Slashdot Mirror


The Worst US Cities To Work In IT

bdcny7927 writes with an excerpt from CIO.com to inspire some caution before your next job switch: "IT workers have their choice of many great US cities for work and play (Atlanta, Chicago, Seattle), but what are the cities that you probably should avoid? Here's a very unscientific, highly subjective and unapologetically snarky list of our least favorite US tech job locales."

93 of 538 comments (clear)

  1. Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, I don't really believe that. I just always wanted to see what that sentence looked like in print.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Skreems · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was surprised to see Atlanta on the "good" list myself.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    2. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow... I'm from Detroit and I laughed so hard when I read that. When people ask me what I thought about my time there I always tell them that "Detroit is a great place to be" then pause a minute and add "from."

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    3. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My reaction has always been that any place that needs to advertise that it is a good place to work/live/start a business is probably a horrible place to work/live/start a business

    4. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Altus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yea, but seriously, Boston is a bad place to live because the sports teams win? That's pretty fucking weak.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    5. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by gr8_phk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sure, they show a picture of some crappy neighborhood in the city. Just north, Oakland county is one of the richest in the nation. The other suburbs are just fine too. Let's set Detroit aside for a moment and consider Michigan in general. Some points:
      1) We've got more coastline than California - and it's fresh water.
      2) We've got 4 seasons (which is good or bad depending on your preference).
      3) More second homes than any other state (most on the water).
      4) We've don't get earthquakes, hurricanes, forest fires, termites, poisonous spiders/snakes.
      5) We do get the occasional tornado, but far less than most of the midwest.
      6) Education: we've got plenty of geek-schools.
      7) Manufacturing. Does anyone care? We can build anything here - tech included
      8) We've got an enormous set of technically capable people just waiting for companies to set up shop here.
      Outside the 139 square miles of Detroit, Michigan is a paradise compared to a lot of places.

    6. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by TheJorge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a commuter who rides the train that feeds Fenway, I can say that's a major detriment. Nothing like 30 minutes in a packed train with sweaty drunk fans to end your day in the office 2-3 times a week.

    7. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They point out the high real estate prices (legit point) but they are high because everyone wants to live here.

      If he doesn't like all those winning teams then I'm surprised he didn't also take a shot about having too many good schools (Harvard, MIT, BU, BC, etc).

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    8. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That should be Michigan's new state motto "Aside from Detroit, we're great!" ;-)

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yea, I don't believe that, sorry. Unless you were getting utterly raped on rent. Housing in ATL is retardedly overpriced. I hope the bubble bursts another 10 times. 920k for a house in brookhaven, when I pay 580 in rent literally right down the street is stupid. You'll never recover your costs anywhere near the city. Renting is cheaper right now...in every scenario I calculated.

      And buying is a gamble unlike renting. You are not guaranteed anything once you buy. I've seen areas like Duluth go from being nice suburbs to overrun with outward moving inner-city trash. Your foundation may split, you could have a water-runoff problem, or a thousand other issues like termites. What guarantee are you referring to?

    10. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking as someone who moved from CA to MI, and who has also lived elsewhere in the country...

      1) We've got more coastline than California - and it's fresh water.
      ---Yes, but I prefer cliffs and the ocean. Still, the MI coast is very nice. I wish that there were mountains here in MI, though. It's so incredibly flat, except for the UP, which is rather remote. In CA you have the ocean on one side, then some 2-4k foot tall mountains, than 2-3 hours to the east are 10-14k peaks. CA also has rain forests, and deserts. I miss the variety.

      2) We've got 4 seasons (which is good or bad depending on your preference).
      ---Winter: Very few people go outside. Plans that involve any travel have a 1/5 chance of needing to be changed unless you are willing to drive on uncleared roads. Many drivers don't think that tailgating should be put on hold when the roads are icy, so there are major delays (okay, only around Detroit) due to countless accidents.

      --Spring: Once it stops snowing, things are gray and muddy for 1-2 months before anything green appears. Then plants suddenly appear and they do it with a vengeance. I marvel at the explosion of plant life. The green part of spring lasts about 1-1.5 months before...

      -Summer: People spend all their time in the sun and complain (in my town here) about how cold it is whenever the 90% humid air drops below 80 degrees F. Having been deprived of sunlight all winter, many people have an obsession with it now. An odd side effect that I see all across the mid-west is the popularity of tanning salons, and of the very dark tan worn for as much of the year as possible. It leads to a lot of 30 year old people looking 45 because of skin damage.

      -Fall: 2-3 months of beautiful weather. My favorite time of the year here.

      3) More second homes than any other state (most on the water).

      -I'm not surprised to hear this. Nearly everyone I know here has a house "up north"

      4) We've don't get earthquakes, hurricanes, forest fires, termites, poisonous spiders/snakes.

      -No termites, really? I think we do have latrodectus variolus (black widows). We do get flooding, both widespread and localized to a basement when the "sump pump" dies. I'd never even heard of such a thing before I moved here.

      5) We do get the occasional tornado, but far less than most of the midwest.

      -There are half a dozen tornado warnings here each summer, but only one tornado near town every 30 years.

      6) Education: we've got plenty of geek-schools.

      -Ann Arbor has a great school (and is a great town). In terms of high schools, I'm a bit less positive. My significant other taught some college classes here and found that a lot of students, even brilliant students, had never written a single research paper in high school. Students who were smart enough to go to any college but who didn't know their way around a bibliography or citation were wronged by their schools. We spoke to some high school teachers who said that the state curriculum dropped research papers when the No Child Left Behind Act appeared. A lot of high schools still teach research papers, but a lot don't, because it's no longer a required topic by the state. I think that's a mistake.

      7) Manufacturing. Does anyone care? We can build anything here - tech included

      -I wonder how hard it will be to retool factories that have been closed for years to accommodate new goods.

      8) We've got an enormous set of technically capable people just waiting for companies to set up shop here.

      -That's absolutely true.

      Thinking MI makes me sad. I'm definitely an outsider (and in my oddly insular little area I've heard people from elsewhere referred to as Outsiders with a capital O), but I've found enough to like that I've got some affection for the state. I hope that the plans to revive the state with green industries work, but I worry that the decay of places like Detroit may not stop.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    11. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by RandCraw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice, fair minded assessment.

