Slashdot Mirror


New Logitech Dark Field Mice Operate On Glass

Slatterz writes "Logitech has introduced new mice that use two lasers rather than one to work on a variety of previously unusable surfaces. The first laser picks out imperfections in the surface of a tabletop while the second laser focuses on microscopic imperfections highlighted and uses those to direct the cursor. The technique, dubbed dark field microscopy, allows mice to be used on almost any surface, including glass (as long as it is more than 4mm thick)."

225 comments

  1. Dark Field Microscopy... by ruinevil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It can also detect the spirochetes that cause syphillis, Treponema palladium.

    1. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by greenguy · · Score: 1

      You overestimate the power of the dark field!

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    2. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Sulphur · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find your lack of faith in the dark field disturbing.

    3. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Informative

      In case anyone cares, "dark field" refers to an imaging technique which uses a light beam to illuminate a surface, but positions the sensor such that specular reflections (i.e., direct reflections which occur when light strikes a fairly smooth surface) are not picked up by the sensor. Instead, scattered (diffuse) reflections are picked up by the sensor, which highlights bumps and nicks in the surface.

      Compare this to "bright field" which refers to a technique where the specular reflection is received directly by the image sensor. The specular reflection is typically much brighter than any diffuse components which also happen to strike the sensor, so a simple threshold is able to filter out the diffuse components.

      Both techniques are used in, e.g., inspection of objects for defects, such as integrated circuits and masks, PCB soldering, etc.

    4. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, humbug. I went to the doctor and asked them to check if they saw any syphilis with this, but they told me they couldn't even find where to look.

    5. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by rattaroaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      It can also detect the spirochetes that cause syphillis, Treponema palladium.

      Yes, but maybe you should just see the doctor instead of waiting for the mouse to come to market.

    6. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Funny

      also, it doesn't have shit to do with using "two lasers", the story writer at PC Authority is just retarded. In addition, if I might editorialize, is this really necessary? How hard is it to just grab a piece of paper or something and use that, or, GASP, use a mousepad! What's Logitech going to come out with next, a raman scattering microscopy, mid-infrared quantum cascade utilizing wireless mouse, for those times when you simply must do your mousing on an atomically pure, sub-angstrom microroughness telescope mirror in a class 1 cleanroom? cmon now.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    7. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, they do use two lasers. No, it doesn't REQUIRE two for technique of "dark microscopy" itself, and the article's description of their use doesn't make much sense at all... it's just to provide more than one angle to bounce off any imperfections.

      Still, I don't see anything wrong with a mouse that tracks so well it will work on glass. It's not like it is designed for glass ONLY, it just means it will work even better on any surface you have. It's just the stupid blogs and reviews that have to go rub it on everry glass surface they can find - Logitech's marketing just says "Experience extreme accuracy and flawless tracking on virtually all surfaces."

    8. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by mewrei · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You say that as if it WOULDN'T be epic to have one of those

    9. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless in hospital or prison where would your average Slashdot reader get syphilis from? Now nterococcus faecium (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa might be on their keyboards and be fun to detect.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Treponema palladium

      Actually, Treponema pallidum pallidum causes syphilis. Palladium (the metal) has nothing to do with it.

    11. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that being said, the tactile response of using a mouse on surfaces other than a cloth mouse pad always feel 'wrong' somehow to me.
      call me old fashioned, but i just prefer the way a mouse moves on a mouse pad vs. the surface of my desk, a textbook, a sheet of paper, or the top of a pizza box.
      in fact, i find that the cheep, blank, generic cloth mouse pads they sell in my local wannabe-walmart do just the trick. fancy shmancy double laser dark field gyro stabilized nuclear sub-harmonic mouses be damned.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    12. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      also, it doesn't have shit to do with using "two lasers"

      Thank Jebus! I thought sharks with lasers were bad enough, but now mice? Anyone else see a problem here?

    13. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      What's Logitech going to come out with next, a raman scattering microscopy, mid-infrared quantum cascade utilizing wireless mouse, for those times when you simply must do your mousing on an atomically pure, sub-angstrom microroughness telescope mirror in a class 1 cleanroom? cmon now.

      Do any of those use THREE LASERS?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    14. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Atario · · Score: 1

      Besides that, this sounds pretty promising to me -- at work, I even use a mouse pad and still end up with the cursor flying off across the screen for no reason at least once every ten minutes.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    15. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Blue+Shifted · · Score: 2, Interesting

      some retail stores would setup their demo PCs on white shiny enamel coated shelves, with no mouse pads. there would be a row of people trying to play with these display units, while being frustrated by the mice not working.

    16. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's Logitech going to come out with next, a raman scattering microscopy, mid-infrared quantum cascade utilizing wireless mouse, for those times when you simply must do your mousing on an atomically pure, sub-angstrom microroughness telescope mirror in a class 1 cleanroom? cmon now.

      No they just bring out a new technology that uses a ***********drumroll************ rubber ball inside the mouse!

    17. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine eyes! The dark field, it does nothing!!! Aieieieie!!!!!

    18. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yes, but maybe you should just see the doctor instead of waiting for the mouse to come to market.

      He posted to Slashdot. He has nothing to worry about...

    19. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by willyd357 · · Score: 1

      No they just bring out a new technology that uses a ***********drumroll************ rubber ball inside the mouse!

      Holy Crap! Thats brilliant!

    20. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm looking forward to a mouse that I can use on any surface - should be useful for in the train to work etc. j:)

    21. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by owlstead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Either the wires are broken or there is a small piece of hair lodged in the hole with the laser and optical sensor. If the reflecting hair moves around the "camera" will try and track the movement. Mouse pads are brilliant in gathering dust and particles, which is the reason I don't use them any more, I'm using a very smooth desktop instead.

      On a more humorous note: especially small curly types of hair seem to be good at lodging themselves in, so this may also be a good indicator of a specific type of internet usage.

    22. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by mikael_j · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure no matter how many lasers they're using Gillette will come out with one that has one laser more...

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    23. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by randyleepublic · · Score: 0

      Logitech's quality and customer service is top notch. However do yourself a big favor: get a USB extension cord and put the little bluethooth dongle thingy on your desk right up close to the mouse. Somehow they, (Microsoft's mice have the same issue), got sold a bill of goods by the Bluetooth association or whoever when they picked the level of signal for the application. It's too dam low. So the extension cord solves that and it's all good.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    24. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by mosch · · Score: 1

      I have a glass desk. It'd be nice to be able to mouse on it directly.

    25. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's just the stupid blogs and reviews that have to go rub it on every glass surface they can find

      Wait.... we're still talking about mice here, right?

    26. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      I'm sure no matter how many lasers they're using Gillette will come out with one that has one laser more...

      the Mach c Turbo?

      the Lazor Blade?

      ...but I don't think the lasers would get dull, so how would they make any money? DRM to shut down the lasers after so many uses?

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    27. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      It can also detect the spirochetes that cause syphillis, Treponema palladium.

      Yes, but maybe you should just see the doctor instead of waiting for the mouse to come to market.

      I don't see why I'd need a mouse that can track around on my syphilis. But then again, no one should need more than 640K eh?

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    28. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      204? jesus. And I thought I was old.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    29. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by o'davy · · Score: 1
      You can also get a fancy shmancy mouse pad. I like mine.

