Slashdot Mirror


DIY 18-ft.-High Robotic Exoskeleton

Hacx sends along a piece from PopSci that begins "Carlos Owens had handled all kinds of machines as an army mechanic, but he always dreamed of using those skills for one project: his own 'mecha,' a giant metal robot that could mirror the movements of its human pilot. Owens, 31, began building an 18-foot-tall, one-ton prototype at his home in Wasilla, Alaska, in 2004. Working without blueprints, he first built a full-scale model out of wood. Moving on to steel, he had to devise a hydraulics system that would provide precisely the right leverage and range of movement. He settled on a complex network of cables and hydraulic cylinders that can make the mecha raise its arms, bend its knees, and even do a sit-up. ... He foresees mechas having uses in the military and the construction industry, but acknowledges that right now they're best suited to entertainment. The first application he has in mind: mecha-vs.-mecha battles, demolition-derby style."

206 comments

  1. Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It only cost him $25,000? That's amazing.

  2. Aliens! by opusman · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered why no one has built a loader a la Aliens yet. Surely it wouldn't be beyond current tech and I'd imagine it would be amazingly useful (not least for fighting Alien queens!)

    1. Re:Aliens! by rastilin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There have been some military projects, but the problem is that anything which can lift over a tonne one-handed requires a power supply too big to attach to the suit itself.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    2. Re:Aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Japanese have one for lifting elederly people at retirement homes. I think the one that has been shown is just a prototype though. But it's basically the same Idea.

    3. Re:Aliens! by mrhthepie · · Score: 5, Informative

      They're called Fork Lift trucks. In reality, Mechs/walkers are never a good solution. Hard to balance and inefficient. In Mecha anime/manga they usually make up some pseudosience as to why they're using walkers and not tanks and planes.

    4. Re:Aliens! by Nutria · · Score: 1

      In Mecha anime/manga they usually make up some pseudosience as to why they're using walkers and not tanks and planes.

      I always thought it was because of Japan's samurai tradition/mythos (like the US has a Wild West gun mythos).

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:Aliens! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Heh, well just get a really long power cord like in Evangelion!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:Aliens! by rastilin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did say "power", but what I was referring to was the systems meant to support the suit's hydraulics. It would be more like a hose.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    7. Re:Aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd say human design is also hard to balance and inefficient yet, that's how it turned out after hundreds of millions of years of evolution.

    8. Re:Aliens! by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well if you want to be able to go long distances you'd probably want all the hydraulics stuff self contained on the unit itself otherwise you're going to have to deal with some crazy pressures (or very large diameter hoses I suppose) and a lot of power to drive the fluid. I'm not a hydraulics expert but the company I do IT for design and manufacture dredgers that use hydraulics. Our normal dredgers would probably operate down to about 500 metres at most, not entirely sure, but we are designing a deep water (max of 3000 metres) system that has a self contained hydraulics system powered electrically from the surface. Obviously that would add a lot of extra bulk and complexity and it would probably be better just to use a bunch of electric motors instead?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:Aliens! by nyctopterus · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's very difficult to evolve wheels, and the concrete floors/roads that make them so efficient.

    10. Re:Aliens! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      It's very difficult to evolve wheels, and the concrete floors/roads that make them so efficient.

      There are lots of roundish animals that could have been a first step. But none of them will use rolling as a method of movement, presumably because of the difficulty of powering it from inside the sphere. A mass moving inside the sphere would be required. Possible but not as easy or efficient as mobile limbs (which is what they all use).
      And of course biological wheels are apparently right out, a biological axis would be extremely complex to even envision (typically some kind of fluid would have to go back and forth to carry nutriments and waste to the round limb, hard to do over a point of rotation, never mind the power transmission).
      It was difficult to do with mechanical systems already.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    11. Re:Aliens! by jamesh · · Score: 1

      There are lots of roundish animals that could have been a first step. But none of them will use rolling as a method of movement, presumably because of the difficulty of powering it from inside the sphere.

      You've never heard of the hoop snake then?

    12. Re:Aliens! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of the hoop snake then?

      No, but it's a great story. I knew of the greek one (ouroboros) because I'm trying to brush up on my mythology. But I haven't gotten around to the modern mythology of the former colonies ;)

      I suppose that all countries have such mythical creatures (we have the dahu) but this type, especially using a snake, is a new one for me. It's very creative. And apparently the story started quite a while ago too.

      Oddly enough I believe I read a novel where something like that was mentioned, but I can't recall what it was.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    13. Re:Aliens! by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was because of Japan's samurai tradition/mythos (like the US has a Wild West gun mythos).

      Yup, there's the big fascination with the warrior who can defeat all odds if he's super-pissed off enough. The Japanese Army in WWII thought they could make up for their material inferiority as compared with the US and Soviet troops simply by fighting harder and showing more spirit. That can work to a degree against a numerically superior but less hardened foe, causing them to break before you do. But if they're just as hardcore, the outcome is inevitable defeat.

      As to why the Japanese hero robot has to be gigantic, I think it's just a cultural fascination with giganticism. Their Tokyo-eating monsters are huge, their weird heroes who fight them like Ultraman are huge, and thus their hero robots would be huge as well. I admit there's something transfixing when looking at a humanoid robotic form laying waste to everything around it.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    14. Re:Aliens! by Nutria · · Score: 1

      thought they could make up for their material inferiority as compared with the US ... troops simply by fighting harder and showing more spirit.

      Never forget the usefulness of racial animus in motivating yourself to stay and fight.

      Soviet troops

      Huh? The Sovs had their hands full with Jerry, and didn't declare war on Japan until Aug. 8, 1945.

      That can work to a degree against a numerically superior but less hardened foe, causing them to break before you do.

      Like the poorly-led Chinese, most of whom really just wanted to go back to their farms.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    15. Re:Aliens! by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      In Mecha anime/manga they usually make up some pseudosience as to why they're using walkers and not tanks and planes.

      It's pseudoscience that human brains have an extremely well-refined intuitions on how to effectively control and use a humanoid structure?

      Tanks are good for fighting, of course, but their human controllers don't "get" all the subtleties involved in making the most out of them.

      It's true that bipedal walkers are hard to balance, but just the same, we have an "off-the-shelf" solution for it.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    16. Re:Aliens! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Hydralic or electrical, you'd still have some sort of umbilical cord. Problems: it could trip over it, enemies could chop through it in a fight, distance from the tender would be limited and last - but not least - it would look uncool.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Aliens! by theelectron · · Score: 1

      Wow, I can't believe I am referencing this, but they could do something like in Neon Genesis Evangelion where the 'mechas' are powered primarily by cable with a battery pack on board to provide power for a short time if the cable is cut.

    18. Re:Aliens! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Or they just turn into Planes... or half plane type things...

