Slashdot Mirror


Red Dwarf To Return, Find Earth

Lawrence Person writes "Everyone's favorite live-action science fiction comedy series will finally return to TV, with Lister, Rimmer, Kryten and the Cat all making it to Earth. The new two-part series Red Dwarf: Back to Earth will appear on digital channel Dave, will be written and directed by Red Dwarf co-creator Doug Naylor, and will reunite the line-up. 'It will sit alongside two further new episodes — the improvised Red Dwarf: Unplugged, which will feature the cast dealing with no sets, effects or autocue, and Red Dwarf: the Making of Back to Earth, a behind the scenes look at the new production.' Personally, I think this is pretty smegging fantastic."

64 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. Written by Doug Naylor. So expect crap. by VShael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Season 7 and 8 levels of crap.

    1. Re:Written by Doug Naylor. So expect crap. by Blue+Stone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When Rob Grant left, it all went to hell.
      It was a real shame to see a show I loved, grow from very humble beginnings, develop into something delightful (despite its still significant budget restraints) and then have to watch through two agonisingly bad series of death throws.

      It looks like it wasn't quite dead though.

      Quick! Someone get a shovel!

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    2. Re:Written by Doug Naylor. So expect crap. by ezzzD55J · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm a huge fan of red dwarf, so I somehow feel like I suddenly have the authority to post spelling/grammar corrections in this story.

      death throws.

      That's death throes. http://xkcd.com/386/

      BTW I actually totally agree with you - I only watch seasons 7 and 8 out of loyalty. 1-6 still really rule hard.

    3. Re:Written by Doug Naylor. So expect crap. by prelelat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even if it's crap it's not worth missing. Even when the stories got a little stale I thought that it was still good I liked that caliber of dedication by the actors and the fact that they are all excited to come back so many years later to finish it off is great. Though I thought that it wasn't going to be written by just doug nailer in the coffin :(

      But it will be a good farewell I think, and I won't have to sit around thinking "but what next" for the next 40 years(even if it's not like the original I still sit down and watch the whole series some weekends). Hands down on of my top 5 favorite shows.

    4. Re:Written by Doug Naylor. So expect crap. by rhyder128k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "even if it's not like the original I still sit down and watch the whole series some weekends"

      What I wouldn't give to have a machine that erases the memory of things like RD, so that I could sit and watch it all again. Sometimes it would be nice to be like Holly in that regard.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    5. Re:Written by Doug Naylor. So expect crap. by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought Rimmer kicking death in the yabos was a great moment. The show was always corny. What makes it great is the interplay between the actors. There have always been times in the show when the writing wasn't what carried it. Not the same show? Okay. Still funny for most of the same reasons? Yes. Looking forward to this new stuff? Ab-so-smegging-lutely.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Written by Doug Naylor. So expect crap. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rimmer kicking the anthropomorphic version of Death in the nuts? WTF?

      It's a great counter to his (original self's) earlier exchange with Lister in "Future Echoes":

      Lister: Come in number 169, your time is up. OK, what was I wearing?
      Rimmer: Ahhh... that jacket, and that red T-shirt.
      [Lister pulls out his hat and replaces it on his head, then yanks a hefty length of piping off the wall.]
      Lister: You said yourself, I can't stop it. Let's get it over with.
      Rimmer: Ah, Lister, what's that for?
      Lister: I'm goin' out like I came in: screaming and kicking.
      Rimmer: You can't whack death on the head!
      Lister: If he comes near me I'm gonna rip his nipples off!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  2. Indeed by Technopaladin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of my all time favorite SCI-fi series. I thought Earth was destroyed and Lister the last human being in the universe(well until the nanites brought back the crew?) So lets hope they arent going to go BACK through time. Or have another BTL episode.

    1. Re:Indeed by gnick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't recall the Earth being destroyed. Lister was in stasis for a long, long time as the ship drifted further and further away, but IIRC, Earth was still there - just unreachable in any reasonable length of time (kind of like Dark Star). (Feel free to correct my bad memory.)

