Slashdot Mirror


The Orange Goo That Could Save Your Laptop

Barence writes "A British company has patented what can only be described as an orange goo that could save your laptop or iPod after a nasty fall. The amazing material is soft and malleable like putty, but the substance becomes solid instantly after impact. You can punch your fist into a ball of the material sitting on a desk and not feel a thing, according to the staff at PC Pro who have been testing the material, called 3do. It's being used by the military, the US downhill ski team, and motorcycle clothing manufacturers to provide impact protection in the event of a crash. However, it's also appearing in protective cases for laptops and MP3 players."

285 comments

  1. I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't the point of protection to absorb the impact? That's why bubble-wrap is squishy. If this instantly turns solid, wouldn't that mean that the g-forces, the energy of the impact is not absorbed by it and is thus transferred to the item inside?

    1. Re:I don't get it.. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Informative


      Presumably the energy is absorbed by it turning solid. Similar in principle (in vague terms) to how the bonnet of a car (hood to USA people) is designed to crumple so that it absorbs the energy of a crash. Afterwards the bonnet is more condensed - harder - but the energy went into making it so, rather than getting transferred on to the rest of the car and the passengers.

      Well the front of normal cars is designed to do that. SUVs are designed to kill people.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    2. Re:I don't get it.. by ATMD · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I guess there's a limit to the amount of shock it can absorb. I would imagine its properties have been tweaked so that it stops any impact within its own thickness. Obviously if the impacting object is travelling faster, that results in more rapid deceleration and thus more forces transferred to the delicate internally-bits of your laptop. For dropping off a table though, it probably provides the smallest possible deceleration force against the floor, compared to protection materials currently on the market.

      My suspicion would be that rather than rather than causing the linear deceleration of a simple spring constant, (like most other foams, rubbers, etc.), it provides an exponential deceleration: the stopping force in a shear-thickening fluid is proportional to the speed rather than the displacement. This means that the material starts acting from the very moment of impact, as that is the point with the highest speed. A spring, (or foam, or rubber, or anything else that acts like a spring), would do essentially nothing until the impact has squeezed it enough to get a decent counter-force out of it. But by that time it might be too late, and the spring might have already bottomed out. I'd be interested to see some numbers for this gel, to back up the stuff I've just written!
       
      /Disclaimer: Mechanical engineering undergraduate. Don't have my qualification yet; take above post with a pinch of salt.

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
    3. Re:I don't get it.. by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Funny

      "SUVs are designed to kill people."

      SUVs arent designed, that would imply some kind of thinking behind them.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    4. Re:I don't get it.. by ATMD · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heh, glad I put that disclaimer there. Stopping force is proportional to velocity, (technically shear rate), in a Newtonian fluid such as water or oil: in a shear-thickening fluid viscosity is proportional to velocity. Viscosity is the proportionality constant linking speed and stopping force, so I guess that makes stopping force proportional to the square of the speed.

      For more info, try these.

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
    5. Re:I don't get it.. by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I got to say that I am quite curious about this. I recall seeing something a while back on the tele about it being used to make new shock/impact protection, but both THAT show and this article/website seem very thin on facts and "how it works".

      Don't even bother trying to watch the youtube movie they have on their website. It provides less information than picking your nose in the dark.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    6. Re:I don't get it.. by ATMD · · Score: 1

      Nice analogy =P

      I'm tempted to improve that Wiki article on power-law fluids when I have a moment, so that it's more readily understood by those who haven't already learned the majority of what it's trying to explain...

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
    7. Re:I don't get it.. by k-sound · · Score: 5, Informative

      A squishy material just softens the impact by slowing the deceleration of your momentum. The problem is if the impact force is high you need a lot of padding to soften the blow. By turning solid on impact you material instantly distributes all this force over a large area i.e. all the force isn't released on e.g. the corner of your laptop causing it to shatter. This is similar to putting a hard cover around your object (like a motorcycle helmet). The advantage of this material is that is is flexible in it's normal state so it can met integrated in clothing etc without limiting movement.

      This video has a great example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JceDaEMIHKE&feature=related
      They use a cap with the material to protect a watermelon from impact with a hammer. With a normal squishy material you'd need a really thick layer to soften a blow like that and a hard material would restrict movement.

      It's a kind of best of both worlds solution.

