of their price. They will continue to be a status symbol, with their value in their price as opposed to what one got for the price.

      You got the same or better diamond, but mine was way more expensive. You are a lesser human being. Move on.

    33. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Was your diamond worth dying for?"

      I predict that soon diamonds won't be graded merely by the 4-C's (cut, clarity, color and carot weight), but by 4-C's and a D (deaths).

    34. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She *slapped* you for doing what she asked??

      DUMP THE BETCH.

    35. Re:Soon to be worthless by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My wife is quite aware that I would NEVER purchase a diamond. She liked the look, so we decided to get a moissanite. The difference in price was a 1 month long honeymoon in Bavaria.

      What is now starting to bother me, is that I see moissanites being sold as 'almost diamonds' and at 75% of the price. The main reason I won't purchase a diamond, even a Canadian one, is that because it is the inflated prices that have allowed all the abuses to continue. Since the Canadian Diamonds are being sold at nearly an identical price point, I've no good words for them.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    36. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually DeBeers was honing in on him at the time and trying to buy the land. I remember watching a documentary about this several years ago. The guy was literally out of money drilling his last few feet with DeBeers helicoptors on the horizon when he found the diamonds. I'm sure DeBeers owns some Canadian properties too.

    37. Re:Soon to be worthless by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that was marketing advice to DeBeers- I should have clarified.

    38. Re:Soon to be worthless by cecille · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the same thing. Not only because it is stupid to spend money on value-less rocks for no reason, but also because I just find them really neat. Not to mention, we're both engineers, so I find something really...I dunno...symbolic about it. Wave of the future, power of technology, all that jazz.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    39. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And think about diamond "glass" in your car, space ship and submarine =D

    40. Re:Soon to be worthless by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

      Anti-theism, on the other hand, gets back into the realm of missionaries and zealots.

    41. Re:Soon to be worthless by timeOday · · Score: 1

      This is rather a contradiction. What is the point of fashion and jewelry, if not to prove you have money to burn?

    42. Re:Soon to be worthless by brucmack · · Score: 1

      Kudos, I think this was the first time I've ever LOLed at the disconnection meme. Well played!

    43. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      derogate?

    44. Re:Soon to be worthless by ODiV · · Score: 1

      DeBeers owns a Canadian mine already, Snap Lake.

      They own two Canadian diamond mines: Snap Lake and Victor.

    45. Re:Soon to be worthless by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Meh, when shopping for an engagement ring I was worried about spending too much money. My girl would kill me if I spend the suggested 3-months of salary on a piece of jewelry. I looked for something nice that I thought she would enjoy wearing. Not all women care about the bling.

    46. Re:Soon to be worthless by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, diamonds can be quite pretty, so I don't know if I'd say that it's retarded to use them as jewelery. What's retarded (at the societal level) is to use them as a status symbol.

    47. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone that ever thought that diamonds had real value is nuts.

      I'm pretty sure anyone who's ever found themselves with a diamond and decided to sell it instead of just throwing it away (you know since they "don't have any value") wasn't nuts. Learn some economics bitch.

    48. Re:Soon to be worthless by tylerni7 · · Score: 1

      I have an interesting idea...
      Start up a company that sells "synthetic" diamonds, but inflates the cost by about 50%
      Take some of the money from the 50% as revenue, and donate the rest to African charities.

      Shallow women will love it because it still costs more than it should, and you won't feel like an asshole buying it because it actually helped people, and it would still be cheaper than "natural" diamonds.

    49. Re:Soon to be worthless by drew · · Score: 1

      Not if you're wife happens to be Dutch... or rather happens to have a somewhat rational outlook on the value of things. At least, my wife claims it comes from being Dutch and I don't know enough other Dutch people to argue with her.

      I once found myself in a conversation with several of her college girlfriends and their husbands about designer purses. (sorry, "handbags") I think the extent of my contribution was a sarcastic "Loiue who?" when one of them was explaining how to identify a counterfeit Luis Vuitton. When one of them asked me why I had never bought one for my wife, I had to explain to them that they may not know my wife as well as they thought, because I would be sleeping on the couch if she ever found out that I spent that much "on a purse". They weren't amused. Instead, she's perfectly happy carrying around the $20 knockoff she bought at a party.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    50. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're pretty stupid.

      So when are you moving out of mommies basement?

    51. Re:Soon to be worthless by Sique · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean like in the old joke about the party at the Nouveau Riche's, where the host proudly presents a bottle of wine: "I got this one for $1000!", when one of the guests replies: "Idiot! I know where you can get the same wine for $1500!"

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    52. Re:Soon to be worthless by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Go ahead. Try to sell a diamond.

      Buy one for $1500 from a reputable dealer, and then turn around and try to get anyone else to pay you more than 10% of what you paid for it.

      Your best option at this point is craigslist. You MIGHT recover 50% if you're lucky.

    53. Re:Soon to be worthless by Sique · · Score: 1

      I never understood the american idea of proposing anyway.
      Wenn my then-girlfriend rented a car and read the contract she found out that family members can drive the rental car too without extra charge. So we decided that from now I was a member of her family. That was the whole proposition. No diamonds. No rings. Nothing.