      But, there was at least one episode where the crew does go back in time to visit Earth. I liked it just because it was so terribly un-P.C. to suggest that JFK needed to be assassinated in order to save the U.S. (Not unrealistic, just not P.C.)

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  3. They did the same thing on Lexx by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Usually these sort of "and then they came to earth..." plotlines are cost-cutting measures (so they can shoot in "regular" locations instead of on elaborate sets). They also often represent "jump the shark" moments for a series. When they did this on Lexx, the show (which had already begun to go way downhill in the previous season) went from bad to ABYSMAL.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:They did the same thing on Lexx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Red Dwarf jumped the shark when they brought back the old crew.

    2. Re:They did the same thing on Lexx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you really talking about elaborate sets in conjunction with Red Dwarf?

    3. Re:They did the same thing on Lexx by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would hardly call the red dwarf sets elaborate, they look like they are about to fall apart most of the time

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    4. Re:They did the same thing on Lexx by Bemopolis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clearly you have forgotten the brilliance that was BATTLESTAR GALACTICA 1980.

      And I would be a lot better off if you tell me how you managed it.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    5. Re:They did the same thing on Lexx by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had forgotten. You reminded me. I must now hate you forever.

    6. Re:They did the same thing on Lexx by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Informative

      Red Dwarf's traditional picture of earth in 1M BC (from the novels) is a giant trash ball ruled by mutant shapeshifting horrors. Quite how that reduces the budget I'm not sure.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:They did the same thing on Lexx by Aneurysm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Usually these sort of "and then they came to earth..." plotlines are cost-cutting measures (so they can shoot in "regular" locations instead of on elaborate sets).

      Not sure this really matters. Red Dwarf has always been low budget, and the later series (7+8 and to a lesser extent 6) where more money was thrown at it also corresponded with a huge dip in funniness. Generally speaking the same few rooms are used on the ship or often just Starbug. Growing up in the UK you get used to low budget comedies and high budget stuff just doesn't have quite the right feel; Red Dwarf always used to be perfect, incredibly low budget and relying just on script and actors to make it enjoyable. My favourite Red Dwarf episode ever was Marooned and that's just Lister and Rimmer in a single part of Starbug for the whole episode (with a Thunderbirds style crash at the beginning).

    8. Re:They did the same thing on Lexx by nategoose · · Score: 2, Informative

      I enjoyed the on Earth Lexx episodes, but unless the Red Dwarf crew went back in time (or they adopt the circular time line from the Lexx universes) your argument is not relevant. The Red Dwarf is supposed to have left our solar system in our future and by the time they get back elaborate sets and props should be needed.

  4. Returning to Earth? by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Neat. Does this mean that there will be flying motorcycles and super-powered boy scouts too?

    1. Re:Returning to Earth? by MRe_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or better yet, you could cross breed them with dolphins and have leaping mutton.

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  5. Fan-smegging-tastic! by hack++slash · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't care what people think about the latter series of RD, I loved them all but the first series is still my favourite. Looking forward to more of the Smegs In Space!

    P.S. Would anyone like any toast?

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    1. Re:Fan-smegging-tastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look, I don't want any toast. In fact, no one around here wants any toast. Not now, not ever. NO TOAST.

    2. Re:Fan-smegging-tastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How 'bout a muffin?

    3. Re:Fan-smegging-tastic! by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aah, so you're a waffle man!

  6. Re:Aged badly by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This series aged badly. Watched a few episodes last year and found them deeply unfunny.

    It's a britcom so of course it'll be a bit campy, a bit odd, and not for everyone.

    What really impressed me was how the Grant and Naylor team wrote the novels as well as the shows. The audiobooks based on the novels were also voice-acted by the original cast.

    Humor is a difficult thing and prose and teleplays are two completely different environments to work in. There's so much to written humor that can simply never be translated to the screen, the classic example from the Hitchhiker's Guide -- "The huge golden space ship hung in the air in almost exactly the way a brick doesn't." How do you convey that visually? You can't, not well. And likewise there's more than just sight gags that simply cannot be done in prose. The easiest example to bring up is the Heath Ledger Joker. So much of that performance wasn't just what he said but how he said it, the mannerisms and expressions. It was both comedic and horrifying.

