Slashdot Mirror


Why the Mediterranean Is the Net's Achilles' Heel

An anonymous reader writes "A spate of broken cables has brought disruption for many of the world's Web users in 2008 — and the Med has been at the center of the problems. For political reasons, the Mediterranean Sea is an Internet bottleneck through which the majority of traffic between Europe and Asia is squeezed. That traffic must run the gauntlet of earthquakes and heavy maritime traffic to reach its destination. Better and stronger cables are urgently needed to avoid a re-occurrence of the 2008 outages."

195 comments

  1. Internet Mythology 101 by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why the Mediterranean Is the Net's Achilles' Heel

    Becuase Radia Perlman held the Internet by the Mediterranean when she dipped it into the river Styx?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      No, because of physics, geology, geography and politics.

      I liked the conspiracy theories better. Rational thought isn't all that much fun sometimes.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by philspear · · Score: 2, Funny

      It sounds more like this is the internet's jugular vein or carotid artery than the achilles heel, just to pointlessly analyze the metaphor. I would think the achilles heel would be people who still don't know not to click the monkey or open attachments from addresses they don't know.

    3. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by camperdave · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't they teach you kids Greek Mythology anymore?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 0, Troll

      I liked the conspiracy theories better. Rational thought isn't all that much fun sometimes.

      "Conspiracy theories" can be entirely rational. People working together secretly towards nefarious ends is not only possible, it happens in practice. It is almost certainly the case that at least a few of the claims that get dismissed as "tinfoil hat delusions" are true.

      "Space jews did WTC, wake up sheeple" is significantly lamer as an anti-conspiracy troll then it would be as an honest claim. In the later case, it's simply foolish. In the former case, it's political chaff that disrupts legitimate discussion on at least two relatively serious political issues: US government secrecy and our relationship with Israel.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    5. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by megamerican · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, because of physics, geology, geography and politics.

      I liked the conspiracy theories better. Rational thought isn't all that much fun sometimes.

      I liked the coincidence theories better. Rational thought isn't all that much fun sometimes.

      The only "proof" that these lines weren't cut intentionally was that two ships were detained in Dubai (of all places) and forced to pay $10,000 to be allowed to leave.

      It didn't cover the fact that the Egyptian government sent out a press release saying that they had video footage of an area where the cable was cut and it showed no ships.

      Questioning the official version of events isn't a "conspiracy theory." Conspiracy happens all the time. The government is the biggest conspiracy theorist out there. They have laws against conspiring to commit just about any crime out there.

      For all I know the company that owns the cables cut them on purpose so they could later get public funds to pay for infrastructure upgrades.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    6. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

      Please cite sources. I'm googling right now (hurray slow work day) but I'd be interested to see some real conspiracies that there were conspiracy theorists for before it all came out. Active conspiracy theories have yet to be proven as actually happening or have happened.

    7. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I would think the achilles heel would be people.

      There. Fixed that for you.

    8. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      I saw a program about a guy that was actually taken prisoner for stumbling onto a fairly major conspiracy in order to keep him quiet. He had discovered that flu vaccine was being tainted in order to send people into a shopping frenzy just before the holiday season. He was taken to an island with others that had stumbled onto various things that couldn't be allowed to slip into public knowledge (the secret for turning water into gasoline, etc).

      IIRC, he escaped on a boat built by another prisoner (Number 6) that was built out of toilet paper and scabs. It was small and smelly, but carried him to safety.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    9. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by gnick · · Score: 1

      Actually, come to think of it, anything on this list would qualify as a conspiracy and, until being proved out, anyone suggesting the truth would have looked like a conspiracy theory nutjob.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    10. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Active conspiracy theories have yet to be proven as actually happening or have happened.

      This definition sets us up for a long argument trying to classify edge cases, which may or may not result in me demonstrating a nice clean example of something that you class as a conspiracy theory later being shown to be factual. That would be an interesting point to make, but not one that I'm willing to spend a bunch of time researching right now.

      I'm much more interested in cases where things that do not meet that definition - because they are well documented - get classified as conspiracy theories and dismissed. A good example is Herman and Chomsky's Propaganda Model and the associated claim that the US mainstream media act - to a very large extent - as propaganda outlets for the US DOD. This claim doesn't fit your definition at all. It doesn't even involve a conspiracy. But it still tends to get reflexively categorized and dismissed.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    11. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't they teach you kids Greek Mythology anymore?

      That was the movie with Brad Pitt in it, right? I saw that and 300...what more do I need to know? :)

    12. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      There's no island, just the state of Nebraska. Have you ever really met anyone from 'Nebraska' or 'Omaha'?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    13. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by HadouKen24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The US government funding mind control research using LSD would probably qualify. The CIA publicly admitted it in the 70's.

    14. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He got away?

      Pfft, must not have had any...Information....Information.....Information.

    15. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Ash+Vince · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hurray slow work day

      Be careful, too many slow work days and you might find yourself with all the googling time you ever needed and then some.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    16. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by zeropointburn · · Score: 1

      Me, but I could be part of the 'conspiracy'. That is, if western nebraska counts. Doubly so, since I work for one of those shadowy media conglomerates that ate up all those little radio stations over the past two decades... Or do I?

      --
      -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
    17. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf! I didn't expect Italy to come out so bad in that list! well, I totally expected it in reality, but it's hard to believe.

    18. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm still not quite sure what is more amusing.

      Your sig itself, or the spelling of Genius.

    19. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure, I'm certain the government has the internet monitored, so that any time the word 'Nebraska' is seen, they have some reply, if needed, to prove there's regular people in/from 'Nebraska'.

      Now, I've personally met folks from North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas (my wife!), Wyoming, Missouri, Iowa, etc. But never met anyone from 'Nebraska'. I think, during WWII, they sent everyone over seas or to Army bases in CA and, with an empty state, started using it as a really large version of Area 51. Who knows what goes on in there.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    20. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Molochi · · Score: 4, Funny

      You need to rent Clash of the Titans to complete your education.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    21. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      You need to rent Clash of the Titans to complete your education.

      You know, I remembered that, and Animal House (a documentary about Greek life) right after I posted.

    22. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      And Jason and the Argonauts. Can't forget that.

    23. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by BradleyAndersen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You update your blog as frequently as I do, and I don't even have such a shuper-shweet blog! But seriously, man, Putin is HOT.

    24. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Becuase Radia Perlman held the Internet by the Mediterranean when she dipped it into the river Styx?

      Goodness gracious. I can't believe that after all these millennia that people still haven't learned the most basic lesson of the story of Achilles: When dipping something into the Styx, use tongs so you can dip it all the way without getting your hand wet!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    25. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      Three words my young padawan:

      Meet the Spartans.

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    26. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      And then it has to go by Paris.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
    27. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Be fair now... In the 60s and 70s, everyone was "funding mind control research" using LSD.

      ~

    28. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, Freemasons running the country (USA), Zionism, allegations of WMD were just a pretext to invade Iraq, DARPA mind-control research, CIA knew Bay of Pigs would fail, etc etc etc

      Most conspiracies that have already been unmasked don't seem so far-fetched, since we've reconciled ourselves to the fact that they are real. The ones not yet proven seem strange, but only until they are confirmed.

    29. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Siridar · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Hercules Returns!

