Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Bay Founder Begs For Hacker Ceasefire

Barence writes "Pirate Bay's co-founder has pleaded for hackers to stop attacking the sites of those organizations lined up against him. Peter Sunde is on trial with Pirate Bay's three other founders for allegedly distributing copyrighted material. The trial is about to enter its fourth day, and in a gesture of support for the four men hackers have begun assaulting plaintiff websites, beginning with that of the The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. The campaign has caused concern in the Pirate Bay camp, prompting Sunde to write a post titled 'We're winning, stop hacking, please' on his blog."

243 comments

  1. With friends like these... by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who needs enemies, eh? :P

    1. Re:With friends like these... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cease fire means stop for now because good may come of it, but if it doesn't, the victor is usually the one who strikes first and hard at the end of the cease fire while the enemy is adjusting their shit.

      Or that's my understanding of it, anyways...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:With friends like these... by HartDev · · Score: 1

      Would it be a bad thing to say, "ha ha" simspons style?

      --
      To see a few of my Android apps goto: www.hartwired.com
    3. Re:With friends like these... by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The unfortunate reality is that, depending on what happens, this could conceivably be construed as either (a) evidence of bad faith (which courts really don't like) or (b) an attempt to intimidate plaintiffs or plaintiff witnesses, which would be a MAJOR problem for the defense (who would then be under the gun to prove total noninvolvement).

      Remember: all it takes is one trumped-up charge to slip past the court/jury to make things go down the shitter.

    4. Re:With friends like these... by adamchou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IANAL, but I would imagine that the plaintiff would need to first prove that the assaults on their site are being caused by the defendant, not the other way around.

    5. Re:With friends like these... by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And this is why you are not a lawyer.

      Merely raising the accusation colors perceptions of the defendants. That's why (whenever possible) the defense tries to get their client dressed up in a nice suit and tie, rather than his dailywear, and tries to get him in with a shave/trim to the beard and hair rather than having it look wild and crazy.

      All it takes is one lawyer standing up in front of the jury and saying "and we believe Mr. X's co-conspirators are responsible for attacking our business website..." and it doesn't matter what comes after. People tend to remember the first thing they are told and assign it higher value than any counterargument, as shown by many, many psychological studies. That biases the jury and judge and makes the case harder to win.

    6. Re:With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Merely raising the accusation colors perceptions

      Way back when I was in law school, my criminal law prof used this example to demonstrate the power of accusation (this in the "innocent until proven guilty" category of things):

      How many of you, when you see a cop car go by with someone in the backseat, think "hmmm ... I wonder why that innocent person is in the backseat of a police car?" How many of you think "I wonder what he did?"

    7. Re:With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be the plaintiffs attacking themselves to win the case since they are losing in court.

    8. Re:With friends like these... by yada21 · · Score: 0, Funny

      This is bullshit if anyone is not a lawyer it is you. now IANAL but i know how it work's, i seen them on TV - "objection you're honour". "sustained - jury will disregard".

      One more time and he's case dismissed and\or disbarred for contempt.

      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    9. Re:With friends like these... by adamchou · · Score: 1

      obviously, neither are you. i am replying to your statement...

      (who would then be under the gun to prove total noninvolvement).

      it is the plaintiff's burden to first prove that TPB is associated with the attacks. After which, TPB then needs to prove that they aren't. If the plaintiff tries to bring that up in this case, the defense can simply object to it as the claim has been unsubstantiated.

      additionally, they would need to file a complaint in a separate case to prove this.

      so are you actually a lawyer?

    10. Re:With friends like these... by adamchou · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is bullshit if anyone is not a lawyer it is you.

      thank you, my point exactly

      now IANAL but i know how it work's, i seen them on TV

      LOL

    11. Re:With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of you, when you see a cop car go by with someone in the backseat, think "hmmm ... I wonder why that innocent person is in the backseat of a police car?" How many of you think "I wonder what he did?"

      Ouch, you actually had give a number on that? On an exam? That's tough; I would have no idea how many would think the one and the other, respectively.

    12. Re:With friends like these... by tqk · · Score: 1

      The unfortunate reality is that, depending on what happens, this could conceivably be construed as either (a) evidence of bad faith (which courts really don't like) or (b) an attempt to intimidate plaintiffs or plaintiff witnesses

      ... Or (c) just another new form of astroturfing?

      Maybe that discredited bunch of unlicenced PIs the MAFIAA was using is doing it. Who knows?

      If it's PB supporters doing the cracking, I suspect it'll stop now.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    13. Re:With friends like these... by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IANAL either, but wouldn't his blog post (a public statement) alone be at least some good faith towards disproving that the attacks were not by them? Even if the jury would not regard any counter-argument as highly as the original argument (and the "we're winning" part might just piss them off, frankly), it would at least look good on their part for not being the hackers in question, err, possible question (?).

    14. Re:With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we've done the math to know the dangers of our second guessings

    15. Re:With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend not to think about people in the back seats of cop cars.

    16. Re:With friends like these... by M1rth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sustained - jury will disregard

      ROFLMAO, if you think that a jury actually DOES disregard things like that, you're a loon.

      --
      If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
    17. Re:With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not on an exam -- just rhetorically in class. Now, whenever I see a person in the back of a police car, I tend to think first "I wonder what he did?" and immediately afterward, about this comment from my crim law prof. I suspect a number larger than 50% figure the guy did something, though that is an assumption on my part, not a statistic.

    18. Re:With friends like these... by russotto · · Score: 5, Funny

      ROFLMAO, if you think that a jury actually DOES disregard things like that, you're a loon.

      Which is why the judge should make up some stuff to balance things out.

      "Jury will disregard that remark, and also the allegation that witness for the prosecution was seen fucking a goat."

    19. Re:With friends like these... by Wraithlyn · · Score: 0

      Meh, I dunno. Sure I wonder "what he did", but that doesn't mean I assume he's guilty of breaking the law.

      Obviously he did something to be in the back of a cop car, even if that means simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

      It's only natural to be curious about an arrested person's circumstances, doesn't necessarily imply assumption of guilt, IMHO.

      Then again (and perhaps more to the OP's point) we're talking about average jury members here, not analytical /. geeks. ;)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    20. Re:With friends like these... by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, it would make court transcripts more fun to read.

    21. Re:With friends like these... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      I enjoy watching the Simspons on my Magnetbox TV. Often, I tape the episodes with my Panaphonic VCR.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    22. Re:With friends like these... by MoeDumb · · Score: 1

      Nor will it escape the jury that the defendants call *themselves* the PIRATE Bay. That isn't too bright either.

      --
      Mod Me Up. You'll make a grown man cry.
    23. Re:With friends like these... by anactualfemale · · Score: 3, Funny

      I generally assume that people are usually arrested for little to no reason. I know sometimes that's not the case, but I live in a rural area. My experience with cops has led me to conclude that they are just bullies, and they harass people just out of boredom. The job seems to attract only people who are belligerent, aggressive, opportunistic and nasty. When I see someone in the back of a cop car, I feel a pang of sympathy.

    24. Re:With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [parent] That's why (whenever possible) the defense tries to get their client dressed up in a nice suit and tie, rather than his dailywear

      I've been on a jury. Each time I saw someone uncomfortably sporting a suit my first thought would be, "Oh great, the lawyer thinks the jury are so stupid that dressing him up in smart clothes is going to help his credibility." It certainly didn't work for or against the testimony of the defendant or any of the witnesses, but it did just make me dislike lawyers a little bit more.

      (And the thoroughly bright jury I had the pleasure of deliberating with picked up crap like this too. Actually, the effort by which 10 of the 11 other jurors tried to be thorough and fair beat down the cynical "jurors are all shallow idiots" you get from elitists who think that they belong to a class more suited to judge others' fate.)

      Way back when I was in law school, my criminal law prof ...

      This provides evidence that people who become lawyers have very similar base authoritarian prejudices. This hardly surprises me - it's like testing for pacifism at an army training camp.

      I've no doubt that anyone I know, seeing someone in the back of a cop car, would think, "hmmm ... I wonder what the cop did?"

    25. Re:With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Does Sweden even HAVE a jury system?

    26. Re:With friends like these... by Meneguzzi · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would just like to point out that you are all assuming a common law legal system (i.e. the system used by England and it's former colonies), which has a jury in most cases. That is not the case with Sweden (and in fact, in most countries in the world), which uses Roman civil law, which is much less prone to the whims of a jury (although it suffers from other problems).

      --
      www.meneguzzi.eu/felipe
    27. Re:With friends like these... by qc_dk · · Score: 1

      i've seen many posts like yours and heard many people say the same. I would like to offer a counterpoint, because I very rarely see it expressed.