      I've lived in MI (Midland, Kazoo, E. Lansing, Ann Arbor) for half of my life (50 years), and have a love/hate relationship with her. Other than the six months of gray skies (Nov-Apr), it's the most livable place I know (vs. PhillyPA, WashDC, SouthernVA, ChampaignIL, & HoustonTX). I'd return to A2 in a minute if I could find interesting work there.

      One more bennie Michigan has that the OP forgot to mention:

      9) SLASHDOT

              Randy

    12. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Boston is one of the best places to live.

      Great schools, excellent job (and education) opportunities, good startups and VCs (especially tech and in the Cambridge area), great food and diversity, beaches that are short drives away, great public transportation, easy access by train or road to a lot of other places in the New England/NY area, plenty of outdoorsy activities etc.

      And of course, good scenic weather (if you're into the New England weather) and a landscape that's mostly lush green and beautiful.

    13. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Boston is one of the best places to visit.

      Fixed that one. It's not affordable, and the weather and traffic suck. I don't care how great a city is--if a family of three can't afford a house with more than 1200 sq. feet and a fenced yard, it is automatically disqualified from the "best" places to live list, especially with bad weather and traffic.

    14. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Altus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally, as an IT geek who isn't even making above the local average for my trade, can afford a single family 1,200 sq foot house with a fenced yard (and a garage) that is a mile away from a subway line.

      If I was willing to live further outside the city it would be cheaper.

      Of course I don't have a kid to support so if your talking about 1 person supporting a wife and kid and a house then you do have to move a bit further into the suburbs.

      As for living in Boston itself, your right, that's really expensive, but then almost nobody lives "in" Boston because it is a commuter city. Its also very very small, most cities in the US have a land area that is equal to the entire Greater Boston Area.

      Boston is expensive, but the pay is good. Also, housing prices are way down from where they were 5 years ago when the market was totally crazy.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    15. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by $criptah · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not 100% true. The problem with Boston and its greater area is age. The metro area was designed with nothing in mind. As a result a simple commute can turn into a nightmare if something goes wrong. there are not too many alternative routes once you get downtown because of the one-way streets that will exercise your patience to the point of no return. Also Boston is home to thousands of free-loading college students who make commutes on Friday and Saturday nights even more painful.

      I lived many blocks away from Fenway and yet every game turned my community and traffic around it into a clusterfuck. I worked next to AT&T stadium in SF and the side effects associated with each game were nothing compared to what I've experienced in Boston.

    16. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Vancorps · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Coming from the north east, Vermont specifically I can understand the thought process behind considering $1500/month for 1000 sq ft to be a good deal.

      Most people that live there have no idea how cheap housing is in the south west. Here in Scottsdale, AZ for instance I have a 2400sq ft house with a pool for $1200/month and I'm paying above the average right now! So yeah, gimme three months of the suck weather for 9 months of fantastic weather. I remember the ole saying from Vermont. 9 months of winter, 3 months of bad skiing.

      Of course all this is combined with the fact that bandwidth is hella cheap here and Peoria even has a pilot program from broadband over powerlines. Of course fiber is available in a great number of homes here in the valley now as well which is even more fantastic.

      I'll drive four hours to spend a weekend in San Diego on the beach rather than choose to live close to it where everything is expensive. Of course 4 hours also puts me in Rocky Point, Mexico which is a fun spot too, so any given weekend I can feel like I'm taking a vacation which is something I never felt living in Vermont.

    17. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Vancorps · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean those crazy girls? No thanks! Of course I'm a bit jaded considering I had a girlfriend that went to GSU who was anorexic but really wanted to have a kid! Needless to say that relationship didn't last too long although the saying is true, crazy in the head, crazy in bed! Woohoo! For like a week

    18. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, and to quote a friend, the only two good things in Dallas are good restaurants and good strip clubs.

      To me, a 1000 sq ft apartment is plenty big. If I had a house, I'd have to worry about a garage, about garbage disposal, doing my laundry, gym and pool membership, maintenance and ad infinitum. An apartment or a condo? Compact, and all those amenities are usually part of the package. Hell, the place in Cambridge is 400 sq ft and that in itself works just fine.

      Besides, it's not just the summer (and honestly, I'd rather spend all 12 months having a Boston winter than a single week of Dallas summer). Dallas just looks and feels very superficial. You can perceive character and depth to some cities, and I don't feel that in Dallas.

      Boston has age and character, and there are a ton of things to do - art galleries, museums, book stores, music concerts, public libraries, sailing, climbing etc. Hell, if you are still bored, just take a train to New York over the weekend. I mean, there are *things* to do. This is probably one of the few places where if you walked into a book store in Cambridge, the guy working there could offer you a discourse on Jean Paul Sartre or John Stuart Mill or a barista talk to you about theoretical comp sci (real incidents both).

      Boston (and specifically Cambridge) also feels very, very entrepreneurial. A lot of my friends doing startups, using their graduate thesis to get seed funding, working for VCs etc. And there is a lot of youthful energetic feel, which is inspiring - and which reminds me of the Silicon Valley.

      Hell, even the bumper stickers tell me more - one place is full of religious mumbo jumbo and right-wing political stickers, while the other has bumper stickers along the lines of "I stop for aliens!". Go figure.

  2. Urban jungles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've never seen one proper city that didn't feel like a very suffocating place, full of busy little bees who have no idea what it is to take the time to smell the roses. I could never live in one. Any ideas about which suburban or rural areas are good/bad to work in for IT jobs?

    1. Re:Urban jungles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Austin/Round Rock area is nice. It's growing fast, but your still never more than a few minutes away from a field of cattle. They're also building big assed roads out here, without the traffic to fill them yet. Seriously, the DOT budget here must be _insane_.

    2. Re:Urban jungles by mh1997 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any ideas about which suburban or rural areas are good...to work in for IT jobs?

