Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Offer Windows 7 On USB Thumb Drives?

Barence writes "Microsoft is reportedly considering offering Windows 7 on USB thumb drives to allow netbook owners to upgrade their machines. Windows has, until now, only been distributed on DVDs or via download. However, netbooks don't have optical drives and the Windows 7 ISO weighs in at 2.3GB, which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap."

259 comments

  1. It's Amazing by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's amazing what kind of viruses you find on USB sticks these days!

    And Microsoft chases OLPC once again.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:It's Amazing by Jurily · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Virus or not, Windows must be getting pretty good if this "data cap" shit is all they can come up with. The last Linux distro I downloaded weighed in at 4,3 Gb and it was nowhere near complete.

      Yes, I know, there's Geexbox with its 20 Mb, but that's not a full OS.

    2. Re:It's Amazing by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The last Linux distro I downloaded weighed in at 4,3 Gb

      Installed size? Or disk size? Because many distros include hundreds (thousands?) of software packages that are not part of the default install.
      Often, software types that MS would get into deep trouble for bundling with windows.

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    3. Re:It's Amazing by Jurily · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hint: 4,3 Gb is the capacity of a DVD. And it was compressed with squashfs, too.

    4. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Microsoft chases OLPC once again.

      Regarding MSFT chasing OLPC...not. Microsoft has been experimenting with putting Windows on USB sticks for a few years. The only question for them is whether it makes business sense. OLPC is hardly innovating in this regard.

    5. Re:It's Amazing by clang_jangle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The last Linux distro I downloaded weighed in at 4,3 Gb and it was nowhere near complete.

      No version of Windows I've ever seen is "anywhere near complete". You have to download 3rd-party drivers and software, unless you don't plan to do anything but play minesweeper.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    6. Re:It's Amazing by Korin43 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ubuntu fits on a 700 Mb CD and is just as completely as Windows. Maybe more because it comes with Open Office.

    7. Re:It's Amazing by clang_jangle · · Score: 0

      No, the net installer is what fits on a CD. Most of the software is downloaded from online repositories.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    8. Re:It's Amazing by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      Like third party security programs, office software, communication software, anti-spyware, cd image burning, dvd playback, file transfer software, secure web browser...the list goes on and on.

      Linux distros like debian and ubuntu come with everything windows does and more in terms of role. You can argue the programs are worse, but in terms of tasks...yeah.

      Glad microsoft is finally following in unetbootin's steps with the USB deployment. This way if I ever went insane I could install Win7 on my x61.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    9. Re:It's Amazing by anjilslaire · · Score: 1

      Not true. You can install a full Ubuntu desktop from a 700mb CD, and never connect to the internet.

    10. Re:It's Amazing by cawpin · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, you get a fully functional system off the CD, perhaps minus some oddball drivers. It is no less than Windows. Net access is not required for the install.

    11. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all of Ubuntu were on the 700 MB CD, there'd be no need for apt repositories. God, what morons!

    12. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every available packages does not fit on the CD. But there is a fully functional, installable OS on the CD with no immediate need to access online apt repositories. If you bothered to read the preceding posts rather than just insult their authors, or, God forbid, actually look at what come on the Ubuntu CD, you might have picked that up.

    13. Re:It's Amazing by gigabites2 · · Score: 1

      No, the net installer is what fits on a CD. Most of the software is downloaded from online repositories.

      The net installer is a 10MiB iso image that you can download here. It's a twist on the Debian net installer. You choose what to install. The idea is not to waste bandwidth downloading a 700MiB or 4300MiB iso. On the other hand, if you do not have an ethernet connection or your connection is, for some reason or other, unreliable, you can download a LiveCD with the standard packages (I dare say, more than is included in the 2300MiB Win7 iso) or an alternate CD aimed at advanced users or users of lower-end computers. If you're so inclined, you can even download a DVD image with some more obscure packages included. Hell, you can easily make or buy a snapshot of the repositories if that's what floats your boat. Stating that the net installer takes up 700MiB on the disk is quite plainly incorrect, however. Quite ironic given your signature.

    14. Re:It's Amazing by Larryish · · Score: 1

      If anyone has a big box of working 128 meg and 256 meg thumb drives to sell, please email larryish-near-gmail-dot-com

      I am willing to pay on delivery, or trade out some tasty bits and bobs that I have in the workshop.

      Sorry for the off-topic post, but I need a few dozen small USB sticks for an electronics project and haven't been able to find any on eBay.

    15. Re:It's Amazing by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      I have Windows 7 installed on my x60 and it went fine with a USB CD/DVD drive.

    16. Re:It's Amazing by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      I didn't get the dock.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    17. Re:It's Amazing by dov_0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've tested a lot of Linux distros, but most of the leading distros seem to fit on one 700mb CD. Full OS with a good suite of applications.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    18. Re:It's Amazing by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Ubuntu inside 700 MB isn't really the point, now, is it?

      Because Ubuntu today at 700 MB is both a far cry bigger than an OS was years ago, and a far cry smaller than many otherwise viable alternatives. Conclusion? OS's are getting bigger every year, and this won't stop any time soon.

      And Optical drives are *not* getting bigger to match. Sure, there's Blue-Ray DVDs, but they just aren't getting the play in the marketplace that we all thought they would. In the dozen or so computers I have, NONE of them have Blu-Ray drives. I've never cared enough to ask for one. In fact, disk-media is, if anything, losing marketshare overall. My most recent computer didn't even come with an optical drive at all - it was understood that the O/S would be loaded by USB media. In my case, it was by an external USB DVD drive, but it could have just as easily been a USB flash disk.

      Just the other day, I saw 2 GB USB flash disks at Office Depot for just $6.99 at the front counter, retail. It's not like they are expensive. But in a way, USB flash is far cheaper still.

      See, I can switch from a 1 GB flash disk to a 16 GB flash disk with ZERO additional hardware cost. I don't have to buy a new drive, I don't have to add any hardware. I don't even have to be running the latest USB 2.x/3.X ports, I can access the latest 16 GB of data with my old P3 over USB 1.x at a whole 1.5 Mb without any problem other than the slow transfer rate.

      USB / flash is the perfect medium for distributing installation media, because it is both cheap and can be whatever size is needed to "get the job done". And it would be easy to set a bit in the USB disk to disable write access. In short... perfect!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    19. Re:It's Amazing by aztracker1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if they added any of that stuff, they'd be in court again... There's a free (beer) security suite MS recently announced, though I'll keep nod32. MS would probably love to include a "Lite" version of Word. Then again, OOo is available for win too. CD burning (images too) are in Win7. Nothing built in for file xfer, but there's always Filezilla. IE8 on Win7 is sandboxed, which is better than other browsers on any OS currently, which run in full user context. IIRC messenger is included as well. I'd prefer a functional gui base OS that lets me easily add what apps I want. PC-BSD is really nice in hat regard. Win7 is really nice in that regard. Also, downloading Win7, OOo, an av-suite, Filezilla, and six months of updates probably still takes less bandwidth than a typical gui linux distro and six months of updates. Not to mention you're still downloading all those apps for 8nix, they're just attached, and many installed even if you don't want them. The fact is, this is simply a flawed argument to begin with, given that MS is very restricted in terms of adding applications with windows. I don't use most of the default apps as it is in windows and in my linux distro of choice (Ubuntu), so I have to download a bunch of crap anyhow. A single month of updates to most linux distros for a usable gui desktop are bandwidth killers as it is.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    20. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Like third party security programs, office software, communication software, anti-spyware, cd image burning, dvd playback, file transfer software, secure web browser...the list goes on and on.

      Linux distros like debian and ubuntu come with everything windows does and more in terms of role.

      Wouldn't that be because Microsoft gets sued every time they add a program to Windows?

    21. Re:It's Amazing by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've always wondered if anyone in the linux world was going to develop bindiffs for package updates. Of course, you have either chaining or n^2 necessary things to cache, but it might safe some bandwidth if implemented intelligently.

      As to updates, Microsoft's updates every Black Tuesday are bandwidth killers too, I fail to see any significant difference here to be honest. If you have a linux box with little installed it will have low update needs. If you have a lot installed it will be high, but when you include all the third party updates you have to mess with on win, I find it hard to believe you come out far ahead either way.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    22. Re:It's Amazing by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      However each month of updates can easily overtake that amount. It's really a stupid point to argue on. *insert linux distro* is more complete... *win-version* would get fined if they added all that functionality (anti-trust bs). *linux-distro* takes a ton of bandwidth for updates. So does *win-version*.

      The fact is, Windows has gotten to very stable and secure, with a fairly consistent & pretty UI. OSX is a really consistent UI on top of a stable unix core, (actual security is debatable). linux is a heavily fragmented UI-inconsistent set of applications on a moderately stable unix-like base.

      Other than diversity in library options, and the gpl mindshare, linux doesn't have much to offer for most people. I like linux. I don't like Apple or MS much at all regarding a lot of their business decisions. But lets face it, these fanboi arguments are asinine, and mostly based on dated information.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    23. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is a fully functional, installable OS on the CD with no immediate need to access online apt repositories

      That would depend on your hardware and software needs. It isn't the absolute fact you seem to think it is.

    24. Re:It's Amazing by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. A lot of distros, such as OpenSUSE, will distribute a DVD but not install every program on the disc at once. Most installations only use a fraction of that, unless you specify to install everything in a mad rush.

    25. Re:It's Amazing by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Debian can be icompletely nstalled with less than 700 MB, as can Ubuntu. Just saying.

    26. Re:It's Amazing by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      USB / flash is the perfect medium for distributing installation media,

      I agree. The only issue are old motherboards that can't boot off of them.

    27. Re:It's Amazing by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu fits on a single CD. I haven't added more than one or two extra Gigs (in terms of packages I've pulled in over the net), and that's primarily for techie development libraries that they've no reason to put on an end-user install disk.

