Slashdot Mirror
How to Charge Your Cellphone Using Wasted Heat
Ilya writes "Companies such as BMW are investing in Thermoelectric Generators to make their cars more efficient by replacing the alternator. Thermoelectric Generators convert wasted heat from the engine into electrical power. This green instructable shows how you can use the same technology right now at home to harvest expelled heat from home appliances to charge your cellphone and other gadgets. Also features a lego racer powered by the roaring flames of a tea candle."
Bill Winston Ministries?
BWM makes awesome cars
I like to work out in my rec. room with various exercise equipment. My favorite? The Carnot cycle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot_heat_engine)
I just hop on and convert all the waste heat in the room to useful energy
Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
I could probably power a small village :-)
If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
Did you customize that sig to your comment, or should you go see a doctor about your explosive flatulence problem?
Authority questions you. Return the favor.
Should really have been called "Cannot" cycle.
If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
Given that the average American consumes 13,500KWh per year, getting a couple of Watt-hours into your phone from wasted heat instead of the grid isn't going to make a damn bit of difference.
"I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
finally someone invents a use for the formerly useless lego mindstorms thermal sensor. Use it to let your mindstorms bot find a recharging stations
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
I read the article in Car & Driver the O.P. is referring to a while ago (if it's not already obvious the automotive company he is referring to is BMW). At least in automotive applications, it begs the question, is it worth the effort? The extra parts, weight, and cost you'd have to add to a vehicle would probably cause you to break even in terms of MPG or dollars per gallon. The situation is similar with diesel engine options, the extra initial cost of the diesel optioned vehicle is often times just not worth it, despite the MPG advantage.
laptop heat? can that be used to charge it self?
Great! Something to finally help the terrible battery life on my 3G.
Yes, but your battery will still go dead.
512 MB RAM, 20 GB disk, 200 GB transfer, five datacenters. $19.95/month.
This is something I never quite grasped from physical chemistry class. Obviously you can reclaim some energy from heat, but you can't reclaim it all, as that would break the 3rd law of thermodynamics. How much energy can you actually reclaim from a given amount of heat? Is it a constant fraction, if so where does that number come from? Is it variable? If so, what does that number depend on?
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
Once our electronic devices realize they can use us as a replacement for a Duracell battery, Zion is lost!
No. See the laws of thermodynamics.
If the geiger counter does not click, the coffee, she is not thick.
That would be the second law, that would be broken if you could recover all the heat. The third law is a bit more obscure and basically means that the first two laws apply to everything.
The amount you can recover varies according to the efficiency of the device you use to recover it, and depends completely on the details of your setup. Obviously no device is 100% efficient (that's the second law again), so you will never be able to recover all of the lost heat. It is possible to get remarkably high efficiency in some setups.
My site: Free Nature Pictures
While my own knowledge of thermodynamics is minimal to say the least (never really studied physics at university, got stuck deep in comp sci instead), I seem to remember something about heat tapping generators reducing the thermodynamic efficiency of an internal combustion engine. If an additional load is introduced on an internal combustion engine, whether that be a direct load such as an extra belt on the output shaft to run the alternator or an indirect one such as a "waste" heat conversion alternator, then wouldn't that also reduce the output power of the engine (necessary in the case of the alternator since gasoline engines will not run without one)? Perhaps I am missing something that a physics geek could easily explain or is there really a "free lunch" here with regard to waste heat?
That heat is traditionally used for roasting nuts
AT&ROFLMAO
Dunno about you, but my laptop uses regenerative breaking. Works well enough, but it's a real pain in the ass jogging behind the sucker.
but you will get longer life out of it then?
Some of the energy can be recovered, but not enough to charge the battery.
Troll, n. - Someone who disagrees with me
I see you got a Lenovo T60 too!!!
Surely the primary objective of a combustion engine is to provide a means of propulsion, not heat generation?
Perhaps I'm missing something?
I totally made a joke about this a few days ago... http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1201373&cid=27599775
The musings of just another geek and his junk.
