Slashdot Mirror


More Brains Needed

Hugh Pickens writes "BBC reports that more people need to donate their brains to medical research if cures for diseases like dementia are to be found and are urging healthy people as well as those with brain disorders to become donors. 'For autism, we only have maybe 15 or 20 brains that have been donated that we can do our research on. That is drastically awful,' said Dr Payam Rezaie of the Neuropathology Research Laboratory at the Open University. 'We would need at least 100 cases to get meaningful data. A lot of research is being hindered by this restriction.' Part of the problem, according to Professor Margaret Esiri at the University of Oxford, may be that people are reluctant to donate their brains because they see the organ as the basis of their identity. 'It used to be other parts of the body that we thought were important,' says Esin. 'But now people realize that their brain is the crucial thing that gives them their mind and their self.' Dr Kieran Breen, of the Parkinson's Disease Society, said over 90% of the brains in their bank at Imperial College London were from patients, with the remaining 10% of 'healthy' brains donated by friends or relatives of patients. 'Some people are under the impression that if they sign up for a donor card that will include donating their brain for research. But it won't,' says Breen. 'Donor cards are about donating organs for transplant, not for medical science.'"

232 comments

  1. Over my dead body! by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can have my brain when you pry it from my cold, dead...

    Oh wait.

    1. Re:Over my dead body! by steelcaress · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Y'know, they never really specified whether the donated brains were from the living or the dead...

      Anyone remember the Live Organ Donor skit from Monty Python?

    2. Re:Over my dead body! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot, we were planning on getting it warm and alive.

      Now hold still...

    3. Re:Over my dead body! by philspear · · Score: 1

      Actually, live brains are sometimes used in medical research, usually embryonic. I've read papers that talk about observing human embryonic cortical development in culture. Naturally, the sources for those brains are not well publicized.

    4. Re:Over my dead body! by philspear · · Score: 1

      Edit: shouldn't have said "usually embryonic." What I meant was that was the only time I had run across live human brain tissue in use.

    5. Re:Over my dead body! by duguk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heh :o) In all seriousness, I've actually already filled in the forms to donate my brain to the MRC London Brain Bank for Neurodegenerative Diseases.

      It's not like it's going to be much to use to me. Just hoping they'll still be around, since I'm hoping it'll still be some way off.

    6. Re:Over my dead body! by nohup · · Score: 3, Funny

      'Some people are under the impression that if they sign up for a donor card that will include donating their brain for research. But it won't,' says Breen.

      Does anyone else feel a uncomfortable at just doing what Dr. Breen says?

    7. Re:Over my dead body! by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny
      Naturally, the sources for those brains are not well publicized.

      I suspect they'd be from inside heads.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    8. Re:Over my dead body! by w0mprat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Naturally, the sources for those brains are not well publicized.

      I suspect they'd be from inside heads.

      Those are female brains then.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    9. Re:Over my dead body! by PachmanP · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hrrm brain shortage + someone who's already filled out the paperwork... Is your brain particularly interesting because if it is I can see an accident in your future. Curiously enough your head will be perfectly intact.

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    10. Re:Over my dead body! by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Calling Dr. Freeman. Grab your HEV suit and crowbar, 'cause Dr. Breen is at it again!

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    11. Re:Over my dead body! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It's not like it's going to be much to use to me.

      If you have it preserved, perhaps cryogenically, then perhaps in the future they can scan its structure in and run an emulation of it. You could essentially "live" forever. Thus, never say never.
                 

    12. Re:Over my dead body! by dougisfunny · · Score: 1

      That, I don't want.

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    13. Re:Over my dead body! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      medical students that don't pay the FEE!

    14. Re:Over my dead body! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone remember the Live Organ Donor skit from Monty Python?

      We've come for your kidney?

    15. Re:Over my dead body! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naturally, the sources for those brains are not well publicized. I suspect they'd be from inside heads.

      Those are female brains then.

      Right. Next you'll be telling us the female orgasm actually exists, too.*

      *The wedding ring dictates that I post this anonymously.

    16. Re:Over my dead body! by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      I know I wouldn't trust the Breen if my life depended on it.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    17. Re:Over my dead body! by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily

    18. Re:Over my dead body! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      So you mean we men would need to fill out a form for donating genitals instead? :P

    19. Re:Over my dead body! by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      I'm never sure what to think about that particular possibility... my normal inclination is that a computer simulation can't be "me" in the fullest sense, because I inhabit a brain, not a computer, so a simulation would just be a copy of me, not the genuine article.

      But then... what am "I" apart from the pattern of stuff happening between my ears, which would suggest that recreating that pattern in a computer program of sufficient complexity would mean "I" was alive again in every important sense of the word.

      I think the sticking point is if I die as a part of the transferral process - then it seems like you've killed "me" and made a copy at the same time. Although leaving me alive would make it even more definitely a copy... seems the only way that avoids the issue would be a gradual replacement of brain tissue with computer components. But then what's so different about doing it all at once?

      In short, no matter how objective or logical I try and be, there's still a clinging sense of there being something a little bit "magic" about the 3 pounds of grey jelly between my ears. Crazy really, but I reserve the right to be irrationally protective when it comes to my brain.

    20. Re:Over my dead body! by duguk · · Score: 1

      then it seems like you've killed "me" and made a copy at the same time.

      Would this copy be anyway an improvement on the original mpeskett?

    21. Re:Over my dead body! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then it seems like you've killed "me" and made a copy at the same time.

      Would this copy be anyway an improvement on the original mpeskett?

      No, he would be exactly the same.

    22. Re:Over my dead body! by duguk · · Score: 1

      then it seems like you've killed "me" and made a copy at the same time.

      Would this copy be anyway an improvement on the original mpeskett?

      No, he would be exactly the same.

      Yeah, that is a problem.



      <cough>The Big Bang Theory S01E12 - The Jerusalem Duality</cough>

    23. Re:Over my dead body! by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is a problem.

      Do I sense that you're perhaps not my biggest fan?

      Strange... you're supporting brain donation, and doubting the plausibility of future re-animation just makes me more likely to do that. I may be irrationally protective of my brain while I'm still using it, but if I can't be brought back after death using it then I have no qualms about it being given over to better purposes.

      Whatever. I guess Slashdot comments aren't the best place for thought or discussion of something a little philosophical (who knew?)

    24. Re:Over my dead body! by duguk · · Score: 1
      Please accept my apologies, it wasn't an attack on you directly, it was a quote from the popular television show The Big Bang Theory, episode S01E12 - The Jerusalem Duality.

      If you haven't seen it, Sheldon has a very similar discussion with Leonard, resulting in that quip. I've got nothing against re-animation (if it were to be possible), I just wanted to bring my poor attempt at humour to Slashdot.

      To quote the original:

      Sheldon: Here's the problem with teleportation.
      Leonard: Lay it on me.
      Sheldon: Assuming a device could be invented which would identify the state of matter of an individual in one location... and transmit that to a distant location for reassembly you wouldn't have transported the individual, you would have destroyed him in one location and re-created him in another.
      Leonard: How about that.
      Sheldon: I would never use a transporter. The original Sheldon would have to be disintegrated in order to create a new Sheldon.
      Leonard: Would the new Sheldon be in any way an improvement on the old Sheldon?
      Sheldon: No, he would be exactly the same.
      Leonard: That is a problem.

      I guess Slashdot comments aren't the best place for geek humour ;o)

    25. Re:Over my dead body! by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Actually there will be improvement - he'll be in the right place at the right time.

      I'll get my coat.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    26. Re:Over my dead body! by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      Ahh, it's all clear to me now.

      There's just not enough hours in a day to keep up with every source of geek references...

  2. Take Mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can take mine. I'm not using it. Or so I'm told.

    1. Re:Take Mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm told I have shit for brains, so I'm donating mine to local gardening enthusiasts.

