Slashdot Mirror


Digital TV Coupon Program Under Way Again

An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from CNet: "Federal regulators said Thursday they are going into 'search and rescue' mode to help the millions of consumers unprepared for the phased transition to digital television, which culminates with the June 12 transition deadline. The millions of consumers waiting for coupons for digital converter box coupons will finally receive them within the next two and a half weeks, thanks to emergency funding for the coupon program provided in the stimulus package, said Bernadette McGuire-Rivera, an administrator for the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. The NTIA is also ratcheting up its outreach to consumers most likely to be unprepared for the transition... FCC commissioners said their agency is also intensifying its outreach, but they acknowledged that while one third of television stations have already dropped their analog signals, the hardest part is yet to come." We previously discussed the DTV coupon program when it ran out of money in January. The $650 million from the stimulus packages adds to the $1.3 billion that's already been spent.

147 comments

  1. Cause it worked so well before by Bobnova · · Score: 2, Funny

    Spend more money to make more money, right?

    1. Re:Cause it worked so well before by Bobnova · · Score: 1

      That's totally on topic. They're spending money on coupons to make money selling off the freed up frequencies.

    2. Re:Cause it worked so well before by Slumdog · · Score: 1

      That's totally on topic...

      Whats the topic?!!!

    3. Re:Cause it worked so well before by donaldm · · Score: 1

      That's totally on topic. They're spending money on coupons to make money selling off the freed up frequencies.

      I doubt it, although to be fair you need to calculate the cost of the whole exercise compared to the money the government gets back through the sale of the freed up frequency spectrum. Call me pessimistic if you like but it looks like a politician's smoke and mirrors exercise.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  2. People who already bought a converter by Skapare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what happens with people that ended up paying full price for a converter because the coupons stopped flowing and 1/3 of the transition (which in many places was nearly a full transition) already happened? Can they just get $40 back with the coupon and their original paid-full-price receipt? Even if they got their full price converter at Circuit City?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:People who already bought a converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they got their full price converter at Circuit City?

      If they got it at Circuit City, then they're probably SOL. Every Circuit City I've seen has closed it's doors in the last few months.

    2. Re:People who already bought a converter by pushing-robot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they had no problem buying it with their own money, why should they get a handout?

      Then again, I'm a crazy liberal who thinks that the government should give to the poor, not the rich.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:People who already bought a converter by PachmanP · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they had no problem buying it with their own money, why should they get a handout?

      Then again, I'm a crazy liberal who thinks that the government should give to the poor, not the rich.

      Well I'm a crazy [insert whatever] who wants to know why the hell we're giving handouts for TV for anybody! Nobody will die without American Idol.

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    4. Re:People who already bought a converter by Sporkinum · · Score: 5, Insightful
      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    5. Re:People who already bought a converter by Skapare · · Score: 1

      So then the government should just give them a $40 or $80 check.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    6. Re:People who already bought a converter by Skapare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The issue isn't about whether someone can get the money to pay for it. The issue is that the government is making a lot of money selling the spectrum, and part of it was to compensate people for the costs imposed on them.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    7. Re:People who already bought a converter by YenTheFirst · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But people will die without tornado information, among other things. Yes, radio is an option. When dealing with people, however, sometimes a graphical representation is just much more useful.

      --
      It's not stupid. It's Advanced.
    8. Re:People who already bought a converter by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      But TV is the opiate for the masses! How can you govern an intelligent, reasoning populace? You can't give them drugs, so you give them free coupons for TV!

    9. Re:People who already bought a converter by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      To reclaim the spectrum (the fcc auctioned off access to the reclaimed spectrum for more than the converter box program spent).

      Broadcast stations got much of that spectrum for a song, but it isn't particularly ridiculous that some of the funds were spent on mitigating the impact of the switch.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:People who already bought a converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who paid full price for a converter because they didn't have a coupon when the partial transition happened need to have that converter confiscated NOW because they are obviously so addicted that the only cure is cold turkey.

    11. Re:People who already bought a converter by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Well I'm a crazy [insert whatever] who wants to know why the hell we're giving handouts for TV for anybody! Nobody will die without American Idol.

      They're doing it because they want the ability to revoke playback of recordings. It's necessary for the proper functioning of the Ministry of Truth.

      Did you see the news the other night? Army kicking in peoples doors and stuff... that can't be real. That newscaster looked a bit freaked out when it was aired. Scared even. You didn't see it? Check it out, I recorded it.

      That's weird... it won't play. Hold on... there's someone at the door...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    12. Re:People who already bought a converter by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I got two today at Circuit City. Free, when you use the coupons.
      I applied for the coupons around Xmas, got then early Jan, used them today.

      Our CC closes Mar 8.

    13. Re:People who already bought a converter by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      The government should give to noone. The government's only proper role is to uphold and protect individual rights. If you want to donate to worthy causes, feel free to do so, and to encourage your friends and family to, but don't force us all to pay for your pet program because you feel pity for the world and think you know how to solve everything.

    14. Re:People who already bought a converter by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The issue isn't about whether someone can get the money to pay for it. The issue is that the government is making a lot of money selling the spectrum, and part of it was to compensate people for the costs imposed on them.

      Who will immediately re-compensate the wireless providers who purchased that spectrum by paying higher prices. It's not like we're getting anything for free, you know.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    15. Re:People who already bought a converter by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      The coupons expire after 90 days (I confirmed that on the dtv.gov page).. did you use expired coupons? and they worked?

    16. Re:People who already bought a converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm a crazy [insert whatever] who wants to know why the hell we're giving handouts for TV for anybody! Nobody will die without American Idol.

      They're doing it because they want the ability to revoke playback of recordings. It's necessary for the proper functioning of the Ministry of Truth.

      Did you see the news the other night? Army kicking in peoples doors and stuff... that can't be real. That newscaster looked a bit freaked out when it was aired. Scared even. You didn't see it? Check it out, I recorded it.

