Linux Foundation Purchases Linux.com
darthcamaro and several other readers have noted that the Linux Foundation has bought Linux.com from SourceForge Inc. (Slashdot's corporate parent). The Linux Foundation (employer of Linus Torvalds) will take over the editorial and community stewardship for the site; SourceForge will continue to supply advertising on it. "[Linux Foundation Executive Director Jim] Zemlin says the Linux Foundation wants to build a collaborative forum where Linux users can share ideas and get information on the Linux operating system. A beta of the site will be released in the next few months. ... Linux.com is being redesigned as a central source for Linux software, documentation and answers regardless of platforms, including server, desktop/netbook, mobile and embedded areas." What do you think should be on Linux.com?
How about the proper spelling of the namesake's name?
He'd be pissed to be called "Linux".
Howtoforge.org has fulfilled that role for a long time which Linux.com aims to do now.
Why didn't Sourceforge Inc. ask us this before they sold the site? Then they'd actually be able to follow-through on the answers.
Linux?
Does anyone else miss the articles they used to post at Linux.com?
I hope the Linux Foundation brings back the articles. Right now it's just a glorified forum
Linux Torvalds? The guy that made the Linus kernel?
The one-stop, easy-install, multi-distro place for all your linux software needs.
...they want to do something like Windows.com and showcase all what Linux can do and be installed on and overall, share a wealth of information for all to enjoy.
It would be neat to see all of this and I can't wait to see what it will be like in the months to come.
Friends help you move...
REAL Friends help you move dead bodies... ^_^
A centralized source of Linux info would be GREAT! Especially if it had a search function that pointed you to a good complete answer to inexpertly phrased questions. Right now, pointing newbies at Google is one of the big linux turnoffs for them.
Most of us experienced users know where to find good help and info so I think they should make linux.com primarily a site for beginners. It would include a broad overview, tutorials, howtos, information about distros and a lot of zealous pro-linux content to spread the love. linux.com is the obvious domain name for someone looking to learn about linux. Notice I say primarily for beginners and not totally. It should of course contain more detailed information.
...and forget the advertising bits.
but does it run Linux?
Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
A redirect to .org seems to be an appropriate option.
3.243F6A8885A308D313
Slashdot Malda should really fix the typos on his site.
What do you think should be on Linux.com?
A mirror of Slashdot. Because nothing will help Linux adoption than seeing a bunch of raving geeks talk about the RIAA.
Why d'ya have to go and sell it?
I don't know for a fact, but I'd guess that a number of visitors will be people who have heard of "that linux thing" and punched in www.linux.com to find out more. While I think it's great that Ubuntu is great for having critical mass and gaining mainstream momentum, I also think it's in everyone's interest to explain, in simple terms, that Linux != Ubuntu, and that Linux is, in a manner of speaking, a whole lot more than Ubuntu.
Kids, when I was your age, .com was for commercial businesses, and no self-respecting FOSS projects would be seen using one. Even for-profit blogs that cover FOSS would use the non-profit TLD, .org.
With such an obvious name, linux.com is where many newbs go first. The forums were not that great to begin with, and in the last few weeks they even lost all formatting, including newlines. I'm glad to see that such an important domain name will be put to good use now.
A neutral communications medium is essential. It is the basis of science, by which humankind should decide what is true.
What do you think should be on Linux.com?
One thing I would like is for it to be a clear and professional page that invites and excites people to learn more about Linux.
What I mean is this: Right now if you google "Linux", the first hit is linux.org. That site has some good info, and even has an explanatory paragraph about what Linux is... but (how to put this nicely?) it doesn't look professional. It doesn't scream "this is a sophisticated and powerful (yet user-friendly) system supported by (and supporting) billion-dollar industries." Instead the impression a first-time visitor will get is that Linux is arcane, old-fashioned, and disorganized.
The fact is that when any of us talk to others about Linux (whether as a home desktop or for business-use), the person will go and search "Linux" and end up being confused. So I would like "linux.com" to have a really carefully designed frontpage, that explains what Linux is, looks very professional (maybe with tie-ins to big-name companies to make the suits feel more comfortable), and helps people get what they need (links to downloads, FAQ, community sites, all that good stuff...).
