Slashdot Mirror


India Will Show Its $10 Laptop Prototype

Tech Ticker writes "The Indian Government last year announced the development of a cheap $10 laptop, but was later rectified as $100 laptop. Now the government has announced that HRD minister Arjun Singh will unveil the prototype of a Rs. 500 ($10) computer. The computer is developed by the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, and Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Chennai. No specifications were revealed but DNA, a daily newspaper, has mentioned that it will be small and portable, will feature Wi-Fi, LAN, and expandable memory, and will operate on 2 watts of power."

374 comments

  1. Imagine... by AdeBaumann · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... a $1000 beowulf cluster of those!

    Sorry, had to be done...

    --
    I gave up sigs almost a year ago.
    1. Re:Imagine... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny

      But does it run Vista?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:Imagine... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But does it run Vista?

      For $10, they can't even afford to put the Vista sticker on these things.

      Which, by the way, is a plus. I just bought my daughter a new laptop, and they put more stickers on that thing than Dale Jr's NASCAR ride.

      The really nasty thing is that not all of the stickers come off, either. A couple of them I was able to remove cleanly, but the one advertising the processor, and of course the "Vista fer Sure!" sticker seemed pretty immutable.

      Hell fire, I'll take half a dozen of those sawbuck laptops right now if they just leave the friggin' stickers off.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Imagine... by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      I'm with you, ever tried to get the "local dealership" sticker from your brand new car? And if you don't do it immediately, the UV will cause the glue to harden beyond repair. Another reason not to "buy from the lot".

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    4. Re:Imagine... by aonaran · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dad made it a condition of the sale that they not put the dealer sticker on it.

      "but they all have the sticker, we put it on as soon as they get to the lot" said the dealer.

      "You do not, you trade cars with other lots and they don't want your sticker on a car they sell" Dad said.

      "But I'm not allowed to let a car leave here without it"

      "Then you don't get my sale"

      He got the car, and there was no sticker on it.

    5. Re:Imagine... by aliquis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hell fire, I'll take half a dozen of those sawbuck laptops right now if they just leave the friggin' stickers off.

      Wow, a promise of a $60 investment! ;D

    6. Re:Imagine... by joeler · · Score: 1

      Sign me up, and give me some of that good 'ol ubuntu - well, maybe not, when the American resellers get finished with their markups it will cost more than a new Dell loaded with Vista.

      --
      >>>please remove "nospam" from email address
    7. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ok... 2W each required for power. $1000 buys you 100 of them, max RAM 2GB. So total power consumption for 100 laptops = 200W, or less than one desktop PC.

      Buy a some cheap NAS and a few $30 Gb switches at BestBuy.

      Run ESXi (if you can) on each (free license). Run 4 Linux-based VMs at 512MB each on each laptop. Throw as many laptops as you can into HA/DRS clusters.

      Configure each Linux VM as a beowulf node if you like, or not. Who cares, you're maximizing/balancing the resources on all 100 machines, do what you like with them.

      You now have about 400 Linux VMs running on about $1500 worth of hardware.

      Poor Man's Datacenter for about the price of one gaming PC. Oh sorry, you'd probably need at least one decent-sized room fan somewhere nearby too, $30 at Home Depot.

    8. Re:Imagine... by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chuck Norris must be your uncle.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when we purchsaed the last car for my wife, I told them no sticker on the car (the actually do not use regular stickers, but the small chromed logo of the business which gets affixed on the side opposite the manufacturer model tag. They tried to give me some crap about all the cars having the sticker. I told them that they would have to remove it. They tried to tell me that they could not. I started in on them then. "Well, if you would like me to advertise your business for you, we can work out a monthly rate based on the number of miles I drive and at what times. The more I drive in rush hour, the more exposure your ad has and the higher the rate. I am sure we can negotiate a one time fee, but it will be in the thousands since I drive 130+ miles each day and spend a lot of time in traffic. Those eyes should not be free" The manager overheard me and assured me and the salesman that the sticker would not be on the car when I took possession, and it was not.

    10. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dads rule.

    11. Re:Imagine... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Informative

      All you need to do is heat up the glue on the stickers with a hair dryer for a few seconds, and they peel right off. Wouldn't suggest using a heat gun on the laptop plastic frame though. Unless you really like texture.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    12. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peal the bad boys off. It will leave the glue behind then use goo gone. This stuff rocks... Been using it for eons with used video games. Why the stores think 5 unremovable stickers is a good idea... Found out about it from another place that bought and sold used games. He used it to take off stickers OTHER stores had put on. So he could turn around and put his own industrial strength stickers on.

      http://www.amazon.com/Magic-American-GGHS12-Gone-Spray/dp/B000ZMY2ZC/ref=pd_bbs_sr_3?ie=UTF8&s=home-garden&qid=1233333465&sr=8-3

    13. Re:Imagine... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      How odd...my car doesn't have a sticker like that. I think in California, they just provide a customized license plate holder instead.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    14. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe cheap on the hardware end, but the VMWare per node licenses are going to be pretty painful.

    15. Re:Imagine... by anothy · · Score: 1

      oh, all the stickers come off. trust me.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    16. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it run Vista?

      For $10, they can't even afford to put the Vista sticker on these things.

      Which, by the way, is a plus. I just bought my daughter a new laptop, and they put more stickers on that thing than Dale Jr's NASCAR ride.

      The really nasty thing is that not all of the stickers come off, either. A couple of them I was able to remove cleanly, but the one advertising the processor, and of course the "Vista fer Sure!" sticker seemed pretty immutable.

      Hell fire, I'll take half a dozen of those sawbuck laptops right now if they just leave the friggin' stickers off.

      Goo Gone. Takes 'em off. It's an oily, citrusy substance and for plastic it's especially suited.

    17. Re:Imagine... by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're vastly overestimating the bus and CPU speed on a $10 laptop. A $10 laptop will most likely be architecturally similar to a mobile phone with a large screen.

      And, if you wanted to run a bunch of virtual machines you wouldn't need a screen at all right? So just wait for them to come out with their $5 server edition!

    18. Re:Imagine... by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      ESXi is free. ESX is not

    19. Re:Imagine... by blhack · · Score: 1

      It still blows me away how many people leave these stickers on their laptops. My mom has got a laptop that is easily 4 years old that *STILL* has the sticker advertising how "Easy to Use" it is complete with ethnically diverse photo of a group of people huddled around a computer.
      Every time that I try to remove these she FREAKS out and says something to the effect of "But what if i need to know what it has?"
      To me, this illustrates just HOW DEEP the ignorance of most computer users goes.

      Mom, I love you, but PLEASE let me take the stickers off of your laptop.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    20. Re:Imagine... by clarkw · · Score: 1

      Heat the sticker first with a hair dryer. After the glue is heated, you can remove the sticker.

    21. Re:Imagine... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Thank you for mentioning this. It's something bizarre I've always wondered about every time I've handled a Windows laptop. I'm a Mac fanboy but I admit there are some very nicely designed Windows laptops (whereas Apple laptop design has stagnated in the last few years, if not gotten worse in some areas). But the companies selling these things ruin whatever design advantage they have with these stupid stickers everywhere. I borrowed my Dad's sleek ultralight portable (I forget who made it) and, while I still can't stand the OS, I had to whistle at the sight of this thing and admit that it had a lot of advantages in terms of form factor and capabilities than anything in the current line of MacBooks. But then when I went to use the thing I was constantly distracted and annoyed by the stickers - at least 5 - that covered up every blank spot available near the trackpad. Why bother paying designers to create an elegant form factor and then screw it up with all these stickers? Can't they just put a sticker on the box? Do we really need to be reminded that this thing was built for Vista every time we open it up?

    22. Re:Imagine... by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Try a hairdryer. Works great to get stickers off cars

    23. Re:Imagine... by dondelelcaro · · Score: 1

      Dealer stickers used to show up in CA too, but the number of people who force dealers to take them off has pretty much made them stop doing it by default. License plate rings are easier to put on and take off, anyway.

      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    24. Re:Imagine... by makapuf · · Score: 3, Funny

      wow, all the home page tags stickers came off of the html when I clicked that link ...

    25. Re:Imagine... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Why use VMWare instead of, say, Qemu? Or even Xen?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    26. Re:Imagine... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      ... and buy the way, the companies get lower prices when they put the stickers on the machines. Why do you think they have them? And why do you think Apple don't?

    27. Re:Imagine... by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      Sun VirtualBox ftw!

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    28. Re:Imagine... by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      In India you don't even get a Cell Phone for $10

      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    29. Re:Imagine... by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Why would you beowulf virtualized things? Beowulf unites into one what virtualization split into many. Might as well eliminate the overhead and just design something that runs as one, without having to unite up the split parts.

    30. Re:Imagine... by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Soak the laptop in hot water, those stickers will get right off.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    31. Re:Imagine... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "It still blows me away how many people leave these stickers on their laptops. "

      Why? I view the stickers on laptops as the same as V8 or engine size ("5.7", for example) emblems on cars. You paid for something with those features, why not show it off? I left all the stickers on my laptop, I think it'd look very empty without them but none of them are gaudy, pointless photos of people smiling, just a large sticker to the right of the touchpad with the specs and various stickers to the right.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    32. Re:Imagine... by lamapper · · Score: 1

      Maybe cheap on the hardware end, but the VMWare per node licenses are going to be pretty painful.

      Maybe cheap on the hardware end, but the VMWare per node licenses are going to be pretty painful.

      Nope, just do not use VMWare...

      Of course Linux being open source, there is always a way to get anything to work if you are willing to spend the time figuring out how to do it. From a corporate standpoint, the hard part is getting things to work the first time, after that you simply duplicate the steps. Sadly some companies will not give their techs the time to figure out how to get something to work...deciding instead to only buy software and hardware with the promise of support from the outside, whether or not that support will work or not. As long as they promise to support it, my butt is covered and protected...dont you hate that short sighted attitude, I know I do. Sometimes what they do is in the best interests of the company, however most of the time it is NOT, just misguided CYA.

      These types of computers are great if they do everything you need them to do out of the box. If not then you might have issues.

      If its built in to the net book, it just works...sometimes adding something can be a problem.

      If a netbook or laptop has WiFi built in, Cam built in, NIC built in, USB Built in(2 or 3 are better), External monitor port Built in; head set and microphone jacks built in; than it just works. Oops, just described an Eee PC there... These $99 - $399 Linux netbooks, laptops and computers have been around since October 2007 and are only getting cheaper today. And thank goodness they will run some version of Linux.

      --
      Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
    33. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A $10 laptop will most likely be architecturally similar to a mobile phone with a large screen."

      Actually, unless these are heavily subsidized, it will probably just be little more than a graphing calculator with a keyboard and (hopefully) a OpenEmbedded OS. They'll have to stretch the term "laptop" to its limits because it will be hard to have a "real" screen and cpu with wifi and upgradeable memory for only $10. Even a cellphone is subsidized by the carrier.

    34. Re:Imagine... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      A mobile phone with a large screen? That'd be awesome! Even the shitty mobile phones from Verizon (the free ones, likely not costing much more than $50 to make, I suppose) likely have chips operating around 200MHz, either ARM or MIPS. Probably faster/newer than that (ie multicore chips w/ video decoding), if it's going to have a non-CLI interface. I'd say at least 200MHz, unless their WiFi implementation doesn't require any CPU utilization. They'll also likely have at least 32Mb RAM due to the requirements of such things, and additional memory overhead, and I'd guess 64Mb+ CF for storage. We're basically talking about the rough specifications of something like a circa-2000 HPC - something like the NEC Mobilepro 780, or a similar era Jornada - but with last-generation CPU architecture (which has improved substantially - if you think x86 has improved a lot since 2000, take a look at ARM!)

      High-end phones would be more than capable of handling 100% of most people's computing needs - in the US - as they clock at 600Mhz+ with specialized chips for a/v decoding. Their biggest limitations in doing so, to date, are a lack of host USB/ubiquitous and functional BT input devices, and the common desktop software most people tend to use (a full-featured web browser and flash plugins, basically).

      And yes, I think we can expect these computers to have at least these specs, provided the device isn't complete vaporware/not coming out at $10. Mass production can cut a LOT off the cost of a device. Hell, you can get some pretty nice, and likely much more functional, "handheld kits" from a small Israeli company for ~$200 each for a lot of 1000 (with your own custom board options). I imagine the state government of India can reduce fab costs a lot more than Israel can.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    35. Re:Imagine... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Large screen? For $10? Maybe if it's black and white....

    36. Re:Imagine... by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

      Yep. I told the dealership if you want to advertise on my car - pay me. They removed the license plate frame.

    37. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust the politicians to glorify a thum(b) drive!

    38. Re:Imagine... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      Now you know why you should have gotten a Mac - no sticker shock. :)

    39. Re:Imagine... by Elahrairah · · Score: 1

      That's why most dealers now use the plastic license plate frames for ID tag.

      Feel free to take it off yourself (or put someone else's on)....

    40. Re:Imagine... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Dads rule.

      I am one. Not so.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  2. I hope they succeed. by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see why Negroponte's OLPC project didn't succeed before. I can buy a netbook on Newegg for 250$... yet a laptop with a quarter of the power and less functionality can't be built for less than 200$ for the OLPC.

    Best of luck to India.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:I hope they succeed. by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't see why Negroponte's OLPC project didn't succeed before. I can buy a netbook on Newegg for 250$... yet a laptop with a quarter of the power and less functionality can't be built for less than 200$ for the OLPC.

      It didn't succeed because Negroponte wouldn't let anyone who wanted one buy it. It's that simple. Had he done that he would have sold enough of them to get them into the field and had money to continue development and produce them faster.

      So what stopped Negroponte was....Negroponte.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    2. Re:I hope they succeed. by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

      I don't see why Negroponte's OLPC project didn't succeed before.

      Politics/idealism, related to "economies of scale don't work that way".

    3. Re:I hope they succeed. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The problem is there is a limit to things like how small/low res you can make the screen and still have something people would consider a laptop, netbooks are getting pretty close to that limit IMO. You may be able to skimp a bit on the processor but really how much cheaper is what OLPC was using than the celerons in the cheap netbooks.

