Slashdot Mirror


Stealing Data Via Electrical Outlet

Ponca City, We love you writes "NetworkWorld reports that security consultants Andrea Barisani and Daniele Bianco are preparing to unveil their methodology at the Black Hat USA conference for stealing information typed on a computer keyboard using nothing more than the power outlet to which the computer is connected. When you type on a standard computer keyboard, electrical signals run through the cable to the PC. Those cables aren't shielded, so the signal leaks via the ground wire in the cable and into the ground wire on the computer's power supply. The attacker connects a probe to a nearby power socket, detects the ground leakage, and converts the signal back into alphanumeric characters. So far, the attack has proven successful using outlets up to about 15 meters away. The cost of the equipment to carry out the power-line attack could be as little as $500 and while the researchers admit their hacking tools are rudimentary, they believe they could be improved upon with a little time, effort and backing. 'If our small research was able to accomplish acceptable results in a brief development time (approximately a week of work) and with cheap hardware,' they say, 'Consider what a dedicated team or government agency can accomplish with more expensive equipment and effort.'"

208 comments

  1. usb keyboard? by screamphilling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    what about usb keyboards? those wires are shielded. the compared the signal to a mouse signal so I'm assuming they're talking about ps2. still interesting(alarming) surveillance technology nonetheless

    1. Re:usb keyboard? by siloko · · Score: 3, Funny

      which is one of the reasons why I purposely get my password wrong, constatnly. Hold on who is this siloko person!?

    2. Re:usb keyboard? by carvell · · Score: 1

      Very, very often, the individual cables (0v, 5v, D+, D-) within the cable aren't shielded from each other, there's just a shield round the whole lot.

      This attack talks about data getting from the data lines to the ground line, which would still happen with most USB cables, certainly the vast majority of keyboards I'd reckon.

      More likley to knock the noise out is the fact that the data is transmitted as D+ and D- in USB. If the D+ leaks onto the 0v wire, the D- can also leak, which just cancels the D+ out, so nothing is seen.

    3. Re:usb keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't most people use a UPS?

      I like this one
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16842111279

    4. Re:usb keyboard? by mrt_2394871 · · Score: 1

      A shielded cable will cut down (somewhat) on coupling between the signal and power lines.

      If you balance the signal on the keyboard wires, and use twisted pair, that'll have a much greater shielding effect, particularly at the low frequencies (a few kHz) mentioned in TFA. USB signals are balanced IIRC, and twisting is recommended (required for high-speed cables). So a USB keyboard probably would help - a bit - but not primarily because of the shiny braided shield on the cable.

      But I'm not sure that's the whole problem solved, since there's still a direct connection (in the form of the PC) between the keyboard and the power/ground line. It's far more likely that the unwanted signal will simply couple through the PC.

    5. Re:usb keyboard? by mlts · · Score: 1

      Naw, I recommend an AC motor connected to a generator via a short shaft linkage, perhaps some gearing to ensure it spins exactly at 3600 RPM in the US, and 3000 RPM in Europe (60hz and 50hz respectively). Yes, it wastes a good amount of power because it converts electricity to rotational movement and back again... but it is going to be difficult for one side to figure out what the other side is doing. Especially if the secure side then has an online UPS with a decent array of deep cycle batteries.

      For even more security, there is always power over the air that Tesla worked on and there have been some advances in.

      But, in reality, the only solid defense against this type of attack is to get TEMPEST rated equipment that is shielded from the power plug on with high quality mu metal wrapped around everything.

    6. Re:usb keyboard? by Wowsers · · Score: 1

      What about wireless USB keyboards, we all know that they're safe because radio waves are not receivable by anyone else are they..!?

      I bet the security story would be used by the likes of Intel and Microsoft to justify the (un)Trusted Computing platform wet deam of theirs.

      --
      Take Nobody's Word For It.
    7. Re:usb keyboard? by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Naw, I recommend an AC motor connected to a generator via a short shaft linkage, perhaps some gearing to ensure it spins exactly at 3600 RPM in the US, and 3000 RPM in Europe (60hz and 50hz respectively). Yes, it wastes a good amount of power because it converts electricity to rotational movement and back again...

      A rotary converter. My dad used to have one of those - it was a beautifully made thing, all brass and varnished wood. Sadly it disappeared after he died. I wish i'd got hold of it.

    8. Re:usb keyboard? by burisch_research · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In reality, you don't need to run most modern electronics equipment from AC. The first stage of ANY modern PC power supply (switched mode supply) is DC rectification - the incoming AC is passed through a diode rectifier, then smoothed with a big capacitor. So you don't need to worry too much about the speed of the motor. I've heard of people who have rewired their entire houses to use 200V DC. Yes, it's much more dangerous than AC, but what it does mean is that you can connect your incoming AC through a monster rectifier directly into a fat bank of series-connected batteries. When your mains goes down, you wouldn't even notice -- and there's no need for expensive inverters to turn your DC back into AC.

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    9. Re:usb keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty wasteful.

      It would be better to create something similar to a keyboards usage patterns.
      Hell, you could probably use a keyboard as the base.

      But instead of actually sending the requests, just remove the data line.
      If that isn't workable, you could always go through the route of writing a driver that will simply drop the patterns from the modded keyboard.
      Detecting things like this from the CPU is a much harder task. (In fact, i would be surprised if it was actually possible)

      Or, y'know, on-screen keyboard for those times when you need extra privacy.
      Fear that someone might hax your screen?
      1) Create simple glyphs that only you understand, or
      2) Create a simply encoding system, but if you have enemies with remote screen readers, this will fail badly.
      I thought every geek created their own languages when they were 10? No? Just me then...

    10. Re:usb keyboard? by Cylix · · Score: 5, Funny

      another approach is to use wireless keyboards.

      No ground fault attack is possible since I'm using batteries!

      I've been fighting the man for so long I've got a million tricks like this up my sleeve.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    11. Re:usb keyboard? by kasperd · · Score: 1

      I've heard of people who have rewired their entire houses to use 200V DC. [...] -- and there's no need for expensive inverters to turn your DC back into AC.

      You can use that to drive light bulbs, but that is about it. Most equipment relies on the input being AC in order to transform it down to the voltage it needs. In order to make it work for any electronics more complicated than an old fashioned light bulb, you'd have to replace the power supply for each piece of equipment. It's much easier to just convert the DC power back into AC.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    12. Re:usb keyboard? by burisch_research · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You miss the point of my message entirely. There are very very few pieces of equipment which actually need an AC source. If you supply your PC with DC power, it will work perfectly fine without any modifications. This is because the DC is chopped up into a very high frequency AC within the power supply. Yes, standard transformers require an AC input -- however these are few and far between these days. Switched mode PSUs use a much smaller transformer, with a synthetic AC input, and the first stage of a switched mode PSU will accept DC just as happily as AC. The only other equipment class which actually requires AC is synchronous motors, such as you would find in a hairdryer or electric drill.

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    13. Re:usb keyboard? by JSlope · · Score: 1

      What about using UPS and other current stabilizers?

      --
      ResoMail - the alternative secure e-mail system
    14. Re:usb keyboard? by JSlope · · Score: 1

      Here is when wind and solar power comes in handy, coupled with a good UPS.

      --
      ResoMail - the alternative secure e-mail system
    15. Re:usb keyboard? by thogard · · Score: 3, Informative

      A USB keyboard will still do a slow scan of row and column and the resistance will go up per keypress and that is what they are looking at. If you can identify the scan frequency, then you can look for current changes at the right times and reconstruct the matrix of key presses. Since most PCs use the same matrix, its trivial to convert the matrix with unknown start values into known start values once you find 0x39 (space bar) shifted some random way and frequently pressed.

    16. Re:usb keyboard? by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I poked around a few designs this morning.

      Most devices are not designed to surpress noise to ground. A typical surge protector relies on shunting part of the load to ground. In fact, most power conditions will not correct ground issues. (Think big voltage regulator).

      An isolation transformer, useful for eliminating ground loops, will most likely keep you safe from power sniffing beasties. Usually, these units come with a ground noise suppression rating and this indicates the relative expected performance.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    17. Re:usb keyboard? by TheMeuge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You really don't need to go that far. If you use a true sine wave UPS (where the incoming current charges the battery, and all power going to your devices is generated from the battery), I doubt you'll have lots of noise coming out of the line.