The Ubuntu homepage is pretty good in this regard. I'm sure I'm not alone in having switched over the last few years from telling people to "read more about Linux" to telling them to "read up on Ubuntu". It's just easier to pick a distro for them (they can always change when they learn more), and Ubuntu has put a nice "face" on the Linux ecosystem. Their homepage doesn't overload you with info, and provides clear links to downloads, community, etc.
So while I hope linux.com becomes many things to many people (and has all the news and content that we geeks want), I hope they take this opportunity to make the mainpage a useful portal for people who want to learn more about Linux. (Since it will be an obvious place for a newbie to first look.)
Linux.com was one of the very first sites I used to frequent on a daily basis. But I quickly lost interest as I found the site ugly and Slashdot together with other sites did a better job.
I hope the new owners can put some serious work into the site.
By the way, Slashdot too needs some love. Details like number of comments submitted to date are missing or are deliberately hidden from non subscribers like me! Heck, we need to know all sorts of statistics. I appreciate the need for cash but I thought that's why we began to see ads especially among comments at Slashdot.org.
Doesn't the submission title say "purchase"?
you know its a good idea
Read radical news here
But does it run Linus?
Whatever useful purpose that site may have once been able to serve has been squandered by SourceForge/VA attempting to use it as nothing more than a revenue stream. The best thing to do with it now is to redirect it to one of the many actual useful sites that already exist.
Just the fact that SourceForge is going to "continue to serve ads" tells you all you need to know about this. It's another colossal waste.
1. monthly debate on the best Linux distro
2. monthly debate on binary kernel modules, proprietary software and GPL, plus ridiculing RML's mustache
3. quarterly email exchanges between Linus Torvalds and other users with the latter calling the former former arrogant bastard and the former calling the latter "a bunch of wanking monkeys"
4. weekly discussion on how Windows sucks and bookkeeping on the number of chairs thrown out of Redmond buildings
5. monthly whining about how slow Debian development is
6. bi-annually mention of Hurd and that it's going to be ready "soon"
So why did Sourceforge let Linux.com go essentially dead at the turn of the year?
All I ask for is the clear, thorough (mostly), and timely writing that was the hallmark of the articles that were on the front page of the old Linux.com.
Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
"The Linux Foundation (employer of Linux Torvalds) will take over the editorial and community stewardship for the site; Sourceforge will continue to supply advertising on it."
Good, I was worried they would run out.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
Doesn't Linus own the Linux trademark? This seems like a fairly cut and dry trademark squatting case.
A site containing nothing but republished Microsoft's "get the facts" stuff would be an epic Aprils fools.
I'd like to see a beta of the site before I make any serious suggestions.
If my memory correct. Some one buy that domain for 5 million dollar at .com craze...
[My english is better than most other people's Turkish, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]
It took until 2009 to make this move. Maybe in 2015 the site will be working as it should.
How about no more Microsoft advertisements. I understand its a money thing but you wouldn't take money from a crack dealer would you?
I mean, honestly, my general daily haunts are slashdot, the register, BBC news, and failblog, and occasionally b3ta.
If I want to learn about linux, then I go to slashdot. That said, if I'm a total linux kernel developer geek, then perhaps I do need to see a daily news update on what patches got accepted and rejected, but somehow, I expect the whole site to be dedicated to boring shit like "linux gets used in some school somewhere", or "some country installs linux box somewhere in the basement of some government office".
I hope it didn't cost too much, because they're not going to get many visitors..
I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
If they really want the community to decide then they should just make it a blank Wiki and let it go with the only restriction being that content be related to Linux.
I want this account deleted.
What do you think should be on Linux.com?
Linux games.
factor 966971: 966971
...for linux.com on the desktop!
needs BitTorrents of various Linux distros. That way we can download Linux better.
Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
Welcome to Linux.com!
You can do anything with Linux, anything at all!
, because its the intertubes.
The articles from the way the site was, needs to continue. The subjects of the articles were very interesting.