      I cannot recall I've had a single interaction with the police, where they have not been courteous and professional. Not that I've had a lot of run-ins with the law, but my experience ranges from police in rural Texas through the french border police to the police of my native Denmark. The causes have been from carrying electronics and batteries in my check-in luggage that was flagged as a bomb by the xray to being wanted by the swiss police because they thought I was an illegal immigrant.

    28. Re:With friends like these... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      How many of you, when you see a cop car go by with someone in the backseat, think "hmmm ... I wonder why that innocent person is in the backseat of a police car?" How many of you think "I wonder what he did?"

      Neither response makes much sense. Why would you assume him innocent, or guilty? I would wonder "What happened?"

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    29. Re:With friends like these... by RMH101 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am in the back seat of a cop car, you insensitive clod!

    30. Re:With friends like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be noted, though, that the Swedish court system doesn't have juries. The judge decides. While there may be disadvantages to that, it is considered less likely that irrelevant emotional arguments will affect the verdict.

    31. Re:With friends like these... by LordAlced · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I just lost my MSI Wind after I spewed a mouthful of water onto the keyboard.

      --
      Error: this custom sig failed to load. Please update your user preferences. If this message still appears, please contac
    32. Re:With friends like these... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      The unfortunate reality is that, depending on what happens, this could conceivably be construed as either (a) evidence of bad faith (which courts really don't like) or (b) an attempt to intimidate plaintiffs or plaintiff witnesses, which would be a MAJOR problem for the defense (who would then be under the gun to prove total noninvolvement).

      No, it's only intimidation if you don't follow through. If you follow through, it's assault. Can't say what effect it's going to have on those teenagers, don't really think they're going to give too much of a shit, but it could prove a major problem for the plaintiffs being assaulted by the angry public.

      Doesn't it seem like it's time for these business people, judges, lawyers, etc to retire, permanently, and hand over the reins of power? Seems that way to me...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    33. Re:With friends like these... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I just lost my MSI Wind after I spewed a mouthful of water onto the keyboard.

      Yeah, he got me too. Russotto earned that +5 Funny.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    34. Re:With friends like these... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      My brother was a cop. A rural SD Sheriff. He wrote poetry. He always wanted to be an officer, since he was 5 or so. He was thrilled to help people. He put drunks in jail for the night and made sure they had breakfast in the morning before sending them home. He did education classes at the local schools and put the nose of his pistol to the head of meth makers while they slept to wake them. He had a "You can go to jail or throw your pot and give me your bong for my wall collection" drug policy. His hero was Serpico They aren't all bad. They treat you like you treat them.

      Sera

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    35. Re:With friends like these... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Like peaces of shit unworthy of breathing the same air as him? </advocate type="drug legalization">

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    36. Re:With friends like these... by Meneguzzi · · Score: 1

      I believe there are some situations in which the Roman system uses a jury, but I think it works differently than in the English system.

      --
      www.meneguzzi.eu/felipe
  2. Cease fire by jetsci · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Cease fire boys, we got 'em where we want 'em!" Reminds me of my old Staff. Sergeant. Even if TPB wins, I imagine this will change the front of file-sharing once again and new technology will emerge. I'm just curious what it will be...

    --
    Bored at work? Play Game!
    1. Re:Cease fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Reminds me of my old Staff. Sergeant.

      What's "Staff." short for?

    2. Re:Cease fire by jetsci · · Score: 1
      --
      Bored at work? Play Game!
    3. Re:Cease fire by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Answer the question Claire!

    4. Re:Cease fire by russlar · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious what it will be...

      I predict a revival of the Sneakernet.

      --
      Anybody want my mod points?
    5. Re:Cease fire by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Staffordshire, in England. Stiff upper lip, and all that. Known for it's particularly fierce Sergeants, much like Nepal is known for its Gurkhas, and for its Bull Terriers.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    6. Re:Cease fire by Kagura · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Cease fire boys, we got 'em where we want 'em!"

      ... surrounded from the inside!

    7. Re:Cease fire by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      How about VPNs? With ddwrt having site to site VPN built in, you can tie your media collection with a few friends, and share everything securely.

    8. Re:Cease fire by tacarat · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's "Staff." short for?

      In the military, like most jobs, the staff is always short for funding or recruiting reasons.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    9. Re:Cease fire by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      Staffordshire, in England. Stiff upper lip, and all that. Known for it's particularly fierce Sergeants, much like Nepal is known for its Gurkhas, and for its Bull Terriers.

      What's a Nepalese Bull Terrier like?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    10. Re:Cease fire by 0xygen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the majority of torrent traffic out there, I think we're safe to assume most people are not personal friends with aXXo, RELOADED, Fairlight, Outlaws, KLAXXON, etc etc.

      I see Microsoft are already trying to get market share on your idea though... http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/19/1822236

    11. Re:Cease fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I live there, and I think it's more well known for farmers and cow shit. Hardly one of the posher parts of the UK. :-)

    12. Re:Cease fire by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the right sauce, tastes just like chicken.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    13. Re:Cease fire by wolf12886 · · Score: 1

      most people are not personal friends with aXXo, RELOADED, Fairlight, Outlaws, KLAXXON, etc

      True, but it only takes one leak. The speed at which sought-after information propagates between sub-networks is astounding.

    14. Re:Cease fire by edittard · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's a Nepalese Bull Terrier like?

      Same as any other dog - biscuits, slow cats and the taste of its own genitals.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    15. Re:Cease fire by 0xygen · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much getting back to the old-school "scene" days, where one kid had modem access to sites afar and everyone else leeched copies off them, but also handed them out to their mates at other school / colleges / places of works and someone would inevitably up it to the local BBS.

      The bandwidth of the sneakernet is truly incredible!

    16. Re:Cease fire by scjohnno · · Score: 1

      Give this man a medal.

    17. Re:Cease fire by ScreamingCactus · · Score: 1

      Microsoft are already trying to get market share on your idea though

      It's a trap!!!

      I really don't think this will damage bt that much though, even if they do lose. There are still other countries people can hide servers in. And if this does spell the end for bt, or even hinder it severely, I suspect a lot of people will go back to Gnutella until a less centralized replacement emerges.

      --
      The path to enlightenment is truly through homemade drugs!
    18. Re:Cease fire by daveime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aww come ON !!!

      We need to be able to mod to +10 Funny ... had me in stitches this one.

    19. Re:Cease fire by icebraining · · Score: 1

      It has emerged: it's called the Kad Network, and is implemented in the official eMule client. The only thing it needs is a node already connected to start picking up other nodes. Usually it uses a node taken from a eDonkey server, but any method for picking it up would do, including a known list (like a darknet).

    20. Re:Cease fire by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      You win!

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    21. Re:Cease fire by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      "Cease fire boys, we got 'em where we want 'em!"

      Or as Captain Kirk once said, "We have them just where they want us."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    22. Re:Cease fire by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Same as any other dog - biscuits, slow cats and the taste of its own genitals.

      We need to be able to mod to +10 Funny ... had me in stitches this one.

      No shit. Another poster suggested a "+5 Fucking Epic" mod recently.

      That's the first Slashdot post in some time that got me to laugh out loud.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  3. Boo, This is Court! More Theatrics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We're winning, stop hacking, please"

    I would prefer something more theatrical such as:

    Does it please the court to know that my hand has stayed the executioner's sword from the neck of the prosecution?

  4. Shouldn't affect the case by aliquis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can see how this can affect the general opinion against them but it shouldn't affect the case as such should it?

    Law is law and different opinions or not agreeing with someone else is a totally different thing.

    Understandable how he wants to play nice though.

    1. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by Zironic · · Score: 1

      Since the prosecution is trying to prove intent supporting the hackers would look rather bad.

    2. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by SpeedyDX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It depends on the individual judge. Normally, of course, judges supposed to look at all the evidence and arguments presented, the relevant case law, and use those as the bases for their decision. They do, however, sometimes come up with a decision based on their own biases, then try to work their way backwards and come up with reasons to support their decision. Sometimes it is evident when this type of situation occurs, but you can never really be sure.

      In this case, if the children - err, sorry, hackers - continue their unnecessary and foolhardy assault on these organizations' sites, it may prompt the judge to look at the defendents in a harsher light than necessary. If criminals (or at the very least, immoral hackers) are backing TPB, then why is it a stretch to say that TPB has been assisting in some form of not-perfectly-legal activity?

      I'm not saying this will happen for sure, nor am I saying that it is likely to happen. It is, however, a distinct possibility. The actions of these children - again, sorry, hackers - are putting TPB in a much more difficult situation than they need to be. They are shooting themselves in the foot, and taking TPB down with them.

    3. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      If criminals (or at the very least, immoral hackers) are backing TPB, then why is it a stretch to say that TPB has been assisting in some form of not-perfectly-legal activity?