    18. Re:usb keyboard? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      another approach is to use wireless keyboards.

      And what do you think happens on the receiver connected to the computer's USB, that's different from what a wired keyboard does?

    19. Re:usb keyboard? by jorx · · Score: 1

      Wireless is great... but doesn't there have to be a receiver? Wouldn't the "keypresses" received by the receiver still be grounded?

    20. Re:usb keyboard? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Mod parent funny. The ground fault attack (hard to carry out) is superseded by the obvious RF attack, that is to just monitor the wireless signal.
      You're not the only one laughing at that joke, but the mods clearly didn't get it (+4 interesting as of this writing.)

      --
      Not a sentence!
    21. Re:usb keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not shielded enough -- if my cell phone is too close to my USB mouse and it rings, the computer interprets it as scroll wheel use.

    22. Re:usb keyboard? by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      That's why i use wireless keyboards.. much more secure!

      Just wish my neighbor's typing didn't show up on my computer from time to time... Was "interesting" to explain why part of a term paper suddenly started listing bestiality websites!

    23. Re:usb keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is kind of old already. My keyboard has a big ferrite beat in it to prevent external noise from causing problems (mostly to filter AC power line noise). However, none of this is particularly new. (OK, it was new at one time, say 1943). In 1943, a US Navy radio technician discovered a large amount of noise over the radio when one of those new teletype machines started printing something in the next room. It was determined that various identified pieces of electronic noise created certain letters. A bit of development and a second teletype and you could electronically tell what was being printed by eavesdropping. A full wikipedia article about all of this by searching the title TEMPEST. You can do it by screen-scraping (high voltage CRT's were great for this), and now this. Governments started wrapping computers in tin foil and metal cages decades ago. Years later, they would just wrap the whole building (local networks are not connected to the internet, and power is created internally). You can't even shine a laser at a window and then take sum and difference frequencies from the incident and reflected light sources, mix them in a differential amplifier, and listen to the conversation in the room from the vibration on the glass, because most spook houses don't have windows. This article is so 'been there, done that'. But get excited if you want (and yes, I really was there, and did that, sincerely, A.C.)

    24. Re:usb keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would actually just make it far easier for them.
      There's no point anyhow, if that type of organization wants to know what your
      doing on your computer, your not going to stop them.

    25. Re:usb keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me that you've been modded interesting, and not funny.

    26. Re:usb keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and hope they can't get a radio receiver anywhere within 10 meters of you.

    27. Re:usb keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another approach is to use wireless keyboards.

      No ground fault attack is possible since I'm using batteries!

      I've been fighting the man for so long I've got a million tricks like this up my sleeve.

      Wireless keyboards are even eaiser to sniff. WTF?

    28. Re:usb keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wireless keyboard for security? Please mod parent FUNNY..

    29. Re:usb keyboard? by metaforest · · Score: 1

      How many times does it have to be said in this thread...

      Ground
      Is the issue here, FFS!

      That green wire that keeps you and your equipment from getting fried by stray floating charges!!!

      They don't put filters in series with ground on consumer gear because it could lead to someone getting fried, or having the gear fail unexpectedly.

      And you don't need AC to get chassis float! Chassis will float just fine with DC. Next time you want to surprise a friend try this:

      When your friend is standing on the ground next to your running car grab a bare GROUNDED wire inside the vehicle and touch his arm or hand. At the very least you'll give him a little static charge, at worse (wet bare feet) he'll melt off the side of your car like he turned to butter.

      On second though don't do that.

      The reason is that the chassis of the car can pick up RF, as well as charge from the ignition coils and return from that thumping Bass Cab you have in the trunk.... it all raises the ground potential of the chassis. We don't notice it because we float with the car. Tires make excellent insulators.

      A USB keyboard will help a lot. D+/D- are balance loaded, but there will still be energy dumped into ground when the signal gets converted to and from to a +5V train of bits during the trnasmission. The issue is that it's going to get buried in the mud with all the other >1MHz hash leaking onto ground from your computer.

      The main reason the old AT keyboard is so vulnerable is because on a modern PC nothing but the old keyboard, and mouse run at those bit rates, and the signal is usually shunted to ground through a small resistor on the motherboard to protect the keyboard port's input buffer, because only a small fraction of the energy sent is needed to determine the line's state.

  2. Think what data they could steal with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Powerline Ethernet

    Nothing we use our computers for is safe from these pesky hackers.
    Time to go back to Tables of Stone.

    1. Re:Think what data they could steal with... by JustOK · · Score: 1

      but then people would take them for granite

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  3. Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, looks like a dupe and the important bit of info is that only PS/2 keyboards are really vulnerable. USB cables are shielded better. Can anyone confirm TFA is the same case?

    2. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is NOT a dupe.
      For crying out loud, actually read the thing.

      TWO completely different conferences.

    3. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about conferences? The actual matter they talk about appears to be the same. Or are you the author of the submission trying to make more money by denying it is a dupe?

  4. random noise generator? by MoFoQ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    even usb uses a GND and the D+/D- (data wires) aren't isolated from the GND.
    Plus most GND is typically a common ground (through the chassis and to the ground of the power cable).

    and if you consider the fact that this was done by unfunded, tiny group in just a week....makes ya wonder what the NSA or any other BIGGER and better funded group would have up their sleeves.

    looks like I have to come up with a random noise generator to hook up to the ground of my power outlets.

    1. Re:random noise generator? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      looks like I have to come up with a random noise generator to hook up to the ground of my power outlets.

      Too much work. Just do what I do -- don't ever type anything worth reading.

    2. Re:random noise generator? by MoFoQ · · Score: 4, Funny

      or hook up an old ipod running death metal to the gnd

    3. Re:random noise generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be anything but random. You need white noise.

    4. Re:random noise generator? by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      looks like I have to come up with a random noise generator to hook up to the ground of my power outlets.

      Vacuum cleaner? Microwave? Air conditioning?

    5. Re:random noise generator? by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Funny

      Too much work. Just do what I do -- don't ever type anything worth reading.

      I am posting at Slashdot - kinda like preaching to the converted, isn't it?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    6. Re:random noise generator? by siloko · · Score: 1

      Vacuum cleaner? Speak for yourself! My vacuum cleaner hose doubles as a microphone and a more melodic password obfuscator has rarely been heard!

    7. Re:random noise generator? by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      I'll have to read this article , because i'm somehow about this.
      Normally , a power supply contains a rectifier , so this should mean the signal can't be carried back.

      I'll have to do some tests on this.

    8. Re:random noise generator? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would be anything but random. You need white noise.

      ...and a sense of humor.

    9. Re:random noise generator? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Normally , a power supply contains a rectifier , so this should mean the signal can't be carried back.

      Current going into a diode will tell you the impedance coming out of the diode.

    10. Re:random noise generator? by Jstlook · · Score: 1

      So ... play it backward.

      --
      ---jstlook ---For that is the way of Elves, for they say both yes AND no, and mean every word of it. --- J.R.R.T.
    11. Re:random noise generator? by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      "looks like I have to come up with a random noise generator to hook up to the ground of my power outlets."

      There would already be a lot of noise in the signal which they must be able to filter already. You'd probably be better off connecting something that mimicked a series of keyboards with keystrokes that were plausible. This would not be random at all, and your keyboard would then be one keyboard hiding among many keyboards, rather than a single keyboard hiding within (approximately white) noise -- which could actually be quite conspicuous.

    12. Re:random noise generator? by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      Strange, a keyboard sniffing technique where Bluetooth keyboards are safer than wired...

    13. Re:random noise generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The original academic spur for TEMPEST was also done with cheap hardware available from non-specialty stores. That's why TEMPEST is so important--anyone with a bit of technical know-how and $40 in their pocket can eavesdrop effectively.

    14. Re:random noise generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A + RANDOM NOISE = A

      Given you have enough data samples. If you like, what you need is false signals mixed in with real signals.

      Or just use a laptop, and only charge it when it is switched off ...

    15. Re:random noise generator? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We musicians have our tricks and devices to get rid of power-line disturbances. I recommend looking for such a device in a big store for musicians and a guide on the net.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    16. Re:random noise generator? by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      What about a device that loops and delays the signals coming from the keyboard, and runs those down the line. With the current keystrokes as well as those from 30 seconds ago, and those from 3 minutes ago, etc, that might be too much similar signal to get something coherent out of.