    30. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by rahunzi · · Score: 1

      Boy, read the first few entries and it [discussion] QUICKLY descended into the UNDERWORLD... wake up people... earthquakes, shipping...naaah The bottleneck in the Med. is the PERFECT place for a attaching a tap for capturing almost all Middle and Far Eastern internet traffic. Satellite/cellular/land line phone stuff is easily captured but fibre optic cables are hard to bug. You have to be hanging around at the end of the fiber and have to deal with say France, or Italy - so you cut the cable using a submersible craft launched from a sub, insert your device to siphon off the traffic and passing through traffic with no one the wiser, all in international waters and then fire up NSA to wait for interesting traffic...Osama who???

      --
      ...that's the beauty of time travel...bye
    31. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by c1t1z3nk41n3 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't HAVE to be a conspiracy... I mean if YOU were from Nebraska would you tell anyone?

    32. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Any time you have a smaller group within a larger group, and they're acting together in secret to further their own interests at the expense of the larger group, you have a conspiracy.

      Which means that every private enterprise is a conspiracy, every corporation is a conspiracy, every government group that secures funds whose purpose and/or usage is kept secret is a conspiracy, every nation state is a conspiracy.

      Conspiracy is the natural order of our global civilization. Which makes those who laugh at "conspiracy theorists" all the more ridiculous looking.

      Once you realize that, you see that it doesn't matter if you catch the conspirators or not. You can still understand the systemic mechanisms by which they are facilitated in their action, and act against those systemic mechanisms. This lets you actively disenfranchise enemies that you cannot see or even confirm the existence of.

      Honestly though, in this case, if you don't recognize that the cables were repeatedly and intentionally cut in the Mediterranean as part of the ongoing military actions of the Allies of Evil, you're a simpleton who ought to be fed with a slingshot.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    33. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      How can anyone talk about an education in Greek mythology while forgetting Hercules and Xena?

    34. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      I "funded mind control research using LSD", but I didn't inhale.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    35. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You know, I remembered that, and Animal House (a documentary about Greek life) right after I posted.

      Don't forget Jason and the Argonauts or Caligula.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the Greeks aren't a myth. I lived next to one for years.

    37. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to see some real conspiracies

      Watergate?

    38. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by JumperCables233 · · Score: 0

      And while you're at it, you can brush up your Scottish History by knocking back a few Highlander reruns.

    39. Re:Internet Mythology 101 by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Three words for you:

      Worst... film... ever!

      I thought they could not make something worse than Scary Movie 2. But they did! May they rot in hell!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  2. This just in... 3 More cut, Not in the Med. by KookyMan · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Three of four sub-cables connecting Asia-North America have been cut.

    This is getting a little crazy, and pardon the tinfoil hat that I'm wearing, how many 'undamaged' cables does this leave?

    I think this is really starting to become hard to blame on 'coincidence.'

    http://blogs.zdnet.com/gadgetreviews/?p=669

    1. Re:This just in... 3 More cut, Not in the Med. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Breaking news...a month ago.

    2. Re:This just in... 3 More cut, Not in the Med. by KookyMan · · Score: 1

      Darnit.. My bad.

      I don't know how I got to that article then since I'm usually a bit better screening my news... *Thwaps head.

      Ah. Now I know. Bad title + link from an article from today (was about Win 7).... There should be rules against putting 'Breaking' in a title that is static and doesn't disappear after time.

      Time to go crawl back in my hole.

    3. Re:This just in... 3 More cut, Not in the Med. by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not "just a coincidence". It's common occurance. Cable cuts happen. All the time. It's just gotten a lot of attention lately because of the attached conspiracy theorists looking to "prove" that Bush was going to attack Iran (he didn't).

      If it was an attack of some sort, don't you think they'd have cut all four?

    4. Re:This just in... 3 More cut, Not in the Med. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's just gotten a lot of attention lately because of the attached conspiracy theorists looking to "prove" that Bush was going to attack Iran (he didn't).

      He's still got six days left! Watch the news next Monday, I'm telling ya!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  3. It really, really does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That traffic must must run.

    Why why did did you you write write the the word word "really" "really" twice twice?

    New policy: for every error found in the summary, $100 will be deduced from the editor's paycheck.

    1. Re:It really, really does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      $100 will be deduced from the editor's paycheck.

      Ha! Joke's on you! They pay us in SCO stock....

  4. not stronger cables... bigger mines attached ;) by swschrad · · Score: 1

    no mystery who cuts a cable when they sink at the same time, is there? a few of those, the marked cable routes will be avoided.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:not stronger cables... bigger mines attached ;) by jammindice · · Score: 4, Funny

      1. acquire non-sea europe to asia internet backbone
      2. hire ships to "drop anchor" on internet cables
      3. ???
      4. PROFIT!!!

      --
      - My uid ends in 69...
    2. Re:not stronger cables... bigger mines attached ;) by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      note: this article seems to be about the middle east and the indian subcontinent. Traffic from europe to eastasia seems to go via the USA in my experiance.

      acquire non-sea europe to asia internet backbone
      And what route would you propose to take to get from india to europe over land?

      looking at a map of the world ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d1/World_TLD_Map.jpg ) the routes I can come up with don't look very promising.

      india->pakistan->iran->turkey->greece or bulgaria?
      india->china->possibly kazakhstan->russia->ukraine or belarus?

      going via the med to egypt and then through saudi-arabia and the UAE seems far more attractive to me. Afaict all those countries have pretty western friendly governments.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  5. Jeez. by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the 90s it was backhoes. Now it's giant cable-eating squid. What next, volcanic eruptions? Really, the problem is two-fold -- first, cables break. Hey, it's several thousand miles long and several thousand feet down, and it's just laying there. Of course it's going to break. You could make the cables out of Unobtainium and they will still wither and break eventually. It's a fact of life. The real problem isn't that they fail, the problem is that the telecommunications companies don't have redundant links because of the expense. So, in summary, the problem is economics. And Cthulu. But you can't stop one of the great old ones, so let's focus on redundant links instead. -_-

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Jeez. by y86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the 90s it was backhoes. Now it's giant cable-eating squid. What next, volcanic eruptions? Really, the problem is two-fold -- first, cables break

      Great point. I suggest lasers.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/07/14/lucent_highlights_laser_networking_system/

    2. Re:Jeez. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, in summary, the problem is economics. And Cthulu.

      He Who Lies Dead but Dreaming has no part to play in the damage to undersea cables, I have this on good authority. The Telcos are actually agents of Cthulhu (duh! -- you should know this by now if you've ever called telco tech support); the internet is just one of his dreams, which will serve to increase chaos and drive us all to madness.

      Seriously, though, blaming the problem on economics is a copout. Why are costs to lay redundant cables so high? What can be done to convince the telcos that laying redundant cables is a good idea? What can tip the CBA to the B side?
      (br>There are lots of reasons a truly redundant system is prohibitively expense. The cost of negotiating rights-of-way through multiple nations, for example. The increased costs to shipping (external cost to the telcos) from avoiding cable paths (and this is magnified with true redundancy, since redundant cables should not follow the same path). The costs of running and maintaining landlines in politically unstable areas. And, not least of all, the costs in materials, capital, and labor to run redundant lines.

