Slashdot Mirror


Long-Term PC Preservation Project?

failcomm writes "I've been talking with my son's (middle-school) computer lab teacher about a 'time capsule' project. The school has a number of 'retirement age' PCs (5-6 years old — Dells, HPs, a couple of Compaqs), and we've been kicking around the idea of trying to preserve a working system and some media (CDs and/or DVDs), and locking them away to be preserved for some period of time (say 50 years); to be opened by students of the future. The goal would be to have instructions on how to unpack the system, plug it into the wall (we'll assume everyone is still using 110v US outlets), and get the system to boot. Also provide instructions on how to load the media and see it in action; whether it is photos or video or games or even student programs — whatever. So first, is this idea crazy? Second, how would we go about packing/preserving various components? Lastly, any suggestions on how to store it long term? (Remember, this is a school project, so we can't exactly just 'freeze it in carbonite'; practical advice would be appreciated.)"

465 comments

  1. I've thought about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem I see with this is that you'd basically need to include instructions on how to operate every protocol as well as an independent power source to operate it.

    The best bet would just be to include a laptop and a few solar chargers to power it. If the future world can't power a laptop with light for some reason... they don't deserve to look back into the past.

    1. Re:I've thought about this by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're assuming that in 50 years:
      - the battery will still be able to hold a charge
      - there will be no data loss on the magnetic media (hard drive)
      - there will be no data loss on the optical media (CD rot)
      - the soldered components will still work (tin whiskers)
      - the display will still work (no idea about inactive LCD degradation)

    2. Re:I've thought about this by thsths · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > You're assuming that in 50 years:

      The capacitors have not dried out. Since they use a water based electrolyte, that could be the most critical point. Sometimes they dry out after just 2 years of normal use, due to the higher temperature during operation.

      But the most important question would be: why? Do you really think that in 50 years anybody cares about a PC that was mediocre in the year 2000? Very few people get excited about punch cards, and that will be exactly how CDs will feel to someone used to wireless solid state data storage.

    3. Re:I've thought about this by franl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the most important question would be: why? Do you really think that in 50 years anybody cares about a PC that was mediocre in the year 2000?

      Time capsules are intended to preserve history for the future. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

    4. Re:I've thought about this by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

      they're just doing it for fun. jeez.

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    5. Re:I've thought about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless there is a massive nuclear war and survivors go back into a dark age, I doubt PC hardware and Windows will be forgotten in 50 years. The Apple II was more than 30 years ago... Is it forgotten?

    6. Re:I've thought about this by icebraining · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I get excited, not about the actual punch cards, but by seeing how much technology has evolved in so little time.

    7. Re:I've thought about this by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up...

      Today's PCs are pretty much guaranteed not to work in 50 years time, no matter what you do. In dry conditions some parts will dry out, in wet conditions other parts will rot.

      In all conditions the magnetics/optics will suffer bit rot and the flash memory will fade (and there's flash memory in the motherboard, hard disk, optical drive and graphics card).

      You might have more luck getting an old machine like a TRS-80 or C64 to last 50 years, but finding a working TV set in 2058 could be a problem.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:I've thought about this by DeadChobi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but personally relevant and educationally relevant are two different things. Punch cards are something that I would discuss as a historical aside in a high school computer science or programming or technology class, and I might trot some out just to show students how far we've come. That doesn't mean that I still use them to store data, or that I am a punch card fanatic.

      Please look at this through the eyes of a teacher; the goal of this project is not to get students using old technology, but simply to give them some understanding of what their teachers had to learn on. I had a teacher in high school who had some old magnetic disks that apparently had to be immersed in a fluid. He showed those to me and some other interested students as novelties.

      Imagine how cool it would be if your children or grandchildren could see what you had to live with, technology wise. Wouldn't that teach them something about history, or give them some understanding of how different our culture was compared to their culture? Essentially, is the goal of education to give a student some practical skills and then boot them out into the world, or do we want to give them a context for their skills?

      This kind of activity is educationally relevant because it allows students to feel like they've contributed something to the world or done something cool. When it's unearthed it will be valuable because it gives their grandkids an understanding of what was technologically advanced in the past.

      --
      SRSLY.
    9. Re:I've thought about this by KeithJM · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

      So you're worried that if we don't do this someone 50 years from now will install Windows ME?

    10. Re:I've thought about this by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem I see with this is that you'd basically need to include instructions on how to operate every protocol as well as an independent power source to operate it.

      Yeah, because in the last 50 years, there have been massive changes to the voltage and frequency of electrical utilities. And why protocols? IP is well documented, and any changes would be as well. There haven't been massive library burnings in quite a while, so we should be safe. There have been very few changes in the last 50 years. There is some "quality" change, but the basics are the same. The microwave oven has taken over, and TVs are flatter. Gadgets are everywhere, but no ones that cause problems. Anyone that learned on a 50 year old car could drive a current one with no more than 30 seconds of training, if that.

    11. Re:I've thought about this by badspyro · · Score: 1

      maybe it would be better to leave them the install disks lol

    12. Re:I've thought about this by zidane2k1 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of punch cards, I do wish I could have somehow had the opportunity to see how those things were created and used. I mean, I see pictures and text on the Internet describing that, but it would be nice to have seen it actually happening, even if it were just in a video.

      Now back to the OP's actual topic, somehow I think only "geek" type people (like me) would really care all that much about PC preservation.

    13. Re:I've thought about this by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Yes. If only we had some kind of network of computers that would store that kind of information and serve it up to the public via some kind of computer. I like to think of such a theoretical computer as a kind of "Data Waiter"(tm). Of course, we need a few companies to crawl and archive it all to make the whole crazy scheme work. For example, what company could possibly manage the googles and googles of bytes of data involved? Come to think of it, the whole idea is so crazy just forget that I mentioned it. It would never work ... :-(


      For those with Aspergers, ESL people, and the fundamentally slow, the above was complete scarcasm ...

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re:I've thought about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Vista

    15. Re:I've thought about this by GlL · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget about stiction http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiction in the HD. If the HD has sat for that long there is a good chance it will not spin up.

      --
      I'm a happy pessimist. I expect and prepare for the worst, when it doesn't happen I am pleasantly surprised.
    16. Re:I've thought about this by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, i'm glad i had the opportunity to work with punched cards and paper tape back at the beginning of the 80s. There was something kinda cool about booting up a computer the size of a large wardrobe and then winding the paper tape into a figure-8 around your finger and thumb so it would run through the reader properly next boot.

      You wouldn't want to drop a stack of punched cards though - it would take you ages to get the operating system in the right order again!

    17. Re:I've thought about this by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      it really depends on how much stronger intellectual property becomes. i'm sure we can all imagine a world where in order to reduce piracy we are not allowed to know how network-protocols work and all machines have to identify themselves with a unique number before they can join a network.

    18. Re:I've thought about this by Teun · · Score: 1

      What about the new OS that'll by that time be almost ready to replace Windows 12?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    19. Re:I've thought about this by a+dark+blue · · Score: 1

      Anyone that learned on a 50 year old car could drive a current one with no more than 30 seconds of training, if that.

      Try to say it it this way: Anyone that learned on a 50 year old computer could work on a current one with no more than 30 seconds of training, if that. :)

    20. Re:I've thought about this by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

      That's not a risk I'm willing to take. Won't somebody think of the grandchildren!?

    21. Re:I've thought about this by Parrot+Mac · · Score: 1

      I'd be more worried if someone saw Vista in 50 years. More like "Holy Crap! The world is still intact?!?!"

    22. Re:I've thought about this by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      Really? I doubt Wilkes or Turing would have any trouble using a Mac / Ubuntu / Windows in a few minutes. But I had serious doubts most of the so-called modern "programmers" would have the guts to do something useful with machine code even on a relatively modern hardware like the PDP-11.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    23. Re:I've thought about this by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      For a program I could see having a deck of unnumbered cards (and I did see some, and in fact the stories of fumbled programs were numerous), but anyone who would make an OS without numbering the cards deserved whatever he got. The biggest problem with dropping the cards was damage to the cards, losing them under machinery or crud from the floor that would get into the reader.

      Virg

    24. Re:I've thought about this by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      True. But even if they are numbered you've still got to sort them out. If they weren't numbered, it would be easier to punch the whole deck again!

  2. As for preservation by gcnaddict · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps that mineral oil which is used to keep CRAYs cool might work? Maybe just get a barrel of that, drop all of the components in, and seal it up.

    I'm not sure how practical it will be for when it's opened, but it'll suffice for keeping the sucker preserved.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:As for preservation by KnightMB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps that mineral oil which is used to keep CRAYs cool might work? Maybe just get a barrel of that, drop all of the components in, and seal it up. I'm not sure how practical it will be for when it's opened, but it'll suffice for keeping the sucker preserved.

      Mineral Oil works good for cooling, but it will eat through your components after a while, especially after 50 years. About the best thing you can do is seal it in the best vacuum possible. A lack of gas around the components does much better than forcing something in, be it air, liquid, etc.

    2. Re:As for preservation by Alsee · · Score: 2, Informative

      mineral oil... drop all of the components in, and seal it up.

      Beware, mineral oil as well as some other supposedly inert liquids can act as solvents leaching certain chemicals out of plastics or other components, causing breakdown. You have to be really careful what you use, especially for long term immersion.

      I think for a "time capsule" you're better off just storing it in a sealed air container. If you want to get fancy maybe go for an inert CO2 or nitrogen atmosphere.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:As for preservation by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Is all that really going to be necessary? People pull old Trash-80's or whatever out of closets and get them to work, and that's been 15-20 years maybe. Assuming the storage is kept cool and dry, I can't see any reason why the hardware wouldn't be usable after 50 years. Maybe throw in some extra RAM and a cloned HD as a just in case (or just two PC's).

      As far as power goes, surely standardized power is embedded well enough at this point that at the very least adapters would be available in 50 years. Think about it; you probably wouldn't think twice about trying to plug in an old television from the 50's would you? Unless Vulcan's land tomorrow with a ship full of antimatter reactors I can't see us abandoning 110 anytime soon.

    4. Re:As for preservation by cjemartin · · Score: 3, Informative

      There may be some concern for the charge that is holding the bios in. I have had PC that have sat unplugged for 5 to 10 years and would no longer boot because it had lost all from in this case an internal battery. You may need to also store away the recovery disk to boot the system with.

    5. Re:As for preservation by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      TRS-80s are far less susceptible to atomic-level deterioration (electron migration, etc.) than today's ICs. And I've had plenty of hardware crap out on me after less than 10 years, let alone 50.

    6. Re:As for preservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, definitely no vacuum. The pressure difference will cause damage. If you think you need to provide more than a stable, not too humid climate, use an inert gas.

      Most components will last 50 years without problems, but the BIOS battery won't. Modern hard disks with fluid dynamic bearings may be a problem. Software should be stored on low density magnetic and optical media: Tapes are still the longest lasting archival format that is directly readable by a computer. CDs are more likely to last 50 years than DVDs.

      The best way to keep a system in working order is to use it every once in a while.

    7. Re:As for preservation by twowoot4u · · Score: 1

      Don't hard drives need atmospheres?

    8. Re:As for preservation by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't the capacitors be an issue on a TV that old? It's pretty common for old tube amps and pre-amps to have all the capacitors replaced by the audiophiles that buy them on ebay.
      I sold an old tube pre-amp, and the guy said that if they don't replace them outright they'll hook up lightbulbs in series and slowly power up the device, using the lights to verify if the electrolytes are still good.

    9. Re:As for preservation by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The goal would be to have instructions on how to unpack the system, plug it into the wall (we'll assume everyone is still using 110v US outlets), and get the system to boot.

      I've rented houses (that I moved out ASAP) that had the wiring from the 1890s/1900s still there, as well old fuse boxes (with those old twist fuses) that were hopelessly intertangled with new fuse boxes (for some reason they didn't rip everything out) and copper wiring intermeshed with aluminum wiring, and wires shielded with tar paper (falling apart). So I don't think you have to worry about moving from 110 anytime soon.

      Notebooks and Desktops can run 110 or european 220 anyway. In some ways, it's a shame we didn't go the 220/240 route but such is the sticking power of standards such that they stick with us and in many cases bog us down for a long time.

    10. Re:As for preservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redundancy is the key here. The GP hit it on the head, have 2 (or more) computers. If a single component failed, you would have at least a backup to be able to replace with.
      The parent is wrong too, EEPROM is used in cases of no power. If you're losing your BIOS because your computer wasn't powered then I'd ask for a refund!

    11. Re:As for preservation by bencoder · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think he means the bios itself. most likely the bios settings, which can normally be wiped by removing the battery for a while. that will cause the computer to most likely forget about the hard drive and not boot. So instructions should be included for how to set that up.

    12. Re:As for preservation by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      i'm just curious. what are the advantages of using 220/240v? isn't japan only using 100v outlets? i would think that a country with as advanced a public infrastructure as Japan would have adopted the most efficient socket standards to power their electronics.

    13. Re:As for preservation by KasperMeerts · · Score: 1

      Only to run them, not for preservation.

      --
      As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
    14. Re:As for preservation by H3g3m0n · · Score: 1

      Also important to remember is that CD's degrade after 5-10 years and DVDs are likely to be quicker, unless your making them like those NASA ones they send out on the space probes that last 10,000 years (and cost heaps).

      Hard drives are also likely to loose data due to magnetic force weakening over time (also solar flares and whatnot if its not insulated correctly).

      A SSD should hopefully be able to retain data for a decent length of time (Although I don't know if this is the case for the 1st generation mainstream drives we are seeing now which have various issues), but I'm assuming this project just involves old scrap systems rather then spending a few hundred $ on something. Maybe you could for out some money for a few SD cards and reader. Once again they need shielding from solar flares.

      --
      cat /dev/urandom > .sig
    15. Re:As for preservation by blincoln · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People pull old Trash-80's or whatever out of closets and get them to work, and that's been 15-20 years maybe. Assuming the storage is kept cool and dry, I can't see any reason why the hardware wouldn't be usable after 50 years.

      The reason is tin whiskers. Electronic devices and components made before RoHS requirements will far outlast anything made since then.

      In other words, it's highly unlikely that in 15-20 years, anyone will pull a working PS3 or Xbox 360 (or Core 2 Duo-based PC) out of the closet.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    16. Re:As for preservation by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      No, definitely no vacuum. The pressure difference will cause damage. If you think you need to provide more than a stable, not too humid climate, use an inert gas.

      Also, vacuum will cause outgassing, particularly of any lubricants or volatile compounds in plastics and rubber, making them go brittle. Not good. So yes, an inert, and dry (think dessicant), atmosphere is much better.

    17. Re:As for preservation by Random+Destruction · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thinner wires to transmit the same amount of power is the main difference. Also you'll lose a bit less power in transit between the step down transformer and your house.

      Its really hard to change power standards once they're in place. I guess there just isn't enough incentive in saving a bit of copper to go through the mess of throwing out everything that uses power in the country.

      --
      :x
    18. Re:As for preservation by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps that mineral oil which is used to keep CRAYs cool might work?

      It was Fluorinert, which is a fluorocarbon-based fluid - and about $200.00 a cup when I admin'd a Cray II back in 1988. Hardly "mineral oil" :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    19. Re:As for preservation by xaxa · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's actually 230V in the EU, not sure about anywhere else.

      To get the same power, a higher voltage gives a lower current (P=IV). The lower current means wires don't have to be as thick (alternatively you can draw more power for the same thickness of wire).

      A normal UK appliance is allowed up to 13A at 230V = 3kW. Stuff like vacuum cleaners and electric heaters might draw this much power.

    20. Re:As for preservation by Al+Kossow · · Score: 1

      A tape may last, but the rubber in a tape drive will not. Floppy disks may actually be the most survivable magnetic media, since the drives use no microprocessors or rubber parts.

    21. Re:As for preservation by kerohazel · · Score: 1

      isn't japan only using 100v outlets? i would think that a country with as advanced a public infrastructure as Japan would have adopted the most efficient socket standards to power their electronics.

      I have no idea why Japan uses 100V for home wiring, but don't be too sure about Japan adopting the most efficient standards. Almost all the plugs and sockets you find here are ungrounded. Half the country is on 50Hz, and the other half uses 60Hz. I don't think these are deliberate choices. It's just that the opposition to change can sometimes be mind-boggling here - from a foreign perspective.

      So even if the US moves away from 110, you can always bring it over to Japan, since I'm sure they'll be using 100 until the end of time.

      --
      Skype is too convoluted... Now I'm reverse-engineering the Kyoto Protocol.
    22. Re:As for preservation by DD32 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I always find it odd to find that some Americans think their way of life will stay around for ever (Power, Units of measurment, etc)

      However, To make this comment useful, Take a look at the graphics here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mains_power_systems As you can see, most of the world uses 230V.. (Here in Aus, Its refered to as 240V, but has been 230V for a long time.. but the +- 10% rule tends to make it higher anyway)

      110V will most likely not last forever in the states, but it'll probably be still there in 10-20 years..

      Of course.. Things will change when wireless power comes into being ;)

    23. Re:As for preservation by unitron · · Score: 1

      Another reason not to phase out incandescent bulbs.

      And yes, electrolytic capacitors don't age well, even if they aren't the ones produced during the "capacitor disease" debacle.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    24. Re:As for preservation by peragrin · · Score: 3, Informative

      um 10 to 20 ha, try 200.

      Also just so you know Every house wired in the USA has had 240 volt since the 70's. The average receptacle might be 110, but the mains coming in, every stove, and most electric heaters are all 240 volt. We get the best of both worlds. efficiency for high power draw items, and cord ends smaller than bricks. Also we have more than 3 receptacles in a room.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    25. Re:As for preservation by DD32 · · Score: 1

      Ok, So you're already making the change then?

      I forgot to check which system the USA uses, In quite a lot of other countries its 230V, and 415V for industrial uses, so it doesn't surprise me that USA has had to enable 240V mainly for heavy-use applications.

    26. Re:As for preservation by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      The main advantage of 220/240v is that everyone else in Europe uses it. The main advantage of 100/110v is that everyone else in the US/Japan uses it.

      Germany standardised on 220v and the US standardised on 110v. Everyone else pretty much followed one or the other. I don't think there was much thought in those days about what the optimum voltage might be.

    27. Re:As for preservation by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Who's going to change it? And what is the political case for making the change? How is it going to be sold to Congress?

      Unless someone can come up with some good reason why the Voltage should change, which more than outweighs the cost of making the change, and replacing every single electrical appliance in the country, I think the US will have 110V electricity until some new thing is invented to replace electricity.

    28. Re:As for preservation by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Informative

      Have a read at the problems faced in preserving the BBC Domesday project, and that's only about 20 years old.

    29. Re:As for preservation by bitrex · · Score: 1

      In the US the residential pole transformers are 240VAC center tapped. For 120 volt outlets neutral is referenced to the center tap of the transformer, with a 3rd socket direct to earth ground for safety. For 240 volt operation hot is taken to be one side of the center tap, and neutral the other side, and since the voltages are out of phase on opposite sides of a center-tapped transformer you have 240 volts phase-to-phase.

    30. Re:As for preservation by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Tin whiskers do exist, but only in solder joins that don't use lead. So far as I know, lead is one of the reasons you can't just throw a PC away. The only nation I could see tin whiskers being an issue would be the UK, since lead in solder is illegal there. Unless I'm wrong, that info could be dated. It's been awhile since I did any real electronics work.

    31. Re:As for preservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your chances aren't that good in finding a working Xbox 360 here and now in 2009 :-)

    32. Re:As for preservation by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Let me clarify, solder joints that don't use a tin/lead alloy. Sorry, it's a party night :)

    33. Re:As for preservation by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      We get the best of both worlds. efficiency for high power draw items, and cord ends smaller than bricks. Also we have more than 3 receptacles in a room.

      Here in Switzerland, standard power is 220v, but even the 3-prong grounded plugs are essentially the same size as US plugs. Typically there are two sets of 3 sockets per room, with one socket wired into the room's light switch, and additional sockets integrated into the panel of any light switches that might be present (which I've decided is an awesome idea).

      Back home in Australia (240v), two-prong plugs are about the same size as US plugs, and it would be unusual to find less than 4 outlets in a room (two sets of two).

    34. Re:As for preservation by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well, it shouldn't be that hard to switch domestic voltages. Japan is always pushing infrastructure upgrades, like switching from 4:3 to 5:3 widescreen, or from analog TV broadcasts to digital, or being the first to adopt the 3G WCDMA standard.

      by including a mix of 240V and 100V in new buildings, and gradually adding 240V outlets to existing buildings, a country that replaces their electronics and appliances so frequently should be able to switch to a new voltage in less than a decade.

      i mean, buying a transformer and installing some new power sockets shouldn't be as expensive as buying a new digital HDTV set. the average Japanese consumer probably spends more money to just have the latest hi-tech gadget or cutting edge cellphone every couple of months.

    35. Re:As for preservation by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      If going with magnetic media a faraday cage might be adviseable, A lot can happen in 50 years.

    36. Re:As for preservation by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      You want nothing touching it. A very effective very expensive method used by the military to seal electronics was to put them in a can and use an inert gas. I do not know the mixture but it would probably be bad to make it anhydrous in every case but good to keep out oxygen.

      I've opened canned 1979 dated parts in 2005 and installed them and they passed the specifications from 1979 and passed government inspection.

      But don't think the government specs are infallible. The plastic seal bad esd packaging they sealed parts in under various gasses seems great but the parts will get plastic from the heat released vapors on them and will not take solder easily if at all.

      Electrolytics of all types will die with time. I'd recommend contacting a capacitor maker and asking them for advice. I'd remove them from the boards and package new ones separately. Include where they go. Fans and hard drives that may have lubricant should be in their own sealed containers.

      Do all packaging with with full esd protection and only use esd packaging.

      Include new fully tested replacement parts, use full esd protection during testing.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    37. Re:As for preservation by tubegeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      The light bulbs are used (in series with the AC line) as current limiters - what you are protecting against is sudden current draw due to shorted/leaky capacitors. They work great, are cheap and easy to wire up, come in various ratings, and do something that a voltmeter cannot do. LOL yourself.

    38. Re:As for preservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As for magnetic media "demagnetizing" over time: that's total bullshit. The problems are completely non-magnetic in nature. The drive heads loose alignment/oxidize in old drives. The binding of magnetic particles to the substrate goes bad over time. Etc. But the magnetic particles themselves don't give shit. If you don't expose them to temperatures over their Curie point, nor to coercion-level fields, they will last a few generations easy.

    39. Re:As for preservation by frieko · · Score: 1

      RoHS is an EU standard restricting, among other things, lead solder. Most devices sold in the US comply simply to avoid separate assembly lines.

      Anyway to address GP's point, lead-free solder has gotten WAY better even in the last few years.

    40. Re:As for preservation by ckthorp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most importantly, they are DESIGNED to take a full-voltage hit directly across the mains.

    41. Re:As for preservation by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Which is why the RoHS requirements were a BAD idea. We should be mandating recycling of the solder, not using a shittier one that causes devices to fail faster. I bet if someone sat down and figured up how much extra waste is being created by the shitty solder it is more than offsetting any gains to the environment by cutting down the lead content. I know that devices just don't seem to last anymore and when you crack them open it always seems to have some whisker formation. And I know my engineer buddies HATE the new solder, as they say it doesn't flow evenly and just makes things fail faster.