      Similar to a looping/distortion pedal for a guitar/instrument.

    17. Re:random noise generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many computers and their power supplies actually are quite terrible random noise sources. Even some shielded cables radiate noise (and data?) because the shield is not properly connected!
      Sometimes it's difficult or even impossible to receive some radio stations due to the noise (and leaking data..?) from computers. The stations may have to increase their power and then they are more likely to cause interference to these computers and other poorly designed devices. Time to start designing everything better!

    18. Re:random noise generator? by linebackn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too much work. Just do what I do -- don't ever type anything worth reading.

      Or do what I do, and always type stuff that will make eyes bleed when read.

      Oh, BTW: Hairy blood dripping decomposing donkey sacks with sphincter spread.

    19. Re:random noise generator? by asCii88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or use dvorak

    20. Re:random noise generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you may have devices that get rid of it when you plug into the power line itself, but we amateur radio operators get our waves direct from the air, so if you are sending white noise down the ground you will also be transmitting it at the same time.

      This is where that death part comes in, you are now interfering with our equipment!

    21. Re:random noise generator? by really? · · Score: 1

      Err ... and what is "death metal" if not "white noise"?

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    22. Re:random noise generator? by boast · · Score: 1

      the best music to have ever existed.

    23. Re:random noise generator? by Nekomusume · · Score: 1

      Using a decent UPS might actually protect you from this. I think most of them shield the ground aswell as the main wires, but I could be wrong.

    24. Re:random noise generator? by budgenator · · Score: 3, Informative

      even usb uses a GND and the D+/D- (data wires) aren't isolated from the GND.
      Plus most GND is typically a common ground (through the chassis and to the ground of the power cable).

      and if you consider the fact that this was done by unfunded, tiny group in just a week....makes ya wonder what the NSA or any other BIGGER and better funded group would have up their sleeves.

      looks like I have to come up with a random noise generator to hook up to the ground of my power outlets.

      Now you know why the NSA and the other spooky types keep their classified equipment running off a generator powered by an electrical motor rather than connecting directly to the power grid. When you absolutely have to keep something secret nothing beats Faraday cages, air-gaps and mechanical isolation from the power grid.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    25. Re:random noise generator? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Basicaly what happens is the keyboard induces current in the ground line

      Since keyboards and mice signals are in the 1 to 20 kHz range, a filter can isolate that range for listening, they say.

      so the answer is to filter out the 1-20KHz range to reduce the level of ground loop feedback and insert some pink noise at the 1-20Hz range into the ground to further bury the signal into the noise.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    26. Re:random noise generator? by chriso11 · · Score: 1

      The D+/D- wires are differential, in which the signal is coupled, and so it will radiate and affect the ground current much less - probably by 2+ orders of magnitude, compared to single-ended signals.

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    27. Re:random noise generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea! I'm going to put some cone feet on the bottom of my PC to keep the noise gremlins at bay.

    28. Re:random noise generator? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Probably not uncommon, actually. Since, outside of fairly seriously paranoid applications, wire is treated as intrinsically safe from eavesdropping, the only real standard constraining leakage is the FCC and/or crosstalk that keeps the design from working

      With wireless, on the other hand, trivial eavesdropping is a basic assumption. This doesn't mean that designers won't fuck it up(Hello, WEP); but the matter is at least considered.

    29. Re:random noise generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be careful anyway. What if they steal your password and start posting insightful comments?

    30. Re:random noise generator? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's for anti-vibration. And racketballs cut in half work just as well. Or hanging a cement block from the ceiling with bungee cords. The second is used in at least one DIY scanning electron microscope design, it's pretty good. Eliminating power noise is an electrical circuit, often an AC->DC->AC circuit.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    31. Re:random noise generator? by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

      wait...they were still alive?
      thought their social security would've ran out by now.

    32. Re:random noise generator? by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      looks like I have to come up with a random noise generator to hook up to the ground of my power outlets.

      Why bother? They already have special cameras that can record LCD screens through walls.

    33. Re:random noise generator? by gboss · · Score: 1

      or you could just use an isolation transformer.

    34. Re:random noise generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but how do they isolate ground? (I assume they do, but how?)

    35. Re:random noise generator? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      > makes ya wonder what the NSA or any other BIGGER
      > and better funded group would have up their sleeves.

      Sometimes they are not that smart. Now, thanks that our "unfunded, tiny group", they will sure invest into this if they haven't already, same principle as a zero day exploit ! ;-))

      We will need a test bed to test the effectiveness of your "random noise generator" ;-))

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    36. Re:random noise generator? by SlashWombat · · Score: 1

      But, the current going into a rectifier diode when feed from an AC power source is complex. (mostly the diode is off ... only switches on when the AC voltage exceeds the voltage stored in the capacitor that the diode feeds!)

      I would have thought that the capacitors in the power supply would have eradicated any mains fluctuations. (Eradicated is a bit too severe a term, but a reduction of 60 dB at the very least would seem reasonable.) Overall, since there are many capacitors in a power supply, the reduction would be even higher.)

      I would have bet though, that listening on a radio receiver to a harmonic of the CPU's clock frequency, you might be able to deduce what was typed. (Then again, the "code" generated by/for the characters would be dwarfed by the code running in the underlying operating system ... Ignoring the "Spreadspectrum" CPU clocks in many PC's - used to reduce the apparent EMC radiation from the PC to meet regulatory requirements. )

    37. Re:random noise generator? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 0

      With the way they master music nowadays pretty much any modern record is white noise -- they use multi-band limiting to keep the whole audible spectrum near the peak for the duration of the album. One of the many reasons I can't listen to the crap they are putting out anymore.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    38. Re:random noise generator? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Err ... and what is "death metal" if not "white noise"?

      "White noise" for the deaf of hearing? Or should that be "pink noise"? I'm not sure if death-metallers would be offended or excited by the girlishness of being compared to "pink noise".

      But this is SlashDot - why should I let not knowing anything about the subject get in the way of posting about it?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    39. Re:random noise generator? by xaosflux · · Score: 1

      According to most old-timer's "That ain't music, it's just 'noise'". They fail to classify the type of noise.

    40. Re:random noise generator? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Ground is just a reference voltage, just bond it to the neutral wire at the generator; a laptop doesn't have a ground when it's unplugged from the charger.
      Sure you want a ground that's bonded to a ground stake with high-voltages like CRT monitors, but its unnecessary on a computer running on 5 and 12 volts.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    41. Re:random noise generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tough. They've been messing up my wireless devices for years; payback's a bitch.

    42. Re:random noise generator? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Heh, interesting that you should consider it strange. Personally, given the at least four other techniques (could be five, first link is 4 techniques and second link is a single technique, but I didn't check if the second link was just repeating one of the 4 from the first) that already exist for sniffing wired keyboards, my only thought upon reading this was "and once more, wireless keyboards prove that they are capable of being more secure than wired."

      I mean, sure it's trivially easier to sniff the wireless signals than those coming from the wired, but how can you be sure that the wireless receiver is actually picking them up?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  5. laser pointer by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    very clever how hey grab info using a laser pointer and measuring the vibrations. i'm afraid you might notice the big red dot on your computer though. sienfield flash backs.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:laser pointer by ytm · · Score: 1

      very clever how hey grab info using a laser pointer and measuring the vibrations. i'm afraid you might notice the big red dot on your computer though. sienfield flash backs.

      You might not notice if they move from proof of concept with laser pointer to a real device. Are you able to see infrared?

    2. Re:laser pointer by Z80a · · Score: 2, Informative

      a lot of webcams can.

    3. Re:laser pointer by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      Agreed - you'd want to use a laser that was not in the visible spectrum.

    4. Re:laser pointer by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      But most people have their webcams setup to face them, not the computer.

    5. Re:laser pointer by La+Gris · · Score: 1

      Even if the wireless keyboards where encrypted. The reciever would still need to be connected to the computer with USB or the regular PS2 keyboard cables and transmit unencrypted USB HID or PS2 keyboard data.

      --
      Léa Gris
    6. Re:laser pointer by needs2bfree · · Score: 2

      You might not at first, but you will when a disembodied voice says "NUCLEAR LAUNCH DETECTED"

    7. Re:laser pointer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My computer is prettier than me, you insensitive clod!