      Lots of people support TPB, for a variety of reasons. I'd be more surprised to find that "immoral hackers" were underrepresented vs. a random sample of the Internet-using population.

      You can't judge an individual, organization, or movement by its most disreputable supporters. If only "immoral hackers" supported TPB that would be a different story, but such is not the case.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    4. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't be an ass. Maybe his backspace key is fucked up -- oh, sorry, impaired -- or maybe his meatbeaters -- oh, sorry, hands -- are too weak -- again, sorry, atrophied -- to manipulate the larger -- oh, sorry, full figured -- key.

    5. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by gnuASM · · Score: 1

      For all we know, the plaintiffs are orchestrating this themselves for the exact purpose of planting this kind of bias into the judge. I had the prosecution pull stunts like this in 2004 in a case I was involved with. It is far more likely, in my opinion, that the plaintiffs are doing this themselves BECAUSE they are losing, and to defame any possible associations the defendants may have, or to tie them to criminals or those with criminal activity is the only way they have a chance at prosecution.

    6. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is it a stretch to say that TPB has been assisting in some form of not-perfectly-legal activity?

      Nobody disputes that TPB has been assisting in illegal activity. The only question is whether they've done anything illegal themselves. If they themselves have done nothing illegal, then the court won't care what was shared using their trackers - even if 80% of it was snuff child porn with a Britney soundtrack.

      (Of course, if they are acquitted, expect the law to change within months. And expect it to be an international treaty, to stop pesky democracy from changing the law back again at the next election...)

    7. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's some twisted reasoning to consider:

      - TPB claims not responsible for the illegal activities of others.
      - TPB asks hackers to stop hacking TPB's opposition.
      - Hackers obviously don't listen and continue hacking anyway.
      - TPB has effectively proven they have no influence on the illegal activities of others ans as such cannot be held responsible.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by edittard · · Score: 1

      Of course, if they are acquitted, expect the law to change within months. And expect it to be an international treaty, to stop pesky democracy from changing the law back again at the next election...

      The bastards will probably make it retroactive too.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    9. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by Muckluck · · Score: 1

      We are often judged by the company we keep. But then again - who are TPB gonna call for a character witness?

      --


      --I like turtles...
    10. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      If criminals (or at the very least, immoral hackers) are backing TPB, then why is it a stretch to say that TPB has been assisting in some form of not-perfectly-legal activity?

      ahh trying the old guilt by association trick, i call to the stand king kong!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    11. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by Carbon016 · · Score: 1

      As ironic as that would be, if you want to be semantic it's only true if "illegal activities" is solely equal to "hacking". Otherwise it's purely inductive. Otherwise, anyone could get out of the same predicament on paper quite easily. 0. Create a site where users clearly are encouraged to blow up flags and statues of Lincoln or the moon or something suitably illegal and unpopular 1. Claim you're not responsible for the illegal activities of others 2. Ask people to stop turning left on red lights on your blog or something 3. People obviously don't listen and continue turning on red lights 4. You have supposedly proven you have no influence on the illegal activities of others and as such cannot be held responsible

    12. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      I'm not following the actual trial very intently but I'd assume that legal reasoning behind torrents is that they are used to distribute legal software. The most common legal downloads that I have seen mentioned on here are Linux Distributions.

      With some of the Public perception being "OMG LINUX IS WHAT HACKERS USE" one could possibly end up following the logic trail of... Pirate Bay Distributes Linux, Hackers use Linux, Pirate Bay taken to Court, Prosecuting companies are getting Hacked, Supposed Legitimate use of the Pirate Bay is supporting evil criminal hackers.

      In a little way it reminds me of a time about a decade ago when Wisconsin was about to pass a law to lower the drinking age to 19. A bunch of underage drinkers at The University of Wisconsin Oshkosh went out a few nights before the final vote to prove that they could handle their booze just like 21+ year olds could. They ended up breaking street lamps, turning over cars, throwing bricks threw shop windows, etc..... Needless to say the drinking age in Wisconsin is still 21

    13. Re:Shouldn't affect the case by holt · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a risky strategy to me. What if people actually stopped turning left on red?

  5. Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by MisterSquirrel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course, as any decent hacker knows, "Stop hacking please" is just a l33t-speak code message for, "Keep up the good work"!

    1. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by etnoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course, as any decent hacker knows, "Stop hacking please" is just a l33t-speak code message for, "Keep up the good work"!

      Actually, he wrote "We're winning, stop hacking plz", which is much more funny. He also wrote "EPIC WINNING LOL" on Twitter after the first round in the courtroom. And he's the press spokesperson for TPB, :)

      --
      Quantum hacker.
    2. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not like he can officially condone this behavior and expect to win a suit that's based around his support of the hacking community. I say hack on. That way he's demonstrated that he doesn't support the hacking, you've demonstrated that he has no control over you, and maybe these people will learn to quit hassling file sharers.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    3. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by furby076 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "EPIC WINNING LOL"

      So basically he is saying that these hackers are raiding the various wings of these lawsuit organizations. So are the drops purpz or orangez?

      RIAA Wing
      MPAA Wing
      FedGov Wing
      Metallica Wing
      Now who are the two main bosses?

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    4. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      RIAA Wing
      MPAA Wing
      FedGov Wing
      Metallica Wing

      At least one nice thing about the Metallica wing is that it features their old, good songs like "The Four Horsemen". You know, back when they encouraged bootlegging. ;)

      The RIAA Wing is all Britney Spears and the MPAA wing is all John Williams scores. The FedGov Wing just plays the XFiles theme song over and over, which is cool at first but gets kinda old.

      Now who are the two main bosses?

      Good question. Uh... Sonny Bono and Walt Disney?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Why would he even unofficially condone it? It's only effect will be to make some sysadmins work overtime keeping an eye on the server. These corporations treat their web site as a form of advertising, and they aren't going to go away just by taking it down.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    6. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I don't know who the other is, but one of them must be Cats.

      I'll wait, it'll come...

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought more, the pirate bay would have seeded an attack code for all bot nets, and then denied responsibility, by saying all their "fans" supporting them are responsible.
      I love piratebay, but most users are not of the calibur to be able to DDoS attack their competitors or enemies.

    8. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      He said "EPIC" and not "LEGENDARY", so I'm guessing purple. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    9. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOW ARE YOU GENTLEMEN?

    10. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      Sonny Bono and Walt Disney? Why does it always have to be zombies!? Can't these people ever come up with something new?

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    11. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      LOL CATS

      I call this one "Meme Collision":

      "I'm in ur base, breakin' ur zigz."
      "You can has way to destrukshun."
      "You no can has chance to survyv maek ur tiem."
      "KTHXBYE."

    12. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent +1 Funny

    13. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kinda ironic since the principal via of malware infestation is torrents ,but I agree, most users have problems burning "teh isoes" God forbid if you upload FLACs -i0

    14. Re:Stop hacking please, nudge nudge wink wink by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      He isn't really a "real" press spokesperson. That is, it's not like he was hired for big money to speak on their behalf. He just happened to be better at expressing himself than the other TPB admins, so he just ended up as the one speaking on behalf of TPB in public. He's just a "regular guy", so it shouldn't come as a surprise that he expresses himself like one.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  6. Holy Shit! by ericrost · · Score: 2, Informative

    An actual link to a real blog instead of JUST the link to the no analysis ad revenue suckhole article.

    1. Re:Holy Shit! by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

      My point was the link IS there. As opposed to most submissions.

    2. Re:Holy Shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [lol=fail] Should've included sarcasm tags [/lol]

    3. Re:Holy Shit! by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      You mean to tell us you actually made some sort of effort to read the article?

  7. Hacking these sites is futile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Especially RIAA, IFPI, MPAA, et al. Aside from unnecessary negative publicity, taking down these static zero-hit sites accomplishes nothing. Immanuel Kant said it best, "If a site is hacked and no one visits the defaced page, can it be truly considered a hack?"

    1. Re:Hacking these sites is futile by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      Immanuel Kant said it best, "If a site is hacked and no one visits the defaced page, can it be truly considered a hack?"

      He truly was a man ahead of his time!

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    2. Re:Hacking these sites is futile by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Futile, unless the hacks are being done by RIAA, IFPI, MPAA employees.

      False flag operations are no one's exclusive domain.

      --
      I come here for the love
    3. Re:Hacking these sites is futile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially RIAA, IFPI, MPAA, et al. Aside from unnecessary negative publicity, taking down these static zero-hit sites accomplishes nothing. Immanuel Kant said it best, "If a site is hacked and no one visits the defaced page, can it be truly considered a hack?"

      Immanuel Kant was a true pissant who was very rarely stable...

  8. Jeez. . . by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 0, Troll

    What a sell-out. . .