      So I personally hope we either go back to the decent solder and mandate recycling(which would be better for the environment in the long run anyway) or find something better to use fast. Because otherwise we are going to be buried in mounds of E-waste that wouldn't have been tossed if the soldier hadn't turned to shit. Maybe all the bloggers out there and engineers ought to start raising a fit and pointing out that it is having the opposite effect on the environment than what was intended. Because I know that I personally having been tossing a whole lot more E-waste since the RoHS requirements came into play.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    42. Re:As for preservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoah, how much memory (actual physical RAM in chips, not virtual stuff) was on a CrayII? Wiki says 256Mwords, but what's a word? Was it a 1 gigabyte machine?

    43. Re:As for preservation by NoMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lol i think using a volt meter could work a tad more accurately than a lightbulb. Talk about clinging to dying tech.

      lol i think you've missed the point of what the lightbulb does lol

      The lightbulb acts as a current/voltage limiter. Picture this:

      • Caps are OK - their internal "resistance" is high so, when in series with the lightbulb, they effectively receive something like 1/2 ~ full mains V & the equipment works (usually at reduced capacity)
      • Caps are faulty - their internal resistance is low, so now the bulb has near-full mains V across it (& lights up fully, as a nice indicator of this) instead of the equipment catching fire.

      It's crude, but effective, and a trick electricians have been using for years.

      (Caveat: the actual technical facts of the matter are somewhat more complicated than this, but given the quality of your comment I doubt you're capable of understanding them...)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    44. Re:As for preservation by dmizer · · Score: 1

      And if the voltage at the mains does change, so what? It's not like power can't be generated at whatever voltage is required.

    45. Re:As for preservation by cdfh · · Score: 1

      It's perhaps worth mentioning that if an inert gas is used, there should be warnings on the packaging. The last thing they want is for a group of students to open the box and drop down dead (from suffocation).

    46. Re:As for preservation by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There was a lot of thought.

      The US standardized at ~110V because that was what basically as high of a voltage as you could put through a ligthbulb at that time (higer voltage light bulbs have more delicate filiments, and therefor arn't as robust). Germany on the other hand standardized several years later, when better lightbulbs were available, so they standardized on a higher voltage which made more efficient use of wire (higher voltage lets you put more power through a given cross-section of wire).

      Both made the best choice given the state of technology at the time.

    47. Re:As for preservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Faraday cage won't do anything to preserve magnetic media.

    48. Re:As for preservation by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      Australia also has awesome stackable plugs that allow piggy-backing, and the ability to change the cable exit point on the plug so that the wire goes in the right direction from the socket to the appliance.

    49. Re:As for preservation by compro01 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the Cray-2's word is 64-bits, so 2GB.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    50. Re:As for preservation by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      About the best thing you can do is seal it in the best vacuum possible.

      Actually, that's about the worst thing you can do - the lubricants in the hard drive will evaporate and migrate, ditto for the lubricants in the fan motors. Other components will also outgas, damaging them. (Notably, your wires/ribbon cables.) A goodly amount of what outgasses is going to end up on HDD platters, floppy r/w heads, CD/DVD ROM lasers... rendering them inoperable.

    51. Re:As for preservation by Casandro · · Score: 1

      Well one problem is probably the flash ROM used to hold the BIOS. I'm not sure if it'll hold it's data so long. After all it's just electrons trapped in a layer. They could diffuse into the surrounding areas easily. This has nothing to do with the battery. The battery is only supporting the clock and the BIOS settings.

      The magnetic areas on a harddisk also diffuse with time.

      Optical discs, especially cheap CDs also only tend to last for a couple of decades.

    52. Re:As for preservation by swillden · · Score: 1

      Ok, So you're already making the change then?

      No. The delivery of three-phase 240V power to residential areas has been standard in the US since shortly after the introduction of electricity. This makes it easy to provide the higher voltage to devices that require it, and half as much to everything else, which is how homes have been wired in the US for 100 years.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    53. Re:As for preservation by irp · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Europa we have 230V for "small items", high power items like stoves etc usually uses 400V.

    54. Re:As for preservation by rts008 · · Score: 1

      "So far as I know, lead is one of the reasons you can't just throw a PC away."[emphasis mine]

      Yes, but there are other good reasons. If you are interested, here is a short wiki that lists them alphabetically. (see:"List of substances contained in electronic waste", about halfway down the page)

      Lead solder is prohibited for plumbing in the USA, but I don't know about anything else.

      BTW, hope you enjoyed the party! (I used the past tense, as if you are doing it 'right', you won't see this for a while! :-))
      *okay, so I've got a double chin on the smiley!-like me!*

      Party like it's 10 years past 1999!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    55. Re:As for preservation by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Vacuum may be hard to maintain, an inert gas like Argon is probably better.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    56. Re:As for preservation by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      the standard european plug is just as small as the american and works on a net of 220V

    57. Re:As for preservation by Siffy · · Score: 1

      You see it labeled as anywhere from 110-125V here in the US. In practice it might test anywhere from 90-135V in a house depending on the area, time of year, and age of the house and wiring. Typical is 115-120V though, and anything less than 110 is very rare. Our larger devices will be labeled 220-240V depending on age. Then of course we have the handful of odd devices like florescent bulbs needing stepped up to 600V by a ballast, the same for metal halide bulbs at 277V typically, and a lot of heavy-duty industrial equipment running at 480V (AC or DC).

    58. Re:As for preservation by Siffy · · Score: 1

      In addition to what's already been said, you also tend to get better efficiency out of 240V devices. Nothing major, but ~5%. But, I believe and someone correct me if I have it reversed, devices like motors with windings are cheaper to design and build for 120V.

    59. Re:As for preservation by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

      how do you explain my 10+ year old game CDs that are still in perfect shape then? CD's degrade in 5-10 years if you give them to someone who isn't a geek, doesn't have a helpful OCD, and someone who simply doesn't care. even my burned discs which I didn't care about are still in readable condition and are more than 5 years old. keeping CD's and DVD's in a time capsule, and thus in a dark, dry place, will allow them to work for several decades. TDK even says metal stabilized Cyanine discs will last up to 70 years at standard storage conditions Click Here. Meaning 50 years is easily achievable with just an educated assumption of safe storage settings.

    60. Re:As for preservation by Teun · · Score: 1
      And now many years after these choices were made we can look at their effects.
      The 110V/60 Cycles system is a lot more safe when it comes to the dangers of electrocution.

      And the 230V/50Hz. system has due to the lower currents a much better result in preventing fires.

      Old Edison was for many years trying to push the DC system but failed. With present technology this might become the next power transmission system, it is already the preferred system for long underground/ sub sea High Tension lines.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    61. Re:As for preservation by xaxa · · Score: 1

      The last American house I stayed in didn't have any accessible 240V outlets (and this was a $2M house). There was one in the laundry room for the dryer, and I guess there were some hidden in the kitchen.
      My flat has several 230V outlets in every room, which is useful for e.g. a 2800W vacuum cleaner or portable 3kW electric heater. That's still not enough sockets, but it was built/wired when an entertainment system was a TV (1 socket) rather than a TV, DVD player, satellite receiver and amplifier (4). Or when bedroom appliances were a light and a clock (2 sockets) rather than a computer + toys + light + clock. Having said that, there are still about 6-8 outlets in each room, but not 6 by the TV, or 6 where my PC is.

      I find American plugs (you call them cord ends?) to be flimsy, it was way too easy to knock them out of the socket, or worse halfway out. The standard European ones are made to grip the socket more. The UK ones are super-safe, and have the cord trailing down the wall rather than out, but they are a bit large. But I can't say I've ever wished my appliances used smaller plugs.

    62. Re:As for preservation by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Maybe because Americans are still making babies unlike most of the world that uses 220+V? Reducing the voltage by half, having 3 prong outlets with an extra ground and standardizing on outlets with thin slits instead of holes nicely sized for little fingers does wonders for keeping a curious toddler alive. In fact, I see a medium-term future with most home outlets being 12v DC for digital electronics and LED lights. You can lick those with your tongue and just get sour taste (although, as I understand, some extremely unlucky people can get electrocuted even in these cases, so it's a matter of statistical safety rather than actually encouraging people to do that).

    63. Re:As for preservation by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Also important to remember is that CD's degrade after 5-10 years and DVDs are likely to be quicker, unless your making them like those NASA ones they send out on the space probes that last 10,000 years (and cost heaps).

      Burned ones degrade, because they rely on chemical dyes which can degrade over time. Pressed CDs and DVDs are vastly more robust as the information is, as the name suggests, physically pressed into the material. A layer of plastic, a layer of foil, a layer of plastic. That's not going to rot or decompose quickly. My 15 year old music CDs still work just fine.

      A SSD should hopefully be able to retain data for a decent length of time (Although I don't know if this is the case for the 1st generation mainstream drives we are seeing now which have various issues), but I'm assuming this project just involves old scrap systems rather then spending a few hundred $ on something. Maybe you could for out some money for a few SD cards and reader. Once again they need shielding from solar flares.

      Flash memory stores information as a charge. That charge eventually leaks to the point where the information is unreadable (about 10 years last time I looked), so flash devices aren't suitable for long-term storage.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    64. Re:As for preservation by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not necessarily. Most cultures have myths of ancients that left traps to protect their treasures from grave robbers. Seems to me that gassing a few of them will motivate the survivors by convincing them they've found something really valuable.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    65. Re:As for preservation by mcpheat · · Score: 1

      The UK plugs are larger as they have to hold a fuse. Most sockets are wired up on a ring main rather than a star configuration more commonly used elsewhere.

    66. Re:As for preservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason British plugs are relatively large is because of over-design and an incorporated fuse. Means that our plugs don't fall out if you even breathe on them... Our cookers, showers and electric heaters get higher amperage circuits. I'm sure when we get electric cars everywhere, people will get even higher voltage or amperage circuits installed in their garage to recharge them quicker.

    67. Re:As for preservation by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      For 240 volt operation hot is taken to be one side of the center tap, and neutral the other side

      FWIW, it's not called "neutral" when it's a hot second phase. "Neutral" is a term specifically reserved for the ground sink used to complete the path of a single-phase circuit.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    68. Re:As for preservation by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      The fuse is there for another reason: the price of copper. After WWII, cooper was so expensive than we developed the ring main: a 32A circuit looping around each floor of the house, rather than having a spur direct to the fuse box for every socket. Since the 32A fuse in the fuse box couldn't protect appliances, the plug must have an internal fuse. But the UK plug is definitely the safest in the world. It's also impossible to insert a finger/pencil/fork/etc into the live pin of the socket by accident: the shutter only opens when the ground pin is inserted.

    69. Re:As for preservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, the 220v circuit is single phase coming out of a "Y" or "Delta" (can't remember which) transformer. It is center-grounded, so each leg is a 110V, single phase, and on 220, both legs are considered hot (black and red, IIRC)and single phase.

      For some small 3-phase systems (like a generator on small commercial boats), you have can use 2 phases which are 120-degrees out of phase, and that's generally a 208-V system. Most things still work OK, but you have to be careful with some electronics and induction motors.

    70. Re:As for preservation by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      There is a very good reason to make this kind of change.

      Power is current times voltage (P = I x E)

      But power is also current squared times resistance (P = I^2 x R)

      Whatever current your load draws sees all the resistance in the wires and connections between it and the power source.

      If you double the voltage, the current required to provide some level of power at the load gets cut in half.

      By cutting the current in half, you decrease the amount of power wasted as heat in all the connective wiring by a factor of four since power is current squared times resistance. The resistance in the circuit is basically fixed and is set by the wire gauge, the length of the run, the quality of the connections, etc.

      So by doubling the voltage, you can reduce parasitic losses in wiring by a factor of four. That's why.

      And as has already been pointed out, provided the wiring is rated for the voltage, by decreasing the amount of current for a given power level, it's like getting a wiring upgrade for your house. The same wiring that could handle a 15 or 20 amp circuit (~1500 to ~2000 watts) can now handle twice that power (~3000 to ~4000 watts).

    71. Re:As for preservation by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      12 volts is not enough to break down skin resistance and pump enough current through the human body to cause harm in most circumstances.

      I have heard a couple of stories where people have experimented with 12 volts and had very unfortunate results, though:

      Some guy jump starting a car that remembered the fun you can have with a 9 volt battery by touching it to your tongue, and touched the jumper cables to his tongue. His tongue exploded. A 9 volt battery has a lot of internal resistance and can't deliver much current through a nice, salty, wet tongue that has very little resistance. A car battery, however, has very little internal resistance and probably dumped hundreds of amps through the guy's tongue.

      And another story about some frat guys having fun with a car battery, jumper cables, and two buckets of salt water. They used the salt water to complete a circuit with their forearms and hands and would see how long they could each "take it" with whatever pain or muscle contractions it caused in spite of the skin resistance (which was drastically lowered by immersing their hands and arms into the salt water).

      Eventually one of them suffered a heart attack when his heart couldn't take the stress anymore, and he died.

      It's not statistics. It's how much current and what waveform across the heart that kills people. It's why sweaty people are much more subject to electrocution than people with dry skin. Or why people wading in water in their flooded basements can drop like a brick if they touch the wrong thing but others, not standing in water, can touch a live circuit and just feel a tingle.

      Path through the body will also affect how likely someone is to die. A voltage across the tongue shouldn't directly affect the heart at all. Complete a circuit with your hands and that puts the current directly across the chest. Or complete through a hand and foot and you also are sending current across the chest.

      It's also why DC voltage is less likely to interfere with the heart rhythm than AC that comes pretty close to the timing of the heartbeat itself.

    72. Re:As for preservation by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      I would suggest an atmosphere of Helium instead. It's somewhat hard to contain, but is inert. As for vacuum, it may rob some volatile stuff off the components (cables, capacitors, etc)

    73. Re:As for preservation by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Back home in Australia (240v), two-prong plugs are about the same size as US plugs, and it would be unusual to find less than 4 outlets in a room (two sets of two).

      Code, in Ontario, says a maximum of 10' of wall space between receptacles, and the receptacles have a minimum of two sockets. In my bedroom, which is 15'x10', that means that, according to code, there's a minimum of 6 pairs of receptacles. There's actually 5 pairs and one block with 6 sockets for the computer desk.

      And most modern appliances can take universal power input. I don't think there's a single power brick in my house for anything, my elliptical machine, my TV, my computers, etc. that doesn't take 100-240V @ 50-60Hz. It's cheaper, for a global company, to manufacture one device that can take anything than it is to manufacture 6 or 7 different devices to account for all of the weird power configurations you find in the world. Case in point, I'm currently waiting in an airport for a flight down to Curacao. There, they have a mix of sockets... some of them are US 110V-60Hz, some of them are US 110V-50Hz, and some of them are Europlug 240V-50Hz. I don't need a transformer, because everything I'm bringing with me (battery charger for my camera, laptop, bathroom appliances) is universal input. I have two socket adaptors with me, and that's all I need.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    74. Re:As for preservation by cthulhu11 · · Score: 0

      Have you read any articles about how electronics actually get recycled? Kids sqatting over fires boiling PC boards in acid, etc. Safe recycling would mean doing it domestically, with far greater costs, and the US consumer has made it clear time and again that saving a few cents is all-important, hence the continued existence of Mal-Wart. I'm not convinced that RoHS solder has an effect on e-waste -- many people toss their electronics long before they fail in order to keep up with the Joneses. The contraction of product lifecycles over time doesn't help matters. Many products are superseded by the time a review article can even see print.

    75. Re:As for preservation by MaxVT · · Score: 1

      Do American toddlers really have fingers 4mm thick?

    76. Re:As for preservation by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Think about it; you probably wouldn't think twice about trying to plug in an old television from the 50's would you?

      Well actually... yes I would! If a 50's television sat for an extended period without being run, you'd run a very high risk of electrolytic capacitor failure if you simply plugged the set in and turned it on.

      If you're lucky and haven't had the electrolyte dry up over the years, you still probably need to "reform" it by bringing up the voltage very gradually.

    77. Re:As for preservation by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

      Why not nitrogen? It's the most common gas in earth's atmosphere (something like 70% IIRC), and it's what museaums are using to preserve mummies.

    78. Re:As for preservation by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      I have for some time wondered how you would preserve at low cost something like an encyclopaedia. I occurs to me that one possibility after you have your airtight container is to just before you seal it you drop into it some dehumidifying crystals and, paradoxically, a moist pad of soft steel wool. The steel wool will rapidly oxidise removing a lot of O2, the crystals will mop up the excess H2O vapour. Or just flood the container with N2, though my original motivation is being able to do this with stuff that may not be readily available. Even so many of the components may drift out of spec just due to temperature over 50 years. Ideally it should be buried in Antarctica, but seeing how that is likely to be a bit too far. Place it underground, but isolated from ground water. Usual stuff.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    79. Re:As for preservation by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Helium is the least reactive gas possible. Nitrogen works for mummies, but I never tried that with computers ;-)

    80. Re:As for preservation by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      But how did it taste?

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    81. Re:As for preservation by fataugie · · Score: 1

      3-Phase? To residential areas? You mean to homes? Really?
      Where do you live? I've NEVER seen 3-Phase in a regular home...take a look at the incoming wires to your panel. There are two lugs.

      You have single phase electric, two 110V legs coming in. Commercial operations have 3-Phase, not residential.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    82. Re:As for preservation by fataugie · · Score: 1

      And another story about some frat guys having fun with a car battery, jumper cables, and two buckets of salt water

      And Darwin is proven right again....

      --

      WTF? Over?

    83. Re:As for preservation by swillden · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks. I had my terminology confused. Your post and Wikipedia have corrected the deficiency. :)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    84. Re:As for preservation by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming (since you say 'game CDs') that they're commercial discs - that means produced in large volume, and thus the data layer will be made from pressed aluminium. Metal doesn't deform over a decade in any half way sensible storage environment, and I think the approximate amount of time it takes plastic to degrade (again, in a relatively normal environment) is known as a 'metric fuckton', so I can see those things easily lasting decades, hell maybe even centuries (assuming there's not some subtle long-term instability in them that I'm missing).

      Burned discs, which is what this machine would have to contain if it were using any kind of user-created content on CD/DVD, are somewhat unstable almost by definition - the writing laser has to be able to cause changes in the dye and thus the dye has to be of a variable nature. If a moderately powered laser can alter its state in less than a second, environmental factors over half a century have a good chance of doing the same. In ideal conditions could you keep a CD-R for 50 years? Perhaps, but it's a gamble. Even with ten backup copies (by no means a difficult task) I'd be dubious; of course, the chances of the data degrading in such a way that you couldn't recover one full copy from bits of each the ten discs is probably small, but that's hardly a plug-and-play solution for people with no idea how to operate that type of technology.

      With the cost of CDs there's no harm in throwing a few in on the chance that they might survive, but I wouldn't count on them. Not that I'd count on any one potential point of failure, obviously. Magneto-optical would stand a better chance of surviving, although I don't know enough about the theory behind their operation to tell you authoritatively how much of a gamble that is, but I believe they're fairly inert below their Curie point. Basically while a CD-R is always in its 'writeable' state, magneto-optical needs to be heated and then written, meaning when it cools it becomes read-only and is less likely to be 'written' by environmental factors. One thing to keep in mind is how they're stored on the shelf, as the media itself can warp simply under the effects of gravity over a long enough time period.

    85. Re:As for preservation by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      220-240 @ 50Hz is used by most of the world (outside America and Japan)

      The USA influenced it's neighbours (and Japan) to use it's standard of 110 V @ 60 Hz

      Power distribution is slightly more efficient with 240V and slightly more reliable with 110V but most long distance power transmission is done at much higher voltages anyway ....

      It's the same as driving on the right or left, it's mostly a matter of tradition rather than any good reason, there are advantages and disadvantages of both systems

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    86. Re:As for preservation by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Even so there are more elegant ways of doing this. Or at least it is a terrible reason to save incandescent bulbs. Plus using TUBES as a reason to save lightbulbs struck me as so ridiculous I posted kind of blindly. Who would argue that we need to keep one useless outdated tech so that we can use it as a diagnostic tool for tech that has been useless for many decades. The whole thing SHOUTED crazy audiophile. I'm sure they'll fight that 1s and 0s deliver lower quality sound and w/e else audiophiles say. (5000$ cables anyone?)

    87. Re:As for preservation by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      A Faraday cage will protect magnetic media from outside influences. It won't keep the media from degrading but it will prevent any inconvenient wars from doing too much harm.

      Virg

  3. Also CF Card by zoloto · · Score: 1

    Along with the CD's place everything on a couple of large compact flash cards because it would be a shame to *really* have a definitive idea of how long optical media will last and expire in.

    1. Re:Also CF Card by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Data on flash cards decay in about 5 years _maximum_. So good CDs are guaranteed to last much longer.

    2. Re:Also CF Card by KlomDark · · Score: 5, Informative

      Archival DVD rated at 300 years. It might not last 300 years, but hopefully it'd last long enough for this time capsule.

      http://www.smarthouse.com.au/Home_Office/Storage/U9P4F7L2

    3. Re:Also CF Card by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      What i would do is use a couple of these, and store some kind of ECC on them with the real data, so that if you didn't get a single good one out of it, you might be able to use the ECC to identify good parts of things and try to rebuild the correct one from all the parts. i'd also look to filling the container with some kind of inert heavy gas, something like krypton maybe (dunno how hard that would be to procure though)

    4. Re:Also CF Card by unitron · · Score: 1

      Data on flash cards decay...

      I had a sudden mental image of the print fading away on the original type flash cards, the index card size paper or cardboard kind.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    5. Re:Also CF Card by zidane2k1 · · Score: 1

      2 + 2 = .... What? I can't read it anymore! 5? Yeah, must be 5, gonna write that in...

      Back to flash memory cards, I really wasn't aware that the data could decay that quickly.

      Hey, so does that mean that my Mario Kart 64 scores will actually fade away quicker than my Super Mario Kart ones (which are stored on battery-backed SRAM)? (Yeah, I know I'm really starting to go OT on this one)

  4. Not optical media by AuMatar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If there's any crack, air will get in and degrade the media. Use magnetic or solid state storage- hard drives or USB sticks.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:Not optical media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Use magnetic or solid state storage- hard drives or USB sticks.

      This really is the worst thing you could possibly do. Do you really think the tiny little magnetic dipoles and electric charges will still be there in 50 years?

    2. Re:Not optical media by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      That's a very good point. Put the time capsule in a vacuum tube, pump out the air, replace with argon, seal the whole thing up.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Not optical media by Repossessed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't hard drives decay quickly if unused?

      Also, you might want a cracked version of windows, Microsoft probably won't have the activation servers running in 50 years.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    4. Re:Not optical media by EdipisReks · · Score: 1

      Don't hard drives decay quickly if unused?/blockquote of course not, unless they are Seagates.

    5. Re:Not optical media by urban_warrior · · Score: 2, Funny

      better yet, include a copy of ubuntu

  5. CD-R DVD-R media failure by Alsee · · Score: 1

    I do not know the expected lifetime of standard CDs and DVDs, but I have heard several reports of recordable CDs and DVDs getting bit rot after just a couple of years.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by mfnickster · · Score: 5, Informative

      Definitely don't use recordable media that are dye-based or phase-change. If you can get the CDs or DVDs pressed professionally, do it - music CDs are made from durable polycarbonate with a layer of silvering applied on the top side, then covered over with lacquer or, preferably, another layer of polycarbonate.

      Wrap the discs in paper, then vacuum-seal them in shrink wrap. Seal them in a padded sealed tyvec envelope. Label "Do not open until Christmas 2060" with a Sharpie.