      That's weird... it won't play. Hold on... there's someone at the door...

      Link or it didn't happen.

    17. Re:People who already bought a converter by kenh · · Score: 1

      We're talkiing about $2 Billion so far ($1.3 Billion for the first program, $650 Million now) - exactly how much did we get from the sale of the spectrum and didn't we already spend it elsewhere? I can't believe someone in Washington left $650 Million dollars lying on the table after they auctioned off the specturm...

      That's not the Washington I knew!

      --
      Ken
    18. Re:People who already bought a converter by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The coupons expire after 90 days (I confirmed that on the dtv.gov page).. did you use expired coupons? and they worked?

      He said he got them in "Early Jan". Even if he got them on January 1 (Assuming that he didn't mean January of a year other than 2009)it hasn't been 90 days.

    19. Re:People who already bought a converter by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, brain fart time. I was mentally 'wrapping' around a year. I got mine early *last* year, so was thinking that was when he got them.

    20. Re:People who already bought a converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or, dog and pony.

    21. Re:People who already bought a converter by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

      Read 1984 sometime.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    22. Re:People who already bought a converter by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      The expiration date on mine was Apr 7 09. 90 days after Jan 7 ("early Jan"). Apparently the date they were printed/mailed.

      I don't need the converter boxes (have cable), but got them in case of future need.

    23. Re:People who already bought a converter by jlarocco · · Score: 0, Troll

      But people will die without tornado information, among other things.

      If the actual people involved don't value their lives enough to buy a TV for tornado reports, I certainly don't value their life enough to buy a TV for them. Let them die for all I care.

    24. Re:People who already bought a converter by m.ducharme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but you didn't buy a tv for them, they bought their own tv's. You bought them (a tiny fraction of) a tv converter box.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    25. Re:People who already bought a converter by pizzach · · Score: 1
      This is a really odd thread here. The parent's parent said:

      But people will die without tornado information, among other things. Yes, radio is an option. When dealing with people, however, sometimes a graphical representation is just much more useful.

      The people who use a TV will likely try to get a converter box immediately when they notice notice they aren't getting any channels regardless of the rebate program. The people who don't care enough to get converter box likely don't need a visual representation, would have never seen the broadcast on TV anyway...and nothing really has changed. The parent poster said:

      If the actual people involved don't value their lives enough to buy a TV for tornado reports, I certainly don't value their life enough to buy a TV for them. Let them die for all I care.

      Like I said above, nothing has changed. You think you made an intelligent retort, but it's the equivalent of telling a non-beer drinker they can't drink beer any more. These people likely didn't give a rats-ass about tornado reports on TV. If they die from lack of information, it would have absolutely nothing to do with owning a converter box. So....is this thread much ado about nothing?

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    26. Re:People who already bought a converter by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Well that just make's his claim that much more dubious. Assuming the people in question were already able to buy a TV, and most of a converter box, I don't see why they can't just bite the bullet and pay for the remaining tiny fraction of the conveter box.

    27. Re:People who already bought a converter by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      You don't need information from a 'tv' when that siren sounds get in your tub, nuff said.

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    28. Re:People who already bought a converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government makes a pretty piss-poor charity. Everything they touch takes twice as long and costs twice as much, and is mired in bureaucratic red tape. They should really leave charity up to, oh, you know, CHARITIES!

    29. Re:People who already bought a converter by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you give everybody a $40 coupon (or whatever) they end up just paying $50 more in taxes or their grandkids get the equivalent in debt. It isn't like "the government" has no relationship to the people who live and breathe within the country. As an added bonus you get to pay a premium on the cost of the converter which is able to be sold for a higher cost since consumers will be willing to pay more on top of their subsidies.

      Sure, the money might "come from" the spectrum sales, but that is just $40 + distribution costs less revenue for the government to operate on, which again, is just higher taxes. There is just one big pile of government money out there - cut off one input and another grows to take its place.

    30. Re:People who already bought a converter by shadow349 · · Score: 1

      Then again, I'm a crazy liberal who thinks that the government should give to the poor, not the rich.

      Then again, I am a crazy American who things the federal government should give very little to anyone, but provide only the most basic of services; being poor should not be "comfortable". As Ben Franklin wrote, "I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it." (From "On the Price of Corn and Management of the Poor")

      As far as the new coupons go, it's probably better for our economy in the long run for everyone to get them and just tossed them in the trash. Given where those converter boxes are made, most of that borrowed/monetized $80 ends up in someone else's economy (China, maybe?).

    31. Re:People who already bought a converter by shadow349 · · Score: 1

      But people will die without tornado information

      There are a lot of cheaper ways to get emergency weather and EBS alerts than from a TV. Hell, most will even alert you when one of these statements affects you, as opposed to a broadcast medium that is usually the same to all members of the DMA.

    32. Re:People who already bought a converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fine with paying for tornado sirens to be installed. We'd also need to educate people about them, of course. The local news would probably do it for free, but if not or if it's not good enough, I'd be fine with buying some TV and radio commercial spots.

      I'm on the libertarian side of the fence, and even I think this would be an excellent use of government money. Hey, it'd create local blue-collar jobs for a while too -- people to install the sirens every couple of square miles -- so it's even got that going for it. Incidentally, a big rollout would generate word of mouth (people would see the sirens getting installed and wonder what's going on), which would make people more likely to pay attention when they hear the explanation (so when they hear that eerie-as-fuck wail for the first time, they know what it is).

      (Captcha: comments.)

    33. Re:People who already bought a converter by trout007 · · Score: 1

      I'm a crazy liberal too. But it seems that giving people that are too poor to pay $100 to watch TV shouldn't be watching TV to begi with. How about this. If you get a free converter it only tunes to educational stations like PBS?

