Slashdot Mirror


Photos of the Damage To the Large Hadron Collider

holy_calamity writes "CERN have released images of the damage done to the world's most powerful machine, the Large Hadron Collider, when an electrical fault caused a helium leak. New Scientist has posted them, along with explanations of what you can see. The sudden burst of gas shifted some of the huge superconducting magnets by half a meter, causing at least $21 million in damage."

106 comments

  1. Why red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is red?

    1. Re:Why red by Cratylus_DS · · Score: 2, Funny

      not safe for work http://lpmuds.net/lhc_NSFW.jpg

    2. Re:Why red by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Large Hardon Collider is designed to pump various types of hardon up to huge energies before banging them together. However, many concerned citizens without the personal experience or understanding of what hardons do worry at the idea of the large hardons being sucked deep into a black hole.

      The device will push large, energised hardons through a ring repeatedly, faster and faster, as smoothly and tightly as possible, until they clash and spray matter in all directions. "It's nothing that cosmic rays don't do all the time all over the place," reassured a particularly buff scientist. "It's perfectly right and natural."

      Low-energy hardon physics and the temperature dependence of hardon production are well understood, as is the process of a hardon smoothly entering the nucleus. But some question what may happen at greater, hotter energies.

      Church leaders have come out at the device. "They're the same polarity!" said Pope Palpatine XVI. The Church worries that strange matter may recruit normal matter and turn it strange.

      After a premature ejaculation of gas, the Large Hardon Collider has been delayed until July 2009. "I'm so sorry," stammered a scientist, "this has never happened to us before."

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    3. Re:Why red by FireFlie · · Score: 1

      My lord those hadrons look like penises!

    4. Re:Why red by RDW · · Score: 1

      Well you wouldn't want a Hardon in your Tract, would you?:

      http://www.springerlink.com/content/72656781214715n4/

      ('Preview (Small, Large, Larger, Largest)').

      For more of the same ('This may strike you as the geek equivalent of looking up "arse" in the dictionary'), see:

      http://www.badscience.net/?p=238

  2. Why by kfort · · Score: 1

    is this story red?

    1. Re:Why by kfort · · Score: 1

      now it's not red, is it just red to alert people to get FP?

    2. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Odd... articles on Slashdot aren't usually read.

    3. Re:Why by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I don't read, I just look at the pictures.

    4. Re:Why by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      This is an even article. See? 1832238

    5. Re:Why by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Do you happen to be a subscriber? If I remember from my stint as a subscriber, articles that are still only readable by subscribers are red.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    6. Re:Why by kfort · · Score: 1

      definitely not

    7. Re:Why by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Sometimes they "leak through" to normal users for whatever reason.

    8. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait, there's no porn here? what am I doing on this site?

  3. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, it's red now

  4. Nerd Ego Busted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet a lot of people felt pretty salty after this happened... WHOOPS!

  5. Doubts. by philspear · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm conCERNed that this think may never stay functional long enough to destroy the earth.

    On an unrelated note, if there's two things I love, one is pointless, likely redundant puns, and the other is shouting "the sky is falling!"

  6. Wanna bet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll bet they get it working on 12/12/2012.

    1. Re:Wanna bet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok. Sounds like a good bet to me. If you win, the world is destroyed and I cant' pay you anything because the world is over. If it starts before then and it destroys the earth, I don't get paid cause the world is over. If, however it starts after then, You have to pay me and I can enjoy my remaining days in comfortable style.

      Of course the only was I have to pay is if by some miracle it doesn't destroy the earth, but does start working on that date. So, I just need come up with a back up plan to destroy the earth.

    2. Re:Wanna bet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thought it was 12/21 - or at least thats what the voices tell me when i take my tinfoil hat off.

    3. Re:Wanna bet? by The+Moof · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you mean 12/21/2012.

    4. Re:Wanna bet? by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      ahA! There are only 12 months, so this date is impossible! So earth will not be destroyed!

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    5. Re:Wanna bet? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      american's write the month first, I believe europeans write the month in the middle (incorrectly). ;)

  7. WHY IS THIS RED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else see this as red? For Christmas, I wonder?

  8. 21m$ 210m$ doesn't matter by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is too important to worry about some loose change (in the grand scheme of the LHC) the most important aspect is the lost time.