    What I find impressive is when you have a writer or writers who can take a story and tell it in such diverse media and do it well. Adams was involved in all the HHGTTG variants and, as I said, Grant and Naylor did both the show and the books.

    Anyway, looking forward to these new episodes! Between this and the final movie wrapping up Dead Like Me, looks like we're in for some good telly this year!

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  7. Re:Aged badly by LordEd · · Score: 5, Funny

    He would have stopped, but the king of the potato people wouldn't let him...

  8. fantastic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally, I think this is pretty smegging fantastic.

    Why is resurrecting Red Dwarf fantastic but resurrecting Blade Runner an abomination?

    1. Re:fantastic? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is resurrecting Red Dwarf fantastic but resurrecting Blade Runner an abomination?

      Because the creator of Red Dwarf is alive and well, and is coming back to revive a universe that was created for the purpose of an episodal series.

      The author responsible for Blade Runner (Philip K. Dick) died during production of a standalone movie based on his standalone book. Given that the story (originally "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep") was an exploration of what it means to be human and NOT an exploration of a fantasy future (ala Star Trek, Star Wars, etc.), expanding the universe would only detract from the original creation.

      Besides, Olmos is too old to play Gaff again. He just wouldn't have that same menace about him. ;-)

  9. Rimmer is back! by DarthBender · · Score: 5, Funny

    Puncture repair kit on standby.

  10. Re:cue flame war over which Kochanski is best/hott by Skreems · · Score: 2, Funny

    The best one is not the hottest one.

    --
    Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
    The Urban Hippie
  11. Re:Aged badly by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a britcom so of course it'll be a bit campy, a bit odd, and not for everyone.

    But you can't just lump all british comedies together that way. Some of them are just incredible works of comic art. Monty Python, Black Adder, the original HHGG, Fry & Laurie, The Office, and Spaced come to mind. And then there are british comedies that to my mind at least, have no redeeming value whatever. For example, Absolutely Fabulous, and Are You Being Served?. Red Dwarf to me, lies somewhere in the middle.

    I'm not sure what it is that I don't like about some Britcoms, but it's not their Britishness. If that were the case, I wouldn't like any at all.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  12. Announced on twitter by Tryfen · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...well, actually, Robert Llewellyn (Kryten) announced it on Llewtube quite some time ago.

    You can also get regular updates from him by following @bobbyllew on twitter.

    He's a really good user of social media - he's very active on YouTube and twitter.

    t

    --
    If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
  13. Re:Smegging Fantastic? by Moryath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Try asking the average American to tell you what a "bog roll" is and watch the steam come out of their ears thinking about it.

  14. have you actually watched Red Dwarf? by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Funny

    They also often represent "jump the shark" moments for a series.

    Did you ever watch the show? They jumped the shark at least once an episode. That's part of what made it so great.

  15. Re:Aged badly by ezzzD55J · · Score: 3, Funny

    Although in the case of HGTTG, I think the radio show out-shines the movie

    The what? ;)

    That said, I have to agree with GPP - It aged badly. When I go back to watch the episodes over, it's rare that I watch anything beyond the ship being reconstructed. It was still fun, but lacked a lot of the charm that the early episodes had.

    Not a matter of aging imho. Something weird happened after season 6. I still deeply love seasons 1-6.

  16. Re:Aged badly by ichthyoboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mr. Flibble doesn't like it when you stop watching...

  17. Re:Aged badly by NCG_Mike · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, let me get this right... you want to visit the King of the Potato People? And you think I'm crazy?

  18. Re:Aged badly by DurendalMac · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think it's your sense of humor that has aged badly. Red Dwarf is still great.

