Slashdot Mirror
High-Speed Robot Hand Shows Dexterity and Speed
An anonymous reader tips a blog posting that begins "A few blogs are passing around videos of the Ishikawa Komuro Lab's high-speed robot hand performing impressive acts of dexterity and skillful manipulation. However, the video being passed around is slight on details. Meanwhile, their video presentation at ICRA 2009 (which took place in May in Kobe, Japan) has an informative narration and demonstrates additional capabilities. ... [It] shows the manipulator dribbling a ping-pong ball, spinning a pen, throwing a ball, tying knots, grasping a grain of rice with tweezers, and tossing / re-grasping a cellphone!"
Welcome our new robot overlords.
I can high five a robot and get it to do it PROPERLY.
Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
Watching that, I can't help but think that the math/programmer behind it is fairly simple with a basic knowledge of physics and the only reason this wasn't around 10 years ago was chips not being fast enough. Now that the technology exists, all the theoretical robot motor function logic can actually be put into practise. If you think about it, the dribbling code must be really simple. Run the numbers while the ball is in the air about precisely where and at what angle the ball impacted the first finger at and position the third finger accordingly and make it swing with the proper force and angle to bounce it back to the first finger. It's like programming pong with a few extra lines of code and raw date from sensors lol. Okay that was a bit too simple as a comparison.
By the way, is it just me or does anyone else think that it failed some of those test on the first fifty takes lol. I think it's not quite as accurate and perfect as the video makes it out to be.
Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
Seeing just how blazingly fast that thing was makes me know that we have absolutely no chance against Skynet.
That's just so WRONG.
Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
For the last decade, I've been eking by on the "well, can a robot tie it's own tie?" Hey, at least there's still "sleeping one's way to the top". And once robots learn to do that... is anyone REALLY going to want to leave their house for a stupid JOB anyway?
I want to see how fast it can move a whole bag of rice. Very impressive, hadn't seen the last few examples before.
My good robotic overlord, why are you tossing that paltry cell phone for three hours in a row already? *Sigh* I guess my inquiries aren't welcome here, sir...
"And inthis sequence this video you can see the robot hand strangling dr. Kamakuro.
Notice how the pressure sensonrs allows it to know when to release to leave the doctor unconscious but alive.
Observe the marvelous precision displayed as it cuts the doctor's hand and peels its skin to make itself a costume.
Ohh, it's trying to sew itself to the doctor's stump; ain't it the cutest thing?"
http://whitewhaletheatre.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/terminator_sideshow_endo_arm.jpg
The accuracy is pretty impressive and will definitely get adopted in future robots, though the speed is a bit scary. At least you shouldn't come within its range in the hope that it will follow the three Laws of Robotics.
Very impressive. I wasn't able to quite tell from the video, though: was the end of the dribbling demo planned, or did the robot lose control of the ball after a few seconds?
This is very nice work. The most interesting result is that some manipulation problems become easier if done fast. In the short term, inertia makes the motions of objects very predictable. With millisecond reaction times, that can be exploited.
Fast machinery isn't unusual, but it's rarely that smart.
This is very nice work. The most interesting result is that some manipulation problems become easier if done fast. In the short term, inertia makes the motions of objects very predictable. With millisecond reaction times, that can be exploited.
Yeah, that long term inertia is a real PITA.
Um, it would be more impressive if the machinery was slow. I mean, it would then require more intelligence to do the same job.
If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
So they built a right-handed robot? I hope they'll follow-up with a left-handed one soon, in order to not be discriminating!
SCNR
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
i have an idea for a new experiment: fire a bullet at it, and see if it can catch it :-) :-)
it would be the ultimate body guard
If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
By impressive you mean 'terrifying', and by useful you mean 'terrifying'
Lets look at the capabilities demonstrated here:
1. Ability to move faster than a human
2. Ability to throw things accurately at a human
3. Ability to tie up a human
4. Ability to perform delicate procedures on a human
Yet our basic anti-robot technologies appear stagnant. Why is there so much more research on developing robots than there is on smashing those metal mothers into junk?
If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
Thus far, robots have tended to shuffle along in an awkward, spastic manner - and at low speed. Could this kind of development help them out? If the reason for the difficulties with bipedal motion in robots is that the actuators cannot respond quickly/accurately enough to maintain balance well, then it will be able to. I'd like to know how fast such a robot can move, as it can already tie me up and perform surgery on me if it catches me...