      The way to tip the scale in favor of running redundant lines is to either reduce the cost of doing so, or increase the benefit from doing so. How much money do the telcos lose when a line goes down? Over time, is that more than the cost of running redundant lines?

      So yes, it's economics, but saying it's economics is glossing over the important details.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Jeez. by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      Pakistan did it when they were off net for weeks in 2005. If you look at recent outages you'll see Pakistan is relatively unaffected because they spent money fixing the lack of redundancy.

    4. Re:Jeez. by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      Just in the 90's? Gee, our internet connection got cut last year by a backhoe.

      Actually, it doesn't take an anchor per se to cut a cable. If the anchor is tethered by a steel wire cable instead of a chain, the steel cable will chew right through the fiber-optic cable, no matter how many layers of armor it has. The anchor itself doesn't have to do the cutting.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    5. Re:Jeez. by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seriously, though, blaming the problem on economics is a copout.

      Not all of us type "KeyserSoze 10000" at the console whenever faced with a gold shortage.

      Why are costs to lay redundant cables so high?

      Perhaps designing something that is several thousand miles long, and under several hundred PSI of pressure, to lay at the bottom of an environment that contains sulphuric acid plumbs, volcanic pits, and large numbers of angry monsters, is not easy.

      What can be done to convince the telcos that laying redundant cables is a good idea? What can tip the CBA to the B side?

      Threats of violence, regulation, and regular bombing of the opposition has worked well for us in other areas.

      How much money do the telcos lose when a line goes down? Over time, is that more than the cost of running redundant lines?

      Obviously, it is not more than the cost of running redundant lines or they would have done so by now.

      So yes, it's economics, but saying it's economics is glossing over the important details.

      Circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because...

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    6. Re:Jeez. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The real problem isn't that they fail, the problem is that the telecommunications companies don't have redundant links because of the expense.

      Last time this came up, somebody in the field posted that the cables just aren't shielded in most locations, because of the expense. There are apparently best practices that have certain pipes or something wrapped around the cables in anchor areas, and certain depths they're supposed to bury the cables at, but they just skip those parts.

      They obviously feel it's cheaper to settle the terms of their SLA's than lay cable properly. So, customers need to demand better (more expensive) SLA's and that equation can change.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Jeez. by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Actually, the cables are buried, but the currents and earth quakes can expose the cables in spots.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    8. Re:Jeez. by F3V0H1B · · Score: 1

      I believe if the telecommunication companies thought this through and made the communications redundant by having some kind of fail safe(s) it would have less dramatic consequences.

    9. Re:Jeez. by techess · · Score: 1

      But you can't stop one of the great old ones

      See that is where you are wrong. While it is difficult to beat Cthulhu, it is possible. The group you are playing with just has to be good at working together. Though I prefer to win by closing & sealing all the gates before Cthulhu awakes.

      For those of you looking for a great co-op board game check out Arkham Horror http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkham_Horror

      --
      Don't anthropomorphize computers. They *hate* that.
    10. Re:Jeez. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How dare you doubt Unobtainium!

    11. Re:Jeez. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So yes, it's economics, but saying it's economics is glossing over the important details.

      Circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because...

      I'm with you so far, but then what?

    12. Re:Jeez. by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      However, using what the company calls Dense Wave Division Multiplexing (DWDM) technology, the system will eventually operate at 10Gbps for distances up to five kilometers

      Your cunning plan, I don't think you've thought it through.

    13. Re:Jeez. by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      They obviously feel it's cheaper to settle the terms of their SLA's than lay cable properly. So, customers need to demand better (more expensive) SLA's and that equation can change.

      It's difficult to demand a higher SLA without paying outrageous prices or the provider saying "Hey, industry standard. Deal with it"

    14. Re:Jeez. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to demand a higher SLA without paying outrageous prices or the provider saying "Hey, industry standard. Deal with it"

      Yeah, everybody would have to do it together.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    15. Re:Jeez. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a real problem. he could set up a clever system of Shark Laser Relays!

    16. Re:Jeez. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but if you have 5 redundant links, it just means nothing will get fixed until all of them fail and the link goes down.

    17. Re:Jeez. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How dare you doubt Unobtainium!

      Well, OTOH, Undoubtainium, ...

  6. heh by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I never had any issues any of the times this happened. I was able to do all the stuff I normally do and visit all the sites I normally visits. This leads me to conclude that the solution is rather simple. The people who are affected by these outages should do something.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:heh by Simon+Huet · · Score: 1

      What did I just read? You american are not going to save the world??!! I'm shocked (and not amused) :)

  7. easy fix by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought of something that should be a pretty simple fix. Why don't they just string the wires over the Mediterranean?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somali pirates?

      *ducks*

    2. Re:easy fix by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      You can maybe do that between Gibraltar and Morocco, but then you have the problem of getting the Spanish and Gibraltar governments to agree to a cable across their border.

    3. Re:easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, which is it? Pirates or ducks?

    4. Re:easy fix by jzarling · · Score: 1

      I saw and article or maybe a tv show once that mentioned the currents through the straits are pretty intense, Im betting it was thought of and ruled out because of this.

      --
      It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
    5. Re:easy fix by Repton · · Score: 2

      The Mediterranean is in the middle of the world. Any route that doesn't go through it is longer, and thus costs more. HTH!

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    6. Re:easy fix by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      Well, I would imagine that it is both difficult and expensive to string underwater cable when compared to over land... This.. http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn16394/dn16394-1_1458.png picture, is of course over simplified.. but it is apparent that going over land would not be an extreme cost increase.. I think the article nailed the real reason it is not over land.. and that's because it would have to go through countries like Iran, and Iraq... can you say.. "snip snip you damn infidels !" ?

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  8. Overstated consequences by ninti · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article seems a little alarmist. For instance, this line: "The 2008 outages hit local economies hard and a stronger quake could plausibly bring Mediterranean economies to their knees, by denying them access to crucial global markets for days or weeks. A 2005 study at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich calculated that a nationwide internet blackout would cost Switzerland 1% of its GDP per week." But of course a cut in the Mediterranean will not be a "nationwide internet blackout" for Switzerland much at all. In fact, if India and the mid-east gets cut off from the rest of the Internet, the rest of the world won't care all that much.

    1. Re:Overstated consequences by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      If India was cut off, that would be a major problem for all the companies that have outsourced call centre and tech jobs to them, and for their customers.

    2. Re:Overstated consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... In fact, if India and the mid-east gets cut off from the rest of the Internet, the rest of the world won't care all that much.

      Except people outsourcing their IT.

    3. Re:Overstated consequences by djupedal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >"If India was cut off, that would be a major problem for all the companies that have outsourced call centre and tech jobs to them, and for their customers."

      You talk about that like it's a bad thing...last time I checked, having call centers in India is a pisser for everyone but the ones collecting a 'veddy!veddy!gut' paycheck as part of the joke, er, sorry, I mean, process.

    4. Re:Overstated consequences by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fuck 'em.

      That'll teach companies to move their jobs overseas. Those companies(and their overpaid executives) can cry a river to the employees they laid off only to give their jobs to India. Mods: I ask you to think about this before you mod me down, but if you want to waste your points, I don't give a fuck! :) Have a nice day.

