Slashdot Mirror


California Student Arrested For Console Hacking

jhoger writes "Matthew Crippen was arrested yesterday for hacking game consoles (for profit) in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. He was released on a $5,000 bond, but faces up to 10 years in prison. This is terribly disturbing to me; a man could lose 10 years of his freedom for providing the service of altering hardware. He could well lose much of his freedom for providing a modicum of it to others. There is no piracy going on, necessarily — the games a modified console could run may simply not be signed by the vendor. It's much like jailbreaking an iPhone. But it seems because he is disabling a 'circumvention device' it is a criminal issue. Guess it's time to kick a few dollars over to the EFF."

161 of 1,016 comments (clear)

  1. The cops that arrested him must be proud by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    oh right, they're just "doing their job"

    1. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They probably are proud, since the particular cops in this case - "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents"- are doing their job.

      If you have some snide comments to make, they would be better directed at the elected officials that created their posts, not the grunts on the ground.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by emkyooess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one accepted these arguments of "just doing my job" in the Nuremberg trials -- why should we now? (Sorry, Godwin.)

    3. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The grunts on the ground still have a conscience. They are not excused from using it. If they honestly think this is right, their conscience is as defective as any common thug. They deserve a thousand times the scorn they will get.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Kenja · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would you rather have police interpreting the laws as they see fit and only enforcing the ones they agree with?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Phoenixhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All too often, they already do...

    6. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by suso · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because there is a HUGE difference between liquefying people and copying someone's game.

    7. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hojima · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, they were proud of what they did, not just doing their job. FTA (chief of the investigation no less):

      "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers," he said.

      Counterfeiting and piracy have grown in recent years in both magnitude and complexity, according to ICE. Industry and trade associations estimate that counterfeiting and piracy now cost the U.S. economy as much as $250 billion a year and a total of 750,000 American jobs.

      I wonder what his source of information is. Oh the MAFIAA? Thought so. Next thing you know they're going to release videos saying it supports terrorism and child molesters.

    8. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because there is a HUGE difference between liquefying people and copying someone's game.

      SOYLENT GAMES ARE PEOPLE! THEY'RE PEOPLE!

      /Heston

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    9. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Canazza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He wasn't comparing copying games to Nazi war attrocities, he was comparing ARRESTING him to Nazi War attrocities, like this:

      Judge: Why did you shoot 15,000 Jews, Gays and Arabs?
      Nazi Soldier: I was just doing my Job

      Us: Why did you arrest that kid for modding his X-box?
      Govt. Official: I was just doing my job

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    10. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because there is a HUGE difference between liquefying people and copying someone's game.

      The actual comparison would be liquefying people vs. arresting someone for console hacking. It was the perpetrators of the holocaust who were tried at Nuremberg, not its victims.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    11. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is this a job of Immigration and Customs enforcement?

    12. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Talchas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only do they do that, they pretty much have to do that in many places given the ridiculous laws that are out there.

      --
      As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century,free flow of information is the only safeguard against...
    13. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would you rather have police interpreting the laws as they see fit and only enforcing the ones they agree with?

      If the law is unfair, unjust, or just plain disproportionate, then yes, I'd prefer to see the enforcers refuse to do the law's bidding.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    14. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by TheSambassador · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But the comparison is still dumb because of the differences in "moral wrong." It's very clear that what the Nazi's did was wrong, but it's not as clear when it comes to modding consoles (especially since the officers probably didn't even know what "modding xboxes" was).

      We really went to Godwin's law fast, eh?

    15. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by westlake · · Score: 5, Insightful
      No one accepted these arguments of "just doing my job" in the Nuremberg trials -- why should we now? (Sorry, Godwin.)

      It interests me when a geek equates the enforcement arm of US customs and immigration to the SS. That his right to a hacked and modded PS3 seems to count for as much as what a prisoner lost in the Nazi death camps.

      The Nuremberg defendants were charged with crimes against humanity - and, and among the specific changes, the crime of institutionalized murder on an industrial scale. That is why the defense of "just following orders" does not work. They were the ones giving the orders.

      Your apologies to Godwin are fraudulent.

    16. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by AP31R0N · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eh. Its' hard for a cop with a associates degree in CJ know that the law is wrong in the eyes of /. members. They're job is to conduct the arrest, not to determine guilt or sentencing. It's for the judge to throw out the case, for a jury to not convict, for the judge to decide the punishment, for the legislators to craft just laws and the supreme court to evaluate those laws.

      Sometimes those charged with enforcement don't understand the why and wherefore. Sometimes they even... agree with the laws. Sometimes they opt to keep their jobs and pension rather than lose their job and possibly go to jail.

      The fault here lies with the laws and our culture's values (specifically, valuing the rights of companies over the rights of citizens).

      i get your point as a matter of a more general principle, following orders is a cheap excuse. In this case, i'm willing to let the arresting officers off the hook. We don't know what is going to happen with this case. Like others have said here, i don't want cops that pick and choose who to arrest and for what, aside from the most dire cases. Ordering a cop to shoot a shoplifter, yeah... that's wrong and all out of whack. Bringing in a kid for an investigation is hardly gross misconduct.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    17. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      they're trying to put a kid away for ten years of his life for tinkering with a console. I'd say the moral wrongness of that is quite clear.

    18. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by jerep · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly, and it just shows how dumb most people are, especially those enforcing the law. They apply it without a single thought. You could make a law about people having to wear specific colors every day of the week, and you'd have officiers enforcing that the next day without asking themselves if it makes sense or not.

      Morals have very little to do with it, the nazi soldiers were obeying orders without questions, just like our soldiers and policemen are. Cases like this guy being arrested for modding consoles just shows how corporations are really running the show in america, and our freedoms can be taken away at any time. They're temporary privileges at most.

      Oh and remember, Hitler was elected in a democracy. I wouldnt be so quick as to compare them to us and make them the bad guys and we the good guys, the line between our two societies is very thin.

    19. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Otto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would you rather have police interpreting the laws as they see fit and only enforcing the ones they agree with?

      YES. Absolutely.

      The law only works as a system when every single person enforcing it applies common sense to the situation. Without that injection of common sense, "law" is nothing more than tyranny and oppression.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    20. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by jerep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would much rather have people and policemen interpreting the law and questionning it and fully making sense of it before applying it, than applying it blindly without questionning, THAT is dangerous.

      Religion is already a clear example of what happens if you follow the law down to the letter without questionning, billions of meaningless deaths, billions more suffering, and noone happy in the end.

      What history teaches us is that only bad things come out of not questioning things and obeying blindly. When we work together and everyone understands the bigger picture, we're capable of the most wonderful things. Its the price to pay for such a brain, the ability to go both for the best and the worst.

    21. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a difference of degree, not one of substance. Arresting people for exercising their rights to their property is not as unjust as killing people for their race, but it's still unjust. Perpetrators of unjust acts should not be exempt from the consequences, whether they are paid to do it or not.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    22. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No one accepted these arguments of "just doing my job" in the Nuremberg trials -- why should we now? (Sorry, Godwin.)

      It interests me when a geek equates the enforcement arm of US customs and immigration to the SS. That his right to a hacked and modded PS3 seems to count for as much as what a prisoner lost in the Nazi death camps.

      The Nuremberg defendants were charged with crimes against humanity - and, and among the specific changes, the crime of institutionalized murder on an industrial scale. That is why the defense of "just following orders" does not work. They were the ones giving the orders.

      Your apologies to Godwin are fraudulent.

      This is a common logical fallacy I see all the time -- that just a comparison differs in degree that the comparison is invalid. In this case, the term Nuremberg Defense is a commonly used term to refer to a specific legal/moral argument, the "I am not morally/legally responsible for the actions in question because I was just following orders."

      You are creating a blatant straw man in arguing that the commenter is honestly considering a modded PS3 equal in worth to a death camp inmate, he is using a commonly accepted figure of speech.

      To get more to the heart of the issue, you do have a right to a hacked and modded PS3, it is absurd that the government can get away with passing a law telling me what I can and cannot do with a piece of hardware that I own, never mind mandating a decade of jail time for it. This young man's civil rights are being violated, and EVERYONE down the line is responsible for it, from the arresting officer to the prosecuting attorney, to the jury who convicts him and the judge that sentences him, and the politicians and lobbyists that pushed through the DMCA. "Just doing my job" is NO excuse, and the legal precedent for this was set during the Nuremberg trials, that is all that is meant in the comparison.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    23. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the comparison is still dumb because of the differences in "moral wrong."

