Slashdot Mirror


Virus Infection Hits UK's Ministry of Defense, Including Warships

Retrovirus writes with a link to a Register story which says that the UK's "Ministry of Defence confirmed today that it has suffered virus infections which have shut down 'a small number' of MoD systems, most notably including admin networks aboard Royal Navy warships."

290 comments

  1. B-5 by Grinfell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somebody sunk their Battleship.

    1. Re:B-5 by Big+Nothing · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm shocked to find that Windows based computers are subject to virus infections! SHOCKED!

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    2. Re:B-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, the sea battles of tomorrow :)

    3. Re:B-5 by calmofthestorm · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm shocked Windows is considered secure enough for said systems. Hell, I wouldn't trust the BSDs with that.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    4. Re:B-5 by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Admin system, not OPS. The ships still run fine, they just lost stuff like crew performance reviews. Quoting TFA: "purposes such as storekeeping, email and similar support functions." That said, the article notes that the loss of email for the crew was a significant blow to morale since that's how most of them kept in touch with their families. Anyone in the military knows how important mail call is.

    5. Re:B-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what would you trust?
      Some proprietary OS from a military contractor? DieboldOS?
      Something developed in-house?
      OpenBSD is developed by some of the very best computer security experts. There is no way that any non-superpower government or contractor can top that.
      In fact, even DARPA funded OpenBSD for a short while until Theo de Raadt was put into the Axis of Evil. It is likely that they still use portions or a version of OpenBSD for high security networks.

    6. Re:B-5 by Myrddin+Wyllt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course - they would be crazy to use Windows for their operational systems, right?

      --
      [ ]Half Empty [ ]Half Full [x]Twice as big as it needs to be
    7. Re:B-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still incredibly stupid to use windows for any of that.

      I cant believe how ragingly stupid the royal navy is. but oh well... It's not like they are even a relevant military force.

    8. Re:B-5 by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 1

      Yeah the Theo thing is shady. Oh well, DODBSD probably going to be forked real soon ;p

    9. Re:B-5 by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes... everyone likes to trivialize the non-essential non-combat functions until suddenly there's no grog.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:B-5 by robthebloke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can't wait to see what happens after the £20bn Trident update. I'm not sure I'd feel safe knowing Norton is a required install on the next generation of nuclear missiles...

    11. Re:B-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There hasn't been grog on Royal Navy ships since 1970, so it's hard to blame that one on Microsoft.

    12. Re:B-5 by Migraineman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But this *is* a critical system. If you know your opponent's logistics capabilities, you can very effectively plan around his resupply requirements (or worse, pin him down and play the attrition card.) The MoD is playing it down, but it's a big deal.

    13. Re:B-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commander: Ensign Yukaybhedam!
      Ensign: Yes, Commander?
      Commander: Click the "Upload virus..." button!
      Ensign: Yes, Commander!
      Commander: We've got them now!!!

    14. Re:B-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guessing people in the military have enough on their minds rather than learning a new operating system, whether linux or mac!

    15. Re:B-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm shocked to find that Windows based computers are subject to virus infections! SHOCKED!

      I do not think that phrase implies what you think it implies.

      Also, it should be "shocked, SHOCKED! to find..."

    16. Re:B-5 by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Navy SysEngr: Well the good news is the ship has been pwned and is sending out spam

      Admiral: That's the 'Good news'? what the hell is the bad news?

      Navy SysEngr: It's being delivered by ICBM...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    17. Re:B-5 by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Admin system, not OPS. The ships still run fine, they just lost stuff like crew performance reviews. Quoting TFA: "purposes such as storekeeping, email and similar support functions."

      Aside from the morale issues with email you noted, storekeeping is hardly a trivial function. A ship that "runs fine" is as much a function of morale and administrative functions as anything else.

    18. Re:B-5 by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      And pretty soon the entire crew has scurvy due to lack of limes.

    19. Re:B-5 by hughk · · Score: 2, Informative

      The QM stores are a critical item. Many, many years ago I was involved in a project deploying VAXes (11/725, I think) onto ships. The computers not only look after stock levels, they also say where stores are, that is which bin to look in. If your ship has just had a major malfunction or suffered a hit, finding the spares to effect a repair is a priority.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    20. Re:B-5 by budgenator · · Score: 1

      They can still shoot, but can't order more bullets.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    21. Re:B-5 by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The US Military has already been trained in Linux, they were trained to use it in the most difficult and obtuse means available; it was a clear case of malicious obedience. They did the same thing to kill JINTACCS, Joint Interoperability of Tactical Command and Control Systems.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    22. Re:B-5 by mpe · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked to find that Windows based computers are subject to virus infections! SHOCKED!

      It would probably be bad judgement for the US military to use Windows computers for anything other than the most trivial of tasks. For the military of any other country to touch the stuff with a bargepole is utterly daft.

    23. Re:B-5 by mpe · · Score: 1

      But this *is* a critical system. If you know your opponent's logistics capabilities, you can very effectively plan around his resupply requirements (or worse, pin him down and play the attrition card.)

      Or even worse work out how to disrupt your opponent's supply lines using the minimum of your own forces.

    24. Re:B-5 by jd · · Score: 1

      Admiral: Well, at least it's not SMTP.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    25. Re:B-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone in the Military also knows that the loss of email is a significant blow to Operational aspects as well. Junior officers can only speak in one language (PowerPoint). To speak via burned CD has got to be a major setback!

  2. Switching to Windows by JohnFluxx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wasn't it big news about a year ago that the UK Navy were switching to Windows?

    Yeah, here it is:

    http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08%2F12%2F18%2F006226&from=rss

    Slashdot article from December 18 2008

    1. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A year is roughly 29 days long now?

    2. Re:Switching to Windows by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 1, Redundant

      December 18 2008 is last year but is not even a month ago :)

    3. Re:Switching to Windows by pejyel · · Score: 5, Interesting
      And it took hardly a month till they got infected...
      FTA:

      Since 6 Jan 09 the performance of the MOD IT systems in a number of areas was affected by a virus. Immediate action was taken to isolate the problem to stop the virus from spreading. This meant that some people were without regular IT access (i.e. email, internet). There have been no infections detected on any networks with sensitive information.

    4. Re:Switching to Windows by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least this isn't January 2000, or those 29 days would have been a whole millenium.

    5. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you just love when total idiots are operating weapon systems worth of hundreds of millions of tax payer dollars? (pounds, yens, pesetas...)

      Windoze is so easy... for viruses to penetrate.

    6. Re:Switching to Windows by pejyel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually the article you're linking to only refers to the nuclear submarines
      and the article doesn't tell whether this infection affected them as well.

      Still, I hope this gives second thoughts to any people in charge
      who considering to "spare money" by installing Windows on such sensitive systems...

    7. Re:Switching to Windows by pmontra · · Score: 2, Funny

      Noting that a new season of Battlestar Galactica premieres today the guys that decided to run the Royal Navy on Windows will say that's not their fault: it's an attack of the Cylons! They have a far superior technology and no existing antivirus could defend the ships.

      Ok, to be fair to the RN they're such an important target that an attacker would write a virus for any OS they run on, Linux, OSX, anything. However the network should have been protected. No USB drives, no connections with the outside, etc.

      Yes I know, the Cylons have other ways to get into the networks (usually nice looking blondes - Cylons are so unimaginative...) and maybe that's what happened.

    8. Re:Switching to Windows by MarkRose · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only leap years. The rest are 28 days long.

      --
      Be relentless!
    9. Re:Switching to Windows by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hah, no. The millennium started in January, 2001.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    10. Re:Switching to Windows by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too bad for the UK Defense department. It's just over the 7 day return policy for ordering goods over the internet, so they can't return Windows for a refund.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    11. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noting that a new season of Battlestar Galactica premieres today...it's an attack of the Cylons!...Yes I know, the Cylons have other ways to get into the networks (usually nice looking blondes - Cylons...