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    2. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by pruss · · Score: 1

      Last I checked (half a year ago or so), it was not possible to get professionally pressed discs in quantities less than about 100-200. If that's changed, I'd appreciate knowing (for family archival purposes).

    3. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely don't use recordable media that are dye-based or phase-change. If you can get the CDs or DVDs pressed professionally, do it - music CDs are made from durable polycarbonate with a layer of silvering applied on the top side, then covered over with lacquer or, preferably, another layer of polycarbonate.

      Wrap the discs in paper, then vacuum-seal them in shrink wrap. Seal them in a padded sealed tyvec envelope. Label "Do not open until Christmas 2060" with a Sharpie.

      Has anybody ever tested one of these sticky labels with a Sharpie for 50 years? I think they should use iron gall ink and vellum under an argon gas seal and sealed in a Faraday cage, just to be safe.

    4. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Keramos · · Score: 1

      Pressed CDs suffer bit rot as well, I believe. Different reason, same end result.

    5. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      music CDs are made from durable polycarbonate with a layer of silvering applied on the top side

      Silvering? No, it's aluminum.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      > Silvering? No, it's aluminum

      Okay, *metaphorical* silvering! ...except when it's gold. :)

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    7. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's not necessarily a bad thing, the chances that 100 discs are all going to get broken or degrade is pretty low.

    8. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      yes, however unlike dye based writable media, which lasts 5-10 years, pressed discs while untested, theoretically can last up to 100, slight change in length of time there, and considering he's only asking for 50 years, it's doable.

    9. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by aitikin · · Score: 1

      If 1 disc is likely to fail, the likelihood of all the other discs to fail goes up exponentially.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    10. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by ACalcutt · · Score: 0

      But between all of the disks(even if they are all bad) you would probably have a better chance of recovering the data.

    11. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

      If 1 disc is likely to fail, the likelihood of all the other discs to fail goes up exponentially.

      No.
      Say the likelihood of a disk failing is 50% and you make two copies. The likelihood of at least one disk failing is 75%.
      But since both disks are identical, we don't care if one fails, we only care if both fail. The likelihood of both disks failing is only 25%.

      The risk does not go up exponentially, it goes down logarithmically.

      Unless you are referring to external failures, such as the building burning down. Those do not change from one disk to a million disks, if you store them all in one place.

      --
      Changa hates change.
    12. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by aitikin · · Score: 1

      No, if you're dealing with a media that's all from the same source, the likelihood that the metal is bad or the plastic is bad or there was a bad batch here there or the next place increases with each failure. After approximately 10, it becomes very likely that they will all fail within the time they're supposed to last. You're looking at small numbers, I'm looking at large ones.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    13. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why vacuum? I think it will be better to use an inert gas, so you don't have pressure problems. Even Nitrogen can do the work very well (even though is not inert).

    14. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Silvering? No, it's aluminum.

      Even if it's silvered with aluminium, its still silvered.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    15. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Say the likelihood of a disk failing is 50% and you make two copies. The likelihood of at least one disk failing is 75%.
      But since both disks are identical, we don't care if one fails, we only care if both fail. The likelihood of both disks failing is only 25%.

      The risk does not go up exponentially, it goes down logarithmically.

      The failure of CDs and DVDs are not independent random events, they depend to a large extent on factors which apply to all the discs - like the physical and chemical properties of the stuff they are made from. As they aren't independent random events you're using the wrong kind of statistics.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    16. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      That process requires glass. The polycarbonate (IOW, plastic) of an optical disk means that it's not silvering.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    17. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      *sigh* You really are a pedantic tosser. Try this definition, or this one.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    18. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting that plexiglass mirrors are not silvered??

    19. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      No, No, No.

      In commercially produced optical media, the plastic is applied to the aluminum, not the other way around.

      IT'S NOT SILVERING.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    20. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Wow, it looks like you had over a week to do your research and still failed. You're still wrong according to the descriptions of CD manufacturing I could find (like this one). The plastic is pressed, sputtered with aluminium (sputtering with aluminium to produce a reflective surface is "silvering"), then the aluminium surface is coated with a varnish.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    21. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Work, family and school.

      Maybe you have nothing better to do, not so with me.

      OK. I'll concede that my memory failed me as to which part was pressed. I stick by my contention that it's not silvering. Silvering requires it to be a chemical process. Even if I concede that one can silver with a metal other than silver, pressing a layer of aluminum foil onto a plastic disk is not silvering.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    22. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      It's not pressed, it's sputtered - vaporised and deposited in a vacuum. At least it is according to the descriptions I found in a non-exhaustive search for a description of the process, like the one I linked to. I wouldn't be surprised if there were different processes in use though.

      I have the benefit of not only being absurdly pedantic, but also working freelance and being childless, so I'm free to research irrelevant trivia at any time of the day or night.

      This is relevant.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    23. Re:CD-R DVD-R media failure by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      It's not pressed, it's sputtered - vaporised and deposited in a vacuum.

      That is done for the mold.

      At least it is according to the descriptions I found in a non-exhaustive search for a description of the process, like the one I linked to. I wouldn't be surprised if there were different processes in use though.

      I've suffered one memory lapse this week, I'll have to check again. Still, I do not believe this to be the case, but I'll hold off until I have proof.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  6. Virtualization by tji · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Virtualization gives an easier way to accomplish this (with the caveat of needing a platform able to host the virtualized platform).

    You can easily snapshot systems, and have an OS image for each x years rather than a complete new platform each time. Doing this today, you could easily produce snapshots from DOS days up until current systems.

    VMware would be easier to create all this with. But, open source Xen would probably be the better choice to ensure future availability.

    1. Re:Virtualization by wangmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you're missing the point of the project. There's far more to computing than operating system and software. If the point was to show where virtualization was now to people 50 years ago, your idea is great, but the point is to remind people 50 years from now what kinds of computers we had that the average person used.

      How uncool would everything be if you opened up a time capsule from the 80s and found out that it consisted of a polaroid picture of everything people wanted to put into the time capsule?

    2. Re:Virtualization by dmomo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is true. But, I would hope that unpacking an actual system that is authentic and plugging in the components would be quite an experience. But for all I know, 6-7th graders will be bored out of their skull. Invite their parents along to open it. I bet it'll be the big kids that really dig it.

    3. Re:Virtualization by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is true. But, I would hope that unpacking an actual system that is authentic and plugging in the components would be quite an experience. But for all I know, 6-7th graders will be bored out of their skull. Invite their parents along to open it. I bet it'll be the big kids that really dig it.

      I dunno. Would there be any point in a 2009 PC without a 2009 internet to use it with?

    4. Re:Virtualization by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      How uncool would everything be if you opened up a time capsule from the 80s and found out that it consisted of a polaroid picture of everything people wanted to put into the time capsule?

      Hmm. A photo of the real thing, perfectly preserved, or the real Jessica Biel, but old, and really, really, really hungry, to the point of wanting to eat your brains. Tough call.

    5. Re:Virtualization by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Err.. the 80s. Right. Jessica Biel would have been pretty young in the 80s. Substitute Star from Lost Boys or something, I dunno ;)

    6. Re:Virtualization by Sparky+McGruff · · Score: 1

      I suspect he's thinking of Jennifer Beals, the star of the groundbreaking motion picture, Flashdance. Written by Joe Esterhaus (before he got cancer and became religious), produced by Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer. Jennifer Beals was a "welder by day, stripper by night" who wanted to go to dance school. You can't beat that for plot. After this movie, Jennifer Beals' fine performance led many young women to prance around in ripped up sweatshirts and leg warmers. Good stuff.

    7. Re:Virtualization by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Nope. I was replying to myself, thinking of Jessica Biel, but then realised the previous poster was talking about the 80s, not current.

      You do raise interesting points about the plot of Flashdance and the consequences though :D

    8. Re:Virtualization by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      The virtualized PC idea is good from the standpoint that if the data in the time capsule is destroyed, maybe the real PC can still be restored from the system images you keep in live, available storage.

    9. Re:Virtualization by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

      Good point. We need to create a waywaybackmachine.

  7. Something is going to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just won't work. Either the hardware will fail, or the media will be unreadable, or something else will go wrong. Just include replication instructions, and they should be able to use their molecular printer to create a working copy.

  8. Way too many unknowns by gavron · · Score: 3, Funny

    "US Power" is not a defined term. Even if you went to the effort of saying "The two leads need to be supplied with a sine-wave alternating current peaking at 115 Volts" you have no way of knowing that in 50 years they'll be using Volts, AC, two leads, or know what a sine-wave is. I like the previous poster's suggestion of a laptop with a solar charger. Of course this makes an assumption that there will be sunlight in the right frequencies and not the bad evil sunshine frequencies. Who knows what 50 years of industrial evolution, weather changes, and clouds will bring. Heck, what if they try and start it up in Seattle and all they have is clouds? Finally, EVEN IF they did start it up, the point of a time capsule is to provide a glimpse of the past, not to ANNOY AND IRRITATE THE FUTURE. That means whatever OS you install on there is a waste. Making someone go through the tedious boot-up sequence (50 years, Moore's Law, remember?) is a waste. In short, a waste. Much better to give them code samples of your hello_world.c so they can laugh about how stuff was hard in the past. Regards E P.S. FTG!

    1. Re:Way too many unknowns by BigFoot48 · · Score: 1

      I can hear it now: "It's been three seconds and still no "desktop", whatever that is, the damn thing is broken!"

    2. Re:Way too many unknowns by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      The Volt has been used as a unit for more a century, and it precisely defined by the SI. It also has the benefit of having a convenient magnitude for dealing with potentials that arise from common chemical reactions. That convenience isn't going to change, so there's no incentive to switch to a new unit. Odds are that as long as there are human chemists on earth, there will be somebody who uses or at least knows what a Volt is. Similarly for something like a sine wave. The only way the nomenclature for trigonometry is going to change in the next few centuries is if we're enslaved by aliens or something equally catastrophic. Basic mathematical patterns inherent in Euclidean geometry aren't going to be easily forgotten or abandoned.

    3. Re:Way too many unknowns by socsoc · · Score: 1

      I have an inkling that they'll still know what a sine wave is and how to use a solar panel in 50 years.

    4. Re:Way too many unknowns by Sperbels · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even if you went to the effort of saying "The two leads need to be supplied with a sine-wave alternating current peaking at 115 Volts" you have no way of knowing that in 50 years they'll be using Volts, AC, two leads, or know what a sine-wave is.

      Um, we're talking 50 years from now...not 500. Many of students who created the time capsule could even be the ones digging it up. There will be plenty of people who understand its power requirements. There will be plenty of people who even know how to operated the thing with proficiency.

    5. Re:Way too many unknowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you have no way of knowing that in 50 years they'll be using Volts, AC, two leads, or know what a sine-wave is.

      Oh, I think the robots running the planet in 50 years will be well-versed in classical math and electronics. :)

    6. Re:Way too many unknowns by mustafap · · Score: 5, Funny

      >Basic mathematical patterns inherent in Euclidean geometry aren't going to be easily forgotten or abandoned.

      You overestimate the power of the US education system.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    7. Re:Way too many unknowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like today, we have no clue of how things worked 50 years ago... I wish there would be some information, even the slightest bit, but no, we have nothing...

    8. Re:Way too many unknowns by franl · · Score: 1

      If wishes were fishes ... We'll never understand those mysterious devices of 1959 that are forever lost to the mists of time.

    9. Re:Way too many unknowns by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Much better to give them code samples of your hello_world.c so they can laugh about how stuff was hard in the past."

      From the desktop BASIC processor in my 1974 Math lab:

      >10 print "Hello World"
      >run
      Hello World
      >

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    10. Re:Way too many unknowns by zmollusc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pfft, more like 'Holy crap, this thing is fast! It boots in minutes, not hours! But where is the dna scanner that tells the government who the operator is?'.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    11. Re:Way too many unknowns by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can hear it now: "It's been three seconds and still no "desktop", whatever that is, the damn thing is broken!"

      Given what we know about human nature and trends in technology it's more likely to be "It's been three seconds and still no blowjob, are you sure this thing is a computer?"

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Way too many unknowns by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *&^*(%(&*)!!!!! -- pressed "submit" before making my point... Hello World is not getting simpler over time, it's getting more complicated. Compare it in Fortran vs. PHP or BASIC vs. Java at http://www.roesler-ac.de/wolfram/hello.htm/ (hello world in 421 languages).

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    13. Re:Way too many unknowns by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Even if you went to the effort of saying "The two leads need to be supplied with a sine-wave alternating current peaking at 115 Volts" you have no way of knowing that in 50 years they'll be using Volts, AC, two leads, or know what a sine-wave is.

      That scenario would only occur if human civilization was destroyed in 50 years. People will still have access to 115VAC, even if they have to run it through a converter first. And it's only 50 years, if it was 200 years then yea, maybe I'd agree with you. Perhaps one day everything will run on anti-matter cells with a lifetime charge, and people won't normally plug things into the wall. But then it seems likely that you can get a module that you can still plug things into, like antique lamps. (I'm positive there will be antiques collectors 50 from now).

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    14. Re:Way too many unknowns by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I'm pretty sure someone will be around that'll remember 50 years ago, we used 120VAC 60hz sine wave. It's not too hard to find information on "the way it was". Like, back in 1890, the Niagara Falls plant provided customers with 110VAC 25hz. That wouldn't exactly work for the common PC, but it would work incandescent lights fine.

          Now, if anyone remembers how to work Linux, OSX, or Vista in 50 years, that'll be the important question. How many folks can attempt to operate state of the art equipment from 1959?

          For giggles, I installed Windows 3.11 in a virtual machine. It installed fine, but I couldn't remember how to use it. It took me a while, but I found instructions on getting TCP/IP networking installed, and still I had problems. Relatively, Win3.11 isn't all that old.

          I think the bigger concern will be the physical hardware. Pieces will corrode. Parts will fall apart. Media will decay. Maybe, just maybe, it will even turn on.

          I was excited to find an old "Novell UnixWare 1.1" (circa 1994) box at an office someone I knew worked at. It was still shrink wrapped from the factory. It sat on the shelf in a climate controlled office. It had been delivered, just in case they had to use it. In about 2005, I decided to install it into a VM. I had to scrounge to find a 5.25" floppy drive to install it. The drive was brand new too, still in it's shrink wrapped box. I happened to have an old floppy cable that I could connect it to, and my BIOS still supported 5.25" drives. I carefully unsealed the box. I then carefully broke the seal on the disk package, after reading it of course.

          Everything was going great. I booted to the first disk. It worked! I started the install, and got the bad news. The media was corrupt. I tried to make it work. The host machine was a Linux box, so I tried to make images of the disks, so I could try to restore them back to new disks. The first disk had errors about half way through, which is what I encountered. The second disk was unreadable. I finally gave up. No ancient Unix for me.

          I've done the same for old hardware. The "I wonder whats on this hard drive" game is always fun. IDE is IDE, and should (hopefully) work. The drives worked when they were unplugged (according to the note I had attached years before). Some didn't even spin. Others didn't even read.

          So, good luck preserving a modern machine for 50 years. You may have a cool ancient toy to play with, or you may have something you can set in the corner and admire. :) Good luck finding replacement parts in 50 years.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    15. Re:Way too many unknowns by damnfuct · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone figured out the antikythera mechanism (approximately more than 2000 years old). In fifty years, anyone who knows its a computer and is interested in starting it up will likely know or have access to information regarding what sort of requirements it has. Besides, skynet will be interested in adding this antiquity to its network.

    16. Re:Way too many unknowns by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1

      Hey, I am one of those "mysterious devices of 1959," and I'll have you know that I'm not lost in the mists of time--I just can't remember where I parked the car. I'll be fine.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    17. Re:Way too many unknowns by hpa · · Score: 1

      The two leads need to be supplied with a sine-wave alternating current peaking at 115 Volts" you have no way of knowing that in 50 years they'll be using Volts, AC, two leads, or know what a sine-wave is.

      This is pretty silly... unless we assume a total collapse of civilization it seems highly unlikely that 50 years from now we wouldn't be able to decode the corrected form of that statement (which is both incorrect - 115 V is RMS, not peak; and incomplete - it doesn't specify the frequency.) A corrected form should look something like (assuming a relatively modern computer):

      The two topmost leads need to be supplied with a 50-60 Hz (300-380 rad/s) sinewave alternating current at 100-240 V RMS (140-340 V peak) from a constant voltage source providing a minimum of 300 W. The bottom lead can optionally be connected to ground for safety.

      Odds are relatively good that they'll laugh and plug in into the wall, which still has a NEMA 5-15 or NEMA 5-20 outlet.

    18. Re:Way too many unknowns by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Lua's is:
      print "Hello world"

      Not all languages are more verbose than the old classics. Though for a laugh, look a "C++-Epoc". I can't believe they actually expected anyone to program like that :P

      Oh, and the link should be: http://www.roesler-ac.de/wolfram/hello.htm (no slash on the end).

    19. Re:Way too many unknowns by gavron · · Score: 1
      > Odds are relatively good...

      ...really? What method did you use to come up with these odds? What numbers did you calculate these odds of which you speak?

      May I subscribe to your journal?

      Seriously, this is an exercise in futility. Talk "odds" all you want, but power systems WILL change and I don't know if it's 10 years down the road or 20 or 50 but they must and they will. There's too much inefficiency in the current delivery mechanism for it to last once the greenies have their way.

      Ehud
      @Previous poster: Yes, my bad. It's not 2^7, it's 7^2, and indeed 2^4+2^3+2^1 covers it within O(2^5).

    20. Re:Way too many unknowns by hpa · · Score: 1

      Power systems change all the time. However, that hasn't kept the user terminal interface to stay virtually unchanged; it is the part with the most inertia and least incentive to change. I wouldn't be surprised if in 50 years we had a standard domestic low-power DC standard for small electronics, but I fully expect it will be in addition to instead of instead of the current 100-240 V terminals.

    21. Re:Way too many unknowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you meant he underestimates the power of the US education system.

    22. Re:Way too many unknowns by madsci1016 · · Score: 1

      "US Power" is not a defined term. Even if you went to the effort of saying "The two leads need to be supplied with a sine-wave alternating current peaking at 115 Volts"

      Well, they would have a problem if they followed that. Technically its 120 V RMS, 170V peaking voltage.

    23. Re:Way too many unknowns by gavron · · Score: 1
      > Well, they would have a problem if they followed that. Technically its 120 V RMS, 170V peaking voltage You don't say. http://tinyurl.com/de8ywk

      Ehud

    24. Re:Way too many unknowns by madsci1016 · · Score: 1

      > You don't say. http://tinyurl.com/de8ywk

      Ehud

      I'm confused, your google results confirm what i said, along with everyone else posting. So, thanks? for backing me up i guess.

    25. Re:Way too many unknowns by gavron · · Score: 1
      > I'm confused
      Yes.

      > your google results confirms what i[sic] said
      No, they show that there's nothing there about "170 vac rms" or anything else you said.

      > So, thanks?
      You're welcome

      > for backing me up i[sic] guess.
      Your guess is wrong.

      Ehud

    26. Re:Way too many unknowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that's the real reason for the time capsule: preserve DRM-free equipment.

    27. Re:Way too many unknowns by mustafap · · Score: 1

      opps.

      I'd mod you funny if I could :o)

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    28. Re:Way too many unknowns by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      They didn't say "170 vac rms", which is the point. Why don't you just admit that you made a mistake in saying it was 115 V peak-to-peak? All this twisting and turning just makes you look like a jerk. It's 120 V RMS, which is 170 V peak-to-peak. 115 V peak-to-peak is 81 V RMS. There's nothing significant on Google about "81 vac rms" either, if that's the metric you like to use.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    29. Re:Way too many unknowns by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Given what we know about human nature and trends in technology it's more likely to be "It's been three seconds and still no blowjob, are you sure this thing is a computer?"

      But it's got electrolytes! It's what computers crave! At least after you replace the leaked ones...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    30. Re:Way too many unknowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basic mathematical patterns inherent in Euclidean geometry aren't going to be easily forgotten or abandoned.

      You underestimate the power of the US education system.

      There, fixed that for you. ;)

    31. Re:Way too many unknowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously? you think in 50 years we will not know of volts, what alternating current or what sine waves are?

      nice troll. dumbass.

    32. Re:Way too many unknowns by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      That serious reply is a joke, just like the parent post, right?

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    33. Re:Way too many unknowns by madsci1016 · · Score: 1

      They didn't say "170 vac rms", which is the point. Why don't you just admit that you made a mistake in saying it was 115 V peak-to-peak? All this twisting and turning just makes you look like a jerk. It's 120 V RMS, which is 170 V peak-to-peak.

      Exactly; lol, thank you. And Ehud, make sure when you try to argue something, that you are not arguing with an expert in the field. Electrical Engineer with specializations in Power

  9. in 50 years battery acid damage and bad caps may s by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In 50 years battery acid damage and bad caps may stop the systems from even booting. Bit rot may mess up the bios code as well.

  10. Don't Bother by dmomo · · Score: 4, Funny

    It got damaged in a flood. Even if it hadn't it wouldn't matter. We just use this 20 year old time machine invented in 2039 to come back for our retro-gaming fix. It's a clunker compared to the new time machines, but it was cheap. Actually, probably cheaper than your P4 uses... AND it uses less power.

    We actually save power by going back in time and using the past's power anyway. The future is AWESOME. Come join us soon!

    1. Re:Don't Bother by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Get off my future lawn!

    2. Re:Don't Bother by Kryptonian+Jor-El · · Score: 1

      How'd you get up to 88mph?

      --
      All your 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 are belong to us
    3. Re:Don't Bother by WAG24601G · · Score: 1

      I call BS. If you were really from the future, your UID would be *way* higher. And if you think "I used my time machine to get a lower one" is a defense, think again. Anybody with a time machine would have gone back for 3-digits or better.

      --
      Everything is easy when you don't understand the problem.
    4. Re:Don't Bother by dmomo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was just freaking out wondering who was using my slashdot account to post nonsense about time travel.

      Then I got a call from my future self. I told me that fresh parsley will be the new Salmonella scare of 2009.

    5. Re:Don't Bother by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      So now we know what happened to John Titor - he abandoned his mission to troll Slashdot!

    6. Re:Don't Bother by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      I'll be there in 50 years.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    7. Re:Don't Bother by WAG24601G · · Score: 1

      Imagine how I was freaking out, reading your post with a mouth full of fresh parsley.

      --
      Everything is easy when you don't understand the problem.
    8. Re:Don't Bother by descalco · · Score: 1
      People from 2059 still use Slashdot?

      I suppose those creationists are right: evolution is a myth.

    9. Re:Don't Bother by synaptik · · Score: 1

      John Titor, is that you?

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    10. Re:Don't Bother by bluephone · · Score: 1

      I also got a call. Again. At 3 in the morning. Apparently your future self still thinks crank calling me is funny. The upside is I see there's no point in asking the the current you to stop. Also, now that I know there'll be time machines in 50 years, I can go back in time, and fuck your mom. That means I'm your father. NOW GO TO YOUR ROOM UNTIL ALL YOUR FUTURE SELVES LEARN CRANK CALLS AREN'T FUNNY ANYMORE. And no space jello tonight either.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  11. boot sequence? Re:Way too many unknowns by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Making someone go through the tedious boot-up sequence (50 years, Moore's Law, remember?) is a waste

    I'm not convinced that boot times have followed Moore's law. It takes my newest computer significantly longer to boot up completely than did my old 286 in the days where everything ran in DOS.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  12. The primary problem with your idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NO electronics are designed to last 50 years. If you got basically all the moisture out of the storage facility, everything but the storage devices MIGHT last, IF the temperature were stable enough. And at the end, you'd have a hermetically sealed container full of poison because odds are that the nasty crap would have come out of some of the capacitors anyway, and the plastic would have been offgassing all of this time, and your time capsule would probably be declared a superfund site.