      Hell, the full install comes with Perl and Python, what else do you really need?

    28. Re:It's Amazing by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      The argument isn't about Windows reliability or completeness. Well, it's slightly about completeness. But let's look at this for a second:

      Microsoft's idea of a very small, stable core is 2.3 GB.

      Ubuntu fits not only a small, stable core, but also everything the average user needs, into 700 MB. (With the obvious exception of certain codecs it cannot include for legal reasons.)

    29. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put a FULLY INSTALLED Ubuntu 9.04 on a stick awhile back. Here's how to do it. http://pkill-9.com/wordpress/?p=51

      Secure, portable operating system.

      Wayno

    30. Re:It's Amazing by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      AndMS doesn't include desktop applications and tools it can't for legal reasons... The fact is that neither provide a complete system, that's completely usable for most people. Also the original media size doesn't account for actual install space, or other updates needed in the months that follow. As to the size, it's relative, there are far smaller versions of windows with a lot of the functionality in the embedded space. Silverlight offers a lot of the .net functionality in a far smaler size. They (MS) are also providing 10 years of 32bit application compatibility that you don't get in Ubuntu.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    31. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doin' it wrong.

    32. Re:It's Amazing by Temposs · · Score: 1

      Fedora implements this. They call them "Delta RPMs". A link and a quote for you:

      http://geeks.pirillo.com/profiles/blogs/fedora-11-review

      A lot of Leonidas' improvements are under the hood, much like Snow Leopard will be. Tighter integration with YUM and Package Kit means that it installs software faster than Apt which Ubuntu and Debian use. It also has a feature by default called Yum-Presto. Which has been available since Fedora 8 and openSuSE 11. Yum-Presto creates Delta RPMs which contains only the changed code of an update. Downloading only what has changed, not the Whole file itself. What differs from the Ubuntu update system is that Yum-Presto does not require special .debs for updating. It just scans the RPM on a configured server and the Code on your computer and complies the difference. While the Ubuntu way of doing it is that special .debs have to be built by the developer to take advantage of this. Another feature of Yum-Presto is that when you install software, it can use code already on your computer so you can save bandwidth installing software too.

      --
      Knowledge is just opinion that you trust enough to act upon. -Orson Scott Card
    33. Re:It's Amazing by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      I play Freecell you insenstive clod!

    34. Re:It's Amazing by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      Neat, someone should port that to apt.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    35. Re:It's Amazing by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu sometimes also has a DVD release. It may just be limited to LTS versions, though.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    36. Re:It's Amazing by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      So that you can use it as a repo. It does not install a larger desktop than the cd version.

    37. Re:It's Amazing by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      They (MS) are also providing 10 years of 32bit application compatibility that you don't get in Ubuntu.

      You mean that you don't need with Linux.

    38. Re:It's Amazing by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      It won't happen on Linux but if you check deeper, Adobe Reader install which produces 220 MB sized (add more to updater) .app files on OS X is 20-30 MB in size.

      Why? They have licensed inosso technology which basically re-creates data on the fly while installing. Obviously, it can run on Linux if wanted/paid etc.

      What I try to say is, there is almost no meaning on the install medium/download size. .CAB alone is a excellent, heavy weight compressor and perhaps MS can even license that inosso technology (or stuffit from Smith Micro) and come up with 256MB installer fitting to IE embedded download/install. It won't make Linux something worse.

    39. Re:It's Amazing by Pigskin-Referee · · Score: 0

      Open Office is nothing more than a striped down version of MS Office. Yet, it has been shown to use even more memory while being far less useful less.

      BTW, MS Office does NOT come with the Windows OS.

      --
      Pigskin-Referee
      Linux: Yesterday's technology, tomorrow ...
    40. Re:It's Amazing by Jurily · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ubuntu fits on a single CD. I haven't added more than one or two extra Gigs

      Nice definition of "fits". I can understand that there's no room for development files on a newbie CD, but by that reasoning, where's mplayer then? And why do they ship a music player that can't play mp3?

    41. Re:It's Amazing by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      apt-cache show debdelta

      Description: diff and patch utilities which work with Debian packages
        debdelta is a program suite designed to compute changes between
        Debian packages. These changes (debdeltas) are similar to the output of the
        "diff" program in that they may be used to store and transmit only the
        changes between Debian packages.
        .
        This suite contains 'debdelta-upgrade', that downloads debdeltas and use them
        to create all Debian packages needed for an 'apt-get upgrade'.
        It may be used in a Debian/unstable host (to speed up download of new
        packages), or in a Debian/stable host (for security updates).

      The thing is that what delta updates save in bandwidth they save in complexity and cpu power, apt-torrent is similar and hasn't really taken off. Even on fedora I got the impression that people weren't amazingly keen on using it.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    42. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you've been living under a rock all this time, either way, you should read up on the legal issues of bundling those codecs alongside the distro.

    43. Re:It's Amazing by Bombula · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Not complete? No shit.

      I downloaded Windows 7 RC and for most stuff it's actually fine - I'm using it as I write this. Not unbelievable, but quite good ... once it's working. Fast, pretty stable, all that stuff. But some serious problems getting it working.

      First, the activation key didn't work for me. I did it all legit: downloaded and installed W7 from microsoft.com, created a live.com ID, got the activation key, pasted it in and "we're sorry, the activation key you entered is not valid for this version of Windows". Just plain broken shit, no excuse.

      Dude, if you can't fucking get your basic shit together, why wouldn't I just use Ubuntu? With Linux, if it doesn't work at least I have the consolation that it's free.

      It's like test driving a prototype Chevy and the fucking _key_ doesn't work. Pro Tip 1, you moron engineers, the FIRST thing you make sure works on a new car/OS/whatever is the FUCKING KEY.

      The comedy continues. There's also a bug in the W7 RC that causes the OS to crash when running installer packages off CDs ... from Microsoft... So I, like hundreds of others, had to do a reg-edit hack to install MICROSOFT OFFICE. http://windows7news.com/2009/01/21/fix-for-installers-and-updates-crashing-in-windows-7/

      Pro Tip 2, you FUCKING IDIOTS: before you release a new OS for testing, the second thing after making sure the FUCKING KEY works is to make sure YOUR OWN FUCKING SOFTWARE WILL INSTALL ON IT.

      Seriously. This is stupidity on the "I forgot to put my pants on before I went to work this morning" level.

      --
      A-Bomb
    44. Re:It's Amazing by walterbyrd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The last Linux distro I downloaded weighed in at 4,3 Gb and it was nowhere near complete.

      Try Ubuntu.

      BTW: the 4.3 GB distro was not "Linux" but Linux with a lot of applications.

    45. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow the shit that passes for comedy on this site.

    46. Re:It's Amazing by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1

      Wait, I thought that all the OS was supposed to do was be an OS, and that by adding anything extra, Microsoft was being a monopoly. But now, if they don't add everything that you would ever want to use on a computer, it's not a complete OS?

    47. Re:It's Amazing by gpsxsirus · · Score: 1

      I've installed Windows 7 serveral times on a few different machines and I've not had any issues. No need to download drivers or anything. Windows Update often finds newer versions of drivers, but the drivers on the install disc have worked without issue for me.

    48. Re:It's Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG you had a rare problem with pre-release software you got for free? The fucking horror.

      I can tell from the tone of your post that no one really likes you. You should cry it out alone more often, then you'll stop looking like a jackass on the internet.

      -----

      This comment paid for by Microsoft.

    49. Re:It's Amazing by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      In RE: your 93rd rule of slashdot (sig for those who have them turned off):

      USB CD-DVD drives are not uncommon... I have two on my desk at work...

      But yeah, a dock does make life easier, no?

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    50. Re:It's Amazing by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      But yeah, a dock does make life easier, no?

      So does linux. Unetbootin, pxe, etc. Also I figured that win7 would have usb install in an attempt to get netbook users, so it wouldn't be an issue.

      Apparently windows installer does support pxe boot, but you need some business server thingimie. I didn't look into it too carefully.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    51. Re:It's Amazing by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      A couple things: 1. Ubuntu contains a complete functional operating system for normal people. It has a browser, a couple media players, an instant messenger, solitaire, and an office suite. That's really all most people use. It may not seem like it to you, but that's because you're on Slashdot. The only thing any of my friends would have problems with is lack of Windows games, and that's unrelated to anything about how big or complete the install is. 2. Ubuntu updates are massive because the entire system is updated (and it comes with a lot of stuff that updates frequently). If Windows updated all of your programs (and your programs actually had updates), you'd be looking at similarly sizes. 3. When you're talking about UI inconsistency you shouldn't be comparing all Linux programs. KDE (qt) and Gnome (GTK) are going in different directions. However, the default Ubuntu install is very consistent (all GTK programs). As for install size. I dual boot Windows XP and Ubuntu 9.04. It's hard to tell how much disk space Windows is using (because of installed games, my documents folder, etc), but my entire Linux partition has 3.5 Gb used with every program I need. Windows Vista uses ~15 Gb and doesn't even come with an office suite (and Office 2007 takes over a gigabyte of space).

    52. Re:It's Amazing by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      And I forgot I was in HTML mode..

    53. Re:It's Amazing by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      The media players out of the box don't support the format(s) most people have their media *in*... My point is, they are both pretty much comparable in terms of overhead. As to windows games, Wine, and related projects actually do a decent job in terms of compatibility, all thee misc card games my mother in law, and grandmothers play run fine under WINE. I like linux a lot, I'm simply making the point that if you include the updates, they are definitely comparable in terms of overhead. And neither comes with a fully enabled system out of the box.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    54. Re:It's Amazing by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu automatically installs all of the codecs you need. It's annoying, but codecs aren't included for legal reasons, not space concerns.