    2. Re:Take Mine by b4upoo · · Score: 0

      I question the accuracy of the report. In the US transplant organs are harvested from people who die in hospital whereas people who die at home or in traffic accidents who have signed donor cards have their bodies and organs put to entirely different practices such as testing fire suits and other tests that we usually don't think about.
                Perhaps we need laws that require all people arrested for crimes such as drunk driving to surrender all rights to the eventual use of their corpses. Perhaps even dropping out of high school could be such a triggering device.

    3. Re:Take Mine by digitalunity · · Score: 3, Informative

      While I'm sure there are some surprising uses for corpses, I can assure you testing fire suits is not one of them.

      They are tested using sophisticated bipedal structures of gelatin and/or elastopolymers that resemble the human body in rigidity and thermal decomposition properties. Those mannequins have hundreds or thousands of pressure and temperature sensors over them to determine how much protection fabrics can provide and where they are ineffective.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    4. Re:Take Mine by Sproggit · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm donating all my organs, but with a proviso that they use at least 70% and all to one recipient...
      That way it's less of an organ donation, and more a hostile takeover...

    5. Re:Take Mine by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, for a hostile takeover, just donate your brain, but for transplant, not for research.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  3. Many fear cost... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    ...I know I do. I've heard horror stories over and over again about how donating your body to science means racking up large bills for your family.

    Offer me a 'cheaper than being buried' option, and I'd consider it.

    1. Re:Many fear cost... by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      I've not heard those horror stories. I sort of expected it would be free.

    2. Re:Many fear cost... by eln · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only cost I've ever heard of is if you want to donate it to some far away medical school, you have to pay to transport it there. Other than that, it should be free.

      Of course, I don't want to donate my body to medical science because I am uncomfortable with the idea of all those medical students laughing^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hstaring in awe at my junk.

    3. Re:Many fear cost... by philspear · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you sure it was "donating your body" and not "paying the mafia to take a dead body away?"

    4. Re:Many fear cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In late 2001, someone close to me died and the cost was over $12k for a plot, vault, casket, marker, viewing, and funeral.

      What is the cost to extract and ship a brain?

    5. Re:Many fear cost... by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      Really? I've heard it means an advance of knowledge and a free cremation.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    6. Re:Many fear cost... by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Here in Canada, at least, you can give your body to science (I have a will that says it's what I want for myself). They use it for whatever needs, keep organs they can use, and return the rest incinerated. No cost anywhere there.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    7. Re:Many fear cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'd think they would pay for your parts, especially if they're in such short supply. Actually, I had never heard of this but suddenly the shortage makes a lot of damn sense.

    8. Re:Many fear cost... by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Informative

      I signed up (in the USA) with "Anatomy Gifts Registry". They donate any usable organs, then any usable tissues, then the rest is "for research". Whether this ends up being med students, or specific studies, I'll never know. According to their paperwork, the only cost is a $10 shipping fee is you want your ashes sent to your family, after the research is over.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    9. Re:Many fear cost... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Those prices are still insane though.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    10. Re:Many fear cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Arkansas, we can just do it at the DMV. Get your drivers license and tell them what you want to donate, it will be on the back of your license that you are a donor and when that makes it rather convenient since that is the only personal thing they can look at if you have an accident. You can specify particular parts, internal organs, or any variation up to your whole body and they contact these people www.arora.org on your passing and according to their site the donor's family is responsible for notta.

    11. Re:Many fear cost... by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      AC, its against federal law to pay for human organs, or they probably would.

  4. I for one by rjhubs · · Score: 1

    welcome our future zombie overlords and have already donated my brain to them.. (Sorry science!)

  5. Just for the record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm, i would certainly feel better if the text would explicitly state it's about DEAD brains ;)

    1. Re:Just for the record by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, If they can keep it alive outside your body, all the better it allow them in the future to put you in a robotic body with lasers and guns and you only malfunction when you start seeing your family.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  6. Uses of donation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donor cards are about donating organs for transplant, not for medical science.'"

    Not according to mine (Ontario, circa 1996):

    ... OR if my organs cannot be used, I would like to donate my body for the purpose of medical education or research to the School of Anatomy at...

    Newer cards don't even have the OR, it just says that you basically donate your body for use however they want.

    If he doesn't like it, he should be campaigning to have the cards changed to include research, not just making public appeals.

  7. won't someone THINK of the children!? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Funny

    ie, I bet they have all the adult brains they need. how about some child brains?

    "think of the children"

    come on, kids. some of you are not using yours. can't you help the good cause out?

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  8. I gave at the office by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not that I don't want to donate my brain, it's just that I've already promised other people that I would have my brain cryogenically frozen so that I can be resurrected at some point in the future, and I'd hate to let those people down.

    1. Re:I gave at the office by Icarus1919 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Promising is not a synonym for threatening.

    2. Re:I gave at the office by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've already promised other people that I would have my brain cryogenically frozen so that I can be resurrected at some point in the future

      Ah, you must be a Cobol programmer.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:I gave at the office by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1, Funny
      Ah, you must be a Cobol programmer.

      Not quite...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  9. wah. by thhamm · · Score: 1

    More Brains Needed! yah here too. desperately.

  10. Grow up by Alarindris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you're dead, you're dead. It's not like your brain wont be rotting in the ground anyway.

    Get over the fact that the universe doesn't care about you and help science!

    1. Re:Grow up by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Make it as easy as donating organs to help people and they wouldn't have a problem.

      Its not like most people care one bit about what happens to them once the doctors give up on resuscitation, I know I don't.

      As others have said, if they lobbied to have research included in the general organ donation then there wouldn't be any problem at all.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    2. Re:Grow up by philspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Get over the fact that the universe doesn't care about you and help science!

      When you put it that way... fuck the universe, I'm keeping it!

    3. Re:Grow up by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not like your brain wont be rotting in the ground anyway.

      Some people's brains are getting a head start on rotting.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Grow up by synaptic · · Score: 1

      Except the atoms that I'm borrowing to live will be reconstituted in other life. In effect, I will be reincarnated as many different lifeforms.

      Given a choice between continuing that cycle and either having my brain sit in a jar of formaldahyde (or sliced up into slides), I'll take the former.

    5. Re:Grow up by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have a strange definition of "I". You are not merely the atoms of which you are composed. In fact 98% of the atoms in your body are replaced yearly. It's not the atoms that matter, it's the pattern they're arranged in. Allowing scientists to study that pattern, and preserve even just a little bit of that information reincarnates you in a much more real way than reuse of the atoms in your corpse.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Grow up by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

      Get over the fact that the universe doesn't care about you and help science!

      But the universe doesn't care about science either.

    7. Re:Grow up by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Honestly, once I am dead, why the fuck would I care about science or whatever? I won't, so they can go fuck themselves.

    8. Re:Grow up by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Good point, the donation would only be good if we could have a proper history of the person from which it belonged to, and a long extensive history of ailments or life patterns....sticking a shoe up your arse, won't interest anyone (not for science anyways)...but knowing that you drank 2 litres of diet pepsi a day for about 10 years , might actually have had effects on the brain.

      So keep certain lines anonymous like maybe name address etc... but put down location (environment,pollution) health choices (works out at gym, runs everyday) and also food choices
      for knowing what the brain was being fed to survive and thrive.

    9. Re:Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where we listening to your ideas, we would still be leaving on trees babbling about evolving that opposing thumb.

    10. Re:Grow up by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's was my position, you are welcome to donate your miserable brain and the rest of those pathetic organs to whoever you wish for whatever purposes.

    11. Re:Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's anything like this, then they're screwed!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD_rot

    12. Re:Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really should keep sharing your ding a ling.

      Peace.

  11. Donor Cards by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Some people are under the impression that if they sign up for a donor card that will include donating their brain for research. But it won't,' says Breen. 'Donor cards are about donating organs for transplant, not for medical science.'"

    Well to be honest, I have always kinda hoped that having my donor card would mean they might transplant my brain...

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Donor Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I first filled out an organ donor card in high school, when a student in my speech class was giving orations advocating organ donation and passing out the cards. I don't have that card anymore, but I remember it had multiple choices on it. You could choose between "any needed organs or parts" and just an enumerated list. You could also choose between donating for transplantation and/or donating for research.
      So maybe they just need to improve the cards people are signing.