      Yes, but I won't tell at the risk of turning it into

      a very suffocating place, full of busy little bees who have no idea what it is to take the time to smell the roses

    3. Re:Urban jungles by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As opposed to the cities that smell completely like public restroom at a cheap bar? Actually New York was rather nice when I went there. The nothing going on part is true in some places but the problem with most cities is everything that is going on costs big bucks. Have you seen what theater tickets cost? A night at a club? Even a lot of museums are charging these days.
      It all depends on what you enjoy doing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Urban jungles by Malc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would you live somewhere that requires you to have a car? What a crazy idea. I live in one of the larger cities in N. America and get around on foot or bicycle. It's at my pace. I live life at my pace - smelling the roses, or not. 5.30pm, minutes after finishing work... I'm sailing and chilling on one of the biggest lakes in the world.

      I've just got back from five months in Australia. In many ways, Melbourne is very similar to Toronto. I lived 45 km away from the city centre in SE suburbs. Never again. What a horrible way to live. Everything we wanted to do was 30 minutes min., probably 60 minutes drive away, on a highway. Talk about rushing around, not smelling the roses, and not actually doing anything. I loved my time in Australia, but I will never live in suburbia again. Out of the city is incredibly boring, and a dreadful lifestyle.

      Each to their own. Some people like it. I don't. I'm looking forward to moving to Europe's second biggest city later this year...

    5. Re:Urban jungles by adonoman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Canadian winters are what make the summers so enjoyable! If you don't get at least two weeks below -40, you don't savor the two week of summer as much as you should.

    6. Re:Urban jungles by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've never seen one proper city that didn't feel like a very suffocating place, full of busy little bees who have no idea what it is to take the time to smell the roses. I could never live in one.

      If you have a car: Yes

      If you walk and take public transportation: No

      I used to be stressed all the time living in a city with over 5 million people simply because of the horrible traffic everywhere all the time.

      So, one day I decide to get rid of my car. I got a job closer to home and now I take the bus everywhere and I feel less stressed and have more money.

      I still visit friends (though I have to plan accordingly) and I can always rent a truck if I need to move anything big.

      Overall city life ain't bad when you don't have to drive in it.

      Though, word of warning... Your city needs to be made for public transportation. I don't think Atlanta or LA is going to be friendly for that.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    7. Re:Urban jungles by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that half the people in Clearwater are Scientologists.

    8. Re:Urban jungles by twistedsymphony · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I love the city because of how much is going on, lots of interesting hole in the wall places to hang out, meet people, do interesting things, etc.

      I live in a rural area though and here's why: I decided that I want a few things out of where I live:
      • a garage where I can work on my cars
      • an office where I can work on my electronics/computer projects
      • a home theater room big enough to support a projector, proper surround sound and seat a half dozen people comfortably

      I bought a small house in New Hampshire and work in IT for a manufacturer, the pays not the best, the jobs not the best, but I'm satisfied with both of those and I get to live in the home I wanted for relatively cheap money. I'm walking distance (half mile) from my local down town which certainly isn't as happening as any city to be sure, but there are some restaurants and small shops. My house is surrounded by trees, I have a large back yard with a patio where I can have bonfires and cookouts. It's got a guest room where friends can visit and spend the night and if I really want to catch a show in the city, it's a little over an hours drive to Boston...

      By comparison a friend of mine, same age, same vocation, lives outside of Boston makes about 20K more a year than I do, but his condo was close to THREE times what I paid for my house (nevermind the condo fees and taxes), and it's smaller than my college apartment. Even though he's paying city prices, he's not walking distance from anything, had has his car broken into a number of times sitting in the lot outside his condo, and for what?

      My company has a division in LA and they've tried to get me to move out there a number of times, the cost of living increase isn't worth what I'd be sacrificing... I've lived in the city, and I've lived in rural areas... there is a lot of middle ground, the key is figuring out what is truly important to you and finding the middle ground that suites your needs.

  3. No way by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish I would be transferred to Alaska. The hunting and fishing is great. There is room to breath. A man can raise a family in a manner more suitable to the American ideal. The commutes cannot be any worse than the suburbs of any major US city.

    Sign me up!

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:No way by causality · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wish I would be transferred to Alaska. The hunting and fishing is great. There is room to breath. A man can raise a family in a manner more suitable to the American ideal. The commutes cannot be any worse than the suburbs of any major US city. Sign me up!

      I hope you already have a family going then, because Alaska has a terribly unfavorable male-to-female ratio. Unfavorable if you're a man, that is. Otherwise I do agree with you.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:No way by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Plus you get paid to live there by the Federal government. Of course, night life is somewhat limited and then there's always the Sarah Palin thing.

      The mistake this article makes it the classic one of assuming that IT folks (a) all want the same sort of things from life and (b) need to live within commuting distance of work. In reality, we cover the spectrum pretty well from TINKs to nuclear family members to shit-crazy Unibomber types to living in our mothers' basements.

      My fondest hope is to eventually work myself to a point where I can telecommute regularly and just live within an hour or two of a significant airport (aka, I need to be valuable enough to get away with this).

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:No way by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uhm, no.

      Alaska has a ton of oil and very few people. The Alaska Permanent Fund is an endowment created by the state government that sets aside approximately 25% of the state's proceeds from mineral sales.

      The dividends from this endowment are then divvied up and paid to the people living in the state.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    4. Re:No way by TeamSPAM · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the proper acronym is DINK - Dual Income No Kids. This led me to come up with the SINKING acronym for an old coworker. It stands for Single Income No Kids Incredibly Needy Girlfriend. :)

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    5. Re:No way by winomonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Alaska is actually a pretty great place to work, and Anchorage isn't too bad. If you are keen on doing contract work, there are more than enough big-oil and government gigs to keep local shops hopping (and hiring). If you like something perhaps a little more noble than working at an hourly rate for the oil man, there are some interesting shops up here doing software development. Want to work for a 10-year-old internationally-known telehealth company? We are hiring .NET ninjas at present. Nature is accessible ... or, more accurately, unavoidable. There are five moose that frequent the lake near our campus throughout the winter months. I can ski five miles from my house to the backdoor of my office and only cross two small side roads due to our extensive trail system. My boss takes about a month off each fall to shoot large animals to provide winter food. Fridays are good days to take off early so that you can get some fishing in. We have a growing (but still young) downtown scene. First Friday artwalks, bike co-ops, art studios, some great microbreweries, a decent hockey team (Brabham Cup and Kelly Cup winners), a horrible arena football team, rollerderby. Winters can drag on a little long (but, as the article mentions, we get less snow than upstate New York), but the summers are phenomenal. Everyone should come work in Alaska (or at least two more senior developers).

