Slashdot Mirror


French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubuntu

Ynot_82 writes "The French national police force, the Gendarmerie Nationale, has spoken about their migration away from the Windows platform to Linux. Estimated to have already saved the force 50 Million Euros, the migration is due to be completed on all 90,000 workstations by 2015. Of the move, Lt. Col. Guimard had this comment: '"Moving from Microsoft XP to Vista would not have brought us many advantages and Microsoft said it would require training of users. Moving from XP to Ubuntu, however, proved very easy. The two biggest differences are the icons and the games. Games are not our priority."'"

368 comments

  1. Games are not our priority by macxcool · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... but solitaire and minesweeper are great training for stakeouts ;-)

    1. Re:Games are not our priority by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Funny

      How do they ever expect to catch Riddler?

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:Games are not our priority by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Informative

      ... but solitaire and minesweeper are great training for stakeouts ;-)

      Doesn't the default version of Ubuntu have both? Mine does along with Chess, Othello, Tetris, Sudoku, Mahjongg, Blackjack, and a few others.

    3. Re:Games are not our priority by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      In fact, solitaire really is great training for using a mouse. Time and again I have seen novice computer users of all ages, who would otherwise struggle with the mouse, become quite proficient after only an hour or so playing solitaire.

      Now if they could just be gotten to stop playing solitaire afterwards, they could move on to other lessons.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    4. Re:Games are not our priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now if they could just be gotten to stop playing solitaire afterwards, they could move on to other lessons.

      I could say the same for fortune. Show a linux noob how to start a terminal and type fortune, then how to press up-arrow to use the history, and you can lean back for an hour or so. Not great console training, but it's a start. :D

    5. Re:Games are not our priority by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

          Fortune is good for teaching people how do web programming.

          Make it show Fortune.

          Make it format pretty.

          Keep clicking reload, and keep making it prettier. :)

          I actually put it back into my personal site. I got the BOFH excuses fortune file, so whenever someone needs an excuse, they can just click.

          "Power Company having EMP problems with their reactor" :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Games are not our priority by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      it also works well as a tutor for learning to use the arrow keys and carriage return / enter... played that way quite a bit when my mouse didn't work

    7. Re:Games are not our priority by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Just change the solitaire shortcut to a link to 2g1c. Problem solved!

    8. Re:Games are not our priority by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, by default Ubuntu includes several more games than Windows. I'd consider them better games also.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    9. Re:Games are not our priority by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Now if they could just be gotten to stop playing solitaire afterwards, they could move on to other lessons.

      Write the game so that the longer you play, the more cards go randomly missing. Once they get down to about 45 cards the game will not be much fun anymore... Call it Terminal Solitaire.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    10. Re:Games are not our priority by Abreu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to mention the fact that you can install a lot more from the repositories

      ...including the ultimate destroyer of productivity: Battle for Wesnoth!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    11. Re:Games are not our priority by Annorax · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget Nethack! The best way to learn the basics of moving around in vi. Back in the day, nethack was mesmerizing.

    12. Re:Games are not our priority by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      People play multiple times because they lose, not because they win. But I'd agree that being unable to win would be pretty depressing; you would need to advertise this, at which point the user gets annoyed and yells at you.

      --
      $ make available
    13. Re:Games are not our priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd consider them better games also.

      How suprising that someone on /. considers something FOSS better than what MS does...

      Come on, how much better can minesweeper or solitaire be?

    14. Re:Games are not our priority by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Thank you, it took me precisely 5 seconds to install using the package manager :). That's one thing to like in Ubuntu...

    15. Re:Games are not our priority by camperdave · · Score: 1

      In fact, solitaire really is great training for using a mouse.

      Rumour has it that that is exactly why the were included. Solitaire for general click and drag/drop operations; minesweeper for right click/left click operations.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    16. Re:Games are not our priority by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      They had the BOFH fortune file? Sweet! :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    17. Re:Games are not our priority by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      The games included in Ubuntu are a superset of those included in Windows. I suspect Ubuntu's extras are what he referred to. And I would agree, though I tend to use Ubuntu as a tool, not a toy.

      Windows, on the other hand, I only boot up to play computer games.

    18. Re:Games are not our priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switching should prove to be very easy for them. It's not like they're doing any actual work with their computers anyways.

    19. Re:Games are not our priority by SleepingWaterBear · · Score: 5, Informative

      Come on, how much better can minesweeper or solitaire be?

      Well, the minesweeper's basically identical, but Aisleriot solitaire (the default Gnome solitaire game) comes with 80 different solitaire variants, which beats the 3 or so that come with windows by a good ways. I personally like Hopscotch.

      Gnome also comes with something like 17 games by default, and you can install hundreds more if you want them without even opening a web browser. I will grant that the networked hearts/spades games in XP are something I would like to see an equivalent to in Ubuntu.

    20. Re:Games are not our priority by emjay88 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I still find nethack mesmerising, you insensitive clod!

      --
      1178161 is prime...
    21. Re:Games are not our priority by rHBa · · Score: 1

      Aisleriot is 100% better than MS Solitaire when it doesn't crash X!

      It could be a GFX driver issue, I haven't bothered to troubleshoot it yet.

    22. Re:Games are not our priority by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Depending on the user, this may not actually improve productivity.

    23. Re:Games are not our priority by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Make it so they *always* win. They'll lose the challenge and get bored. Set it up that the cards are random but always winnable.

    24. Re:Games are not our priority by meyekul · · Score: 1

      Luckily neither he nor his cohorts ever thought to set up shop outside of Gotham City.

    25. Re:Games are not our priority by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      Not all of them. Chess Titans on Vista really is a very good game, if a bit easy. The interface is better than most FOSS chess games that I've seen.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    26. Re:Games are not our priority by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Yes, by default Ubuntu includes several more games other than Windows

      Is this what you meant? I was a little confused by the word omission.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    27. Re:Games are not our priority by hajus · · Score: 1

      You jest, but for a summer job in 92, I worked at a Large Computer Company inc. as a beta tester for a program running on Windows 3.0. As part of our 3 day training, we were made to play solitaire for several hours the first day to train using the mouse.

    28. Re:Games are not our priority by turey22 · · Score: 1

      He had to comment on the games...thats real funny!

    29. Re:Games are not our priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First line in my .bashrc:
      echo `fortune bofh-excuses`

    30. Re:Games are not our priority by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1
      ... and finding and downloading installable games are easier for Ubuntu IMHO. want a tetris clone, fire up Aptitude and .. oh there is one click on it and install presto. No searching of the internet required and you can be reasonably insured that the game isn't spyware.

      That said I wonder if part of the savings they are claiming is for the training that MS suggested? I'd think training would still be required. Especially the expensive IT courses. They might have been lucky and had an entire IT staff that knew both systems but it is unlikely. Sending each admin of on a several thousand euro training course can add up quickly. I suppose the alternative would be to replace your IT staff but that probably would cost even more than retraining the existing one (recruitment costs, severance etc). Here's hoping it works out for them.

    31. Re:Games are not our priority by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Aisleriot is 100% better than MS Solitaire when it doesn't crash X! It could be a GFX driver issue, I haven't bothered to troubleshoot it yet.

      If this is the case you have a problem, I never have had X11 crash on me although on rare occasions I have had some applications freeze. Xkill is great for this.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    32. Re:Games are not our priority by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Most Linux distributions have a package manager and installing is so easy. You even have the option of using a full GUI or for MS Windows people the "command line". After all we can't let MS Windows people know that there is an installer GUI for Linux they might get upset :)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    33. Re:Games are not our priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The version of minesweeper I have ensures that the game is solvable. No more spending an hour finding 98 out of 99 mines, and having two spots left, with no indication of which of them has the last mine.

      That's the one from Simon Tathams portable puzzle collection, check them out, almost all the games in that collection ensures a possible solution. That's the guy who wrote Putty, btw.

    34. Re:Games are not our priority by Nutria · · Score: 1

      how much better can ... solitaire be?

      PySol has a very handy auto-drop feature, which takes the drudgery out of the game.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    35. Re:Games are not our priority by Nutria · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... and finding and downloading installable games are easier for Ubuntu IMHO. want a tetris clone, fire up Aptitude and .. oh there is one click on it and install presto.

      Except that it requires the root password, and lusers aren't given root.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    36. Re:Games are not our priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they were referring to the fact that Ubuntu can do everything MS Windows can do except play higher end games well or have fancy icons that show the taskbar apps in thumbnails. ( Yes, I know all about Compwiz... )
      He was being semi-sarcastic.

      His point was that because they WON'T be playing high end games and the fancy icons do not benefit the French police in their desktop needs, that the switch to Ubuntu was sensible and worthwhile.

    37. Re:Games are not our priority by Neeperando · · Score: 1

      Yes! I'm glad I'm not the only one who has seen this. It hasn't happened to me in a long time, though. Are you sure it hasn't been fixed?

      --
      Being a computer scientist means you tell people how computers should work, not that you know how they actually work.
    38. Re:Games are not our priority by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      Except that it requires the root password, and lusers aren't given root.

      You're not an Ubuntu user, are you?

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    39. Re:Games are not our priority by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Except that it requires the root password, and lusers aren't given root.

      There's no spoon. I mean root. Lusers don't need to know what that is. They just get asked their own password.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    40. Re:Games are not our priority by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Rather humerus though, a windows users points out the rather lame free games that you pay for when you buy the OS as a benefit but hey, they forget, Linux distributions all come free with an unlimited client file server. So lame window dressing for the windows OS versus thousands of dollars saved in per seat client licences.

      I am still waiting for the day when M$ sales stuff stumble and point out you can get OpenOffice.org on windows to make it more competitive with Linux ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    41. Re:Games are not our priority by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      looks like ubuntu does indeed have a package called "fortunes-bofh-excuses"

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    42. Re:Games are not our priority by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      You're not an Ubuntu user, are you?

      Apparently, neither are you. Not all users have effective root access on Ubuntu. It also wouldn't be hard in an enterprise environment to set it up so users could install any software they wanted, but only from an approved repository, and just not put any games in that repository.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    43. Re:Games are not our priority by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're being pedantic or just ignorant. Yes, technically it doesn't require the root password, but it does require root access, which Ubuntu prefers to provide through asking for the user's own password instead of one master password. That doesn't mean that method of gaining root access can't be easily turned off. In fact there's a pretty gui for doing just that.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    44. Re:Games are not our priority by theaceoffire · · Score: 1

      Not letting random users install fifty billion "hit the balloon" games without permission seems like a big plus in the business world.

      --
      I steal signatures. This one used to be yours.
    45. Re:Games are not our priority by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Depends how deeply you want to install things. You can always download the application and install it in userland. I also suspect that you could configure Aptitude after you did the base install so that the user could install whatever they want using the nice GUI and it would go automagically to the users home directory something like /home/bob/Applications. User leaves delete his account and presto his junk apps are gone. At my work we do a similar thing with Macs, everyone can install things into their own application folder but if they want others to be able to use it too they need to have us come by with the admin access to install it in the system applications folder.

    46. Re:Games are not our priority by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      My uncle has seen this once (ubuntu) and my mother once (eeebuntu), but other than that, I've never seen aisleriot crash. Granted they've only been on linux for a few months, but they use it quite a bit and I've never seen it on either of my laptops (using ubuntu since 7.10).

    47. Re:Games are not our priority by Annorax · · Score: 1

      I think that I need to dust off my HJKL keys....

      I was going to insert a representation of what hack kind of looked like on the screen here, but Slashdot didn't like all the "#" and "." characters :-(

      Filter error: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.

      The dog misses It's a full moon tonight

  2. Run away or I shall taunt you a second time by Teresita · · Score: 5, Funny

    You don' frighten us, Microsoft pig-dogs!

    1. Re:Run away or I shall taunt you a second time by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft: can we come to see you and have a chat?

    2. Re:Run away or I shall taunt you a second time by MacColossus · · Score: 5, Funny

      They said they were looking for the Vista Grail. I told them we already have one.

    3. Re:Run away or I shall taunt you a second time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fetchez la vache!

    4. Re:Run away or I shall taunt you a second time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! Now go away or I'll taunt you a second time.

    5. Re:Run away or I shall taunt you a second time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. Had to laugh at that one. +1 Funny

    6. Re:Run away or I shall taunt you a second time by zebidee · · Score: 1

      la vache?