    2. Re:Donor Cards by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I've always thought the problem was that it's an opt-in system, and that the relatives seem to often be able to over-rule what the person selected on their drivers license.

      I think we should make it opt-out. There would be so many more organs available for research and transplant, we could save quite a few lives.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Donor Cards by philspear · · Score: 1

      I think we should make it opt-out. There would be so many more organs available for research and transplant, we could save quite a few lives.

      Well one particularly stupid and annoying argument I could see some particularly stupid and annoying and coincidentally persuasive individuals making is that evil/liberal doctors would then euthanize people to harvest their organs.

      Probably the more likely reason it's opt-in instead of opt-out is the inevitable greedy lawsuits that "grieving" families would pursue. "He totally had an opt out card at home in a shoebox under his bed, but they took his liver anyway! Poor Johnny wanted to be intact for the great resurection! I want 50 million dollars!"

      Laws SHOULD be passed setting up an opt-out database and mandating that if you're not in that and don't have the opt-out signed on your DL, your family cannot sue for that.

    4. Re:Donor Cards by Cybah · · Score: 1

      An opt-out system (or presumed consent) was debated a lot here in the UK in 2008. Due to objections from various sources, our government is trying a "major publicity campaign" to boost the numbers of donors. If that's not successful, we may end up with the system anyway.

    5. Re:Donor Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if they can't ID the body?

    6. Re:Donor Cards by philspear · · Score: 1

      1. Most of the time I would think they would not be able to get any useable organs for transplant if the body was unidentifable anyway.
      2. They could and would err on the safe side and not harvest organs from John Does. I'd wager that most people who die at hospitals have identification on them. Even if most don't, it would still be more organs donated and more lives saved.

    7. Re:Donor Cards by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      they might transplant my brain...

      into a chicken, perhaps?

    8. Re:Donor Cards by cobraR478 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Doing nothing should not result in the state having control over your body when you die.

    9. Re:Donor Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should make it opt-out.

      The root principle of fascism is that your body belongs to the state. Fascism is seeded when your body belongs to the state unless you are loud enough to object. This includes the principle that your body is only on loan while you're alive.

      But, in the spirit of opt-out, I've subscribed you to various mailing lists. There will be so many more offers available for you to spend your money on, we could save quite a few businesses, each of which are owned by individuals who need to put food on the table.

    10. Re:Donor Cards by monoqlith · · Score: 1

      Question: is that a brain transplant for them or a body transplant for you?

  12. Mmmm, Brains by telchine · · Score: 1

    The main problem I have with donating body parts for scientific research is that I don't want silly medical students using bits of me to play pranks on each other!

    1. Re:Mmmm, Brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at me, I'm Davy Crockett!!

    2. Re:Mmmm, Brains by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Funny

      The main problem I have with donating body parts for scientific research is that I don't want silly medical students using bits of me to play pranks on each other!

      Are you kidding?! Biohazardous pranks are hilarious! How can you not donate to that cause?!

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    3. Re:Mmmm, Brains by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I kinda like the idea of my dead body parts causing a few laughs, after I am dead.

      Toe in a taco? Butt in a burger?

      I just hope that this doesn't increase medical students appetite for human flesh.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Mmmm, Brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already saw your vest.

    5. Re:Mmmm, Brains by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Bah!!!

      Play is one of the best ways to learn.

      Besides, you sound a little paranoid. Oh No!! Someone may ............ ok, I can't even figure out what kind of prank a medical student may play with my old organs. Seriously, you may just be abit paranoid, relax a little.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    6. Re:Mmmm, Brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope that this doesn't increase medical students appetite for human flesh.

      A student's gotta eat too... ;-)

    7. Re:Mmmm, Brains by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      well if you're donating your brain you usually get decapetated and then dephallicated after which the prankster ligates the penis shaft to your neck thus making you an in-the-flesh dickhead. Its even possible to pose the body however you want due to rigor mortis and all... at least thats what we did to this one dude: NSFW

    8. Re:Mmmm, Brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Mmmm, Brains by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      Why would you care at that point? You would be dead, anyway. Well, unless a zombie virus spreads, but what are the odds of that?

  13. offering any money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They offering any cash incentive?

    I'd sign up for a

  14. More Brains Needed by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Funny

    They certainly are. Unfortunately, the trend seems to be the in the other direction. Especially among politicians.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  15. Braaains... by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    Someone's been playing Left 4 Dead too much I think!

  16. What about cadavers? by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    The medical students are practicing with dead bodies all the time. Why can't those brains?

    1. Re:What about cadavers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because brain dissection is part of their anatomy learning experience.

  17. Who Knew??? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

    Medical Researchers were zombies? ANYONE???

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  18. No way by symes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'll only donote my brain if it's smashed up with a hammer first - or some L33t h4ck3r5 might steal my secrets and credit card numbers!

    1. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why I'm donating mine to 'Will it Blend?'.

    2. Re:No way by RockWolf · · Score: 1

      That's why I'm donating mine to 'Will it Blend?'.

      Will It Blend - Hannibal Lecter edition.

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
    3. Re:No way by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      That's why I'm donating mine to 'Will it Blend?'.

      Will It Blend - Hannibal Lecter edition.

      I'll donate the fava beans...

    4. Re:No way by princessproton · · Score: 1

      I've got a nice Chianti.

      --
      I'm always positive; it's my nature.
  19. Easy option by LingNoi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm sure if they asked the Chinese government they could get some brains from executed prisoners.

    1. Re:Easy option by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      The Chinese execute most prisoners by a single rifle bullet to the back of the head. The brain would therefore be useless.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:Easy option by LingNoi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure they could make an exception, like shooting at the gut. Sure, it's more painful and a slow way to die but if money is to be made then they should just suck it up for the greatness of their country.

  20. Packing Instructions by jayrtfm · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you are going to donate a brain, there are recommended packing instructions.
    And don't risk using UPS, since Sterling Courier Systems is the pathologist's preferred shipper.

    1. Re:Packing Instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For pickup call 1-888-633-6666 and indicate that you would like to send tissue samples to: "NYBB - Taub".

      With that kind of a phone number, my guess is they aren't getting a lot of brain donations from the Evangelicals...

      Seriously, WTF?

  21. Flawed assumptions by Linux_ho · · Score: 3, Funny

    'It used to be other parts of the body that we thought were important,' says Esin. 'But now people realize that their brain is the crucial thing that gives them their mind and their self.'

    That's not necessarily true. For example, I do a lot of thinking with another part of my anatomy. Ask anyone.

    --
    include $sig;
    1;
    1. Re:Flawed assumptions by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily true. For example, I do a lot of thinking with another part of my anatomy. Ask anyone.

      It's true, folks!
      I asked Linux_ho's former roommate, and he said that Linux_ho has most definitely used his uvula to handle some sticky situations.

      Quite expertly, I might add.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    2. Re:Flawed assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why you're not allowed at the park anymore.

    3. Re:Flawed assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your butt?

  22. Healthy as well as with brain disorders? by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if I'm not quite certain which category I belong in?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  23. use a Hammer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WAIT! what about piracy? The ONLY way to take care of privacy concerns is to "smash with a hammer"

  24. This is a total cover up by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    Don't you watch late night TV? The real reason is that the donated brains are going to zombie research (trying to recreate zombie Jesus). There aren't enough brains left over to do non-zombie research.

  25. Obvious solution by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Replace the removed brain with an electronic brain. A simple one would suffice. All it would have to do is say "What?" and "Where's the tea?"

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Obvious solution by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Replace the removed brain with an electronic brain. A simple one would suffice

      A 6502 would be ideal.

    2. Re:Obvious solution by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Replace the removed brain with an electronic brain. A simple one would suffice

      A 6502 would be ideal.

      It worked for Ahnold.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:Obvious solution by chipxsd · · Score: 1

      and BB too

    4. Re:Obvious solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know George W. was reading slashdot

    5. Re:Obvious solution by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I didn't know George W. was reading Douglas Adams.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  26. ObZombie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Braaaiiinnnsss...