  4. Gary Indiana by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

    makes Detroit look like Paris.

    1. Re:Gary Indiana by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pretty much. There's nothing quite like that thick yellow smog that hangs in the air over Gary, or that lovely smell of sulfer and despair that reminds you "Yep, this is Hell. Enjoy your visit from the safety of the highway or the train, and thank your lucky stars you don't have to get out."

      "Detroit" proper certainly sucks, but it's never really had an IT infrastructure to start out with. Outside of Compuware, high-tech jobs just don't exist there. I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that those 440+ IT jobs in "Detroit" are postings from Livonia or Novi, which is about the same as equating a job posting in Simi Valley with one in Compton.

      I worked IT for a Community College that serves Detroit. By far the most dysfunctional IT organization I've ever seen. After getting hired, the first thing my boss told me was "I can't believe they hired you, you're not related to anybody here." Dozens of redundant administrators with no real job function other than drawing a paycheck, a single, insanely flaky DNS and AD server (located downtown) serving 5 remote sites that would wipe out connectivity across all campuses when it went down. I finally started SSH tunneling all of my traffic to my home connection so I could at least keep myself entertained. One of my favorite moments was when one of the network administrators was on site and I showed him what I was doing. His first question: "What's SSH?" By that time, I wasn't even remotely surprised. I was slightly surprised when I saw that job posted internally after the same admin moved to a different role. Starting salary: 65k. A junior admin with no skills whatsoever pulling down that kind of money. God only knows what his bosses made...

      I was finally "indefinitely laid off" (no one ever got fired, downsized, rightsized, or had their position eliminated. You were simply placed on indefinite lay off. I heard of people getting called back to their jobs 5+ years after they got laid off) by the "Senior Associate Vice president of human resources", and yes, there were associate VP's of HR, VP's of HR, and a President of HR. If you were in the HR department, you were some form of Vice president. Or you were a secretary who was assumed to be boning and or related to his or her associated vice president. I had two weeks vacation and was told that I had a signing bonus from the union contract (Yep. Union IT. The union was equally incompetent) coming to me upon my "lay off." I was paid 8 hours vacation (the payroll system was never, ever right. They said I had 8 hours, they paid me 8, and sent me to one of the dozens of voicemail boxes that never got checked.) and told that the bonus didn't really apply to me due to a quirk in the rules.

      So I walked away with a day's pay instead of a month's, and I framed the letter. I use it as a reminder of how crappy an organization can really be.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  5. Bozeman MT by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where until recently, your passwords were government property.

  6. The complete list by Whatsisname · · Score: 5, Informative

    The list for people that don't like slideshows:

            1. Detroit, Mich. - Jobs available: 449
            2. Bentonville, Ark. - Jobs available: 81
            3. Cleveland, Ohio - Jobs available: 211
            4. Syracuse, N.Y. - Jobs available: 49
            5. Tie: Boston, Mass., and San Francisco, Calif.
            6. Anytown in Alaska - Jobs available: 24
            7. Orlando, Fla. - Jobs available: 235
       

    1. Re:The complete list by jimbobborg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I find it funny that Boston is on both the best and worst list.

    2. Re:The complete list by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it funny that Boston is on both the best and worst list.

      I recently was in Boston for the first time on business. I thought it was a great city as there was plenty of good food and night life as well as viable mass transit. Unfortunately there were the downsides too. I thought the city was "old" and "dirtier" than what I am accustomed to in Minneapolis and I definitely didn't feel terribly safe wandering around by myself at night. Would I live there compared to Minneapolis? Probably not but do I see why it's on both the best and the worst, yes.

    3. Re:The complete list by paazin · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought the city was "old" [...]

      Well, considering that it's one of the oldest cities in the US, not a really big surprise.

      [...] "dirtier" than what I am accustomed to in Minneapolis and I definitely didn't feel terribly safe wandering around by myself at night.

      Like most places, depends on where you are. Some sections of the Boston Metro area are pretty bad (Roxbury, I'm looking at you) but even in some of the "dingy" areas of the city (where many of the university students live) are actually quite safe and have a good amount of interesting culture and unique qualities you wouldn't find in the midwest or many other US cities.

    4. Re:The complete list by the+phantom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Too little water and you die of dehydration. Too much water, and you drown. Is water a good thing or a bad thing?

      Perhaps the implication is that a city needs to have the occasional professional sports championship in order to be a good place to live, but that if it racks up too many championships, it becomes unlivable again. I have far less trouble with this assertion than I do with understanding why professional sports matter at all vis-a-vis the quality of a work location.

  7. Southern Utah.... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where a BS in CS or CIT makes 9 bucks an hour and an illegal migrant housing framer makes 30.

    1. Re:Southern Utah.... by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stop complaining and buy yourself a hammer

    2. Re:Southern Utah.... by rhsanborn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The funny bit is that they don't much mention anything about IT. It's almost all about the environment. Alaska has moose, and Syracuse gets too much snow, and Detroit is Detroit, etc, ad nauseum.

  8. Highly subjective is right. by ageoffri · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd gladly take a position in Alaska. Wide open land with relatively few people. No overbearing State government that can't balance the budget, not much of an immigration problem up there either. Thanks to the oil revenues residents get checks from the State. About the only thing I would miss is being able to take the t-tops off on my Z28 even occasionally in the winter and pretty much all summer long.

    If I had to name a State as worst State it would be California. Land of tax and spend with no fiscal restraint, holder of first county to declare bankruptcy and likely first State to go bankrupt. Of course the single biggest reason to avoid California for me is that about 3/4 of my firearms are unconstitutionally deemed illegal by the State.

    --
    -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    1. Re:Highly subjective is right. by eln · · Score: 3, Insightful

      California's problem is not all the "tax and spend liberals", it's that it has the most boneheaded system of government ever devised. It's Constitution is huge and unwieldy, and can be changed by a simple majority vote. Its government can't do anything like raise taxes or cut spending to balance the budget because the referendum system blocks them from doing anything that's unpopular with 51% of the voters.

      California is a great study in why populist democracy is a lousy way to run a huge and complex state.