      It's a difference of degree only. Why does that change anything? Doing evil is always wrong, even if it's just a little evil. Getting paid to do it does not make it OK either.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    24. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by twidarkling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't they already do that?

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    25. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by mea37 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You forget the enforcers are human, and have their own idea of what is unfair, unjust, or just plain disproportionate.

      If you allow that a police officer should, at his discretion, refuse to sieze a computer because he doesn't believe in the DMCA, then you accept that another officer might just refuse to enforce an anti-discrimination law.

      The police have a job, and it isn't "deciding what the law should be".

    26. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes because unjustly incarcerating a person is the same as murdering thousands of people in cold blood.

      I would highly recommend that you pose rational and logical arguments, instead of emotionally based hyperbole if you want anyone to take you seriously.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    27. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by TheSambassador · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the OP was taking a shot at the officers arresting the kid and not the people making up the laws, maybe the point then is the ignorance of the officers involved. While everybody (hopefully) knows the "wrongness" of killing people (thus making the "I was just doing my job when I killed 30 people" argument null), it's different here.

      Obviously us slashdotters (who are 100% right all the time) know how silly the prescribed punishment is for an offense like this. However, people in other areas of expertise don't really understand the laws they are enforcing (currently modding consoles IS illegal... whether it should be is another story). All the officers know is that a kid was doing something against the law, thus they arrested him for it. They probably don't know what console modding is, nor are they the ones deciding the punishment.

      The real question is - should we expect law enforcement officers to be the interpreters of "moral right" and not enforce the law when they take issue with it? Clearly we'd have many issues if each officer were to do this. Should we expect the officers to know and understand every facet of the law, as well as the technicalities of very specific offenses? I'd argue that this is too much. This is why we have the justice system, and not Robocop.

    28. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by CodeArtisan · · Score: 5, Informative

      they're trying to put a kid away for ten years of his life for tinkering with a console. I'd say the moral wrongness of that is quite clear.

      Just for clarification, the 'kid' is actually 27 years old. More importantly, as is often the case in these reports, the maximum penalty for the charges would be 10 years. As the case hasn't even gone to court yet, there is no indication as to what the actual sentence (if any) will be.

      Not saying I agree with the charges, but at least let's discuss the facts.

    29. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except it hasn't been OUR government since WW2. Which is why the Soviets have been gone for a couple of decades now and we are still cranking out super weapons like we are getting ready for WW3. This is why voting is now a pointless exercise, because all it takes is five minutes with a lobbyist and a pen to make your vote meaningless. When bribery is legal and corporations have more protections than people do it is time to just admit the system has failed folks.

      Hell Obama did a full 180 and could run against his 2008 self and not have anything in common! That is the power of money. We might as well change the national anthem to "mighty mighty dollar bill" and be done with it. Even my 92 year old grandma who voted every election from 1942 onwards refuses to vote anymore because she thinks it is pointless. It really doesn't matter what we think or believe anymore, you can't compete with big fat checks. Sad but true.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    30. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by 1729 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A while back, I considered going into federal law enforcement, based on their need for computer scientists and my fascination with criminal investigations. The ~50% pay cut ultimately dissuaded me, but I spent some time thinking about issues like this.

      For example, I'm generally in favor of drug legalization, but I would have had to enforce the current drug laws in this job. I'm okay with busting drug traffickers (and people selling alcohol without a license, for that matter), but would I have a problem arresting someone for personal drug use? After some contemplation, I decided that I wouldn't have a problem doing so. Law enforcement officers don't make the law or even interpret ambiguities in the law. This is the job for the legislatures and the courts, respectively.

      Simply put, I don't want a cop to refuse to enforce a law for personal reasons. I have to qualify this, though. First, although selective enforcement of the law can be dangerous, there should still be some room for common sense (i.e., it's not necessary to ticket someone for jaywalking on an empty street.) At the other end of the spectrum, if a cop considers a law truly immoral, then they should resign rather than fail to do their job. However, there's a huge difference between laws one might disagree with and laws which are truly reprehensible and immoral. We shouldn't conflate a law like the DMCA with a genocidal regime like Nazi Germany; the Nuremberg references are way overblown here.

    31. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The real question is - should we expect law enforcement officers to be the interpreters of "moral right" and not enforce the law when they take issue with it?

      Yes. No person should ever do something they believe is wrong. Henry David Thoreau addressed this issue better than I can:

      Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right. It is truly enough said that a corporation has no conscience; but a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience. Law never made men a whit more just; and, by means of their respect for it, even the well-disposed are daily made the agents of injustice. A common and natural result of an undue respect for law is, that you may see a file of soldiers, colonel, captain, corporal, privates, powder-monkeys,(5) and all, marching in admirable order over hill and dale to the wars, against their wills, ay, against their common sense and consciences, which makes it very steep marching indeed, and produces a palpitation of the heart. They have no doubt that it is a damnable business in which they are concerned; they are all peaceably inclined. Now, what are they? Men at all? or small movable forts and magazines, at the service of some unscrupulous man in power? Visit the Navy Yard, and behold a marine, such a man as an American government can make, or such as it can make a man with its black arts -- a mere shadow and reminiscence of humanity, a man laid out alive and standing, and already, as one may say, buried under arms with funeral accompaniments
      -snip-
      The mass of men serve the state thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. They are the standing army, and the militia, jailers, constables, posse comitatus,(7) etc. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones; and wooden men can perhaps be manufactured that will serve the purpose as well. Such command no more respect than men of straw or a lump of dirt.

      As for the ignorance issue, you have a responsibility to ensure that your actions are moral. Ignorance of the legal status of your actions will not get you off the hook in court. Ignorance of the moral ramifications of your actions will get you no sympathy from me.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    32. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, he's being put away because he profitted helping people play pirated games.

      No, he's being put away because he profitted helping people play BACKUP games (and pirated games as a side effect). Do you see how the DMCA is evil, now?

    33. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by interval1066 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      @MindKata: "For example, if I buy a console, and then write a manual about how to modify that console, then legally that is wrong."

      Is it? I believe I have seen plenty of books on the shelves at B&N that purport teaching you to do something that if you actually carried out the activity described you could be arrested. So I think you're wrong on that score. Did you mean to say "Morally wrong?" cause I'll buy that.

      Even so, I think its ridiculous to sentence this guy to term that is equal to the minimum sentence for manslaughter if he is convicted. Someone is out of control, and its not this guy.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    34. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes because unjustly incarcerating a person is the same as murdering thousands of people in cold blood.

      I would highly recommend that you pose rational and logical arguments, instead of emotionally based hyperbole if you want anyone to take you seriously.

      it may not be the same, but it's evil, anyway. And it sets a precedent: Circumventing a copy protection device is now a criminal offense, even if you do it for fair use purposes. The law is completely wrong, it was lobbied by a monopoly, and helping enforce it is evil.

      Since when was The Law supposed to benefit the rich?

      The worst part is that if I wanted people to rebel against this unfair law, suddenly I'd legally become a conspirator.

    35. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Asclepius99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a little like saying that if someone steals a wallet following orders then they are innocent because the Nuremberg defense is valid as long as you didn't kill hundreds of people.

      That's not like saying that at all. Because these officers were enforcing a law, not breaking it. Wasn't the point of the Nuremberg defense that they were following legal government and military orders, not just that they're following orders in general?

    36. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except he wasn't using a hacked and modded console, he was SELLING them, a LOT of them. No matter how you look at it, even if you agree that you hacking a console yourself should be legal, reselling consoles that are basically being designed to pay illegally copied games rather than imports is NOT ok.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    37. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by russotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He could have been arrested for jay walking with a 10 year maximum prison sentence and arresting him would still not be morally equivalent to putting someone on a train Auschwitz.

      Really? There's a reason it's called "pound me in the ass Federal Prison". I suppose you could argue that sending someone off to be tortured and raped for no good reason is not morally equivalent to sending them off to be killed for no good reason, but there isn't _much_ moral difference.

      He will have a fair trial, likely with a jury of his peers if he chooses to fight it, and, if it really is "some kid tinkering with his console" either get acquitted or, at worst, some probation, a fine, or community service. If only the Jews in Poland had received that much "moral wrongness"...

      No. Most likely, he'll be offered some sort of plea deal, which he'll almost have to take because the stakes are just so high. If he gets a trial, it'll be a trial by a jury of those who agree with the law and who have agreed in advance to convict even if they feel it is unjust. Silliness about probation, a fine, and community service is just wishful thinking; violation of the DMCA is a felony.

    38. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Opie812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when was The Law supposed to benefit the rich?

      Since the first person wrote the first law.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    39. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Fumigator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh please! Your hyperbole is off the charts! You are hurting your position in the debate by spewing such drivel.