    Oh, and:

    http://brains4zombies.com/

    (just for fun)

  27. contact your local medical school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    My mom had completed the paperwork to donate her body to the local medical school before she found out she had a rare degenerative (untreatable and invariably fatal) neuromuscular disorder. in her consultations with the neurology team at the local school, they determined that the leading research team was at another major university, so they just added that school to the paperwork to receive her brain and spinal cord. other than completing the paperwork, signing it and advising her next of kin, the process was seamless. the funeral home guys picked her up after she died and we gave them the paperwork. the university guys took it from there.
    easy. and very satisfying.

    1. Re:contact your local medical school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The casualness of your tone is creepy, you make it sound like eBay review. The only thing that is missing is "A+++++++!"

    2. Re:contact your local medical school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would buy again.

  28. Re: Your brains by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is anybody else here thinking of Jonathan Coulton's Re: Your Brains?

    Heya, Tom' its Bob from the office down the hall
    Good to see you, buddy; howve you been?
    Thing have been OK for me except that Im a zombie now
    I really wish youd let us in
    I think I speak for all of us when I say I understand
    Why you folks might hesitate to submit to our demand
    But heres an FYI: youre all gonna die, screaming

    (chorus)
      (zombies) "All we want to do is eat your brains!"
      Were not unreasonable; I mean, no ones gonna eat your eyes
      All we want to do is eat your brains
      Were at an impasse here; maybe we should compromise:
      If you open up the doors
      Well all come inside and eat your brains!

    I dont want to nitpick, Tom, but is this really your plan?
    To spend your whole life locked inside a mall?
    Maybe thats OK for now but someday youll be out of food and guns
    And then youll have to make the call
    Im not surprised to see you havent thought it through enough
    You never had the head for all that bigger picture stuff
    But, Tom, thats what I do, and I plan on eating you, slowly

    (chorus)
      (zombies) "All we want to do is eat your brains!"
      Were not unreasonable; I mean, no ones gonna eat your eyes
      All we want to do is eat your brains
      Were at an impasse here; maybe we should compromise:
      If you open up the doors
      Well all come inside and eat your brains!

      Id like to help you, Tom, in any way I can
      I sure appreciate the way youre working with me
      Im not a monster, Tom...well, technically, I am
      I guess I am

    Ive got another meeting, Tom; maybe we could wrap it up
    I know well get to common ground somehow
    Meanwhile Ill report back to my colleagues who were chewing on the doors
    I guess well table this for now
    Im glad to see you take constructive criticism well
    Thank you for your time; I know were all busy as hell
    And well put this thing to bed
    When I bash your head open

    (chorus)
      (zombies)"All we want to do is eat your brains!"
      Were not unreasonable; I mean, no ones gonna eat your eyes
      All we want to do is eat your brains
      Were at an impasse here; maybe we should compromise:
      If you open up the doors
      Well all come inside and eat your brains!

    --
    "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
  29. Re:Doctors, Researchers, Get Your Brains, Quick! by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, I resemble that remark!

  30. Specifically... by Kyru · · Score: 1

    We need more like the ones from this gal named Abby Normal.

  31. Cooking Instructions? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Funny

    They seem to be missing.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  32. And how does that make you feel? by mouse_8b · · Score: 1

    IANANeuroscientist (yet?, wish me luck), so I don't really know how science experiments on brains. Is it simple observation of brain physiology, or do they actually "zap" it a little and see what neural pathways are activated?
    If it gets zapped, an interesting philosophical question arises. If consciousness is an emergent property of a neural network, then would activating a small network bring some small fraction of consciousness to a brain? I realize that if this was the case, it would be on a very low level, maybe not even comparable to the lowest vertebrates. I also realize perception is immeasurable, but if, while alive, I can retrieve a memory and re-experience a stimulus, could a dead brain "remember" things that had been stored to memory while living? Could new memories be created?

    1. Re:And how does that make you feel? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      If consciousness is an emergent property of a neural network, then would activating a small network bring some small fraction of consciousness to a brain?

      "It's starting to roll."
      "Shit!"

      "Bring in the L.E.D. Lock it down."

      "He's on."
      "What's the story?"
      "We saved the left arm."
      "What? We agreed on total body prosthesis. Now lose the arm."
      "Jesus, Morton."
      "Can he understand?"
      "We'll blank his memory, anyway."
      "We should lose the arm. What do you think?"
      "He signed a release when he joined the force. And he's dead. We can do pretty much what we want."
      "Lose the arm."
      "Shut him down. Prep him for surgery."

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:And how does that make you feel? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Early in the 19th century, when experiments using electricity really were blossoming, there was a common belief that electricity was a sort of life force (or at least related to life), since a muscle would contract when shocked. While it's true that neurons use electrical charge for some portion of their communications, it's a separate thing from bringing them back to life. It's not like you could power a brain back up by running a few microvolts through it, or something. If any of the cells are still alive, you may start a flurry of communication between them. The brain is essentially a huge collection of pattern-matching "circuits", chaotically interconnected. I doubt that the communication generated would be terribly meaningful.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:And how does that make you feel? by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Well I mean...how would you measure consciousness with just a brain? You need some sort of intelligible sensory input and a way for the brain to output intelligent behavior that you could measure. You can keep brain cells alive after the organism dies and stimulate them electrically to study the effect doing this at certain amplitudes/frequencies has on down/up stream neurons, but that couldn't tell you anything about what function those neurons were involved in or anything. The use of diseased brains is to compare them with healthy brains and each other to localize where things went wrong and due to what kind of abnormality (I guess thats the physiological studies you mentioned). AFAIK this requires the cells to be dead due to staining/preservative/etc procedures.

  33. To be fair.... by Klootzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trying to cure Autism is like trying to cure innate stupiditity, I have serious doubts you'll be able to change the neurological wiring with any efficacy.

    Certain learning techniques can be used to improve synaptic formation in those with a lower amount of total neurons, thus increasing their mental capacity somewhat, which works for some of those individuals born with below-average intelligence. But how do you fix someone with "too many"?

    Of course, currently, most Psychologists/Psychiatrists work on the concept of treatment with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and/or drug treatment:
    "Now Jimmy, if people are WRONG, just go along with it and pretend they aren't, and here, have some SSRIs, we dont' know if these will fuck you up for life, but it's easier on everyone else if we give you pills".

    How about we just lobotomize them all instead? Sound good?!
    The sentance above is an example of hostile sarcasm.

    Anyway, I'm more than happy to donate any bits of me that Medical Research can use!
    Disclaimer: I'm not a Neurologist/Neurosurgeon/Neuropsychiatrist - happy for anyone else to correct me if I'm incorrect somewhere and they've got the knowledge.

    --
    A Man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties -- Albert Einstein
    1. Re:To be fair.... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I would hardly underestimate the difficulty of doing so(since we certainly haven't had resounding success thus far); but in principle there is no reason why you shouldn't be able to change neurological wiring. After all, you grew from scratch whatever neurological wiring you currently have, and are constantly adding and pruning.

      We are unlikely to be able to do much without substantially greater understanding of how the brain works; but brains are really, really plastic, so we have every reason to believe that, once we know where the levers are, and how they should be set, we can do all kinds of cool stuff.

    2. Re:To be fair.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps in gathering autistic brains they can find out more about the condition. Rather than "curing" autism, in understanding it better it is possible to help?

    3. Re:To be fair.... by Diamonddavej · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have a PhD and autism, so that makes me autistic but not stupid. Simon Baron-Cohen, a autism researcher, has expressed his worry that "curing" autism could reduce the number people studying maths and other professions that require good systematizing ability, a strength possessed by people with autism. Here is his comment on the BBC website...

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7736196.stm

      I agree that the way to discourage curing autism, at least getting people to consider its wider implications that go beyond autism, is to connect the search into a cure with the search for genes that code for personality traits.