  9. Suspicious by Eudial · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One should be open to the possibility of IFPI "hacking" themselves to gain popular support. It is, after all, instant sympathy. It wouldn't be the first time something like this has happened.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re:Suspicious by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      One should be open to the possibility of IFPI "hacking" themselves to gain popular support. It is, after all, instant sympathy. It wouldn't be the first time something like this has happened.

      Doesn't seem like that would be very effective. The only people who even notice are probably going to be those who already have entrenched opinions on RIAA and company already (pro or con). Is this going to make it onto general news anywhere?

      Not only that, but how would this be relevant to the actual case?

      I don't actually know the answers to those questions, they weren't entirely hypothetical.

    2. Re:Suspicious by Eudial · · Score: 1

      Even if the trial outcome may not be affected, there is also a war of opinion outside the courtroom (at least in Sweden, where the copyright issue gets a lot of media space, partially due to the pirate party). And the undeniable effect of moves like this is that

      * There is an appearance of dissent amongst the pirates, that they are unreliable and can't even agree with themselves.

      * The poor copyright lobby looks like it's a victim to savage internet-hoodlums with no respect for the law or society.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    3. Re:Suspicious by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be the first time something like this has happened.

      What is the first time something like this has happened?

    4. Re:Suspicious by Eudial · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be the first time something like this has happened.

      What is the first time something like this has happened?

      The earliest account of the method I can find on it's wikipedia article dates back to WWII, but the method in one form or another probably predates modern propaganda warfare.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    5. Re:Suspicious by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Very slim possibility, I should say. They have little chances of gaining support even if they covertly organize kidnapping of their own children.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    6. Re:Suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It _is_ very effective.
      I went to their site today to see what labels are IFPI members, so I could avoid them, but I couldn't get to their site!!

      Luckily, Google had it cached, so I could see the list. And it's a long list, IFPI is like RIAA++.

    7. Re:Suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > instant sympathy

      I'm feeling a curiously complete absence of sympathy. My sympathy module might be broken. :P

    8. Re:Suspicious by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      If the IFPI really want sympathy, they should try executing all of the upper management. If that doesn't work, then we can reconvene to discuss further options.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    9. Re:Suspicious by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      Very slim possibility, I should say. They have little chances of gaining support even if they covertly organize kidnapping of their own children.

      Good point. But what's really suspicious to me is that the "hacking" didn't start at the beginning of the trial, although there was plenty of advance notice. It only started after half the charges were dropped.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  10. Hacked by themselves? by tigre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comments towards the end of TFA suggest the hackings may be sponsored by the IFPI/MPAA so as to make the Pirate Bay look bad. It would be amusingly absurd to see counter-hacking by TPB supporters keeping the "enemy" sites up.

    1. Re:Hacked by themselves? by The_R_Meister · · Score: 1

      So if they keep hacking, what does that say about the hackers? Are the hackers sponsored by the IFPI, meaning they'd never listen to a request from the Pirate Bay? Or are they really just clever Pirate Bay hackers masquerading as IFPI hackers, in which case, they still wouldn't listen? Or could they possibly be IFPI hackers pretending to be Pirate Bay hackers masquerading as IFPI hackers?? It's so simple, really - all you have to do is divine from what you know of hackers ...

    2. Re:Hacked by themselves? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 3, Funny

      hacker1: finally we got root!
      hacker2: what i thought they were a windows box?
      hacker1: not anymore, dos a load-balanced Lighttpd cluster bitches!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    3. Re:Hacked by themselves? by tigre · · Score: 1

      I can clearly not choose the server in front of you.

  11. don't be a dumbass by ArcSecond · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it amusing that the same mind that could be outraged at the prosection of "four innocent men... accused of copyright infringement" would then go on to say "we urge the public to boycott and lynch those responsible".

    Boycott, sure. Protest, fine. Even a little creative vandalism is good. But lynching?

    I would say someone has their priorities out of whack. Either they haven't thought this through or they are just *that* dumb that they would offer "support" to someone on trial by calling for violence against the plaintiffs.

    I thought hackers were supposed to be ingenious and creative thinkers. Not the equivalent dumbass jocks on a rampage.

    --

    I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

    1. Re:don't be a dumbass by furby076 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought hackers were supposed to be ingenious and creative thinkers. Not the equivalent dumbass jocks on a rampage.

      Years of repression in highschool locker rooms by the sports jocks breeds creative thoughts of violence in the adult hacker community.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    2. Re:don't be a dumbass by hardburn · · Score: 1

      The kiddies are that dumb. In times past, they'd be stealing booze and porn from convenience stores. These days, they make botnets. Neither one takes a great deal of imagination, given the prewritten botnet tools floating around.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    3. Re:don't be a dumbass by D+Ninja · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought hackers were supposed to be ingenious and creative thinkers. Not the equivalent dumbass jocks on a rampage.

      I think it's interesting that "hackers" are supposed to be so much better/smarter than "dumbass jocks." Really, consider the comparison.

      Dumbass jocks - Their turf is real life.
      Hackers - Their turf is computers.

      You get either group on their own turf, they're going to act very similar. Heck, all hackers and jocks are human, so, when put in the right situation, they're going to react similarly (ala Lord of the Flies). No reason to expect one group to be "better" than the other.

    4. Re:don't be a dumbass by rob_benson · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was thinking "lynch them". boycotting, protesting, and vandalism leave witnesses.

    5. Re:don't be a dumbass by Quothz · · Score: 1

      Heck, all hackers and jocks are human, so, when put in the right situation, they're going to react similarly (ala Lord of the Flies). No reason to expect one group to be "better" than the other.

      You... you understand that Lord of the Flies is fiction, right? You can't use it as an example of human behavior. But I'm inclined t'agree with you, even so. Valuing knowledge and information doesn't give moral superiority over valuing physical prowess, although I think the intellectual crowd tends to reach a (relatively) mature ethic earlier in life.

    6. Re:don't be a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerdrage FTL.

    7. Re:don't be a dumbass by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a lynching is not very creative...

      now if they had said, 'chop off thier balls and ram them down thier throats, then fileshare a recording of thier last moments as they die in pain, being sure to utilise dynamic range compression to make the sounds of them thrashing about in thier final moments before the lack of oxygen and blood loss kill them sound annoyingly louder than whatever was played immediately before it'

      That would have been a start...

    8. Re:don't be a dumbass by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know it's fiction. I wasn't using it as an example of behavior. I was using it because it's relatively common and most people understand what it's trying to show. (And, as many a natural disaster has shown, people do revert back to "survival mode" - from the rich to the poor - when put in the right situations.)

      As for your comment:

      although I think the intellectual crowd tends to reach a (relatively) mature ethic earlier in life.

      I'm curious as to what you mean by "ethic." My only remark is that, if you're part of the intellectual crowd, you may be bias. (I'm part of the same crowd though and my gut instinct is that, an intellectual crowd will think through things more and come to more advanced conclusions...but that's without any sort of scientific backing. And, of course, I am biased as well.)

    9. Re:don't be a dumbass by Quothz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is me:

      although I think the intellectual crowd tends to reach a (relatively) mature ethic earlier in life.

      This ain't:

      I'm curious as to what you mean by "ethic." My only remark is that, if you're part of the intellectual crowd, you may be bias.

      Fair enough. As t'my bias, I'm the artistic type. I reckon I relate to the thinky types more closely than the jocks. And I was typing out of my ass, with no peer-type review backing me up. It's based entirely on my own observation and reflection.

      As t'what I mean, I think the intellectual crowd, broadly speaking, tends to have a better understanding at a young age of how their actions affect others and a stronger sense of sympathy. That is, they seem to be less inclined to cause harm, and more likely to see any potential harm in their actions. That's far from universal, of course, but in a very broad, loose way, I do believe it's the case. Hey, when's the last time an academic fraternity or chess club got in trouble for hazing?

    10. Re:don't be a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their! Their, their, their!

      I would have let one or two occurrences of "thier" pass without comment, but not four in a single sentence!

    11. Re:don't be a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hacking a website is hardly violence. The TPB gus and others have been harrassed by the media industry very badly. Sooner or later, if you push, something has to give.

    12. Re:don't be a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better than they're. or there.

    13. Re:don't be a dumbass by furby076 · · Score: 1

      now if they had said, 'chop off thier balls and ram them down thier throats, then fileshare a recording of thier last moments as they die in pain, being sure to utilise dynamic range compression to make the sounds of them thrashing about in thier final moments before the lack of oxygen and blood loss kill them sound annoyingly louder than whatever was played immediately before it'

      I hope I am not on any list of yours man. I am thinking of Billy Madison, and you're Steve Bucheme.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    14. Re:don't be a dumbass by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      better than they're. or there.