      Just sayin'.

      --
      Sig goes here.
    30. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by pv2b · · Score: 1

      If Gillette made a wireless optical mouse, the mouse itself would be dirt cheap, but would be powered by proprietary non-standard non-rechargable batteries that cost about 50 euros each for a month of usage.

    31. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a more humorous note: especially small curly types of hair seem to be good at lodging themselves in, so this may also be a good indicator of a specific type of internet usage.

      OH MY GOD THAT'S SO FUNNY

    32. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Meski · · Score: 1

      also, it doesn't have shit to do with using "two lasers", the story writer at PC Authority is just retarded. In addition, if I might editorialize, is this really necessary? How hard is it to just grab a piece of paper or something and use that, or, GASP, use a mousepad! What's Logitech going to come out with next, a raman scattering microscopy, mid-infrared quantum cascade utilizing wireless mouse, for those times when you simply must do your mousing on an atomically pure, sub-angstrom microroughness telescope mirror in a class 1 cleanroom? cmon now.

      It would have been funnier if you had said GaAsP instead of GASP

    33. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Meski · · Score: 1

      A good indicator that the person shaves too, or the pieces of hair would be too long to get in the mouse hole. I probably should stop typing now.

    34. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      oh that's nerdy! I tip my hat sir.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    35. Re:Dark Field Microscopy... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      but is it 3 dollars?

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  2. Something something something dark side! by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 4, Funny

    This tech sounds awesome in an evil way. Or evil in an awesome way, I guess.

    1. Re:Something something something dark side! by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Why yes, sounds suspiciously like the evil HHGG v2, the bird...

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:Something something something dark side! by jadv · · Score: 1

      Sounds EVIL enough for a Dr. EVIL reference. If the new mouse has 2 lasers, it must also have 2 sharks, which will fight over who gets to eat the mouse. In the end, they will kill each other and the mouse will prevail. I for one welcome our new... OK OK, I'm going to take my medication and jump into bed.

    3. Re:Something something something dark side! by lennier · · Score: 1

      Not just field mice. DARK field mice.

      KA-SQUEAK-DOOM!

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  3. ultra-minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that mean I can scan for ultra-minute imprefections in my counterfit art mousepad?

  4. how's this compare to BlueTrack? by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is pretty much the selling point for Microsoft's BlueTrack (video at Amazon) as well. Theirs appears to be based on a blue LED and some optics picking up / processing the scattering, rather than dual lasers, but since they're more or less aimed at the same problem and claim similar success, I'd be curious how they compare.

    1. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Replying to my own post, it looks like BlueTrack specifically disclaims working on glass. However, a different mouse already claimed to work on glass two years ago.

      I suppose what I most want is a bit of an overview of what current mouse tech we have and what they're good for.

    2. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And people wonder why i still have a ball mouse. Periodically I find it useful to have something that works even on dirty windows.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    3. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by drizek · · Score: 1

      Blue LED

      Dual Laser Beams

      It doesn't take a genius to figure out which is the cooler solution.

    4. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh - to each his own. With my optical mouse I can sit it on the leg of my jeans (even on the side if I feel like it) and use my mouse wherever I want. Or on the actual surface of my couch. Ball mice tend to not work so well on fabrics.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by TheGreenNuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Periodically I find it useful to have something that works even on dirty windows.

      See now I'm just confused. Is there a clean version of Windows that I wasn't aware of?

    6. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just get a trackball?

    7. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Eh - to each his own. With my optical mouse I can sit it on the leg of my jeans (even on the side if I feel like it) and use my mouse wherever I want. Or on the actual surface of my couch. Ball mice tend to not work so well on fabrics.

      And with my trackball, I can do all of the above, and not have to move the mouse around physically to do it. Plus, because the ball is a fixed entity, the lasers/pickups can be optimized for it (and it can be designed for most efficiency too). So not only do I not have to move the damned thing, meaning that I've got that much more desk space available for notes and such, it's much more accurate.

      Or perhaps we could stop with the pissing match and saying how mine's better than yours, and agree that it's a question of personal preference, and that people will choose what they want to choose?

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    8. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. It all depends on your particular needs. I sometimes tend to lift my mouse sometimes when I am playing games. No problem with my ball mouse, but when I do it with my optical mouse, the cursor sometimes goes screaming away in a direction I didn't intend to move.

    9. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Or perhaps we could stop with the pissing match and saying how mine's better than yours, and agree that it's a question of personal preference, and that people will choose what they want to choose?

      Perhaps you never learned the meaning of "to each his own", which I explicitly prefixed my comment with?

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    10. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just get a trackball?

      Tried them years ago - not my thing. I just can't use them as fast without having a flat space for visual reference.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    11. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't Vaseline gum up the ball?

    12. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Maybe it does...

      Blue LEDs... I like them a LOT. My favorite color.

      Dual Laser Beams... Well Laser Beams are already pretty damn cool, especially the blue ones and you get DUAL.. SO...

      I still dunno. Both are pretty damn cool in my book.

    13. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by drizek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blue LEDs were cool when the iPod came out and it was the only one to use them for backlighting.Color screens make blue LEDs obsolete.

      On the other hand, Laser Beams are Forever.

      There will never be a time in the future when laser beams will be considered uncool. That is a fact.

    14. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Periodically I find it useful to have something that works even on dirty windows.

      Perhaps you should run a registry scan to clean your windows?

      Or try the new OS coming out, a hybrid of Linux and Windows that's supposed to be real clean and shiny: Windex.

    15. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      This is precisely why I love my trackball. You don't need a surface at all.

    16. Re:how's this compare to BlueTrack? by Meski · · Score: 1

      Eh - to each his own. With my optical mouse I can sit it on the leg of my jeans (even on the side if I feel like it) and use my mouse wherever I want. Or on the actual surface of my couch. Ball mice tend to not work so well on fabrics.

      --
      This comment is worded exactly as intended. Any application of lame "Fixed that for you" jokes will be "dealt with".

      It might have been worded as intended, but my mind read couch as crotch, first time. :^)

  5. Umm... by adolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Didn't Logitech make a mouse that worked on "any surface" about five fucking years ago?

    *puzzle*

    1. Re:Umm... by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mice that work on any surface have existed for years. They use an amazing technology called a "ball."

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Umm... by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 4, Funny

      We have more surfaces today than five years ago, obviously. You can't really expect old technology to remain relevant in such a fast moving world as ours, can you?

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    3. Re:Umm... by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sorry, but no ball mouse worked on my carpet for very long before being strangled, but the optical ones have no issue...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:Umm... by cailith1970 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep, glass has only been invented since 2004. Before that we just used melted sand. ;)

      --
      I intend to live forever, or die trying. - Groucho Marx
    5. Re:Umm... by BagOCrap · · Score: 4, Funny

      Never got mine to work on top of a pizza... Might've been the cheese?

      --
      -- Chaos, panic, pandemonium... My job here is done!
    6. Re:Umm... by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

      It definitely makes me think of the apocryphal story of NASA spending millions developing a pen that could write in space while the Russians just used a pencil.

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    7. Re:Umm... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "They use an amazing technology called a "ball."