    19. Re:Aliens! by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Concrete roads don't exist where the military often wants to be. That's why tanks were developed. Get something that goes over terrain better than a tank, and you would have a great defense contract.

    20. Re:Aliens! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Indeed it is uncool and impractical, and it is the only reason the mechs in Evangelion are kind of lame compared to Transformers, Gundam Wing, RahXephon, etc. But it is still an option if you keep the back well protected and for some reason need a crazy powerful mech ;) You'd think if you put a 1500HP tank engine and a few electric motors in it then you could have it being self powered though. I'm not a mech engineer so I don't know what kind of power they'd require to be useful :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    21. Re:Aliens! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Because most of their fighting is done against opponents on stairs?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    22. Re:Aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    23. Re:Aliens! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why no one has built a loader a la Aliens yet. Surely it wouldn't be beyond current tech and I'd imagine it would be amazingly useful (not least for fighting Alien queens!)

      They did it was in the movie "Alien"; it would be really hand in a handful of extreme fringe cases. Most time when in those fringe cases a traditional forklift/jitney doesn't fit, they get a custom built automated solution rather than an alien-loader.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    24. Re:Aliens! by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      I admit there's something transfixing when looking at a humanoid robotic form laying waste to everything around it.

      speaking as pioneer of the first human-robot marriage (and subsequent divorce), I can tell you that it gets old real fast

    25. Re:Aliens! by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Soviet troops

      Huh? The Sovs had their hands full with Jerry, and didn't declare war on Japan until Aug. 8, 1945.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria

              * Khingan-Mukden Offensive Operation (August 9, 1945 - September 2, 1945)
              * Harbin-Kirin Offensive Operation (August 9, 1945 - September 2, 1945)
              * Sungari Offensive Operation (August 9, 1945 - September 2, 1945)
              * South Sakhalin Army Group Offensive Operation (August 11, 1945 - August 25, 1945)
              * Seisin Landing Operation (August 13, 1945 - August 16, 1945)
              * Kurile Landing Operation (August 18, 1945 - September 1, 1945)

      Point being, the Japanese were rolled over by Soviet armor. Armor didn't really play as much of a role in the island-hopping campaigns and so their infantry was able to put up more of a fight in the jungles. In the open against tanks, they were woefully unprepared.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    26. Re:Aliens! by Simetrical · · Score: 1

      It's very difficult to evolve wheels, and the concrete floors/roads that make them so efficient.

      Rotation in living systems

      Wikipedia can be pretty awesome.

      --
      MediaWiki developer, Total War Center sysadmin
    27. Re:Aliens! by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Indeed--legged vehicles could have many uses in unpredictable/complex environments. But in controlled environments (such as where forklifts generally operate), wheels are more efficient.

    28. Re:Aliens! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I thought it was because of Japan's obsession with impractical robotics?

    29. Re:Aliens! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Are you sure they're more efficient? ;)

      I kid, I kid. Legged contraptions will never fully replace wheeled vehicles, but there is a huge niche that they could fill that nothing else does right now.

    30. Re:Aliens! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Get something that goes over terrain better than a tank, and you would have a great defense contract.

      I can name two, but I've been beaten to the contract already: aircraft and spacecraft. They can even go over terrain a tank can't, such as water.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    31. Re:Aliens! by db10 · · Score: 1

      I imagine the relationship tarnished over time.

    32. Re:Aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPOILER.

      Why does everyone keep saying the Evas are mechs. We're supposed to think they're mechs when the series starts, but they're actually angels/proto-humans with soul-violating technology plugged into them so that they can be merged with a pilot. Not really germaine to a discussion on real world giant robots.

    33. Re:Aliens! by somersault · · Score: 1

      I suppose you're right, been about 7 years since I watched it now though, and I still think of them as mechs despite them being mostly organic. They're large pilotable humanoid creatures and that's what matters, no matter how they were made - perhaps we could do something similar with a mix of cloning and genetic modification (as disturbing as that idea is).

      --
      which is totally what she said
    34. Re:Aliens! by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      With the S2 engine, the Eva's operation time is extended to infinity. Kinda hard to beat.

    35. Re:Aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on whether we're talking about Supers or Reals.

      Super Robots are the power ranger type ridiculously huge robots with nigh unlimited powers. Those things are humanoid just because it's pretty easy to make a humanoid look badass by adding on spikes.

      Real Robots are those from Gundams, mass produced and used in place of other wartime tech as a "jack of all trades" vehicle. The basic understanding is that they can do tighter turns, making them more agile than tanks, equip different types of equipment for various situations, ie flamethrower against infantry, heavy duty beam cannon against battleships, swords for close range fights against other mechs. They can also move heavy materials around so you don't need forklifts or cranes.

      Now, I think that if we advance robot tech far enough, humanoid robots would actually be pretty darned useful. But the problem there is, by the time we advance the robotic tech that far, the other tech will have advanced farther too, making giant robots obsolete.

      But then, with giant robots you can do fights where they cut each others heads off and keep battling because YEAH they're robots.

  3. First thoughts... by nizo · · Score: 1

    ...what could possibly go wrong with this thing??

    But someone please please film this thing; I suspect when something blows out on it, it will indeed make for some awesome youtube footage.

  4. Mecha Palin! by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wasila, Alaska? The killer app for this device is to put a set of high-heels on it and have it run as the GOP Veep candidate in 2012 - all puny mortals bow down before Mecha Palin, or be crushed!

    Only the Obamabot can save us!

    1. Re:Mecha Palin! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wasila, Alaska? The killer app for this device is to put a set of high-heels on it and have it run as the GOP Veep candidate in 2012 - all puny mortals bow down before Mecha Palin, or be crushed!

      Nah, Giant Mecha Palin should run for Prez and her VP can be La Pequena Palin

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Mecha Palin! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      I was figuring Gov Palin could take care of the mecha problem, since she could clearly see this from her house.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Mecha Palin! by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      to put a set of high-heels on it

      Don't forget to put the lipstick on it....

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    4. Re:Mecha Palin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Master Blaster run Bartertown!

    5. Re:Mecha Palin! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Only the Obamabot can save us!

      Don't you mean Obamaptumus Prime?

  5. Too big. by onion2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole idea of mecha robots is plain wrong. It's not necessary to make an exoskeleton that big. In a military (or 'gaming') situation it'd just present a bigger target. All you need is a minimal amount of armour with enough power to augment picking up large amounts of weight, and possibly some system to dampen recoil if you're holding a projectile weapon.

    (Oh dear. I'm actually arguing that mecha robots are a poor weapons system design on the internet. Is this what my life has become? Maybe I should go outside?)

    1. Re:Too big. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there's no real practical application for this thing, but there's no practical application for Rube Goldberg machines either, and we all love those things.