    8. Re:I don't get it.. by Shin-LaC · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course. They evolved to be that way, to maximize their fitness in an environment full of size queens.

    9. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it stop Linux crashing?

    10. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno, but if they made it blue it may help stop Windows crashing.

    11. Re:I don't get it.. by DemonBeaver · · Score: 1

      Most of my papers are written by picking my nose in the dark!

      --
      This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (STFU)
    12. Re:I don't get it.. by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well... we all know what's in this stuff don't we ? It's custard (possibly with some orange food colorant).

      The behavior described here is identical to that exhibited by custard and other liquids with low viscosity but high surface tension. The effect is that low velocity impacts are passed through easily but high velocity impact causes the surface tension to rapidly increase and prevents entry. To put it bluntly, you can run over a swimming pool full of custard, but you can't walk over one (brainiac did an episode on it, though they could have done a better job of explaining the theory about why it works that way - wikipedia is your friend here - as per their usual script, they were mostly interested in the fun-value of a swimming pool full of custard... the test subject did indeed run over it until he got to the middle, was told to stop... and then sank).

      Now I'm sure it's not actually custard in this goo (well, fairly sure) but the phenomenon is certainly not new and has been known for a while. What seems new is that this is a much lower liquidity and viscosity than most of these substances (it appears to be at the level of clay or playdough rather than a flowing liquid) - which clearly makes for a whole new range of practical applications, since it won't soak into things or leak, you can make things like laptop protective cases lined with the stuff which would be impractical with custard....

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    13. Re:I don't get it.. by selven · · Score: 1

      Drag in air, water or any other normal substance is always proportional to the square of the velocity. This is because if you double the speed of an object travelling through a fluid, the particles will hit the object twice as fast, causing twice as much change in velocity, and there will be twice as many particles hitting it per second. Combine those two effects and you get the proportionality to v^2.

    14. Re:I don't get it.. by Another,+completely · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So it wouldn't save a drive head, since there will be a sudden acceleration, but it might stop the case from deforming so the screen pops out. If I can believe the hype, then we won't have drive heads for much longer anyway. If all the internal bits are well attached, I guess that could be enough.

    15. Re:I don't get it.. by Aviation+Pete · · Score: 1

      Isn't the point of protection to absorb the impact? That's why bubble-wrap is squishy. If this instantly turns solid, wouldn't that mean that the g-forces, the energy of the impact is not absorbed by it and is thus transferred to the item inside?

      I would guess the point is the load distribution on the laptop. The unprotected laptop will see a spike of load on one point which will easily exceed the strength of it's shell. When enclosed by a solid material, the load will act on a much larger area, and the maximum load will be proportionally lower. The g forces will stay the same, though.

      --
      You know it's time for the next revolution when your rulers' names end with roman numerals.
    16. Re:I don't get it.. by kpainter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Similar in principle (in vague terms) to how the bonnet of a car (hood to USA people) is designed to crumple so that it absorbs the energy of a crash.

      I always assumed that the reason for the crumple was to maximize the cost of repair ultimately necessitating the purchase of a new vehicle.

    17. Re:I don't get it.. by Kuroji · · Score: 1

      Actually, by all appearances, it's just a bright orange variety of the Smart Mass that ThinkGeek sells.

    18. Re:I don't get it.. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think the point of using the goo for "US downhill ski team, and motorcycle clothing manufacturers" is to allow a solid type of protection in a crash in FLEXIBLE material such as clothing. So that normally you can move freely and easily, bending whatever parts of the clothing as you naturally would, but when there is an impact, that part of the clothing turns into a harder ridgid/solid material, offering more protection. Think of a D&D cloak of resistance geeks. Basically, it would be like wearing a normal median weight flexible clothing that suddenly turns into a suit made of shin guards, but all over the place, including joints.

      Using it on a laptop is silly. The case is already a firm solid. You could get much better protection by just using a harder shell on the laptop. The spinning hard drive is the only part that truly needs a cushy landing if it stops suddenly and is not protected by a hard shell.

    19. Re:I don't get it.. by Dekker3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

      wait... "stopping force proportional to the square of the speed"
      so if something impacts it twice as fast, it'll push back four times as much?

      doesn't that mean it'd be perfect in some kind of new body armour? if it's not too heavy to be useful, that is. or just on the parts that need the most protection..

