Slashdot Mirror


How an Online-Only TV Series Stays Successful

ChronoDragon writes "The Wall Street Journal points out that it is possible to make a successful web series without the backing of a studio. With the release of a music video, Do you Wanna Date My Avatar, and the start of Season of 3, the web series The Guild is ready for even more success. The Guild, created by Felicia Day (Doctor Horrible), is a low-budget comedy series about a group of MMORPG gamers and their interactions both online and off. While there are a lot of references that will be instantly recognized by gamers, the show is still very accessible to non-gamers."

163 comments

  1. You mean... by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean that its easy to stay successful when you make your media convenient to your users? Perhaps the RIAA/MPAA can learn something from this....

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:You mean... by sorak · · Score: 1

      And don't forget low-budget!

    2. Re:You mean... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Funny

      NO! These users seeing this show for free are STEALING!!! It's all STOLEN! They didn't pay for it, SO IT'S ALL STOLEN!!

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    3. Re:You mean... by Loomismeister · · Score: 1

      It sort of depends on what you define as successful. These people involved in the show certainly aren't making a ton of money. I see where your going but I don't think this show is the right example.

    4. Re:You mean... by Kamokazi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's free, not convenient, it's not like the users are paying for it.

      Amazon.com Sales Rank: #8 in MP3 Songs (See Bestsellers in MP3 Songs)
      Popular in these categories: (What's this?)
      #1 in MP3 Songs > Dance & DJ
      #5 in MP3 Songs > Pop

      Oh shi-

      http://www.amazon.com/dp/B002JEEJ2A?tag=you09f-20

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    5. Re:You mean... by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Just ask Cory Doctorow who makes a pretty good living from his books even though most (if not all) are available for free download at his website Craphound.com.Not to mention all the writers that make their works freely available for download at Baen Books free library.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    6. Re:You mean... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Well, that and having a cute girl in your cast.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. Owwwww! by GPLDAN · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dammit, the PAIN! My eyes! I watched "Do you Want to Date my Avatar?" !

    1. Re:Owwwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it really makes me depressed when I see how popular that video is

    2. Re:Owwwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd missed the story trolls.

    3. Re:Owwwww! by Ferretman · · Score: 1

      Funniest. Video. Of. The. Year.

      --
      Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
    4. Re:Owwwww! by schon · · Score: 1

      Funny, I quite liked it.. the Indian and the bald guy are hilarious!

      Not to mention the music, which combined with Day's voice reminds me of Stacey Q..

      I bought the MP3 from Amazon. :)

  3. Eek. by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Funny

    World of Warcraft: Destroying relationships with girls since... well, the day it came out.

    -- No. I mean this. I've got about six female friends that either bought it as a anniversary or birthday present, or their boyfriend bought it... and the relationship has always ended within eight months after that fateful purchase. My last friend got so fed up that she took the laptop (with the CD still in it) and smashed it in the driveway, drove over it a few times, then hit it with a hammer. Then she called all her friends and went to have ice cream. That game is pure evil -- it makes boys think dating a high level elf huntress is better than having a real girlfriend.

    Legions of geeks coming to the defense of the game in 5...4...

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Eek. by bwindle2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My wife and I have both played since before the first expansion pack came out, and we're still happily married (and have two kids). All things in moderation (we limit ourselves to 4 WoW nights a week)

    2. Re:Eek. by brainboyz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dating a high level elven huntress is fine, as long as she belongs to your RL girlfriend. WoW is also great as long as you can limit your usage so your RL girlfriend and job get more usage than WoW.

    3. Re:Eek. by SupremoMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hardly accurate for all relationships. I played with my girlfriend for quite a while, and I must say nothing made her more attractive to me than her dancing as her troll priest avatar.

      Here is an idea for your friends, why don't they try to take interest in what their guys enjoy? Then instead of bitching and moaning that their boyfriends don't spend enough time with them, they will want to find ways not to spend so much time together.

    4. Re:Eek. by epiphani · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the exact reason I avoid MMO's like the plague. I know what would happen to me, because it's happened before with IRC. At least then I was 17 and had nothing to lose.

      --
      .
    5. Re:Eek. by idontgno · · Score: 1

      My toons are all celibate. Since my beloved IRL doesn't play, I don't even allow myself the fantasy of another SO relationship. Problem solved.

      Flirting is flirting, even on line. There's a real live person behind the character. Don't do it.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    6. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. That biatch should have her legs broken for breaking another person's property.
      2. Maybe if that biatch would stop eating ice cream, read a book, lose some weight, get some brains (impossible for females, it's genetics), then she and her boyfriend would have something to talk about and he would consider being with her as interesting as playing Wow.

      p.s. I don't play WoW myself.

    7. Re:Eek. by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Undeniably a very daunting limit. How do you even survive?

    8. Re:Eek. by mcgrew · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oh, man, you're brave. If there wasn't a -1 limit you'd probably be modded about -100 now.

      I'd have modded you +1, funny. I did know guys several years ago who wound up divorced because of their Quake addictions.

      I'll probably be modded down too, but it doesn't matter, my karma is excellent. I can afford a few downmods.

    9. Re:Eek. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Never having played Second Life (I'm still working on getting a first life!), I'm not quite clear on how any virtual avatar could be non-celibate... computer bits are computer bits, naughty bits are naughty bits, and the two cannot coexist in the same space.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    10. Re:Eek. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All things in moderation (we limit ourselves to 4 WoW nights a week)

      FWIW... I'm not sure that fits the definition of in moderation.

      I mean, sure, some people watch TV seven nights a week, and compared to that, 4 nights only is limited... but for me, as a married guy with a kid, a hobby done in moderation means once a week, tops.

      YMMV, of course -- I have no idea what your life is like, etc. But for me, just the thought of spending more than one night a week playing games makes my skin crawl with the thought of all the chores that wouldn't be getting done.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    11. Re:Eek. by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      World of Warcraft: Destroying relationships with girls since... well, the day it came out.

      -- No. I mean this. I've got about six female friends that either bought it as a anniversary or birthday present, or their boyfriend bought it... and the relationship has always ended within eight months after that fateful purchase.

      I'd be sold, except for the fact that your math doesn't work. I have six female friends that either bought [insert product here] as an anniversary or birthday present and they all broke up with their boy/girl friends within 8 months! That's almost certainly true for anyone who has at least 8 female friends.