      You definitely have waited enough! Now, go have your medicine tonight! I have to wait for the DVD. (snif)

    12. Re:Switching to Windows by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      actually they haven't switched yet, so using your kind of reasoning this justifies their choice.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    13. Re:Switching to Windows by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2

      Ok, to be fair to the RN they're such an important target that an attacker would write a virus for any OS they run on, Linux, OSX, anything. However the network should have been protected. No USB drives, no connections with the outside, etc.

      Once again, you need two things to be able to write a virus :
      - resources
      - a flaw that allows it to infect the PC and spread to others

      There exist people with resources willing to make virus for such systems. That is true for any army in the world. That is why armies usually tend to be paranoiac about the flaws they could introduce in their systems. Spending billions and an army of hackers won't be able to create a flaw in a secure system. It is simply true that flaws are more common and less efficiently patched in Microsoft products than in any other.

      I would also like to point out that the virus allegedly did just disrupt some minor functionality (email, intranet access) for a few days in a non critical period. I doubt it was specifically tailored for this attack. It really looks like they caught a common virus.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    14. Re:Switching to Windows by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there was another article about the rest of the Navy switching to Windows iirc.

    15. Re:Switching to Windows by dethic · · Score: 3, Informative
    16. Re:Switching to Windows by KingMotley · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you read the article, you'd notice that the systems that were affected were the NavyStar email/internet servers. NavyStar servers are UNIX (HP NonStop G06) based, not Windows based. Also you should note that the mission critical systems (Like the Windows on Warships networks) were NOT affected.

      Please troll somewhere else. Or at least condemn the security of *nix based systems.

    17. Re:Switching to Windows by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks for finding that

    18. Re:Switching to Windows by 2Bits · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, when you are living in a window-less basement^^^ er, I mean, your command center, 29 days seems like a whole year :)

    19. Re:Switching to Windows by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And when that topic came up on slashdot I questioned the wisdom running windows on military hardware for security reasons and was laughed at since people took they view that this is the military, they're not going to network the boxes, they have more sense, it's not like they'd be connected to the net! god no!
      Well now I claim the right of "I told you so!"

    20. Re:Switching to Windows by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe the Norton 30-day trial has expired.

      --
      No sig today...
    21. Re:Switching to Windows by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They mention an e-mail system, so I wouldn't be surprised if they were running Exchange. For some reason, people seem to have trouble realizing that IMAP does basically everything that Exchange does, but with complete compatibility and reduced risk.

    22. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hear that depends on which ship you're serving on. Some of them have these crazy computer systems, and they can't work out what's wrong.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    23. Re:Switching to Windows by dominique_cimafranca · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I beg to disagree. A search of publicly available documents shows that NavyStar has Windows and DOS components. Fujitsu's ITSEC certification report (No. P230), in particular, shows Windows XP, Windows XPe, and DOS clients. See diagram on page 10.

      Also, the article doesn't say that the servers were hit. Only that the system was based on a server cabinet and cable-networked PCs. As I understand it, NavyStar is a hardware platform of ruggedized PC components.

    24. Re:Switching to Windows by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if you use the wrong calendar :)

    25. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The linked article states the the Royal Navy is "ahead of schedule" (i.e. not yet finished) for the switch on board nuclear submarines, wheras the virus apparently spread to "Royal Navy Warships" (i.e. not submarines)

      Not to mention theat the virus affected admin networks, wheras "Windows for Submarines" is referring to the instalation of windows on Command Networks (which I have to assume are physically separate)

      Sorry to burst your bubble of wild speculation, but if you read the articles the two appear to be fairly unrelated :-)

    26. Re:Switching to Windows by drsmithy · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is simply true that flaws are more common and less efficiently patched in Microsoft products than in any other.

      Evidence ?

    27. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd bother to RTFA, you'd realise that SMCS-NC runs on a sub and not on the ships affected. It also plainly states that none of the Command Systems were affected.

      But then again, why bother to RTFA when you can make a quick-and-ill-informed Windows-bashing post and get modded +5 for informative (it may be informative but it's totally irrelevant) by the /. pro-linux crowd?

    28. Re:Switching to Windows by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1
      http://adminfoo.net/2007/03/os-vulnerabilities-compared.html

      Oh, I know, it is a blog, not a reputed tech journalist, so you need a grain of salt. Well, here is the methodology :

      1. Install the OS as default-ly as possible. Scan it with nmap and Nessus during the installation. (for the chart, he ignored this) 2. At completion of installation, scan again. 3. Install relatively common listening services and scan again. 4. Install the latest 'major patch', and scan again. 5. Finally install all 'minor patches' published prior to Jan 1 2007, and scan again.

      The chart is quite interesting. FreeBSD, as the popular wisdom says, shows 0 vulnerabilities. All Linux default installs show zero vulns as well. When some services are activated, they tend to show less vulnerabilities.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    29. Re:Switching to Windows by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Let me ask you a question: if someone was born on 01.01.0 how old would he/she get at the 01.01.2000?

      There is no such person. There is no year zero.

    30. Re:Switching to Windows by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Not if you use ISO 8601:2004

    31. Re:Switching to Windows by jimicus · · Score: 2

      Because God knows nobody at the Ministry of Defence ever needs to schedule a meeting with a bunch of people.

    32. Re:Switching to Windows by mewsenews · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IMAP doesn't have a calendar, and Outlook's IMAP support is really terrible.

      Don't get me wrong, I hope Exchange/Outlook dies out, but IMAP is not a drop in replacement, server side or client side.

    33. Re:Switching to Windows by marcosdumay · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok. You didn't get it. Let me explayn...

      woooosh!

    34. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "woosh" has been sponsored by the Y2K-commitee

    35. Re:Switching to Windows by rastilin · · Score: 5, Funny

      On behalf of Slashdot I accept that you were right and that we should have listened to you. Furthermore I bestow upon you the title of "Psyker".

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    36. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMAP does basically everything that Exchange does

      I don't think you have any idea what you're talking about.

    37. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are drop in OSS solutions for that however I am not experienced enough to talk about them. I do know they exist.

    38. Re:Switching to Windows by BeardsmoreA · · Score: 1

      That's ISO 8601:2003 in THIS house you insensitive clod!

    39. Re:Switching to Windows by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we discussed this story (maybe not that particular one) on slashdot years ago.

      I remember commenting or at least reading the comments on it.

    40. Re:Switching to Windows by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      why bother to RTFA when you can make a quick-and-ill-informed Windows-bashing post and get modded +5 for informative (it may be informative but it's totally irrelevant) by the /. pro-linux crowd?

      You must be new here. I for one welcome our new inexperienced individual thinking AC overlords.

    41. Re:Switching to Windows by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Yes, but morons can install and admin exchange. That's worth any other feature you care to name.

    42. Re:Switching to Windows by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know, it is a blog, not a reputed tech journalist, so you need a grain of salt

      That is only the beginning of the problems:

      * It's 2 years out of date.
      * It's making some apples-to-oranges comparisons (eg: using XP Gold without similar era versions of Fedora/RH, etc)
      * There are at least two outright lies in the table - neither of the Vista "vulnerabilities" are remotely exploitable, and for them to even be present the default configuration must be changed so the firewall is disabled. (Refer to the source material.)

      All Linux default installs show zero vulns as well.

      As do up to date versions of Windows XP and Vista (or would, if the goalposts weren't moved).

      When some services are activated, they tend to show less vulnerabilities.

      Even a cursory glance at the table shows they're running fewer services. Hardly evidence from which one can draw a reliable conclusion.

      In short, it does little to support the assertion "it is simply true that flaws are more common and less efficiently patched in Microsoft products than in any other".

    43. Re:Switching to Windows by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      no but there is a year 1900, 1800, 1000 ect.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    44. Re:Switching to Windows by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      I guess even humans can be affected by the Y2k-problem, hehe :) .

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    45. Re:Switching to Windows by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      no but there is a year 1900, 1800, 1000 ect.

      Yes, but no year zero. In the Gregorian calendar, 31st December of 1 BC is followed by 1st January of 1 AD. Therefore the AD period reaches a hundred years old at the end of the year 100, not at the beginning of that year. Same for the millennia: the second millennium ended on the night of 31st December 2000.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    46. Re:Switching to Windows by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Let me ask you a question: if someone was born on 01.01.0 how old would he/she get at the 01.01.2000?