    40. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is why the Soviets have been gone for a couple of decades now and we are still cranking out super weapons like we are getting ready for WW3.

      Our nuclear stockpile has been halved since 2001 and should be about 2,200 by 2012.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    41. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. The laws are so outrageous that anyone pointing out the honest truth about them looks like they're spewing hyperbole.

      I mean, consider that if I claimed you could be found liable for damages of $675,000 for copying 10 songs? Ridiculous, right? But undeniably true. Same goes for the DMCA. Yes, circumventing a technological copy protection measure can result up to 5 years in prison for each violation. Yes, jurors are required to state that they will obey the judge's instructions no matter what their personal feelings on the law. Yes, expressing disagreement with the law is reason to be excluded for cause during voir dire. And yes, prosecutors take advantage of long maximum sentences to force defendants to give up their right to a trial and plead guilty.

    42. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely you mean there's a difference between liquefying people and locking them up with rapists and murderers for a decade.

      In this case, copying someone's game is analogous to being a Jew. It's the trivial imagined offense which brings about the disproportionate punishment.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    43. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uhhhh....who said ANYTHING about nukes? Nukes were a last resort "got you last" kind of deal and weren't big profit makers anyway. for examples look how much effort it took to finally kill that POS F-22. Why? Big fat checks baby! And I can promise you there are literally hundreds of "bridges to nowhere" lining every defense and civilian budget. Why? Because bribery....errr I mean large PACs and campaign contributions are legal.

      Politics shouldn't be a career, it should be like jury duty. We take a pool of our best and our brightest and we 'draft" them for four years. Once drafted they are paid the same salary as they were at their previous job, and the company they worked for has to give them their job back when their "duty" is over. One term, no exceptions. As it is the revolving door between the private sector and "public service" pretty much guarantees that corruption will be rampant. After all, you want that cushy job after your political career is over, don't you?

      Without a fundamental reworking of the system like I just described voting is simply a pointless exercise. Does anyone think that McCain would have been ANY different? Nope, he just would have kissed the defense dept booty instead of the ACORN booty. Both of them would be puckering up and lining up to kiss the corporate ass. Just another case of SSDD. Sad, but true.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. Misread by dontPanik · · Score: 4, Funny

    I misread this as "California Student Arrested for Console Hating."

    I imagined a college student having an impassioned argument with a police officer on whether the ps3 or the xbox 360 is better. The student goes too far and insults Halo and he's lead away in handcuffs.

    --
    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Misread by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      They see me pwnin'. They hatin'.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Misread by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup. Helping slaves escape used to be against the law too. All those people should have went to jail and have the full weight of the law thrown against them as well.

      FWIW, I used to think that way too - you break the law, pay the price, and work to fix the law. Then, started thinking about people who just want to sit down at the front of the bus... or drink from a water fountain...

  3. Apphrended by ICE by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The DHS wants you to think of them like this: http://www.dhs.gov/index.shtm

    But this is what they really are: http://www.ice.gov/

    No quarter to tired, poor, huddled masses yearning to breathe free.

  4. Justice by Kamokazi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

    --
    As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    1. Re:Justice by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Funny

      And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

      But isn't violating a "business model" a seriouser threat to our homeland security?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Justice by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is how law enforcement works: Go after the low hanging fruit, generate press about it, and people think you're doing a great job. Solving major crimes is HARD. Much easier to just round up some petty criminals like pot smokers and "console hackers". That way, you can say you put away so many thousands of criminals this year, and everyone will want to give you a big fat raise and a pat on the back for being "tough on crime". Meanwhile, the really dangerous criminals get to go about their business, and you don't have to worry about doing any actual police work.

    3. Re:Justice by megamerican · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you haven't realized it already the Legal system is functioning the way it is intended.

      Plato states quite clearly that there is no true justice, but the appearance of it is what matters in society. The lower classes of society must believe there is justice else the upper classes may lose their power.

      Don't worry however, the DHS has plenty of training manuals stating that people who question the government are possible domestic extremists. There will be a few agents on their way to send you to a re-education camp.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    4. Re:Justice by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You actually hit it on the head.

      If you go after big gangs and organized crime you end up with dead cops because those guys will defend themselves.

      Cops choose to grab the helpless citizen that is beaking an obscure law that in reality is not harming others or society. It's easier to rough up a unarmed college student, less chance of having a 10gauge with a slug unloaded at your chest.

      Note: if you wear kevlar, a 10gauge to your chest will put you on the ground for at least 30 minutes, thugs with shotguns scare the shit out of cops because their armor does nothing to stop kenetic energy from knocking them over and making it hard to breathe.

      Honestly, cops need to be going after the hard crap that actually harms others and society, and not the harmless crap.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Justice by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Note: if you wear kevlar, a 10gauge to your chest will put you on the ground for at least 30 minutes, thugs with shotguns scare the shit out of cops because their armor does nothing to stop kenetic energy from knocking them over and making it hard to breathe.

      Very true, but the perp can just as easily and more effectively use most any rifle. Body armor generally stops slow moving and lighter projectiles - namely most handgun rounds and shotgun loads. Almost all high power rifles (even grandpa's 100 year old .30-06 deer hunting rifle) will punch right through body armor without flinching. You still see "armor piercing" rounds listed for those and people tend to think of those as "cop killer" rounds, but what they don't realize is that "armor piercing" rounds for most rifles are referring to vehicle armor, not personal. Against personal armor it's all armor piercing.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:Justice by SBrach · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless you're talking .50BMG when you say "high powered rifle" Level IV body armor will stop most high powered rifle rounds. I believe level III will stop most as well (in areas reinforced with ceramic plates). Also, to the GP, read Newtons laws of physics some time please.

    7. Re:Justice by nomadic · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you go after big gangs and organized crime you end up with dead cops because those guys will defend themselves.

      That's just not true; in fact, federal agents especially tend to focus on the bigger gangs and organized crime because they think it's more efficient to get rid of the big fish than chase after a lot of small ones. There's a reason that organized crime organizations (in the U.S. at least) have tended to go out of their way to avoid violence with police; in fact, if an individual in one of those organizations killed a cop he would usually be killed by his own organization in a very public way to assuage police anger.

    8. Re:Justice by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

      Our legal system could begin to function again if it was not completely overwhelmed with crimes related to drugs. If they legalized drugs and made them a family issue rather than a criminal issue, 80% of crime would vanish almost overnight. With such a drastic reduction in crime suddenly the courts could focus on things that actually matter and could then spend those hundreds of billions of dollars toward education and other social programs. Not to mention we would suddenly have a multiple billion dollar tax base which has gone completely untapped. And best of all, we'd stop making the scummiest of scum drug lords filthy rich. Its a win-win for everyone yet no elected official will get off their ass and do something about it.

    9. Re:Justice by rtechie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the WHOLE POINT of most 9mm SMGs is that they can use standard 9mm pistol ammo, which is cheap and plentiful as opposed to expensive rifle ammunition. Most American police agencies use Heckler & Koch MP5 SMGs chambered in 9x19mm Parabellum, the exact same round used by the common Beretta and Glock pistols used by police officers.

    10. Re:Justice by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plato states quite clearly that there is no true justice, but the appearance of it is what matters in society. The lower classes of society must believe there is justice else the upper classes may lose their power.

      Bzzt.

      Plato states quite clearly that he considers justice to be *the harmonious functioning of all parts in order to accomplish its telos*. So there is justice inside of a dog when all of the parts are working together to help the dog track some prey, for example. Justice in society is when all components of society are working together harmoniously as well.

      It's an odd concept, and rather different from what we consider justice today. I think you just picked up on Glaucon's argument, or one of the other alternative views Plato writes about in the Republic.

  5. Scary by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's terrifying to me (and a sign of the times) that we can't do what we please with the material we've paid for. Sure, violating copyright is counter productive in the long-run, which is why we have it, but tinkering with stuff has a long proud history. Imagine if the guy who invented pneumatic tyres was taken to court because it violated the bicycle company's right to sell him replacement solid rubber rims? I doubt this guy was doing anything innovating, but he sure won't be doing so now.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:Scary by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only reason to mod a console for MOST people, not the nerds on /., is to play pirated games. The summary and your post are both misleading and naive.

    2. Re:Scary by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fact that guns are used to kill stuff IS the deterrent. Talk about a failure of an analogy.

    3. Re:Scary by purpledinoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why can't everyone see that the legal system is slowly being steered to work against the people, to benefit corporate interests? Why isn't it a crime for executives at AIG and other bailed out banks to receive huge bonuses at the expense of tax payers? Why is it a crime for some college kid to hack some game consoles? We're talking about billions vs hundreds of dollars.