    20. Re:I don't get it.. by PPH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well the front of normal cars is designed to do that. SUVs are designed to kill people.

      But its the people in the SUV that will be killed . So be happy.

      Most collisions are single vehicle, involving a car with a fixed object. If we assume that most fixed objects are much more rigid than the vehicle, if you have an engineered crush zone, you'll stand a better chance of survival than if you have a rigid frame.

      My SUV is designed so that it's frame doesn't distort when pulling with a winch. A side effect of that is that it has a rigid frame. Too bad for me, but its a decision I made when selecting it. You may feel free to laugh at me when I hit a tree. I laugh as I drive by every poor fool stuck in a snow bank whose car I would destroy trying to winch it out.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    21. Re:I don't get it.. by SkyDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using it on a laptop is silly. The case is already a firm solid. You could get much better protection by just using a harder shell on the laptop.

      Maybe being less clumsy would help? Just a thought......

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    22. Re:I don't get it.. by Muckluck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I must take your disclaimer with a pinch of salt. You are an undergraduate, which implies that you are still studying. Since you are studying, this implies that you are using your brain trying to figure things out. This means that you have NOT yet reached the point where you "know it all" because you have been "doing this for years and this is how everything works". Work as hard as you can not to fall into this type of "Engineer Brain" trap. The older I get, the harder it is to fight... Thanks for a well thought out post and follow up. Makes sense to me...

      --


      --I like turtles...
    23. Re:I don't get it.. by 2gravey · · Score: 1

      "SUVs are designed to kill people."

      Yeah, but not the people in them. They're designed to kill the poor fools in the Prius that the SUV ran into.

    24. Re:I don't get it.. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      No, orange is the right color for Windows. On the color wheel, it's the opposite of blue, fitting, since its effects are the opposite of a crash.

      The orange ball of life.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    25. Re:I don't get it.. by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      No they have been designed for product placement. I imagine a Hummer employee in a suit wandering Hollywood lots: 'Shooting an action movie? History? Was time travel mentioned in the script? Sorry.' (leaves card, goes to next lot) 'Is this a post nuclear Apocalyptic wasteland type movie? Wha--Resident Evil 14! JACKPOT!

      And so on...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    26. Re:I don't get it.. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      But its the people in the SUV that will be killed . So be happy

      Not if it hits a cyclist or a pedestrian. I know those are rarer in the USA, but here in Europe, people are driving around in SUVS and when they hit someone on a bike, or an adult or a child - all of which are also more likely to happen in a SUV due to the height - then the chances of that person being killed are much higher than with a normal car.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    27. Re:I don't get it.. by maharb · · Score: 1

      I think I will wrap my iPod in custard. It will be cheaper.

    28. Re:I don't get it.. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Using it on a laptop is silly. The case is already a firm solid

      Plus, most Slashdot users' laptops already have enough goo on them.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    29. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't laugh when you hit a tree, just when you pay for gas. That's the funny part.

    30. Re:I don't get it.. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Presumably the energy is absorbed by it turning solid.

      It sounds a little bit like what you get when you mix cornstarch and water. If you press it slowly, your finger sinks right in as if it's liquid, if you hit it hard, it's solid.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    31. Re:I don't get it.. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Is why they have running chainsaws on the front.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    32. Re:I don't get it.. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Can play around with a substitute; corn starch and water. Make a thick slurry and you can push your finger through it slowly but if you hit it faster, it hardens up at point of impact. Kinda' wild.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    33. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the same thing initially, however corn starch and water does the exact opposite actually, as the goo gets soft on impact and hard to touch normally.

    34. Re:I don't get it.. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      My guess is that it will be layered with other material.
      By turning hard it will spread out the impact over a larger area.
      A good example of how can work would be to take two sheets of foam. Hit one with a tack hammer.
      Take a piece of plywood and put it on the other sheet of foam and hit that with a tack hammer.hammer.
      So use a layer of the goo and a layer of foam.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    35. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The material does not all instantly turn rigid. If it is indeed like my motorcycle armor, it is viscoelastic, with extreme emphasis on the visco-. Energy is absorbed by the viscosity, but the load is also spread over a wider area as the material deforms. I have tested, and you really can hit this stuff pretty hard and not hurt yourself. The load is comfortably spread over the surface of several knuckles, not just the point of the first knuckle to make contact.