  19. Craig Charles == drug problem by Yuioup · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if Craig Charles has dealt with his serious drug problem

    1. Re:Craig Charles == drug problem by Goffee71 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Come on, the Mirror made it a serious drugs problem to sell papers - more than likely he was no more or less off his head than any other TV actor

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    2. Re:Craig Charles == drug problem by Canazza · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's Ouija, what you described is a board with a nail in it, wielded by a Glaswegien (AKA a Weegie)

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    3. Re:Craig Charles == drug problem by Canazza · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    4. Re:Craig Charles == drug problem by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      God I hope not. I remember watching a documentary once about Red Dwarf, and Craig Charles admitted that for most of the first two seasons, he and Danny John Jules were pretty much baked out of their skulls. Those were also the best in my opinion :)

      Seriously, does it really matter that much? What my choice of actors does in their spare time is of no concern to me. I like their work and therefore I appreciate their work.

    5. Re:Craig Charles == drug problem by Rune69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, Craig Charles and Chris Barrie admitted to hating one another for most of the series. They didn't even speak off-camera until Series 7.

      hmm...let's bring back that hate!

      --

      When faced with a problem, many web developers say "I know, I'll use JavaScript!".
      Now they have two problems.
  20. gestalt entity fissioned by junkgoof · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Gestalt entity Grant Naylor fissioned, both Rob Grant and Doug Naylor, came out with crappy books, and, in spite of (or because of) the contributions of Robert Llewellyn the series went from amazing to crap.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  21. Re:Aged badly by jabithew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find the biggest difference is that Britcoms are normally about losers. Compare with the US, say 'Friends'. The main characters are very successful; they have lovely flats near Central Park. I find it hard to have empathy with them. Whenever they have a 'problem' I wish they'd just shut up and catch themselves on. They seem like whiney, spoilt, brats.

    Lister, on the other hand, is a slob who lives in an interstellar slum. Yet he always seems pretty chirpy about it. You should check out the US version of Red Dwarf, where some moron at the networks replaced Lister with a super-jock. None of the jokes made sense afterwards.

    Of course, there are good US comedies (normally the cartoons) and there are *loads* of really, really bad Britcoms.

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  22. Re:Aged badly by bob.appleyard · · Score: 2, Informative

    The thing is, Grant Naylor were a great comedy team. You can see what each provided to the mix -- when Grant left, the show lost a great deal.

    --
    How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
  23. Re:Aged badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You like parodies of things you aren't familiar with and don't like parodies of things you are. I think you don't understand parody.

  24. This will be ... economical by Attila+the+Bun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So they're back on Earth, and what do you know, the year is 2009. This is going to be cheap to produce...

    Red Dwarf: Unplugged, which will feature the cast dealing with no sets, effects or autocue

    ...and getting cheaper all the time. Or should I say, it will have a minimal carbon-footprint, and be compatible with the current economic climate. Even the script will probably be recycled. Printed on recycled paper, I mean.

  25. Re:Aged badly by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am unanimous in that!

  26. Re:Aged badly by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    A racist stereotype of...a cat? In all the years Red Dwarf has been around, I have heard *not one* complaint from the cat community, yet you claim to have some greater insight?

  27. Re:Aged badly by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is summed up by the never made Red Dwarf USA .... ...Rewritten by Grant and Naylor .. and a team of American writers and producers ...Lister is heroic, and handsome (but still a slob)

    Most British comedies are still written by a very small team (usually 2 or 3) people rather than the joke committee system they have in the states, it is noticeable that the US comedy shows that work in the UK are the ones with the smaller teams of writers ....

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  28. Re:Aged badly by jeffhoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comparing Red Dwarf to Monty Python, HHGG or The Office is an insult to Red Dwarf. The Office is best watched on a weekday evening after a hard day of work. Monty Python is great entertainment with friends on a Saturday afternoon. Red Dwarf is something entirely different.

    Like many Americans I first encountered Red Dwarf on PBS late Saturday evenings. After seeing one episode (Demons & Angels) I was hooked. I was thrilled when Season 1 released on DVD and I watched it through that Saturday afternoon. However, it didn't seem to hold up over the years. I was watching a mediocre British comedy, and quite confused.