      If this thing can walk, pick up a car and throw it, etc. then it's worth it's weight and effort. If this thing could be folded down to fit on a flatbed trailer, it would be a major attraction at monster truck rallies, etc.

    2. Re:Too big. by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately, years arguing on the internet have left your muscles too weak to function.

      You'd need some sort of mechanised exoskeleton before thinking about venturing outside.

    3. Re:Too big. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tell that to my MadCat!

    4. Re:Too big. by Renraku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are actually a poor system.

      You don't get decent speed or armor, you don't get awesome firepower like a 120mm cannon.

      Basically, powered exoskeletons are not strong enough to withstand an RPG attack, aren't fast enough to dodge them, and aren't armed enough to deal with anything beyond a few AK-47 wielders.

      How do we fix it? Easy. Make them pretty much immune to small arms fire. Make them faster. Adopt tactics to cover each other. Implement scanners and other intelligence devices so you know where the enemy is coming from and maybe where those IEDs are hidden.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    5. Re:Too big. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it can barely pick itself up. That's why you don't see any videos of it walking or doing much of anything really. It's simply incapable of doing so.

    6. Re:Too big. by ls671 · · Score: 1

      You mean just like the Crysis suit ? ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    7. Re:Too big. by Bluesman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe we could have one with large treads on it so that it could cover large distances quickly, and strong plating and explosive armor so that it would be immune to all but the largest projectile. And why stop at one operator? It could be large enough to hold a small crew of people who could operate the machine as a team, and possibly provide some sort of situational awareness/intelligence function.

      All you'd need then is a turret with a large cannon on it and you'd have the perfect military land robot.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    8. Re:Too big. by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      The whole idea of mecha robots is plain wrong. It's not necessary to make an exoskeleton that big. In a military (or 'gaming') situation it'd just present a bigger target. All you need is a minimal amount of armour with enough power to augment picking up large amounts of weight, and possibly some system to dampen recoil if you're holding a projectile weapon.

      The basic concept of the exo-skeleton is you get to be superman without having to be a kryptonian. You're as powerful as a tank, can blast things just by moving your arms, it's scifi fantasy.

      Those trying to come up with a practical justification say it's the next advancement of the tank which is all about letting a human being go into combat with serious protection. But if you think about it, the only reason why tanks are manned is because automated systems aren't good enough to let them operate autonomously. Every gun on a WWII warship needed human to load the weapons, manually aim them, pull the trigger, etc. Now warship turrets are highly automated and only need humans to reload the enormous ammo hoppers, perform maintenance, etc.

      The exoskeletal combat suit is likely never going to happen. The basic elements of combat are finding out where the enemy is and hitting him in the most vulnerable place possible. The technology of the time will dictate the weapons at hand. We're going to see a lot more robotic scouting systems, more potential for bot-on-bot action. But in a situation like Iraq, we won't see someone waddling into combat in power armor, they'll be remotely controlling the robot that's exposed to fire. The best comparison I can offer you are the Automated Weapons Platforms from the old PC game Xcom. You had human squads in the fight but the AWP carried the heaviest weapons and kept them mobile. Humans carrying that kind of firepower would have to unload and fight from a fixed position, not on the move.

      We'll likely see exoskeletons in the civilian world. I could see them really being worth the cost in construction and other situations where very awkward loads need to be carried through confined spaces. More maneuverable than a forklift, simple enough for illegal labor to use, and not all that expensive. If it can't meet those criteria, it ain't happening.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    9. Re:Too big. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah! that's a great idea! Do all that and remove the arms and you'd really be talking! Wow, I can't believe no one's thought of that!

    10. Re:Too big. by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like that idea. Maybe each member of the crew should operate a smaller, individual vehicle that can clamp onto the mecha's main structure, acting as its "arms" or "legs" or "head". Perhaps some sort of rallying cry would help synchronize the assembly process, something alongs the line of "VOLTROOOOOOOOOON"

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    11. Re:Too big. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a military (or 'gaming') situation it'd just present a bigger target.

      Yes, because tanks and armoured veicles are such a bad thing in battle...

    12. Re:Too big. by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      You'd need some sort of mechanised exoskeleton before thinking about venturing outside.

      Better make it extra-large (I'm thinking 50+' tall), too. Who knows what sort of terrors the outside world will hold? You'll need all the armor and firepower you can get.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    13. Re:Too big. by rezalas · · Score: 1

      The exo-skeletal combat suit will happen, just not in the way people want it to. Units like this would be of great use for land forces during occupation or high intensity situations where robots are not suited to be due to the mixed set of combatants and non-combatants that are common to urban warfare. Special Forces will most likely some day have breach and patrol squads of these for specialized purposes like breach and sweep missions or scout and intercept. While robots are good at killing, they'll likely never be suited for situations where death isn't the sole option. Mixed situations like this is where mobile suits like this would excel. I don't ever see the application of giant robot suits the size of cities mind you, but small combat suits that allow a man to get in and out of buildings without taking the roof off (or perhaps breaching the roof as an option?) would be a boon for the military (which is why they are developing them!)

    14. Re:Too big. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well then try and get rid of the people. People are soft and squishy and they have parents and families that get upset when they don't come back.
      Then you could make it even smaller, lighter, and cheaper.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:Too big. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part about construction? A large mecha like that could be used to easily lift and place large steel beams or concrete forms into place. Something that is done by cranes and guys climbing all over a structure trying to pull yank and maneuver a multi-ton beam into place. Imagine how easy it would be to dig a trench and then lay 36+ inch concrete pipe for drainage systems. Just grab a bucket and dig with both "hands". Would be much faster then a guy with a joystick. Then just let go of the buckets, grab a 4000 pound section of pipe and put it in place. There are many uses for something that could give an operator near human like range of motion but offer the ability to manipulate multi ton objects. Some arms could also have attachments or even a multi tool system like drills, torches, welders etc.

      Imagine these things used for demolition. Just walk up to a house or building and rip it apart. Hell even heavy duty towing and recovery could use them to pick up rolled trucks or load wreckage onto other trucks. How about even bigger ones that could lift 30-40 ton intermodal containers.

      For military use big mecha don't exactly sound like a great idea for combat situations. But for heavy duty lifting it sure will, any one remember the mecha forklift used by Ripley in Aliens? Might come in handy.