      Dude, we're talking The Pirate Bay here ... it's thar!.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  12. The Revolution Will Not Be Televised.... by Phoenixhawk · · Score: 5, Funny

    It will however be available as a torrent :)

    1. Re:The Revolution Will Not Be Televised.... by CMF+Risk · · Score: 1

      Can I get a Pre-Air leak of it?

  13. Re:Good Christ.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I hope English isn't your first language.

  14. KingKong, part II by EGenius007 · · Score: 1

    This goes nicely with their King Kong defense, though. "See, we can't control what our supporters are doing to your web sites, just like we can't control the information that's getting posted on our forums. If you're going to accuse us of copyright infringement, you might just as well accuse us of hacking."

    --
    I know what you did last summer. Just kidding, I don't work at the NSA.
  15. Couldn't they... by Terrorwrist · · Score: 0

    just download that torrent I think it was called "antihacker.rar"? You just unzip the rar and install that in there www root server folder.

  16. ah, Slashdot Asperger's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently we can't recognize a little tongue-in-cheek hyperbole? Sigh...

    No, really. They were calling for murder. Right. Keep on believing that, dear.

  17. Swedish chef lives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you read the article, if you want a good laugh, feed the blog post comments through text to speech software. It sounds like the Swedish chef.

    Apologies to Swedish people, about that, but not about the Swedish chef.

  18. alternate motivation by bugi · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure that the attacks are intended as support of TPB's founders, beloved by all though they are, so much as protest against abuse of the legal system by IFPI et al.

    After all, copyrights aren't an entitlement as IFPI are claiming, but an incentive for them to open "their" creations for the common good. They're just trying to extort an increased scope for the standard bribe. Who wouldn't object to that?

  19. Its like Lafayette's plea to the french people by unity100 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    after 1789. to stop violence.

    they liked him ( he is the lead of the group who worked on and wrote declaration of the rights of man ), respected him, but they were SO fed up with aristocracy and what they lived in their hands that noone heeded the pleas to stop violence against aristocrats.

    its something like that. 3% of the population is trying to suppress 97% of the population like those times. 3% is the corporations and the i.p. industry, and 97%, the people, like the last time.

    i dont need to remind you what happened after 1792.

    1. Re:Its like Lafayette's plea to the french people by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      i dont need to remind you what happened after 1792.

      1793?

    2. Re:Its like Lafayette's plea to the french people by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gah! Can't you at least put a spoiler alert in your subject?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Its like Lafayette's plea to the french people by RoverDaddy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I suggest you avoid looking at your desk calendar or the whole rest of the year will be ruined for you.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    4. Re:Its like Lafayette's plea to the french people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont need to remind you what happened after 1792.

      1793?

      1793-01-01 00:00 -- 2009-02-19 17:35 ?

    5. Re:Its like Lafayette's plea to the french people by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      1793?

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

      Those bastards! What were they thinking?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Its like Lafayette's plea to the french people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparisons of IP and the aristocracy are completely wrong. The aristocracy took their money from the people through obligatory taxes. The IP companies built something and individual people agreed to trade with them (aka capitalism). Perhaps a better analogy would be that the 97% of non-farmers are attacking the 3% of farmers because they refuse to pay anything more than "free" for food, while manufacturing arguments like "food should be free", without much though thought to those who created it in the first place.

      (I should add, as a poor, independent software developer who hopes to actually earn a living writing software, that I am apparently part of your evil aristocracy oppressing the common people. I resent that comparison.)

    7. Re:Its like Lafayette's plea to the french people by unity100 · · Score: 1

      the method doesnt matter, the end result matters.

      as of this point there is an established powerhouse of distribution and intellectual property. they are a handful of people, and they basically decide wherever market and even trends go. they can make or break stars. they can buy laws and buy enforcement.

      this is the end result. it doesnt matter whether they acquired it through some long standing tradition of a belief god given rights, or by increasingly manipulating and cornering the market.

      and you are no part of that aristocracy, if you pardon the offense here. your position as a software developer trying to earn a living on software, is the position of d'artagnan who is trying to make a career and living out of his sword, in employ of Louis XIII first, and Louis XIV later. despite being a novel, it actually pictures many frenchmen's lives in those centuries - trying to benefit from the 'trickle down' effect, which never trickled. an aristocratic system, regardless of the means it was acquired, does not reward or even like outsiders or outsiders trying to rise in ranks.

      you are one of the people. you are one of us. your benefits, your profit, your fate is tied to ours. you should remember that.

  20. makes me wonder by castironpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why would hackers be targeting those sites now instead of hitting them 24/7/365? It's not like these organizations were good and then all of a sudden became evil when they brought TPB to court.

    Besides, who really cares about their websites? If the hackers really wanted to get the job done then every employee of every one of those organizations would have nothing but goatse in their inbox from now until the day they resign.

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
    1. Re:makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a suggestion ?
      You would want to edit it slightly and rename it each time you send it,so they couldn't just implement a global block, and then put it in as a picture on seemingly legitimate queries : -
      "When is this album by the backstreet boys coming out ? GOATSE !!!"
      "Can I use this picture of Jack Valenti in my newsletter ? GOATSE !!!"
      "I have this group photo of the RIAA lawyers, can tell me who is the one in the middle please ? GOATSE !!O!!"

  21. Re:Boo, This is Court! More Theatrics! by tacarat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd mod you up strictly for my love of flowery bullshit phrasing.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  22. trail of innocent people by fermion · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What I found most interesting was the report that one defacement included a complaint that innocent people were on trail. I though the idea that only guilty people are tried was an United States philosophy, along with idea that defense lawyers sole purpose was to get the guilty off on technicalities.

    In fact, as annoying as the trial is, this is how a court system should work. There is an ambiguity in law. The copyright owners believe that one is true, the Pirate Bay believes another thing is true. Rather than complaining that the process of justice is moving along, we should be thankful that we live in a world where somewhere such a process is available, and the Pirate Bay was not just summarily destroyed and the people involved were not just summarily fined to oblivion, which is what happens in America.

    I hope that the rest of the world is not being infected with the meme of the court system as a tool of the criminal, because it is sure nice to have an place where a relatively impartial educated person can hear and adjudicate on legitimate differences of opinion.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:trail of innocent people by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The copyright holders I keep hearing about continue to believe shit that has been struck down again and again. Apparently this case opened with a speech by the prosecution saying that the purpose of copyright was to ensure artists get paid and can control the use of their work. This has never been true and has been made abundantly clear by every court in the world that this is *not* the purpose of copyright. It exists solely to benefit the public in ways that a lack of copyright supposedly would not. As soon as the prosecution got up saying that shit the judge should have found him in contempt and thrown out the case. He's misleading the court and that shit should not be tolerated.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:trail of innocent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean trial, right? Or is there a hiking trail somewhere?

      And we pretty much have to put anyone who looks guilty enough on trial to figure out whether they're innocent or guilty. I mean, how would you design a system that figures out whether people are guilty or not before you have the trial? Have Monty Python test them for being a witch?

    3. Re:trail of innocent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The copyright holders I keep hearing about continue to believe shit that has been struck down again and again. Apparently this case opened with a speech by the prosecution saying that the purpose of copyright was to ensure artists get paid and can control the use of their work. This has never been true and has been made abundantly clear by every court in the world that this is *not* the purpose of copyright.

      It is in Sweden.

      Why do you think such a tiny population has the second biggest music industry in the world -- incentives (who do you think produce all that crap Americans listen to).

    4. Re:trail of innocent people by dissy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is in Sweden.
      Why do you think such a tiny population has the second biggest music industry in the world -- incentives (who do you think produce all that crap Americans listen to).

      I thought it came from China, like all the rest of our stuff ;P

    5. Re:trail of innocent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently this case opened with a speech by the prosecution saying that the purpose of copyright was to ensure artists get paid and can control the use of their work. This has never been true and has been made abundantly clear by every court in the world that this is *not* the purpose of copyright.

      [citation needed]

    6. Re:trail of innocent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but I have read a law journal or two. This thinking that copyright is for the benefit of the public (and essentially a tool of economic incentive) may be the thinking under US law, but the Europeans don't agree. In certain EU countries (I want to say france and germany) copyright is considered a moral right of authors to control their work (its distribution and modification primarily), and does not follow this economic reasoning. If you're interested to see how this has affected American interpretations of copyright law,
      http://www.harvardilj.org/print/58?sn=0&PHPSESSID=3dd7cab394325a519a902f04d8172bad

    7. Re:trail of innocent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, you are discussing copyright, which is a US concept and does not exist in most European law. Here, the laws are based on (in translation from Norwegian) "Rights to your mind's productions", and is philosophically much more tied to artist's control than to benefit to society.

      I believe the concept is roughly the same in Sweden, though I know much less of their laws and their origins than I know of Norwegian law.