    2. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Rolgar · · Score: 2, Informative

      At what point did Reagan or Bush Sr. have a Congress friendly to spending cuts? Answer, never. The House of Representatives was majority Democrats all 12 years they were in office, and the Senate for 6. Even then, it's very difficult for any democratic government to actually cut taxes, because of the people who would lose 'their' job, and complaining from the vocal constituents who feel entitled for the outrageous handouts the government gives. We should have it be mandatory that all departments (other than Defense and Revenue) should have their existence be re-approved every 4 years, one year after the election. Make the departments justify their existence for the funds spent. (Maybe it's a bad idea, and we'll certainly never see it happen, but at least it would be a change, right?)

    3. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I had to name a State as worst State it would be California. Land of tax and spend with no fiscal restraint, holder of first county to declare bankruptcy and likely first State to go bankrupt. Of course the single biggest reason to avoid California for me is that about 3/4 of my firearms are unconstitutionally deemed illegal by the State.

      As a New Jerseyan, I am absolutely insulted and appalled that you think there's a state in this great nation more corrupt than us!

    4. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Funny

      I will go corrupt official toe to toe with you. You can have your Tony Soprano wannabes, and I'll put the city of Detroit against your whole exit ramp infested state! Hell, Monica Conyers has more corruption in her little finger than any five state or local officials you can find.

      The gauntlet has been thrown down!

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    5. Re:Highly subjective is right. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dude, it's a 2/3 majority, not a 3/4 majority. And far from "not listening to the People", the initiatives system makes California one of the most responsive to the will of the People. Which is exactly why they're in so much trouble.

      People: We demand that $2B from the general fund be set aside for the education of small puppies.

      Government: OK. That means that uncommitted revenue drops by $2B. We'll have to cut teacher's salaries by 14%.

      People: Idiots! Why do you hate children? We demand that teacher's salaries be increased 5%, not cut.

      Government: Okay, but we'll have to cut housing assistance.

      People: Why do you hate the poor? You may not cut housing assistance.

      Government: We'll raise taxes, then.

      People: We demand that all tax increases be approved by 2/3 of the state senate.

      Government: You do know that means taxes will never go up again, and that you're allowing a tiny, intransigent minority to run the state off a cliff, right?

      People: Why don't you respect the will of the People?

      Prop. 13 has butchered California. Prop. 13 was a conservative brainchild. Congratulations, bozo. You and yours just wrecked 1/5th of the the economy. But I suppose you think your state will be so much better once the schools shut down and Prudential is buying ad space on El Capitan.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    6. Re:Highly subjective is right. by EricTheGreen · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see your Michigan and raise you my Illinois.

      You're complaining about a piddly-wit mayor? Of our two most recent ex-governors, one is up the river and the other is likely joining him in a couple years. Our junior senator essentially bought his way into the job and got caught. And that's before we even bring Mayor "Chucky" Daley and his bankrupt-the-state 2016 Olympics and endemic "pay to play" city infrastructure contracts into the mix.

      I feel bad for the agony being experienced by MI right now, but you're not even in the same league as the Land of Lincoln in the corruption department. And be grateful for that...

    7. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Second that you felt the need to butcher Reagan's name.

      In all fairness, I butcher Reagan's name whenever I can, mostly to counter the roving band of tards trying to name every building in DC after him. He was a mediocre president, not a saint.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:Highly subjective is right. by scottv67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Then I had a 97 V6 Camaro

      Please accept my most sincere condolences.

  9. What? by qoncept · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a worthless list. What did anything they talked about have anything to do with IT?

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:What? by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean besides the sports teams? What geek doesn't pick the city in which he wants to live based on how their sports teams are doing there?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:What? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What a worthless list. What did anything they talked about have anything to do with IT?

      Totally. I want to know which cities have the best (fastest/cheapest/least-restrictive) broadband to the home and have good/free muni-wifi. Which ones have a Fry's or the like, which ones are in states with low/no sales tax and/or don't try to impose "use tax" for mail-ordered toys. Which states don't require fingerprints to get a driver's license. Which cities have a "university culture." Which ones have cheap electricity for the server farm in my basement.

      Those sorts of things are a lot more specific to IT people than the weather and sports franchises.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:What? by iamhigh · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's CIO.com, nothing they talk about has anything to do with IT!

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    4. Re:What? by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Madison WI. No, seriously. Huge 'university culture', lots of middle/big town conveniences, a liberal city/county government and a moderate state government. I don't know about the broadband situation but I would imagine that with the number of students and young IT people in the area it's probably above average. I don't know what you call 'low' sales tax, but the state rate is 5%.

  10. Alaska is nice - if you can keep a job by heffy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wouldn't mind working in Alaska - lots of fresh seafood, cheap real estate, small town feel - if I can be sure my job is secure. Just like working in IT in some small midwest town, there aren't many options for switching jobs if you need to switch. How many large companies are hiring if you're an Oracle DBA in Alaska?

    That's the beauty of Silicon Valley. I can work at a company for a few years and move to another, similarly-sized company at a higher position without much hesitation or worry. There are hundreds, maybe thousands of small companies looking at hiring IT folks. That kind of job security is what makes California much more appealing than a smaller city.

  11. San Francisco by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love that San Francisco made the list -- I was just thinking last night about how I love everything about San Francisco except for the idea of living there. I'll take the Oakland hills any day and twice on Tuesday.

    I'm starting to wonder about California overall. The entire state is slowly sliding downhill (and not in a earthquake-into-the-ocean sense) thanks largely to the proposition system where any shitheaded idea can be made law by a simple majority vote -- I mean, if you ever need evidence that direct democracy is a terrible idea, look no further than CA.

    Institutionalized gay bashing? Check. Costly mandates we have no way to pay for? Check. And then there's my personal favorite, a short-sighted effort to limit property taxes whose only real effect is to hurt younger people just starting out and drive the schools into the shitter? You know it.

    I mean, maybe having worked with users for all these years, it's a little more obvious to me that people are (by and large) stupid assholes, but I feel there's enough evidence to convince any reasonable person at this point. Which is why we still have the proposition, I suppose.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:San Francisco by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Exactly how does that hurt young people?"

      Proposition 13 keeps the taxable value of a property at or near its value at the time of sale. An older couple who bought their house in the 1960s for $20K pays very little in property taxes, even as its value goes up to the $400K range.