    16. Re:Too big. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The biggest vulnerability in the powered exoskeleton is the soft center -- that human controlling it that it needs to protect or else it becomes completely non-functional. If only there was some way to protect the operator by putting her in a bunker somewhere, and control the "exoskeleton" by remote control! Then you wouldn't need all that armor, and the entire payload could be comprised of fuel and weapon systems.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    17. Re:Too big. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Dude it's only 18HP, get all Tim-Taylor on it and drop in a chevy small-block or even get a Cat Diesel then you'd have something; maybe some accumulators near the control valves to shorten reaction times! An igniter and a acetylene injector in the exhaust stack would be cool for shooting fire-balls everything it punched or stomped something.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    18. Re:Too big. by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      The exo-skeletal combat suit will happen, just not in the way people want it to. Units like this would be of great use for land forces during occupation or high intensity situations where robots are not suited to be due to the mixed set of combatants and non-combatants that are common to urban warfare. Special Forces will most likely some day have breach and patrol squads of these for specialized purposes like breach and sweep missions or scout and intercept. While robots are good at killing, they'll likely never be suited for situations where death isn't the sole option. Mixed situations like this is where mobile suits like this would excel. I don't ever see the application of giant robot suits the size of cities mind you, but small combat suits that allow a man to get in and out of buildings without taking the roof off (or perhaps breaching the roof as an option?) would be a boon for the military (which is why they are developing them!)

      But there's no need to put the person inside. You could operate them by remote and make them smaller, no need to fit the human form so they can be optimally shaped for the mission. That's the part that people keep overlooking, that the remote control or autonomous AI could get that good.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    19. Re:Too big. by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Maybe we could network them together too, we could call the network something like AirWeb or... CRAP.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    20. Re:Too big. by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I think we will, definitely, see an exoskeletal combat suit come into use. The thing is, I don't think it'll be anywhere near as big as the suits amine/this guy seem to advocate. I think that they will end up being as form fitting as possible.

      The thing is that regardless of all the advanced weaponry we've developed, the last few wars have shown that you still need feet on the ground to take and hold populated areas. When it comes to breaching buildings and patrolling insurgent infested areas, we've seen that our technological advantage is, largely, neutralized.

      A combat exoskeleton designed to be little larger than an average man (or maybe, even, the size of an average man with below average sized men being chosen as pilots) would allow travel inside confined places like buildings while also providing the ability to mount heavier armor; carry heavier weapons; carry more ammo; and carry better communications gear. This could make it so that the troops put in the most dangerous positions (breaching buildings and running dangerous patrols) would be impervious to injury from all but the largest IEDs/mines/grenades that would have killed or maimed troops wearing today's heaviest body armor.

      Of course, at some point it will be possible to design robots that can do the same job. However, I've seen much of the cutting edge technology in both exoskeleton design, robotics, and AI and I think that the exoskeleton will be here much sooner than a robot/AI that can physically do all the things a person can as well as make judgment (ex. whether someone encountered is an enemy combatant or a civilian) calls as well as a human soldier. This all assumed that we decide that we, actually, want robots/computers to have that kind of independent power.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    21. Re:Too big. by rezalas · · Score: 1

      Nobody is overlooking it. What we know however is that these suits will be ready and in the field before AI is good enough to replace them. We already have units that are being tested and some are pretty close to field worthy. The reason we ignore AI is because at the moment no AI or remote camera system can equal a highly trained field operative.

    22. Re:Too big. by db10 · · Score: 1

      yea! yea! and frickn lasers!

    23. Re:Too big. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not "Too big."

      Too big to fail.

    24. Re:Too big. by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Another strike that Mecha or humanoid like combat robots have against them is that with all available current power sources they are going to give of a lot of heat except, as the parent points out, they are not as heavily armored or fast as conventional wheeled or tracked land vehicles. Your relatively slow moving and under-armored mecha is going to show up like the Sun to any heat seeking anti-tank type missle. Some helicopter or light infantry team is going to put a missile right up the hot tail pipe of the mecha (up yours...literally). The main reasons mecha have not been done yet or even seriously attempted in real life is because with current technologies and costs they do not offer any serious advantages over existing vehicles while at the same time being almost as vulnerable and many times more expensive than properly equipped infantry.

    25. Re:Too big. by ZosX · · Score: 1

      You are missing his point. If you essentially have a large walking tank there is no point in having a human inside when a human can just control one remotely. The F-22 will likely be the last manned fighter. That is significant. The weight, size, and cost savings from not having to support a pilot are immensely game changing as well. For a long time now, the pilot has been a large limitation on aircraft performance. Unmanned aircraft pull turns potentially radically harder than humans. With some basic AI you could even have them automatically fly home if they lose contact with the base. This is where our current level of AI could prove effective, so forget the AI requirement, as it is not really important at this point. Most army "robots" are hardly autonomous. For what its worth, any occupying force would likely keep soldiers in the streets amongst the population. Rolling tanks and heavy equipment around tends to make the people feel (understandably) extremely uneasy and oppressed. I'm sure the Palestinians might know a thing or two about the psychology of that.

    26. Re:Too big. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that now, but wait till the angels start attacking and we need an EVA unit to take on something that big!!! :-)

    27. Re:Too big. by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

      The idea would be to find a power source that can be compact enough to fit easily on the exo. The only thing that can probably supply enough sustained power, that we have today, would be a fission reaction. The problem is it would need tons of shielding along with the coolant, and the pilot might have to be in summer clothing.

  6. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by axllent · · Score: 1

    I don't think it does very much though ~ looks more like one big welded robot model with a few hydraulics. Would be interesting to actually see it "in action".

  7. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This seems really familiar.

    I'm pretty sure this is the same mech a couple of years back. He's probably mad a little progress since then.

  8. Mechwarrior by ArcadiaAlex · · Score: 0

    Lets hope microsoft don't buy the rights to the gaming franchise

  9. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by oliderid · · Score: 1

    I tried to find vids of this thing. All I found was a 2 years old interview. http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=3202576

  10. It works great, until... by GreenTech11 · · Score: 1

    It worked great, until he walked under the magnet at the rubbish tip...

    --
    Laughter is the best medicine, except if you have a broken rib.
    1. Re:It works great, until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah great, now we can re-use our powerful harddrive demagnetizer magnets hidden in the door frame as mecha traps!

      Hehe come on mecha !

  11. ...video of a prototype by gadget+junkie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Here there's a video of an experimental Raytheon exoskeleton for the US army. It seems that we're a long way from seeing something like "starship troopers" especially because there's a conspicous umbilical cord in the Video, probably for the external power source and computer controls. While Moore's law can cope with computing requirements, there's nothing similar in power production, and especially in power density.
    Novody would want a battery powered exoskeleton with a 10 minutes charge.

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    1. Re:...video of a prototype by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

      Nice video there.

      The video states at the end that the tethers are mostly for experimental safety purposes, and the unit can do without. You are right about the power density though, to operate something like this on the field you would need to change the PSU every few minutes with the current human technology level. Who knows, maybe the are experimenting with plutonium batteries over there. j/k

    2. Re:...video of a prototype by Daemonax · · Score: 1

      Well that what about the HAL exoskeleton? That doesn't require the umbilical cord. http://www.cyberdyne.jp/English/robotsuithal/index.html

    3. Re:...video of a prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAL has less than 3 hours of battery life. Not exactly useful for anything.