    4. Re:Scary by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Once I buy the device, it's mine, and I should be able to do whatever I want with it. If I, say, decide to make a bomb with it and blow something up, you can prosecute me for blowing something up, and for possessing explosive materials, but not for the act of fiddling with the device. Saying most people who do X do so because of Y doesn't mean that doing X should be illegal. People who buy bongs or make pipes out of random household materials do so in order to smoke weed, but buying bongs or fashioning pipes out of weird shit is not illegal. Playing pirated games on any device is and should be illegal. Modifying the device in a way that makes it possible to play pirated games should NOT be illegal.

    5. Re:Scary by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You aren't buying material. You are paying for a license to use the material in a certain way.

      When you buy a game console, does the store have you sign some licensing document? No? Then the "you don't own, you're just licensing" theory is a steaming pile of horseshit.

      These game consoles are the rightful property of their owners, who can rightfully use them in an consensual act, including hiring someone to repair or modify them.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    6. Re:Scary by amplt1337 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why can't everyone see that the legal system has historically, with very few exceptions, done nothing but work against the people, to benefit corporate interests? Why isn't it a crime for executives at AIG and other bailed out banks to receive huge bonuses at the expense of tax payers? Why is it a crime for some college kid to hack some game consoles? We're talking about billions vs hundreds of dollars.

      FTFY.

      It works this way because their billions buy Congressmen, while our hundreds pay them rent.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    7. Re:Scary by Omnifarious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's even questionable whether or not violating copyright is always counter productive in the long run. Our current copyright laws are mainly the result of people with lots of money and influence getting laws passed that profit them at our expense.

    8. Re:Scary by Verdatum · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bad analogy. Building bombs is indeed illegal. So is possession of drug paraphernalia. Bongs may only be sold for purposes other than smoking marijuana; namely smoking tobacco.

    9. Re:Scary by gnapster · · Score: 2, Informative

      But at that time, the phone was rented, not purchased.

    10. Re:Scary by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Playing pirated games on any device is and should be illegal. Modifying the device in a way that makes it possible to play pirated games should NOT be illegal."

      And therein lies the rub. From TFA:

      "The Cal State Fullerton student was arrested Monday on federal charges that he illegally modified Xbox, Playstation, Wii and other video game consoles to enable the machines to play pirated video games."

      "Specifically, the college student is accused of modifying for personal financial gain technology affecting control or access to a copyrighted work"

      'They' aren't trampling your rights to mod the hardware you own. They're trampling this guys (non-existent) right to mod consoles for profit. This isn't some basement hacker getting his door kicked in by the jack booted thugs. He's no different (legally anyway) from guys selling pirated movies.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    11. Re:Scary by Desler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, maybe he enabled a few folks to violate copyright; however, unless he was placing copyrighted code onto their modded consoles, he only made some software and hardware modifications on boxes that had been legally purchased with the owner's consent.

      Facilitating copyright infringement is against the law.

    12. Re:Scary by bevoblake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the actions of building an atomic bomb or a biological weapon should be illegal for the public good. It's too late to prosecute someone for "blowing something up" with a highly-destructive device. As for possessing explosive material - what about ammonium nitrate? It's a high explosive with legitimate uses as a fertilizer. The "act of fiddling" with it is what makes it dangerous, not the inherently useful materials to begin with.

      I understand your argument and where you're trying to go with it, but there are many shades of grey here that aren't handled. I'd tend to argue that the cops may be doing something correct by arresting someone who is modding consoles solely for the purpose of copyright violation (which I'd be shocked if he wasn't), but I'd say the main error here is that the potential penalty is too draconian. Furthermore, if they apply DMCA to more legitimate practices, such as modifying the PS3 to run home-made programs that you couldn't otherwise run, the cops should take it on the nose. I haven't heard of that happening; although as crappy as the DMCA is, I won't be surprised to hear it.

    13. Re:Scary by Endo13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is that in the video game industry, when you boycott by simply not buying, you instantly become a "pirate". We are way beyond this type of boycott having any kind of positive desirable effect.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    14. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. It is a machine, just like a vacuum. If I want to modify my vacuum to have double the suction power, I can do so. Modifying can make it easier to pirate games, but the modification of the console itself does not pirate games. I can use Internet Explorer to download pirated games, should we outlaw that as well? Granted, there may be some problems if you advertised your modification as allowing you to do so, as it would be like a gun shop advertising that you can use it to kill your boss.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    15. Re:Scary by mattOzan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you buy a game console, does the store have you sign some licensing document? No? Then the "you don't own, you're just licensing" theory is a steaming pile of horseshit.

      As with all the EULAs that we so love to hate, no signature is required for it to be actionable. If you see the EULA which states "if you disagree, you must return the product," and then you keep the product (Xbox, CD album, DVD movie, video game, etc.), it is assumed that you agree to the EULA. Yes, I think this is BS just as much as you do. But what should we do with our frustration? I think it boils down to three options:

      1. Ignore it. We all do this. But it doesn't really lead to positive change.
      2. Take legal action (complain to your representative, donate to the EFF, educate users, etc.) I agree that this is ultimately how change must happen (i.e. the overthrow of the DMCA). But your representatives have many reasons (aka lobbyists) to preserve the DMCA. This is the slow path to change.
      3. Boycott the product. Honestly, this would be just as difficult to organize as Option #2, at the scale needed to provoke change. But if enough people stopped buying consoles with EULAs, I do believe that the EULAs would change overnight. These companies listen to their accountants much more seriously than they listen to Congressmen.
    16. Re:Scary by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2

      Why can't everyone see that the legal system is slowly being steered to work against the people, to benefit corporate interests? Why isn't it a crime for executives at AIG and other bailed out banks to receive huge bonuses at the expense of tax payers? Why is it a crime for some college kid to hack some game consoles? We're talking about billions vs hundreds of dollars.

      The justice system, and every government ever in existence has always been based around benefiting the rich over the people. To be fair, the people who received bonuses at AIG received them because they performed well. Its not like they were rewarding people for sucking at what they do. A few branches brought the whole AIG down, and those that didn't handle themselves typically did not receive a bonus. It shouldn't be a crime to modify your own property. Though modifying a console could make piracy possible, the justice system is supposed to punish people for what DOES happen, not what COULD possibly happen. E.g. if someone almost killed another they don't get charge for murder in the first degree.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    17. Re:Scary by Tynin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's no different (legally anyway) from guys selling pirated movies.

      I would agree if he was selling pirated games, but what he was doing is more akin to selling a DVD player that is region unlocked.

    18. Re:Scary by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No you may not. Section 103 (17 U.S.C Sec. 1201(a)(1)) of the DMCA states: "No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title." Be sure to thank your helpful Congressmen for this provision.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    19. Re:Scary by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So, what's the difference between me modding my own hardware and then saying "well, done with that fun hack... I'm putting this on eBay so I can get my next toy to see if I can hack it" and this guy hacking the hardware and then selling it? Really, what, specifically is different? Intent?

      Good luck making intent illegal without trampling all over everyone's rights.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    20. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is different, you would then be violating FCC regulations. However, if you modified your FM transmitter so you could plug your iPod shuffle into it (I believe that does not have a standard headphone jack), then you would be fine. I bought the hardware from the store and never signed a contract, so I should be able to do as I please with the hardware as long as I do not violate laws. When you modify a console, you are opening it to run software other than what it normally runs. The problem is that this is the basis for a lot of copy protection on these systems. Instead of protecting the media or using keys like they do with computer software, they prevent the console from playing software other than licensed software. Since this is considered circumventing copyright protection under the DMCA, it violates this law. This is another example of how the DMCA violates your rights to lawfully use and repair/improve the things you own.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    21. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These devices function just fine without the services offered (i.e. Nintendo Store, Playstation Network, and Xbox Live), otherwise they would not be able to sell these consoles to the tons of people without broadband internet access. I am fine with these services banning modded consoles, and in many cases it would be best if they did so. However, protecting a bad business model is not a legal right. Stopping copyright infringement is good, but go after the people doing the copyright infringement, not the modders and the homebrew scene.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  6. jailbreaking an iphone? by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    more like he was jailbreaking an Iphone for idiots who don't know how to do it but they just want it done. so they pay this guy to do it for them.

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
    1. Re:jailbreaking an iphone? by YayaY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah, that would be criminal too. This is the current state of affairs in your country. Time to wake up!