      (And yes, we are married now for more than 10 years).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    54. Re:Soon to be worthless by Oqnet · · Score: 1

      It depends my wife got ring with small diamonds that looks amazing because of the clarity, it wasn't overly expensive. She loved it but she would have been happy with a cheap ol' ring with no diamonds in it if thats what I had bought her. That's because we had other things we needed to spend the money one.

      Now if I was well established and had money no need to worry about buying a house or anything like that, if I had gone out and spent 5 dollars on the ring it would have probably been disappointing. The ring isn't something silly you give because it costs a lot of money, but it should represent how much that person means to you. If you would rather go get a fake diamond she could take it as you don't think she's worth a real one. It might have nothing to do with value.

      Some girls like my wife have common sense and don't think such ways. There are also some girls who I have known that were very nice that would be happier with a small diamond ring than a large factory made diamond.

      Following social norms doesn't make you shallow. It just means you are likely normal in that setting. Not to say that it's right but I don't think you should call them shallow for it. Shallow is when you present the ring you could aford and they are pissed you didn't go x amount into debt to get it and still want a nice wedding.

      on a side note my wedding band cost more than her two rings(not together).

    55. Re:Soon to be worthless by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Only if your wife is a shallow materialistic person. If you *deceive* your wife into thinking its something that its not, then YOU are the materialistic shallow person, but if you explain to her the advantage of a laboratory manufactured diamond it becomes a conversation piece, and something to be proud about.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    56. Re:Soon to be worthless by wurble · · Score: 1

      Wow, my wife said the same thing. She prefers the look of moissanite to diamond because it's "more sparkly". Not wanting to shell out that kind of cash, I got her a CZ instead.

    57. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad thing is, that seems makes for >51% of the demographic in my current age bracket (granted, given a small sample set compared to all women near my age bracket).

      "Sanity" is just the tyranny of the majority sadly.

    58. Re:Soon to be worthless by oo · · Score: 1

      I once found myself in a conversation with several of her college girlfriends and their husbands about designer purses. (sorry, "handbags")

      The word you're looking for is "bags".

      No one says "purses" or "handbags" anymore. It's like saying "stewardess" when you mean "flight attendant" or "apothecary" when you mean "drugstore".

    59. Re:Soon to be worthless by Omestes · · Score: 1

      If this happens you picked the wrong woman.

      I already told my long-term girlfriend (roughly 4 years now) that if we ever get married she's getting a emerald ring, not a diamond one, emeralds are the rarest gem stone in the world, and IMO the most aesthetically pleasing (though I prefer opals, which aren't gemstones, per se).

      If she really bought into the almost century long advertising campaign, then she can take a hike, or if she just wants to be with me as some "status symbol", then she can most assuredly go away.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    60. Re:Soon to be worthless by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Some of us don't take it that seriously. I almost married my ex-girlfreind so she could get a better off-base housing allowance, before that we almost got married for financial aid (when we were still dating). The odd thing is that my current girlfreind was okay with the idea as long as it was temporary, and there was no sex.

      We also have an open agreement that we can marry Europeans or Canadians for citizenship, as long as its non-sexual, and we can arrange it at the same time.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    61. Re:Soon to be worthless by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      When your wife finds out you spent $5 on a perfect diamond that was made in a lab instead of by the Earths natural and loving embrace, you will find out how loving and warm your couch is...

      If your wife is shallow enough to care about the price of a diamond instead of the fact that you thought enough to buy her one

      Except that if a diamond only costs $5, the notional wife isn't going to value it beyond being a gift from you in the first place. A diamond [currently] has value because it's expensive and represents a sacrifice. A $5 diamond is no different than a cheap prize from a carnival game - a heartfelt gift, but ultimately disposable.

    62. Re:Soon to be worthless by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Informative
      Neatorama had an interesting article called 10 Facts About Diamond You Should Know/a> that included a section about resale of diamonds:

      Why is there no active after-market for diamonds? It is estimated that the public holds about 500 million carats of gem diamonds - if a significant portion of the public begins selling, then the price of diamond would plummet. To prevent this from happening, the diamond industry spent a huge sum in making diamonds "heirloom" properties to be passed down for generations, keeping the price of diamond artificially high (so people wouldn't be tempted to unload them for fear of losing money) and discourage jewelers from buying diamonds from the public.

    63. Re:Soon to be worthless by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Not rare and not valuable would make them perfect for a shiny bauble people wear as decoration, no?

    64. Re:Soon to be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      before that we almost got married for financial aid (when we were still dating)

      that would be preferable to getting married once you stopped dating...

    65. Re:Soon to be worthless by TheLink · · Score: 1

      So it was a bit like whoring yourself out but minus the sex?

      With a bit more effort, you'll be a consultant in no time. :)

      --
    66. Re:Soon to be worthless by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Because it looks pretty?

      Jewellery doesn't have to cost a lot of money to be pretty.

      Same goes for the girls ;).

      --
    67. Re:Soon to be worthless by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Anyone that ever thought that diamonds had real value is nuts.

      They do have real value, as drill bits, saw blades, abrasives and heatsinks.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    68. Re:Soon to be worthless by kchrist · · Score: 1

      And if your wife considers a heartfelt gift from her husband to be "ultimately disposable", you also need a new wife.

      My wife's wedding ring is an antique gold ring set with a ruby. Neither of us had any interest in supporting the diamond industry, and she just plain preferred the ruby.