      Revise that to "trackball" and you'd be correct.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that story is fucking bullshit and the pen maker approached NASA after it was developed

    9. Re:Umm... by raving+griff · · Score: 1

      Regardless of glass's age, it has only become a mainstream feature of desks in the past five to ten years. I would be willing to bet that five years ago, the fraction of people using a glass computer desk was a tiny minority. Aside from that, mousepads were still in wide circulation, as roller ball mice were still somewhat mainstream. These two facts combined mean that very few people would run into a problem with being able to use their mouse with a glass desk.

    10. Re:Umm... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's all fun and smug until all the fine graphite dust emitted by the pencil fucked up your capsule. Fischer Space Pen FTW!

    11. Re:Umm... by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Which is why he called it "the apocryphal story".

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    12. Re:Umm... by Barny · · Score: 1

      And yet I use a glass mouse pad on my wooden desk quite well with any laser or optical mice :)

      Check out the Rantopad range, smoked glass pads that look cool and weigh enough that they will never slip off the desk.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    13. Re:Umm... by cshake · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that old trackball works perfectly anywhere, and has a tiny footprint!

    14. Re:Umm... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 2, Funny

      That story's bullshit, they brought up an extra astronaut to swing the pen in circles so the ink stayed in the tip.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    15. Re:Umm... by adolf · · Score: 1

      I still have a vintage 1997 Cirque Glidepoint (what you whipper-snappers might call a "trackpad"). It works fine on any surface, and takes up a whole lot less room than a typical trackball.

    16. Re:Umm... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      You carpeted your desk?

    17. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a good thing they invented the lesbian mouse, then - no balls and it loves carpet.

    18. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trackballs sucked and that's why they never caught on. Hell, I'd rather use one of those lame ass pencil eraser laptop nubs than a trackball.

    19. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree, who wants to use his mouse on old surfaces?

    20. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.logitech.com/repository/1158/jpg/9580.1.0.jpg

      Works on any surface. Garuanteed.

    21. Re:Umm... by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      No-one in the universe, except for EVE-O players know the word Apocryphal. :)

    22. Re:Umm... by Fizzl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I think glass-top tables were big in 80's. Then they were deemed tasteless. And now they are hip and new again!

    23. Re:Umm... by impaledsunset · · Score: 1

      Just because it can work on any surface it doesn't mean that it's a good idea. Ewwww!

      At least nobody claims to have tried if it would work on the surface of their swimming pool.

    24. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doing it wrong

      hint: use a hand instead

    25. Re:Umm... by JavaBasedOS · · Score: 1

      It worked for a good five seconds... They just need to come up with a more 'air-tight' mouse.

      Speaking of which, they should come up with an underwater mouse that uses miniature "turbine" that lie on the same plane as the bottom of the mouse, but are orthogonal to each other! Then we can have underwater LAN parties as people used to have underwater tea parties.

    26. Re:Umm... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Carpet? I guess nobody told you that it's really *not* a foot pedal.

    27. Re:Umm... by maharb · · Score: 1

      These don't work on glass. Or at least the glass I have. I own one and its an amazing mouse though, just a little misleading when it says it can work on anything.

    28. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MX1000... great mouse :) still using it.

    29. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing they invented the lesbian mouse, then - no balls and it loves carpet.

      I am being truthful when I say this might be the most hilarious post I have ever read on slashdot. utterly awesome.

    30. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't be. After all, everybody knows mice love cheese.


      Okay, I'll go now...

  6. don't be so picky! by jjeffries · · Score: 5, Funny

    >The first laser picks out imperfections in the surface of a tabletop while the second laser focuses on microscopic imperfections highlighted and uses those to direct the cursor.

    Anybody doing retail sales has surely encountered couples like this. I'll bet the second laser demands a discount for the imperfections that the first laser found.

  7. More than 4mm thick by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Informative

    What consumer glass tables are more than 4mm thick? Yeah designer stuff and commerical furniture that has glass surfaces use 5-10mm glass, but this will still be useless on consumer grade furniture. Chances are, if you're a consumer using a consumer grade mouse, you'll be using it on consumer grade glass furniture.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:More than 4mm thick by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you're saying this mouse doesn't work on windows?

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:More than 4mm thick by maxume · · Score: 5, Informative

      Any time I have ever encountered anything resembling a glass table, it has always been a freaking slab of glass, not 4mm of it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:More than 4mm thick by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Well played sir, well played.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    4. Re:More than 4mm thick by blg42 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying this mouse doesn't work on windows?

      But then what really does...

    5. Re:More than 4mm thick by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No it should work fine, most window(s) installations are usually pretty dirty.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    6. Re:More than 4mm thick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No. I have a glass top on my cocktail table and it was priced just about equal to wood top and tile top cocktail tables. The glass is 0.25" thick which is 6.35 mm. It's 2'x4' and only cost a couple hundred bucks; certainly not designer.

    7. Re:More than 4mm thick by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Well you're in luck if you need to check slashdot at a cocktail party now aren't you? :)
       
      Seriously though, most glass top desks you can buy at office depot are 4mm or less.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:More than 4mm thick by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      No joke. Maybe the original poster is confusing mm and cm or something, because 4mm is pretty darned slim. Almost everything I've seen would run more like 10 or 12mm in thickness.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    9. Re:More than 4mm thick by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      Yup. After doing some field tests on the mice, this error message keeps popping up:

      Your mouse has moved. Please restart Windows for the change to take effect.

    10. Re:More than 4mm thick by quenda · · Score: 2, Informative

      What consumer glass tables are more than 4mm thick?

      All of them. 4mm is the thinnest glass you will find in a house - e.g. windows, cabinet doors.
      Coffee tables around here use 5mm, and larger tables are thicker.
      Unless you mean supported glass, like a mirror or a glass sheet over a wooden table-top.

    11. Re:More than 4mm thick by turing_m · · Score: 1

      Classic.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    12. Re:More than 4mm thick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you fucking high? 4mm is about 1/8 inch. I wouldn't set a keyboard on that, much less a monitor.

    13. Re:More than 4mm thick by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      If your glass table top is less than 4mm thick, you might run into other issues. Especially after becoming very frustrated with the subpar performance of your new mouse...

      On the bright side, however, you'd have 2 companies that you could milk for tort money for your slashed fists: Logitech, and the maker of your flimsy glass table top!

    14. Re:More than 4mm thick by KazW · · Score: 2, Informative

      What consumer glass tables are more than 4mm thick? Yeah designer stuff and commerical furniture that has glass surfaces use 5-10mm glass, but this will still be useless on consumer grade furniture. Chances are, if you're a consumer using a consumer grade mouse, you'll be using it on consumer grade glass furniture.

      Just measured the thickness of the glass on my IKEA desk, 5mm. I think that IKEA is a would be a good "standard" to go by what a lot of home and office users would have. I wouldn't classify IKEA as "designer" or "commercial" either, even though they do commercial sales for office furniture, it's the same products as those sold to a home consumer.

      --
      Geeks don't grock information, they grep it.
    15. Re:More than 4mm thick by maharb · · Score: 2, Informative

      BS, I am sitting at a desk bought from office depot. It and all the ones ones I looked at there are well over 4mm. I just measured the glass in mine and it is 7mm/8mm thick. Double what you are claiming is the max.

    16. Re:More than 4mm thick by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      What consumer glass tables are more than 4mm thick?