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    34. Re:People who already bought a converter by Naatach · · Score: 1

      Well I'm a crazy [insert whatever] who wants to know why the hell we're giving handouts for TV for anybody! Nobody will die without American Idol.

      You are forgetting a key point - the TV keeps the unwashed masses placated. It's not as appealing to riot when you're missing American Idol.

      In Soviet Russia, American Idol watches YOU!

      --
      There may be no "I" in team, but there's also no "F" in way.
    35. Re:People who already bought a converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

      Read 1984 sometime.

      I did. Animal Farm, etc too. I was actually hoping to see a link to a youtube clip or something of what he was talking about because I wanted more information. Thanks for being a dick instead though. Real productive, really supports your argument.

    36. Re:People who already bought a converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you know, you didn't pay for any of it. The FCC brought in over $20 billion auctioning off the 700mhz spectrum, and has spent a totaly of $1.3 billion on this box program. None of it out of taxes.

    37. Re:People who already bought a converter by mpe · · Score: 1

      If they had no problem buying it with their own money, why should they get a handout?

      It's probably the companies who sell and make the boxes who are getting the biggest handouts. Since it's likely that the coupon value represents the lowest selling price. Even if it were possible to make a profit with a cheaper price.

    38. Re:People who already bought a converter by maxume · · Score: 1

      The converters only cost $60.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    39. Re:People who already bought a converter by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      pfft, most who die during a tornado will have died anyway, with or without a converter box, with or without a helpful pamphlet on tornado safety, and with or without the care and concern of a bleeding heart hand-wringer. That converter box isn't going to hold your walls and roof up.

    40. Re:People who already bought a converter by donaldm · · Score: 1

      But people will die without tornado information, among other things. Yes, radio is an option. When dealing with people, however, sometimes a graphical representation is just much more useful.

      There are not many states were tornado's occur. From what I have seen not being an American there are tornado warning systems set up in all towns and cities where there is a possibility of a tornado.

      What about the hearing impaired? Well you could argue that TV can help but lets be honest here how many people, hearing impaired or not remained glued to their TV in the off chance they may be warned of a pending disaster, most watch TV for entertainment. As for graphical representations most people don't know how to understand them. Radio, police, national guard and friendly neighbours do more to help in early warnings of pending disasters than TV can.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    41. Re:People who already bought a converter by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      >Well that just make's his claim that much more dubious. Assuming the people in question were already able to buy a TV, and most of a converter box, I don't see why they can't just bite the bullet and pay for the remaining tiny fraction of the conveter box.

      Because after paying for a 60 inch plasma, most of the cost of the converter box, and the months electric; they're broke!

    42. Re:People who already bought a converter by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      To reclaim the spectrum (the FCC auctioned off access to the reclaimed spectrum for more than the converter box program spent).

      This is the part I don't understand: if the FCC made all this money off the auction, why did the coupon program run out of money until an "emergency" infusion of cash from stimulus funds? Shouldn't the the accepted auction prices been high enough to at least cover the cost of freeing up the spectrum being auctioned? This smells fishy...

    43. Re:People who already bought a converter by maxume · · Score: 1

      Only a portion of the auction receipts were allocated to the coupon program (probably based on some estimate of the demand for converters). Really, it is a good thing that the FCC didn't have to deposit the auction funds in a 'converter box' account, and then move the funds after the program was complete (it is just a little unfortunate that the estimate was wrong).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  3. Is it spent yet? by pavon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That $1.3 billion is the amount that has been allocated to be spent. Last I read, less than half of that had actually been spent and the rest was tied up in coupons that had been requested but had neither been used, nor expired yet.

  4. Doing the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The program allows 2 coupons per household, at $40 each. This is a max of $80 per household.

    The total program funding is given at $2 billion. This means, at a minimum, 25 million American households still receive OTA TV signals. Given that not everyone who's eligible will apply, and not every household has multiple TV's, a more realistic figure might be somewhere around 30 million households.

    There are a little over 110 million US households in the US per the US census bureau.

    Assuming the program is properly funded, this means that between 25-30% of US households still use OTA TV.

    Something's not right here. I seem to recall the numbers for "how many people will be affected?" by the DTV transition were considerably lower. Either this program is dramatically over funded, or a huge percentage of participants don't actually need the boxes, or digital TV penetration is considerably lower than was advertised when the transition was debated...

    1. Re:Doing the math by Bobnova · · Score: 1

      Anybody that currently subscribes to extended cable already has a digital converter box, that takes care of a lot of 'em.

    2. Re:Doing the math by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Assuming absolutely 0% overhead, you'd be right.

    3. Re:Doing the math by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're missing something with that logic. While most households do have cable/satellite, those can become useless in bad weather (lines breaking, dish swinging in the wind), not to mention random cable outages caused by careless people with backhoes, drivers running into poles, etc. Most sensible people, when asked "Do you want two coupons so that your two cable-equipped sets can continue to receive OTA TV if your cable goes out?" will say "Yes." without giving it a second thought. I'm surprised that the number of people requesting these is not closer to 100% of all TV households.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Doing the math by Boarder2 · · Score: 1

      Seriously? If your sat/cable TV goes out, you're so desperate for TV that you switch to OTA?
      Wow.

    5. Re:Doing the math by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Err... the post above you was missing something, rather. Clicked the wrong reply button. My bad.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Doing the math by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even though I have satellite, I am still very much affected by the DTV transition. For example, in my basement I have a traditional OTA TV that I rely on when there is stormy weather. Now, this wouldn't be a problem but A) I live in the midwest, where, in the spring and summer tornado warnings come out of nowhere and it is imperative I get watches/warnings along with radar so I can know if a tornado is about to strike. B) My satellite does not get great signal when it is storming outside.

