Slashdot Mirror


Fallout 3 DLC Coming To the PS3, New Content Announced

Bethesda has announced that their packs of downloadable content for Fallout 3, previously only available to Xbox 360 and PC owners, will soon be coming to the PS3. "Operation: Anchorage will be released for PS3 in late June, followed by the release of The Pitt and Broken Steel 4-6 weeks apart." They also confirmed the existence of new DLC packs that will arrive on a similar time frame. Point Lockout will allow players to "explore a massive new swampland area filled with new quests and content," while Mothership Zeta lets you "experience an alien abduction first hand and find out if you're tough enough to survive."

71 comments

  1. Shark jump? by Gwala · · Score: 1, Interesting

    OK, Point Lookout - great, the first three DLC were fun (albeit buggy).

    But Alien Abduction? I know Fallout has always had tongue in cheek references to Aliens but this strikes me as jumping the shark here.

    --
    #!/bin/csh cat $0
    1. Re:Shark jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fallout jumped the shark when Bethesda got their grubby paws on it.

    2. Re:Shark jump? by Misanthrope · · Score: 1

      SPOILER WARNING

      In Fallout 1 and 3 you can find an alien ship crash landed.

    3. Re:Shark jump? by ilovegeorgebush · · Score: 1

      I think it might work actually. There's a reason it's there and perhaps it'll merge into a nice little sub-plot.

    4. Re:Shark jump? by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not something I'd want as core Fallout material - the aliens should be restricted to crash sites and cool blasters to reward dedicated explorers, and maybe the occasional super-rare random encounter for characters with a 10 in Luck. They shouldn't be central to any plot lines. But as an expansion pack? Sure, why not? Go out there and zap some little green men, that's completely in keeping with the 1950s pulp SF aesthetic. In fact in anticipation of this I think I'm going to start up a new character, and not a stealth sniper like my current one, but a heroic manly hero with high charisma and speech because he always talks the alien overlord's daughter over to his side. But... hmm... should he be called 'Buck', 'Dan', or 'Flash'?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:Shark jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully it will be a simulation just like Operation Anchorage or Tranquility Lane.

      Fallout 3 isn't really a cannon Fallout game, but it's still an interesting Post. Apoc. game. I enjoy it, but Bethesda appealing to the console fans has done a number on the series. Not even going to touch F:BoS and it's console goodness.

    6. Re:Shark jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Call him Duke!

    7. Re:Shark jump? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Brock Brickson or Brick Brockson

      As in: "I'm Brock Brickson, Captain of the Space Service, stalwart hero, this is my second in command Trace Dirkson the guy with a lady in every spaceport, our bon-vivant ships doctor, Dr. John Clark, our appeasing scientist Dr. Neville Smythe, and our plucky space Cadet Timmy Thompson with his space monkey Buppo.

    8. Re:Shark jump? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      fallout 3 can't really count, being bethesda's story and design.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    9. Re:Shark jump? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      "Cannon" is a weapon, "canon" is the word you want. :-)

      Fallout 3 is canon, there's no one else making fallout games is there, so guess who gets to decide what's in it and what's canon, the developer and publisher, not the community.

      As for BoS, it's a fun little Diablo clone set in the "Fallout universe", sure, there's some differences from what the Fallout 1/2 diehards consider "canon", but they can shut the hell up because they don't make the games or own the franchise. Don't run it on a 80GB CECHE01 PS3 though, it has texture glitching like all the Snowblind Engine games have on the PS3, only to a much much worse extent.

    10. Re:Shark jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fallout 3 is canon, there's no one else making fallout games is there, so guess who gets to decide what's in it and what's canon, the developer and publisher, not the community.

      It'd be like if somebody stole Star Wars from George Lucas and decided that Luke Skywalker is now an anthropomorphic cat. Of course, it'd still probably be better off than Lucas himself, but you get the point.

    11. Re:Shark jump? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The Fallout IP belonged to Interplay, not Black Isle. they could do whatever they wanted with it, including selling the IP for single player Fallout games to Bethesda.

