Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Drops Xbox 360 Pricing

Kawahee was one of several readers to tip news of a price cut for the Xbox 360. This comes after Sony dropped PS3 prices and unveiled the Slim model last week. The 360 Elite will now retail for $299, but will no longer ship with HD cables. The 360 Pro has been reduced to $249, but Microsoft is phasing it out. Analysts don't expect this new price point to be a huge boon for sales because the Elite doesn't match the PS3's hardware capabilities and is still more expensive than the Wii. Microsoft has "no plans" for a smaller version of the 360.

169 comments

  1. MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The 360 is nearing the end of the typical console lifespan (which has always been about 5 years, give or take) and is getting a bit long in the tooth anyway. A DVD drive and 4-year-old CPU are already starting to hold it back (several new games are coming out for it that will have to span across several DVD's, versus one bluray for the PS3). They really should be looking at a new generation console soon (for 2010 or, at least, 2011). If they wait too long, Sony is going to start trouncing them with the stronger hardware of the PS3.

    And this time MS, for the love of God, please put some effort into making a hardware design that doesn't cause another RROD fiasco, or take a step BACKWARDS with no standard hard drive. That was just shameful.

    On a personal note, how about making your online architecture a little more friendly to MMO's? The PS3 has several in the pipeline, and you don't have any. There are only so many FPS's and racing games I can put up with before I want some innovation. Backwards compatibility probably wouldn't hurt either. Just my opinion.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      And this time MS, for the love of God, please put some effort into making a ... design that doesn't cause another ... fiasco, or take a step BACKWARDS ... That was just shameful.

      Oh, wow. Somehow, this just gave me a really strong feeling of deja vu.

    2. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by d3l33t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They cant afford to drop the current software development cycle. Why do you think every other console figures a minimum 8 year cycle.

    3. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The standard has always been 5 years, even through the early 80's console collapse and several recessions. IMHO, any console maker who ignores this (especially in this competitive market) does so at their own peril. It was Sony's attempt to drag out the PS2 cycle to 6 years that allowed the 360 to finally gain a foothold over Sony to begin with.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by sick_em · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, Microsoft seems to be positioning Project Natal as a sort of new console launch. The dvd problem is mitigated in their eyes by the introduction of digital downloads (although some consumers do not regard them as equal. As for the RROD, console hardware gets new revisions during its lifetime. The 360 has been through three or four of them I think. Combine more efficient hardware revisions, improved hard drive capabilities (please let us install our own....), and a new software interaction paradigm and you can get something resembling a new console. side note: as a graphics programmer, it seems to me that we're reaching a point of diminishing returns in real-time realism. its to the point where some developers choose a less realistic look to avoid the uncanny valley, and real time ray-tracing not being hungrily pursued by everyone due to raster algorithms being "good enough"

    5. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you want backwards compatibility, shouldn't you get an XBOX 180?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    6. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would point out the multitude of problems with that response, but I'm not going to start yet another PC vs. console pissing contest, thank you. Suffice it to say that the PS3 is getting some MMO's on their console finally, but MS is not. And I think a truly next generation console needs to expand its capabilities to handle all game genres.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think that they're going to stick with the Xbox 360 for a while longer.

      First of all, they have previously stated that they wanted to be profitable this go around. Even though Windows and Word are still a large cash cow for Microsoft, they can't afford to continue to bleed money in other divisions. They probably would reach profitability on this current generation and have started making up for the losses of the original Xbox if they hadn't run into the red ring problems. That probably set them back a year or so at least.

      They're also in no real danger of being one-upped by Sony either. The PS3 may have technical superiority, but it's not by a large enough margin to cause people to move away from the Xbox 360. Sony also has a lot of costs to recoup as well and it doesn't appear as though they're in a hurry to release a new console any time soon.

      It also seems as though Nintendo has begun to hit market saturation with the Wii at its current price. The sales have been down over the last few months and there's still no word of a price cut. I'm expecting one around Christmas, but they may be running out of steam. If anyone needs to come out with a new piece of hardware it's Nintendo.

      If they announce a new system in the near future, sales of their current generation will probably tank. At that point Sony will be able to catch them in sales and they'll end up as the also ran of the current generation. It's likely that they're discussing hardware options for a future console at this point and possibly sharing some of that information with third parties that they'd like to keep close. It's also unlikely that they'll rush in attempt to be the first out of the door as it cost them a lot this time around.

      They're also between a rock and a hard place in terms of making a decision of whether they'll move heavily towards digital distribution. They probably don't want to put a Blu-ray drive in their next machine as it increases the cost and justifies Sony's position. A DVD drive likely won't cut it for the next generation of games and the hard drives being included in consoles aren't there in terms of size yet. They'll need at least 500 GB drives if they want to move towards digital distribution and given the drives consoles are currently shipping with it will probably be another 2 years before 500 GB drives come standard. I don't foresee Microsoft using a PPC chip in their next console either which will probably kill backwards compatibility or add to the cost of the machine if they decide to support it.

      They likely have plans, but I don't expect them to make any moves until either Sony or Nintendo does something first. My bet is on Nintendo just because they're flush with cash and really lagging behind in terms of hardware, especially with both Sony and Microsoft releasing motion control features in the near future.

    8. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Cornflake917 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On a personal note, how about making your online architecture a little more friendly to MMO's? The PS3 has several in the pipeline, and you don't have any.

      Wrong.

      If they wait too long, Sony is going to start trouncing them with the stronger hardware of the PS3.

      Sony has had over 3 years to "trounce" them. This hasn't happened yet. Why would the stronger hardware aspect of the PS3 all of the sudden start attracting gamers away from the 360?

    9. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by medv4380 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that the PS2 still has a good number of units sold every month and is close to what the 360 sells they are probably thinking this is becoming a 10 year cycle or something longer. Nintendo was right when they said that more expensive hardware wasnt needed for more advanced game development. MS just needs to make their system cheaper and more reliable.

    10. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by interkin3tic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The 360 is nearing the end of the typical console lifespan (which has always been about 5 years, give or take) and is getting a bit long in the tooth anyway.

      I disagree. I'd rather not have to buy another console, the wii has, for better or worse, seems to have shifted console makers' focus off of cutting edge graphics to making it appealing to people who play fewer games. See project NATAL: that's not for people who play a lot of games, that's for the families, for parents, for party games, etc.

      DVD player holding it back? Maybe there are some people who get irrationally angry and violent when they have to change discs, but I managed to play many games on the PSone which were on multiple discs without breaking down and crying. It's really not a big deal. If it saves me even a hundred bucks from not having to buy a bluray player with my console, I'm completely fine with changing discs.

      CPU also I don't know about. I think the graphics are fine. And it's not going to happen because of computing power anyway: MS isn't going to spend a ton of money developing a more powerful console, when the console that's selling the best has about as much computing power as the first XBOX. Not saying that's the best reason to not have a new generation with a better CPU...

      If they wait too long, Sony is going to start trouncing them with the stronger hardware of the PS3.

      As I understand it, MS is already losing money on the 360. And of course, the wii is trouncing both of them.

      On a personal note, how about making your online architecture a little more friendly to MMO's? The PS3 has several in the pipeline, and you don't have any. There are only so many FPS's and racing games I can put up with before I want some innovation.

      MMOs= innovation? Really? I've seen plenty of innovative FPS and racing games. If you are a fan of MMO, ask for MMO because you want MMO, but don't confuse lack of MMO with lack of innovation.

    11. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not that I care about consoles, but if I did I still don't see myself downloading a multi-DVD game to play on one.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    12. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It also seems as though Nintendo has begun to hit market saturation with the Wii at its current price. The sales have been down over the last few months and there's still no word of a price cut. I'm expecting one around Christmas, but they may be running out of steam. If anyone needs to come out with a new piece of hardware it's Nintendo.

      No, they just went without a killer app for too long. Their strategy does not allow for pricedrops that quickly, especially when it's known what needs to be done to restore the sales without a pricedrop (namely releasing more killer apps). Besides, they just came out with a new piece of hardware called the Motion Plus. Since they don't consider graphics and processing that important they won't release a new system just to upgrade those.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    13. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by moon3 · · Score: 1

      with the stronger hardware of the PS3

      Sony's marketing team trumpets many things... but the fact is that Xbox 360 is more powerful then PS3 if you mean to use it for programing and rendering games, Google Valve or Activision and read their opinions regarding the matter.

    14. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The PS3 no longer costs $200 more? It also plays Bluray movies? People already have 360s and it seems like an upgrade?

    15. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      My XBox 360 has actually been more reliable than my PS3, which has died twice (one a failed HD that I replaced myself, once YLOD that required a $150 replacement from Sony). Of course, that may in part be because the 360 is so noisy that I never forget to turn it off when I"m done using it, while I leave the PS3 running continuously and donate time to the Folding@home project

    16. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by thule · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It also seems as though Nintendo has begun to hit market saturation with the Wii at its current price. The sales have been down over the last few months and there's still no word of a price cut. I'm expecting one around Christmas, but they may be running out of steam. If anyone needs to come out with a new piece of hardware it's Nintendo.

      Nintendo is blue ocean. They are not trying to compete in the red ocean that is Xbox and PS3. MS and Sony have to price cut because they are fighting over the same pie.

      The Wii is finally getting some interesting third party games. The MotionPlus is awesome and makes a huge difference in certain types of games. Less "waggle" and more precision. Nintendo really doesn't need to do anything right now. Sure, they'll have an HD console someday, but for now, the Wii is doing just fine.

      A lot of people think that New Super Mario Wii is going to be HUGE (especially in Japan).

      They likely have plans, but I don't expect them to make any moves until either Sony or Nintendo does something first. My bet is on Nintendo just because they're flush with cash and really lagging behind in terms of hardware, especially with both Sony and Microsoft releasing motion control features in the near future.

      This is exactly why hardware performance doesn't matter. Nintendo *is* flush with cash and has moved many, many more units and they did it with lesser hardware! They weren't fighting over the current "hardcore" market. They were going after expanded market.

      For the "hardcore" crowd, the PS3 is the way to go and MS could end up loosing some share to Sony.

    17. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      If you want backwards compatibility, shouldn't you get an XBOX 180?