      So yes, even though I do not technically "need" a DTV converter box, I am seriously considering buying one for the news coverage during severe weather.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    7. Re:Doing the math by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Informative

      In a severe thunderstorm under a tornado watch? You bet your you-know-what I switch to OTA. A few extra seconds notice of approaching tornadoes can save your life.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:Doing the math by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      I live in the Midwest, on a farm, on a hill. I find the tornado warnings on the radio quite adequate.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    9. Re:Doing the math by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I am the paranoid type that has to know EXACTLY where the hook echo is that they are talking about not that by worrying about it will I change anything but still.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    10. Re:Doing the math by maxume · · Score: 1

      If you are in a situation where seconds matter, why not act preemptively?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:Doing the math by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Uhh, no. I have extended basic cable, and have all analog. They are going to move it to digital at some point (unrelated to the OTA digital, but IMHO they're using the confusion as a reason for switching). Actually, I have two Tivos that can use cable cards, so I guess technically I have a "digital converter box", but it's not being used for that.

      (We can get 'free' boxes that will convert the equivalent of extended basic channels -- but that doesn't help S3 Tivos.)

    12. Re:Doing the math by mahohmei · · Score: 0

      Where I live, pre-ATSC, I could pick up zero channels using an indoor antenna--I joked that Comcast jammed the airwaves. Mount an antenna on the roof, and you're in business--bonus points if you had an antenna rotator.

      At home, I have cable TV, but no roof antenna. If Comcast fails because of an idiot with a backhoe, we're stuck with whatever is archives on the TiVo.

      Now, if Comcast goes all-digital, forcing us to get a cable box, we might dump cable TV, get Internet-only, and put an antenna on the roof. We'd need two ATSC tuners.

    13. Re:Doing the math by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Do you also have satellite internet? If not, I've found the "Graphical Forecasts" and CONUS products at weather.org to be *really* good.

    14. Re:Doing the math by Firehed · · Score: 1

      If there's a tornado watch, what the hell are you doing sitting around staring at the TV?

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    15. Re:Doing the math by voxel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, before television, I think every time a storm came, people just ran outside got zapped by lightning and flew around in the air by the tornados until they landed in Oz.

      --
      Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
    16. Re:Doing the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't get tornado warnings from AM/FM radio? (or better yet VHF weather radio)

    17. Re:Doing the math by vdammer · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I live in the midwest, where in the spring and summer I can feel by the humidity, air pressure and temperature if a tornado is on the way. I certainly don't need the idiots at the local weather station telling me where a funnel cloud might be. And in the event that my senses aren't enough, the mechanical voice of the national weather service over a radio is the only other thing I need.

      Weather warnings on tv are annoying time vampires that interrupt the show I'm trying to watch.

    18. Re:Doing the math by BarefootClown · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I am the paranoid type that has to know EXACTLY where the hook echo is that they are talking about not that by worrying about it will I change anything but still.

      And you want to force me to subsidize your neurosis. How cute.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    19. Re:Doing the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's a tornado watch, what the hell are you doing sitting around staring at the TV?

      Checking to see if the watch has been promoted into a tornado warning.

      You don't need to cower in the basement for a tornado watch. Those tend to last for several hours, and do not necessarily mean that any tornado will even develop. Even with tornado warnings, most people check to see if they are actually in the path of the storm.

    20. Re:Doing the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the midwest, where in the spring and summer I can feel by the humidity, air pressure and temperature if a tornado is on the way.

      Looks like you're in the running for a Darwin award.

    21. Re:Doing the math by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      I live in a hurricane prone area. Often hurricanes will take out power/cable/whatever and TV or radio are vital sources for information during extended shortages of resources (power/water/gas/etc).

      When it's in August 100+F weather with 90% humidity and you're running a fan and a TV set on a generator you definitely want to know which gas stations are open, where you can find food, and any estimate you can on when the power will be back. You would be amazed by the chaos that a week or two without electricity causes.

    22. Re:Doing the math by PerfectSmurf · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't farm in the midwest though. Farmers have to spend as much time in the fields as possible to tend their crops. They can't spend 50% of their summer sitting inside because the national weather service radio says there's a thunderstorm watch covering a few hundred square miles in their area. They can't spend 20% of their summer sitting inside because there's a thunderstorm warning covering a portion of the same. If severe storms are cropping up during a critical week of harvest they can't afford to run inside every time an isolated thunderstorm cell or a tornado comes within 20 miles of them. Those local weathercasters that endlessly interrupt our favorite shows with detailed radar and storm tracks annoy the heck out of us, but they help the farmers that grow our crops to safely stay in the fields long enough to grow and harvest their crops and stay in business.

      --
      I smurf everything and everything I smurf is perfect.
    23. Re:Doing the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Study the difference between WATCH and WARNING.

      Then try playing again.

    24. Re:Doing the math by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Unless you're hitting force one winds, then your dish shouldn't be swinging in the wind. If it is, it wasn't installed right.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    25. Re:Doing the math by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Your dish is not aimed right if you get a marginal signal in bad weather (unless it's covered in snow.) If you are in the US Midwest you are in the prime signal spot for the systems (Dish and DirecTV.) Call for service (Lie to them and say there is no signal at all. The tech will understand.)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    26. Re:Doing the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised that the number of people requesting these is not closer to 100% of all TV households.

      Probably because it requires you to go online to sign up. That, strange as it may sound is a somewhat inconvenient if not foreign idea to many. You may have 3 computers running in a single room, but someone down the street has to go to the public library and sign up to use one by the hour.

      If the government set up a booth at the mall, you can bet everyone would grab one, if only for the reason "they were handing out free stuff." I requested two of the coupons, partially "just because I could." I put up the extra on Freecycle, and the guy I gave it to later admitted he already had two and wanted a third. I wound up having to turn away a church and people who by their own words "really needed" the coupon.

    27. Re:Doing the math by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Uhh, no. I have extended basic cable, and have all analog. They are going to move it to digital at some point (unrelated to the OTA digital, but IMHO they're using the confusion as a reason for switching). Actually, I have two Tivos that can use cable cards, so I guess technically I have a "digital converter box", but it's not being used for that.