    69. Re:Soon to be worthless by Omestes · · Score: 1

      How like whoring yourself out? She'd be paying all the money. All it would take is me spending a month or two in Florida, before flying back home and getting on with my life. Then after her enlistment was up, divorce.

      I would have gotten a free, all expenses paid vacation, and I also would have been a favor for a friend. Don't see the whoring in that.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    70. Re:Soon to be worthless by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you've never met my wife.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Carbon by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now we can make better diamonds than nature. I suggest we use use diamonds as carbon sequestering to prevent global warming! ;)

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Carbon by gnud · · Score: 1

      This comment is not interesting unless it's shown that depositing carbon in diamonds from thin air will deposit more carbon than will be produced by creating the nessescary energy.

    2. Re:Carbon by Strep · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps leave it to nature. After all, trees do a pretty damn good job all by themselves.

    3. Re:Carbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment is not interesting unless it's shown that depositing carbon in diamonds from thin air will deposit more carbon than will be produced by creating the nessescary energy.

      If the manufacturing facilities were cheap enough, renewable energy could be used. I think it would be cheaper, though, to grow trees, cook them to charcoal, and bury the charcoal.

    4. Re:Carbon by aaron+alderman · · Score: 1

      What are we going to do with the remaining dioxide?? You environmentalists never think about the consequences of your actions!

    5. Re:Carbon by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      Good thinking! And then we burn the diamonds, and the problem is solved completely!

  5. That's funny because I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Canadian, I consider myself a bit of a "rogue", and I was down to my last diamond when I discovered nickle in Northern Ontario

    1. Re:That's funny because I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this some sort of sexual innuendo?

  6. i don't get it by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why are diamonds still considered precious?

    don't we have the technology to make them cheap?

    sure, there's all the convoluted diamond market, debeers monopoly explanations, but that's like saying no one can buy marijuana because its illegal

    if i want to get a diamond, why can't i pay $5 and go get one the size of my fist? its just carbon. that i can't do that right now, seems absurd to me, and even more absurd, that we should still be digging this stuff up and considering it valuable

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i don't get it by hardburn · · Score: 4, Informative

      The areas where diamonds have direct, practical use have been on artificial diamonds for a while (specifically, diamond cutting blades). It's only the jeweler's diamonds that are still natural.

      There are also some potential practical uses of diamonds that have no current use because large quantities are too expensive. Such as building materials, thermal conductors, and semiconductors.

      Until recently, most artificial diamonds had too many impurities to look good on a ring, even to an untrained eye (you'd have to be blind to not notice that your stone is distinctly yellow). Even now, making pure artificial diamonds is about the same price as digging them out of the ground. Still, the techniques are only going to get better, and I'll be dancing the streets when DeBeers goes bankrupt.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    2. Re:i don't get it by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Growing diamonds of nontrivial size still isn't cheap, unfortunately. Prices are falling, and size and quality are improving; but high temperature vapor deposition still consumes fair chunks of expensive machine time.

      People who are buying a couple of carats for thousands of dollars are utter morons; but diamonds as bulk material aren't really here yet.

    3. Re:i don't get it by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why are diamonds still considered precious?

      Marketing and cultural inertia. No more, no less.

    4. Re:i don't get it by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Informative

      why are diamonds still considered precious?

      don't we have the technology to make them cheap?

      sure, there's all the convoluted diamond market, debeers monopoly explanations, but that's like saying no one can buy marijuana because its illegal

      if i want to get a diamond, why can't i pay $5 and go get one the size of my fist? its just carbon. that i can't do that right now, seems absurd to me, and even more absurd, that we should still be digging this stuff up and considering it valuable

      Diamonds are precious because about 70+ years of marketing by DeBeers has made popular opinion think they are valuable. All those "Diamonds are forever" type of ads you see? Marketing. And not just any diamond, they had to be big, beautiful expensive diamonds, not the cheap ones people used to buy in the early 1900's. And not only that, but marketing to convince people they need to keep buying diamonds.

      And yes, we can make them artificially - either vapor deposition, or large pressures and high temperatures, or probably a ton of other methods. Look up for industrial diamonds (they're quite useful in industry).

      It's basically all DeBeers marketing - DeBeers basically bought up all the diamond mines and established a complex network of distributors that effectively took over all cosmetic diamond sales. These diamonds were then effectively rationed to make their price go up. When some shrewd business practice causes potential losses in the value of diamonds, DeBeers puts some control that effectively disrupts the practice. (DeBeers has tried hard to quash any sort of thing that might disrupt the price of diamonds and collapse its monopoly). The price of a diamond is artificially inflated, and kept that way. And marketing ensures that you can't get away with some low-quality diamond, you must buy a nice expensive one for your significant other.

      In fact, the resale value of diamonds is quite poor, so as investments, you can do better elsewhere.

      Here's an interesting read on how DeBeers turned a relatively cheap gem into something desirable, and managed to keep tight control over production in order to keep value up.

      http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/198202/diamond

    5. Re:i don't get it by thewils · · Score: 3, Informative

      why are diamonds still considered precious?

      I'll answer that one - it's because the Cartel that sells them decides on the price. That way it is maintained artificially high. If diamonds were sold for their rarity value they'd be much, much cheaper.

      Here's more on the subject (pdf link)

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    6. Re:i don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Ads provides:
      http://www.diamondnexuslabs.com/index.php?cPath=2_135

      Loose lab created cut diamonds, for ~$100 a carat, up to 9.