      --
      Votator.com implements a fair voting scheme (free
  7. US of A by Krneki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The land of the free. On less Trollish note, it's time you do something about this corporation laws, I can't understand how the freedom of a business comes before the freedom of the people.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:US of A by TechForensics · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't understand how the freedom of a business comes before the freedom of the people.

      There is a quote attributed (perhaps erroneously) to Mussolini, but he is alleged to have said "Socialism should more properly be called corporatism, because it combines the power of the business sector with the power of the state".

      I do believe America is suffering now under a kind of corporatism. The term seems more accurate than capitalism. At least since we are also a democracy there may be hope.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    2. Re:US of A by jpmorgan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The quote usually given is 'Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power,' not socialism. However as you point out, there is no evidence that he ever made that statement. However, is we presume he did, the important thing to remember is that Mussolini understood what corporatism meant. It does not mean rule by large corporations, in the modern western sense. The 'corporations' referenced by corporatism does include business groups, but also includes trade unions and guilds, military organizations, religious groups, farming lobbies, etc... The idea being that strong government power would be delegated to these groups within their own perspective field of interest, and government itself would be responsible for keeping them from each others' throats, like a pack of rabid dogs.

  8. Organized crime by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is behavior you'd expect from the Mafia. It just underscores the fact that there's not much difference between our government and an organized crime syndicate.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  9. I wonder where these numbers came from? by nizo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Industry and trade associations estimate that counterfeiting and piracy now cost the U.S. economy as much as $250 billion a year and a total of 750,000 American jobs.

    I mean, aside from being pulled out of thin air that is?

    1. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funnily enough 750,000 seems to be the go-to figure for jobs, either created or lost. I read "Risk" by Martin Gardener recently and I've found it's great for noticing when people use their memory of other numbers to cue-up made-up stats like these. (That will also take you to some debunkings of those numbers.)

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'm looking into buying the book, is it risk by dan gardner?

      page here

    3. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by DeadboltX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like how generic piracy is lumped together with counterfeiting, which could include the printing of several billion dollars... I wonder how much money/jobs software piracy alone is estimated to cost.

  10. They force you to lease software by Vovk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And Now they expect you to only lease hardware as well?

    If he owns an xbox he should be able to do whatever he damn well pleases to the xbox, it is the same as any other computer. It's fair for the company (microsoft/sony/nintendo) to make it so that their games will not work on a hacked system, they shouldn't have to guarantee the games will work unless you use their specifications, but it's not fair to take him to jail even if the modifications allow him to use unsigned software. hell, I build computers that have the capability to play pirated games all the time. How is this different?

    PS: in before RTFA, he's modifying consoles for financial gain, how is this different from building a computer for financial gain?

    1. Re:They force you to lease software by Vovk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's my point. It shouldn't be illegal to mod an xbox, it's just a computer which has been built with the hardware and software required to run xbox games. It should be treated just like any other computer

    2. Re:They force you to lease software by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is it illegal, though?
      Car Analogy:
      You can legally mod cars (for financial gain even) to exceed speed limits to the extreme.

    3. Re:They force you to lease software by ablaze · · Score: 2, Informative

      Everyone is allowed to remove the catalytic converter and muffler from his car. The car is not allowed to be used after that though. The same goes for removing seat belts. Rolling back an odometer is forging, a completely different topic. I cannot understand why changing some kind of hardware you own, or changing hardware of other people can be illegal. The use of unlicensed games on a modified device could be, but not the modification itself. In that way, your remark was very much to the point, although to be read without sarcasm.

    4. Re:They force you to lease software by Whorhay · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are perfectly free to remove the emmissions controls from your vehicles. Just don't get mad when you are no longer allowed to drive them on public property.

      You are also allowed to do whatever you want with an Odometer in your own vehicle. Just don't go and claim that the reading is accurate.

      You may also remove all the seatbelts from a vehicle. Operating it in that condition though on public property or with passengers will likely get you in trouble.

      The only semi valid point is the odometer adjusting, and that's because it's not a safety issue but an honesty one. When I purchased my xbox there was no aggreement for me to sign or not that said I could not modify it or have another modify it.

      If the beverage companies got a law passed so that no one could re-use their bottles would you find that law valid? What if Nalogen started selling their bottles prefilled with water and stated selling "refills" for their bottles and tried to restrict you from refilling your bottle on your own through acts of congress?

      Unless it breaks someone elses basic human rights we should be allowed to use and modify any product legally purchased as we see fit.

    5. Re:They force you to lease software by jhoger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fuck all these laws that control how we use stuff we own!

      [/sarcasm]

      Yes... so are you arguing that the government has a right to control how we do everything because we permit it to control some things? Where does liberty come into the equation then?

      The general idea is that your right to swing your arms stops at your neighbor's chin.

      The Supreme Court may have found a corporation to be a person, but I don't.

      All these examples you gave are pretty weak. Disable your catalytic converter, and you have a fairly direct effect on air pollution which impacts you and your neighbors health. Roll back your odometer... there's really no reason to do that ever except to cheat someone. That's effectively interfering with an official measurement. Remove seat belts in a car... again, a safety issue.

      Now, a game console. There is a legitimate purpose to doing that: running unsigned games on hardware you own (did you sign a contract saying otherwise when you bought your console?). That shouldn't be illegal, if you believe in liberty.

  11. Back before it was even called the DMCA by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I remember back when the WIPO copyright treaty that would lead to the DMCA was being quietly passed by member nations. Only a few of us were even talking about it at the time. But the implications were pretty clear to me even then. Making it illegal to even CIRCUMVENT copy protection measures would inevitably lead to people being prosecuted for even the most innocuous and widely accepted activities (at that time, it was mostly stuff like bypassing Macrovision, copying videotapes, copying CD's, and taping stuff on cable). It was quietly outlawing activities most people considered sacrosanct, and we let it happen. The U.S. signed onto the treaty, the Congress passed to DMCA to implement it, and everyone just sort of ignored it--figuring that the local guy in the neighborhood who copied a CD or VHS for you would never be effected. But it was always only a matter of time before they got down to enforcing it in at the local level. It may have started with the big pirate operations, but it was bound to come down to local modders too. It was only a matter of time.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  12. Parity? by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is insane. This kid is looking at 10 years for modifying hardware while another story linked right at the bottom of the same article describes a cop getting a one day suspension (with pay) for running down a child with his car

    1. Re:Parity? by marcop · · Score: 4, Informative

      I disagree it was the kid's fault. The cop was responding to a "disturbance call without starting his lights and sirens" and he "sped around a short curve". So he was speeding to the call without putting on the safety devices that allow him to break normal traffic laws. He caused the accident by driving carelessly on a dangerous road. A 1 day suspension for what is basically reckless endangerment is laughable.

    2. Re:Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Watch the video in the story. He was doing 72 in a 40, and department policy forbids him doing that. At least they are "considering" filing additional charges perhaps even criminal. The officer should be thrown in jail for his careless misconduct.

    3. Re:Parity? by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 3, Informative

      I clicked your link... The kid was struck crossing a busy, unlit road at night, by a car coming around a blind corner. Sounds like tragic accident to me. If anybody is to blame it's the kid's parents for letting him out at night on a bike, without proper safety instruction.

      Read the article. The cop was speeding around a blind corner without his lights or siren on. Yes, he was responding to a call, but he was breaking police protocol, and probably state and local laws, by speeding and by failing to turn on his lights and siren. Should the kid have been in the street? Well, there's no law against riding your bike in the street that I've heard of. How do you know that the child had no safety instruction? It seems to me that the cop is the one without adequate safety instruction. Hitting and killing that child seems to have been caused by the officer's negligence - driving too fast without his lights and siren on.
       

      So what's your point? That we should be punishing people severely for things they have no control over? I presume you believe the punishment for violating the DMCA to be disproportionate, but you picked a poor example.

      My main point is that there is a severe lack of parity in the US justice system. Those with money and/or power (cops, giant corporations) can basically do what they want while the little guy (kid on a bike, hardware hacker) get screwed or worse. A side point would be that a crime that has actually caused significant harm (the cop killing the kid) goes basically unpunished while the "crime" of modifying game consoles which hurts basically nobody can be punished by 10 years in jail.

    4. Re:Parity? by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the kid's parents for letting him out at night on a bike, without proper safety instruction.

      Studies have shown that crossing a street from a sidewalk on a bike can be MORE dangerous than riding in a lane on the street, because drivers are less likely to see you. On "busy streets" in my town, the cops will give cyclists a ticket for riding on the sidewalk.

      And regardless, the cop was doing nearly double the speed limit WITHOUT having his lights or siren on.