    5. Re:Overstated consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Put an on/off switch on the backbone
      2. Turn switch off during peek call hours
      3. ...
      4. Profit

      A solution to the economic downturn in the US. Lets see how long it takes for those tech jobs to come back...

    6. Re:Overstated consequences by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Hm, let me adjust my tinfoil hat for a second...

      Say some organization wants to reduce offshoring in the US, as a means of stimulating employment in the US.

      Say that one way to 'encourage' bringing offshore jobs back onshore is to limit the benefits (or increase the costs) of offshoring.

      Say that there is a small number of vulnerable points, that disabling of would greatly increase costs/reduce benefits of offshoring.

      Say that the organization mentioned above has access to the greatest naval materiel in the world.

      I know it's a stretch, but in the interest of a good old conspiracy[1] theory, is it possible that the US Government is disabling global information infrastructure in order to bring jobs back onshore?

      [1]Besides which, you can't spell "conspiracy" without "piracy", which just about seals the deal for me, that's too much of a coincidence to believe that this theory is false.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:Overstated consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! And all the people employed in the US by foreign companies should be laid off as well. And then anyone who is employed by a business that relies on export earnings should be laid off. We don't need your dirty foreign money. Or importing goods. Yeah. No foreigner is going to get their hands on God's very own currency.

      USA! USA! USA! USA!

      Mod me down! Mod Me down because you are all working for the "man". YOU JUST CAN'T HANDLE A TRUTH-TELLER LIKE ME WITH MY UNVARNISHED "REAL AMERICA" TRUTHINESS.

      (obligatory +5 interesting)

    8. Re:Overstated consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US guvmint didn't care about letting jobs be outsourced in the first place, why would they suddenly care enough to go cutting undersea cables?

    9. Re:Overstated consequences by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, to be fair, India and China can always choose not to outsource to the U.S. 20 years from now when they're rich and mighty.

      It works both ways as long as so much depends on some little string threaded through the Ocean. Companies could stay rooted in one nation and deal with the ups and downs(with the benefits of academia and defense employment), or they could constantly go in circles chasing the cheap through constant relocation.

    10. Re:Overstated consequences by dwarg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I considered modding you down, but decided to comment instead.

      I understand your sentiment, but what you're ultimately suggesting is that we eliminate access to the internet for any country with a cheap labor pool. This punishes the citizens of those countries more than it does the execs of the major corporations that exploit them.

      This story is about an international communications issue. If you want to talk about labor issues I would say this:

      There are many powerful people trying to make protectionism a dirty word, if we want to fight them we have to be specific in our demands on who deserves Free Trade agreements or gets Preferred Trade Status. Protecting workers rights "over there" means increasing labor costs "over there" and makes them less appealing than local workers when you factor in communications and shipping costs (environmental protections should also figure into that equation). When they can treat their employees humanely, pay them a living wage, stop tainting the local water supply and still afford to send products to our markets cheaper than we can, then they deserve those jobs and we don't.

      The problem is that we've spotted our competitors a huge advantage by not holding them to any of the standards we hold ourselves to. Which means we tied our own hands, or maybe slit our own throats.

    11. Re:Overstated consequences by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I understand your sentiment, but what you're ultimately suggesting is that we eliminate access to the internet for any country with a cheap labor pool.

      I heard it as a complaint that the CEOs are looking to short-term gains and not counting the very real risk that network connectivity from the US to India may be impaired at some points. If they didn't examine and account for that risk in their calculations, then they are incompetent or liars (or both).

      When they can treat their employees humanely, pay them a living wage, stop tainting the local water supply and still afford to send products to our markets cheaper than we can, then they deserve those jobs and we don't.

      Which is why the US should have tarrifs on a per-country basis related to worker conditions and environmental care. If they "externalize" industry cost by dumping toxins rather than cleaning or storing them, then we should increase the cost here by that amount. They can pay for good practices or we will charge them so that they would be making the same if they did.

    12. Re:Overstated consequences by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      or they could constantly go in circles chasing the cheap through constant relocation.

      I bet you a Coke this will always happen. For example, I put forward the Dell facility in Ireland that was closed because they moved the plant to Poland because of cheaper costs.

    13. Re:Overstated consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is also why it's better for American workers if the US adopts a relaxed immigration and naturalization policy combined with selective protectionist barriers against under-regulated countries vs. the other way around.

    14. Re:Overstated consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering if the stuff I say as AC gets through, but yeah I've been making that point a few times. Would be nice if enough people also relayed this to the congress-critters so that free trade can be re-evaluated.

      If we want to have free trade, it should be done on equitable terms. Members in the agreement should be held to the same standards and scrutiny that inflict costs upon the markets involved. (EPA, OSHA, S-OX, etc. or some agreeable equivalents) Otherwise the players in the game are not on the same footing, why should we agree to play when some participants are "cheating" and doing so in a very blatant manner. Many of the current free trade agreements are skewed in an unfair manner, and we should get out of them. And if a re-do of free trade means we have to inspect foreign operations, and let other countries do the same to ours - it's still worth it. Ensures that the world economy game is being played by the rules that would make free trade actually worthwhile.

      (As for why I post AC? I'm not bothered enough to register. I'm not too concerned about making karma-points or whether my views in general are popular, what I say should stand or fail on its own without previous points biasing one way or another.)

  9. Three words by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    Redundant routes duh

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'll just have to get redundant anchors then. ;)

  10. Gauntlet != Gantlet by hedronist · · Score: 2, Informative

    Arrrrgggghhhh! From Bartleby.com:

    A gauntlet is "a heavy glove, often armored" or "a glove with a heavy cuff covering part of the arm." To throw down the gauntlet is to challenge someone; to pick up the gauntlet is to accept someone's challenge.

    A gantlet is "a lane between two lines of people armed with staves or whips, through which someone being punished is forced to run while being clubbed or whipped by the people on either side" (run the gantlet) and, figuratively, "any series of trials and difficulties."

    Grumble grumble ...

    1. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by Xolotl · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually gauntlet is the preferred spelling for both, although the etymology behind the use of gauntlet for punishment is different (the first meaning is from French, the second from Spanish). Gantlet is also correct, although archaic, for both.

      See: gauntlet.

    2. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Are they pronounced the same?

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    3. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn!

    4. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by demonbug · · Score: 1

      According to the all-powerful Google:define (and the Oxford Dictionary), gantlet appears to be an alternative spelling of Gauntlet. They do, in fact, mean the same thing(s).

      Thanks for playing, though.

    5. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for kindly pointing out that the OP is really just yet another of the many on the web who think they're a lot smarter than they really are.

      Oh wait, this is /. That's everyone here. As you were.

    6. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      Arrrrgggghhhh! From Bartleby.com:

      A gauntlet is "a heavy glove, often armored" or "a glove with a heavy cuff covering part of the arm." To throw down the gauntlet is to challenge someone; to pick up the gauntlet is to accept someone's challenge.

      A gantlet is "a lane between two lines of people armed with staves or whips, through which someone being punished is forced to run while being clubbed or whipped by the people on either side" (run the gantlet) and, figuratively, "any series of trials and difficulties."

      Grumble grumble ...

      If it's important enough to use "must" twice before running it, it can be spelled "gauntlet". I'm not sure what the rule is if "must" is used thrice though.

