Slashdot Mirror


Visualizing Data Inside the 30-ft Allosphere

TEDChris writes "The Allosphere, being created at UC Santa Barbara, is the most ambitious attempt yet at creating powerful 3d visualizations of raw scientific data, such as the structure of a crystal, or how quantum effects take place. Researchers watch from a bridge inside the 30-foot sphere, looking at data projected 360 degrees around them and listening to 3D sound. The first major public demo of the facility has just been posted at TED.com. Optimists would argue that many of the greatest scientific breakthroughs happened through a new visual way of imagining data. Penicillin and relativity come to mind. So this is either a killer new research vehicle, an incredible toy, or just an insanely expensive art project."

131 comments

  1. 360 or 420? by bugi · · Score: 1

    Just 360 degrees? Why not 420?

    1. Re:360 or 420? by Zibben · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because they're afraid you may try to eat the data from a case of the munchies.

    2. Re:360 or 420? by wsanders · · Score: 1

      The volume controls go up to 11.

      The TED conferees pay big bucks, you don't want them to think they are just rocking out to the same Moody Blues laser show they've been seeing since 1975.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    3. Re:360 or 420? by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would have expected just over a dozen and a half steradians myself.

    4. Re:360 or 420? by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Steradians... *goes to Wikipedia*... Ah, that's pretty interesting. Yes, I suppose ~12.5 (4pi) steradians would do it.

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    5. Re:360 or 420? by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, clearly, they meant 4*pi steradians anyway.

    6. Re:360 or 420? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      They built a 420 degree version, but they sited it north of the North Pole.

  2. What is a USC Santa Barbara? by isBandGeek() · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've heard of a UC Santa Barbara and a USC, but I've never heard of a USC Santa Barbara.

    1. Re:What is a USC Santa Barbara? by macraig · · Score: 1, Funny

      Didn't you get the memo? All colleges in California are now just adjunct campuses of USC, by order of the Governator himself. He said he'd be back if it wasn't done.

    2. Re:What is a USC Santa Barbara? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, yea this one is definitely at UC Santa Barbara, walked through it one time, pretty impressive. Still in need of a unique Human Interface Device though.

    3. Re:What is a USC Santa Barbara? by section321a · · Score: 1

      Maybes its the University of South Carolina at Santa Barbara? Go cocks! (Oh heavens, I can't believe I actually said that...)

    4. Re:What is a USC Santa Barbara? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      Just wait until all the Gauchos find out they're going to have to live in Watts instead of Isla Vista.

    5. Re:What is a USC Santa Barbara? by TEDChris · · Score: 1

      Ooops. Guess I can type faster than think. Too much data ogling. heh.

      --
      Twitter ID: @TEDChris
    6. Re:What is a USC Santa Barbara? by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      I think it's University South Carolina at Santa Barbara. It was started during the Civil War.

    7. Re:What is a USC Santa Barbara? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't be a whole lot worse than Isla Vista.

  3. Find people with powers? by Again · · Score: 5, Funny

    What I want to know is if it can find people with powers. If it can, then I need to build myself an awful looking hat.

    1. Re:Find people with powers? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Funny

      an awful looking hat.

      You mean helmet. Heh. I just said 'helmet'.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Find people with powers? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Funny

      build myself an awful looking hat.

      Just steal a fedora from a kid trying to look stylish at the mall, much faster than building one yourself.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:Find people with powers? by tttonyyy · · Score: 1

      I want to know if I can borrow it to play Half-Life 2: EP3 when it comes out. Now that would be awesome. :)

      --
      biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    4. Re:Find people with powers? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just download the ISO... ;-)

    5. Re:Find people with powers? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      You so deserve +5 Funny for this. It took me a while to realize the reference.

    6. Re:Find people with powers? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Does this Half-Life 2: EP3 come with ... um ... downloadable graphics for one of the characters?

      To, um, enjoy the higher resolution, of course!

    7. Re:Find people with powers? by hannson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, everybody here's thinking it but I'm saying it:

      Lets invest in the porn industry!!

    8. Re:Find people with powers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds more like capt picard's map room in "Generations"

    9. Re:Find people with powers? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      And a dorky-looking helmet at that.