      Plus they were trying to make the thing very rugged and child-proof.

      But IMO the most important issue was by refusing to release it on the general market (except as part of G1G1 which was a rather expensive way to get a machine) they stopped themselves from ever building up the volume needed to produce the things at a low price. Electronics manufacturing has HUGE economies of scale.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:I hope they succeed. by pz · · Score: 4, Informative

      It didn't succeed because Negroponte wouldn't let anyone who wanted one buy it. It's that simple. Had he done that he would have sold enough of them to get them into the field and had money to continue development and produce them faster.

      So what stopped Negroponte was....Negroponte.

      Uhm, sources for this, please? According to the Wikipedia entry, there's an estimated 1,000,000 units sold http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Laptop_per_Child#Summary_of_laptop_orders and according to a recent written interview with Negroponte, they're about to deploy the 1,000,000th unit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Laptop_per_Child#Summary_of_laptop_orders --- so I fail to see where your assertion holds together. You can't take orders for a million units and be all that selective about who buys them. Through the B1G1 / G1G1 programs anyone with a valid credit card could purchase. That certainly sounds like an open door.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    5. Re:I hope they succeed. by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

      It didn't succeed because Negroponte wouldn't let anyone who wanted one buy it.

      Wouldn't or couldn't? I still wonder if they really got the price point right in parts and manufacturing. Maybe it wasn't getting the power and functionality but all the durability issues that caused the profit loss. So they could afford to take the loss as long as the massive consumer machine of the big countries didn't come crashing in.

    6. Re:I hope they succeed. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You think India is "third world"?

      Let me guess, you're an American, right?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:I hope they succeed. by grumbel · · Score: 2, Informative

      G1G1 was a special time limited, was USA only and cost twice as much as a normal OLPC. Not exactly an 'open door'.

    8. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Simple. I, as a consumer in the U.S., couldn't simply buy one. I had to use the Buy-one, Give-one program. A much better program would be to let anyone buy them, in any amount without doubling the price. If it was a hit in the retail market, the price would have come down.

      It failed before it started.

    9. Re:I hope they succeed. by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The G1G1 _doubled_ the price of the laptop for a lone purchaser thus putting it closer to the range of a standard cheap notebook for the average purchaser. This alone was enough to push people away from purchasing it for their own use.

      If he had just let people buy them in single units for the stated original cost he would have considerably more money to produce more units and would have likely hit that one million unit mark much much sooner.

      He also started the G1G1 program only AFTER people complained they couldn't buy one for themselves. Furthermore he STOPPED the program instead of just letting it run and gaining whatever money he could get out of it.

      As for citations do your own damn research - the rest of us have been watching this train wreck since it started.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    10. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let me guess, you've never been to India. Sure, there are places that are modern and very livable, but you also have many areas with slum conditions unimaginable in Western Europe and North America.

      Have you ever seen a river of shit and waste with a plank over it leading to someone's home?

    11. Re:I hope they succeed. by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      It didn't succeed because Negroponte wouldn't let anyone who wanted one buy it.

      Wouldn't or couldn't? I still wonder if they really got the price point right in parts and manufacturing. Maybe it wasn't getting the power and functionality but all the durability issues that caused the profit loss. So they could afford to take the loss as long as the massive consumer machine of the big countries didn't come crashing in.

      Possible but if he had generated more cash by allowing the average person to buy one at the regular price it probably wouldn't have been an issue.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    12. Re:I hope they succeed. by xtracto · · Score: 1

      uuu,

      does Slumdog Millionaire rings any bells to you?

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    13. Re:I hope they succeed. by drunkenoafoffofb3ta · · Score: 1, Informative
      I thought "third world" was outdated terminology.

      I'm sure "developing countries" is the modern, PC, terminology.

      /off to read the Guardian newspaper

    14. Re:I hope they succeed. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      because you know nothing abotu the OLPC project.

      your netbook is a toy that if dropped once in the sand or mud it will be dead.

      the OLPC is a cheap panasonic toughbook. the OLPC is designed to survive in 3rd world conditions Operate from 0% humidity to 100% humidity in 120 degree heat.

      Your netbook is a child's toy compared to what the OLPC was supposed to be. It's like how the top of the line Alienware or Dell XPS is a complete joke to a Toughbook 30.

      and it's why a toughbook 30 is $5800.00 for lessthan 1/2 the processing power of the Alienware laptop.

      OLPC = toughbook netbook. They cost more plus they dont want to force all cultures to learn english to use it. Unlike all netbooks.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Let me guess, you've never been to Louisiana post Katrina?

    16. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen a river of shit and waste with a plank over it leading to someone's home?

      Yes, Katrina images have been broadcast throughout the world.

    17. Re:I hope they succeed. by asdir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By most accounts, and the most important of them is the GDP per capita, India is a low income country and therefore a developing nation.
      I guess it is fair to say that a developing nation is a third world country, don't you?
      They might have a big GDP growth and some advanced technologies invented in their country, but that does not mean that the average Indian is rich, at least not yet.

      You accuse your parent as narrow minded? Your own conclusions don't seem to be too far away from prejudice either, my friend.

    18. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me take a guess. As the other person mentioned you've either never been to India ("real" India, not just a big city) or you are from India and trying to stick up for your shithole?

      By every account India is a Third World country. Just Google "Third World" you moran.

    19. Re:I hope they succeed. by TheKidWho · · Score: 1, Informative

      Right, because that's how Louisiana is on a day to day basis right?

      I guess we are supposed to assume that Sri Lanka on a daily basis is similiar to the images we saw after the Tsunami right?

    20. Re:I hope they succeed. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Was India Eastern Block or Western then (if not third world it must have been 1).

      Interestingly the 1st world also has priorities higher than getting everyone a laptop (proven by the fact that many don't have laptops in the 1st world, and it largely goes ignored).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    21. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I thought "third world" was outdated terminology.

      I'm sure "developing countries" is the modern, PC, terminology.

      I'm sure "non-viable markets" is the modern, Mac terminology.

    22. Re:I hope they succeed. by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Nice try, lousy choice of Country.

      As a Sri Lankan myself, I can say there is a lot of bad crap going on there, before during and after the tsunami.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    23. Re:I hope they succeed. by machine321 · · Score: 1

      You think India is "third world"?

      Let me guess, you're an American, right?

      So what is it? Fourth? Fifth? With nearly a third of its population living in poverty, I'd hope they're still developing.

    24. Re:I hope they succeed. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can buy a netbook on Newegg for 250$... yet a laptop with a quarter of the power and less functionality can't be built for less than 200$ for the OLPC.

      The OLPC's laptop may have a quarter of the processing power of your $250 netbook, but it also only consumed a quarter of the current. Price and performance were not the only factors considered when designing the XO-1.

      Had he done that he would have sold enough of them to get them into the field and had money to continue development and produce them faster.

      Open sales are great if you have the manufacturing capacity to deliver them, but the XO-1 project didn't. I guess you weren't involved in the "Give One, Get None" debacle of 2007; I didn't receive mine until mid-Spring 2008 because of their supply chain and distribution issues.

    25. Re:I hope they succeed. by nicks,nicks,nicks! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me guess,you watched Slumdog Millionaire,right?

    26. Re:I hope they succeed. by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Because them, being a third world nation, have more insights about what is the real needs and the real usage. It's about insights not just good intentions. OLPC was a good intention, it's good hardware for the price and all but they managed the project like anything in first world: "lets just let MSFT to put a the foot's fat finger in this.. What can possibly go wrong?!" Good luck for India any advancements from there are most than welcome (and needed) in third World.

    27. Re:I hope they succeed. by HisMother · · Score: 1

      It's not? The "old world" is Europe. The "new world" is the Americas. The "third world" is everything else. Don't like it? Tough. But yeah, nobody uses these terms much anymore. We say "developing countries" instead of "third world."

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    28. Re:I hope they succeed. by amilo100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you ever seen a river of shit and waste with a plank over it leading to someone's home?

      India must be bad. I live in a 3rd world country and have never seen rivers of shit.

      The only rivers of shit I've seen is in rich coastal towns (where sewage is stored in tanks and sometimes overflows).

    29. Re:I hope they succeed. by KeithJM · · Score: 1

      yet a laptop with a quarter of the power and less functionality can't be built for less than 200$

      It's a quarter of the power, but it has some additional functionality. It needed to use about 10% of the electricity that a netbook uses, needed to be rechargeable with a hand crank, and needed a new OS written for it (yes, I know, they could have used Linux, but we're talking about seriously underpowered laptops). It also has to be solid enough to deal with temperature extremes and potentially rough treatment (it doesn't come with a nice padded laptop bag). In a way your argument is similar to the complaints about the Macbook Air. You're paying more for the form factor and the engineering to leave stuff out to meet other requirements.

    30. Re:I hope they succeed. by kokojie · · Score: 0

      I believe India actually belong to the 4th world, non-developing countries. It hasn't really improved much for 30 years. The vast majority of their population still live like animals.

    31. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've got to be kidding, there are places in India that look like right after Katrina left, dead bodies rotting in streets and all.

    32. Re:I hope they succeed. by Fex303 · · Score: 1

      You think India is "third world"?

      Let me guess, you're an American, right?

      Or just someone who understands what the term generally means?

    33. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over 300 million people in India live on less than a dollar a day.

      Yes India is the third world.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World

      Not that I agree with the OP that should stop India from pursuing relatively high tech projects.

      [Insert smug comment here about how you must be European, probably Parisian.]

    34. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 world = U.S.A. and Europe
      2 world = Former U.S.S.R.
      3rd world = everyone else

      So yes, India is third world.

    35. Re:I hope they succeed. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Who is to say he is an American? I also like how you were modded +1 interesting and +1 underrated for such a lousy cheap shot. You are either jealous of America or have some bottled up anger in you that needs to be addressed. You also have most likely never been to India.

    36. Re:I hope they succeed. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      He probably mean that if normal people could buy ONE cheap instead of having to buy one and give the other one away he'd have more orders from normal/rich/whatever people, which would raise the production amount and his income which eventually would lower prices even more.

    37. Re:I hope they succeed. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      +1 on all of it, no chance in hell I'd buy an OLPC for the cost they ask from normal people, which is closer to current netbooks than $100.

    38. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For 85% of the population in India it is very much a third world country by any standard. For the other 15%, things are much better. Let me guess, you don't actually look at the numbers when you form an opinion, right?

    39. Re:I hope they succeed. by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the third world anymore. But the major hurdle for India is this: \n
      It has 3 times the population of US but has third of the land.

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    40. Re:I hope they succeed. by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I don't see why Negroponte's OLPC project didn't succeed before.

      the N word

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    41. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup New Orleans

    42. Re:I hope they succeed. by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      Lol. Consider that a +5 Funny :)

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    43. Re:I hope they succeed. by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      Hello .. Japan?

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    44. Re:I hope they succeed. by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Louisiana post-Katrina was like that for a month or two tops (and then not even close to everywhere). I lived in New Orleans for more than a year after Katrina, and I was an SSE for SGI at the time so I drove all over the state that whole time. New Orleans is no where near "recovered" even now, but it was well past the "rivers of shit in front of your house" stage by about two months after the storm.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    45. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is in the first world. RTFA.

    46. Re:I hope they succeed. by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Is it really that hard to use wikipedia?

    47. Re:I hope they succeed. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Developing content is much more labor (capital) intensive than developing a single hardware design and building a million copies.

      As far as I can see "Sugar" is a really good name for the OLPC software project since it's just "Sugar coating" existing software, no original content there.

      What would be really cool would be for OLPC / SugarLabs to align with some of the free education content thats coming out - but most of that free content is aimed at high school and above, while the OLPC hardware seems to be aimed at kindergarten through 5th grade.

    48. Re:I hope they succeed. by arkarumba · · Score: 0, Troll

      I haven't seen a river of shit, but I have seen a public bathroom at a bus station with turds all over the floor, and I mean ALL OVER.

      Picture you local bus station bathroom. Draw a grid of 10cm squares. Start at the far end and lay a turd on every gridpoint. Awful! As I understand it, that is standard practice there.

    49. Re:I hope they succeed. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen a river of shit and waste with a plank over it leading to someone's home?

      I live near Boston, so yes.

    50. Re:I hope they succeed. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Low density rural life is much less appalling than high density cities, regardless of whether you are in the 1st or 3rd world.

    51. Re:I hope they succeed. by zigurat667 · · Score: 0

      No, I'm from Germany and I've actually been to India. Please make yourself a picture of the situation in India and I bet you'll laugh at your comment just like I did.

    52. Re:I hope they succeed. by tepples · · Score: 1

      I can buy a netbook on Newegg for 250$

      How well does this netbook work in direct sunlight? How well does it communicate with other netbooks but without a Wi-Fi AP? And how well does it work without a reliable source of AC power for charging? The XO laptop was designed for all three of these use cases.

    53. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That you equate regular conditions of India to conditions in the US right after a major disaster actually proves the parents point quite nicely.

    54. Re:I hope they succeed. by DreamsAreOkToo · · Score: 2, Funny

      yet a laptop with a quarter of the power and less functionality can't be built for less than 200$ for the OLPC.

      I don't know. The more I hear about this "laptop" (portable, operating off of 2 watts, expandable memory...) the more I'm convinced it's the real deal.

      Soon, all Indian children will have calculators.

    55. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Third world might be out of date, but developing world is not the new euphemism. "Developing" countries are now, and always have been second world countries, which is where much of India falls right now. A country the size and population of India can not be classified as any one thing. At its best, it looks like any "first world" country, at its worst (not counting natural disasters) it looks like any "third" world country. The US, seldom looks third world (again, discounting natural disasters), though there are areas that would definitely look at home in a second world country.

    56. Re:I hope they succeed. by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      Read my parent. I was correcting him.

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    57. Re:I hope they succeed. by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Draw a grid of 10cm squares. Start at the far end and lay a turd on every gridpoint

      Can more than two people play this game?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    58. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what do the chicago housing developments, East side Detroit, East St Louis.... make the US then?

    59. Re:I hope they succeed. by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      They did use Linux.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    60. Re:I hope they succeed. by shashark · · Score: 1

      That's Slumdog Millionare talking for you, my friend.