      Isn't that the number of Kilos the original Xbox weighed in at? *badum-shh*

      Yay, jokes from the turn of the century!

      I'm very sorry... :(

    18. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Vexor · · Score: 1

      ...how about making your online architecture a little more friendly to MMO's? The PS3 has several in the pipeline, and you don't have any. There are only so many FPS's and racing games I can put up with before I want some innovation. Backwards compatibility probably wouldn't hurt either. Just my opinion.

      Champions Online (see: MMO) is slated for a 360 release at somepoint in the future. At one time Age of Conan was, but that seems to have vanished.

      --
      ~Vexed and loving it!
    19. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by quantumplacet · · Score: 1

      there's nothing stopping consoles from having MMOs hardware wise. the reason that no one's making one for XBOX is because MS doesn't like monthly subscriptions on XBOX Live.

    20. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      In point of fact they're lying through their teeth if they're actually claiming that it's less powerful for such activities. It's much more powerful, the problem is programming for it is completely different than programming for a strictly CISC platform. This means all the guys you have programming for the PC have to learn a new programming set, or pass the work off to people who weren't initially involved. From Valve's standpoint, it certainly would have been a better move never to develop for the PS3, but that's primarily because they cater to a market that consoles generally can't touch.

    21. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      Final Fantasy XI works fine on the 360. No live gold required...

      --
      -SaNo
    22. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by funky49 · · Score: 1

      Why would the stronger hardware aspect of the PS3 all of the sudden start attracting gamers away from the 360?

      The trouncing would come due to the PS3's stronger horsepower being reflected in games while the X360 games stagnate. Since there is 'room to grow' in terms of BR versus DVD discs and SPUs to be tapped on the PS3, it is more future-proofed than the X360. As Microsoft wants to recoup development costs for the Xbox consoles, they will stick with the X360 longer which will make the PS3 look more and more favorable.

      --
      --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
    23. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about godawful PS2 ports. I mean a modern MMO, obviously.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    24. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Mattb90 · · Score: 1

      That list actually highlights the issue with MMOs on the Xbox 360:
      - Age of Conan: "development hell", though still possible
      - All Points Bulletin: not confirmed for any consoles yet (check this at gamescom last week)
      - Champions Online: may actually come to 360
      - CrimeCraft: not confirmed for any consoles yet
      - Huxley: "development hell", looking less and less likely
      - Kingdom Under Fire II: may come out, and will be on 360, but we've not seen the MMO part yet, and it's still got a vague 2010 release date
      - Marvel MMOG & Marvel Universe Online (same thing: cancelled by Microsoft, parts became Champions Online
      - Stargate Worlds: not confirmed for any consoles
      - The Secret World: as Age of Conan (same developer, except even PC version is still rather vague).

      That's not really a great list in the end. There are likely various reasons behind these issues, including development costs, but I'm sure Microsoft's tight grip on Xbox Live is part of the problem. Of course, console MMOs in general are an issue, as we have yet to see one on the PS3 either, though DC Universe is getting there, and SOE have a couple more on the way, along with Square Enix's FFXIV, of course (which itself may end up on 360, once they are able to negotiate the Live issues).

      --
      Mattb90
      Editor, allaboutgames.co.uk
    25. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by 222 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hardware sales have more or less been in line with each other when release dates are aligned. The Xbox obviously has higher total numbers given its earlier release. Cost wise the PS3 has a substantial advantage (Free online play, built in wifi, blu-ray player)

      Exclusives are a fair split these days, IMHO, a PS3 exclusive tends to look better than an Xbox exclusive. [Note: I OWN AN XBOX, AND LOVE IT. Quick plug... my PSN and XBL name is Malcorin :- ) Feel free to add me.]

      I think a lot of hardcore gamers would like to have both, and $299 is a price which seems to make that realistic. To quote a close friend of mine, "The price drop was exactly what I was waiting for".

    26. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Champions Online got pushed from a set release date to "To be announced" recently (just like 360 version of Age of Conan did just before it disappeared). I suspect the 360 version is now dead.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    27. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Lietenant_Dance · · Score: 1

      You mean like the monthly subscription they charge for XBOX Live?

    28. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by joocemann · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Why would the stronger hardware aspect of the PS3 all of the sudden start attracting gamers away from the 360?

      The trouncing would come due to the PS3's stronger horsepower being reflected in games while the X360 games stagnate. Since there is 'room to grow' in terms of BR versus DVD discs and SPUs to be tapped on the PS3, it is more future-proofed than the X360. As Microsoft wants to recoup development costs for the Xbox consoles, they will stick with the X360 longer which will make the PS3 look more and more favorable.

      echo!

    29. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by moon3 · · Score: 1

      I would still trust more western developers then Japanese marketing trumpet here.

    30. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by not+already+in+use · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A DVD drive and 4-year-old CPU are already starting to hold it back (several new games are coming out for it that will have to span across several DVD's, versus one bluray for the PS3).

      DVD is still a perfectly capable medium for video games. If you think the increased cost of a blu-ray drive is justified by the handful of games that happen to be bigger than a single DVD, you're smoking crack.

      and 4-year-old CPU... If they wait too long, Sony is going to start trouncing them with the stronger hardware of the PS3.

      How do you figure? Microsoft's 4-year old processor has kept up with Sony's, wait for it.... 4 year old processor. The Cell, by the way, hasn't lived up to the hype, unless of course you like running folding@home. Otherwise, the PS3 architecture is not a good fit for game development. The reason the 360 is trouncing the PS3 is not only because of cost, but because it is far easier to develop for.

      The PS3 has several in the pipeline, and you don't have any.

      If by that you mean the XBox has Final Fantasy 11 and Phantasy Star Universe, and the PS3 has none, then sure, I agree with this statement wholeheartedly.

      There are only so many FPS's and racing games I can put up with before I want some innovation.

      Yup. This is Microsoft's fault.

      Honestly... who modded this insightful??

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    31. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In point of fact they're lying through their teeth if they're actually claiming that it's less powerful for such activities. It's much more powerful, the problem is programming for it is completely different than programming for a strictly CISC platform. This means all the guys you have programming for the PC have to learn a new programming set, or pass the work off to people who weren't initially involved. From Valve's standpoint, it certainly would have been a better move never to develop for the PS3, but that's primarily because they cater to a market that consoles generally can't touch.

      False.

      The XBox 360 has a faster and more flexible GPU than the PS3. The PS3's CPU is better at doing floating point than the 360's, BUT developers don't need much floating point work done on the CPU. The PS3 has a very crappy real CPU (as in, a general processor) that has a bunch of very fast BUT very specialized ALUs bolted on. Unfortunately for the PS3, this doesn't help in games. Physics could leverage that, BUT the 360's CPU is also plenty fast for physics work as well.

      The PS3 can technically out render the 360, but when it comes to typical game architectures the 360 is the superior platform. Hence why PS3 graphics ultimately don't look any better than 360 ones, because the actual bottleneck of the system (the GPU) is stronger on the 360 than the PS3. And before you start pointing at games like Killzone 2, it isn't the PS3's hardware that made that game look good but the ridiculous amount of optimizations in the game as well as the design of the levels themselves.

      Also, even when considering raw floating point power, the PS3 really doesn't have all that much of an edge. We are talking 400 vs. 350 GFLOPs (PS3 vs. 360). Both are pathetically slow compared to $100 video cards that have already hit 1 TFLOP.

    32. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by brkello · · Score: 1

      Ugh, I totally disagree. Games on the 360 are just fine for this gen. Graphics are good and I enjoy the box. If people have to put games on multiple discs, fine, that isn't a big deal. It doesn't look any worse than the PS3. The lifecycles of game consoles need to be longer both for the company's profits and because there isn't anything that is going to give the consumer a significant change. We aren't seeing the NES to super nintendo differences anymore. So let's give more time for the technology to improve.

      And I am not sure what you are talking about as far as FPS and racing games. It has the best RPGs of all the consoles.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    33. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. I think hardware across the computing world has pulled ahead of software for once. Obviously nothing will last for ever, but I think this is one of those rare times when hardware companies can afford to stagnate while developers figure out how to actually take advantage of all the new technologies that have dropped on us in a few short years.

    34. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by steveha · · Score: 1

      If anyone needs to come out with a new piece of hardware it's Nintendo.

      I'm not sure this is true. Isn't the console market sort of a "not much profit on the razor but huge profit on the razor blades" sort of market? In other words, given that the Wii has been a huge smash success, aren't they cleaning up on game licensing revenues? Given how many units they have out in the market, do they really care if sales slow down a bit?

      [Microsoft may] move heavily towards digital distribution.

      Yes, everyone will. A problem, though, is that if DVDs aren't big enough for a game in the next few years, then downloading that game will take forever with most available broadband.

      They could go to a Steam-like system where a game can trickle down the wire over the course of weeks, but that implies getting customers to pre-order the games for download delivery, and the customers leaving their video games powered up and connected to broadband. It will happen someday, but I don't think Microsoft can afford to leave an optical drive off the next gen. Maybe the gen after that...

      They probably don't want to put a Blu-ray drive in their next machine as it increases the cost and justifies Sony's position.

      Increases costs? Yes, but if they are limited by DVD capacity, it's the only solution.

      Justifies Sony's position? Perhaps, but if they need it, they need it. Microsoft rarely makes "cut off nose to spite face" decisions.

      I don't foresee Microsoft using a PPC chip in their next console either

      Now that's the most interesting comment you made. Why not? On what do you base this comment? Have developers expressed dissatisfaction with PPC? If not PPC, then what? Does Microsoft want to start buying Intel?

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    35. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Who cares about Bluray? I'm downloading everything.

    36. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
      It has nothing to do it CISC. All the present generation consoles (PS3, Xbox 360, Wii) use IBM PowerPC derived RISC CPUs.

      It has to do with Cell being bandwidth and memory constrained. You cannot even access the main memory directly with one of the Cell SPUs, all access must pass by the single CPU first, causing a bottleneck. The Cell SPUs are not full fledged general purpose units either. Even Sony could not program Cell for what their originally perceived uses and had to graft a NVIDIA GPU on it because they could not get the fillrate numbers they wanted because of the limited memory bandwidth. The Cell design was a mistake. The CPU power is too weak and the SPUs crippled.