      There is no such person. There is no year zero.

      Sure there is: 01-01-1 BC == 01-01-0 AD. (discounting Julian / Gregorian / Hebrew calendar changes)

    47. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you greatly underestimate the abilities of people to write bad software. I assure you that we can find software with more flaws than even Microsoft's :). And, too be fair, people spend hundreds a man hours a minute trying to hack Windows, try and find another OS to compare that to.

      What is just unbelievably idiotic is connecting the system to the outside world. The old saying goes that the only secure computer is one locked in a basement and unplugged. They could at least not be plugged into the internet - or any general desktop environment that any user would ever use. The first rule of security is only allow necessary access. The minimum privileges model is older than any of us - and standard procedure in all non-technical aspects of the armed forces, besides for any half-assed sysadmin.

      I'm not Microsoft fan, but Microsoft isn't at fault here, and neither is their (IMHO crappy) OS. Windows is a generalized OS, with piles and piles of unnecessary cruft for this job - each line of code, each "feature" is an opportunity for a security flaw. That's not Microsoft's fault, it's a desktop system, not an OS for running spy satellites. It would be a lot more appropriate to run something like RTOS, QNX, or any of the slew of OSs designed for high-reliability embedded systems - and then KEEP SHIT OFF THE SYSTEM. Keep it disconnected, and as isolated as you can.

    48. Re:Switching to Windows by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      The study is a bit old, that is true. I would be interested in a more recent one, but this one is consistent with results that appeared in 2004 (during MS's get the fact campaign that claimed Windows superior security)

      Note that no up to date versions show vulnerabilities known by Nessus, which is something that one would expect from any decent software developer (including Microsoft). That means they patch within less than a few months their flaws. What is more interesting is looking at default installs, older than the Nessus version, how much the system was resilient to future threats.

      Running fewer services from a default install is a desirable feature, IMHO, but that is another debate. I think that one of the main problems of windows and one of its main infection vector was (I heard they made progress) its tendency to open ports and services that less than 1% of users will use or are even aware of.

      There is a single fact as well worthy of consideration (I was not sure that there was no exception but wikipedia seems to confirm it). There has never been a single virus for linux that could gain root control from a user's action. All the worms/virus that can hit linux boxes and spread are cross-platform (most of the time that means they target an application, like Apache, not an OS). We have yet to see a single virus epidemia that would target only linux boxes.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    49. Re:Switching to Windows by Octorian · · Score: 2, Informative

      That comment makes absolutely no sense. IMAP is a protocol. Exchange is a mail/groupware server software package. Exchange supports IMAP, as do many other mail/groupware server software packages.

    50. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll tell you what's wrong: the servers have fallen and they can't get up!

    51. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      14 day return policy. I live in Europe, you insensitive clod!

    52. Re:Switching to Windows by alexandreracine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and can you imagine 29 days without email? "ABANDON SHIP CREW!"

      --
      No sig for now.
    53. Re:Switching to Windows by peragrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And given the virus outbreak the MOD only hires moron admins.

      Servers should never be run by idiots. As crap like this happens every second because of it.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    54. Re:Switching to Windows by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      I think that one of the main problems of windows and one of its main infection vector was (I heard they made progress) its tendency to open ports and services that less than 1% of users will use or are even aware of.

      Very few users would be aware of what a 'port' or 'service' are in a technical sense. If you mean the _features_ that those services and open ports provide, I would consider the figure to be extremely questionable. The typical open service on a Windows machine is filesharing, and I'm fairly willing to bet more than 1% of people know you can share files between computers.

      There has never been a single virus for linux that could gain root control from a user's action.

      I'm not quite sure what you mean here, or what you're trying to say. There have been no shortage of root-privilege escalation exploits on Linux, nor of them being combined with remote application exploits.

      Regardless, the significance of 'root control' is a dramatically (and frequently) overstated anachronism. Most malicious code can do everything it might ever want to do with regular user privileges.

      All the worms/virus that can hit linux boxes and spread are cross-platform (most of the time that means they target an application, like Apache, not an OS). We have yet to see a single virus epidemia that would target only linux boxes.

      You're highly unlikely to ever see a "virus epidemic" on Linux until it's usage demographics are at least somewhat comparable to Windows. This has nothing to do with "security" and everything to do with "users".

      Finally, none of this goes any further towards supporting your original assertion.

    55. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?!? You don't have access to the internet? I'll be pulling the latest episode off of eMule minutes after it has been shown.

    56. Re:Switching to Windows by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      If we were going to start a new calendar to mark some significant event based on today, would we mark the first day day 1, year 0 to mark the number of days since the event, or day 1, year one? I'd think it would make more since to have a year zero so the year on the calendar would always mark the amount of time since the passage of the event, and other than proclaiming something as part of some best of the (decade, century, millennium) list, it doesn't actually affect anything other than providing pedants an opportunity to be pedantic.

      According to Wikipedia, the start of the calendar was set in the 6th century, by Dionysius Exiguus, and he didn't indicate if year 1 or 0 was the beginning of the calendar, which was his best estimate of the birth of Jesus of Nazareth. Since it's based on what amounts to a guess, and it doesn't actually affect anything, we should go ahead and tie decades, centuries, and millennium to a year that starts with zero, because that seems to be what people prefer.

    57. Re:Switching to Windows by toby · · Score: 1

      This idiotic idea has been kicking around for longer than that. This 2004 article dates the Windows decision to circa 2001.

      --
      you had me at #!
    58. Re:Switching to Windows by mazarin5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is that you Adama?

      --
      Fnord.
    59. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really need some? Amazing!!!

    60. Re:Switching to Windows by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 0, Troll

      Still, I hope this gives second thoughts to any people in charge who considering to "spare money" by installing Windows on such sensitive systems...

      I suppose it all depends on whether the people making the decision were 'sponsored'?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    61. Re:Switching to Windows by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Then we should also tie warships' and submarines' essential control functions to Windows, because that seems to be what people prefer...... :-/

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    62. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C:\>yum update
      'yum' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
      operable program or batch file.

    63. Re:Switching to Windows by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      In this example, 1BC can easily be considered year 0. Exactly like the PHP mktime function which allow out of range dates like Feb 30th to automatically calculate the correct value as March 2nd.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    64. Re:Switching to Windows by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      No, because if they were using a Norton trial (which are typically user versions only), they would have been infected a LONG time ago!

    65. Re:Switching to Windows by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Compromise? Accepting defeat? Admission of being wrong?!?

      sigh...

      You must be new here.

    66. Re:Switching to Windows by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      C:\>apt-get update
      'apt-get' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
      operable program or batch file.

      Damnit!

    67. Re:Switching to Windows by Candid88 · · Score: 1

      You should try studying for a Computer Science degree, you get 3 years of "is 0 or 1 the first number" fun.

    68. Re:Switching to Windows by Candid88 · · Score: 1

      Except that the fact these infected computers are owned by the military is pretty inconsequential as they are on admin networks, not operations networks. Payroll computers are hardly running top-secret, mission-critical applications.

      Heck, most the people using them probably aren't even military personnel.

    69. Re:Switching to Windows by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The days start at one.

      The months start at one.

      Why would you expect the years to start at zero?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    70. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reject your reality, and substitute my own. The year 2000 is so much nicer than 2001.

    71. Re:Switching to Windows by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sometimes, just sometimes, system admins are required to run things in spite of the fact that the systems are insecure. Typically, Sys Admins aren't the ones doing the system purchases or making the decisions on what systems to run. And sometimes, penny pinching tightwad beancounters make the decisions and those decisions don't include things like anti-virus, system backups and all the other things that would help mitigate against such problems.