    61. Re:I hope they succeed. by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nonsense. The first world was NATO and its sphere of influence. The second world was the Warsaw Pact and its sphere of influence. The third world was everyone else. The terms ceased to be useful in the 90s when the Warsaw Pact fell apart.

    62. Re:I hope they succeed. by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      And how well does it work without a reliable source of AC power for charging?

      Just carry a car battery with your netbook everywhere. It's only a few kg extra.

    63. Re:I hope they succeed. by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      You've brought up a good point. Hypothetically if the children are given advanced, programmable calculators ...

      Anyone still has his TI-series calculators or Commodore machines?

    64. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right.

      Apropos of nothing, fucktardness runs in Negroponte's family. His brother John is a famous war criminal. I suspect Nick is trying to atone.

    65. Re:I hope they succeed. by kabocox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and it's why a toughbook 30 is $5800.00 for lessthan 1/2 the processing power of the Alienware laptop.
      OLPC = toughbook netbook. They cost more plus they dont want to force all cultures to learn english to use it. Unlike all netbooks.

      Which is the main reason their main customers the police have been moving away in droves. First it was the CF-48 semi-rugged for $1.6K. After 5 years of that, it was why can't we just use off the shelf Dells. So now we are spending just under 1K for Dell laptops. Generally the CF-48s would last 5 years with only 3 classes of issues. 1 batteries need to be replaced at the 2-3 year mark. 2 a few HD crashes. 3 wrecks total the car. The insurance pays for the cost the laptop in that case. (Trust me we didn't like putting the fully rugged CF-25s back into service after wrecks even though we could.)

      Now we've only had the Dells for about a year and a half. We've not had any wrecks or HD crashes yet. We've had a charging issue or two. Usually that's due to the car electrical stuff being wired wrong and not the laptop though.

      Trust me, if those $350 minilaptops could run our 3rd party software, we'd seriously think about sticking those in the cars. So cheaper laptops are taking over due to price where fully rugged laptops used to completely monopolize the niche. If we tried mounting one of those minilaptops in a police car the two issues that we will run into are mounts and power chargers for them. That's the two issues we have for any different models of laptops that we chose to stick in there though.

      Now, sure netbooks can't hold a candle to real toughbooks, but about the only one's that can really afford real toughbooks are the US military. No one else can afford the price/performance penalty. You were usually 2 generations behind off the shelf laptop tech in a toughbook. This was due to heat build up and being completely sealed.

      You imagine that you can build a toughbook for less than $100? Trust me, even your third world folks are more realistic than that. If it were remotely easy for a slight price increase every freaking laptop on the market would have toughbook standard features. It's not a cheap or easy add on though so you rarely see semi-rugged much less rugged laptops.

    66. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the problem is that if they sold more - then it wouldn't be a non-profit anymore. They could only sell for a while, then they needed to stop selling them for a bit.

    67. Re:I hope they succeed. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      What's the first and second world? First = rich? Second = half rich? First = europe? Second = USA (hey we didn't knew it existed!)?

    68. Re:I hope they succeed. by Thinboy00 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Okay... what idiot rated that "Overrated" when it was at 0?!

      --
      $ make available
    69. Re:I hope they succeed. by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. The first world was NATO and its sphere of influence. The second world was the Warsaw Pact and its sphere of influence. The third world was everyone else. The terms ceased to be useful in the 90s when the Warsaw Pact fell apart.

      [citation needed]

      --
      $ make available
    70. Re:I hope they succeed. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      You underestimate how cheaply ARM7s can be cranked out. Look at something like the Game Boy Advance - it has an ARM7, which was good enough for a desktop in the mid 90's.

    71. Re:I hope they succeed. by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1
      --
      $ make available
    72. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could probably throw Canada in there as a 1st world country too... We're not *that* primitive.

    73. Re:I hope they succeed. by PaneerParantha · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yamuna, the river on the banks of which the capital city of India is located, is one such river.

      "Yamuna is one of the most polluted rivers in the world, especially around New Delhi, the capital of India, which dumps about 57% of its waste into the river."
      Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamuna

    74. Re:I hope they succeed. by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      First = NATO, 2nd = Warsaw Pact, 3rd = Unaligned countries. These days the term is "developing" but people cling to "3rd world" because it's evocative.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    75. Re:I hope they succeed. by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Meh, did you ever use some of the old, old school laptops with text-only screens? The ones that did something like 78x30 characters with this half-size flip up screen?

      Though yeah, people are spoiled now, and won't accept things they would have thought was amazing 10 years ago.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    76. Re:I hope they succeed. by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Would untreated sewage flowing onto Cleveland, Ohio's only large public beach (Edgewater Park) qualify? If so, we have a winner. Dying rust-belt cities like Cleveland or Detroit are not drastically different than what I have seen of comparably sized cities in Africa, South America or the poorer parts of Asia. The extremes of poverty may not be as great, and the life expectancy is a little higher (only because we don't have comparable rates of AIDS infections yet), but the climate of hopelessness, violence, and despair is at least as bad as in any of those places, and perhaps worse.

    77. Re:I hope they succeed. by murdocj · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was an article on Slashdot in the last day or two that listed the 1,000,000 number but also said that 300,000 had been sold via a government contract to one South American country, and 600,000 to another (one of the countries was Peru, not sure of the other). So basically that one million was two individual very large deals, not lots and lots of people suddenly developing an interest in buying the product. The problem with having a few big deals is that if you don't get the next big deal, you are out of business, which it sounds like is what happened.

    78. Re:I hope they succeed. by ericlondaits · · Score: 3, Informative

      Each country has its own education policy... they'd never accept the OLPC if it imposed its own educational curricula. There's no such thing as a "neutral" educational material...

      I know what you're thinking, but no, not even for math! ... during the years of military government here in Argentina it was forbidden to teach through Sets theory. It became the norm later, when democracy returned. ... Even without that craziness, there are a lot of ways to approach math.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    79. Re:I hope they succeed. by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      Online multiplayer support is scheduled for summer 2009 through Steam.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    80. Re:I hope they succeed. by Ninnle+Linux · · Score: 1

      After World War II, people began to speak of the NATO and Warsaw Pact countries as two major blocs, often using such terms as the "Western Bloc" and the "Eastern Bloc". The two "worlds" were not numbered. It was eventually pointed out that there were a great many countries that fit into neither category, and in 1952 French demographer Alfred Sauvy coined the term "Third World" to describe this latter group; retroactively, the first two groups came to be known as the "First World" and "Second World".

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_World

      Wow that was damn hard to find.

    81. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just Google "Third World" you moran.

      "moran"? Oh, the irony...

      This is what happens when "developed" countries teach creationism in schools, people.

    82. Re:I hope they succeed. by Tybalt_Capulet · · Score: 0

      In Chicago, right? They aren't ALL that bad, just most of them.

      --
      Has the old saint in his forest not yet heard of it? That God is dead?
    83. Re:I hope they succeed. by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Having been to India for work, specifically Bangalore, I can tell you that there are places you can go that you would think you are in your office in the US or Europe. In fact, really the only things I noticed while at work were the different plugs you had to use. Well, and the large number of Indian workers, but that wasn't a massive change from work in the US. :)

      However, go anywhere outside of your nice office complexes, hotels and living accommodations and you *know* you are in India. It looks exactly how I would expect a third world country to look. Gutted buildings, tents set up for people to live under on-ramps, terrible roads, almost no street signals (not that anyone would obey them anyway). Go outside a city and its even more obvious.

      Let's be clear, I'm not saying India is a horrible place, but its clear that they would need a lot of changes to have the same feel you might have living in the West.

      If you have ever been to Jamaica, India outside the office parks looks just like Jamaica outside the resorts, except with a LOT more people.

      And rule of thumb, eat the Indian food in India. The faux Western food sucks ass. If you are invited to go to TGI Friday's, make sure you bring a good amount of money, its one of the more expensive places in Bangalore.

    84. Re:I hope they succeed. by tepples · · Score: 1

      And how well does [the average commercial netbook] work without a reliable source of AC power for charging?

      Just carry a car battery with your netbook everywhere. It's only a few kg extra.

      If you add a UPS that's "only a few kg extra" to a computer intended as an elementary education tool, you add two problems: 1. Kids can't easily carry the UPS. 2. How do you recharge the UPS?

    85. Re:I hope they succeed. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Thanks, had no idea the definition was military.

    86. Re:I hope they succeed. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If you're counting from the sun, every country is on the third world.

      What's that you say? Damn it, Jim, I'm a nerd, not an economist!

    87. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you would have been forced to donate a laptop to a needy kid rather than blow it on online poker. And if it arrived a week late, you would have hassled the volunteers over the phone and complained about Customer Service.

    88. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Orleans is no where near "recovered" even now

      Why even try? Much of the city is below sea level, shit is bound to happen again. Carlos Mencia put it right: "Rebuild New Orleans? Whose idea was that - fuckin' Aquaman?!"

    89. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. The first world was NATO and its sphere of influence. The second world was the Warsaw Pact and its sphere of influence. The third world was everyone else. The terms ceased to be useful in the 90s when the Warsaw Pact fell apart.

      So Japan, a G7 member, was considered a third-world country?

    90. Re:I hope they succeed. by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      "Developing" countries are now, and always have been second world countries

      The "worlds" classification does not work that way.

      First world: wealthy capitalist countries. USA, Canada, Japan, Australia, all of Europe.
      Second world: communist countries. China, Cuba, North Korea. Previously, of course, the Soviet Union.
      Third world: developing or poor countries. All of South America, all of Africa, most of Asia, and Russia.
      Fourth world: nations without a state: roma, palestinians, native americans; or nomadic, hunter-gatherer societies.

    91. Re:I hope they succeed. by poached · · Score: 1

      mod parent up. I think their manufacturing facility was not able to fulfill the demand from the B1G1 program, let alone the entire impulse-buying US consumer market. That left a sour taste in people who actually participated in B1G1 and left OLPC's image tarnished.

    92. Re:I hope they succeed. by FluffyWithTeeth · · Score: 1

      Please don't use terms you don't understand.

      India is not a communist country, or under the political influence of the soviet union. Therefore it is not a "second world country".

      The term 'developing country' was made up to replace 'third world' after the collapse of the soviet union made the first second third system obsolete.

    93. Re:I hope they succeed. by renoX · · Score: 1

      >The G1G1 _doubled_ the price of the laptop for a lone purchaser

      And they had much trouble delivering the order as it's much harder to sell 100000 times one laptop than to sell once 100000 laptops, so there's a scaling issue.

      When you see the cost of a batch of CPUs, do you expect to be able to buy one CPU at this cost at retail?

    94. Re:I hope they succeed. by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was always about the cash for production. From Businessweek at about the time of the G1G1 promotion opening:

      "While the highly quotable Negroponte has been a master at getting publicity for OLPC, this effort is mostly about cash: "It has become important for us to raise money this way," says Negroponte. "I have met with about 30 heads of state. They're all enthusiastic. But there's a huge gulf between a head of state shaking your hand and a minister making a bank transfer." Negroponte won't predict how many laptops might be sold through Give 1 Get 1, but factory capacity presents no limitations: Quanta Computer in Taiwan can produce 1 million XO Laptops a month, if need be. "

      If he truly had wanted that to work he would not have restricted the program in any way. Just from the above clip the factory production wasn't an issue so what else could it have been? Hmm?

      He personally chose to restrict the sale of those laptops. Since his stated goal was cash for production he shot himself in the foot - nobody else did it for him.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    95. Re:I hope they succeed. by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good but why did they have to go and cripple it with the horrid Sugar abomination. It's pretty much an embarrassment that something as basic as a GUI is so poorly implemented that it can drag a a 433MHz processor to its knees when there were 4MHz machines in the 80's with a mere pittance of RAM that could outperform the OLPC in usability.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    96. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen a river of shit and waste with a plank over it leading to someone's home?

      The description given is quite accurate, but it's the smell of that river that really gets the attention.

      India is so far from the western experience that it's difficult for westerners to believe just what it's like.

    97. Re:I hope they succeed. by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      You think India is "third world"?

      Let me guess, you're an American, right?

      I am not American, and I have been to many places within India. I have seen many other countries too.

      India is a third world country. It's not a matter of debate, it's a matter of fact.

    98. Re:I hope they succeed. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      No.

    99. Re:I hope they succeed. by horza · · Score: 1

      In a cheap PC you definitely want to use an ARM processor. It's not only a fraction of the price but has a fraction of power consumption. It's pure RISC so you don't have that large translator to cope with that dinosaur the x86 instruction set. I had a 8MHz ARM2 which ran windows fine under RiscOS, outperforming the 266MHz Intel chip out at the time. The latest ARM chip would go well with a cheap plastic OLED screen.

      Phillip.

    100. Re:I hope they succeed. by cybernanga · · Score: 1

      Being a non-profit doesn't mean you can't make a profit. It just means that you can't take the profit out of the organisation.

      --
      www.Buy-Proxy.com - A "buyer-driven" global marketplace.
    101. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    102. Re:I hope they succeed. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      And a machine that was built with those 80's specs as it's goal would have cost $25 and made the OLPC look fragile. I can take my C64 in a joystick and literally throw it across the street and it will work fine, and it runs just fine off of 4 AA batteries.

    103. Re:I hope they succeed. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Native GUI performance wouldn't have been because of the CPU, but rather the tight coding of the OS.

      And, running MS Windows... the newest version that !PCEm would support would be 3.0, no? And, full software emulation... eurgh. (Although I've heard it wasn't far off of a 4.77 MHz 8088...) So, no, that would be much slower. ;)

      (I've never used actual Acorn hardware, though, being in the US.)

    104. Re:I hope they succeed. by thaWhat · · Score: 1

      Don't use terms at all. I'm sick of the euphamisms. Being an Australian, I freely admit that while we whiteys enjoy a comfortable standard of living, At the bottom of the food-chain we struggle, but even at the said bottom, we still experience a better quality of life than those at the bottom end of the indian experience except, perhaps for our indigenous population who run into the same degree of day-to-day suffering as the lower castes of India. It isn't about first or third world. It's about the spectrum of privilege to despair of it's citizens. First, second and third world is about that ratio. Given what we do to the people that had stewardship of this country before we came, I'd rate my country up with the U.S. Exploitative. That is the real term for first world. Ask the Navaho, ask the Cherokee, Ask the Koori, ask the untouchables. More power to India (just hold off on the nukes, mkay? - There is an alternative). Two pesos expended.
      C:\>

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a thumb.
    105. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1st world - Western Democracies
      2nd world - Communist bloc
      3rd world - the unaligned powers, with India talking about a "third way" and wanting to be the leader of the developing world.