      --
      -- "Hey kids, try this at home!"
    7. Re:Run away or I shall taunt you a second time by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "Fetchez la manchot!"?

  3. Go France! by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now if only state and federal agencies in the US would do some of the same. Sadly, so long as corporations are allowed to lobby, the pork train will probably continue.

    1. Re:Go France! by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sadly, so long as corporations are allowed to lobby, the pork train will probably continue.

      Hey, it's not "pork", it's an "economic stimulus".

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Go France! by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Honestly, not supporting a business that resides in your nation during the current state of the economy is a pretty bad thing for the government to do. I am not arguing that it should not happen, but right now may not be the time.
      In Canada, the government run Lottery corporation just bought 20 Mercedes for prizes, when all the auto companies here are having massive lay-offs/closures. Needless to say they're taking a little flak.
      The point is that the government should be helping to foster the development of it's own economy by investing into it.

      Just my two cents

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    3. Re:Go France! by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Honestly, not supporting a business that resides in your nation during the current state of the economy is a pretty bad thing for the government to do.

      But which companies to support? Red Hat is based in the USA as are many other Linux-based companies. The thing is, when you keep buying things from a certain company just because its made in the USA, you help monopolies and deny justice. Why would the justice department pass a ruling on MS if everything they use is MS based and in the short term it would cost more money to switch?

      The point is that the government should be helping to foster the development of it's own economy by investing into it.

      But why support a company convicted of running an abusive monopoly? Sure, if it was cheaper to do it the MS way it might make some sense, but compared to Linux, MS is very expensive for little to no quality benefit. By buying MS products governments are helping MS build an even larger monopoly along with effectively tying the hands of judges in monopoly cases.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:Go France! by Caue · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah. Slashdotters forget basic economy like the rest of North Americans. Hurray closed markets... oh wait, I guess not.

      If someone needs to explain to you why this is such a dumbass idea, try the cotton or the corn lobby. They will explain how that kind of thinking made americans choose the least efficient bio-fuel. Go sugarcane, go (that was a no-brainer by the way.. sugarcane = sugar = energy for your children AND you car)!

    5. Re:Go France! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If your choice is between equivalent options, one foreign and one domestic, then perhaps that is true. However, if the options are not equivalent, that doesn't necessarily hold.

      In this case, for instance, the contention is that a government agency can save millions of dollars by using Linux. Millions of dollars saved is millions you don't have to collect in taxes, or millions that you can do other things with(depending on whether you think the organization in question should focus on present level of service, controlling costs, or present level of cost, improving service).

      If a government can actually save money by using linux, then their using Windows amounts to overtaxing their citizens for the benefit of a private corporation. That is bad.

    6. Re:Go France! by Stewie241 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In some cases, I would agree. However this is an issue of a police force saving money, not just spending money differently. They could easily use local support agencies for their Linux and it would still help drive the economy.

      I'd rather they save money and redistribute it as needed rather than going for the more expensive option for the sake of it.

      The other problem with the car thing, is what cars are actually made in Canada? Each of the big 3 only make about 6 different vehicles in Canada, and none of them compare in luxury to an MB. Not only that, but the MB is apparently made from Canadian steel anyway, so...

    7. Re:Go France! by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      They were found guilty of anti-trust violations with penalties enforced for their transgressions. The sad thing is that the whole thing is a joke. Bundling IE isn't really a crime. Bundling WMP isn't a crime. However, the Halloween Documents suggest there were serious illegal, anti-competitive practices at play that no one ever really hit them for.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    8. Re:Go France! by Pope · · Score: 1

      It's not "Canada", it's only Ontario's lottery commission that is getting flak for buying German cars. Hell, they're so clueless at times I'm sure they thought Chrysler & Daimler were still merged.

      Who was doing the most bitching? President of the CAW, of course.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    9. Re:Go France! by atomic777 · · Score: 1

      I can only hope that we're just seeing the beginning of this.

      With the financial crisis, not only do the big players have a lot less credibility in strong-arming governments into using locked-in solutions, budgets are also tightening everywhere and open-source is a perfect way to save money. FUD tactics focusing on obscure risks from moving to OSS are far less effective on a government that has a population watching its expenditures like a hawk. Voters will be tolerant of blips in government services if they believe they are part of an undertaking to help avoid tax increases.

      In such an environment, adoption of OSS to save money and invest in the local economy is truly a no-brainer.

    10. Re:Go France! by dedazo · · Score: 0

      They were found guilty of anti-trust violations with penalties enforced for their transgressions

      Which isn't remotely close to a criminal conviction.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    11. Re:Go France! by IdleTime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the corn syrup produced in such copious amounts can now be found around Americans waists...

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    12. Re:Go France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Check out the footer of the French consulate's web page: http://consulfrance-montreal.org/

      They already use open source software. I think I noticed that footer more than a couple of years ago or so.

    13. Re:Go France! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Not sure why you were modded down... you can practically go into any market with a blindfold and pick up a random food item. Take off the blindfold and read the ingredients list. You'll likely find HFCS as one of the major items on the list.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    14. Re:Go France! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      If a government can actually save money by using linux, then their using Windows amounts to overtaxing their citizens for the benefit of a private corporation. That is bad.

      Sounds about par for the course these days though...

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    15. Re:Go France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't many Canadian car makers around that I know of. A T-Rex would be cool though. Mercedes Benz probably sells a lot more tickets than say, a Ford.

    16. Re:Go France! by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Honestly, not supporting a business that resides in your nation during the current state of the economy is a pretty bad thing for the government to do.

      Why is MS at risk of going under? I'd much rather government stimulus come in the form of hiring unemployed IT people to help them transition and unemployed coders to add features they need/want and hiring smaller companies to provide support. Giving large amounts of money to MS is (amusingly) approaching the broken window fallacy.

      The point is that the government should be helping to foster the development of it's own economy by investing into it.

      Yes it should, but I'd much rather they hand all that cash to truly innovative companies that will provide longterm benefits to the economy and the government. Fostering innovation has been a key to several economic recoveries. Monopolies and especially monopoly abusers are death to innovation.

    17. Re:Go France! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      In Canada, the government run Lottery corporation just bought 20 Mercedes for prizes

      That's nothing, in the UK the National Lottery just bought a fleet of Cadillac STSes. If you win, they don't make you take one.

    18. Re:Go France! by Enderandrew · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes it is. They were found guilty of breaking the law. It was in a criminal court, and they were convicted. What part of that do you not understand?

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    19. Re:Go France! by j79zlr · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is not really how it works though. I have done some engineering work on DOD projects a long while ago and they require everything to be US made. Everything. I just remember that the conduit runs cost approximately 4x's average construction cost since all of the steel used in the piping and the fittings had to be made in the USA.

      --
      I'm not not licking toads.
    20. Re:Go France! by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 1

      Except they won't be saving the money, it's going to go to some other crazy project. Budget never go down in Government unless something major is done like cutting from the top.

    21. Re:Go France! by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 1

      Agreed!, the protectionist bullshit needs to go. Heck look at which company invested the most in new car factories in Canada in the last 10 years. Guess what, it's not GM.

    22. Re:Go France! by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 1

      Small Business has been the economic driver for a long time. Cut all the taxes to company with 20 or less employees and see the job market turn over.

    23. Re:Go France! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          But, what are the Canadian owned and built brands of cars? I know GM builds some there (or at least did), but is there a truly domestic car there, not owned by an American company?

          Ok, I went and asked a Canadian, rather than waiting for a response. He couldn't think of any, and couldn't find any through G00gle.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    24. Re:Go France! by dedazo · · Score: 0

      It was in a criminal court, and they were convicted.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft


      United States v. Microsoft was a set of consolidated civil actions filed against Microsoft Corporation

      Hope that helps.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    25. Re:Go France! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I saw an ad on TV recently, touting the wonders of HFCS. It's all natural and good for you. There was a very fine print line at the bottom of the last couple seconds of it that said something about Corn Growers of America, or something of that sort. :)

          I don't watch TV, and watch even fewer commercials, so if I happened to see it, that was either really dumb luck, or they're spending a lot of money on pushing the wonders of their product.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    26. Re:Go France! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      They have commercials every 5 seconds it seems.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    27. Re:Go France! by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The EU case is the big one. The government found they broke the law, and fined them for doing so.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    28. Re:Go France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an ad on TV recently

      I don't watch TV

      You seem confused.

    29. Re:Go France! by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      Oddly at the local grocery store, knowing where to look has allowed me to drink HFCS free juice(for some juices like pomegranate, they're completely free of added sugars). The HFCS juice is usually about the same price as the cheap stuff, or when on sale it's cheaper.

      It's possible to avoid HFCS almost entirely. You just have to be an intelligent discerning shopper.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    30. Re:Go France! by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like the US lately, it has tons of Japanese-owned car factories selling more units than American-owned ones. Yes, that's right. Japanese companies hire US workers to build cars in the US. US car companies lay off Us employees and hire Chinese and Mexicans. So in many cases, you help the US economy as much or more by buying a "Japanese" car.

    31. Re:Go France! by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      How is a government court saying you broke the law, and issuing a fine not a criminal proceeding? Civil cases deal with damaged parties. They didn't award damages. The levied a fine for breaking the law. When you break the law, you commit a crime, and thusly the basis for criminal proceedings.

      Now you're just trolling.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    32. Re:Go France! by Darby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, it's not "pork", it's an "economic stimulus".

      In a similar vein to "I economically stimulated your wife last night" ;-)

    33. Re:Go France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, I wish Congress and the White House would stop "economic stimulating" us bent-over taxpayers...

    34. Re:Go France! by turgid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except they won't be saving the money, it's going to go to some other crazy project.

      What, like educating children, feeding the poor, healing the sick and looking after the elderly and infirm?

    35. Re:Go France! by Darby · · Score: 1


      Small Business has been the economic driver for a long time. Cut all the taxes to company with 20 or less employees and see the job market turn over.

      Beware the law of unintended consequences. If it turns out that the sweet part of the sector is made up of companies with 21-25 employees, you've just created an incentive for them to fire several people ;-)

      Plus all the 20 employee companies who won't hire now.

    36. Re:Go France! by dedazo · · Score: 0

      Can you point me to a legal document that characterizes the EU legal actions against Microsoft as a criminal matter? I'm more than ready to be proven wrong.

      Now you're just trolling.

      No, I'm correcting you. If you don't like it, feel free to offer evidence to the contrary, or stop trying to argue something you clearly don't understand. There's a difference between facts and fallacies of relevance (argumentum ad odium in this case).

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    37. Re:Go France! by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Given that in the last week or so I have found one serious factual error and two copy and pastes from my site, I would say that Wikipedia is not an ideal authoritative reference.

      Not that your wrong, but quoting a primary source is better, and I am sure you can fine one for this easily.

    38. Re:Go France! by dedazo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust Wikipedia any further than I can throw it, but in this case I know at least this piece of information there is correct.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    39. Re:Go France! by enjerth · · Score: 1

      What exactly do you think convict means?

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/convict%5B2%5D

      transitive verb
      1: to find or prove to be guilty
      2: to convince of error or sinfulness
      intransitive verb
      : to find a defendant guilty

    40. Re:Go France! by Lord+Fury · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yep, historically that's who governments give money to the second they have freed up funds, right? It's not like it ever goes to politicians friends'(lobbyists and/or campaign contributors) causes.

      Any money saved will go towards building another bridge to nowhere.

    41. Re:Go France! by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1: The police are funded by the taxpayer - if they can save the money then taxpayers have more to spend on imaginary things like belief-in-house-prices. According to the businessmen and politicians this is a Good Thing. The economists and mathematicians disagree.

      2: The police are in the business of keeping us safe and secure. Given the choice of a *nix based system and Windows where would you want your criminal (or otherwise) record stored?

      3: Is "THE ECONOMY!" the new "TERRORISM!"?

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    42. Re:Go France! by dedazo · · Score: 1

      http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?typed=conviction&type=1&submit1.x=0&submit1.y=0&submit1=Look+up

      n. the result of a criminal trial in which the defendant has been found guilty of a crime.

      Try to use the proper tool for the job.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    43. Re:Go France! by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      It is by definition a criminal decision. The EU courts ruled they broke the law, and thusly committed a crime. They issued a punishment in the form of a fine.

      Civil cases by definition are judgments on damage, not based on breaking the law. For instance, in OJ's civil trial, the issue wasn't whether or not he broke the law, but rather whether or not he damaged the Goldman family. He was asked to pay damages, but not punished for committing a crime as they did not find him guilty in criminal court.

