Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Cocaine Test Prompts Red Bull Removal In Germany

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the but-it-just-tastes-so-yummy dept.

viyh writes to mention that six German states have mandated pulling Red Bull Cola energy drinks off the shelves after testing found trace amounts of cocaine in the drink. "Germany's Federal Institute for Risk Assessment said Monday that the cocaine level was too low to pose a health risk. It planned to produce a more detailed report Wednesday. Red Bull said its cola is 'harmless and marketable in both the US and Europe.' It said similar coca leaf extracts are used worldwide as flavoring, and a test it commissioned itself found no cocaine traces."

32 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. Hah by mackinaw_apx+ · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that's how you get your wings! :p

    1. Re:Hah by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Cocaine is a hell of a drug." - Rick James

  2. Bottoms Up. by Ostracus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Coca Cola with real Coca.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Bottoms Up. by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Coca cola already contains real Coca, with the cocaine removed. There is only one company licensed to import Coca leafs into the US, and as far as I'm aware they only sell the extract to Coca Cola.

      Nice way to get a legal monopoly on that special "Coca Cola" flavor, no?

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    2. Re:Bottoms Up. by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually Coca-Cola does still contain real coca leaf flavouring. It has the cocaine extracted by Stepan Company before the leaves are passed on to Coca-Cola.

      I wouldn't be particularly surprised if the process is less than 100% effective, either. When you're looking at amounts on the order of 10^-9 grams per litre, it's quite possible that any cola with real coca leaves in (don't know how common they are) has always contained traces and nobody's noticed or cared.

    3. Re:Bottoms Up. by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The money in your wallet probably has trace amounts of cocaine, too.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  3. The War on (some) Drugs by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the stated purpose of the War on (some) Drugs is public safety and the prevention of crime (since drug use is handled as a law enforcement problem and not as a medical issue), I'd like to know how this furthers the cause. The brief article stated the cocaine content amounted to 0.4 micrograms of cocaine per liter of the beverage. Sounds to me like anyone trying to use cocaine by drinking Red Bull Cola would die of excess water consumption (anything is a poison given a high enough dose) before they'd feel the cocaine at all. Additionally, if someone tried to extract the cocaine from the drink and purify it, they'd spend a ton of money on the drink and I would imagine, since we're talking about nanogram amounts per liter, the expenditure would have to far exceed what they'd pay if they obtained it from a drug dealer.

    Welcome to modern drug hysteria where logic and reasoning need not apply when evaluating potential threats to public safety. Aren't the Germans glad they have a government that's powerful enough to worry about things like this? It's amazing, really. No matter how absurd the drug hysteria becomes, no one or almost no one with any significant media presence is willing to suggest that maybe the way we're currently handling drugs isn't the best way to deal with them.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    1. Re:The War on (some) Drugs by JustinOpinion · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would imagine, since we're talking about nanogram amounts per liter, the expenditure would have to far exceed what they'd pay if they obtained it from a drug dealer.

      Should be easy enough to calculate:

      Pure cocaine sells for, let's say, $30,000 per kg. To get a kilogram of cocaine from RedBull would take 2.5 billion liters, or roughly 7 billion 12 oz cans. A 24-case of Red Bull seems to cost about $34.80, or $1.45 per can.

      In other words, to get 1 kg of cocaine from Red Bull would cost $10 billion, not to mention the enormous expense of purification. And all this would only be worth $30,000. It would cost 340,000 times more for the Red Bull than the cocaine would be worth.

      As you said, the numbers don't exactly add up. Not even close.

    2. Re:The War on (some) Drugs by hoytak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds to me like anyone trying to use cocaine by drinking Red Bull Cola would die of excess water consumption (anything is a poison given a high enough dose) before they'd feel the cocaine at all.

      [Citation needed]

      I suspect it'd be because they flew off into outer space and suffocated.

      --
      Does having a witty signature really indicate normality?
    3. Re:The War on (some) Drugs by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Aren't the Germans glad they have a government that's powerful enough to worry about things like this?

      The war on drugs is a good topic to start not to single out nation states. It's Germany now, but this is no exception. The rest of Europe isn't much better, except maybe Portugal who have actually decriminalised a lot. Even my Holland is slowly turning into a nanny state when it comes to drugs. Let's not even get started about the US, or the rest of the world for that matter.