    4. Re:...video of a prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Josh, don't be a twat the HAL hasn't got anywhere near enough power to be useful in a military capacity. It's designed to improve mobility for old people and such like.

    5. Re:...video of a prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose your definition of 'anything' excludes any task that requires humanlike manipulation of objects two to ten times your muscular capacity for 3 hours or less of nonstop labor? And that's only until you need to switch batteries or recharge.

      Incidentally, the FAQ lists battery life for normal activites at 5 hours for the newer batteries.

    6. Re:...video of a prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgive me if I'm a bit skeptical of their 2-10 times capacity claim since there is no actual weight capacity indicated. I can lift about 3 times as much as my wife, but I wouldn't exactly consider myself strong.

    7. Re:...video of a prototype by Missing_dc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lockheed Martin has been working on something vaguely similar, and while Ray's has that umbilicus, LM's is self powered.

      http://www.societyofrobots.com/robotforum/index.php?topic=7306.0

      One of their versions was powered by a small generator that ran on jet fuel.

      --
      How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
    8. Re:...video of a prototype by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Nobody would want a battery powered exoskeleton with a 10 minutes charge.

      Especially if it was piloted by a mentally unstable 14-year-old boy.

    9. Re:...video of a prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eva pilots would go for it. They only got 5 minutes when off the umbilical cable.

    10. Re:...video of a prototype by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      I suppose he could do the same thing they did in the M1A1 Abrams tank and replace the batter with a turbo-shaft engine based gen-set.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    11. Re:...video of a prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possible SPOILERS.

      Yeah, but those weren't giant robot exoskeletons they were piloting. Those were clones of garden of eden era humans/angelic beings with devices jammed into their heads to control them.

    12. Re:...video of a prototype by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      One of their versions was powered by a small generator that ran on jet fuel.

      Jet exhaust is extremely hot. It would be the perfect target for a cheap heat seeking rocket or missile. We spend billions to build an exoskeleton that can be knocked out by portable heat seeking missile probably costing less than $250,000...wonderful.

    13. Re:...video of a prototype by ZosX · · Score: 1

      From what I understand the exoskeletons can run for 2 hours or something on a charge. I know the japanese HAL units are claimed to run for about 2.5 hours. Not a very long time. I can't see any of this stuff making it into the field any time soon.

  12. Wasilla, Alaska? by speedtux · · Score: 0

    That is disturbing. Is this a plot to keep Palin under control, or is it Palin's (not so) secret master plan to take over the world? Muwahaha.

  13. good idea by pink-lady · · Score: 1

    Good post !

  14. Re:It's bloody rusted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A tarp won't prevent it from rusting, and a garage would probably be cost-prohibitive. The only solution to keep it from rusting would be paint, which would cost a lot too. I think he's more interested in getting it working than he is about making it look nice.

    I have an old backhoe, it's heavily rusted, but all the bearings and hydraulics are in good shape and the machine, despite how it looks, still functions fine.

    I agree that a video would make it more convincing, but I don't think it's fair to call BS right yet, the thing's probably not even finished yet.

    As far as it being a sculpture, you're right, it is a sculpture, but sculptures don't have to remain perfectly still, if he can move the arms and pick stuff up, it's at least something.

    If you ever pissed this guy off enough that he would want to kick your ass, and it comes down to you and your fists verses him in his big rusted "sculpture" which apparently has working hydraulics, who's gonna win?

  15. On mecha, and exoskeletons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are approaching the idea of mecha ass-first.

    These proposed engineers of mayhem mostly treat "BIG FUCKING ROBOT OH YEAH" as an end in itself. In any semi-realistic context mecha should be seen as something that naturally evolves into being as agile, versatile exoskeletons are made progressively more powerful; you have to work up to big with a design where everything else works superbly, you can't work from big down. Otherwise any advantage gained by size will be hugely offset by the sad fact that the thing moves like a turtle in molasses.

    Mecha become reasonable when they can move and maneuver with the same agility as a human being -- think Eva, which can run, dodge and so on with considerable finesse. (Here's waiting for those carbon nanotube aerogel artificial muscles, by the way.) But since we can't even do that for a human-sized exoskeleton, any effort to build a mecha that's not severely dysfunctional is going to be impotent.

    1. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      They're also approaching the idea of mecha with the assumption that they're an intrinsically good idea. There's a reason why there are no one-tonne bipeds in nature, and no ten-tonne land animals altogether. "Naturalistic" mecha fiction tends to have to come up with contrivances for why they're useful, and they don't often make sense. There was a grand (in-fiction) rant in the "Aliens Colonial Marines Technical Manual" about how "powerloaders" could simply step over obstructions, but the pressure on the feet would cause them to sink on most terrain.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a reason why there are no one-tonne bipeds in nature, and no ten-tonne land animals altogether.

      There used to be plenty.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      And now there arn't.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The T-rex was a very successful animal.

    5. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by discogravy · · Score: 1

      Otherwise any advantage gained by size will be hugely offset by the sad fact that the thing moves like a turtle in molasses.

      Turns out that turtles will probably swim just fine in molasses.

    6. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by internerdj · · Score: 1

      I'm curious if a legged transport might provide more versatility than a wheelchair. It doesn't make sense to cruise to K-Mart in a legged vehicle but for dealing with more rugged terrain or say stairs legs make more sense. The problem I see is we want to make exoskeleton's in our own image. Fine it is a cool technical problem to get a biped to walk but four legs seems to be a fairly stable model in nature and has fewer balance issues. The issue would then be figuring out how to best conserve energy. Practically the energy expended should be lifting the much lighter legs and shifting pairs of legs between active and locked positions.

    7. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...you can't work from big down."

      Like we've done with computers, engines (think steam to gas), lasers, reactors, and a number of other things people have duct taped into such ideas?

      I don't see why using what we have to make something large to prove the concept and then improving as materials and manfuctoring processes improve is such a bad idea. So it'll start out slow. Just means we'll have something to improve on.

    8. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to say that the dinosaurs evolved to extinction? That hundreds of thousands of species, across all continents, at roughly the same time, all came to evolutionary dead ends? That they coincidentally all did this just before a meteor strike that spread iridium dust over everything?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of T-rex?

    10. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason why there are no one-tonne bipeds in nature,

      Currently.

      and no ten-tonne land animals altogether.

      Again, currently. In the past, in a higher oxygen atmosphere, being big, even bipedal, was not a bad thing at all.

      You really need to expand your view beyond the tip of your nose.

    11. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying that being a ten ton living creature that spends most of its time on land wasn't a particularly viable model for long term survival.
      If it were, there'd be more of them (big 10 ton non-aquatic beasts) roaming the lands, but it isn't since there aren't.