      The EU ruling again was that they broke the law, not that they damaged any company or individual specifically, or a group of them in a class-action suit.

      I asked how you hope to explain how that isn't a criminal decision.

      You insist I wasn't even referring to the EU case. That is trolling. The EU case is the larger and more prominent case. It is the one that is still being reviewed, with additional fines.

      Most people don't even know of the US case. When you insisted that I was somehow backpedaling and not even referring to the EU case in the first place, you were just picking a fight and trolling.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    44. Re:Go France! by jasmak · · Score: 1

      It benefits the country because a part all of that money spent on MS products goes towards the GDP and taxes. Although Red Hat is based in the US, they don't make the kind of profits that MS does and thus don't contribute to the economy as much.

      --
      It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    45. Re:Go France! by dedazo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It is by definition a criminal decision.

      It is if you're emotionally predisposed to consider the circumstances a "crime", but that doesn't make it a criminal proceeding or finding. If you like, it's the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor, I suppose. May I suggest catching up on how this works? This is a good starting point, although I'd go for the references there more than the contents of the article.

      Copyright infringement is also "breaking the law", yet I'd bet you'd argue to no end that it is not a crime, either.

      When you insisted that I was somehow backpedaling and not even referring to the EU case in the first place, you were just picking a fight and trolling.

      I don't care what you think I'm doing, as long as you understand that you're wrong, slashbot moderation notwithstanding.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    46. Re:Go France! by enjerth · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you want to focus on the use of the word crime instead.

      http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?selected=399&bold=||||

      crime
      n. a violation of a law in which there is injury to the public or a member of the public and a term in jail or prison, and/or a fine as possible penalties.

      So are you suggesting that there was no law, that breaking the law did not cause injury to any member of the public, or that it was not punishable by a fine or imprisonment?

    47. Re:Go France! by RebootKid · · Score: 1

      Crap, accidentally clicked the wrong mod option. Replying to remove that.

    48. Re:Go France! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I'm surprised they used Ubuntu rather than Mandriva. Mandriva is a French company.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    49. Re:Go France! by dedazo · · Score: 1

      So are you suggesting that there was no law, that breaking the law did not cause injury to any member of the public, or that it was not punishable by a fine

      I didn't "suggest" anything. All of that is true, except:

      imprisonment

      That being the difference between a civil and criminal process. Unless you can produce proof that Bill Gates or anyone from Microsoft spent time in jail for violating the Sherman Act, or that the antitrust trial was anything other than a civil case.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    50. Re:Go France! by enjerth · · Score: 1

      Notice that it says a term in jail or prison, and/or a fine?

      Would you like to try a new angle?

    51. Re:Go France! by jbengt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your logic is ill.
      If all else is equal, the more expensive option puts a drag on the economy, the cheaper option frees up money for other productive uses.

    52. Re:Go France! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      American cops have time to play computer games.
      A quick ride out into suburbia or the inner city and they can get a monthly quota of low hanging criminals.
      French cops fear stumbling on real state crimes and spend most of the day stressing about what not to investigate.

      eg. Elf Aquitaine
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elf_Aquitaine#Fraud_scandal

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    53. Re:Go France! by dedazo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why is it so difficult to understand that breaking the law does not equal committing a crime? Would you be OK with the police putting you away for a year because they caught you going 5mph over the speed limit? After all, you did break a law by doing so.

      A criminal conviction can result in prison time, execution and/or a fine. A civil judgment will never land you in jail, it will never get you killed (although it can bankrupt you) and it does not imply criminal behavior in any way. It only means you were found to have broken the law in some way.

      Microsoft was found to be in violation of antitrust law because they abused their position as a monopoly. They were never "convicted" of anything, and the legal proceedings against them were civil, not criminal.

      If you think that's a semantic point, consider having a felony (murder) on your record, as opposed to a misdemeanor (jaywalking). Then try passing a background check the next time you are up for a job.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    54. Re:Go France! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Sorry, I intended to say "I don't watch TV much". :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    55. Re:Go France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Court Findings of FACT
      Guilty as charged. Note that Microsoft appealed, wtf would they appeal if they were not found to be guilty, they wanted to be found guilty? lol

    56. Re:Go France! by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      And what exactly do you think a 6 year government SOE project is? They may save money in the long run, but it's going to be the long run. A migration on that scale is a huge amount of cost and work.

    57. Re:Go France! by meson2439 · · Score: 1

      I dunno about microsoft case but speeding is breaking the law and is a crime although not a serious one. In some country, they could put you to jail for that. Just like tax evasion which normally wouldn't serve you jail time but sometime it does. The same for minor offenses such as littering for example. Breaking the law is a crime dude.

    58. Re:Go France! by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible to support thousands of programmers without filtering the effort through Microsoft.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    59. Re:Go France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's not "pork", it's an "economic stimulus".

      In a similar vein to "I economically stimulated your wife last night" ;-)

      What, she wasn't worth more thorough stimulation?

    60. Re:Go France! by Lars512 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Defense has additional and different concerns than other areas of government. They need to make sure that even if a war broke out with a country that you and I buy components from, the military can still source the components to build what they need. If that means keeping a less efficient industry in business in the States, consider it an expensive insurance policy.

      It makes perfect sense, but it's also a bit funny when you consider that DOD itself is just an enormous insurance policy. Or at least, it should be...

    61. Re:Go France! by CaptainDefragged · · Score: 1

      ...or shop in Australia

      --
      Don't tailgate - the end is near!
    62. Re:Go France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let us know where you live so we can avoid it. Being *convicted* of speeding is not my thing.

    63. Re:Go France! by Jmanamj · · Score: 1
    64. Re:Go France! by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's not "pork", it's an "economic stimulus".

      yes, made of bacon-weave.

      --
      Balderdash!
    65. Re:Go France! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Why is it so difficult to understand that breaking the law does not equal committing a crime?

      Why are you so boneheaded that you don't see that always commit a crime when you break the law.

      A criminal conviction ...

      Why are you saying "criminal conviction" ? I thought you said earlier that any sort of conviction could only be a conviction if it was a conviction for a crime. Now you seem to be agreeing that not all convictions are necessarily criminal convictions.

      Why not just face up to the fact you were wrong and take it like a man ?

    66. Re:Go France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the pork train will probably continue

      If the pork train collided head on with the gravy train, the results would be delicious!

    67. Re:Go France! by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      If you think that's a semantic point, consider having a felony (murder) on your record, as opposed to a misdemeanor (jaywalking).

      And you are not a lawyer. Both of those are crimes that will get you tried in a criminal court. Don't confuse a misdemeanor offense with a civil judgment, they are two very separate things.

      That being said, I don't understand why the antitrust case against Microsoft was brought as a lawsuit.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    68. Re:Go France! by pete_norm · · Score: 1

      What, you're so bad that she asked you to pay for it?? With me, she does it for free!

    69. Re:Go France! by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      It's called "viande de cochon" en français.

      Except for the name, it's the same shit everywhere.

    70. Re:Go France! by SiliconSorcerer · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! (I work for one) Many (MANY) thousands of system running linux all but the top including desktops (and macs ;) but we still spend MILLIONS on Micro$oft we simply DO NOT NEED! Open Office does everything I need it to do!

    71. Re:Go France! by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      Yes, my comments were very US centric. We subsidize the corn growers heavily here, leaving to prolific HFCS use.

      Probably the biggest HFCS consuming industry is soda pop, which commonly use cane sugar outside the United States. Personally, the cane sugar soda tastes better.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    72. Re:Go France! by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 1

      Not really, you don't have to have a huge gap in taxes. Adding one more person would just add some taxes but not enough to cause the owner to not do it.

    73. Re:Go France! by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      MS have a higher profit margin as they sell products of marginal cost to produce, so more of the money goes into the bank accounts of the company and it's shareholders (where is just gets stockpiled)...
      RedHat have higher operating costs as most of their business is based on consultancy, so more of the money goes back into the economy (mostly wages etc).

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    74. Re:Go France! by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Wah, wah.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  4. Duh by spykemail · · Score: 5, Funny

    Free is cheaper. Who knew?

    1. Re:Duh by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except for most of the suits I've dealt with at my last two companies. We keep talking about the need to save money and cut costs, so we lay people off. When I show them articles how IBM saved over 100 million dollars last year migrating more Windows systems to Linux, they balk at the notion. We literally use everything from Office 97 to 2007 here, and we can't share documents internally. We had a big crisis when departments couldn't work together on a budget, because no one could open each other's files.

      I suggested OpenOffice to several execs, and not a single one would consider moving away from Office. It is just unthinkable. They keep insisting they want everyone on the same version of Office (and we have Mac users with Mac Office) but they won't buy new Office 2007 licenses for everyone. They want a solution that is free, but they are terrified of free software.

      Instead, they'll cave and buy more Office 2007 licenses, and fire more people to make up the difference.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Duh by Totenglocke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your anecdote further strengthens my view that American companies are all run by idiots. I swear, American companies sit down and figure out the most efficient way to run the company and then say "Ok, great -- lets do the exact opposite".

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software AND hardware cost over 3 years dwarfs in comparison to payroll. If you want to save big money you find ways to employ fewer people. In most companies the IT payroll is usually 75% of the annyal budget. Everything else fits in the remaining. YOu could reduce overall budget by about 5 - 10% depending on how agressive you were with the OSS thing. YOu could save about 40 - 50% by using the systems better and requiring less admin etc. I would do both. Hire some, Fire alot, and switch as much as I could to OSS.

    4. Re:Duh by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      You must have never worked in a big enough enterprise. Sure, buying a few HP or Dell boxes with 2 sockets will run you a few grand, but when the support costs on 1 superdome can pay for 2 IT workers per year, not even mentioning the costs of additional disk or the initial purchase, you would be hard pressed to think that a few IT workers will clog the costs up too much. In all, about 8 UNIX guys can administer 500 machines pretty effectively. Cut that to 5 and you end up with loose ends and lots of problems. You saved a lot of nothing doing that.

    5. Re:Duh by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They aren't run by idiots. They're run by selfish bastards. There's a big difference.

      An idiot will make you fill out form 22/B in order to get a new stapler because he doesn't know of any other solution. A selfish bastard will make you fill out form 22/B in order to get a new stapler because he wants to save money on staplers and knows that most people won't take the time unless they really really need one.

      This may seem like the effects are similar, but they aren't: the idiot, when he hears of a more efficient way, will at least consider changing it or at worst be very confused. The selfish bastard, when he hears of a more efficient way, will fire the guy who made the suggestion for undermining his authority. It's a difference between Dogbert and the PHB.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:Duh by nschubach · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily idiots (but I'm sure it applies somewhat.) Boards are made up of people from other companies. In fact, the company I work for took on a board member from Symantec a few years back. The same year, everyone got "upgraded" to Symantec Anti-Virus. It's a buddy-buddy world in Corporate America.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    7. Re:Duh by Tuoqui · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People lack the balls to make such a big change.

      Remember 'Noone got fired for choosing Microsoft' is a famous line the higher up IT guys like to wave around. Fact of the matter is that noone ever got fired for choosing open source either. It's poor implementation of any solution that gets people fired.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    8. Re:Duh by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          It's more like, they stay with what they know is safe, regardless of the costs (in man hours, dollars, or pieces of their souls).

          Myself, I'd look at it as, what is the cost difference? You'll have to deploy OpenOffice to every desktop. That will take manhours. But, if you have to deploy/upgrade and maintain the MSOffice installs, that will also take manhours. I'd say it's a wash on the manhours, but really it isn't. OO installs quicker. The licensing is ... well, free. Even if they do decide to one day charge, it most likely won't be as much as for MSOffice.

          But, OO doesn't come with Outlook. That's the only problem I've seen for some places so far.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude.. you are not alone..

      "Probably" Most American companies can't afford to even consider other products because of the cost of training, installation, maintenance, support, and the physiological effects other software products may have on people etc..

      Microsoft owns us and there is nothing we can do. From old baby boomers to Generation X and probably Generation Y have little choice as this is what our education system is based on, Microsoft.

      Maybe because of the Vista fiasco other options may be considered, but not in my lifetime..

    10. Re:Duh by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The menus in OpenOffice.org are more similar to pre-Office 2007 than the Office 2007 ribbon is.