If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
Well, be assured that THEY do develop anti-robotic weapons. THEY just keep them secret so that normal humans like us won't have a chance. It's the preparation for the final ... wait, why are there black helic... No Carrier
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
anyone know what will happen if this technology is combined with http://spectrum.ieee.org/blog/robotics/robotics-software/automaton/robots-evolve-to-exploit-inadvertent-cues and used for tasks such as food harvesting also, robo wars of the 2 technologies combined would be fun -- superfast and evolving bots...
Walking robots is not just a gimmick - wheels and tracks can't go up stairs. The Dalek problem...
"I always assume Psychology students are hiding in the bushes"
Tracks can, and wheels can too if they're in the right configuration. The Daleks just had ground clearance issues ;)
Dalek problem?
What problem? They can fly, I'd take flying over not being able to perambulate up stairs any day.
"There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
By impressive you mean 'terrifying', and by useful you mean 'terrifying'
Lets look at the capabilities demonstrated here:
1. Ability to move faster than a human
2. Ability to throw things accurately at a human
3. Ability to tie up a human
4. Ability to perform delicate procedures on a human
Why be delicate when you can be crude? The robot doesn't need to sit in a tank, it could be the tank. With hydraulics for both small and large arms and IR cameras it could kill you quite easily as long as it doesn't need to care about collateral damage. Tie you up? More liker tazer and bag you, much easier. And you definately don't need much delicacy to make a torturebot, so what here is really terrifying? We already know they can be damn destructive, delicacy is what we need to have a robot whip up an omelet for me without making a mess.
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
I don't know why this is news, they've had extremely fast, highly dexterous guitar playing robots since the 1980s in the form of Yngwie Malmsteen and Micheal Angelo Batio.
Capabilities not demonstrated here:
n. Ability to not have your coordinate system remain stationary.
"Dave, would you please step approximately three feet to the left, so that I may dissect you?"
"No thanks, Hal."
So, yes, this is a great robot for strangling those pesky paraplegics.
And you definately don't need much delicacy to make a torturebot, so what here is really terrifying?
Actually I think it requires quite a bit more of delicacy to make a torturebot than a killbot...
Yet our basic anti-robot technologies appear stagnant.
That's not true. We are continually creating new code to crash modern electronics ever more quickly. In just a few months Windows 7 will be out -- I guarantee the robot couldn't survive that.
Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
Only in the "new" Dr. Who can they fly - it was an old joke with the previous Dr. Who incarnations that the best way to beat Daleks was to walk upstairs.
"I always assume Psychology students are hiding in the bushes"
Finally robots will be able to do the high speed, high precision moves magicians need to "create" coins out of thin air or do card tricks.
Real Daleks do not climb stairs, they level the building.
http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
!pr0n? Obligatory tag on 90% of slashdot posts.
T-1000
I for one welcome the new self aware machine overlords!
I am now going to buy shares in the companies that make this, the flesh light and real doll. These three together will make a HUGE amount of money.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
Churgery without sedation, but also without bloodloss. "Yeeaauch! It HIT me!" "No, it removed the cancer from your liver, and sewed you up quite nicely." "... wot?"
Funny, I just watched 'The Forbin Project' last night. If you've got an hour or so to kill and like evil computer stories and don't mind watching an old movie made in 1970 with the USSR as adversary you'll like this movie. It was quite good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQjebwUrhvc
If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
It seems the mods have a great sense of irony -- the guy making the extremely overdone Skynet comment gets modded up (+5 even!) and I get modded down (as redundant of all things!) for pointing this out. WOW!! I can see from the other comments that there are some people who find my thoughts valid -- I call bollocks on whoever modded me down here.
To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
I can play the holophoner.
A lot of highly-dexterous manual labor has been moved out of developed countries to developing ones because of the high level of developing country wages.
Where possible, developed country manufacturing companies have eradicated manual operations with machines, to the extent that despite manufacturing output rising, manufacturing employment is falling in the developed world. But some things (such as shirt sewing and shoe assembly) are still impossible to automate currently.
Should developed countries become able to replace developing country dextrous labor with dextrous robots, it would be a major world economic game-changer.
We can only hope that the developing world will expand into higher value-add jobs before this occurs.
I'd like to see this robo-hand on Iron Chef...