    37. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by idlehanz · · Score: 1

      LOL@MS

      Its not far enough!

      --
      Changing the world... one research project at a time.
    38. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The trouncing would come due to the PS3's stronger horsepower being reflected in games while the X360 games stagnate. Since there is 'room to grow' in terms of BR versus DVD discs and SPUs to be tapped on the PS3, it is more future-proofed than the X360. As Microsoft wants to recoup development costs for the Xbox consoles, they will stick with the X360 longer which will make the PS3 look more and more favorable.

      It's a huge balance. The PS3 hardware may be superior (we don't know - Sony's apparently not letting devs take advantage of all that power), but developers have shown immense creativity in creating games that work great still. The PS2 still has games coming out that aren't as crippled as you might think, and it's got nowhere near the specs of current-gen systems.

      The balance is because if Sony is counting on the PS3 to last a long time as developers get comfortable with it, Nintendo or Microsoft might announce a next-gen system that's released way earlier than the PS4. The Wii, for example, could easily get a high-def version (I don't blame Nintendo for sticking with standard-def - not everyone has HDTVs for their kids). Or Microsoft might have something brewing in time when developers complain the Xbox360 is too slow.

      The big issue for Sony right now is having to balance the Blu-Ray player market (really, who'd buy a standalone player now when Sony sells one that supports BD Live, will be supported with firmware updates for years to come (bugs be found in Blu-Ray still), lots of storage, and WiFI for $300?), against the gaming market. Hope may be for those "blu-ray players" be used as "game machines", but not always. Everyone who has asked me about blu-ray, I say "Buy a PS3 - don't bother with standalone players". Some of those may buy a game or two, but the others I know haven't.

      Having a higher installed base of PS3s now won't mean much if only 2/3rds of them are used for gaming...

    39. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS3's supposedly superior hardware is mostly hype. I doubt these "analysts" have looked beyond the basic specs when they conclude that the PS3 is technically superior.

      Sure, the SPUs and hard disk space are nice, but graphically, the 360 is significantly ahead the PS3. Sony cut some major corners in the GPU department. For a graphics programmer, making the RSX keep up with the 360's GPU is not a simple task. I say this from (daily) experience. It's no surprise that a lot of cross-platform games look worse on PS3 as a result. The RSX does have a few tricks up its sleeve, but it's a generation behind the X360 GPU and in terms of raw pace, the X360 just walks all over it.

    40. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by gbarules2999 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The expanded market that bought a Wii, and Wii Fit, and Wii Sports Resort, and...oh. Nothing else.

      You can argue until you're blue in the face about how Nintendo's going in a different direction, but I bought a Wii early on and have felt the burn everytime I walk past that useless piece of crap in the living room. It does nothing better than the Gamecube and has only garnered the same old same old only Nintendo could get away with rereleasing over and over again. While the "expanded market" has already purchased, played and probably moved on from their Wii's (I know my circle of friends have, especially the non gamers), Nintendo's busy developing and tinkering as if people still care.

    41. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by centuren · · Score: 1

      Sony has had over 3 years to "trounce" them. This hasn't happened yet. Why would the stronger hardware aspect of the PS3 all of the sudden start attracting gamers away from the 360?

      I agree with your general sentiment, but this concept still seems valid. It's not that the stronger hardware will kick in "all of a sudden", but rather than over 3 years, gaming companies have been producing games for each platform, and every game release faces the pressure to be better than the last. If the big video game studios start to find themselves more limited by 360 hardware than PS3 hardware through their own natural process of bigger, more impressive games, then Sony could possibly gain advantage by nature of having the hardware to support the absolute best. I don't think this will be such a big deal, since the gap isn't *that* big, and it seems the 360 still has a lot of advantages over the PS3 to retain game developers.

      Certainly, I don't see a lot of gamers going out and buying a PS3 who already have a 360 with a game library unless a sense of major superiority in games spreads. Since game developers want a large user base to be enticed, and gamers want a large (and superior) game library to switch, I don't think we can assume how things will go.

    42. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they wait too long, Sony is going to start trouncing them with the stronger hardware of the PS3.

      Sony has had over 3 years to "trounce" them. This hasn't happened yet. Why would the stronger hardware aspect of the PS3 all of the sudden start attracting gamers away from the 360?

      The Xbox might only be pitched at "gamers" (that you must be willing to pay a subscription to play online suggests it is), but there are a heck of a lot more price-sensitive casuals out there. The Wii proved that rather nicely. Those price-sensitive casuals, however, are now buying HD-TVs in their droves (where a couple of years ago 1080p tvs were a bit pricey) so would quite like any games console to do HD too, they like the idea of renting Blu-rays to play on their new HD-TV as well, and ooh look the PS3 does this and also has very nice games too including online for free. And (here's where "price sensitive" comes in) it's no longer too-expensive.

      But then I'm just a "case-in point": wouldn't buy an XBox because I don't play enough to justify the subscription, and am non-geeky enough that playing humans is preferable to playing single-player-only. Previously wouldn't buy a PS3 because it was just too dang expensive. But now it looks like a bargain, and one is being bought. I've never bought a Sony product before, so I can't easily be accused of being a "fanboi".

    43. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by plague911 · · Score: 1

      Because over the last few years hardware was not the limiting factor. Now apparently it is becoming the limiting factor. The ps3 seemed to be designed for a longer life cycle than the x-box or wii. Longer to ramp up and longer to get into full swing. It seems like a strategic decision however I do not know if it will pay off in the end. The bet was that by loading it with the most up to date hardware they could they would be able to A) push blue ray and B) make a system that would hold out for a few extra years and C) make the jump between the next, next gen system smaller. All these decisions were aimed at the same battle plan. Don't worry about now (they knew the economy was going down the crapper), beat the competition during the late game and make the transition to the next gen system seamless for those designing the games. The next gen x-box 360 will not be able to use a DVD player they will either A) need to go all digital and loose the market of anyone without a high speed connection or B) beg Sony to let them use blueray, they likely will also need to make a major architectural change. The Wii relied on a gimmick there have been loads of cheap counsel like knockoffs they did well this cycle but I dont think that strategy will lead to good profits in the future.

    44. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISP's are cutting off people or throttling bandwidth for downloading more than 50GB a month, and you think hard drive sizes are the biggest obstacle to digital distribution of 5+GB games? Really?

    45. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluray is a pointless upgrade, most are not interested in it and many like me who do hi def content do it by downloading it from the web. If I wanted a blu ray player I would buy a dedicated one.

    46. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by LBt1st · · Score: 1

      Then it sounds like you bought the wrong system. Most of the people enjoying the Wii aren't exactly slashdot readers. So you don't hear about them but I assure you there are people that exist who love their Wii. Even my Mom enjoys the console.

      And I agree with the poster above. MotionPlus has added a great deal of possibilities to the Wii. Even the launch titles have made excellent use of it and I'm sure there's more to come.

    47. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluray is a pointless upgrade, most are not interested in it and many like me who do hi def content do it by downloading it from the web. If I wanted a blu ray player I would buy a dedicated one.

      so you're retarded then? I'm no sony fanboy, but the simple fact is that the ps3 is still the best bluray player in terms of price and features

    48. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by xtracto · · Score: 1

      What Microsoft has to do is to improve their console QA and production quality to decrease their 33% (to 50%) failure rate.

      I do not own an Xbox360nor a PS3, I own a Wii. However, I have started thinking in buying one of the two consoles. I was starting to lean towards the Xbox but after browsing the net a bit I read about all the failure rates (I was half aware before about that). On the other hand I just read (in a comment on slashdot) that I would have to pay for the the online playing option! and on top of that, the console power is *less* than the PS3!

      Both of them have the same games (Army of Two for PS3 FTW Yay!!), so for me it is a no brainer to get the PS3.

      On a related issue, I *hate* that Europe (e.g. Germany) will get the PS3 at 300 Euro while the UK will get it at 250 GBP (285 Euro)! what a ripoff for the EU

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    49. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Agreed: Nintendo really needs to drop the Wii price, probably in tiers up through Christmas. It's been the same price since the Christmas before last Christmas, which is kinda nuts considering (as the other guy said) there've been no 'killer apps' for a while.

      Regardless of whether they targeted the Wii at kids or not, there is only so much that can be done with cinematic-brandings using LEGO concepts. They haven't even bothered to release (and improve upon) that many Nintendo classics, for that matter. If they'd have done that, I'd have bought one a while ago.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    50. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, that is not the view of developers here who work on Xbox/PS2/PS3/Xbox 360/Wii/PC. They all wish the PS3 never existed as its so hard to get performance out of it. The Cell is a good processor if you have predictable work (compressing/decompressing video etc) in which you can then predictably feed the SPE's, games and general processing does not fit well with this.

      While the Xbox 360 may have it's own issues, developing for it is by far much easier to "Get Things Done(tm)" on it. And the Xbox has a much better GPU in it, as Sony where originally going to stuff 4 Cells into the PS3 and let them do all the work...

      As for bluRay drive in the PS3, yes this is a good selling point, but a bit muted by dedicated players coming on the market, never mind streaming HD video to your Xbox/PS3 from your PC (or the on demand service) been used more and more by people.

        (we work for a large games development studio that makes many AAA titles...)

      Thanks

    51. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by thule · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know what type of games you like to play, but you might want to take a look at recent releases and coming soon listings for the Wii. You might be surprised to find that things are starting to broaden a bit. I think that third party game companies were caught a bit off guard. They didn't know what to do with the Wii, so they ignored it. Now that over 50 million units have sold, Nintendo has their attention again. Deep Space Extraction, The Conduit, Cursed Mountain, and The Grudge are all targeted at the traditional gamer. Final Fantasy games are certainly targeted at the traditional gamer. So keep your mind open!

      If you haven't picked up a MotionPlus, do it! Tennis and golf games with the MotionPLus are amazing. Why would anyone play those types of games on a PS3 or XBox? Red Steel 2 should work much, much batter than the original title since it uses the MotionPlus.

      And come on, any true gamer would love the Virtual Console on the Wii.