      India isn't *a* third world country, she is *THE* third world country.

    106. Re:I hope they succeed. by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      I know what you're thinking, but no, not even for math! ... during the years of military government here in Argentina it was forbidden to teach through Sets theory.

      why?

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    107. Re:I hope they succeed. by sowth · · Score: 1

      Is that a hurdle? Why would it be? Maybe it is because I live in the western US, but I don't see the US as very populated. Go nearly anywhere outside of the major cities in Oregon, Idaho, Utah and it is mostly empty--just wilderness and some farmland. I haven't been in California for a while, but as I recall, it seems most of the land there is also wilderness and farmland.

      Is it because there isn't enough room for farmland to feed the people?

      As for all the naysayers denouncing the $10 laptop: I've seen 100MHz Microcontroller with 16MB of RAM for less money[1], and that is plenty of processing power for the average person. It won't do video or high end games, but it can do web browsing, word processing and even photo editing. Though, I am sure the thing would have a really cheap display. (Old fashioned LCD?) Maybe it wouldn't be down to $10(US) right away, but if they designed it right, I imagine they could get close.

      I've seen several hundred MHz motherboard+cpu combos for about $30 at Newegg. I don't see why people think shooting for low cost computers is such a crazy idea. It is just salespeople in the "civilized" world don't want to sell anything that cheap. They don't give a piece of crap about anyone who doesn't throw tonnes of money around/away. No wonder the jackoffs in Wallstreet and the big banks need a fucking bailout. They waste money and demand others do the same.

      [1] this was a few years ago, but I imagine prices have come down if any changes.

    108. Re:I hope they succeed. by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      They were deemed "subversive" which was a catch-all term for "evil" back in the day... it's not clear why, but I found the following unattributed quote:

      âoefomenta la idea sovietizante de lo colectivo y de los agrupamientos como relaciÃn indispensable para solucionar un problemaâ

      which approximately means:

      "Promotes the 'sovietizing' idea of the collective and grouping as an indispensable relationship in solving a problem"

      It sounds quite likely this was the reason, given the mentality of those times.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    109. Re:I hope they succeed. by nicks,nicks,nicks! · · Score: 1

      Hmm,that wasn't supposed to be funny.That was to be indignation as how you can make an opinion from the (few) Hollywood movies which are always depicting the seamier side of life in India.And because Westerners aren't allowed into China,China is apparently "the world's factory" and no flip side of the coin at all.

    110. Re:I hope they succeed. by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "What would be really cool would be for OLPC / SugarLabs to align with some of the free education content thats coming out..."

      Or even better, help subsidize the OLPC by advertising with educational software. This is a first laptop for nearly all of these kids, I'm sure some companies would like them them to associate their first encyclopedia with World Book or first algebra lesson with... whoever does algebra. Program runs, has a nice splash screen "Encyclopedia brought to you by WORLD BOOK" or "Algebra lesson brought to you by (BLANK)", or even better, if it finds a internet connection let it download new advertising. I'm sure many companies would be very happy to pay to have their splash screen in front of a million children.

      A company called Channel One offers free TVs to schools paid for by advertising. In exchange for allowing children to watch 12 minutes of news daily, 2 of which are commercials, they install TVs in every classroom and it costs the schools nothing.

      If OLPC had done this they probably could have reached the $100 per laptop goal and become a huge success.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    111. Re:I hope they succeed. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Ugh! Adware... I can see why he didn't, but if it were my company, I'd probably have done something limited and "tasteful" before letting the operation go down the tubes the way he has.

    112. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OLPC is not a consumer product. The don't want consumers to buy them, because the product is not for them.

    113. Re:I hope they succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is the political implication of set theory? is this I found from google relevant?

    114. Re:I hope they succeed. by arkarumba · · Score: 1

      Responding to my own post... Wow. My first troll rating. Sorry it came across like that. Its a personal experience from travelling north-west India in 2000, a reasonably large town - perhaps Ahmadabad. My mate's girlfriend had diarrhea and was in tears that it wasn't possible to walk from the entry to the toilet at the other side of the bathroom.

      I didn't know how else to convey the image of it. Speaking to the locals, its a common occurance.

      India was a great source of bizarre travel experiences - like our bus driver changing a flat tyre while parked on a hill, with a rock placed under the wheel on the up-hill side of the wheel - doh!

    115. Re:I hope they succeed. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Love that dirty water.

  3. 2 watts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great scott! The only thing capable of generating 2 watts is a battery.

    1. Re:2 watts! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Guess it won't have enough power to hit 88.5 MPH, then huh?

    2. Re:2 watts! by aliquis · · Score: 1

      For $10 I guess it will be as much of a laptop as this is a DS.

    3. Re:2 watts! by up2ng · · Score: 1

      By 88.5 miles per hour the "OUTATIME" license plate was spinning and tire marks were on fire!

      It only needs enough for 88 mph.

      --
      Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  4. Critical thinking anyone? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No specifications were revealed but DNA, a daily newspaper, has mentioned that it will be small and portable, will feature Wi-Fi, LAN, and expandable memory, and will operate on 2 watts of power.

    A little critical thinking here: How, exactly, would anyone build that for $10? How much is the cheapest of cheap WiFi adapters at retail? $30? $20? Okay, now how thin are those margins?

    I just don't see how they can pull all that off for $10.

    1. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      You can buy (in bulk) SOCs with cpu, wifi, and lan for less than that retail wifi adapter. But at a $10 price point, I'm thinking more graphing calculator than laptop.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could if they integrated as much as possible onto one chip. Probably not a coincidence that India is home to many chip layout services. It would be dead easy for them to set up a fabless IC manufacturer, producing "laptops on a chip".

      One of the biggest costs will be the screen. I guess they might be able to do it for $10 if they use 1.8" screen or similar. In that case the computer will look like a 1990s mobile phone.

    3. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Also... dump the Wi-Fi and LAN and have them as external USB-plug-able devices.
      No hard drive - use SD cards instead. At under $1 per GB - small extra cost.
      Use existing batteries - like rechargeable AA or mobile phone batteries for power supply.
      No packaging.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    4. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is a cheap graphing calculator!

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    5. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      well, they can save money by insourcing the software development...

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      I just don't see how they can pull all that off for $10.

      TFA sure doesn't shed any light on that question. I suppose you can sell laptops at any price you want, as long as you don't care about breaking even.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    7. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The margins are pretty fat, and the Wifi chip maybe accounts for half the parts in that wifi adapter, then there's tooling and development costs to be amortized on top of that before the margins start kicking in, but still, $10 would have to be without a display and using a fairly low spec ARM or similar processor (which would also be required for the 2W power drain), with 0Mb of that expandable memory in the base system.

    8. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was thinking Etch-A-Sketch, and second hand at that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I just don't see how they can pull all that off for $10.

      I bet the guys that built the ENIAC were thinking, "They'll never fit anything THAT powerful in a suitcase" too.

      "And it's foolish to even THINK that you'd be able to buy anything as powerful as ENIAC at Wal-Mart for under $300" were their very next words.

      [Yes, I'm aware that there was no Wal-Mart in 1946. That's why they call it "hyperbole" - P.R.]

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      No packaging.

      And Lord, please don't forget, NO STICKERS

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1) Get everything on one chip. The difference between cost of production of a CPU chip vs a CPU + a dozen periferials are marginal. And then you save on motherboards, adapters, communication etc.
      2) Retail takes some 50% cut. Other middlemen, another 30%. The actual cost of production is like 5-10% of the retail price. I've seen your $10 USB hubs I've bought for 3PLN (that is $1) in retail in Poland. That is including tax, shipping to Polish retailer, and a bunch of other fees after they left the hands of the manufacturer. So, yes, the margins are ENORMOUS.
      3) Development is half or more of the actual cost of the device. If the development is 100% government funded, and you pay only for your physical copy of the laptop, not for license to all the firmware and hardware design, the cost goes down by a huge margin.
      4) They have all the technology. Intel, NVidia, LG, whatever brand name you mention, they likely have their factories in India. And the government may simply declare any NDA null and void by fiat, hire their employees, and have them re-create whatever they had made at their original employees. Not saying this will certainly happen, but it's not impossible - all the licensing, sublicensing, sub-sublicensing costs for all the little parts, protocols, interfaces, patents and so on, are another HUGE chunk of the cost. And if it's not a direct copy, but a rewrite, and all hidden inside one dedicated chip, who is ever going to find out?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    12. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Leonidas89 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The answer is simple. Good genious people that wants to make a better world do exist (In India, not in America)

    13. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      And what makes you think those $1 USB hubs aren't Chinese knockoffs?

    14. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Very simple answer, I commend you for the thought you've put in to obtaining and sharing this answer with us. It's a good thing those genious[sic] people in the US are just a bunch of greedy capitalistic fat cats and would never do anything to improve the world.

    15. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is a cheap graphing calculator!

      The TI-85 I needed for my high school algebra classes cost $90. A decade and a half later, that same model still exists and still costs $90. As far as I can tell, all they've changed in that time is the faceplate and replaced the proprietary serial connector with a USB plug.

      If the graphing calculator market had followed the same price/performance curve that personal computers have, we'd have plenty of powerful $10 calculators today.

    16. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Big difference between "I don't see how they can"(statement about present/immediate future) and "They'll never"(statement about possibility generally or longer term future.

      You'd be a moron to say that they'll never have a device like this for $10. They almost certainly will. There are, though, some very plausible doubts about their having such a device now, or within the immediate future.

    17. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I bet the guys that built the ENIAC were thinking, "They'll never fit anything THAT powerful in a suitcase" too.

      In that case, "never" turned out to be about 30 years, and would not have been possible without a series of technological breakthroughs (including, most importantly, the transistor).

      In this case, somebody is saying that "never" is already here, in that sufficient technology exists to build the $10 laptop today. Even if it takes 3 years to get from prototype to production, it's still an absurd claim.

    18. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >Retail takes some 50% cut. Other middlemen, another 30%. The actual cost of production is like 5-10% of the retail price.

      Yeah, thats not true. Retail is a 50% markup but another mysterious 30% middle-man (who?) and then another 10 to 15% missing? Hell, wholesale markup is usually only 20%. The cost of goods with profit to pay salaries, R&D, etc is usually 50% of the retail price. Shave off salaries, r&d, and you can perhaps pull out another 20-30%. You aint getting down to 5% of retail cost. Youre crazy if you think Dell is selling $500 computers with 19" LCDs and it only costs them $25 dollars to make. The CPU alone costs that much.

      Look at the OLPC. If the eeepc is 350 then it should cost 17 dollars each. Obviously it doesnt.

      That said, there are high-margin items out there that have a low cost of production like soda, but its rare for electronics to ever be a high-margin item.

      Im sure a 10 dollar computer or glorified PDA is possible, but only with qualifiers like "with enough government subsidies" and "enough sales" and "enough donations" and "enough large scale production." The project hasnt even stared at they are claiming a minimum of 20 dollars per computer (times of india Jan 30). I wouldnt be surprised to see that rise again.

    19. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      Man, I agree with all you said, but... TEN FSCKING DOLLARS.

      No amount of government fiat is going to make even a screen+wifi+storage fit into $10.

      Unless, of course, they massively subsidise each single unit. So the real cost would be in the high tens, or even a hundred, but Auntie Sonia and Manmohan Chachoo foot 80-90% of the bill, so it's $10 at the point of sale, not in production costs.

      I suspect that's what they really mean.

    20. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >2) Retail takes some 50% cut.

      You've never owned a computer store, nor worked in one, have you?

      Divide that by 10 and you have the top margin on the popular products. 50% is reserved for junk like cables. 1% - 5% is the margin on common parts (like the stuff you'd put in these things) such as hard drives, monitors, PCI cards in general, etc. It's the same on laptops, although some craptastic "high-end" shops do try on the 50% margin--and usually end up out of business before the year's end.

    21. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by yada21 · · Score: 0

      You'd be a moron to say that they'll never have a device like this for $10.

      I say that and Im not a moron.

      Dew to the fiat currency scam by the time they can make it for 10 dollars. say one year frm now. then 10 dollars will be like 200 today. 10 will maybe buy you a cup of coffee or the sugar to put in it.

      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    22. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Fjandr · · Score: 2, Funny

      The original would likely have been Chinese to begin with, so being a Chinese knockoff wouldn't necessarily mean anything. :)

    23. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, no. I've seen the retail markup of most computers and computer accessories. While the accessories might approach 20%, computers are usually about 1%-10% markup, tops. Mostly in the lower single digits, though. Really.

      That's why no one can seem to stay in the retail computer business very long. Aside from a few protected channels, like the Apple Store, direct PC makers like (Dell), and power buyers like WalMart who carry like 2 different machines at any one time, tops, the markup on most computers is very, very thin.

    24. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youre crazy if you think Dell is selling $500 computers with 19" LCDs and it only costs them $25 dollars to make.

      You're right, I'd be crazy to think that Dell *makes* anything other than plastic logos. Dell *assembles* computers from off the self parts made by other people. Usually Clevo and MSI for their laptops.

      30% middle-man (who?)

      Indeed.

    25. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      5. lower your targets. 12-key rubber membrane keypad attached to a 4-line LCD screen.

    26. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      You can do all of that, but still the cost of the screen has to exceed $10. A 51 inch LCD TV retails for $1500. Now if you use a 5 inch screen, the cost would be $15 ($1500/100). That is not including any of the peripheral costs.
      Add to this the fact that India does not have a decent fab facility - It seems like US, Germany and China/Taiwan are the only countries which could Fab any new CPU for this product and we have not heard anything from them.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    27. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      This is along the line of the Tata car that was announced for some inconceivably low price to the consumer - it works in the Indian economy, but not on the world market.

