Slashdot Mirror


Hulu Again Removed From Boxee and Again Added Back

An anonymous reader writes "In a mouse and cat game, Hulu the popular online content provider of shows, movies, and more has blocked Boxee yet again from accessing the Hulu content from the Boxee application. Just as Boxee added RSS feeds to include Hulu content, Hulu responded with blocking Boxee users from accessing the content via RSS feeds the very same day. RSS feeds are publicly available and it's really disappointing to hear that a site would block certain applications from accessing their content in such a manner. I would assume that the Boxee development team is currently working on disguising its browser to look like Firefox, Internet Explorer, or some other known browser in an attempt to fool Hulu."

220 comments

  1. The explanation is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're aliens.

    And that's how they roll.

    1. Re:The explanation is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The moderators don't have a TV you insensitive bastard.

      Turing word: lacking
      In a sentence: Today's group of moderators is not lacking in lackwits.

  2. Update = duplicate? by JackieBrown · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Did we really need a whole new article for this?

    Couldn't it have just been added as an update to the original posted the same day?

    1. Re:Update = duplicate? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2

      who reads stories twice here when they're that far apart? I think we even need a third article that explains why eactly hulu blocked them. I don't really get it. What's up Hulu's ass? They're loading their website, so what, get over it.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  3. Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Manip · · Score: 3, Informative

    Claiming that "Boxee" is like a browser's RSS feed is totally misleading. The software package cuts out the entire site, the adverts, etc and repackages it as almost its own material (with a small source icon).

    How would you feel if someone hot-linked your content, consumed your bandwidth, and gave you no advertising revenue in exchange?

    1. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd feel like a damn idiot for momentarily forgetting how the Internet works and for trying to have a lawyer solve an engineer's problem.

    2. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by mc1138 · · Score: 1, Informative

      An excellent point, Hulu is able to to what it does because of throwing in a few ads, often fewer than what you would see on normal network TV. Having programs that strip this stuff out could cause problems down the road for Hulu with content providers.

    3. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! And every time you fast-forward through commercials you're STEALING!

    4. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Daimanta · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "How would you feel if someone hot-linked your content, consumed your bandwidth, and gave you no advertising revenue in exchange?"

      Probably like a person with a very broken business model, but that's just me.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    5. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by mysidia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not an engineer's problem entirely. No matter how they engineer it, someone can possibly scrape their streams, and serve them to the user utilizing the provider's bandwidth.

      So they can and shold get their lawyers involved to take action and stop the blatant copyright infringment (framing someone else's content in your own site is a case of infringement, except when you're authorized to do it [implicitly and otherwise], and you do it in the manner so authorized).

      There is a possible solution though: inject the ads into the video itself, so they can't be separated.

      Make the videos 'dynamic' flash videos, so the advertising can't really be removed without modifying a .SWF file.

    6. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 0

      The software package cuts out the entire site, the adverts, etc and repackages it as almost its own material (with a small source icon).

      What do youy mean "the entire site"? It's RSS, not HTML. There's no "entire site" for Boxee to display.

      Now I'm not familiar with Boxee or with Hulu's RSS feed, so I cannot comment on the specifics, but, unless Boxee is actually modifying the contents of the RSS feed, it seems to me that Hulu are acting like jerks.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    7. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by physicsphairy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seeing as hulu lets you embed their content like youtube, it is strange if their objection is that in-site ads are being skipped. (And are we back to the AdBlock extension == theft argument?)

      Otherwise, I assume the ads embedded in the video are still be played.

      The only reasons I can imagine for Hulu to wat to block Boxee are (1) ignorance of their own profit model (2) planning to release their own hardware box, or else partner with someone else in order to get the same vertical monopoly going.

    8. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Samschnooks · · Score: 0, Troll

      "How would you feel if someone hot-linked your content, consumed your bandwidth, and gave you no advertising revenue in exchange?"

      Probably like a person with a very broken business model, but that's just me.

      I agree! The same goes for banks! They obviously have a broken business model, so I thought, well, since they're not lending money, I'll just go in and cut them out and help myself!

      Fucking FBI! They didn't understand that I was doing the country a service by updating the banking system!

    9. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0, Troll
      Or violating the DMCA by circumventing. From Sec. 1201 (a)(1)(A):

      No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title...

    10. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this article is about how they are having the engineers solve this "engineer's problem". Yes?

    11. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Goaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now I'm not familiar with Boxee or with Hulu's RSS feed

      So... you have no idea what you're talking about, but you won't let that stop you?

    12. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Spazmania · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably like a person with a very broken business model, but that's just me.

      Then your solution is what? Hula should shut down completely instead of just excluding Boxee? How does that help anyone?

      If you park your car downtown with the windows rolled down and the keys in the ignition, you may be an idiot. But the guy who takes it is still a thief. And the quiet little towns where nobody will take it... those are treasures.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    13. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's never stopped anyone else...

    14. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by wastedlife · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a possible solution though: inject the ads into the video itself, so they can't be separated. Make the videos 'dynamic' flash videos, so the advertising can't really be removed without modifying a .SWF file.

      Hey, you just described exactly how it works. There is no copyright infringement going on here. Boxee is not a web site, it is a media center application. Hulu allows embedding of their videos. They have ads in the video stream. Boxee basically just embeds the video, ads and all, into the application so that it can be played on your computer screen or TV with a simple interface.

      If I recall correctly, Hulu originally provided code to help Boxee display Hulu content. So why the change of heart? I read some speculation somewhere that Hulu is actually being pressured by the content owners to stop Boxee because there is less advertising revenue from web streaming than there is for live TV. Since people use boxee to play videos on their TV and not a computer screen, the content owners feel they are losing out. What I don't think they understand is that you can watch Hulu's videos using your computer on your TV with or without Boxee.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    15. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Fritzed · · Score: 1

      Boxee does NOT strip out the ads for any of the content that you view through it. In fact, when you opened the Hulu plugin with Boxee, it even provided the same cycling flash ad as you see when you load Hulu.com.

      The only difference between using Boxee and going to the Hulu site directly is the way you navigate which shows and episodes are available. There are no ads at all on Hulu when navigating the lists of available programing.

      It is also worth noting that Hulu provides the ability to embed their videos into any site. This is effectively what Boxee did but their site was designed specifically to be navigated using a remote with the Boxee interface.

      The reason that Hulu's content providers want them to block Boxee is simply because they cannot/will not graps the concept that internet video is slowly replacing regular broadcast.

      --
      Spooooon!!!!!
    16. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How would you feel if someone hot-linked your content, consumed your bandwidth, and gave you no advertising revenue in exchange?

      Attracting my attention to your particular little problem is the product. The content is the advertisement for the product. The bandwidth is justified because reaching into someone elses mind and affecting it with what you create and publish is the reward.

      If reaching other people with your creation is not your goal, if you consider that aspect of the exchange meaningless, if the only reason you publish is so you can bait a hook and sell influence to a third party, then you should get the hell out of the business. You're an antisocial bastard who doesn't deserve a dime, and you don't deserve to have people pay the slightest bit of attention to the crap you're peddling.

      Personally, I think taking money for advertising is tantamount to fraud and people who do it should be systematically punished.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    17. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Sparks23 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except Boxee didn't strip the commercials from Hulu. I used to watch Hulu in the browser in the beta days, and then later in Boxee. I saw the same ads inlaid in the show whether I watched on the site or via Boxee. The difference was that Boxee had better UI for browsing the programs, and that Boxee's method of reading the stream gave me considerably better framerate/performance than trying to view full-screen in Flash on the site did.

      In other words, Boxee was a great deal more usable for me as a viewer, and I saw all the same commercials I did as a user of the website. (Hulu doesn't do sidebar advertising, their adverts are in the programs themselves where ad-breaks would normally be.)

      --
      --Rachel
    18. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hulu allows the embedding of their videos on other websites, and Boxee does not strip out the commercials. Hulu is not taking a financial hit from people watching videos on Boxee.

      Either you are clueless, or lying through your teeth.

    19. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're quite welcome to miss the point, if you like. Who am I to stop you if such a thing makes you feel better?

      On the other hand... if you'd rather understand what it is I'm actually saying, you should take note of the fact that RSS is meant for content syndication and is meant to be interpreted as a set of individual items, while a web page is meant to be displayed as a whole. Unless Boxee is stripping the RSS content itself, its use is consistent with the purpose of an RSS feed. That's my point.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    20. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to point out that this isn't because people in quiet little towns are necessarily honest or upstanding people, it's because you can't do anything without the entire town knowing about it. And probably a bunch of people gathering to beat seven kinds of hell out of anyone who tries it.

    21. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I'd realize that my content is online and therefore available to anyone and just say what the hell. If it created a problem for me then I'd realize I had a stupid business model or had some technical flaws and make changes.

      Ad supported content that keeps you from being comfortable in your access of that content is a bad model. Instead of fighting Boxee why not work on a solution such as streaming ads into the content?

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    22. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Daimanta · · Score: 1, Troll

      "If you park your car downtown with the windows rolled down and the keys in the ignition, you may be an idiot. But the guy who takes it is still a thief. And the quiet little towns where nobody will take it... those are treasures."

      So copying is theft? How distorted.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    23. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best part about this is that the above apparently incorrect comment has been noticed and mentioned in the latest techfragments article linked from TFA.

    24. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Actually Hulu does have traditional ads on the video pages as well, but I'd imagine that they're considerably less lucrative than the ones injected in the videos.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    25. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Does it still show the commercials that pop up during the video?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    26. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Firehed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now I'm not familiar with Boxee or with Hulu's RSS feed, so I cannot comment on the specifics, but, unless Boxee is actually modifying the contents of the RSS feed, it seems to me that Hulu are acting like jerks.