      WoW is a time sink, as are all MMOs. If you introduce a time sink into a relationship without an understanding around what you both want out of it, there's going to be trouble. The same is true for any hobby that requires a great deal of time. I've seen hunting and model rocketry have similar influences.

      My last friend got so fed up that she took the laptop (with the CD still in it) and smashed it in the driveway, drove over it a few times, then hit it with a hammer.

      Your friend is unstable. She needs help. Really.

      Then she called all her friends and went to have ice cream. That game is pure evil -- it makes boys think dating a high level elf huntress is better than having a real girlfriend.

      Jerks. Level isn't everything, you know!

      Legions of geeks coming to the defense of the game in 5...4...

      3/10 for the troll. 1/10 for the logic.

    12. Re:Eek. by daveywest · · Score: 1

      Brings new meaning to "the night isn't over yet baby."

    13. Re:Eek. by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      My toons are all celibate. Since my beloved IRL doesn't play, I don't even allow myself the fantasy of another SO relationship. Problem solved.

      Flirting is flirting, even on line. There's a real live person behind the character. Don't do it.

      Common sense on Slashdot? Inconceivable! =p

      My wife and I play Guild Wars together and have the same understanding. If she's not on, I'm not flirting with any females. If she is, she's the only female I am flirting with.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    14. Re:Eek. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      nothing made her more attractive to me than her dancing as her troll priest avatar.

      ... and this is why geeks have the female stigma that we do. You're saying that *nothing* makes your girlfriend more attractive than when she logs in to a video game and presses a key. I mean, you've seen the girl naked before, right? But you would prefer watching a character dance onscreen than actually interacting with your girlfriend's physical body?

      To each his own I guess..

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    15. Re:Eek. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      it makes boys think dating a high level elf huntress is better than having a real girlfriend.

      I hate to be the one to point it out, but if someone thinks that way, it's not the game's fault. They were already like that before they got the game, your friends just either weren't able to pick up on it, or thought they could "fix" the guy.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    16. Re:Eek. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I mod you -1 stupid for referring to girlintraining as "man".

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    17. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bite. One's a mental connection, a communication, sometimes a "come hither". Another is, well, nothing new. And the former does not preclude the latter, y'know? It's a different kind of flirting.

    18. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But you would prefer watching a character dance onscreen than actually interacting with your girlfriend's physical body?

      If I had to sit through hours upon hours of shallow, meaningless conversation and gossip delivered in an artificially girly porn-star voice devoid of all personality* and then have to be teased for a week before I finally get to dip my wick into a bimbo who obviously never learned how to fuck in high school, then yeah, I'd much rather interact with a jumble of polygons I can shut off every now and then. But that's coming from somebody who actually gets pussy without having to pander to it. Your mileage may vary, mister friendzone!

      *in other words, 99% of women in my age group...

    19. Re:Eek. by brucifer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm just curious about what people are supposed to be doing at night after the kids are all in bed. Well, activities that don't involve making more kids aside.

      Why is there this sense that we have to be busy doing things all the time? My parents used to watch TV at night, I prefer to play video games to unwind. I think it provides more mental stimulation than popping open a beer and sitting on the couch.

    20. Re:Eek. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Funny

      My real life girlfriend is a high level elf huntress you insensitive clod!

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    21. Re:Eek. by myawn · · Score: 4, Funny

      All things in moderation

      Especially moderation.

      --
      Subscribers can see articles in the future? So what? Everyone gets to see them in the future.
    22. Re:Eek. by sexconker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So she's got you by the virtual balls as well?

    23. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats moderation? Dam I knew I was doing something wrong when I decided to spend time with my child and turn off the computer. How about less than 10hrs a week on ANYtHING computer releated. Saying you use it in "moderation" is like saying MJ and Coke aren't drugs.

    24. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must say nothing made her more attractive to me than her dancing as her troll priest avatar

      Holy crap you have GOT to be kidding me. Seriously?
      Is she that dull in real life or are you??

      How about 10 samples of better answers:
      "Nothing made her more attractive to me than...

      Wholesome style:
      1 - watching her sleeping peacefully in bed next to me
      2 - when I saw her in in her beautiful wedding dress
      3 - when she held my newborn son in her hands

      Party style:
      4 - when she let me do a tequila body shot out of her belly button
      5 - when she brought me a beer from the fridge on Superbowl Sunday
      6 - going skinny dipping with her in the middle of the night

      Dirty ones:
      7 - watching her masturbate in the shower
      8 - when she swallowed

      Geek one:
      9 - when she dressed up in the princess Leia slave girl outfit
      10 - watching her install Ubuntu... naked!

    25. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choose NOW!

      Opera, "chic-Flick" or WOW....

      I like the "naked" part as much as the rest. I got the name of energizer bunny from my last girlfriend cuase I wanted to keep going adn going.. but that aside Find someone you can releate to and enjoy lots of things with. NOT just bedroom danceing. Base any relationship on pure hormones and its over before it starts, even if it is hot and really good. :P

    26. Re:Eek. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know, but "nothing more attractive"? Really?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    27. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she dances like the avatar in real life.

    28. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      killyourself

    29. Re:Eek. by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know, but "nothing more attractive"? Really?

      Maybe he's into blue skin and underbites...?

    30. Re:Eek. by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      MJ's dead, friend. And I'd rather Coke than Red Bull.

    31. Re:Eek. by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      10 - watching her install Ubuntu... naked!

      (Peels lacquer layer off disk.) Okay, Ubuntu's naked, where do I get the girl?

    32. Re:Eek. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I guess.. I mean, it's no alien sideboob, but I guess if that's your thing.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    33. Re:Eek. by Night+Goat · · Score: 4, Funny

      But you would prefer watching a character dance onscreen than actually interacting with your girlfriend's physical body?

      You haven't seen his girlfriend.

    34. Re:Eek. by Draek · · Score: 1

      My toons are all celibate. Since my beloved IRL doesn't play, I don't even allow myself the fantasy of another SO relationship. Problem solved.