      Sometimes the idiots who you speak of aren't really idiots, just handcuffed by pointy haired bosses.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    72. Re:Switching to Windows by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      The whole of MOD and military is moving to one windows system called DII and it's costing a lot http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2007/11/19/228122/mods-5bn-defence-information-infrastructure-hits-major.htm

      From the bottom of the article -

      Some of the planned DII technologies

      -Computer Associates helpdesk and service catalogue

      -Windows XP and Vista

      -Proxima BSM business service reporting

      -HP Radia software management

      -MicroMuse Netcool system management

      -Computer Associates Argis system management

      -Quest Active Role Server for user setup

      -NDL Metascybe Active Conductor for terminal emulation

      -HP protect tools; Sanctuary, NAI McAfee for security

      -Veritas Netbackup for back-up/clustering

      - Verity enterprise search

      - Exchange and Boldon James for medium and high grade messaging

      - K2.net for workflow

      - Microsoft Adam for enterprise directory

      Almost an exercise in doing things badly.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    73. Re:Switching to Windows by tuxgeek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know this post is redundant, but ...
      I knew you were right in your parent post.
      Amazing how many flames you can get from idiots that don't know their asses from a hole in the ground.
      Alas, /. is not only for smart people. Some of Jerry's "Special" kids also know of us as well.

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    74. Re:Switching to Windows by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      The MOD doesn't comment on submarines especially the nuclear boats so we will never know.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    75. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is simply true that flaws are more common and less efficiently patched in Microsoft products than in any other.

      Evidence ?

      http://www.microsoft.com/

    76. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidence ?

      read the article

    77. Re:Switching to Windows by mpe · · Score: 1

      I think that one of the main problems of windows and one of its main infection vector was (I heard they made progress) its tendency to open ports and services that less than 1% of users will use or are even aware of.

      It even appears to be the case that the major use of some Windows "features" is the distribution of malware. The 1% being more less than one in a thousand to one in a million :)

    78. Re:Switching to Windows by slycer · · Score: 1

      nnnnnnnnnnnnoooooooooooooooooooooooooo

      I was sick of this argument 9 years ago. Way to start it again.

    79. Re:Switching to Windows by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      (Like the Windows on Warships networks)

      Windows for Warships? Version 3.11?

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    80. Re:Switching to Windows by enilnomi · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that this was caused by a built-in backdoor to the NSA, as you said back then?

      --
      education is no substitute for intelligence
    81. Re:Switching to Windows by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but no year zero. In the Gregorian calendar, 31st December of 1 BC is followed by 1st January of 1 AD. Therefore the AD period reaches a hundred years old at the end of the year 100, not at the beginning of that year. Same for the millennia: the second millennium ended on the night of 31st December 2000.

      Technically, there is a 0 AD. Which is equal to 1 BC. And 0 BC is equal to 1 AD. Deal with it.

      Bet let's keep in mind this is one of those discussions geeks have when there are no women around to impress and no useful work to do. It has absolutely no import in our lives.

    82. Re:Switching to Windows by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      So what you're telling me is that you and your friends preferred to fetishize ovular numerals rather than use the opportunity to "realize the truth" as an excuse for a second, even better, mondo party-for-the-millennium a year later?

      Ah well, it's too late now, I guess.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    83. Re:Switching to Windows by chadenright · · Score: 1

      The days start at Sunday and the months start at January--which is the same as saying, tis mere convention that their numeric array key values start at 1, whereas years are of type Int rather than String, and so of course they start at 0.

    84. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well ok you don't get a calendar. OK set up a iCAL server for that. For mail yes it IS adrop in replacement. You are right Outlook has terrible IMAP support SO! don't use Outlook. Hell there are hundreds of email clients and free ones at that. Try Thunderbird it has great IMAP support. Change to a decent IMAP server and no more fiddling with Exchange every other day to keep it going.

      If you have to have your calendar server and mail server on the same box try Java Messaging. Great Calendar server, great IMAP service and has an Outlook Connector if you really need to keep your stupid Outlook client.

    85. Re:Switching to Windows by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Yes, the NavyStar system has all 3 types of clients (Windows XP, Windows XPe/CE, and DOS). The article says that whole ships were completely without email and internet services. Unless you know of a worm that is capable of attacking all three Windows XP, Windows XPe/CE, and DOS clients, then a short term "fix" would have been as easy as turning off the clients that could be affected.

      Besides that, other articles on the subject specifically said it was the server components (That run UNIX) that were affected. And if you didn't know, many/most flavors of UNIX (Including HP NonStop G06 which is what NavyStar runs on) are capable of running on "commoditized PC hardware". For reference, using the link you gave, please see "Omega Server Components" in the diagram on Page 10. You will clearly see the outward email/internet servers are labeled as being "HP S76 NonStop platform with HP NonStop G06 OS", which is exactly what I said it was.

    86. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that would accept the PC standard counting of the memory bus which is why we got 64K (which was enough for Steve Jobs (swoons)) in the Upper Memory area.
      As this is /. we must reject all things non-Apple and accept that it was 2001 whether nice or not.

    87. Re:Switching to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, weeks start on Sunday? No, not here jimmy, the week starts on Monday.

    88. Re:Switching to Windows by readin · · Score: 1

      Hah, no. The millennium started in January, 2001.

      Which milennium? The one that started in Jan 1000 and ended in Dec 1999? Or the one that started in Jan 1001 and ended in Dec 2000?

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    89. Re:Switching to Windows by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The third millennium. Using the reckoning that was devised in an era and place where the concept of "zero" was still poorly understood by the population at large.

      If you want to use some other reckoning, you're welcome to it. But you should probably specify it somewhere and/or define it in some publication.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  3. Time to switch? by Hunter761 · · Score: 4, Funny

    One more reason to use Linux: "Your country's security depends on it."

    1. Re:Time to switch? by pejyel · · Score: 0

      One more reason to use Linux: "Your country's security depends on it."

      How could that get modded "Funny"?!

    2. Re:Time to switch? by oliderid · · Score: 3, Funny

      An army of Penguins came to my mind.

    3. Re:Time to switch? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      because it's a joke as in "ha ha". Something that isn't suppose to be taken seriously by either Linux or Windows fanatics.

    4. Re:Time to switch? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Why not?

    5. Re:Time to switch? by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      An army of Penguins came to my mind.

      I bet the Navy Seals would win in a fight against the Army Penguins. Tim S.

    6. Re:Time to switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the Navy Seals would win in a fight against the Army Penguins

      But they would still be lost in Europe. ;)

  4. What happened to *nix ? by Sapdot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm surprised something as crucial as Defence systems are running a version of Windows.

    1. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If defense systems weren't running on Windows, how would security personnel inconspicuously play solitaire?

    2. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Me too. However its the email system which went down. Sailors are pissed (I live in Portsmouth and there was a bit about it in the local newspaper). Navigation and command systems were not affected as they live on physically separate networks.

    3. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      well, hasn't windows struggled to be marketed as posix compliant exactly for this?

    4. Re:What happened to *nix ? by should_be_linear · · Score: 4, Funny

      As insider I can confirm system was fully 24/7 reliability certified, even shielded for smooth operation under nuclear attack. But then 1-year-free AVG licence ended.

      --
      839*929
    5. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You would be surprised to know that some crucial IT decisions in the MOD are taken by humans that can be competent soldiers but incompetent IT technicians. Or, simply, bribery-open people close to retirement.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    6. Re:What happened to *nix ? by MarkRose · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sailors are pissed

      Aye... with the email down, we're downing the rum!

      --
      Be relentless!
    7. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, they play solitaire so they can hide the p0rn they are streaming.

      That's probably what got them, someone on the network looking for and distributing p0rn.

    8. Re:What happened to *nix ? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      KPatience?

    9. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Putting on my most Pedantic persona :

      If you are pissed in Portsmouth then you have drunk too much alcohol, only in the Western Colonies does one refer to a state of aggravation as being pissed.

      I can only deduce that you Sir must be an American interloper in our fair land

      Now discarding Pedantic persona

    10. Re:What happened to *nix ? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      It's not. They have their own separate network. The systems in the story are mostly HR, food stock keeping etc.

      Important information, but it's not going to automatically launch a nuke at Israel or Pakistan.

    11. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Or install the latest desktop widget some kind stranger has sent to them.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    12. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I see. So rather than trying to push Linux due to it's security or stability or flexibility advantages we need to advertise the fact that it, too, has solitaire.

      Well aware that you're probably right, I don't know weather I should laugh or cry.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    13. Re:What happened to *nix ? by clemdoc · · Score: 1

      Use KDE. kbattleship should be fine.