    8. Re:trail of innocent people by zobier · · Score: 1

      "Rights to your mind's productions"

      So it's like "Imaginary Rights" then.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    9. Re:trail of innocent people by hobbit · · Score: 1

      Hang on, I'm confused. Was the shit about some shit more shit than the other shit, or was the first shit's shit the most shit?

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    10. Re:trail of innocent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I though the idea that only guilty people are tried was an United States philosophy

      Look, if we knew in advance that someone wasn't guilty, there wouldn't be much point of a trial, would there? The purpose of a trial is to determine guilt and innocence.

      along with idea that defense lawyers sole purpose was to get the guilty off on technicalities.

      A better description of our philosophy is that it is better a guilty man go free, than an innocent man be imprisoned.

    11. Re:trail of innocent people by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Hang on, I'm confused. Was the shit about some shit more shit than the other shit, or was the first shit's shit the most shit?

      George Carlin, is that you? Oh yeah, that's right ...

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    12. Re:trail of innocent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently this case opened with a speech by the prosecution saying that the purpose of copyright was to ensure artists get paid and can control the use of their work. This has never been true and has been made abundantly clear by every court in the world that this is *not* the purpose of copyright. It exists solely to benefit the public in ways that a lack of copyright supposedly would not.

      I'm unclear on your argument. The purpose of copyright was to improve society by incentivizing creators to create. Without copyright, creators could not hold-on to their work, or make much money from it because anyone could duplicate it. Thus, no copyright = less money for authors = no/few authors could afford to write for a living = fewer books = society is worse off because it has fewer books, fewer authors, fewer intellectuals. Copyright helps in the creation of intellectual/creative works.

    13. Re:trail of innocent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, cause he never said piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, or tits.

  23. Re:Good Christ.... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Are you kidding me? One of the first people you blame is the opponents of file sharing? Get real - these are often the same folk who go to black hat conventions, and spend their spare time devising attacks on software - I think it's far more logical that people doing things like this are very much the fans of TPB.

    "Little stupid scriptkiddie somewhere that doesn't understand" is also a bit of a reach. All the more "mature" warez/sceners know far better than to do this kind of thing, right?

  24. woops, I misread that... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    in a gesture of support for the four men hackers have begun assaulting plaintiff websites, beginning with that of the The International Federation of the Pornographic Industry.

    And I'm not that into pr0n, either.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:woops, I misread that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with you? Are you blind?!? (Looks at user name) Uh... never mind! Sorry... I have to go now.

  25. Brilliant ploy by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another take on this is to let a wider sympathetic audience know that there is hacking going on. By giving more people the idea, they are probably insuring that a new wave of attacks on the plaintiffs' internet assets will occur.

    By stating this as a plea to cease, they also get to claim that they have no control or involvement in any illegal hacking that is occurring. The can adopt the moral high ground and demonstrate that they are trying to curtail illegal activity being perpetrated by less savory individuals.

    Well played, sir. Well played.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  26. Sorry, cant have it both ways by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Either you support vigilante actions or you don't.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Sorry, cant have it both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hacking websites is illegal (Unathorized access etc.).
      Indexing, linking and storing the result of mathematical operations isn't.

    2. Re:Sorry, cant have it both ways by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Hacking websites is illegal (Unathorized access etc.).

      May be illegal. The New World Order hasn't become quite that all-encompassing yet. It gets even more complicated when you're cracking a site in another country.

      Indexing, linking and storing the result of mathematical operations isn't.

      Depends upon where you are. The laws of various countries are still struggling to figure out how to deal with the Internet. By and large they're not doing a very good job of it, that's true.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  27. Fighting fire with fire.... by VinylRecords · · Score: 4, Informative

    How many times has the MPAA or RIAA been linked with hiring hackers to DOS attack torrent websites or upload releases that contain viruses or malformed software in them?

    RIAA hired hackers to infect P2P users and websites
    http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2003/01/15/riaa-denounces-claim-it-hired-hackers-to-attack-p2p-systems

    TorrentSpy says MPAA paid man $15,000 to hack and disrupt TorrentSpy's network
    http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/7583.cfm

    The hackers are only responding appropriately in this case.

    The Swedish government put The Pirate Bay in court and TPB responded appropriately by hiring lawyers and civilly appearing for trial.

    The MPAA and RIAA hacked and disrupted P2P networks and so hackers fought back using the same exact methods.

    Is hacking the MPAA or RIAA good? Not at all. But they started this nonsense both in and out of court with lawsuits and hiring people to illegally hack and disrupt networks.

    1. Re:Fighting fire with fire.... by houghi · · Score: 1

      But they started this ...

      Excactly the same argument I used when fighting my brother and sister when they were 7 and 6 and I was 8.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  28. if you're going to hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doing something quiet and sneaky would be far more useful than a childish site defacement.

    Don't just do the electronic equivalent of scrawling "you suck" on their wall, rifle through their filing cabinets. Grab and leak copies of their email archives showing record exec's scummy behaviour - screwing over various artists, cocaine deals going down etc. (believe me the industry is full of drugs). Find details of their strategic pro-copyright-monopoly plans and counter them. If you can, find private keys they're using for encryption and DRM.

  29. Monty Python... by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    I have visions of the Crimson Permanent Assurance coming alongside the Very Big Corporation of America and hitting it with cannonades, full broadside.

    Argh! Call of your dogs, yee scurvy pirates!

    1. Re: Monty Python... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And while you're at it, call off your dogs, too!

  30. Cui Bono? by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The way I see it, the plaintiff saw half the charges being dropped on the first day, panicked, and then defaced their own site to drum up some sympathy, knowing that it would put TPB in a bad light.

    --
    Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  31. Re:Good Christ.... by Skrapion · · Score: 2, Informative

    What the GP is suggesting is a conspiracy theory, that the opponents to file sharing hired some hackers to attack their own sites, under the assumption that everybody will suspect TPB is behind the attack and that it will ruin TPB's credibility.

    Now, I don't prescribe to this conspiracy theory, but the opponents to file sharing aren't as adverse to hiring hackers as you seem to think.

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  32. Bishop Berkeley, not Kant by Mathinker · · Score: 2, Informative
  33. Wow... old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OLD NEWS... geez this only happened almost two days ago. People submitted events of the hack on ifpi.se within minutes of the hacking (it was still live) but Slashdot waits to post news that is over a day and a half old.

    Guess I must still be new here. ;)

  34. Sounds like good evidence to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is perfect proof that the majority of PB users are kids who have more time than money. The media industries are NOT losing any potential sales to these people.

  35. The human mind is funny by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    The human mind is actually funny. We all think we can juggle multiple variables, and only look at the important, but the cruel (and proven by studies) reality is that everything gets dragged towards the value of "how much I like or dislike that guy on the whole." That overall opinion isn't an average of the individual and independently-evaluated values, but rather the other way around, a value that gets averaged into all the others.

    It works equally well for:

    - humans. If person X really likes person Z, the same personality traits will be given a big positive delta. "Yeah, he's outspoken, but we need people who call things as they are. And yeah, he finishes his projects later than other people, but he's a perfectionist and you can't rush quality. And maybe some bugs slip past his tests, but it's inevitable in this line of work." If person Y really hates Z, the same things get a big negative delta in their perception. "He's rude and lazy, and his programs are so buggy you have to wonder if he even tried starting them before committing in CVS." Which is why being the boss's best buddy actually works.

    - companies and products. Fanboy flamewars are probably the best illustration of it at work. You see extreme deltas applied in their perception, so the same thing (which is probably not even important for anyone else) becomes pure perfection and even God couldn't have done it better to one camp, and the work of Satan to the other camp.

    - games. E.g., see all the people who swore that everything about WoW is perfection when they liked it, and flipped to swearing that every single aspect or design decision is pure evil and only deluded idiots like it, when they eventually got bored of the game.

    Etc.

    Or to put it otherwise, there's a reason why everyone from Bill Gates to some obscure singer tries to whitewash their PR image, by means varying from posing as the great philanthropist (e.g., Bill Gates) to milking some compassion (e.g., Michael Jackson.) Because while we _should_ be evaluating the products based on their individual merits, liking the guy actually makes you like his products too, and hating him makes you find more faults in his products.

    What I'm trying to get to is: judges and _especially_ juries should judge the facts independent of any other factors, but they're still humans like the rest of us. Many a case (again, especially when it involved a jury) ended up actually being judged by how well one likes the defendant, or by which lawyer is more charismatic.

    So it's probably a good idea to avoid being perceived in some unsympathetic light, e.g., as "one of those evil hackers."

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:The human mind is funny by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      You are so correct.

      Dale Carnegie noticed close to a hundred years ago that we make decisions emotionally and then we weight the facts to support that decision.

      If someone likes you, they weigh down bad facts and up good facts.