    7. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      I doubt it matters, both words have no real meaning in modern day society anyway, so their only significance is historical.

    8. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny

      And here I thought a 'Gantlet' was a chart which showed exactly when you would be hit with whips and staves, so that each hit would come after the ones before it and only when there were enough people and whips available to do it.

    9. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by camperdave · · Score: 1
      A gantlet is "a lane between two lines of people armed with staves or whips, through which someone being punished is forced to run while being clubbed or whipped by the people on either side"

      Sort of like the Klingon Rite of Ascencion, then?

      Actually, Bartleby Says:

      If you are not sure whether you should throw down the gantlet or the gauntlet, don't throw in the towel. There are two words spelled gauntlet and both have gantlet as a spelling variant, so you can't go wrong.

      So, if you can't go wrong, I'm not sure what's gotten you worked up.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      Actually, the Oxford English Dictionary lists "Gantlet" as a subset of Gauntlet under sense 7. I would link to the entry, but it's behind a firewall. Furthermore, Merriam-Webster's Concise Dictionary of English Usage says:

      Some confusion exists about the status of these spelling variants. The argument is sometimes heard that they represent etymologically distinct words, and that gantlet is the only correct choice--or at least the preferable one--in the common phrase run the ga(u)ntlet. This argument is mistaken.

      Then it goes on to describe why.

      Given that the OED hasn't found a distinct difference between the two and that MW's linguists agree with the OED, I think you're wrong and being an incorrect prescriptivist.

    11. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      As ballast to the parent's argument, I'll observe that major language authorities agree, as I describe in this comment.

    12. Re:Gauntlet != Gantlet by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Would this be an appropriate juncture for the "your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter" meme?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  11. optical links by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Instead of cables, which can be broken, they could use optical links.

    Due to the distance and bandwidth needed, powerful lasers would be needed.

    Since vast stretches of open water need to be covered, an aquatic platform would be needed, one that could be repositioned for optimal spacing or to avoid obstacles.

    Unlike other gratuitous mentions, this really is a case were we could use some frikin sharks, with frikin lasers mounted on their heads.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:optical links by geobeck · · Score: 0

      We're talking about some pretty powerful lasers here. Would a shark be able to support such a giant (significant pause) "la-ser"?

      Besides, the cost of such a concept might run as high as (significant pause) one mil-li-on dol-lars!

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    2. Re:optical links by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Are you a member of the Flat Earth Society?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:optical links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong. I've got the two words that fix this problem: semaphore towers.

      It will put a lot of people back to work, too...

    4. Re:optical links by xtant21 · · Score: 1

      How about we just retro-fit all of the sharks with frickin' lazer beams on their heads? We could then have a massive mesh laser beam network bouncing off of sharks heads from one side of the Med to the other.

    5. Re:optical links by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Great.
      All the Terrorists need is a few buckets of dead fish to disrupt the Intarweb.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  12. isn't this obvious by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

    "The team found that removing links that connect two nodes each with a large number of connections has a disproportionately large effect on a network's performance." Did we need a researcher to perform experiments to figure this out?

    --
    Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
    Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
  13. O Brave Achilles by Gizzmonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Asia! I know your Internet access hangs rather perilously, but calm yourself! I've written a song about it!

    (somber, drum beat a la "Ballad of the Green Berets")

    O Brave Achilles
    Your packets spill
    Through the Black Sea
    and the Dardanelles

    A hero bold
    So proud and true
    The finest bits
    Traverse his tubes

    But when the Fates
    Judge the big wet
    Will their fell looms
    Cut the Internet?

    (LUTE SOLO)

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:O Brave Achilles by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Every song should have a lute solo.

    2. Re:O Brave Achilles by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Funny

      lute solo

      Is that Han's younger brother?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:O Brave Achilles by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      No song should have a lute solo.

      There fixed that for you.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  14. Tell that to Clint Eastwood by localroger · · Score: 1

    Because I'm sure as hell not going to tell him.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  15. I am torn... by mckwant · · Score: 1

    Torn between being happy knowing how to use the word properly, but having (yet) ANOTHER thing about which to be a grammar nazi.

    So thank you, but only a little bit. No, slightly less than that.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
    1. Re:I am torn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Grammar nazi's have no reason to complain about the gauntlet/gantlet confusion, as it is not a grammatical issue.

      God bless apostrophe's.

  16. Uncharted by dj015 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Though there is abviously no excuse for the cables that have been there for a while with newer cables you often find that they have been layed straight through what was once an anchorage as they get closer to shore and nobody has "gotten around" to updating any of the charts yet. I had this situation in the Azores a while back when we anchored in what was shown in all charts and publications to be the only anchorage available only to be met on the dock by a not so friendly police man shouting something in Portuguese along the lines of we just laid a load of fiber optic cables through there and your anchor is on top of them... of course we moved immediately into the port which was what we planed to do in the afternoon but when we asked the Harbour Master why there had been no notice to mariners about the new cabled a shrug of the shoulders was the most informative answer we could get.

    1. Re:Uncharted by eth1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those cables must have been laid by amateurs. The lengths cable-layers normally go to accurately chart their cables and avoid areas where people anchor are quite impressive.

  17. Airborne by SebaSOFT · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What if you put the cables floating with 10k millions of balloons?

    1. Re:Airborne by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      You've been playing World of Goo a bit too much.

  18. Maybe by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe Cthulhu will quit trashing the lines if we offer to set him up a frame r'lyeh switch back at his pad. You know he's all about pirating the tentacle pr0n.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wrong ocean.

      R'lyeh is a sunken city located deep under the Pacific Ocean and is where the godlike being Cthulhu is buried.

  19. "the Med"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi USA. It's nice that you're writing about the Mediterranean, but please, don't call it "the Med". We know you like to shorting words (it seems there are many pedophiles crossings [ped xing] in the USA). But we really like to call the our beloved sea "Mediterranean".

    Thanks
    Mediterraneans

    1. Re:"the Med"? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Hi Anonymous Coward, please do not abbreviate our country as USA. It is The United States of America. As a matter of fact, do not abbreviate anything. Ever.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:"the Med"? by hey · · Score: 1

      Please refer to the USA as The United States of America.

    3. Re:"the Med"? by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      LOL--"do not abbreviate anything. Ever." Read your "sig" lately?

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    4. Re:"the Med"? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      LOL--"do not abbreviate anything. Ever." Read your "sig" lately?

      Well, he's an American so he probably has a gun. Maybe he's referring to his SIG Sauer? ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:"the Med"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Oh, shoot, look at the time. I have to go take my Mediterraneans.

    6. Re:"the Med"? by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      Is that really a stereotype of Americans--that we all have guns?

      I guess I'd like to have a hunting arm, but have never had anyone volunteer to take me hunting, so I've had no need. Besides, I don't need a gun. I have ten kids. If anyone were to break into my house, I'd just yell, "Hey, kids, it's your long-lost uncle Leo! Give him a hug!"

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  20. The new US Autocracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why should we be trying to get a federal system for socialized healthcare? I mean I just think it's a step in the wrong direction. If you think about it, do you really expect a system run by the US Federal system won't be horribly inefficient and prone to massive amounts of corruption? Also where is this money going to come from. No doubt it will come as yet another increase in taxes that will basically subsidize the poor and just shift the bill from insurance companies to a middle class payroll tax.