    Moral of the story: shoot some digital video of some people using the computers, then pack them off to the recyclers. Whether the exercise is worthy is not really at issue; it's not really a feasible idea anyway. The cost of preserving the machines (are you going to have shielding capable of protecting digital magnetic media over that time scale?) coupled with the risk of the systems not working when you try to fire them up anyway makes the whole point moot for most schools (and most anyone else, too.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:The primary problem with your idea by Dadoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      NO electronics are designed to last 50 years.

      Maybe they weren't designed to last that long, but they do, anyway. There are plenty of Apple IIs and TRS-80's out there, still running just fine. I have a 30+-year-old computer, myself, that still works. Granted, it's not 50 years, but it's getting pretty close.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    2. Re:The primary problem with your idea by drmerope · · Score: 0

      NO electronics are designed to last 50 years.

      Quite so, one effect you did not mention is that the microprocessor is unlikely to work after 10 years. During manufacturing Boron is diffused into selected regions of purified silicon (doping) to create the transistors. This is done at high temperature, but even at room-temperature the diffusion process continues. Most CMOS process technologies have anticipated lifespans of 5-10yrs.

      10yrs from now, this may just mean you have to clock the processor more slowly. In 50 yrs? Who knows.

    3. Re:The primary problem with your idea by LNX+Systems+Engineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was also before companies figured out how to cut costs by using as few materials as possible, even if doing so compromises longevity. 20 years ago, fibreglass boats were practically tanks because manufacturers had no idea how *little* of the stuff they'd actually have to use. There are other areas where this is painfully obvious, such as home construction.

      Either way, I would have to think that in the last 20 years hardware manufacturers have figured out how to use materials more "sparingly." I wonder if high grade server equipment might last a bit longer. After all, those components are made with "zero fail" in mind.

    4. Re:The primary problem with your idea by rm999 · · Score: 1

      I have a ~25 year old computer that still works. What will happen in the next 25 years that will cause it to fail?

      It doesn't matter how long they were **designed** to last - what matters is how long they will realistically last.

    5. Re:The primary problem with your idea by loose+electron · · Score: 4, Informative

      boron magically electromigrates or keeps on diffusing? Um, I have been doing ultra high reliability electronics for over 25 years and this is total news to me. Don't think so. I know of electronics in geostationary satellites still humming along over 20 years and still going strong. There probably is even older out there, but I wasn't involved, so I cant say.

      Suggest:
      I would put any and all data storage in multiple formats and multiple copies. Cover your bases.
      Find a way to seal the system against moisture. (Airtight containers and Silica Gel packets inside.)
      Provide lots of text based paper documenting the system, and all its hardware and software. (information printed on high quality paper)
      Multiple disk drives that can be booted from would also be good.

      As a side note, the 6800 microprocessor still gets made and used today and thats about 30 years old right now. I have both an Atwater Kent and a Crosley radio from 1928 and 1932 and both of them still run just fine. Not too shabby for 70 year old electronics!

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    6. Re:The primary problem with your idea by icebraining · · Score: 1

      My N64 is 12 years old and it didn't got any slower, on the contrary, somehow the "jungle" track on Mario Kart 64 got a speedup :P
      And I don't store it in any special means, just got it inside a drawer in my bedroom and sometimes I give it a spin :D

    7. Re:The primary problem with your idea by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Informative


      During manufacturing Boron is diffused into selected regions of purified silicon (doping) to create the transistors....Most CMOS process technologies have anticipated lifespans of 5-10yrs.

      Uhh.. I've had plenty of machines that are more than 10 years old that work just fine. I've got one machine that's been running continuously for 6 1/2 years (a few reboots, but no crashes). The motherboard is approaching 10 years old.

      Several years ago I had an AMD 386-40, circa 1992. I ran it as my mail server until maybe 2005 when I decided to upgrade to a faster machine and run spamassassin. It ran continuously for several years, and with the exception of HD and power supply failures ran without a hitch.

      The ONLY component failures beyond the normal PS/HD failures I've seen are blown capacitors. This happened after only a few years, and was part of the larger problem people have been experiencing with bad caps.

      So.. I'd say your theory about boron diffusion destroying computers in 5-10 years doesn't stand up to the evidence. There's a LOT of people with rather old everyday machines that run just fine after 10 years.

      --
      AccountKiller
    8. Re:The primary problem with your idea by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Also, just to hedge your bets, have the manual printed in spanish as well as english. There's a pretty good chance that half the kids in the group that opens it will have spanish as their primary language and english as a second language.

      --
      SRSLY.
    9. Re:The primary problem with your idea by drmerope · · Score: 2, Informative

      boron magically electromigrates or keeps on diffusing? Um, I have been doing ultra high reliability electronics for over 25 years and this is total news to me. Don't think so. I know of electronics in geostationary satellites still humming along over 20 years and still going strong. There probably is even older out there, but I wasn't involved, so I cant say.

      You apparently have no knowledge of deep-submicron VLSI. Regardless I did not say that the device magically fails at year 10, I said that it might need to be clocked more slowly. If you are conservative with your operating frequency to begin with, you are going to see many more years of life. Consumer electronics are not conservative.

      There is nothing magical about "diffusion", an concentration gradient will result in diffusion, only a question of how fast.

      Last, joining "electromigration" with "boron" is just nonsense. Electromigration effects the metalization, not the dopant atoms.

    10. Re:The primary problem with your idea by drmerope · · Score: 1

      So.. I'd say your theory about boron diffusion destroying computers in 5-10 years doesn't stand up to the evidence. There's a LOT of people with rather old everyday machines that run just fine after 10 years.

      Its called stochastic process and margin. It also depends on operating temperature. I'm certain that you cannot overclock the chip as much as you could when it left the factory. You just don't realize it.

    11. Re:The primary problem with your idea by durdur · · Score: 1

      I've got a 70's era tube FM tuner that works fine. It doesn't have the original tubes in it but it's normal to replace those. The capacitors in these things can go bad but it's pretty common to have ancient ones that still work. Old military electronics is even more likely to be all in good order: it was made with higher grade parts and often built to take vibration and other abuse.

    12. Re:The primary problem with your idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ridiculous. Given the choice of a 50 year old electronic device (if any kind, in any shape) and a video of someone else using the device, I'd prefer the device itself and I suspect anyone else would also.

      Some plastics do not preserve well. Who cares.

    13. Re:The primary problem with your idea by bill0755 · · Score: 1

      Don't feed the trolls - when an AC says something stupid, let it slide.

      Even though you didn't post as AC, I'll let this slide anyway. Now go watch a video of someone posting on /.

    14. Re:The primary problem with your idea by mindstormpt · · Score: 1

      I have a 386 from the eighties and it works fine. I also have a Pentium 100 from '94 working too. Neither was particularly well cared for. Oh, and a SNES from '93. And an N64. And 2 other PCs older than 5 years working 24/7. In a house in which temperature ranges from less than 10C in winter to over 30C in the summer (excelent engineering).

      And it's not like I had 10 of each, so either I'm extremely lucky or something's wrong with your estimate.

    15. Re:The primary problem with your idea by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have a 30 year old portable "football" game. Works great. I've also got an old HP scientific calculator that is 25 years old. Electronics can last a long time if you take care of it.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    16. Re:The primary problem with your idea by mrraven · · Score: 1

      I call b.s. plenty of old tube radios that are 50+ years old work fine including capacitors. I suspect even the batteries are going to be the biggest problem and they might even last vacuum packed. Right now as we speak I am listening to 36 year old Advent speakers picked up off Craig's list that were haphazardly stored in someone's damp basement that have capacitors in the crossover network between the woofer and tweeter, and they sound just as good as any audiophile under 1000 dollar speaker.

      Don't believe the hype.

      --
      Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
    17. Re:The primary problem with your idea by fm6 · · Score: 0

      It doesn't have the original tubes in it but it's normal to replace those.

      Dude that's why it hasn't worn out. Or to be precise, it's worn out several times in small stages. The original tuner is long gone, expect for low-tech stuff like knobs and sockets.

      Modern electronics is thousands of times as complicated as your tuner. And most of that complexity is in integrated circuitry that, unlike your vacuum tubes, does not support drop in replacement Fortunately, this circuitry lasts a lot longer than vacuum tubes. Not forever, though. Probably not 50 years.

    18. Re:The primary problem with your idea by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Informative

      For mass market gear, old computers are almost certainly longer lived than newer ones. If you can reflash a computer's BIOS(or equivalent, for the openfirmware/linuxBIOS/EFI/whatever crowd), then it is stored in flash. Retention time? Maybe a decade. Firmware in PROMs or mask ROMs will last more or less forever.

      When one of today's computers is booted up 50 years from now, a few caps will probably need to be replaced, many of the plastics will be brittle, the silicon will probably be like new; but the firmware will be gone, and who will have a copy of "Dell GX270 A08" in 2059?

    19. Re:The primary problem with your idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the thing is older stuff was designed by the seat of the pants, newer computers have allowed engineers to learn what tolerances are in everything from automobiles to airplanes to buildings. Just because something 30 years old works today doesn't mean something built today will work in 30 years.

    20. Re:The primary problem with your idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS on the proms lasting forever. PROMs were AFAIK gone with the 80s, and those that were made in 70s and 80s are now suffering from bitrot. Ask anyone using old digital T&M gear (Tek, HP, ...).

    21. Re:The primary problem with your idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 30+-year-old computer, myself, that still works. Granted, it's not 50 years, but it's getting pretty close.

      That's like saying in percentage terms a D is close to an A though.

    22. Re:The primary problem with your idea by unitron · · Score: 1

      Non-polarized electrolytics or non-electrolytic capacitors in a crossover network aren't subject to nearly the stresses put upon capacitors in power supplies, especially in switching supplies, or the ones clustered around a CPU, or the high voltage electrolytics used in tube-type equipment. Electrolytics that have been in constant service have a better chance of surviving than those which have been lying around unused.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    23. Re:The primary problem with your idea by notsoclever · · Score: 1

      And how do you expect them to store the digital video or watch it? In 50 years, DVD players will be even less common than VHS players are now, and those are ubiquitous - could you really expect any current storage media to be readable?

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people: ones who understand ternary, ones who don't, and ones who think this joke is about binary
    24. Re:The primary problem with your idea by sangdrax · · Score: 1

      That is because the ones that died young are no longer around. All Apple IIs surviving now appear to be 'made to last'.

      It may well be a wise move to bury older hardware that already survived a few years. Just to weed out the batches that fail early.

    25. Re:The primary problem with your idea by msu320 · · Score: 1

      Helium is a relatively cheap way to keep things preserved. The Declaration of Independance is preserved in part by being encased in helium. And if you put the computer in a leak proof container, the helium should displace any oxygen that that could oxide the metals in the computer.

      --
      New slashdot layout sucks.
    26. Re:The primary problem with your idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this has turned into a good old fashion nerd fight.

    27. Re:The primary problem with your idea by loose+electron · · Score: 1

      Yep, I am a total idiot. Glad you told me here publicly, I need to be reminded frequently! Thank You! :)

      As an aside, may I suggest "How To Win Friends and Influence People" by Dale Carnegie, I think you might find that it supplements your semiconductor physics knowledge.

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    28. Re:The primary problem with your idea by Criton · · Score: 1

      Yah I have found a few old systems that still work including Atari 2600s and a morrow MDC III. But if you really wanted to preserve a system maybe replace the bios flash chip with a milspec one high end flash has a 50 year data retention time and the HD with a flash drive remove any batteries. Keep at least two copies of bios and flash. For storage take a lesson from NASA on old Apollo hardware pack it in a container filled with nitrogen. The ROHS stuff may not last as long as non ROHS. ROHS was a stupid ass ideal and the alternatives are well known to cause far more damage in their mining then lead ever did but the EU is ran by morons anyway. Who knows maybe ROHS will be killed when someone gets sued over a critical piece of equipment failing due to tin whiskers and the sub humans who pushed it hunted down. As an EE I have nothing good to say about ROHS other then it needs to be struck down and all supporters dumped on the bottom of the ocean.

  13. preemptive correction just for the nerds by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No consumer electronics are designed to last 50 years. Unless you have been computing on a space probe, recycle the computers.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:preemptive correction just for the nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about something like a ZX81?

      There are only two electrolytic capacitors on the motherboard, it uses a ROM rather than an EPROM, and consists of mostly common parts except for the ULA.

      It bet it would be far more likely to last 50 years than a 286 or something.

    2. Re:preemptive correction just for the nerds by toddestan · · Score: 1

      While it's probably a bit out of the scope of the time capsule project, what about trying to presever a computer that is delibrately over-engineered? A random Dell probably won't last 50 years, but what about something like a Panasonic Toughbook?

    3. Re:preemptive correction just for the nerds by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I don't know of any non consumer electronics designed to last fifty years either - even the long duration machines like the Pioneer and Voyager probes were only designed to last ten years of so.

  14. Will they care? And avoid moisture. by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. The students won't care. They'll be concerned with whatever popular culture dominates in 2059, not with old tech. Except for the nerds.

    2. If you do this, preserve other things as well. Preserve a copy of the newspaper from the Obama inauguration. (Provide instructions on how to open and read a paper newspaper.) Preserve whatever popular culture dominates in 2009. Preserve pictures of the school and letters from the students.

    3. Think carefully about whether you'd really like to inflict Windows XP and Compaq hardware on a new generation of students.

    4. Store it someplace dry. Moisture is your biggest enemy. Basements will flood, roofs will leak. Think mold, think corrosion.

    5. Motherboard batteries will die, and may leak. Remove them and all other batteries. Forget laptops.

    1. Re:Will they care? And avoid moisture. by mustafap · · Score: 1

      And

      6. Do a hard copy printout of the BIOS. Its flash memory will have become erased in 50 years.

      7. Dito for any BIOS in your video hardware

      8. Provide a schematic of the PC so they can identify all the tantalum and electrolytic capacitors, and replace them with new equivalents.

      9. Forgot it all. Put a packet of cigarettes in there instead. It will be fun rediscovering the habit again.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    2. Re:Will they care? And avoid moisture. by L.MCH · · Score: 1

      And

      6. Do a hard copy printout of the BIOS. Its flash memory will have become erased in 50 years.

      7. Dito for any BIOS in your video hardware

      7b Ditto for the hard disk and cd/dvd-reader (their integrated controllers have their own firmware stored on flash eprom) and check if the rest of the hardware has other microcontrollers with firmware on flash eprom.

      The best strategy is to store on cd/dvd the bios, firmware and all the documentation for the programming interface (usually JTAG) and the exact protocol and procedure needed to reflash the chips from scratch (usually you find them in .pdf format in the technical documentation of the chip manifacturer).

      Better if there are multiple copies on different disks of exactly the same data so even with damaged or "faded" disks it will easier to perform at least a partial recovery by comparing
      the disk content .

    3. Re:Will they care? And avoid moisture. by ktoepke · · Score: 2, Informative

      Two words. Pelican Cases. "Guaranteed for life against everything except bears and small children". No, I'm not in any way associated with the company. I've just had a LOT of sensitive equipment (cameras, phones, ipod, laptop, laser measurers, etc) saved because of the company's product (drops, drop-kicks [ex-girlfriend], flooding, TSA). Any time I'm transporting or storing personal electronics I use Pelican Cases. Must have 40 of them around the house.

    4. Re:Will they care? And avoid moisture. by earlymon · · Score: 1

      (Provide instructions on how to open and read a paper newspaper.)

      Seriously - you're fucking kidding, right?

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    5. Re:Will they care? And avoid moisture. by owlman17 · · Score: 1

      3. Think carefully about whether you'd really like to inflict Windows XP and Compaq hardware on a new generation of students.

      This sort of reminds me of Jason X...

    6. Re:Will they care? And avoid moisture. by unitron · · Score: 1

      8. Provide a schematic...

      A schematic? Of a recent motherboard or switching supply? You must be from a galaxy far, far away, because such things certainly aren't available around here.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    7. Re:Will they care? And avoid moisture. by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 1

      (Provide instructions on how to open and read a paper newspaper.)

      Seriously - you're fucking kidding, right?

      Mostly, but at the rate newspapers are bleeding money these days, there may be only a few (NYT, WSJ, and maybe one or two others) left in fifty years. And probably only old farts will have much experience with actually unfolding them.

    8. Re:Will they care? And avoid moisture. by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Roger that, Houston. In a few short weeks, we'll have no local newspapers where I live - shutdown due to lack of revenue - or in-depth reporting, take your pick.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  15. Nitrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Purge it with gaseous nitrogen (its not terribly expensive) and keep it in a low humidity, cold place.

  16. Flash isn't forever, either: ~10yrs by Mathinker · · Score: 2, Informative

    The information in flash memory is stored as electric charge which slowly dissipates. Last time I checked, it was recommended to refresh it periodically, or the information could be lost in as little as 10 years.

  17. 50 yrs is not that long by retech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Keep multiple systems and monitors.

    In 50yrs I think you'd have more problem porting the video out than anything else. Remove the batteries too.

    Why not store 3 complete systems in 3 entirely different ways. Hoping that one of them will survive intact. Or components from all three will have enough intact to make a complete system. Let's assume that whoever finds it, even in a century will be intelligent enough to turn it on. Unless this ends up being an Old Man in the Cave sort of scenario. Then you've no hope anyway.

    My uncle still fires up his Apple LISA every few months to do his accounting on it.

    1. Re:50 yrs is not that long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      My uncle still fires up his Apple LISA every few months to do his accounting on it.

      Which is why he can still get it to fire up. 50 years with no power will probably condemn the capacitors to oblivion. Without proper attention to moisture the disk drive (hard and floppy) heads will have probably oxidized beyond usability. I have a circa 1992 386/20 that is still running but a shortwave radio of about the same time period is inoperative due to capacitors that crapped out since it sat idle for that same 15 years.

      If you have the inclination then go for it but I'd suspect you'll have more of a static display (and there is some value to that I suppose) than a functioning PC after 50 years.

      Ten years may be doable and that's a bunch of PC generations.

    2. Re:50 yrs is not that long by thsths · · Score: 1

      > In 50yrs I think you'd have more problem porting the video out than anything else.

      Maybe, but then maybe not. NTSC was defined in 1941, and current TVs are still compatible with the signal defined then. Yes, I know that things are changing: modulators are a thing of the past, and digital is the way to go. But still, compatibility has not been broken over nearly 70 years.

      So do not underestimate the inertia of standards once defined. I would not be surprised if USB is around for a long long time, for example, just like the infamous 1/8" TRS jack.

    3. Re:50 yrs is not that long by Junior+Samples · · Score: 1

      Most likely, the electrolytic capacitors in the power supply and motherboard will dry out and loose their capacitance. At that point the unit will not power up when power is applied.

      10 years is probably the best that you can hope for considering the component quality .

    4. Re:50 yrs is not that long by rcastro0 · · Score: 1

      > I would not be surprised if USB is around for a long long time

      That's what was said about the RS232c interface, Parallel Printer Ports, PCMCIA slots, Firewire connectors, pc game inputs, VGA cables, AGP slots and Scuzzy interfaces not long ago.

      --
      Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
    5. Re:50 yrs is not that long by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that this "student of the future" will be familiar with modern-day computer troubleshooting techniques to piece this 50+ year old machine together from 3 separate machines. If you'd never seen or worked with one of today's computers would you know what the BIOS beep errors meant? Or how to tell if it was the hard disk that wasn't spinning up? Or better yet, if it was spinning up but not booting due to some other problem? We may as well hand you a stack of punch cards and stick you in a room with an ENIAC and say "Let us know when you have it running."

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:50 yrs is not that long by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Pack a laptop and the video problem goes away ( well, if it still works in 50 years )

      As far as powering up a 20 year old lisa every so often, thats a lot different then having a PC sit for 50 years and *never* turned on. If they are not used they tend to deteriorate faster. Also current PC's are not built as rugged as they did back then. ( both due to increased miniaturization, and lower quality )

      I dont think it will be functional in 50 years and will just be a conversation piece to go with the video.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    7. Re:50 yrs is not that long by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      DVI can do VGA real easy. AGP died to pci-e. AGP was able to do more then just video but you did not see that much and very few boards had more then one agp bus.

      Pci-e is being used by all kinds of cards. Firewire 800 uses the same connectors as the planed fire wire 1600 / 3200

    8. Re:50 yrs is not that long by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Ten years doesn't seem anything. My normal PC is six years old and only the video card has failed, everything else is working perfectly even during CoD4 matches in the summer, and rebooting due to over-heating :P

    9. Re:50 yrs is not that long by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      VGA will probably be dead in 10 years, sure. However, if you packed a PC with an HDMI out, I'd bet HDMI is here to stay. It's fast, sleek, and I'm not really sure what could be done to improve it.

    10. Re:50 yrs is not that long by notsoclever · · Score: 1

      And even DVI is already starting to go away.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people: ones who understand ternary, ones who don't, and ones who think this joke is about binary
    11. Re:50 yrs is not that long by this+great+guy · · Score: 1

      My uncle still fires up his Apple LISA every few months to do his accounting on it.

      This brought a tear to my cheek. Thank you !

      - Steve Jobs

    12. Re:50 yrs is not that long by Teun · · Score: 1
      You hit it on the head, the important bit is to fire that machine up every once in a while.

      So why not change the rules of this time capsule a little and indeed make it a yearly event to fire it up?

      This will give the capacitors a chance to regenerate and will give you a chance to repair the odd bits that do get broken.

      And you can copy the whole system from disk one to disk two so you regenerate these bits too.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    13. Re:50 yrs is not that long by William+Ager · · Score: 1

      ... did you read the main argument of that post? It doesn't sound like your normal PC has been turned off for six years if it's been running CoD4 matches...

    14. Re:50 yrs is not that long by Perf · · Score: 2, Funny

      At my Chinese laundry, they still fire up their 2000 year old abacus to do accounting.

    15. Re:50 yrs is not that long by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      No there is no need to assume the student of the future will be able to understand the operation of the machine without someone to explain it to them. At least no only 50 years from now anyway. See in most human societies people have access to these rather amazing resources where knowlege of the recent ent past is concerned. They are often refered to as parents and grandparents. There is even the suggestion that great grandparents may in many cases still be able to speak and interact with the most recent generations.

      Sorry I just felt I better clear that up for space alienies like yourself.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  18. Re:in 50 years battery acid damage and bad caps ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seconded. Batteries could be replaced but capacitors could not. Too much volatile chemistry involved.

  19. Re:boot sequence? Re:Way too many unknowns by gavron · · Score: 1
    I said boot _sequence_ not boot _times_. What it took to boot an MV system in 1975 or a DOS system (1981) or a CDC Cyber 370 in 1984 or a VMS VAX in 1987 is a different set of instructions than AmigaDOS (1986), or Windows 95 (1996), or Ubuntu Linux 8.10 (2008) just to name a few.

    The "method of sequential steps to start a personal computer" (should such a thing exist in 2059) will be far far different than what it is today. I brought Moore's Law into it to give an example of the orders of magnitude of difference that 50 years can bring. 2^7 is 49. That's 7 generations of change as per Moore's law [for CPU usage] in less than 50 years. There will be significant REVOLUTIONARY changes.