    11. Re:Duh by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Ideally, you put it on your initial image when you image computers. But we also have Altiris which can push packages out to every computer. Deploying the software is actually quite easy.

      The Helpdesk manager said he is concerned that it would be harder to support because it is another app. I asked him how many calls he gets per day to convert documents that people can't open, or how difficult it is to support varying versions of MS Office?

      Even as a SysAdmin, I get people asking me how to use Excel or Word daily. And as someone who pushes FOSS, I've never heard a complaint from friends or family, for whom I've installed OpenOffice. Honestly, for the average user, all the basic functions are either the same as in MS Office, or intuitive.

      It is only power users who really know Excel that will struggle to relearn those tasks in Calc.

      As for Outlook, there are nicer solutions like Zimbra, Thunderbird, etc. Gmail hosting is also pretty nice. But prying away people's familiar e-mail app is not easy in a corporate environment.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    12. Re:Duh by euxneks · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I was watching an english documentary the other day called "The Office" - I don't think they have a very good manager.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    13. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I believe there is an update that allows recent versions of Office to work with the Office2007 file format.
      http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=941b3470-3ae9-4aee-8f43-c6bb74cd1466&displayLang=en

      So they could theoretically apply it to all computers, re-save all the files as 2007 format and voila.
      The only downside is some of the features 2007 has will probably not be supported on the older versions. Oh, and you're still MSs b*tch.

      OpenOffice will never be supported by the corporate since there is always some annoying paper pusher with zero productivity who cannot live without some feature of Office. While macros can be somewhat understandable, this is not what what I'm talking about.

    14. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked for the banks.

    15. Re:Duh by BagOCrap · · Score: 1

      Your anecdote further strengthens my view that American companies are all run by idiots. I swear, American companies sit down and figure out the most efficient way to run the company and then say "Ok, great -- lets do the exact opposite".

      This applies to the Icelandic government, too. It's not just Americans.

      Laying people off is (still!) some kind of a last resort, reducing work time and salaries seems to be "the solution" here. Well, management is cut down somewhat - but that's probably the wisest decision of the "big bosses", although they probably don't realize it. Unless they're just fishing for votes...

      --
      -- Chaos, panic, pandemonium... My job here is done!
    16. Re:Duh by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Once I admin'd a network with Zimbra. I stay far far away from that now. Thunderbird is a good alternative. I actually liked Evolution, but it became more of a pain to get installed, so I've just been using Thunderbird lately. Evolution was so close to being an Outlook clone (without the crashing) it was nice.

          I like GMail too, but it may not be totally appropriate for a business. Web based is nice, most of the time. The question is, can you trust every Google employee who may have access to the data? If your company is contractually obliged to maintain security of data including emails, does this violate the terms of the contract? The only real good solution for email for most companies is an in-house one.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    17. Re:Duh by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I agree. And that is the funny thing. It is easier for XP users to move to KDE 3.5 than to move to Vista. And likewise it is easier for Office 2000/2003 users to move to OpenOffice than to Office 2007. Microsoft loves to write articles about "total cost of ownership" where they claim you'd have ridiculous training budgets to train people how to use free software, while they assume users automatically know how to use Microsoft apps, and thusly don't need training.

      These days, the opposite is becoming reality. It costs more to train users on newer Microsoft apps.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    18. Re:Duh by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      You should switch companies.

    19. Re:Duh by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      The real problem they have with Open Source is that they do not understand it. How could be something free and still better than something which comes from a company. A company which earned their respect.

      Also OS is free as in speech. So you cannot control it. This is a frighting concept for most people in the management.

      And on top of this, they think if we switch, we have to relearn everything. And they barely manage to use their machines right now. I have seen enough business people which were quite capable of using their word processor, but they never use a new function, because it might destroy their work.

      Well the software they use is normally not that bad, however they have developed a certain respect or fear to the subject, so they are not able to decide logically. So they decide to stay with Windows and other MS products.

    20. Re:Duh by Matt+Perry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suggested OpenOffice to several execs, and not a single one would consider moving away from Office. It is just unthinkable.

      How did you mention it? Did you write a proposal that examined the financial ramifications of switching from MS Office to OpenOffice, including not only licensing costs but also retraining expenses? Did you outline the benefits of switching including how quality would be improved? Did you explain possible alternatives including the possibility of doing nothing? This is how executives think. They want to see a written business case before they'll consider taking actions like you propose. You'll have to make your case for how the company will improve their operations, save time and money, and most importantly how the success of the project will be measured.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    21. Re:Duh by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is only power users who really know Excel that will struggle to relearn those tasks in Calc.

      Whups (Ding!) Right on many counts, wrong on the implication there.

      In the business world, at least among the top 10 banks, Excel is a defacto standard -- not just for moving spreadsheets, but for moving software between companies. An absolutely huge amount of business is transacted via business rules living entirely in spreadsheet VBA. I know, I developed some of it (contemptable, perhaps, but a guy has to eat). Throw the spreadsheet across the hall to the next company and they can run it irrespective of what infrastructure the other company is running.

      It's ugly, I know, but it's the rule. There's more than intellectual inertia keeping people from shifting to FOSS. I'm just really glad that some organisations are making the shift despite the huge embedded world of VBA.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    22. Re:Duh by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      When you buy exchange, you license it for X number of users and a Copy of outlook is included in that license. (Not advertising here, Outlook has caused me far more hair loss since it was pushed upon us)

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    23. Re:Duh by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Buy it? Isn't that what Warez sites are for? :)

          Just kidding. My servers are all Linux. My resume does have Exchange on it, but only because I was forced to setup, configure, and maintain it, and that had a legitimate license. :) My job was to work the server, so I didn't know how many licenses it came bundled with. I just had an original disk to install with.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    24. Re:Duh by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Informative. Too bad moderation doesn't go to +6.

      Not sure about your "selfish" description though. Perhaps better words would be "controlling", "insecure", "lacking confidence", "manipulator".

    25. Re:Duh by Ice+Tiger · · Score: 1

      Companies are generally feudal in nature so not surprising this behaviour is exhibited.

      --
      "Because we are not employing at entry level, offshoring will kill our industry stone dead."
    26. Re:Duh by Daengbo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But, OO doesn't come with Outlook. That's the only problem I've seen for some places so far.

      I know I'm in the minority on Slashdot for this one, but if I were setting up a new small business right now, I'd be using Google Apps or Zoho ... probably Google. Pay for the required Internet service and $50/user/year.

    27. Re:Duh by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      They aren't run by idiots. They're run by selfish bastards. There's a big difference.

      Agreed, but often the end result is the same. An idiot will run a small company into the ground and move on. A selfish bastard will gut a company of a all valuable assets to temporarily boost the stock, collect huge bonuses, and then sell off the remains of the company to a larger one or just walk away. The end result is the same except the latter is more sustainable. After running the company into the ground intentionally, an executive can almost certainly get a job working for one of his buddies who he was giving huge bonuses to. After accidentally running a company into the ground an executive is less likely to get another high paying executive position (although not as unlikely as any rational human would think).

    28. Re:Duh by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      You should check out Novell's fork of OpenOffice, at go-oo.org. It has support for VBA, Micorsoft Office macros, Works file formats, etc.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    29. Re:Duh by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      You should check out Novell's fork of OpenOffice, at go-oo.org. It has support for VBA, Micorsoft Office macros, Works file formats, etc.

      Would someone please mod this guy +5 "paradigm shift" please?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    30. Re:Duh by againjj · · Score: 1

      Isn't that supposed to be 11?

  5. did i read that wrong? by hort_wort · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thought they switched to Geico?

    1. Re:did i read that wrong? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes.
      I did have to pause a moment to think millions of what? Initially I thought people.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:did i read that wrong? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      I've got people!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  6. Allies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So can we now call Linux the Allies coming to save France? I didn't want to 'call' the other side of that.....

    1. Re:Allies? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      So can we now call Linux the Allies coming to save France? I didn't want to 'call' the other side of that.....

      No! No, way! You absolutely, positively are NOT going to trick me into saying that Microsoft is the Axis of Evil! Do you have any idea how fast I'd be modded down by the Microsoft fanboys? Forget it! I'm not doing it!

    2. Re:Allies? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Well.. They guillotined the blue screen of death!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    3. Re:Allies? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Is there a "law" that states Godwin's law will be applied to any and all conversations leading to references of Nazi's or Hitler? Kind of like a meta-law...

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Allies? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          So, you're suggesting a relationship in behavior between Microsoft's world domination, and that of Hitler and the Nazi party? :)

          Would they really be a party? Most parties I've went to were fun events, involving booze, women, and loud music. Maybe they should be referred to as the Nazi bad guys club, or something like that. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:Allies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This exists. And it has been proven that the Godwin's Law Event Horizon (GLEH - the time at which the nazis are brought up) is usually reached _after_ the Godwin's Law Self Referential Event Horizon (GLSREH - the time at which Godwin's Law is brought up). Redirecting Godwin's Law to point to Godwin's Law instead of Hitler changes the function time from O(log(n)) to O(log(log(n))).

  7. French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubuntu? by canuck08 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubuntu."

    Jesus Christ! Windows was killing millions of people in France?!?!

  8. Applications already migrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the summary doesn't mention, but is worth noting, is that they were already using open source programs where possible---Firefox, Thunderbird, OOo. Now I think their migration is wonderful, but I suspect it might have been somewhat more difficult if users were asked to adjust to new programs, as well.

    1. Re:Applications already migrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      They migrated their applications first, as part of a phased rollout, aimed at being a first step before the migration to Linux.

      So the users did migrate applications, it just wasn't at the same time as changing operating system.

    2. Re:Applications already migrated by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0, Troll

      What the summary doesn't mention, but is worth noting, is that they were already using open source programs where possible---Firefox, Thunderbird, OOo. Now I think their migration is wonderful, but I suspect it might have been somewhat more difficult if users were asked to adjust to new programs, as well.

      The only insightful comment so far, and I don't have any mod points. :(

      Oh well. Yes, that is what is meant by "nothing changes but the icons".

    3. Re:Applications already migrated by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What the summary doesn't mention, but is worth noting, is that they were already using open source programs where possible---Firefox, Thunderbird, OOo. Now I think their migration is wonderful, but I suspect it might have been somewhat more difficult if users were asked to adjust to new programs, as well.

      Of course it would have been more difficult. That just means they did it right, switching to Free applications first then to the Free OS. They probably saved money in the first step as well as the second, and lowered the burden by doing it phased rather than dumping it all on the users at once.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Applications already migrated by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      It is a similar migration strategy as the one used in Munich. They called it soft migration, because they first migrate back office services, then applications and at the end the OS. And while they are migrating they review and refine their processes which saves additional money.

    5. Re:Applications already migrated by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. How could anyone adjust from ie to firefox, they are completely different. And Outlook to thunderbird, who has heard of such a thing. And Office to OO, that is impossible. it would take a company of geniuses.

    6. Re:Applications already migrated by broken_chaos · · Score: 1

      Many of those are reasonably similar to their Windows/closed-source counterparts - there are many of the same basic features, and many are located in more or less the same place.

      Considering the vast changes to IE from 6->7, Office from 2003->2007 (I think these are the right versions), and Windows from XP->Vista, it may still be around as difficult to train for proprietary upgrades, even where the similarities aren't as pronounced.

    7. Re:Applications already migrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason to use free software was not so much the cost (well, it *was* a resaon, but not the main one), but the fact that they could check the code and modify it. AFAIK the added a could of modules to Thunderbird. A few of their admin are also extremly competent perl developper (belonging to the french "mongeur de perl" group)

    8. Re:Applications already migrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the article says "French Police" to ease the translation. But in France there are two independent organisation for national security : a military force called "Gendarmerie" and a city based called "Police". And it is only the "Gendarmerie" which made the move.

      I am following this story for a couple of years and I found out, form interview and reports, that they are doing really strange things: They are investing time and money to understand what can be the best for them in the average and long term. They even mention it in their documents, talking about the evolution of the business model of FOSS against proprietary software

      I don't really know what it means but I know that in a regular company, they send you to a psychiatrist just for thinking about it.

    9. Re:Applications already migrated by dacaffinator · · Score: 1

      That's really an endorsement for porting Linux apps to Windows.

  9. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jesus Christ! Windows was killing millions of people in France?!?!

    Why do you think they call it the 'Blue Screen of Death'?

  10. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe...,

    "French Police Save Millions of people that were in the process of Switching to Ubuntu, from M$ henchmen out to kill them.