    10. Re:Find people with powers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds a lot like the tank in the command ship in Doc Smiths Lensman novels. Only predates Picard by about 6 decades.

  4. Allosphere? Bah! by Monkey_Genius · · Score: 2, Funny

    What they need is the Infosphere!

    --
    I've got your sig, right here.
  5. I'm no scientist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But this sounds like a giant, expensive toy.

    1. Re:I'm no scientist... by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      I am a scientist, and I agree.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    2. Re:I'm no scientist... by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      I just saw the vid and I was not impressed. I don't see how this offers you anything other than what essentially amounts to a giant monitor, unless you go through pains to condition your data to the Allosphere specifically... and I've got to imagine conditioning data at every iteration and every step of your analysis for one particular view inside an Allosphere is not worth it. The data almost certainly doesn't just know how to present itself on a 360 degree plane (I'm not a mathematician, but I think this would still be considered to be a 2D plane?) which would take advantage of the viewpoint characteristics the Allosphere could offer.

      It's got a pretty cool name though.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    3. Re:I'm no scientist... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yep. This sphere brings no new capabilities, SGI used to build stuff like that back in the '90s.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:I'm no scientist... by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      Dr. Kuchera-Morin is primarily an artist. She's truly interested in doing what she says in her TED talk, which is bringing all disciplines together to share knowledge, but she originally imagined the Allosphere as the ultimate multimedia theater. The artistic computer music community (especially the people in the MAT program, which she directs) are heavily into spatialization using a large number of loudspeakers and the Allosphere will facilitate such art presentations. If scientists can get some use out of it, all the better, but I sense (I really don't know) that she pitched the Allosphere to UCSB's world-renowned physics department in order to get funding. She's been talking about the Allosphere since the founding of the MAT program (1999 I think), and I still don't know how she did it.

  6. Why expensive? by Lorens · · Score: 1

    Just borrow the set from X-Men...

  7. IMAX? by otomotopeia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems like it's nothing more than 2 IMAX theaters tied together?

    1. Re:IMAX? by smartbei · · Score: 1

      Not IMAX - OMNIMAX or IMAX Dome.
      See IMAX Dome.

  8. Amazing(not) by Zerth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So it is just two CAVEs stuck together? Yup, real advanced technology there.

    I hope nobody tells them about head-mounted displays.

    1. Re:Amazing(not) by MadnessASAP · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's what I was thinking. They could just buy some very high density LCD's and pay one of the engineerign students to spend a few weeks rigging them up with a motion detector and headphones? Uses alot less space, power and you get true stereoscopic vision. You would also get many different viewpoints for more then one perspective on the same dataset. In short it looks impressive at first but becomes a colossal waste of when you really think about it.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    2. Re:Amazing(not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need eye tracking too for head mounted, and that's still a pain to sort out.

    3. Re:Amazing(not) by mikael · · Score: 1

      The innovation isn't in the projection system - it is the fact that they are visualizing large amounts of data interactively in real-time, particularly volume rendering. Everything from the Schrodinger equations defining the probabilistic orbits of electrons to functional MRI directly from the scanner in real-time. It is easy to play a pre-recorded movie of a fMRI scan on a number of large monitors, but they want to visualize more complex information such as what effect the increased demand on blood flow has on the turbulence of blood circulation, or allow surgeons to visualize the best way to thread a catheter through an artery to treat an aneurysm.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Amazing(not) by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but head-mounted displays were Dominion technology. They were the bad guys. That's probably why the UCSB folks went with the astrometrics lab from Voyager (only better).

    5. Re:Amazing(not) by sverdrup · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anyone else remember going on this ride at Disneyworld?

    6. Re:Amazing(not) by davolfman · · Score: 1

      University of Utah has been doing haptics like that for a long time.

    7. Re:Amazing(not) by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Why? You could use perfectly smooth hemispheres made from OLEDs over the eyes and them make a dozen headsets and it would STILL cost less then this thing does.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    8. Re:Amazing(not) by dave420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems to be more about the software that represents the data in a visual/audio form than the displays, which as you note - are not fantastically exotic.