    14. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Navigation and command systems were not affected as they live on physically separate networks.

      So, we were just one USB stick** transfer away from the Navigation and command systems being infected. Brilliant.

      **Or any functional equivalent

      And yes, the theory *may* be that such transfers are
      a/ Strictly not allowed by policy
      b/ Physically disallowed (USB ports blocked)
      c/ Disallowed by OS policy.

      Does anyone really believe that such transfers don't/can't happen though?

    15. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wine

    16. Re:What happened to *nix ? by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      KPatience? sorry, he was asking about playing Solitaire.

    17. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you live in Britain you should know that here being "pissed" means drunk, "pissed off" means annoyed. So you've said that the sailors are drunk. Being sailors that may well be true, but I don't see the connection to email.

    18. Re:What happened to *nix ? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      kbattleship? I always thought that was the KDE program for running navy vessels.....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    19. Re:What happened to *nix ? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "Sailors are pissed"

      You missed a prime opportunity to say that seamen are pissed. Such a waste..

    20. Re:What happened to *nix ? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      AisleRiot Solitaire

    21. Re:What happened to *nix ? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but now all I can picture is a drunk navy seal trying to play solitaire on a spinning green radar screen...

    22. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      windows in my military?
      my head asplode!
      (followed shortly by my warship)

    23. Re:What happened to *nix ? by Candid88 · · Score: 1

      Well, in a sense yes.

      Even in militaries, application availability is a principle concern when purchasing systems. Keeping in mind these were admin networks (rather than operational networks) it's not hard to see why - like most organizations - they choose a more widely supported OS over a more sercure one.

    24. Re:What happened to *nix ? by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Admittedly the original post was american english, rather than the Queens English, but this is an American board and the lingua franca is American. If the original post had said the sailor's were mad about it. Some Americans might be confused and think a Windows Virus was the cause of madness in the British Navy, the virus is a symptom rather than the root cause.

  5. Appropriate enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All your base are belong to "someone other than yourselves"

    1. Re:Appropriate enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still too soon.

      +3 Funny to the guy who posts the link explaining the joke.

    2. Re:Appropriate enough by slugtastic · · Score: 1

      I'd link it, but Im lazy.

    3. Re:Appropriate enough by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    4. Re:Appropriate enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://xkcd.com/286/

  6. UK by alxkit · · Score: 1, Funny

    it wasn't a virus - it was a bug. a beatle, technically.

    1. Re:UK by slugtastic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      [Citation needed]

  7. Viral infection? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    It would be much more newsworthy if it was a bacterial infection.

    A warship-eating bacteria.

    You could so do a Steven Seagal movie with that premise.

    1. Re:Viral infection? by thomthom · · Score: 1

      Steven Seagal? pffth! Come one, we want Chuck Norris!

    2. Re:Viral infection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that there is a film that an alien lifeforce comes all the way from pluto(whatever) to say hi, turns out, it starts to infect the ships computer systems and turning them into it's body, the ship as the body, the computer system as the mind, then all the people on board have to fight for their lives, etc, etc. no joke, but I can't remember the name now.

    3. Re:Viral infection? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      The movie name is, surprisingly enough, "Virus".

    4. Re:Viral infection? by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Like in TNG espisode #34 where an organism eats the hulls of the USS Enterprise and the IKS Pagh? Who knew they were still using windows in the 24th century!

      --
      Be relentless!
    5. Re:Viral infection? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I'll go one better - Steven Seagal versus Chuck Norris.

      There. Dear MPAA, Make me that film and I'll start buying cinema tickets.

    6. Re:Viral infection? by thomthom · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris, no doubt. But Chuck Norris versus MacGyver?

    7. Re:Viral infection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's easy. McGyver would win with the help of Chuck Noris.

      McGyver would hold a paper clip in one hand, a dixy cup in the other, use Chuck Noris's round house kicks to bend the paper clip and insert it into the dixy cup. Then he will take a role of duct tape, toss it at chuck while holding onto the end of the tape so it unrolls and collect Chucks sweat on the sticky part. McGyver would then wring the sweat into the dixy cup, put a chery bomb onto the other side of the paperclip, light it, toss it at chuck and when he blocked it, it would explode with all the might Chuck has essentially defeating himself.

      McGyver wins.

    8. Re:Viral infection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait...Chuck Norris' own power used against Chuck Norris? I'm sure McGyver would be destroyed by the resulting super nova

  8. if a virus can do that... by crazybit · · Score: 1

    it means a true l33t cracker could easily start World War III?

    --
    - Human knowledge belongs to the world
    1. Re:if a virus can do that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means that a true l33t cracker can own their battlecruisers.

    2. Re:if a virus can do that... by Xest · · Score: 4, Funny

      As it was only the admin network effected, then not unless all that's required to start a world war is that someone spoofs an e-mail as such:

      To: Rear Admiral Whoever
      From: Vladmir Putin

      Subject: lol u suck
      im in ur macines stealing ur data

  9. Schadenfreude by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not currently allowed to do security-cleared work in UK, because I've just spent several years living in that hotbed of communism and espionage, New Zealand. Pity the MoD don't take such a rigorous approach to basic IT competence.

    --
    "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    1. Re:Schadenfreude by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Agreed. Anyone who happened to work at Redmond for an extended period of time should be denied any IT job in a critical structure.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:Schadenfreude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greenpeace and Mossad agree with you there mate.

    3. Re:Schadenfreude by slackticus · · Score: 1

      Clearly the MoD is afraid that you work for Sauron.

    4. Re:Schadenfreude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, spied on many hippies lately?

    5. Re:Schadenfreude by sentientbeing · · Score: 1

      Oh I Dunno, Maybe changing your slashdot username might aid your application?

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  10. Yes, 70 years ago. by solder_fox · · Score: 0

    It marked the end of the era of the battleship.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Prince_of_Wales_(1939)

  11. pfah by amnezick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course they went to Windows:
    Clicking Torpedo and then the enemy's battleship on a screen is much more efficient than typing
    "attack --weapon torpedo --count 2 --coords 42394799879x3179478912"
    and then waiting for the result in
    "tail -f /var/log/messages"

    --
    mov ax,4c00h
    int 21h
    1. Re:pfah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You jest but most of the old command systems did (and still do) use the command line. Trackerball input was done using a special key.

    2. Re:pfah by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 5, Funny

      But then why don't they switch to the iPhone?

      Surely touching the torpedo and then touching the enemy's battleship is even easier than clicking? Even a kid can do it.

    3. Re:pfah by MarkRose · · Score: 5, Funny

      It looks like 'attack' uses GNU-style command line switches. Do you know if the source code is available?

      Sincerely,
      Ministry of Defence.

      --
      Be relentless!
    4. Re:pfah by NCG_Mike · · Score: 1

      You can use my "bomb" program. It has command line completion: bomb bel^t will bomb belgrade... Nooo! It's selected belgium!

    5. Re:pfah by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah, but we Linux users are all peace-loving Communist hippies without the knowledge to write efficient programs for warmongering.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    6. Re:pfah by value_added · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clicking Torpedo and then the enemy's battleship on a screen is much more efficient than typing
      "attack --weapon torpedo --count 2 --coords 42394799879x3179478912"
      and then waiting for the result in
      "tail -f /var/log/messages"

      More likely it was done using a wizard invoked as Start > Programs > Ministry of Defense > Utilities > Torpedo Enterprise Edition 1.37 > Torpedo Launch. MoD Power Users would, of course, just do Start > Run > TLaunch.EXE to open the graphical window before holding the mouse on the spin box to increment the coordinate numbers to the correct values, and then selecting File > Actions > Torpedo > Launch and clicking "Yes" on the "Are You Sure?" dialog boxes. SuperKeen Techsavy Power Users will shun the above methods and opt for something more Unix-like:

      Windows Powershell
      Copyright (C) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reservered.