    7. Re:i don't get it by speculatrix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      consider, say an Intel CPU - the fabrication plant alone costs billions, and yet when make in volume they can sell them for tens or hundreds of dollars.

      the whole point of diamonds is that they're "rare" and "special" in the minds of the buyers.

      neadiamonds synthetics are damn expensive when you consider the equipment is dirt cheap compared to a semi foundry!

    8. Re:i don't get it by McGregorMortis · · Score: 1

      The article says that in 2007 the Canadian mines produced 17 million carats, worth $14 billion.

      That works out to $82/ct. Remember that next time you're asked to pay $5000 for a 1ct engagement rock. That is one hell of a markup.

      I guess that's what it takes to cover the expenses involved in sustaining artificial rarity.

    9. Re:i don't get it by ogar572 · · Score: 1

      why are diamonds still considered precious?

      Because all women want them and men are dumb enough to pay too much money for them (including myself).

    10. Re:i don't get it by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Yep, for right now the cost of a gem quality diamond is about the same whehter it's dug out of the ground by an 'almost-but-not-quite' slave in Africa or produced in a lab on the East coast. Of course, there is the ethical difference to examine there, and for that reason my wife will never recieve another 'natural' diamond ever again.

      And yeah, I have told her that, and she was suprisingly fine with it, enthusiastic even after I explained the moral arguments of it.

    11. Re:i don't get it by fprintf · · Score: 1

      Just remember that there is a difference between industrial grade diamonds, which are sold relatively cheaply, and jewelry quality diamonds. So your average price per carat does what averages do -- you sell millions of tons of industrial grade diamonds, for things like sandpaper, drill bits, grinding stones, and anything else, for cheap brings offsets the lower volume/higher cost ring-quality diamonds. A majority of diamonds produced from any mine are industrial quality, the rest are still relatively rare.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    12. Re:i don't get it by shakah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      isn't $823/ct more like it?

    13. Re:i don't get it by fprintf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only does the cartel get to arrange the pricing, but the distribution network is artificially limited also. Not to be anti-semitic, but I used to work in a Jewelry store in Massachusetts, and the owner told me that you had to be Jewish in order to be in the distribution chain. He told me that the only people allowed to train to cut large stones in New York are Hasidic Jews. Once past the initial wholesale level and moving toward retail, it apparently opens up some more. In fact, I bought my wife her first diamond at the diamond district in New York from a store run by some Lebanese friends of the family.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    14. Re:i don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So diamonds weren't desirable before DeBeers showed up? Where did all the old tales about people treasuring diamonds, gold, rubies, etc come from?

    15. Re:i don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not nearly as much as people think. Rubies and sapphires and the like were much more valuable.

    16. Re:i don't get it by McGregorMortis · · Score: 1

      You're both right and wrong. Actually, it was $1.4 billion in the article. $14 billion was a typo.

    17. Re:i don't get it by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      It's basically all DeBeers marketing

      Never in my 36+ years of life I've seen or heard an ad for diamonds. And I learned about DeBeers here on /. My wife probably never heard of DeBeers either. Not every part of word is influenced by marketing of some company. However I still consider diamonds to be nice and interesting - simply because they are unusual. They are on the edge of the scale. That determines the price.

  7. I would appreciate it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...if you assholes wielding the "!news" tag would just relax and perhaps even just fuck the hell off for the holidays. This site covers a *broad* range of geeky interests, and not every single post has to be "ZOMG! Zoobuntu fork Humpty Hump just added support for a third mouse button and a reverse-engineered hacked driver for the 3DFX card! w00t!"

    Seriously. Some of us leave the house sometimes, you jackasses.

    1. Re:I would appreciate it... by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why does a simple tag get you so riled up?

      Seriously. Just ignore it.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:I would appreciate it... by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      True. But an article that starts off saying "nearly two decades ago" is probably a bit stale. I know I've heard this story several times in the last decade, including at least 1 TV show dedicated to the subject. Maybe others have too.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    3. Re:I would appreciate it... by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      Good for you. Go and read the next story.

      I on the other hand hadn't heard about this, and even if I had, the comments (apart from these ones) are quite interesting.

    4. Re:I would appreciate it... by berend+botje · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't make it news. Rather, it makes it !news.

    5. Re:I would appreciate it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, look on the bright side, it could be tagged "!story" ;)

    6. Re:I would appreciate it... by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      ZOMG! Zoobuntu fork Humpty Hump just added support for a third mouse button and a reverse-engineered hacked driver for the 3DFX card! w00t!

      Wow! Where can I find a download?

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    7. Re:I would appreciate it... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      It's only a tag. It's only meant to clarify. It probably means someone saw this story before. The way the headline is written, it could have been interpreted as either breaking news or old news. Relax man.

    8. Re:I would appreciate it... by Faylone · · Score: 1

      I've got to agree that !news isn't a very useful tag, although stories like this should be tagged history rather than news.

  8. Doom by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

    His discovery started the largest staking rush in North America since George Carmack found gold in the Klondike a century earlier.

    As opposed to George's descendent who started the largest exodus of a planet when he opened a portal to hell.