  11. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by nixdroid · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, no, millions of _Francs_. About $1.98.

    --
    -- Consensus - 50% probability that the majority are wrong.
  12. French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know so many switching to Ubuntu were in need of being saved.

  13. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Caue · · Score: 1

    I swear I read it like that as well... But then I saw the Ubuntu in the end of the phrase and tought: naaaah. No OS other then Leopard could be harassing to so many people, and leopards are not that dangerous if you let them be.

  14. You just saved millions! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Waddya gonna do?

    We're going to Disneyland!

    --
    What?
  15. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And why do you think the French sigh of exasperation is "sacre bleu"?

  16. Mandriva snubbed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why didn't the French police didn't switch to Mandriva since it is of French origin? I thought the French are fairly protectionist and prefer to use French-based companies over foreign ones. Seems like they could have given Mandriva a needed financial boost with lucrative support contracts.

    1. Re:Mandriva snubbed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu (Canonical) is a British company, which is still EU.

      They aren't necessarily paying Canonical anything anyway -- I'm sure there are local French companies willing to provide Linux support, just as there will be French companies willing to do any additional software development they need.

    2. Re:Mandriva snubbed? by basiles · · Score: 5, Informative

      First, a small precision: The Gendarmerie Nationale is not exactly the French national police (called Police Nationale in French), but an armed force (the fourth french armed force, after infantery Armée de Terre, navy = Marine Nationale, air force = Armée de l'Air). The small difference between Gendarmerie & Police is that Gendarmerie members are exactly soldiers (with strict military discipline).

      In practice, Gendarmerie tend to work in rural or semi-rural areas, while Police tend to work in urban zones (actually, there exist some kind of competition between Gendarmerie and Police, which gives interesting french thriller films and books) And they have different legal abilities. For example, in some limited cases, a Gendarme can legally shoot his gun first, while in principle a Policier (policeman) can use his gun (policemen and gendarmes are armed with guns) only for self defense (but IANAL so I may be wrong).

      Gendarmerie is centralized and military, so it was easy to order them to switch at once to Linux [no training needed; just an official order from a high-rank official]. And I hear their IT department was strong enough to customize (without subcontractors) some Ubuntu distribution to the exact needs of Gendarmerie (which includes access to some peculiar databases). This could be an explanation of why Gendarmerie did not need any support from Mandriva.

      But Mandriva still has several French state contracts, including even research contracts on collaborative projects.

      Disclaimer: I do work sometimes with Mandriva on collaborative research projects (such as GGCC).

    3. Re:Mandriva snubbed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, there are many companies around that can do contract work on any distribution you care for. A normal software service is called an SSII (Société de Services en Ingéniérie Informatique, service company in software engineering), but enough companies are calling themselves SSLL (Société de Services en Logiciels Libres, free software service company) that the concept is being understood well enough by the marketplace.

      Gendarmerie Nationale is hardly the only public service, around here, to be quite interested by Free software (in both understanding of the word)...

    4. Re:Mandriva snubbed? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      (the fourth french armed force, after infantery Armée de Terre, navy = Marine Nationale, air force = Armée de l'Air).

      Looks like you forgot "la force de frappe", which apparently has something to do with foamy coffee and making people drink it. I think it's some kind of French nationalist defence against Starbucks and initiation ritual for newcomers moving to Paris.

    5. Re:Mandriva snubbed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just an FYI, a Wikipedia link on your mention of force de la frappe would go a long way to make your joke funnier.

  17. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not just in France, the summary says Euros, so people all over Europe.

  18. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, it's a reference the Virgin Mary, for whom the color blue is sacred.

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. For information by godrik · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Gendarmerie Nationale already used free software daily such as open office. The migration would have been more complicated is they were using MS Office.

    1. Re:For information by getclear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not particularly, they would have had to offer retraining from 2003 to 2007, as well as on the new OS.

    2. Re:For information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ain't necessarily so. If you don't use VBA macros or complex docs, it could even be easier to switch from Office XP to OpenOffice than to Office 2007. French parliament didn't use any free software on the desktop before switching to Ubuntu.

    3. Re:For information by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      The Gendarmerie Nationale already used free software daily such as open office. The migration would have been more complicated is they were using MS Office.

      Actually, they used MSOffice back in 2005. They did a staged transition to free software, first moving to OpenOffice and Firefox and Thunderbird. Now they're moving into the second stage and switching the underlying OS now that most of their applications are platform independent.

    4. Re:For information by godrik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My point was that moving from office 2003/windows to openoffice/ubuntu would induce much more compatibility issues than from openoffice/windows. since the file format are fully compatible.

  21. Tis a good day for Linux by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Great for Linux , awesome for Linux admins, even better for open source movement!

  22. Euros by Enderandrew · · Score: 0, Redundant

    France completely switched to the Euro years back. I was there. The article even mentions it was Euros. But I should expect people on /. to RTFA.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  23. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who will be the first moron to post one of those lame "whooosh" postings?

  24. can't happen in Cambridge, MA. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    Almost every time I pass the parked policy car in Cambridge, I saw the policeman playing some game (e.g., solitair) on his PC. I guess games *are* the priority here, hence don't see any migration to Ubuntu any time soon.

    1. Re:can't happen in Cambridge, MA. by janeuner · · Score: 1

      Never mind that Solitaire is on the default Ubuntu install, along with a dozen other (read: more than Windows) pre-installed games.

  25. No, that's not what they did by kenh · · Score: 5, Informative

    They saved millions by migrating 90,000 desktops to OpenOffice, they have migrated only 5,000 desktops to Ubuntu, they plan for 15,000 by the end of 2009, and 90,000 by 2015. (IIRC).

    The title of the article, and the title of the slashdot posting is inaccurate - the savings are real, but the reason was not Ubuntu - it was OpenOffice.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:No, that's not what they did by thewils · · Score: 1

      I think this is the key to moving away from Windows. Once users are happy with Open Office, Firefox, Gimp for Windows etc, then the next step to migrate totally to Linux becomes a much smaller one to take.

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    2. Re:No, that's not what they did by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 0, Redundant

      QUICK! Mod him down!

      He's ruining The Year of The Linux Desktop(TM)!

    3. Re:No, that's not what they did by fm6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The title of the article, and the title of the slashdot posting is inaccurate...

      What's your point?

    4. Re:No, that's not what they did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to be fair, they switched to openoffice so that the next step -- switch to ubuntu -- would be seamless. so it is true that in the process of switching to ubuntu (using openoffice first being a first step), they saved millions.

    5. Re:No, that's not what they did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The title of the article, and the title of the slashdot posting is inaccurate - the savings are real, but the reason was not Ubuntu - it was OpenOffice.

      YOU are inaccurate, they already migrated to openoffice, now they decided to not buy vista and instead migrate to Ubuntu, hence, saving millions more.

    6. Re:No, that's not what they did by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Um... that's exactly what the summary says. The migration will not be completed till 2015.

      And at an estimate of 100 bucks a license, thats 9 *million* in savings over moving to Vista instead.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    7. Re:No, that's not what they did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here. Any excuse to bash MS is open game.

  26. This just in from the ticker. French police save m by gd23ka · · Score: 2, Funny

    French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubuntu

    French Police are going door to door these past days informing citizens of the long-term health
    effects of Windows. The so far largest campaign for public health in the history of France is
    expected to continue for another week and is aiming for a coverage of over 90% of the nation's
    households. Jean Trudeaux, an elderly villager in the Bretagne recalls opening the door to officers
    early in the afternoon and being asked if he owned a computer. Acknowledging the possession of
    a computing device, Trudeaux learned of the immense cardiovascular risks associated with using
    inferior desktop software that is sold to an unsuspecting public bundled with almost every sale
    of computer hardware. At the end of the conversation with the officers, Trudeaux remarks:
    "I don't use my computer that often but that's mainly because it's such a hassle to do anything
    with it and then I get really really mad".

    While the campaign has certainly not escaped the attention of Microsoft it has also been noted
    by the medical profession world-wide. In an interview with Dr. Francois Boudoir, one of the foremost
    advancers of the field of cardiology in France the connection was quickly made between reducing the
    amount of time spent in distress to downright rage and the more than obvious benefits thus incurred
    for cardio health. "This campaign will save millions of lives in the long run and we need to look at
    this problem from more angles than just the cardiologist's perspective. This is also a quality of
    life issue."

  27. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Funny

    You?

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  28. Biggest differences? by CannonballHead · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The two biggest differences are the icons and the games.

    Man alive. If that's what this person thinks are the "biggest differences" ... I don't know, that just sounds really strange. This wasn't a very technical person, I take it, saying this. Even from a pure user's perspective, there's more that is different than "icons." Like, the entire GUI is different. I know, basic functionality is mostly the same, and you still click things to get them to open, but there's still a lot more different. Good things, too, I'm not trying to say the switch was a bad idea (like security and updates). But it slightly boggles my mind that someone thinks the "biggest difference between XP and Ubuntu are icons and games." It's almost an insult to Ubuntu! ;) Except I like XP, too, but whatever.

    I am expecting responses saying that this was from the "user's" perspective... probably true; I still think there's more different than icons and games. Package management would be a major difference from XP, for one thing. More so than icons.

    1. Re:Biggest differences? by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      But really, the paradigm of all modern GUIs is the same. There really isn't that much difference between XP or XFCE on a paradigm level. It's all clicky menus and icons.

      My parents, who are about the most illiterate people I've ever met, went from Win98 to Gnome to Mac OSX over the years without a single complaint about usability of the GUI. Plenty of other issues, but never about the GUI.

      So yes, I agree with the article. The biggest difference is in the icons and the games.

    2. Re:Biggest differences? by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      But he didn't say the biggest GUI differences, even (and his name is "Guimard" hehe). He said the biggest differences. Either he was actually referring to the visual GUI aspect, or ... something else, but that "something else" is what is a little weird. There's a lot of differences between XP and Ubuntu, perhaps the least of which are GUI. Which is what you are trying to say, I think, in saying the biggest GUI difference is icons/games. He didn't make that distinction between GUI and Other differences. At least, not in the quote in the article (I looked, summary has the complete article's quote, looks like).

      As far as illiterate people switching, it seems the more computer illiterate people are, the easier of a time switching. I assume it's because they're used to nothing, and every time they sit down to a computer, it's new. My parents had little trouble going from XP to openSuSE... since they didn't know really what a file or directory was in the first place, it's not hard to switch...

      Anyway, I'm a fan of Linux and think it has great uses in offices that just need to do office type things, no special programs, etc. I'm just saying that there are differences (GOOD ones, too!) that he could have mentioned. Like security or reliability. You'd think the French police would be interested in those. :)

    3. Re:Biggest differences? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      You let your desktop users install and update their own software packages? Remind me never to come to work in your IT department.

    4. Re:Biggest differences? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the message that was intended was that overall the change did not affect users very much outside of relatively trivial things, not that those two things were literally the biggest changes in the system period.

      I know this is heresy around here, but sometimes literalism is not the best route to understanding.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Biggest differences? by Draek · · Score: 1

      In context, I think he was reffering to the biggest obstacles for users to adapt themselves to it. From their perspective, different icons and different (more!) games are about the only thing they'll see, since all they need an OS for is to launch the applications they need to work, which had already been migrated before.

      Reliability, ease of administration, security and such may matter to the average home user, but in a large organization those things only serve to make the local IT staff less prone to BOFH outbursts :)

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    6. Re:Biggest differences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Illiterate? So, what, your parents can't read or write?

    7. Re:Biggest differences? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Noticable differences between windows and linux

      One big issue is file handling. On windows practically all apps use the standard windows file dialog (or a very minor variation on it). On linux there is a huge hodgepodge with many of them not showing standard locations requiring manual browsing to /media and guessing while of the subdirectories is thier usb stick and which are just stale crap. The gnome file dialog is also slow as fuck because of attempts to identify files by contents.

      I've also noticed clipboard support for anything more than plain text to be poor on linux though I belive this is improving

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  29. Sadly, "thanks" is all those programmers will get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, the system was free to the French government. But I wonder, with the economy the way it is,who's going to help all those programmers that donated their time and effort to write all that code? Are the French going to step up and make a donation to help out all those coders trying to make the mortgage payment?

  30. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no, millions of _Francs_. About $1.98.

    Let me guess, you got your conversion done by Bill O'Reilly, whose call for a boycott of French products utterly destroyed* the French economy!