      It is known that people with Autism and Asperger's are far more likely to vote in certain political directions and express a different degree of religiosity, so we are looking at personalty traits - of all people not just autistic people - when we look for a cure. It is scary stuff, the general public does not understand the ethics or its wider implications.

    4. Re:To be fair.... by Klootzak · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I wasn't clear, I'm not saying it shouldn't be studied, I just seriously doubt people will be able to "cure" something that I suspect is linked to inheritable Genetic traits.

      Of course you could move into the territory of Eugenics, but I think that's a slippery slope to tread.

      Learning about or understanding more about the condition is never a bad thing.

      --
      A Man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties -- Albert Einstein
    5. Re:To be fair.... by Klootzak · · Score: 1

      Completely agree with you...

      It is scary stuff, the general public does not understand the ethics or its wider implications.

      Which is why I believe it needs to be talked about, so people understand what it is, as you'll know, Autism covers a spectrum of conditions (according to my current understanding of it).
      My annoyance is when people stereotype behaviours that aren't exhibited by every individual within the spectrum.

      --
      A Man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties -- Albert Einstein
    6. Re:To be fair.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're comparing autism to stupidity? Fantastic. It's not like autistics aren't already treated like shit. We are put in Special Ed classes, treated like we can't learn, like we are broken or inferior.

      Most autistics have higher intelligence levels than neurotypicals, yet we have a harder time communicating such. Autism is a communication problem, not a stupidity problem.

    7. Re:To be fair.... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "Certain learning techniques can be used to improve synaptic formation in those with a lower amount of total neurons"

      The idea that autistics have a lower amount of total neurons is quite the opposite, people who are autistic have larger then average brains. Elephants have very large brains as well but I doubt anyone would consider elephants even as smart as many low IQ human beings.

      Currently not much is understood about autism at all.

    8. Re:To be fair.... by Klootzak · · Score: 1

      The idea that autistics have a lower amount of total neurons is quite the opposite, people who are autistic have larger then average brains.

      That's not what I said, I was giving the opposite end of the spectrum as an example, my meaning is being misinterpreted, read my other posts before jumping to conclusions.

      Currently not much is understood about autism at all.

      This, in a sense, is the point I was trying to make regarding the prescription (by a number of the Psychiatric community) of SSRIs, I don't think this is a good thing, seeing as we don't know enough about the condition.

      --
      A Man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties -- Albert Einstein
    9. Re:To be fair.... by Klootzak · · Score: 1

      So you're comparing autism to stupidity? Fantastic. It's not like autistics aren't already treated like shit. We are put in Special Ed classes, treated like we can't learn, like we are broken or inferior.

      Most autistics have higher intelligence levels than neurotypicals, yet we have a harder time communicating such. Autism is a communication problem, not a stupidity problem.

      No, I'm saying exactly what you are, and have done, if you read my post history before jumping to conclusions you will have a better undrstanding of the point I am/was trying to make.

      Another flawed assumption you make is that I myself do not fall within some point of the autism spectrum, and haven't endured exactly what you describe at various points of my life.

      The least you could do if you're trying to attack my credibility is post without anonymity.

      --
      A Man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties -- Albert Einstein
    10. Re:To be fair.... by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      It's more than just the spectrum thing. Yes there are different classifications of it, (which mostly boil down to how impaired communication is) but aside from a few core symptoms of each spectrum, there are hundreds of things associated with autism which any individual has a sampling of.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    11. Re:To be fair.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do you fix someone with "too many"?

      Lots and Lots of Alcohol!

    12. Re:To be fair.... by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      One of the conditions mentioned is Tourette's Syndrome. We have some ideas about what that does to the brain, but only a few, there are things we don't really understand. And, more importantly, we have no idea *why* those things happen, or which gene (or combination of genes) creates the susceptibility to it.

      If we could even identify more of the differences between a normal brain and a Tourettic brain, then perhaps we could trace that back to some of the responsible genes... which is practically the Holy Grail of Tourette's research.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    13. Re:To be fair.... by Amenacier · · Score: 1

      But how do you fix someone with "too many"?

      Lots and Lots of Alcohol!

      And, according to the laws of nature, only the fittest will survive!

      --
      Amenacier
    14. Re:To be fair.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, don't worry, you expressed yourself perfectly clearly. Several respondents have just made a classical reading comprehension error of extrapolating identical cause ("are you saying we lack neurons and are stupid?") from identical symptom (difficulty with communication).

      I'm not sure whether it's a coincidence, but an attempt to build a huge literal framework around an idea rather than correctly interpreting its context and limits is fairly typical of autistic behaviour. A close schoolfriend's brother was autistic and it took quite a while for me to adapt my communication method for what I could (perhaps meanly) describe as a lack of empathy for the thought processes of others.

      I think one problem is this horribly linear view of intelligence, so on the one hand you get people saying "autistic people are just dumb" and the other you get very defensive "no, we're more intelligent than average!" from autistics. It would be more reasonable to say that people with autism may have particular mental strengths, but they also have (sometimes rather obvious) mental weaknesses, meaning they may be more productive in certain tasks but much less in others. It is unreasonable for the non-autistic to say that an autistic person is thick because they cannot communicate well, just as it is unreasonable for an autistic person to discard the ability to communicate (which includes the ability to correctly interpret) as a feature of the broad spectrum of abilities that constitute intelligence.

    15. Re:To be fair.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It is known that people with Autism and Asperger's are far more likely to vote in certain political directions and express a different degree of religiosity, so we are looking at personalty traits

      We know that it is possible to induce a "religious" experience by stimulating a particular region of the brain, and while paths are many, truth is one - a hippie way of saying that the Republicans and Democrats can't both be right (although they can certainly both be wrong.) What I'm trying to imply (and now say) is that perhaps that is because they have a different viewpoint that allows them to see more of the truth of the situation? I mean, I don't necessarily believe that it is true, but maybe they are simply correct? All I know of how autistics vote I learned from google, which is to say, they seem to be suckers like the rest of us and back the candidate that addresses their issue.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:To be fair.... by chazbet · · Score: 1

      For adults, maybe, but at an earlier age autism isn't necessarily hard-wired:
      http://blog.qsac.com/2008/01/neuro-behavioral-model-autism-brain.html?
      http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?aid=1928680

      Since intervening very early in child development seems to be helpful, why couldn't we one day find a way to regenerate/rewire those pathways?

  34. Ethics, line 1... by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have known several nurses, and many more in the helping professions, and their advice has been universally the same to me: Never get an organ donor card. Never. This is for two reasons. The first is that there is a huge shortage of tissue across the board. The second is that most of the hospital staff knows this and they aren't going to work as hard to save your life if you've got one of those organ donor cards. My friends have actually overheard doctors talking and saying to the effect of -- "Well, he kinda screwed himself here, hitting that other car head on at 80 MPH. Damn drunk. We could spend $40k in surgery on a 1 in 7 chance that he'll survive, or we can take his organs now and be 85% sure it was the right choice to make. And the surgeon's already put fifteen hours in today! I don't want to be the one to tell him he's got another four hours before he can go home for this bonehead..."

    These people make triage decisions every day. Don't take this personally, but you aren't a person laying on the table but a machine that's broken. You're just like a thousand other lumps of flesh that come through the doors every day. Don't think you're special. Do. Not. Real life is not like those campy medical/reality TV shows you laugh along with. There are no witty one liners, there is no epic drama where the doctor comes in and realizes it's some rare disease from bum fuck egypt with a cursory glance. There's just a lot of really tired people with a dark and dry sense of humor, who live on caffeine, try not to make any big mistakes, and hope their significant other will put up with the long hours and 4am emergency pages for just a few more years until they pay off their student loans.