    55. Re:It's Amazing by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      And with Windows only using about half of the available space on a single-layer DVD format that it targets... Productivity applications aren't included for legal reasons, not space concerns.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    56. Re:It's Amazing by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, there is a 32 bit compatibility layer for Linux, and while you usually don't need it, certain programs still aren't being released as 64 bit binaries. It's really not a point for either OS as Windows 7 64 bit does this too (and I think Vista does, but I've never installed it).

  2. Pirated USBs by Tippu · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there any pirated USB sniffing dogs?

  3. Good. by revxul · · Score: 0

    I think this is a very good idea.

    Reusable FTW!

    --
    Truth, Just Us, And Hatred For All Mankind!
    1. Re:Good. by C18H27NO3+ · · Score: 1

      Reusable or not I'm sure they factor in the cost of the media when they come up with the pricing.

    2. Re:Good. by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Gee, how very evil. Or are you suggesting something else?

  4. I encourage this trend by chebucto · · Score: 4, Funny

    The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    1. Re:I encourage this trend by revxul · · Score: 1

      Oh that would be excellent!

      --
      Truth, Just Us, And Hatred For All Mankind!
    2. Re:I encourage this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that you mention it, how much would it cost to bulk order 10MB USB flashdrives? This seems to have a possibility of happening.

    3. Re:I encourage this trend by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not if they send out 64 MB thumb drives. :P

      By the way: Does this still happen in reality? I haven't seen their CDs for a decade.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:I encourage this trend by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!

      Until you find out they are read-only.
         

    5. Re:I encourage this trend by gsmalleus · · Score: 1

      The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!

      Why would anyone need that many thumb drives?

    6. Re:I encourage this trend by NotBorg · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. Even if they were only 64MB, the fact that they are not read-only makes them much more interesting than their coaster counterparts. If they were just as prolific as the CDs were... I could see many interesting if not amusing projects springing up to make use of them. Sure they may not be turned into a solar arrays but I could still see them being used in other arrays.

      I don't know what the practical limits are to chaining USB hubs and devices. I don't really care enough to find out. On the other hand, if AOL started popping out millions of USB devices it would probably be a much more interesting piece of information.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    7. Re:I encourage this trend by NotBorg · · Score: 1

      And... who says 64MB isn't enough to be interesting? ----> http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    8. Re:I encourage this trend by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why would anyone need that many thumb drives?

      RAID.

    9. Re:I encourage this trend by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It could be like floppy disks once were - they were cheap and plentiful enough that you could give them to someone and not have to worry about getting it back.

    10. Re:I encourage this trend by theeddie55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A USB host controller can support 127 devices.

    11. Re:I encourage this trend by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just put tape over the tab and you're good to go!

    12. Re:I encourage this trend by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Now all we need is old Iron Eyes Cody to be standing by the highway, crying over a pile of USB sticks.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    13. Re:I encourage this trend by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!

      Though flash drives list no specs other than the size, there are a lot of variables. I think a flash drive used for software distribution could be optimized for low price that it would suffer on writing or have the writing circuit totally removed to make it only possible to read from.

      These flash drives would make for as good a removable storage as CDs made for coasters.

    14. Re:I encourage this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!

      Why would anyone need that many thumb drives?

      Some geek you are. Yeesh.

      By order if the elder geek counsel, turn in your geek credentials, hat, commiserative pen, pocket protector, starbucks mug, star trek slogan shirt, and Underwear at the door.

    15. Re:I encourage this trend by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I expect the drives will be read-only, otherwise it would be a support nightmare.

      You can actually install Vista from a USB drive without any hacks. On a quick flash drive it is much faster than from DVD. You can do it with XP too, but it requires special USB drivers that cannot be legally obtained without a copy of Server 2003.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. not to be a douche... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary states "Windows has, until now, only been distributed on DVDs or via download" Calling BS , raise your hand if you remember windows on CD's, 3.5, or floppy... Windows has been distributed ion many methods.

    1. Re:not to be a douche... by j0se_p0inter0 · · Score: 1

      :raises hand: I've still got an unopened Win 3.1 box somewhere. 3.5" diskettes. Wonder if it's worth anything now?

    2. Re:not to be a douche... by value_added · · Score: 1

      The summary states "Windows has, until now, only been distributed on DVDs or via download" Calling BS , raise your hand if you remember windows on CD's, 3.5, or floppy... Windows has been distributed ion many methods.

      IIRC, MS Office was offered on floppies as well.

    3. Re:not to be a douche... by will_die · · Score: 1

      Not much.
      Less than $10 on ebay

    4. Re:not to be a douche... by TheRealFixer · · Score: 1

      As I recall, Windows 95 was the last one to be distributed on floppy. I remember installing it, and it was a ridiculous number of floppies. Upwards of 20 I think.

    5. Re:not to be a douche... by Evil+Shabazz · · Score: 1

      Ebay'ers will tack the word "vintage" on anything these days in the hopes of luring some schmoe to buying it, won't they?

      --
      Down with the career politician! SUPPORT TERM LIMITS
    6. Re:not to be a douche... by vux984 · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I recall, Windows 95 was the last one to be distributed on floppy. I remember installing it, and it was a ridiculous number of floppies. Upwards of 20 I think.

      Nope only 13. Windows NT 3.1 came on 22 though.

    7. Re:not to be a douche... by 16384 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, MS Office was offered on floppies as well.

      yep, 32 of them, if I remember correctly.

    8. Re:not to be a douche... by MadnessASAP · · Score: 4, Informative

      And the 32nd floppy would have an unrecoverable read error during the install.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    9. Re:not to be a douche... by anjilslaire · · Score: 1

      Indeed. XP & 2003 came on single CDs

    10. Re:not to be a douche... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      this site claims that you could get Office 97 on 45 disks.

    11. Re:not to be a douche... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      What's a floppy?

    12. Re:not to be a douche... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something that costs $2 million to copy?

    13. Re:not to be a douche... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Office 97 on only 45 disks... isn't that false advertising?

    14. Re:not to be a douche... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      They used some kind of weird compression to stick 1.7 MB on each disk.

    15. Re:not to be a douche... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I have Windows 98 on 3-1/2" floppies. It's a huge pile. I've never opened it. The way to get it was to buy the full 'retail box' ('Install on any new PC') version of Windows 98. There was a coupon inside the manual that came with it to order the diskette set for a nominal fee. I think it was $10. Then they by mistake shipped me two copies.

      I have Windows 95 on 5-1/4" floppies, too. Another thing you had to order. It ended up being handy because you copy all of the files off the floppies into a folder, burn it to a CD, and get the most bare-bones version of Windows 95, and one that installs without prompting for a CD key. The 3-1/2" version prompts for user info and then 'fingerprints' the install media.

    16. Re:not to be a douche... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Windows 98 could be ordered on 3-1/2" floppies. A lot more than 20 of them.

    17. Re:not to be a douche... by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      There were 2 purposes of the odd disc format
      1. To save money on floppies
      2. Do make it harder to back them up - an early anti-piracy method

      PS the first floppy was a standard 1.44 MB one. It included a driver for the format of the rest.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    18. Re:not to be a douche... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The stack I have here for Office 95 ends at 25, with disk 25 being PowerPoint Viewer. Though there were a bunch of different versions so I don't doubt it.

      One thing that pissed me off a while back was one of the Windows upgrade disks, which would install on a blank drive provided you could prove you owned a previous version of Windows by inserting the install media when setup prompted you. Only thing is it would only scan the CD drive, so me with my stack of Windows 95 floppies was S.O.L. (at least without doing the full install of 95 off the floppies then trying again). That's when I found the CD key for skipping the media check on the upgrade disks.

    19. Re:not to be a douche... by similar_name · · Score: 1

      most bare-bones version of Windows 95, and one that installs without prompting for a CD key

      If I recall correctly when Windows 95 asked for the product key you could hit ignore and continue on your way. I think Office 95 would except 456 then anything. But that's been years, my memory could be off.

    20. Re:not to be a douche... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PackRat Alert: yeah, I still own my original win3.1 floppies. All housed with other swantiques (like an original wildcat bbs) in a Faraday-shielded ammo box. I wouldn't call BS, but can we not take it for granted that there soon won't be anything like a Windows Start-Up Disk any longer and perhaps the thumbdrive could serve that purpose?

    21. Re:not to be a douche... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time, don't attach the floppy to the fridge with a magnet.

    22. Re:not to be a douche... by yanyan · · Score: 1

      No problem. Just make another copy of the 32nd disk.

    23. Re:not to be a douche... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      tomsrtbt used to do that too. In fact, after checking it appears that it still does.

      I used to love that distribution. These days I don't need my tools to fit into 1.7MB, but that used to be very handy.

    24. Re:not to be a douche... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      I think one of the upgrade disks (95-98?) would accept itself as a qualifying version of Windows. Seemed like an odd idea to me.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    25. Re:not to be a douche... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man that's steep. Don't copy that floppy!

    26. Re:not to be a douche... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why this is modded "Informative" I don't know... If Windows encountered a read error on the floppy during installation, it would just ask whether it should retry or abort.

      Unlike, say, MS Office 4.3 on CD-ROM, which can be put in an infinite loop if you choose the wrong option...

  6. I guess that's nice by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At least you could wipe the thing and get a thumb drive out of it.

    1. Re:I guess that's nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you could wipe the thing and get a thumb drive out of it.

      I'd bet that they come on read-only media.

    2. Re:I guess that's nice by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Why? Wouldn't that be a rather expensive way to get a thumb drive? That'd only be a few GB in size.

    3. Re:I guess that's nice by bipbop · · Score: 1

      Ah, it's okay, use a hole punch.

    4. Re:I guess that's nice by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I would expect not. It would be nice, but, I'm sure it would be read-only, to maintain the integrity of the OS's files. Ya know, so viruses couldn't infect "known good" original files.