      There is that whole meteor thing, but since life started over (I envision some things actually survived - hence the Darwin reference) and none of the big dino's came back when a zillion other life forms did ...

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    12. Re:On mecha, and exoskeletons by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It took about 247 million years for the sauropods to evolve from about the size of an iguana to the 10 ton beasts we all know and love. In the 65 million years since the the "big one", mammals have gone from the size of mice to the size of elephants and giraffes. Give them another 180 million years and they may make it to broto-sized beasts. Sure they aren't reptiles, but that doesn't mean that they won't evolve into 10 ton non-aquatic land roamers. After all, woolly mammoths were reaching that mark at the end of the last ice age.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  16. Isn't this the same guy from before? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    That's been working on this since 2004 and has likely been posting about here before?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  17. Well Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    once a year we have an article about this one on /.

    and once again, not much has changed ;)

    Come on ... we were promised Mecha-style Exoskeleton years ago and still no improvement ? DOH !

  18. Found some videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
  19. Found some videos of it by parcanman · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Why lie when you can just make up stuff and claim it to be true?
    1. Re:Found some videos of it by notseamus · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, nobody mentioned the dual flamethrowers!

      --
      I dreamed of Freud: What does this mean?
  20. Alaska? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Voice module online... audio functionality test... initialized. Designation: Liberty Prime. Mission: the liberation of Anchorage, Alaska. Primary targets: any and all red chinese invaders. Emergency communist acquisition directive: immediate self-destruct. Better dead than red!!"

  21. Demolition Derby? by gringer · · Score: 1

    mecha-vs.-mecha battles, demolition-derby style

    Or Mechwarrior style (character inside robot), or OMF 2097 style (robot remotely controlled by character). Repair costs for those things can be pretty high, even for just getting a few scratches in the battle.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
    1. Re:Demolition Derby? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh! that's what the prize money's for... I always made a healthy profit in OMF 2097 :P

    2. Re:Demolition Derby? by Dexx · · Score: 1

      Set up in a gravel pit or something, cams all over the place with a PPV feed..

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
  22. Red eyes!! by tikram · · Score: 4, Funny

    It has red eyes! It means it's a decepticon! RUN FOR YOU LIVES!!!!!!!!!

  23. Re:It's bloody rusted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy on foot would win, because that big rusted "sculpture" can barely move.

  24. Creators Website by axek · · Score: 2, Informative

    The website for Carlos Owens is http://neogentronyx.com/, where he has a few more photos and other projects...

  25. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    He's probably mad

    Well, yeah, but that's in the job description for all mad scientists.

  26. Dr. Miles Bennett Dyson by amn108 · · Score: 1

    Not exactly a Cyberdyne Systems research object, but a good start :-) Give it a couple of hundred of revisions, and we have on our hands a human terminator with a neural net capable processor, hyperalloy endoskeleton that withstands molten steel exposure and can run at above 60mph for prolonged periods of time and lift objects five times its weight, a plasma fusion reactor for power source good for 200 years of continuous operation, and naturally a very perverse attitude towards all things human.

    1. Re:Dr. Miles Bennett Dyson by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, the amazing thing is that this is some hobbyist's project, not a multi-million dollar research project. The fact that it works at all, or even that it doesn't collapse under its own weight is enough for me to be impressed.

       

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Dr. Miles Bennett Dyson by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You say that as if you think it's a good thing! Turing test: FAIL.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  27. Good to see that's covered. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now Alaska is safe from any potential communist invasion...

  28. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by EdZ · · Score: 3, Informative

    And according to his site, he's managed to spend $5000 on a valve. This guy has been around for a long while, made plenty of wild claims, and demonstrated absolutely nothing. Several times in the past he's attempted to sell this ting on ebay, and failed every time. He's basically a laughing stock.

  29. A great day for (mad) science by ericferris · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, it's a great day for science! Not only we have this news item, but we have an illustration of it too!

    --
    Fantasy: http://ferrisfantasy.blogspot.com/
  30. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He completed and was trying to sell the mech suit like 4 years ago. This story is almost as old as the internet itself. Slashdot's editors are really slacking these days.

  31. I hope he's limited its movement range.. by cheros · · Score: 4, Funny

    If he hasn't built in any restrictions I predict a posthumous Darwin Award the moment the guy tries to absently scratch his nuts :-)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  32. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's probably mad a little progress since then.

    Absolutely. He used to be a raving lunatic.
    Another few years and he should be quite sane.

    (ps: use commas, your sentences are hard to read)

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  33. Doesn't make sense by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Surely in this day of high speed wireless communications, it makes absolutely no sense for the person to be physically "inside" the "mecha", or on the same continent for that matter. Of course I'd hate to see one of these babies turned into a zombie...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Doesn't make sense by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Of course I'd hate to see one of these babies turned into a zombie...

      Redefining "war driving".

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Doesn't make sense by bluesatin · · Score: 1

      Wireless is hardly known for it's fast latency times; lag is bad enough when you're playing a video game, let alone a multi-million dollar mech.

    3. Re:Doesn't make sense by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Wireless is hardly known for it's fast latency times;

            I wasn't exactly referring to your everyday linksys router when I said wireless. I meant "without wires". I'm sure that the same technology that can allow someone in Nevada to fly a UAV and kill 'insurgents' in Paki^H^H^H^HAfghanistan in real time can be applied here. "Lag" should be less of an issue for a stable ground based robot than for something that flies through the air and shoots people. I can't imagine a 20 ton robot doing brain surgery.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, it would be interesting to see what happens if the person inside gets turned into a zombie.

    5. Re:Doesn't make sense by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Mechas make no damn sense!

      There just cool, as is the idea of being inside one and controlling it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  34. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by Fred_A · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This guy has been around for a long while, made plenty of wild claims, and demonstrated absolutely nothing.

    I don't know the history of his project, maybe it's the same guy, maybe not, but any project of that scale that starts with "Working without blueprints" is headed straight for the wall IMO.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  35. Not 18 feet... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Unless Carlos Owens and Theodore Agranat are 9-10 feet tall.

    http://content.zdnet.com/2346-9595_22-11979-2.html

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Not 18 feet... by undercanopy · · Score: 3, Funny

      umm...the shot was taken from a lowered perspective to be able to get the mecha and the people in the frame while still being close enough to discern who they are

      similarly, i'm pretty sure this picture isn't definitive proof that the statue of liberty is only 15 ft tall

      --
      -- D-23994, Muff#2613
  36. Whassup? by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    18-Foot Mecha Exoskeleton

    The first application he has in mind: mecha-vs.-mecha battles, demolition-derby style.

    Time: 4 years

    Cost: $25,000

    Am I the only one thinking this guy has way too much space in his backyard, money lying around, and time on his hands?