      Mine. A few years ago I got a black-glass-top desk. It's about 6 or 7mm thick, I'd guess, just eyeballing it without having done any real measuring, and it's hardly designer or anything -- just picked it up at Office Depot one day. Of course the first thing I discovered when I got it home and put the computer on it is that optical mice don't work on glass. :)

      Someone in this thread pointed out that you could put down some paper or a mousepad, which is exactly what I do, but really it's kind of a hassle, as it limits the space in which I can move the mouse, and it's one more thing to shuffle around when I'm rearranging stuff to accomodate laptops or midi controllers or what-have-you. If these things work as well as Logitech is claiming, I'll probably get one.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    17. Re:More than 4mm thick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is probably an American and thinks that "mm" means "millionth of a mile", where your desktop is about 4 millionths of a mile thick! (or fourth thousandths of a fathom).

  8. Heard in Microsoft HQ... by l3ert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers...

    --
    per dolorem ad astra
    1. Re:Heard in Microsoft HQ... by AntikInsomniak · · Score: 1

      I lol'd

    2. Re:Heard in Microsoft HQ... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      It certainly says something about the current state of humanity, when the "news" reported by The Onion often eventually becomes true.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  9. Field Mice by Kratisto · · Score: 3, Funny

    So how does the field mouse tell the Logitech Mouse where the imperfections in the surface are? Presumably Logitech has decoded the language of the tiny mammals.

    --
    Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
    1. Re:Field Mice by Mozk · · Score: 1

      No, they just bop them on the head. But apparently Logitech is racist, because it only bops the dark ones.

      --
      No existe.
  10. Or you can just... by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

    keep a mousepad in your laptop bag.

  11. Come on... by More_Cowbell · · Score: 1

    I normally hate when people comment about prices, but come on... $80 or $100 for a mouse? I guess I'm a hypocrite, but that seems ridiculous. I'll be sticking with my regular laser mouse that works on *almost* any surface...

    --
    Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    1. Re:Come on... by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Obviously, this is aimed at the same retards that call themselves audiophiles and spend obscene amounts of money on wooden stand offs because it makes the noise sound "warmer".

      That said, I'm going to order two. :p I can't help it if I've got a thing for mice and stationary.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:Come on... by Mauzl · · Score: 1

      This just in: Premium items not for everybody.

      Film at 11.

    3. Re:Come on... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      All depends on what your priorities are (or how much disposable income you have). Buying the best of anything will generally seem irrational to people not really into that area. Hell I paid over $100 for my last remote control. Sure there's universal remotes over at Walmart for $8, but those can't be programmed over USB . . . :)

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    4. Re:Come on... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I've alway paid about $80 to $90 for a Logitech mouse, going back to 1991. You get what you pay for...however, the recent SetPoint drivers have really driven down the quality of otherwise excellent hardware.

    5. Re:Come on... by chromas · · Score: 1

      No way a peripheralphile would use a laser mouse! The smooth, sleek design of a rubber-coated ball bearing allows for extremely accurate motion capture; those damn digital cameras and lasers just distort the movements and give low quality cursor motion that only a common Best Buy customer with low-res 3200x2400 LCDs could possibly tolerate.

    6. Re:Come on... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I normally hate when people comment about prices, but come on... $80 or $100 for a mouse? I guess I'm a hypocrite, but that seems ridiculous. I'll be sticking with my regular laser mouse that works on *almost* any surface...

      "Well Sir the majority of our less demanding customers are quite happy with a $5 mouse with pretty flashing lights. The more discerning ones want more.

      Still if a $5 mouse is enough for you, Sir, I guess that's ok."

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:Come on... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      If you have a glass desk where you have your laptop on for more than 4H a day, it is better than buying a new desk or having to put up with one of those crap mouse pads.

      Personally I've used a laser mouse on reflecting surfaces and they seem to do OK. And I don't like glass desks since they cool down my wrists too much.

      A good mice lasts forever nowadays, only the wires seem to be wearing out after a while. I've got no trouble spending a bit more on a mice if it means better control (less resistance for RSI).

    8. Re:Come on... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Actually, most people I've met who find regular mice (optic or rubber ball-based) inferior tend to use Wacom tablets instead, going from a Wacom table to a regular mouse is quite frustrating because you get used to not only the precision of the table but also that mouse movement is relative to the tablet and not the rotation of the mouse.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    9. Re:Come on... by maharb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you use the same mouse for 7+ years I think its a worthwhile investment. It's one of few pieces of hardware that can travel through endless computer upgrades. It's also the most precision based input device. I believe that it is very worthwhile to buy the best mouse you can then use the hell out of it. You are going to be touching it every day and if it has any imperfections you are going to be pissed every day.

      I have the G5 and have been using it for around 6 years. For less than $10 a year I got an awesome mouse.

      I of course am assuming this is a great mouse. This is more a general statement than related to this specific mouse because I have never used it and don't know if it is amazing.

  12. Precision technology by m.mascherpa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm so glad we figured this out.
    It was unacceptable that we weren't able to use mice on glass.
    My productivity will increase dramatically.

    1. Re:Precision technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sense and appreciate your sarcasm, but those of us that live in that type of house are very grateful for this development.

    2. Re:Precision technology by paintswithcolour · · Score: 3, Funny
      Dear sir,

      We are delighted to hear of your most recent mouse developments. For too long has there been a line of segregation between those who work inside the office, and those that work outside. Before down, we only understood the concept of Internet time-wasting (an oft mentioned topic on Slashdot) in theory. Finally, we will get to surf porn at work and play flash games, with the same freedoms are everyone.

      Many Thanks,

      The Window Cleaners Union

  13. Obligatory... by BagOCrap · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new dark field mice overlords!

    --
    -- Chaos, panic, pandemonium... My job here is done!
  14. Trackball by MrMista_B · · Score: 4, Funny

    Use a trackball: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Trackball

    Specifically, I use this Logitech trackball: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logitech-trackball.jpg

    After using that, using a mouse feels like my response time and accuracy is that of the old-style slow and stupid zombies.

    1. Re:Trackball by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      Trackballs are nice until you try to play an FPS with one.

    2. Re:Trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would use a track ball, too but i find it's a better work out to jerk my arm around, i can put more energy into things and therefore get more out of them in my heart

    3. Re:Trackball by Megatog615 · · Score: 1

      Really? I play better with a trackball(specifically the one pictured). My shots are far more precise with it because my thumb is far more steady than my arm.

    4. Re:Trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to decades of spectacular alcohol consumption, my hands twitch WAY too much for a trackball.

    5. Re:Trackball by alohatiger · · Score: 1

      This is the king of pointing devices. If only they made a BlueTooth version...

      --
      Bigtime Consulting - "We're the best because we cost the most"
    6. Re:Trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. When you first start playing an FPS with a trackball, it takes getting used to, but once you get the knack, speed and accuracy are great. I started with a trackball playing Unreal Tournament and use it for everything now - games, work, whatever.