  7. Windows Live Live Distro finally means something by deanston · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe MSFT can copy Linux and make it a live distro so people can try it out before full install... wait, that'll never make them bite. Nevermind.

  8. Re:Windows Live Live Distro finally means somethin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
  9. Not so average by Itninja · · Score: 1

    If it's taking someone (in the US) "several hours" to download 2+ GB with their "average broadband connection", then they don't have an "average broadband connection". There is some debate about what the average broadband speed actually is in the US, but even the low end is 1.9mbps (that was from an Ars Technica back in 2007 - surely it's faster by now). Let's take the midrange, again from back in 2007, of 4.8mbps. That makes a 2.3GB download take little more than one hour. Even if congestion slows ones speed by half, that only about 2.5 hours.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Not so average by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You may not be aware that "average" in New York City, and "average" in Backwoods Nowhere are entirely two different animals. It takes me DAYS to download a 4 GB ISO. Seriously, I wouldn't bullshit you. I use Firestarter firewall, and set it to shape traffice, giving priority to interactive (browsing) traffic, so I'm only using about 85 to 90 % of my bandwidth for a download. On "average" it takes between 4 1/2 and 6 days to download a movie.

      Now that you realize that not everyone has the bandwidth that you enjoy, you might do a little research, and find out what percentage of the US population enjoys "fast" internet. Or not. No research is required to stick your foot in your mouth again. ;)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:Not so average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all that is still pretty low considering my home connection is currently pulling 27mbps downstream

    3. Re:Not so average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lets play with some numbers. To be considered a broadband connection it has to be at least 256 Kb/sec. This works to about 32 KB/sec.
      2.3 GB then would take almost 21 hours. 512Kb = 10.5 hours, 1024 = 5.25 hours, etc. (you can see the pattern)
      Yeah, that would take a while. Even my home connection(5Mbit, so I'm going to call that 5000 Kb/sec (which I have held solid for a few hours at slightly above 600KB/sec) ) would be 1.1 hours. Still awfully long depending on if it was able to hold that the entire time.

      Plus, 2.3GB is probably the full thing. Odds are they aren't going to install every thing (do you really need drivers for every video card they have for the initial install? You might just need the bare minimum for video and then get the drivers from the manufacturer's site post-install. Same thing with sound, network, chipset, etc). Then if you get (I haven't looked at the types of Win7, so using the Vista names) Home Basic, you are not going to have lots of things that they do have in the other versions, so you are going to have a much smaller initial install.

    4. Re:Not so average by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The article to which you are referring is probably this one It's not quite clear how 1.9 Mbs is the average. Is it a mode, a median, or a mean?

      The paper behind the article includes this gem.

      There are 8 megabits in a megabyte, so a 100 megabit per second connection takes 8 seconds to transmit a 100
      megabyte file.

    5. Re:Not so average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Average is a mean, dumbass.

    6. Re:Not so average by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Really? The arithmetic mean can be surprisingly irrelevant.

    7. Re:Not so average by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Sounds like one of those cases where you'd get higher bandwidth via DVD's sent in the mail. Modern version of an old saying that goes something like, "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a grad student with a station wagon full of tapes..." Or maybe you should be strapping thumb drives to carrier pidgeons. (re.: RFC 1149) In any case, I agree, we need to run fiber everywhere -- there's not much excuse not to do it.

    8. Re:Not so average by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I live in the middle of nowhere and it would take me less than 2 hours 30 minutes to download 4GB of data, and that's not even at maximum speed. My ISP isn't a huge company either, they manage phone and internet connections for small towns all over the province (where Bell/etc wouldn't even care to get the marketshare - too small).

      You need to kick your ISP where it hurts (tech support, customer service, whatever).

    9. Re:Not so average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not be aware that "average" in New York City, and "average" in Backwoods Nowhere are entirely two different animals. It takes me DAYS to download a 4 GB ISO. Seriously, I wouldn't bullshit you. I use Firestarter firewall, and set it to shape traffice, giving priority to interactive (browsing) traffic, so I'm only using about 85 to 90 % of my bandwidth for a download. On "average" it takes between 4 1/2 and 6 days to download a movie.

      Now that you realize that not everyone has the bandwidth that you enjoy, you might do a little research, and find out what percentage of the US population enjoys "fast" internet. Or not. No research is required to stick your foot in your mouth again. ;)

      Using what?? Bitorrent? if so then duh.....

      If you have direct links to the files and are not using file sharing networks it should not be taking you DAYS to download an ISO..

    10. Re:Not so average by Kjella · · Score: 1

      It takes me DAYS to download a 4 GB ISO. (...) On "average" it takes between 4 1/2 and 6 days to download a movie.

      Some quick math says that works out to 100kbit/s. I guess noone's disputing that, only that what you have can under no possible definition be considered "broadband". It's less than double ISDN, even - which is what I could get in a city of 150k people back in 1997. I guess the most positive thing I manage to say about your line is that it beats dial-up....

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:Not so average by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "Duh" to bit-torrent"? What exactly is the difference between direct access, and bit torrent, assuming that my bandwidth is being used to capacity? The protocol maks little difference, it's the bandwidth. On a GOOD day, I will see 42 to 44 Kbs downspeed. Most days, the speed will vary from 30 to 36. On a bad day, 4 browsers on the line at the same time have problems navigating the web.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    12. Re:Not so average by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Using what?? Bitorrent? if so then duh..... If you have direct links to the files and are not using file sharing networks it should not be taking you DAYS to download an ISO

      That kind of depends, something popular like Ubuntu on release date downloads much faster over file sharing. I can download the 700 meg ISO in 11 minutes. I'm mostly slowed down by my own crappy network(10 mbps so I max out around 1.2 mBps), but hey I've never paid for a computer part.

    13. Re:Not so average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (do you really need drivers for every video card they have for the initial install? You might just need the bare minimum for video and then get the drivers from the manufacturer's site post-install. Same thing with sound, network, chipset, etc)

      Absolutely need? Not really. Want anyway? Hell yes. If there's one thing that's annoyed me greatly about my experiences installing Windows, it's the need to go and hunt down half a dozen different drivers when doing a fresh install, just to get all of the computer's internal hardware going.

    14. Re:Not so average by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Except that the Windows 7 default 64bit install starts as a 4GB DVD, but balloons out to a 20GB on-disk size. And that's not including an office suite and so on, like Linux distros do.

    15. Re:Not so average by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      "Broadband" in the US is generally defined as "better than 200kbps" and no, I haven't misplaced a 0 in there. Dual ISDN counts as broadband. Crappy 768kbps DSL counts as broadband. you get the picture.

      On a connection like that - and they are very, very common - downloading even a smallish DVD image (like the 32-bit Win7 .iso) will take much of a day.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    16. Re:Not so average by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      What about those of us outside the US? In places like Australia, our bandwidth is limited by the undersea cables connecting us to the rest of the world, so even those of us with ADSL2+ have limited connection speed to international sites. Apparently they're going to be installing a new line soon, but it's worthwhile realising that not everyone lives in the USA, and internet speed varies considerably when you look at connections from outside your continent.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    17. Re:Not so average by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh, but - you seem to be makng an assumption here. That being, that the United States has the best infrastructure. Scroll up to Yvan256's post. In Europe, people living out in the countryside have internet connections that rival what we can boast in our population centers. From what I've read and understand, only Japan can rival Europe's infrastructure. The US is being left further and further behind, primarily because we like our monopolistic corporations to concentrate their resources in the largest population centers.

      So, rdnetto, we have that in common. We are both at the mercy of the people with the money.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  10. ROM drives possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is possible to have this on ROM drive? Has anything like that been tried?

    1. Re:ROM drives possible? by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, they just need to put a different type of chip in the thumbdrive, no biggie. The problem is that flash memory might be a lot cheaper due the massive amount of factories already tooled to produce it. Maybe they could include a physical write protect switch like you see on floppies, or something.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    2. Re:ROM drives possible? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll probably just wire a standard flash chip shut with the same pin used for the write-protect switches that some of them come with. Then there will be some "hardhack" Slashdot story about someone who managed to put Ubuntu on an AOL or Microsoft flash chip after taking a soldering iron to it.

  11. Booting is a big pro Linux argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Linux can boot from everything and doesn't have arcane configuration or environment requirements for doing so. It can run from RAM and read-only devices without cutting back functionality. The Windows boot process is full of dependencies, convoluted and badly documented.

  12. Somebody is thinking at Microsoft? by bignetbuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who hired them and how long do you think they will last at Microsoft? hohoho

    Ok, being serious. It makes sense. With Time Warner slapping draconian download caps on those poor people in Texas, a USB flash drive for OS distribution in a growing netbook market shows some...slight...thinking ahead of the curve. Can you imagine the ire of not only having to download a 3.5GB OS onto a netbook but if you actually run over your cap and get charged EXTRA for it? Oh man. I would shoot my netbook.

    Kudos to whomever pulled this rabbit out of the hat.

    1. Re:Somebody is thinking at Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Can you imagine the ire of not only having to download a 3.5GB OS onto a netbook

      I'm more excited about the ability to modify the installation (slipstream servicepacks/drivers/hotfixes) without having to kill a dvd every time.

      OTOH, it does increase the possibility of someone injecting a trojan on the USB en-route. *adds another layer of tinfoil to hat*

    2. Re:Somebody is thinking at Microsoft? by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      I am sorry but the netbook would not be the thing I would be thinking of shooting if I went over.

    3. Re:Somebody is thinking at Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would shoot Jeffrey Bewkes.

    4. Re:Somebody is thinking at Microsoft? by Amphetam1ne · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile on the other side of MS, they're just about to start offering streaming 1080p movies on demand over Xbox Live. So that's a minimum of 9GB being consumed in under 2 hours. They obviously don't care about your cap that much.