    The sooner they get back on track (geddit) the better :-)

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
    1. Re:21m$ 210m$ doesn't matter by critical_point · · Score: 1

      By the same logic, if the science to be discovered at the LHC is so important as to justify any cost, then shouldn't it also be so important as to be worth the wait, however long that may be?

      Or is it right that we should be upset about both delays and over expenditures, even knowing that in the end we will both pay and wait to get what we want?

    2. Re:21m$ 210m$ doesn't matter by CallsignBaron · · Score: 1

      Quote from Photo #3 comment: "Release valves designed to let leaking gas escape could not let it out fast enough to prevent the damage." I hope that money not only goes to repairs but also to beef up the safety net. I'll be really pissed if we destroy our planet over budget concerns.

      --
      "I reject your reality and substitue my own." ~ Adam Savage, Mythbuster extraordinaire.
  9. ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    poor machine :(

  10. Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by Zymergy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ah, through the "wisdom" of the US Congress, the SSC (Superconducting Super Collider) was killed over a mere $12 Billion cost savings (which was well under construction just south of Dallas, TX). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_Super_Collider
    Some say it was largely due to infighting with 'higher educational interests' back East and in the Chicago area, - but really the answer most likely due to nothing more than Greed and Money.

    TO think that The US Federal Government will give taxpayer money to banks et al to the tune of $2 Trillion with NIL oversight and NIL public disclosure is extremely dangerous and shortsighted. ( http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20670001&refer=home&sid=aXNaCKxb.oIs )

    We (in the US) could have had something MORE POWERFUL than the LHC here in the US. (As I try not to think about the high-energy physicist brain-drain to France/Switzerland)...
    Once upon a time, the US took pride in having the best and coolest toys the world over... (/sigh)

    1. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not agree more, but some can make the argument that the financial bailout was good for the economy. OK lets say it was and that in general people felt it was a good thing.

      The military has spent how much per-month on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq? Approaching $5 Billion per-month (http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-09-07-cover-costs_x.htm) you only need 3 months of that to completely offset the costs of the SSC.

    2. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by pz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The worst part about the SSC is mentioned in the parent comment's parenthetical comment about brain drain.

      When the SSC was cancelled, there was a flood of high-energy physicists who were suddenly out of work. The US lost an entire generation of talent in physics. Instead of continuing on with a remarkable collection of centers of excellence, each themselves breeding excellence, and maintain the intellectual, scientific, technical, and economic advantages that the US Government prides itself on, the (pardon me) boneheads in Congress thought it better to continue the long slog toward mediocrity.

      High-energy physics no longer happens in the US (my apologies to readers at LL, LANL, Brookhaven, Fermi, Argonne, Berkeley, and so forth). It happens in Europe and will continue to do so for the forseable future.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    3. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "TO think that The US Federal Government will give taxpayer money to banks et al to the tune of $2 Trillion with NIL oversight and NIL public disclosure is extremely dangerous and shortsighted."

      Well, maybe the people at CERN should have diversified, and invested in a bank, et. al.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And by an odd coincidence, that['s about when particle physics took a detour into String Theory from which it has yet to recover. Almost nothing of value has happened in the field (especially in the US) since the SSC was canned. But hey, we can toss $30B to bail out the executive bonuses for a bank and not think twice about it (or even once).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by Werthless5 · · Score: 1

      Particle physicists mourn its loss, especially those of us that really dislike having to go to Geneva every summer (damned French language barrier!!!)

    6. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by SBacks · · Score: 4, Funny

      the (pardon me) boneheads in Congress

      Well, if you think you can do better, I hear there's an opening for sale in Illinois.

    7. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by cmdahler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I dunno - if I had been in Congress back in 1993 I might have had some doubts about a project that had initially been sold to the government for about $4.5 billion and then ballooned to over three times that amount before the tunnels were even completely dug. There may have been a lot of factors involved in the cancelation of this project, but shutting off a pretty big spigot of wasteful public spending through inept mismanagement and fund milking certainly played a role in Congress' decision. I was living in Dallas at the time and had just graduated a few years before that in physics, so I kept pretty close to all the news stories. The DOE at the time couldn't manage its way out of a wet paper bag, and the wasteful spending and siphoning of funds made the whole thing look like the Big Dig in Boston. To be honest, it's really no wonder Congress canceled the project. At the rate they were going, it would have cost upwards of 20 billion to finish the project, and remember that we were also contributing a huge amount of money to the ISS at the time and had also just come out of a recession, so everyone was real leery about all that money. Wrong time, wrong management, that's ultimately what killed the SSC.