    Ehud

  20. hard drive lifetime by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

    The biggest hurdles are probably the shelf life of the hard drive and any electrolytic capacitors in the system. The spindle motor lubricant will dry out, as will the electrolyte in the capacitors. I seriously doubt that it will still be bootable 50 years from now. Sadly, I don't think there is a good answer here. VMs or emulators are potentially a partial answer, but you're still counting on a compatible VM player being available decades from now. And I don't think this is really what you had in mind regardless; it seems like you were wanting to preserve the actual hardware.

    1. Re:hard drive lifetime by icebraining · · Score: 1

      There are emulators to almost every architecture out there, AFAIK. If he includes the OS, I doubt that a x86 emulator with some basic peripheral interfaces won't be available.

    2. Re:hard drive lifetime by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I think his intent was to preserve the *actual* system, not just an emulation of it.

  21. I'm still using a 6-year-old Dell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:I'm still using a 6-year-old Dell... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Only 44 more years to go!

  22. Shorter time span? by jd142 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instead of 50 years, make it 25 or 20. Then their kids can be in middle school and see the computer their folks used to use.

    There are plenty of pc's made in 1984 that can still work fine.

    1. Re:Shorter time span? by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of pc's made in 1984 that can still work fine.

      ..and nobody had to put them in a time capsule for them to work just fine - you could probably grab everything you need to get a 1984-era PC working off ebay today. Which makes this whole exercise seem a bit redundant.

    2. Re:Shorter time span? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Lots of PC's from the 70's and 80s are still alive and kicking, but how many from the late 90's have survived?

      I know my personal collection points to the incremental 'cheapness' of each generation.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Shorter time span? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Late 90's?

      I've got a dialup server that's a 300MHz P2. It also runs a print server and firewall. And only 2 cables: Power and phone. Even uses wifi to conect to our internal network.

      Guess what's on the wifi: WRT54GS. And another firewall. Different passwords too. And wouldnt you know... Channel 14 :D I wonder...

      Im now looking at consolidating my dialup and file server to 1 machine (and dumping the 300MHz). Im hesitant to for security reasons. Still, its dialup. Not many people scan our network these days.

      --
    4. Re:Shorter time span? by jo0ls · · Score: 1

      The BBC Domesday project attempted to create a time capsule in 1986 and is a classic example of digital obsolescence. The BBC Domesday project Camileon Project

    5. Re:Shorter time span? by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'll sell you my 1997 Dell P2, it has fired up in the last 6 months.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Shorter time span? by jd142 · · Score: 1

      You missed the point of the time capsule idea. :) The fun is for the students of today to add the personal notes about how cool a game is, or how cutting edge a computer is. Then the future kids get to be historians and examine and "unearth" the capsule.

      Just about every item preserved in every school sponsored time capsule can be bought on e-bay today or just seen in a museum. That's not the point. The point is to give both sets of students a connection to history, to make it fun and part of their lives instead of just a one day field trip to a museum to see things they don't have a connection to.

  23. Why save crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of those brands has put out a quality product in the last 10 years. Those machines were ready to be retired the day they were purchased and you're lucky they lasted beyond the warranty period.
    Next thing you know someone will want to enshrine a [shudder] Gateway machine

  24. Keep a Video/Photographic Timeline by Microlith · · Score: 1

    Take a picture of one of the computers, a video of it in action, and write down all the machine stats. Note the date it came into use and the year it was retired, and keep short list of technology changes that occurred during the period it was in service (increases in disk capacity, processor speed, processor -technology- even) and just keep a running timeline.

    There's little value in the actual hardware, and as others have noted some of it may not even turn on due to changes in things like batteries and capacitors. Preserve a few specimens if you can, but don't rely on them.

  25. You know what would suck? The Y2038 Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Somehow, you get your computer preserved and it makes it to 2059. Everyone is excited, the telepresence news crews are in attendance, and you go to boot it up... only to have it crash due to a Y2038 bug in some code Microsoft borrowed from FreeBSD. Oops.

  26. You need to be well-organised by eobanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In my experience, departments can be re-structured, staff get replaced, budgets get changed, buildings get remodelled, torn down, or re-purposed. Frankly, if you expect such a project to survive even 50 years you may have to do a bit of planning first. Figure out who is going to manage the whole thing; a system can't just be put in a closet in a classroom; find a central location (say, a large airtight, waterproof safe in the school library, labelled with a plaque, and get the school board, school paper, etc. informed about the project so that its existence is recorded in various ways. I'm sure that's just about the best you could do with your budget. I'd also not recommend preserving just one system, but probably several complete ones, maybe of varying age. If you got a couple of 286's with PC-DOS, a couple of Pentium II's with Windows 95, a couple of original iMacs with Mac OS 9, etc, that might be much more interesting than just one system, and surely it's better to have some redundancy in case one or more of the machines don't survive for some reason. And certainly include as much physical media with as wide of a variety of software as you can...floppy disks, CDs, DVDs, hard drives, zip disks, and perhaps best of all would be USB flash drives as these would be more likely to survive than optical or magnetic media, and unlike these, USB mass storage might be possible to read with computers with computers built in 2020 or even later. Miscellaneous tips: I wouldn't bother with any software that requires online activation, active internet connection, etc. I'm sure the internet will be quite different from how it is today, and even software giants like Adobe or Microsoft may be long forgotten in 2060. Make sure the systems POST without their clock batteries; these will surely be dead in 2060. Include as much paper documentation as you can. Manuals, quickstart guides, printed tutorials, anything. The documentation on this stuff might be very well preserved online in 2060. Or it might not.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:You need to be well-organised by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another idea... don't put it in an actual capsule at all.

      Climate controlled closet, visual inspection of the system yearly, boot test every three years. Also, every year or two, fresh burns of optical media.

    2. Re:You need to be well-organised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, departments can be re-structured, staff get replaced, budgets get changed, buildings get remodelled, torn down, or re-purposed. Frankly, if you expect such a project to survive even 50 years you may have to do a bit of planning first.

      Seriously. Haven't you seen Forever Young?! Stinkin' bureaucracies!

    3. Re:You need to be well-organised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!

    4. Re:You need to be well-organised by cdfh · · Score: 1

      a system can't just be put in a closet in a classroom

      My old school's building is of very old design, and there are surely many cupboards that nobody knew about, which have not been opened for tens, or maybe even hundreds of years (perhaps an old closet in the boiler room).

      Perhaps a closet might be opened during the course of some building works in another hundred years or so. Goodness knows what they might find. Every-so-often I've seen articles in newspapers about old things being perfectly preserved at the back of the cleaners' cupboard, and suchlike.

      If the system survives for a few hundred years (even if the electronics does not work), then it could be extremely exciting for the future pupils to see a time bubble in their own school.

      If I were organising this, I would be very much in favour of finding an old, ignored, cupboard which hasn't been opened for years, and "preserving" (perhaps just as little as dust covers) a few computers, or mobile phones; and forgetting about them.

      Afterthought: I just remembered that in the graphic design building of the school, there was a framed drawing which had been drawn in the nineteenth century by pupils. It had recently been discovered during redecoration work.

    5. Re:You need to be well-organised by blue_goddess · · Score: 1

      1. In Poland (generally in former soviet block) there are many schools (especially those built in 1950's) that have shelters in basement. These are probably good places to consider. If your school don't have nuclear-proof shelter, but you know such place nearby, it probably wold be good idea to hide your stuff there.
      2. http://www.keo.org/uk/pages/default.html Even if you don't have comparable amount of money, there are plenty of ideas to borrow from such projects. For example all of your students could write one-page message that would be enclosed with your computer.
      3. Including written materials and instructions is possible, ie. you do not have to rely on picture-based instructons, contrary to many projects (like Pioneer probes). The actual proof: it is easy to read text written 50 years ago or more.
      4. On the other side 50 years should be enough to attract attention other than future students of your school. In 50 years there could be some sort of computer archeologist or other, who might be interested in such equipment. Think about: what I would like to have attached to computer that is 50 years old.

      --
      As a computer, I find your faith in technology amusing.
    6. Re:You need to be well-organised by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

      Figure out who is going to manage the whole thing; a system can't just be put in a closet in a classroom...

      To add to the learning experience, give your entire class a 50 year assignment: "To maintain or assign others to maintain the storage and/or the systems, to boldly go..." This project is an excellent idea, it's a classroom sized version of the longnow to try to get students to think beyond the next {insert ephemeral pop star} video.

      I would try to find a 40 or 50 year old electronics device, disassemble it and a modern P.C. to show the students what has changed and what remains.

      Most 40-50 year old electronic devices used vacuum tubes which were fragile and had a finite lifespan but they were designed for easy replacement. Comments about the short lifespan of Electrolytic capacitors (primarily the big ones in switching supplies) are absolutely correct, especially when power isn't applied. What I would do is:

      • Find a motherboard which operates on 12VDC (e.g. laptop) and just assume that the 110-12VDC transformer won't work in 50 years but provide instructions for powering the device off a 12VDC source (e.g. car battery, photovoltaic battery or future power source).
      • Don't try to store a car battery, but if you select a low power motherboard, you could store a solar power supply with the PC.
      • Add a bridge rectifier in case the future archaeologist is careless with polarity.
      • Don't rely on spinning magnetic hard drive, but choose a system which can boot from a spinning magnetic hard drive, a USB flash device, a CD and a DVD. Install your OS and applications redundantly on all of these devices.
      • Upload the disk image to an online archive.
      • Store extra copies of the flash, CD and DVD in various locations. Document the GPS coordinates of these locations in paper documents which are also stored at each of the locations.

      Your project is possible. Last spring I was running software on an Amiga 1000 from 1985 and as recently as 2004, I've watched videos on a VCR from 1976 (one of the filter caps on the VCR was bad so the sound was buzzy, but otherwise it was O.K.)

    7. Re:You need to be well-organised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This made me laugh, actually. So, my dad works in the administration for the engineering school at a major research institution. They were stripping a building for some major overhaul, and someone came across this old metal cabinet. They opened it, and saw these big, unlabeled jars or cans or something inside, and had no idea what was in them. Someone went over a building or two and came back with a geiger counter, just to be safe, and discovered they were pretty radioactive. Apparently, some professor back in the 50s or 60s or earlier, when the school was getting a lot of grants from NASA and DOE and DOD, had been doing some research on radioactive materials and when he retired, he just moved all his personal stuff out of his office, but left the cabinet full of samples... They wound up having to build a giant concrete pit next to the building because the area is too built up for them to have been safely removed...

    8. Re:You need to be well-organised by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 1

      Another idea... don't put it in an actual capsule at all.

      Climate controlled closet, visual inspection of the system yearly, boot test every three years. Also, every year or two, fresh burns of optical media.

      What about the mystery factor? When you open a capsule from 50 years back you can't quite know what to expect. With your idea you are taking that aspect away.

      One other thing about the capsule though. You should definitely include a piece of paper showing the on switch and such - just so people opening the capsule don't mistake it for a fancy chair.

  27. As far as making sure it's ready for the future... by Cprossu · · Score: 5, Informative

    For long time storage, I would suggest taking apart the entire system and giving it a good cleaning to remove any dust, Also inspect all electrolytic capacitors for any leakage or damage, you don't want an out-of-box experience to have to include replacing all the capacitors (although it may end up needing it anyway) This will obviously include voiding the warranty on the power supply to clean it out properly (be careful of the capacitors inside as they could hold a deadly charge, even after 15 minutes if the internal resistors don't work correctly) and inspect it. You should remove things like the CMOS battery, usually a button lithium cr2032, which would leak and destroy circuits on the motherboard, or at least go dead, and you should also pack some spare parts and components with it (at least a spare motherboard, ram, cpu, power supply, optical drive, spare fans, expansion cards, etc) , along with the documentation for them, which might not be available then. Pack at least 2 hard drives, pre-loaded with all the software you want them to see, including iso's of the discs that you will include, as you don't know how long the cdrom/dvd media will actually last.. you might want to include a fully bootable flash drive or two with the software and os as well. Include a complete listing of the bios settings for when they do have to put a battery in... if you can, make a written writing with all the electrolytic capacitors values and voltages, as that might come in handy for later. Include as many operating systems as is possible, to give a flavor of what pc's used to be like and what used to run on them, make sure all the licensing information is both in paper and digital form for any piece of commercial software, as they may need it to run the software, even if the companies who made it are long out of business by then. if the pc uses a standard db15 for vga, you should leave a crt and a lcd if possible, and if it uses a dvi connection you should also leave a DVI-DB15 adapter. Make as many video output options as you can available in case things have changed....
    Include a nice strong keyboard (like an old IBM Model M) along with a couple of the other keyboards you have (use different models and brands if possible), as the rubber membrane keyboards will likely not age very well. Include a ball and a optical mouse for snickers, and possibly a document on how each works...

    Of my years of collecting old pc's, that's what I've always wished was done for me! =)

  28. Get a netbook by quo_vadis · · Score: 1

    The best thing to do would be to ensure your entire system was self sufficient to some degree (i.e. display, OS, input devices were fixed). A netbook would be the perfect low cost solution. Just get an eeePc with a 4/8G hard disk, set up with some slideshow to start on boot and store that. To ensure you dont wind up with the problem of bad flash hard disks, either make a few copies on SD cards, or get a ROM based hdd, burned with a system image. That way when people open it up, there wont be issues of how to connect it to a working monitor/keyboard etc. Just plug in battery and press power button.

    --
    Legally obligatory sig : My opinions are my own... etc etc
    1. Re:Get a netbook by Cprossu · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want to bury a lithium ion battery with the possibility of moisture getting in, would you??

  29. pack away some back up parts by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a few extra motherboards, most necessarily

    it won't get you to 100 years, but assuming you pack away 4, and 2 die in the first 30 years, it will get you past 50 years at least

    and, with hard work, and assuming nonoverlap in what part failed, you could cannibale parts to get at least one still working for a very long time

    besides, even if they completely stop making capacitors, past 150 years, and all the caps fail, a capacitor isn't exactly a difficult component to troubleshoot, understand, or even make

    at 150 years, there would be enough interest in building a new capacitor, and enough interest form antique historians to invest in the time to understand and trouble shoot the pc to keep the thing running

    and at 200 years, it would probably even be worth a pretty penny

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  30. It'll be funny when if it did boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait 50 years, unpack it and plug it in.... Then wait while it downloads 50 years worth of windows updates as it simultaneously gets infected with 50 years worth of viruses, worms and other nasties!

    1. Re:It'll be funny when if it did boot by cpghost · · Score: 1

      And you'll have to wait a LONG time, to compensate for the lack of 2^10 cores that Windows would require to still barely boot.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  31. How can this be modded "Redundant" ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the first post, it can't be redundant. What idiot got mod points to do this? BTW, I'm not the poster, it's just that as a member of the community I find this ridiculous.

  32. Write the instructions in Chinese ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    might be a good idea.

  33. Also a cool economics class project by El+Cabri · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slip in a paper share of MSFT in the time capsule with a note : can you imagine that in OUR time, people would pay seventeen BUCKS for that !!?

    1. Re:Also a cool economics class project by cpghost · · Score: 1

      With 50+ years of inflation, how much purchasing power would seventeen bucks still have?

      Money decays too, not just electrolyte capacitors...

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:Also a cool economics class project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll think, "wow what a great deal." It'll probably be worth a few thousand dollars by then.

  34. Cover the basics by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    Make sure you've got good watertight, light-proof packaging. Pack it with plenty of desiccant packs. Maybe some oxygen absorber packs too. A big heat-sealed moisture barrier bag would be a good start, if you can get one that big.

    I'd be a little concerned about the electrolytic capacitors in the computer. There's probably not much you can do if they're going to leak - maybe you could fill the whole thing up with something absorbent that could be vacuumed up later, but I wouldn't count on it.

    Also make sure you don't leave any CMOS backup battery installed. If it has to be included, bag it separately.

    Keep the capsule temperature controlled. Assume it's going to flood at some point - there was a time capsuled opened here not long ago that was almost totally destroyed by water leakage.

    Make sure the local library has paper records on where the capsule is, what's in it, and so forth.

  35. EEPROM is the clincher by gillbates · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of the EEPROMs used to store the BIOS code only have a rated data retention lifespan of 10 or 20 years. In 50 years, it would likely not even be able to boot.

    But even should your EEPROM remain intact, the other problem is getting that hard drive spindle which has remained stationary for 50 years spinning again.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:EEPROM is the clincher by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      But even should your EEPROM remain intact, the other problem is getting that hard drive spindle which has remained stationary for 50 years spinning again.

      Buy a cheap SSD with 10GB storage. I would also caution against CD/DVD-RWs - they don't have a rated life. Perhaps a USB stick to boot off with Ubuntu on it.

      And will the Fluorescent lights in a monitor last? Not sure about that tech, would think LED backed LCDs are safer, but a bit too expensive.

      If you go to a flea market, you should have no problem locating 50-100 year old tech. Not sure what the purpose of a time capsule such as this is, as it will likely get lost, punctured somehow and permanently damaged, etc.

      Perhaps the submitter just doesn't want to go through the trouble of properly disposing of the computers, and is showing the kids the way to get rid of things cheaply is to bury it;)

    2. Re:EEPROM is the clincher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You along with all the other people offering this answer do not understand: FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES TO THE LAYMAN, EEPROMS AND FLASH DRIVES/DISKS ARE THE SAME. ALL WILL DISCHARGE.

      No the better option would be using a non-rewritable PROM technology that permanently fuses in one of two modes. Properly stored this method should keep a non-rewritable copy of the bios in usable condition.

    3. Re:EEPROM is the clincher by sunwolf · · Score: 1

      About the spindle - would using an SSD drive help?

    4. Re:EEPROM is the clincher by gillbates · · Score: 1

      Not for a 50 year project. The NAND flash used in SSDs has a variable lifespan - I'm thinking that it is not rated much beyond 10 or 20 years, if it is rated at all. Most of the NAND flash work has been directed toward increasing the number of useful cycles, not ultimate retention life. Regardless, it's not as if one can buy an SSD knowing the rated life of the chips these days.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    5. Re:EEPROM is the clincher by DrDitto · · Score: 1

      Flash memory has a rated bit lifetime of 10 years. Course that is a manufacture rating...you might get more in practice.

    6. Re:EEPROM is the clincher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would this effect flash ram as well? Maybe a gumstix computer as they store the boot process in flash ram?

    7. Re:EEPROM is the clincher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you could boot of an usb stick

  36. Re:You know what would suck? The Y2038 Problem by Yvan256 · · Score: 0

    Isn't it the Y2036 bug?

    In any case, dates should be saved as complete entries (year, month, day, hour, minutes, seconds, milliseconds if needed), not "number of milliseconds since date XYZ".

  37. Re:boot sequence? Re:Way too many unknowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    2^7 is 49. That's 7 generations of change as per Moore's law [for CPU usage] in less than 50 years. There will be significant REVOLUTIONARY changes.

    2^7 = 128. 7^2 = 49. 50 years is about 2^5.644 (lg(50)), so it's about 5 and a half generations.

  38. dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no one is going to want to touch that crap in 50 years. I get angry when I have to deal with anything sub pentium4!

  39. In consideration - Historical Archivist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After glancing at many of the nay-sayers and upon this posting, I'd like to remind everyone that very few common instruments of man have been created to endure beyond the life of their users, and quite often they are a joy to be discovered, even if the most basic of happenstances occurs to keep them somewhat preserved.

    Many solid state electronics last just fine for decades, nestled in their Styrofoam enclosures. I have personally seen a 1981 KayComp power up after being stashed under a desk for 25 years. I have little doubt it could have happily lasted another 25 down there. . . mercury and plastics gassing away.

    The important thing is to offer reasonable protection and documentation. Your Media is going to be the first thing to go. . . so try and document how the media would have worked "IF" it works. Use Acid Free Mylar where possible to keep paper and media from reacting as much with the environment. Take reasonable steps to make sure the computers are packed away from light, (UV hasten the decomposition of plastics), dirt and moisture. Make sure they can be accessed without being damaged and create a reasonable storage scheme that is organized, minimal and well documented.

    Essentially, do your best. Even if they don't power up in 50 years because they won't accept the wireless transmission of neo-voltage power used in that day and age, they will be marvels to students of that day. And people may figure out new pieces to apply to their lives in the future based on where we were going today. Also, if one "teacher" or child who has yet to be born, wants it bad enough, they'll figure out how to make them work, or have enough data from the specimens you try to preserve to make a model in their modern day.

    Afterall, if I could see just pieces of something like Babbage's difference engine, it's a wonderful experience, even if it doesn't have any punch cards to fully work.

    good luck
    -Scribe of Argos

    1. Re:In consideration - Historical Archivist by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      OH yeah, while they are at it, they can include a stone with three languages chiseled onto it so researchers in 50 YEARS can decipher the primitive script in the manuals. Yeah, that's the ticket.

      Sure, we still know how to use shit from 50 years ago, but you never know about 50 years from now.

      It's only 50 years people. Pull the batteries, throw in a copy on all available media, box the shit up in 'airtight' containers, pump in helium or nitrogen, then box that up, and stick in in a closet somewhere. It's not like it has to be available when Cartman finally gets his Wii system.

    2. Re:In consideration - Historical Archivist by Cprossu · · Score: 1

      I still have my tek 535 and 547 'scopes, which still work as well as they did the day they were manufactured, despite being over twice as old as I am. I am surprised by all the nay-sayers here on /. myself actually. I collect old computers and enjoy seeing a totally different view on how things were, and in quite a few cases, how they should be today but aren't. There's nothing in this world like flipping on my appleII, which I bet if I put in a case would work perfectly in the next 50 years, and coding up an old applebasic program, or running an old game, which I still haven't beaten yet. Computing has progressed a very very huge amount in very little time, and it will be very cool, even if it doesn't end up working without some work, for a future generation to see what caves we lived in before what they produced took over...
      Just throwing away something we have today just because it might not work later, or there would be better things around anyway is not a good basis for improving humanity. We need reminders, like the trs-80, b-reactor at the hanford site, the saturn V rocket, the Colussus at bechelli park, old television sets, and yes, todays' pc, to remind us of things we done and how we did them so we can once again progress.

    3. Re:In consideration - Historical Archivist by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      I have personally seen a 1981 KayComp power up after being stashed under a desk for 25 years.

      I think you got lucky. A coworker brought in a Kaypro II a couple of years ago that had hardly been used and stored in his father's garage. He fired it up and let it run for about a hour. Then there was a loud pop, a shower of sparks and smoke rolled out of it. One of the capacitors had blown a hole right through the power supply's circuit board.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    4. Re:In consideration - Historical Archivist by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I still have my tek 535 and 547 'scopes, which still work as well as they did the day they were manufactured, despite being over twice as old as I am. I am surprised by all the nay-sayers here on /. myself actually.

      That stuff was built to last, in an era before we discovered all kinds of nifty new ways to make electronics even more disposable so that we could generate more mountains of trash, because repairing electronics is difficult and expensive and no one wants to do it any more.