      --
      I only buy pepper spray that's been tested on anti-vivisectionists.
    5. Re:Somebody is thinking at Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine the ire of not only having to download a 3.5GB OS onto a netbook but if you actually run over your cap and get charged EXTRA for it? Oh man. I would shoot my netbook.

      Whom should be shot in this scenario? Your ISP thats who!

  13. Perhaps they mean skinnyband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...not broadband.

    Even if it was a full DVD-R (about 4.7G), we'd be talking an hour or two with typical broadband.

    And if your prohibits you from 5G of download in a day, then I hope you don't pay too much for it. That's a piddly amount of download. I probably blow through about that much per day on an average day, with perhaps triple that on a day when I'm actually interested in something.

    1. Re:Perhaps they mean skinnyband by tepples · · Score: 1

      And if your prohibits you from 5G of download in a day, then I hope you don't pay too much for it.

      Mobile plans severely penalize those who download 5 GB in a thirty day billing period.

    2. Re:Perhaps they mean skinnyband by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Typical? Average? This entire discussion is full of shoddy statistics.

      If Microsoft were to eliminate discs entirely, and distribute Windows 7 as a digital download, it would cut off millions of potential customers who use DSL. I know, I know, the average bandwidth "is" 1.9 Mb/s-- larger than the 256K/384K/512K/768K/1.5M DSL variants. But it doesn't mean that those customers don't exist-- if bandwidth was uniformly distributed, those slow lines would still comprise a substantial fraction of broadband connections.

      It's probably not a uniform distribution. I suspect that FIOS, and 99 Mb/s cable brings the average up substantially. Here on slashdot, the average is probably a bit different--distorted by campus ethernet, perhaps. But the mean is irrelevant. The median and the mode are more important to Microsoft.

    3. Re:Perhaps they mean skinnyband by Holi · · Score: 1

      re: You'll know HDTV has become mainstream once HDTVs are in pawn shops.

      I work for a pawn shop and we have several in hock, and have sold many more. I think its there by your standard.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  14. Linux on USB Flash Drives by Teckla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On a related note, several years back, I emailed Ubuntu with a product suggestion. I asked them for "Ubuntu on USB Flash Drives", installable via a simple Windows executable. Double click the executable, choose your USB flash drive, and it would install on the USB flash drive and just work.

    My thought was that it would make it much easier for Windows users that are curious about Linux to try it out. No need to burn a disc first (burning discs can be complicated for non-technical users), no need to boot from the optical drive to get into the Ubuntu installer, etc.

    And since USB flash drives are read/write, you could even let them update packages, save documents, etc. A much better, more realistic experience than a read-only test drive of Ubuntu on CD.

    They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion, but alas, it never materialized...

    1. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by AndrewNeo · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you're looking for UNetbootin.

    2. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by mariushm · · Score: 1

      USB drives are still more expensive and heavier compared to CDs.. They can easily order 50.000 cd's cheaply... When they offered Ubuntu for free, they were practically begging people to request up to 10 discs at once and give the ones they don't need to friends because the shipping costs were higher than the costs of manufacturing them.

    3. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by karnal · · Score: 1

      http://www.pendrivelinux.com/

      Pen Drive Linux to the rescue!!!

      --
      Karnal
    4. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's not a new idea at all. Mandriva already does that and it has been doing that for years. I mean, since the days of Mandrake 9.2, I believe. That means since the days of Ubuntu 5.04, now that it appears that everything linux has been somehow reduced and limited to Ubuntu.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    5. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 1

      No, he said he wanted a Windows Executable with a nice GUI that would automatically download the right soft (Some custom ISO) and let you store everything you need in your USB Pendrive, like codecs, office alternatives, Firefox, etc.
      Something my parents could do over the phone as long as they have USB booting as default to migrate.

    6. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? Ubuntu will still ship you a free CD

    7. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fedora has had a LiveUSB creator for a while now. You can easily choose how much space to give to persistent storage. It works in Windows and Linux. As a side note, I have used it to create Ubuntu LiveUSB keys as well.

      https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/

    8. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also by default in Ubuntu 9.04 you can run usb-creator. It's in System, Administration menu, or just run usb-creator from the terminal. You need to download the Ubuntu ISO or use the Ubuntu install CD though.

    9. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by mariushm · · Score: 1

      Yes, dude, because when they order 50.000 cd's they pay something like 5 cents for each manufactured disc, so the shipping price is the only real cost they had.
      I distinctly remember they had on the page a note saying people should ask for at least 5 and give the extra discs around because it used to cost them the same to ship one or five discs or ten discs.

      You wouldn't be able to do this with USB sticks because unlike CD's which fit nicely in an envelope, USB sticks are bulky and relatively heavy and cost more to ship.

    10. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by JobyOne · · Score: 1

      I feel Ubuntu's pain in that case, but in the case of Windows I say "fuck them."

      If they're charging me hundreds of dollars for software, they aren't allowed to complain about distribution costs, that will only happen if Microsoft were a bunch of greedy assholes...oh wait...

      --
      Porquoi?
    11. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a related note, several years back, I emailed Ubuntu with a product suggestion. I asked them for "Ubuntu on USB Flash Drives", installable via a simple Windows executable. Double click the executable, choose your USB flash drive, and it would install on the USB flash drive and just work.

      My thought was that it would make it much easier for Windows users that are curious about Linux to try it out. No need to burn a disc first (burning discs can be complicated for non-technical users), no need to boot from the optical drive to get into the Ubuntu installer, etc.

      And since USB flash drives are read/write, you could even let them update packages, save documents, etc. A much better, more realistic experience than a read-only test drive of Ubuntu on CD.

      They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion, but alas, it never materialized...

      Actually, ROM USBs do exist; I work part-time at Office Depot we've had a few preloaded with demo prints for Brother printers (supplied by Brother themselves) in the past. The files show up when the Flash drive is plugged in a PC, but will not delete or move (they copy, of course). I actually assumed by default that MS would be using this for flash-based W7 delivery.

    12. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I think he was referring to your use of past tense. A DVD weighs about 16 grams and a USB stick less than 30 grams according to some quick google searches, so that's not an issue. Using one of those padded envelopes (also cheap in bulk) I don't see why you couldn't easily stuff five or ten USB sticks in one either. The thing is still cost, even a cheap 1GB usb stick for a CD+ size release will cost you almost 5$ retail ex. VAT, even if you say 3$ in bulk + cost of adding image it's too much. Plus people might just order to get an USB stick. It's better to have people create a stick from the DVD, for which there's already tools I think.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should look at "unetbootin" (http://lubi.sourceforge.net/unetbootin.html) which will put a linux "liveCD" onto a usb flash drive sow that you can boot and run without ever having to burn a CD (it can use a downloaded ISO image) or it will download it when running (for those that can download a CD iso in less than 8-10 hours). It is available for both Linux and M$ as an executable (you have have to install " p7zip" compression tool as I can not remember).

      The current version has built-in support for automatically downloading and loading the following distributions, though installing other distributions is also supported:

              * Ubuntu (and official derivatives)
                          6.06 LTS, 6.10, 7.04, 7.10, 8.04 LTS, 8.10, 9.04, Daily CD Images
              * Debian
                          Stable/Etch, Testing/Lenny, Unstable/Sid
              * Linux Mint
                          3.1, 4.0, 5-r1, 6
              * openSUSE
                          10.2, 10.3, 11.0, 11.1, Factory
              * Arch Linux
                          2007.08
              * Damn Small Linux
                          4.4
              * SliTaz
                          Stable, Cooking
              * Puppy Linux
                          4.00
              * gNewSense
                          deltah-2.1
              * FreeBSD
                          6.3, 7.0
              * NetBSD
                          4.0
              * Fedora
                          7, 8, 9, 10, Rawhide
              * PCLinuxOS
                          2007, 2008
              * Sabayon Linux
                          4-LiteMCE
              * Gentoo
                          2007.0, 2008.0
              * MEPIS
                          SimplyMEPIS 8, AntiX 8
              * Zenwalk
                          5.2
              * Slax
                          6
              * Dreamlinux
                          3.2
              * Elive
                          Development
              * CentOS
                          4, 5
              * Mandriva
                          2007.1, 2008.0, 2008.1
              * FaunOS
                          0.5.4
              * Frugalware Linux
                          Stable, Testing, Current
              * xPUD
                          0.8.9

    14. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by theaceoffire · · Score: 3, Informative

      "They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion, but alas, it never materialized..."

      ^_^ Actually, it did. Grab the most recent copy of Ubuntu on a live CD, boot into it, go to "System", "Administration", and click "USB Startup Disk Creator".

      It takes ANY ISO and makes a USB bootable with it. Have used it already, worked great for installing to an EEE.

      --
      I steal signatures. This one used to be yours.
    15. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives by boss_hog · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you care, since it's not Ubuntu directly, but Fedora has done this for at least the past 6-12 months. They have since version 9: https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/

      you might be able to use an ubuntu livecd image with it...?

  15. Not surprising at all... by jeffliott · · Score: 1

    When people have been doing this with Windows AND Linux for a few years now. The very interesting thing I see about this is perhaps they could have their update client update the thumb drive so if you ever have to reinstall (I mean it IS windows) you wouldn't have to go through the painful 10 billion hours of updates? Especially on these netbooks with painfully slow performance specs. I recall it taking close to 8 hours to install XP on an Acer Aspire One with a super slow SSD.

  16. hello, i live in times square by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Troll

    what is this "backwoods" that you speak of?

    what subway line do i need to take to get there?

    is there any parkland, you know, trees, which i have heard fables of, in this "backwoods" place?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:hello, i live in times square by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Trees? Yes, of course we have trees. In fact, you can just send me your carbon credit payments: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/25/AR2009062503028.html

      With enough payments coming into the area, maybe we can all get together, and convince the telcos to upgrade to optic fiber.........