    That doesn't mean they don't care, or that they're ghoulish devils come to suck your precious organs. But it does mean-- don't put that sticker on your license. They don't know you. They don't care. There's a thousand other people behind you and a thousand more ahead of you and they have a job to do. No. I'm not lying. No this isn't an urban legend. No I didn't hear this from a friend of a friend, I heard this directly from the mouths of the people who can point out names and faces of the people who have said stuff like this--Just so we're clear. I'm not trying to scare you, I have no hidden agenda. If you really want to be an organ donor, tell your friends and family, have it in your will, tell them where it is, and make sure they're clear that it's what you really want and you'll come back and haunt their ass if they don't make your last requests. Just don't put it on your license.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well I know lots of members of the medical profession, and I can say this is total rubbish, for 3 reasons: 1) Doctors appreciate organ doners. They know very little about you when you are rushed in, but if they know you are a doner they know something good about you. 2) There has been rumours of doctors getting in trouble for doing just what you say, and no-one wants to risk getting in trouble, so they err on the side of caution. 3) Why the heck would a doctor decide to not do an expensive operation? The hospital gets paid when they do expensive operations. I can honestly say YOU are scaremongering, and in the process possibly risking other people's lives. If you do die, getting the organs as quickly as possible is crucial, so your scaremongering could well kill people, and that makes you a shit. Sorry.

      --
      Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    2. Re:Ethics, line 1... by devotedlhasa · · Score: 1

      You could also make the argument that they will try harder to save you as an organ donor. Dead tissue isn't very useful for transplantation.
      ...although...dead tissue does work great for medical school. For some of you it could be the first time a woman will your penis.

    3. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Point 1: She didn't say they don't appreciate organ donors, she said they won't try as hard to save you because of a good chance of you dying anyway. As well as you may have been a drunk driver and they have passed judgement on you to save other people with your organs that may not be as stupid.
        Point 2: I know plenty of doctors that have been in trouble for stupid stuff, and as long as the doctors are saying it around people that aren't their boss or a reliable witness they can say whatever they want and deny it later, it's about proving it.
        Point 3: Most hospitals get paid very little compared to what the procedure actually costs. Our clinic gets 5 dollars, yes FIVE dollars for every vasectomy we do because of the other money the state provides in grants and such. That's why hospitals over charge insurance for other things like aspirin, to make up for the money they lost on the expensive operation that they didn't get paid for.

    4. Re:Ethics, line 1... by rxan · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to scare you

      Holy crap man. Before reading this post I was all for donating my entire body to transplants or medical research. But you've certainly given me a good case of paranoia.

      There should be a clause on donor cards for "Only donate my body if I'm going to die for sure. Like really really sure. Like please, please, triple-please save me before donation!"

    5. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      err..wait.

      Having been in the medical field for a while, from my complete experience, this is nonsense. I can't remember the last hospital I visited in the eastern side of the United States that had only one surgeon avialable on any given day. The truth is these guys do put in some serious hours but there is almost always more than one (...and for obvious reasons). So the story of the nurse or doctor mentioned wanting to relieve this surgeon is bogus.

      If anyone truly believes this, I encourage you to never go to a hospital and deny all medical care. If these people are so ready to lose patients for the option to maybe save another I wouldn't trust them with 90% of a normal doctor visit.

      The truth is, that most of these individuals attend school for a long time to make big bucks and contribute to the medical community. Ask a surgeon if they can recant a time when they lost someone on the table. If they had--They'll remember it, because it's not easy obviously, even if you think they're a drunken loser.

      Again the donor card has nothing to do with contributing to science, although when you truly do die, your organs would go to someone in actual need.

    6. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this really matter?

      From what I understand, your body will quite possibly save several lives, and not just one. Statistically, it'd be saving lives to shoot a healthy person, and use his/her body to save $x (where $x > 1) unhealthy-but-could-be-healthy-with-spare-parts people.

      While this might be rather unorthodox for a healthy person, if he/she will probably die anyway, they might as well choose the "greater good" option.

      (Afterthought: If trying to fix the dying person does not damage their body (or otherwise make it unsuitable for transplant), they should probably exhaust all other options first)

    7. Re:Ethics, line 1... by mugnyte · · Score: 1

        What dramatic writing. However, donor cards still serve the common good over the individual.

        As for you credibility, you claim what you write is no rumor, so please post the folks who own up to this as your sources.

        The more people that have them, the less any "laziness effect" might appear on behalf of ER medicine.

    8. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap man.

      Dude, her name is "girlintraining."

      Oh, wait a minute...

    9. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever I hear a story about donating organs, I think of California's ruling that dead bodies aren't property, so no one can do anything if a hospital takes the organs without permission. I know its not exactly a great selling point for the hospital, but there's nothing the patient's family can do. In this case, why not bribe some hospitals to give them the organs when they have patients like these? Here's an article that seems to cover the topic pretty well: http://www.kentlaw.edu/perritt/blog/2007/06/who-owns-your-body.html.

    10. Re:Ethics, line 1... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Except that the healthy person has a right to live, and to keep on living as long as they can.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    11. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. I'm not lying. No this isn't an urban legend. No I didn't hear this from a friend of a friend, I heard this directly from the mouths of the people who can point out names and faces of the people who have said stuff like this--Just so we're clear.

      Just so we're clear, the way one would go about actually convincing sensible people that this is anything other than an urban legend would be to actually name those names rather than insisting that other nameless people could do so.

    12. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No this isn't an urban legend. No I didn't hear this from a friend of a friend, I heard this directly from the mouths of the people who can point out names and faces of the people who have said stuff like this

      If what you say is true and you are really privvy to this information, you must be struggling with some serious ethical issues not contacting medical authorities, especially if you have specific names to work with. What you suggest violates just about every ethical rule of the medical profession. Perhaps YOU didn't hear this from a friend of a friend, but we here on slashdot have no way of confirming your story except by your word. The only evidence you present is your word and you are an anonymous person to us -- not even at the status of a "friend of friend".

    13. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      We could spend $40k in surgery on a 1 in 7 chance that he'll survive, or we can take his organs now and be 85% sure it was the right choice to make. And the surgeon's already put fifteen hours in today! I don't want to be the one to tell him he's got another four hours before he can go home for this bonehead..."

      That sounds bad, if you're the guy on the table. What if you're one of the 5 people those organs will save?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      The first is that there is a huge shortage of tissue across the board. The second is that most of the hospital staff knows this and they aren't going to work as hard to save your life if you've got one of those organ donor cards.

      Sorry, but your comment is made of FAIL. ER docs don't harvest organs, and their jobs are some sort of test where they get partial credit for saving the organs but not their owners.

      Learn what you're talking about. Until then, keep your urban legends to yourself.

    15. Re:Ethics, line 1... by similar_name · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think there is a simple solution. If you don't have an organ donor card then you don't get any organs either if you need them.

    16. Re:Ethics, line 1... by areusche · · Score: 1

      Doctors and surgeons are paid by how many people they see and in ER situations by how many operations and procedures they complete.

      It is in the hospital, head surgeon, doctors, and nurses best interest to make sure they have taken care of everyone in as many ways possible.

      They could care less if you're an organ donor, because if that $50,000 operation that your HMO covers has a 1 in 7 chance of working then they'll take it. Also there's power of attorney to also consider. Pulling the plug on a patient requires the ok of the person who has power of attorney, NOT the doctors or triag staff. And believe me hospitals get in contact with a patients next of kin very quickly.

      There are separate doctors who handle organ transplants. The ER staff does not even make determinations about transplants.

      From what I can gather you are spreading a bit of FUD. Sorry, but your post sounds like a he said she said story.

    17. Re:Ethics, line 1... by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Really this is a question about how much faith do you put in your fellow man? Think about that, and the fact that the one doctor your friend overheard is not representative of all of them.

      There is also the question of why aren't organ transplants opt-out instead of opt-in? Everytime there's always these few people who have religious objections - why can't they just fill out a form and get opt-out status? Let's see, 1 hour's (I'm being generous) worth of work vs several lives ... Clearly its easier to be lazy.
      The fact is that most people do not care either way, and it would save millions of lives if organ donations ocurred after death unless the subject was a registered exception.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    18. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doctors appreciate organ doners

      ...but prefer doner kebabs that aren't made from offal

    19. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES!! Why is this option not discussed more?

      Organ donation should be opt-out... but if you do opt-out, no organs for you! People are still free to make the selfish choice, they will just have to pay for it... I suspect we would never have a shortage again!