    Government regulation and meddling in the Healthcare industry is what got the United States in this HMO nightmare and you're saying that more Government intervention is going to solve it? Perhaps we need less Government interference and let the companies do their job. Healthcare probably wouldn't be as horrible if it wasn't for the mandates on the insurance company providing everything and the emphasis on having healthcare tied to an employer we would all have affordable healthcare.

    Please keep in mind that this Universal Healthcare will be truly free only to the unemployeed and extremely poor. Your hard earned tax dollars will go into a mandatory pool of money to pay for this possibly inefficient system. I would rather the States take it upon themselves, with some Federal assistance, to provide healthcare for their citizens. It's a hell of a lot easier to jump State than to apply for a Visa to another country and stick it out there. If Massechusetts wasn't government paid for healthcare for everyone while Utah doesn't then so be it. Let the local Governments, a truer representation of the local populations, decide it out rather than the ivory tower that is Washington D.C. Haven't we spent enough money already?

    I really think people (especially hardline Democrats) should stop relying on their Government for every single thing. It's still going to be your money paying for the thing, might be better to reform the system and actually be able to have a real choice.

  21. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I don't see the problem - split the world, we don't much care about them or they about us.

  22. Actually, Gauntlet == Gantlet, chief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's always fun to get to use a pompous, self-indulgent know-it-all's own "sources" against him.

    http://www.bartleby.com/68/95/2695.html

  23. Conspiracy Theories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think that the US govt should just provide Europe and Asia a free, high speed satellite link for all their traffic to route thru instead of thru undersea cables. The traffic will be all safe and reliable, and of course would be 100% snoopage free.

  24. Alright, I'll say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better and stronger cables are urgently needed to avoid a re-occurrence of the 2008 outages.

    I call bullshit...

    Smarter, and fiscally responsible ship's captains are needed to prevent future outages like 2008's...

  25. ...except by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    >> Better and stronger cables are urgently needed to avoid a re-occurrence of the 2008 outages." ...Except I seem to recall that it appeared to be deliberate sabotage, as in both big cases of the Mediterranean outages, multiple key cables all went down within hours of each other after years of no problems.

    Just laying stronger cables obviously won't make much of a difference if it was indeed sabotage.

    1. Re:...except by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The secret services have since times immemorial understood to cover up their work as random accidents. Iran just happens to be at the other end of those cables... Don't take an international politics expert to connect the dots.

  26. because by moxley · · Score: 1

    Because somebody keeps cutting the cables and blaming it on ship anchors?

  27. Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Italy being shaped like a boot have anything to do with the Achilles' Heel?

  28. Achilles heel? For whom? by edmicman · · Score: 1

    Partially tongue-in-cheek, partially serious....but my Internet in the US works just fine to connect to other US destinations likely without passing through the Mediterranean. 99.9% of my destinations are US-based and hosted - I know the US isn't the center of the world, but this sounds like an Achilles' Heel for the *other* side of the world :-P

  29. Yup, didn't affect me at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could still contact my favourite servers in Japan from the Netherlands, so as far as I'm concerned the outages didn't happen.

  30. more landings by hey · · Score: 1

    Seems to me if they had more landings (eg multiple landings per country per cable) then it would be more robust. Probably most of the breaks happen close-ist to shore so have a backbone in the middle (or 10 miles out) at a landing every so often.

    And software that can route around a land-10-mile break.

    1. Re:more landings by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      How does this cure the problem? These cable breaks are IMHO deliberate, and have been done to install high bandwidth tapping devices probably by us, but possible by the Israelis, Chinese, French, or Brits.

  31. Re:Israeli wire cutting by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given the Holocaust Israel is committing right now in Gaza

          Spoken by a true student of... er, no, not history that's for sure. This isn't a holocaust, it's a mere reconnaissance in force. Call me when they start burning over 20,000 people a day for the crime of "Not Being Israeli". THEN you'll have your holocaust.

          Why do people scream "war crimes", "genocide" and "holocaust" all the time since the war in the Balkans? War is ugly. Chuck rockets at your neighbor and what do you expect? I'm sure Canada wouldn't tolerate it from the US. We'd have to invade them and burn down their White House again.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  32. Why sea cables? by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Europe and Asia are connected by land. While it might have to divert around a few non-cooperative countries, you'd think that sufficient backbone could be laid down over land routes to all necessary countries. It seems like underwater cables would be used only when absolutely necessary (such as from North America to Europe or Austrialia to Asia - and even then satellite is available (though with higher latency and lower bandwidth).

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    1. Re:Why sea cables? by qw0ntum · · Score: 1

      It also seems like it might be more expensive and/or complicated to lay cable overland for thousands of miles versus underwater for thousands of miles. Think about what moves on the sea floor. Now think about what moves around on earth's surface. Now think about getting a right-of-way across Asia and coordinating with all the governments and private landowners that you'd have to deal with. So I think it is probably easier just to drop a cable under the ocean, since it's going to be more protected from people and probably just simpler all around.

      --
      'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    2. Re:Why sea cables? by supernova87a · · Score: 1

      according to an article (referenced below, very entertaining article which I suggest you read when you have the time), laying undersea cable a bit safer than overland, because "anyone with a bulldozer" can be a fool and do damage to your line.

      see here (again, one of the best articles I've ever read):
      http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/ffglass.html
      or here
      http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/OpEd/virtual/stephenson.html

    3. Re:Why sea cables? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Why sea cables? Europe and Asia are connected by land. While it might have to divert around a few non-cooperative countries, you'd think that sufficient backbone could be laid down over land routes to all necessary countries.

      Because laying land cables is extraordinarily expensive - after all, sea bed is free while someone owns the land. Another problem is that you'll be laying cable across some pretty tough and inhospitable terrain far from civilization, which raises maintenance costs considerably. Finally, if you actually look at a map rather than just say "you'd think", you'll note the lack of cooperative and stable countries on the land route.

    4. Re:Why sea cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now think about getting a right-of-way across Asia and coordinating with all the governments and private landowners that you'd have to deal with.

      Which would probably be either re-using railroad right-of-ways or re-using major road right-of-ways.

    5. Re:Why sea cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? Worked great for gas.

    6. Re:Why sea cables? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Europe and Asia are connected by land. While it might have to divert around a few non-cooperative countries, you'd think that sufficient backbone could be laid down over land routes to all necessary countries.

      Well, lets exclude Iraq, Iran, and Afganistan. Then exclude running a cable over the Himilayas. Then you pretty much have to run it undeasea to get to India. Even if you did try a Himilayan route, that would probably end up going through China. How's that great firewall coming? Want to get it in the water before those countries, then you run it through Saudi Arabia. My guess is that it would be hard to lay a pipe filled with 50% porn and get them to look the other way. And the shortest rout out of Africa goes through places like Ethopia and Somalia. So running it through the Med and only really touching one country, Egypt, and you are done with it and that seems so much easier than the land routes. The problem is that it is also much less redundant. And with the existing capacity, it's easier to route from London to India through the US than to try to get someone that went around Aftica all undersea. But that's about the only politically feasable way of getting fiber to India and beyond that doesn't run undersea through the Med.