      It won't last forever either, but Tek used to give it their level best, as did DEC, Tandem, and many others.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:In consideration - Historical Archivist by Cprossu · · Score: 1

      Yeah I see your point on the teks, I should have picked something else that's a bit more realistic as far as build quality is concerned.. I still have my columbia data mpc1600 going, as well as a taiwanese xt rip-off, many appleIIc's, my mac 512K, a couple of mac plus's, my cobbled-together but still working 286(that box gives me a new problem every year), and a amd 386 that's never let me down. I try to keep at least one pc of each generation running, so I'll see how I do in the next 50 years as well, but then again this is with constant tending. I think the greatest thing he'll have to face is the 'lytic capacitors on the mobo and in the psu as long as he removes the cmos backup battery, and if they survive ok and he documents that it might need new caps, breathing life into it shouldn't be that bad, even 50 years on... as long as his still is mostly lead based solder, there's a good amount of data for it, if it's not though, then he might have issues later on...

      speaking of which I need to source some tunnel-diodes for my teks before those go bad ^_^
       

    6. Re:In consideration - Historical Archivist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thing built 25 years agot or more are far better built than the utter crap we have today. I picked up a museum piece TRS-80 model II with a pile of 8" floppies and it all works just fine. The old NASA software on the disks for sattelite solar array calculations all still read and run. this was stored for the past 20 years in a barn in a set of cardboard boxes on the top of a shelf. the barn has seen hundreds of temperature cycles, humidity of 100%, etc... and the thing still looks new inside and functions great.

      Now a Dell brand new today? I dont expect ti to last more than 3 years before a failure. Today stuff is built as crappy as possible to make maximum profits. Back then they were trying to build quality products.

    7. Re:In consideration - Historical Archivist by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Are you on Tekscopes? I have a 547 and 567. Lots of plugins, sampling heads and probes. I have a P6032 that works. Good to see another collector into these beasts that's younger than the beasts...

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    8. Re:In consideration - Historical Archivist by Cprossu · · Score: 1

      Yeah I am on tekscopes, but I haven't needed to go there for advice in a quite a very long while. (I just love how all my questions were pretty much answered there). I also printed the manuals for my scopes via B.A.M.A and have the original one for my 535. (oh yeah, my 547 has a 4dig serial, I've always thought that was cool(#008103)

    9. Re:In consideration - Historical Archivist by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Great, I have a lot of original manuals from eBay. My 547 came from Radio Canada so it was in excellent shape. Had the HV transformer re-potted by Bill Schell so it should be good for a few centuries. I scanned and OCR'ed the 1S1 manual, ever seen that one in the wild?

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
  40. Re:boot sequence? Re:Way too many unknowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2^7 is 49? Uh oh.
    7^2 is 49.
    2^7 is 128.

  41. My company just replaced our 8 year old Dells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking the same thing... my employer has Dells from 2000-2001 and just started a rolling replacement of them this month, mostly so that we could upgrade to Office2007 (because more and more clients are using it and we need to be able to exchange documents).

    1. Re:My company just replaced our 8 year old Dells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mostly so that we could upgrade to Office2007

      Don't forget to have a ribbon-cutting ceremony!

    2. Re:My company just replaced our 8 year old Dells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever you do, don't tell your boss there's a free .docx converter -- you'll never get a new computer then.

  42. Settle for compromise by grilled-cheese · · Score: 1

    I agree that the difficulties of preserving technological hardware are going to be more expensive than most are capable of (noble as it may be).

    I would do as others have suggested and videotape the process of the hardware in operation. In addition however I would build a virtualized environment using purely open-source projects. That way you are preserving the memory of the physical actions, the real user/software interaction, and the code necessary to keep the project usable in the future.

    Consider the case where someone wanted to preserve their commodore64 experience a long time ago. The hardware itself is scarce to find working even now at less than 50 years. The video would preserve the painstaking data entry and big cartridge mentality in the design. With modern virtualization technology, you could preserve any software environment in use today practically. This preserves the ability for future generations to develop and use these antiquated systems in the future for historical discovery. Additionally you would have to preserve a copy of the source code used to operate the virtualization software at the time in which the preservation is made. Giving people data formats that don't exist anymore is useless, but giving them the code needed to resurrect a working example has value. Even today, there are still ways for people to compile and execute programs written decades ago, provided they have the source.

  43. Very good... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    also:

    Argon filling the enclosure would help.

    If you were using modern stuff for a time capsule, there are mobos with only ceramic caps available now.

    Caps and batteries will be bad in 50 years. Electrolytic caps lose the oxide layer in a few years.

    Inert gas with desiccant will work, Vacuum packing a hard drive is a bad idea; The heads will vacuum weld to the platters. (both are reeeeally flat...)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  44. Capacitors are your enemy by Telecommando · · Score: 4, Informative

    The electrolytic capacitors are going to dry out in 50 years and will cease to function. There's a chance they will damage other components when the power supply is powered up again. I've seen it happen with equipment that is less than 25 years old. I don't think there is any known solution to this problem.

    I'm currently restoring a 50 year old stereo receiver (Harmon Kardon TA230) and the electrolytics are almost completely gone. Everything else is in excellent shape; the resistors, coils, tubes, even the lamps test good but the caps are all shot. This receiver has a old style transformer power supply, so I can bring the voltage up slowly using a Variac for testing. Your computers are going to have switching power supplies which will not like having a lower voltages applied to them so that's not an option.

    I honestly have my doubts that much from this era will survive 50 years. It's all made as quickly and as cheaply as possible with the expectation that it will be replaced in 3 or 4 years.

    I currently have an Apple ][ that no longer can read its boot disks, a PC XT that doesn't always recognize one of its ST-506 drives and a few months ago I went through my Amiga disks and found that most of them were no longer readable. All of these are far less than 50 years old and have been stored carefully and well cared for.

    However, my AIM-65 made in 1977 is still able to read data from my ASR 33's paper tape reader, which is 45 years old and still working fine.

    Yeah, my wife hates me for keeping all this junk.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    1. Re:Capacitors are your enemy by yayotters · · Score: 0

      Do the newer solid-state capacitors that motherboard makers (I know Gigabyte is at least) are using now suffer the same issues?

    2. Re:Capacitors are your enemy by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree about caps.

      I once worked at a place that had dumb terminals that were going on five years old that were seriously flaky because of the capacitors. I managed to fix the situation by telling the users that when they turned off the terminal at the end of the day, they should set the entire thing upside down. The idea was to use gravity to redistribute enough of the electrolyte so that the dielectric performance was improved. It worked like a charm, although I got a unfortunate reputation for being something of a mad scientist. People who couldn't remember my name would refer to me as "that guy who had us turn our computers upside down because of those jelly-roll things."

      So although it is a long shot, it might be worth storing the things upside down. In part this might counteract the migration of electrolyte that has occurred over the years, and when they unpack the thing and set it upright, it will counteract any migration of electrolyte that occurred during storage -- presuming any is left.

      I wonder whether sealing the circuit boards in wax might help with the outgassing problem. There's an epoxy that is specifically designed for pouring over circuits, but wax could be undone after the capsule was opened -- although it would be messy.

      In any case, the first step you should take is to restore the computers to as close to perfect working order as possible. You could desolder the capacitors and install brand new, high quality replacements. Also pay attention to connectors that need replacement. Then you should prepare the computers for storage. Speaking of connectors, it might be best to unplug as many connectors as possible, to prevent metal-to-metal reactions. Disassemble everything, leaving clear instructions about how to put them back together again.

      The hard disks are bound to be a problem. Assuming the motherboard and power supply survive, I'd include a variety of media: CD-ROM, CF Card (yes, I know it's a long shot), maybe even 5" floppies with FreeDOS. Since you probably don't want to encourage kids to mess with VDTs, I'm not sure what you should do about preserving the CRTs. I'd consider an inexpensive LCD panel or maybe even one of those USB LED displays and set the computer up to display a welcome message if it boots up at all.

      It occurs to me that it might be worth making the time capsule airtight, adding valves to it, then purging and pressurizing it (slightly) with a inert gas. Other than the shell, you could probably get most of what you need form a welding supply store. Purging the air of water, oxygen and miscellaneous pollutants would reduce the chemical degradation of the equipment. Pressurizing it might retard the outgassing problem for a few years. Although it is unlikely that the capsule would remain pressurized after decades, you'd have to put a warning on it if you don't want some future person to blow their head off. You probably should put a warning on the capsule anyway; I agree with the other poster who noted that after several decades, you could end up with a box of gaseous poisons, and I don't think people will become more careful about this sort of thing. They might be used to a world in which pollutants are more carefully regulated and recycled.

      You could include a seal that the openers would break, with instructions to do outdoors and to give it a few hours for any contaminants to disperse.

      Finally, there's a lot of educational value simply in researching the problem. Students should contact curators at museums which preserve and display antiquities, or which collect old technology.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  45. Condensators too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most likely also the condensators will be dried already, the motherboard will not function properly. There is simply no way you can preserve a modern(ish) computer for 50-100 years in a working condition. Too many parts will fail in 10 years already, because they were simply built to last only for so long time.

  46. Preservation by cffrost · · Score: 4, Informative

    The US National Archives for Preservation and Archives Professionals page contains much information, including that which is specific to time capsules.

    Northeast Document Conservation Center is another good resource with guidance pertaining to specific types of materials.

    NIST's PDF guide Care and Handling of CDs and DVDs contains best-practices for optical media storage/handling.

    --
    Thank you, Edward Snowden.

    "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  47. Why lock useful computers in a vault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been to a school that had done the same basic project with one wrinkle: they just forced students to keep using the same computers for 50 years.

  48. one word of advice... BOOM! by swschrad · · Score: 1

    that's what the electrolytic capacitors in the power supply and on the motherboard and plug-in cards will do, go boom.

    in the case of old tube equipment, there are two schools of thought on this.

    the preservationist school says bring the unit up slowly on a Variac to reform those capacitors that are not fully dried out, say, over 12 to 24 hours. then test the caps, and anything failing needs replacement. issues with your plan are no exact replacements, SMT desoldering and resoldering, etc.

    the functionalists recap the whole machine first (the frustrated preservationalists gut the old capacitor bodies and put the new stuff in them, then seal up again with the same old wax or pitch) and then power it up for a smoke test. most of the same issues.

    this is not looking too positive as I see it. something with as few electrolytics as possible would be the best bet, like a laptop.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  49. Re:You know what would suck? The Y2038 Problem by Zironic · · Score: 2

    That would make it a serious pain in the ass to do time calculations.

  50. No consumer electronics last 50 years ?? by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    There are quite a few old tube radios around that are more than 50 years old that still work. I've got a Hammarlund HQ-129X built in 1946 that still works with the original capacitors. It's been fired up often enough that the electrolytics haven't de-formed. You might nit-pick that it's not a consumer product, but it was built for the short wave listener and ham radio operator, not for the government or commercial users of the time.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:No consumer electronics last 50 years ?? by franl · · Score: 1

      And there's also this light bulb that has burned for over a century: http://www.roadsideamerica.com/set/lightbulbs.html

    2. Re:No consumer electronics last 50 years ?? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How many MIPS does that lightbulb get?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. One label is enough for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Put a large label outside the box that reads:

    Porn pictures inside. DO NOT OPEN

    The students of the future will figure out the rest no matter how the education system will have been rotten.

  52. No Lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's an astroturfer from the future...

  53. The Rosetta Stone method... by madcat2c · · Score: 1

    It worked for them then, why not now? Deciphering the Egyptian language was because someone took the time to write the same story in hieroglyphic, Demotic. and Greek.

    So, do the best that you can do to preserve the pc (clean it and vacuum seal it at a packing plant?), pack as many spare parts as you can (cables, drives, etc), image the drive to other drives (As spares) and seal them, Image the drive to a few DVD's,

    Lastly, find a way to just dump the contents of the drive into pure binary code and print it out.

  54. One generation is enough for obscurity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you're going to store anything for more than one generation, you need to be prepared for the technology to be lost to the ages. Vaccuum tubes aren't even 100 years old, but barely anyone alive can run a tube computer anymore, much less make one.

    If you want to store something over ages, then you need to be prepared for the loss of languages. Use as many languages as possible. Remember that without the Rosetta stone, ancient Egyptian heiroglyphs would be lost to us.

    Include manuals. Setup. Assembly directions. Transistor theory. Electronic manuals. The chemistry behind vital components. Blueprints on the components. Blueprints on the tools needed to make the components. Comic books detailing what a computer is, how it is built, and how it gets used. You don't know what will or won't be remembered in the future. Parts will rot and decay, what is common knowledge today will become obscure tomorrow. It's important that your device can be rebuilt, and understood. If the secrets of even one critical part is lost, it may be impossible to rebuild the machine. But at least it'd make a good museum piece.

    If you do all this, your students will learn heaps of information about computers. There's plenty of topics to cover, even for students uninterested in computers. Of course, the experience may end up being more valuable than the project itself.

  55. A simulated solutiion by Breconides · · Score: 1

    If you really want to have the kids 50 years from now be able to experience what computing is like today, maybe the best thing to do would be to just keep the computer and monitor enclosures. Then, keep a copy of the hard drive contents yourself, backing them up and maintaining them yourself, and in 50 years, go back to the school. You could install a display inside the monitor case, use computer innards of the time, and then use an emulator to basically simulate the whole experience.

    It's not a perfect solution, and doesn't cover certain things like an authentic input device (mouse, keyboard), etc., but to me it would seem to be more important for them to experience a close simulation than for everything to be completely authentic.

    It would mean keeping the files from corrupting over the years, etc., so more work for you, but it would take care of the hardware failure issues.

    1. Re:A simulated solutiion by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Good idea! It's like the people who put PCs inside '80s-style arcade cabinets for playing Pacman and Defender on emulators.

      --
      No sig today...
  56. Not gonna work.... by macraig · · Score: 1

    Unless you store the thing in a vacuum, some things just aren't gonna last 50 years, and if it works at all when they fire it up it won't work very long. In particular, the grease in the drive's sealed bearing is going to oxidize and harden; the same would happen even quicker to the exposed grease in the DVD drive. You might solve the former problem with an SSD, but I doubt any obsolete school PCs are going to have those. You might be able to leave instructions how to disassemble and re-lube the optical drive, but the hard disk... fuggedaboudit.

    1. Re:Not gonna work.... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I don't share your pessimism. I think that in the future, everyone will be able to re-grease the hard drive bearings in the cleanroom of their flying cars.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Not gonna work.... by macraig · · Score: 1

      Alrighty, then!

  57. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I couldn't care less about the computers from 10 years ago, let alone any monsters from the dawn of computing.

    You may have fond memories of today's technology (probably because you have an irrational attachment after seeing your son grow up with it) - but I have absolutely no expectation that kids in 50 years will care about today's computers.

    Assuming your preservation works, this is the reaction that I would expect:

    1. Anger at being forced to play with this outdated stuff for a class project.
    2. Laughter at how incredibly bad the hardware is, how impossibly dated the software is.
    3. How difficult all this crap is going to be to recycle.

    If you want to preserve a computer - do it for yourself. Not for some unborn future kids that are, in all likelihood, not going to even have a passing interest in the technology that's been enjoyed by your present-day kid.

    1. Re:Why? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, there may be some people like me, who would love to see a computer that is older than me, and would really love to so something with it, at least see it working, not just put behind glass in a museum.

    2. Re:Why? by JockTroll · · Score: 0, Interesting

      But for every one of you there are a thousand or more turdbrain like the parent poster who absolutely believe that they are living in the most amazing era ever, and that by the simple fact of being alive in it makes them better than their forerunners. They masturbate furiously in their own feces thinking nobody will ever best them, and nobody will ever get the stupid idea out of the fecal matter they have in their skulls.
      I'm packing some of my own shit in a time capsule, so that it can be smeared on the future clueless kids.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    3. Re:Why? by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Let's empty all the museums and make *really big* fast food restaurants in them!

  58. Things to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remove any Batteries from the system. This means the CMOS battery. The hard drives will most likely stick after that much time so starting them again may be a little difficult. An OS CD (not cdr) to reinstall the OS would have the best chance of success. Put several hard drives in with the same OS copy so the odds of one working are better, same goes for OS CDs.

  59. Great idea by dindi · · Score: 1

    For me it is a great idea, but I can imagine the non-geeky person saying "what's great about all this old @$@#$".....

    It's like trying to show an ASCII only BBS from 18 years ago to your average younger colleague, and you just see their expressionless face wondering how much you had to care about a screen refresh on a menu to avoid high bandwidth usage even on a high tech 9600bps modem.

  60. So first, is this idea crazy? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > So first, is this idea crazy?

    Yes. Do it.

    > Second, how would we go about packing/preserving various components?

    Pack it all in cosmoline.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  61. slashdot suggestions by ckblackm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Print out a copy of all the slashdot suggestions and include it. In 50 years they might have an idea of who was *Insightful* or *Full of it*.

    1. Re:slashdot suggestions by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Extreme meta modding.

  62. Not feasible for a school project by AimHere2000 · · Score: 1

    As others have already pointed out, there are many problems inherent with trying to preserve electronics in a working condition for such a long period of time. All of the components (down to the smallest level) would have to have been designed and manufactured for long-term stability, as would the data storage media holding the BIOS, operating system, apps, and user data. If this prerequisite is not met, it'd simply be a crap shoot as to whether any of it would work after 50 years sitting idle, no matter how you chose to store it. Doubly so, since the systems in question are hardly in fresh-from-the-factory pristine condition to begin with.

    Besides, I fear that the methods of preparation and storage that would be needed to give the system a real chance of booting up, would be beyond the means of a small school project like this. You'd have to back up not only the OS and data disks, but the BIOS EEPROM and *every* other ROM or ROMlike chip in the system, including those on video/soundcards, hard/floppy/CD/DVD drive circuit boards, the display controllers in the the monitor, etc. ... and back it up multiple times to media that has a chance of surviving for decades (I'm talking factory-stamped CD/DVD-ROMS, not user-writable discs).

    Then you'd have to make sure those media are stored in archivial fashion: properly packaged and stored under carefully-controlled conditions of temperature and humidity in a dust-free, pollutant-free environment, perhaps even going so far as to seal them in an inert gas. And you'd have to do the same to the computer hardware, preferably NOT in the same physical location or container, as the electronics could degrade and affect the data storage media.

    It would be far easier to merely preserve the hardware and storage media as inert objects for museum display, with no expectations of keeping them in working order. And even then, you'd have to be prepared to deal with toxic by-products leaking out of the electronics over time.

    Either way, this would be a project better suited for a major university or privately-funded museum than for a small school. If you really want to press forward with it, I'd suggest contacting one of the larger museum institutions for suggestions and/ or assistance.

  63. Power source specifications by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

    Do not forget to include the power source specifications.

    While I don't see it as terribly likely for standard wall outlets to change in 50 years, it is possible that a new technology will emerge that prompts the standard to change. It could be a different frequency, different voltage, different physical pin arrangement... All must be specified so that adapters can be constructed in the event of a standard change.

  64. impossible x infeasible by solaraddict · · Score: 1

    I think "feasible" is the word you're looking for. After all, you could get 200 CDs pressed, then throw 199 of them away, no? It will surely be the most *expensive* CD you can get (both in terms of money and waste), but it can be done.

    1. Re:impossible x infeasible by Migraineman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Play the statistics. Tip the entire pile of 200 CDs into the time capsule bin. You gain exactly zero advantage by putting them in the landfill, and have a "maybe one will work" if you forward them to the future. I don't know about you, but I'll take a "maybe" over a "guaranteed zero" any day.

    2. Re:impossible x infeasible by Siffy · · Score: 1

      If I hadn't already posted in this thread you'd get a +1 Funny for putting the image in my head of a group of kids all standing over a solid steel box as it's being opened and "hey look at this junk they left us" when they see a loose pile of 200 discs just dumped in there. I know that's how I pack my time capsules. I'm not opening them, so what do I care?

  65. Computer History Museum by IL-CSIXTY4 · · Score: 1

    If you're serious, give the folks at the Computer History Museum a ring and see if they have any advice. But, be prepared for disappointment. There are many 40-50 year old pieces in their collection that don't work anymore, and it's kinda hard to get parts with how quickly tech changes.

  66. It'll take some reliability engineering... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no way you will be able to just toss a computer in a sealed capsule for half a century and expect it to work when unsealed and powered. Modern components simply are not engineered to this level of reliability, and for good reason - they're going to be obsolete in 5 years, so it makes no economic sense. You'll have to do at a lot of detail work to try and assure that the machine will even start:

    You will have to replace every single electrolytic capacitor (in everything - mainboard, PSU, every drive, monitor, mouse, keyboard and speaker amp) with solid-state versions. Electrolytics dry out and it's very unlikely that anyone other than a computer historian would think of this before powering the computer up. Altair 8800s and Imsai 8080s from the late 1970s are now to the point that their power supplies and electrolytics must be replaced for them to work reliably - don't expect your machine to fare any better.

    It's also a safe assumption that the lubrication in any rotating media drive will be gone by 2060 - not sure how to deal with that other than providing lube in a hermetically sealed package along with instructions to disassemble the CD drive and apply it.

    How are you going to have your data last? Tapes and hard drives will demagnetize by 2060. Flash may have a prayer; Your best bet is to get some extremely long-lasting batteries and interface a microcontroller with a plugged-in thumb drive. Store the data along with error-correction codes on the drive. Have the system wake up every ten or twenty years and "scrub" the drive, reading every block and writing it back. Do the same with the system's bios EEPROM - the system will be useless if that gets killed by a cosmic ray. You should also pay to have data CDs gold-mastered - redundancy is the only way to go here.

    The display is another problem. The only technology I'd really trust to just work without needing any repair is an LED display; LEDs can run continuously for decades. After the LEDs, a CRT is probably the best bet (despite a decent one having hundreds of precision electrolytics that'll need replacing) - After all, we've got examples of working CRTs from the 50s and 60s. Newer technologies haven't been around long enough to prove themselves yet.

    Get a corrosion resistant, hermetically sealed package for the whole kit and kaboodle and flood it with a dense inert gas like SF6 to keep anything from growing. Thoroughly sterilize every square millimeter with a hard UV light just to be safe. Put the HDD in its own sealed bag full of nitrogen if you include one.

    For power, your best bet is probably a primary battery (Mg-Cu) with seperately-stored electrolyte feeding an inverter - The shelf-life is "forever until mixed," at which point the machine will probably have a few hours of power depending on how much you include.

    Assume that the people who recover the device will still speak your local language and have libraries where they can look up terms such as volt/byte/etc. If they can't, I doubt there will be enough of civilization left to care about some artifact from before The Fall. I think that it will take far more time and money than you're prepared to casually expend if you want to entomb a computer and have any reasonable probability of it turning on and actually working after 5 decades alone, rather than just popping a PSU capacitor or being a dead relic.

    1. Re:It'll take some reliability engineering... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Precisely.

      Honestly, if you want to provide your grandchildren a picture of the past - antiques and things they aren't likely to see in the future - you're best bet would be to seal up something like a dictionary and/or a firearm. Those items will either be politically/socially passe by the time they're in school, or all but non-existent.

      And, worst case senario, they'd be able to utilize the firearm to protect themselves.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:It'll take some reliability engineering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One correction:

      EEPROM lasts longer if it is NOT refreshed.

      Every write weakens the insulator for the floating transistor gate used to store the information.

      EEPROM should last ~100 years if it is only written a few times.

    3. Re:It'll take some reliability engineering... by cecom · · Score: 1

      Wow, man, wow! Posts like these make me continue reading Slashdot despite all the crap.

  67. Not just moisture! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    The items should indeed be sealed, air-tight, in a dry container of some kind, on a cold clear day (low water content in the air), preferably along with a couple of pounds of Dri-Z-Air or some such moisture absorbing compound. (I am not kidding.) If you cannot seal the container on a cold day then you might be able to find a walk-in freezer that is big enough for you to put it all together there. Let the objects cool off and wipe off any surface moisture before putting them in their sealed container(s).