      I solved the problem differently: I just ship my characters amongst themselves, that way its no more "cheating" than masturbation is.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    35. Re:Eek. by zhilla2 · · Score: 1

      disclaimer: i am not a gamer.
      i personally know about 5 people that lost their girlfriend/boyfriend for being too hooked up to wow, and ~3 for fps games.
      since you cant (yet) make real babies inside a game, darwin wins!

    36. Re:Eek. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You have kids.. aren't they supposed to be doing the chores?

      (...and what chores? Doing laundry? at least the separation/folding of washed/dried clothes can be done while watching TV.)

    37. Re:Eek. by startled · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why is there this sense that we have to be busy doing things all the time?

      Please remain in your location. A squad will be sent over shortly, and you will be "optimized".

    38. Re:Eek. by startled · · Score: 1

      for me, as a married guy with a kid, a hobby done in moderation means once a week, tops.

      Your posting history shows that you post more than once a week. Is that part of your chores, or part of your job?

    39. Re:Eek. by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Buy a Roomba, play more WoW.

    40. Re:Eek. by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      I think you're mistaking his point. It's not that he's more attracted to the polygonal body than the real body. It's that his girlfriend is fetishizing his hobby with a lovely /dance. He loves that she enjoys his hobby, much like the satisfaction you get when you recommend a book or movie to a friend and hear how great it is later on.

      Pornography is rift with females fetishizing male hobbies. If you don't believe me, search girls with guns on Google.

    41. Re:Eek. by astrotek · · Score: 1

      my roomba just made me more messy

      drop some chips, fuck it
      drop some cheerios, fuck it

    42. Re:Eek. by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Actually the level 80 Blood Elf hunter that I'm dating belongs to my wife. So yeah. Likes a bit of Orc Warrior in her, you might say.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    43. Re:Eek. by fractoid · · Score: 1

      This is the exact reason I avoid MMO's like the plague. I know what would happen to me, because it's happened before with IRC. At least then I was 17 and had nothing to lose.

      Au contraire. I started playing when I was 22, working full time and had moved out of home. I had nothing else to do on the evenings so why not? At the time some of my friends were still in school/uni when they started playing and I remember thinking "god, I'm glad I didn't start playing this while I had study to do".

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    44. Re:Eek. by javajawa · · Score: 1

      dal DOT net? Umm... did you get over that addiction?

      --

      Meh

    45. Re:Eek. by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      You haven't seen his girlfriend.

      Neither has he.

      --
      Balderdash!
    46. Re:Eek. by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

      And it's not limited to guys either. Within my group of friends, there are more female players than male. Go figure ;-)

    47. Re:Eek. by stars_are_number_1 · · Score: 1

      No, he's in a committed relationship with the woman (one woman!) that he loves. There is a level of trust built between the two; a trust built upon the fact that neither one of them will go flirting with other people.

    48. Re:Eek. by Nyder · · Score: 1

      sorry, have to call lies on that.

      WoW comes on a DVD, and the DVD is NOT needed to play the game.

      So there would be NO reason for him to have it in his drive, 8 months later.

      Sure, he could of had the DVD in his laptop for 8 months, but anyone with half a brain realised that it's bad for the drive to travel with a disk in it for 8 months.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    49. Re:Eek. by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Unless you are some ultra rich nerd most settle for soem ugly nerd they are able to get - which (like them) doesn't look too hot. And because (normal) men are visually oriented its hardly surprising that even an image is more appealing to him.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    50. Re:Eek. by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      All things in moderation (we limit ourselves to 4 WoW nights a week)

      FWIW... I'm not sure that fits the definition of in moderation.

      I suppose it depends on how long you're playing each night. Not everybody is in the "omg I must spend 6 hours raiding each night or it's not worth it" club. Log in, do a daily or two, hit a battleground, etc.; you can do that four times a week and easily have less than 2 hours of play time per week.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    51. Re:Eek. by Phoghat · · Score: 1
      As you remember me saying I Am Older than Dirt. I have socks that are older than most of you.

      I have 4 adult sons that are all married with children, the oldest with 4, the 2, 2, 1. They all play games frequently. Their wives are all down with it, because they don't let it get in the way of husbanding and parenting. They watch TV infrequently, so the time they would spend watching TV is the time the would rather spend playing a game.

      It's all in how you go about it, init?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    52. Re:Eek. by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm 62 and I really don't care for TV (well yes I do have SOME favorite programs that I watch and I only watch about 15 hours of TV a week. I find most television boring as hell and sometimes multitask by watching and reading a book). But, I do play Some Games, and agree that they keep my mind sharp while most people my age watch mindless pap.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    53. Re:Eek. by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      "That game is pure evil -- it makes boys think dating a high level elf huntress is better than having a real girlfriend."

      Your point being ... ?

    54. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, part of the attraction may be that his girlfriend is doing something that she knows he enjoys, because she wants to make him happy or turn him on. Thee's nothing like someone who knows your buttons and enjoys pressing them for you ;)

      I would say that it's the same as me getting my wife to wear a band t-shirt for me, or your average sports fan getting his gf to wear the jersey of his favorite player...

    55. Re:Eek. by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      my roomba just made me more messy drop some chips, fuck it drop some cheerios, fuck it

      Erm dude - just cos it's like having a live-in maid doesn't mean you get to take out your kinky maid fantasies on it. I mean do you seriously want to be the guy the new generation of "Well I was doing the hoovering in my dressing gown and it kind of slipped" excuses are based on?

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    56. Re:Eek. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I didn't refer to her as a man, it was like "Man, it's hot in here". Would you say "Woman, it's hot in here?"

      Is American English not your first language? If not then I understand your misunderstanding of common American phrases.

    57. Re:Eek. by Doggabone · · Score: 1

      FWIW... I'm not sure that fits the definition of in moderation. ... YMMV, of course -- I have no idea what your life is like, etc. But for me, just the thought of spending more than one night a week playing games makes my skin crawl with the thought of all the chores that wouldn't be getting done.

      The missus and I would play games between 3 or 5 nights a week - not always online, mind you. That doesn't mean that we spend all the time between 6:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m playing games. We may only play for a couple of hours. One or two nights are weekend nights, and if those nights are available we have more time then. We also keep up with the chores, take walks once or twice a week along the river, keep up our jobs ... you get the point. As you hint, the trick is not exactly in what you do 4 nights a week or so (TV, games, whatever...), it's balancing that with what needs to be done. That defines near enough to moderation for me - as distinct from excess, when the chores don't get done and the crawling of skin sets in.