    7. Re:Why sea cables? by Beretta+Vexe · · Score: 1

      Somalian undersea cable will give an all new meaning to internet piracy.

         

    8. Re:Why sea cables? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Run cables all throughout Europe (if they aren't there already) and then run the cables down through Greece, Turkey and other friendly countries into the Red Sea and through to Asia or so.
      I see no reason why the cables have to run down the length of the Mediterranean (up until you hit Turkey or so, all the countries it would need to run through are part of the EU now so it would be easy to just draw up an EU wide set of rules for it)

    9. Re:Why sea cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir I will lay you this sufficient backbone! I have choice very cheap labor. Come from Meditranean country. My employe can kill shark with laser beam. Lots of shark in Mediterran. This why cables break so much.

      If please enlist my service, I build with shark laborers a very good network. Please advice!

    10. Re:Why sea cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent written by someone who hasn't looked at a map or understood geopolitics. Sigh.

      a) Overland routes are less reliable. There's more people operating digging equipment on land than on the sea bed. That translates into lots of outages.

      b) Sea bed in international waters is free to use. Negotiating right of way/wayleave on land is a pain. Using existing rights-of-way such as railways, motorways, canals, pipelines, electricity distribution, etc is already done. However (a) still hits you.

      c) Idiots of application programmers have no concept of latency. When these applications get rolled out, users of telecommunication networks demand the lowest latency links possible (and then some) - so a possible backup route round the coast of Africa is not used because it adds an extra 100 ms or so. I have seen client server apps developed on fast Ethernet LANs with the client on the same segment as the server. Oddly, it didn't work when the client was a few thousand kilometres away on the other end of a 256kbit/s link. The programmers blamed the network.

      d) Longer routes cost more.

      e) Even if applications do understand latency, routing doesn't. EIGRP tries to get costing right, but it is a difficult problem in large networks - but using BGP or IS-IS (as most do) means that it is not easy to get the right balance between choosing the lowest latency route and the highest bandwidth route. When you need to make this decision on every packet that passes through a 10 Gbit/s interface, you can't use a lot of cpu cycles trying to decide. RSVP tried to address this, but is/was even less popular than IPv6.

      f) if you truly understand that telecoms links are not reliable, and can vary dramatically in latency, and build your business processes around that, then outages and brownouts won't affect you. The ones complaining are the ones who thought they could get away without proper backup processes. Obviously, you can get way with it for a while...

    11. Re:Why sea cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm... take a look at a map and some leason's it politics and history.

    12. Re:Why sea cables? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Europe and Asia are connected by land. While it might have to divert around a few non-cooperative countries, you'd think that sufficient backbone could be laid down over land routes to all necessary countries.

      You'd think the same for gas pipelines :) When it comes to "non-cooperative countries" things start getting complex.

  33. Re:Israeli wire cutting by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Canada wouldn't tolerate it from the US. We'd have to invade them and burn down their White House again.

    You'll run out of ice to skate on, Mountie!

    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  34. Sharks with friggin' lasers on their heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all that is needed to stop the dozeoids dragging their anchors across the cables.

  35. "The Internet routes around damage" by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to the idea that the Internet routes around damage? I can no longer connect to vesti.ru because the route from my ISP to Moscow goes through Telia's routers and they no longer peer with Russia either through design, damage, or poor maintenance. Shouldn't the packets get rerouted if a particular link is down?

    1. Re:"The Internet routes around damage" by Beretta+Vexe · · Score: 1

      "Shouldn't the packets get rerouted if a particular link is down?" In a perfect world, yes it must be rerouted.

      In real world ISP have peering contract between them, they usually share some amount of bandwidth for free ( balanced usages form two neighborhood, etc ... ) but charge for the extra ( you use my infrastructure and it have a cost ).

      So most of the ISP and large network infrastructure provider ( backbone, undersea cable, etc ..) will not forward rerouted packet for free.

      Pro. it's encourage big ISP to be directly connect to each other. that mean cheap "regional" bandwidth for the ISP and an high density network.

      Con. It's make the inter continental/regional traffic expensive and unwanted. That one of the reasons ISP hate P2P traffic. Minor player are isolated and vulnerable, their are not interesting for big player ( few bad peering contract ).

  36. Backup links by wsanders · · Score: 1

    The current model is that most providers lease space from a competitor for the time it takes to repair their own link. That's a hell of a lot cheaper than laying extra cable, or allowing your service to go completely dead. Ownership of the cable (like terrestrial lines) is a web of consortiums and leaseholds that make the cost of providing some redundancy a lot less than 2X.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  37. Is there some reason by e-scetic · · Score: 1

    Why these cables can't be buried? Of course if you just plop them down on the seabed then you're going to run into trouble.

    1. Re:Is there some reason by Beretta+Vexe · · Score: 1

      It's already hard for an offshore oil platform to dig in deep see. It's nearly impossible in this case. Their are not such think as submersible bulldozer robot and the seabed composition is mostly unknown.

      Doing anything in high deep is extremely expensive too

  38. So... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    ...am I the only one here who thinks that the time for satellite data links is pretty much upon us? If stringing data cables under the Med. (or anywhere else for that matter) is such a gawdawful issue then perhaps we need to think more about punting a few more data sats up into orbit as a solution. Granted, the Great Old ones could re-hatch and eat them but that's what we have Hellboy for.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geosync satellite suck due to the ~1.5 second round-trip times.

      LEO satellites have other issues. Mostly cost.

      Running cable across sea floors is a *lot* less expensive.

    2. Re:So... by Jason+daHaus · · Score: 1

      Thats all well and good until a solar storm wipes out the the sats...

  39. More routes needed. by john.picard · · Score: 1

    There just need to be more point-to-point routes between major cities and across country borders. Yes, it is also a good idea to run cables underwater, but the more routes exist, the more likely it is that when a cable is cut somewhere (whether deliberately, accidentally, or due to an act of God), the traffic will automatically be routed around the damaged area.

  40. multicast, and overflowing by network congestion by cpghost · · Score: 1

    What if your favorite DNS server happens to use a multicast address, and for some strange routing reasons, your queries get routed to the other side of the world... perhaps through the Med, every now and then? Or if you even happend to be an mDNS early adopter/tester/developer/..., and the same happens? And even if you didn't look so far, network links get congested, and traffic could easily overflow to peering networks, and this could very well mean, that ISP A and ISP B, both in the US, transmit packets through Asia or Europe as a congestion-avoidance measure. As a matter of fact, it happens quite frequently (and the other way around too).

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  41. Re:Israeli wire cutting by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    We'd have to invade them and burn down their White House again.

    You mean you'd have to get your British friends to do it for you? ;)

    Besides, we all know the US and Canada will never come to blows. In the worst case scenario it will just be decided by a winner-take-all game of ice hockey. If the Americans win you'll see millions of people screaming "USA! USA! USA!" If we lose we'll just go back to watching football (no, not that "football") because who gives a shit about ice hockey anyway? ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  42. Re:Israeli wire cutting by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 1

    Guess who else uses white phosphorus? That's right, the good old US of A.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4417024.stm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4442988.stm

    PS: I'm an American.