    52. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the statistics bear out the contrary position. My own analysis (based on "nongamer" relatives/friends/etc that bought a Wii) is the same. Generally, they buy the Wii, they buy 2-3 other games tops, and then they don't buy another game for at least a year.

      If they love the games they are playing? Great. I wish more games were like that. I have a VERY short list (perhaps 20-30 titles) of games I deemed worthy to hold on to and re-play, over a 15-year gaming history.

      Unfortunately, that spending model doesn't help the games market. Just like the Gamecube days, there are a handful of titles that could have been "must-play" variety, but the long tail - the "ooh this looks good" - is missing. It goes straight from Zelda down to "yet another shitty anime-looking golf game that doesn't implement motion sensing properly."

    53. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by composer777 · · Score: 1

      Good point with mentioning CISC having nothing to do with it. It's 1999, and apple and sun want their (RISC vs CISC) marketing back. What's incredibly ironic, is that the original poster didn't realize that the 360 is using a PowerPC core. Even more ironic is that even apple gave up that battle and is using intel chips. Worse, as I would always mention to my apple fanboy friends, there is no such thing as CISC as it's described in marketing literature, as modern CISC CPU's break instructions down into microcode, and run them on what's the equivalent of a RISC core (I could see steam coming out of their ears when I would mention that). But, I suppose the PS3 IS awesome at folding at home, we can give them that much. :) And, it's a great bluray player, that's what I use mine for.

    54. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by ookaze · · Score: 1

      The 360 is nearing the end of the typical console lifespan (which has always been about 5 years

      This is not true.
      5 years is the typical lifespan of the losers home consoles.
      The winner home console is defined by the one that sells the most, and the losers are the other ones.
      The winner typically lasts 10 years or more.

    55. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is true. You can see the list for yourself from an old post of my (I'm too lazy to repost it). Five years has been the standard for console generations since the 70's.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    56. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by ookaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that they're going to stick with the Xbox 360 for a while longer.

      I think if they do that they will continue to crash and burn.
      Seems like they think Natal is their next console, their console rebirth.
      I bet this will crash and burn badly, and finish destroying their hopes of breaking even.

      First of all, they have previously stated that they wanted to be profitable this go around. [...] They probably would reach profitability on this current generation and have started making up for the losses of the original Xbox if they hadn't run into the red ring problems. That probably set them back a year or so at least.

      No!
      Their only profitable fiscal year, they made less than $500 M (million) profit, and this was the Halo 3 fiscal year. They already lost $3 B (billion) dollars this generation on XB360, and lost $4 B on XBox (that's $7 billions in the hole for XBox brand at the very least). So the RRoD set them back at least 2 years back, most likely 3, and they have no chance of breaking even on the XB360 before 8 more years.
      That's because you should keep in mind that they're back to losing money since their first price drop, despite selling several internal development studios and cutting off others.
      And here comes another price drop. Their revenus also declined since their first price drop: sales didn't make up for the price drop of last year.
      They're in a very bad position.

      They're also in no real danger of being one-upped by Sony either. The PS3 may have technical superiority, but it's not by a large enough margin to cause people to move away from the Xbox 360. Sony also has a lot of costs to recoup as well and it doesn't appear as though they're in a hurry to release a new console any time soon.

      The problem is that technology or competitor doesn't decide what the consumer will buy.
      What will make them in a hurry to do anything is the gaming market.
      The problem of both HD consoles, is that they can't release a new console now, while at the same time they must release one soon, as their sales are dropping and they're not making money, but their business model requires that they sell lots of games.

      It also seems as though Nintendo has begun to hit market saturation with the Wii at its current price. The sales have been down over the last few months and there's still no word of a price cut. I'm expecting one around Christmas, but they may be running out of steam. If anyone needs to come out with a new piece of hardware it's Nintendo.

      This is pure nonsense.
      How come the Wii has hit market saturation while it sells more than the HD consoles put together at the worldwide level? Even in the USA alone, the biggest market, the Wii still sells more than any of the HD console.
      That's without a single price drop, in soon to be 3 years! And with a XB360 model cheaper than the Wii since more than a year worldwide!
      Given that, saying that Wii has hit any market saturation is pure nonsense.
      If anyone needs to come out with a new piece of hardware, it sure enough is NOT Nintendo.
      At best that's wishful thinking.

      My bet is on Nintendo just because they're flush with cash and really lagging behind in terms of hardware, especially with both Sony and Microsoft releasing motion control features in the near future.

      That's the problem: Nintendo will go on riding this generation and making lots of money while the others will painfully sell less and less. The HD consoles motion controls have not even a date of release, not even a price, they're just plain vaporware for now, but vaproware doesn't work in gaming.
      Nintendo doesn't care that they are lagging behind, as that is precisely part of their plan.
      Nintendo just moves like they want, completely unaffected by the HD consoles. On the contrary, those are the HD consoles that painfully try to catch up in Wii's path, but fail miserably for now.
      How come the fact that PS3 and XB360 are playing catchup to the Wii with motion control is seen as a strength? Especially when the Wii is still selling more than both combined?

    57. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by ookaze · · Score: 1

      The expanded market that bought a Wii, and Wii Fit, and Wii Sports Resort, and...oh. Nothing else.

      You can argue until you're blue in the face about how Nintendo's going in a different direction, but I bought a Wii early on and have felt the burn everytime I walk past that useless piece of crap in the living room. It does nothing better than the Gamecube and has only garnered the same old same old only Nintendo could get away with rereleasing over and over again. While the "expanded market" has already purchased, played and probably moved on from their Wii's (I know my circle of friends have, especially the non gamers), Nintendo's busy developing and tinkering as if people still care.

      So much anger and rage that it becomes nonsense.
      Nothing else eh ? Let's see :
      Mario Kart Wii : 17+ millions sold
      Super Mario Galaxy : 8+ millions sold
      Super Smash Bros Brawl : 8+ millions sold
      Mario Party 8 : 6+ millions sold
      Legend of Zelda Twilight Princess : 5+ millions sold on Wii alone ...
      The list of huge million sellers is going on.
      Well, but that's nothing (LOL!).

      Some people like to live in their fairy tale world.

    58. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by ookaze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sony has had over 3 years to "trounce" them. This hasn't happened yet. Why would the stronger hardware aspect of the PS3 all of the sudden start attracting gamers away from the 360?

      The PS3 is not even 3 years old yet, and not even 2.5 years old in Europe!
      Hyperbole?
      The XB360 has one entire year of sales without competition of headstart too.
      And the PS3 is now far less expensive.
      I don't think hardware will do anything though. These are videogame consoles, not technology items, but entertainment items. The games are what will count.
      The thing is that the poor output of exclusive games on the PS3 will have some of its best ones soon: GT5 and FFXIII (well, not completely exclusive).

    59. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by amaprotu · · Score: 1

      I'm no sony fanboy, but the simple fact is that the ps3 is still the best bluray player in terms of price and features

      Really? The new slim, and reduced price existing PS3s are $300. Newegg (good prices, but I'm sure not the cheapest around) has 7 players for $200 or less (1 under $100!). Another 7 that are under $290.

      Of *course* it is cheaper than any console + a bluray player. But the argument that it is the best bluray player for price and features is old and hasn't been true for a while.

    60. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      The problem with the wii is similar to the problem with the ps2 towards the end of it's life, yes there are plenty of awesome games, but they are drowned out in a sea of crap.

      As per usual the only games people can trust tend to be nintendo first party games, with others being hit and miss (usually missing).

    61. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing that allowed Microsoft to get a foothold over Sony can be attributed to several things. First was the 360 coming out four years after the original Xbox, instead of the standard five years, second was the obscene launch price of the PS3 coupled with lack of shortages for the 360 by the time the PS3 came out, and there's the games. None of the earth shattering exclusives for the PS3 were even announced until two years ago.

    62. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Of *course* it is cheaper than any console + a bluray player. But the argument that it is the best bluray player for price and features is old and hasn't been true for a while.

      Sorry, but it is still the best bluray player for the price based on features, implementation of the bluray spec., and performance (output quality, startup time, etc.).

    63. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      Even Sony could not program Cell for what their originally perceived uses

      I seem to remember ibm touting cell as a multi-media chip? for those kind of fixed pipeline things with no branching or jumping around in memory too much the cell is perfect. Yes the SPU's are not full fledged general purpose units, but they are perfect for use as DSP's in media bits.

    64. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by ookaze · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is true. You can see the list for yourself from an old post of my (I'm too lazy to repost it). Five years has been the standard for console generations since the 70's.

      It's wrong from the simple fact that the lifespan of a console is not defined by the fact that its successor is out. The PS2 has not finished selling, but the PS3 is out since 2006.

    65. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wii has lots of uses, between playing roms and gamecube games to browsing the web. What other (unhacked) console can you pause a damn rom, switch to your web browser and gameqfaq some stuff, watch a youtube video, and then flip back into your game. The wii is great. I actually haven't seen much that interests me on the ps3 or 360, I only bought my 360 so that I could play the 'Skate' games becuase those are really great games. The Wii has great Nintendo titles, sweet features and an interesting input device (I like sitting in front of a big screen youtubing and reading websites after work on it with the wii mote, it's comfortable and easy). I waited in line for it and I'm still quite happy with it. When I wanna get hardcore I play skate 2 or SF4 on 360, best new games out right now.

    66. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by that you mean the XBox has Final Fantasy 11 and Phantasy Star Universe, and the PS3 has none, then sure, I agree with this statement wholeheartedly.

      So, XBox 360 has two old MMOs, while PS3 has several future MMOs (The Agency, DC Universe Online, etc) coming out? Also, you realize that both FFX1 and PSU have PS2 versions? That play perfectly on the PS3?

      One thing Sony has is that it is an MMO company. Microsoft is not (any more).

      I've played Phantasy Star Universe since launch. I want more console MMOs. XBox Live would be a great platform -- Microsoft just doesn't seem interested in making it happen.