      Well, you might want to look into that. Hulu's RSS just links to the hulu.com page where you can watch and provides a little information about the show (rating, run-time, etc.). Boxee is (presumably) following that link and then page-scraping the video into their own interface. I hear that there are significant performance improvements by using Boxee's player over Hulu's so they may be scraping the video stream directly rather than just embedding the player in a different interface, but in either case the video definitely isn't coming in directly through the feed.

      Just so I don't have to respond to your other response: yes, RSS is meant for content syndication. Hulu (and/or its corporate sponsors) have decided to syndicate the link to watch the show as well as some metadata, and are not syndicating the show itself. It's very much akin to a TV Guide - it tells you where to go and how to watch, but you can't watch the show from the little booklet.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    27. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Miseph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting theory. Please, let me know when you develop a means to pay the bills with your lofty ideals, it sounds much more fulfilling than selling out the way everyone else does.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    28. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, you sound like you are gainfully (for now) employed by one of these so-called content providers. Have you even used Boxee? Ads are still in the video stream. It's like... watching TV. Where is the motivation to copy the content when I can readily access it on-demand anyways? Those who are using this technology are well aware of where the content is coming from. No one is being scammed or defrauded of their content rights. Hulu already allows you to link directly to content so I don't think that is the true issue. As long as they get their ad views and ad revenue, what do they care?

      Time to wake up and smell the coffee. Change is coming whether you like it or not.

    29. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interesting theory. Please, let me know when you develop a means to pay the bills with your lofty ideals, it sounds much more fulfilling than selling out the way everyone else does.

      You mean like when my girlfriend releases digital copies under creative commons, allows book publishers, music publishers and event promoters to use her images free with attribution, and then sells the original works of acrylic painted on canvas in higher volume and for higher prices? Works real well... gets a lot of commissioned pieces for murals, does live paintings of performers at raves and spoken word events and festivals, the list goes on.

      It's called dealing with the realities of the world. Sell what is naturally scarce and share what is naturally plentiful as wide and far as you can, and people will come knock on your door. Now, contrast that with a business model whose entire existence relies on the continuation of wildly unpopular and wasteful legal structures that treat bits on a wire as though they were carrots dug out of your garden. Who is the idealist here?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    30. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you got it. Hulu WILL NOT WIN. They cant. The Boxee and XBMC hackers outnumber them 30 to 1 and they have far more talented programmers than Hulu could even hope to hire. Sorry, but it's the simple truth. They are making a lot of guys itch and they also like the challenge.

      I get a kick out of how the boxee plugin is getting all kinds of press, while the XBMC plugin has been disguising it's self as IE 7 for quite a while now in the Daily builds.

      Hulu, you might as well give up. The Boxee plugin will turn rogue and you cant sue those that you cant find.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    31. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by antibryce · · Score: 3, Informative

      Boxee doesn't remove any ads. You see the exact same Hulu ads you would see if you went to their website.

    32. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you park your car downtown with the windows rolled down and the keys in the ignition, you may be an idiot. But the guy who takes it is still a thief.

      Ah, I can tell you don't live in San Francisco. A few months of living here and you'd find that smash & grab is the rule, no one is punished for it, and that you're a dumbass if you thinking anything in your car is safe. My friend who's lived here for 8 or 9 years doesn't lock her car doors because she doesn't want to pay for another new window. It's pretty much the utopia that a lot of /.ers want: illegally acquiring something of value for free with no significant chance of repercussions.

    33. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      YOU CANT STEAL WHAT IS FREELY GIVEN TO YOU.

      Why cant you people get that through your heads??

      Boxee did nothing but showed the EXACT SAME CONTENT in a better UI. Commercials all were there.

      Just because some low IQ moron says something is not to his liking, it does not make it illegal or wrong. Whomever said that Boxee was stealing anything is a complete and utter moron that really needs to be killed so that he does not cause the rest of us to become dumber simply from his existence.

      This is the Crux. Hulu said , "no more boxee" because some really really REALLY stupid executive at some content provider that Hulu does nto have the balls to name said they did not like it.

      Only the incredibly low IQ people think that boxee was stealing anything. These same people think that Best buy employees are highly educated and know what they are talking about.

    34. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by ximenes · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only advertising that I've noticed is the little banner that appears in the upper right corner, which in my experience is always for the same product shown during the in-video ads.

      I guess Hulu's recommended video listings could be considered ads as well, since they're intended to drive you to other Hulu video offerings rather than just watching whatever afterwards, as you would be more likely to do with Boxee.

    35. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by coolsnowmen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      -Did the Parent say that?! no. It is an analogy.

      -I'm not sure what part of hulu you arn't getting. They provide a service but are at the mercy of the content providers. They have no business without them, but they do have one without boxee. So when content providers say "don't let boxee use hulu", hulu listenes, whether they want to or not.

    36. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see. So rather than a straight presentation of the RSS feed, Boxee is taking the RSS feed and using that to figure out which videos to embed?

      I can see how such use of the RSS feed might be seen as questionable, but aren't they still embedding the videos according to Hulu's own embed code? The original poster complained about missing ads, but if Boxee is embedding videos according to Hulu's own standards for third-party embedding then I still can't see much wrong with what they're doing.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    37. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by kimvette · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's still a retarded move though; hulu and similar services have been drawing people away from "pirated"[sic] content and back to revenue-generating content, and now that it is hitting critical mass the content owners are shooting themselves in the foot. The folks at Hulu seem caught in the middle. Who are the losers? Both consumers and Hulu.

      What content producers, software producers, and so forth are STILL failing to realize is that they are making the "pirated"[sic]/counterfeit product MORE valuable than the real thing because the "pirated"[sic] content is invariably not crippled by DRM.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    38. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if there is any additional advertising on Hulu it is so unobtrusive that I've never used it. I don't run adblockers (although some news sites are so obnoxious I should install one) because I recognize that advertising revenue is what pays for "free" content. If the advertising revenue disappears, eventually so will the content.

      However, given the situation where the ads are embedded in the streams, it's foolish to block Boxee. All Boxee does is drive more viewers to the content.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    39. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by kimvette · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However, you CAN bypass DRM for the purpose of interoperability. Want to watch media on Boxee? You now fall under the requirements for the clause which allows defeating/bypassing the DRM.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    40. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by nametaken · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have thought this was true until I realized it happened for me. I started using PlayOn to watch Hulu content on the XBox and big ol' plasma tv.

      After a couple weeks I realized I hadn't had a compelling reason to download anything from my usual sources. In the meantime they got to advertise to me just like on TV. Fewer commercials so I mind them less.

      I wish they'd all stop pissing and moaning and just recognize that this model is a GREAT transitional one between TV and wherever we're headed.

      Charge more for the ad space if you have to. Maybe charge a couple $'s a month for aggregators like Hulu. Whatever has to happen, but figure it out because the world is heading this way anyway. It's just a question of whether you want to fight it or make a couple bucks at it... like NetFlix. ;)

    41. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Antimatter3009 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What content producers, software producers, and so forth are STILL failing to realize is that they are making the "pirated"[sic]/counterfeit product MORE valuable than the real thing because the "pirated"[sic] content is invariably not crippled by DRM.

      I think they realize what they're doing, and I think they know the consequences. Right now they have content that generates different revenue in different forms. TV is the highest, the internet is lower, and pirated is zero. They were losing some viewers to piracy before, so they countered with Hulu. Now they're losing more viewers from TV to the other two. By limiting Hulu, some portion of the people affected will resort to piracy, but I think they're betting on some portion resorting to plain old TV.

      How the various content owners think is much easier to understand if you view it from their perspective. They want to make as much money as possible. They only care about how many viewers they have so far as it makes them more money. I'd bet that they think they're increasing revenue with this move, even if they decrease legal viewership. If we're lucky, they're wrong. Otherwise, this will continue.

    42. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by SilentChasm · · Score: 1

      It already had ads in the streamed videos, which Boxee did display.

    43. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by jellomizer · · Score: 0, Troll

      There is no point in arguing. Guys like the parent just think everything should be given to him for free, at the same time he expects his boss at work to pay his paycheck on time and get annual raises no matter what his performance is like. He will only accept B2B business models were the customer is not directly effected by this. Advertising is pure evil and attempts to make it better for him is just more evil. His view of the world is based on the Dot Com error economics of yea we are selling at a loss but we will make it up in volume. Combined with very basic knowledge of how things really costs and misunderstanding numbers cause products to be more expensive then people think.

      There is no changing his mind. He probably lives in his moms basement where everything is given for free anyways and cash that he makes goes straight to toys.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    44. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Content owners are leaning on Hulu to block boxee clients. Simple as that.

    45. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by michrech · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're acting as if the advertisements aren't being displayed -- to my knowledge, the advertisements that are presented (usually 4 to 5 times, from my own viewing of various shows) while watching the video still play.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    46. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Dolohov · · Score: 1

      ... except the paid banner ads and internal content ads (which may or may not be positioned according to payment like some search engines' results). If we don't acknowledge that those are there (and missing from Boxee), some marketing jerk is likely to say "they're not obtrusive enough, make them flash and change size!"

    47. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by saiha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never had heard about Boxee and this type of thing (I had used Hulu before however) until Hulu/content producers got all crazy.

      /goes to check out boxee

    48. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by saiha · · Score: 1

      I would feel like I should work with those people to get a bigger slice of the pie.

    49. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by saiha · · Score: 1

      Its like that in a lot of bigger cities. My brother never locked his doors when he lived in Las Vegas for the same reason. No point in having to also buy a new window when something got stolen.

    50. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So... you have no idea what you're talking about, but you won't let that stop you?

      You have nothing to add to the discussion but a vacuous post that proves that you don't understand what the adults are talking about.