    20. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Platypii · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is (roughly) the idea behind LifeSharers. Personally I think this is exactly the way to go:

      http://www.lifesharers.com/

    21. Re:Ethics, line 1... by wugint · · Score: 1

      What do you think this is, House M.D.?

    22. Re:Ethics, line 1... by invisiblerhino · · Score: 1

      1) Doctors appreciate organ doners.

      Sometimes after a late night at the brain lab, what you really need is a kebab.

      --
      xterm -n 8
    23. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As usual, Carlin put it best:

      And don't be pulling any plugs on me, either! Here's another bunch of macho asshole bullshit floating around this country! People talking about: "Oh, pull the plug on me! I'm ever like that! If I'm comatose...!" "If I'm like a vegetable, pull the plug on me!" Fuck you! Leave my plug alone! Get an extension cord for my plug! I want everything you've got! Tubes, cords, plugs, prods, electrodes, IVs, you've got something--stick it in me, man! You find out I've got a hole I didn't know I had, put a fucking plug in it! Vegetable, shit, I don't care if I look like an artichoke! Save my ass!

    24. Re:Ethics, line 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know somebody who is reasonably well connected and his advice is to NEVER get a donor card.

      When the state governor gets checked into the hospital and needs a heart, you better hope you don't have a tissue match...

      When was the last time you heard about a VIP having to wait for an organ? And it isn't just the US - do you think that Tony Blair gets the same NHS that the average Brit gets?

      I'm all for donation in principle. However, in practice that consent could get used in ways you wouldn't prefer. I'd prefer to tell my relatives my intentions and hopefully they'll make the right call. Yes, I realize that could create a risk of unsuitable organs. I really wish that people were perfect, but they're not...

  35. 10% of doctors are too literal by Nux'd · · Score: 1

    "...with the remaining 10% of 'healthy' brains donated by friends or relatives of patients."

    Errm.. won't they need them for when they go visit?

  36. Wait until they're dead by unlametheweak · · Score: 3, Funny

    ' Part of the problem, according to Professor Margaret Esiri at the University of Oxford, may be that people are reluctant to donate their brains because they see the organ as the basis of their identity.

    I would have thought that they only accepted brain donations from families of people who have already died. Certainly donating your brain while you are still alive would have an effect on your identity. I would hope this practice stops.

  37. Get in line... by cjb658 · · Score: 1

    I need more people with brains at my job too.

  38. I've done it in Aus by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    I have donated my brain in Australia
    http://www.braindonors.org/

    I'm not gonna be needing it after the Aus Gov filter my internet... so why keep it ? :-P

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:I've done it in Aus by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Thats really not something you can say in past tense.......

  39. FUD... in the most vile form. by Klootzak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even more despicable than trying to create fear, uncertainty and doubt of Open-Source, are people who try to do the same thing against those who would save lives... I hope you sleep well girlintraining.

    --
    A Man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties -- Albert Einstein
  40. Science, or practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was talking to a surgeon a while ago, and she was saying that people were under the false illusion that donating their bodies would go towards cutting edge science. Apparently they're just used by medical students for scalpel practise.

    1. Re:Science, or practice? by Klootzak · · Score: 1

      Apparently they're just used by medical students for scalpel practise.

      Alot (possibly the majority) of them are, however, would you rather a surgeon who's never practiced working on you while you're alive?

      Take your FUD elsewhere.

      --
      A Man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties -- Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Science, or practice? by Amenacier · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're not just used for scalpel practice - they're used for anatomical studies so that when your surgeon is opening you up, they know what all your organs actually look like and don't spend half an hour playing "find the body part we want". In order to be successful in dissection and surgery, you need to have practice on real flesh, because it's never as neat as the plastic models of the body would make you think.

      --
      Amenacier
  41. They can have mine on one condition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a great idea. When I die, I donate my brain to science, with one stipulation: in order to receive access to it, the scientist must publish a paper in a peer-reviewed journal about how awesome I am. Thus, the scientific community at large will regularly be reminded that I was one super-cool awesome dude.

  42. Ok, you've convinced me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll give you my brain.
    What do I have to do to donate my body to science? Is it just a different sort of donor card?

  43. I want that article icon by v1 · · Score: 1

    for a desktop item picture, it'll make a great folder icon for say, Documents. But masked properly please, a black box border looks awful.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  44. bra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On another note, I love how the article linked's URL is as follows
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/today/tomfeilden/2009/01/medical_science_needs_your_bra.html
    I would like to note that for... "Medical science" I also too need your bra, feel free to send them

  45. LIve Brains!!! Yum! by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    "Part of the problem, according to Professor Margaret Esiri at the University of Oxford, may be that people are reluctant to donate their brains because they see the organ as the basis of their identity."

    Yeah, that's definitely the problem! I need my brain so that I have an identity! I'll not give it up willingly!

    You'll have to pry it from my skull you zombies unless I shoot you in your dead head first!

  46. In Canada 'medical research' is an option by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly here in Canada, first it asks if you would like to donate all organs or just specifics, then there is another question asking if they cannot be used for transplant can they be used for medical research.

  47. my wife may care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Think she wants to do without the normal funeral?

    So, no thanks. Now, if I could provide additional
    support to my family by selling body parts in an
    auction after my death, that's another matter.

    With some of these transplant operations costing
    over a million dollars, I damn well think my
    family should get a cut. After all, they just lost
    a loved one and even the breadwinner.

    The "shortage" is a market distortion. Let the
    market be free, and the problem goes away.

  48. I'll donate my brain by Godman · · Score: 1

    If it goes to a foundation for the study of the long term effects of marijuana.

    --
    I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
    1. Re:I'll donate my brain by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      If it goes to a foundation for the study of the long term effects of marijuana.

      You don't need brains for that study, an afternoon stroll through Berkeley would give you all the data you need.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  49. Sooner, The Better... by johnshirley · · Score: 1

    In traditional /. fashion, I didn't even bother to RTFA... but I can just envision the folks at Open U saying, "We know you aren't using your brain, so, please, donate your brain to medical research today!" I know some people I'd like to volunteer for the program. That lemon who made the lane change across all six lanes of the expressway at the last possible second this afternoon, for example. Or maybe the fact that he did it was evidence that he'd already donated his brain to medical research.

  50. I call bullshit by nbauman · · Score: 1

    No. I'm not lying. No this isn't an urban legend. No I didn't hear this from a friend of a friend, I heard this directly from the mouths of the people who can point out names and faces of the people who have said stuff like this--Just so we're clear.

    Yeah, that's what the urban legends always say.

    If somebody actually did say that to you, they're putting you on.

    Are you still going to believe them when they tell you about having sex with corpses?

  51. Who do I contact? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    You are all making jokes, but I'd be happy to donate my brain if it would provide even a little data. I'm not planning on dying soon, but if I do I'm really not going to need the brain anymore. So why let it go to waste?

    I'd imagine it's important to set these things up before hand. To get any meaningful data, they're going to need to know a lot about my medical history, drug use, and who knows what else. They'll also want to be notified quickly after death, there are a lot of changes that take place in the brain immediately after death. I wonder how it all works.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  52. Those darn zombies... by CrypticKev · · Score: 1

    This article was automatically posted by a /. zombie process... ^Z^Z^Z^Z... We now return you to normal service.

  53. Depository by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they just go to the brain depository and look for Abby Normal?

  54. Harvard takes brains ... by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

    ... and I'm not just referring to the incoming students. If you want to donate and live in the northeast, try the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center at McLean Hospital. They have forms you can fill out on the site, but only if you don't plan to use your brain permanently. (Disclaimer: I used to fix their computers.)

  55. shoudn't it be easy... by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

    to get someone with dimensia to hand over their brains?

  56. But I'm not dead yet by bradbury · · Score: 1

    While I am all for organ donation and digging into defective brains.

    I am completely against medical therapies which prematurely terminate the life of an individual
    While I am completely aware that there is a medical case for declaring an individual as "dead".