    But there are three other great enemies of longevity that you should also attend to: air, temperature, and light.

    Not only should the storage space be dry, it should be kept consistently cool (below 50 F if possible), and in the DARK.

    Air is largely a problem because of the moisture, but it can cause other problems as well. The container should be air-tight.

    Even then, consider that the standard shelf life of a CD is supposed to be 10 years. You may be able to extend this is you keep them cool, dry, and dark, but I would take care.

  68. cost me a days consulting by dominux · · Score: 1

    turned up at a client and they were all of a fluster. Everything infected, no idea what it was going to do next as it rampaged about the domain. They were terrified because: "we don't know what our computers are doing" which is the normal state when using proprietary software, they must be more used to it than I am. As a consultant the best thing for me to do was leave. I wouldn't attempt to do any work on someone elses infected computer, I don't want to end up owning the problem, and they didn't want to spend a day listening to me talking about how they should switch to a grown up operating system.

  69. long lasting Caps? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    Not all caps are made the same...Is there capacitor that is top class and could function even after 50 years? A few custom caps would cost some $$ but replacing the motherboard ones would help longevity.

  70. Look no further than my high school by Laxator2 · · Score: 1

    Back in '92 the school received a bunch of 386 machines. The school principal (or "director"), computer illiterate and scared of such dubious machines, decided that allowing the students to use them will have only one outcome: the students will damage the machines. Therefore, to prevent such damage, he locked them away in a warehouse, and I am sure that they are still there, in the same warehouse, in the same state as in '92. Not a trace of damage, of course.

  71. It's kinda stupid, but the best way is... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Multiple sources. Include vacuum packed optical media, magnetic media, flash media and laminated paper printouts of the code.

    In 50 years they should still have the ability to take digital photographs of the laminated sheets and with a little luck, OCR will be much better. You're going to have to make danmed sure that you can keep moisture out of the package. You should find the thickest, heaviest mylar you can and use that to vacuum pack the components. And with each of the components wrapped in air tight media, wrap them again. After that, wrap them again. Light, oxygen and moisture are your enemies. You must keep them out.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  72. Sometimes things just keep working by JeffTL · · Score: 1

    I have a Western Electric Model 500 telephone, manufactured per the bottom plate May of 1963, but including older parts such as the black metal fingerwheel. I think the ringer needs to be adjusted for the voltage on my line, but its line cord has already been replaced with a modular one and it works great -- on cable company phone service no less. So it's working at upwards of 45 years, combination in-service and a few years in the attic. Obviously this is a simpler device than a computer, but electronics can hold up if they are built right.

  73. Re:in 50 years battery acid damage and bad caps ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi. I'm writing this on a computer that have had the capacitors replaced.

  74. So what percentage is that? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    "there's also this light bulb that has burned for over a century"

    So what percentage of 100 year old lightbulbs still work then? How many lightbulbs from 100 years ago are still functioning? I am guessing a very, very small percentage chance of success. i.e. be optimistic, but realistic...

  75. Three words by PNutts · · Score: 0

    Al Capone's Vault.

  76. Re:You know what would suck? The Y2038 Problem by The+Iso · · Score: 1

    Isn't that equivalent to "number of milliseconds since 0001-01-01"?

    --
    "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." - Bob Dylan
  77. Re:in 50 years battery acid damage and bad caps ma by aurispector · · Score: 0, Troll

    bullshit - or someone just screwed you but hard

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  78. It's simple, really: by who's+got+my+nicknam · · Score: 1

    All you need to do is find a closet somewhere in the school. Pile the old computers in there (it's best to just fill the closet right to the ceiling, that way there's little incentive for anyone to ever clean it out), and lock the door. If you can lock it with a padlock, and then throw the keys away, even better. In fifty or even a hundred years, your 'time capsule' will still be intact. Given the amount of money schools are given for renovations, nobody will be tearing the closet out for a good while yet; and given the lack of money for IT support, anyone who did happen to stumble across it would merely shrug and shut it back up again.

    I work a public school IT department, and we find little stashes of 30-year old computer gear often enough that it's not a surprise anymore- and that's in a tiny district with only four schools!

    If your closet has an electrical outlet, even better. You can build a circuit to keep the BIOS battery charging the whole time and just leave it plugged in.

    For redundancy, hide a few machines in some of these locations as well:

    Above the ceiling tiles in the staff lounge
    On top of the furnace/boiler in the basement
    Beneath the bleachers in the gymnasium
    Above the ceiling of the girls' change room (on second thought, bad idea. Some nerd will find them for sure, there)
    On a shelf in the custodian's closet
    Between two of your Dell blade servers in the NOC
    In the closet with the overhead projectors and VCRs and filmstrip players- nobody ever goes in there anymore!

    --
    "Apparatus dignosco occultus, satis non supernus."
  79. 'Activations' makes this unworkable. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Since XP needs activation servers, our project is doomed to fail. DRM has large chunks of our current culture to be a dark age. I assume that this being a school, you are not going to illegally crack the DRM.

  80. Its all pointless anyway by xZoomerZx · · Score: 1

    The computer will be ruined by the decomposing body soup of the nerd killed and dumped into the capsule by a lesser nerd.

    Dont any of you people watch "Bones" on FOX?

    --
    Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  81. Re:You know what would suck? The Y2038 Problem by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    That would make it a serious pain in the ass to do time calculations.

    Or time travel - let me tell you. Just last week, I tried to travel to the year 2077, but the control computer had the 2038 bug and I ended up back in my own garage where I started. Man-o-man was that embarrassing!

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  82. Go 50 years the other way by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What 1959 technology would you like to see run? A turntable? A TV? How about a Radio? We still have all those things, but now, they are cheaper (adjusted for inflation) and better.

    So much of the experience of a current "computer" has nothing to do with the hardware, it's the content. So the virtualization ideas, etc have some merit.

    50 years from now, how "cool" is old hardware going to be? Not very I expect. They will have better cheaper computers.

    IMHO, you'd be better off including lots of pictures and printed material that will be usable, toss in some hw too, even if it won't work. In the end, I suspect an old yearbook will be more interesting than a computer.

    Meh, that's just my 2 cents worth.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Go 50 years the other way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, some things from the recent past are still around, but how about more recent things? Betamax player? 8 track player? Lawn darts?

    2. Re:Go 50 years the other way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My kids were entranced with my journalist grandfather's portable typewriter and large format camera. Now they know why they are called a "shift" and "return"keys. Lack of plug perturbed them a bit and having to retype/use liquid paper for mistakes they thought was hilarious!
      Explaining about gestener sand other printing options was interesting, they weren't sure I wasn't taking the mick!

  83. Gmail by Dr.Diesel · · Score: 1

    Just gmail a video of it running/booting/etc to yourself, then simply bury a 8.5x11 piece of paper with our username/pass for them to download in 50 years! By then googleNet will rule the world and your mailbox will be 75PBs in size!

  84. Capacitors will not survive.... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    You will need to replace the electrolythe capacirots. They only have a shelf life of about 10 years. One possible way around that is to get an all-solid (ceramics) capacirot board. You will not get a PSU of that type though. You can get a 24V (or the like) DC input PSU with ceramic capacitors though and then will only need a 24V PSU to get it working.

    On the data-carrier side, the FLASH BIOS may be gone on the mainboard, typical CD/DVDs do not survive nearly as long and drives will also suffer from capacitor and lubrication agent decay.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Capacitors will not survive.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP works for ~30 days or something without activation.

  85. Remove the clock battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The clock battery will be the first thing to die. The "coin shaped" battery will last no more than 3 years in a dormant machine.

    Most older PC's, the settings for the hard disk geometry are stored in CMOS powered by the clock battery. When the battery goes, your system is no longer bootable, and it's often very difficult to figure out what the correct settings are years later.

    At a minimum, write down all the BIOS configuration information you can find (in the BIOS config screens that you can get into if you press a key on system boot) and then remove the clock battery from the motherboard. This will prevent battery corrosion from damaging the motherboard and may allow the battery to last longer. Include a brand new spare battery in the archive for good measure - preferably in its original packaging.

  86. Make a living capsule... by Hasmanean · · Score: 1

    The problem with burying a time capsule is that it works for dead items, but does not work well for something which is supposed to work when you resurrect it.

    Why not encrypt your message, spread it around on the surface, freely, and just bury the key in your capsule? For more fun, encrypt it with just enough encryption so that the time it takes to crack it is equal to the time capsule length.

    --
    Hasan
  87. Battery life by Passman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This actually brings up perhaps the biggest problem with the project.Where will they find a battery for the bios?

    While some bios will boot (to default settings) without a bios battery installed most will simply fail post, hard.

    Will a battery, even still in the original packaging, even hold a charge for 50 years? If you look back, battery technology has advanced quite a bit in the last 50 years and there is every indication that this will continue for the next 50 years so getting a hold of the exact battery (or even a similar one) that the bios needs may be impossible.

    --
    Minne-snow-da: Winter is comming...
    1. Re:Battery life by theeddie55 · · Score: 1

      then wire the battery compartment to the outside of the case with a sign saying stick 3 volts here, that way there's no need for the exact battery type to be included.

    2. Re:Battery life by Malvineous · · Score: 1

      So wire up a 3V transformer to the battery socket...

    3. Re:Battery life by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most every PC I've come across with a bad BIOS battery will run once you've configured the BIOS and will hold the settings until you turn it off again. The best bet would be pull the battery off the motherboard (to prevent corrosion when it leaks), pack the computer with a note on how to configure the BIOS and what kind of battery needed to retain the settings and the specifications for it. They'll probably be able to get a CR2032 in 50 years, as it's an extremely common type of battery, and even if they aren't, I've find motherboards extremely tolerant anyway - anything 1.8-3.5V or so that they can jam in there will hold the settings.

    4. Re:Battery life by rts008 · · Score: 1

      "The best bet would be pull the battery off the motherboard (to prevent corrosion when it leaks), pack the computer with a note on how to configure the BIOS and what kind of battery needed to retain the settings and the specifications for it."

      Good point.

      I think I would also include the latest BIOS firmware with the storage media, along with the protocol/procedure to reflash the BIOS.

      When I read the summary, the mobo battery for the BIOS chip and degradation of the BIOS firmware were my first thoughts about how difficult his project may be.

      It is an interesting mental exercise though. (at least for me)

      I have nothing else worthwhile to contribute at this time...later.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    5. Re:Battery life by Teun · · Score: 1

      Not really an issue, any power source with the correct Voltage will do, the form factor is at best secondary.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    6. Re:Battery life by tellthepeople · · Score: 1

      There are batteries that would work after 50 years. They keep the reactants separate until some action is preformed, like pulling a tab. The military uses this type of battery in some situations. Also, even if it won't work after 50 years all you need is to say that the bios needs X volts at Y amps.

      --
      Tanto nomini nullum par elogium.
    7. Re:Battery life by fataugie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where will they find a battery for the bios?

      That's easy. Just include an extra!

      Wait....oh....nevermind.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    8. Re:Battery life by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      IT's simple enough to find a motherboard that won't fail POST when it encounters a dead CMOS battery. Just remove the battery from each machine that you're considering, and only choose one that can POST without the battery. Then include a printed sheet with instructions on manually setting up the BIOS, and you're good to go.

      Virg

  88. Just don't piss off the futre! by soybean · · Score: 1

    The idea of pissing off a planet with much higher technology then ours really scares me.

  89. Re:in 50 years . . . and tin whiskers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may have to provide instructions for constructing replacement capacitors and CMOS battery as well as how to detect and remove the tin migration needles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whisker_(metallurgy) for an overview) that are likely to form, fungus, possibly conductive dust layer, and the like. The insulation may well be faulty by then, too.
    Also, on archival paper, provide the code for the bios so that it can be replaced.

  90. Gee you really think it is a good idea? by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Good luck trying to get Windows XP to "activate" in 50 years from now.

    I don't think IPV4 will still work 50 years from now anyway and domain names will change. Either Microsoft will be out of business or no longer will accept Windows XP activations.

    I think whatever exists of the Internet in 50 years will ban old technology from connecting in order to promote the latest technology. It would sort of like getting a Univac to connect to the Internet today and use Firefox to browse web sites. Not really possible and a platform 50+ years old would no longer be supported.

    I am quite sure that HTML will be replaced with something else in 50 years, and old web browsers couldn't connect to it anymore than Netscape 1.0 could do dynamic HTML 4.0 and AJAX and Shockwave Flash web sites.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  91. 50 years unlikely - maybe 20, with some work by gooneybird · · Score: 1

    You could just takes pictures of everything using a 35mm BW FILM camera and have the prints developed with silver-halide and put the prints in the time capsule. We know that prints of this type will last for 100's years...Sometimes our technology isn't all that it's cracked up to be...
    ---OR---
    To get increase the odds of getting to 20 years:
    Motherboard:

    - Replace all electrolytic caps (they'll dry out) with tantalum caps (expensive)
    - If the BIOS is flash or eprom (unlikely - haven't been used in 10 years), burn a PROM (Programmable ROM) and substitute. The PROM will last longer.

    LCD display:
    - same prep as motherboard

    Hard Drive:
    - Problematic. The bearings in the motor will probably seize after a long period of inactivity. Maybe a new SSD (but flash will have its problems as well)? - Even having a bootable CD/DVD custom-pressed will still need a CD/DVD reader (has a motor with bearings). Maybe increase your odds by putting in dual drives? - One of them may survive. - Maybe set up a USB thumb drive and try to boot from that. (make sure MB can boot USB drive)

    Keyboard:
    - Anything mechanical will be a problem. I would find a membrane-keyboard (the type that you can buy that is waterproof). This might have the best chance of avoiding corrosion

    Entire Computer:
    - Seal in moisture resistant plastic. Also put in at least 2 pounds of desiccant. Fill with nitrogen to prevent corrosion on metal-metal contacts.
    - Replace all wiring with silicone-based wiring. (Wiring will dry out, crack and short when power is re-applied after 20 years)
    - What OS are you going to use? CP/M was used 20 years ago, how many people know how to boot a CP/M system? The current generation doesn't even know about DOS...Do really think that anyone will be using windows in 20-50 years? Sorry Bill, ain't gonna happen... (we'll probably be using some kind of molecular computer that looks like a glass filled with water and is programmed for a specific task using nano-programming bots)
    - If you aren't going to bury it, enclose it in metal container that is sealed and grounded to prevent the random cosmic ray from corrupting programmable memory or magnetic bits on the hard disk. Also helps in the event of solar storms/flares
    - Make sure you have all of the cables you need. It's unlikely someone will find any of the same type 20 years from now. How many people still have a Centronics parallel port cable?
    - I would probably disconnect all internal cables and connections to reduce metal-metal corrosion and also allow the nitrogen to infiltrate everything. This includes unplugging DRAM and CPU. Make sure to include instructions on how to hook everything back up.

    - Power:
    - Enclose the following:
    - 55W 18V Solar panel
    - 12vdc-120vac pure sinewave inverter
    - 12v lead acid battery that is dry and never been charged (plates are not wet) This will keep for 10+ years
    - battery acid (enough for charing battery)
    - instructions for preparing, charging battery using solar panel and how to hook up solar panel to charge.

    So, if you don't do the above and just throw everything in a bag, you might get 5-10 years before things deteriorate to the point that they fail. Another alternative might be to use a laptop where at least everything is self-contained. Still need a way to power it though. The electric-grid (in its current form) has been around for about 100 years. It will probably make it for at least 30-50 years, so power would be the least of my concerns.
    And my last question would be, would anyone be alive (or care) about a computer that's 20 years old.

    Do you currently care about an IBM PC -8086 with 256K of memory, a 360k 5.25 floppy, a 5MB hard drive with a hercules monochrome monitor?
    That was 20 years ago...

  92. My thoughts by Montusama · · Score: 1

    After reading some comments and the article. (from what I know) For the media, I would recommend commercial disk as dyes on disc don't last for long (or at least don't seem to last as long as pressed). Having more than one copy would be helpful probably, in case some don't work ,and trying to make sure they don't oxidize is probably you're #1 priority after disc quality. As for the computer, some have spoken about battery problems and even capacitors and maybe even data not being on the BIOS chips and the HDD not possible spinning. Battery problem - simply removing the battery and putting it in another container, but this doesn't help keep the data in the various chips. Capacitor's are probably the tricky part as they do contain a "voltage" and you can't discharge them really so...no idea. HDD - you could try SSD but I don't think they can keep data there that long? and what's the "half-life" on data on a traditional drive? assuming it's shielded from electromagnet interferences, will it stay there "forever" ? If I was going to put such a feet, I wouldn't go with a "completed" system, as it's probably too risky. Maybe you would want to provide multiply system's and prepare each part of the system, to be stored separately from each other. And provide instructions on how to put it back together (in case some parts don't work). If you put enough parts in it, you should be able to get a complete system out of it. Personal opinion, you should just throw some CRT's in the capsule, and maybe even an LCD and Plasma, the CRT should last long enough (assuming it doesn't suffer from the same problems as a computer would) and would probably be more "amazing" to people in the future. Of course I'm assuming the CRT will be 100% dead by then, and won't be like VHS (or even LD's) where they just won't completely die.

    --
    God Of War ^^
  93. Distribute them as widely as possible. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be better not to put them all in one place.

    If you are going to get 200 CDs pressed, you'd do well to keep a few dozen of them in your capsule, and distribute the rest.

    If it's a project at a school, insert a copy of the CD in the back of every copy of that year's yearbook. Make sure to send several copies of the yearbook with the CD insert to all the local libraries in the area. Chances are that will ensure that at least one of them will survive for 50 years. At least in my area, the libraries have yearbooks from all the local schools going back to the 40s, which I presume is when they started producing them. (They have class photos going back a lot further than that, too.)

    In general, if you can make information interesting (or at least package it with something interesting), you can practically let other people do all the archival work for you.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Distribute them as widely as possible. by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the CD is likely to be useless without the hardware to read it (hence the need to archive the entire machine.) As an example, I used to write software on a Terak 8510/a. Let's say that I archived 200 of the 8-inch floppies into high-school year books. Right now, a mere 30 years later, they would be completely useless, regardless of their ability to retain data. So unless the yearbooks all have PCs taped to the back cover, I don't see the distributed model gaining you anything.

  94. Re:in 50 years battery acid damage and bad caps ma by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    Why is it bullshit? I did the same thing to my computer, I can do that kind of stuff. It's a PIII-866 running W2K. The computer started failing more and more often and one day stopped reacting at all; nothing happened on power up. Saw all the big caps had bulging tops. Got the mobo out, heated up the desoldering gun, removed the caps and replaced them with caps from a more recent but otherwise dead AMD mobo. Works fine since then. I'll probably squeeze a few more years out of this machine.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  95. Media's the weak point by StonyCreekBare · · Score: 1
    First point, Lots of us have electronics from 1958 that still works fine. As someone who collects old radios and stuff, I can attest that most electronics lasts a long time pretty well, especially if stored well.

    Second point, everyone rapping on about how the capacitors won't last are mostly ignorant people repeating stuff they've heard. The capacitors that won't last are the cheapo junk capacitors made in China. Quality caps last just fine. I have a "Junk box" full of quality American and Japanese made caps dating from the 1960's and 1970's that I STILL use as repair parts when I need a capacitor. Never have had a bad one, and I'm talking boxes of hundreds of them.

    Of course, most of the computers you are talking about are probably filled with crap Chinese capacitors. On the other hand, if they're already a decade old, maybe not. The China junk usually dies in a couple of years. I've repaired many a two year old computer whose capacitors have failed.

    I have quality Collins radios from the 1940's that still have all original caps (and tubes) and still work fine. On the other hand, I have a very expensive 7.1 channel surround sound amp system, about 5 years old, and it's power supply caps went out recently. I pulled out a couple caps from my junk box, caps old enough to vote, wired em in, and the Amp lives on.

    Media, yeah, that's another story. Most will be unreadable in 50 years. Quality optical might have a chance. Paper tape will last. Yeah, that's the ticket. Print the MSDOS install disks to paper tape! That'll work ;) Windows will need a LOT of tape.

    Stony

  96. Found out today that CD-Rs didn't work for me! by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    The irony of the timing of this post is incredible! Just a couple of hours ago, I was copying some family pictures from CD-Rs burned about 10 years ago, and only appx. 60% of the pictures could be copied over! The other 40% had CRC errors :-/

    By the way, these CD-Rs were stored in a dark area (never any sunlight near them, in a So. Cal. climate (rarely humid), and I was expecting these to last a bit longer in this environment. I thought these CD-Rs had a decent chance of lasting a while. Guess I was wrong.

    I learned the hard way I have to constantly store these files in parallel in multiple mediums (magnetic, optical) and I guess I will have to start a process of periodically burning new discs, whether I need to or not.

  97. A lot of Integrated Circuit chips have shelf lives by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    Some Integrated Circuits have a shelf life.

    They can actually go bad just sitting in an ESD tube
    on a shelf.

    So keep that in mind.

    http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:bML8_AJcIkUJ:focus.ti.com/lit/an/szza046/szza046.pdf+IC+shelf+life&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  98. vacuum couild kill the hard disk by naz404 · · Score: 1

    vacuum could kill the hard disk. typical hard disks especially older ones require a certain amount of air pressure for the head to glide over and not touch the platter. I read something to this effect that explained why most laptop hds would fail at high altitudes such as at extremely high mountains.

  99. Delete the Pr0n!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to delete the pr0n!

  100. Here is a wild idea: by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    Keep it actually plugged in and running for 50 years. Configure the BIOS to wake on LAN, so it can recover from blackouts. Better yet, if it has a wireless network card. You could wall it away, and even remotely ping it every now and then to see if it is still alive.

    I wonder if you could replace the BIOS battery (which obviously won't lasts 50 years) with a nuclear pacemaker. Contact Medtronic to see if they could donate one for this cause. Either that, or remove the battery and provide enough instructions to boot the machine with default (dead battery) BIOS settings.

    I think in 50 years there will still be enough experts in antique computers (The original Mac just turned 25 for perspective) to get the machine up and running, as long as nothing has corroded beyond repair. New motherboards and high end power supplies are being made with polymer capacitors that last a lot longer.
    http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=2113

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  101. Brawndo by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

    Don't worry about it in the future they'll have Brawndo and it's got what computers crave. Your computer will work fine.

  102. Rats / rust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In reality, the two number one killers of computers in storage are (1) rats and (2) temperature changes causing moisture condensation / rust. Computers more often than not are stored in less than ideal conditions "just put somewhere".

    Rats love to chew up PC ribbon cables to keep their teeth from growing long. You will open PCs you think are sealed to find ribbon cables shredded. They can get through open drive bays and open slot slits in the back with no problem whatsoever... go in and chew up the cables, maybe drop off a few acorns, and leave.

    Moisture is another huge problem, caused by extreme cold. Moisture will form on steel cases like dew. I've checked on PCs in my collection in storage before only to find them soaking wet.
    Any amount of rust on a case, will grow.

    Your boot floppies will be the first to go.

  103. I have an IBM 8086 by crazybit · · Score: 1

    that I booted a month ago after 25 years of being inside a dusty closet. It booted DOS from a 5 1/4" 3M diskette, and I was able to play "Zaxxon" and "Pirates!" from other disks lying around. Many didn't work, but there where enough survivors to show my son how was computing back in the early 80's.