    67. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by joocemann · · Score: 1

      It is interesting that you use the terms 'blue/red ocean' when comparing the Wii to the other two major consoles on the market. The reason I point this out, and something that I noticed on zeropunctuation --- people will not actually compare a Wii game to a 360/PS3 game. They compare games between the 360 and PS3 all the time, as if they are comparing the various elements of two great athletes. Its like the Wii, in its lack of good games and processing power gets its own 'special olympics' category to be in.

      I would *love* to see comparisons made between these consoles and for this strange idea of the Wii being a separate 'class' to fall. It really isn't a separate class of console --- it serves to entertain us in quite the same ways that the other two major consoles do as well.

      Its really hard to find any comparisons of the Wii to the 360/PS3, let alone comparisons of games.

      Just so you know, they ARE competing. When mommy buys tommy a Wii, she probably checks off the 'got him a console' box and won't be interested or easily ready to pay for another console. The same if the first choice was a 360 or a PS3. Just because the Wii games are more casual, less graphical, and gimmickly-interactive than the 360/PS3 games, doesn't mean that the consoles are not often in the situation I just described.

      (watch the Wii owners mod me down despite the fact that it is likely sitting and collecting dust and representing a waste of money in the corner)

    68. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by joocemann · · Score: 1

      dude... to quote a LOT of friends of mine, my father, and my brother "The price drop is exactly what I was waiting for".

      I can only forsee a huge surge in PS3 sales. My parents are buying them as blu-ray players!

    69. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by sleeponthemic · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more with you. Tired, tired, tired of checking out the reviews of new games seeing nothing but mediocre to average software selling. Tired of standing next to people in a store, buying Wii games on cover alone. Tired of hearing from my family members how they have bought game X because it sounded okay, only to discover it was a steaming pile of shit. Very little but exploitation occurring in the market for Wii games. I mean, why bother putting out a decent game when your market are largely, not gamers who choose games with less savvy decision making processes? I was ready for the Wii to be great. I went to a fair bit of expense to get 4 controllers and I have never, ever used them to any use outside of Wii bowling.

      Not to say there hasn't been the odd good game, but it's always been predictable. There's very little surprise in discovering that the new mario/kart is good. Nothing but decent maintenance releases for the long serving fans of nintendo.

      Sure, I agree that my point of view is a little close-minded - there's always a few people that pop and say "what about game x?". Yet, unfortunately, these "x" games are generally split decisions. Where are the games that all agree are great? I just want to play stuff that is guaranteed good. Why is it that I have "take a chance on conduit"? Too few sure things. Too much digging for gold. I can buy an 360 (which I've resisted) and easily go buy 10 sure thing games that are going to entertain me. Can't do that with the Wii, unless I'm buying mario, mario kart, smash bros, zelda (sequel, sequel, sequel etc etc).

      --
      I record my sleeptalking
    70. Re:MS needs to be thinking about the 720 by brkello · · Score: 1

      So you think the PS3 will trounce the 360 because everyone already bought a 360. Brilliant logic there!

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  2. Keep Trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all that Microsoft has to do is add built in WiFi, somehow earn a reputation for reliability, reduce the amount of sound the Xbox 360 produces, and they might be ready for the big leagues.

    What's that? The X-Box 360 has by far the largest market share (other than the wii-toy)?

    I guess that means that Sony screwed up their launch pretty freaking badly.

    1. Re:Keep Trying by matang · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "wii toy" - right, because the other two are deal-making, shuttle launching, techno-heavy pieces of equipment. "hey guys, we better get some xbox360s in here before people stop taking us seriously."

    2. Re:Keep Trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hush, hush, don't try. He's "hardcore" and "elite" with his gaming, "yo". Just reassure him that if he keeps on plugging his ears, closing his eyes, yelling loudly, and ignoring it, maybe the Wii will just go away. That'll at least shut him up for a few hours. It's the only way to get any peace and quiet from people like him, because his mind is too "hardcore" for us.

    3. Re:Keep Trying by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      What's that? The X-Box 360 has by far the largest market share (other than the wii-toy)?

      And Linux has by far the biggest desktop marketshare besides the proprietary crap. Insulting the market leader doesn't make him disappear.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  3. I might finally buy one.... by EvilStein · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The price drop does make the unit a little more attractive, especially since it now does Netflix streaming as well. I was thinking about getting another Roku box, but this makes the Xbox 360 a more likely purchase. The fact that it can play games is a spiffy feature as well. :)

    Although, "Left 4 Dead" might eat up what little free time that I have....

    1. Re:I might finally buy one.... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 0

      There are a lot of cheaper alternatives than a 360 and an Xbox Live subscription for streaming Netflix to your television.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    2. Re:I might finally buy one.... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Be forewarned that Netfix on Xbox 360 requires a subscription to Xbox LIVE Gold at fifty bucks a year.

      -Peter

    3. Re:I might finally buy one.... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I'd totally buy one with the price drop, I thought about it before, but I have a lot of xbox original games and my poor halo special edition's disk seems to be puking now. The backwards compatibility list on xbox.com hadn't been updated since 2007 last I checked a month or so ago, and it said "we're working hard to expand this list". Baloney. I'd buy one if I could play my old games. I'd also pay for a replacement disk, but they don't even offer paid support. I'm going to have to buy a mod kit to replace the drive, but even those are hard to find now for the original xbox.

  4. They probably are. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's been my experience that, when the 'new, smaller, cheaper' version of a console comes out, the next-gen console is probably only a year or two away. I think it's pretty clear they're not coming out with a next gen console this year (too late in the year with no hype; if you plan to release a new console, you target a Sept-Oct release timeframe, so that hopefully people buy them for Christmas, and you begin the hype 6 months or a year beforehand), but they could be planning a 2010 or 2011 release of a new console.

    1. Re:They probably are. . . by joocemann · · Score: 1

      FYI, microsoft has already well discussed the next gen coming in 2012. I gotta get to class, but if you need a reference i betcha google can do it quick.

      Ciao.

  5. Low-end HDMI Cables by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Informative

    Low-end HDMI Cables are about $3 on MonoPrice.com, etc. Not a big loss, but a bit inconvenient if you don't have a couple lying around. I hope this doesn't boost sales of Monster cables.

    1. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by poormanjoe · · Score: 1

      I am a netflix subscriber, and have recently begun watching Netflix on Mozilla! This makes me wonder, with the "Instal other OS" option of the PS3 would I be able to watch Netflix on a GUN/linux Mozilla browser? This certantly would not be a selling point for the average person, but a fun project for current owners. This would put the PS3 further up as the hardcore gaming council king over the 360, to include games.

      --
      I want to be retired when I grow up.
    2. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Xbox 360 doesn't transmit the audio over HDMI

      That's not right, check you cable or connections. Many of us are HDMI only with the 360.

    3. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by c_jonescc · · Score: 1

      sound certainly goes through HDMI on my machine...

      --
      Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
    4. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by do0b · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? The cable leaves plenty of space for a hdmi connector, unless you're using some sort of moster cable. The Elite version came with a second dongle that only had optical out and rca audio out that leaves plenty of space for a hdmi cable to fit in the connector.

      --
      After 12 years and a few days, I finally gave in to the dark side and joined slashdot.
    5. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      xbox 360 damn well does full audio over HDMI... either that or some magic voodoo is providing me with dolby digital sound, because thats the only thing connected to my reciever. The elite does ship with an adapter that allows you to use both the optical or RCA audio jacks with the hdmi cable if thats what you want.

    6. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Or you could just use the built-in netflix client on the 360....

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    7. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by adamstew · · Score: 1

      I have a 360. Hooked to my TV. With an HDMI cable. It most certainly transmits the audio to the TV via the HDMI cable and my TV then passes the audio right along to my receiver.

    8. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by Killer+Orca · · Score: 1

      I am a netflix subscriber, and have recently begun watching Netflix on Mozilla! This makes me wonder, with the "Instal other OS" option of the PS3 would I be able to watch Netflix on a GUN/linux Mozilla browser? This certantly would not be a selling point for the average person, but a fun project for current owners. This would put the PS3 further up as the hardcore gaming council king over the 360, to include games.

      Do you mean Mozilla or Firefox? I have tried using FF to watch Netflix and it says my browser is not supported, and yes I refuse to install silverlight. Audi over HDMI works, there is just a bu preventing it from working across the board.

    9. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by SighKoPath · · Score: 1

      If you don't have sound with your 360's HDMI, it's likely a problem with your TV. I've got a Westinghouse LCD HDTV, and it has problems with HDMI audio every month or so. It'll keep showing the video, but no audio at all over HDMI. The only solution I've found is to unplug the TV's power, wait a minute, then plug it back in. It's a pain, but like everyone else has said, the 360 certainly has HDMI audio, and that's what I have to do to keep it working with my TV.

    10. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the 360 fanbois were yelling at Sony for not including an HDMI cable... now that the 360 elite won't have one, it's "no big deal".... How odd. :)

      I agree with you, for the record... including an HDMI cable isn't necessary or a selling point for me. (The pack-in MS put with the Elites bit hairy butt anyway... if you can find a more cheaply made cable, I've not seen one yet.)

    11. Re:Low-end HDMI Cables by bmatt17 · · Score: 1

      No you can't. You can't stream netflix in Linux Period as far as I know. Has to do with the DRM in Silverlight. Firefox works but it has to be in Windows.

  6. For one by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    MS need to quit making gamers paid for Xbox Live; granted Sony PS3 network has its' issues but it is free to play. I never like the idea of paying full price for the game then have to pay a monthly/yearly fee to be able to play it online.

    1. Re:For one by joocemann · · Score: 1

      PSN is totally fine. The 'issues' arguments are an artifact from launch-year era functionality that is since fixed/improved/expanded.

  7. sales are gonna skyrocket by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

    I predict at this new price point, sales will skyrocket once MS hits the kill switch on all the remaining XBox360s. With a 54% failure rate, people will just figure it's business as usual from owning a 360 and 96% of those people will go out and purchase a new one.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    1. Re:sales are gonna skyrocket by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      They do have a decent guarantee. It sucks to have to send them, but it's free, and reasonably quick.

  8. No plans for a smaller version?? by spazoid12 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Microsoft has "no plans" for a smaller version of the 360.

    Oh, you mean something that is even more likely to overheat and would probably exceed the current awesome 50-whatever% failure rate?