    So long as the individual's brain is intact and can be preserved, using technologies known to Alcor and/or other preservation organizations -- one is not "dead" -- i.e. the physicians pronouncement in the ER is WRONG.
    I realize that I am promising potential future technologies. But you have to realize that the past can be broken. And more importantly that is the course that humanity has chosen.

  57. an obvious reason by cekander · · Score: 1

    We can hypothesize all we want about why people WOULDN'T donate their brains to science, but when a lot of people aren't aware of the process for doing so, well it seems like maybe we've found a good reason why people DON'T.

  58. +1, Bingo!!! :) by Klootzak · · Score: 1

    there are hundreds of things associated with autism which any individual has a sampling of.

    Wait, you mean, I could randomly say... because someone is very interested in something "uncommon" and spends time doing it, and also mistypes the occasional letter, or uses uncommon language, that they have Autism/Aspergers???

    Oh, and that typically these tendancies are exhibited mostly in males? (and sometimes sound alot like savantism?)

    Do the Psychiatric community know this?!?!?! ;)

    --
    A Man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties -- Albert Einstein
  59. Dr. BREEN?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no real interest in donating my brain to the guy whose brother is the Combine quisling running City 17...

  60. Did someone sign Dubya up? by AnalPerfume · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing most of the planet would be curious to know just how this jackass managed to cause so much suffering to so many. It'd be a service to world peace (yeah I know, bare with me) to prevent history repeating itself. Perhaps the answer lies in the brain. I'm sure there'd be plenty of concerned citizens around the globe who'd happily speed up the donation if they got the chance. Perhaps letting Dubya retire to Baghdad to revel in his successful war to restore democracy to Iraq would work, he'd need to pay for his own security of course, the deficit he's left behind can't stretch to excesses like protecting him from his own mistakes.

    Dubya has to be a fascinating study, how an imbecile managed to do so much damage. Logic and common sense has no answers to this. Maybe a vaccine can be discovered and fed into the air supplies of government buildings the world over.

  61. I read the title and thought by dlawson · · Score: 1

    "I'll say."

    --
    dot-sig.
  62. What do you do with a brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can put your weed in there

  63. donating is complex by belmolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For those of us willing to have our former bodies used for any good purpose, the existing system is frustrating because there is no coordination among multiple uses. Your body can be put to three different uses after death: (a) organ donation; (b) medical research; (c) medical training. Organ donation and medical research are in principle compatible - whatever organs aren't need for transplantation are available for research. However, neither of these uses is compatible with medical training: medical schools want the whole body for use in anatomy classes, not whatever is left after bits have been removed for transplantation or research. Furthermore, at least here in British Columbia, and as far as I know, everywhere else, there are three separate systems for the three uses. What I would prefer is to be able to sign up in one place to donate my body for whatever is the best use at the time. If an organ is critically needed, give it to someone, and use the remainder for research. If no organs are needed for transplantation, use it for research or anatomy class, wherever the need is greater.

    1. Re:donating is complex by climb_no_fear · · Score: 1

      Or if no organs are suitable (think of hearts from obese individuals, kidneys from diabetics, someone who dies with cancer, etc., all becoming more and more common), this would be ideal. Right now, only the donor card option is easy but if the organs aren't suitable, it all goes in the bin...

  64. Old Story by UncleWilly · · Score: 1

    In my Dad's Pre-Med (post WWII, 1940's) class there were all guys and one girl. During the cadaver dissection period, someone cut the penis off one of the cadavers and put it in the lab coat pocket of the girl. My Dad still laughs, remembering the look on her face when she accidentally discovered it, Mom laughs right along..

    They sure knew how to have fun in Days of Yore!

  65. to ease the pain of being dead by Maxmin · · Score: 1

    More Brains!

    Oh, and check out the zombie pinup calendar for 2009.

    --
    O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
    1. Re:to ease the pain of being dead by troll8901 · · Score: 1
  66. Brain function vs higher level functions by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    In computers, it would be pointless to relentlessly study the physics of semiconductors or arrangements of NAND gates if your interest was object oriented and functional programming. Equally, such an understanding (physics and logic circuits) would not help find most software bugs (especially a case of the wrong algorithm being used.) In such cases, the meaning occurs on a higher level of abstraction.

    Why do the many researchers into the human brain think that this sort of thing won't happen with the brain and the mind, i.e. why do they think understanding the brain will give an understanding of mental dysfunction?

    If there are universality phenomena at work (analogous to Turing completeness), then many of the workings of the mind will not be specific to the implementation details (i.e. the specifics of brain under study.) Such things need theoretical and mathematical insight, and not the cutting up of more brains.

    Just my 0.02 euros...

    --
    John_Chalisque
    1. Re:Brain function vs higher level functions by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Why do the many researchers into the human brain think that this sort of thing won't happen with the brain and the mind, i.e. why do they think understanding the brain will give an understanding of mental dysfunction?

      I'm sure you get a lot of puzzled voices on the end of the phone when you call your cable company to complain that your TV's volume is too quiet.

      Because:
      1) The software in human brains is actually mostly in the wiring. Different areas of the brain do different things.
      2) As far as humans are concerned, our transistors are the bits that typically go wrong. They usually are pretty similar to one another, and are all created from the same basic template. So if there's a problem with the template, you get systematic issues.
      3) Mind is a pretty loose and sloppy concept to begin with. If you don't believe me, try some hallucinogenics some time. You'll very quickly gain an appreciation for exactly what a con this whole "mind" thing is. It's not as obvious as you might think; our brains are very good at faking the impression of a "mind".

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  67. I dunno... by dutchd00d · · Score: 1

    I'd have to think twice before donating any part of my body to a Dr. Breen.

  68. Re: Your brains by Gracenotes · · Score: 1

    Is anybody else here thinking of Jonathan Coulton's Re: Your Brains?

    Yeah, samzenpus is.

  69. yeah, but you read what they said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they need more autistic brains. Go ahead and donate. :)

  70. More Brains Needed by BForrester · · Score: 1

    Yors sEnsErily,

    Zombees

  71. How about a link with info on HOW to sign up? by celest · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    Jokes are great, but I'm looking for information on HOW TO SIGN UP!

    I WANT to donate my brain to science after I die, but I have no idea what paper work I have to fill out to do this in my province/country. (Ontario, Canada)

    Anyone have the necessary information? Please post.

  72. Umbrella Corporation! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Zombie Research!

    Scientist1: "Braaains..."

    Scientist2: "Braaains!"

    Scientist3: "Braaains?"

    Scientist2: "Braains!"

  73. Can you donate if your mental? by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    Can people with dementia donate their brain? I thought you had to be sound mentally to make such a decision. If they can't donate their brain due to their mental state, can someone else do it for them? Or do they need to donate when they are young and vibrant and maybe the scientist will get a good mix.

  74. artlebedev's brain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is artlebedev cool with you using their art?
    hmm...

  75. So how many do they need total? by shrikel · · Score: 1

    We would need at least 100 cases to get meaningful data.

    How many brains come in a case?

    (Obvious answers, to preclude some of you smart-alecks out there:

    • All of them
    • One in each braincase

    )

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
  76. Things to do when you're dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget:
    d) The Body Farm for forensics research
    e) Being plasticized and put on public display as art

  77. This explains everything by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

    I wondered why rush hour in the Twin Cities seemed worse than normal this morning. Now I know why. Some folks found out about this and donated early.

  78. What?!?... by xded · · Score: 1

    No "5, Funny" zombie-related post yet?

    Oh, come on...

  79. Living Donors by rcleme05 · · Score: 1

    I believe we employ a few in management.

  80. data recovery by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    How do I encrypt my pr0n and social so nobody steals my identity?

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  81. Donate all these by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Everybody in the outgoing Bush Administration.

    Oh, wait, they don't have any to donate...

    Never mind.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  82. Send more paramedics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send more cops!

  83. people shouldn't really have a problem with this by fightinfilipino · · Score: 1

    they're not unreasonable. i mean, no one's gonna eat your eyes.