      (We can get 'free' boxes that will convert the equivalent of extended basic channels -- but that doesn't help S3 Tivos.)

      If you have cable (analogue or digital) you don't have to worry about a converter box since your TV acts as a monitor. If you have a HDTV with a digital or HD tuner you don't have to worry about a converter box. The same is true if you have a HDD DVD/BD recorder with a digial or HD tuner and again your TV acts as a monitor. The only time you do need a converter box is when your TV has a analogue tuner connected to a TV antenna. One thing many people don't realise is they may have to change their TV antenna as well to pick-up digital signals properly.

      Nearly all TV's from the 1970's on (some much earlier) have at the very least composite (ie. AV or that yellow plug) video in. In fact most modern TV's have in addition component (red, blue, green and L/R audio), SCART (mainly European) and possibly HDMI inputs. By using any of these a TV becomes a monitor. Of course what ever is supplying video to the TV must be able to pick up a Digital TV (SD or HD) signal.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  5. And amazingly . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we have not heard stories of mass outages of TV for the unprepared

    1. Re:And amazingly . . . by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Any such stories have been overshadowed by mass outages of jobs, mass outages of lending by banks, mass outages of investment in stocks, and mass outages of sanity in Congress.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  6. Tv went blank. by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And nothing of value was lost.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Tv went blank. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody stop posting. Parent said it all. Seriously.

    2. Re:Tv went blank. by Korbeau · · Score: 1

      What about the gone-on-DVD series you rip off BitTorrent?

    3. Re:Tv went blank. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      "off bit-torrent" thats a good way to propagate false assumptions that the only thing its used for is copyright infringement.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Tv went blank. by Drumforyourlife · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way. Now that I don't sit around watching TV, I'm more fit, have more energy, and I have time to do the things I like to do. No more boring nights for me! yes, I know it's a choice, but I needed that prompting to get me moving I guess.

  7. got mine by Garganus · · Score: 1

    Just as an anecdotal data point, I requested coupons the day after the last /. article about their running out. I got them in the mail last week. I'm guessing you were asking rhetorically, but just in case; folks who couldn't wait are boned.

    1. Re:got mine by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Lots of people had to hurry up and buy right before Feb 17. If the coupons had been flowing as they should have been, they would have gotten their coupons and saved $40 on the converter. They still need to get their share of the money paid for the TV spectrum some other way.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  8. No sympathy by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

    Federal regulators said Thursday they are going into 'search and rescue' mode to help the millions of consumers unprepared for the phased transition to digital television, which culminates with the June 12 transition deadline.

    "Millions" of unprepared consumers? Seriously, the commercials warning about the transition have been playing several times an hour every day for the past 6 months or more (I was even getting them on Satellite TV, which is immune to the change) It's literally been impossible to avoid hearing about this.

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    1. Re:No sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, if you don't turn on the TV ...

    2. Re:No sympathy by jshackney · · Score: 1

      What's funny... I really haven't watched much OTA television since my kids were born. Maybe about two hours a week just capturing snippets of the news--but mostly Sesame Street. So, you could make a good argument that I DO live in a cave and I knew about this transition years ago when it was first proposed. I even vowed not to purchase a new television until after the transition occurred. I've since changed my mind on that, I'm keeping the TV and getting the converter. How could anyone be caught off-guard by this? It baffles me.

      Now, why didn't I get a coupon so I can snag one of those fancy $130 antennas?

  9. Maybe our only chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is it folks, this may be the last real chance we have at identifying the portion of the country that's incapable of intelligence! They don't need search and rescue, they need search and destroy!!!!

  10. I don't get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Send taxpayer money to Chinese manufacturers of converter boxes; to accommodate the bandwidth auctions to major US telecom companies: who intend to soak customers to get their money back?

    Am I missing something???

    1. Re:I don't get it! by Skapare · · Score: 1

      You got it, exactly.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:I don't get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're missing that the cause for all of this was the government's unwillingness to tell a mobile telephony provider to shut off and stop interfering with licensed radio spectrum used for public safety.

  11. hurry it up, dude by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, let's just get the effing show on the effing road, dudes,... I bought my DTV converter, with coupons, over a year ago, and still get a crappy signal because 5% of the numb-nuts put it off until the last minute,... So all the DTV stations around here only broadcast signals at 25% power. So hurry the frak up so the rest of us get a decent DTV signal!

    1. Re:hurry it up, dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Applied for my coupon the very first day they were available. Didn't get it until almost exactly a year ago.

      "Sorry, we have no converters in stock yet"

      Tried again. And again. And then again. Apparently, they'd arrive during the day, and be cleared out before I got off work every fucking time.

      "No, sorry, you can't reserve one, sir."

      Day before they expired in June 2008, I'm going place to place, trying to get one. Still none to be had.

      So now, I've been waiting nine months for them to let me reapply. And the numbnuts in Congress waited to the last minute before the conversion to go, "Oh, yeah, those of you screwed by slow processing and then a lack of availability, maybe you should get a second chance, because our asinine expiration date fucked you out of 'em."

    2. Re:hurry it up, dude by maxume · · Score: 1

      You fucked up; you should have waited until a good box was available and then applied (they are a technology product, being first is not a good thing!).

      (I applied ~June and got my coupons in September, at which point stores were chock full...)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:hurry it up, dude by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Applied for my coupon the very first day they were available. Didn't get it until almost exactly a year ago.

      "Sorry, we have no converters in stock yet"

      Tried again. And again. And then again. Apparently, they'd arrive during the day, and be cleared out before I got off work every fucking time.

      "No, sorry, you can't reserve one, sir."

      Day before they expired in June 2008, I'm going place to place, trying to get one. Still none to be had.