  13. the poll on the nbc site ... by neonprimetime · · Score: 3, Informative

    on the right hand side of the article, did anybody notice the poll that allows you to rate the story?

    your options are ... "We are ..." a.) Laughing b.) Furious c.) Bored d.) Sad e.) Thrilled f.) Intrigued

    I voted Furious ... cause the charges are kinda ridiculuous ... and I'd be pissed if it happened to me.

    But the current scores are ... Laughing 50%, Furious 33%, Bored 17%, Sad/Thrilled/Intrigued 0%

    1. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Aim+Here · · Score: 4, Funny

      From the percentages you post, I deduce there had been exactly 6 votes posted, so we now know there are at least 3 assholes on the internet.

    2. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is, that someone will spin that as

      "64% of people were FURIOUS that this nasty little toe-rag was hacking consoles and cheating the companies out of their God-given profits!!!"

      It's now 82% furious, by the way.

  14. Devil's Advocate by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, I'm going to say something that I'm certain will be enormously unpopular here - what he was doing is a crime and he almost certainly knew it was. Sorry. He got caught breaking the law.

    Now, should it be a crime? Should it be a crime with a possible 10 year penalty? Should law enforcement resources be wasted on inane garbage like this while there are real, serious criminals out there that are still walking free? I think the answers to all those questions are obvious (at least I hope they are...) but the reality is what he was doing is a crime and thus he broke the law. I would hope people will be sufficiently bothered by this situation (and the ten year sentence for something so insignificant while people who commit violent crimes get much less time...) that they will be motivated to write their government and demand a change. If enough people raise their voice, maybe, just maybe, the government will pay attention. As it is, the only voice they hear are those of lobbyist for major media companies who want laws like this on the books. They got their way and now this guy is (presumably) guilty of something that shouldn't be a crime, but currently is...

    1. Re:Devil's Advocate by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, he broke the law and got caught. What's your point? That we shouldn't be outraged? I'm not surprised this happened, but it's still outrageous. Every person involved in the investigation and prosecution of this act, and the passing of the legislation that criminalized it, is complicit in evil. They are far more dangerous than the "criminals" they claim to protect us against.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  15. Re:Not-for-profit by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is most likely a student helping his friends

    Uh huh. Let's not bother to read the article, shall we?

    The charges against Crippen stem from an ICE investigation initiated late last year [...] agents executed a federal search warrant at Crippen's home, where they seized more than a dozen Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony video game consoles.

    Look, the sentence this guy is facing is ridiculous and the law needs changing, but we don't have to pretend that he's just some nerd modding a console or two for his homies.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  16. The hyperbole is staggering... by cptdondo · · Score: 2

    [quote]âoePiracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers,â[/quote] Right. A kid in his basement modifies a Wii and this poses "a significant health and safety risk"??? WTF? Piracy like this is mostly a victimless crime. It's a crime created artificially by a corporate culture. Crimes are supposed to be something that hurts real people directly. Piracy doesn't do that.

    1. Re:The hyperbole is staggering... by amplt1337 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A kid in his basement modifies a Wii and this poses "a significant health and safety risk"???

      Maybe the modification is taking off the wrist strap.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  17. Once again the media completely misses the point by sqrt(2) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article

    Counterfeiting and piracy have grown in recent years in both magnitude and complexity, according to ICE.

    That's nice. Now how is that connected to the "crime" of modding a console? How is what he did connected to piracy other than the strained connection that modding consoles inevitably leads to piracy which he should be held responsible for? Even if you buy that, how is any of it inolved with "counterfeiting"? No one is stamping out illegal copies of games to be sold as the real thing here. Wrong issue entirely.

    Some estimates indicate that 5 percent to 8 percent of all the goods and merchandise sold worldwide are counterfeit.

    Again, a completely irrelevant fact mentioned only for the purpose of trying to connect his "crime" to a larger and more obviously illegal sounding one.

    I wish mainstream news outlets would hire people to do research and write informed articles, because the alternative seems to be just parroting whatever the alphabet soup of government agencies tells them about the issue. Though, I guess now I know to watch out for those counterfeit modded game consoles.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  18. Health and Safety issue??? by MadCow42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >> âoePiracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers,â he said.

    Health and Safety risks? Give me a f*&%ing break... at least with regards to Intellectual Property. Sure, counterfeit aircraft replacement parts pose a real safety problem (and it's a real problem... go after that one, guys!), but copying videogames?

    If the guy was overtly doing this to enable the use of pirated games, then sure, he's guilty. But if the majority of his work is to enable homebrew or emulation software, they should set him free and give him a pat on the back. I lose all sympathy for the copyright holders when they try to use FUD about "Health and Safety" to prop up their failing business model.

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  19. Apphrended by DHS by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure glad that the Homeland is secure from this miscreant.

    1. Re:Apphrended by DHS by tuxgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're also monitoring this forum, soon they will be at your door as well
      Hold on ... gotta go, someone is pounding at my

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Apphrended by DHS by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps he was dictating?

  20. Pirated PS3 games gave me swine flu by Fierythrasher · · Score: 2, Informative
    Did anyone read the article? I quote Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers

    Um...exactly how does a pirated PS3 game create a health or safety risk?

  21. Troubling by mewsenews · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Joe Public will read this story and think "so what, some kid who helped destroy game company profits got his comeuppance," but the technically astute on this site will notice that this law, while currently applied to a trivial domain like game consoles, will be affecting the whole computer industry for years to come. The iPhone, like most game consoles, has a mechanism to prevent unsigned code from running. It is protected by the DMCA. The Kindle from Amazon is probably protected by the DMCA.

    Your legal ability to do what you want, with the hardware you own, is slowly being eroded by new hardware with DRM baked in, and lawsuits like the one in the article. The issue is about personal freedom as much as it's about piracy.

  22. Imagine if Trusted Computing had taken off... by javacowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...then people who modified generic PCs to run "unauthorized software" would receive the same sentence.

    Frightening.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
  23. Pirate Party? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm curious if the Pirate Party will start getting enough traction in the U.S. to matter.

    Cases like this only really piss-off young, highly technical persons. But if you factor in the RIAA's and MPAA's actions over the last 5 years, it makes me wonder.

  24. Playing pirated games will cause you do die by VinylRecords · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article:

    "Playing with games in this way is not a game -- it is criminal," said Robert Schoch, special agent in charge of the ICE investigations office in Los Angeles. "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers," he said.

    Emphasis mine. What health risks are there? Pac Man fever?

    1. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems like that statement is trying to suggest that a modified XBox 360 or Playstation 3 will explode or shock the consumer when they use it or something. When really it is just soldiering a Mod Chip to a part of the motherboard so that Homebrew games and other unsigned games can be played.

      Actually since he is a professional, he'd do a better job than if the consumer tried to modify their game console by themselves and risk bricking it or something worse.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Informative

      To these kinds of people alterations done to electrical equipment not done by a certified electrician could potentially cause short-circuits and fire. IIRC electrical fires are the main cause of home fires.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  25. correcting an error in my post - apologies by TechForensics · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't understand how the freedom of a business comes before the freedom of the people.

    There is a quote attributed (perhaps erroneously) to Mussolini, but he is alleged to have said "FASCISM should more properly be called corporatism, because it combines the power of the business sector with the power of the state".

    I do believe America is suffering now under a kind of corporatism. The term seems more accurate than capitalism. At least since we are also a democracy there may be hope.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    1. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by eln · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Good thing you made that correction...socialism is the exact opposite of corporatism. Fascism, at least the way it was implemented by Mussolini and Hitler, was very much corporatist, though. It's really kind of funny how much people scream "socialism" these days when we're so much closer to corporatism than we are to socialism. In socialism, the government controls the industry. In corporatism, the industry (the corporations) control the government. We are much closer to the latter.

    2. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good thing you made that correction...socialism is the exact opposite of corporatism.

      Actually, socialism is not the opposite of corporatism/fascism. They are both forms of command economy where the government decides how to distribute resources. They are also both about the group being more important than the individual.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  26. Re:What's the issue here? by p1r4t3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That would be similar to someone putting performance parts on their car and a cop pulling up and arresting them for street racing on the basis that they would be using said modifications to do so. No crime has been committed unless it has become illegal to modify purchased devices and hardware. I know they say he was circumventing parts of the hardware that protect copyrights of games against piracy but I do not see how that is against the law unless it is proven without a doubt that he did so with piracy in mind.

  27. Re:What's the issue here? by Jellybob · · Score: 2, Informative

    this is far less of a moral grey area than downloading is.

    No, you've got that backwards.