      So no matter how much the Fallout oldbies complain that Fallout 3 isn't a real Fallout game, and that it should have been isometric, turn based and done by Black Isle, it's all irrelevant now.

    12. Re:Shark jump? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      It does count, Bethesda owns the Fallout IP for single player games so if they say it's Fallout, it's Fallout.

    13. Re:Shark jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who legally owns the IP is irrelevant, the series was Black Isle's baby. Fallout 3 isn't a real Fallout game, and if you disagree you are wrong.

  2. DLCs by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

    If I haven't beaten the game by now should I even bother with the DLCs? I've owned this since Xmas and my guy is level 8...

    1. Re:DLCs by Gwala · · Score: 1

      I found the DLC's were entertaining - but they were really really really buggy.

      --
      #!/bin/csh cat $0
    2. Re:DLCs by drb_chimaera · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Until I can either get the DLC via Steam (as I did the original game) or just buy it in a shop I'm not interested - I don't want anything to do with Games for Windows, tvm - the horror stories are more than enough to make me give that platform a wide bearth.

    3. Re:DLCs by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      If you are still playing (and are on PC), you could install the unofficial Fallout 3 patch - I think it comes with patches for the DLCs as well.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    4. Re:DLCs by senorpoco · · Score: 1, Troll

      I really regret buying the xbox version for just that reason. There is a whole world of user created content that we poor foolish console users miss out on.

    5. Re:DLCs by N1AK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A Fallout 3 Game of the Year edition will be available in October. It will include the original game plus all five add-ons for £39.99 / 59.99 for Xbox 360 and PS3, and £29.99 / 49.99 for PC.

      It seems there is some good news for people who don't want to buy quite sizeable game 'extensions' through Games for Windows or Xbox Live (myself included). I have bought and completed Fallout 3 for Xbox and would like to get the add-ons but I won't until they are available in a more consumer friendly form.

      It will cost about £30 to buy all 4 add-ons, and these are software downloads with all the issues this entails (especially on a closed platform like Xbox). This means no lending to friends, hassle getting them back if my box dies, no second hand market and little chance of backwards compatibility on the next console version. Instead I can happily wait 5 months and get the game + all add-ons on disc for the same price as the add-ons alone or cheaper.

    6. Re:DLCs by drb_chimaera · · Score: 1

      Does mean rebuying the original game though which is a bit of a hassle...

    7. Re:DLCs by andy9701 · · Score: 1

      I was really happy when I saw that there will be a box with all of the Fallout 3 content in it later this year. I've been meaning to pick up Fallout 3 for a while not, but just haven't gotten around to it. While I'll have to wait a bit longer, given that I'm essentially getting all of the DLC for free, that's a deal that I can't pass up.

    8. Re:DLCs by senorpoco · · Score: 1

      especially if you part exchange your original copy. www.cex.co.uk

    9. Re:DLCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, for buying the console version, you received a version of the game that doesn't crash every few minutes and is an unstable mess. I'd rather have a fun, stable environment for 90 hours of play than a frustrating, unstable game for 120 hours.

    10. Re:DLCs by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Level 8?!? Have you actually played the game since Christmas? It's almost impossible not to level up.

    11. Re:DLCs by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Yea, I struggled with this for a bit. But honestly, I did oblivion on the PC and found the mods just took away from my fun for the most part. It started off with horse saddle bags and ended with me using unofficial ninja weapons and a unlimited bag of holding.

      I must confess the graphics upgrades the community released were VERY good.