    4. Re:The War on (some) Drugs by euxneks · · Score: 5, Funny

      Should be easy enough to calculate:

      Pure cocaine sells for, let's say, $30,000 per kg. To get a kilogram of cocaine from RedBull would take 2.5 billion liters, or roughly 7 billion 12 oz cans. A 24-case of Red Bull seems to cost about $34.80, or $1.45 per can.

      In other words, to get 1 kg of cocaine from Red Bull would cost $10 billion, not to mention the enormous expense of purification. And all this would only be worth $30,000. It would cost 340,000 times more for the Red Bull than the cocaine would be worth.

      As you said, the numbers don't exactly add up. Not even close.

      There ought to be a Google calculator function for this.

      "$30000 worth of cocaine in Red Bulls"

      $30,000 dollars worth of cocaine = $10,000,000,000 dollars worth of red bull

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    5. Re:The War on (some) Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't want your daughter hanging out with jazz musicians.

      1895 telegrammed: WANT MORAL ISSUE BACK STOP

    6. Re:The War on (some) Drugs by fractoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I will tell you why I am against legalization of drugs (although this is an unpopular stance on slashdot):

      I will tell you why I am for legalization of drugs, and hopefully you will see that my reasons are exactly the same as yours:

      Because when I have crackheads walking down the street all the time to the house on the corner, I want to be able to call the police and have them be able to do something about it.

      Because if crack were legal, crackheads wouldn't walk to that house, they'd drop into a chemist and pay $24.95 for a clean, measured dose. They wouldn't have to deal with dealers price gouging them once they get hooked, so they wouldn't have to steal your bigscreen TV to pay for their next hit. If they get wired and screw up in public, then arrest them for their behaviour. If they don't cause any public nuisance then why is it any of your damn business what they do?

      When my neighbor's meth lab burns his house to the ground, I want him to go away, not build a new, better one.

      Why would your neighbour bother to run a meth lab if he can buy some cheaply and legally? I don't see him running an illegal still in his basement.

      These are not made up issues. Drugs suck. They cause sucky things in society. And a lot of people, probably the majority, feel this way.

      These are not made up issues, but they are caused by prohibition, not by the drugs themselves.

      The only reason that legalisation ISN'T good is that people who get addicted would not have so much pressure to quit. I say that is their personal choice and they should take personal responsibility.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    7. Re:The War on (some) Drugs by YttriumOxide · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since neither marijuana nor LSD are addictive, you might want to reconsider some of your wording Mr Troll.

      All we here is the wonderful hippie wonderland where everybody gets high 24/7 and somehow that doesn't fuck everything up.

      Almost no-one is advocating "getting high 24/7" - we advocate reasonable laws to allow people to make some personal choices and accept the responsibilities of those choices if they're badly made. If a guy buys cocaine and uses it, no problem from my point of view. If he buys cocaine and beats the crap out of someone since he's the type of person who gets violent on it, then he should be arrested for assault - no different to alcohol. If various drugs were legalised, then yes, there'd be people who abuse them, but I don't think it'd be a significantly different number to the number of people that abuse them now. Just as there are people that abuse alcohol currently, but the vast majority of us that do drink it are able to do so in moderation without being permanently drunk.

      The vast majority of the problems are because they're illegal. The guy I get my LSD from is a pretty shady sort of character, and I wouldn't put it past him to do other criminal things such as theft and perhaps even physical violence. If I could avoid ever seeing that dickhead again, buy my acid from a pharmacy, and hear he's gone out of business, then I'd be a very happy man.

      full disclosure:
      I don't use marijuana - don't like the feeling it gives.
      I also don't use cocaine, but mostly due to the price/performance factor (it's way too expensive for so little effect) as well as some concerns about the health risks.
      I do use LSD though on a fairly regular basis - up to around 6 times per year on average these days, but much more when I was younger. I love the things it does to me, and consider myself a much better person for having had it.
      Despite this, I'm in favour of the legalisation of all three (and more), not just my "preferred" substance(s).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    8. Re:The War on (some) Drugs by N1AK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you completely incapable of considering the notion that you might be wrong? A good half-dozen people have responded with very clear arguments explaining why legalisation isn't going to cause you any more problems than you already have. You seem to be holding onto this bizarre notion that drug legalisation means the complete abolition of all laws relating to drugs.