  6. What about wireless keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More and more people are using them, there's no encryption and each keypress is broadcast direct.

  7. converting powerline signals into keystrokes by chiu.au · · Score: 1

    What we want is a technique to convert power-line signals into keystrokes.

  8. How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...before their site gets hacked by Anti-Sec?

  9. Root is like crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Root is like crack. Don't smoke it. I did once and got hooked. I ran Mac OS Updates as root. ****, I even had sex with my girlfriend as root. Man, that caused some permissions problems. When I started the road to recovery (logging in as Zacks) my girlfriend was all like: "**** no! You can't get any cause you don't own me an I don't go groups. You don't have the power to read, write OR execute so get out of my FACE" So I was all HELL NO bitch. And she wuz like you do not have root (superuser) privlages so get out of my TruBlueEnvironment! So then I went chown and chmodded her ass to me. Dat be-otch be up in my hizzouse. What what. Holla!

    1. Re:Root is like crack by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      ....Yeah, what he said!

    2. Re:Root is like crack by dotgain · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wish you wrote man pages

    3. Re:Root is like crack by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I even had sex with my girlfriend as root.

      Kind of appropriate!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Root is like crack by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I'm rather glad he doesn't.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  10. Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The SIGINT in the Netherlands did this kind of stuff well before the new millennium, including reading the screen (LCD or CRT) and audio by tapping into the ground or pointing a dish to the emitting circuit, one of the reasons why the whole building handling sensitive information must be encased, making it practically a faraday cage. Only disadvantage is that your cellphone doesn't work although the SIGINT saw that as an advantage.

    1. Re:Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just the Netherlands. I lots of western (and eastern?) intelligence agencies have been able to read what is displayed on your screen from the emissions of your video cable for about a quarter mile (400m) since decades ago.

    2. Re:Done that by Kuroji · · Score: 1

      Well, when you get down to it, any outside communications that isn't through a secure line is a possible liability. You don't want someone waltzing in and sending out sensitive information on a phone call. Granted, if they're determined they'll get that information one way or another, but that's where SIGINT ends and HUMINT begins.

    3. Re:Done that by Rakishi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hell if I remember correctly my old motherboard had a setting to add random noise so the memory chips couldn't be read from their emissions. So yeah, it's an old and well known problem.

    4. Re:Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was even one where they read a CRT based on nothing more than the glow in a frosted window nearby! Since the electron beam is painting each pixel one-at-a-time, the glow will contain the entire image serially encoded.

    5. Re:Done that by polymath69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And from whence did this old motherboard of yours derive its random noise, O von Neumann?

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
    6. Re:Done that by emlyncorrin · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you're trying to imply, it probably used the thermal noise from a resistor, or something similar. There are several well known methods for generating random noise.

  11. UPS? USB? by seifried · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing (hoping?) this doesn't work if you have an in-line UPS (that conditions power constantly) as that should hopefully futze (technical term, really) the signal up? I'd be curious to know about that. I'm also assuming this doesn't work for USB as well since most computers have multiple USB devices (hopefully transmitting/receiving enough to mask the keyboard signal).

    1. Re:UPS? USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing (hoping?) this doesn't work if you have an in-line UPS (that conditions power constantly) as that should hopefully futze (technical term, really) the signal up?

      Even a double-conversion UPS will likely have no effect because it is required by code to pass the grounding conductor through. This attack seems to be measuring current leakage to ground, which will normally travel along the entire circuit to the actual grounding point at the service junction; since it doesn't involve changes to the waveform along the power-carrying conductors, line conditioning would have no effect on it.

      It may not be measurable from a separate circuit though, which would limit the number of usable locations within a building to mount an attack from.

    2. Re:UPS? USB? by sjames · · Score: 1

      I doubt it will help. The ground on a UPS is a pass-through.

      USB would at least make it harder.

  12. Oh No ...Will Anti Sec Strike Again??? by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    What now? Flickr? Photobucket? Porntube? What will the neon hats do next?

    1. Re:Oh No ...Will Anti Sec Strike Again??? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I want to see Anti-Sec hit slashdot. Maybe then they'll fix their broken fucking code.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Be safe !! Encrypt your input !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this day and age you cannot be too careful !! Encrypt your data input !! YES !! While you type !! You can do this NOW !! and for the low low price of only $189,00. Act quickly as supplies are LIMITED !!

    http://ratsass.org.net.bg/

    Do it today and have that safe, summer's evening feeling all the time !! Because you never know what I'll do with your data !!!!!

  15. tempest by arabagast · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEMPEST - the fact that these guidelines exist, means that this is in not new.

    --
    Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
    Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
    1. Re:tempest by hebertrich · · Score: 2, Informative

      Similar techniques are at least 40 years old.
      One of the ways described in litterature makes use of the variation
      in current in the ac line.Others were simply picking up the rf and used a
      tv monitor with variable h and v frequencies to actually look at what was on the
      monitor.
      Still .. it's no big news . they are simply reproducing what's been known
      for ages .. computers are easy to intercept because they radiate massive
      amounts of RF.

       

    2. Re:tempest by MDMurphy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I worked in a facility that was fully TEMPEST shielded in the 80's. Dual airlock doors with full metal seals to get in. The power leakage problem was taken care of a motor/generator setup. Incoming power only went to an electic motor. The motor was connected a shaft which spun a generator to supply power to the computer room. With only a mechanical connection no data would be leaking back.

    3. Re:tempest by lewko · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a rotary UPS would achieve the same thing. I wonder about the Earth link though.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    4. Re:tempest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I know for a fact the USAF was working on this in the very early 80s, shielding mainframe printers, terminals and typewriters from "eavesdropping."

    5. Re:tempest by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not only not new, but the codeword Tempest was declassified in the 80s - not the standards, just the codeword. The Government has been doing this for a LONG time

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    6. Re:tempest by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Not only not new, but the codeword Tempest was declassified in the 80s - not the standards, just the codeword. The Government has been doing this for a LONG time

      Yeah, I knew a mid-level computer store salesman in the mid 80's who was selling hardened Compaq gear to the government, and everybody in the chain knew about these kinds of attacks.

      They could also read the text directly off the CRT's noise from several hundred feet.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  16. If 'they' really want to spy on you ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the cops or feds really want to spy on you, you will have a hard time preventing it. My advice is not to attract their attention in the first place.

    If you're someone like the mafia, you can't use electronic devices and you can't write anything down. Each of your clandestine conversations has to be in a different noisy location so they can't set up a directional microphone or bug. You also have to prevent them from getting a deaf person to lip read you. (I don't have direct experience with criminal gangs but anyone can observe that they usually aren't brought down by wiretaps. The big prosecutions of mafia bosses usually resulted from getting an underling to rat on his boss.) The point is that anyone worried about being spied on can and will take measures to prevent it.

    Spying on someone is expensive. Spying on someone's key clicks is particularly expensive and probably won't produce great results. Someone tried an experiment of bugging an office by shining a laser on the window. The results were disappointing. The vast majority of the conversation was uninteresting. The experimenters decided that no useful information would have been gathered.

    Tapping telephones and data links is relatively easy (compared with sniffing keystrokes). Stealing someone's laptop is usually also easy. Unless I'm taking measures against those kinds of spying, I'm not worried about having my keystrokes sniffed. If I were at danger of being spied on, I would be much more worried about being betrayed by a 'friend', associate, or employee.

  17. Newton's law? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    Many 'net junkies like to say things like "Information wants to be free!" as if there was something anthropic about information.

    But information is the foundation of the Universe, so much so that quantum mechanics is routinely described with terms like "information loss" and even measured. It's almost like Douglas Adams was right all along, and the universe actually is a large supercomputer trying to find out the answer to life, the universe, and everything. Where are the hyper-intelligent mice?

    But if the universe is information, then the laws of the universe apply to information itself. Laws, such as: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

    While things like shields and noise generators serve to obfuscate what goes on in a computer, they don't actually solve the basic issue that power *is* being consumed, radio waves *are* being generated, heat is being generated, and that these properties will *always* be detectable by various means so long as they are, in fact, being generated.

    The only possible way around this might be some form of reversible computing but the basic programming model will require so many architectural changes to enact that it's realistically an entirely new form of computing.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Newton's law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, Newton's Law only applies to just that - Newtonian Mechanics.