    Yeah, I want that!

  9. The price drop is interesting..... by 8127972 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .... When they get the reliability improved so that they don't have a 54.2% failure rate, then I might consider buying one.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:The price drop is interesting..... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Supposedly they have, you have to consider that stat is over the entire lifetime of the thing (and probably on a biased sample but that aside) and it doesn't matter what the reliability of the current ones is since all the old ones still figure into the stat.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:The price drop is interesting..... by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      Where is the proof that the Jasper motherboards have actually helped? All I've seen is the same speculation and finger crossing with the last two revisions.

      If they fixed it, I may just buy one, but not until then.

    3. Re:The price drop is interesting..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "54% failure rate" was BS from the start. The percentage shown was that 54% of failures were RROD related, which is actually astonishingly SMALL if you ask me. I guess people who shred their optical drive by tilting the console while it's spinning have to account for another percentage. Then there's the matter of the awesomely strong statistical methodology of an anonymous self-selected internet poll on an enthusiast site. Makes Fox News look, uh, fair and balanced by comparison.

      Why does a collection of such supposedly smart nerds deliberately switch off their brains whenever Microsoft enters the picture? Or here's a thought, maybe knowing a collection of technical trivia doesn't actually make one smarter than the next person.

    4. Re:The price drop is interesting..... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      In one of the links I found this very intelligently written post, which kinda kills your buzz (I guess):

      It's funny because people keep thinking these chip revisions are going to make the hardware more stable and they're not. Their sole purpose is to save Microsoft money in production costs. Smaller chipsets=fewer materials=more $$$ is MS's pocket.

      The amount of heat the CPU and GPU produce are the least of your troubles folks, there many more issues with the 360's design and they're all far more severe. Let's start with the thermal paste. For those unfamiliar, thermal paste is what's used to transfer heat between the GPU and CPU to their respective heatsinks. The thermal paste that MS uses in the 360 is cheap crap that bakes into cement after a few hundred hours of use. This issue could be easily fixed if MS would just use a more effective paste like Arctic Silver 5 but that would drive production costs up ever so slightly and we can't have that.

      Next problem: They mounted the disc drive on the GPU heatsink. Seriously MS? What the hell? That is the worst design idea ever, the heatsink's purpose is to pull heat off the GPU so a fan can blow air over it which will whisk it away out of the system. The worst thing you could do there is mount one of the hottest running components in the system directly on top of that. You're just asking to create a hotspot.

      Problem 3: Air flow. Worst designed system for airflow ever. There are two primary intake fans on the 360. One is covered up by the harddrive. The other can't pull air in if the system is standing vertically. If you don't lay the system flat it has to rely on the incredibly tiny vents on the side of the system to pull all the air into the system. Beyond that the interior of the system does not allow for optimal airflow. It's awful. Compare the guts of a PS3 and a 360 if you ever get the chance (Google). The PS3's innards look like they were well planned out and intelligently placed. The 360 is a clusterfuck that looks like MS just schlepped all the components in and called it good.

      Final problem, and by far the worst: The X-Clamps. Why these are still present I don't know. Essentially for those who don't know the X-Clamps are two X shaped clamps on the bottom of the motherboard that hold the heatsinks in place. Their fatal flaw? They warp under intense heat. That warping bends the motherboard. That bending breaks solder connections. The breaking produces the RRoD. These clamps could easily be replaced with screws, washers, and nuts. In fact many console modders have done just that and found in combination with an application of Artic Silver 5 to the CPU and GPU it fixed a red ringed console. So why these are still in use I don't know. What I do know is they are the 360's main problem

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    5. Re:The price drop is interesting..... by joocemann · · Score: 1

      Umm.. you're talking about a span of 4 years, not 40 years. My NES still works.

      4 years is not a long 'entire lifespan' as you imply it to be.

      54% over 4 years is a nightmare; imagine if half the babies born on earth died by 4 years old. That would seem pretty bad in terms of health/genetics of our species.... 4 years is not a long time.

  10. Price increase for the UK by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thanks for using the UK and the exchange rate to boost your profits, cunts.

    http://www.edge-online.com/news/xbox-360-elites-price-cut-arcades-raised

    I'm sure the reason they haven't done this all over Europe is because they're only popular in the UK so they feel they can get away with this.

  11. it's a good move, deal with it. by tisch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    remember the slogan that nearly killed apple? "what you use at work, you'll use at home." ? well, MS knows this. it's tried and true. they are the only system with a flagship online game of magnitude. no ps3 game can touch it as far as participation goes. "what your friends play, you will play." it doesn't matter that the system is worse for more money, people want to play with other people they know. it's not meerly for gameplay. this is why the wii, the most technically inferior of the three is still going for 250$. people want to play with friends while drunk. nothing wrong with that. ps3 can't get the same feeling for $299, and xbox can't for its new price either. each has their perks. this was a good move by microsoft, and they'll milk the 360 until you can run emulators of the games on netbooks for less money.

    1. Re:it's a good move, deal with it. by tepples · · Score: 1

      they are the only system with a flagship online game of magnitude.

      True, World of Warcraft runs on a Microsoft platform, but you might have forgotten that it also runs on Macs.

  12. why live is worth it by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Ever notice that there are far less free demos and dlc on Sony's network. In the past I wasted several times the cost of live in an average year buying games that I would have skipped had demo been available, in the long run Live has saved me money. Besides that I have averaged enough freebie's each year to make it worth while anyway.

    Sony's business model is why its inferior...the developers have to foot the costs of hosting and bandwidth which causes many of them to just not bother. Add in a more refined interface, full chat, netflix, etc and I will gladly pay my paltry $40 a year for Live.

    1. Re:why live is worth it by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      That's 60€ in Europe... I have no idea why it's so much more expensive but I know I'm not paying that much considering I tend to play online maybe once or twice a month.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:why live is worth it by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Sony's business model is why its inferior...the developers have to foot the costs of hosting and bandwidth which causes many of them to just not bother. Add in a more refined interface, full chat, netflix, etc and I will gladly pay my paltry $40 a year for Live.

      I thought Microsoft also charged the developers for demo/patch bandwidth?

    3. Re:why live is worth it by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      Sony's demo selection is much better in Japan. I expect to see that migrate over here in time.

  13. it's not a good deal by markringen · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1: media capability's are poor 2: dvd plaback is worse than a PS2 3: game will require 4 disks this year 4: no blu-ray. 5: $50 more and u have a blu-ray 6: $50 and you yourself can upgrade the HDD to a 500GB in the future. 7: $50 more and you have xbox live gold, or a PS3 so all-in all it's a pretty bad deal vs the competition. and unlike others i am not an anonymous coward! so if you feel like i am a troll, just think what of what u are first ;)

    1. Re:it's not a good deal by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed with the PS3's media capabilities. I really like the PS3's pseudo-3D menu system. Understated, very easy to navigate, and you always know where you are in a menu hierarchy. The Microsoft interface is typically Microsoft--lots of flashy graphics, but hard to find your way around, and stuffed with advertising. The PS3's prowess as an upscaling DVD player is impressive, comparable to expensive standalone players, and of course it does bluray too. The XBox 360 DVD player, on the other hand, is about the equivalent of one of those $30 players that Best Buy stacks up near the door. The PS3 plays a lot of media formats, although I have seen it fail on some oddball .wmv files that the XBox 360 can manage. I'm not sure why, but I've had more difficulty streaming files from PC to the XBox 360 with UPnP than I have with the PS3.

      The only real strength of the XBox 360 as a media center is Netflix, but that's a big advantage if you don't have the same capability somewhere else.

    2. Re:it's not a good deal by Amarantine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny that none of the points you mention are about the actual games. I mean, we are talking about games consoles, right? Why not choose the console that has the games you like most, instead of having a pissing contest about dvd playback quality and hard disk size?

    3. Re:it's not a good deal by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      "u"? What is this, AOL?

      That's a whole lot of talk about media capabilities but you know, I buy videogame consoles for videogames and so do most other people. Listing hardware features is silly. The Wii has the least features on paper (though it has the non-gaming feature I use the most: A weather channel that doesn't require booting the PC or following the TV broadcast schedule) but people buy it at a higher price than the 360 because it has games they want. Listing hardware features is like telling someone they need to get a Mac when they want to run all their Windows-only programs.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:it's not a good deal by Mr._Galt · · Score: 1

      unless of course you don't care about blu-ray, or you don't care if a game has more than one disc (a lot of them used to, it wasn't a big deal), or if you want to do things like have custom soundtracks and chat across different games, etc etc Then some people might think it was an ok deal. The PS3 is a solid machine, but people care about different things. Whats important to you, is not necessarily important to me.

    5. Re:it's not a good deal by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      1: media capability's are poor

      Unless you're talking about blu-ray (points 3-5), I'd love to hear what you mean. I've been ripping my DVD collection and streaming them from my Windows Home Server. It works equally well on both my PS3 and my Xbox, but I sort of prefer the Xbox's interface, so I typically use that system. Yeah, I wish it supported more video and audio formats, but both systems seem to be fairly limited in that respect.

      2: dvd plaback is worse than a PS2

      What was your experience with this? The few times I've played DVDs on the 360, it worked just fine. Honestly, though, it's my PS3 that's typically used for DVD playback. I like the Bluetooth remote better than the 360's infrared remote.

      3: game will require 4 disks this year 4: no blu-ray. 5: $50 more and u have a blu-ray

      Pretty much all the same point here... Yes, the 360 doesn't have blu-ray. Definitely a disadvantage, but honestly, most games are still shipping on a single DVD. It's typically the big RPGs with tons of video that need multiple disks. And yeah, it's sort of a pain, but not THAT big a deal.

      6: $50 and you yourself can upgrade the HDD to a 500GB in the future.

      Yep, that's a nice feature of the PS3. It would have been nice if the Xbox was user-upgradable as well.