    9. Re:Amazing(not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you have not actually tried an HMD...

      You would think they would be great, but with the poor resolution, limited field of view, awkward fit, and cable issues, they are no match for a Cave or the Allosphere. Maybe someday many of the human factors issues will be resolved, but there are still some psychological issues (like the inclination not to move when you know that the environment doesn't match what you are perceiving) that make HMDs less compelling. [which doesn't mean that a compelling case for the Allosphere was made in that video either...]

  9. Mac vs. PC by inertia187 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mac: Hi, I'm a Mac.

    PC: And ... I'm ... a ... PC.

    Mac: Wow, PC. You're really slow today.

    PC: Yes ... I'm ... running ... AlloSphere ... research ... for ... UCSB ... ... today.

    Mac: What exactly is the AlloSphere useful for?

    PC: Scientifically, ... it ... is ... an ... instrument ... for ... gaining ... insight ... and ... developing ... bodily ... intuition ... about ... environments ... into ... which ... the ... body ... cannot ... venture: ... abstract, ... higher- ... -dimensional ... information ... spaces, ... the ... worlds ... of ... the ... very ... small ... or ... very ... large, ... and ... the ... realms ... of ... the ... very ... fast ... or ... very ... slow, ... in ... fields ... ranging ... from ... nanotechnology ... to ... theoretical ... physics, ... from ... proteomics ... to ... cosmology, ... from ... neurophysiology ... to ... the ... spaces ... of ... consciousness, ... and ... from ... new ... materials ... to ... new ... media.

    Mac: Wow, that ... that sounds pretty amazing.

    PC: It ... is.

    Mac: Anything else?

    PC: 42.

    Mac: What does that even mean?

    PC: I ... have ... no ... idea.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Mac vs. PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why is PC running Shatner OS?

  10. This will clearly revolutionize the visualization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of 30-foot soap bubbles.

  11. Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really? From what I recall, penicillin was discovered by noticing that mould contaminating a bacteria sample caused the bacteria to die, and relativity came straight out of the mathematics (you can derive special relativity in about one sheet of A4 - general relativity is much harder). Is there some story that everyone except me knows about?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course there is no such story. Don't be silly. In fact, forget the whole thing...

    2. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      From what I recall, penicillin was discovered by noticing that mould contaminating a bacteria sample caused the bacteria to die,

      And how do you think Flemming determined that the bacteria were dying? With a revolutionary new imaging system of course: his eyes.

    3. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Einstein used to construct mental images, which often became the inspiration for his mathematical theories. For instance, a train traveling at c with a headlamp on the front...and somehow, the light from that is moving at c away from the train. From an external perspective, both the train and light beam are moving at c. Obviously, there's time dilation involved....at least, I was always told that he came up with that thought experiment.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    4. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Before Einstein started scribbling stuff down on paper, he performed "thought experiments" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gedanken_experiment, which are like a form of visualization. For instance, while he was at the Swiss patent office in Bern, he started to try imaging what the world outside would look like, if the street tram he was riding in, was traveling at the speed of light. He imagined that if traveling away from a clock, the hand would never move from his perspective.

      No cats were injured in Einstein's experiments.

      I'll have to pass on the penicillin, although I regularly "visualize" a form of it in my breadbox every week.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      Thought experiments seem pretty different to data visualisation to me. In fact, how are they remotely related?

    6. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      I'm still not seeing how thought experiments (an imaginary experiment) and data visualisation (finding ways to display complex datasets) are related.

    7. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      They're actually fairly similar. You build a model governing a toy universe, and set it to motion from a given state. If the results look like what you see in the real world, that's evidence for the model's accuracy. I have no idea how Einstein intended to observe the time dialation effects at the speed of light, however.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    8. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Funny

      Simple, the ones who invested the millions of dollars required for this data visualization, failed to do the thought experiments necessary to see what a collasal waste of money it is was going to be.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    9. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by simplerThanPossible · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking it might have involved the microscope

    10. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      Yes you just described a thought experiment. But data visualisation is still unrelated. Einstein couldn't have done it (no computers).

    11. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by necro81 · · Score: 1

      you can derive special relativity in about one sheet of A4

      You can today, because people have picked it apart for over a century. People could have written it succinctly a hundred years ago, but they were still getting their heads around it. They didn't have nicely prepared lecture notes to work from.