    2. Re:Newton's law? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      In this case, there is an easier way, and it's called optical links, which don't radiate RF when you send photons through them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Newton's law? by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Funny

      They leak photons if you bend them just right :-)

    4. Re:Newton's law? by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      That was Asimov.. not Adams.. I think you're thinking of this?

    5. Re:Newton's law? by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      No, he was thinking Adams. He got his scale badly wrong; that's all. The hyper-dimensional mice were manipulating the giant computer of the Earth... not the Universe.

      And that Asimov short was a real brain twister when I first read it.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    6. Re:Newton's law? by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      In this case, there is an easier way, and it's called optical links, which don't radiate RF when you send photons through them.

      However the transmitters and receptors of the optical signal will generate ground transmissions no different from a standard electrical signal. A simple noise filter circuit will level off the sharp signal bursts into slower power drains which would be unintelligible to any signal detector.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
  18. wasnt this here earlier by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

    not sure, but i think there was a similar article posted here a few weeks ago, maybe i saw it on digg, not sure but have read this earlier

  19. Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So even my keyboard needs a tinfoil hat right now!

  20. Military has known about this for decades by meerling · · Score: 1

    The military has had line filters and other protocols to deal with this exact issue in place for at least 20 years now.

    And no, that's not idle speculation, it was one of the things we had to deal with when I was in the military.
    It's even referred to by one of those silly military project names.
    Sorry, I'm not sure if I can post the name, so I won't.
    (If someone else posts it, correctly or otherwise, I will neither confirm nor deny it's accuracy, so please don't ask.)

  21. I think this is complete rubbish by crusty_architect · · Score: 1

    There is going to be a lot more induced signal onto the earth of a PC than just keyboard signals. PC's use switch mode power supplies, these are very very noisy electrically. Let's not even start with the multitude of other sources of induced EMF in a modern PC. I just don't believe these guys. Sorry. (Electrical Engineer of some 25 years).

    1. Re:I think this is complete rubbish by arabagast · · Score: 1

      they seem to be filtering the signal quite a bit (obviosly), and a bandpass filter at a known frequency would take care of quite a lot of the random noise from the rest of the system.

      --
      Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
      Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
  22. Would a Hum-X fix that? by TimTucker · · Score: 1

    Would a Hum-X filter it out?

    http://www.ebtechaudio.com/humxdes.html (~$70 from Guitar Center or similar stores) -- basically a small filter to help eliminate noise on ground lines (quite useful for fixing A/V problems involving differences in ground, i.e.: when you have a projector on a different circuit than your audio equipment).

    1. Re:Would a Hum-X fix that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from this specific attack, yes, it will. However, it won't protect you from Van Eck phreaking or other RF techniques. But yes, it's a good start.

  23. Wireless? by piphil · · Score: 1

    Surely half the job has been done by the increased use of wireless keyboards? I know they're generally short-range transmitters, but wouldn't it be relatively easy to reverse-engineer the wireless communication of various company's wireless devices to create a universal listening device?

    1. Re:Wireless? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      In short: Yes, it's very easy to capture keystrokes over bluetooth, even when the device isn't paired with you. Google for "bluetooth keyboard sniffing".

      But there are easier, more reliable ways to get information. Let's say you were involved in corporate espionage, and you wanted to capture the keystrokes of a company's CEO. Here's the easy way to do it:

      1. Buy a USB keylogger
      2. Bribe the local cleaning staff: "I'll give you $1000 (or whatever) to connect this to Mr Guy Smiley's computer, where the keyboard plugs in. Here's how you do it ..."
      3. Insert on Monday, collect on Friday.

      It's a sad fact, but almost no one notices the cleaning staff. And the cleaning people are there when you aren't.

      So for $300-$350 for the keylogger, plus $1000 (or whatever) for the bribe, and waiting a week, you now have lots of information about what the CEO has been typing. Usernames/passwords, private memos, etc.

      While I have never done this, I know a tech support person in another IT department who discovered a USB keylogger had been installed on the Director's laptop dock. But I guess the Director had dropped his laptop that morning, and the techs were replacing it with a new one, including a new dock. That's how they found it, pure luck. They suspected someone was doing that to catch the Director's username/password.

      I know an IT Director in another organization (a small company) and they had an incident a few years ago where the IT Manager (who also did tech support as part of a staff of 3 ... small company) installed a software keylogger on the Director's and CIO's computers as they were deployed. I understand he used this to get their passwords and read their email.

      So yeah, this stuff does happen.

    2. Re:Wireless? by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      The only effective Bluetooth sniffing attacks I've heard of occur during the pairing process. Correct me if I'm wrong, but as long as you pair keyboards with PCs in a secure environment (a big mylar bag?) and warn your users not to re-pair their keyboards, I think you'd be pretty safe.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  24. Could accomplish? by feepness · · Score: 1

    , 'Consider what a dedicated team or government agency have already accomplished with more expensive equipment and effort.'"

    FTFY.

  25. Overrated by sleeponthemic · · Score: 1

    Stealing power is where it's at. They should come up with a way to steal power instead.

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
  26. Re:Panasonic BANKGRUPT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's not right, there's no 'g' in bankrupt.

  27. "stealing"? Please don't promote english abuse by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    you can't "steal" data.

    you can compromise the data, hack it, crack it, breach the computer, etc, but its not theft.

    Please don't promote this butchery of the english language being perpetrated by luddites and imbeciles so paranoid they feel the need to apply a double standard in which the bill of rights does not apply on the internet.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:"stealing"? Please don't promote english abuse by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
      Although I agree, the term is so misused these days (particularly in reference to "theft" of copyrighted information) that it has been devalued. Because we are all brought up to consider stealing to be bad, the spin-doctors are tapping into our conditioning to elicit an emotional response that is rarely warranted.

      In my mind, if you have something and I take it off you, that's stealing as you don't have it any more.
      If you have something and I copy it, that may well be a crime, or immoral, but provided you still have the same use of it as before, I would never consider that "stealing".

      It will be interesting to see how todays children view "stealing" as they grow up. Will it still be considered the heinous act it was when I was a child, or will they be so hardened to its misuse that reference to stealing will be the equivalent to telling them something is rude.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    2. Re:"stealing"? Please don't promote english abuse by dissy · · Score: 1

      Please don't promote this butchery of the english language being perpetrated by luddites and imbeciles so paranoid they feel the need to apply a double standard in which the bill of rights does not apply on the internet.

      Sadly for this specific case, "Hey! He stole my idea!" was in use in English long before the Internet existed.

      That old saying will be a lot harder to get people to stop saying/thinking than all the newer made up stuff where 'theft' means 4-5 different crimes, only one of which is actually theft.

    3. Re:"stealing"? Please don't promote english abuse by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      Mmm. And what of all those spies who have been charged with stealing secrets?

    4. Re:"stealing"? Please don't promote english abuse by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Yep, it is listed in GNU's words to avoid or use with care: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Theft

  28. Just us a filter? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    Some/all of APC's surge suppressors contain in-line EMI filters.

    Is that enough to stop this hack?

    1. Re:Just us a filter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably, if they did it right

    2. Re:Just us a filter? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      That kind of EMI filtering reduces interfering signals (coming in and going out), but does not eliminate them. If the signal is low enough not to interfere with other equipment that is good enough. The conducted emissions testing required for FCC, EC, etc has limits (more strict at higher frequencies). If the measured signal is below the limit you pass, but the signal is still measurable.

  29. Listen to music from your computer with a radio by biduxe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A great deal of people here already know, but for the others:
    http://www.erikyyy.de/tempest/

    Software to generate images (noise) on your CRT screen so that the generated interference will translate as sound you can listen to on a radio receiver

    It works great to listen to music when you do not have a sound card!

  30. No ground wire? by ripdajacker · · Score: 0

    What if the power outlet does not have a ground wire? Or the cable from the computer to the outlet does not have one, would the hack then be possible?

    1. Re:No ground wire? by ledow · · Score: 1

      Possibly, because "neutral" is just the same in theory but slightly harder to isolate from the mains supply, but in theory there's no reason why not.

      However, only stupid countries have unearthed outlets.

  31. Mechanical Solution by MDMurphy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I worked in a facility that was fully TEMPEST shielded in the 80's. Dual airlock doors with full metal seals to get in. The power line leakage problem was taken care of a motor/generator setup. Incoming power only went to an electic motor. The motor was connected by a shaft which spun a generator to supply power to the computer room. With only a mechanical connection no data would be leaking back.