      But that certainly didn't stop you from posting did it. Go away & let the adults talk cutie.

    51. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Amen Brother.

      Someone mod this Coward up!

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    52. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with "mooching", "freeloading" or "stealing".

      This is simply some content provider deciding that they will EXCLUDE
      someone. It would be just like NBC declaring that you can't watch
      their show with a Sony TV or that "gooks" can't watch their show with
      ANY TV.

      This is effectively a TV broadcast in the form of a website.

      There is nothing to steal to begin with.

      What we have here is basically a bunch of corporate bootlickers
      trying their best to come up with highly lame excuses to defend
      the "artistic megalomania" of the relevant content owners. They
      are not beneath mindlessly accusing others of being theives.

      This is simply "artistic megalomania". It's time to stop the
      madness and stop putting up with this notion that authors have
      more rights than what a 1950's view on copyright would allow.
      The new technology doesn't really change anything. Copying,
      distribution and performance are the same things they always
      were.

      Actions that simply enable use of what's been freely offered
      to all, or bought by an indivdiual should not be criminalized
      or demonized.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    53. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Stinky+Fartface · · Score: 1

      You make a grand assumption that most people have some creative contribution to add to this world. Sorry, but most don't. Creative types have a hard time believing this could be true, but it is. Many people have functional contributions that cannot be subsidized by the whims of the internet's paying customers. In fact, it is the case for the vast majority of people. I wish it weren't true, but *that* is the reality of the world, not the one you describe for your talented girlfriend. I wish her well but your scenario doesn't work for the general population.

    54. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by davolfman · · Score: 1

      Hulu doesn't want to block anything. It's the backers with the strings on the content who've gone stupid (though not really very suddenly, they just returned closer to their ground state of being complete morons).

    55. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Probably like a person with a very broken business model, but that's just me.

      Let's see you do better. The people that yap about broken business models generally aren't doing anything better, or anything at all. As far as I can tell, it's just hot air used to make excuses, I've never seen anyone that cite "broken business model" suggest a better alternative.

      As it is, there is not much for a sustainable business model for video producers on the internet. The people that are really good might be able to support one family, if they're lucky, maybe two families, but even people with millions of views often make little or no money at all, even lose money because there's so little money to be made.

    56. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by philipgar · · Score: 0

      Actually, in this instance it can be considered theft. Copying a cd for personal use isn't necessarily theft, but copying a cd, and then selling burned copies of it for profit is definitely very close, if not indistinguishable from theft. It's one thing to illegally use someone else's content. It's another altogether to use someone's content as your own while they pay the cost to distribute it. Companies do have legal rights to prevent others from doing this, and they can and should use them. If there was no such thing as copyright, information might exist, but it would be in a wide range of disarray and it would be hard, if not impossible to determine which sources you can trust. If some other website could republish all the content on the new york times for instance, what incentive would the new york times have to hire writers and reporters in the first place? The same goes for most content providers. They would cease to exist, and all content would be from questionable sources without any real professionalism put behind it. Of course it's arguable how much professionalism goes into much of the content produced today, but that's a completely separate issue.

      Phil

    57. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is indeed a stupid move. I remember, back when I helped to run TV-Links, we sorta helped start all of this. I mean, it was one thing to download a dvdrip, but to stream it took balls...I think we had almost 1/4 million videos, and in Alexa hit above 15 and 25 for page rank in the US and UK, respectively (in the top 100 worldwide I believe too). However, the end justifies the means. We dreamt of a future with boxes like this and where media websites would give content away for free or with ads.

      Unless they want someone else to try a TVLinks (hell, The Pirate Bay said a while back they wanted to try it), then they should stop squabbling over what is good. The masses want streaming video of their favorite stuff, so give it to them.

    58. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You make a grand assumption that most people have some creative contribution to add to this world. Sorry, but most don't. Creative types have a hard time believing this could be true, but it is. Many people have functional contributions that cannot be subsidized by the whims of the internet's paying customers. In fact, it is the case for the vast majority of people. I wish it weren't true, but *that* is the reality of the world, not the one you describe for your talented girlfriend. I wish her well but your scenario doesn't work for the general population.

      We're not talking about most people. We're talking about professional creators. If you don't have a creative contribution to add to this world, you sure as hell shouldn't be getting paid to sit around all day publishing.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    59. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by saxoholic · · Score: 4, Funny

      No matter how they engineer it, someone can possibly scrape their streams

      As long as they don't CROSS their streams. That would be bad.

    60. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      Luddites all over again.

    61. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by ClassMyAss · · Score: 1

      I read some speculation somewhere that Hulu is actually being pressured by the content owners to stop Boxee because there is less advertising revenue from web streaming than there is for live TV.

      There are three options as to why this is the case:

      1. Advertisers are overpaying for TV ads
      2. Advertisers are underpaying for streaming ads
      3. Internet eyeballs are actually worth less to advertisers than TV eyeballs

      Anyone care to speculate? Personally, I'd suspect that it's a lot of 1) and a little of 2), but I could be wrong. In any case I highly doubt that 3) is primarily to blame - when I see ads on Hulu, I actually sit through and watch them, whereas on TV the ad breaks are more than long enough to switch the channel/go grab some food/etc.

      Internet TV is something that the networks and content producers should be rushing to embrace, not fighting. If it means less advertising revenue, then they really have to fight that head on and try to either bring about fairer prices or increase the value of each view, not try to push the issue to the future. I know for a fact that a lot of companies are starting to sit out of the TV ad bidding process altogether this year because they realize they can get better ROI from internet ads. That more have not realized this is most likely a matter of inertia, and once they do, I'd expect to see some price normalization across the board, with internet ads coming up and TV ones coming down (besides, with internet ads you can actually tell when people click through, which makes it easier to measure the impact that the ad has).

      Next in line is to start actually putting shows up on the net before the torrents get there, as an awful lot of people will happily sit through some ads, but if the show is not up yet, will equally happily hit the Pirate Bay to get it. The 1 day to 1 week lag time means that most of the real hard core fans have likely already gotten illegal copies, and this is certainly eating into revenue from sites like Hulu.

    62. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by ClassMyAss · · Score: 1

      Guys like the parent just think everything should be given to him for free, at the same time he expects his boss at work to pay his paycheck on time and get annual raises no matter what his performance is like.

      If you're not getting an annual raise, then you're getting an effective annual cut, so I think that's a perfectly reasonable assumption (unless your performance has been truly awful)...such are the wonders of inflation.

    63. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by ClassMyAss · · Score: 1

      Let's see you do better. The people that yap about broken business models generally aren't doing anything better, or anything at all. As far as I can tell, it's just hot air used to make excuses, I've never seen anyone that cite "broken business model" suggest a better alternative.

      Well, the alternative is to get the hell out of the business. Luckily, these things have a way of resolving themselves - if the content producers can't figure out how to make a profit distributing shows on the internet, then they will be forced out of business as the demand for internet TV increases. The point is, their current actions likely don't help their bottom lines at all, and in all likelihood merely slightly delay the inevitable transition.

      The ultimate irony is that the increased availability and better user experience provided by web distribution will probably ultimately be more profitable than the current TV model is, as it will draw a lot more eyeballs to the ads (and allow for niche programming that could not be allowed to take up a prime time spot - Firefly would probably still be alive if Internet distribution was the norm and your profit merely had to surpass your expenses). This could be accelerated if they got behind it, and prices would come into line far more quickly, but instead they are fighting against it, which is probably hurting them (and us!) significantly in the long term even if it's slightly helping in the short.

    64. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      LOL that's hilariously ignorant. There has got to be a good quote for that.

    65. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Well, what is the naturally scarce thing in a blockbuster film that you could sell?

      Is there enough of it to cover the typical $200M cost to produce? Or better yet, have some obscene profit, to cover the films that turn out to not be good enough to make back their production costs?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    66. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Miseph · · Score: 1

      So if your actual creation doesn't exist in any form other than digital, fuck off with wanting money for it? I'm glad that your girlfriend can make a living selling ACTUAL PHYSICAL PAINTINGS while giving away digital copies to anyone who wants one, but if you can't see how perhaps that example isn't relevant across the board then you are beyond helping.

      I'm also wondering where your bizarre black and white world view comes from. Is there no middle ground between merely wishing to share an artistic vision as the ultimate expression of one's soul and creating "art" for the mere purpose of generating revenue? I'm pretty sure that most professional artists out there (including, from the sound of it, your girlfriend) actually strike a balance between the two: they create art because that is what they live to do, but since living DOES require some sort of income they also find a way to make money doing it, and begrudging somebody that income is just asinine.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    67. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wouldn't be surprised if the cable/satellite companies and local broadcasters are pressuring the national networks, as they have the most to lose from Internet-streaming set top boxes.

      Local broadcasters don't have enormous profit margins. They're hurting right now, and if ten percent of their market decide to stream Hulu to their TV, it could mean bankruptcy for many smaller providers. NBC and Fox have done the math; they don't want to lose the majority of their audience (who still watch whatever's on the tube) just to make a minority (who've learned about this whiz-bang Internet thingy) happy.

      Cable and satellite companies, of course, have tremendous influence over the networks as well, as they provide the majority of the audience these days. They also have a history of doing whatever it takes to prevent competition and sweeten their contracts with the networks. If NBC has to choose between Comcast and Hulu, they'll pick the one that has 25 million paying subscribers. Hint: It's not Hulu...

      Honestly, I don't think this is really about Boxee at all. I think it's just an attempt to set precedent. Lots of people are scared to death of a box that lets people watch whatever they want, whenever they want, with no monthly fee (beyond their broadband service). End distributors (local networks, cable companies) are afraid of the competition. Networks are afraid of losing their position as the gatekeepers of content, as the Internet makes it far easier for content creators (the individual production companies) to deal directly with the "distributors" (YouTube, etc).