    Downloading a game ISO has only one purpose. The playing of that game, without paying for it.

    Modding an Xbox, as you say yourself, allows you to run XBMC on it. A legitimate use of the hardware, which harms nobody.

  28. Re:Not that disturbing by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 2, Informative
    Googling "Odometer Jail" returned this story.

    Aug. 21--A former Spokane Valley car dealer, who now sells used cars in Post Falls, avoided a likely prison term and a substantial fine by helping investigators unravel an international odometer rollback case. Instead of low-mileage bargains, more than 135 buyers were stuck with high-mileage Canadian imports with altered mileage gauges. For his part in the conspiracy, Richard "Rick" Shafer got no prison time Thursday, but must complete six months of home detention when he's not at work and repay a Spokane credit union $172,792.

    There's another where a dealer got 10 months.

    Anyway, last time I sold a car (In Indiana), when you sold the car there was a checkmark on the form where you could say that the odometer was not correct. (I knew it wasn't because it rolled around past 00000) Modifying your own odometer was perfectly legal, as was paying someone to do it, as long as you didn't sell the car as having that mileage.

    Modifying game consoles isn't fraud, unless you don't tell a future buyer that it's been modded.
    They say it's a circumvention device, but like the Sony Betamax case, if he can show that there are significant, non-infringing uses of a modded console, he could win. (If he has the resources to fight)

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  29. Get involved by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been involved in a Civil Liberties group that reviews and lobbies legislation for appropriate changes prior to them becoming law, something quite different from the EFF. From my initial conversations organisations like this are in need of people with a technological bent to advise them on the ramifications of technology legislation before it passes into law.

    It's not the first time I've done it and I've found that if you you are polite to the ministers involved they are quite responsive and will listen to what you have to say and if they see your name often enough they will ask you for advice, they asked me. It's interesting to see the changes you suggest actually either make it into law or not make it into law due to your lobbying.

    Thing is, it's not a game. If you don't act then, incrementally, freedoms will be whittled away. If it's not by the lobbying of a special interest group (for example Microsoft with the Xbox) then it will be by a knee jerk reaction to something else that has happened. Once it's passed into law it's very unlikely that it will *ever* be rolled-back.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  30. Re:What's the issue here? by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

    this is far less of a moral grey area than downloading is.

    I think you have that backwards.
    downloading (as implied in your post) is specifically to avoid paying for content.
    Modding an Xbox can lead to playing homebrew games, apps, and other very cool stuff that has little to nothing to do with piracy. Hell I modded countless Xbox 1's to run linux.

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  31. Re:Duh, ICE is a Dept Within DHS by rliden · · Score: 5, Funny

    What? How about taking your own advice Anonymous Coward. I see you post on every feckin story I read. You always take this tough guy stance and say exactly what you mean without fear of karma or being modded to oblivion. I wish you would just shut the fuck up and quit posting in every article I read..

    --
    Don't think of it as a flame, more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage.
  32. Re:Not that disturbing by funkatron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't want to go to jail? Don't break criminal laws.

    You don't want people to break criminal laws? Don't write shit laws.

    --
    "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
  33. Re:Hooray by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The whole tone of your post makes it obvious which side you're on. Shoveling scorn on one side of an argument while proclaiming to be neutral is intellectually dishonest.

  34. Re:Really? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    That statement does not pertain specifically to mod chips or software, but is a general statement about such goods.

    Hardware, batteries, etc that are counterfeit can and have caused injury and death.
    Counterfeit medicine, vitamins, and supplements have caused sickness and death.
    Counterfeit toys and children's clothing contain dangerous chemicals, lead based paint, are missing flame retardants, or are made of flammable material.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  35. Re:Duh, ICE is a Dept Within DHS by Verdatum · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seriously. 4chan was a Garden of Eden before that Anonymous guy showed up.

  36. No sense of balance by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ten years for hacking consoles? He should have stuck to arson and murder, he'd have gotten less than five.

  37. Re:Hooray by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The summary made some good points, but your reply contributes nothing to the discussion. I'm not sure why you were modded insightful. If you think a discussion on this topic is going to be pointless, why are you here?

  38. Re:What's the issue here? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Informative

    Downloading a game ISO has only one purpose. The playing of that game, without paying for it.

    No, it doesn't. Optical media is delicate.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  39. Ridiculous by Aurisor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't comprehend how this should be a *criminal* offense.

    Really? This person is so dangerous we need to lock him in a metal cage for ten years?

    I agree if we allowed people to completely, freely, brazenly enable piracy on a commercial scale, there might be some damage to the production of video games that might hurt us all. Confiscate the guy's hardware, take his profits, and figure out how many consoles he sold, and fine him the cost of, say, two or three video games per console.

    Honestly, it's this kind of batshit-insane loss of all perspective that makes young people hate The Establishment so much. I swear, if prison times reflected actual *physical peril* that someone represents to society and fines represented *actual damages* (plus a slight disincentive (like 10%, not 10,000%)) the relationship between authority and youth in this country would be dramatically different.

  40. The American Federal System by westlake · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

    It functions as it was built to function.

    In the American federal system, violent crimes are traditionally prosecuted at the state and local level.

    The federal government has no general criminal jurisdiction outside of Washington D.C., its island territories, military bases, Indian reservations, and similiar enclaves.

    The Secret Service was orginally organized to fight counterfeiting - a purely economic crime with an interstate dimension. ICE is the criminal enforcement division of the customs and immigration service - and these are not guys you want to fool around with.

    Violent offenders who do enter the federal system get hammered. There is little willingness to plea bargain. When the judge says twenty-five years to life, you serve twenty-five years to life.
     

  41. Re:What's the issue here? by Anne+Honime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are sooooooooo wrong. Downloading an iso to replace the original DVD I legally own but innocently scratched is not a violation of the copyright nor of the license. In criminal law, you must prove the intent and the actual criminal facts ; you should never deduce from a neutral fact which outcomes can be both legal and criminal that it is criminal by itself. Of course there are statute laws that criminalize simple facts, because it makes the prosecution job easier, but this is a sloppy job and should not be tolerated in a free society. This type of justice has only be extensively used in red dictatorships like soviet Russia, and it's disheartening to see it invade our 'still not so long ago' free societies.

  42. Re:Not-for-profit by Vectronic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quantity doesn't really mean anything, I've got 6 computers, that doesn't mean that I am selling 5 of them. How many of those "...more than a dozen..." are actually running? or in a closet? covered in 3mm of dust?

    ...Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony video game consoles.

    Well MS hasn't been involved that long, but what if some of the "Nintendo's" are NES/SNES, are the "Sony's" PS1's? I'd still have a Commodore64, Atari, NES, Sega Genesis, etc if I hadn't moved, and I likely wouldn't be doing anything with them.

    ...illegally modified Xbox, Playstation, Wii and other video game consoles

    Fine, but what constitutes "illegal", are they all modded? or were some of them just sitting there without there shells "potentially modified" or some shit? I'm not saying the guy is innocent, only that the article is full of fuck all, and uses the classic tactics to enrage (frankly, idiotic) people like trailing off into

    "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers," he said.

    Like this guy modding consoles caused your favorite store to close, and is going to make YOU lose your job, and hell fuckit, he might even give you cancer. KILL THE BASTARD.

    He deserves a fine, and nothing more.

  43. Re:Not-for-profit by Omnifarious · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact that it is criminal at all is ridiculous. Either my property is mine to dispose of as I wish, or it isn't. If it isn't then we should just declare ourselves communists and have the truth of it out.

  44. Re:Hooray by jhoger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, it sounds like you have an opinion. But I'm not really sure since you didn't say anything substantive.

  45. Ars Technica dug up sources a year ago by grimJester · · Score: 4, Informative

    Link

    The 750k jobs is a dubious claim from 1986 about counterfeit goods. The $250 billion is a 1993 figure given for the worldwide market of, again, counterfeit goods.

  46. He's not a damn murderer by Binder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Besides the fact that this shouldn't be illegal...

    The most frightening part of this is that you can kill someone and get less jail time. How can this be seen as a greater threat to society than killing someone?

  47. I find the stupid here disturbing by diamondsw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look, we all know that the DMCA is evil and has been repeatedly abused. This is not one of those cases. The guy was modding consoles for profit. You can go on and on all you like about homebrew, but *you* know, *I* know, and *everyone else* knows that's not why he was doing it. He was doing it so cheap bastards can play copied games. This has nothing to do with your rights. If there was no DMCA, he'd be gotten on other laws - this was just the most convenient one. He's a stupid-ass student criminal, plain and simple. Now, feel free to debate the severity of the sentence - that's legitimate. But defending him as some noble kid who got put down by "the man" just hurts our cause. Pick your battles, people.