      $ C:\Documents and Settings\Midshipman R. Kelly>Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_PingStatus -Filter "Address='42394799879x3179478912'" -SubmarineName '*' | Select-Object -Property Address,ResponseTime,StatusCode
      64 bytes from Russian_Sub: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=109 ms
      64 bytes from Russian_Sub: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=38 ms
      64 bytes from Russian_Sub: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0 ms
      ^C
      $ C:\Documents and Settings\Midshipman R. Kelly>(Get-WmiObject -List -Foes . | Where-Object -FilterScript {$_.Name -eq "Russian_Sub"}).InvokeMethod("Torpedo",("attack","weapon torpedo",2,"42394799879","3179478912"))
      The requested service has not started is not running.
      More help is by typing NET HELPMSG 38000357699.
      $ C:\Documents and Settings\Midshipman R. Kelly>Restart-Service -displayname "Ministry of Defense Torpedo Service"
      Ministry of Defense Torpedo Service is starting.
      $ C:\Documents and Settings\Midshipman R. Kelly>(Get-WmiObject -List -Foes . | Where-Object -FilterScript {$_.Name -eq "Russian_Sub"}).InvokeMethod("Torpedo",("attack","weapon torpedo",2,"42394799879","3179478912"))
      System Error 1058 has occured.
      The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled, it has no enabled devices associated with it, or you lack sufficient administrative rights.
      $ C:\Documents and Settings\Midshipman R. Kelly>get-eventlog application -newest 10 | format-list | more

      Mod +5 Worthy of Tears

    7. Re:pfah by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      Lightweight, that's still the Windows way - operating on individual targets, tut, tut, tut. This would require far too much from the Weapons Administrator.
      Should be:
      grep "enemy" ocean/* | killall

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    8. Re:pfah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      officer@warstation:~$ sudo attack --weapon torpedo --count 2 --coords 42394799879x3179478912
      officer@warstation:~$

    9. Re:pfah by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Waaaaa! YOU DA MAN!! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!

      No, seriously, you know PowerShell programming? You typed all that from memory?

    10. Re:pfah by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of your torpedoes is trying to launch.
      Allow | Deny

      One of your torpedoes is enabling a tracking mechanism.
      Allow | Deny

      One of your torpedoes is trying to blow a ship.
      Allow | Deny

    11. Re:pfah by Ciaran+Power · · Score: 1

      getopt_long also matches unambiguous options given the first few chars, so you might be able to do:

      attack --w torpedo --cou 2 --coo 42394799879x3179478912

      thus sinking their battleship

    12. Re:pfah by INT_QRK · · Score: 1

      "Air Track T2142 ID Hostile. Missile Inbound! Kill Track T2142 with Birds! Engage! -- What? Damn it! I can't!...Sir...Damn it!...I'm still waiting on the hourglass!"

    13. Re:pfah by drx · · Score: 1

      Does attack also do batch processing of multiple targets?

    14. Re:pfah by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Or do you mean:
      $ attack --weapon torpedo --count 2 --coords 42394799879x3179478912
      bash: attack: command not found
      $ /sbin/attack --weapon torpedo --count 2 --coords 42394799879x3179478912
      bash: /sbin/attack: Permission denied
      $ su
      Password: ***
      su: incorrect password
      $ su
      Password: ***
      # /sbin/attack -- wea<BLAM!>

    15. Re:pfah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 funny is not enough 4 this one LOL

    16. Re:pfah by eric2hill · · Score: 1

      Something on your system is trying to launch a torpedo.

      Cancel or Allow?

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    17. Re:pfah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MoD Power Users would, of course, just do Start > Run > TLaunch.EXE

      Start>Run? WTF? Real power users hit Win+R... That's right, as in "run, windows, run"!

    18. Re:pfah by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Imagine those sailors getting pissed in a bar showing off their iPhones to their mates. Somebody would get a blinding headache in the morning...

    19. Re:pfah by IronChef · · Score: 2, Funny

      It looks like you're trying to sink an enemy warship. Would you like help?

      * Verify range to target with one ping only
      * Sound battle stations
      * Turn on the red lights
      * Just launch the torpedo
      * Click the monkey and win an iPod!

      Or maybe we need Clippy's help with a vertical launch scenario. "It looks like you are trying to start Armageddon. Would you like help?"

  12. obligatory userfriendly link by itsme1234 · · Score: 4, Funny
  13. Re:Virus? in such a critical environment? by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Funny

    Exactly. I'm surprise those computers got infected with Windows in the first place. Usually it takes a CD to spread that virus.

  14. ITV news last night... by martin · · Score: 5, Informative

    ITV News was stating it was also effecting 6 RAF admin bases as well and they outbreak has been running since well before Christmas. All of this hear-say as the MOD (rightly IMHO) are keeping alot of this info to themselves.

    Also no signs of how the malware got into the systems, accidently or a deliverate 'attack'.

    given the time to clear up and the large number of systems it's compromised it's a little worrying to the least.

  15. troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    now that everyone knows this account is fake, could you stop using it?

    at least to show some respect to the man who passed away so recently

    1. Re:troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much caffeine?

    2. Re:troll by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      He's afraid of losing his proud "+5, Funny" history in his comments.

      His 6-digit UID also looks beautiful and provides many mathematical factors.

  16. Brave New World by tcolberg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, it really must be the 21st century. For millennia, when navies had problems with viruses, it was the sailors being a little too loose while on shore leave. Today, the ships are the ones getting infected due to open ports.

  17. That is not the way of the l33t!!! by Klootzak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    it means a true l33t cracker could easily start World War III?

    A true l33t cracker would NEVER engage an enemy with something as petty as violence or death...

    He or She would realize that only escalates and encourages fear, he or she would engage the world with words.

    One of the worlds most admirable and effective Social Engineers said: "There are many causes that I am prepared to die for but no causes that I am prepared to kill for."

    --
    A Man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties -- Albert Einstein
  18. Is Fujitsu not to be held accountable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I find this quite funny, 29 days into migration (rollout included) and the poor machines are already infected.

    What is not so funny is that the MoD people are such muppets for taking that sort of decision on such critical systems!

    Still a question remains. If the contract was given to Fujitsu should they not be held accountable as well, along with the MoD ?

    1. Re:Is Fujitsu not to be held accountable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If the contract was given to Fujitsu should they not be held accountable as well

      If we give Fujitsu the sack, we would still have to pay them. So we might as well let them sort out the mess. The alternative is to scrap the system and tender new contracts, where the only bidder would be Fujitsu.

      And the next time any moronic civil servants think of some dumb-ass IT scheme, Fujitsu will probably be awarded the contract. Again.

    2. Re:Is Fujitsu not to be held accountable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since I know 1st hand how moronic Fujitsu Services are I have to say that sounds like a brilliant plan ...

      Maybe Fujitsu should have run against Obama for the presidency. Surely they would eventually (next millenium) manage to solve the credit crunch crisis through non-stop rain-dancing

  19. If they'd watched BSG they'd have known better by drewish_princess · · Score: 5, Funny

    Admiral Adama never would have let that happen on his ship.

    1. Re:If they'd watched BSG they'd have known better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah cylon attack on the way

    2. Re:If they'd watched BSG they'd have known better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he was Captain Adama at the time of that mistake

    3. Re:If they'd watched BSG they'd have known better by woboyle · · Score: 1

      Yeah. He refused to allow any networked computers on the ship. Seems they allowed the propagation of enemy (Cylon) viruses too easily... doh, really? :-)

      --
      Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  20. Would you like some help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too... many... Clippy... jokes. Must not regurgitate... tired Slashdot... meme.

  21. Mod and thin-foil hats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the MoD needs to cut expenses by using standard PC components rather than custom hardware, should they not be using FreeBSD, OpenBSD or some esoteric form of *nix installed on encrypted hdds with with hardened FS ACLs, properly defined jails and allowing only dual layer VPNs over IPSec ?

    Maybe they are relying on the power of the thin-foil hat ...

       

    1. Re:Mod and thin-foil hats by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      The MOD definitely didn't cut expenses. They are spending a hell of a lot installing XP everywhere http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/07/it-defence.html
      But then what do you expect when EDS are involved?

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  22. Black Tot Day, 1970 by Kirth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, its blindingly obvious that the Royal Navy is worth zilch and run by nincompoops and incompetents since July 31st 1970, 6 bells of the forenoon watch. That was when the last rum ration was issued.