    --
    www.isoHunt.com
  43. One acronym: RTFA by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    The problem, as TFA itself says is that the non-Mediterranean routes would be through politically-unstable countries or regions, like eastern Turkey (site of a long-running conflict between the Kurdish minority and the government), Iraq, Iran, etc.

  44. Net Topology is Political by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    If performance to half way round the world was comparable to performance locally, oh what a world it would be! We might see breakthroughs in international co-operation, from the grassroots popular level up. Nationalist isolationism would be relegated to the old farts (defined as one who has never twittered. Shit that's me.)

    Yes I know there are unavoidable speed of light related latency issues with distance, but I'm saying that efforts should be made to make raw throughput (bandwidth) comparable from arbitrary point to arbitrary point on the Internet, and that work should be done to keep latency to the bare minimum mandated by physics.

    Seriously, there should be an international standards organisation with teeth mandating highly redundant, high-performance interconnectivity worldwide. It's a matter of
    life and death.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  45. Re:Israeli wire cutting by couchslug · · Score: 1

    The US is behind the IDF in smoke operations, even the non-controversial sort.

    WP is the most effective obscurant. Note the burn times in the FAS link and consider how an advancing force needs to reduce enemy vision.If the IDF wanted to target civilians instead of merely accept the risk of injuring a few they'd have set the fuzes for ground burst.

    Fun fact:
    The media like to show photos of airburst WP rounds (note the WP-impregnated felt sprinkling downwards) but generally does NOT show the thick clouds of smoke they produce.

    http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/smoke.htm

    Typical airburst pic, usually shown without related images, but there are more here:

    http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/84166551/Getty-Images-News

    If you scroll down and click on the "similar images" link, then check "boom" "shell" "Gaza Strip" "horizontal", you'll see the clouds of smoke produced!

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  46. Re:Israeli wire cutting by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "I'm sure Canada wouldn't tolerate it from the US. We'd have to invade them and burn down their White House again."

    Don't think you need to wait for an excuse!

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  47. Re:multicast, and overflowing by network congestio by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

    But, if the route's down, wouldn't another route be tried?

    After all, that's the original purpose of the Internet - to route around points of failure if possible.

    The scenario you mention of course happens all the time, but if a massive link goes down somewhere on the other side of the world, and mDNS can't deal with that, then that seems like a bug that needs to be fixed in mDNS, not a problem with the network itself. Of course, your latency may be higher and your connection may have less bandwidth, if you can't route around congestion, but it's better than trying to send your packets through India when the link doesn't exist.

  48. Re:Israeli wire cutting by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    Yep I'm American too and I've seen the twisted burned bodies in Falluja.
    I've never seen what white phosphor does to peopl,e so first I thought they tested some
    new microwave weapon on them.. then somebody told me it's WP.

  49. Re:Israeli wire cutting by gd23ka · · Score: 0, Troll

    I know, I know, we all tend to blow things out of proportion. You're right of course
    this is just a friendly neighborly knock on the door to check if everybody is okay,
    just like the Nazi humanitarian mission in Poland was.

    "Why do people scream "war crimes", "genocide" and "holocaust" all the time since the war in the Balkans?"

    Hmmm... maybe because of all the death and destruction? And ethnic cleansing that's going on?
    Who knows? I mean that's just my personal half-baked theory.

  50. Redundancy the other way? by srothroc · · Score: 1

    I don't know much about the physical topology of the internet, but how come there isn't any redundancy the other way? String a few cables to Russia, to Asia through them. It seems to me like the Bering Strait would be a much shorter and simpler hop than the Mediterranean.

  51. Re:Israeli wire cutting by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "Yep I'm American too and I've seen the twisted burned bodies in Falluja."

    In person? Details?

    Desert heat and decay make for propaganda-genic corpses. There are lots of such photos for the Googling.

    Of course WP is legal to use against combatant personnel (so is napalm), but there aren't many WP casualties to show for it. Many bodies are "twisted" due to being killed in combat.

    Some famous Gulf War examples of generic non-WP casualties.
    http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0212/pt_index.html

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  52. Re:Israeli wire cutting by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    Nothing really like what you're showing me here. It kind of looked like they had
    melted, limbs bloated and contorted. I didn't poke any but I'm pretty sure
    they were dry as sticks more like mummies which was why I first thought some energy
    weapon got used on them. And would I really know? There have been reports of microwave
    weapon tests on the Iraqi population.

    The footage was shown to the European parliament in Strasbourg. Two MPs attended, one
    guy was reading a newspaper the other working on his laptop.

  53. this is by doubletrigger · · Score: 1
    "For political reasons, the Mediterranean Sea is an Internet bottleneck through which the majority of traffic between Europe and Asia is squeezed."

    "bottleneck" makes it sound like a negative. maybe Thermopylae 2.0 is a better term.

  54. Is there any reason... by Xest · · Score: 1

    ...we have to have cables under the med? If they haven't noticed, you can go from Portugal in Western Europe down to the southern tip of South Africa all the way to the North Eastern tip of Russia by land.

    Sure you still have the earthquake issue but you don't have the boat issue and it's not as if gas and oil pipelines don't already have to deal with these problems along these routes.

    Is it really easier and cheaper to run cables undersea than over land? even when maintenance is taken into account?

    I can understand the pacific/atlantic cables, but the EMEA region and Asia? Is it just down to wanting to have cables that take the most direct route to drop latency as much as possible?

  55. A good article about this subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For anyone interested in cable laying, this lengthy article is well worth a read.

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/ffglass.html

    BTW, I'm disappointed at the lack of conspiracy theory posts. Where's the USS Jimmy Carter nowdays?

  56. More Alternatives, Some Speculative by BBCWatcher · · Score: 1
    1. Satellite links, primarily as backup. LEO satellites are better, if possible.
    2. Microwave links, again primarily as backup. Requires line of sight hops but might be appropriate to "skip over" certain places. The taller the towers, the more geography that can be skipped.
    3. Tethered balloons. (The U.S. uses these on its borders in its aerostat system.)
    4. A polar cable route, such as Norway to Alaska to Japan. With global warming this route becomes increasingly practical, but it might be technically possible already with the help of a submarine.
    5. Mesh hops. Scatter numerous radioisotope-powered repeaters along the sea bed and let them chat with each other. Drop a few more every so often to keep the mesh sufficiently healthy.
    6. Local network rerouting. As a backup, reroute traffic over the various national short-haul networks between India and Europe. Pay for carriage and let the various countries in between compete.
  57. what if the next cable is cut by an asteroid? by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    Mediterranean isn't just at threat from ships cutting cables with their anchors, politics, wars, earthquakes, and volcanoes, but also from asteroids as powerful as two Little Boys. I guess there is no good cable defence against a big asteroid, is there?

  58. Where Are The Photos? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Has anyone (other than the repairmen themselves) actually _seen_ one of these broken / damaged cables? It should be pretty obvious how they were damaged, at least discriminating between anchor cuts and crushings, tool marks from big honking cable cutters wielded by evil Special Ops types, and the "stretch until it breaks" scenario (presumably what happens when an earthquake occurs).

    So let's see some photos, folks, of the actual damaged cables. Or is someone just making all this crap up?

  59. Re:Israeli wire cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people was hanged after the Nuremberg trials for doing precisely the same thing the israelis do: kicking people out of their houses at gunpoint, killing them if necessary, and then settling their land.