    12. Re:DLCs by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I agree, I switched back to pc gaming after a year-long detour into console (xbox360) gaming. At first I was near ecstatic, no more more upgrade treadmill, excellent interface (from MS nonetheless!!), great selection of games - and thanks to its North American origin and DX-based development you get PC-type games, not that weird Japanese crap. The reason I came back to PC gaming: FPS and console controllers - not meant to be together, despite what HALO fans say. Disconnect from the modding community. EXTREMELY infantile multiplayer crowd coupled with Live microphone = near instant brain explosion. Judging by the voices 80%+ of players on Live! are prepubescent boys with an attitude problem. Like I want to hear some fat 12 y/o yell at his mom to bring him pizza, cause he's playing GOW and can't be bothered to move his fat ass. The graphics hardware is getting a bit old which is VERY noticeable compared to what games look at 1920x1080 on my friends PC gaming rigs.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    13. Re:DLCs by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      I was talking the same "exterminate the brutes" view until I changed my Zone or whatever it is from Hardcore to Casual. It is nice to play with people who don't complain about the fact that you do unbelievably stupid stuff like, "spawn 'n shit".

    14. Re:DLCs by Nesman64 · · Score: 1

      Great. Now I have to ebay my original copy before this news hits the rest of the world.

      --
      coffee | nose > keyboard
    15. Re:DLCs by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

      Obviously I'm not playing that much. Which is my point, if I'm not even playing the main game that much should I bother with the DLC?

      I never finished GTA4 either.

    16. Re:DLCs by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      You don't have to use the cheat mods ;-) In my latest Oblivion game I used ~70 mods. Installing Oblivion, patches, mods, utilities and getting mods to work together could take half a day, but compared to the 100s of hours of fun ahead, I felt that it was worth it. Hell, I don't think I could go back to playing it unmodded - with a better UI, overhaul mods, and gameplay mods the game just became so much more to my liking.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    17. Re:DLCs by Golddess · · Score: 1

      How exactly is getting the game + 4 add-ons for cheaper than just the 4 add-ons a hassle? Is there something which restricts you from using your current saves with the new disc?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    18. Re:DLCs by drb_chimaera · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I suppose I should have said 'feels a bit wasteful' which more accurately sums up my feelings on the matter.

    19. Re:DLCs by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      It takes time to get used to dual analog controls, and if you're a PC gamer it's going to be worse for you since you haven't developed the fine motor skills with your thumb to use the right stick effectively. Which means that you'll be frustrated and complain about how the controls suck, I've seen it before. Your best bet is to NOT play competitive multiplayer FPS's on your console but other games until you build up your right thumb skills.

      As for the players, well you can try playing at hours they won't be, or find more "casual" players (who tend to be older and less likely to be assholes). We got the players you describe on the PS2/PS3 too.

      As for the graphics 1920x1080 is what we call 1080p, same resolution, so I don't know what you're complaining about, unless the games you played didn't run at that resolution

    20. Re:DLCs by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it's almost impossible to play without at least the Unofficial Oblivion Patch and some sort of levelling mod.

      --
      No existe.
    21. Re:DLCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly not playing it much.
      But even i hit level 20 and i don't play it much.
      I've done about 4 missions, and have 34000 odd caps just from raiding everywhere.
      Fun times.

      Also i haven't even started GTA4 yet...
      I've only really played Multiplayer.

    22. Re:DLCs by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

      Hmm maybe your playing at a much easier difficulty than I am. I'm playing on hard. I've almost finished the survival book from that annoying girl and I'm on my way to that city that was built out of an aircraft carrier over in the corner of the map. I've done some other side missions as well.

    23. Re:DLCs by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I've almost finished the survival book from that annoying girl

      Moira! Easily one of my favorite NPC's in the game. She's just a perky cutie patootie with that cute accent.

      Another favorite is Cerberus, a Mr. Gutsy you might encounter sometime.

      I'm on my way to that city that was built out of an aircraft carrier over in the corner of the map.

      Rivet City. Good place to pick up some better gear if you haven't done tons of exploring and side quests. It can be tough to get there without a longer range weapon, depending on where you cross.

  3. Re:Screw you Bethesda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There hasn't been a single game thats sold a console this generation yet.

    Of course there has. Wii Sports and Brain Age.

  4. Cool... by bhunachchicken · · Score: 1

    ... something to play next year then! I don't know about anyone else, but by the time The Shivering Isles came out for Oblivion, I had OD'd on the game, so wasn't in the mood to play it. I recently picked up the Game Of The Year Edition for the PS3 in a sale, a year after stopping playing it.