If only we could come up with some sort of mineral oil solution to absorb my body heat, i could power my computer from the heat my body generates! I could even get my neighbors to join in and we could pool our bodyheat to power a super computer. And maybe to relieve boredom we could all play in a "virtual world" so that we don't waste our energy on non-supercomputer related activities. Maybe the Matrix Online would be a good choice.
How much energy is produced? I'd imagine not a lot. How much does it weigh? Does it cost more in fuel to lug these around than they can produce? You'd need one at the exhaust, one at the engine, one at the brakes..
Is this another deal where I spend $1000 and get 5w/hour?
I just hop on and convert all the waste heat in the room to useful energy
If you're doing exercise, it'd be a Carnot heat pump, n'est-ce pas? One end would get cold, and the other hot...
Sony had a pretty efficient line of nut-roasting batteries but too many people returned them because most people want their salted, too.
cell phone died but need a number? rub the battery between your hands quickly for about 30 seconds. it'll give your phone enough charge to load the contact list and jot down the number of the chick that stood you up. who needs BWM to come up with this "technology" stuff, i've been doing it for years.
Only if you run your computations in reverse some of the time.
Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
Regenerative breaking?
Does that mean hitting it with a sledgehammer recharges the battery?
"City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
I guess farts are funny anymore.
Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
Heat can be used to do work.
News at 11.
What's with all this "environment awareness" crap! God created all cars the way they are. Cars are meant to give off heat! Cars are MANLY. What kind of wussy car uses "environment friendly" ways and whatnot. What's next, telling us to "conserve energy" to "save the planet"?! Hah! Now if you'll excuse me I gotta get back to my Dodge truck!
Regards,
An Angry Texan.
Yes, you will get longer battery life if you turn some of the "heat" into electricity. There are some problems to look out for, though. The thermocouples don't really convert heat into electricity. It's the temperature difference between the hot and the cold side which creates the electricity, so you have to have a heat source and a heat-sink capable of sinking the heat without warming up too much. Since the cool side has to stay cool, the temperature difference between the air and the heat-sink is low, which means you need a much bigger heat-sink than normally. (The instructable shows a thermocouple with heat sink mounted on the side of a bike exhaust: the additional drag probably costs more energy than the device can extract from the heat difference...)
I just want to comment that at one time my house had a microvolt thermostat. The power to run the thermostat came from the heat generated by the pilot light of the gas furnace. The advantage of this is that if the power went out, the heat could still turn on.
When I upgraded to an energy efficient heating system (with no pilot light) this was replaced.
JTEC. Use this, drop the alternator as well as the serpentine belt and move towards an all electric system. This would allow them to move a GAS car to an electric powered steering (or perhaps a motor driving hydraulic pump), a heatpump that would also go into an electric car. This would allow a car company to more easily move towards electric cars.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
"It was the G1-1.4-219-1.14 $75 from tellurex."
Using "waste" sure is expensive...
I was visiting Illinois State University's physics department because I am planning on attending this fall. They were working on a material along these lines with a fairly high efficiency rate but they were just starting actually trying to make small amounts of the material.
Their intended use of the material would be in steel foundries, etc. where millions of dollars are spent on power and even something not very efficient could save a ton of money.
From what I gathered talking to the professor there the same efficiency increasing techniques could be used even with smaller temperature differentials as long as you had different materials used.
Sorry but they don't have too much information on their website. They had a few posters with information in the building but not much online.
http://www.phy.ilstu.edu/programs/research.html
A link to the professors bio:
http://www.phy.ilstu.edu/facandstaff/marx.html
I THINK they said the calculated efficiencies would be along the lines of 15-25% depending on materials, temperature differentials, and the actual temperatures. It may have been higher than that though.
Cooking on your car's engine.
Have gnu, will travel.
It's also worth noting that these heat-to-electricity units impede the flow of heat. Just like putting a dam with a turbine in it makes the water levels upstream go up, a peltier style generator would increase your laptop's temperature.
Hopefully, the generator will provide the extra energy needed to power all the extra fans you'll need.
A Welsh phrase comes to mind: 'Malu glo man yn gnapiau' - smashing fine (small) coal into lumps. Now that's the kind of regenerative breaking that'll actually power your laptop!