      This means that the last people to buy into the real estate market (read: young people) shoulder the bulk of property taxes.

      It also pushes the tax burden away from businesses, who are more likely to hold on to properties for several decades. Also, if a company wants to get rid of a property, they can deed the property instead, retaining technical ownership without triggering the re-evaluation.

      It also pushes the tax burden away from the rich (who are far more likely to own property) and towards sales taxes which hit the poor harder. Since younger generally equals poorer, that also hurts young people.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    2. Re:San Francisco by Skyshadow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what you're calling defining marriage now? So it's cool for 3 or 4 or 5 people to "marry" each other (yes, it will lead to that, people are doing it in other areas of the country). Got it.

      It's called gay bashing when you disagree, but it's called tolerance when I disagree, right? I have to tolerate it while you can just call me a bigot, right?

      Prop 8 changed the state constitution to take away the right of gay people to get married. It was a purposely and specifically targeted assault on the rights of a minority.

      You want to "protect marriage"* from all the horrors of those icky homos who have the gall to love each other and think that they deserve the same legal protections that those of us who happen to love members of the opposite gender are entitled to, then that's your right. But don't sit there and act all offended because I called a spade a spade -- there's absolutely no logical reason why the government should not allow gay people to get married, ergo you're a bigot for supporting removal of their rights.

      * And what a great phrase that is, eh? I love how it implies that marriage is somehow under assault, like it's going to change somehow if we allow 'dem queers to get hitched. Thing is, though, I sure didn't notice a change in my marriage when same-sex couples were getting married at city hall....

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  12. I live in Orlando and it's not that bad. by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, so I have lived and worked in IT in Orlando for the past 10 years and on top of it all, I work from home. Trust me on this, there is nothing that beast working out by the pool in January in T-shirt and shorts and a cold one.

    And climate, well.. for 9 months of the year, the climate is perfect, warm and not humid. For three months, July-September, it's hot and humid and that is also the peak of hurricane season. But I prefer 95F and an occasional hurricane over months of waist deep snow and below zero . Hacking ice of the windshield before freezing on my way to work is way too overrated!

    Not to mention that I can see each shuttle and rocket launch from my living room!

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  13. Bentonville? by shystershep · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish they'd enlightened us as to some of their 'subjective' reasons for their choices. The Northwest Arkansas metro area (Fayetteville, Springdale, Bentonville & Rogers) regularly makes the top ten of 'best places to live' lists. It's not New York, if that's your thing, but then they listed Boston & SF, too, so WTF?

    --
    The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
  14. In this economy... by DesScorp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...the worst cities are those with no jobs. The best cities are the ones with jobs. If you want to pay your bills, you go where the jobs are.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  15. What kind of list of worst cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    doesn't include Troy, NY? Or Urbana, IL? Or Waco, TX?

    Or how about Washington, DC? Hint: IT guys are low on the totem pole, and politicians, lobbyists, and AOL execs let you know it.

    And San Francisco is a BAD place to work? Sounds like these guys sampled the local flora. Hint: if it really did suck, real estate prices would be as in Detroit or Cleveland. And if traffic really is the issue, what about Atlanta, Dallas, and Los Angeles?

    FWIW, Cleveland and Pittsburgh aren't THAT bad. And yes, I do mean it. It's been 40 years since the Cuyahoga burned, and it's actually kinda nice now. As is the Erie waterfront.

  16. Snarky indeed... by merc · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live and work in San Francisco and quite frankly I love it. I've never experienced any of the issues the article claims plague our city (I'm not sure what iJacking is, but my eye sockets are just fine).

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  17. Already done by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live here, and I've got a friend who works for SourceForge ... I'm not sure in what capacity, though. There's definitely a demand for people with technical skills. There's also ample opportunities for infrastructure development if you're interested in the hardware side of things. The state is working pretty hard to improve broadband access (http://www.newsminer.com/news/2009/jun/21/fairbanks-representative-hopes-highlight-lack-alas/ and http://www.newsminer.com/news/2009/mar/16/internet-companies-hope-stimulus-boon-bush/).

  18. Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is all you need to know, math guys: Syracuse holds the title for the U.S. city (pop: 50,000+) with the highest average annual snowfall (115 inches), besting even Anchorage, Alaska (114 inches). It also has a bit of a problem with Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) due to all that snow and not a lot of sunshine. It's called the Salt City: A good thing, since there's all that snow and ice on the roads.

    Available IT jobs in Syracuse (as posted on June 18 on Dice.com): 49

    I'm tired of seeing people endlessly trash Upstate because of what they read about the winter. What the summary doesn't tell you about the 115 inches of snow is that you rarely have more than 10 inches on the ground at a time; the weather trends for this area lately have seen snow coming primarily on the leading edge of warm fronts in the winter. The result of this is of course you'll shovel your driveway on Monday and then put on sunglasses and a very light coat by Wednesday. In reality every winter in Upstate New York has been near-record warmth for the past several years, and after the short winter season (only about 3 months in reality) the rest of the year is temperate.

    That said, the economy of Upstate New York does leave something to be desired; but that can be said for many other parts of the country as well.

    But I might be brought to disembowel the next person who reads about Upstate New York and then trashes it over weather that they have not experienced for themselves.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The other point to note is that in my experience (in Rochester, NY), upstate New York actually knows how to handle snow. The roads are clear and safe to drive 99% of the time, with plows deployed the moment snow starts sticking. Contrast with, say, D.C. or Seattle (both of which I've experienced) which regularly run out of salt, fail to plow many streets for up to a week, etc. And of course, the drivers in D.C. and Seattle don't know how to deal with snow/ice: at the first flake, ancient reptilian instincts cause them to drive straight into trees, jersey barriers, other cars, etc.

      So yes, there's more snow, but it's not an additional inconvenience, as long as you don't mind the cold in the first place.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    2. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pffft. If people cared the facts, we'd have little to talk about here and action movies would be 10 minutes long.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  19. I'll speak up for Cleveland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having worked for 4 different tech companies in Cleveland, I'll speak up for it. Cleveland does have a few things going for it if you're in the tech sector.

    There's good higher education to hire from (CWRU (of which I'm an alum) and CSU (from which I've had a couple of excellent co-workers)), good cultural institutions (Cleveland Orchestra, Cleveland Museum of Art, Playhouse Square, The Cleveland Playhouse), good restaurants, affordable housing, decent enough public transportation, and bearable traffic. There's also a national park within about 30 or 40 minutes of downtown (Cuyahoga Valley National Park).