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  17. a step in the right direction by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    I think all software should be on those. If you scratch a USB drive, it still works. I don't think they have as good of a shelf life but it's not like you'd do a whole ton of I/O on it to kill it quickly. How often do you reinstall windows? Some really expensive software like robo-sewer control programs for robotic sewing machines installs off a USB drive and also requires that the USB drive be plugged in to start up the software. Talk about hard to pirate! You can't just image the drive either. It senses the serial number of the drive or something. Just think if games did this. They could be totally open with no stupid DRM malware or internet connection required. Just the USB drive needs to be plugged in and you're good. Plus, why stop there? I reeeeeally think Microsoft (and everyone else) should go back to cartridges for video games instead of CD/DVD games. Then there's basically no size limit, developers just add in a 16GB memory chip instead of 8 if they have a big game. That worked for the sega genesis and N64. Plus you can't scratch your cartridge and then have to pay another $60, and they could make the cartridge easily self destructable if anyone opens it to avoid ROMing. Just make the inside a vacuum and put an air sensor that will release a quick charging capacitor burst that fries all the memory chips if it senses air. That and put two layers of barely separated copper foil around the inside of the plastic casing and if anyone tries to penetrate it, they touch and complete a circuit that fries the memory. Flash based memory or basically anything non-optical needs to be implemented for a lot more future technology so I'm all for windows going to it at least!

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:a step in the right direction by maxume · · Score: 1

      "Just make the inside a vacuum"...Just?

      Anyway, those dongles apparently are more 'involved' to work around than they are hard to work around:

      http://www.woodmann.com/crackz/Dongles.htm

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  18. Re:It would destroy your USB stick by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Informative

    One thing I noticed is that my hard drive light it pulsing every few seconds. I wonder whether that is a background indexing service doing its thing?

    No, thats insert polling on your SATA ports, presumably because you have a SATA device that supports removable media (CDRom, DVDRom, ...)

    Thats not a Hard Drive light, thats an I/O light. Nerds are supposed to know what that light is.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  19. Re:It would destroy your USB stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why what do you get off a Linux stick besides Wordpad and Notepad?

  20. If so, how about distributing a KVM/VMWARE image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, save us the trouble!

  21. Re:Idiots. by computerman413 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whoever installs Windows 7 on a goddamn computer is a dumb, dumb motherfucker.

    There, I fixed it for you.

  22. WTF? by Anonyme+Connard · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is considering offering Windows 7?

  23. I've wondered why there are no usb ROM disks by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that a usb ROM would make a ton of sense for things like this. If not USB than SD cards - as these are becoming fairly ubiquitous pretty quickly.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:I've wondered why there are no usb ROM disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better then ROM, for Microsoft, USB drives offer the possibility of a read once drive for copyright protection.

    2. Re:I've wondered why there are no usb ROM disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... talk about paranoid.

    3. Re:I've wondered why there are no usb ROM disks by Kenja · · Score: 1

      There are. Or at least a lot of flash drives have a write protect switch that could be soldered closed.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:I've wondered why there are no usb ROM disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me that a usb ROM would make a ton of sense for things like this. If not USB than SD cards - as these are becoming fairly ubiquitous pretty quickly.

      They exist:

      See reply to http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1284401&cid=28497433

  24. Re:Windows Live Live Distro finally means somethin by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe MSFT can copy Linux and make it a live distro so people can try it out before full install... wait, that'll never make them bite. Nevermind.

    It may not be a "live distro," but Win 7 has already captured about half the desktop share of Linux. Operating System Market Share

    Net Applications is mass-market oriented. If your gadget can access the web, Net Applications will track it.

    W3Schools is developer-oriented. But even there Win 7 has 1/4 the share of Linux. OS Platform Statistics

    It took Linux six damn years to move from 2% to 4% in the W3Schools stats.

    Win 7 gets a 1% share in five months.

  25. Why would anyone want to buy a capped connection? by rolfc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I have a 100/100 fiber in to my livingroom for 15$/month. Don't pay for slow and capped connections. Demand what you want

  26. Duh? by anti-human+1 · · Score: 1

    I assumed the summary meant WIRELESS Broadband data plans? The mention of "broadband data cap", I thought, indicated this. Netbooks, after all, are intended to be portable, on the go machines; many of which bundle data plans for subsidizing costs on the computer itself.

  27. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by BountyX · · Score: 1

    I want that =(, who is your provider?

    --
    Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
  28. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where can I get this service in South Africa? We pay more than that for 384kbps DSL with a 3GB cap.

  29. Hardware bases copyright protection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised that they have not tried something like this sooner seeing as it really paves the way to a hardware based copyright protection system. How hard would it be to place some kind of Microcontroller on or add firmware to a smart USB controller which records information about the system that it is being installed to and prevents the number of installs before it refuses to allow access to the stored data. It would also be make it much easier to embed the product key into the product itself. If this system information and product key information where unaddressable over the USB bus, it could make a hardware based copyright system that is non-trivial to overcome.

  30. Too bad you will have to keep it plugged in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DRM anyone? "W7 have not been able to detect a valid dongel" Please plug it in or call Microsoft.

  31. Whoa! by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    Downloading Windows 7 for free, burning to a DVD and installing was a surreal enough experience already!

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:Whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      According to economic theory, financial crises don't happen, clearly standard economics is wrong.

      According to Newtonian mechanics, an object in motion will never stop, clearly Newtonian mechanics is wrong.
      According to Darwinism, apes evolved into humans, but there are still apes, so clearly Darwinism is wrong.

      Or, more precisely: "If you attack an uneducated caricature of what a discipline actually says, you merely reveal your ignorance."

  32. Easy solution to this problem: Bribe fw nazi by scottv67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the Windows 7 ISO weighs in at 2.3GB, which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap.

    There is an easy solution to this problem: if you don't have a decent connection at home, download the ISO at work. Check with your company's firewall nazi (that's one of the hats I wear during the day). See if he/she objects to you downloading that ISO or if company policy prohibits this type of download. If you ask nicely, the firewall nazi will probably find a way to download that ISO image rather quickly and you won't have to worry about burning up your bandwidth cap at home or waiting five days for the download at home to finish. If you mention something like, "Hey, I heard you like Five Guys. Can I buy you a burger and fries sometime?" as you hand the USB drive to the fw nazi, he/she will be much more receptive to your request. It's all in how you ask. Am I going to download a copy of the latest Star Trek movie for you (even if some free F.G. is on the line)? *No.* Would I download an ISO from Microsoft for you if you ask in a pleasant tone? Probably. Also, the chances are good that I have already downloaded that ISO for my own testing or someone who sits near me at work has a copy of that ISO.

    1. Re:Easy solution to this problem: Bribe fw nazi by Metroid72 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... you're the firewall Nazi at your company.

    2. Re:Easy solution to this problem: Bribe fw nazi by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. We are the firewall Nazis.

    3. Re:Easy solution to this problem: Bribe fw nazi by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... you're the firewall Nazi at your company.

      Let me guess...you didn't even read the message that I posted.

      "Check with your company's firewall nazi (that's one of the hats I wear during the day)."

      ('firewall nazi' is a title given by one of the corporate counsel at a place I used to work when our email scanning appliance blocked a non-work-related .exe attachment from getting to that particular lawyer's inbox.)

  33. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by nickspoon · · Score: 1

    That's great for you; the majority of us can't get that sort of speed, and certainly for not that sort of money. The maximum reasonable broadband speed where I live (semi-rural UK) is 8/1. There are companies which do offer fibre to some places now, but you're looking at £50/mo for 50/50, with 'Fair Use'.

  34. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by tepples · · Score: 1

    I have a 100/100 fiber in to my livingroom for 15$/month. Don't pay for slow and capped connections. Demand what you want

    From whom in the United States? And how do you connect when outside your home?

  35. Slackware install from USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are going to upgrade, get the good stuff

    Utterly painless dual boot on my 900HA. wireless was the only thing I needed to tweek.

  36. If they were really on the ball by stox · · Score: 5, Funny

    They would offer Windows 7 in a convenient suppository.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:If they were really on the ball by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      They would offer Windows 7 in a convenient suppository.

      I'm sure we'll get it up the ass either way.
         

    2. Re:If they were really on the ball by n1hilist · · Score: 1

      ...and have Developers! coming out of my arse?

      No thanks. Besides, Ubuntu is already brown and it installs from USB just fine. :D

    3. Re:If they were really on the ball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes instead of these humiliating discs !!!

    4. Re:If they were really on the ball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the reboot time on that?

    5. Re:If they were really on the ball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      juz remember to remove the plastic packaging before inserting into receptacle...

    6. Re:If they were really on the ball by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Weren't you paying attention? They just did

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  37. Smart idea, but an even better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is to also have a Live mode that won't even require to be installed on the hosts machine.
    2 sticks in one, one containing the main system files, read-only, the other being your user space.
    It's not like it would be hard to pull off, and the cost won't be that much more if you keep the sizes low. (and you can always offer larger ones too)
    Having a Win7 Live would be useful if you screwed up your machine and need to do some repairs and/or backups if the repair attempts fail.

    I have a WinXP live just in case i screw things up, as well as UBCD, several diagnostic tools and so on. All in one beautiful disc. :)

    Starting off at 1gig and going up.
    Could be used to carry your most important files around, or all if you end up getting one of the larger ones and don't use a lot.
    Just out of interest, are there any companies out there who make things like this? One part read only (with switch?) and another read/write? Such a thing would be incredibly useful.

    1. Re:Smart idea, but an even better idea by hamburgler007 · · Score: 1

      But then the pirates would win! It seriously pisses me off how I can make a live linux thumbdrive for emergency recovery, but can't do the same for xp without having to edit files I shouldn't have to worry about.