      So the networks have to walk a very fine line here. On the one hand, they can't afford to anger (or bankrupt) their current distributors. On the other, they can't afford to lose their dominance, even as people start switching to Internet-based services.

      As a result, the networks seem to be taking a cautious approach: They work to popularize their own online services, like Hulu, in hopes of transferring their content oligopoly to the online world, but they avoid direct competition with their major distribution methods.

      I'd wager that if streaming ever reaches a "saturation point", where everybody is watching TV on their computer and the market seems ready to switch, the networks will release some ordained "magic box" which streams their content (and maintains their control over the content market), and happily give their old distributors the metaphoric finger.

      Or, if one large content owner makes a big push for streaming set top boxes, expect the rest to follow suit fairly quickly.

      Until one of those occurs, though, expect more of the status quo. To use an analogy that describes technology adoption by most large industries: Nobody wants to be the only one in the pool, but they definitely don't want to be the only one out of the pool. They may all decide to jump in together, but if one decides to jump in now, the rest will follow.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    68. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by thebigbadme · · Score: 1

      Copying music is analogous to going to a library and photocopying an entire book. See, it's perfectly legit to copy sections from a book to use for academia or reviews, but doing the whole thing, and for what? Probably just to fill up space on your bookshelf at home, or worse, read it, without providing any incentive to any of the parties involved, including the author(s) to continue to create anything. Yeah, so you don't like the distribution model? Somehow I really doubt this is what's behind the claim, but it's the one that I hear most often, and so I'm going after the throat kill on this one. Do you send money to artists after you download their music? Seriously, it isn't difficult to figure out how to get money to them. and no I don't mean do you go to a show and spend other money on them. I mean, do you hand over money, with no premise of gaining anything further such as a t-shirt, or even just the ticket to the show... do you still pay the artist, even if you circumvent everyone else involved?

      How about the engineer(s) and producers who help make the music not sound like it was recorded in a closet? Oh, wait, you'd be fine with music that sounds like that? There are tons of bands who go that route for one reason or another, no reason to copy the music of an artist who has a big budget studio behind them. If you don't like it, don't download it. If you like it buy it. If you can't decide first, download it, try it, buy it or delete it. Copying music does cause a loss of money if and only if that money would have been spent on the music otherwise; and a generally accepted view is that if you earn $x for doing work z, but you could be earning $y (more) doing the same job, then you're losing $y-x
      yes, you still make money, but really, you lose money that you could have made. As per this example, music piracy is theft, because there is a loss. If you want to avoid the theft claim, you have to show that you wouldn't have purchased the music otherwise. And if you can prove that, then you shouldn't be keeping the music.

      p.s. I love to download music, but I also love that music I love keeps being made, and so I buy my music. and as far as a dead artist goes.... see, people like to leave things for their heirs. That's part of the motivation for doing it. That's not your prerogative, it's theirs. Circumventing the part where you actually have to spend money reduces the incentive for other artists. Yeah you can tell me if they don't like that fact, they don't have to make music. But you, by the same token, should follow the axiom: if you don't like the system being used to offer the goods, don't consume the goods; support only the artists who do things how you like. Help those artists out by encouraging others to do the same. You really want to "change" the system, convert your friends and family away from the systems you despise.

      --
      "It's the Law of the Universe, and I'm the sheriff." Slash-cott 2/10-2/17
    69. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by budgenator · · Score: 1

      What difference can it make, open hulu with firefox then click full screen, works fine, connect your 42 in LCD TV to the computer no problems.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    70. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by quadrox · · Score: 1

      Actually, after having watched http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy-fD78zyvI I'm not so sure the parent is really a troll after all - although his "solution" probably isn't the right one :)

    71. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by budgenator · · Score: 1

      No, find the guys that know how to bake a pie just for you and work for them.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    72. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you click on the ads and be taken to the advertiser's webpage?

      I saw an ad for the movie 'Choke' a few months back and was curious to see what the next movie based on a Chuck P. novel was going to be, and of course it opened a tab and took me to the 'Choke' website. So, can boxee do this?

      It's an honest question, as I've not installed boxee, but despite all your misplaced raving frothy anger, I suspect the answer is 'no.'

    73. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      This is the Crux. Hulu said , "no more boxee" because some really really REALLY stupid executive at some content provider that Hulu does nto have the balls to name said they did not like it.

      You do realize that without content providers, Hulu ceases to exist, right? Having the proverbial balls to stand up to them could only backfire, as the content provider will happily stop providing. This is the nature of the beast when someone is providing content that has perceived value. (If it did not have perceived value, people would not watch it.)

      Only the incredibly low IQ people think that boxee was stealing anything. These same people think that Best buy employees are highly educated and know what they are talking about.

      Insulting people is always a fine way to make your point, but frankly stealing (or not) is irrelevant to the discussion. Hulu has not accused anybody of stealing, they're just saying "you can't do this anymore", and taking steps to prevent it.

    74. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm [sic] of this.

    75. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What content producers, software producers, and so forth are STILL failing to realize is that they are making the "pirated"[sic]/counterfeit product MORE valuable than the real thing because the "pirated"[sic] content is invariably not crippled by DRM.

      And by ads, and by FBI warnings, and by "don't download movies, downloading is stealing" movies, etc.

      That last one cracks me up every time: I exclusively get to see those when I actually *pay* for a movie. What message are the distributors sending there, anyway? If you spend money, we'll treat you like a criminal and abuse you, and claim your time for ourselves. However, if you download the same thing, you are not treated like a criminal, you can control the movie as you like and you don't have us accusing you of being a criminal.

      It's really hard for me to draw the conclusion "so I should go to a theater and be treated like a criminal" from that...

    76. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you park your car downtown with the windows rolled down and the keys in the ignition, you may be an idiot. But the guy who takes it is still a thief. And the quiet little towns where nobody will take it... those are treasures.

      The problem with your car analogy is that Hulu is explicitly making available their content. If there's no authentication, and they just cough up the data when you ask for it, then you're clearly not stealing - to stretch the analogy a bit more to try to actually make it fit the situation, it's more like the RSS is a flyer telling you where to get the car, and when you get there you're permitted to take it. Of course, this is a stupid analogy and you are a stupid person for trying to make it in the first place because after you take a car, the car is gone, but after you download TV from Hulu, you've watched an ad and made some money for Hulu, and someone else can do it too.

      You are hereby no longer allowed to make automotive analogies on the internet. kthxbye.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    77. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Interesting theory. Please, let me know when you develop a means to pay the bills with your lofty ideals, it sounds much more fulfilling than selling out the way everyone else does.

      You do not have the right to make a profit. If you did, nobody would ever have to look for work - work would find them. Every business would be successful. And we could all suck each other off as we drove to the moon. Advertising is a deliberate attempt to use known tactics to make people feel inadequate so they buy shit they don't need or usually even want. Copyright, the basis on which you suggest that we pay the bills, was created not to provide incentive to create new works, but to provide incentive to submit your work to the archive for presentation. It has since been railroaded by commercial interests who have repeatedly purchased legislation to extend copyright terms. You clearly do not understand this if you are making dizzy-headed pronouncements about "paying the bills".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    78. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What difference can it make, open hulu with firefox then click full screen, works fine, connect your 42 in LCD TV to the computer no problems.

      Besides missing the entire fucking point (this is a video appliance) you have also missed that many people want to operate their entertainment center with a remote control. Trying to find the mouse pointer on a 42" television takes too long, I just want to press a button.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    79. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hulu's business model is fatally flawed because they have to bend over any time a content provider says "grab them ankles". They have no chance to survive (make your time etc.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    80. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...[sic]...[sic]...[sic]...

      I don't think that means what you think it means.

    81. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      I'm also wondering where your bizarre black and white world view comes from. Is there no middle ground between merely wishing to share an artistic vision as the ultimate expression of one's soul and creating "art" for the mere purpose of generating revenue?

      The house you live in doesn't appear because people are systematically denied the right to share. The food, the goods, none of them appear because of copyright. The copyright is only a mechanism for sorting common goods among the population. Therefore, there is no reason why we can't support the same number of creators we already do without copyright.

      That's my position. I don't support expending extra social resources on cops and robbers to keep the children of that poor family down the street from having access to culture because you're too comfortable to want the boat rocked on what amounts to nothing more than an administrative process.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    82. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      I would not enjoy knowing every homework I ever finished was turned into the teacher under a glass frame engraved with someone else's name.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    83. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      There is nothing stopping you from watching Hulu on your MediaPC directly from the web browser. Boxbee just made the interface easier. I do it all the time with mine. I have a 3-D gyration mouse which makes navigating websites as easy as using Boxbee. I have actually watched video's via the 'fullscreen' option on Hulu. Granted, you don't get some of the filtering benefits for scaling and such, but it's not that drastic a difference for a decent quality feed.

      This is just stupid, and THAT's how the content providers apparently roll...

    84. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Nadda,

      You assume people running these entities have employees with vision and or understanding. My take on the world has been pretty much the opposite.

      I'm amazed at how companies keep afloat with all the morons running the show. Oh wait, they are collapsing...

      I know it sounds fairly negative, but just remember my view is colored by experience.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    85. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Actually...

      Local broadcasters don't mind streaming their content, but there are restrictions imposed upon them. Just like hulu.

      What you will find are local broadcasters seeking any means necessary to get their self produced content out there and generate revenue on alternate models.

      At least the smart ones anyway.

      It's free advertising that pays for itself.

      It's brand marketing that pays for itself.

      It's also promoting the community which creates loyalty.

      I knew a station once that the running joke was they would get a 4 share even if they ran bars and tone.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    86. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not going to event attempt to lock down your web site with password protected access, you're rolling out the red carpet.

      We can access your site with any browser or client we want.