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:Whassup? by phrostie · · Score: 1

      i'm thinking i need more spare time and space in my back yard.

      i think he's got it right.

  37. But things 18 feet tall aren't cute! by Fry-kun · · Score: 1

    That's why my Colossal Tammy Tinkle Doll was such a failure.
    Oh, you don't understand me.
    We're finished!
    *runs out of the room crying*

    --
    Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?
  38. Nerfvody. by Tei · · Score: 1

    "Novody would want a battery powered exoskeleton with a 10 minutes charge."

    You probably missed all the Evangelion episodes?

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

    1. Re:Nerfvody. by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Good point those thing had a 5 min battery life

  39. Not for the claustrophobic! by fprintf · · Score: 1

    Despite the open mesh steel frame, this thing is definitely not for the claustrophobic. I am getting chills just looking at how the guy is trapped, er... strapped in there and all I can think about is being stuck if it happens to tip over. I am definitely not a target customer for this thing, then again I probably wouldn't fare much better in a tank or submarine either.

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  40. And when you stand in the cockpit by kaizendojo · · Score: 0

    ...You can see Russia!

  41. Bad weapon, but useful for construction? by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree with you, in the context of a weapon. But consider how useful this could be for construction. The ability to lift large objects (like beams) into position could be quite useful.

    A four-legged version might be more useful, however.

    --
    Place nail here >+
    1. Re:Bad weapon, but useful for construction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! But think, if we used wheels, it could move around much more quickly, and then instead of two arms, maybe just one, but really long, and a counterweight for balance?

    2. Re:Bad weapon, but useful for construction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow sounds kinda like a tank, no?

    3. Re:Bad weapon, but useful for construction? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      The four-legged version would have unfamiliar controls. Maybe two could run a centaur. Start with the power supply onboard and use digital RC to close the positioner loops. Get the man out for safety reasons : a buzzing fly or an itch could spell doom. Pay no attention to the dingbat behind the curtain.

    4. Re:Bad weapon, but useful for construction? by delt0r · · Score: 1

      In construction we call then cranes. Very useful.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    5. Re:Bad weapon, but useful for construction? by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Because nobody has thought of that before.

    6. Re:Bad weapon, but useful for construction? by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 1

      No, more like the exoskeleton shown in the movie "Aliens".

      Your examples are simply existing construction equipment, and are nothing like powered exoskeletons. Thus I contend that your links have little to do with the current conversation.

      My comment was responding to the statements concerning the limitations of exoskeletons as weapons. The article was about a exoskeleton without indication of what it would be used for. But most comments suggest it is a weapon. I'm just pointing out that it could be used for other things. A helicopter is a lousy airplane, but has its own set of uses.

      --
      Place nail here >+
  42. Captain? by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    Captain Mifune, is that you?

  43. Made of wood? by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    Like in Robot Carnival's "A Tale of Two Robots"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdOieEsk918

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdqhD5NAv9w

    "I am Jonathan Jameson Volkeson the Third, no doubt the worlds most brilliant scientist. I will not let the course charted by my peerless intellect be stopped by you or anyone."

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  44. AWESOME!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truly awesome and inspiring. Way to go Carlos!

  45. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by jgtg32a · · Score: 2, Insightful

    True, but that may have just been the author of the article saying that he designed and built it from scratch, he wasn't following any plans that someone else made

  46. Wasilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joshua's Army will be unstoppable!

  47. "Loader-Lifter" implemented in real life by StCredZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By Sarcos corporation. This one is a bit smaller, and has no grippers yet, but the arms and legs function. IN fact, the arms and legs are *more* agile and human-like than in the Aliens movie!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhj3Z9o6t0g

  48. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by Alinabi · · Score: 1

    This seems really familiar.

    Yes it does. What is it with all these monstrosities coming out of Wasilla lately? Is the pollution that bad over there? I say we pitch them against each other and see who wins?

    --
    "You can't allow somebody to commit the crime before you detain them." [Condoleezza Rice]
  49. All it needs is a basket of A-bombs on the back by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then, I'll be ready to invest. Or run. "ALASKA'S LIBERATION IS IMMINENT!"

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:All it needs is a basket of A-bombs on the back by CodeBuster · · Score: 1
  50. Homeland Defense by coaxial · · Score: 1

    Finally, something that can not only see Russia, but also defend us when Putin raises his head over the airspace in Alaska.

  51. Human-agility is possible by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    Mecha become reasonable when they can move and maneuver with the same agility as a human being -- think Eva, which can run, dodge and so on with considerable finesse. (Here's waiting for those carbon nanotube aerogel artificial muscles, by the way.) But since we can't even do that for a human-sized exoskeleton, any effort to build a mecha that's not severely dysfunctional is going to be impotent.

    The biggest limitation of the Alaskan mecha, is that it has no force-feedback. People who can't feel their own limbs, or the resistance of the ground and objects against them are *incredibly* clumsy. So are robots that try to move with no kinesthetic sense.

    Sarcos corporation has developed Haptic Interfaces which give you force-feedback. The military has been working towards humanoid full-body haptic harnesses since the 1970's, actually with really good progress since the 80s.

    Look at the example videos on this page: http://www.sarcos.com/teleop_videos.html

    I like the "Large Dextrous Arm" which is shown holding a freaking anvil like a beer mug.

    There's also Sarcos corporation's "Loader-Lifter" which incorporates those haptic technologies: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhj3Z9o6t0g

    If you had a full-body haptic harness in the abdomen of a giant mecha, with the pilot secured to the mecha's spine at the small of the back, then you'd have a working giant-human agility mecha. The pilot's own inner ear would work as the balancing mechanism! The parts of the mecha's body would be in the same relative positions as the pilot's, including the head. That, combined with full-body force feedback would be enough. The thing would move slowly like the bosses in "Shadow of the Collossus," but they would move like a human of that size would, because you're just translating a real human's movements and kinesthetic senses to a larger and heavier frame.

    Not practical, but it wold be so cool! (And make this Wasilla thing look like a toddler with arms asleep.)

  52. see? by n30na · · Score: 1

    See Kids? Even Weeaboos can achieve their dreams!

  53. Warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should only be operated by those possessing a class two rating.

  54. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at the machine, I don't even think he was following plans he made himself.

  55. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would rather see the development of this.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3JAa9_YcdI

  56. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Where in his post would you place a comma to make it more readable? The only problem I see is the missing 'e' in 'made'.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  57. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by srk2040 · · Score: 0

    Now all it needs is a modified rocket punch and a freaking laser mounted on its head.

  58. So how many... by macraig · · Score: 1

    ... missile salvos can it survive?

    1. Re:So how many... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      From flying giant robots? all you can throw at her~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by besalope · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought Palin used to be the Mayor of Wasila, AK. If so all these monstrosities coming from this small town in the deep North make quite a bit of sense...