    Eventually I realized that Red Dwarf needs to be enjoyed late at night. Like ATHF, it's bizarrely hysterical but only when in a certain mood. Red Dwarf is not meant to be analyzed for plot holes or comedic merit. It's meant to be watched in a dark room, late at night, and alone. Only then does it become a spectacle of incomprehensible British slang, something far greater than it was meant to be.

    Red Dwarf is the only TV series I've purchased on DVD. I've seen the episodes so many times that I remember the audience's laughter. It's no exaggeration to say that it's the best show I've ever seen. But, I can understand that many consider it a mediocre sci-fi comedy. It needs to come with a warning label, "Only watch after 10:00 PM".

  29. Re:Aged badly by MattBD · · Score: 2, Informative

    No. ITV is notoriously lacking in any kind of comedy whatsoever. Or if they do come up with something another channel steals it, as happened with Men Behaving Badly. Channel 4 were responsible for The IT Crowd. Graham Linehan, the creator, has worked with Channel 4 before, as he was co-creator with Arthur Matthews of Father Ted (genius comedy!), and also created Black Books.

  30. Re:Aged badly by zdickinson · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would disagree that Friends is full of successful characters. For much of the show Joey is a bad, unemployed actor. Chandler is so unknown at work that his coworkers call him by the wrong name. Rachel went through an assortment of jobs and was fired often. And while Ross was a professional success, he was a social loser. Monica is the one character that is a success in most aspects of her life, but I'm sure that's to highlight the other characters' flaws. And yes, I'm surprised I just broke Friends down to that degree.

    --
    I hate ethics, I avoid them on principle.
  31. Re:Aged badly by Adam+Hazzlebank · · Score: 2, Informative

    Channel 4

  32. Re:Aged badly by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

    We call them "Americans". It's not their fault.

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  33. Re:Aged badly by dow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn right you are on that one... its perfect to watch on returning from the pub, a little merry but not so that you're tired. The state that if you hit the computer you're just going to say something that you later regret on Facebook, Slashdot or wherever you end up. Red Dwarf, or Southpark I find perfect for these situations.

  34. Re:Aged badly by Dues · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think it's funny how you mentioned "Friends" and the US version of "Red Dwarf" in the same post. That "super jock" you mentioned was actually offered the roll of Joey on friends, but he turned it down and took the gig as Lister instead because he didn't think friends had any chance of success...

  35. Re:Aged badly by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Funny

    ITV axed Men Behaving Badly

    What did they axe them?

  36. Re:Aged badly by bogjobber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Friends is supposed to be about losers, too. It's just that the writers never bothered with making the show realistic, which is why they can spend all their time together and they all can afford large Manhattan apartments while working part time in a coffee shop.

  37. Re:Aged badly by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 3, Funny

    You are wrong.

    Now I am angry, very angry.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  38. Re:Aged badly by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Funny

    Post pub, with triple-fried-egg-chilli-chutney-sandwiches.

  39. Re:Aged badly by Monty+Worm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That said, I have to agree with GPP - It aged badly. When I go back to watch the episodes over, it's rare that I watch anything beyond the ship being reconstructed. It was still fun, but lacked a lot of the charm that the early episodes had.

    Not a matter of aging imho. Something weird happened after season 6. I still deeply love seasons 1-6.

    This is something I really don't agree with.
    Some things can be said to age or go downhill, others simply change.

    Believe it or not (and I hope you would, given the demographic of the SD crowd), people don't like doing the same stuff all the time. They like change. They like to be challenged. They like to learn new things.

    Sometimes, new things aren't quite the same as the old. Some better, some worse. You have to allow for possible failure if you want the good stuff.

    Early Dwarf was primarily an odd-couple comedy, the inter-relation between diametrically opposed characters in a confined environment. After a while (series 3?) it became an ensemble piece. Then it veered in another difference for a while.

    Seriously, if Rob + Doug had wanted to do the same thing, they'd be writing for soaps.

    Yech, I sound like some of my old teachers.

    --
    ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.