      Although it seems pretty obvious that you'll just ignore these as well, I've got time to burn trying:
      1/ If people can buy drugs from a legal source their will be less dealers (less risk of dodgy doses, less risk of crime etc).
      2/ If less money is being spent on catching and incarcerating people for possession etc this leaves more for rehab, catching illegal dealers etc.
      3/ Legalisation of sale does not mean it would be legal to use in public.
      4/ It would be easier for addicts to seak help without the stigma of an illegal habit.

      There are downsides to legalisation, and I don't know if they would be bad enough to justify keeping drugs illegal. However, if you have a problem based on those, then make your case with them, currently all you are doing is repetitively claiming that drug legalisation will cause a mob of crackheads to congregate at your frontdoor.

  4. Levels by EdIII · · Score: 5, Funny

    the cocaine level was too low to pose a health risk.

    I would say the levels are too high when you are willing to blow some dude in a bathroom stall to get more Red Bull. Till then, it's probably just fine.

    1. Re:Levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Sir,

      When you're ready, I am waiting in stall 3 with your Red Bull.

      - Red Bull Dealer

  5. She's alright by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Trace amounts of cocaine were found in the German parliament toilets.

    Ergo, German politicians should be banned from Germany.

    --
    Azural - instrumentals
  6. This really isnt suprising by Tigersmind · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They would of course have a very small amount in the drink. Not enough to break laws, but enough to make people go "Lets get this! It's cocaine!" if it would ever be discovered. Marketing at its best folks.

  7. So _that's_ how it works... by lobiusmoop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Red Bull is a homeopathic stimulant!

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:So _that's_ how it works... by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. That concentration is far too high to qualify as homeopathic. For that you have to get it down to less than one molecule per liter.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:So _that's_ how it works... by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Less than one molecule per liter? That's the homeopathic equivalent to a placebo. The strong stuff is measured in molecules per cubic lightyear. Boy, it sure is a good thing we as a civilization don't treat health problems magic water, huh?

  8. Oh yeah? by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've never bought or used cocaine yet I probably have more of it in my wallet. On my bank notes.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  9. In other news... by denzacar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Due to trace amounts of cocaine known to be found on dollar bills - eating, snorting, licking or in any other way ingesting of money shall be strictly prohibited.

    If the police officer founds that there is probable cause that the suspect was planing to engage in money ingestion - he/she/it has authorization to detain the suspect and confiscate the said money as evidence.
    Cause there is no ceasefire in the war on drugs.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:In other news... by xianthax · · Score: 5, Informative

      67% of dollar bills in this study, and thats south shore mass, i would expect manhattan to step that number up a bit.

      http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080411/NEWS/804110348

  10. Half-baked by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 4, Funny

    Red Bull is not a drug. I used to suck d*** for coke. Now that's an addiction. You ever suck some d*** for Red Bull?

    1. Re:Half-baked by ionix5891 · · Score: 5, Funny

      cocka cola?

  11. Yo dawg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    we heard you like tweaking so we put a stimulant in your stimulant so you can tweak while you tweak

  12. Re:Don't forget this fact, you can't get it back by Falconhell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ya know what cocaine makes you feel like?

    More cocaine!

  13. Re:It's everywhere by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are small amounts of everything everywhere, for sufficiently small values of "small".

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  14. Red Bull Cola Tastes like shit! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I tried Red Bull Cola and it tastes horrible. Its not even good. It's just shit.

    Perhaps the cocaine content is to help "sell" the product as something deliciously mmm mmm good? You would have to be on hallucinogens to enjoy Red Bull Cola's shit taste.

     

  15. Re:No RedBull for the French either by voop · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was surprised, while living in France last year, that RedBull is illegal. I was even more surprised when they told me you can buy Poppers at clothing shops like nothing happens. Any Frenchie care to comment on it??

    You asked for it, there you have it. I am not a Frenchie and can't speak for the availability of poppers -- but Red Bull *was* illegal due to its taurin content. The French equivalent of the FDA didn't think that it was possible to determine, based on available studies, if the product was safe, and was citing at the time (if I recall correctly) something about detected hyperactivity in animals who'd consumed high doses of taurine. In April 2008, in a neutered version (arginine instead of taurine and much less caffeine...) was approved for sale in France.

    In, I think, later 2008, the unneutered Red Bull entered the French market: this time it was the EU that forced the French to accept it. A product sold in one EU country can legally be imported and sold in an EU country (or something to that effect), and Red Bull was/is sold in many (but not all) EU countries.

    --
    -- "Life is a bitch - and she hates me..."