    Hopefully they'll do the same thing with Fallout so I can pick up the disc sometime in late 2010 ;)

    1. Re:Cool... by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      That happened to me. I have the PC version of oblivion and never played the expansion. However 2 days ago I picked up a used GOTY edition oblivion for the 360. I'm actually looking forward to another play though.

  5. I am loving Fallout by falcon5768 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just got the game this week.... but really could they FIX the other three packs on the 360 too? The Pitt lags the freaking hell out of my trips into Downtown, almost to the point its impossible to play.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  6. GOTY and DLC retail packages by wjousts · · Score: 1

    Ars is reporting that the DLC will be available in two retail packs for PC and XBox, as well as a GOTY edition in October with all the DLC. Finally I'll be able to get the DLC without the ass rape of Microsoft Points.

    1. Re:GOTY and DLC retail packages by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      from what I can tell, they are going to cost 40 dollars each, same cost as getting them from the downloader.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:GOTY and DLC retail packages by wjousts · · Score: 1

      The DLC is $10 each and the two retail packages will contain two DLCs each (pack 1: Operation Anchorage and The Pitt, pack 2: Broken Steel and Point Lookout). AFAIK, there is no announced price for them, but presumably they'll be somewhere in the $20 region. Not $40 each.

      But, either way, the point is that with GfWL, the list price isn't the real price because you can't buy the exact number of points you need. Instead you have to buy more and give Microsoft and interest free loan until such time as you find something else to spend your points on, and with the PC, you'll probably won't ever find anything else you want.

    3. Re:GOTY and DLC retail packages by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

      You can actually buy MS points in $5 increments from the Zune site. The same points are used for GfWL.

      --
      For great justice.
  7. Re:Screw you Bethesda by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

    There hasn't been a single game thats sold a console this generation yet.

    I bought a 360 to play dead rising, GTA 4 and Halo 3. I bought a ps3 to play MGS4 (yup that's it). I bought a wii to play zelda, metroid, and legit emulators.

    Of course I have a lot more games now, but those got me started.

  8. I just don't see these "bugs" by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    You know, people keep talking about bugs in this game and with the DLC. I've played dozens of hours of this game (almost as much as I played Oblivion), including the Broken Steel DLC, and I've had it freeze on me maybe two or three times in that entire time. I don't know what people are talking about, but this game and the DLC have been pretty much bug-free for me (knock wood). I have the 360 version, FYI.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:I just don't see these "bugs" by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The folks complaining about bugs are playing the PC version rather than the 360 or PS3 version which are pretty much bug free as you said.

  9. More DLC is good but can they fix patch 1.5 first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is impossible to play F3 with the 1.5 patch for me. I get CTD's when entering many places including Megaton. I've reinstalled the game, updated drivers, sacrificed a chicken at midnight, etc etc but it doesn't stop the regular CTD's.

    I'm currently playing on patch 1.4. There are some minor glitches when you have Broken Steel installed but it doesn't affect gameplay.

    I really hope Bethesda is working on this.

  10. very interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello /.

    I'm glad to "read the news" and find out that some game came out for some console. That's why I'm glad to wake up in the morning. Maybe, from now on, I'm going to buy a TV set and watch Oprah, it's almost the same.

    1. Re:very interesting by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      the news is that Bethesda originally claimed that technical reasons of some sort would keep Fallout 3 DLC from being on the PS3.

  11. What about us poor Steam users? by mackil · · Score: 1

    Bethesda, we're still waiting for the DLC's to be released via Steam (I refuse to use GFW)!

  12. Paid Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats with /. and this game. I can't seem to find the print saying "Paid Advertisement". Game ain't that great and it came out a year ago. Lets move on.

    1. Re:Paid Ad by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      A year ago? More like 7 months, and it's a big game, so people are still playing it. It's not even a budget game priced game yet.