      7: $50 more and you have xbox live gold, or a PS3 so all-in all it's a pretty bad deal vs the competition. and unlike others i am not an anonymous coward! so if you feel like i am a troll, just think what of what u are first ;)

      I own all three consoles, and the Xbox gets about 95% of my play time, and ALL of my online time. Essentially, when playing with my friends, xbox live is the place to be. It's really as simple as that for me.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:it's not a good deal by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      I agree. However, ever since the PS2 the purpose of game consoles has been blurry with all the added media features. Microsoft entered this market in the first place because they wanted to enter the multimedia box market, which Sony was entering.

    7. Re:it's not a good deal by tepples · · Score: 1

      Essentially, when playing with my friends, xbox live is the place to be.

      Then how do you play when your friends are in your house?

    8. Re:it's not a good deal by markringen · · Score: 1

      you don't that's why he has an xbox, basically he is admitting he has no friends (hence xbox live). SingstarRus! seriously!

    9. Re:it's not a good deal by markringen · · Score: 1

      except there are no good games on the wii. not any gamer would ever want.

    10. Re:it's not a good deal by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      You're No True Scotsman-ing the term "gamer" there because there are millions of people who do want these games and since they're playing games that makes them gamers.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:it's not a good deal by markringen · · Score: 1

      okay, comic book store guy.

  14. Have been waiting for this by Kalendraf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I originally held out buying a 360 until the 65nm processor came out (Falcon version). But then due to the RROD problems, I opted to wait for the 65nm GPU as well (Jasper version). Those have been out for a while now, but it's still somewhat hit or miss as to whether the Elite version you get has a Jasper board (65nm CPU + 64nm GPU) or an older version. However, it appears now that most of the new elites and nearly all arcade versions have Jasper. My only reason for holding out longer is that I suspected a significant price drop on the elite was coming.

    Now that the price is dropped, I'll finally get one. I'll just make sure to doublecheck that it's rated at 12.1 amps so I know for sure that I'm getting a Jasper.

  15. what about the peripherials ripoff...... by Sobakus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most required price cuts are for the outrageously expensive wifi adapter and the absurdly overpriced 120 gb hard drive. I have an original xbox 360 with 20gb hard drive (only had 1 RROD, hoorray) and I can barely install 1 game, and forget about movie downloads or a couple of demos unless you uninstall that game. Right now in spain a 120gb harddrive + wifi adapter will actually cost you more than the full xbox 360 arcade pack. To all you PS3 fanbois, bless Sony for letting you put any hard drive you wish. Believe me, after years fighting with a ridiculous 20gb drive thats one hell of a feature (...insert envy emoticon here...) WTF Microsoft??!!!!

    1. Re:what about the peripherials ripoff...... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The most required price cuts are for the outrageously expensive wifi adapter and the absurdly overpriced 120 gb hard drive.

      Wait a minute... is that correct? The 360 doesn't even have wireless networking built in? You've got to be kidding!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:what about the peripherials ripoff...... by Lectoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do what I did for me and two people I know, hack a cheap 120 GB WD hard drive to work. http://www.pcworld.com/article/150970/upgrade_your_xbox_360s_hard_drive_on_the_cheap.html

      --
      Is it just me, or do you hate it when people say "Is it just me..."?
    3. Re:what about the peripherials ripoff...... by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 1

      I've heard that there are USB wifi adapters out there that work with the 360.
      A friend of mine got one, and I've heard no complaints.

    4. Re:what about the peripherials ripoff...... by Turiko · · Score: 1

      yes it is. The only real built-in network connection is by cable, and with the average joe buying a 360, that's a big problem.

    5. Re:what about the peripherials ripoff...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, Sony still sticks it to it's customers in one dimension: The controller.

      A DualShock 3 Sixaxis controller retails for $54.99. If your system comes with one, and you want to enjoy 4 player action on a game, shell out $164.99.

      The cool thing, however, is that the PS3 accepts generic USB gamepads. It's really a great piece of hardware. I'm extremely happy that I scored mine on eBay for $200.

    6. Re:what about the peripherials ripoff...... by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      I know how you feel. Not because I've experienced it, but because I've seen how cheaply PC stuff has become.

      First off, I'm in Canada - where prices are more expensive than the US. I picked up a brand new 1TB HDD for $70, and a Saitek P3200 for $6. That includes shipping. Great quality PCI wireless cards can be found for under $25, and I got my SennHeiser PC161 headset for just over $40. :)

      So when I see the prices you have to pay for console peripherals, I shudder. And then when I see the prices in other countries, like Australia, or Spain, it makes me want to retch! Talk about a crazy profit margin on the hardware!

    7. Re:what about the peripherials ripoff...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nope, it's true. Not only does the 360 not have wireless built in, but the wireless adapter has a list price of $99.99.

      Despite this recent price drop, I'd say that for most people the PS3 is cheaper. The 360 base console console is cheaper, but when you factor in wifi, xbox live, ridiculously overpriced hard drives, etc....

  16. No HD Cables? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How lame! I opened up my new PS3 Slim, and found no cables. How the HELL can you play games designed to be played in HD, on an HD TV, if you don't have HD, or HDMI Cables?!?! How Lame! And now Microsoft is following suit?

    Who are the "Most People" that Microsoft is talking about? Every single person I know who owns a 360, both in real life and online, is using an HDTV. Lucky for me I just bought an elite with the HDMI cables, and am swapping the cable between the two. Its so ridiculous...

    1. Re:No HD Cables? Seriously? by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Spend the $3-6 at your local discount electronics/parts store and buy a second hdmi cable.
      As long as you avoid the Future Shop/Best Buy/Circuit City versions, HDMI cables are relatively inexpensive.

    2. Re:No HD Cables? Seriously? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      That's the point isn't it?

      The cables cost $3 retail, but they don't include one. Which means people get the thing home and find they don't have the cable and probably end up paying $70 at best buy to make it work.

      Since that's $70 that wasn't spent on a game, sony might even lose out on the deal.

    3. Re:No HD Cables? Seriously? by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      That's the point. Both MS and Sony are banking on the notion that you'll get the "one stop shop" BB or whatever $90 HDMI cable, helping out their retail "partners" whenever they can. I remember when the Elites were first out, the BB employee tried to sell someone a Monster cable because the pack-in "sucked". Now that's fun, isn't it? :) The pack-in did suck, but not $99 suck. :)

      But the parity is back now that the Elite has no good cables, but MS's component cables are a tad pricier than the equivalent PS3 cables (last I checked...) We should get some monoprice.com stickers and put them all over the boxes at BB and such... so someone, somewhere, will do a little research and stop making the gimpy bastard who runs Monster cable rich off fleecing the ignorant. :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    4. Re:No HD Cables? Seriously? by macshit · · Score: 1

      How lame! I opened up my new PS3 Slim, and found no cables. How the HELL can you play games designed to be played in HD, on an HD TV, if you don't have HD, or HDMI Cables?!?!

      Er, all of these systems can be played on non-HD TVs as well, and indeed, maybe it's a good bet that many people that have waited this long to buy the system are exactly the sort of people would are least likely to have an HD TV (they're not enthusiastics / early adopters).

      Example: me. I don't own an xbox or a PS3, and I have a relatively crappy old SD TV. But now that the PS3's price has dropped to something non-insane, I'm thinking of picking up a slim to play stuff like RE5. Since I don't have an HD TV, I'm quite happy not to pay for cables I won't use...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  17. why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by Brit_in_the_USA · · Score: 1

    Why does every console seem to be a complete , from scratch, design. Why couldn't the next Xbox 360 be evolutionary. Upgrade the 3 core PowerPC chip to a 4-6 core at higher clock rate. Upgrade the ATI GPU to the correpsoding latest tech.

    That way the developers could hit the ground running with slightly modified dev tools and "A" rated titles could be available very early on in the consoles life which helps decide a "victor".

    Like wise sony could do the same, I am under the impression that cell was designed to be modular, so how about 2-4 of the latest die shrunk cells int eh next console with latest nvidia GPU tech.

    1. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Why does every console seem to be a complete , from scratch, design.

      Because developers discovered that the old design had run into fundamental bottlenecks after three Moore density doublings. That's why the GameCube and Game Boy Advance were redesigns. But the Wii, DS, and DSi were evolutionary, just as you recommend.

      That way the developers could hit the ground running with slightly modified dev tools

      That worked for Wii developers (Wii is an overclocked GCN with more RAM and a USB controller). It worked in a different way for Xbox and Xbox 360 developers (they use a variant of DirectX).

    2. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1

      At that point, it's called a desktop computer and not a console.

      --
      SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
    3. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft made a mistake using a PowerPC chip, that's the problem. They should have stuck with x86 chips. Then they could load up a 32nm, 8 core CPU in late 2010 and have NVidia and ATI compete to pick the graphics chip, and developers would see more power, a new DirectX version, but otherwise a similar development experience.

      PowerPC... Seriously, smart decision there Microsoft.

      For that matter, Cell was a stupid choice too. Mainstream x86_64 chips are now the only logical choice for a high end console, but both major console makers have F'ed themselves.

    4. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At that point, it's called a desktop computer and not a console.

      It's a console as long as it uses cryptographic methods to shut out any development that is not part of a day job, such as development done by students and hobbyists. If it were a computer, I could load GCC onto it.

    5. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Microsoft made a mistake using a PowerPC chip, that's the problem. They should have stuck with x86 chips.

      Microsoft tried this with the original Xbox, but I seem to remember that Intel price-gouged Microsoft near the end of the Xbox's life cycle, and Microsoft couldn't keep up with Sony's price cuts on the PlayStation 2. The switch to an IBM CPU was to keep this from happening again.

    6. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were a computer, I could load GCC onto it

      You mean kinda like the same way I can load GCC onto my PS3?

    7. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by smash · · Score: 1
      That defeats the purpose of buying console hardware in the first place. You'll just end up with lots of different spec machines floating about, and your developers will not know which one to target. If they target the top end, people have to upgrade hardware more often, which means they may as well have just bought a PC. If they target the baseline then there's no point in upgrading the hardware.

      Sega found this out with the 32x, mega-cd, etc.

      Put out one half-decent hardware spec, pump out huge numbers of it to get economy of scale and focus on good software. That is how to make money in the console market (just ask nintendo).

      If you want to put out faster hardware in the console world, its better to make it an entirely new model so that the "duh, will this work on my box?" question never comes up.