    So the move to use Microsoft Windows and the subsequent(and consequent) series of disasters associated with such an abysmal piece of software does not strike on as "odd" with the same rear-admirals (which probably carry the word "rear-" in front of their title in order to find their posteriors) who had risen up their ranks without their daily rum ration.

    It should have been clear in 1970 that the Navy which ruled the waves for 200 years wouldn't take something like having their rum taken away lightly; and that most probably their best sailors and officers would turn away in disgust of such a move, leaving only the incompetent and spineless to run and ruin the Navy. And in recent times, leaving a software company from the USA to ruin the Navy. Perhaps they realised the case was hopeless and retired to a half-pay life of binge-drinking; at least they could have their rum on shore, to drown their shame in.

    Such a sad state.

    --
    "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
    1. Re:Black Tot Day, 1970 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't talk to me about naval tradition. It's nothing but rum, sodomy and
      the lash.
                                      -- Winston Churchill

    2. Re:Black Tot Day, 1970 by u38cg · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm looking at this post, five mod points ready to go, and I really have no idea what I should rate this. I've solved the problem by replying instead. Well played, Cap'n.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    3. Re:Black Tot Day, 1970 by darinfp · · Score: 1

      When WILL /. listen and give us that "+1 lack of rum" mod we so desperately need. I know I could have used it a few times in the stories about the Jobs deity.

    4. Re:Black Tot Day, 1970 by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Don't talk to me about naval tradition. It's nothing but rum, sodomy and the lash.

      If life in the Navy consists of spending a lot of time on boats listening to the Pogues, why didn't they say so? I'm joining up!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  23. Windows is the right os for the war machines by viljun · · Score: 0, Troll

    Windows is the right os for the war ships. It's good if there's problems with weapons & other war stuff. It gives them bad image and maybe there'll be a little less weapons & funding then.

    And if we don't count what happens in movies, it's rare computer bugs kills civilians. Mechanical failures are a different thing:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J5PWIgRSOM

    --
    Ville / Varuste.net
  24. Re:Virus? in such a critical environment? by timmarhy · · Score: 1, Troll

    no where did it say it was windows, in fact it says the mail servers were supplied by Fujitsu so it's most likely linux. so all you retards crowing about windows being insecure should eat your words.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  25. I have just one thing to say: by Xtense · · Score: 3, Funny

    :facepalm:

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams [...]."
    1. Re:I have just one thing to say: by martinX · · Score: 1

      I suppose that's better than napalm.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  26. deja vu by lililalancia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was at a Linux Worldexpo in London several years ago when someone from the audience piped up about Windows on warships during the Great Linux Debate dinnertime session. I think he was a journalist from a Computing publication, but this was exactly the scenario he painted back then.

  27. Scurvy by sepelester · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ever wish your computer was as secure as a battleship? Now it is.

    Since the britons installed Windows, every sunday, late at night, pirates in the Irish sea have remoted their ships to a buccaneer's den on the Isle of Man.

  28. Did they do it on purpose as a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it beyond credulity that this is a test-scenario implemented on a boat at sea to see how a disruption might manifest itself?

    1. Re:Did they do it on purpose as a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

  29. Hardly surprising.. by Drasil · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just look at the guy doing their IT. "Sometimes I just switch it off and on again, heh heh." Sounds like Windows to me.

    1. Re:Hardly surprising.. by PinkyDead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it just me? - or is it completely terrifying that someone in the marketing department of the MoD thought that that ad would inspire confidence in the safety of the UK's nuclear arsenal?

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    2. Re:Hardly surprising.. by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Well, the UK's nuclear arsenal doesn't go on ships, it goes on subs, and that wasn't a sub. And I think the point of the advert was not to demonstrate capabilities, but more to say "hey, we have lots of guys, just like you! Come and join us, sailor!"

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  30. operational issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    they can no longer clear shipping lanes, since they lost the minesweeper app

  31. Adama would disapprove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't we learn from Battlestar Galactica not to network computers on a warship? God help us if Britain is invaded by Cylons...

  32. LSE, Healthcare, Navy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first went down to prevent the Brits from making money on the day of the announcement of $700bn package

    google "lse sql server sjvn"

    Now the Navy!

    Micro$oft! Way to go!
    Darth Sidious to Count Dooku:
    "Healthcare?"
    "Done."

    "Stock Exchange?"
    "Done."

    "Navy?"
    "Done."

    "Haw Haw Haw. Good work...."

    Has Brown outsourced the Grand Orwellian Screwup to M$ or is US planning something?

  33. Well there's another one to chalk up billy boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ho Humm ..

    Well it seems that the MOD's belief in ol billy boy has crapped on them once again , Thing that gets me is just how much they ARE hiding , how much of the true infrastructure is ACTUALLY infected i would not mind betting a lot more than they are admitting to .

    If things suddenly start going boom and bang and similar in the night we will know that it is complete system wide not just the email system as they are claiming

    I dont know about the Norton 30 day trial i think they have signed up with Norton the biggest con job on the planet when i ran windBloWs for work i found Norton to be an absolute waste of time money and disc space it let so much in it was untrue AVG free kicked it well into touch

    Not anonymous just sick of the crabby mods on here
    they need a reality check

  34. Nice. by tenco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Armies battling computer viruses at least don't engage in other kinds of warfare. Let's keep it that way.

    1. Re:Nice. by NoisySplatter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, a warship sure has a hard time doing anything without their ship store to supply them with junk food and toothpaste.

      --
      In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
  35. ah....but can point and click do this? by thaig · · Score: 1

    find /sea -iname '*enemy*' | xargs attack --weapon torpedo --count 2

    --
    This is all just my personal opinion.
  36. What's more shocking by transporter_ii · · Score: 3, Funny

    All the computers had MS Antivirus 2009 installed on them...and they still got infected with a virus!

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    1. Re:What's more shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No just McAfee

    2. Re:What's more shocking by woboyle · · Score: 1

      Isn't MS Antivirus 2009 an oxymoron? And wouldn't only a moron use it?

      --
      Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  37. Der Herr der Ringe by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    I understand. They're afraid you'd put on a ring and "rule them all".

  38. Shuttleworth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey maybe Mark can get a Business Plan together for them.

    Otherwise they need to consult with Volkerding about a inhouse solution.

  39. MOD PARENT UP!!! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Insightful, informative... whatever. Both are on the money.

    Although... I must say - he sounds more like a just plain old non-OS related idiot.
    That he-heh-heh giggle is a dead giveaway.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  40. As Admiral Grace Hopper put it, by gzipped_tar · · Score: 2, Funny

    "A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships were built for. Go out and get infested."

    (Sorry, Admiral Hopper. Just can't help...)

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    1. Re:As Admiral Grace Hopper put it, by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Oops. I mean "infected". :P

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  41. On 2nd thought - make all armies use windows by yossarianuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    If all armies in the world switched to Windows we would have world peace.....

  42. Rum ration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    My father (Navy 1940-1948), like all other officers, got whisky. This is why people went for commissions. Therefore, if half pay officers had still existed, they wouldn't be drinking rum.

    The other side of this was my cousin, a Methodist lay preacher, who turned down a commission because "officers drink too much."

  43. Computer virus != virus by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

    The post is misleading. The article is talking about a COMPUTER virus, which is not the same as a virus.

    Everybody likes to play the ultimate geek now and then, but let's not forget the proper use of the word "virus" is only about living organisms.

    --
    Catalin Braescu
    Ofaly.com
    1. Re:Computer virus != virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because WARSHIPS can be infected by AIDS.

    2. Re:Computer virus != virus by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      >proper use of the word "virus" is only about living organisms.
      So you're saying the word should never be used again, eh?

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  44. Don't think they asked the right question by smchris · · Score: 1

    The MoD insisted that no command or operational systems had been affected, though many of these are based on similar hardware.

    Hardware?

  45. As I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great Britain government is just mad about security. They're now setting up an email and calls government registry to save all data for more than a year, from everybody.

    They also have security cameras all arround the country. I've been in London, and it's more likely a giant great brother, since you step out of your home and until you come in again, you're continiously being taped. Some areas of the city even have the same street taped from every possible angle light posts, semaphors and walls allow them to.