    8. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by ortholattice · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And by an odd coincidence, that['s about when particle physics took a detour into String Theory from which it has yet to recover.

      And by another odd coincidence, other particle physicists took a detour into Wall Street, where they applied their advanced mathematical knowledge to creating exotic derivatives like Credit Default Swaps, but arguably without proper financial training or real-world experience. One is tempted to wonder whether the U.S. might be ahead by $2 trillion - $12 billion = $1.988 trillion had they just gone and financed the SSC instead.

    9. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, let me get this straight - you wish that Congress would've spent 12 BILLION dollars of your money (and, I might add, mine) just so we could show everyone that the USA still have the world's BIGGEST DICK?

      Well, buddy, feel free to pay for it, but not with MY tax money.

    10. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by idontgno · · Score: 5, Funny

      And by another odd coincidence, other particle physicists took a detour into Wall Street, where they applied their advanced mathematical knowledge to creating exotic derivatives like Credit Default Swaps

      That's the scariest correlation I've heard in a long time.

      <Credit Bank VP>: "'Morning, Erwin, how's the CDO hedge working out? Makin' the firm some megabux?"
      <Ex-physicist>: "Maybe we did, maybe we didn't."

      In the end, the VP opened Erwin Schrödinger's books, collapsed the quantum superposition of mortgage debt obligations, and found that the economy was dead.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's the funniest bailout comment I've seen!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by khallow · · Score: 1

      We (in the US) could have had something MORE POWERFUL than the LHC here in the US.

      Science doesn't justify the waste present in the SSC. The bailout has the virtue of keeping the financial system from collapsing. The SSC doesn't deliver 1% of that value.

    13. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by jmtpi · · Score: 1

      Almost nothing of value has happened in the field (especially in the US) since the SSC was canned.

      I disagree

    14. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that sounds pretty dumb to me. But it does bring up an interesting point about opportunity costs. If we had gone with the SSC, we'd have lost the value of these physicists to Wall Street. Another reason to be leery of Big Science projects.

    15. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS ARE NOT EXOTIC. THEY ARE ONE OF THE SIMPLEST THINGS OUT THERE.

      Forgive the caps, but I am so sick of people not understanding or bothering to look up even the simplest pieces of finance.

    16. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      And by another odd coincidence, other particle physicists took a detour into Wall Street, where they

      ... persisted in their urge to create a black hole, be it in space or in the economy.

    17. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      It's not the CDSs that are toxic, it's the CDOs.

    18. Re:Too bad Congress killed the SSC in Texas... by wsanders · · Score: 1

      And that a was one friggin' big cat.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  11. This is actually pretty cool... by deft · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is actually pretty cool... and I'll tell you why I feel that way.

    If it just worked, I'd be amazed at the results, follow the discoveries. But there's something about it NOT working that reminds me this is the cuttingf edge of the cutting edge. Thi is when the rocket launch explodes on the pad, this is when the systems fail... and it shouts "humanity is working outside its limits, and we're pushing those limits every time we do something like this". I dig it when the REALLY REALLY smart people have issues with something... usually thats very cool stuff.

    I should say when they have trouble with 'technical/physics/electronics' kind of stuff. Not with women. We know they have trouble there already.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:This is actually pretty cool... by prograde · · Score: 1

      Ok, that's perverse. But I'm on side.

      When spectacular science fails, it does so in a spectacular way!

    2. Re:This is actually pretty cool... by neoform · · Score: 1

      When the rocket explodes on the pad, it's either cause there was a flaw in it's construction, or there wasn't enough computer simulations.

      The explosion isn't supposed to happen with the powerful computers we have available to us now days.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    3. Re:This is actually pretty cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I assume that if the people at CERN have overlooked something, that's only because it's never been looked at before.

      Makes me feel not so bad for misfiling that $21M sales report.......

    4. Re:This is actually pretty cool... by jcrousedotcom · · Score: 1

      You go with that:

      Obligatory link to story.