      If India could get serious and produce these things with world-competitive quality in volume, they could have a strong export market. Unfortunately, the products don't currently appeal to anyone outside India, at least not anyone who can afford to pay the freight to ship them.

    28. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The silicon for your WiFi sells for less than a $ in bulk. The rest is packaging/Marketing/retail cost.

    29. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well guess what? You're likely right. I'll believe it when I see it out in people's hands.

      Let me break it to my non-Indian friends here on /.. Out here in India, journalism is just as sensationalist and bad as there in the US, when it comes to technology. Add to that the involvement of the HR minister (==scum) and the politicians. Plus there are always people trying to catch headlines with tall claims, and then there are outright nuts. I stopped believing shit that certain news papers spew. I've lived here, and boy have I seen stuff on the newspapers. I stopped rolling my eyes like when I was 10.

    30. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Well, yes and no. I agree with the pricing stuff, they could definetly be cheaper.

      However, the TI-85 was actually discontinued several years ago in favor of the 86, which was in incremental improvement. Unfortunetly the 86 has also been discontinued (they were both really great calcs though). The current lineup is the 84+ line, which is the successor of the 83/83+ line. Very little has changed from the 83s to the 84 however and they are still priced similarly.

      There is of course also the 89Ti, which is in a league of it's own. The 89/89Ti, 92/92+ and v200 are all m68K based (no, they can't run linux...), the 83/84+ lines and the 85/86 all use Zilog z80 chips. ...yes, I'm a calculator nerd.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    31. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      link or gtfo

    32. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Dell's expense still reflect the total cost and real market price of this PC.

      >Dell *assembles* computers from off the self parts made by other people.

      Exactly. Assembly is an expense. Design is an expense. Marketing is an expense. Warranties are an expense. Ongoing support is an expense. You cant just look at the cost of the components and think, "Well, these will magically form themselves into a product for the end user. So all expenses past component price are some unneeded middle-man."

      You can remove marketing from this equation for the Indian PC, but you arent removing assembly, design, warranty and support. Actually, it would be disingenuous to remove marketing as an expense. This program is being marketed by tax dollars.

    33. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Nor do they pass safety regulations anywhere else. Sure its cheap. Its a shell around a motorcycle with two extra wheels for balance.

    34. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by ksd1337 · · Score: 1
      Ooohhhh Ooohhhh I can play this too.

      No packaging, no stickers...

      NO CARRIER

    35. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by captjc · · Score: 1

      You can find Graphing Calculators for like $20 new. They are not great calculators. You don't get the CAS systems that TI and HP are known for, but you get a decent calculator for what most Middle through High school students need. Mostly what you are paying for is the proprietary software in the calculators. The hardware is otherwise pretty cheap.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    36. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      First you claim to not know who the mystery middle-men are, and they you lecture on their expenses?

      A seat, take one.

    37. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joys of monopoly. Algebra/Calculus books in high schools actually use the TI series down to the series of keystrokes needed to do the work.

      TI was here, Casio is loser.

      Show up with a Casio/HP/Other and if you're dumb you're screwed.

    38. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's his point. it's the R&D, amortized over the whole run that drives up those costs. The actual marginal cost of each of the components might be much lower. Low enough so a chinese knockoff can be 10% of the price of the one made by a company that had to pay for its research.

    39. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why the PDA market didn't kill the graphing calculator market, or at least drive graphing calcs down to the level of scientific calcs.

      Imagine some sort of small-screen matlab.. on an iPod Touch...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    40. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking Etch-A-Sketch, and second hand at that.

      You don't have to go second hand, just think small ($2.80).

    41. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real reason is that teachers know what a calculator can do but cannot limit what a PDA can do. Any modern PDA includes internet access (either wifi or 3g), so the student could be Googling the answer.

    42. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      If you do a lot of calculations, you don't care how pretty something looks just how efficiently you can get those calculations done. The last thing I would ever want is for the device I use for that to have a touch screen because the second it made a mistake in selecting an option in some highly nested menu system I would throw it as hard as I could against the wall and break out the best engineering calculator made in the last 5 years. My 48gx is lost somewhere in the Cascades after a camping trip or I would still be using that.

    43. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There probably are. but you are always told by your professors to buy Ti or HP. never which functions you will need.

      i'd be feeling a sucker if i had to pay $90 for a calculator. sorry for you

    44. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by ChatHuant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Retail takes some 50% cut. Other middlemen, another 30%. The actual cost of production is like 5-10% of the retail price. I've seen your $10 USB hubs I've bought for 3PLN (that is $1) in retail in Poland. That is including tax, shipping to Polish retailer, and a bunch of other fees after they left the hands of the manufacturer. So, yes, the margins are ENORMOUS.

      But you're wrong in assuming that the x% + y% plus whatnot are just profiteering. Yes, the manufacturing cost may be relatively small compared to the retail cost, but the difference is not all due to markups. More expenses are required in order to get the manufactured product to the consumer: transport, warehousing, salespeople, the logistics of moving the things arouns, loss on damaged goods, and so on. Even if you set up Costco-style warehouses, there is still a cost that needs to be passed on to the customer.

    45. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Quality Logo Products will apply warning labels to all orders being shipped to the state of California - no exceptions. Proposition 65 Warning Labels Read - This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and/or birth defects or other reproductive harm.

      Do they apply these warning labels to everything, whether or not it is in fact known to "cause cancer and/or birth defects or other reproductive harm"?

      Not that it matters to most of us here. There's some guy higher up the thread who'd like to see female geeks naked!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    46. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      For that matter, why do you assume they'll violate NDAs and IP? They could buy their cpus from China, which has it's own model. It's based around an old Intel design, but there've been significant mods, and as I understand things, no internationally recognized IP violations took place. Not of patents, not of copyrights, not of trademarks, and certainly not of trade secrets.

      Now I don't know that China has a really low power model, but I'd be rather surprised if they didn't.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    47. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Nor do they pass safety regulations anywhere else. Sure its cheap. Its a shell around a motorcycle with two extra wheels for balance.

      ... and that works for India, good for them. If the US would get it's head out of the SUV, we could save ridiculous quantities of oil, but that's not the way we roll...

    48. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      I just don't see how they can pull all that off for $10.

      Thats because they can't. It's the nature of dishonest people to promise more than they can deliver.

    49. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      If the graphing calculator market had followed the same price/performance curve that personal computers have, we'd have plenty of powerful $10 calculators today.

      Actually, I think we'd have much more powerful $90 graphing calculators.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    50. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I recall, the 48/9 series also had some pretty extensive menus to drill down. And the function selector (and the other, rather numerous list boxes) on the 49 would have benefited greatly from having a multitouch scroll bar.

      Even if you naively did a one-to-one mapping and made the buttons bigger to make up for the resolution, you shouldn't need more than 3 pages for full button parity. You could use the tilt sensor for that.

      It's not a tv remote, you're not going to be using it without looking at it.

      But... a limited scientific keypad mode (configurable of course like the HPs) and a graffiti/keyboard-typed console mode, combined with an extensive help system (why not put the whole owners' manual in) would be a great start for something like a matlab appliance.

      Forget about teachers objections, though. Graphing calculators shouldn't be allowed on tests, period. 1) I don't care how much they think they understand them, there are *lots* of places to hide contraband. and 2) a well designed test shouldn't require any of the features unique to a graphing calculator.*

      *by the time you're talking about subjects that might find a pocket computer useful on a test, the students should probably be able to bring any outside materials they think they might need, anyway.

    51. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Cept you'd have no one to buy them.

      Teachers and test makers are against giving students computers or anything easily programmed (reading a manual doesn't seem to be easy for most students, apparently). The TI-8x are about the most advanced they'll allow on standardized tests (why you'd need them is another matter).

      So the highly lucrative student market has a $90 supply demand point at a given level of functionality.

      Any more functionality and parents won't buy them cause the schools, teachers and test givers will ban them. (I have no idea where iPhones and their ilk land, but I'm guessing they aren't allowed to be out during or taken to tests.)

    52. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, part of the reason for that many students won't read the manual to learn how to use it, and the teacher isn't going to learn how to do everything on every model of calculator. So instead, the school standardizes on a certain model, then they teach the kids how to solve problems using that specific calculator.

      Besides, $90 wasn't that bad. I found the calculator to be a great help, it was fun to program, it kept me entertained for endless boring hours of high school. My TI-85 served me well for my 4 years of high school, and my 5 years of college (though granted it was a lot less useful in college as the math I was doing exceeded its capabilities). And after years of banging around in my backpack and my pockets, it still works flawlessly today.

    53. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Aren't they just charging for the brand name and the IP?

    54. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little critical thinking here: How, exactly, would anyone build that for $10? How much is the cheapest of cheap WiFi adapters at retail? $30? $20? Okay, now how thin are those margins?

      I just don't see how they can pull all that off for $10.

      Wifi? Bad example, the chips cost $1 or so. Expensive ones are like $5. There IS a HUUUGE markup on these.

                Your point stands, though, I am doubtful this could be done for $10 though -- the LCD would be costly. The 2GB of RAM would cost almost $10 by itself I would think.

    55. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe IIT-M was involved in development of 802.11. Not sure to what extent.

      Additionally i believe they may be using a cell-phone chip from samsung/freescale/TI that provides most of the basic features they are targetting. i beleive this could be a reason for the low wattage of the end-product. I also expect them to use Linux that has be extended to provide a multi-lingual UI that may be required for a country like India.

    56. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Oh, nope. They are the Chineese originals. Exactly the same "knock-offs" as your $10 ones. Same device, same design, same PCB, maybe no package at some times. And of course no brand, but they are manufactured by the very same factories, on the very same assembly lines.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    57. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Other middle-men: transport, storage, logistics, wholesale (often 2-3 levels).

      Another 10-15% missing in other taxes (than VAT), manufacturer's profit (the cut above costs), insurances, interest on credits and so on.

      Maybe EEE doesn't cost 17 dollars each. But I assure you a $50 gamer's mouse costs below $5 in manufacture costs. A $15 SD Card reader is $0.50. An overclockable $300 memory is just the same as $30 one (meaning maybe $3 in manufacture), except past some more QA. Besides, EEE was especially aimed at low price, low price IS the selling point, so the margins had to be cut down. Take your average $1000 laptop instead, and analyze its cost as a sum of components plus assembly.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    58. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      I have a friend working at a small computer store. I know his cut is about what you said, and I know the wholesale prices. Then I know the prices of a "prestige" computer shop (+20 - +40%), a hypermarket (+50 - +200%), a big electronics stores network ( 0 - +200%, insane promotions and ridiculous standard prices), and second-hand - ( -80 - +50% )

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    59. Re:Critical thinking anyone? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Especially if you have a "0 dead pixels" policy.

      The 51" TV contains costs of manufacture of 3 51" LCD panels, from which 2 were discarded due to presence of dead pixels.
      The 100 5" displays contain costs of manufacture of 10 5" displays that didn't pass QA. Same number of dead pixels per square inch, but much smaller unit size disqualified by their presence.

      It applies to non-"0 dead pixels" products to a degree too. Yield of a modern assembly line for highest performance chips (1GB RAM dice, quad core CPUs, fastest GPUs etc) is like 20%. Meaning you buy one CPU, you pay for 5 - your own and 4 failed ones. Cut your requirements by 10 and you have a 100% yield, on an assembly line that has already paid for itself, in a tech that paid back its development costs already. And you can still do wonders on a 400MHZ CPU.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  5. From TFA - $20 actually by denzacar · · Score: 5, Funny

    But they hope for a lower price with mass production.

    "At this stage, the price is working out to be $20 but with mass production it is bound to come down," R P Agarwal, secretary, higher education said.

    Meanwhile, this laptop is still priced at $12.25.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      And it's still made in the USA!

    2. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was surprised that something is still made in the USA. And it no longer is:

      Etch A Sketch moves to Shenzhen, China.

    3. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Ha, very little is "Made in the USA" anymore. Between Walmart pressuring companies to move their manufacturing to China (it's very hard to get them to even do business with you if you tell them your stuff is made in the U.S.), the burgeoning Chinese economy, and recent trade deals; I'm actually surprised anymore when I hear that a manufacturing plant is closing (as I thought they all pretty much already *had* closed). It seems like the only thing that's still made here are cars (even Toyota, BMW, etc. have car plants here). But that's only because China hasn't gotten big into car manufacturing yet ("yet" being the operative word).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Damn. Way to burst my bubble.

    5. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? The manufacturing that's done in China is for cheap consumer goods, heavy manufacturing is still done in the US.

      Where do you think they make the Lithrogaphy machines, CNC machining centers, etc...?

    6. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      China is getting ready to build cars in Mexico to sell to the US. If we ditched NAFTA (heh heh) they'd probably have to make them here to be profitable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fuck! There is only 5 left in stock!

    8. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I hate going to WalMart, but I find it MUCH easier to buy American made products there than at many other stores.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    9. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by aonaran · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to the states in many years. I think it's been 17 years or so since the last time I stepped into a Walmart State-side, but back then they used to have signs all over that screamed at you in big bold letters "made in the USA"
      What happened?

    10. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      You can find a pretty good rundown on the history of Walmart and China here. And, for a pretty fair breakdown of just how aggressive Walmart has gotten at pressuring its suppliers to use Chinese manufacturing, check out the book The Walmart Effect

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I haven't been to the states in many years. I think it's been 17 years or so since the last time I stepped into a Walmart State-side, but back then they used to have signs all over that screamed at you in big bold letters "made in the USA" What happened?

      Well, they probably drove all the USA manuf's out of business. One of the nastier Walmart/Vendor relationship issues was that they will demand that you lower the price that Walmart pays for your goods every year. Otherwise, they'll buy elsewhere.

      So take a small company that makes a product. Walmart comes along and says "we'll triple your volume if you sell to us". Sounds great, right? Fast forward a few years and now Walmart demands that you sell them units at cost or below. If you say no, they pull their business and your volume drops by 75%.

      All that capital equipment that you bought to deal with the larger volume? Yeah, you're still paying for it.

    12. Re:From TFA - $20 actually by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      What happened?

      Sam Walton died.