    87. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't try to confuse us with semantics.

      Once the content is distributed good luck getting your leash on it back.

    88. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you understand the use of [sic]...

    89. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I wasn't quite clear on what you were trying to say amongst the grammar nazism. Like it or not, "pirated"[not sic] is a word now.

    90. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Same thing that happened to me. Take my ability to watch Hulu on a big TV away and you know what happens? I go elsewhere to fetch the content and put it up on the TV.

    91. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that. As long as Boxee can masquerade as a regular IE/Firefox browser, Hulu is fucked.

    92. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Whomever said that boxing was stealing is a complete and utter moron"?

      Do you think the following is English as well:

      "Him is a good person"?

    93. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by profplump · · Score: 1

      I agree that protecting the TV segment of their market is probably a good idea for protecting short-term profits. But it's clear that such a strategy is a long-term loser -- the very fact that there are non-TV markets now and weren't before suggests that they need a new business model to keep afloat.

      Don't they want to make the most money possible over a period longer than a year or two? I mean, I know the ones that get paid in stock only care about the speculative value of the company, but seriously, don't any of the owners have an interest in long-term profitability? Or the mid-level management who doesn't have the opportunity to make money on the speculative value of the company, and might still want a job in 5 years?

      And given that perspective I'm back to not understanding what they're doing at all -- you not only have to think from their point of view, but you have to intentionally reduce the scope of your thought to only including short-term profitability for this plan to make any sense.

    94. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      That little banner is how you're supposed to click through to find out more about the product you were just told about. I'd bet that, despite the fact that barely anyone clicks it, that button is a big part of how Hulu sells advertising as being more valuable than TV advertising.

      The other thing they do that Boxee didn't "see" is the full-page branding on certain ads. While the ad's playing, the rest of the Hulu page suddenly becomes rebranded to whatever's being advertised for the duration of the ad, thus making the ad take up more of the screen.

      Of course, neither of these things show up if you view the Hulu video full screen, so it's a difficult argumnt to make.

    95. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      If there's no authentication, and they just cough up the data when you ask for it, then you're clearly not stealing

      Next week you'll react with outrage when some vendor refuses to release their modified Linux kernel. Our stuff, our rules. Don't like? Don't use.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    96. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Next week you'll react with outrage when some vendor refuses to release their modified Linux kernel. Our stuff, our rules. Don't like? Don't use.

      The first and second parts of your statement seem to conflict. When a vendor refuses to release the source code to a modified Linux kernel which they have distributed as per the license they are in violation of the license. When Hulu offers a video stream by making links to the content (again, "making available" and without access restrictions) specifically for the purpose of embedding said content, then attempts to draw a line between a web page on the web and a web page on a device, they miss the whole point. They made that content available, I don't have to put my J.H. on anything to get the stream... All I've really agreed to do is accept a stream of bytes. Copyright law restricts what I might do with it, but they're not rebroadcasting - the stream is being used by the user for the purpose for which it is intended (*whew*.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    97. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by jessemaurais · · Score: 1

      Hulu is actually being pressured by the content owners to stop Boxee because there is less advertising revenue from web streaming than there is for live TV.

      Once again profitable business becomes unprofitable because new technology makes it obsolete. And all the businessmen can do is cry foul. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

    98. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by tiny-e · · Score: 1

      This is the Crux. Hulu said , "no more boxee" because some really really REALLY stupid executive at some content provider that Hulu does nto have the balls to name said they did not like it.

      You do realize that without content providers, Hulu ceases to exist, right? Having the proverbial balls to stand up to them could only backfire, as the content provider will happily stop providing. This is the nature of the beast when someone is providing content that has perceived value. (If it did not have perceived value, people would not watch it.)

      Only the incredibly low IQ people think that boxee was stealing anything. These same people think that Best buy employees are highly educated and know what they are talking about.

      Insulting people is always a fine way to make your point, but frankly stealing (or not) is irrelevant to the discussion. Hulu has not accused anybody of stealing, they're just saying "you can't do this anymore", and taking steps to prevent it.

      You do realize that Hulu is OWNED by the content providers, right?

    99. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Jon_S · · Score: 1

      Manip:

      You are completely wrong and now this wrong-hood has even been picked up by the story linked in the summary (quoting you).

      Hulu.com, the website and RSS feed, **HAS NO ADVERTISING**.

      All the advertising is embedded in the stream, as in non-skippable TV commercials. Boxee plays the stream unedited, with all the embedded ads (commercials). Boxee displays all the advertising that comes out of Hulu, because none of it is in the website, and all of it is in the stream.

    100. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advertisers are apparently willing to pay more to reach viewers via a TV station than via Hulu, which makes viewer shifting from TV to Hulu bad for the content owners. The weird thing is the content owners founded Hulu to stem off anything that would have been worse for themselves, and now they're weakening it.

    101. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Antimatter3009 · · Score: 1

      Well, short term thinking is a classic problem with the corporate model, but I think it's a bit of that combined with a bit of ignorance. I don't think they fully understand what they're dealing with. They want to treat the internet like a secondary, smaller version of tv. They think they can limit it so that they retain as much control of it as they do with cable. Of course, everyone here knows they can't. The internet is an inherently different medium than tv. Until the people in charge understand this and embrace it we're going to keep seeing these sorts of decisions that make no sense to us.

      I'm not sure when that will happen, though. They were making buckets of money in the old system and, since the advent of internet viewing, they've seen revenues steadily decline. From their perspective, what makes the most sense is to make the internet act like tv. We know that can't happen, but what we think doesn't really matter. Eventually they'll have to come to terms with the new reality, but it might take awhile.

    102. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      It's still a retarded move though; hulu and similar services have been drawing people away from "pirated"[sic] content and back to revenue-generating content, and now that it is hitting critical mass the content owners are shooting themselves in the foot yet again ... The folks at Hulu seem caught in the middle. Who are the losers?

      There, fixed that for you.

      As for the winners and losers... As a consumer, yeah, I lose something that I was getting for free. Oh well, easy come - easy go. Hulu loses out, of course, but the big losers are the content providers. My gawd. In what world is it "just good business" to deliberately cut off a large portion of the network that delivers your revenue generating content (commercials)? Un-fucking-believable.

    103. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Um, yes? Hence "without content providers, they don't exist".

    104. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by tiny-e · · Score: 1

      Um, yes? Hence "without content providers, they don't exist".

      No. Directly owned.

    105. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Why do they serve them up using a different URIs if they want them all served up at the same time? If you make them addressable independently, of course people will be able to only ask for one of the resources.

    106. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by blueskies · · Score: 1

      They'd have to own the Linux kernel first. Good luck buying the copyright for every piece of it.

      Why don't you figure out how many people would have to sell their copyright and then get back to me about your broken analogy?

    107. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Hulu is owned by the content owners. So Hulu/content owners are trying to block boxee clients.

    108. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      "Our stuff, our rules" means the author/owners of Linux get to choose what the rules of Linux use are. The rules they chose happen to include requiring folks to release their changes as source code whenever they release modified binaries based on that code.

      "Our stuff, our rules" means Hula gets to choose the rules of the content they control as well.

      Boxee taking (or helping take) that content in a manner where Hula disapproves is no different than Linksys taking the Linux kernel in a manner incompatible with the GPL.

      You like the latter because it advantages you. You dislike the former because it inhibits you. Fair enough. But when you step beyond like and dislike and use words like "right" and "wrong" you cross the line into hypocrisy.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    109. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that I don't download nearly as much now that I know about Hulu.

      The main reason I pirated content was because I couldn't get it any other way - which I still do, when it's not available on a quality site that I know about.

      Free, on-demand content is the *only* thing I'm interested in. As a creator of creative content, I understand that people have to make money, and I gladly will submit to a few ads in exchange for a quality service.

      In my mind, Hulu is better than torrents because it's immediate, of a guaranteed quality, and completely legal.

      I go for hulu first - if they don't have it, I'll look on tpb, then I'll ask friends. I never pay directly for content (unless I like it enough to buy). To me, tv does not exist. If the industry wants guaranteed revenue from me, they should use hulu, or try legal action. (a class action suit against AC? Hmm...)

      Basically, if content is removed from hulu, the media companies will be back where they started - with *nothing* from me.

      As far as the cost of bandwidth, they should integrate p2p to distribute the load of popular shows... just a thought.

      On a tangent, I empathize with Europeans - I hate how the Dr. Who site tells me I can't watch their stuff because I'm not in the UK.

    110. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by blueskies · · Score: 1

      No. I like the latter because it is backed by existing law.

      Hula could use existing law to limit viewing, but they don't want to inconvenience the viewers that they approve of.

      Hula is beholden to current laws, so they need to follow those rules. If they don't like those rules, they don't have to share or create content at all. Our country, our rules.

      If they want to use HTTP, then they are free to do so, but don't bitch because they don't know how to authenticate and authorize downloads.

      Hulu acts like a victim because they don't understand how the web works. I'm sorry that their idiots, but just because you're an idiot doesn't mean you get different rules.

      There is no hypocrisy here because Hulu is freely handing out their content and then trying to put conditions on it. Oops..too late hulu.

      The GPL even protects you against the content owner. If the content owner wants everyone to stop using his code, it is too late. The owner can stop licensing code as GPL, but the existing code is out there (just like the original ssh (now closed source) but the old versions are still available)

    111. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Um, yes? Hence "without content providers, they don't exist".

      No. Directly owned.

      Um, yes? Hence "without content providers, they don't exist". Why is this hard? Company A owns Company B. Company A says "Do this or we have no reason to continue your existence." Company B refuses. Company B ceases to exist.

    112. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Alsee · · Score: 1

      The only reasons I can imagine for Hulu to wat to block Boxee are (1)... (2)...