      Motorcycle knee padding (for street riding anyway) is about 1/2" [12mm] thickness of this stuff.

    36. Re:I don't get it.. by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      very thin on facts and "how it works".

      Oh come now. The promotional video is FUCKING EXTREME! With snowboards! And Punk! What more could you possibly want?!

    37. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of a D&D cloak of resistance geeks.
      So it improves willpower as well!?

    38. Re:I don't get it.. by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      That is assuming that they are hitting other cars and not a wall. In which case, the wall usually wins.

      Also take into account their propensity to roll over and you have a deathtrap on wheels (maybe a rolling deathtrap?)

    39. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using it on a laptop is silly. The case is already a firm solid

      Plus, most Slashdot users' laptops already have enough goo on them.

      I think you're on to something! Maybe the orange goo is really Cheetos-based? I think they turn solid in my tummy.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheetos

    40. Re:I don't get it.. by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      The gas mileage depends. I live on top of a hill, and my Jeep Liberty actually gets better gas mileage on the hill than regular cars, simply because it is more able to make it up the hill.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    41. Re:I don't get it.. by felipekk · · Score: 1

      They should make the airbags on SUVs out of this material!

    42. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Gallagher's gonna be pissed.

    43. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but not the people in them. They're designed to kill the poor fools in the Prius that the SUV ran over.


      Fixed that for you

    44. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a really lousy tow truck driver if you destroy cars merely by pulling them out of a snowbank. Restrict yourself to pulling SUVs out or learn basket weaving. In my experience, SUVs get stuck more often, mainly because their drivers fail to understand that four-wheel drive makes them accelerate faster *but not stop any faster* than other cars. To the extent that they have more weight per tire contact, they in fact stop slower than a regular car. Then they forget about slowly rocking a tire out of an ice spot and instead try to gun the 4WD.

      Not all SUV drivers are arrogant. But you better not come my car if ever I need a tow.

    45. Re:I don't get it.. by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Actually, no, this stuff is also shear-thickening. It is just plasticised so it doesn't run.

      Something that softens on impact would be something like ketchup.

    46. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kate Bush, is that you?

    47. Re:I don't get it.. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      When I was working for General Dynamics two years ago they used a similar material. Its main purpose was to prevent the resistors or ICs from "popping off" like popcorn during heavy vibration.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    48. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "this means that the material starts acting from the very moment of impact, as that is the point with the highest speed"

      Are you saying that different points of the laptop are moving at different speeds???

    49. Re:I don't get it.. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Interesting
      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    50. Re:I don't get it.. by denobug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. to fit the poor soccer mom and her four pretty girl in a busy schedule. Or on a long family trip where the parents up front can stop hearing kids constantly asking "are we there yet?"

      I hate to break it to the urban dwellers, but there are plenty of folks in Unites States that lives well outside of the city limits of a major city. I know plenty of folks who dislike the crowded city and choose to live in smaller towns. In the case where driving 100+ miles are short for a family trip over the weekend an SUV of reasonable size is actually very well suited for a family's needs. It is not evil (just as those small-town folks don't call a dirty major metropolitan bad--they just don't like it), it is just a different way of life.

      I'm not suggesting that the we don't need to improve the gas miilage of the SUV category. I just think that the space requirements are truely appealing and there can be a compromise between the space and fuel efficiency, and the fact that one out of several vehicle a family owned in US is an reasonable sized SUV, not necessarily a beast such as a Suburban, is a bad thing.

    51. Re:I don't get it.. by severoon · · Score: 1

      The idea is that parts of the compound under high stress solidify, transmitting the energy of the drop into other parts of the goo, diffusing it over a wide surface area (actually, what makes it so effective is that it's transmitted through the entire volume, *not* just along the surface).

      This stuff is comprised of macromolecules, same as if you mix a little corn starch and water. The molecules are big and have trouble navigating past one another, so under stress they tend to get tangled up and not slip by each other. The more stress -> the more friction -> the more energy absorbed.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    52. Re:I don't get it.. by denobug · · Score: 1

      I won't laugh when you hit a tree, just when you pay for gas. That's the funny part.

      My small SUV gets great milage than a 10-year old Accord. You point being?