  6. For the non-Indians... by langelgjm · · Score: 1

    crore = 10 million
    lakh = 100,000

    As for the article's statement that "In this context, government would give Rs 2.5 lakh per institution for 10 Kbps connection and subsidise 25% of costs for private and state government colleges," I think this is probably a misprint.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  7. Power core... by Ferret96 · · Score: 1

    The laptops are actually going to be old cell phones with a pretty laptop-y cases around them...

    1. Re:Power core... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Actually I think cellphone technology is the way to do this.

      You'd take an ARM core and put it on one chip along with the peripherals like Wifi. For power use, AA batteries. Ram and Rom would be cheap mobile phone class multi chip package containing DRAM and flash. Actually mobile phones use a technique called POP, package on package where the MCP is stuck on top of the custom chip containing the CPU and peripherals. Keyboard is a chiclet one like mobile phones use. OS would be an ARM Linux variant. Most embedded ARM designs have USB and some are USB hosts. You could use that to connect to a USB flash disk which gives you expansion.

      There are mobile phones with a small color display for around USD 20 build price. If you want to run Linux you'd need more RAM, but DRAM is cheap these days.

      Actually the hardest bit is the display, even a netbook sized one is probably more expensive than you can afford. I expect this thing will be more like a graphing calculator/mobile phone form factor than a laptop one, just because of the cost of the display.

      Of course, you could have a largish, cheap, but lousy mono STN display like the original laptops had. Of course in a few years a largish, cheap, but non lousy OLED display will be possible.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  8. A great hope for India by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    Using cheap local labor in order to strengthen the local education is a very good move, both industrially and PR-wise. If they manage to mass-produce it, they will probably be able to sell the same machines for 20$ or 30$ abroad. It could give them a foot in a field that is China's stronghold. And I, for one, would prefer to see India (World's first democracy) to be labeled the World Factory than the People's Republic of China.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:A great hope for India by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Might also help with political stability, if you know about science, technology and reason its a lot harder to go round killing innocent people.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    2. Re:A great hope for India by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0, Troll

      Tell that to the Germans. There's nothing about education that fundamentally creates less murderous people.

    3. Re:A great hope for India by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Not really...
      If the government is powerful enough, and makes the population feel that they are not powerless (even if they are), then those in power can go around doing pretty much anything they want, and cover it all up so people never find out, and if a small number of people do find out they can easily be branded insane and locked up.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:A great hope for India by CSHARP123 · · Score: 1

      India has been attributed to World's Largest Democracy. I am not sure if it has been attributed to Oldest Democracy. Do you have any links that points to that?

    5. Re:A great hope for India by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      The idea behind the expression "world's first democracy" is that the only democratic way to rank democracies is by population. Age, wealth, military power are (or should be) irrelevant.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    6. Re:A great hope for India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the Americans. There's nothing about education that fundamentally creates less murderous people. Since WWII America has killed, conservatively, 10 million civilians.

    7. Re:A great hope for India by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      There is something about education that makes us disptue your claim though.

      10 million? Where are your citations?

      Consider that both the Korean War and the Vietnam War were civil wars, it's a fairly bold assumption to make that no civilians would have died without American Military intervention.

    8. Re:A great hope for India by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You have to admit that a lot of them had it coming or were unfortunate enough to be in the CEP of someone that did though.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:A great hope for India by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't underestimate the military power of democracies though. My one of my Dad's colleagues at university worked at Los Alamos. Two American military guys, turned up at his house in England and said he was needed for a project related to the war effort. This was during the Battle of Britain. He said at that point the papers were talking about how the Germans had 1000 planes say, and the British had 800 but on the other hand the British were fighting at home so to speak which gave them an advantage.

      Anyhow he flew to America and got a train cross country. As from the train he spotted airfields essentially full of American military aircraft, easily more than the numbers of English and German fighters combined.

      Before he got to Los Alamos, he knew the US/UK would win the war.

      America: Fuck yeah!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:A great hope for India by Myrddin+Wyllt · · Score: 1

      Not a popular opinion in the UK/US, but I always thought the USSR won the war (in Europe at least). Looking at it objectively that seems quite clear, whatever Hollywood may have been telling us for 60-odd years. The Eastern Front was where all the killing and dying happened; D-Day, North Africa, Italy and the road to Berlin were just a side-show by comparison.

      --
      [ ]Half Empty [ ]Half Full [x]Twice as big as it needs to be
    11. Re:A great hope for India by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Well I dunno. But I do know that seeing all those American fighters made my Dad's friend realise that the UK wasn't likely to get invaded by the Nazis.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re:A great hope for India by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      The danger in india/pakistan isn't those in power as much as it is the extremists who see their religion going the way of Christianity if india/pakistan accept technology how the west have.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  9. Subscription for 47 years by messner_007 · · Score: 1

    It is true, it costs only 10 bugs, but you have to stay subscribed for something for next 47 years ...

    1. Re:Subscription for 47 years by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Only 10 bugs huh? So I can just give them one copy of Vista and then I should be set for the next century.

  10. I Smell Crap by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forgive me but how reliable could such a cheap product be? I am willing to suspend disbelief but this sounds like good old fashioned BS.

    1. Re:I Smell Crap by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      5 years ago a cell phone like the one i have cost 150 bucks

      I lost my brick recently and bought this one for a whopping 10 bucks.

      I pay almost as much for fast food.

      That, of course, is US retail, which means it should cost 3 in developing nations and still make companies a profit.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:I Smell Crap by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Uhh... You realize cell phones are subsidized by the service provider?

    3. Re:I Smell Crap by Dansteeleuk · · Score: 1

      I guess laptops could be too. In fact it's a growing trend in the UK. Buy this service plan! Free laptop, okay, it's usually a netbook, but not always...

    4. Re:I Smell Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my cell phone for free.

      That, of course, is US retail, which means it should cost -$10 in developing nations and still make companies a profit.

    5. Re:I Smell Crap by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      A lot of the ones aren't now.. go in a big enough service plan and you can get a quite decent laptop for free. You see a lot of students with them now.

    6. Re:I Smell Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, 10 USD is pushing it, but i can find a phone without and service plan for 30 USD here in Sweden.
      I bet you can find one for half that somewhere in the world.

    7. Re:I Smell Crap by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      True, but there are prepaid POS phones that are $10USD, such as Virgin Mobile (Sprint), coupled with a 1000 minute card for $50USD, compared to the $45ish monthly for my 400 minute + 200 text Verizon plan...

      OTOH, you get what you pay for with a lot of those prepaids...

    8. Re:I Smell Crap by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      My Dad has a Nokia 2630. It's like the one you linked to, except it has Bluetooth. It cost about USD30-40 - supermarkets buy up things like this in bulk and sell them off at a deep discount. It's actually a remarkable piece of low cost engineering, and probably quite sufficient for the vast majority of people.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:I Smell Crap by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, there was a trend here in the US where almost every damn electronics store seemed to be listing all their computers as $400 cheaper than they were... because of a 2 or 4 year dial-up internet contract (I forget how long it was) at $21.95/mo from the various idiot-targeted ISPs (AOL, MSN, and the like,) and a $400 mail-in rebate for those contracts.

    10. Re:I Smell Crap by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      True, but there are prepaid POS phones that are $10USD, such as Virgin Mobile (Sprint), coupled with a 1000 minute card for $50USD, compared to the $45ish monthly for my 400 minute + 200 text Verizon plan...

      OTOH, you get what you pay for with a lot of those prepaids...

      and virgin mobile is exactly what I use. the phone was not attached to a contract.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    11. Re:I Smell Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about the costs of producing (no NRE etc.) something common. Say a $25 rechargeable drill you can buy at most U.S. grocery/hardware/home improvement/general stores. This drill cost at most $2.50 to make at the factory, likely less than that. I think that drills made in 10k lots would run about $1.50 at the factory.

      Take a bottle of beer. AFAIK, the cost at the big brewery is a couple pennies. For a beer factory to break even, if you'd take their beer from their door, you would need to pay them around $0.018 per 12oz bottle, if you'd buy it in say 100,000 bottle lots. Transporting this stuff around, making profit, selling and paying taxes costs so much that you end up paying about $0.80 per bottle in retail.

    12. Re:I Smell Crap by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, and usually, yes. But cell phones - any particular model - is usually not produced in very high numbers. (For instance, I'm pretty much in a Verizon-only area. I have not once seen my current phone used by someone else, and only once have I seen any of my old phones. There are a lot of variants out there.

      They could easily, easily cut the cost of production by simply producing a higher number of a better phone, and putting pretty color face plates on it (and being Verizon, locking down 90% of the functionality in software).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  11. will feature Wi-Fi, LAN, and expandable memory... by Rikiji7 · · Score: 1

    ...and will feature an Intel QuadCore for a retail price of 10$. Of course.

    --
    slashwhat?
  12. Ridiculous price by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that finds a $20 price-tag utterly ridiculous?

    Even if you use a TV for output, the SoC with wi-fi, cell-phone-style power supply, a keyboard and a GB of RAM cannot go for less than $20 and will not go for 2 watts.

    This is seriously wrong and, when I see a government official making such lunatic claims, I expect the people being ripped off.

    1. Re:Ridiculous price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At $20 bucks, it's more of an embedded device(pda without the touchscreen?) then a labtop. It's a misuse of the term labtop.

    2. Re:Ridiculous price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a dvd player with remote control and the abilty to play divx from usb. £14. it uses more than 2W when playing dvds.

    3. Re:Ridiculous price by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a misuse of the term labtop.

      I really don't know how they could have misused that term.

  13. Where is China's innovation? by bogaboga · · Score: 1, Troll

    I thought China would do this before India because all I see around is stuff with the label "Made in China." I hear they (the Chinese), even made an iphone rip-off , but I have not seen it anywhere! So where is China's innovation?

    1. Re:Where is China's innovation? by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      all I see around is stuff with the label "Made in China."

      Yes, but the stuff made in China is generally designed in Europe or America. That will change, but it will take a few decades. Japan was building cheap knock-off products through the 1950's and '60's, and didn't begin to really rival U.S. design and engineering until the '80's. If China follows the same path then we're about 10-15 year away from quality products designed in China.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    2. Re:Where is China's innovation? by Kokuyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      China does not have innovation. Unlike Japan, China does not feel the need to rise above simply copying stuff poorly and selling the resulting product for less than the original.

      And frankly, to me it seems their strategy is paying off.

    3. Re:Where is China's innovation? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      technology like this is too dangerous to the PRC.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    4. Re:Where is China's innovation? by nbharatvarma · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have seen IPhone rip-offs for Rs. 2500/-. At the current rate of exchange, it would be around $50. These phones don't even have IMEI numbers and the government has banned the phones for that reason.
      I have seen the phone in action and it works just fine.
      I am guessing you will never get these mobiles in the U.S. :)

      --
      ... and I shall strike upon thee with great vegeance, furious anger and a slightly positive karma.
    5. Re:Where is China's innovation? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      China does not have innovation. Unlike Japan,

            Perhaps if you were just a little older, you would remember when all Japan could do was copy Western technology. However today Japan can innovate. Give China another 30 years, and then watch out!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Where is China's innovation? by KibibyteBrain · · Score: 1

      There is some Chinese innovation, but most of it is in tooling and manufacturing technology, which if you think about it is their main area of experience. In fact, much of the product design innovation over the past few years that Western engineers have been able to devise have directly exploited new Chinese materials and manufacturing techniques. But being innovative when it comes to the actual product design is greatly helped by a consumer culture, which is a very very infant concept in the PRC.

    7. Re:Where is China's innovation? by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      Japan was building cheap knock-off products through the 1950's and '60's, and didn't begin to really rival U.S. design and engineering until the '80's.

      This may (partially) be true. Remember that some Japanese companies sold transistor radios while American companies were still using vacuum tubes. China's economy is a lot stronger than most people think.

      They for example produce almost four times as much steel as its nearest competitor (Japan). Its global share of publications almost quadrupled in the ten years from 1995 to 2005 and almost equals Japan's.(OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2008).

      If China follows the same path then we're about 10-15 year away from quality products designed in China. There are already a lot of quality products designed in China. Huawei 3G modems comes to mind. One of my family members recently opened a little factory and almost all equipment was designed and built in China.

      I would be more worried about the USA. A smaller percentage of things that I buy was designed in the USA (operating system + CPU is all I can think of). Chinese and Indian cars are becoming more common (GWM, Tata, Cherry, Channa) and American cars less common.

    8. Re:Where is China's innovation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be more worried about the USA. A smaller percentage of things that I buy was designed in the USA (operating system + CPU is all I can think of).

      I'm running Linux on a Pentium M... Finnish OS on Israeli CPU... so it's not looking so good for these either :(

    9. Re:Where is China's innovation? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      China and Japan are not really the same though. China builds electronics in big factories that are really indistinguishable from the old collective farms and communist era factories. I.e. they are good at getting lots of people to do a simple task. The advent of capitalism means that they make things for export and the old communist system of jobs for life, free healthcare and so on has been abolished.

      One of my colleagues, who was born in China, told me that the factory workers are often not paid by the factory owner and if they demonstrate the local party will send goons to silence them. Most of the factory owners are foreign, usually Taiwanese and all the design is done outside China. Basically China is a massively feudal place.

      Now Japan, even in the 1950's wasn't like this. The Japanese had good domestic engineering companies even in the 1930's. Most of them were bombed to bits in World War II, but Japan was a modern society 50 years before the fascists took over, and became one again quite quickly again after the Americans rebooted it. And post war it wasn't too surprising that they concentrated on consumer electronics now that America had taken over responsibility for Japan's security.

      Now up until very recently for example, it was a very equal, well educated and essentially middle class society, a bit like an Asian version of Sweden. Equality has dropped a bit, but the essentially middle classness of the place hasn't changed. That's the sort of society you need to produce engineering companies. It's also very different to China, which has never really got past feudalism. Feudal societies aren't egalitarian enough to be good at designing consumer electronics, because that implies that (young, poor) engineers need to be able to tell the (old, rich) owners how to get things done. In a feudal society the orders flow in only one way, from the top down.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:Where is China's innovation? by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      China builds electronics in big factories that are really indistinguishable from the old collective farms and communist era factories.