    * (According to sources named Bill O'Reilly)

  31. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by agnosticanarch · · Score: 1

    I'll bite.

    Uhm.... whooosh?

    *shoots post in the leg*

    There ya go: one lame "whooosh" posting.

    ~AA

    --
    I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
  32. There are 2 separate national police force by thirty-seven · · Score: 5, Informative

    The French national police force, the Gendarmerie Nationale...

    Actually, there are two separate national police forces in France.

    The Gendarmerie Nationale is, (adapted from Wikipedia):

    the national gendarmerie (a military body charged with police duties among civilian populations) and military police force. Its missions include:

    • The policing of the countryside, rivers and coastal areas, and small towns with populations under 10,000. About half the French population is under the direct jurisdiction of the Gendarmerie.
    • Criminal investigations under judiciary supervision.
    • Crowd control and other security activities.
    • The security of airports and military installations, as well as all investigations relating to the military, including in foreign interventions.
    • Participations in ceremonies involving foreign heads of states or heads of governments.
    • Provision of Military police services to the Military of France.

    The Police Nationale is, (adapted from Wikipedia):

    the main civil law enforcement agency of France, with primary jurisdiction in cities and large towns. In those larger cities and towns, its mission includes:

    • Conducting security operations (patrols, traffic control, identity checks...).
    • Conducting criminal enquiries, serving search warrants, etc under the orders and supervision of the Investigating magistrates of the judiciary. It maintains specific services ("judicial police") for criminal enquiries.
    --

    Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    1. Re:There are 2 separate national police force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Gendarmerie originally was a MP force (when it was created during the reign of Napoleon, I think).

      Then its duties were switched to the policing of countryside (as opposed to the policing of cities and urban areas which is the responsability of the Police Nationale).

      Gendarmerie still has a military status but it isn't under the authority of the Ministry of Defense any longer. As the Police Nationale, it is now under the authority of the Ministry of Interior/Ministry of Home Affairs.

    2. Re:There are 2 separate national police force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's all very true. but you'll know the difference when you encounter them: the gendarmes are quite nice people, the policiers are absolute assholes.

    3. Re:There are 2 separate national police force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so to say : crowd control is generally not under the supervision of the Gendarmerie (except for cases when crowd is to be controlled in bare nature, like fields where activists come to destroy GMO, or cases when crowd is more or less calm, like in the subway or train stations), but generally (in urban areas, when there are manifestations, sport events and such) under the Police's one (and amongst the worst  : CRS, eg "Compagnie Republicaine de Securite" - which is a bunch of very violent cops, all armored and weaponed, specialized in this kind of interventions, eg trained to brutalize manifestants, scatter crowds, and, earing from the son of one of them, that I know, sing a lot of racist songs before their interventions)...

      ... oh, and Sarkozy (the tiny and ultra-conservative french president) wants this duality to cease to exist : his goals seems to be the inclusion of the Gendarmerie inside the Police, so to only have one entity to manage (well, those are official words - in practice, he also ruled the Ministry of Interior, when Chirac was president, before him, which means he ruled over the police, but not over the Gendarmerie, as the commander in chief of the french armies is the president, eg Chirac at this time... so one may guess he placed people with trust of his to key-employments in the Police, so to rule it better, and now, has a better hand on it than on the Gendarmerie, even though he's also commander in chief of the armies now...).

    4. Re:There are 2 separate national police force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are going to merge soon.

  33. Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like results from this story last year .

  34. Read the original report - you'll feel much better by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    According to Guimard the move to open source has also helped to reduce maintenance costs.
    Keeping GNU/Linux desktops up to date is much easier, he says.
    "Previously, one of us would be travelling all year just to install a new version of some anti virus application on the desktops in the Gendarmerie's outposts on the islands in French Polynesia.
    A similar operation now is finished within two weeks and does not require travelling.

    Aaah... government work.
    Not only do they find an exceptionally complicated way to solve a simple problem - they don't know when to keep their mouth shut when it goes in their favor.
    Traveling around French Polynesian islands updating anti-virus software for living?

    Why yes. It is MUCH better to sit in some windowless room instead.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  35. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    That kind of self-referential humor makes my head hurt :(

  36. Re:Sadly, "thanks" is all those programmers will g by initdeep · · Score: 4, Informative

    no
    they donated their code.

    if they wanted to get paid for their code, they should have not donated their time.

  37. Mandriva? by generalchaos23 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am surprised that they didn't go with Mandriva, seeing how I am pretty sure they are based in France.

    1. Re:Mandriva? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While more polished than Ubuntu on the surface, Mandriva is decidedly shitty underneath. Ubuntu's Debian heritage gives it elegant architecture and management far beyond what Mandriva offers.

    2. Re:Mandriva? by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      While some may think you're trolling, you hit the nail on the head. I was a longtime Mandriva/Mandrake user (even gladly paid the yearly membership), but once I discovered the goodness that was Debian's Snyaptic vs Mandriva's own package manager, I couldn't go back.

      Granted I have yet to see anything equal Drakconf (Mandriva's control panel) in ease and usability. But, being able to easily update and upgrade my system with more reliable package sources outweighs that benefit.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    3. Re:Mandriva? by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      Are you trolling? I don't use Mandriva myself (I use Gentoo, and advocate Debian and Ubuntu), but I know that Synaptic was invented by Conectiva, who merged with Mandrake to form Mandriva.

    4. Re:Mandriva? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your shitty RPMs.

    5. Re:Mandriva? by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      They're not (or were not when I was using it) using synaptic as a package manager.

      Trust me, you don't know package management pain till you use a package manager you have to first setup (or it will only install packages from the install CDs) to be useful (unlike Ubuntu which comes ready to use the online repositories out of the box). Then as I stated, all operations were slower than synaptic, no option to "reinstall", and the package manager will silently fail on such things such as one of your repos being offline.

      I have now been using Ubuntu for a couple of years (was testing it alongside Mandriva for most of that) and I've never encountered that issue. Note that I'm not dissing on Mandriva just for the hell of it. I consider Mandriva to be one heck of a distro with only 2 major flaws that if addressed would hands down make it the best distro (imo).

      Keep in mind, I haven't used Mandriva since version 2008 (or 2008.1) so things may have improved. YMMV, etc.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    6. Re:Mandriva? by AnibalOjeda · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what i was thinking.. Bad news for Mandriva, are they still doing business?

      --
      Saludos, Anibal Ojeda http://anibalnet.nl
    7. Re:Mandriva? by generalchaos23 · · Score: 1

      I agree, Synaptic package manager is great. I was also a long time Mandriva user before I had to switch distros for work. To make my life easier I made the switch at home as well (to Ubuntu for desktops and Debian for my servers). I just figured that for support purposes they would have gone with a distro that is french based. I am a ubuntu fan but I do try out Mandriva's newest versions because I used them for so long and it isn't a bad distro. Just seemed a little odd is all, although I am sure they will not regret going with ubuntu.

  38. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    Hah, now all this needs is Jean Reno and Robert de Niro chasing Bill Gates across Paris in a Peugeot 406...

  39. Pretty easy? by sam0737 · · Score: 1

    ...Seriously?

    Unless the sole purpose of the computer is to access web based application, otherwise how could it be easy?

    Or does it only refer to the user training part? Then I would believe easy is the correct word to describe (Form Windows, you have to train user to use windows LOB apps too)

    1. Re:Pretty easy? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How much training have you received in using the apps that you use 90% of the time?

      Just curious.

      I don't know anyone who has received formal training in how to use their email client, web browser, word processor, or presentation software. If they don't
      know how to do something, they simply ask peer who does.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    2. Re:Pretty easy? by Draek · · Score: 1

      No, the sole purpose of the computer is to access the applications they require to do their work, but *those* had already been taken care of and migrated to multi-platform offerings long beforehand. All the user training they needed to do *now* was to teach them which icons launched which applications, and remind them to stay away from games in work hours ;)

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    3. Re:Pretty easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not about email client, web browser, word processor...

      But I believe in a Police department, there are specific apps that people would have to learn.
      Like how to file a case, how to associate the statement to the case, how to search...police car dispatching, scheduling, etc.

      If it's on Web then it might be fine. If it's Java you still need to run the whole test pass again and fix any bug you have right? (Potentially have to rewrite some import/export that designed to work with Microsoft Office)

    4. Re:Pretty easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our city government gave 1 day training courses for each application to all city employees when the new version of MS Office 2007 was installed.

  40. Re:Read the original report - you'll feel much bet by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    So... much... sunlight...
    *wimper*

  41. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "C'est la fenetre bleu de la mort!"

  42. anti-monopoly rulings by eleuthero · · Score: 1

    Will this switch on a large level impact the EU's suit against MS? If there are large numbers of computers, especially at the government level, that do not use MS at all, does this not take the force out of the meme, "It's a monopoly, kill it now," or is there more to this than is clear at present?

    1. Re:anti-monopoly rulings by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Will this switch on a large level impact the EU's suit against MS?

      No.

      If there are large numbers of computers, especially at the government level, that do not use MS at all, does this not take the force out of the meme, "It's a monopoly, kill it now," or is there more to this than is clear at present?

      If every single company buying site licenses of Windows were to switch to Linux, it still would not make enough of a dent for MS to not have enough market share to have monopoly influence. The vast majority of the market is OEM licenses for pre-installs. In fact, almost all the computers in question probably already were bundled with a Windows license and then a second, site license was bought, before finally being migrated to Linux. Until major OEMs start shipping Linux in significant volumes. This was 90,000 machines. In an average quarter there are 71,900,000 computers shipped to the EU with Windows pre-installed, site licenses. Windows has 99% of the applicable market. By my calculations, that means this news accounts for .001% of the market. Since MS would have to drop to about 70% before the EU would consider them no longer having monopoly influence it will take 29,000 more switches of the same size every quarter. So when you start seeing 10,000 stories like this on Slashdot every month, MS might be in the clear.

  43. Re:Sadly, "thanks" is all those programmers will g by basiles · · Score: 1
    This is not exactly true. The usual way to help open source software is to help on its development.

    The French public sector (much bigger in proportion than the US one) did contribute significantly to opensource software (for example, the first linux thread library and Ocaml has both been written by a French public sector researcher, Xavier Leroy, and you'll find thousands of other cases, like Frama-C.).

    Also, French government did issue several contracts (outside of Gendarmerie) to support opensource software, and did pay development of significant applications. My perception is that the French government is supportive to open-source.

    At last, French private sector is increasingly contributing to opensource projects (for example Penjili at EADS or Airbus).

    Unfortunately, several French government sites are using proprieray (non-standard) technologies (like Flash at Assemblée Nationale - the lower Parlement Chamber).

    The French non-profit APRIL association is quite powerful at lobbying for free software.

  44. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    I wish I could *whooosh* this whole thread.

  45. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no... they call it "Le Blue Screen of Death".

  46. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        No, 1,000,000 FRF = 196,721.05 USD

        But, the French use the Euro now, and 1,000,000 Euro = 1,290,965.50 USD

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  47. So now you have a project plan by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1: Switch your applications to Open Source.
    2: Switch your operating systems.

    And ironically, the best way to switch people away from Windows is to port free and open source applications to the platform.
     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:So now you have a project plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is because people love applications, not OSs. As long as they get what they want and how they want it, computer users could give a rat's ass about what a program runs under. The fact that the desired software is free and can run under a decent OS that costs the same makes the eventual decision a no-brainer.

      The commercial software companies could do something to keep their edge by providing support and other things of value for the money, but I suppose they'd rather shoot themselves in the foot by fustrating their customers with semi-literate cue card readers in Bangalore. The free software wins here too. (And in some cases in an epic manner.) Why spend money on commercial hand-waving B.S. when the free stuff has real support via the ability to talk to the developers directly via IRC/email, and by getting relevant answers via a FAQ/forum?

      Once more people figure that out, Windows and pay-for software becomes that much less relevant.

  48. oh no!` by ufoolme · · Score: 1

    My ICONS ?!

  49. Inspector Clouseau made the decision by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    "I don't know something about machinery, I know everything about machinery."

  50. They were convicted. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/convicting

    Just check the dictionary for bunnies sakes,

    You can be convicted in both criminal and civil courts.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  51. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, shut up and eat your 'freedom fries' already

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  52. Oh please. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    This tired canard yet again...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  53. Most likely applications are web based. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Many companies and institutions are using web based applications.