    And also, stop putting out the crap of "why aren't they working the important cases?". Ever think that some officers/agents are assigned to different areas based on their expertise? And perhaps putting these cops on the homicide or gang squad isn't going to catch a killer or shut down a gang any faster? To put it in terms you'll understand, you don't want the guy who wrote Notepad working on the kernel. Just because you have resources spent on many tasks, does NOT mean that putting them all on a particular task will get that task done any sooner or better. I would have thought technical people would have understood resource allocation better, but the amount of stupid and kneejerk reaction around here really surprises me sometimes.

    Welcome to Slashdot. I must be old here...

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
  48. Re:Not-for-profit by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you agree that the actual facts of the case don't matter and it's fine to just make shit up, why not say he's blind and has never touched a console in his life?

    Yes, the law itself shouldn't care, but let's not pretend some random falsehood for no reason, when the law is perfectly stupid on its own.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  49. Selective enforcement and prosecution by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uh, they do that. There are thousands of laws. Many not enforced in practice.

    If they enforced them all, they might not even get out of their neighborhood. Might be a bit like Robocop when he was loaded with hundreds of directives :).

    According to the laws in Michigan, committing adultery would get you a life sentence. Seems the courts and prosecutors there are talking about repealing the relevant law. So that's selective prosecution as well.

    But you know, maybe one should take a poll of betrayed spouses (and maybe even their children) and ask them what their opinion on adultery is. Do they view it as less or more negative than being mugged at gunpoint? How about being beaten up (but resulting in no broken bones or major scarring)? I won't be surprised if many of them would get over being mugged at gunpoint far more easily.

    The average sentence for robbery in the 1st degree when armed with a deadly weapon (not necessarily a gun) appears to be 10 years.

    http://www.cga.ct.gov/2000/rpt/olr/htm/2000-r-0510.htm

    Of course one has to factor in that a robber could in theory more easily rob more people than a person could commit adultery with. Perhaps a robber is a danger to more people and thus should be put in jail for longer?

    --
  50. Re:Not that disturbing by jhoger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously? Are there legitimate applications for modifying an odometer other than cheating people?

    There are legitimate reasons to jailbreak an iPhone, or a game console: running unsigned binaries on equipment you own.

    The government shouldn't take your liberty to protect a business model.

  51. Re:Not-for-profit by AndrewNeo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Reverse engineering is against the DMCA.

    Woah, I think you need to re-read your DMCA.

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Re:Consentual acts with consoles by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah, but most of the consoles people care about these days haven't reached the age of consent...

    Nintendo is over a hundred years old.

  54. Re:Consentual acts with consoles by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah, but most of the consoles people care about these days haven't reached the age of consent...

    Nintendo is over a hundred years old.

    Nintendo the company is. But the Gamecube is... what, eight? And the Wii is like two or three?

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  55. Console Modding, the DMCA and You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In case anyone is curious about the legal side of this issue, 17 USC (s) 1201 (The anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA) states:

    (2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that -

    ( A ) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;

    ( B ) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or

    ( C ) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

    (3) As used in this subsection -

    ( A ) to "circumvent a technological measure" means to descramble a scrambled work, to decrypt an encrypted work, or otherwise to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair a technological measure, without the authority of the copyright owner; and

    ( B ) a technological measure "effectively controls access to a work" if the measure, in the ordinary course of its operation, requires the application of information, or a process or a treatment, with the authority of the copyright owner, to gain access to the work.

    So yes, it is definitely a legal grey area. Basically, it is illegal to sell/make modchips and provide modification servcies in the United States IF their primary and only real purpose is to get around a copy protection measure.

    Console modification has the primary purpose of enabling the play of legal imported games and fair use backups, as well as enable the use of homebrew code that GREATLY expands the capabilities of the system (a perfect example of this is Xbox Media Center for the original xbox) and thus isn't just about bypassing a copy protection measure to enable piracy. In fact, if you have an original xbox and your hard drive dies, the only way to replace it is with a chip or with a TSOP flash, as the stock bios doesn't recognize non-locked hard drives (and the drives don't just have to be locked, they need to be locked with the key stored on the onboard eeprom). A modchip/tsop flash with a modified bios lets you bypass all that nonsense and just use any standard IDE/ATA hard drive with the system.>
    The DMCA is a seriously terrible law to begin with. It fundamentally changes the way traditional copyright has always worked, and violates consumer rights in the name of helping big business. To quote one of my law textbooks on it:

    The DMCA changes the traditional fair use doctrine of copyright law. Historically, it has never been a crime to access or make a copy of a copyrighted work; what has been a crime is the misuse of that information. This rule remains valid for the nondigital world of copyrighted works. The DMCA changes this rule for digital protected works, making it illegal to merely access the copyrighted material by breaking through the digital wrapper or encryption technology that protects the work.

    As a side note, nowhere does the DMCA say it is illegal to USE or BUY modchips, just to make and sell them. So that leaves the end user (you) in the clear so long as they're not using it for piracy.

    The sellers and makers of "anti-circumvention" devices and services on the other hand seem to be where the law is aimed at, and while I honestly don't believe the DMCA applies to chips and modding servcies, apparently the US government and the gaming industry disagree.

    The only precedent for chip sales and the DMCA I could find was a September, 2006 case in which Sony sued Divineo (SCEA vs Divineo Inc, et al(457 F. Supp. 2d 957; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74878; 81 U.S.P

  56. Re:Misread... Fortunately, he's not a by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Player HATER.... doh!

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  57. personal fair use vs. personal financial gain by lophophore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are legitimate reasons why you may wish to "circumvent" the copy-protection on your game console. For instance, suppose you have a XBox, and you want to run the XBox Media Center (xmbc.org) on it. Guess what! The XBox won't run unsigned code. XBMC is not signed. The only way to run XBMC (the "award winning free and open source software") on the XBox (which you **own**) is to either install a modchip, or use a "softmod" -- both of which actually do "circumvent" the copy-protection scheme in the XBox. A Federal Crime. That's a sad state of affairs, and why the DMCA is bad.

    Modding your console for your own personal use to run F/OSS software (or something else) is not going to attract the attention of the feds.

    Running a business (that's the "for personal financial gain" in the complaint) modifying game consoles so people can run bootleg (or other stolen) games -- well, that is criminal behavior. This guy had it coming to him.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  58. Re:Consentual acts with consoles by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Informative

    This thread is PedoBear approved!

  59. Re:Not-for-profit by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 2, Informative
    Defending the GP: My friend works for a video game company. One of the "perks" is that they get a debit card with a decent amount of cash on it every year that they *must* spend on games or game-related material (the idea is to allow him to discern what makes a game good or bad and serve as inspiration at work). The amount of money provided is enough that he, at last check a year or so ago, owned the following:
    • NES
    • SNES
    • Wii
    • Dreamcast
    • PS1
    • PS2
    • PS3
    • Xbox
    • Xbox 360
    • Some ancient cartridge based TI system (TI-92)
    • Two gaming capable PCs
    • Probably one or two more consoles hidden in the cabinet gathering dust

    Even without that sort of eclectic collection, if the guy from the article had a few friends that played LAN games between a few copies of a console, twelve would be easy. That said, I'm guessing the feds have more evidence than the console count, but there's nothing intrinsically incriminating about having twelve consoles.

    Beyond that, arresting a guy for modding consoles on any level below mass-production (at least a few hundred consoles a month) seems like a real waste of time. Much like arresting prostitutes, you're shutting down one small time provider of an "illegal" service, but the built-in demand will ensure that you do nothing to stem the tide.

    --
    $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  60. But cops don't wear Level IV body armor. by jpstanle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But cops don't wear Level IV body armor. Level IV body armor is usually a heavy metal/ceramic "impact plate" that covers only the most vital organs in the center of mass. It is generally only found on military infantry, or occasionally on very few SWAT teams. Level IV impact plates are really heavy, bulky, and uncomfortable. They are completely impractical for a patrol officer, and even rarely found in SWAT/Entry teams.

    Level III or IIIA soft vests, which is what 99% of cops actually have, is only effective in defending against handgun calibers and shotguns. This is usually 'good enough' for cops since handgun calibers compose the majority of their threat. But don't think cops are trotting around in level IV impact plates, because they're not. The worlds best IIIA vest can't even hold up to 'small' centerfire rifle calibers like 5.56 NATO, 7.62x39mm. And even Level IV impact plates can only take a couple shots from big game calibers like .30-06 or .300 Win Mag before failing.