      World of Warcraft: Destroying relationships with girls since...

      We did eventually give up WoW, for loss of interest. It's not the game that ruins relationships. It's the devotion to time-sinks at the exclusion of your relationship, and yar, you betcha WoW facilitates that. So do sports teams, knitting, music, internet surfing ... many things will do it. Online games are more encouraging, however, with that danged carrot in front of your nose all the time. But WoW or not, the relationships that died because of WoW would have found another death in the game's absence. If any online game is more appealing than your partner, you should be looking for another partner.

    58. Re:Eek. by Doggabone · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know, but "nothing more attractive"? Really?

      For me, it wouldn't be the online avatar dance, but it is definitely and "Really" be that overlap of interests and perspectives, the feeling of being understood and accepted that is attractive about the lady of the house. That's not the same as tickling my sexual fancy, that's making me want her to be the one tickling it. And why can't that come from online avatar dancing? She said once that the first time she knew she loved me was when I got out of the car to clear shopping carts left out of parking spots away and put them in that shed (so that other drivers could park without dinging their car). The "moment" can come at the damndest times, you never know when.

    59. Re:Eek. by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      I'd be sold, except for the fact that your math doesn't work. I have six female friends that either bought [insert product here] as an anniversary or birthday present and they all broke up with their boy/girl friends within 8 months! That's almost certainly true for anyone who has at least 8 female friends.

      Sure, but did they all blame the same thing, without talking to each other first?

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    60. Re:Eek. by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      This was marked Insightful?

      God, Slashdot could use more women.

    61. Re:Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, sure, some people watch TV seven nights a week, and compared to that, 4 nights only is limited... but for me, as a married guy with a kid, a hobby done in moderation means once a week, tops.

      Without a kid, and with spouse who honestly enjoys the game and has their own account, 3 to 4 nights is easy.

      It quickly pays dividends with fewer trips to the movies, mall, eatery, etc.

    62. Re:Eek. by smithmc · · Score: 1

      But for me, just the thought of spending more than one night a week playing games makes my skin crawl with the thought of all the chores that wouldn't be getting done.

      Don't worry; that feeling goes away after a few weeks of WoW.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    63. Re:Eek. by keytoe · · Score: 1

      My parents used to watch TV at night, I prefer to play video games to unwind. I think it provides more mental stimulation than popping open a beer and sitting on the couch.

      I've caught comments my whole life along the lines of "Why are you wasting time playing video games?" - from people who spend their entire free evenings plopped in front of the television. I've never understood this. I always ask how, exactly, a non-interactive video experience is less wasteful and I routinely get baffled looks back.

      I've come to the conclusion that there was some social brainwashing component regarding video games that happened in the 80s that makes people believe this. Questioning this 'truth' is somehow an alien thought.

      Of course, it didn't help that as a kid growing up that anything I did in front of the computer was considered 'video games' by my parents. For the record, I didn't play many video games growing up. That was my education.

      PS: I play lots of video games now ;)

    64. Re:Eek. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know.. but..

      "nothing made her more attractive"

      "nothing"

      not anything

      The single most attractive thing she could possibly do would be to log in to WoW and hit the "dance" button. woooooo!

      Maybe I just can't relate because all of my girlfriends have disliked video games, but still.. nothing?? really?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    65. Re:Eek. by qoa · · Score: 1

      The disc was still in it huh? Story sounds fishy to me. When you have an mmo the disc is used about once then pretty much thrown out. Chances are there were gigs of updates after it was installed, and no reason to leave that in there.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
    66. Re:Eek. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      My kids are too young to (significantly) help with the chores.

      (...and what chores? Doing laundry? at least the separation/folding of washed/dried clothes can be done while watching TV.)

      Laundry. Cleaning. Preparing food for the next day. Household maintenance. Yard maintenance. Household repairs. Doing the bills. Maintaining the household budget. Cleaning the cars. Maintaining the cars. Research (investment, purchasing, schools, medical issues, all the million other things that require research). Planning events (birthday parties, barbecues, etc). Thank you cards. Mending clothes. Shopping online for gifts, clothes, etc. Grocery shopping as needed. Volunteer chores (regular chores for an elderly neighbor; doing laundry & cooking sometimes for the neighbor who just had twins).

      Sure, I'll get a half hour or so before bedtime to read or watch TV or play a game... but I thought that WoW takes significant chunks of time (like 4+ hours) often?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    67. Re:Eek. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a lot of stuff.. at least one tiny bit, paying bills, could be done automatically (and save money (time and no stamp)) if you just sign up for auto-bill pay.

    68. Re:Eek. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I'm paranoid about my bills. More than a couple times a year, there's a billing error that needs to be corrected... I know if I had autobillpay I'd probably not examine my bills thoroughly.

      So far this year I've noticed (and gotten corrected) overcharges on my Amex, another one of my credit cards, my Verizon bill, my Comcast bill (service now canceled due to shenanigans on their part), my HOA, and my gas bill.

      Last year was much the same. I won't use autopay when corporate billing is so screwed up.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    69. Re:Eek. by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Well, saying "nothing was ever more X than Y" is a figure of speech, so it's supposed to be a bit exaggerated. But whatever, I guess.

  4. Simple answer by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They weren't terribly profitable until they shacked up with microsoft and got distributed via the live. They sold some t-shirts and the like, but didn't really hit it big until they stopped 'self publishing' (i.e. uploading to youtube) and got a distributor (microsoft live).

    Oh, and wall street journal articles and front-page slashdots don't hurt either.

    1. Re:Simple answer by ChronoDragon · · Score: 1

      Didn't say they were profitable, just successful and it all depends on how you define successful. It this case I would say that developing a fan base counts although money never hurt anyone. Given that the WSJ article just came out and this is the first time I've seen anything about it on /. you can hardly say they have anything to do with its successs MS Live isn't the only vehicle for distribution, the episodes are available on MSN. It was only for the first episode of Season 3 that it premiered on Xbox Live first (MSN is next week).