      Besides, for the price of an Aeron, a table, and a mouse pad, you can buy a lap rack for your notebook and a lazy boy. The Logitech Trackball mouse sits perfectly on a recliner arm. )

    7. Re:Trackball by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Trackballs just aren't for everybody. I tried them many times back when they were more popular (ie, about 8 years ago). I found one by Kensington that was much better than the rest I tried, but even it was only "tolerable". Nowhere near as quick or comfortable as a mouse for me. And I learned a long time ago that if I have to work at liking something, that I probably don't really like it anyways.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:Trackball by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It might have been caffeine for me, I don't know. If I make it sensitive enough such that I don't need to take my thumb off and roll again to cross the screen, it's too twitchy. Maybe there are some acceleration tweaking programs to improve that, I just don't care, it's not for me.

      My biggest problem is that my thumb does very well on side-to-side motion, but not the motion needed for tracking the pointer up and down. It just doesn't work well for me, too awkward. A regular mouse seems to be a lot more isotropic for me.

    9. Re:Trackball by sznupi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not all trackballs are tailored to using them with a thumb, look up "Logitech Marble Mouse". It's quite different...I hate thumb-operated trackballs, but love this one.

      Now, if only Logitech somehow integrated proper scrollwheel into it... (or one day I will find that old MS one somehow similar to Marble Mouse, as far as which fingers you use)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    10. Re:Trackball by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Trackballs that are controlled by thumb are dumb, since the thumb is not meant for moving sideways, it was designed for grabbing things. Since my thumb hurts more easily than my shoulder or wrist, I would never use one.

    11. Re:Trackball by shermozle · · Score: 1

      Too bad Logitech canned the best one they ever made: Logitech Trackman Marble FX. I owned four of them, but they all eventually died. Now trying the Kensington Expert Mouse (which is, actually, a trackball) but because it's flat, I find it makes my wrist and shoulder sore.

      The beauty of the Trackman Marble FX was that it didn't use the thumb on the ball, and the whole thing was tilted at an angle so your hand sat flat, no tilt in the wrist. I'm thinking of putting an angled block under the Kensington device to do the same thing.

    12. Re:Trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I didn't realize that some people use their arm for aiming a mouse. When I play FPS, my hand is resting on the mousepad, completely surrounding the mouse. There is no way I am aiming using my arm. All the aiming is done through precise movements of my fingers. The great thing is that everything is resting, it's just slight side-to-side motions with my thumb on the left side and pinky+ring finger along the right side for those precision movements. I used to use a trackball. I stopped a while back because the mechanical ones would slip too much, and the optical ones couldn't track fast enough. I now believe that mice are more accurate, simply because it's much harder to make precise movements with one finger (or thumb) that has to constantly hold a ball in place versus only having to expend energy while moving a standard mouse, and letting gravity do most of the work after that. In case you're interested, my current favorite mouse is a razer deathadder, primarily because the shape is perfect for my hand, and the sensor never messes up for me.

    13. Re:Trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trackball are pieces of shit. Innacurate. Ugly. Unusable. Try beating someone with a REAL mouse on a game like quake....

    14. Re:Trackball by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Been using that line since the white serial ones came out way back when. Never looked back, and I do CAD/CAM ten hours a day.

    15. Re:Trackball by firefarter · · Score: 1

      As a trackball user of many, many years I'd like to plug the Kensington Slimblade Trackball http://slimbladetrackball.com./

      Best trackball, no, best input device I have ever used. Get this: to scroll, you twirl the trackball along the z axis. Hardware is wonderful, the extra software is crappy but there is no need to install it.

  15. dammit by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Funny

    I _knew_ I shouldn't have gotten that desk made out of 3mm glass.

    1. Re:dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn dude, we have the worst luck, mine is 3.9 mm

    2. Re:dammit by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Don't panic, someone will launch a $500 four laser mouse that will work on it in a few years.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  16. The mouse and the buggy whip by jarocho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Analysts keep suggesting that the mouse is nearing obsolescence, and that in less than five years, it'll look about as natural in your hand as a buggy whip. However, I remain unconvinced.

    That said, if and when Toyota or anybody else figures out how to port their brain-controlled wheelchair tech to the PC, the mouse may indeed become one of those things your future grandkids will see in photos and ask, "Did you really ever use one of those things?! It's so weird looking!!!"

    Until then, a laser mouse that can be used on transparent glass surfaces still has a certain wow factor.

    1. Re:The mouse and the buggy whip by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For art? yes. a tablet +pen is far more useful. and touchscreen tech is still artificially high priced so that will not be common until companies pull their heads out of their arses and start putting it on all LCD's.

      Outside that, mice work for what they are intended, and are dirt cheap.

      cant beat dirt cheap.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:The mouse and the buggy whip by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      touchscreen tech is still artificially high priced so that will not be common until companies pull their heads out of their arses and start putting it on all LCD's.

      I commented to someone at work a few months back that I reckoned touch-screen technology would be present in the majority of laptops- if not monitors in general- in five years time.

      I also commented that it would not replace the mouse for the same ergonomic and practical reasons that they were an unsatisfactory replacement for keyboards 25 years ago. If you have them vertically and have to point at them, it's exhausting for your muscles; it you have them horizontally, they're hard to look at, and your hands will get in the way.

      Unless you're using one for display and one for input; but if you have the input and display separate (possibly with the main monitor mirroring what you're doing with the input monitor) it cuts out half the point of using a touch screen over a mouse or laptop touch-pad.

      Computers are not the same as the iPhone; or rather, you don't use an iPhone in the same way that you'd use a computer. So touch screens will be useful on PCs, but they won't replace the mouse IMHO.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:The mouse and the buggy whip by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Herein lies your problem.

      you dont put a touchscreen vertical or horizontal.

      you put them at a 45 degree angle if it's at a workstation. 99% of all the acting theater systems I program have two or more touchscreens for audio mixing and lighting control. they are situated at 45 degree angles around the operator.

      works great and is easy to touch and slide. And contrary to your belief, most people are not so muscle atrophied that they cant lift their arm for more than 10 minutes at a time. Every install had touch-screns and none have ever had a request of "can we have a mouse instead? my arms get tired." Those systems are operated for 2-4 hours in a stretch non stop.

      Now, touchscreens do suffer from pointer accuracy. Mashing buttons or moving sliders is easy, selecting between the h and e in the word the is not.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:The mouse and the buggy whip by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      you dont put a touchscreen vertical or horizontal. you put them at a 45 degree angle if it's at a workstation.

      I'll take your word that they word well for that specific- and niche- use.

      I was discussing their suitability for general purpose computer use. In which case isn't having the screen at a 45 degree angle an inconvenient angle for continuous viewing? And are those screens you describe being used for both controls/GUI and output displays (as most computer interfaces are) or primarily as reconfigurable soft-control panels?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  17. Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by quenda · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first laser picks out imperfections in the surface of a tabletop while the second laser...

    Sound familiar? This sounds to me like it could be the start of a Gillette vs Schick style pissing contest, the absurd current state of which was foretold by The Onion.

    Let me go on record as predicting Microsoft will bring out a 3-laser mouse within 12 months. With an ergonomic grip and lubricating strips on each end.

    1. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With an ergonomic grip and lubricating strips on each end.

      Hmmmmmm. The lubricating strips could help me with my one handed mousing.

    2. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by TheGreenNuke · · Score: 1

      I'm holding out for the equivalent of the Platinum Mach14. That or the vibrating "power" version.

    3. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmmmm. The lubricating strips could help me with my one handed mousing.

      I think I've spotted a flaw in your plan: the hand that needs lubrication is not the same as the mouse hand.