      --
      Illiterate? Write for free help!
    5. Re:This is actually pretty cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not with women. We know they have trouble there already.

      One large hadron collider, just isn't enough.

    6. Re:This is actually pretty cool... by ContactClean · · Score: 1

      While I won't go so far as to say that the problems with the LHC are cool, I do think it is to be expected. The LHC is a highly complex instrument with countless sub-assemblies and parts. I am sure that every effort was made to model the interaction of all these parts but the truth is that no one knows how it will perform untill it is physically assembled and then put into use. To expect it to work without incident as soon as it is powered up is unrealistic.

      Compare it to the design and construction of a modern day airliner. Computer models are used to design, plan and aid in construction but a full size working aircraft is still produced before they start shipping them off to waiting customers.

       

    7. Re:This is actually pretty cool... by White+Shade · · Score: 1

      And when it does, it means we learned something really, really important.

      --
      ìì!
    8. Re:This is actually pretty cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we know how to build stuff that wouldn't have issues like this, only nobody would be able to afford building it. The main problem in engineering is how do we make it strong enough to stand up, without the cost being more than the benefit.

    9. Re:This is actually pretty cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An electrical connection melted during a test to make sure the equipment could handle the high currents needed to power the LHC's huge superconducting magnets.

      This is called a successful test. It would have been bad to have it happen when the ring is full of fast shiny things.

  12. I liked the earlier description... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Informative

    I preferred the description of the damage that was released a couple of days ago on CNET-

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-10120215-76.html

    "A resistive zone developed in one of the electrical connections, creating an electrical arc that punctured one of the helium enclosures around a magnet, according to an analysis by CERN. The warming helium expanded in the vacuum enclosure of the central subsector of the pipe, damaging the vacuum barriers separating the central subsector from the neighboring subsectors."

    Geordi La Forge couldn't have said it better.

    1. Re:I liked the earlier description... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just don't see why it was so hard for them to prevent something so simple as that. I mean, c'mon, it's not rocket science!

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    2. Re:I liked the earlier description... by joeytmann · · Score: 1

      Kinda curious as to what the ratio is for mass:volume for liquid helium and vaporized helium? ie if you have one liter of liquid helium if that were to turn to gas what is the volume then? You'd tend to think the'd have come up with that and figured out how much pressure would be in the lines so those relief valves could handle it.

      --
      Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
    3. Re:I liked the earlier description... by Quietust · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia lists an expansion ratio of 1 to 754 for liquid helium, which would certainly explain the amount of pressure exerted when it leaked.

      --
      * Q
      P.S. If you don't get this note, let me know and I'll write you another.
  13. Sonic Screw Driver by pembo13 · · Score: 0

    Seems like Dr. Who aimed his screw driver at that thing. That would be cool though.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  14. serves them right... by will381796 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...for trying to engulf the planet in a black hole.

  15. Stop Delaying the Apocalypse by xpuppykickerx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The interest rates on my credit cards is getting outta hand and I was hoping the LHC would help change this.

  16. Just a Cover Story by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone who has been following these developments closely knows that the "helium leak" is just a cover story for the out of control mini black hole they created when they turned it on. Those magnets were shifted when they were finally able to collapse down the black hole, it went out with a massive gravitation burst (measured by seismographs as far away as the USGS Hawaii Volcano Observatory) that damaged a lot more equipment then they are letting on. Now that they know how dangerous it is, I wouldn't count on them ever turning on the Large Hardon Collider again.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Just a Cover Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got anything to back that up?

    2. Re:Just a Cover Story by swilde23 · · Score: 1

      A mod +5 funny?

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    3. Re:Just a Cover Story by mrsquid0 · · Score: 1

      For pity's sake, please stop telling people what really happened. We don't want to frighten anyone.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    4. Re:Just a Cover Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I do. I read about it on the internet. And everyone knows that everything on the internet is true!

    5. Re:Just a Cover Story by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember there is a backup LHC. Why build one when you can build two for twice the price.

    6. Re:Just a Cover Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did no one else notice that he said "Hardon"?

  17. So by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

    Does the $21M cover the repairs to the damage done by the gas leak directly, or to that and the changes needed throughout (I would imagine) the entire system to make sure it doesn't happen again? I mean, since it failed the test and the electrical wiring couldn't handle the high current, won't they need to upgrade all the wiring? Either way, $21M really doesn't seem that bad for a project of this magnitude, I mean, what is that, the annual profits of an average smallish medium sized business?