    2. Re:Simple answer by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, though the reason I didn't equate success with profitability was because while different people want different things out of life, very very few creators of online web-shows don't have some sort of future monitization hopes (getting hired by another media outlet or show, or having their show picked up, or getting paid to do the show). The creators obviously enjoy doing it and they'd much rather be able to stop working at their day jobs and just create full time. In order to do that, it takes profitability. I think that 'success' might be 2+ million views on youtube per episode, but Success is getting paid to do what you love (create these shows).

    3. Re:Simple answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can hardly say they have anything to do with its successs MS Live isn't the only vehicle for distribution, the episodes are available on MSN. It was only for the first episode of Season 3 that it premiered on Xbox Live first (MSN is next week).

      Uhhhh, you do realize what the MS in MS Live and MSN both stand for, right?

    4. Re:Simple answer by Kamokazi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah I got a kick out of how Tink's iMac turned into a plain old LCD with a Vista sticker slapped on it in Season 2...it made me chuckle.

      And seriously MS, those LCDs are dull....why not get a nice shiny Samsung or something if you're trying to flash that Vista orb?

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
  5. Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have access to the Blizzcon feed via DirectTV or the internet, there is an extensive interview with Felicia Day and accompanying video regarding the background, making, and future of the Guild.

    It's around 5:45 PM in the Saturday feed. It's in a filler time that many people who bought the package might not have watched.

    Alas for the majority of us, she talks about how so much of the needed resources are loaned to her from friends and other kind people who want her to succeed. While that's all well and good, that can't be counted on as a viable business model. (Almost any business can be profitable if it can acquire most or all of its resources for free and convert them into a product to sell.)

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    1. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by nine-times · · Score: 0

      I would guess that the equation of coming up with a business model is somewhat complicated. How big is the audience? Is your content paid from subscriptions or from advertisers? If subscription, how expensive is the subscription? If ad-supported, who's advertising with you and how much are they willing to pay? How big is your budget for filming?

      I would bet that there are a few different business models in there that would work. In this case, I've never heard of "The Guild" before and suspect that their audience can't be all that huge. It sounds like the budget is small, but there are no suscriptions. It looks like there are some banner ads, but not interspersed throughout the show like Hulu. Still, they're getting by, and good for them.

      None of this really gives you a good indicator whether web-only shows could have viable business models. The question is, what would happen if the last season of Lost went Hulu-only? Could they make enough from ad revenue there to pay the production costs? What if they went with something like iTunes season-pass? Of course, if it's on TV people are likely to watch it there, and then online viewing will be smaller.

      And then of course there's the problem of the distribution channels not being mature. How many people still don't have a good Internet connection? How many people want to watch TV on their big screen TV but don't have set-top boxes?

      If you think about it, distributing your show over the Internet should eventually be a no-brainer. If everyone has fast enough Internet, then the show's producers will get to scrap all the overhead of the networks and cable operators and maybe even the studios, and go direct to consumer. Maybe in return they have to deal with someone like Apple or Hulu for distribution, who can then insert commercials or charge subscription fees, replicating the same business models as traditional distribution but with lower overhead.

    2. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by Iwanowitch · · Score: 5, Funny

      And let us not forget this lovely bit from the interview.

      Cue "this is why we don't have women around" debate in 3.. 2.. 1...

      --
      One CS student VS 893 DOS games: Let's play oldies
    3. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by ChronoDragon · · Score: 1

      They don't use subscriptions. It was initially self-funded and they eventually added a "donate" button to the site. They started the second season using the same model but soon made a deal for funding and distribution with Sprint and MS. They are supplementing their revenue with DVD sales (and now sales of the music video via iTunes and the mp3 through amazon. But you are right, you could never use the same business model to produce a show like Lost and be profitable. It really all depends on how the show is written and what sets you need. When you center your show around your characters and not fancy special effects, sets, and big name guest stars, it can make a big difference in your costs.

    4. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by Maria+D · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can people call something that works "not viable"? What is wrong with getting support from people who like you and your work, directly? As you said in your last sentence, it would work for almost ANY endeavor.

    5. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by nine-times · · Score: 0

      Just to be clear, I think that there probably is a business model for Lost to use only online distribution, but only when the online distribution channels become mature enough that TV networks and cable TV operators are essentially unnecessary. Needless to say, TV networks and cable operators don't have much of an incentive to make that happen.

    6. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by Rigrig · · Score: 1

      Cue obligatory xkcd link in 3.. 2.. 1... 0

      There, fixed that for ya.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    7. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Many small businesses start this way, with people maxing out credit cards and borrowing money from friends and family in order to get started. Many fail, too. Some don't. Richard Linklater got his start in this fashion and saw some reasonable success.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    8. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by skeeto · · Score: 1

      When my wife showed that to me I was annoyed. It reinforces the stereotype that geeks are unable to be around women because they always repulse them. Most geeks seem to have no idea how to act around women, so when they finally get the opportunity they make off-putting comments like that. Don't they see how lame it makes them look?

      To quote you, this is exactly why we don't have women around.

    9. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Cue "this is why we don't have women around" debate in 3.. 2.. 1...

      Did you watch the music video? This woman clearly made use of her "female attributes" in that video. If she didn't want women to be viewed that way, maybe she should have avoided turning herself (even more) into a sexually desirable object.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    10. Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      It's not like she exactly discourages the connection between her and sex, is it'? Their music video is highly suggestive, and she portrays herself as a sexually attractive woman. Can you blame geeks for being sexually attracted to her?

      I suppose you could say that she should be able to portray herself as extremely sexy and into that sort of thing and still not have to be treated like this, but these are males we are talking about. Geeks, yes, but males. Any group of males would have reacted to her "invitation" to see her as a sex object, not just geeks.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  6. answer: it doesn't. by martas · · Score: 1, Informative

    *opens -1:Flamebait umbrella*

    1. Re:answer: it doesn't. by Zocalo · · Score: 0, Troll

      answer: it doesn't.

      Ooh! It's that "Here's the answer, what's the question?" game!

      I think the question was... "Does the carpet match the drapes?"

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:answer: it doesn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Jeopardy?

  7. Tiny budgets help a lot by JSBiff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't get me wrong, I enjoy The Guild, and am quite impressed how good the show is with what they have to work with, but if all TV had to be made with the tiny budgets they work with (each episode is like 10 minutes long, very limited sets, etc), you wouldn't get shows like Star Trek, Babylon 5, Firefly, or Battlestar Galactica, to name but a few.