  60. Ob Meme by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one... oh nevermind.

  61. Cage match by sxltrex · · Score: 1

    We've got to get this thing together with this guy.

  62. Robot Jox and Robot Wars by mknewman · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows "Robot Wars" with the excellent Barbara Crampton already predicted this. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107979/ It will be buried once the Chinese take over and only brought out to defeat our overlords!

  63. ...for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our Alaskan MechaOverlords.

    Sorry, someone had to say it.

  64. Some kind of frozen water theft... by bosef1 · · Score: 1

    All it needs is a coat of spray paint...

    "Why'd you make him black?"
    "Because I wanted him to be perfect."

  65. I love mechs by geekoid · · Score: 1

    but in all reality they wouldn't work structurally or practically.

    Still, I love me a good robot fight.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  66. Robot Jox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robot Jox for real! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102800/

  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    I don't know the history of his project, maybe it's the same guy, maybe not, but any project of that scale that starts with "Working without blueprints" is headed straight for the wall IMO.

    Well, I have to admit I don't think some of those connections are supported in SDS/2.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  69. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    Talk about *whoosh* ...

    "He's probably mad, a little progress since then."

    Since Fred A is making a joke, and that the guy is probably at least a little 'mad' since you pretty much have to be to make a big metal robot on your own. You know, the stereotypical Mad Scientist type.

    Does this make sense now?

  70. Pleo? by shentino · · Score: 1

    I would like to see a pleo made out of one of these.

  71. Right Place, Right Time, Right Thing... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking the power supply is a small diesel engine from a tractor. There appears to be an over abundance of metal used, but that could be "slimed" down later. What I think is most interesting is the location, a place where Artic Circle Testing could accomplished with little transportation costs. Temperatures at Alaska range from the very hot to the very cold. Just a funny thought, what would it look like if one of the Inuit Tribes were to use it to hunt Whale? That would make an entertaining summer movie.

  72. No, the cat doesn't "got my tongue". by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Any butthole can slap together pipes and hydraulics.

    It's the computer control which turns it from novelty that falls over at the first push or incline into a real machine.

    And then it gets blown up by a tank anyway since it's a sitting duck.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  73. DIY? Nah.. by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Rather than the DIY route, I much prefer to buy my mechas from the dealer's inventory.

  74. Reverse Stonehenge by anagram4mongo · · Score: 1

    Good god! That's way too big. It was supposed to be 18 inches tall!

    Bloody hell.

  75. WOW! Insightful? Really? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    So what are you saying?
    That the robot is actually as tall as the Statue of Liberty only it is really far in the back?

    Take a look at the photos in TFA:
    http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-05/man-machine

    See the giant robot? See its giant head? How about that giant plate across its giant chest and the triangular formation in between the chest-plate and the head?
    Now scroll down and take a look at the other photo.

    See that triangular formation and robot's chin? And the giant human inside the robot?

     
    How about that other photo at ZDnet?
    http://content.zdnet.com/2346-9595_22-11979-1.html

    See the chest-plate and the human inside the robot?
    Also, note that the robot's leg-plates are just slightly wider than human legs and that the distance from the top of the leg plates to the robots chin is about 4-4.5 feet (height of a 6-foot human minus the lower half of the leg) - give or take a couple of inches.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:WOW! Insightful? Really? by undercanopy · · Score: 1

      no saying that at all, saying you're a fool to try and proclaim that PS was lying about the height of the robot based on the height of foreground object in a low-angle shot. (sure we COULD calculate the height of the mecha based on that if you knew the angle and the distances to the mecha and the people from the camera and the height of the people, but we don't)

      We can both look at those pictures all day, doesn't change the fact that they're still perspective shots and that PS is likely far-more well informed about the project than you or i

      Actually, the last picture you linked to lends to the mecha being 18 ft... thanks for helping my case.

      --
      -- D-23994, Muff#2613
  76. Oh and... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Note the human on the left and the barrel on the right?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ploFd9su_n4

    At 1:59 you can see all three in relation to the ground and each other.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  77. Sorry for pointing out the obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is going to fall on him and kill him. Probably due to metal fatigue, or a mistake on his part at some point. Hate to be a downer, but it is probably pretty likely. Look how rusted it is. Also, this isn't new news, it was in popular science months ago.

  78. Palin Home Destroyed by Transformer by bodland · · Score: 1

    Future headline....

  79. Already been done by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    Didn't someone in Wasilla already come out with a smaller more light-weight version of this mecha?

    I think they called it Sarah Palin...

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  80. Robot Jox by rosasaul · · Score: 1

    Ah so Maybe one day we can live in the Future of Robot Jox http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102800/

  81. Good good! by denzacar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Did you even bother to look at the video?
    Like at 1:39 and 2:11 where the guy rests his hand on the robot's "knees" - while standing upright and on the same level as the robot.
    Or when he puts his hands inside it at 2:29 clearly showing that robot's lower half is at about the height of the man's chest.

    Do you have any idea how much is 18 feet? That is nearly 5.5 meters. Height of 3 tall men.
    Or 2 Yao Mings plus a 3 feet tall midget. Or you can just have Yao Ming standing on the table and his clone standing on his head.

    I've rarely seen such obtuseness.
    I truly hope that you are just trolling and that IRL you have better command over your primary mental faculties.
    Cause, you know, it is just no fun trying to point out a logical error to a person of diminished mental capabilities.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  82. I think I saw this movie..... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the one where he builds himself a magnetic source that lays over top his heart to avoid a shrapnel from ever getting to the heart? Until they come out with IM2, i will be watching this one closely

  83. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by kayditty · · Score: 0

    No. How does "He's probably mad, a little progress since then" make any sense?
    Perhaps something like "He's probably mad--a little progress since then [when?]" would work better, but it's still missing something.

  84. Re:Damnit, that looks awesome. I want a video of i by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

    Question is will it have an AI so it doesnt need a pilot? If so will it be renamed to Liberty Prime with a mission to free Anchorage?

  85. Use mechas for construction work?! by hvidstue · · Score: 1

    To me construction og repair work in larger scale is the most obvios use for a mecha. Often cranes, bobcats, dumpers etc. is too static in their funktionality. Mechas being multi-funktional is idéal as a working machine.

  86. Serious Efforts Elsewhere by violettheconqueror · · Score: 1

    Just to mention a serious effort is underway to build a 20+ft high mecha. They actually have funding and trained engineers, as well as the computer systems to back it up, not just a bunch of hydraulics and prayer. Theirs may not be fully built, but at least when it is it will walk and not fall over like this guys. They are called MPS (Mechanized Propulsion Systems) and they have buisness plans for it. Check out their website they have a ton of information www.MechaPs.com