      You missed (3) anything less than 30 years old is like the Boston Strangler.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    113. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by tiny-e · · Score: 1

      Um, yes? Hence "without content providers, they don't exist".

      No. Directly owned.

      Um, yes? Hence "without content providers, they don't exist". Why is this hard? Company A owns Company B. Company A says "Do this or we have no reason to continue your existence." Company B refuses. Company B ceases to exist.

      No. This is a shitty way of saying "It's not our fault -- it's those guys over there."

      When, in fact, 'us' and 'those guys' are one in the same.

      Same pants, different pocket.

    114. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      I see your point. The end result is the same though - Hulu doesn't have the option to say "no", which is what I was pointing out to the OP.

    115. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Hula is beholden to current laws, so they need to follow those rules.

      You believe that Hula is legally obligated to serve up content to Boxee users? Seriously?

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    116. Re:Boxee is not like RSS in a browser by blueskies · · Score: 1

      No. WTF? no. Just that they need to follow the rules. They just can't make up rules that don't follow US law (in reference to the "don't like their rules..." comment)

  4. Boxee? by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  5. End result = No more RSS by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This will result in us just losing the RSS openness of Hulu. Currently, their shows can be embedded in other webpages. They'll probably end up having to remove this too.

    1. Re:End result = No more RSS by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      If Hulu wants to bankrupt themselves by forcing all of their customers away, that's OK with me. There are plenty of similar online services who DO get it, and we don't really need one that arbitrarily denies service based on user-agent, for no discernable reason whatsoever.

    2. Re:End result = No more RSS by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

      openness of Hulu

      Ah! Is this an oxymoron contest?

      My turn then: "Atheism of the Pope"

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:End result = No more RSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're stretching this a bit. There is a discernable reason, it's just not a legitimate one (in our minds, anyway).

    4. Re:End result = No more RSS by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      You're right. I wrote that before I knew what the reason was (computer OK, TV bad). I almost put the word "sane" instead, and then it would have still been accurate.

    5. Re:End result = No more RSS by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Ah! Is this an oxymoron contest?

      My turn then: "Atheism of the Pope"

      The Pope is an atheist, an N-1 atheist.

      He disbelieves the existence of every single god and goddess ever invented, except one.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:End result = No more RSS by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      an N-1 atheist.

      He disbelieves the existence of every single god and goddess ever invented, except one.

      Atheism is a boolean value. It has to be null, and the pope believes in an irrational number of gods which equals both 1 and 3 ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:End result = No more RSS by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Dude, I'm a human development major. I seriously sat here for 45 seconds saying "Damn, they really didn't teach me much math..." until i crossed my heart so say a pray....oh duh.

  6. Re:Stop telling companies how to operate. by bytethese · · Score: 1

    I think you forgot to include your signature: "This message brought to you by Hulu executives."

  7. Have you even used Boxee??? by wastedlife · · Score: 5, Informative

    Boxee does not strip out the ads. It is still the same video stream, boxee just gives a remote-friendly interface to the media. It is no different than watching Hulu in full screen with your computer plugged into a TV. Hulu allows embedding into another website just like Youtube and other media sites, so how is embedding into the Boxee media player any different?

    Also, Hulu's ads are played in the video. How are they being deprived of advertising revenue?

    --
    Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    1. Re:Have you even used Boxee??? by nova_ostrich · · Score: 1

      I imagine that the content owners aren't quite sure how Internet TV can be most profitable yet. I doubt they make much from advertising through Internet streaming compared to the traditional TV market. In a knee-jerk reaction, they're saying that if you're going to watch their shows on a TV (which Boxee obviously lets you do), then you should do it with the full set of commercials, rather than the one or two that get displays with the on-demand Internet streams. For the time being, TV streaming through a browser is probably considered a hassle for most viewers, so they have to make up for it with fewer advertisements. Boxee takes away the hassle (and in many cases, makes things BETTER than traditional TV), so content providers think they're getting ripped off again. In short, they're trying to insert the maximum amount of annoyance viewers will tolerate, and Boxee is screwing it all up! How dare they.

      --
      It's scary being a Flash and Flex developer on Slashdot. You guys are unnaturally rabid.
    2. Re:Have you even used Boxee??? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Also, Hulu's ads are played in the video. How are they being deprived of advertising revenue?

      I don't think it's directly about the internet or software, but what it's replacing.

      If Boxee is being used at the TV to replace the cable box or directly watching broadcast TV, then they lose a lot of ad revenue because online video ads don't pay a tenth as much per viewer as it does on TV or cable.

      They're trying to straddle two worlds, the old broadcast model, which paid a lot better, but is weakening, and trying to transition to the internet model, the medium is strong but the money is very weak.

  8. Rename slashdot to "Hulu Boxee Wars" by olddotter · · Score: 1, Informative

    If every iteration of this cat and mouse game gets on Slashdot, then almost every other story will be about it....

    1. Re:Rename slashdot to "Hulu Boxee Wars" by pm_rat_poison · · Score: 1

      mod parent up! :D

  9. Re:Stop telling companies how to operate. by wastedlife · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no "ripping" of content. Hulu lets you embed their videos into another website. Their ads are in the video. Boxee just provides an interface to play the video with it streaming from hulu. If you are wondering why you need another interface, realize that Boxee is a Media Center app. It is streamlined to be controlled with a remote and its main function is playing your own content. Adding hulu into the mix gives you the ability to watch hulu's content legally without having to navigate with a normal web browser. The price you pay is you watch the normal Hulu ads. Sounds like free advertising for Hulu to me.

    --
    Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  10. xbmcboxee by doronbc · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should see the larger image. Boxee is a fork of Xbmc, xbmc but stripped down. Xbmc can run python scripts, check other xbmc plugins which work, ninja video, ted talks, rev3. http://code.google.com/p/voinage-xbmc-plugins/downloads/list I have a plugin for fancast which hosts a lot of the same content as hulu. I'm not sure they intentionally strip out the ads, id be more than willing to sit through them though.

    1. Re:xbmcboxee by doronbc · · Score: 1

      edit: title should xbmc>boxee

    2. Re:xbmcboxee by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh wow, I didn't know about Fancast. It has a lot more of the shows that I usually just download, since hulu doesn't have them.. Why haven't I heard of it before?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  11. changing user agent by godrik · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Ok, I am risking making people believe, I am an idiot. But, isn't it is as simple as changing the user agent ? This should take at most 3 minutes to any developer (one to get the UA of Internet Explorer, one to copy paste it in the code and one to commit it).

    I must have missed something...

    1. Re:changing user agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried that earlier this morning. So far can't find where the UA string is. Switching to MacFUSE instead of cyberduck so I can do a project search in textmate.

    2. Re:changing user agent by SilentChasm · · Score: 1

      Spoofing the user agent isn't exactly the desired method as the user agent is important for statistics and other things. I don't think it should ever be necessary to spoof it if everyone is acting nicely (server and client).

  12. Hulu + Boxee by unfunk · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know just why Hulu & Boxee don't get along? I've read that come content providers asked Hulu to block Boxee, but I completely fail to see the logic behind the request.

    1. Re:Hulu + Boxee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      My understanding: Content providers gave Hulu a license to display their works on computers. However, they don't perceive Boxee as a computer; instead, they perceive it as a TV. They haven't given Hulu a license to display their works on TVs, so they're unhappy with Hulu being on Boxee. Of course, there's no difference between "display on a computer" and "display on a tv" anymore, but they don't want this to be true. It's dumb, but that's the media industry for you.

    2. Re:Hulu + Boxee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is that the content providers aren't ready for a world where geeks sit around on their couches and watch their COMPUTERS on their TVs. For the content providers, watching Hulu served content from a computer is one thing, watching Hulu served content on a TV, that's another. It comes down to Hulu competing with their primary product via the same display device: TV.

    3. Re:Hulu + Boxee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It comes down to Hulu competing with their primary product via the same display device: TV.

      Sounds like "Who killed the electric car?" all over again.

    4. Re:Hulu + Boxee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all these pc's with HDMI connectors they basically mandated should take care of that argument...

    5. Re:Hulu + Boxee by ngg · · Score: 1

      I think it's actually a little more subtle than that:

      The content providers gave cable companies "exclusive" licenses to display their content on TVs, which in this context means "we won't give anyone else a license to display our content on TVs in your coverage area." So, yes, Hulu doesn't have a license to display on TVs, but the reason that matters is that the cable companies are pressuring the content companies to pressure Hulu to takes steps to prevent its feed from working on people's TVs. Because the cable companies are worried that people might just cancel their cable subscriptions. It doesn't really make sense that the content companies would want to block Hulu from Boxee all on their own--they own Hulu, so they get all of the ad revenue, instead of sharing it with the local distributors.

      Frankly, this just makes me hate the cable monopoly a little more.

    6. Re:Hulu + Boxee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is simple: Hulu is a company that's basically owned by the content providers, who don't get it. Hulu is too weak and lame to stand up and do the right thing, so they caved to the content providers ridiculous demands, and now find that their audience is gone.

      I've switched back to The Pirate Bay already, and Hulu has lost me forever. Hulu had their chance and they blew it by backing the wrong horse.

      Fuck Hulu, they are dead to me.

  13. What do hulu expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I'd never heard of Hulu so I went to the site and...

    Javascript is required to use Hulu. For the best experience, please enable Javascript and reload this page.

    I use youtube-dl and mplayer to watch youtube hosted stuff, elsewhere I'll pull the URL manually from script or container files. Hulu can scream that users must use software configuration x/y/z to use their service but that's not how the web has ever worked.

  14. It was Hulu's decision to stop Boxee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The content providers, NBC and Fox, own Hulu. The Hulu president stating he had nothing to do with blocking Boxee is a lie. Hulu plans their own box on your TV.