      If you take the time to truly know and like them, then your actions will naturally follow to their benefit.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:The human mind is funny by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > - games. E.g., see all the people who swore that everything about WoW is perfection when they liked it, and flipped to swearing that every single aspect or design decision is pure evil and only deluded idiots like it, when they eventually got bored of the game.

      WOW is the McDonald's of MMO's. Just because millions like it doesn't mean its quality food.

      Its initial designers didn't have a fucking clue about dead-time. At least they are slowly learning.

    3. Re:The human mind is funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . becomes pure perfection and even God couldn't have done it better to one camp, and the work of Microsoft to the other camp.,/quote>

      There, fixed that for you.

    4. Re:The human mind is funny by Dracil · · Score: 1

      I've read of a study where people are given two identical socks and asked to pick which they like better and why. People will often pick the right sock and then come up with all sorts of rationalization as to why it's better.

    5. Re:The human mind is funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or to put it otherwise, there's a reason why everyone from Bill Gates to some obscure singer tries to whitewash their PR image, by means varying from posing as the great philanthropist (e.g., Bill Gates)...

      Uhhh... Bill Gates has given over $28 billion to charity as of 2007. Just saying, I think he's doing more than "posing" as a great philanthropist...

    6. Re:The human mind is funny by Friggo · · Score: 1

      And how much of those $28 billion was in cash and how much of it was in licenses?

    7. Re:The human mind is funny by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      They also find that if the people had to suffer / pay more to get / keep one of the socks, they would want it more.

      Part of the reason people stay in abusive relationships apparently.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    8. Re:The human mind is funny by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Because while we _should_ be evaluating the products based on their individual merits, liking the guy actually makes you like his products too, and hating him makes you find more faults in his products.

      Does that include John W. "Try my product!" Scherer of Video Professor fame? I can't stand that dipstick, and I wouldn't "try his product" for that reason alone.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:The human mind is funny by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      Which is the philosophical equivalent to "Sorry you are pregnant with my spawn, here is $100k"

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  36. We are Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are Anonymous. We are legion. We are one. We do not forgive. We do not forget.

    1. Re:We are Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are boring. We are stupid. We like attention. We are wanker trolls. Ho Hum.

  37. in reverse order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its Bull Terriers

    Right.

    its Gurkhas

    Right.

    it's particularly fierce Sergeants

    Wrong.

  38. Who's next? by ToNoTo13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, if they are found guilty, what's to stop "interest groups" from going after gun manufacturer's next saying that they are enabling criminals? And after that auto manufacturer's for enabling drunk drivers for after all without cars we wouldn't have drunk drivers. Whatever happened to personal responsibility and holding the actual criminals responsible for their actions?

    1. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next up: making sure file sharing for personal use is not a crime.

    2. Re:Who's next? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      So, if they are found guilty, what's to stop "interest groups" from going after gun manufacturer's next saying that they are enabling criminals? And after that auto manufacturer's for enabling drunk drivers for after all without cars we wouldn't have drunk drivers.
      Whatever happened to personal responsibility and holding the actual criminals responsible for their actions?

      You forget, those are merely the lives of people who make less than 250,000 US dollars a year, and this is the revenue for large corporations.

      One of these things is worth more than the other. /sarcasm

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    3. Re:Who's next? by ProfM · · Score: 1

      So, if they are found guilty, what's to stop "interest groups" from going after gun manufacturer's next saying that they are enabling criminals?

      Taking this one step further ... I could then go after the RIAA for "disturbing music" like Gangsta Rap and such.

      And don't forget to go include MPAA for ANY of these movies ... it will drive a normal person to commit multiple acts of violence.

    4. Re:Who's next? by Axess+Denyd · · Score: 1

      ...they used to go after gun manufacturers all the time. The only thing that stopped them was a law passed under Bush, The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms act. (that is a rather crappy Wikipedia entry, but you get the idea)

      Unfortunately, because Illinois is evil, they continue to bring lawsuits against gun companies, for the crime of...making guns.

      Personal responsibility? You must be new here.

      --
      ---- Watch out for snakes!
  39. I know... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 4, Funny

    With friends like these, who needs enemies, eh? :P

    Canadians

  40. The BitTorrent WILL put you in the driver's seat.. by jeko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...but the Revolution will not be televised. It probably, however, will show up on YouTube on your iPhone. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqWMmwH4p6w

    Even when I was so incredibly young and fiercely stupid that I was living in Houston and voting Republican, I still had enough of an ear to smile at the voice behind that poem.

    For you poor bastards who came of age during the time of Bush, here's a brother who suffered under the time of Nixon, by way of a Reagan victim.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Revolution_Will_Not_Be_Televised

    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    You will not be able to stay home, brother.
    You will not be able to plug in, turn on and cop out.
    You will not be able to lose yourself on skag and skip,
    Skip out for beer during commercials,
    Because the revolution will not be televised.

    The revolution will not be televised.
    The revolution will not be brought to you by Xerox
    In four parts without commercial interruptions.
    The revolution will not show you pictures of Nixon
    blowing a bugle and leading a charge by John
    Mitchell, General Abrams and Spiro Agnew to eat
    hog maws confiscated from a Harlem sanctuary.
    The revolution will not be televised.

    The revolution will not be brought to you by the
    Schaefer Award Theatre and will not star Natalie
    Woods and Steve McQueen or Bullwinkle and Julia.
    The revolution will not give your mouth sex appeal.
    The revolution will not get rid of the nubs.
    The revolution will not make you look five pounds
    thinner, because the revolution will not be televised, Brother.

    There will be no pictures of you and Willie May
    pushing that shopping cart down the block on the dead run,
    or trying to slide that color television into a stolen ambulance.
    NBC will not be able predict the winner at 8:32
    or report from 29 districts.
    The revolution will not be televised.

    There will be no pictures of pigs shooting down
    brothers in the instant replay.
    There will be no pictures of pigs shooting down
    brothers in the instant replay.
    There will be no pictures of Whitney Young being
    run out of Harlem on a rail with a brand new process.
    There will be no slow motion or still life of Roy
    Wilkens strolling through Watts in a Red, Black and
    Green liberation jumpsuit that he had been saving
    For just the proper occasion.

    Green Acres, The Beverly Hillbillies, and Hooterville
    Junction will no longer be so damned relevant, and
    women will not care if Dick finally gets down with
    Jane on Search for Tomorrow because Black people
    will be in the street looking for a brighter day.
    The revolution will not be televised.

    There will be no highlights on the eleven o'clock
    news and no pictures of hairy armed women
    liberationists and Jackie Onassis blowing her nose.
    The theme song will not be written by Jim Webb,
    Francis Scott Key, nor sung by Glen Campbell, Tom
    Jones, Johnny Cash, Englebert Humperdink, or the Rare Earth.
    The revolution will not be televised.

    The revolution will not be right back after a message
    about a white tornado, white lightning, or white people.
    You will not have to worry about a dove in your
    bedroom, a tiger in your tank, or the giant in your toilet bowl.
    The revolution will not go better with Coke.
    The revolution will not fight the germs that may cause bad breath.
    The revolution will put you in the driver's seat.

    The revolution will not be televised, will not be televised,
    will not be televised, will not be televised.
    The revolution will be no re-run brothers;
    The revolution will be live.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  41. TPB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The TPB is victorious. I knew they'd win.

  42. Re:Figures by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

    Summary judgment can only be ordered if either party is unable to make a case. Judges cannot impose summary judgment simply on a whim. At best, this might be grounds for sanctioning TPB's lawyers, but I don't know how that works over in Sweden.

    --
    If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
  43. Re:Boo, This is Court! More Theatrics! by Arslan+ibn+Da'ud · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..but you decided to post instead. ...ducks...

    --

    Practice Kind Randomness and Beautiful Acts of Nonsense.

  44. Re:Boo, This is Court! More Theatrics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should yell "Reveal thy bossoms or begone with thee!!" to Monique Wadstedt (Lawyer for RIAA I think.)

    I also predict that the modding of this post will reflect how many slashdotters also lurk on 4chan.

  45. I get your point by mangu · · Score: 1

    its Bull Terriers

    Right.

    its Gurkhas

    Right.

    it's particularly fierce Sergeants

    Wrong.

    I see what you mean. You are saying that Staffordshire is known for its Bull Terriers, Nepal is known for its Gurkhas, but it's not particularly fierce Sergeants that make Staffordshire known. I guess you're right.

    Actually, now that you mention it, it's quite the opposite. Even their police has given up and "is open to all ... gay ... , etc" Sergeants.

  46. This only proves that by I_want_information · · Score: 1

    You should never piss off the geek community... it WILL cut off its nose to spite your fugly face.

  47. Did you pass high school grammar? by LonghornXtreme · · Score: 1

    Did this go through an editing process?