    For once MS was right about something: when they killed Netscape they were making sure the threat to the importance of the OS as the work environment of choice will go away.

    I think they have failed, big moves like this (and many others that remain unknown to the general public because big companies don't publicize this kind of stuss in general terms) give full credence to the model where the web browser is king.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  54. 90000 computers is small fish by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    At last when compared against the whole market.

    Make no mistake, this is great news, but it is by no means the final blow against MS's dominance in the desktop.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  55. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

    Well, the way the story is told is that during the reign of Louis XIV, people used to say sacre-dieu (god damn). Somehow, Louis XIV took umbrage to that, being that his status derived directly from god, blasphemy, etc. So he forbade people to say sacre-dieu. The people, ever inclined to poke fun at his royal highness, instead realized that the name of the king's dog, Bleu, was close enough to the current swear that not much change in habit was required.

    So instead of sacre-dieu, people started to say sacre-bleu.

    I know, the parent missed the joke, but I figure if we're on the topic of explaining something, we might as well be serious about it.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  56. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by steelfood · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The more surprising thing is that the French police were able to save anyone at all.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  57. Minor correction by sodul · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gendarmerie Nationale is a branch of the French army, and are not the police. One major difference is that they are allowed to shoot to kill, while the police is not allowed to shoot even after they get shot at and are injured.

    1. Re:Minor correction by owlstead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "while the police is not allowed to shoot even after they get shot at and are injured"

      They can only shoot their side arm after being buried 6 feet under? Or do they have to go to the arcade like the rest of us?

    2. Re:Minor correction by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      and they carry bigger guns and dress like bad guys in an action movie. That was my impression. Gendarmerie hang out in French airports.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    3. Re:Minor correction by sodul · · Score: 1

      They can only shoot their side arm after being buried 6 feet under?

      Pretty much, yes.

      Or do they have to go to the arcade like the rest of us?

      I don't know what you mean, if you mean they only shoot the plastic gun from the arcade game, then yes that's the extent of it. I suppose they do shoot once at the police academy and have to miss their toes to pass the 'test'.

      During the riots in 2007 a group of policemen were shot at and one of them had his leg wounded, when he reached for his gun an other policeman prevented him from shooting back. I have a link to the partial article in french (registration required for full article I suppose).

      Last year a man suspected of kidnaping jump out of the police station window (or gendarme station here), the gendarm shot him in the back. Better article this time (french again).

    4. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This needs minor corrections:

      - Gendarmes are not allowed to "shoot to kill", they are allowed to shoot first depending on the circumstances (and usually have to do a warning shot first)
      - Policemen are allowed to use their guns to defend themselves if they are being shot at, and in other extreme cases if their or someone else's life is at stake. The fact that they don't use their guns can be linked to the fact that it's hard to prove afterwards in front a justice court that the action was legitimate

    5. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is not so extreme.

      Both Gendarmerie and Police are allowed to shoot.
      And if need be to shoot to kill.

      Thing is Gendarmerie,as it initially was a branch of the army, has greater latitude when its personel has to use weapons.

      Members of the Police have to be in immediate life-threatening situations to use their weapons (lives involved being theirs or civilians')
      And they can shoot first in such cases.
      Members of the Gendarmerie don't need these kinds of situations.
      Example : the Gendarmerie is allowed to shoot a criminal to stop her/him from fleeing (it indeed happened a few months ago when a hand-cuffed prisoner was trying to escape from a Gendarmerie precinct).

  58. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Flammon · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's sacré bleu screen of death in France.

  59. Re:Read the original report - you'll feel much bet by Kalriath · · Score: 1

    They've obviously never heard of Systems Management Server, or Remote Desktop.

    Likely because their desktop support people stood at their door with a softball bat watching for people trying to tell them.

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  60. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Fenax · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Bleu" was a voluntary mistake. Preventing to say "Dieu" (god) at that time it was forbidden to curse his name, but people did it none the less, just hid themself a bit" This guy is quite famous in curses. Sacre is the ceremony for making someone holy or something like that.

  61. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before you die you see the screen.

    A fatal exception has occurred.

  62. Where is GORILLA.BAS? by arth1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The games that come with Vista are quite a bit better than gnome-games:

    Chess Titans
    Freecell
    Hearts
    Inkball
    Mahjong Titans
    Minesweeper
    Purble Place
    Solitaire
    Spider Solitaire

    Most of these have been updated quite a bit, both with respect to looks, sounds and playability.

    Although I miss pinball, I miss gorilla.bas even more :-)

    1. Re:Where is GORILLA.BAS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here you go then. GORILLA.BAS in flash!

    2. Re:Where is GORILLA.BAS? by InfoJunkie777 · · Score: 1

      The game has been redone and is even MORE fun, if possible. Here is a link to the file (gorilla230.zip): http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/www.winsite.com/winxp/games/%5Bpage=7%5D, Enjoy!

      --
      Don't explain computers to laymen. Simpler to explain sex to a virgin. -- Robert A. Heinlein
    3. Re:Where is GORILLA.BAS? by dmizer · · Score: 1

      But, TFA indicates that the difference in games were found when switching from XP to Ubuntu, not from Vista to Ubuntu. So, really it doesn't matter if Vista games are different or even better than Ubuntu.

      I miss pinball too.

    4. Re:Where is GORILLA.BAS? by barncha · · Score: 1

      "Most of these have been updated quite a bit"

      Where Microsoft knows where it's priorities lie then... same crappy notepad, cmd, control panel...

    5. Re:Where is GORILLA.BAS? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      If you installed your Linux distribution then you may have installed over fifty games, especially if you install KDE 4.2. I know these games are not like the latest "games for Windows" but there are much more interesting games than what MS Windows gives you with it's basic install.

      If you like retro games you can easily install native Linux emulators like Mame, NES, SNES and Sega Master System and Megadrive/Genius and most of the ROMS play just as well as the original game machines with the added advantage of being able to have your choice of controller. Of course you can also do the same with MS Windows.

      If you want you can install Wine on most Linux distributions and play many slightly older "games for windows" although you may have to do some tweaking.

      In the case of the French police I am quite sure there would be little if any games installed and the root password would be on a need to know basis. This still won't stop a normal user installing a game it just means the game is installed in the users home directory which is much more secure then allowing root or sudo to install non approved software in a system file-system.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  63. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by xoundmind · · Score: 1

    But have they saved more souls than Jesus? That could really put Ubuntu over the top in the OS war.

  64. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Errr, francs ? You haven't been in Europe since 2000 have you. It's been euro some time now so probably they saved as much as the US deficit.

  65. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

    GP is only off by a factor of about 100,000. I'm going to assume he just put the decimal in the wrong place. I get $10 confused with $1,000,000 all the time.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  66. "Stop, or I'll say Stop! Again." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're talking about French Police here.

    "Stop, or I'll say Stop! Again."

  67. pro-linux.de has more detail by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    according to http://www.pro-linux.de/news/2009/13904.html this reduced their IT-expenses by 70%

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  68. *Microsoft* surrenders! by billstewart · · Score: 4, Funny

    The IBM PC was a hamster wheel, and MS-DOS smelled of Elderberries...

    And what is the air velocity of a chair thrown by a CEO?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:*Microsoft* surrenders! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An African or European CEO?

  69. Wait, what? by Tarlus · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    Moving from Microsoft XP to Vista would not have brought us many advantages and Microsoft said it would require training of users. Moving from XP to Ubuntu, however, proved very easy.

    I think the curve of going from XP to any form of Linux would be steeper than going from XP to Vista. I mean, layout changes between both versions of Windows don't exactly require staff training.

    On a side note, does anybody else cringe when someone refers to Windows XP as "Microsoft XP"?

    --
    /* No Comment */
    1. Re:Wait, what? by moogsynth · · Score: 1
      I've always thought the arguments made about people requiring special training to learn how to use a new computer OS are more than a little bit bogus. Applications>Office>OpenOffice Word Processor. How difficult can it possibly be?

      According to here, looks like the police chaps agree.

      Conventional wisdom dictates that user training should accompany new software deployments. However, the Gendarmerie figured that people knew âoehow to operate a web browserâ and opted not to provide training for any of the new apps.

      Happily, they were proven right with the vast range of users effortlessly picking up the new office suite, web browser and mail program.

    2. Re:Wait, what? by mrsurb · · Score: 1

      I "migrated" my wife from Vista to Ubuntu last week. She's a clever girl, but not technically aware. She just wants to do stuff. Total training: "Firefox replaces IE, OpenOffice replaces Office, Pidgin replaces Messenger."

    3. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft said it would require training of users.

      I mean, layout changes between both versions of Windows don't exactly require staff training.

      So, you disagree with Microsoft about Vista? I think that Microsoft has done far more user-testing of Vista than you have.

    4. Re:Wait, what? by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      So, you disagree with Microsoft about Vista? I think that Microsoft has done far more user-testing of Vista than you have.

      Doesn't matter whether or not I disagree with Microsoft. Read the article. They comfortably adopted an OS more foreign than Vista without any need for training.

      --
      /* No Comment */
  70. Games by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    First of all, I play LOTS of games on Linux thanks to Wine, including LAN games together with other people who are using Windows themselves.

    Second: police could play games: simulation games in group, combat training, etc...

  71. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia has other etymologies. I think it's more likely a derivative of sacredieu (holy god!), myself.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  72. Hatred for MS=America is also a motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't underestimate the French dislike for MS as a representative of "US imperialism".
    Laugh if you want, but I've heard this sentiment expressed more than once.
    The only one time in my life where I've seen hatred bring about some good change. God works in mysterious ways!

    1. Re:Hatred for MS=America is also a motive by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Meh. You call it 'God', I call it 'karma'.

  73. Year of the... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

    No, I just can't do it.

  74. Loophole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does something that is free have to be made in the USA? That is, let's say you purchase support contracts for a number of installations of Red Hat. Now, the money spent is for support from Red Hat, as well as the use of maybe Red Hat trademarked/copyrighted artwork (icons, background images, etc), and maybe a few Red Hat proprietary utilities/programs.

    The bulk of a Red Hat distro is Free Software. Much of the software may have been 'made' (that is, written) by developers in other nations, but since you aren't technically paying for that software, does it matter?

    DoD might have to use USA sourced products if it is purchasing those products, but is it allowed to use free stuff from other countries?

    1. Re:Loophole? by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      This isn't stuff. It's code.

      Applying this doctrine here is equivalent to requiring that all government agency legal opinions be wholly owned by American law firms.

      Linux would be the equivalent of relying on the longstanding body of international common law, and sewing it together with some U.S. government lawyer's work.

  75. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by McGiraf · · Score: 1

    "C'est la fenetre bleu de la mort!"

    that would be

    "C'est la fenetre bleue de la mort!"

  76. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, no, millions of _Francs_. About $1.98.

    No, it's euros now days, and it's more worth than dollars :)

    Cheers

  77. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    Would you mind sending me $10 via PayPal? I promise I'll send you $10 back. :) If there's a decimal slip in there, it won't matter, right? :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  78. Re:Hidden Costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems you've taken stupid pills this morning. Read what TFA has to say. Microsoft themselves said that Vista would require training.

  79. no virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the virus? Doesn't The Gendarmerie Nationale want virus in is computers :(

  80. Hello French Air Force, and Navy??? by rstanley · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Now if the French National Police could only talk to the French Air Force, and French Navy, maybe their planes could take off, and their subs could avoid hitting British subs! Long live Linux and Open Source Software! And they get their favorite games as well! And it all just works!!! Go Figure!

  81. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by oliderid · · Score: 1

    And it is rarely used. "Nom de Dieu" is more popular nowadays.

  82. linux zealot tearaways in france must be thinking by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    f*ck ze pol... oh i eeze so co'nfliqueteede!!

  83. protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point is that the government should be helping to foster the development of it's own economy by investing into it.

    Because your economy is completely isolated for every other economy, and cutting off others will do no harm to yourself.

    [/sarcasm]

  84. What about Cluseau? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zut Alor!

  85. Not people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... they saved millions of souls from the devil!

  86. Cost, Flexibility, Security. by iiiears · · Score: 1

    GNU Software isn't simply the free initial cost it is also the flexibility to change it to meet your needs, and in this case you might easily assume that meant security also.

      If a government agency as large as they are could easily afford Microsoft and some access to MS Windows source code and chose GNU what were the other considerations?

      Competition is always good and an entirely homogeneous OS culture slows innovation and runs the risk of a single point of failure.