    12. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      To do the visualisation, you'd have to do a kind of thought experiment first - to decide what to display, how to display it etc. But the machine can't do the clever creative/imaginative bit for you. They're two differeent things. IKIGMDFT, but it seems the fancy hardware is redundant. Another solution in search of a problem?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by datandrews · · Score: 1

      The better archetype for this would be Snow's map of the London cholera epidemic of 1854: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1854_Broad_Street_cholera_outbreak Visualizing the data was the key to discovering the outbreak's source: a contaminated well. It also helped solidify the "germ theory" of disease.

    14. Re:Penicillin and relativity come to mind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QM thought experiments are the basis for quantitative simulations that are directly compared to empirical results. Visualization is a relatively new branch of research with regards to physics simulation. Progress quickly comes up against hardware limitations in both computation and representation.
      Also consider the time scale for physics breakthroughs to alter our perception of reality.
      Constructing perceptual representations is not only valuable to the physicist but it will result in more intuitive ways to communicate the concepts.

  12. It will definitely be a cash cow . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So this is either a killer new research vehicle, an incredible toy, or just an insanely expensive art project.

    It's entertainment! It sounds like a great source of revenue to me. Charge admission! Team up with The Discovery Channel and whip up some fascinating images with insightful commentary! Scientists love showing off their research to awed folks who can't really comprehend it.

    I want one! I can't wait for the Slashdot article that describes how to make a cheap, open source version of this!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:It will definitely be a cash cow . . . by Zerth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      2 hemispheres made of rear-projector material, 2 projectors, 2 webcams, computer with dual video cards or one card with 2 ports.

      Project a grid onto each hemisphere, use the webcams to distort the grid until it projects evenly across each hemisphere as viewed from inside(you'll lose some resolution at the edges).

      Play quake until you vomit.

    2. Re:It will definitely be a cash cow . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here they are making VR bigger... didn't slashdot just have an article about people trying to make MRI's smaller... who would want to stand in a dome when they can sit with a baseball hat on that does the same thing?

    3. Re:It will definitely be a cash cow . . . by mikael · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Imax theaters?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:It will definitely be a cash cow . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      playquake until you vomit.

      Could you imagine the view of Vi(m) on that thing?

      Programming at it's absolute finest!

  13. Is immersion even a good idea? by Ghostworks · · Score: 0

    If 3D visualization is that helpful, is being immersed within the scene really that good of an idea? I'd hate to think that thousands of dollars would be spent on every session in this thing, only to discover that the team had their backs towards the "insightful" portion of the graphics. Is there any reason this couldn't be done with a desktop unit the size of a beach ball and a pair of headphones? For that matter, is there any compelling reason that this couldn't be done better with a couple of flat screens and surround sound?

    1. Re:Is immersion even a good idea? by xpatch · · Score: 1

      Trying to think outside the box while stuck in box in a sphere....

    2. Re:Is immersion even a good idea? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      If 3D visualization is that helpful, is being immersed within the scene really that good of an idea?

      Assuming they can avoid being goatse trolled, yes. Otherwise the thing will be burned down quickly.

      A lot of 3d data doesn't really work well on flatscreens. I take confocal microscope images, there are plenty of tricks to convey the 3d, like causing my movies to wobble, but when there's a lot of noise it's tough to keep track of it. Maybe this would help. Of course, the images don't look really good when I blow them up to full monitor, at 30 feet they would become just downright ugly. I'm sure other applications though really are hurting and resolution would be just fine.

    3. Re:Is immersion even a good idea? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Well, for one thing, it would be hard to get twenty people into a sphere the size of a beach ball.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Is immersion even a good idea? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Simple, they always have two researchers standing back to back, so that all 360 degrees are covered. That way, there's never any chance of anything sneaking up behind them and stealing their funding.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  14. Is it 120Hz? by xpatch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does it do 120Hz for some 3d action ^.^

  15. famous planetarium example by Tiro · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I recently visited the Morrison Planetarium at the California Academy of Sciences. It's a new facility with impressive technology (and cost).

    However the presentation was all animation, moral harangues, and celebrity voiceover, with little content and no interesting astrophysics science. The whole concept seemed like a watered-down ripoff of the powers of ten video I saw in middle school. Remember that? I would much rather have watched that again.