The article never said it was sold and I know that it wasn't. It was given by Sourceforge to the LF. But hey, this is slashdot and headlines almost always are incorrect :-)
You just need to use the correct search engine "wifi config"
The internet needs more porn.
Let's sell linux.com for sixtynine trizillion dollar and buy microsoft.. we will figure out the rest later.
Another place for collaboration. Let me guess, we will be able to setup blogs and wiki's too. One thing that really irritates me is the amount of repetitive stuff on the net on each subject.
If, and I have to highlight if, this is to be successful, they must continually ensure that what they are teaching/preaching/whatever, is at least current. I don't know how many times I've went to blogs/wikis/whatever to find out how to do something on Linux to find out that it for was an app version now 4 years old and the options don't work anymore.
They must also stay away from flavor lockins or it will surely suck like every other site of its kind.
That being said, I'll wait to see what they are really planning. I best it's Linus's attempt to rule the world. ;)
I'd like to see a slightly dorky personal web-page for Linus Torvalds. But that's probably just me.
I seem to remember VA Linux paying over a million bucks for it originally.
Email addresses, of course. I'd pay for a @linux.com email address...1gb storage, SSH access to mutt/pine/emacs, IMAP/POP, decent webmail package... yeah, I would definitely pay for that. Premium for good service. :)
$$$
Thank you.
to answer to OP's question,
I would like to see a noobfriendly environment with guides and linux tutorials that are written in something else than Plaintext.
Useful information on how to contribute to the Linux documentation.
If linux want to have a larger marketshare, then the community will have to accept that the number of Idiots that can't read the manual will increase.
A beta of the site will be released in the next few months.
Surely this transition of ownership has been negotiated for some time now?
They can plan and build a website long before they own the domain. Why didn't they?
Hey hey, this is no troll.
NO SIG
hard core homosexual dwarf porn??? isn't that what the domain suggests?
Gads! I think we should put Linux stuff on it.
Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
You wanna the mass-converts? Make loading a nice multimedia-heavy distro a one-click effort. I know that'll annoy some, but it's the only road to Broadway.
Boxed Ubuntu sets on the shelves at Walmart by this summer? OEMs-a-plenty? Hey, at least someone is finally making excellent games we can finally buy! I mean, how much longer are we going to have to word-of-mouth this OS before it finally has a life (as in: IRL) of it's own?
~Just as a thing fails if it lacks a kernel, so too it fails if it lacks a skin. ~ Rumi, Discourses
I vote for 2 girls 1 cup...
Now can we please acquire (NSFW): python.com and redirect it to (SFW): python.org?
-metric
Does anybody know about http://google.com/linux ?
And when I actively choose to use the non-GNU versions of things it becomes..?
Busybox and uClib running above the Linux kernel.
A very popular combination in the embed world.
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
Yea, that phrase was already overused but the concept of a site that cares of Linux compatibility with common hardware is important.
The point is: since Linux.com attracts lots of people, if it pushed only the use/purchase of compatible hardware (think about Vista only laptops or obscure driverless gadgets) that would make a difference to the eye of the corporate world.
Now I actually might have a reason to visit that site.
You are not what you own.
I wonder how much GNU is in Android?
[Linux Foundation Executive Director Jim] Zemlin says the Linux Foundation wants to build a collaborative forum where Linux users can share ideas and get information on the Linux operating system.
Great, but do we really need a new linux forum?
I am the lawn!
The Linux brand has enormous leverage. We should make the most of it.
The best function that linux.com could serve is as a portal into Linux resources and the entire Linux community. But it has to be organized in such a way as to make Linux adoption as easy and painless as possible. There's no conflict between that and all the other capabilities we might like the site to have.
Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
It will be GREAT!
I can run Iexplorer in VisualStudio/Linux Wine. I then run Bochs to boot mach GNU/HURD so I can post on Slashdot and so GCC can compile those nasty cancers they're known for.
DEUUUUUUUUUUUTSH!
"This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
feedback@linux.org
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.7.1 ... Host xxxxxxxx listed in Access DB. See http://www.invlogic.com/mail/access.html (state 14).
----- Original message -----