    The tech sector is a little small, but it's fairly close-knit as a result of that. I don't think you need 6 degrees to get from anybody to anybody else. One or two is probably sufficient.

    While the professional sports teams are perennially frustrating, that's not what I look for in a city. At the end of the day, a city is what you make of it. Cleveland comes with a lot of big city perks without a lot of big city hassles.

  20. In this economy any IT job is a good job by Ex-Linux-Fanboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    In this economy, any IT job is a good job.

    Of everyone who was in my circle of friends working in the IT and computer industry in the mid-to-late 1990s, the only people who have jobs today are in middle management. Not one non-manager I knew back then and know today is working today in the tech industry.

    I became an ex-pat, teaching English, translating documents, and helping with the Windows machines in an accounting office in Mexico. I would like to return, but there are just no jobs stateside where I want to live right now.

    One friend saved enough money to semi-retire; he, right now, is living with his family to minimize expenses and off of savings. He's not really sure he even wants to return to the industry; the last job he had a couple of years ago left him really burnt out.

    Another friend lost his job at a video game company in the late 1990s. He never got hired in the tech industry again, and is currently living off of a military disability pension, paying his debts and planning on returning to college.

    These are my luckier friends. Two friends, who have families to raise, both very recently lost jobs in the tech industry and have no idea when they will get work again. One is living off of savings and is really scared when he will get a job again. Another didn't have as much savings, had to leave the apartment he was leasing, and is currently shacked up with a buddy who lets him sleep in the extra bedroom in exchange for computer help; his wife and kids are living with their family.

    I am sure either one of these guys would accept a job in Cleveland or Alabama or anywhere else where the company is willing to pay them enough to support their family.

    It's a really scary time to work in the tech industry. If you have a job, and it pays enough to support your family, thank the lucky stars you're still working. Not everyone is as lucky as you right now.

    1. Re:In this economy any IT job is a good job by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lucky stars? My ass. I thank the hard work, diligence, years of earning a rock solid reputation and maintaining social contacts.

      The stars can kiss my ass.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:In this economy any IT job is a good job by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Of everyone who was in my circle of friends working in the IT and computer industry in the mid-to-late 1990s, the only people who have jobs today are in middle management.

      Not surprised. The 1990s drew in tons of unqualified unprofessional people into IT. Anyone who could install ICQ and reboot an Win98 machine got some kind of job by clueless hiring managers. These people didnt develop professionally, they didnt finish school, they couldnt write a basic admin script, didnt know any OS9 or OSX let alone any linux, and they didnt know much outside of the most basic level 1 support tasks.

      Ive met these people and they really dont belong in the industry. Im not saying your friends are these people but there might be some overlap here. The culling in the last few years has sent a lot of people who dont belong in IT back to school or in different industries where they belong. Its more competitive now and when I mention, say, ssh I dont get a clueless look from the guy Im talking to. Having to work with unqualified bullshitters isnt desirable at all.

  21. Come to Alaska! by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 2, Funny

    We'll throw "might get mauled by a moose" for free!

  22. Missing by waterlogged · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Washington D.C. The entire metropolitan area is one big mess. I have to plan my WEEKEND trips to the grocery store with severe traffic in mind. The area/weather/people are nice enough. However, with the addition of the commute times, I am basically holding down another part-time job just to get to work and back. I work 10-12 hour days just to avoid sitting in that mess for 3-4 hours a day.

    --
    I couldn't fail to disagree with you any less.
  23. Popular myth by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 4, Informative

    That was true during the pipeline construction era, but it's far closer to 55-45 male/female now. Funny how a rush of 50,000 male construction workers will skew the demographics of a state with a population of fewer than 300,000 (in the '70s) people.

    1. Re:Popular myth by Ironica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was true during the pipeline construction era, but it's far closer to 55-45 male/female now.

      That's still pretty unfavorable. It means that if every woman hooks up with a guy, there's still 10% of the population that's single and male.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    2. Re:Popular myth by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remember, you haven't lost your girlfriend, just your place in line.

  24. They missed a couple by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Informative

    My personal worst list:

    • Memphis, TN - The capitol of North Mississippi. Grimy, dirty, backward city with one of the highest crime rates in the country. Not even tourists want to go there anymore. Redbirds Stadium is a great place for a ball game but entertainment outside that sucks ass.
    • North Platte, NE - If there's a place that can make Memphis look attractive, it would be that hell hole of a city.

    I agree with Bentonville. Wal-Mart has to outsource development because it's such a crappy place to work and then you have to live in podunkville, AR, for the privilege of working in a crap shop. Their turn over is high and even the really good people I know who have worked there hated it.

    Even with the economy in the toilet there are too many good opportunities out there to be stuck in a dreary job.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  25. Orlando by Knowbuddy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've worked in IT in the Orlando/Central Florida area since 1996. It's not that bad. It's not some perfect Utopia, but nor is it one of the worst places to work.

    The Good

    • One of the cheapest costs of living, especially if you don't mind commuting from the burbs.
    • No state income tax.
    • Hundreds of miles of beaches within 90 minutes in almost every direction.
    • More theme parks than you can shake a stick at, most of which offer cheap annual passes to Florida residents. (True story: I used to live across the street from Universal, and would get up at 8am to go ride the roller coasters for an hour before work.)
    • Wide variety of cultures and food, so if you've got a craving for it, you can probably find it within a 10 minute drive.
    • Winters are beautiful and cool.
    • Rails-To-Trails has converted many miles of old railroad tracks into running/cycling trails. My favorite trail is a half-marathon long (13.1 miles) one way, with only 2 lighted intersection crossings.
    • The IT program at the local university (UCF) isn't bad, and is very tech-worker-friendly with its online options. Many of the local community colleges even offer certification programs (such as A+, CCNA, Oracle, and even RedHat) in both day and night school.
    • Shuttle launches are awesome and you can see them by walking outside. Yeah, they're going away in a few short years, but they're still awesome.