  16. No imagination... by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Funny

    So this is either a killer new research vehicle, an incredible toy, or just an insanely expensive art project.

    All three, you got the superego, the id and the ego all in one machine.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  17. Just imagine... by natophonic · · Score: 1

    ... a LAN party with a cluster of these!

  18. What is it for... owls? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Human beings only have about a 120 degree maximum field of view, so 360 degrees isn't that useful. It is easier to rotate the image into your field of view than to turn your head 360 degrees to see it all, IMHO.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:What is it for... owls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human beings only have about a 120 degree maximum field of view, so 360 degrees isn't that useful. It is easier to rotate the image into your field of view than to turn your head 360 degrees to see it all, IMHO.

      You're assuming there's just one lonely human being. Try giving him a friend and your optimization falls apart quickly.

    2. Re:What is it for... owls? by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it is far easier to turn your head than to calculate and rotate an image, especially if you have more than one person that you're displaying for.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:What is it for... owls? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rotating the image into your field of view would destroy some of the spatial awareness of the data.

      One of the points is for spatial awareness to more easily come into play when interpreting data.

      Pretend you are a drug researcher, and you're working on developing analogues of naturally-occuring protein substrates. If you have a 360 model of the receptor site of the protein, being able to visualize the space your substrate fits into could help you identify possible analogues.

      For an oversimplified example, look at epinephrine, which is a naturally occuring substance in the body that binds with adrenergic receptors and causes a response. Adding a methyl group in the right spot gives you a different compound that binds with adrenergic receptors more than epinephrine, but causes no response. Thus we have a compound that can be used as a drug to prevent that response. Or, maybe we can build a drug that increases the response.

      Epinephrine drugs are well-understood... but there are many possible drugs that could be developed if we had better modeling and understanding of protein receptor sites. An encompassing 360 view of a receptor site could result in a breakthrough.

      There are a ton of other ways this could be useful, that's just one example.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:What is it for... owls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's called pymol and its free for academics...

    5. Re:What is it for... owls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really have no idea what you are talking about.

    6. Re:What is it for... owls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love this:

      Pretend you are a drug researcher, and you're working on developing analogues of naturally-occuring protein substrates. If you have a 360 model of the receptor site of the protein, being able to visualize the space your substrate fits into could help you identify possible analogues.

      Normally examples are made to 'dumb it down' for people to understand better. But here at /. this is your equivalent.

    7. Re:What is it for... owls? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      What is this "friend" thing of which you speak?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  19. How good is it for porn? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    So, what kind of porn can you get on this thing?

    --
    This is my sig.
  20. Really Cool, But... by gpronger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My guess is that it will be seen as an impressive technological feat, with marginal real applicability.

    In the talk on "TED" JoAnn Kuchera-Morin, trumps the ability to fly into the brain, see the tissue as landscape and hear the blood density as sound. It is very unclear the advantage of the projection to the scale they've accomplished (other than to say we've done it).

    They've pulled together impressive super-computer technology, but if it was on a larger PC screen versus a "walk-in" version, is there a real gain?

  21. As a scientist by Hoplite3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It sounds like a cool toy, but choosing the correct way to visualize data is really hard. Generally, picking which quantities to plot against each other corresponds to taking a lower dimensional slice of a data set. Picking the right slice isn't just difficult, it's a really important result of the research.

    There have been lots of advances in trying to automatically determine these sorts of reductions (the Netflix recommendation contest brought a lot of this to public attention), but for many problems, the "interesting" lower-dimensional space that's plotted corresponds to some important symmetry of the data.

    I guess what I'm saying is that in science (like in art) limitations sometimes help guide useful thinking. Just seeing "everything" in 3D 36 degrees with more dimensions represented as sound doesn't necessarily help that.

    --
    Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
  22. Solution Looking for a Problem by Siberwulf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly, it seems rather useless (in these examples). I won't knock music in general, but does a computer singing a song really going to be helpful in diagnosing something? Just because you have more information, doesn't mean you have any higher level of useful information.

    I will give the presenter props though. That was like a Science Word Bingo caller going for blackout.