    I for one, am happy that at least *some* bigger budget shows are made (yes, yes, not all big-budget shows are any good - some are just big money holes), but I'd like to see a successful larger-budget online show, to pave the way for a gradual move to more television being online.

    1. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but I'd like to see a successful larger-budget online show, to pave the way for a gradual move to more television being online.

      The main problem is control. With a small-budget show, you have a group of friends who generally agree on most things. With a larger budget you have more roles, more people, with more people becomes more disagreement. With TV you have the network more or less as a moderator, approve the content and distribute it. But with online its different, -anyone- can host it and its usually distributed over many channels, so do you put the content up for free on YouTube? Do you have ads on it? Do you have another site with it on there? Do you sell it? Do you sell it over a channel with DRM? What about iTunes, what if you want different pricing? Etc. This can lead to disagreements and eventually fragmentation.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      ", you wouldn't get shows like Star Trek, "
      haha. star trek had almost no budget. In fact one episode had a props budget of less then a dollar.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by bertoelcon · · Score: 4, Informative

      As am american I think Dr. Who props were inventive as hell and the show is awesome, and I thought it had like 0 funding too.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    4. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by PylonHead · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to this site:

      http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/TOS_Season_1

      Production for the initial season of Star Trek cost almost US$200,000 per episode.

      That would be the equivalent of $1,322,201 per episode in today's dollars.

      --
      # (/.);;
      - : float -> float -> float =
    5. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      That's called "the exception that proves the rule".

    6. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Blake's 7?

      The ship was a cardboard cut out for frack's sake.

    7. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      haha. star trek had almost no budget. In fact one episode had a props budget of less then a dollar.

      [citation needed]. "My big brother told me" is not a credible source.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by ChronoDragon · · Score: 1

      Never trust big brothers. Mine used to tell me that the Enterprise could land on a planet. To do so, it flipped over on its back; internally, all of the rooms rotated to maintain a proper vertical orientation. I don't know who was dumber, him for believing that or me for believing him. Fortunately, one of us got smarter.

    9. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a pet peeve of mine. See this.

    10. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by Draek · · Score: 1

      The progression is quite simple:

      some small-budget productions -> lots of small-budget productions -> some big-budget productions and lots of small ones -> lots of big- and small-budget productions living in a stable ecosystem.

      It happened with games and the web at least, so it's likely what'll happen with online video shows as well. And I, for one, am quite happy that we've finally reached some degree of success with step 1, even if we're not ready yet to throw our dumb boxes out the window.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    11. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know who was dumber, him for believing that or me for believing him.
       
      ...or perhaps you, for still believing that he believed it, rather than realising he pulled a "Calvin's Dad" on you.

      Fortunately, one of us got smarter.

      Mmm.

    12. Re:Tiny budgets help a lot by BorisAmmerlaan · · Score: 1

      Blake's 7?

      The ship was a cardboard cut out for frack's sake.

      Not really. I saw the model up close about 12 years ago and talked to the maker. IIRC, he said it cost about 3000 GBP to make. (Maybe less, but it was expensive.) You're probably thinking of the oak leaves that were used to represent a giant space brain. ;-)

  8. loaded with ad's cheap + sets + acting + MS lockin by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0

    loaded with ad's cheap + sets + acting + MS lock in.

  9. Re:loaded with ad's cheap + sets + acting + MS loc by ChronoDragon · · Score: 1

    Its only a MS locking if you look at MSN that way. They are making the episodes available there (and after the first episode of season 3, they will be available on MSN at the same time as they are put on Xbox Live.

  10. Re:loaded with ad's cheap + sets + acting + MS loc by Herms · · Score: 1

    MS Lock in? What MS lock in? I've watched The Guild and never once did so through anything Microsoft.

    They sell DVDs of seasons 1 and 2, and I assume will do so with 3 once it's done. And the eps are posted (officially) to youtube a while after they're released to Live.

    Oh, and that song they did is on both Amazon MP3 and iTunes.

    So while they do use Microsoft for some distribution, it's not locked in at all.

    --
    ~Herms
  11. The Guild is for the easily amused by BrowncoatJedi · · Score: 0

    Or WoW zombies. It really isn't any good.

  12. Torrent? by Chelloveck · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Torrent?

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torrent?

      Pancakes?

    2. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torrent?

      Pancakes?

      Peaches?

    3. Re:Torrent? by ChronoDragon · · Score: 1

      You don't need a torrent, each episode is about 5 minutes long. You can catch all of season 1 at their youtube channel and season 2 at their watchtheguild.com. You can also find the episodes at MSN but its a bit harder to find them in the right order.

    4. Re:Torrent? by citylivin · · Score: 1

      http://www.mininova.org/tor/2882031

      The submitter says they are crap web quality though (ripped from website). Couldn't find a DVD rip, but I didnt look very hard.

      Never heard of this show. Hopefully it will be along the lines of pure pwnage, which incidentally has all their eps in decent quality up for free download (and has apparently been picked up by showcase ?!?).
      Now thats a real success story!

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    5. Re:Torrent? by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      And Ice Cream!

      By your powers combined, I'm... oh wait..

    6. Re:Torrent? by cattrain · · Score: 1

      You can also watch seasons 1 and 2 in Windows Media Center.

    7. Re:Torrent? by Loko+Draucarn · · Score: 1

      Curses! It's Captain Delicious!
      My plot to make everything taste like pork is thwarted!

    8. Re:Torrent? by mitgib · · Score: 1

      Peach torrent pancakes!

      --
      Being a spelling & grammar Nazi is a sign you do not poses the intelligence to contribute to the conversation
    9. Re:Torrent? by ChronoDragon · · Score: 1

      It seems Media Center is just getting the vids from MSN, but it does have them organized in the right sequence. Thanks!