    The Bad

    • It's a commuter town. Get used to driving everywhere. The public transport (GoLynx.com) is laughably bad, especially for IT workers. (The buses don't run useful schedules near the tech areas such as Heathrow.)
    • The nightlife continues to decline, and many local lawmakers continue to nail down the coffin lid.
    • Yeah, we occasionally get hurricanes. Sometimes more than one per season. But they aren't nearly as bad as what you see on TV, and we don't panic like other places do. In most cases we shut down the town for 24-48 hours and then go right back to work.
    • The blue-hairs. Yes, they really do drive as bad as you've heard. Yes, they do get out and vote for things that will make you cry.

    The Ugly

    • The heat. Today it is 95F with a heat index of 109F. And it's not a dry heat. It is an oppressive, sticky, walk outside and break into an instant sweat kind of heat.

    The tourists aren't that bad, unless you are hanging out in the tourist areas. Which you aren't going to do after your first month here.

    In all, there's more good than bad.

  26. Walmart has among the most advance retail IT by peter303 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thats how they plowed into being the world's number one low-price retailer. They move a half trillion of product a year and know where most of it is any anytime to the single item. I not interested in business IT, but I have to admire their results. (Maybe they should have used some of that dough to hire style consultants like a Martha Stewart.)

  27. With a grain of salt... by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After reading TFA which brings a tie between Boston and LA as awful places to work, the link right below this article entitled "Where the IT Jobs Are: 10 American Cities" lists BOTH Boston and LA.....

    Just for reference, the article from this thread is from June 18th or so while the second article praising cities for IT jobs is from May1st.

    Although the original article mentions both places as a heaven for IT geeks, it also warns against the quality of life in the areas....or maybe I'm just trying to find the silver lining?

    --
    A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
  28. They forgot ... by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Redmond, WA.

    Yeah, mark this as flamebait. But sometimes its not about how many jobs are available, its about the quality of the work. I don't see anything attractive about a career that involves having to clean up after the 800 pound gorilla.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  29. Re:Just an awful list. by Skapare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember that these articles are written by people who have only a passing interest in IT or technology. They like and buy gadgets. They never choose the OS their computer runs. They have no clue what geeks really like (for example quality import or locally brewed beer, instead of massive quantities of major brand junk).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  30. Big market bias by buckeyeguy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Top 10 list of "where the IT jobs are at": all big ad market cities. You can't pay me enough to move to Chicago, EVER, much less for a job, but it's on the CIO darling list.

    Bottom 7 list: small/mid-market and rust belt cities. Way to dig deep, CIO.

    Sure, Cleveland has it down side, but compared to the 'top 10 cities for IT jobs' that they also have a slideshow for, the place is WAY cheaper to live in, and if you're smart you're not living in the city anyway, when a nice clean house in the nice clean burbs is dirt cheap. Plus if you get overworked and have a heart attack, head over to the Cleveland Clinic; they'll patch you up real good.

    So people from SoCal, how's LA to work IT in, what with the crappy traffic and screwy government?

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  31. Re:Cleveland doesn't suck. by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 2, Informative

    Were building. Residential and commercial vacancy and foreclosure rates are very high, among the highest in the nation, throughout the entire region.

    There are a few positives, if you can land a job: commuting is tolerable; culture is good for a city its size; cost of living is fairly low. Some of the suburbs (e.g., Lakewood, Cleveland Heights) are quite interesting and livable. Reasonably good healthcare. A handful of great colleges (CWRU, Baldwin Wallace, Oberlin). If you have very marketable skills and can mostly avoid the central city, a great quality of life is possible here.

    But the negatives absolutely abound, especially in and near the central city. No large IT shops left. Small and shrinking middle class (consisting mainly of tradespeople; very little gainful employment of knowledge workers). Random violent crime against ordinary people (not just gang violence, and not confined to the inner city). World-class corruption at city, county, and state levels. Pervasive air and water pollution. Among the country's worst schools, in a country not known for good schools to begin with. Little sunlight. High rates of depression, thyroid problems, and various cancers. Low life expectancy. Very low average household income and wealth by developed world standards. Severe racial segregation and very poor race relations in general. Crumbling infrastructure. Bridges that are literally falling into the river, but cannot be closed for lack of any alternative. Public transportation limited to city-to-city or suburb-to-city commutes, while of what few jobs remain very few are in the urban core (most are in suburbs unreachable by transit). Rapidly aging population, well over national average levels of obesity and chronic health problems, mostly caused by pollution and/or poverty. Competes every year to top lists of poverty; always makes top 10 lists for crime. Entire streets boarded up and essentially abandoned. Most inner city neighborhoods ruled by thugs and/or organized crime. I could go on but I think you get the point.

    I'm still lucky enough to have an IT job (for now at least) but if not for that job, plus most of my family being here, I'd have left long ago, probably for Eastern Europe where I also have family connections. Cleveland epitomizes just about everything that is wrong with this country. Both the causes (irresponsibility, entitlement mentality, government-worship, racial and economic prejudice, provincialism, anti-intellectualism) and the effects (poverty, disease, ignorance, near total lack of upward mobility, and the overwhelming feeling of hopelessness and resignation). It could be fixed, if enough people cared enough to act, but they don't, so the only real chance anyone has to better themselves and their families is to leave if they possibly can.

  32. Re:LAZY! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did I miss it? When did the "top ten" list get watered down to "top seven"? Too lazy to dig up three more crappy towns?

    In this economy, all internet posts are being cut down by 30%. Or more as in

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  33. Boston: worst and best at same time? by Kostya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They sarcastically slam Boston, but then list it as one of the 10 cities where "all the IT jobs are". So make up your mind already.

    And as someone living in Boston, screw you and your list :-)

    --
    "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
  34. The inverse is true as well by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I was planning to move here to Denver, I had countless people on forums tell me how annoying it is that it's sunny all the time, how you have to practically ration your water, and other tales of woe. Only had one come right out and say that the residents don't want other people moving here (particularly Californians who drive up property values).

    --
    Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
  35. Re:Ageism anyone by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They don't typically post pay rates. But it isn't unusual to also see them demand expert knowledge in six or seven obscure and unrelated technologies, I'm sad to say.

    Still, if experience requirements mean anything, it is very unusual to see a job posting willing to hire anyone younger than 35 or 40. You can say anti-old-people-ageism exists, but all of my experience suggests the opposite.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.