Keep the hot side hot and the cool side cool... don't tell me McDonalds had the secret to providing a minuscule increase in energy efficiency and only used it to make a crappy burger!
Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
I wanna use my huge bank of toasty little wall warts to charge my cell phone. If I can do that the lazy little power-sucking tribbles might finally justify their existence.
Peltier Junctions are really old news, they're not very efficient at all, they don't last forever, and they're not particularly cheap. TFA doesn't have anything new to say or any links that have anything new to say. Mod the entire post down to -1, Useless post and move on.
Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
*Cellphone dies in the middle of a winter storm.*
Woman Says: "I guess our only option is to warm our cellphone up somehow, since we didn't bring a charger."
Woman Thinks: "Maybe there are some pocket heaters stored in the trunk."
Man Looks at Woman and Thinks: "Business hours are open."
So your cars Catalytic converter could become a replacement for the Alternator? That might even boost millage as not having the alternator would reduce drag on the engine.
How %efficient are these thermoelectric devices in outputting electric power W from the power W extracted by cooling the wastefully hot devices? And how much power does it take to manufacture one of these thermoelectric devices?
--
make install -not war
So what?! These ideas are nothing new, as Thermal Generators have been around for a *very* long time.
I remember using a tea candle to power my TV remote control. Add a bowl of delicious ice cream to the device, and you could crank out even more power.
Yet *ANOTHER* case of someone discovering something that has already been discovered, and making a big deal out of it.
Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
If you're living in a cold climate, the exhaust from the dryer ought to go to a heat exchanger to help heat up your house.
If you're living in a hot climate, it's a waste of energy to use anything other than clotheslines and drying racks.
Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
What's with all the McDLT references as of late? Is this a new internet meme?
That was a fucking delicious burger though.
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
I have a secret plan to run ipods off of the Cosmic microwave background radiation.
Can I use the waste heat from an electric motor to charge the battery that run the motor?
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
You can use this or some similar gadget to turn anything into a timed device. About twenty bucks.
Weaselmancer
rediculous.
These temperatures are the absolute temperatures, (Kelvins) not degrees C or F.
As a result, mostly the hot end and the cold end are too close in temperature for any useful work to be obtained from waste heat. But you might be able to get enough from a car exhaust to be useful...depends if it cost more or weighs more than an alternator too.
Hey! Without that crappy burger we wouldn't have gotten this wonderfully crappy ad! cut them some slack.
You don't get much from thermoelectric conversion - in my business of wireless sensor networks you see a lot of offerings. The best stuff in the past couple years generates about 50uW/sq cm for a 5C difference. That's good enough for a wireless sensor hugging a tree, perhaps. Available power goes up for more thermal difference, but it's unlikely that anytime soon either BWM, Adui, or even Fnord, for that matter, will be replacing the inexpensive, reliable and robust automotive alternator with a pricey power-producing muffler. Well, maybe Fnord.
The way this works is that the hotter your CPU (or whatever is generating the heat) gets, the more electricity it generates. So if your CPU is already at the limit of its heat tolerance (e.g. if your laptop's heat management system has told the fan to turn on), then adding this would only make it worse because you'd use all the power -- and more* -- to run the fan faster. If, on the other hand, your laptop runs cool enough (without a fan) that it has room to get hotter without breaking, then you could benefit from adding one of these. Basically, it has the same effect on the laptop as increasing the ambient temperature would.
(* see Second Law of Thermodynamics)
"[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz
If you were using fans to begin with, this would always cause a net loss in efficiency. The only way to gain would be if the surroundings could absorb the extra heat fast enough without spending extra energy on cooling.
"[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz
I don't understand that people expect me to first watch a video and then click ten links just to read an article. Yes, yes, ad revenue, I know, but I guess the majority of people that are directed to a site like that won't bother to read the text.
-- Cheers!
Apparently they actually patented various things to do with that burger: http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=4653685&KC=&FT=E
Just thought I'd point out that, while most of the ideas are sound-- if not net energy loses when you consider the energy cost of producing everything required to charge your iPod-- the idea of using the fireplace as "waste" heat just shows how out of touch the writer is with the laws of thermodynamics and the relative efficiency of these kinds of power generators.