    I expect that moving military to windows is some kind of movement like: "Hey people they've just hacked our army, we have to empower security a bit further!".

    What a poor thing, government little by little, almost everywhere in europe and USA, is trying to take power from law to empower themselves, breaking this way the power division of democracy. We're just approaching at max. speed to 1984.

  46. Poor Little Virus Author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe its just me but if I had written a piece of software that caused as much trouble as this has to an organization that includes the SBS ( Special Boat Service a.k.a. SAS on the water) I'd probably be packing and looking for alternate everything.

  47. 28 Days Later by ehaggis · · Score: 1

    Wasn't that a movie about a virus in England? This seems a bit more frightening.

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
  48. What if the ship is in the middle of a war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While sailors are at battle stations, sailor IT admins are fighting the viruses on their windows boxens.

    ROFTL

  49. This is why Windows should be banned. by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 0, Troll

    Bill Gates a terrorist, it's more likely than you think.

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
    1. Re:This is why Windows should be banned. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      No, He's a True American Patriot, keeping America's Independence. ;)

  50. What the hell is wrong with these people!!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Windows has *real* security problems. We are not talking about mere differences in opinion, but real-live security problems from the ground-up. We are talking about a systemic philosophy within Microsoft that allows things like the TIFF code to execute binary programs, privilege escalation, and so on.

    The Windows apologists like to claim that there are so many exploits only because Windows is so "popular." It isn't true. Windows is insecure by design. Microsoft intentionally installs APIs through which the system can be modified regardless of the user. On top of that, the kernel device driver model is less regulated than unix.

    Windows is a security disaster, and while it is dangerous enough in a consumer setting. It is a stunningly bad idea to put it in a secure situation.

  51. /. shines again!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that it is stylish to a) not read the article, b) ignore any facts, and c) slag MS (even when they are not involved), but is it too much to ask to at least read the HEADLINE to the article? You know, where they say

    Windows for Warships(TM) combat kit unaffected, says MoD"

    1. Re:/. shines again!! by IsaacD · · Score: 0

      Yeah, bashing everything Microsoft became the norm quite some time ago. It's to the point of silliness now.

  52. Eminiar 7 by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

    Only until you install the disintegration chambers.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  53. BSG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh shit! Imminent Cylon attack

  54. Actually, that may be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the virus is designed to relay information, the admin systems on the US naval ships have loads of information that can be used about the crew as well as manuals, designs, etc. The real problem is that this would not be enough to force the navy to change behavior and put in a secure OS. BUT if this HAD hit the operating OS, then most likely the navies would re-think being dependent on such a weak OS. I am guessing that the same is true of UK.

  55. Easy fix by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1

    They should install that version on Unix seen in Jurassic Park. I'm STILL waiting for that awesome OS to be released to the general public. I guess it's ahead of it's time. :(

    --
    http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
    1. Re:Easy fix by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      You're looking for SGI IRIX, a little behind it's time, and a real *#%#@ to install.
      Feature/Maintenance streams, needing intermediate update CDs... bleh.

    2. Re:Easy fix by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1

      sdhfsfgsgfa7ryg. You're Kidding, right? It was a joke! I know they werent using unix in JP!

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
    3. Re:Easy fix by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I'm completely serious. Google: IRIX Jurassic Park
      This is the first link: http://sgistuff.g-lenerz.de/movies/jpark.php

    4. Re:Easy fix by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1

      dont you know that when you dissect a joke, the joke usually dies in the process? what sort of foul murderer are you?

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
    5. Re:Easy fix by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      An emotionless and efficient one, apparently.

    6. Re:Easy fix by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1

      are you coming on to me

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
    7. Re:Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, emotionlessly and efficiently.

    8. Re:Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but one of lines (the girl) says its SUN!
      "This is SUN Workstation! I know how to use this!", if I remember it correctly after so many years (JP 1). There is some delicious irony in the fact that it was an SGI machine!

  56. MOD!=soldiers by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    You would not be surprised to know that many of the procurement people in the MOD are not and have never been in the Armed Forces, and are widely hated by serving personnel. After the Falklands War, it was identified that the MOD had failed to provide the Army with, for root's sake, adequate socks. I remember one officer remarking that the MOD would now have a Project Manager, Socks. To which someone else replied that this was incorrect; they would need two: Project Manager, Socks, Left and Project Manager, Socks, Right.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  57. It's Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. not Defense!

  58. Windows on the submarine by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 1

    That Windows running submarine suddenly not so funny.

  59. Whach your mod points go down the drain by wfstanle · · Score: 1

    "I'm looking at this post, five mod points ready to go,"

    Do you realize that you are not allowed to post and moderate on the same article? If you did, any mod points you use on this article have been wasted.

    1. Re:Whach your mod points go down the drain by u38cg · · Score: 1

      And you, Sir, I moderate -1, Whooooosh.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  60. Doo be doo. . . It's in the stars. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    The crystals and incense folk call this, "Mercury Retrograde", and in the case of Astrology, they're actually on fairly firm ground.

    Communications and technology become jumbled and fragile in these periods. Global slowdowns and best laid plans going to pot.

    Watch the patterns. One of my favorites was when those 5 undersea cables got cut and the world flipped out.

    Happens twice a year for about twenty days each period. Back up your stuff before these times hit. Or just yell until you're blue, "Correlation does not equal causation!" --Which is actually quite true. Mercury isn't out there with bolt cutters. It's just a means of measuring the weather patterns of reality. This period ends Feb 1st. It's generally a good idea to hold off on signing anything important or buying any new hardware until after that date.

    It's not just radioactive isotopes wobbling in their decay rates in time with the Earth's orbit. Everything is affected. --There are fundamentals of matter and energy, from which consciousness arises, which are not yet properly understood by modern science, and so we have to rely on the old-wive's rosemary-smelling almanacs for guidance. I suspect if the scientific community ever got over it's understandable knee-jerk over-reaction to the stupidity of religion and actually managed to work out the mechanics behind the observations, we'd zoom ahead by lightyears in our understanding of physics.

    But the problem is that the "Must Not Offend Popular Consensus Even if it's Wrong" instinct affects scientists and laymen alike.

    Ah well. We'll get there one day. I hope.

    Cheers!

    -FL

  61. wwII Japanese troop strength by number6x · · Score: 3, Informative

    In WWII Japanese troop strength was determined by tracking logistics. Judging the amount of water requested delivered to islands allowed the allies to determine troop levels on those islands.

    There are no non-critical systems in war time.

  62. Brace yourself for 2009-01-19! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brace yourself for my 2009-01-19 I-told-you-so!

  63. Braiiiiins by crawly · · Score: 1

    I can't be the only person who saw the words, UK infection, Ministry of Defense and thought it was gonna be a Zombie invasion.

    --
    GCS/S d-x s+(+): a C++++$ UL+$ P+ L++$ !E--- W++@ N++>$ !o !K-- w++$ !O !M !V PS++>$ PE !Y PGP+ t+ 5++ X++ R tv b
  64. Re:Virus? in such a critical environment? by beta21 · · Score: 1

    I mean seriously, what could sailors be downloading that could be dangerous to windows machines?

  65. time runs faster in the basement by bugi · · Score: 1

    It's the other way around, trust me. When you hit 40 and Mom hollers down to come up for your birthday party, it's like, "Oh, man am I getting old. That year just flew by."

  66. Crony Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is more common than you might think. The US Embassies just had a similar bout with virii. I wouldn't be surprised if all our medical and government records have been compromised already.

  67. Easy to install, painful to repair by AnotherScratchMonkey · · Score: 1

    I've found that all MS products are easy to install and run, as long as nothing goes wrong. The moment something fails, you've got major pain to deal with. You're going to have to bring in someone with lots of acronyms after their name.

    It's like a modern luxury car: Pretty and comfortable, but when it breaks, you're looking at an expensive visit to the dealer.

  68. Does no one see what is going on here? by Caedis · · Score: 1

    So, the reason the UK is having these issues is because of this: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/15/151223 You censor the nets, you deal with a lot of upset hackers.