  23. Sound is the differentiator by HalWasRight · · Score: 1

    I see the 3d sound capability as a differentiator vs merely a spherical screen. Dr Kuchera-Morin is a musician after all.

    --
    "This mission is too important to allow you to jeopardize it." -- HAL
  24. Epcot Center... by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 1

    Epcot Center has one of these...

  25. oblig. by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I for one welcome our holodeck overlords.

  26. A new pr0n theatre by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    It would be totally useless, but imagine the in depth visuals one could get with that.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:A new pr0n theatre by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "It would be totally useless, but imagine the in depth visuals one could get with that."

      At last, a way to appreciate my Roseanne Barr endoscope porn collection in its full glory!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  27. can you say 'CAVE'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks very much like an oversized CAVE system to be honest. At one of my former employers we had one as well for similar visualizations. The problem was convincing customers that it's actually a very useful tool for research. Most people, even scientists, don't see the possibilities and see it as a gimmick. They often ask if it plays Quake and such *sigh*

    But yeah, I really hope this thing gets used for some good research and doesn't go the same way as other CAVE-like systems, ending up as a PR tool

    1. Re:can you say 'CAVE'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My company was on the design team for the AlloSphere. After listening to the ideas they wanted to express in this "venue" we took our planetarium experience and turned it on it's side. (pause for groans) To help visualize/demonstrate the idea, we found an old globe lying around, cut it in half and glued an extra long scale rule in the middle as the audience platform. While I can't speak to how they are using it today, at the time we conceived it it was pretty radical. We looked at all kinds of immerse technology, including CAVEs, small planetarium domes and plain old curved simulation screens and there was nothing you could get 20 or so researchers in at the same time and have everyone in the sweet spot. One really has to look at it from the starting point of a planetarium, not Starry Night on a flat screen. I have not been in the thing since it's been commissioned but I look forward to hearing what the multichannel sound system does.

  28. Geological research by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    The USGS and the oilfield companies could use this to their advantage, predicting major events, to computing more precise strike points for drilling, reducing the chance of having a "dry hole".

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  29. visualization? by speedtux · · Score: 1

    Yeah, penicillin required looking at a petri dish, but I'm not sure that counts as "visualization".

    Einstein apparently was a visual thinker, but the emphasis there is on "thinking", not plotting, graphing, or other artifacts; visual thinking in mathematics is very different from 2D or 3D data visualizations.

  30. Cerebro lives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Early reports indicate that the facility is also useful for tracking down mutants.

  31. How many fictional references can you name? by Tsar · · Score: 1
    Offhand, I thought of (in the following order):

    Meanwhile, in the non-fictional realm, the VR Lab at the University of Tsukuba (Japan) has been working for years on "Ensphered Vision", complete with sound.

    1. Re:How many fictional references can you name? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Babylon 5, the Minbari have something like this to coordinate space combat.

  32. Visualizing new tech on old tech? by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    So when do scientists plan on researching visualization hardware that is forward compatible so that we can observe 1:1 preview samples of the next generation of hardware. The article presented yet another video of an amazing visualization device that I cannot comprehend on my tiny computer display or my HD television set. At least on PBS they try to explain the future with diagrams depicting how it is suppose to work.

  33. Awww... by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

    The first thing I read when I skimmed the headline was "Visualizing Data Inside the 30-ft Allosaur".

    I can't be the only one who thinks it would be cool to somehow store data inside dinosaurs.

    --
    Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    1. Re:Awww... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      For some reason, a quote (often attributed to Groucho Marx) comes to mind:

      Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.

      I'm presuming that Marx's comment was a prescient perspective on the future of in-animal data storage and presentation.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  34. Death Star by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

    OMG it's the blueprints to the deathstar. We need to analyze these for potential weaknesses.

    Before you mod me off topic, please watch the video intro.

  35. The real question... by camperdave · · Score: 1

    The real question: Would this "flying" through the landscape of data be called Allosoaring?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  36. tommy boy common sense by SethJohnson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Tommy: Hey, I'll tell you what. You can get a good look at a butcher's ass by sticking your head up there. But, wouldn't you rather to take his word for it?
    Mr. Brady, Customer: [confused] What? I'm failing to make the connection here.
    Tommy: No, I mean is, you can get a good look at a T-bone by sticking your head up a butcher's ass... No, wait. It's gotta be your bull.
    Richard: [embarrassed] Wow.