    --
    15TW = 15,000 Nuclear Reactors. (Approx. one accident a month.)
  87. french fail at accounting. by timmarhy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    if you slathering linux zealots actual RTFA source, this claim of 50 million euro saving is arrived at by the commissioner multiplying the cost of the licenses by how many they didn't have to purchase. A text book example of calculating yourself rich. he also claims NO training was needed... so no training of your system admins, or any staff? yeah right.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:french fail at accounting. by dickens · · Score: 1

      I suspect you meant "slavering" (drooling) not "slathering", which means to spread something thickly.

      Although, some might argue that you used the right word after all.

    2. Re:french fail at accounting. by ardle · · Score: 1

      this claim of 50 million euro saving is arrived at by the commissioner multiplying the cost of the licenses by how many they didn't have to purchase. A text book example of calculating yourself rich.

      If they did have to purchase those licenses (and they would have had to, sooner or later), would they have got the budget for it? How long would they have had to wait for approval?
      Now that they won't have to spend that money on licenses, what will they spend it on instead? I expect that they don't have the money in the first place (as you suggest).

      he also claims NO training was needed... so no training of your system admins, or any staff?

      Yes. Quote from TFA Source: "Users need no training to use a web browser". He was not talking about administrator training, it was end user training. Here is what he had to say about the savings they were making on administration tasks:

      Previously, one of us would be travelling all year just to install a new version of some anti virus application on the desktops in the Gendarmerie's outposts on the islands in French Polynesia. A similar operation now is finished within two weeks and does not require travelling

      Ubuntu's advantage, in particular, is that it effectively delegates many administration tasks to application and package writers. The commercial world calls this "software as a service", I think.

  88. save by TrueRecord · · Score: 2, Funny

    French Police Save Millions

    At first I was so glad and thought they saved millions of people.

    But I was wrong it was again about money...

  89. Grizzly by BlueStraggler · · Score: 1

    Check out the Grizzly, the NEV, the Spyder, or the ZENN. Yes, they're all pretty strange. If we want normal cars, we buy Hondas.

  90. that's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they saved 50 million euros, but they could save 15% by switching to Geico.

  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. My GF's Vista err.. XP by Gible · · Score: 1

    My GF says: "it wasn't that hard to learn the new and changed stuff [in Vista] - I was just not impressed with having a girly OS"

    --
    ~/ One man's opinions is a lifetime of pain. /~
  93. Publish their plan by pclaphamnz · · Score: 1

    I'd like them to publish their roll out plan and how everything was configured. Could be a possible security risk, but the know how would be valuable for others thinking of the same thing.

  94. the icons and the games by komok · · Score: 1

    "...The two biggest differences are the icons and the games. Games are not our priority. Icons are."

  95. many just aren't aware of what's going on by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    Large corporations tend to have a problem that nobody is: 1) responsible for; or 2) even aware of; what's going on in many parts of the organization. This is especially true for long-term responsibility and awareness.

    The lower-level managers ideally have the best idea of what's going on in their particular groups, and should be aware of any issues their group is having communicating with other groups in the company. This is especially true of day-to-day annoyances like "we always have problems opening these goddamn files people email us", which tend not to be on the agenda of higher-level management very often.

    But this would work best if lower-level managers stayed with the groups for a while; at many large corporations, lower-level management positions are just stepping stones to higher-level management positions, and often get rotated through every 2-3 years. They often never really do figure out what their group is doing in detail; they just want to make sure nothing problematic happens and the figures look good (according to whatever metric the particular company happens to use).

    Even in the cases where they do, the same problem continues as you percolate up the chain. Does the middle-level manager overseeing, say, 10 of the small groups stick around long enough to develop a working relationship with the 10 lower-level manager, and a working model of what is going right or wrong in the groups? Often, no.

    Basically, a huge percentage of everyone's time is spent just trying to figure out who is in charge of what this month, bringing them up to speed on very basic things, and so on. Forget "rationalize office software"; you're lucky if the meetings aren't about "wait a minute, who are you again? I didn't even know we had a group doing that!"

  96. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Except it's a screen, not a window, so it's L'ecran blue de la mort (and damn Slashdot for not supporting accents, I mean, seriously, we're in 2009, not 1979, they could at least support extended ASCII)

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  97. 50 million EU... about 500 policemen by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Staggering.

    Essentially 500 jobs worth of money shipped to bill gates every year.

    And that is just france.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:50 million EU... about 500 policemen by ardle · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Far more interesting than a discussion about which operating system has the best games.
      Of course, the money isn't all going to Bill Gates: employees' salaries have to be paid, children have to be fed.
      Somehow, it seems more useful to and train people to protect the public than to encourage them to write software that can only be used by those that are willing to pay...

  98. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it isn't and is considered extremely ancient and laughable to say.

  99. Police vs Gendarmerie by Alarash · · Score: 1

    Just for the record, the Gendarmerie is not "the" French national Police force. It's a Police branch of the Military, deployed in the country-side or low population areas (mostly, not always). The national Police, which is called, tumtumtum La Police Nationale, is a separate force, usually deployed in larger cities.

  100. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    well, five hundred years ago, maybe.

    "bordel de merde" would be a little more contemporary..

  101. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    last I checked the Euro was worth more than the US Dollar. Francs haven't been used for quite some time.

  102. WTFing "icons"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does that mean? I've used Ubuntu for years and never had any problems with "icons", whatever they mean. Then again, I never had any problems with the games either...

  103. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, the glorious strength of the US economy...

  104. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

    Whoo you've got balls, making jokes about other countries economies while being american.

    Glass house, man.

  105. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lovin'it

  106. Re:Sadly, "thanks" is all those programmers will g by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    This was more of a stimulus to the French economy than buying Microsoft products. The best a Frenchman can hope for from that is a small cut for sales. This way, there is a reasonable prospect of projects that local talent can work on - bugfixes, improvements, customization ; much of which would be difficult or impossible with software from Redmond because the relevant source is unavailable.

  107. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by sapphirecut · · Score: 1

    LOL. Looks like the title got a little lost in translation. Guess they're going to save money and not necessary lives. And maybe time a faire des jeux.

  108. so by unity100 · · Score: 1

    they didnt save ANYthing on that 5000 desktops they moved to ubuntu then ?

    1. Re:so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they didn't save anything by switching to Linux as the computers they converted already had a legal and paid for copy of Widows on it.

      To put it another way, if you remove the old engine out of your car and replace it with a new engine that you got for free then you didn't save any money. Of course this does not take into account fuel efficency, reduced maintinance, etc.

      Now if the cops had brand new computers with no OS, and then installed Linux, then those machines would be cheaper then ones with Windows installed.

    2. Re:so by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      The Linux move is instead of an Upgrade to Vista, in the short term, they may not have saved anything, long term, they saved on license upgrades, plus if any of those machines were older, hardware upgrades.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  109. What Monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Linux is such a great alternative then why is the EU always suing Microsoft for being a monopoly? If you can get the same functionality free then I'd say MS doesn't have a monopoly. You can't use IE on Linux so opera and others have nothing to worry about. If Opera and the EU are so interested in combating Microsoft maybe they should provide a campaign to teach people about the alternatives to Windows instead of suing and saying there aren't any. Oh, that's right, they can't get a nice fat multi-billion pay out that way.

  110. Savings by jonnyt886 · · Score: 1

    Estimated to have already saved the force 50 Million Euros, the migration is due to be completed on all 90,000 workstations by 2015.

    The article says they've saved that 50m since 2004. I'd be interested to see what the savings are over the long term, given that people cite long-term costs ('Total Cost of Ownership' or TCO in MS-speak) as a factor in the whole Windows-Linux debate.

    Don't get me wrong - I'd like to see Linux succeed, but have there been many really big-scale rollouts of this nature that show that the flexibility and choice that Linux/FOSS offers trumps the inflexible but less costly (in terms of training/config) Windows/proprietary alternatives?

    One thinks immediately of the Munich Linux rollout, but this link suggests that it has been delayed (I haven't been following the story).

  111. Re:Read the original report - you'll feel much bet by sorak · · Score: 1

    Why yes. It is MUCH better to sit in some windowless room instead.

    Yes. Now the room has ubuntu.

  112. Re: French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no, that was before your economy collapsed.

    Millions of francs is now bilions of us dollars.

  113. Saving millions by lsatenstein · · Score: 0

    At first I thought it was people that were saved (French Police Save Millions Switching To Ubuntu) I thought the word by was missing between Millions and Switching. Even so, Millions is not people, but Euros.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  114. Possible business opp... by dogsolitude_uk · · Score: 1

    Hm.

    I'm sure many other companies and organisations could also save millions by switching to Linux.

    What with this Global Credit Crunch that El Gordo has failed to save the world from, this could be the window that the Penguins need to storm the market.

    I'm wondering if there could be a market for Linux consultants/trainers in the near future.

  115. Re:Sadly, "thanks" is all those programmers will g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is going to help you that donated your time and effort to write your post? People do things they enjoy for free.

  116. Is Wesnoth as time-sucking as Freeciv? by KWTm · · Score: 1

    ...including the ultimate destroyer of productivity: Battle for Wesnoth!

    I've fiddled with Wesnoth before. Are you sure it's as much of a productivity-sucker as Freeciv?

    I tried Freeciv after reading this Slashdot article about using strategy games to make you smarter, and have spent countless hours exercising the neural connections in my cranium. There's an incredible amount of planning involved, in order to coordinate all the units' movement and production so that they all converge simultaneously on a single enemy city (say) and crush it.

    It got to be complex enough that I had to start recording my plans and thoughts in a text file with different sections for different parts of the map, with comments like "Let's attack here with my battleship! Oh, wait, the battleship needs to go elsewhere to prepare for an assault in 2 turns." Sometimes it would take half an hour or more to make a turn, and on more than one occasion I ended up writing comments like, "Hey, what's this transport doing here? I already said before that I planned to move it over there. Did I forget to move it? Oh, wait, this is still the same turn."

    The planning makes a difference, though. When you step into the gutted enemy capital city and take it over, it looks like it just happened that one turn, but in order to make that happen, you'd time your science to finish researching mechanized infantry just before your attack, so that the enemy that was expecting cavalry is now suddenly dealing with mechanized armor. And just as your engineers finish building the railroad, suddenly the units that were hovering just outside detection now have the target within striking distance. Because you know that if you don't kill all of the enemy troop units camped at the capital in 1 single turn, the enemy will just replenish units from nearby cities and your burst of force is wasted.

    Of course, I'm talking about playing against the computer AI which is infinitely patient in waiting for me to make a move. And my settings are not that difficult either. I can't wait to start playing at a more challenging level, sometime when I finish my current game around Christmas (have been playing for 3 months so far). I can't even begin to conceive playing a networked game against other human players.

    So ... Wesnoth similar? Should I plan for lots of time like this if I start a game?

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  117. You guys gotta watch each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, you Linux users / advocates / fanbois / proponents / evangelists (these are interchangeable terms, to someone who is none of them), you should keep an eye on each other. This guy just UN-sold me on Linux by stating: "The two biggest differences are the icons and the games. Games are not our priority."

    Well, melikes games... so Linux adoption, not an option.

    Put simply, don't expect everyone to take up Linux unless you appeal to everyone, not just FOSS and small business users.

  118. Mandriva installing only from CD's by KWTm · · Score: 1

    you don't know package management pain till you use a package manager you have to first setup (or it will only install packages from the install CDs)

    Tell me about it. My favourite (not!) time was when I couldn't use the CD drive: it wouldn't eject because it was "still in use by another program". Trying to figure out what program had failed to release the CD drive, I saw on the web that the "lsof" command could give me the info I wanted. But "lsof" was not installed by default, so I told the "urpmi" program to go install it. It said: "Please insert Mandrake CD #1 into CD drive."

    That was Mandrake 9. Mandrake 10 was where I jumped over to Ubuntu, and I never installed anything named "Mandriva" on any of my computers.

    I'm sure Mandriva is much improved now, and PCLinuxOS is winning awards, I hear. But it doesn't matter that much to me now.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  119. Re:Read the original report - you'll feel much bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presumably, the person making this decision didn't get to do the travelling themselves and was jealous.

  120. Why would the French be against games? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    It's not like they ever work anyway.

    --
    This is my sig.
  121. Re:Sadly, "thanks" is all those programmers will g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for those employed by organizations to work on open-source software.