      So now, I've been waiting nine months for them to let me reapply. And the numbnuts in Congress waited to the last minute before the conversion to go, "Oh, yeah, those of you screwed by slow processing and then a lack of availability, maybe you should get a second chance, because our asinine expiration date fucked you out of 'em."

      I keep seeing stories about this "shortage" and I think the problem is more with how the converters were distributed than a real shortage. The Circuit City where I live priced them at 70% off last weekend and they still had a mountain of them piled up on the floor. I would estimate there were 500+ stacked on the floor by the entrance, and still more on the shelves. I've been to several other cities in the US in the last couple of weeks and have seen them on store shelves also.

    4. Re:hurry it up, dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I keep seeing stories about this "shortage" and I think the problem is more with how the converters were distributed than a real shortage. The Circuit City where I live priced them at 70% off last weekend and they still had a mountain of them piled up on the floor.

      And the availability of converters last weekend is somehow proof there wasn't a real shortage nine months ago, when my coupons expired?

  12. Cable outage by Skapare · · Score: 3, Informative

    About 3 weeks ago, power was lost due to a storm. On the 2nd day of no power, I ran an extension cable from the TV to the my big UPS that still had energy remaining because I shut down the computers soon after the power went out (knowing it would be a while before it came back on). Nothing was coming through via Comcast. That could be because their lines were damaged in the storm, or their equipment was without power. I could get TV over the air from 2 stations, one in analog (which isn't anymore), and one in digital (because I could power my digital tuner from the UPS). People who have cable and no fallback means to receive TV in the event of a storm or accident that takes out the cable wiring or equipment is ... unprepared.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Cable outage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, by this logic, everyone who has a TV needs a converter box...

    2. Re:Cable outage by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Does the word "radio" ring a bell?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Cable outage by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      Probably not. To me it seems like the "coupon-defending" crowd is leaving heavily on the notion of "it's impossible to get enough warning information from a radio". It's been explained time and again that the radio has sufficed for this purpose in the past, and it will suffice in the future.

      I know that when the power goes out here, I don't dick around with the frickin' TV trying to get it power. I pop a 9-volt into my radio and tune it to the usual AM news stations for info. Some people just refuse to comprehend that THE RADIO WORKS!

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    4. Re:Cable outage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever gotten shitty radio reception, buddy?

  13. Expired coupon holders? by actionbastard · · Score: 1

    What happens to all those who applied for coupons in the early stage of the program -only to be told by local retailers that there was no stock available- and their coupons expired?

    --
    Sig this!
    1. Re:Expired coupon holders? by SEE · · Score: 1

      TFA syas that they're planning on making it possible to reapply. The DTV2009 site doesn't seem to have it as an option yet, though.

  14. Wait, What? by vintagepc · · Score: 1

    From the summary, "The millions of consumers waiting for coupons for digital converter box coupons will finally receive..." Coupons to get coupons? How long before those run out and we need coupons for coupon coupons? (ad infinitum? Also kind of sad that this typo reflects the actual state of things!!)

    --
    Evolution - Est. 4500000000 B.C. Don't piss in the gene pool.
  15. insidious focus by PublicBore · · Score: 1

    Whom is the target of this program? Supposedly it is consumers unprepared for the transition, that being those not yet digitally equipped. Why aren't they yet? Given the addictive nature of television, I can't think of a reason other than that they are not addicted. If television addicts are already eqipped for digital TV, and everyone else just doesn't care, who will benefit from the program? Because it doesn't exist for consumers, but for the fear that less consumers may watch TV, it will help neither the consumers nor those with the fear. It'll only help whomever ends up with the money.

  16. Yes by localroger · · Score: 5, Interesting
    At first I wasn't going to get a converter, because I am allergic to paying money for the privilege of watching commercials. But this is one of the reasons I relented.

    I have to say I am surprised at the result. Even 60 miles from the transmitters with a modest antenna that gave me a very snowy signal on analog, I have twice as many channels and they are razor sharp. There have been a few transient artifacts but not the hopeless pile of random polygons I feared because of my marginal signal strength. I was very afraid the damn thing wouldn't work at all out here and I'd be stuck for the difference between the true cost and the coupon.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:Yes by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      Have you tested that this works when there is a storm system between you and the transmitters? Signal loss is much higher in saturated air (think rain) than unsaturated air.

    2. Re:Yes by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      It would work as well as analog TV - and probably better, with the error correction.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    3. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am allergic to paying money for the privilege of watching commercials

      Please, do tell us where we can get one of those free television sets that you have!

      I'm in Hawaii, (Oahu) we switched back in January. Results for me have been sketchy. Any given time, I can't get a signal for half the channels (I've tried rescanning with my antenna switched both on and off.) And it isn't just specific channels. The first few weeks, I couldn't even pick up certain ones on the scans. They then came in ok later, but another station wouldn't come through. Now the latter is coming in, the first is sketchy (mess of polygons,) and another set of stations has almost no signal. Thanks to all this, I've been catching up on a lot of DVDs.

      On the upside, I now have an extra 6 Christian stations available to watch. [roll eyes]

  17. Stimulus package by mattwarden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, can someone explain what the DTV coupon program's funding has to do with stimulating the economy?

    1. Re:Stimulus package by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      The same way it has anything to do with studying the odor of pig excrement.
      http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1509505/president_obama_addresses_nation_pork_pg6.html?cat=9

    2. Re:Stimulus package by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      One word: Keynes.

      I don't agree with Keynes but the spending - even pork like this - is based on Keynes' theories.

    3. Re:Stimulus package by mattwarden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Keynesian theory suggests that private sector decisions can be non-optimal. I don't see how a move out of a government-controlled spectrum by a government-sponsored program fits into that.

      I see a lot of crap in this "stimulus package" that is just an excuse to spend money the government thinks needs to be spent for any variety of reasons.

    4. Re:Stimulus package by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. It was just put in the stimulus bill for the convenience of it. The DTV coupons have already been paid off via the analog spectrum sale; the issue was that not enough money from the sale had been allocated to the coupon program. So they put an item in the stimulus bill to have more money allocated to it (which at this point, all remaining money had been put in the general fund).