    4. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by acidream · · Score: 1

      I've got one of those vibrating "power" razors, and its actually one of the best razors i've ever used, too bad the damn blades are 17 dollars a box.

    5. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by kimvette · · Score: 2, Funny

      You would think so, but he is REALLY into his computer!

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by chromas · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1. Electric toothbrush
      2. Straight razor
      3. Duct tape
    7. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      That's cheap. Here, we pay roughly 45$ per box.

    8. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by TheGreenNuke · · Score: 1

      Yea, but how useful will your mouse be when it vibrates on its own?

    9. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schick fucked up and sent me a free quattro handle in the mail, and I've been shoplifting their blades ever since.

    10. Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Lasers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They brought out a mouse that could do this over 6 months ago.

  18. For desktop use, what's the point? by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Funny

    For all the things they've been able to get mice to track on, it still sucks to move a mouse on anything other than an engineered mousing surface. This new sensor may be a good feature for notebook mice that will be used on who-knows-what, but buying a premium gaming mouse for it's ability to track on crappy surfaces makes about as much sense as buying a Formula One car for its off-road handling.

    And if anyone says "but it's better!": Today's well-made mice track fantastically well on a proper surface. They're already, for practical purposes, perfect. Yes, admittedly, there are people whose Logitech or Microsoft mice track poorly. But those people fall into two groups: (a) those who aren't using a pad at all, and (b) those who are using a horrible made-when-men-were-men-and-mice-had-balls pad they had lying around. Logitech and Microsoft would be better off just throwing in a proper mouse pad—and there are some excellent, relatively cheap cloth pads—than endlessly making slightly better sensors just so that people's cursors jump a bit less while they're scraping their mice back and forth on horrible surfaces.

    (And if Microsoft and Logitech had half as much innovation in materials as they do in optics, their mice would move like air hockey pucks by now.)

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:For desktop use, what's the point? by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is wrong with you people complaining about logitech improving their product? I don't get it. My logitech mouse works on most of the surfaces I've tried it on, but not everything. Would I like it to work everywhere? It would be nice. I can't imagine why anyone would be opposed to that.

      Also, no I don't use a mouse pad and I don't want to need one. Talk about pointless.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:For desktop use, what's the point? by Idiomatick · · Score: 3, Funny

      "mice would move like air hockey pucks by now"
      Is that patented?..........A bit noisy but....

    3. Re:For desktop use, what's the point? by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      His point was this mouse is aimed to gamers for uber precision. But the feature is useless to gamers buying this mouse since they already have 50$ mousepads and do not need to use it on glass... What he is missing is that it is about the technology trickling down to everyday mice which will be usefull in the future even if not for the market they are targeting atm the tech is valuable.

    4. Re:For desktop use, what's the point? by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with innovation. I have a problem with companies that spend all their time on "penis envy" products rather than creating anything particularly new and innovative.

      Remember the "muscle car" era? When innovation and safety took a back seat (cough) to squeezing out a few more horsepower than the competition? We seem to be going through the "muscle mouse" era, where companies are focusing on evolutionary change at the expense of revolutionary change.

      Think about what's happened with mice over the past decade. Sure, the ergonomics have improved a bit. Wireless mice work better—longer battery life, more reliable signals. Sensors can track on more surfaces, and have a higher resolution. Oh, and on a few models you can really spin your scroll wheel now. Granted, that's more improvement than the keyboard has seen, but it's still pretty pathetic.

      It's not like there aren't plenty of ways you could re-design a mouse. I'll let my imagination loose for a second: Why do we still have scroll *wheels*? Why not add an integrated trackball, like a scaled-up version of Apple's scroll ball? While you're at it, put a second ball where the thumb would rest. Now you could pan and scroll in any direction, while manipulating windows or other objects with your thumb, both independently of your "cursor". It would be like multi-touch for your mouse. Or you could just give your wrist a break for a while and use the mouse as a nice trackball. While you're at it, add a button or two for your ring finger and pinky to press. Add the latest haptics tech, so you can feel feedback as you use your mouse - a tactile grid and guidelines as you work in a design program, for example, or even a way to subtly "feel" your way through blocks of code. Articulate the frame a bit, so that the you can make the mouse wider or narrower to fit your hand properly. Add touch-sensitive pads to the buttons, so your mouse knows exactly where and how hard you click. Etc., etc., etc. And make these sorts of features standard across the product line, so that software developers don't dismiss them.

      I'm not saying that any of those ideas are especially great. Most of them are probably rubbish. The point is that there are a million ideas out there waiting to be tried, yet manufacturers aren't even attempting to be creative anymore. Logitech and Microsoft spend endless amounts of money hot-rodding a design that's already more than a decade old, where the significant problems have all been solved, just so that they can keep selling you the "new hotness" year after year. They spare nary a dime to work on anything brilliant, new, and revolutionary.

      Also, no I don't use a mouse pad and I don't want to need one. Talk about pointless.

      Do yourself a favor and buy yourself a Xtrac pad; they're the best bang for the buck I've found. For ten bucks you can have a good sized surface that's far smoother than your average desktop. If you're the type that moves your mouse all over your desk, get the Ripper XXL - it's a freaking meter wide (and half a meter high) and it only costs $25. You can put your keyboard and stuff on it and still have room to move your mouse all over the place. They're both quite thin and won't slide around or get in the way. Trust me—once you've tried a decent pad, you won't go back. And it has nothing to do with tracking; a good pad will let your mouse glide smoothly with just enough friction for fine movement. Using a mouse on your desk feels like sanding wood by comparison. And, as a side effect, you'll probably start wondering what the big deal is about the latest sensor technology.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    5. Re:For desktop use, what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Being able to track on more surfaces is always nice, but using a surface designed for the mouse is far from pointless. A mouse at the edge of its tracking ability annoyingly jumps around the screen, and a rough surface ruins the teflon pads. It's amazing how awful using a gunky mouse is, and how effectively almost any wooden desk suface does this.

      I've a five year old Logitech that tracks flawlessly, still moves like an air hockey puck, and the underside has never been cleaned in any manner. Two-dollar fabric & rubber mousepad for the win.

  19. the real question is.. by BattleApple · · Score: 0, Redundant

    how do we attach this frickin thing to a shark?

  20. Black Helicopters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dark field mice are supposed to be a top secret, covert operation. How did you guys get wind of this?

  21. Er, so are you telling me by thewils · · Score: 2, Funny

    My mouse will work with Windows?

    Finally!

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  22. Can anyone help me? by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    I'm jonesing for a new overpriced mouse that works on glass instead of my perfectly good $25.00 mouse that works just fine on my wooden desk.

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
  23. Very good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and it would be even better if they throw in a glossy red mousepad absolutely free. :)

  24. But Five blades really is better. by tjstork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First off I wouldn't give the Onion too much credit for "foretelling the blade count war", because, every teenager and pre-teen has been making 22 blade razor jokes probably since they first made twin blade razors. It's not a big deal

    Secondly, five bladed razors are better. The five blade Gilette Fusion is a wonderful razor. Having to use an old twin blade compared to the fusion is just terrible. In fact, my wife routinely steals mine (and a fresh blade), in order to do her legs. Lady's twin blade razors in cute little pink and white packages do not work as well as a good old five blade ultra sharp kick butt razor.