    Instead of watching Hulu's free content with commercials I'm back to buying content through Apple TV, and now Amazon through the Netflix/Roku box.

    Sayonara, Scru-lu!

  15. Who-lu? by owlnation · · Score: 0, Troll

    Since the US is the only country that can access Hulu's content this is hardly Earth shattering news.

    When Hulu discovers there's a whole planet out there, the rest of us will start to care.

    1. Re:Who-lu? by narcberry · · Score: 2

      Americans care because they can use Hulu.

      The rest of earth cares because Americans are doing it. Earth shattering title still secure.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    2. Re:Who-lu? by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Who the fuck cares? This a complete non-event. Hulu is boring, therefore their strife with some other unknown company is boring too.

      *shrug*

    3. Re:Who-lu? by nhtshot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More like..

      When Hulu is ALLOWED to discover the rest of the planet.

      Several people have said this, but it needs to be pointed out. Hulu is a corporation with a LEGAL licensing agreement for their content. They have to bow to the whims of the MPAA, etc.

      While the ideologues among you will say that they should just tell the media companies to screw themselves, we all know that isn't going to happen.

      Both the issue at bar here and the one you present are directly the fault of the content providers. They'll continue to learn their lessons the hard way, just like they always have.

      Did you expect them to show any more knowledge of the internet world working with Hulu then they do with anyone else?

  16. No speculation necessary by nova_ostrich · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jason Kilar, CEO of Hulu, admitted on the company's blog that the content owners demanded that Boxee stop displaying Hulu content.

    --
    It's scary being a Flash and Flex developer on Slashdot. You guys are unnaturally rabid.
    1. Re:No speculation necessary by pyite · · Score: 1

      Jason Kilar, CEO of Hulu, admitted on the company's blog that the content owners demanded that Boxee stop displaying Hulu content.

      Then I will have no remorse when traditional content producers die an albeit slow death. I'll continue to watch content I record with my DVR (and fast forward through commercials), I'll continue to download content via torrents (where there aren't any commercials), and I won't watch content with Hulu, where, ironically, I was willing to watch commercials.

      Die, die, die. Long live TWiT, Revision3, and Wine Library TV. Just like music publishers gave into getting rid of DRM, every other industry will be forced to get rid of ridiculous restrictions or they will meet their end.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    2. Re:No speculation necessary by kent_eh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      content owners demanded that Boxee stop displaying Hulu content

      *shrug*
      If they don't want me to watch their content, I have no problem obliging them.

      And since Hulu is only available in one country in the world (not the one where I live) I guess there's a lot of their precious content that I won't be watching. Doesn't bother me, I've managed to survive this long without it.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    3. Re:No speculation necessary by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your post earns a big "goodie for you".

    4. Re:No speculation necessary by _LMark · · Score: 1

      I hypothesize that the content providers (Fox/NBC) are caught between a rock and a hard place (of their own making...). One take in an op-ed piece at O'Reilly here. On the one hand, they have existing relationships through various cable and satellite companies that currently provide most of their revenue. On the other, they're seeing interest in on-demand viewing of their content via the web.

      I think the pressure is coming from Comcast, Cox, et al. because they stand to lose their lucrative monthly CableTV fees. I'm running a Mac Mini with Boxee connected to my TV (after using an AppleTV quite successfully) and it caused me to cancel my TV service. Between my current DVD/music library, Netflix account, and studio-provided video streams, I have access to much more content than I could get for any price from the cable/sat company. Accessing the internet from my couch is a nice bonus.

      Interesting aside: I occasionally miss being able to turn on the tv and let a channel pick content for me (including occasionally entertaining commercials). I can't decide if it's just nostalgia or if I enjoyed the random passivity of the experience. Or if I'll still feel the same in 6 months.

      --
      'the Internet is right.'
    5. Re:No speculation necessary by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Doesn't bother me, I've managed to survive this long without it.

      Kent, the doctor's office is on the phone with your lab results.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  17. Screw `em by Simulant · · Score: 4, Informative

    This code, executed on a dd-wrt router, will give all your clients 30 seconds of nothing during commercials when watching Hulu videos. It will block most other browser ads also but what the hell... Works really well with Slashdot.

    Just add it to your startup section and enjoy a nearly ad-free internet.

    ----
    logger WAN UP Script Executing
    sleep 5
    test -s /tmp/dlhosts
    if [ $? == 1 ] ; then
    echo -e "#!/bin/sh\nwget -O - http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.txt | grep 127.0.0.1 | tr -d '\015\032' | sed -e '2,\$s/127.0.0.1/0.0.0.0/g' -e 's/[[:space:]]*#.*$//' -e '2,\$s/0.0.0.0 localhost$/127.0.0.1 localhost/g' -e '2,\$s/0.0.0.0 pagead.*.googlesyndication.com//g' | grep 0.0 > /tmp/hosts\nlogger DOWNLOADED http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.txt\nkillall -1 dnsmasq" > /tmp/dlhosts
    chmod 777 /tmp/dlhosts /tmp/dlhosts
    fi
    ln -s /tmp/hosts /etc/hosts
    echo "45 23 * * 5 root /tmp/dlhosts" >> /tmp/crontab
    -----

    1. Re:Screw `em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather have a 15 second commercial play in a window/tab I'm not paying attention to than 30 seconds of silence.

    2. Re:Screw `em by nschubach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suggest anyone interested in this grab the script form the forums: http://dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=202542#202542

      (It doesn't add in domain names for links if you have them enabled)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Screw `em by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Excuse my last post... here is the thread dedicated to that script:
      http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=263581#263581

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Screw `em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are adds on Slashdot????

    5. Re:Screw `em by Eil · · Score: 1

      Can you post a link to this script instead? Pasting it into a comment mangled it horribly.

    6. Re:Screw `em by shentino · · Score: 1

      Yes

      And from the BSA no less!

      Slashdot's CIO should really get in touch with Google over /.'s adsense account...

    7. Re:Screw `em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are commercials on Hulu? Lol I have used that hosts file for years even on my linux systems. Screw ads. I already pay for my broadband connection why should I have to view commercials.

  18. I shall answer thee with radiohead lyrics by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know just why Hulu & Boxee don't get along? I've read that come content providers asked Hulu to block Boxee, but I completely fail to see the logic behind the request.

    "I don't care if it hurts, I wanna have control [...] 'cause I'm a creep."

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  19. Hulu has made it clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hulu has made it abundantly clear that they do not want people to view their videos over the internet. Therefore, people should just stop watching them.

    Awesome business move there Hulu.

  20. Not really about boxee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This probably really isn't about boxee - it is about the content owners wanting to get rid of hulu and build their own individual sites. So anything they can do to make it harder to use hulu, especially on something likely to be playing on a TV screen is in their interest.

    1. Re:Not really about boxee by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      This probably really isn't about boxee - it is about the content owners wanting to get rid of hulu and build their own individual sites. So anything they can do to make it harder to use hulu, especially on something likely to be playing on a TV screen is in their interest.

      Yeah well ... any outfit that would pick that Baldwin dimbulb as its spokesman has problems anyway.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  21. One word. Branding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Branding is very important in the advertising arena. If you want people to buy advertising from you, and to increase the popularity of your service, you must get your name out there and associated with your product. Boxee using Hulu's service gives a small source icon, and that's it. That means that advertisers are more likely to approach Boxee, than Hulu for advertisements if Boxee ever chose to offer that service. Even if they never offer advertising, that extra step in the referral process is likely to cause deminished advertising revenue for Hulu.

    Short answer: Boxee should have gotten permission. If they don't, then while it is, or should be legal to use Hulu's content in this manner (as long as they show the correct source,) they will have to "put up" with Hulu's attempts to disable it.

    This isn't even to mention the fact that I would like less annoying ads in the actual stream, which if Hulu allows Boxee to do this, are only likely to increase.

    1. Re:One word. Branding. by batkiwi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How do you explain that hulu lets you embed their videos on any web page you choose, just like youtube does?

  22. Actually, they are aliens by Toe,+The · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Conventional wisdom tells us that the best conspiracies are completely in the open. People never suspect because they figure a real conspiracy would try to hide itself.

    So if the owners of Hulu are in fact aliens, this is exactly the sort of ad campaign they would run.

    Hm. Guess we're screwed.

    (So let's just hope they're abundantly stupid like the aliens in Signs and never take into account the fact that if water kills you on contact, maybe you shouldn't invade a planet covered in mostly water, inhabited by beings made of mostly water. HTF did that movie ever get past the script stage?)

    1. Re:Actually, they are aliens by kiddygrinder · · Score: 4, Funny

      That movie would have been 1000% better if they'd tried to invade on a rainy day.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    2. Re:Actually, they are aliens by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

      Fortunately for them and the script writers... an the day they invaded, there was absolutely no rain anywhere on Earth.

    3. Re:Actually, they are aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF. No Spoiler alert? DOWNMOD please!

    4. Re:Actually, they are aliens by slackbheep · · Score: 2, Funny

      The aliens who invaded probably just couldn't read the hazard warnings left in the fields by smarter aliens :P

    5. Re:Actually, they are aliens by tonto1992 · · Score: 1

      What bothered me was the fact that the aliens hung out in a corn field. Now, as any country boy can tell you (or anyone who's ever detassled), if you walk through a cornfield in the wee hours of the morning in late July (I'm assuming it's late July since the corn is that tall (based on the old adage that corn should be knee-high by the 4th of July (to make sure you can harvest it in time))) you're going to get absolutely soaked from all the dew... And if you don't get soaked from the dew, you're going to get soaked by the center-pivot irrigation that'll be rolling through, and that corn looked too good to be dryland crop, in my opinion it was irrigated.