    1. Re:Mechanical Solution by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I worked in a facility that was fully TEMPEST shielded in the 80's. Dual airlock doors with full metal seals to get in. The power line leakage problem was taken care of a motor/generator setup. Incoming power only went to an electic motor. The motor was connected by a shaft which spun a generator to supply power to the computer room. With only a mechanical connection no data would be leaking back.

      So that's basically a mechanically implemented low-pass filter, right? I would think that it would be easier and cheaper to implement electronic low-pass filters at each wall outlet. Especially if you're worried about someone plugging a sniffer into one of the facility's interior power outlets.

    2. Re:Mechanical Solution by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a voltage fluctuations inside simply become resistive fluctuations in the motor, causing the motor speed to fluctuate, and thus cause fluctuations on the supply power?

    3. Re:Mechanical Solution by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a voltage fluctuations inside simply become resistive fluctuations in the motor, causing the motor speed to fluctuate, and thus cause fluctuations on the supply power?

      Sure, but rotational inertia would smooth them away unless the signal was at 0.1bps or so...

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    4. Re:Mechanical Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An electronic solution would be easier and cheaper, but how do you prove it works? What happens when a component fails? Sometimes simple solutions are the most reliable.

    5. Re:Mechanical Solution by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      An electronic solution would be easier and cheaper, but how do you prove it works? What happens when a component fails? Sometimes simple solutions are the most reliable.

      Presumably by the same means you prove that the mechanical system works.

      My guess is that there's actually more existing research on how to design extremely effective electronic filters for a certain frequency band (or anything that makes the SNR get very close to 0 while keeping noise to acceptable limits), than there is regarding the use of a motor/generator combination to achieve the same effect. If anything, I'd expect more justification to be needed for the (presumably less studied) mechanical solution.

    6. Re:Mechanical Solution by timholman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So that's basically a mechanically implemented low-pass filter, right? I would think that it would be easier and cheaper to implement electronic low-pass filters at each wall outlet. Especially if you're worried about someone plugging a sniffer into one of the facility's interior power outlets.

      But it wouldn't be cheaper, and it would definitely be less secure. With a mechanical low-pass filter, you have one central node you have to maintain. You have a big capital outlay, but once built, the motor-generator combo is very, very reliable, and needs little maintenance. It is practically impossible for a lone attacker to compromise it. With electronic low-pass filters at each outlet, you have hundreds (if not thousands) of nodes to monitor and maintain (consider the ongoing expense of that), and it becomes very easy for a single person to compromise one of those nodes using just a screwdriver.

      Good security is never just a matter of money. It's a matter of understanding how attackers behave, knowing how people and equipment can be compromised, and then spending money wisely, even if not frugally.

    7. Re:Mechanical Solution by dkf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't a voltage fluctuations inside simply become resistive fluctuations in the motor, causing the motor speed to fluctuate, and thus cause fluctuations on the supply power?

      If there's a flywheel in there (and the sheer mass of the rotor assemblies will act as one) then the fluctuations will be so small that it'll be just about impossible to see anything, even with top quality equipment attached at the perfect point (on the outside, of course).

      The other possibility is to just put a lot of other disparate busy traffic on in the inside too. Sure you'll be seeing fluctuations, but you'll never figure out what they mean; for all you know, that glitch you've just measured isn't a password but rather a server handing out yet another lolcat picture.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    8. Re:Mechanical Solution by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So that's basically a mechanically implemented low-pass filter, right? I would think that it would be easier and cheaper to implement electronic low-pass filters at each wall outlet. Especially if you're worried about someone plugging a sniffer into one of the facility's interior power outlets.

      But it wouldn't be cheaper, and it would definitely be less secure. With a mechanical low-pass filter, you have one central node you have to maintain. You have a big capital outlay, but once built, the motor-generator combo is very, very reliable, and needs little maintenance. It is practically impossible for a lone attacker to compromise it. With electronic low-pass filters at each outlet, you have hundreds (if not thousands) of nodes to monitor and maintain (consider the ongoing expense of that), and it becomes very easy for a single person to compromise one of those nodes using just a screwdriver.

      Good security is never just a matter of money. It's a matter of understanding how attackers behave, knowing how people and equipment can be compromised, and then spending money wisely, even if not frugally.

      But the mechanical barrier is so big and expensive that you can only afford to have them at major barriers. That still leaves all the devices on the "trusted" side of the barrier as running on what's essentially a big, trusted data bus.

      If someone can sneak a sniffer into the secure area and plug it into an unmonitored electrical outlet that's electrically near a secure system, then you have a problem.

      So I guess the question is, do you trust all the people on the inside? And do you adequately scrutinize all devices they bring inside, including everything that might have a tiny microchip?

    9. Re:Mechanical Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you would have to be retarded to install a low pass filter at every outlet,

    10. Re:Mechanical Solution by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Sneaking a sniffer into a temest secure facility - OH, YOU are a funny person, even if you don't mean to be - hint - no electronic devices in or out, and you have a TS clearance just to walk in the front door

      Up until the mid 1980s (can't remember the exact year) the codeword TEMPEST itself was classified at least Secret - I never needed to know more than "It's a kind of RF testing - here are some of the labs that do it, get some quotes for us" - and no, it wasn't done over the phone. I remember when it was declassified because I could finally get quotes on the phone. Ended up that the company I worked for never did win any of the contacts that needed TEMPEST, so I never had my security bumped up to do the work (I would have been the guy to go to the labs)

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  32. RTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only are there two different cases and two different conferences, even the methods are different.

    In this one the idea is to monitor the ground cable at the power outlet. In the link you posted the idea is that ground cable works as an antenna and they monitor the microwaves sent by it.

    This is /., we can't demand that people RTFA. But reading even through the summaries would be nice.

  33. Utility Meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I suspect the best way (at a law enforcement level) to listen to the electrical contents of a house or business would be to add an appropriate circuit to the "smart" power meters already in place.

    These meters can already offer other services to the home in some cases, like localized BPL, and demand shut-down of air conditioners and such.

    How much harder would it be to add a relay for surveillance of home electronics? With a warrant, of course.

  34. It's Tempest, and it is not classified by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Informative
    Oh dear. I too have signed the Official Secrets Act, and I can tell you that none of the basic stuff is classified at all. No need to make a big mystery of it. Indeed, when working on a restricted project in the early 1980s which involved detecting very small signals, we borrowed a full EMI secured trailer to use backwards (i.e. keep all the external RFI out, including that down all power lines.), and no security measures were applied to its use. Subsequently I worked on EMC for a while, and all the power line and data line securing technology has been in the public domain for ages, along with EMI gaskets for faraday cages, various means of applying conductive films, silver loaded epoxies, CRT enclosures and the rest. The stuff available from Japanese companies on the commercial market was far more advanced than the approved military technology we had been using, owing to the delay involved in the military approvals process.

    Securing notebooks is of course much easier than securing PCs because the keyboard data doesn't go outside the system. The intro to the article appears confused. Any signal on the earth line has to be due to capacitative coupling between a keyboard and external ground owing to the well known law that the sum of all the currents in all circuit paths to any junction must be zero. If you want to improve security against ground line signalling when using a notebook, run it on battery using secured wireless networking, and use the built in keyboard and monitor.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:It's Tempest, and it is not classified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear. I too have signed the Official Secrets Act, and I can tell you that none of the basic stuff is classified at all.

      Oh, sure, that's what they want us to think. /tinfoil hat

    2. Re:It's Tempest, and it is not classified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear. I too have signed the Official Secrets Act

      Who hasn't? I signed it when I worked for DWP. I had a temp job calling up unemployed people and telling them to get bank accounts so we could save money by bank transferring their dole instead of issuing giro cheques. That crufty old database was full of (mostly inaccurate) private data, but hardly anything worthy of being called an Official Secret!

  35. A reason to keep that old CRT by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    With all the sh.... they pump out from the EHT circuitry and SMPS, I would expect them to do a pretty good job of blowing away any microvolts that come from the keyboard.