      I would differ with this. Productivity markedly increased since the free market reforms. A lot of workers are paid piecewise. Here is a nice section of an article giving basically the argument that I want to make (http://www.imf.org/EXTERNAL/PUBS/FT/ISSUES8/INDEX.HTM#Boom).

      As far as I understand China still has free health care (obviously not up to western standard).

      Most of the factory owners are foreign, usually Taiwanese and all the design is done outside China. Basically China is a massively feudal place.

      This is true in a certain sense. There is a lot of mindless manufacturing going on. But you ignore the amount of scientists and engineers that China produces. They produce a lot of engineers (and some at least) to a high standard. Here is another interesting article: (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/07/29/the-chinese-education-boom/). College enrolment has tripled between 1998 and 2008. 20% of people will be enrolled in a form of higher education by 2010. Compare this with 1978 â" 4/5 people were involved in subsistence farming.

      My point in the previous post was that you will not see a lot of Chinese engineering because it does not stare you in the face. This is certainly true â" whether it is a dough mixer, cheap infra-red dongle, re-branded 3G modem, ulta-cheap (and somewhat shitty) cellphone charger or a rechargeable battery.

      I agree with you that the comparison with Japan may not be apt â" Japan certainly comes from a higher base. Probably the best comparison would be Taiwan's economic development.

    11. Re:Where is China's innovation? by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I'm just old enough (barely) to remember the phrase "Japanese imported junk." You don't hear that a lot anymore.

      Japan's rise to economic superpower status was a testament to the character of the Japanese people themselves, who always have been honest, smart, hard-working, and willing to save and invest now in order to prosper later. China shares many of these same advantages, plus many of its own: a much larger population, much more natural resources, less history of military expansionism and empire-building, and, ironically, one of the highest levels of economic freedom in the world. It will go far, provided it does not fall into the trap of militarism or another Hundred Flowers fiasco.

    12. Re:Where is China's innovation? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Taiwan is a democracy though, and China is a nasty police state.

      I'm in Taiwan at the moment, and I've been to China a few times and they are as different as night and day.

      At work Taiwanese people are always seem to be debating various solutions to technical problems whereas the Chinese seem to be in 'keep your head down, avoid trouble with the Powers That Be and try to bullshit/cheat outsiders' mode. Outside work the Taiwanese are very friendly and the Chinese are still pretty buttoned down.

      Here everyone advocates the same 'keep your head down' approach when you're actually in China, otherwise bad things can happen to you

      My point is that you can see that the Taiwanese get shit done, and the Chinese don't, once you get past the bullshit. I actually think all the obvious signs of development in China are as fake as the old collective farms and miraculous increases in steel production back in the 50's.

      Now you could say that Taiwan industrialized before it was a democracy, but Taiwan pre 1989 and China now are not really comparable. China's a horrible fascist state, and Taiwan was more like one of those banana republics. Sure obvious dissidents were locked up, but I don't think it was as efficiently totalitarian as China has been since the revolution.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    13. Re:Where is China's innovation? by argiedot · · Score: 1

      The Godson series was very interesting, and definitely is worth watching. The Chinese are doing just fine.

      And, as an Indian, I'll believe this $10 machine when I see it. A cell-phone costs $15 at least.

    14. Re:Where is China's innovation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it be that these cheap iphones were stolen goods?

    15. Re:Where is China's innovation? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      This was the case not long ago, and is probably still mostly true for their commercial stuff. But if you'll look into Chinese military programs, you'll see that they have already successfully moved away from replicating others' designes to designing their own very competitive ones, for everything from assault rifles and ammo for them to tanks and airplanes.

    16. Re:Where is China's innovation? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Potentially. Japan, unlike China, never had the problem of 90%+ of their population being completely uneducated and living in 3rd world hellhole, though. Yes, they had to recover from WWII, but they did it quickly, as a national effort. And in a much smaller area than China.

      Not saying China can't do it, or won't do it. They just have a lot more hurdles to jump. India, more still.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    17. Re:Where is China's innovation? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Something like this, maybe?

      16GB 3" 16:9 QVGA RMVB MP3 MP4 MP5 Player FQ5-16R - $57

      The software sucks, but yes, it's incredibly cheap to make this kind of hardware these days. I've seen a number of "direct from china" sites selling this, and other, shit for what I consider to be pennies - phones which wouldn't work here, but are otherwise (seemingly) featurelist compatible with the latest, greatest on the US and EU markets for $30-60.

      Which brings to mind the iPhone. It's hilarious how it's one of the higher priced phones, when it is likely one of the cheapest to make. Apple is soaking up the profit with that one. It's a real boon for hte mto only have one actual phone at a time, as then they don't have to spend extra money for 'retooling' for different hardware.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  14. Ignore IP licensing and engineering costs by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That'll save you a bundle right there. If you write the engineering off as a total loss after you take the first corporation bankrupt and then you stiff the IP owners on royalties when you build them, you'll be on the way to getting it done. It will be flimsy, not include batteries (for 2W you can buy rechargeables), and have a very poor screen, and the $10 won't include packaging, marketing, distribution, or profit. The QA will be poor too, so there will be lots of failures, but at that price point most won't bother to send it back for repairs.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Ignore IP licensing and engineering costs by craagz · · Score: 1

      How about a LCD screen like the one on old calculators?? Monochrome!

    2. Re:Ignore IP licensing and engineering costs by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      $10 x ~50 = Rs 500 is a lot of money in India. I think they would send it for repair.

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    3. Re:Ignore IP licensing and engineering costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what they said about the $2000 car, and guess what... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata_Nano

      No point running the thing down even before any specs are released.

    4. Re:Ignore IP licensing and engineering costs by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      thaats not a lot here in india...atleast not for a laptop or cellphone. maybe too much for a pizza...definitely unbelievable for a laptop

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    5. Re:Ignore IP licensing and engineering costs by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I imagine you could expect it to at least be 256 gradient monochrome at a fairly high resolution - say, 640x320 or such. Maybe even 256 color.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  15. Leverage a MP3 player by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your average chinese MP3 player or cellphone with an added keyboard could be repurposed as a very cheap "laptop".

  16. Who will do the tech support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Who can they outsource?

  17. price a big mac in india? about 5 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but where da beef?

    o'course it don't include no beef

    indians dont eat beef bozo

  18. Pre-order gift by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Included will be a voucher for your trial version of Duke Nukem Forever.

    Also, a calendar going up to 2050 specifying exactly the year of "Linux on the Desktop."

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Pre-order gift by harry666t · · Score: 1

      > a calendar going up to 2050

      duh, it'd have to end on 2012 anyway.

    2. Re:Pre-order gift by argiedot · · Score: 1

      More likely, if it were specifying the Year of the 32-bit Linux Desktop it couldn't go past 2038.

  19. Well look at that... by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    No specifications were revealed but DNA, a daily newspaper, has mentioned that it will be small and portable, will feature Wi-Fi, LAN, and expandable memory, and will operate on 2 watts of power."

    Not only will it be able to play doom/quake/unreal, but it will come with a pony too!

  20. And just like anything else out of India... by lightningrod220 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the quality will be laughable. Like I always say: cheap, quality, expandable: pick two.

    1. Re:And just like anything else out of India... by HikingStick · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You've not been following the Indian manufacturing industry. They are making leaps and bounds in quality, and it should not be assumed that Indian goods are junk.

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    2. Re:And just like anything else out of India... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      His post had nothing to do with the quality of indian manufacturing. Regardless of where the product is manufactured, you still have to deal with the tradeoffs between cost, quality, and features (in this case, he mentions expandability as his preferred feature).

      This is a play on the axiom I've seen hundreds of times regarding speed, quality, and cost (fast, good, or cheap -- pick two).

      So the point is, if you;re looking at manufactured goods, and you want cost to be tiny, it generally means you need to compromise on either quality or features of the product. This has nothing to do with the manufacturing capabilities or standards in different regions (though, generally, the region where you're manufacturing will impact the finished good, whether because of the quality of the workforce, cultural issues, local availability of quality components, transport costs if bringing in components, etc).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:And just like anything else out of India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, I think this was a tongue-in-cheek reference to US outsourcing policies rather than an attack on the quality of Indian goods...

    4. Re:And just like anything else out of India... by Nebu · · Score: 1

      the quality will be laughable. Like I always say: cheap, quality, expandable: pick two.

      If the two they picked were "cheap" and "quality", I would be satisfied. I don't care about "expandability" for a $10 laptop.

    5. Re:And just like anything else out of India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've not been following the Indian manufacturing industry. They are making leaps and bounds in quality, and it should not be assumed that Indian goods are junk.

      I see the Indian government employs PR people. Surely nobody else would seriously make such a statement.

    6. Re:And just like anything else out of India... by horza · · Score: 1

      the quality will be laughable. Like I always say: cheap, quality, expandable: pick two.

      At $10? The first two.

      Phillip.

    7. Re:And just like anything else out of India... by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      Sorry to violate the premises of your fantasy world, but I have no connection to India. I'm just a conservative who lives in a fly-over state who is willing to fairly assess the quality of goods and services.

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  21. It's gotta be a calculator by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 1

    Somebody must be getting a computer and a calculator mixed up.

    Would make a certain amount of sense. Somebody wants to get lots of free advertising, so they make a fancy calculator and say it's a computer.

    Who knows, maybe I'm even right.

    (Okay, after RTFA it's the Gov't looking for free publicity and votes).

    I suppose we'll see Feb 3rd.

  22. SmartPhone? by normanjd · · Score: 1

    Sounds a lot like a smart phone... Load Android and your done...

  23. Runs under Ninnle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This laptop would not be possible if not for the work of Ninnle Labs, who created a slimmed down version of Ninnle Linux, with NinWM as the window manager. Should work fine.

  24. Bill of Materials not $10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this differs slightly from the OLPC project, in that the laptop is only for distribution in India and that the MHRD (a.k.a Indian government ministry) is planning to play sugar daddy to this project "for perpetuity" to maintain the price at $10 (Which again no-one will pay, but will just be deducted off the grant to the participating government funded schools - I guess!!). Interestingly there is no mention of a display anywhere and the Bill of materials seems closer to $47 http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199203891

  25. Oh, huh. by trudyscousin · · Score: 3, Funny

    The sheer hubris of this announcement made me wonder: When did M. Night Shyamalan start making computers?

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
    1. Re:Oh, huh. by zbharucha · · Score: 1

      I am amazed and saddened at the levels of scepticism shown by the /. community at large. Before this thing has even been formally released, you lot have descended upon it like a swarm of locusts. Have an open mind! If this goes ahead as planned, it will be a BIG thing for India and will bring education to a lot of impoverished regions in that corner of the world. It almost seems as if you don't want this to happen.

    2. Re:Oh, huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Have an open mind!" works only on things that are actually plausible, or at least close to plausible. Announcing an SUV that gets 28mpg is plausible. Announcing an SUV that gets 190mpg is laughable.

      $10 for the features listed here are laughable, no matter how strong your national pride is, and most slashdotters can't even find a decent wristwatch for $10. If they'd said $100, no one would have batted an eyelash, since that's at least plausible given the prices of other devices in that range.

      Here, I'll sell you a $1000 house. What, you don't believe me? Have an open mind!

    3. Re:Oh, huh. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Be afraid, be very afraid.

      IF that were to happen, it'd blow up after about 60 minutes of use - and then you'd realize that it's just the speaker popping. It's a design feature, don't worry about it.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  26. Gentlemen! I present you: The Electric Abacus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm picturing an abacus with 2 watts worth of LEDs, and a cup with a string.

    For wireless data transmission: just yell, or glance at your neighbor's abacus.

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. 3. Profit??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to make any profit with a 10$ notebook is to preinstall shitloads of adware, trial software and other stuff that tries to nag more money out of the user. On a low performance machine, there won't be a lot of memory/clock cycles left to do anything useful.
    When this thing hits the market, it'll probably deliver the most annoying user experience in history.

  29. Re: 10$ laptop with 2GB RAM ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > A $10 laptop (Rs 500) prototype, with 2 GB RAM capacity....

    Honestly 2GB ? If its DDR2, I might as well buy the "laptop" , chuck everything else and use the RAM. Its rather weird how it can be this inexpensive. I'm not sure if India has proper semi-conductor fabs, to make components this cheap - and what about licensing and stuff ?

  30. The purpose of computeres ..... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ,,, is for you to find uses for them.

    That would have been part of the educational experience...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  31. Can we get that price lower? I think we *can*! by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 5, Funny

    A $10 notebook is yet more proof that free markets, competition and Globalization will ensure the future strength prosperity of Western Civilization!

    But can we get that price lower? I think we *can*!

    1.) First, we have to trim the lowest 10% of performers from every organization. (Pay bonuses to executives for doing this effectively.) Tip: trim Human Resources last -- we need them to do the hatchet work while senior management strokes the shareholders and analysts.

    2.) Repeat 1.) a few times and what will remain is a lean and absolutely *amazing* company of workers who do more error-free work with a facial muscle spasm than other schmucks do in 6 months with both hands and 20/20 vision!

    3.) Next, we find cheaper workers. India's labour costs are a big part of that $10. Whom will we get to do the work? EASY... we train bonobos. We don't even have to feed them much -- those suckers are pretty lean.

    4.) Sack all Testing and Quality Assurance people. With our lean, superproductive staff and well-trained bonobos, we won't need to test. And if there's a problem, we'll silence talk of it with legal threats and "promise" to fix the bug(s) in a future release. (Ha ha!)

    5.) Squeeze as much free money as we can out of the government. If the government is Pro-Business, say we're creating new jobs in a cutting-edge market. If the government is Green, say we're saving the bonobos. If it's a coalition, say whatever you have to say no matter how self-contradictory or idiotic.

    6.) Spend cash from 5.) on bribes to steal someone else's technology. R&D is for losers.

    7.) Throw the product over the wall and pump up the advertising! If it fails, lock the workers out and give senior management a round of bonuses. But it won't fail, because using the above strategy, I think we have the $10 notebook down to $2.35.