    "The trial is about to enter its fourth day, and in a gesture of support for the four men hackers have begun assaulting plaintiff websites, beginning with that of the The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry."

    Dear lord... use some commas and make it two sentences.

    1. Re:Did you pass high school grammar? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's just me. However, I have noticed something recently. We don't like long sentences. I read the above with ease. In fact, I don't see what you're complaining about. It seems odd to me. I grew up reading Lord of the Rings. And other things like that. Long sentences aren't rocket science. They can even be easier to read than short sentences. Sometimes they are more suited to your subject. Just don't confuse the long sentence with the run-on sentence. Phew.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:Did you pass high school grammar? by LonghornXtreme · · Score: 1

      ". . . and in a gesture of support for the four men, hackers have begun assaulting. . ." would be much better.

  48. It's a lose-lose situation by gilgongo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of me wishes TPB will wipe the floor with the vile scum that are the plaintiffs. But really, I know that if TPB win, things will just get worse as the plaintiffs will seek to defend their revolting monopolies in ever more extreme ways elsewhere. They'll be like Agent Smith: just bringing in more and more lawyers.

    If TPB lose, then things will get even worse as file sharing is forced further into the darknet and whole cultures start to grow up effectively rejecting completely any moral regard for copyright in any form. The RIAA and the others have not a clue about how far things can go here, nor how damaging they will become in trying to prop up their failing business models.

    And just in case anyone is tempted to say that I'm going over the top about being able to share my Pixies albums with strangers, let me assure them that they've missed the point by a mile.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re:It's a lose-lose situation by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

      If TPB lose, then things will get even worse as file sharing is forced further into the darknet and whole cultures start to grow up effectively rejecting completely any moral regard for copyright in any form.

      I wish more people could get this key point.

      2GB microSD cards are now at $6 and dropping fast. The cheapest cards will (Due to SDHC) stay at this size for a while, becoming ridiculously cheap.

      There is no way "copyright" as a concept can survive without strong moral support in the population. Violating copyright will be easier than jaywalking.

      --
      I lost my sig.
    2. Re:It's a lose-lose situation by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If TPB lose, then things will get even worse as file sharing is forced further into the darknet and whole cultures start to grow up effectively rejecting completely any moral regard for copyright in any form.

      What if they won, and the RIAA just decided to call off all lawsuits? I know it's not likely, this is a hypothetical. Where is the moral regard for copyright?

    3. Re:It's a lose-lose situation by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Most of me wishes TPB will wipe the floor with the vile scum that are the plaintiffs. But really, I know that if TPB win, things will just get worse as the plaintiffs will seek to defend their revolting monopolies in ever more extreme ways elsewhere. They'll be like Agent Smith: just bringing in more and more lawyers.

      So you're saying that our only hope is Keanu Reeves?

      Christ. We are so screwed.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  49. NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another one got caught today, it's all over the papers. "Teenager Arrested in Computer Crime Scandal", "Hacker Arrested after Bank Tampering"...

    Damn kids. They're all alike.

    But did you, in your three-piece psychology and 1950's technobrain, ever take a look behind the eyes of the hacker? Did you ever wonder what made him tick, what forces shaped him, what may have molded him?

    I am a hacker, enter my world...

    Mine is a world that begins with school... I'm smarter than most of the other kids, this crap they teach us bores me...

    Damn underachiever. They're all alike.

    I'm in junior high or high school. I've listened to teachers explain for the fifteenth time how to reduce a fraction. I understand it. "No, Ms. Smith, I didn't show my work. I did it in my head..."

    Damn kid. Probably copied it. They're all alike.

    I made a discovery today. I found a computer. Wait a second, this is cool. It does what I want it to. If it makes a mistake, it's because I screwed it up. Not because it doesn't like me... Or feels threatened by me... Or thinks I'm a smart ass... Or doesn't like teaching and shouldn't be here...

    Damn kid. All he does is play games. They're all alike.

    And then it happened... a door opened to a world... rushing through the phone line like heroin through an addict's veins, an electronic pulse is sent out, a refuge from the day-to-day incompetencies is sought... a board is found.

    "This is it... this is where I belong..."

    I know everyone here... even if I've never met them, never talked to them, may never hear from them again... I know you all...

    Damn kid. Tying up the phone line again. They're all alike...

    You bet your ass we're all alike... we've been spoon-fed baby food at school when we hungered for steak... the bits of meat that you did let slip through were pre-chewed and tasteless. We've been dominated by sadists, or ignored by the apathetic. The few that had something to teach found us willing pupils, but those few are like drops of water in the desert.

    This is our world now... the world of the electron and the switch, the beauty of the baud. We make use of a service already existing without paying for what could be dirt-cheap if it wasn't run by profiteering gluttons, and you call us criminals. We explore... and you call us criminals. We seek after knowledge... and you call us criminals. We exist without skin color, without nationality, without religious bias... and you call us criminals. You build atomic bombs, you wage wars, you murder, cheat, and lie to us and try to make us believe it's for our own good, yet we're the criminals.

    Yes, I am a criminal. My crime is that of curiosity. My crime is that of judging people by what they say and think, not what they look like. My crime is that of outsmarting you, something that you will never forgive me for.

    I am a hacker, and this is my manifesto. You may stop this individual, but you can't stop us all... after all, we're all alike.

    1. Re:NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Damn kid. Tying up the phone line again. They're all alike...

      I use fibre-optic broadband, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:NO by burning-toast · · Score: 1

      The Hacker Manifesto. by +++The Mentor+++ Written January 8, 1986 As seen in Phrack

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_Manifesto

      Attribution is a good thing.

      - Toast

  50. Split them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Mercy

  51. we hackers gave peace a chance by CHRONOSS2008 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    we gave a year to certain people as a promise not to interfere, things are not getting better they are getting worse. and no pirate bay had and has nothing to do with any of it. look at there PR mans blunders as a sign that they know they are going to lose if they don't smarten up.

    now causality will occur on a scale they haven't seen for some time. If you notice you don't see north american attacks that often though they do infrequently occur.

    Like one poster said when 3% aggravate the larger 97% you can be sure that even 1% of the 97% is enough to make them quake.

    THEY brought the suit , they got the laws its htere system. this is our system

  52. Re:Good Christ.... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    Not bad for being someone's first language.
    Personally, English is my zeroth language.

  53. ;-) it's a joke... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    To whomever modded me flambait:

    Your irony counter is illegally parked not-on-slashdot. Please move it, or I'll have it towed in here ;-) ... I love Canadians, especially when on strike ;)

    1. Re:;-) it's a joke... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      To whomever modded me flambait:

      Your irony counter is illegally parked not-on-slashdot. Please move it, or I'll have it towed in here ;-) ... I love Canadians, especially when on strike ;)

      The true irony is that your original comment eventually earned a +5 Funny ... and your complaint was modded Flamebait.

      You should be more patient.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  54. Re:Boo, This is Court! More Theatrics! by mqduck · · Score: 1

    But you posted, so your mod was useless! It's okay, I modded Anonymous Coward up for you, to make up for your foolishness.

    --
    Property is theft.
  55. Re:Figures by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

    And you don't know how summary judgment works.

    --
    If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
  56. Re:Boo, This is Court! More Theatrics! by pjtp · · Score: 1

    You're English I take it?

  57. no chance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    don't even think about stopping. no mercy! take them bastards down, now!

  58. Re:Boo, This is Court! More Theatrics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it please the court to know that my hand has stayed the executioner's sword from the neck of the prosecution?

    How appropriate. You fight like a cow

  59. Re:Boo, This is Court! More Theatrics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I know what filth and stupidity really are.

  60. Re:Boo, This is Court! More Theatrics! by tacarat · · Score: 1

    I know! /. needs to move to the rollover points plan. I had some extra last month!

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  61. Re:Good Christ.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add to that the fact that they have those websites that have been sitting idle for years and years. So this means they finally get some use out of those resources. I think we've established means and motive.

    Please also keep in mind that organisations like the 'AA's are a conspiracy by definition.

  62. Do you have a link? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Do you have a link to what was the original intent of copyright?

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Do you have a link? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link to what was the original intent of copyright?

      Here you go: The United States Constitution

      I have no idea what the original intention of copyright was in the TPB's part of the world (Europe has a different view of such matters, although we're trying to "harmonize" ourselves with the EU for some reason) but here in the United States it goes like this:

      To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Do you have a link? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to know if the idea started in the US or somewhere else, and what the EU bases its idea on.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  63. Re:Good Christ.... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Personally, English is my zeroth language.

    There speaks a software engineer. Either that, or you were born zero-based.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  64. Re:Good Christ.... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    There speaks a software engineer.

    I wish.

  65. Re:Figures by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    If I were a judge in this case...

    And the world breaths a great sigh of relief that you're not a judge in any case.

    --
    What?