  13. Who is Pure Evil?!? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My last friend got so fed up that she took the laptop (with the CD still in it) and smashed it in the driveway, drove over it a few times, then hit it with a hammer. Then she called all her friends and went to have ice cream. That game is pure evil...
    The game itself is neutral. Playing the game isn't evil, just a waste of time. However, willful and wanton destruction of other people's properly certainly could be considered pure evil! (Wouldn't just hiding the CD be sufficient?) Elf Huntresses don't get pregnant, don't sleep with your best friend, don't throw out your porn or videogame collections, don't embarrass you in public, don't run up you credit cards, and don't smash up your car... how is that not better than a real girlfriend? (Sure, the Elfess doesn't put out, but then my wife, having just had an operation, isn't putting out right now either!)(Actually, my real life girl friends have never slept with my best friend. They have, however, gotten pissed off, run off and married strangers they had only known a few weeks. All the other complaints are real and have actually happened to me.)

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Who is Pure Evil?!? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Story is bullshit.
      You don't use a disc to play WoW.

      Install (download or disc, either way) and play.
      No need for any disc in the drive.

  14. "successful" is a relative term by dancemonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As another comment noted, they were not really that successful until actually receiving distribution. As a cast member in a web series (Break A Leg) we have been struggling not to gain an audience, respect, or critical acclaim since we have all of that. We just need money. Even the brushes we've had with sponsorship and major network distribution tend to fall apart through no fault of our own. It's just the way the business works.

    We poke fun at The Guild from time to time, but it's a great show. I don't think though that's it's really a model of how to "stay successful" as an online-only series. You can't replicate what they did or follow their path like a recipe.

    It just doesn't seem possible to actually BE successful as a web-only series, if success is defined at all in terms of money, without real money backing you. We even had a marketing firm whoring us around for awhile, and while it led to a few sponsorship deals here and there it never really led to independence for anybody from their day-to-day careers. There's just no real monetizing of the online-only series going on unless you have a patron or distributor who's willing to take a loss on you in order to get some other intangibles out of it.

    That said, Break A Leg has a major distribution deal in the works, but it only proves the point. We're never going to be "successful" sticking to the web. The internet was just a way to get our show out there, and the show initially was just a way to showcase our talents (as writers, actors, editors, sound designers, directors, cinematographers). We need someone to get us OUT of the internet in some form in order to really get us see and heard of on a scale massive enough for everyone to quit their jobs.

    Oh well, that's just me ranting. I love internet episodics, I hope they never go away. I just also hope some way materializes for people to earn real money doing them without needing a Microsoft distro deal or a major network buy-out.

    1. Re:"successful" is a relative term by ondigo · · Score: 1

      I've thought all along that The Guild cast's main objective was to increase their visibility and get cast in more shows. I'm not in The Industry, but it does seem to me that visibility, buzz, and name recognition are immensely important intangibles to actors. If the Break A Leg folks were to get similar buzz that led to more gigs but the show itself folded, would you not still count it as a success?

    2. Re:"successful" is a relative term by dancemonkey · · Score: 1

      To a certain extent that has happened for us, though not to the degree it has for Felicia Day.

      You're right, success can be defined many ways. For BaL's creator the show has done well for him, though still see above.

      Exposure is always great, but the point of the article is valid. Web series aren't finding money, so I guess I agree!

      Actors don't care about money though. If we did we'd be... well, not actors.

    3. Re:"successful" is a relative term by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      If your objective is to get hired in other shows, then I'd say you have to be hired for other shows as a result of that work. I don't think Felicia Day was obscure before The Guild, maybe it helped some, but it doesn't seem like it helped a lot. Now if the other actors in the show get hired as a result of the show, then you might have something to call a success, but that depends on how far the career goes. Most actors are unemployed, even the successful actors seem to realize that, they probably had been unemployed more than they like to think about.

    4. Re:"successful" is a relative term by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      You are right. As it is, not many shows earn much money back without some form of distribution and marketing. YouTube can be considered both, but even people that get millions of views on their videos don't make an independent living, even the million+ view videos only make tens of thousands of dollars if they are lucky. I don't think YouTube pays anyone outside of some specially arranged deals. Making money through these free distribution services rely on people buying products as a result, and it doesn't look like there is enough money in that.

      I think the way to approach it is just to do it for fun, not expect any payback, and as a result, be very smart about your expenses and investments. If you do get some money out of it, good, if you don't, at least you had your fun.

    5. Re:"successful" is a relative term by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      As a cast member in a web series (Break A Leg) we have been struggling not to gain an audience, respect, or critical acclaim since we have all of that. We just need money.

      Having just looked at your website, I can't see anywhere that I could pay to get access to your episodes. I can't see anywhere I could pay to get a DVD.
      Assuming that you're giving away your product for free (seriously? then complaining about cashflow?) I also can't see anywhere that I can pay to have an enhanced experience of some kind.

      Have you considered actually... y'know... *CHARGING* for access to watch the shows? Like giving away eps 1-3 from a series for free, then charging $1 an episode after that? Or letting viewers watch the first X minutes of each episode then 50 cents for the rest? Or selling a DVD with added-value material that SERIOUS fans would appreciate like commentary, actor/cast bios, extra bits to flesh out personalities, "deleted scenes", extra scenes, mini-episodes fleshing out a real one etc?

      If the first thought that enters your head is "people won't pay money to watch our series" then perhaps your series isn't compelling enough? But assuming it *is* compelling and appealing it seems to me that you need someone with a commercial brain to work out how best to monetize it... I bet you have some "experts" or talented and/or experienced people in their field for certain roles like costume, scriptwriting, make-up, camerawork, soundwork, editing.. acting etc... so why not someone talented/experienced in commercial aspects?

    6. Re:"successful" is a relative term by VShael · · Score: 1

      Excellent point sir.

      Kevin Smith (the Clerks guy) has a weekly podcast called Smodcast. It's quite successful, in terms of downloads, nominations for awards, etc... But they have had real difficulty getting and keeping a sponser for the show. And he's pretty famous and well connected.

  15. Re:loaded with ad's cheap + sets + acting + MS loc by Locklin · · Score: 1

    Also on Miro:
    https://www.miroguide.com/feeds/8889

    (looks like it's way behind though).

    --
    "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  16. obligatory redhead quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbFjePdOpK8

    "Felicia Day from "THE GUILD" gets asked about her carpet @ Blizzcon 2009 (UNEDITED)!"

  17. Please ignore, sorry by e9th · · Score: 1

    Sorry. Undoing an infelicitous earlier moderation.

  18. Joss Whedon? by Mybrid · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if she and Joss retain any professional connection?

    I guess I just kinda assumed that Joss was helping her out on this.