    Bottom line is, if Gillette's research arm comes up with diamond tipped blades, or some sort of a ten bladed razor, then they've got my interest. Paying extra for a razor may seem like a waste to some, but after twenty or thirty years of shaving with crappy razors, those few extra bucks are money well spent. A good razor is worth it, and honestly, I could see a good mouse being worth it too.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:But Five blades really is better. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      ...my wife routinely steals mine (and a fresh blade), in order to do her legs.

      Same here. And my wife usually doesn't see fit to mention it until after I've scraped half my face off with a blunt blade. Her legs don't feel that bristly to me, but they sure do take the edge off a razor pretty damn fast...

    2. Re:But Five blades really is better. by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      The first razor I ever liked was the original Mach 3, and I haven't switched yet. I might try out the 5 blade version sometime soon. Twin bladed razors suck ass in comparison. I don't think people are really criticizing Gillette per se, they just like to make fun of things, and extrapolate from short patterns in ridiculous ways.

    3. Re:But Five blades really is better. by chromas · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not the legs.

    4. Re:But Five blades really is better. by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      Double-edged razor. Stop the marketing.

      How much did you spend on your razors? I pay less than pennies for a shave and probably have a closer shave than most people who use the gillette uber-maximum-fusion stealth hyperium razors.

    5. Re:But Five blades really is better. by CrashandDie · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it takes you half your shave to notice the blade is blunt, you're doing it wrong.

    6. Re:But Five blades really is better. by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      My choice is to avoid the blood and the pain. Norelco is my friend. Can't speak for the ladies and their legs, different problem.

    7. Re:But Five blades really is better. by JSmooth · · Score: 1

      SNL (Saturday Night Live) made this joke in the third season over 20 years ago (I believe it was for a 3 bladed razor).

      I love that all you suckers have fallen for the advertising and are convinced it makes a difference. That keeps the price of the single blade razors I sue dirt cheap. Thanks!

    8. Re:But Five blades really is better. by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      You've never shaved with a double-edged razor, have you? The razor costs ~$20 new (it's solid metal), but the blades cost $0.20 max. And you get equal or better results. But hey, if you want to buy your razor blades under the same model most people buy ink for their printer, that's cool. ;)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    9. Re:But Five blades really is better. by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because my single blade, double edged Merkur Heavy Duty has blades that cost ~50 cents (for top quality blades) and it shaves better than the fusion I used to use.

      Those Fusion refills are ridiculously priced, at lots of markets they put em behind locked glass. That said, the fusion shaves better than a 2 bladed cartridge razor, and there's no learning curve.

      --
      Photos.
    10. Re:But Five blades really is better. by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      Multiple blades work better than one if you grow more than peach fuzz. The idea is to not have a raw face from 400 strokes with a one-blade piece of shit.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    11. Re:But Five blades really is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off I wouldn't give the Onion too much credit for "foretelling the blade count war", because, every teenager and pre-teen has been making 22 blade razor jokes probably since they first made twin blade razors. It's not a big deal

      Hell, Saturday Night Live beat the Onion to the punch by more than a decade with their mockumercial for the Platinum Mach 14.

      Paying extra for a razor may seem like a waste to some, but after twenty or thirty years of shaving with crappy razors, those few extra bucks are money well spent. A good razor is worth it, and honestly, I could see a good mouse being worth it too.

      More blades doesn't define a good razor -- it merely helps mask the fact that they're using the cheapest blades and design they can get away with. If you want a good shave (I have a shaved head, and used to go through a pack of Fusion blades per week), you really can't beat a good non-disposable razor. Merkur DE razor at Amazon, $40. Seems pricey, but bear with me. One hundred double-edged blades at Amazon, $20. You read that right. 20 cents per blade (I can do my entire head using two blades -- they're double-sided, after all). Let me repeat that -- twenty cents per double-sided blade. Last but not least, of course, the shave soap at Amazon, $1.25 per bar. I've been on my current bar of soap for about three months now. Compare this to the $3-$4 it costs for "shave gel" (which is essentially just liquid soap with thickeners and perfumes added) that lasts a couple of weeks. These three components make up the best damn shave I've ever had. Costs a little more up front, but it will (a) pay for itself in just a couple of months; and (b) give you a better shave (albeit a bit slower) than anything Gillette has ever approached. I used to love my Fusion, but the $3-to-$5-per-blade racket is ridiculous.

    12. Re:But Five blades really is better. by o'davy · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, for the discerning gentleman you can get your blades marked with each day of the week.

      --
      Sig goes here.
    13. Re:But Five blades really is better. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      The besty shaves I ever got were with the ancient Gillette Blue blades in a double edge razor. They were inexpensive, and didn't hold an edge for a great length of time, but so very smooth. I miss them!

      I have a heavy beard growth, and the double and triple blade razors just get clogged almost immediately. And if I take the time to use them to get really close, which involves shaving three times, the results are still not as good as that old Blue blade.

      --
      Why is this even on SlashDot?... Why is this even on Slashdot?...Why is this even on Slashdot?
  25. $100 by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not surprisingly, the mouse costs a lot more than I'd be willing to pay. My 3-button, scroll-wheel USB Intellimouse Explorer 3 is close to celebrating it's 10th birthday, and is still going strong, and still feels to me like the best mouse I've ever used. Microsoft sure knew how to put their name on quality hardware back then.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:$100 by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Oops, forgot to mention I paid something like $7 for it, too, back when pricewatch.com was actually good.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    2. Re:$100 by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I paid that 5 years ago for my Logitech MX laser cordless and it's the best mouse I have ever had. works great, feels better than anything else and still holds a charge for 4 days straight. I've worn finger patterns into the paint. Dont knock a high end mouse till you try one.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:$100 by Raverrn · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I've had my MX Laser for 4 years now, and besides changing the feet out ($2) a few months ago it's been solid as a rock. Accurate, holds a charge for days, and had a good dozen buttons. It's a hundred bucks well spent.

    4. Re:$100 by dandart · · Score: 1

      Yep their games rom back then were great, and dare I say it, their OSes. Now they severely screwed up their company by suing everyone in sight and making their stuff crap. Me no like.

  26. 4mm Glass surface by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would hate to be the one using a mouse on a glass surface less than 4mm thick. It would probably break very easy. Some specs are kind of useless. Like linux supporting thousands of processors hehe.

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
    1. Re:4mm Glass surface by cheros · · Score: 1

      "Some specs are useless"

      You're supposed to use it on a table, not on your reading glasses. Duh. :-)

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    2. Re:4mm Glass surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are also desks with supported glass, i.e. a glass "writing pad" over a wood substrate.

      My dining table is a sort of lattice of teak hardwood with a layer of glass over it... I am not sure if the glass is less than 4 mm but it is quite thin; it's very sturdy in practice, because the glass never spans more than about 2 cm of open space. Optical mice are not very reliable on it, when we've had working sessions w/ laptops around the table.

  27. Cool and Bummer by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope it does not reduce the number of plain old LED optical mice out there because those are a GREAT source for machine vision for robotics. the basic 32X32 pixel cameras in a mouse works GREAT for a small robot for machine vision.