    1. Re:So by Werthless5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      We don't need to rewire the whole system, only a small batch of magnets that received the bad soldering job. The rest are fine, and we now have better ways of checking the soldering points remotely (ie without having to heat up the other 7 sectors of the LHC).

      The $21M covers all repair costs, including replacing some of the wiring in a batch of magnets in a particular sector. Actually, part of the plan is to use backup magnets (obviously double checked for this flaw) so as to save some time, but we don't have enough backup magnets to replace all of the ones that need to be fixed.

    2. Re:So by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
      AFAII, there are still two repair options on the table.

      The "quick" option is estimated to give them (reduced) beam in late summer 2009.

      The "serious" option involves fitting a new exhaust system to every section of the ring, and means that they'll miss 2009, and we'll be looking at 2010.

    3. Re:So by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
      Are we sure that it's only a small batch of magnets that "received the bad soldering job"? I thought that the reason why the joint failed was still supposed to be an educated guess (since the joint in question completely vaporised, leaving us with nothing to examine).

      But maybe there's been some new information since last time I checked. Any pointers?

  18. Good news ... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    You know somewhere in another universe this thing is working fine.

    1. Re:Good news ... by Wanado · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, luck would have it that that universe is full of beautiful women that will discover our planet and destroy us with lasers, OR full of disgusting aliens that force us to mate with them. I've seen it before.

      --
      Somehow along the way I made a bad choice in life and now must live with 0 Karma.
    2. Re:Good news ... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      Alternate reality's a bitch! With lasers!

  19. MRI Quenching by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    MRIs have a feature called quenching. Where when there is a problem there are small heaters which heat the Liquid Helium to a warmer temperature (that closer to liquid Nitrogen). So you don't break your million dollar MRI. But loose a Thousand dollar supply of Liquid He

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:MRI Quenching by blueg3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's not a feature, that's a side effect. Some types of failure cause the liquid helium to warm up until the magnet is no longer at superconducting temperatures. This causes a sudden resistance, which can damage the magnet, heats the whole system up (boiling off the coolant), et cetera. MRI systems generally have an emergency shutoff feature, the side effect of which is magnet quenching.

      In this case, a quench is what happened -- resistance in the circuit caused helium boiloff, which destroyed superconductivity. They have many safeguards for this, as this was well-known before the first MRI or superconducting collider was built. Release valves allow the boiling helium to escape, and resistor banks are used to draw off electrical energy from the system. However, their system wasn't sufficient to handle the level of failure that occured.

    2. Re:MRI Quenching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The magnet quenching is often the emergency shutoff feature. The point is that you want the whole superconducting circuit to lose the superconducting state at once, instead of a local hotspot which would melt a part of million dollar coil. Sometimes only heat conductors are used to distribute the sudden energy released, sometimes you redirect the current to a resistor that heats up the whole system - I think the latter was what GP was talking about.

  20. There is a GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly this was an act of Divine Intervention...

    1. Re:There is a GOD by Werthless5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right now all of the detectors are calibrating with cosmic rays.

      I'll consider it an act of Divine Intervention when God uses cosmic rays to spell "TURN THIS SHIT OFF" on every detector.

      Until then, let's fix this black hole device!

  21. From the energy out of thin air department by bokkepoot · · Score: 0

    What makes CERN so unique, is that per the article "Large amounts of helium vaporised, causing several magnets to heat up"

    1. Re:From the energy out of thin air department by Werthless5 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly how it happened. There was essentially a spark that went through a helium container, causing the helium to vaporize (from its liquid state).

      Liquid helium is what is being used to keep the magnets cooled. When the helium vaporized, it heated up. Thus, the helium vaporization caused several magnets to heat up.

      There is no way for a superconducting magnet to heat up on its own because it's a superconductor; no power is ever lost to heat as there is no resistance in the wiring!

    2. Re:From the energy out of thin air department by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what happened.

      Can't help it if you don't understand superconducting electromagnet failure modes.

  22. Large Hadron Goatse cookies by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    In honour of the LHC starting up in September, my girlfriend made some celebratory cookies ... of the Large Hadron Goatse. Note the gold ring.