    53. Re:I don't get it.. by Alef · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is rather to distribute the impact over a larger area of your body or whatever is being protected. That's why for instance a shin guard is hard (though padded on the inside). The problem with hard protection is that it inhibits your movement -- you don't want to go downhill skiing in a Star Wars stormtrooper armour. So if the protection is soft whenever moving normally it's a big advantage.

    54. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you live somewhere near snow.

      I grew up near San Francisco and moved to Iowa. I always laughed, even then, at the behemoths that never even went to the mountains- like they really need it in Orinda or Concord- especially with gold fucking spinners.

    55. Re:I don't get it.. by peragrin · · Score: 3, Informative

      SUV's only roll over due to stupid drivers. you really have to make a sharp fast turn to roll an SUV. Like 90 turn at 50mph.

      The biggest probleem is that the average driver can't adjust their driving depending on the type of vehicle. Going from sports car to SUV is very different. They don't handle the same.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    56. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "SUVs are designed to kill people."

      Yeah, but not the people in them.

      And that is the real tragedy.

    57. Re:I don't get it.. by Tanman · · Score: 0

      Then your assumption is horribly, horribly inaccurate.

      Did you know a steering column can hole-punch the human torso?

    58. Re:I don't get it.. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I always assumed that the reason for the crumple was to maximize the cost of repair ultimately necessitating the purchase of a new vehicle.

      A little from column A, and a little from column B. You can hardly pay for repairs or a new vehicle if you died in the crash.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    59. Re:I don't get it.. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It works the same way as the safety foam in Demolition Man.

      Though seriously that idea bothered me - it seems like if the foam could fill the inside of your car so quickly it would also fill your airways and kill you horribly.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    60. Re:I don't get it.. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Until it passes the failure point. Concrete is strong in compression until you get too much weight on it, then it crumbles. Same concept. If the material at it's hardest isn't enough to resist a bullet, it'll be useless. Maybe behind an armor plate of some sort that won't deform, thereby spreading out the forces though...

    61. Re:I don't get it.. by kpainter · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!!

    62. Re:I don't get it.. by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Will the three people above me jump off of a cliff plz thx

    63. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SUV's only roll over due to stupid drivers. you really have to make a sharp fast turn to roll an SUV. Like 90 turn at 50mph.

      Most drivers are stupid drivers and you can roll most SUVs at low speed by hitting the curb while cornering.

    64. Re:I don't get it.. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You first. I promise I'll make sure the other two jump after you.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    65. Re:I don't get it.. by brkello · · Score: 1

      Uh no, that's not quite how it works.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    66. Re:I don't get it.. by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Then enlighten me, where is that extra gas mileage coming from? Or are the gas meter and odometer lying to me? I know how to do simple arithmetic. I realize normally it would get worse mileage (trust me, I don't dare take it on the highway...), but it does get better mileage when driven only on the hill and around town. It isn't wasting so much energy as heat from having to open the throttle so much farther. It is pretty thirsty on normal roads though.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    67. Re:I don't get it.. by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Allow me to clarify: the gas mileage doesn't actually improve (all cars do worse on hills), but other cars' mileages become much worse.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    68. Re:I don't get it.. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I always assumed that the reason for the crumple was to maximize the cost of repair ultimately necessitating the purchase of a new vehicle.

      Nah, that's the reason for putting a pretty, painted conformal plastic fascia on a frigging *bumper*.

      Cost to fix a 15 mph rear-end hit on a Lexus RX: thousands of dollars and hours of labor to replace the bumper, fascia, etc.

      Cost to fix a 15 mph rear-end hit on my 2002 Sierra with a solid steel bumper: $80 and 10 minutes for the body shop to pull it straight, and you can't tell it's been hit otherwise. Alternately, I can stick an aftermarket bumper on there for $200, and also in about 10 minutes.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    69. Re:I don't get it.. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I laugh as I drive by every poor fool stuck in a snow bank whose car I would destroy trying to winch it out.

      Oddly enough, my Oldsmobile comes with pre-made hookup points for towing it. Now, maybe that's an exclusive feature of such high-end luxury cars, but I doubt it.

      Honestly, did you think SUVs were the first vehicles that ever got towed?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    70. Re:I don't get it.. by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Funny

      you don't want to go downhill skiing in a Star Wars stormtrooper armour

      Speak for yourself!