      The fact that this is in the stimulus bill is just a matter of convenience, it's not a stimulus item and it's not intended to stimulate anything.

    5. Re:Stimulus package by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Ever been downwind of a pig factory farm?

      No?

      Then you have no idea what nauseating stench really means.

      Yeah, spend some money to improve quality of life for those who live near one of these places.

      (and to the Libertarian wankers who are even now typing that those offended by odors should move: Please FOAD, now!)

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  18. Penny-ante entrepreneurs are the reason why by macraig · · Score: 0

    If there hadn't been so many trailer-trash penny-ante entrepreneurs requesting the coupons and then buying converters with no intention of using them but rather re-selling them on eBay and the like, there would have been plenty of funding to get the converters into the hands of the people who arguably need them. The trailer-trash entrepreneurs were quite probably the early adopters in the program, and the government had no way to guarantee that the converters being purchased with coupons were actually being used by the same people.

    That's what happens when you let capitalist foxes into the socialist henhouse, so to speak.

    1. Re:Penny-ante entrepreneurs are the reason why by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Based upon your understanding of what socialism is, is this YOU in the documentary "Right America"?

      Really, doughy, illiterate and a head full of piercings is no way to go through life, boy!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    2. Re:Penny-ante entrepreneurs are the reason why by macraig · · Score: 1

      I think you understand ad hominem quite a bit better than you understand socialism. Thanks for the deep insight.

    3. Re:Penny-ante entrepreneurs are the reason why by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      As opposed to YOUR absurd comparison of "socialism" and the current administration?

      Humanoid, please!

      Compared to any of the socialist countries in Europe, the Obama administration is a right wing ultra capitalist regime.

      Frankly, if you think Obama administration is "socialist", I must insist that you cease using the Internet this instant, before you get your stupid all over everything.

      Good day, sir!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    4. Re:Penny-ante entrepreneurs are the reason why by macraig · · Score: 1

      You're raucously funny... my original comment contained no mention at all of either "Obama", "administration", or even "government", much less a comparison of any of those to socialism. You've just managed to redefine the acronym TMI: Too Much Inference.

      I don't know which dogmatic partisan high-horse you're riding, but would you kindly go ride it somewhere else and get it the hell out of my flower garden? Thanks much.

    5. Re:Penny-ante entrepreneurs are the reason why by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      So you're now claiming that you didn't write the following:

      " That's what happens when you let capitalist foxes into the socialist henhouse, so to speak. "

      Hard to imagine that you weren't referencing the current administration.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    6. Re:Penny-ante entrepreneurs are the reason why by macraig · · Score: 1

      Nope. I was thinking pretty generally and rhetorically when I wrote that, even though (now in a less sleep-deprived state) I see that I did use the word government at one earlier point. At least I didn't use it in the same breath with socialism, like I said I didn't.

      (Ideally, socialism and government wouldn't have anything to do with each other, because people would AGREE to the socialist economy without force of government. The libertarians have that much right: using force of government is never ideal. My ideal would be a fully socialist - objectively valued - economy and a democratic government, but it's still a pipe dream. People have to want it. We don't have that kind of consensus.)

  19. Bread and circus by kimvette · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I am SO glad that our leaders are dealing with the important issues. I mean, it's not like we have a shitty economy or horrible foreign relations to worry about lately.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Bread and circus by Helmholtz · · Score: 1

      If people quit zoning out on The Biggest Loser and Dancing With The Stars, they may actually start talking to one another. And then, they might start READING too. Before you know it, they may start taking a vested interest in where their money goes and why. That certainly can't be tolerated ... quick, give more funding to fix the Boob Tube!

      --
      RFC2119
  20. Unlike most govt spending it's NOT a handout by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well I'm a crazy [insert whatever] who wants to know why the hell we're giving handouts for TV for anybody! Nobody will die without American Idol.

    It's not a handout. It's a (partial) reimbursement from the government to the previous users of the bandwidth for seizing the bandwidth and selling it for billions, which went into the treasury.

    The analog television system worked just fine for what it did. A LOT of people bought equipment in the good faith expectation that it would continue to be usable for the equipment's life.

    Then the government decided that, if it forced the TV stations to switch over to digital, they could provide a replacement service that would be better than the existing system (which wastes lots of bandwidth to reduce analog interference), it could re-sieze a lot of that bandwidth and auction it off to other users.

      - The existing broadcasters get replacement bandwidth and can get more use out of it by multiplexing other services into it - which helps them pay for the new equipment.
      - More use gets made of the total bandwidth, thanks to the new services enabled in the auctioned spectrum. So the buyers and their customers are enabled.
      - But the old viewers are hosed. They have to upgrade perfectly good equipment or buy a converter to continue getting the level of service they already bought into. There are a LOT of them, and many of them don't have a lot of spare money to throw at the extra expense.

    So the government is spending PART of the money it got from the auction of the spectrum to pay PART of the cost of the converter boxes for the viewers.

    It's like paying (but less than market rate) for land seized by eminent domain.

    The origin of property rights is making use of and improvements on previously unowned property in the expectation that you can then continue to do so. By that definition, the broadcasters and the viewers had a property right in the spectrum previously used for analog broadcast TV from which they've been evicted by the government for its own profit. So it's reasonable for them to expect payment for their loss and trouble.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Unlike most govt spending it's NOT a handout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you getting your information? How is ATSC Digital TV better than NTSC-III with ghost-canceling circuitry?

    2. Re:Unlike most govt spending it's NOT a handout by shadow349 · · Score: 1

      It's not a handout. It's a (partial) reimbursement from the government to the previous users of the bandwidth for seizing the bandwidth and selling it for billions, which went into the treasury.