  9. Chapter VII by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "That in some fields of his country there are certain shining stones of several colours, whereof the Yahoos are violently fond: and when part of these stones is fixed in the earth, as it sometimes happens, they will dig with their claws for whole days to get them out; then carry them away, and hide them by heaps in their kennels; but still looking round with great caution, for fear their comrades should find out their treasure." My master said, "he could never discover the reason of this unnatural appetite, or how these stones could be of any use to a Yahoo; but now he believed it might proceed from the same principle of avarice which I had ascribed to mankind. That he had once, by way of experiment, privately removed a heap of these stones from the place where one of his Yahoos had buried it; whereupon the sordid animal, missing his treasure, by his loud lamenting brought the whole herd to the place, there miserably howled, then fell to biting and tearing the rest, began to pine away, would neither eat, nor sleep, nor work, till he ordered a servant privately to convey the stones into the same hole, and hide them as before; which, when his Yahoo had found, he presently recovered his spirits and good humour, but took good care to remove them to a better hiding place, and has ever since been a very serviceable brute."

    1. Re:Chapter VII by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Informative
      Damn - Swift on /.!

      If I had mod points...

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    2. Re:Chapter VII by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Swifts Gulliver's Travels is in incredible gem (see, I'm posting on topic!). Even after more than 200 years it has astute, applicable and biting political commentary and LOL scenes. Lilliputian royalty looking up and seeing what G's threadbare clothing was no longer hiding as their carriage passed between his legs had me in tears, as did his methodology for extinguishing a file in their palace. Seriously geeky reading entertainment, you can get it FREE. http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/829

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  10. lots of these geologists around by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Colorado people are constantly looking for oil, gold, uranium, diamonds, etc. Few get lucky. Much of the easy stuff was found in the 19th century.

    Some new gold mines were discovered in California by petroleum geologists. They discovered buried riverbeds where placer gold concentrates using petroleum seismic sections.

  11. The usual shoddy reporting by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems a little unfair to call the guy a 'rogue' or 'absent minded'. He's an intelligent bloke who applied his knowledge and intellect to a problem, spent nearly a decade doing the necessary legwork, and eventually hit the big time when it all paid off. That's not 'rogue' behaviour, that's hard work. I'd have given up. Well done to him. He deserves it.

    I agree wholeheartedly. This wasn't a get rich quick story. It was somebody who worked hard to become rich.

    The story is actually more interesting than the Wired story says. For years geologists had been finding raw diamonds in the NWT, and had been going nuts trying to find where they were coming from. The real breakthrough was realising what a kimberlite pipe would look like out in the tundra, sorting out the geology that went along with it, then examining likely sites. Many of these are now well-known names, like Ekati and Diavik.

    I too wish these folks well.

    ...laura

    1. Re:The usual shoddy reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of these are now well-known names, like Ekati and Diavik.

      Are they all named after Ewoks?

    2. Re:The usual shoddy reporting by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have you ever read about how kimberlite tubes are probably formed? It sounds very exciting. The initial magma burst upwards is only hasty by geologic terms, but the final burst of gas and magma out of the surface of the earth is at supersonic velocities. People have claimed it's possible some of the material is moving at beyond escape velocity and gets shot into space.
      So while I'd love to discover a kimberlite tube, I'd rather it wasn't on MY property.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:The usual shoddy reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of these are now well-known names, like Ekati and Diavik.

      If you're a fan of Ice Road Truckers, that is. :)

    4. Re:The usual shoddy reporting by eyendall · · Score: 1

      "For years geologists had been finding raw diamonds in the NWT"

        I remember my geology prof back in 1968 talking about the presence of diamonds in southern Canada deposited by glaciers. Tracking back pointed to the NWT as the source. It was just a matter of time before someone solved the puzzle.

  12. Multi-classing is overrated by zindorsky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure a rogue/geologist sounds pretty cool, but multi-classing is not a smart decision. You're better off just focusing all your levels in one class.

    --
    If the geiger counter does not click, the coffee, she is not thick.
    1. Re:Multi-classing is overrated by servognome · · Score: 1

      Maybe he wasn't a min/maxer and just wanted to roleplay.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:Multi-classing is overrated by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Nowadays its much easier!

      You just take the geologist class and then take the "sneak of shadows" feat... Then you can spend some more feats to add more rogue powers to your geologist

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  13. WoW by Tommy316 · · Score: 1

    Big deal, my rogue mines all kinds of cool things. Maybe the next story can be how a hunter found rugged leather or a priest found goldthorn.

  14. so i was following this old lady by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Troll

    for 10 minutes, and she had her blinker on the whole time

    it made me so angry, at a stop light i got out my car and beat the shit out of her

    not really

    but i think you might know the feeling

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  15. so buy her something genuinely rare by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    like an iridium or palladium or rhodium ring

    it will be many, many moons before we'll be able to synthesize these elements relatively cheaply via radioactive decay or find some relatively cheaply exploitable extraplanetary source

    meanwhile, you will have bought her something genuinely rare, valuable, and expensive, which is what a diamond ring is suppose to symbolize in a relationship as an investment

    meanwhile, diamonds are the symbols of monopoly, conflict, and falsely inflated value. which is not the symbol of love in a relationship you or her are looking for (although perhaps a valid symbol for many relationships out there, there's a joke in there somewhere, ehem)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:so buy her something genuinely rare by Strep · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On Rhodium, it went from over $10000/oz to under $1000 in the past 6 months...