This is effectively a heat engine, and so we can produce no more energy than the maximum permitted by a Carnot engine. Thus, there is very little exergy (layman's definition: useful energy that can extracted.) in such a process. To use your fireplace, or any other source of heat in the home that is designed to heat your home, to generate electrical power is absurd. You wind up losing far more than you gain, as you will now have to run your fireplace that much more to make up for all the "cold" you're bringing into the house.
Bleh, are people really that desperate to get energy for nothing? Have they not yet learned that just using less of the stuff is by far the best way?
www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
We have a problem the size of a swimming pool and think it would be a great idea if we spent our R&D budget investigating thimble efficiency with respect to making it smaller.
Deleted
Another 150Wh.
Charge your PDA.
300Wh.
Trickle charge rechargable batteries (for your remote controls): 1200Wh.
Power your security system (passive): 900Wh.
Charge up the capacitor for the alarms: 900Wh.
And so on.
Entropy can only increase or stay the same in a closed system.
Which also gives you the out of "this isn't a closed system". What if the wind blowing past your car generated more electricity from its eddies? Those eddies even out and you get less drag AND more power.
But entropy is still increasing, so no disobeying the laws of thermodynamics.
I used to have neighbors who would leave their air conditioners running all day, then, when they came home, they'd let the doors hang open for a while to let some warm in. Less stupid people could help, too.
I was curious, where do your stupid neighbors live? A "friend" of mine has this extra 0-gauge cable and some splicing gear lying around...
On the topic of using waste heat from a car engine, is it practical to run the chiller unit on the cars Air Conditioning from waste heat.
In the good old days you could get gas powered refregerators. These basically used heat from a flame to power the cooling system. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorption_refrigerator.
Car Air conditioning usually used a compressor based refrigerator that adds an additional load on the engine that allegedly can increase fuel consumption by 10%. The heat from the engine on the other hand is waste that needs to be dissipated.
Any engineers know whether this is feasible?
I'm not an electrical engineer, so this may be a stupid question/idea: Are these things any more efficient than current solar cell technology? Would an array of these mounted on or under a sheet of metal and painted flat-black generate more electricity than a similar-sized solar panel? Would it be cheaper to produce?
(Sorry if it was already brought up. I can only get through 3-4 slides at instructables.com before I get too annoyed at all the ads to continue.)
If the efficiency is more than 0%, then it is retriving energy that would not have been available for use before.
And if it doesn't save more than it costs, it won't be made because the free market will have people do other things with their money.
WHY are you grabbing straws to throw the idea away???
...40 years ago when I was a teenager.
I figured you could wrap the exhaust pipe with thermocouples, and put some more in the engine-to-radiator stream, and maybe generate enough electricity to take some load off of the alternator.
I also had an idea for hand-cranked generators for the back-seat passengers (i.e., my younger siblings) to turn, keeping them busy on long trips!
It's tough being so far ahead of one's time like this... nobody recognizes my genius... they LAUGHED at me in Budapest! They laughed at me in Moscow! But when I complete my next invention.... BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
a vehicle functions the way it was designed, meaning if it generates heat, components will function properly based on the fact that heat is dissipated around them. Once heat is harvested and turned into energy, components don't function as expected. I wonder just how many modifications these vehicles will have to take.
TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
I have thought on this a little myself. The major question that I have been unable to answer is this. The peltier device must also provide some resistance to the transfer of heat while in the process of generating energy. Assuming that the radiator of the engine is engineered for the smallest possible weight (dubious I'm sure, but for the sake of argument...) then is the amount of added weight necessary to compensate for the peltier device and its additional cooling requirements made up by the energy harvested? There is an equation in there which I have never been smart enough to build appropriately. The equation simply asks the question is the energy required to move the extra required weight greater than or less than the energy harvested by the device? If it is greater than, then it is a worthwhile improvement, if it is less than, then it is not. Anyone with a more physics oriented mind care to drum up the variables? Anyone with some math background care to put those variables together?
1. The heat of the sun is wasted.
2. Mankind converts the waste energy from the sun into ueful energy.
3. Plug your cell phone into the socket.
Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.