    So far as this being a practical way of eavesdropping - I don't buy it. There are lots more established methods of discovering what people are typing, plus this seems to completely overlook all the activity from the mouse. Governmant agencies? Nah, if money was an issue, they'd just kick the door down and take your PCs away. if they want to be stealthy they have far more resources to apply to the problem and far more reliable solutions.
    A nice lab experiment, but no practical use.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  36. Worse than a duplicate: A degrade-licate. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've read both Slashdot articles. They look similar to me. The older one is far superior.

    Basically, if you have a keyboard of poor quality that has poor shielding and no noise reduction components, it is possible to read signals. The question is, which keyboards and computers are poorly designed and poorly shielded?

    Read the complete story: This PDF, not referenced by Slashdot, tells the whole story: CanSecWest/core09 March 16-20, 2009 (PDF). Quote from page 41: "This doesn't work against USB keyboards because of differential signaling". Also, on page 12: "The [PS/2 keyboard] wires are very close to each other and poorly shielded".

    Slashdot articles of especially poor quality: Are they paid advertisements? I've read Slashdot articles for years, and there is now a new phenomenon. A publication runs an article of very poor quality and Slashdot links to it, possibly to lead Slashdot readers to the publication so that they will read the ads. This article was submitted to Slashdot by a professional writer, Hugh Pickens, who is possibly acting as a public relations agent. He has written at least 413 Slashdot articles. Does someone at Slashdot accept money to publish his articles?

    Quote from the OLDER article referenced by the OLDER Slashdot story:

    'March 12, 2009, 02:46 PM - IDG News Service -

    'Inverse Path researchers Andrea Barisani and Daniele Bianco say they get accurate results, picking out keyboard signals from keyboard ground cables.

    'Their work only applies to older, PS/2 keyboards
    [PS/2 connector, not PlayStation], but the data they get is "pretty good," they say. On these keyboards, "the data cable is so close to the ground cable, the emanations from the data cable leak onto the ground cable, which acts as an antenna," Barisani said.

    'That ground wire passes through the PC and into the building's power wires, where the researchers can pick up the signals using a computer, an oscilloscope and about $500 worth of other equipment. They believe they could pick up signals from a distance of up to 50 meters by simply plugging a keystroke-sniffing device into the power grid somewhere close to the PC they want to snoop on.

    'Because PS/2 keyboards emanate radiation at a standard, very specific frequency, the researchers can pick up a keyboard's signal even on a crowded power grid. They tried out their experiment at a local university's physics department, and even with particle detectors, oscilloscopes and other computers on the network were still able to get good data.'

    1. Re:Worse than a duplicate: A degrade-licate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More then likely he is sensationalizing a previous article he has found. Certain admins are more likely to pick up on sensational material (misleading or not).

      At 413 article submissions you have someone who is really bored or has an agenda.

      If you really want to know you will have to dig into every article to create a matrix regarding who benefits the most.

      Follow the money and you will find those responsible!

      Good luck and god speed!

  37. There's probably some grumbling going on by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    ...makes ya wonder what the NSA or any other BIGGER and better funded group would have up their sleeves.

    There are probably some NSA designers out there reminding everyone that it was inevitable someone would figure it out and luckily they still had 500 more ways to get the same data.

    Years ago at Hanford they were doing some experiments monitoring the power going into a house. Discovered they could tell exactly what was going on in every room at any given moment just by watching minor fluctuations in the power signal. I can't remember if it was utility sponsored research or DoE funded. It was discontinued over privacy concerns...or so they said at the time. I'm sure the NSA wouldn't share those concerns. With the right equipment I'm wondering if you couldn't key log every computer in the house for entire neighborhoods?

    The day I have to run a Wild Weasel mission to mask keystrokes on my wall outlets is the day I'm going to get really serious about moving off grid.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  38. ungrounded outlets by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    my apartment only has grounding wires in the kitchen, so i'm safe.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:ungrounded outlets by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      At least as safe as you can be in a place where most appliances aren't grounded...

    2. Re:ungrounded outlets by ledow · · Score: 1

      Nee-aaa... That's the nearest rendition I can do to the sound I made when I read your post.

      Ungrounded outlets? I take it that you could, at some point in the year, be running heaters or air-con, or computers connected to phone lines, or a fish tank, or washing machine, etc. from them? Or that you have any metal-enclosed device like a PC that you touch the case of at any point while it's on? Hell, even static buildup can be a problem with unearthed appliances and it's a known factor in combustion of flammable substances.

      You have to be quite, quite, mad to think that's a good thing not to have an Earth on there. But then, I live in a country that has the safest mains plugs in the world (UK and, because they copied us, Ireland, Sri Lanka, Bahrain, UAE, Qatar, Yemen, Oman, Cyprus, Malta, Gibraltar, Botswana, Ghana, Hong Kong, Macau, Brunei, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, Mauritius, Iraq, Kuwait, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Belize, Dominica, St. Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Grenada and some parts of Saudi Arabia). You can't even get near a live conductor without the aid of at least one solid object to pop open the safety pin that blocks access to the L/N connectors and another to touch the conductor behind that - not the sort of thing you can do accidentally.

      We do *have* double-insulated, non-Earthed appliances that plug into our normal sockets but I'm pretty sure it's against almost all wiring regulations to NOT have an Earth on the *sockets* except on extremely legacy systems. Just about everything made since the 50's has had that. The *slightest* bit of damp in the walls, a flooding appliance, a spilled glass of water on your PC or even just a bad thunderstorm and you'll quickly learn why Earth connections were put into virtually every electrical supply system in the world. The worst that happens with *properly*-Earthed and fused outlets (both are required in order to work properly) is an extremely brief, painful shock, and we use 220v+ over here. Without proper Earthing you are playing with slowly killing yourself either by shock, fire or exploding appliances.

      I just hope like hell that you never find out what that means physically.

  39. In other news... by moniker127 · · Score: 1

    Inventors of the methodology were last seen being vigorously helped into vans by friends of their.

  40. UPS battery solves this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a UPS battery in between, your line noise should be stabilized enough not to be read. As another advantage, if there is a power cut, your system stays on long enough for safety measures.

    1. Re:UPS battery solves this by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. It depends on how it's constructed. Even some of the 'filtered' power bars may have enough filtering to eliminate signal leak, but as they said, the signal is picked up from the ground, so I have too little analog electronics knowledge remaining to be sure.

  41. Bogus rehash of old methods by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This "Story" is a bogus rehashing of old, old methods. Old as in 60 to 80 years old. The NSA has been grabbing serial teletype signals off adjacent signal and power wires for at least that long.

    It's old and in this case quantitatively bogus. The keyboard signals are milliamps. The leakage to chassis ground will be at least 40dB down, or under a microamp. The leakage from there to earth ground will be at least another 20dB down so we're down in the nanoamp range. By comparison the background ground currents from the PC's switching power supply and other devices will be several thousand times greater. If there's a light dimmer on the same circuit the noise will be nearly a million times greater. You can't combat that kind of background noise.

    Same problem with the keyboard vibrations-laser scheme. They got the idea from a 1930's detective story where the secretary put her gold cigarette case under the phone receiver so her typing could be heard on the other end. Old!

    But that only had a chance of working because each typewriter key row has a specific length of lever and spring, plus the typefaces are arrayed in a curve, so each one strikes the paper from a different angle, giving the listener an opportunity to guess the letter from the combination of X info from the length of the lever and spring, and Y info from the typeface strike angle.

    But that is completely inapplicable to a modern keyboard, where THE KEYS ARE ALL IDENTICAL. No differing row and arc info at all. Maybe a teensy difference if the keyboard base is flimsy and has a slight change in resonance across the board. But unlikely.

    I call bogus.

    1. Re:Bogus rehash of old methods by hax4bux · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'm w/you. There are several exploits but your point is spot on, old electro-mechanical (read motor driven) consoles/printers were exploitable and this was a well known topic within the TEMPEST community.

      For a modern keyboard, not only is it hard to tell the difference between keys but it would be hard to tell the difference between computers as well. In addition to the information supplied above, this is a testimony to modern manufacturing as well (uniform products all make the same noises).

      For all the posters who mentions UPS and isolation transformers: you win. An isolation transformer is a typical part of any secure environment.

      I sorta miss teletypes. Now that my hearing is fading.

    2. Re:Bogus rehash of old methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you could pull keyboard strikes from an nearby outlet, how many PCs in an office are running on the same circuit. It would be almost impossible to isolate an individual system's input.