    2. Re:so buy her something genuinely rare by Omestes · · Score: 1

      When my dad remarried, the ring was cast from gold he dug up himself, with a small gold nugget on top. Nothing says romance like something personalized, unique, and requiring actual thought (unlike going to a store, buying a premade ring, with a silly stone that everyone else must have).

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  16. Diamonds for Ten Dollars Per Carat by WisdomGroup · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fortunately, diamonds will sell for ten dollars per carat in the year 2015. All of us will benefit from inexpensive, flawless diamonds. Computers will become faster and less expensive. Advanced medical equipment will become available to more people. Photovoltaic cells made from diamonds will bring cheap power to the masses. What an exciting time to be alive!

  17. I bet... by iCeSkUuBe · · Score: 1

    he must have been a Dwarf Rogue, that way he could use find treasure.

  18. And another northern neighbor . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    . . . has as already become uncomfortable competition for de Beers: http://www.khulsey.com/jewelry/kh_jewelry_diamond_mines_russia.html

    I remember reading that, eventually, Russia reach a, um, "deal" with de Beers. It is in their interest, as well, to artificially inflate the price.

    But despite all this, de Beers seems to always remain de Beers.

    After all, "a monopoly is forever."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:And another northern neighbor . . . by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Years ago aluminum was more expensive than gold. The refining process was so difficult that, though aluminum was one of the most common metals, the yield was in grams. Then someone invented a new extraction process. Aluminum suddenly became cheap.

      Carbon is not so rare. It may not happen soon, but there may be a time when common items such as ICs or even cell phones cases are made from diamonds. Instead of measuring by carat, they'll measure it by ounces or inches.

    2. Re:And another northern neighbor . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      The "monopoly is forever" statement was meant as a wry pun on the famous de Beers "a diamond is forever" ad slogan.

      I'll buy a diamond for my girlfriend, when I know that the price has not been set by de Beers.

      Hey, maybe the canadian companies won't play ball with de Beers?

      But since mining companies are *really* hurting these days, I could imagine that all out them want to squeeze out profit.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:And another northern neighbor . . . by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Hey, maybe the canadian companies won't play ball with de Beers?

      Of course they won't. Here, we play hockey!

    4. Re:And another northern neighbor . . . by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I've heard that some of the British crown jewels are made from aluminum. And similarly, there is aluminum jewelry from the Tzars in the armory in moscow.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  19. when has it ever been true by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    that rare and valuable also implied price stability?

    i don't think gold's enormous price fluctuations have convinced people to stop buying gold

    if something is rare, its rare. no price fluxuation is going to change that fact

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  20. bad teaser by cornercuttin · · Score: 1

    the teaser for this story is bad. it really has nothing to do with the guy who discovered it, and is more about the industry itself. the story doesn't even say if the guy who discovered it is reasonably successful or not. blah.

    1. Re:bad teaser by mangu · · Score: 1

      Have you RTFA? Both of them? The second one says he paid $200 million in a divorce settlement and is quite happy about it.

  21. Those aren't diamonds.. by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

    It's a mass grave.

  22. What took them so long? by theillien2 · · Score: 1

    I saw a show about this a few years back (I wish I could remember the channel it was on). Why are NPR and Wired only now talking about it? It certainly is an interesting story, though.

    --
    If we don't protect the freedom of speech how will we know who the assholes are?
  23. Submitter confuses Rogue with Nethack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Geologist (actually "Archaeologist") class never existed in Rogue. I don't even think Rogue had diamonds. Sheez.

    Come on editors! You gotta catch this stuff!

  24. Something like this happened in the past as well. by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    One hundred and fifty years ago, pure aluminum was as expensive as gold. Then someone came out and discovered that if you heat aluminum oxide until it is molten, and use electrolysis, you can generate as much pure aluminum as you want, cheap enough to wrap left over foods and threw it away afterward.

  25. Did he... by prescot6 · · Score: 1

    ..stealth to the back of the cave?

  26. Ice Roads by rlp · · Score: 2, Informative

    The diamond mines were featured in the first season of "Ice Road Truckers". The mines get supplied with their heavy equipment a few months in mid-winter when an ice highway is maintained across frozen lakes and rivers in the region. Watching someone drive 80 tons of mining equipment over a frozen lake is an amazing thing.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Ice Roads by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

      I know a park ranger who lives up in the Nunavut. The price of goods can skyrocket when the ice highway melts every year. Milk can go up $15/l in a day. Because of the very shallow water around Iqaluit, the ice highway in the winter is really the only option to bring in certain items.

  27. Carmack? by Godji · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read that as "John Carmack found gold in the Klondike a century earlier"? Maybe he drove one of his Ferraris at 88 mph and travelled through time to ge the gold, which he then used to buy the Ferrari?

    1. Re:Carmack? by Godji · · Score: 1

      Replying to my own post:

      After doing some research on this, it seems that he actually used the gold to buy more plutonium and go to the future, where he downloaded the Doom source code (it had been open-sourced by then), brought it back with him, and released Doom, which made him rich and famous, and thus able to buy the Ferrari.

      It all makes sense now.

  28. Diamonds are nearly worthless. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are enough companies that produce "industrial" diamonds for many uses. They can also produce diamonds the size of the largest found diamonds.
    And they nowadays have such a high quality, that the sole thing that lets you detect the difference, is that natural diamonds have more errors in them.