      That was true for the ORIGINAL coupon program ($1.3B). The NEW funding ($650M) is being monetized (ie - printed) by the Treasury.

    3. Re:Unlike most govt spending it's NOT a handout by maxume · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you do your accounting; the spectrum sale netted more than the combined costs of the coupon programs, so the government profited, second coupon program or not. That the second program was appropriated separately and after the income was spent makes it easy to say "Oh, they are spending new money on that", but that means you are also ignoring the previous profit (which may make sense to you, but most people would tend to group the whats, not the whens).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  21. emergency funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "thanks to emergency funding"
    Are these people serious? Emergency funding? This isn't that big of a deal. Oh well, a few noobs could be without tv for a week or so.

  22. LIBERTARIANS: LISTEN CAREFULLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    LIBERTARIANS:

    LISTEN CAREFULLY: The government made a NET GAIN on this transition.

    They sold the spectrum reclaimed from analogue broadcasts for much more than this coupon program costs. It's not donating taxpayer money for TVs, it's compensating people for re-selling THEIR assets (radio spectrum) to private companies, something the government should be doing more often IMHO. And before anyone jumps up and down about how "people should be allowed to broadcast on any channel they choose", realise that no radio communication would work if that were the case - everyone would broadcast over everyone else, no-one would receive the signal they want, and it would be anarchy. There needs to be some authorisation for maintaining radio signals, and as bad as they are, the government are the only ones capable and willing (private enterprises don't have authority over one another, and no market force compels them to maintain the spectrum in the interests of the people).

    Libertarians with mod points, moderate this post to oblivion if you want.

    1. Re:LIBERTARIANS: LISTEN CAREFULLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly only gigantic multinational companies should be able to afford to buy radio space. What were us crazy people thinking, wanting to use a bit of the public airwaves ourselves??

  23. uTorret + Hauppauge MediaMVP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TV Tunning? That its so last century!!

    1. Re:uTorret + Hauppauge MediaMVP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > TV Tunning? That its so last century!!
      and News? we real nerds use ham radio, you know?
      (belive me, bearbug57 gives better news scope that local media)

  24. Just used my coupons by gsmalleus · · Score: 1

    I ordered mine right after the story about the lack of coupons showed up. I got my coupons a few weeks later. Went and used them last week at Circuit City. Most everything in the store was gone except around 100 Guitar Hero games and 2 pallets full of DTV converter boxes. With the going out of business prices, the cost of each converter box was less than $40!

  25. this doesn't make any sense... by ryanw · · Score: 1

    This amount of money could have been used to buy everyone a new HDTV who watched tv over the air... Most people have cable, or satellite.

    This is absolutely absurd to spend this kind of money on something that people should be figuring out on their own.

    1. Re:this doesn't make any sense... by Nichole_knc · · Score: 1

      Hear hear.. However I think you are speaking to a mute crowd since it seems 99% who posted here stuck a hand out for the GOV hand out and slashdotters no doubt!! It is not the governments issue for all Americans to get digital.. NON-ISSUE.. Should not have existed to begin with.. Go digital - if you cannot see your tube - get box or new tube.. Real easy here folks. me I am digital, self made antenna - no cable or sat - hooked to the net for everything I want to see. NOTE: streaming WHAT you wish to see is a whole lot CHEAPER than paying for 500 channels full of non-interesting crap..

  26. Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in in Florida. After Wilma hit in 2005 I was without cable for 3 weeks. For this reason, I got a free converter box with free shipping from freetvsignal.com. I am going to keep it with the rest of my hurricane supplies.

  27. stations not putting out enough power by TMB · · Score: 1

    Can they put some of that money into ensuring that the stations broadcast with a usable amount of power? Most of the stations seem to put out enough power for decent reception only in their immediate vicinity - places that are far enough away that the analog signal is only slightly fuzzy (but still entirely watchable) get nothing thanks to the all-or-nothing nature of digital.

    [TMB]

    1. Re:stations not putting out enough power by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      Digital signals are on different frequencies (for the moment) than their analog counterparts, and usually at lower power.

      My PBS affiliate is analog and physical channel 13. The digital channel is physically broadcast on channel 61, and at 10% power.

      It never works.

      After February 17^W^WJune 12, the digital channel will be moving back to physical 13 (which propagates better, and antennas like better) and up to full power.

      So, as soon as the transition finally happens, it will work fine. Which is why I was pissed that it was held back.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:stations not putting out enough power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are at their full licensed power on 61. VHF channels have a higher licensed power than their UHF counterparts as they need this higher power to propagate as far. While your specific antenna may perform better in VHF-High than in UHF, their service contour will remain somewhat unchanged.

  28. The coupon program is a joke by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

    There is no oversight whatsoever to the whole process. They claim my coupon was mailed on 12/29/08; it never made it to my mailbox. After a few weeks I contacted the program's customer support, and I am basically SOL. There is no way they will reissue coupons if they get lost in the mail, nor are you allowed to reapply. There is no way to appeal this decision. There are internet forums full of people saying that their coupons supposedly mailed between november and december never arrived, and got the same reply I did when complaining. I suspect something wrong went on during those months, and they just won't admit it. Again, there is no recourse.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    1. Re:The coupon program is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then fucking buy one, you scrounging cunt.

  29. Socialist foxes, capitalist henhouse. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Get it right.

    Socialists don't raise hens but will gladly share in yours.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Socialist foxes, capitalist henhouse. by macraig · · Score: 1

      You know, it's usually fearful people who dispense that kind of regurgitated FUD and spin. I doubt you're any sort of mastermind with an evil plan, rather just some poor Pavlovian brainwashed minion saying the only thing he knows to say whenever his knee is whacked in a certain way. Of what exactly are you afraid, I wonder?

      The scenario you insinuate isn't really socialism at all, but a perversion of it. It would be a nobler thing to actually study what you've been taught to fear, rather than repeating FUD. FUD is FUD because it's MISinformation.