  38. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by dotgain · · Score: 1

    Hey, I leech my employer's OC48 and the cost to me is $0/month. Great for me, but it doesn't mean I can just tell everyone to do the same. Most geeks have less trouble getting sex than a satisfactory internet hook-up.

  39. Re:Idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's faster than XP. What's not to like about it?

  40. What concerns me the most about this article... by cyberjock1980 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't the news of Microsofts ideas. It's that the article already makes the assumption that you have bandwidth caps and Microsoft is having to work around them. On Microsoft's front, this is great. However, this just reeks of society accepting that bandwidth caps are here, acceptable, and we should just succumb to our limitations.

    If the article had instead mentioned the "new unacceptable limitations being imposed by broadband ISPs" I would see it differently. Instead it states "...which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap.".

    To me, the article writer is already stating that bandwidth caps are here to stay, we lost the war on bandwidth caps, and we should rejoice that Microsoft has plans to overcome these obstacles.

    This is always how major obstacles are overcome when the public cries.

    1. Proudly display your new 'grand plan' and how it's 'needed' or 'helpful'.
    2. Public outcry comes and you dash for cover to avoid being attacked.
    3. Bring the program back a little at a time and convince the press (or buy them) into stating your plan as if it is already here and in use.
    4. Bring your 'grand plan' to market. The public is sick of hearing about the negatives of the 'grand plan' and have decided that it WILL happen, there's nothing they can do about it, and should just accept that it is here to stay.

    This happens with MANY things in life...Obama's 'grand' plan for health care, Bush's bailout plans, ISP bandwidth caps... I could make a very long list of things that you can read about that are worded as if they are here already.

    I admit, the article is written with a .uk domain, so maybe the UK already has imposed limits. But I've seen wording here in the USA making statements implying everyone in the USA has bandwidth caps and we should all run and check them regularly.

    1. Re:What concerns me the most about this article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some countries do have bandwidth caps, unfortunately - Australia definitely does. In addition, not everyone has great download speeds. There are still people who are unfortunate enough to have dial-up in some parts of the world, too...

    2. Re:What concerns me the most about this article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the news of Microsofts ideas. It's that the article already makes the assumption that you have bandwidth caps and Microsoft is having to work around them. On Microsoft's front, this is great. However, this just reeks of society accepting that bandwidth caps are here, acceptable, and we should just succumb to our limitations.

      I admit, the article is written with a .uk domain, so maybe the UK already has imposed limits. But I've seen wording here in the USA making statements implying everyone in the USA has bandwidth caps and we should all run and check them regularly.

      Bandwidth caps already are here, and acceptable, in many places around the world that aren't the US. I always have to roll my eyes when I see an American bitching and whining like spoiled children about not being able to to absolutely everything without any kind of limitation. Bandwidth caps are a reality, just not one that's caught up to the average American yet... but they will.

      And honestly, they can be a little frustrating at times, but they're not the end of the fucking world.

    3. Re:What concerns me the most about this article... by beuges · · Score: 1

      As I just mentioned in another post, in South Africa, I pay around $15 for 2GB of data per month. That's excluding line rental. After that, its around $9-$10/GB. Fastest home DSL line speed available is officially 1MB/s, going up to 4MB/s depending on your line quality and distance from the exchange.
      Local bandwidth (connecting to South African hosts) is dirt cheap, but international is pretty much daylight robbery. The US has the benefit that most datacenters are hosted in the US already, and the US also has a huge number of undersea cables running from all over the coastlines to Europe and Asia where most of the rest of the internet is hosted. The whole of Africa has a tiny number of cables, meaning that internet access is hideously expensive.

      http://www.nrc.nl/multimedia/archive/00170/270808ECO_glasvezel_170984a.jpg
      http://www.telegeography.com/products/map_cable/images/Cable_Map_big.gif

      It always amuses me that people from the US complain when their ISPs threaten to impose 100GB/month caps. You guys have absolutely no idea how lucky you are.

    4. Re:What concerns me the most about this article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck sakes, what a little whiny brat. What are you, 12?. So, an ISP should simply permit you to download as much as you want 24/7? How many businesses have you operated? You do realise (yes, realise is with 's', not 'z') an ISP is a business right? They too are required to pay bills, pay for bandwidth, invest in infrastructure, pay dividends, etc.

      How many times have you walked into a restaurant and were allowed to eat whatever the fuck you wanted for a flat fee?
      Walk out of a shop with as much produce/clothing/stuff as you could carry for a flat fee?
      Use as much electricity as you wanted for a flat flee?
      Use all the apartments on your floor for the price of a single apartment?
      Get a years supply of petrol (yes, you fucking dummy, it's petrol, not "gas" which is the stuff you breath or pass out your ass) for the price of a tank.
      Watch as many movies as you wanted for the price of a single ticket.
      et fucking cetera.

      How is bandwidth/traffic consumption any different to any other commodity? It costs actual money to provide, is finite. Did you get that last word?

      Maybe if I put it in terms you can wrap your mind around: when was the last time you worked at a job for a year and were paid for a single day only?

      There's something wrong with the youth today, they seem to think society and businesses owe them everything and they're *entitled* to get it for free. If they can't get it for free, then they're being denied what's rightfully theirs and the organisation which dares to charge them for usage is evil.

      You can't have it both ways. Capitalism and socialism do not mix well. Either accept that things cost money in the free world (and that you are welcome to shop around), or continue to whine like a child and accept that adults will laugh at you.

      Or fuckoff to China or North Korea and go goose step with the rest of them and get all your bandwidth for free.

  41. Re:Idiots. by TW+Burger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I installed the Win7 Beta on a netbook as a test. It works surprising well (Vista did not, XP or Linux far better than Win7), except the video is screwed up for high end graphics applications like those silly new games that require the graphics capacity of a combined Pixar and Dreamworks production. One more more thing: Use mofo or some other less offensive term. The rest of us are able to maintain etiquette even when anonymously corresponding on line.

  42. Re:Windows Live Live Distro finally means somethin by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You forgot to say "among windows users". Moving from 1 windows version to another is not equivalent to moving from windows to linux. So what was your point again ?

  43. Clever bastards by edcheevy · · Score: 1

    Realistically, who isn't going to delete the W7 files off the USB drive when they're done so they can use it for other things? Should you ever need to reinstall, you'll have to buy another one. A clever win/win for Microsoft.

    1. Re:Clever bastards by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      And even if they don't erase Win7, a virus will probably crawl onto it eventually

  44. Re:Windows Live Live Distro finally means somethin by ubersoldat2k7 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, people doesn't learn from their mistakes. I give two years until Win7 is crippling with crap.

  45. Re:Idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever installs Windows on a computer doesn't know any better.

    There, I fixed it for you.

  46. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by confused+one · · Score: 1

    I'm paying $29 for 1.5Mb. I think that's more typical in the US, if broadband is available.

  47. Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives == Mandriva Linux by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    I think you should try Mandriva Flash. BTW, all Mandriva ISOs can run directly from a USB stick.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  48. Re:Idiots. by ghetto2ivy · · Score: 1

    It's faster than XP. What's not to like about it?

    Oh, I don't know, maybe the whole thing about being, you know, Windows? Complete with viruses, DRM, spyware, MS deciding my rights, product activation, having to call MS if I upgrade my mobo and other substantial parts at once, oh and the whole paying money for it thingy.

  49. Re:Idiots. by profplump · · Score: 1

    Are you seriously telling someone who wrote an intentionally offensive post to not swear because you find the specific word offensive? You're aware that the post would still be inflammatory even without the particular word to which you object, right? So isn't intentionally misspelling that word akin to putting lipstick on a pig? I guess you're welcome to try to make communities you participate in less offensive by whatever standards you personally hold -- I think whining about swearing a bad idea, and find the whining much more disruptive than the original use of "motherfucker" -- but you should at least pick battles where the outcome has a pragmatic effect.

  50. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by JobyOne · · Score: 1

    Well whoop-de-doo for you! Aren't you special. Most of us (even in my metro area of 850,000) have nowhere near options like that.

    Most of us would pay for a capped (or slow) connection because it's better than nothing at all. Not all of us are as privileged as you.

    Personally I pay $50 for 5/1 (thankfully uncapped), because that's the best option I have available. I remember living in a rural area where my only option was 28.8 (on a good day) dailup. That was only about 6-8 years ago, too. Try expressing a little gratitude for what you've been given by the world, and try not to have such an overblown sense of entitlement.

    --
    Porquoi?
  51. Re:Windows Live Live Distro finally means somethin by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    The codeword is 'captured.'

  52. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    I have a $120,000 house that is over 100 years old and on 5 acres of land, including a mini-orchard. I paid less for my home probably in part because I live in an area where I can't get 100/100 for $15/month.

    All I have is DSL although a local provider sells a directional RF beam connection for about $30 a month.

    I'm pretty happy with what I've got going here.

  53. Re:It would destroy your USB stick by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    Actually, nerds don't keep up much at all on PC tech. That's what the dinks in the Hardware Section of Frys are for.

    Do you know how to wire in a 74182 Look-Ahead Carry Generator chip to a 74181 ALU chip? What would be the main advantage to going to the 74LS182 part?

    What would be a suitable size of inductor for a small switchmode power supply, say one using a Maxim chip, that you'll be using to power a 12-bit PIC processor, a solid state relay, and four LEDs?