    Industrial diamonds cost next to nothing compared to natural diamonds. But De Beers & co want you to believe that natural diamonds are somewhat special, while even real natural diamonds are not that rare at all.

    If you want to buy real rare stones as a gift, buy rubies, sapphires, emeralds, opals and the like. Or naturally colored diamonds (black, red maybe?). They are fuckin' expensive. But here it's because they are really rare.

    I for one, do not buy something like that at all. There's no real value in rare stones for me, and if I don't want to sell them to someone who thinks they are valuable...

    I like to buy personal gifts. And I like to only buy gifts, if the person does not expect a gift. Otherwise it's nothing special anymore.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Diamonds are nearly worthless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubies, sapphires and emeralds (all basically the same base with different impurities) have been lab-made for quite a long time as well. Manufacturers have been 'stabilizing' (read: epoxying) opal too.

      If you want to really play the rarity angle, go for the meteorite fragments and such - even those aren't all that expensive.

    2. Re:Diamonds are nearly worthless. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      We've had synthetic rubies, sapphires, emeralds and opals for longer than we've had practical synthetic diamonds.

      My mother was buying a family ring and one of our birthstones is ruby. She was trying to decide between the (tiny) expensive natural stone or the synthetic one. My father, who did his masters building lasers back when you could get a masters for building lasers, mentioned that he had a big stick of synthetic ruby in the garage somewhere. Synthetic, because natural stones were too flawed to use in lasers.

    3. Re:Diamonds are nearly worthless. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I knew that it's wise to not buy stones for big money. ;)

      Oh, and I need big cubes (think square meter) of jewels in my garage too. :D
      Hey, why not build the windows out of diamond. *Then* I want to see them fuckin' kids break them!
      Oh, and the grass shall be made out of emeralds... *sharp* emeralds. O:-)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Diamonds are nearly worthless. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You picked some good examples. Synthetic rubies, sapphires and opals are a lot cheaper than the natural versions. I don't know about emerald directly, but I imagine it is too.

      Synthetic opal is surprisingly cheap, and very pretty - much more so than all but the best (and much more expensive) natural opal.

      Many more expensive watches actually have faces that are made of synthetic sapphire instead of glass. It's effectively scratch proof.

  29. Diamond grit for 7 cents a carat by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

    Diamond grit, as an abrasive, is currently around $0.07/carat in bulk. It's almost all synthetic, not hard to make, and used for a wide variety of cutting tools. Synthetic diamond production is about 100x mined production. The glamour has gone out of diamond; it's now what sewer workers use on their cutting tools when they need to slice through cement pavement.

    CMU has a new process for microwave-annealing diamonds to remove flaws and make colorless synthetic diamonds.

    The diamond industry (i.e. DeBeers) painted themselves into a corner, by taking the position that that "flawless" diamonds are the most valuable. That's not where you want to be positioned going up against the industries that make semiconductor wafers.

    This all happened to sapphires about sixty years ago. Sapphires used to be rare and valuable. Then Linde Chemical started synthesizing them, and destroyed the market. Now you can buy sapphire bar stock and transparent sapphire plates for supermarket checkout scanners. Since then, it's happened to rubies and emeralds. Now, cheap diamonds.

    1. Re:Diamond grit for 7 cents a carat by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I thought naturally made diamonds always had flaws, the idea is to have the fewest and smallest flaws, so I suppose someone one of those techniques could increase the value of a natural diamonds by reducing them, but not eliminating them.

      Oh well.

  30. hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps Marlene wasn't getting enough attention, what with Charles working so hard. So she got herself a little Stu on the side, and Charles decided to not put up with either of them? Plausible.

  31. History Channel Show by davrodg · · Score: 1

    History Channel ran a story about him in Modern Marvels - it was a good show and if you can, you should watch the show to see the DeBeers vs Small Man battle and some other cool theories he has on geological/ice drift that prompted him to look below the ice based on patterns of deposits from a glacier. Very interesting stuff indeed - despite all the rants - this is a good topic about innovation, forward thinking and the challenge of David vs. Goliath in modern terms... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0877223/ http://www.amazon.com/History-Modern-Marvels-Diamond-Mines/dp/B001CU9486 http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=4&url=http%3A%2F%2Fthepiratebay.org%2Ftorrent%2F3592588%2FModern_Marvels_-_Diamond_Mines&ei=lbFCSeKZPNG3tweKqP3TCA&usg=AFQjCNFANj1cetx6DEkhjYL2v1NJmGwaVA&sig2=rvJ3z4L9GKhe_vyIQZn02w

  32. News For Nerds: SLASHDOT the Encyclopedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOT.

    Stuff That's Very OLD

    I read the book in 2002.

    Cordially,
    Kilgore Trout

  33. I thought it was a mortgage by LandruBek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought the American dream was "get a mortgage and own property": they tried to make land-owner status accessible to everyone.

    --
    $META_SIG_JOKE
    1. Re:I thought it was a mortgage by LordEd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I thought the American dream was to spill hot coffee on yourself and sue for millions of dollars.

      Suing each other is your national hobby, isn't it?

    2. Re:I thought it was a mortgage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Suing each other is your national hobby, isn't it?

      Beats curling, at least.

    3. Re:I thought it was a mortgage by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Suing each other is your national hobby, isn't it?"

      And shooting each other....remember, we do like our guns too!!