    Unless of course "$10" is a typo.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:Can we get that price lower? I think we *can*! by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      5.) Squeeze as much free money as we can out of the government. If the government is Pro-Business, say we're creating new jobs in a cutting-edge market. If the government is Green, say we're saving the bonobos. If it's a coalition, say whatever you have to say no matter how self-contradictory or idiotic.

      This is the most important step. Through taxation, anything is possible. We can make a $700 dollar-quality laptop cost $10 in individual payment while expending $2500 dollars per laptop in taxes. And I think we can get this done easily, as most of the countries in the world are run by bonobos themselves.

    2. Re:Can we get that price lower? I think we *can*! by krunchyfrog · · Score: 0

      You forgot

      8.) ???

      9.) Profit!

      --
      printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
      -- myself
    3. Re:Can we get that price lower? I think we *can*! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you understand IBM's new staffing and business model.

    4. Re:Can we get that price lower? I think we *can*! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be a typo. For some reason I don't see the Indian gov handing over $5000 US per institution for a 10 kbps connection.

  32. May I take your order, sir? by mindwanderer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes, I'll have a chicken tikka, garlic naan, and a Rs. 500 laptop.

    --
    :wq
  33. Re: by neptunenitk · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine how they can do it for 10$ and still have 2GB ram. I mean a microcontroller here costs $2 ! Sure would make a nice way to control robots, if they're really going to make it for $10.

  34. Here's a spy shot of the $10 laptop during testing by dusanv · · Score: 1

    Right here.

  35. Lower GDP vs. lower cost of living by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    By most accounts, and the most important of them is the GDP per capita

    Translated into dollars or into Big Macs? There's a difference. Plenty of countries have deeply undervalued currencies, which makes the cost of living in those countries appear a lot cheaper than the cost of a comparable lifestyle in North America, Europe, Japan, or the Republic of Korea. Look up purchasing power parity and The Economist's Big Mac Index in the encyclopedia, and follow the references if you're interested.

    1. Re:Lower GDP vs. lower cost of living by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      RTFA: (from that last link (before the sig))

      In many countries, eating at international fast-food chain restaurants such as McDonald's is relatively expensive in comparison to eating at a local restaurant, and the demand for Big Macs is not as large in countries like India as in the United States. [snip][emphasis added]

      --
      $ make available
    2. Re:Lower GDP vs. lower cost of living by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      That makes the assumption that eating a Big Mac in the slums of a third world country is equivalent to eating a Big Mac in the slums of a first world country. It isn't, not by a long shot.

      In a first world country, even the slums have:

      • A virtually limitless supply of clean drinking water.
      • Halfway decent trash disposal. (I just got back from studying Spanish in Nicaragua, and the level of trash was ridiculous. The good neighborhoods had 3-4 times the amount of litter I'd expect to see in the bad neighborhoods in the states.)
      • Restaurants with enforced food codes. You cannot run a business without at least something resembling proper sanitation in the States. Nicaraguay, an 8 year old delivers tortillas to an entire village, walking on foot from the tortilleria.
      • Halfway competent and honest Law enforcement in general. (Arguable, but in any case much better than in a third world country.)

      So yes, you can buy a Big Mac, and gas, and electricity, and water much cheaper than a third world country. However, the Big Mac is much more likely to give you intestinal parasites, the roads you're driving on are horribly maintained, the electricity comes and goes with the wind, and the water... don't drink the water.

    3. Re:Lower GDP vs. lower cost of living by thaWhat · · Score: 1

      Precisely. It's not about the economy, it's about survival of the masses. C:\>

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a thumb.
    4. Re:Lower GDP vs. lower cost of living by asdir · · Score: 1

      Although I think your's is a valid and important distinction, I would argue that it is beside the point I tried to make: My parent should rely on data and statistics, indices and empirics; not on his/her own subjevtive and probably biased perception.
      As for econometrical nitpicking: What about the GDP pc ppp's fallacies? What about under- or overevaluating bundles of goods because certain goods don't exist in comparable countries (like Rikshaw rides) or cannot be compared due to other circumstances (a fan will less likely be needed in Finland than in Togo)? Similar critique could be applied to the Big Mac index.
      However, in our case I admit that GDP pc ppp is preferable, because adjusting (more or less) badly is better than not adjusting at all. ;-)

  36. Live like animals, or like plants? by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The vast majority of their population still live like animals.

    As opposed to some other country, where the majority of the population live like plants? I guess you're right: too many USA residents have become couch potatoes.

  37. good for homeless by hort_wort · · Score: 0

    This would be wonderful stateside too. There are a lot of homeless people that hang around the public library here looking at porn all day. Imagine if after one day of begging, they could be looking at porn anywhere! Why, they could even look at it at their favorite hangout outside of XXX Liquor!

    Seriously, I went to the library one time to get a copy of "Linux for Dummies", and I felt very out of place....

  38. Re: 10$ laptop with 2GB RAM ?? by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    that's *capacity* not the measly arsed 256MiB it probably comes with...

  39. Undervalued currency? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Over 300 million people in India live on less than a dollar a day.

    All that tells me is the rupee is likely undervalued vs. the USD. What is the relative purchasing power of Rs 49 spent in India vs. $1 spent in the United States? (You can't use the Big Mac index directly because consumption of beef is unpopular in India.)

  40. Re:Hey Congress, when you're in a hole, STOP DIGGI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, we're going to get ourselves out of debt by spending another $820 billion - on top of the already $700+ billion that was approved right before Bush fled office. Can we please elect some people who are familiar with the basic concepts of addition and subtraction?

    I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but...

    The theory behind spending in this way is sound if you accept that the current situation is of a very specific type. Namely, that the economic slump and credit crunch are both persisting, at the core, because of depressed expectations about future economic output. The idea is that perhaps this downturn is more a feedback effect than a legitimate economic failure, such as would occur if there were severe infrastructure problems that fundamentally limited our real potential for wealth creation.

    So the theory goes, our current economic state is under-performing relative to our actual potential output, and since this is just caused by a bad feedback (financial crisis causes credit to freeze, which causes problems for businesses that rely on credit for day-to-day operations, which leads to depressed expected future values, which feeds right back into the financial downturn, etc.), all that needs to happen is to bump the system back against this feedback. In other words, put gobs of money into the system, and it will (artificially, if you wish) increase expected revenues, which will increase valuations, which will make the numbers guys tell the business guys that things are looking better, and the credit markets will open up again, which will help to unclog the arteries of the rest of the economy.

    So it's a perfectly valid theory, and amounts to sacrificing a bit of long term economic performance to (try to) achieve short term stability; considering that "short term" might mean half a decade or more, this is not altogether unreasonable. But it all depends crucially on the assumption that the economy is fundamentally sound and that this is just a departure from its normal operations; if it turns out that what we thought was our "normal" economic state was really the fluke (leverage + credit insanity = unsustainable growth), then it won't help things one bit.

    Of course, if that's the case then we're probably screwed anyways, and a few trillion in debt here and there are the least of our problems.

  41. Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah but will it support Crysis?

  42. $10 laptops? No. Motivational tool? Yes! by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

    For a lot of the reasons already put forward, it seems unlikely that the Indians will be able to deliver a $10 laptop. They are also smart enough to know that people will go only as far as you push them. Give me two weeks to finish a project and guess what, I will use the time available. That's a big part of why Windows is so bloated. Computers are now HUGE, give a developer gigs of RAM and gigs of storage, well guess what, he'll use it! I remember the flight simulator I had on my C64. Can you imagine telling a kid today, "We need a spreadsheet app, and it needs to run on 1 meg of RAM". He'd choke, but in the end might actually do it. Same with India, if they said "we want a $50 laptop", they would wind up with a $75 laptop. $10 is ridiculous, but $25... mebbe not.

  43. The truth behind this laptop... by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    Those crafty Indians. They can't fool me. At $10 per laptop they're fucking selling abacuses.

  44. Shop Around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can now find Scientific calculators (non-graphing) for only $1 US at some dollar stores....

  45. To quote Robocop. by neo · · Score: 1

    I'll buy that for $1.

  46. Rewrite source code - who's going to find out? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    all the licensing, sublicensing, sub-sublicensing costs for all the little parts, protocols, interfaces, patents and so on, are another HUGE chunk of the cost. And if it's not a direct copy, but a rewrite, and all hidden inside one dedicated chip, who is ever going to find out?

    Well, the Linksys Linux is heavily modified (I assume) for their devices (using Broadcom CPUs), but somehow we still found out.

    Anyway, do you really think they'll hide the codes in their firmware? I, for one, hope that they'll open source their stuff.

  47. Why? by thatgun · · Score: 1

    Why make more computers when there are plenty of old computers polluting our environment?

  48. Re:Leverage a MP3 player by freedumb2000 · · Score: 1

    How true. Give me a touchscreen chinese MP4 Player add USB host functionality, LAN and flashable OS and i Have my netbook of choice.

  49. There are cheaper laptops on the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the credit crunch crisis, laptops of Citigroup executives will be soon available on Ebay a dime a dozen, together with the rest of the company.

  50. how much does it cost to make an iTouch? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Apple could probably sell a version for $50 if they put their mind to it. Its peripherals and moving parts that add to cost and an iTouch has little of that. Keep the wireless, but drop the camera and motion sensors.

    1. Re:how much does it cost to make an iTouch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just the markup that brings it up a couple hundred dollars.

    2. Re:how much does it cost to make an iTouch? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      What? Put their mind to it?

      Why would Apple sell it for $50 when they're making a killing selling it for more? No successful company in their right mind would undercut themselves.

      China IS making iTouch type personal entertainment assistants for right around that price mark. Quite a few. Just look on ebay; you'll find 'em.

      Yes, their software mostly sucks; yes, they're often defective or sold deceptively. But if they work, they'll get the job done.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  51. Citation? we don need no steenking citation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As for citations do your own damn research" (Cheerio Boy (82178) )

    You made the claim, You are being asked to back it up. Burden of proof is on you.

    1. Re:Citation? we don need no steenking citation! by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      "As for citations do your own damn research" (Cheerio Boy (82178) )

      You made the claim, You are being asked to back it up. Burden of proof is on you.

      Fair enough my anonymous friend: Here you go.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
  52. Big Macs themselves aren't a perfect example by tepples · · Score: 1

    and the demand for Big Macs is not as large in countries like India as in the United States.

    I was talking about purchasing power parity in general, using Big Mac sandwiches as an example of how to measure purchasing power separately from currency exchange rate. India is a special case, as it is the birthplace of a faith that prohibits consumption of the kind of meat in a Big Mac sandwich. Feel free to substitute another commodity to make an index that's more valid for countries with a large Hindu population.

  53. $10 laptop is easy. by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    $1 for a chalkboard and $9 to hire a group of people to follow you around and do whatever you write.

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. not gonna happen by ovu · · Score: 1

    Intel does not have factories in India

    Plus, critical competitive technologies from US companies are legally forbidden to be exported to untrustworthy countries. India is on that list, by the way.

    Isn't blatant IP ripoff more China's forte anyway?

  56. In other news: by cpscotti · · Score: 1

    Brazil starts development for the $1 laptop. Officials say it will feature no keyboard, just a big click wheel. For that the government will be forced to move a break on Apple Patents for the famous Click Wheel.
    Another Features include:
    *Internet Connection

  57. It can be done - the Indian way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is possible that Indians can sell laptops for $10. Manufacturing costs can be skipped entirely by stealing the laptops from rich westerners.

  58. Re: by Larryish · · Score: 1

    Uh.

    You are sort of missing something.

    I don't know how to say this without feeling like I am painting you with the color "stupid"...

    But...

    Each laptop will have a 2 GB CAPACITY.

    Not 2 GB of RAM out of the box, but will (possibly) allow you to BUY and INSERT more RAM after purchasing the machine.

    In will likely actually ship with the bare minimum RAM to run a tweaked Linux distro, I am thinking maybe...

    640 KB?

    After all, who would ever need more than 640k of memory?

  59. Spokesperson: $10 laptop to cost US$100 after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:

    "Indian government promoted low-cost laptop will cost US$100 and not $10 as earlier stated."

    "A spokesman for Minister of State for Higher Education, D. Purandeswari, said on Wednesday that the price of the laptop would in fact be US$100 rather than $10.

    "In a transcript of the speech delivered by Purandeswari at a conference in Delhi on Tuesday, which was provided by the government's press bureau to reporters, the Minister was quoted as saying that the government aims to provide $10 laptops to students.

    "The transcript has been updated subsequently to reflect the new price of the laptop."

    Read article at: http://www.techworld.com.au/article/255131/india_10_laptop_cost_us_100_after_all
    Note: ad displays before article.

  60. Check out my new sig by bloobamator · · Score: 1

    I am only posting this so that I can check out my new sig. Check it out!

    Oh, and $10 laptops? What does it use for network access, carrier pigeons? (Cue rimshot...)

    --
    "Crude and slow, clansman. Your attack was no better than that of a clumsy child."
  61. Re: 10$ laptop with 2GB RAM ?? by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Still, just the fact it has "2GB capacity" means it has at least one memory slot. I find that rather surprising, as at that price point, I would expect the ram to be soldered directly to the board and no upgrade capacity at all.

  62. Use a MP3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use /v. yuz or, for past tense form of 9, yust; n. yus/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [v. yooz or, for past tense form of 9, yoost; n. yoos] Show IPA Pronunciation
    verb, used, using, noun
    -verb (used with object)
    to employ for some purpose; put into service; make use of: to use a knife.

  63. Re:Hey Congress, when you're in a hole, STOP DIGGI by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

    And this has to do with $10 laptops how?

    --
    I am not devoid of humor.
  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. Can't resist......must....make.....fun...of...name by QKRTHNU · · Score: 0

    Haha, What a name. My guess is that the Sakshat will indeed be a Sak of Shat.

  66. *batteries not included by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    No specifications were revealed but DNA, a daily newspaper, has mentioned that it will be small and portable, will feature Wi-Fi, LAN, and expandable memory, and will operate on 2 watts of power.

    User interface devices and storage media sold separately.

    Seriously, imagine what you could do with a small CCD and a mobile chassis for just one of these babies without those extra items, if not a hundred of them for $1000.

    Now I just need heat-seeking pistol rounds and I can recreate the setting of the movie Runaway.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?