    Ah, but don't go home with your hadron
    It will only drive you insane
    You can't shake it (or break it) with your Motown
    You can't melt it down in the rain.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  23. Pictures unviewable by Animats · · Score: 1

    The pictures aren't appearing in my browser. Unclear why; some CSS botch or attempt at DRM, I expect. Anyway, here are the actual picture links:

    HTML 3.1 - it just works.

    1. Re:Pictures unviewable by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      http://www.newscientist.com/data/galleries/dn16254-damage-that-derailed-higgs-hunt/two.jpg/
      No wonder they had a problem- they couldn't even build the thing in a straight line. All that money and they couldn't even afford a level?

    2. Re:Pictures unviewable by X0563511 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Fail. Get rid of your trailing /

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Pictures unviewable by aaron.axvig · · Score: 1

      Looks good on Vista with IE7. Microsoft: it just works.

    4. Re:Pictures unviewable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How pathetic.

  24. i wonder who squealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    New Scientist broke these pix, not CERN. I'm pretty sure i know who took those pix (not gonna tell!). "We" where i work have had them for a while, and have elected NOT to spread them around and allow CERN to put them up themselves. I guess someone decided to "help" them out. It is debatable as to the moral rectitude of this decision, but I could have put these up weeks ago and chose _not_ to.

    As i understand it, the pictures you see are taken 5 half-cells away from the primary failure, or somewhere around 50+ meters from the explosion.
    Wow, huh?

    Note the red things in the picture, those are magnet stands, ripped out of the concrete. The magnet body in that shot is sitting on wood cribbing -- it was sitting on the floor. You can deduce the displacement form careful examination.

    Berry ++ ungood. We all feel badly for them and wish them the best of luck.

  25. A month later... by ZirbMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Well there's your problem!"

    Thanks for letting us in on the details so quickly.[/sarcasm]

  26. Adjacent Universe Anomaly by gluefish · · Score: 1

    One of my sources ( the one I use the tinfoil hat to talk to ) reports that in one of our adjacent alternative universes there is a black hole where Earth used to be. The last message through that pipeline was from one of the Cern engineers, saying "Watch This!" They have had to seal the connection to that universe to prevent our universe from being sucked through the pipe by the black hole at the other end.

    --
    I'd rather have a free bottle in front of me than a prefrontal lobotomy.
  27. Electrical Joint Compound by gboss · · Score: 1

    Hey, remember the EJC at the connection this time!

  28. Sad by lordharsha · · Score: 1

    Brings a tear to my eye.

    --
    I am, and that is sufficient.
  29. So it ends, by IronDragon · · Score: 1

    Not with a whimper, Not with a bang, but with a chorus of high-pitched funny voices.

    1. Re:So it ends, by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      LOL. Mod +1 Funny.

      --
      Squirrel!
  30. SSC & SDI by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
    Back then, the US needed a bank of high-energy particle physicists for the Star Wars project. SSC was supposed to be the "white" counterpart of the SDI project, encouraging students into the field, and helping to develop the associated industrial infrastructure - SDI coudl then tap into that infrastructure and skills base.

    Once it became apparent that the original SDI project(s) weren't going to happen, part of the strategic justification for priority-funding SSC disappeared.

  31. SSC reuse. by ErkDemon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    On the plus side, it gave Texas the world's finest all-weather underground go-karting track.

    Actually, I'm really quite disappointed in the computer games community, that they haven't used a revamped SSC as a fictional location for a racing game. I mean, you have nice tubular tunnels which means that cars can loop-the-loop and do all sorts of cool things ... at maximum speed, the driving view would be at ~90 degrees to horizontal in the bends ... just needs some section colour coding, a bunch of floating camera pods and some bolt-on gadgetry (viewing stations, etc) for the cars to avoid. Maybe some rocket launchers.

    "SSC Racer". Cooool. If anyone wants to write it, give me a credit somewhere ...

  32. Yo ! by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

    We need Alpinekat to write a new rap telling us what went wrong in 'street' terms.

    --
    Squirrel!
  33. francis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one has to get worried, because LHC will not create any black holes or even dark matter ,why you may ask ? its because the have got the whole science wrong so no one should worry that i can gurantee you 100%

    kasuleconcepter@yahoo.com