    I even have an arduino bot using one to avoid objects.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Cool and Bummer by jamesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Got any links to projects that use those? I'll almost certainly never get around to it but it would still be fun to read about others doing it

    2. Re:Cool and Bummer by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      http://www.bidouille.org/hack/mousecam/index.en.php

      everything you need to know to get them working.

      I have links to robotics uses on my work PC, I'll try to post them monday/tuesday.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Cool and Bummer by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Hey any way to see what your bot 'sees'? I am interested as well! :)

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  28. Hopping through the forest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep them away from Little Bunny Foo Foo and you should be all right.

  29. Confessions of a Trackballaholic by WidgetGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been using optical trackballs ever since they came on the market. All of my computers are currently outfitted with the Microsoft optical trackball (I know it's hard to believe given the brand, but it is really quite well-designed and built). A trackball is especially useful with my laptop. The total amount of space taken up by the device is fixed (the device's size). No extra room is needed since it doesn't need to be moved like a mouse. They work on any surface they can be placed on, rough or smooth. No mouse pad required. They can be used in any orientation (upside down, on a 90-degree angle to the surface on which the computer is sitting -- you name it). No lasers, just LEDs (two). My trackballs range in age from six years to ten years. They work as well now as when they were brand new.

    Fortunately, Microsoft isn't the only company selling an outboard optical trackball these days. Logitech makes a very nice optical trackball (Trackman Wheel Optical) with the same ergonomic properties as the Microsoft product. The Logitech product has the added benefits of being slightly smaller and way less expensive than the Micrsoft unit. Amazon is currently selling them for $24 ($45 for the cordless version at TigerDirect). It gets excellent customer ratings everywhere it's sold.

    Unfortunately, the price of the Microsoft optical trackball has gone through the roof since I bought my last one. Amazon's price for new units is $199.99!! I paid $39.99 each for mine many years ago, brand new, at CompUSA (not on sale)! And, back then, there wasn't any quality competition. If that were still the case, I'd reluctantly spend $200 if one of mine broke down. They really are worth it. But, since there is now a quality alternative, and since I need a new trackball for my new desktop, I just ordered a Logitech Trackman Wheel Optical from Amazon.

    I could never go back to using a mouse. Never.

    --
    One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
    1. Re:Confessions of a Trackballaholic by WidgetGuy · · Score: 1

      Well, apparently, the reason for the ridiculous hike in the price of the Microsoft Optical Trackball is that they are no longer being made. Screwed by Microsoft once again! They've also apparently stopped making the Trackball Explorer. I located a couple of those going for $270 per. Sheesh. Used and "refurbished" original Microsoft optical trackballs are going for around $100 on Amazon and eBay. Hmmmm... I may become a Logitech-only trackball shop sooner than I'd planned.

      --
      One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
  30. I for one welcome our lazor weilding mice overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oblig

  31. dual optical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im still using my old mouseman optical dual sensor mouse from logitech its about 10 years old, they seems to be recycling ideas.

    well good for them, this is still my favourite mouse ever.

  32. Wow... by dandart · · Score: 1

    LAAASERRRRSSS! Choow choow pew pew! But nooooo! They had to put puny ones in, didn't they? Harrumph.

  33. Which is highly desirable by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While it is easy to say "Oh just get a surface the mouse works on," well that kinda ignores the point of an optical mouse. One of the major reasons to want them is that you don't need a dedicated mouse pad. You just drop them on a table and they work. However, you discover that isn't the case on some surfaces, and it isn't always predictable. Some surfaces that look smooth to you may have plenty of imperfections for it to track. Other that are "less perfect" can in fact be unusable because their patterns are highly regular.

    Also what people need to remember is that just because a mouse works on a surface, doesn't mean it is working as well as it could. You can find surfaces where the mouse is usable, but when you compare it with a more irregular surface, you find that it wasn't tracking well. The more precise the tracking, the less likely that will be a problem.

    So having a mouse that relies on smaller and smaller imperfections is nice because that means it'll track on more surfaces. Is it a must have? No, but it is convenient. Some people want high quality, and are willing to pay for it. This is a product for them.

    1. Re:Which is highly desirable by 4phun · · Score: 1

      My wife will come in an occasionally to wipe off my desk leaving a lite film of water behind. A Logtech wireless mouse doesn't work properly on that until I dry the desk off. Also if she brings me a beer or an ice tea that is so cold condensation will form and spread from the mug across part of the desk so that the mouse skips or flakes out. This new mouse looks like it will not be susceptible to that sort of problem so I would buy one as soon as it is available in Atlanta.

    2. Re:Which is highly desirable by executivechaos · · Score: 1

      ...your wife is AWESOME 0_0

  34. All the people pushing trackballs or whatever... by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you find they work for you, great, but there's a reason that most people use mice, and why laptops no longer have trackballs on them... it seems that most people just aren't comfortable using them. I've tried, I've had several trackballs, and while they work great for very small precise movements or for massive spin-the-ball videogame action they're just too hard for me to drive the mouse 500 pixels over and click on a word in a document.

    On the other hand carrying a thin mousepad between the screen and keyboard of a closed laptop so it's always there and convenient to use is a hell of a lot cheaper than a dark field mouse.

  35. my 25 year old mouse works on glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your mouse has no balls.

    It takes balls to mouse on glass.

  36. I thought the plural was "mouses" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This entry calls the plural of the pointing devices "mice", but I thought two mouse devices were called "mouses"....

    which is it?

  37. Why? by mhajicek · · Score: 1

    Why do the sharks need mice?

  38. Deja vu - V400 by zm · · Score: 1

    The Logitech V400 mouse also sported a dual laser several years ago. I have yet to experience worse tracking performance than what that thing offered, even regular optical mouse was WAY better on any surface I tried. Hopefully this one will be better, but for now I'm sticking with my VX Revolution.

    --
    Sig ?
  39. The "mouse mouse" by julien+dot · · Score: 1

    I bet this mouse can also work on grass.

    --
    Julien C.
  40. been using a glass surface by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    for my M$ optical mouse for a long time. I placed an inked 1/8th inch grid under the glass and it works like a champ. I got the idea from old sun/sgi servers with the donut style laser mouse and the mettalic grid mouse pad. I do have to say though dual lasers seems like an awesome upgrade. and would seem to allow diagonal tracking to a much finer degree...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  41. Big hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't particularly care for what kind of technology it uses, I just wish it was big enough to sit comfortably in my palm.

  42. Why? by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    Someone tagged this article with "why."

    Why? Because my current stylish computer desk is glass. I have to use a mouse pad, and it's really annoying. My end-table in my living room is also glass, and I have to use a mouse pad there for my HTPC.

    I hate mouse pads, and I like glass.

  43. Range? by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    Anybody know what the range of the cordless mouse is? Will it work across a living room from my glass coffee table?

  44. One blade by imhennessy · · Score: 1

    It's older than I am, and doubles as a totally bad ass accessory for a night on the town.

    ivan

    --
    Like to brew? Want to talk about it? Brattlebrew: groups.yahoo.com/group/brattlebrew
  45. New Logitech Mouse... one limitation... by Polo · · Score: 1

    New Logitech Mouse works... on glass, in space, underwater, on sand, in an oven...

    (but ONLY if you're right-handed)

  46. Re:All the people pushing trackballs or whatever.. by firefarter · · Score: 1

    I'd argue that the reason that trackballs disappeared from laptops is that trackpads are just so much thinner.