  54. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by Michael+Meissner · · Score: 1

    Good for you. As the other posters have mentioned, this isn't available to everybody. For example, I had a T-1 connection to my house when I was a work at home programmer, and the rate was $400/month. It was the only high speed connection available to me at the time (no cable, and we are too far from the central office for DSL, but because T-1 is regulated, the phone company has to provide it wherever it provides a landline). Well, the T-1 bill would have jumped to $700/month starting next month, and we decided that enough was enough, and cancelled the service. Right now, my only options are 3G networking (Sprint and Verizon) or satellite (hughes/wildblue), both of which have bandwidth caps. Both Sprint and Verizon offer service with 5 gigabytes/month service, and seem to be a much better deal than satellite. I went with Sprint, because my neighbors have been using it for a bit. It is fast enough that I can get a VPN connection to work, though the upload speeds and ping latencies are a little slower than I had with the T-1. In theory, Verizon Fios will be here within the year, and I hoping to get business class service from them.

  55. Re:Idiots. by Lennie · · Score: 1

    Who ever said that ? I've never seen it mentioned anywhere that 7 is faster than XP.

    --
    New things are always on the horizon
  56. Re:It would destroy your USB stick by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

    Thanks for pointing that out but that simplistic explanation doesn't cover it. Besides a 1Hz pulse there are also irregular flashes and occurs when applications are not open (so it's not just web caching etc). I also don't get this stuff on Ubuntu. It is something that happens in Windows only. No problem for USB if it is read-only but I don't think it is.

  57. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Ok I demand fiber for $15/month!

    What's that? You say my only options for broadband are Verizon, Comcast and Clearwire? And none have fiber? And their cheapest plans for fiber are twice that, monthly?

    Look, assuming you're talking about American dollars (thus, located in the US), you must realize that your situation is unique. The vast majority of the population doesn't have the ISP option you have. Whatever it is-- since you didn't share your provider, I suppose you could just be bullshitting.

  58. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

    I called the local cable company, phone company, electric, my cell carrier, and the city hall demanding this... didn't work... still on a crappy connection with trouble streaming hulu low-q feeds.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  59. Win7 install option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any reason you can't use an external optical drive to install Win7 on a netbook?

  60. Re:It would destroy your USB stick by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Have you tried going into "Resource Monitor" to see what's accessing the disk? Note that I'm assuming that functionality was carried over to Windows 7 from Vista.

  61. Re:Idiots. by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

    It might not be faster than XP but it certainly feels faster. After my motherboard got fried I installed a new one and decided to go with a clean install of Windows 7, which I'm using right this moment and it feels very fast and stable. As a matter of fact I have not felt this good on Windows ever since I beta tested Win2000 and even the betas of that one were pretty stable to the point that I ended up replacing my 98 with 2000 entirely.

  62. Re:Idiots. by denttford · · Score: 1

    Shrug. I'm writing this response on a Z530 powered Fujitsu U820 with 1 GB of RAM. In Washington Square Park. And I mean writing: the pen input on Windows 7 is fantastic. 1 BSOD in a month of use-which was heat related (I left the thing on in a bag). The constraints on my use are not any worse than on similar hardware using XP or Ubuntu. I skipped Vista, but Win 7 has been very impressive.

    --

    Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
  63. Windows ISO size by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering for some time if the Windows ISO size now was because of the way the Vista installer works now. Supposedly it uses a disk image that it just copies over before the final configuration.

    However, the same install disc is used for Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, and Vista Ultimate. I doubt that's changed with Windows 7.

    Each of these being their own separate image would explain the file size...

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  64. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by beuges · · Score: 1

    Here in south africa, that $15/month gives me a 2GB cap per month. That excludes the line rental - only data. And the fastest DSL line speed is officially 1MB/s but it goes up to 4MB/s if you're lucky. It's another $9-$10 per GB after that.

  65. In some countries download caps are the norm by Bunyip+Redgum · · Score: 1

    Download caps are the norm for many ISPs in Australia.

  66. 10 GB last time I checked (2 days ago) by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Windows 7 64bit install is 10 GB, even with significant amount of features turned off (and compressed,removed).

    Also, when comparing Linux to anything else, install a full feature development environment to that OS along with Documentation which will also include debug libraries etc. For example Visual Studio and XCode on OS X. That is the real size for you to compare while there are many other effects like Windows help files (CHM) are really,really compressed to a point to choke low Mhz systems.

    Another thing is, the amazing waste of space MS does by basically copying entire thing to local HD while installing. I wondered if they were that stupid and now we see the real deal, it was all for these kinds of feature plans. You know, user will likely delete the USB key contents somehow or they will get corrupted etc.

    1. Re:10 GB last time I checked (2 days ago) by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      USB keys can be write protected, or even read only.....

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    2. Re:10 GB last time I checked (2 days ago) by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      So what is the point of copying entire DVD ROM (notice: DVD ROM) to local hard drive and keeping it even after successful install and activation? Steve Jobs will break into guys home and steal the DVD?

    3. Re:10 GB last time I checked (2 days ago) by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Imagine you are out in the field and want to (re)install something... Keep the fragile DVD with you at all times?

      What if it's a volume license, where you only get 1 DVD for a large number of users... Burn a disc for each one of them (and reburn each time the disc goes bad/broke) ?

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
  67. It grows too by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Don't forget every single download will be kept deep in Windows directory (windows update, downloads etc.) and will just stay there unless you turn off windows update service (stop) and delete them by hand. There is almost no reason to keep them since in case Windows totally breaks, those files will go away too. They don't have expire policy either. E.g. theoretical speaking, .NET 4.2 install won't really remove .NET 4.0 installer files. (no apt-get clean)

    I am not exactly a fan of Linux or even OS X install policies but they are angels compared to Windows (including 7).

    1. Re:It grows too by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Vista SP2 can remove all old updates. Please update your troll.txt

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
  68. Re:It would destroy your USB stick by adolf · · Score: 1

    Different strokes for different folks.

    Not everyone here on Slashdot is a low-level hardware geek. But I, for one, am a very good high-level hardware geek (please note that I didn't say "PC hardware").

    I can interface high-level things in ways that make you low-level people turn befuddled and feeble.

    It's good that you know something about building a switch-mode power supply -- I don't. And it's good that I know how to take that thing that your switch-mode power supply is delivering current to, and do something useful with it that you didn't intend.

    I couldn't do my stuff without you guys building things for me to work with, but that doesn't mean that I'm not filling an important role that you [aren't|don't want to|can't].

    It takes all kinds -- be nice.

  69. Re:It would destroy your USB stick by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

    Yeah, half a dozen Prefetch processes and another half dozen miscellaneous Log services [$LogFile (NTFS Volume Log)] lastalive1.dat., SYSTEM.LOG etc. Not big writes but still chipping away at the drive (not good for USB drive, my original point).

  70. Great! by crhylove · · Score: 1

    One more format upon which I do not want their bloated, buggy, crappy rerelease of Vista.

    I'll stick with Linux and XP still. Wake me up when MS pulls their head out of their ass and I don't lose FPS in whatever crap video game I still keep XP around for.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:Great! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You should try something before you start giving out about it - it'll save you from making the mistake you just did.

    2. Re:Great! by crhylove · · Score: 1

      I have tried Win 7. It has about half the performance of XP. Similar to Vista, actually. They just barely removed enough cruft to make it SEEM slightly faster.

      It's really not though. Do your own benchmarks, and find one where it beats XP x64!!!

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  71. Re:Idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you put Windows 7 on a brand new quad core with 8gb of ram, it is indeed faster than XP running on the top of the line pc back when XP was first released.

  72. Will Win7 be a "live System" like Knoppix? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Will I be able to run Win7 from the thumb drive, just like a fully installed Win7? Or will the thumb drive Win7 do nothing expect install Win7 on my hdd?

  73. broadband data cap by mysidia · · Score: 1

    ... serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap."

    I'm all for this.

    I think it's Microsoft's civic duty to encourage buyers of Windows 7 to download it

    If for no reason than discouraging ISPs adopting outrageously small broadband caps.

  74. Re:Windows Live Live Distro finally means somethin by westlake · · Score: 1

    You forgot to say "among windows users". Moving from 1 windows version to another is not equivalent to moving from windows to linux. So what was your point again ?

    That there has been no significant migration to Linux even with the Live Distro to help pave the way?

    Net Applications is, as I said, mass market.

    The push behind Win 7 can't all be coming from the MSDN side - the developer, the IT pro.

    The power users have to be out in force as well - the users comfortable downloading and installing an RC - and for Linux they should be the low-hanging fruit.

  75. Troll eh? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    How hard to offer same basic delete functionality via update to windows update framework? As we all know, it is so advanced (!) that it is impossible to implement in any other browser rather than IE. It can be done even with a simple VB Basic script. In fact, someone should do it and post to sourceforge (as it MUST be open source).

    Perhaps, XP SP3 owners, especially Netbook owners which became the primary target of XP may need to get rid of gigabytes (yes, gigabytes) of updates without stopping update service, hunting the file salad (in directory which is NOT recommended to browse/modify just like Apple System folder) and delete them praying they won`t break anything?

    This kind of "blaming the guy for being a troll because he didn`t agree" belongs to some iSystem, not Windows.

  76. Re:Idiots. by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 0, Troll

    Cunt. Motherfucker. Cum dripping from your father's anus.

    There, be offended. Also, welcome to the internet. Your old-fashioned oppressive ideas of etiquette are meaningless here.

  77. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by rolfc · · Score: 1

    There are several providers, in Sweden. That's why we are well ahead of the rest of the world in terms of clashes with the media industry. They won't sell content to reasonable prices so people share with each other.

  78. Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio by rolfc · · Score: 1

    Flamebait? You must be jealous ;)

  79. i-Flapp is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great stuff Microsoft. But i-Flapp is doing this already. And itâ(TM)s only $10. I use it all the time, so thereâ(TM)s no way that Iâ(TM)m gonna pay extra to upgrade to Windows 7 now.

  80. You don't have to wait for Microsoft Windows 7 by geekspeak09 · · Score: 1

    This is not big news when there is a product like i-Flapp that lets you port your applications and settings from one system to another even if the other system does not have the software loaded. You can buy this now and do not have to wait until October for Microsoft.