    1. Re:Joss Whedon? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Anyone know if she and Joss retain any professional connection?

      I guess I just kinda assumed that Joss was helping her out on this.

      Question: Who directed Do You Wanna Date My Avatar?

      Answer: Jed Whedon.

      Question: What else did Jed Whedon work on?

      Answer: Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog with his brother Joss.

      Question: How many times during Commentary: The Musical (on the Dr. Horrible DVD) does Felicia Day mention The Guild?

      Answer: At least 3, but it's all part of one song on it.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    2. Re:Joss Whedon? by ChronoDragon · · Score: 1

      Clearly they do. Joss' brother Jed directed the music video and co-wrote the song (he provided the music and Felicia did the lyrics). Felicia also stars in the unaired Dollhouse episode "Epitaph One". As for Joss helping her on this, I could be wrong but I don't believe so. I suspect his hands are full with Dollhouse.

    3. Re:Joss Whedon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Felicia was in that episode of Dollhouse that was only on the DVD.

    4. Re:Joss Whedon? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      I guess I just kinda assumed that Joss was helping her out on this.

      Joss has noted The Guild as being an inspiration for doing Dr. Horrible. So there's some recognition there, but it certainly doesn't sound like there's any direct help. It seems more like The Guild was in production well before Joss was even aware of it.

      I think it was during the Comicon panel on The Guild that Felicia explained the involvement of Jed, Joss' brother. It went something along the lines that they decided they needed some teaser to start up the new season and thought a music video would be fun. Felicia called Jed because of the great job he did with Dr. Horrible, not really expecting that he'd have time to work on it. To her surprise, not only did he say 'yes' but he almost immediately had an initial score hashed out based on her lyrics. As an aside, Joss' wife is one of the backup dancers in the video.

  19. Huge built in audience by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

    Part of The Guilds success is no doubt due to their vast built in audience... A show for players of Puzzle Pirates or City of Heroes/Villains has much less of a potential audience. It also no doubt helps that those audiences are used to fan made material and have very low expectations as to writing, acting, and production values.
     
    (As a side note: Has everyone forgotten RvB already?)
     
    I don't however agree with summaries conclusion that the video's are 'accessible to non gamers'. I'm a gamer (though mostly out on the fringe, UO, CoX, YPP!), and I found them somewhat hard to understand because the terminology used was so WoW centric.

  20. Wow... this is terrible. by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

    I watched what I think was the first episode of season 2.

    That was awful. Thankfully it was only 5 minutes.

    I see why it's online and not on TV.

    1. Re:Wow... this is terrible. by PylonHead · · Score: 1

      Did you start from the beginning of season 1? It's character driven. If you've followed it from the beginning it'll make a lot more sense.

      I'm not saying it's great or anything, but it makes me smile.

      --
      # (/.);;
      - : float -> float -> float =
    2. Re:Wow... this is terrible. by Aniyn · · Score: 1

      I've watched it since it started, and it's already jumped the shark. I couldn't even finish the last episode.

    3. Re:Wow... this is terrible. by ChronoDragon · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The start of season 2 is heavily based off of the the first season.

    4. Re:Wow... this is terrible. by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      No, I can see the characters and the stereotypes they're supposed to be. You've got the GM, the crazy chick, the uber asian gamer, the fat mom ignoring her kids and family... I get the characters. They're just bad, and badly acted. It looks like the series is for people who don't play MMOs so they can feel justified when they make fun of people who do play them.

      There really isn't a whole lot to the series where I felt like I was missing something by not having seen season 1.

  21. Production Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unfortunately the production quality is extremely poor compared to studios. It really helps to have industry professionals on the crew. But that requires money... and unfortunately this type of media provides extremely limited budgets, particularly in the current economy.

  22. She's female. So it is OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Only men can commit acts of violence and domestic abuse.
    She is female and therefore, by definition, a victim not a perpetrator of violence.

    Really, you didn't learn this in school, or at least college?
    Well, I am sure a judge will be more than happy to teach you it someday.

  23. Needs Slashvertisement Tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New season kicks off soon (if not already), do the math, whether you are a fan or not. The recent ads like this connected me to Dr. Horrible (wonderful show) but call it what it is.....

  24. Blech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (1) it's a crappy show. It's not funny at all, and I'm a gamer (maybe that's why it's not funny?)
    (2) Felicia Day would be kinda mediocre, but I love red hair. Hot. At BlizzCon some dude asked her if the "carpet matches the drapes." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbFjePdOpK8&feature=player_embedded

    (3) I have a hard time believing it's terribly profitable. Maybe this is a new type of "sponsorship" model for TV shows where instead of being sponsored by networks, they're sponsored directly by advertisers, though.

  25. The stars answer... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

    Here stars of online tv shows answer this exact question:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBaOCKtDY9g&feature=related

  26. Let me guess... by iceperson · · Score: 1

    You and your wife both work, pay someone else to raise your kids, then complain about not having time to take care of things that need to get done all so you can drive that expensive car and/or that new high tech TV.

    Getting judged by people who know little/nothing about you on the Internet is fun.

    1. Re:Let me guess... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      You guessed wrong.

      Yes, we both work. Yes, daycare is involved. But if you think daycare is raising our kids, you're sorely mistaken.

      First, there's no complaining involved.

      Second, we don't own expensive items. We solidly live within our means, save over 15% of our net income (not including 401k) -- college tuitions aren't going down, and donate over 5% (plus a lot of time spent volunteering). We aren't materialistic in any sense of the word... we place a high value on making sure there are no problems if one or both of us gets laid off.

      But the core of your post is that you believe I'm judging other people. I'm not passing judgment... I'm just curious as to how a couple with two kids can devote so much time to a hobby.

      Because none of the parents I spend time with can afford to...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Let me guess... by iceperson · · Score: 1

      My wife and I place a high value on not paying someone else to care for our children. Because of this she is able to take care of the housework, shopping, etc... while I am at the office. This means we have time for our family AND a hobby at the end of the day.

      It surprises me that so many people you know have 16-17 hours worth of things that need to be done everyday. I wonder how someone would fit in non-recurring events such as band concerts, ballgames, and other activities that come up into lives that are already so full.

  27. Nope, it can't be your friends... by iceperson · · Score: 1

    it has to be the game...