      Console people don't want to deal with that sort of shit, they just want to buy any game off the [console X] shelf, take it home, and play it.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    8. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      The two aren't mutually exclusive. A console upgrade can still be a major event. They would still only do it every 5-7 years. But when they do it, the changes would be deterministic. I as a developer would know "OK, they'll have more cores, faster processors, more memory, and a much faster GPU but otherwise the way I do my work hasn't changed a whole lot".

      I'm not saying they upgrade willy nilly or allow users to upgrade, I'm saying pick a mainstream architecture so that when they do update it with a new console version it's not a huge change.

    9. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      And now who will they turn to if IBM gouges them? At least there are 3 x86 CPU suppliers...

    10. Re:why not just upgrade the CPU and GPU? by tepples · · Score: 1

      And now who will they turn to if IBM gouges them?

      If I remember correctly, the difference is that Intel insisted on producing chips in its own fab. IBM, on the other hand, was willing to license the "Waternoose" 3-core, 6-thread PowerPC CPU design to Microsoft so that Microsoft could choose its own fab, and Microsoft chose Chartered Semi.

  18. This is not even really a price drop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are phasing out the Pro model at $250 and dropping the Elite model to $300. However, once the Pro models are gone it's still going to cost you $300 to get a Xbox 360 (the Arcade model doesn't count). So, how exactly is this a price drop? I suppose you could argue that it is a value increase (as you are getting 120 GB instead of 60 GB), but I certainly wouldn't call it a price drop.

    I bought a Xbox 360 Pro a year ago for $300. I've had no problems with it and enjoyed it a lot. However, if I were to do it all over again today I would go with a PS3. Back then a PS3 was $500. Today, however, for the same price as a Xbox 360 you get built-in Blu-ray, WiFi, and a standard hard drive interface. On the hardware front it's not even a contest. Xbox 360 has some great exclusive games, but so does PS3 (I hate exclusive games, but that's the world we live in). On top of that, Xbox Live is $50 a year. Xbox 360 was killing PS3 from the start (and rightly so; who pays $600 for a console?), but now the PS3 is in position to reverse that trend. Meanwhile, half of all Xbox 360s are failing. The future doesn't look so bright for the Xbox 360...

  19. Re:Peripherials... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I guess 20GB would suck... I've got one of those 60GB ones, that's plenty but I think I have less than 40GB free. The pricedrop means that now all 360s with HDDs come with the 120 GB one so a pricedrop on that part probably won't do that much.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  20. Component by pavon · · Score: 1

    If you have an older television that needs component cables though, you'll have to shell out $35-40 for the XBox specific ones.

    But -$100 +$40 +40GB = still a better deal than before the price drop.

    1. Re:Component by Rijnzael · · Score: 1

      The Xbox 360 HDMI kit pavon is suggesting comes with an HDMI cable AND an adapter for optical and RCA audio out, for when your speakers are not integrated into the display device. HDMI audio signal means nothing if there are no speakers to play it out of. I believe this is what pavon means when he says "older televison", and this obviously also applies to most monitors.

    2. Re:Component by pavon · · Score: 1

      Well, I was actually talking about the component video cables for televisions that don't support HDMI at all, just component video.

      The kit you are talking about is something different and costs $45-50. If you don't care about optical audio, I think you can just use the RCA cables that come with the system for audio and your own HDMI cable.

  21. The price drop... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    ...won't even compensate for the DVDs that it will destroy during the Xbox 360's lifetime.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  22. Paying For Access To Other'sContent (Re:For one) by EXTomar · · Score: 1

    This has been something that has perpetually annoyed me. For instance, subscribers are sending $50 a year to Microsoft to play Infinity Ward's online content. It would be one thing if people were sending that $50 to Infinity Ward but this is going to Microsoft. It always seemed weird gamers where eager to pay Microsoft when they aren't responsible for content or fixing games like Modern Warfare 2 and yet are getting payment for it.

    This is compounded by the PC vs console experience where a lot of the features XBox 360 fans fawn over are provided cheaper and easier than $50 a year. Console gamers wonder how dense PC gamers without XBox Live while PC gamers wonder how dense console gamers are when the same technology is all around them for free to use.

  23. Microsoft desperately slashes Xbox 360 price by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Illustration: The new accurate Xbox 360 logo

    Microsoft has discounted the entry-level Doesn't-Do-Much Xbox 360 to $200 from Friday, $50 cheaper than the Nintendo Wii. (This will translate to a GBP250 price point in the UK.)

    "We are thrilled to be the first next-generation console on the market with a big 'Microsoft' logo on it to reach $199, a price that invites everyone to enjoy Xbox 360," said Aaron Greenberg, marketing marketer for Xbox. He says this will cause a "smash and grab" mentality amongst consumers. "And not 'grab and smash' as they throw it out the window when it gets a red ring of death again."

    The models that actually play anything worth playing will, of course, stay at $300 and $400. "But history shows that more than 75 percent of all console sales happen after the price falls below the $200 mark. Which would be the PS2, PSP and DS ... uh, forget I said that."

    Greenberg assures consumers that the new cheap Xbox 360s will not be refurbished red ring of death casualties. "Not all of them. Honest. However, twenty Xbox lifts every morning will be much better exercise than Wii Fit."

    Microsoft Japan is already actually paying people to take the machines, with little success. "We hope more people will be able to enjoy Xbox 360," said marketing marketer Takashi Sensui, "and we can stop enjoying quite so many of them. We also have this fine pile of HD-DVD drives ... Wait! Come back!"

    Greenberg further assured consumers that "the Xbox 360 will kick the PS3's ass every way from Friday, you wait and see." Nintendo were unable to comment in time for this story as they were still too busy trying to make Wiis fast enough to keep them in the shops.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  24. skip the wifi adapter by clarkn0va · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get yourself an inexpensive ASUS WL520gu router and install the latest tomato firmware. Blammo! Instant wireless bridge for 4 ethernet devices, no client drivers required. You're welcome.

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  25. xbox vs ps3 by gomezfreak · · Score: 1

    I bought a xbox360 the 1st go around mainly due to the $600 price tag of the PS3. I already knew about the RROD issue so I bought the extended warranty from GameStop. Had the thing 5 months in a well ventilated area and I played it around 10-15 hours a week on average. RROD. So I brought it back, traded it in with the warranty, got a new one, and sold it to a guy at work along with the 6 games I played through in those 5 months.

    A few months later I bough a 40GB PS3. The only regret I have is that I didn't hunt down a release 60GB with backwards compatibility. But to be honest it doesn't really matter. I stream everything from my Mac using PS3 Media Server which is free. And, I've played some pretty cool games in the process on both systems which was awesome.

    --
    It takes a big man to cry. It takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. ~ Jack Handy
    1. Re:xbox vs ps3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow,I was almost listening till you said you had a Mac and then I lost all respect for you.

  26. No $200 Arcade box? by Asterra · · Score: 0

    I like how the article (and its link to the article pushing the PS3) both ignore the continued existence of the $200 "Arcade" unit. Tell you what. I'll use the same approach:

    ---
    Attention! Microsoft introduces bare-bones Xbox 360 with smaller internal storage and a pricetag $100 lower than the recently announced PS3 Slim! With this entry, Microsoft seeks to one-up the competition - both from Sony and their mutual rival, Nintendo - by offering the most affordable current-generation gaming console in the market. Combined with what is widely regarded as the most robust library of AAA titles, this new Xbox 360 package may prove irresistible to financially weary consumers this holiday season.
    ---

    I also stifle a chuckle at the various folks who have implied that the PS3's price has been the only thing keeping it from being a success. Developers would beg to differ, since it takes a great deal more time and money to eke a 360-like performance out of the PS3, and generally involves sacrifices, such as anti-aliasing or reduced texture detail. Someone already said it earlier: The PS3 had three years to prove its hardware superiority. The only argument a person can still make is a deliberately vague one: To say that the PS3 has a "hardware advantage" (Blu-ray, Wifi) without specifically admitting that its visual capabilities are in fact inferior, as Konami themselves demonstrated with their three-year, 720p, 24fps masterpiece.

  27. What, you're not going to keep waiting? by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    Until the Valhalla edition of the 360 comes out? (Supposedly comes out next year)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  28. Is this really a drop, though? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    In the UK, at least, Microsoft's dropping the 360 Elite price but it's discontinuing the Pro. Combined with the changes to the Elite box contents post-price-drop it means we're basically paying £30 more if we want the system with a hard drive, and in exchange we only get a measly 60GB extra HDD space. It's not like HDDs are expensive on their end.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  29. Fat PS3 is a desktop computer. by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You mean kinda like the same way I can load GCC onto my PS3?

    You have a fat PS3, which is switchable between a game console and a desktop computer at boot time. But I have a feeling Sony will discontinue it in the fourth quarter of this year, just as it discontinued the fat PS2 in favor of the slim PS2. And like the slim PS2, Xbox 360, and Wii, the slim PS3 is exclusively a game console.

  30. Console wars... ...yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, let's get down to the nitty gritty. for 300 dollars you get a console that is a bluray player. Wow, blueray players are 100 at walmart. You get a slim console that has neither backwords compatibility for ps2 games and it doesn't allow 3rd party operating systems installed. It has a small handfull of good games. And it get's hotter than a SLI laptop (do expect hardware malfunctions on this batch). And for 200, I can get a system with streaming unlimited netflix movies for 9 dollars a month, upgradability without the need to use a screwdriver, and it comes with a cable to transfer all the files off my old hard drive to my new larger one. Has a huge collection of xbox1 and 360 titles it plays. Here's what I know from real gamers, ps3 has hurt themselves by: Not caring about people who want to play their older ps2 games, not caring about the people that just bought them for cheap linux servers, not caring about keeping their exclusive titles, not caring that gamers don't care about movies, we buy game systems for games, not caring that the world economy was in a recession but keep your prices sky high until it's too late that no one cares anymore. And if you want the clinger, many people who owned the PSP's know just what gamers think are good games. Good games to sony are stuff that when you pull out the UMD disc, you want to put it through a paper shredder to cleanse yourself from ever playing it, and wasting your hard earned money. All I have to say is, sorry sony. Too little. Too late.