  13. Console? You don't know what you're missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Console gamers are still missing out on the best bit Fallout 3 has to offer - the player made mods, which have immensely better QC than any of the official not-worth-paying-for DLCs. But for any unfortunate bastard that bought the DLC, the latest Broken Steel DLC and 1.5 patch breaks nearly every other mod out there. Looks like Bethsoft hates to see that others can do better than them, and for free.

  14. Fix the PC version first! by ageoffri · · Score: 1

    I'd really like to buy the DLC's but I refuse to until they fix the crashes with the PC version. I've gone through a ridiculous amount of steps to get the game playable with only a crash to desktop roughly once an hour. Supposedly one of the major problems is DRM on the mp3's used for sounds. I ended up skipping many of the side quests and finished the main quest due to the crashes.

    --
    -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
  15. IGN has much more information and an interview... by VinylRecords · · Score: 1

    http://ps3.ign.com/articles/984/984129p1.html
    Some highlights:

    IGN: Is Point Lookout a reference to Point Lookout State Park in Maryland? Is that where the DLC takes place?

    Todd Howard: Yes, yes it is.

    IGN: What about for Mothership Zeta?

    Todd Howard: If you poke around Fallout 3, you can find a crashed UFO with an alien inside that is broadcasting a signal your Pip-Boy picks up. You get abducted and the whole thing takes place on a giant alien spacecraft. It's one of those classic 50's B movie type things, but with a harder edge.

    Some people are sounding the 'jump the shark' alarm on this DLC but let's wait see just how 'hard of an edge' this DLC has before we roast Bethesda.

    Of course Bethesda is full of shit for one of the answers in this interview...

    IGN: Why is it that the first three pieces of DLC are finally hitting the PS3? Was it a timed exclusivity deal, or was something else worked out?

    Todd Howard: It's mostly the workload on us. Based on our Oblivion experience, it was clear that Xbox users were much more comfortable buying content, by a wide margin. It's a lot of work to get them ready for a particular platform and now that they've been so popular, we want to get them on the PS3. And there's obviously been a lot of frustration on the part of PS3 owners, who don't feel they are getting the total Fallout 3 experience, and we don't want that to happen. We want everyone to have everything, but we still need to set priorities so we can use our development time wisely.

    IGN: Was the eventual PlayStation 3 release for the existing DLC always in the works, or was it something that came up after the fact?

    Todd Howard: We always wanted to do it, but until it actually looks like it will happen, we don't want to make promises. We've been working on it and they aren't done yet so it's going to take time for each DLC to be moved over to the PS3 and work well. As a result there will still be a month or so gap between each one once they start hitting on the PS3.

    This was the same thing with Oblivion. MS paid them for timed exclusives for add-on content or DLC. I don't know why they are lying in this interview.

    Nevertheless more Fallout 3 content to hold everyone over until the next Fallout or Elder Scrolls. And Bethesda is making an M-rated game for the Wii as well to keep us occupied.

  16. Finally DLC coming to the PS3! by Capeman · · Score: 1

    I have been playing Fallout for more than 60 hours(PS3), and I haven't finished the game yet because of all the sidequests, back when they announced the DLC, when they said that they weren't coming to the PS3, I kind of lost my interest in the game, but now that they are going to release them for the PS3, I'll continue playing the game.

  17. Re:Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    moar?

  18. Re:Screw you Bethesda by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    I bought my PS3 for Yellow Dog Linux, Oblivion, Fallout 3, and the ability to keep on playing my library of PS1/PS2 games, plus all the PS2 RPG's they keep on releasing. Won't that thing (the PS2) ever die as an RPG platform?

  19. Re:Screw you Bethesda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PS2 was an RPG platform? The only RPG I've seen for the PS2 is Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance. Unless, of course, by RPG you meant JRPG, which is entirely different, as JRPGs involve no role-playing and aren't games.

  20. Re:Screw you Bethesda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PS2 was an RPG platform? The only RPG I've seen for the PS2 is Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance. Unless, of course, by RPG you meant JRPG, which is entirely different, as JRPGs involve no role-playing and aren't games.

    And to think people say opinions can't be wrong. I'm going to save this post as 100% irrefutable proof that they're wrong.