    Preserving modern electronics shouldn't be THAT hard.

    --
    - Human knowledge belongs to the world
    1. Re:I have an IBM 8086 by nikolag · · Score: 1

      Since everybody is writing about capacitors, bear in mind that You can get electrolyte-free motherboard today.
      That kind of motherboard has capacitors that are less likely to leak. It might be just a little bit more expensive, but not much. CMOS battery can be removed and placed in protective storage, any - almost all computers can boot without it.

      On the other hand, for several bucks, You can get factory-pressed CD's with live OS.
      You can always go with CF card and card reader, that sure isn't expensive, and it' will probably replace any HDD that needs to boot in several decades. Costs much much less than SSD. USB flash sticks can be tricky, but that's why this is a project not a routine job, experiment.

      In my experience, most likely problem with computers sitting around is that You have to take care about connections (RAM, PCI cards, semetimes even processor), they simply need a "nudge" after several years. As today motherboards have everything integrated, that problem is probably reduced just to DIMMs.

      Also don't remember that contact paste between processor and cooler will dry-up in years, so if you can glue it or something, that might help.

      Keep in mind that CRT/LCD/display is not the only peripheral You have, what about printers? I still have LaserJetII+ and I have seen original Apple LaserWriter working just a year ago! Original toners in their package can last for, maybe a decade, I really don't know. Ink-jet printer can be left as an example, together with some termal printer. Why not?

      After all, why just PC's? How about something hand-held? Portable video games? Consoles? Mobile phones with OS?

      At the end, documentation is the king, but try to document best what is specific for Your selection/packaging, as that will be a problem.

      When making documentation, observe diferences between computing from 70's or 80' and now, and try to see what is likely to be a problem. How will the mouse look to a user in 30+ years?

      This sounds like only Your imagination is the limit.

      --
      Doing a good job is like spilling coffee on a dark suit, you feel warm all over, but nobody notices.
    2. Re:I have an IBM 8086 by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

      I really don't know. Ink-jet printer can be left as an example, together with some termal printer. Why not?

      The Inkjet cartridges will be either be hard little bricks, or filled with dust in 50 years. I am guessing the cartridges would dry out even if they were packaged in vacuum-packed foil or plastic. Inkjet printers also have an ink well to collect excess ink, if an inkjet is left plugged in, the printer will wake up and clean the heads periodically by disposing ink directly into the ink well. It basically just pisses away the little amount of ink in the inkjet printer, even when you are not using it. Over time, the ink well will solidify and you will have a brick of ink, which jams the printer. So an inkjet probably would not be a good candidate for a time capsule.

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  104. Why bother storing a computer at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pointless to store a computer. Just use Windows! They'll NEVER break binary compatibility!

    Of course, you still have to find the proper media to store your data in. May I suggest a solid-state drive? Get it with a USB interface; USB is still the wave of the future.

  105. Another application for the relativity fridge by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

    The relativity fridge has a large mass inside so that time runs much slower - at a ratio of 1 year to one second. So take food out as you put it in - preserves freshness + temperature (cold or hot).

    From the other posts I think you'll agree that such a fridge is your only option - electronics are not built to last that long! And there will likely not be any spare parts.

    Stephan

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
    1. Re:Another application for the relativity fridge by nikolag · · Score: 1

      The problem with Your relativity fridge is putting the stuff in and removing it out.
      As the time moves slower in it, You might wait a decade before some robotic arm reaches for something. I would not put my hand in it to reach for something!

      --
      Doing a good job is like spilling coffee on a dark suit, you feel warm all over, but nobody notices.
    2. Re:Another application for the relativity fridge by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

      The old model K-300 had a bit of a problem like that. But the newer models are just fine. It is completely safe to put your hand in any of them!

      --
      http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
    3. Re:Another application for the relativity fridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you just need to add an off/off switch to your mass generator.

  106. Ohh! by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Store copies of the Duke Nukem series on various forms of media and store it with it. Someone will throw it up on the then-ebay and a geek will buy it, the geek being compelled to play the prequels to Duke Nukem Forever the way they were meant to be played.

    --
    www.isoHunt.com
  107. Migration by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    CDs also only tend to last for a couple of months.

    There, fixed that for you.

    The pressed CDs, if using high quality materials and at least good storage might last that long. Home-made CD-R and DVD+-R will last a small handful of years, at best. The life span of the organic chemicals in the dyes used in CD-R, DVD+-R is close to five years. The clock starts ticking from the date of manufacture. It ticks faster while in sub-optimal storage and while in use. Bad storage means, too hot, too cold, temperature variations, too moist, too dry, humidity variations, and of course polluted air.

    Anyway, it's mostly stupid to worry about the physical media, when it is the filesystem format that determines the ability migrate to new media or even new types of media. The file formats, however, have the ultimate, final say in whether or not the data is accessible.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:Migration by Casandro · · Score: 1

      Anyway, it's mostly stupid to worry about the physical media, when it is the filesystem format that determines the ability migrate to new media or even new types of media. The file formats, however, have the ultimate, final say in whether or not the data is accessible.

      True, but there are often situations when copying the data is infeasible, especially in long-term-storage. If you need to copy your data every decade and there is a few decade long war, you have problems.

      I don't think file-formats will be much of a problem. It used to be one in the 80s and 90s, but today proprietary file formats pretty much died out. I mean nobody really uses Microsoft Word or something anymore, do they? Or Wordstar or Visicalc. Those packages have died out a long time ago.

  108. Keep using it? by Fzz · · Score: 1

    Maybe the best way would be to keep using the machine? Not every day, but boot it up once a year for the class history project. Provide a list of things that need to be done each year as preventative maintenance: copy from one set of memory sticks to another, or whatever. And what to do when a read fails - you have redundant copies, but you need to make sure to regain that redundancy once the first failure occurs. And you need instructions to take out the motherboard battery afterwards and to replace it every 5th year. Provide a logbook so people can tick off these things. This way you not only preserve the hardware, but preserve a little of the knowledge about the machine itself and how to use it.

    I doubt you can get disks or CDs to last 50 years, but your best bet might well be to ensure they're spun up occasionally. And for disks, the surface will need to be read and re-written.

    Any hardware failures will be easier to repair the earlier they are detected. If something fails 15 years from now, you have some hope of finding a spare on Ebay or whatever the equivalent is then. If you only detect it in 50 years, the task is much harder.

    I might also think about replacing the stock power supply with something simpler and containing no electrolytic capacitors (no soft-power settings - just on/off 5V and 12V). With some built-in self-test before you throw the switch to send power to the PC itself. Finding a simple replacement power supply 50 years from now should be simple if you've got the specs written down. Finding a replacement motherboard because you just sent overvoltage to it would be a lot harder.

  109. Long-Term PC Preservation Project? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 50 years the world may not exist.

    Did you ever think about that?

  110. Go for it by Murpster · · Score: 1

    The naysayers must be people who frequently discard and replace electronics. There are some very real long term storage risks, but many things can remain working for a long time. I collect vintage computers like Commodore 64 and Amiga and TI-99 systems. While the oldest "computer" I have is an Atari 2600 from the mid 1970s (it's the original model) if a computer-like machine can stay working for 20-30 years, 50 must be possible. I know of people with computers over 30 years old (Apple, PET, Altair, etc) that are still completely functional, though to be fair they are still maintained and used rather than sitting in a locked closet. Issues likely to come up are mechanical (hard drive damage) and fluid leaks (capacitors and batteries). Not much you can do about capacitors short of having the machine powered up for a few minutes every few months, but you can remove the motherboard battery and put it in a plastic bag along with details on the type of battery should it need replacing. For what its worth I've never actually seen a leaking capacitor on even old machines that have sat in closets for years. It is POSSIBLE though. I think if you store it in a cool, dry, dark place free of physical shock (drops that could damage the hard drive heads) and include spare parts for a few things like motherboard battery and perhaps a clone of the installed hard drive, you've got a reasonable chance of it at least partially working still in 50 years. If the machines are being junked anyway, what do you have to lose? If you can store 2 or 3 computers, even better. If you can arrange for someone to plug in and power on the machines for 5 minutes at least 2 or 3 times per year that should go a long way to reducing the risk of capacitor leakage. I say go for it!

  111. physical security is also critical by JimJinkins · · Score: 1

    Assume you have figured out how to package your computer time capsule. Where will you store it for 50 years?

    If it is stored in a school system attic, basement, storage area, etc., you can count on it that some administrator or custodian will decide to throw it out to make space for something else they want to store.

    A city or university library that is not part of the school system may be more likely to keep your package for 50 years. Maybe not.

    The same argument applies to every kind of site I have been able to think of. At the least, plant multiple capsules in different places.

    I am not trying to throw cold water on the time capsule idea. It would be a good project to build a capsule or capsules and store them, even none of them survive.

  112. Innert gas, not vacuum by Nowhere.Men · · Score: 1

    In vacuum, many materials will sublimate.
    Also keeping your container vacuum tight for 50 years will be a big challenge.

    Innert gas like nitrogen is relatively cheap and as the difference in pressure between the inside and outside of the vesel will be minimised, you have a better chance to maintain the atmosphere inside.

    The biggest challenge will be to remove all traces of humidity which will be the killer fof any equipment.

  113. three phase electric power by Nowhere.Men · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-phase_electric_power

    It comes in a 5 wires cables. 3 phases, a neutral and the ground. Out of wich you can get 3 different, Slightly dephased normal 230V.

    I know that because I was almost electrocuted trying to do just that for a Xmas party at University in a Parking facility. The beer pumps needed normal outlet whil the parking had triple phase one.
    Someone connected the cable to the power while I was I finishing at my end. No harm done, just a little shock.

  114. Punched cards by Merdalors · · Score: 1

    I worked with punched cards as a student in the 60's, and at my first job in the 70's. It was kind of neat. Editing source code consisted of shuffling cards. To 'insert' or 'delete' a character, you had to press hard on the card to prevent it from dup'ing in synch with the other card. We invented the 240-column card (three four-bit digits per column).

    Compiling a 4,000-line assembler program took 40 minutes. When cards jammed and tore, you had to re-key them manually.

    In the late 80's, the Boston Computer Museum had an excellent working display of punched card equipment. They closed, but their exhibits were shipped to a computer museum in Mountain View, CA. http://www.computerhistory.org/

    They sell a DVD of a movie that shows the early days of computing, including scientists manually copying results displayed on a primitive CRT: "See how they ran". ahref=http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/accession/VT%20298rel=url2html-8937http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/accession/VT%20298>, which I seem to recall runs longer than 17 min.

    PS: I never dropped, nor saw dropped, a tray of cards. Besides, they were sequence-numbered and could be re-sorted.

    --
    Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
  115. Re:in 50 years battery acid damage and bad caps ma by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    I presume they are talking about electrolytic capacitors, because they're the ones which tend to go bad over time. Multi-layer is a technology used in ceramic capacitors, which tend to last longer and don't need replacing. Even if they do need replacing, they are (obviously) designed to take the heat of soldering. All the MLCCs I've hand-soldered have survived, even the ones I did with an iron rather than hot air.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  116. The real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real question here is whether or not I'll be able to access my data posthumously.

  117. Beautiful tech by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I got an Tek 453A, the first all solid-state model of o'scope which had apparently been used in a coal or oil-fired power plant for over 30 years. After cleaning off all the soot inside and out, it was a beauty, with sinuous gold traces on the PCB, little sockets for the transistors (they didn't quite trust them at that point), hand-painted precision resistors... a work of art. See http://www.diyguitarist.com/TestEquipment/Tektronix453.htm [not my site] for pictures of the insides.

    I used it for teaching electronics to a small group of 8-12 year-olds - when I opened the case an aroma of ozone and machine oil wafted out, and I'm sure that they'll remember that experience if they get a whiff of that electrical scent even when they're 90.

    Unfortunately, when using the scope on the deck on a misty day with the kids, it started making zapping sounds and died. I still haven't gotten around to figuring out whether it was the caps or something else in the HV supply, but it's still the finest thing I own.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  118. correction: Western Electric phones last 50+ years by vaporland · · Score: 1

    "NO electronics are designed to last 50 years."

    I have a number of dial phones from the 50s and before. They still work and I can still use them. They work and sound much better than the cheapo wireless phones sold at wal*mart for $70+. Not only that, the Bell phones don't emit electromagnetic radiation into my head while I am using them.

    The electromechanical communications technology of the postwar Bell System was designed to survive a nuclear attack. Current "digital" telephony is much more hackable, buggable and failable. Remember the total failure in NYC of the cellular switching system on 9/11?

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  119. Difficult, but doable by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Select a pc old enough not to be Rohs compliant but without many hours on it. For CDs use only archival-quality ones from that Japanese company with the name that starts with Tai. Seal the CDs in airtight metal containers. Put dissicant in the containers and flush them with nitrogen. Use silicone to seal the containers. DON'T use any sticky tape of any kind for anything. Have your welding shop build an airtight steel case out of .25" plate. Wrap the pc in heavy vinyl (but don't tape it!) and wedge it and the boxes of CDs in with dry wood (NOT plastic). Add lots of dissicant, close up the case, flush with dry nitrogen through the fittings installed for that purpose, seal them, paint the whole thing with several coats of epoxy paint, affix a brass plate explaining what it is, put it in your (above ground) vault...

    Oh. Wait. You said FIFTY years. Just put the stuff in a box with a note taped to the side and stick it in a closet. It'll be fine.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  120. The newer it is, the shorter the shelf life by Animats · · Score: 1

    It's a tough problem. Ceramic-package ICs were hermetically sealed, but plastic ones are not, and there's a long-term corrosion problem. Storage in shrink wrap, using dry air, heat-sealed plastic, and a "desiccant pack" inside to absorb any remaining moisture, will at least keep the corrosion problem down. That's easy to do. I'd suggest packing at least three of everything, so that people in the future can swap parts around if they have to. And include plenty of the consumables - blank disks, etc. I don't know if ink-jet ink would last, but laser toner probably would.

    Older equipment is easier to restore. I'm currently restoring a Teletype Model 15, produced from 1930 through 1958. This unit was built during WWII. It hadn't been powered up in many years. I put on a modern power plug and cranked it up, and it started turning. Many parts were sluggish; the oil had congealed. At first, the main clutch wouldn't release. But after a few minutes of warmup, it was running again. I'm now cleaning it up and will do a proper lube job.

    But a Teletype Model 15 has hundreds of oiling points, dozens of screwdriver adjustments, a cast-iron base, and weighs over 50 pounds. Nobody will put up with that in modern equipment to get a machine that can easily last a century.

  121. nothing. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    There is nothing you could do to make the old hardware functional in 50 years. You will run into a slew of problems.

    The first problem you will run into is the hard drives not working in a scant decade. They are not designed to last that long and, particularly after years of use, won't. The polymer lubricants used to keep the things turning will be dry and the drive will either not spin up or spin up and quickly self-destruction.

    The second problem is data longevity. Bit rot will set in fairly quickly. While I have no direct evidence as to how quickly, I guess it'll happen within the first 10 years to the point where the data is inaccessible/irretrievable. (Think: a lot of software only 10 years old is no longer accessible; you need to continually bit-refresh medium, or replace it outright.)

    I suspect even the best CDR media will not last 20 years. Tape might, but you'd run into bitrot with that, as well. CD pressed media might do the trick.

    I'd say your best bet would be to provide media with emulation software. In 50 years, the entire paradigm of computing is likely to have changed.
    Think, for a moment, about the computing devices your parents had available to them in the 1960s. That's a lot of change, and we're still undergoing said change. A ~15-year standard like VGA/d-sub connectors or USB isn't likely to mean anything by then - and what if a USB mouse or monitor doesn't work, while the rest of the system does? The system as a whole provides a further problem, because a failure of anything else on the system is likely to result in a fairly obvious

    Don't put a computer in a school time capsule unless you expect it to merely be a curiosity. Even the 5.25" floppies and Apple II system put in the ground when I was in 2nd grade (20 years ago) is now likely inoperable and poses nothing much more than a curiosity.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  122. Re:dumpster by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering if the "time capsule" will be painted hunter-green and have the "WM" logo on the side. "No problem, we'll store the contents of your "time capsule" at our special "aggregation facility."" Some folks at Stanford seem to think it's a good idea.

  123. Debian Stable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Debian Stable should run on it just fine 50 years from now. Maybe it will be version 5.0 by then

  124. Should be spectacular by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Plug in, turn on... Fzzzzzt!!! Kazap!!! Badaboom!!! I seriously don't expect a consumer grade PC to work after 50 years with no power. All the capacitors will be dry and shorted out for one.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  125. Taiyo yuden dvd's by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

    use dvd's made by taiyo yuden. Those are better quality and should last longer practically..

  126. Danger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    capacitors degrade over time.
    You can't just plug in old radios from 50 years ago and expect to be safe.

    Think about the power supplies. Big caps in there!

  127. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to preserve a computer for any length of time is to use it monthly. To use it for any length of time one must migrate it to a virtual machine. To keep on using the virtual machine one must migrate the virtual machine to newer hardware yearly.

  128. fat chance by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    here's a couple semi-long term anecdotal pieces of evidence that should give sober pause for anyone thinking this could be so easy.

    i) back in 1965, my father bought a top-of the line Grundig reel-to-reel recorder. i remember him using that thing through the 1970's. it was pulled out from time to time in the 1980's -- still working after fifteen years, and built like a tank. then i remember him pulling it out and firing it up back 1990's - probably about 1992 -- well it wouldn't work. like good geeks, we opened it up to try and fix 'er. well, i was quite surprised that some of the plastic gears in there were still functioning, but one of the gears had been made out of a lead-alloy composite... and had crumbled to DUST.. after not even two decades.. there is NOWHERE that would still make that gear.

    ii) in the late 1980's i managed to get my first really good stereo system -- a pair of $400 speakers, with 'specially engineered acoustic resonance foam' in the woofers -- well the special foam that made them sound better and cost more only lasted abotu twelve years, and they too -- CRUMBLED TO DUST. the paper cone speakers lasted longer.

    iii) around 1994, i went out and got myself a top-of-the-line Sony VHS Stereo VCR, thinking i wanted to invest in a good one that would last. well, at christmas 2007, i wanted to digitize some old family video from 1995 -- hooked up the VCR -- and the video the logic for the tape mechanisms and the video out electronics is shot -- so much for longevity. the same is true of my sony 8mm handycam -- tape and electronics are self-destructing in less then 10-15 years.

    this gives great pause to my childhood aspirations of expecting old electronics to last at least for a couple decades. the old tube radios and record players - despite thier great limitations, were inherently simpler devices, and with constant care could last an order of magnitude longer than modern minitiature micro-electromechanical devices. we still have some 1940's and 1950's stereo tube equipment that has moved with us from house to house, and still works fine -- never even had to change the tubes in over 40 years -- so it makes me think that old audio gear (amps and radio) generally outlasts new (1980's and 1990's) video electronics. this confirms my suspicions that the smaller and finer they make the electronics -- the less long they last (in decades).

    now to expect modern drives with their much finer tolerances to simply 'boot up' after fifty years sitting there -- that seems a bit of a fairy tale, given my experience.. :-^

    2cents from toronto
    jp

  129. The media wont last by ambanmba · · Score: 1

    After having successfully rescued some 1929-era shellac 78rpm records, I tried to migrate some late 1990s era CD-Rs to a hard drive and most of them had already deteriorated enough to corrupt data. There are tools to overcome some of this, but don't count on any media lasting in an "archive" - you must have plan in place to regularly migrate the data to newer media. You can read more about it here: http://blog.ambor.com/2009/01/rescuing-corrupted-files-from-old-media.html

  130. People Who Call Themselves Environmentalists by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    Which is why the RoHS requirements were a BAD idea. We should be mandating recycling of the solder, not using a shittier one that causes devices to fail faster. I bet if someone sat down and figured up how much extra waste is being created by the shitty solder it is more than offsetting any gains to the environment by cutting down the lead content. (...) Maybe all the bloggers out there and engineers ought to start raising a fit and pointing out that it is having the opposite effect on the environment than what was intended. Because I know that I personally having been tossing a whole lot more E-waste since the RoHS requirements came into play.

    Absolutely. And hybrid cars which save a little on fuel but won't last as long as a regular car because they're more complicated and therefore more expensive to troubleshoot. And front-load washing machines, which save a little water but have the same problems as hybrid cars. And compact fluorescent light bulbs which save a little operating energy, but at what price to the manufacturing and recycling energy? (Hey, my tungsten lightbulbs aren't wasteful anyway; I live in a northern climate so the heat they throw off still reduces the time my furnace has to run!)

    It's a crock. I care about not wasting. I care about not making a mess of the planet. And I think that's the vast majority of people. But when you have people who are so rabid about the subject that they feel the need to call themselves "environmentalists", they're usually sufficiently scientifically ignorant that they're overtly dangerous to the health of the planet.

    I have one like that at work. He jumps up and down and yells about how we're killing the planet. Let's see...

    • He bitches at me because I have a 1970 Dodge Dart, which isn't "environmentally friendly". My Slant-6 powered Dodge Dart gets 25MPG; his new Ford Focus gets 30MPG. He drives 35km round trip to work every day because he lives in the suburbs, while I walk to work most days and drive my Dart entirely as a pleasure car.
    • He thinks I'm a horrible person when I shop, because I reuse the plastic grocery bags I pull out of my pocket, while he gets fresh paper every time.
    • I got him to sign the petition to ban dihydrogen monoxide. I explained that dihydrogen monoxide was one of the most commonly-used industrial coolants and it can now be found in lakes, rivers, and every living creature on the planet. So he signed it.
    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:People Who Call Themselves Environmentalists by fataugie · · Score: 1

      I got him to sign the petition to ban dihydrogen monoxide.

      So I take it your friend doesn't like Water and wants to ban it....good thinking on his part....brilliant scam on yours.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    2. Re:People Who Call Themselves Environmentalists by John_Booty · · Score: 1

      I got him to sign the petition to ban dihydrogen monoxide.

      So I take it your friend doesn't like Water and wants to ban it....good thinking on his part....brilliant scam on yours.

      Congratulations. You got the joke.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
  131. Better yet, 10 or 15 and *repeat* by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

    Package up the old computer with archival media and instructions to open it again in 10 years.

    Instruct the folks in 2019 to replace the batteries and re-burn copies of all the discs to fresh archival media. Then have them add their own computer to the capsule, re-seal, and store it until 2029. Repeat every 10 years.

    In 50 years you have not one old broken computer that won't work, but a series of old computers, one for each decade, each of which has been refreshed and refurbished every decade so that they all work. Much more likely to succeed, and much more interesting to boot.

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
  132. Humidity control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll want some sort of dessicant in the container just in case of water or humidity damage. I recommend a cloth bag full of silica gel cat litter. It's amazing stuff, we use it in the lab to preserve samples.

  133. Re:You know what would suck? The Y2038 Problem by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

    It will be 1970 when it boots up - the CMOS battery will be dead.

  134. Components will fail. by Trilobyte · · Score: 1

    There are likely to be components in those PCs which were not made very well and will fail over time. Leaky capacitors, etc. Also the batteries might start leaking. Who knows what else might fail from age... somebody might go find these things 50 years from now and have a pile of toxic chemicals where PCs were expected to be. Fun!

  135. 110V ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well just my 2 cts but... ... you know, that the rest of the world (this insignificant small part of the planet, that is not the USA) hasn't used 110V for decades now?

    Probably this may happen to god's own country one day within the next 50 years.

    But well, probably you go metric before that.

    Jeeez.