    Later in the movie:
    [saying it correctly]
    Tommy: I can get a good look at a T-bone by sticking my head up a bull's ass, but I'd rather take a butcher's word for it.

    Seth

  37. WOOT! by Drone69 · · Score: 0

    One step closer to the Holodeck!

  38. P0RN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will there be p0rn and popcorn?

  39. Something's Familiar Here by Psion · · Score: 1

    A multi-story, round room with a bridge in the center used to display 3-dimensional scientific data? Where have I seen this concept before?

  40. multi-dimensional dynamically-varied quantum fluff by kharchenko · · Score: 1

    I tried to watch the presentation but had to stop because of the nauseating stream of peseudo-technical nonsense that this woman is spewing.
    She's the "inventor of the Allosphere" - the "dynamically varying digital microscope" where the "researchers interact with data by injecting bacterial code" and defy quantum mechanics by showing "where the electron is at any given point in time and space".
    Why not just describe it for what it is - a spherical projection screen for visualizing scientific models.

  41. Officially by credd144az · · Score: 1

    The coolest computer monitor in the world.

  42. Hmmm, just like... by meerling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not exactly a new concept, just new in that somebody actually built one.
    This kind of thing has been in Sci-fi for ages, everything from Star Trek to X-Men.

    1. Re:Hmmm, just like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the case for most technological achievements? Or did I misread that as criticism of the importance of their work...

  43. I guess headphones and by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    some 3d glasses are not cool enough for these folks.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  44. Crystals? by SpitfireSMS · · Score: 1

    Makes me think of black mesa..
    We MUST stop this

  45. Very little room for ART in Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? Just exactly how are artist's renderings of scientific data useful (besides injecting preconceived notions)?

  46. I More Step Towards Something REALLY COOL!!!!! by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    Now *THIS* sounds cool!

    What would make the whole setup complete would be to develop a camera that can take spherical images. They can buy an unmanned drone ( or better yet, build their own) and take flying spherical video!

    I would definitely line up to pay $$$ for a 10 minute "flight" over the Midwest or Sierra Nevada.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    1. Re:I More Step Towards Something REALLY COOL!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they have this at Disneyland "Soaring California"

  47. Progress visualizing "spooky" effects of physics by isd.bz · · Score: 1

    There has been some interesting progress in visualizing some of the interesting (or spooky) quantum mechanical effects. http://visualphysics.org The software which generates it is available for free. It uses mathematics based in Quaternions to visualize the mathematics behind spacetime, standard model groups,etc.

  48. It's been done. by Animats · · Score: 1

    CAVE-type displays (you're surrounded by rear-projected screens) have been around since 1992. Mechdyne (which bought FakeSpace) makes a number of variations on this theme. Their standard CURV display can be purchased in sizes up to a full hemisphere. A full sphere would be a custom order.

    The new California Academy of Sciences building has a "planetarium" which is really a 75 foot dome equipped for full digital projection over slightly more than a hemisphere. There's a writeup in Maximum PC.

  49. reminds me of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This certainly is a big round room." -Wolverine

  50. The UCSB Library by drizek · · Score: 1

    has a cool little motion detecting LCD setup next to the elevators. (I still haven't figured out if this Allosphere thing is in UCSB or USC)

  51. Allosphere by EricTheO · · Score: 1

    Is Professor Charles Xavier behind this project?

    --
    -Eric
  52. 30-foot by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

    That would be roughly 9 meters.

  53. Anyone else think "Cerebro"? by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

    As in the device in the X-Men movies?

  54. DNF by master_p · · Score: 1

    so that is what 3DRealms awaits for!!!

  55. Re:Progress visualizing "spooky" effects of physic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. This is a difficult and very worthwhile problem. How do you represent quantum spin? This is the kind of application that will prove the value of the instrument. Its no coincidence that it was built in a research institute for quantum computation.
    Its unfortunate that most commentators focus on entertainment applications (a symptom of watching too much television). Visionaries are typically forced to justify there efforts in the context of common knowledge, however, the historic contribution of the endeavor will be in physics.