    3. Re:Bogus rehash of old methods by James-NSC · · Score: 1

      While it is "bogus" in that there is no new information here, it isn't bogus in the sense that it can't be done. When I was getting my EE, I was able to do a POC with nothing more than a bread board and an oscilloscope. In conjunction with using a laser to pull sound off windows (used by the CIA also) the possibilities with serious funding are truly endless.

    4. Re:Bogus rehash of old methods by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      It would seem to violate Kirchoff's and Ohm's laws to expect that a milliamp of current looping from keyboard to motherboard is somehow going to jump out to earth ground, somehow. And that signal will somehow be detectable among the many AMPS of other quasi-random signals running along the motherboard, and many amps of ambient noise on the power line.

      And filtering is of very limited help. The spectrum of keyboard signals is overlaid by dozens of power line harmonics of much greater amplitude.

      What does work is to pick up the direct radiation from some of the cheaper unshielded keyboards. You have to be within a few feet of the keyboard but even a cheap transistor radio can pick up the keyboard signals.

    5. Re:Bogus rehash of old methods by James-NSC · · Score: 1

      Keyboard -> motherboard -> jump to ground, no, but the system as a whole (not the u fluctuations of the individual components there in) was (this was early 90's) be detectable. Not detectable in the "1011011 = exact data sequence" sense of the word but in a active/inactive "is the keyboard in use" sense... sure.

  42. Easily solved....via my ingenius new invention by moxley · · Score: 1

    I just cut 2 power cables off of old power supplies, I have spliced the cut ends together; pos to pos, neg to neg, grd to grd. It's one long cable terminating in a 3 prong power plug at each end!

    It's so eloquent!!!

    Now all I have to is plug one side into an outlet and plug the other side into another outlet that is about 5 feet away!!!
    I'm sure It'll probably send those secret stealing feds into an endless loop.

    I've got one side plugged in, just gotta get this other side plugged in and THEN WE'LL SEE WHO'S LAUGHING!!!

  43. so... don't allow visitors to plug in? by schamarty · · Score: 1

    so one day this will be in a laptop form factor. You have a visitor who comes in, plugs his laptop into a power socket (our security policy doesn't prevent that; it only prevents network access), and bam he's sniffing keyboards from yards away.

    Cool!

  44. Re:no gnd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about chopping the gnd pin in the plug? do computers really really need a gnd connection?

    I mean, where i live (Peru) is hard to find power outlets with gnd, most common households simply lack it, or if the outlet has it, is not even wired. What most people here do is simply chop out the gnd pin or use an adapter, they do this with every electronic appliance. I have been doing this with all my computers and never ever had any problem related, even had some of them working for more than 15 years and no problems so far.

    The biggest hassle you have to deal with are some small sparks when connecting some devices and thats it.

    btw: There are no thing like electrical storms or even proper rain in Lima, so ymmv..

  45. Heard about this six years ago by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Old college roommate, former Air Force Intelligience type, one day decided to give me something to think about when I was trying to be more secure with my PC... "Don't you think when you push 'A' on your keyboard or push 'B' on your keyboard that something ever so slightly different happens in your power supply?"

    It's very old news amongst SIGINT types...

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  46. How long until Monster Shielded Keyboard Cables? by lemurosity · · Score: 1

    You'll be able to get them at Best Buy for $129.99.

  47. UPS System Line Noise Filtering by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Do you really need a random noise generator ?

    Maybe it's just me, but my computers and all networking gear is connected to the main house power via UPS systems. Besides not wanting the random voltage spike or power failure to kill my system, it's designed to filter noise off the line to begin with, so I have serious doubts any noise generated from the computer will "leak" out past the UPS going the other way. . . .

    1. Re:UPS System Line Noise Filtering by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      It's designed to filter noise off the power line and protect against power spikes on any line. Do you really expect it to filter noise on the ground line (the subject of the article)?

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  48. You don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... ground cable works as an antenna and they monitor the microwaves sent by it"

    You don't understand the technology. Microwaves are very high frequency. They are monitoring very low-frequency signals.

  49. Isolation Transformer / UPS by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    I wonder if having a isolation transformer, or UPS keeps this from happening.

  50. Of course, that's not safe either. by Zancarius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I'm sure you were jesting (though someone is liable to believe you!), wireless keyboards aren't safe either.

    --
    He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
  51. Add Noise by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Looks like time to start adding random noise to the ground line.

    Next problem please.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  52. Re:no gnd? by roto3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Getting rid of the ground prong at the plug won't remove the circuit ground. The neutral prong is still ground in this sense. The ground prong is intended to be connected to the metal chassis, so that if a wire comes loose inside of an appliance and contacts the chassis, it will be shorted to ground instead of causing the chassis to go live.

    The reason that there is an additional ground prong and the case isn't just connected to the neutral prong is that it's easier to mess up the wiring of line and neutral at the socket, or use an adapter that's not properly polarized, etc. It's harder to plug the ground prong into anything that's not ground.

    If you cut off the ground prong, you're just removing this protection; the circuit ground is still on the neutral connector, so you're not protecting yourself from this attack.

  53. Imagine what the government can do by noidentity · · Score: 1

    If our small research was able to accomplish acceptable results in a brief development time (approximately a week of work) and with cheap hardware, consider what a dedicated team or government agency can accomplish with more expensive equipment and effort.

    There was a Slashdot story about this recently, though the equipment was a bit simpler, basically a piece of paper saying "List all your social networking sites and passwords along with your job application."

  54. what is "death metal" if not "white noise"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Black metal is white noise.

  55. Take this hackers! by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    That's why I run my computer off a car battery!

  56. Re:If 'they' really want to spy on you ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either way this is cool. Sure they could just get a key logger, whatever. It's not "OH NOEZ PARANOIA" it's "Whoa you can do that?".
    I've noticed it with my guitar as well--if I scroll on my computer, the amp generates different noise. Dimming the lights also does this, but more drastically.

  57. COTS Power and PC Equipment... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    One reason this is possible is because there is no regulation, or very little, on PCs anymore. I doubt a modern power supply could pass a conducted immunity test if someone's life depended on it.

  58. X10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, is this about X.10? That's been around for a pretty long time. Ambient noise doesn't help too much anymore either since you can use it as a carrier wave and then filter out the frequencies you want at a distance. So sometimes the noisier a city gets, (or an electrical line) the further the reach of that particular technology. As far as I know, that one is not yet on the shelves at Radio Shack. DC or AC current make a difference?

  59. Re:If 'they' really want to spy on you ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pwn their router.

    You get all outbound and inbound information available to you. Heck, knowing what webpages someone is accessing is useful enough for most things.

  60. 413 articles published by Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's 413 articles published by Slashdot, not just submissions.

  61. Tempest by mtucker502 · · Score: 1

    This has been in use for a LONG time by the Military. Check out Tempest

  62. The Recruit by hellfish006 · · Score: 1

    I think someone has been watching too many hollywood films

  63. don't be naive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Consider what a dedicated team or government agency can accomplish with more expensive equipment and effort."

    you mean "consider what they have already accomplished"

  64. Easy Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just...use a laptop and unplug it. I guarantee they can't use this method then.

  65. Everything old is new again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This really is no new discovery. More than 25 years ago, DOD-certified equipment used a form of active noise as a shield around systems used for classified documents. "Tempest-shielded" equipment was highly controlled, and companies responsible for misplacing a tempest shielded system were subject to some pretty severe penalties as well as the immediate revocation of their rights to build or maintain such equipment. We forget so much in the technology sphere, and it takes very little research to discover ways of accessing systems we thought we had "fixed" long ago.

  66. Is a UPS isolation? by WindShadow · · Score: 1

    I wonder if a standard UPS is enough isolation to mask the signal? I guess there are two types, the cheap ones which kick in when power fails, and the double conversion style, like Exide, which always convert AC to DC, then convert the DC back to AC. That let's them just add a little power during a brownout.

    For all I know all of the major brands might be double conversion, but the Exide is the only one I've used which doesn't go to all battery power on low voltage.

  67. Yes, a UPS isolates. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Any properly designed UPS would certainly not allow ANY noise to be conducted to the wall power plug.

    All UPS units convert AC do DC, and then back to AC. The better ones have extra hardware that adjusts for low input voltage conditions.

    There is a big capacitor across the DC which would certainly act as a short for any keyboard signal.