    6. Re:Actually, they are aliens by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      if water kills you on contact, maybe you shouldn't invade a planet covered in mostly water

      They're religiously nudist.
      Obviously, a race capable of crossing the stars would have spacesuits and be able to make a fucking dry suit, or a god damned raincoat, but NO! They HAVE to walk around naked and exposed at all times, even if that means that their centuries-long plan will surely fail a day or two after they finally land the invasion party.

      You should see the footage of their first moon landing. All that gasping and exploding eyeballs... So tragic.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:Actually, they are aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The movie itself is a total day-spoiler. Watching it will just piss you off. OP did you a favor.

      Also, the stupid movie is seven years old. I think there's a statute of limitations on spoilers.

    8. Re:Actually, they are aliens by shadwstalkr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HTF did that movie ever get past the script stage?

      That was the real Shyamalan Twist(tm) of the movie. "I got Mel Gibson and Joaquin Pheonix to star in this steamer, and then I got you to pay me so you could watch it! Surprise!"

    9. Re:Actually, they are aliens by Valarauk · · Score: 1

      (So let's just hope they're abundantly stupid like the aliens in Signs and never take into account the fact that if water kills you on contact, maybe you shouldn't invade a planet covered in mostly water, inhabited by beings made of mostly water. HTF did that movie ever get past the script stage?)

      Use a little imagination, say the beings in Signs were actually biologic helper-constructs and that the water vulnerability and low IQ were checks put in place by their creators to prevent them from pulling a planet of the apes on their asses. The things are mass cloned from eZEmatic constructor nanites for zero cost anyways, who cares if they get fucked up.

      For a sci-fi nerd, and I assume you are if your still thinking about Signs seven years later. You seem to have taken a lot of preconceptions about alien species to the theater with you. Try to have an open mind. Remember, just because a good director has to make a story plausible within the bounds they define doesn't mean they have to spoon feed the viewers everything! The water susceptibility and IQ weren't important to the story so they were left up to us.

      --
      **insert favorite profound quotation here**
    10. Re:Actually, they are aliens by vertinox · · Score: 1

      So let's just hope they're abundantly stupid like the aliens in Signs [wikipedia.org] and never take into account the fact that if water kills you on contact, maybe you shouldn't invade a planet covered in mostly water, inhabited by beings made of mostly water. HTF did that movie ever get past the script stage?

      Maybe they were from the B-Ark.

      No. The aliens... Not the script writers.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  23. Whats the problem? Hulu works fine with linux. by voss · · Score: 0, Troll

    They block boxee. So what? If your too lazy to navigate to hulu.com which works fine with linux and mac via firefox, maybe its a bad tactical decision but it doesnt stop you from watching hulu. Its still free and its still available...over the internet!

    1. Re:Whats the problem? Hulu works fine with linux. by samgman · · Score: 1

      Don't you know that Boxee works on Apple TV? Hulu is so much better on a 70" Mitsubishi than a little computer monitor.

    2. Re:Whats the problem? Hulu works fine with linux. by Otto · · Score: 1

      Shockingly, most people want to watch TV shows on their TV. Not on their computer screens.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:Whats the problem? Hulu works fine with linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's quite an old way of thinking. I personally don't know anyone with an actual TV set any more.

    4. Re:Whats the problem? Hulu works fine with linux. by Otto · · Score: 1

      That's quite an old way of thinking. Most hippies didn't own TV sets.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  24. Well, here's the obvious solution... by perigee369 · · Score: 1

    ... I believe most TV shows are on BitTorrent sites. :) Reminds me of the obligatory Star Wars reference "The more you tighten your grip Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers..."

    1. Re:Well, here's the obvious solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, the RSS feed is much friendlier.

  25. Get an open source media box by voss · · Score: 1

    All modern hdtvs made in the last 3 years have HDMI or DVI ports. Apple TV has an hdmi port.

    The flaw is not in Hulu which works with any opensource web browser on windows, mac or linux, its in Apple TV, a closed source box with crippled functionality. That boxee software is opensource doesnt mean it can help itself to hulu's content.

    Just because I am not an apple fanboy doesnt make me a troll and doesnt make me wrong either.

    1. Re:Get an open source media box by Otto · · Score: 1

      The fact that a company provides content does not mean that they get to dictate how one can view that content. If it's technically possible for me to view Hulu content on my TV, and Hulu takes measures to prevent that, then Hulu is in the wrong.

      To me, Hulu is acting as a content provider. They provide the content to me. If I want to display that content in the way I choose, then that's my right to do so, and I have no problem circumventing any technical measures they decide to put in my way.

      However, it's simpler to simply give Hulu the finger and switch back to bittorrent for my television show downloads instead. If Hulu is going to attempt to make it impossible to view legal material, then I'll view the exact same material illegally (only in higher resolution), and tell Hulu to go screw themselves.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:Get an open source media box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears the point that you're missing, voss, is that not everyone watches TV alone. Hulu on Apple TV was great. I couldn't give a crap who makes the box.

  26. Actually ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... it is Hulu's content providers that have made that decision. Hulu has to go along or lose the content providers. Hulu's difficulty is convincing the clueless executives at content providers like NBC that the provider's understand of the internet, and their desire to make the internet work just like TV broadcasting, is flawed.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Actually ... by Otto · · Score: 1

      Hulu made the wrong move. They should have lost the content providers instead. Because then, at least, they would not have tarnished their name beyond repair forever.

      Hulu is effectively dead. They just haven't stopped writhing yet.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:Actually ... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      So...it's better to not have any content to provide?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:Actually ... by Otto · · Score: 1

      New content can be created or found. Audience, once lost, cannot be produced again.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    4. Re:Actually ... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      True...I suppose i tend to think of it as: They became your audience *because* of this content...if you get rid of that, you can show them some new stuff, but you can't make them like it.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  27. my name is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boxee is a troll, confirm/deny?

  28. Irrelevant to many of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake me up when they allow people outside the US to use their site.

  29. Re:Stop telling companies how to operate. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Honestly, I don't know the full history of this story, nor how exactly Hulu works.

    This is the point where you should have canceled your post.

  30. It's fun to watch open war on the internets by aaandre · · Score: 1

    Two companies at war deploying tech solutions to battle each other is certainly a lot of fun to watch for web developers, engineers and geeks. It's like photoshop tennis but with real tech, not just words and art.

    We are the spectators of a mild legal cyberwar.

    Wake up, the future is here, science fiction concepts from 20 years ago are now reality.

    Am I the only one finding this pretty amazing?

  31. hulu lame US only - why use it by xristy · · Score: 1

    Hulu is really not worth using. There must be a more effective service for boxee. I can't use Hulu because my IP address doesn't appear to be in the U.S. and they claim some license restrictions that don't permit anywhere but the U.S. to view their content. What utter garbage to spend time worrying over a lame service further restricting who can use them!

  32. Re:Stop telling companies how to operate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The advertising is not "free" in this case. It is indeed PROFITABLE advertising for Hulu, as they receive the same video ad hits as they would on their site's player.

  33. Creative contribution and Publishing by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    If you don't have a creative contribution to add to this world, you sure as hell shouldn't be getting paid to sit around all day publishing.

    I think it's possible to have a successful publishing-only system: one which adds value by filtering noise, checking facts, and rearranging materials for easier readability. I just don't know of real-world examples.

    (I almost wanted to point out Slashdot itself, then I realized the Slash system was created by Rob Malda himself. Same for Wikipedia, by Ward Cunningham.)

  34. Re:Stop telling companies how to operate. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    We want them to. If we bitch and complain enough they might do what we ask.

    If they want our custom, we have the right to make demands. Capitalism is about providing people with what they want and finding a way to make money from it. It's not about providing people with what you're willing to offer and demanding some money for it.

  35. What's Boxee? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    A little explanation would be nice, or at least a link to the website...

    Yes, I know google exists, but the point of the article summary is to inform.

  36. Boxxy is our queen by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    Boxxy is our queen Boxxy is our queen Boxxy is our queen

  37. Think about it by voss · · Score: 0

    Hulu is providing its content legally and for free to windows, mac and linux owners. If you want use torrent to get your content...be my guest. Hulu is saying we will let you watch whatever you want for free as long as you do it through our website. IMHO Its a reasonable request. If your media device doesnt have a web browser(many do) thats a problem with your device.

    Boxee is a company that wants in the long run to make money off its set top boxes and to use hulu content free of charge to do so. They use it with a cloak of open source

  38. It's the distribution deals, stupid by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

    What's all this nonsense? First off, this has very little to do with outfits like the MPAA. Hulu is owned by NBC and Fox. A lot of the content on there is directly owned by these companies and they could give it away for free on the streets if they liked. Second, the rest of the content isn't owned by them but is licensed by them. If you understand anything about licensing, you know it's regional. It's done this way to maximize profit for the content owner. For the stuff Fox/NBC doesn't own, if Hulu could come up with the same amount of cash as all their other distribution deals, I'm sure the content owners would love do a worldwide deal. Right now, they're probably making peanuts off of Hulu compared to their prior distribution methods. For example, they have deals where they sell the Simpsons around the globe. I'm sure that nets them a nice bit of change.

    Now, what do you think would happen to those deals if everyone around the globe could watch them from Hulu? Okay, right now it wouldn't have that much of an impact because it has yet to go mainstream. But that kind of content access WOULD make it go mainstream. Do you think some network in France would pay top dollar for the most current season of the Simpsons if people could easily play it off of Hulu? In a sense, Hulu has to be afraid of its own success. It needs to have a revenue stream that would replace all these distribution deals that would fall apart.

    (FYI, I'm not calling you stupid in the article title. It's just paraphrasing the Clinton slogan.)

  39. HU LUsers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lusers that spell losers with a u.

  40. does miro still work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does miro still work with hulu?