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  34. please all stand and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fipke is a small man with a shaved head, a burnished tan, piercing blue eyes, and forearms like Popeye's. As a kid, his frantic start-stop mind made people think he was stupid. After getting his high school girlfriend pregnant, he agreed to marry her ... and then failed to show up for the wedding. (The couple eventually married after the baby was born.) He stutters and says "hey" in almost every sentence. He frequently loses his glasses and his keys, shows up late to appointments, and has a history of spending prodigious amounts of money in strip joints. His nicknames have included Captain Chaos and Stumpy.

    . . . welcome stumpy as one of us!

  35. a story about how a man. by anothy · · Score: 1

    Both NPR and Wired are running stories about how nearly two decades ago, a dogged, absentminded Canadian geologist named Charles Fipke who was practically down to his last nickel when he discovered diamonds in the Northwest Territories...

    did what? there's no action clause here; they're all turned into adjective clauses about Fipke. go ahead, diagram it for me. you could just remove "who" or "when he" and it'd make perfect sense.

    on the up side, this now removes any doubt as to whether grammar on slashdot is getting worse or i'm getting more persnickety: it's me.

    --

    i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    1. Re:a story about how a man. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Did I miss the point? "discovered diamonds" would seem to be fairly, uh, action-y. Or maybe I should say verb-y?

    2. Re:a story about how a man. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Wow, I did miss it. I completely edited out the "who" without ever realizing it. Of course, I also added in the half dozen missing commas.

      Excuse me, I'm going to go read a classic now. It seems my brain is angry with me.

  36. Sounds like an ad for Rio Tinto by Durindana · · Score: 1

    Let's keep in mind that multinational mining conglomerates are easily some of the most corrupt, soul-destroying organizations in the world. For example:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bougainville#Shutting_the_Panguna_mine

  37. I thought it was to go on a huge drug binge! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    ...Oh wait, that was Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. Never mind.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  38. Wired map is hosed ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The map in Wired is *way* off. It places the mines too far north. Three of them are almost in the Arctic Ocean (they should be near Slave lake) and the fourth is on Baffin Island (should be in Ontario). Here are the correct locations:

    Diavik mine - the satellite image is early in the mining operation, before the pit was dug (it is in the lake to the east).

    Ekati mine - to the NW of Diavik. Google Maps shows one pit open. There is higher-resolution imagery in Google Earth that shows three pits.

    Snap Lake mine - this one is owned by DeBeers.

    Victor mine - also owned by DeBeers, there isn't much to see except muskeg in this part of northern Ontario. Apparently the picture was taken before the mine was opened.

  39. tossers by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    Both NPR and Wired are running stories about how nearly two decades ago, a dogged, absent minded Canadian geologist named Charles Fipke who was practically down to his last nickel when he discovered diamonds in the Northwest Territories.

    Does anybody read these submissions ?
    What happened when he discovered these diamonds ? I get the "who was" and "when" but what happened nearly 2 decades ago ? Why should I invent the rest or follow links to find out what a sentence means ? Lose the "who" or it doesn't make sense.

  40. Related Articles by big+dumb+dog · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a link to the article about the rogue gynecologist that discovered diamonds?

    --
    "Seven years of college down the drain. Might as well join the f-ing Peace Corps." - John 'Bluto' Blutarsky
  41. Good Documentary by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

    There is a great 3-part documentary titled "Diamond Road" put together by SBS (Australian I think?). You can find some torrents for it via mvgroup. They go into some of the geopolitical/economic issues around diamond trade, including some of the Canadian mines.

  42. That's nobody's dream by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Informative

    People always bring up the McDonalds coffee suit as an example of frivolous lawsuits, but if you read up on it - it is anything but. Here, read this.

    Here are some noteworthy bits from the link:

    For years, McDonald's had known they had a problem with the way they make their coffee - that their coffee was served much hotter (at least 20 degrees more so) than at other restaurants.

    McDonald's knew its coffee sometimes caused serious injuries - more than 700 incidents of scalding coffee burns in the past decade have been settled by the Corporation - and yet they never so much as consulted a burn expert regarding the issue.

    The woman involved in this infamous case suffered very serious injuries - third degree burns on her groin, thighs and buttocks that required skin grafts and a seven-day hospital stay.

    So the lawsuit actually did make sense, McDonalds really did screw up. They knew they were hurting people, they had a history of hurting people, and they didn't care. And the lady in question had third degree burns around her genitals from a cup of coffee. Dunno about you, but $480k minus hospital bills isn't *nearly* enough to have someone do burn grafts around my genitals.

    I'm not meaning to stomp on you, and I hope it doesn't come off that way. Honest. It's just that the McDonalds coffee case is always quoted as an example of frivolous litigation, and it absolutely isn't. I used to say the same thing you did and someone (in fact, it happened here on /.) corrected me about it. So I do the same whenever it seems appropriate.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  43. moissanite more valuable than diamonds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I investigated getting a diamond but they are, as another poster mentioned, not rare and not valuable. So I got a moissanite, they are made in America and tests as a diamond at the jewelers. Price wise they are about $550 a carat. I looked at a ton of rings and different price levels of diamonds and I cannot tell the difference and I compared side by side. I say f**k the cartel and buy american.

  44. Stop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "from the with-maps-microscopes-and-strippers dept."

      I want to marry whoever wrote this line.