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    71. Re:I don't get it.. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      People soften on impact...

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    72. Re:I don't get it.. by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Isn't the point of protection to absorb the impact? That's why bubble-wrap is squishy. If this instantly turns solid, wouldn't that mean that the g-forces, the energy of the impact is not absorbed by it and is thus transferred to the item inside?

      I'm not sure I get it, either... But, consider what happens if you drop a laptop: odds are that the point of impact will be fairly small (i.e. one of the corners will reach the ground before the rest of the machine) - if the machine is surrounded by a material that's very nearly solid and which conforms well to the shape of the laptop, it will transfer the impact to the laptop - but over a larger surface area.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    73. Re:I don't get it.. by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      No, at different points *in time* the laptop is moving at different speeds. At the moment of impact, it won't be getting any faster after that, only slower.

    74. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be hard to accidentally roll a modern SUV, but their handling still sucks. Which means that it is often impossible to avoid an impact that would have been trivial to steer around in a sporty sedan.

    75. Re:I don't get it.. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yeah, turning solid instantly is not going to protect anything. You may as well have a solid to start with. On the other hand, staying goo the whole doesn't do too much either (though it has some protection). The transition from one state to the other is important, plus the right amount of deceleration, and how the energy from the impact is transferred out from a single point throughout the substance. So the question ignored by the article is why is this better than rubber, foam, balloons, etc?

    76. Re:I don't get it.. by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      Maybe being less clumsy would help?

      Clumsy is not a choice. Clumsies unite!

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    77. Re:I don't get it.. by Graff · · Score: 3, Informative

      My SUV is designed so that it's frame doesn't distort when pulling with a winch. A side effect of that is that it has a rigid frame. Too bad for me, but its a decision I made when selecting it.

      Rigid under tension is not the same as rigid under compression. Most SUV's are designed with hardened points for towing (tension) but they still have crush zones for accidents (compression). In fact, because of the size, the crush zones in an SUV are often larger and more effective than those in a smaller car.

      Overall, you are safer in an accident when you are in an SUV than when you are in a smaller car. Of course, this does vary according to the type of accident and overall safety design of the vehicle. You also have to factor in that SUV's are more susceptible to some kinds of accidents than other cars.

    78. Re:I don't get it.. by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      It improves going downhill.

    79. Re:I don't get it.. by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I'm pretty sure that's the only way I want to go skiing down a hill. I'd be far more likely to be unharmed when I inevitably hit a tree if am am wearing stormtrooper armor than normal ski clothes.

      And that is in addition to the shear coolness factor of stoomtrooper Skiing.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    80. Re:I don't get it.. by hippo_of_knowledge · · Score: 1

      Therefore, people are made of ketchup. QED

    81. Re:I don't get it.. by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Of course, it would be great to improve the fuel mileage of an SUV. And of course, people purchase an SUV when they, strictly speaking, don't 'NEED' an SUV... although it's a bit arrogant for people to make that judgment.

      But the hostility towards SUVs is a bit crazy. It's obviously become a figurehead, a symbol that an entire group of people have learned to just despise in an unreasoning, emotional sense. People in this thread have commented about how SUVs 'offend' them; jokes are made about how worthless the 'soccer moms' who drive them are, and about how them dying wouldn't be a bad thing. Crazy. Slashdot posters should be smarter than that, they shouldn't get THAT caught up in an irrational movement against something.

    82. Re:I don't get it.. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Cost to not be a fucking moron and avoid the crash: priceless.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    83. Re:I don't get it.. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Priceless? I suppose. The transporter technology necessary to beam my truck out of the way of the guy that hit me from behind while I was stopped at a light probably would have been quite a pretty penny.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    84. Re:I don't get it.. by Tanman · · Score: 1

      It'd be funny if a lot of people did not genuinely wonder why their car bends and breaks so easily in a wreck when it seems like repairs would be cheaper if they didn't. Cars did not always have crumple zones, and for a long time the thought was that you wanted the car to be unbreakable so that it could 'win' in collisions. It is only since more modern safety modifications have come to pass that people realized you don't want the force of the accident transferred to the occupants.

      Hell, crumple zones were only added to many pickup trucks in the last 10 years or so. Before then, and even more recently for some models, they were built like battering rams with stiff pillars that were hardened to increase carrying capacity with no thought for safety.

    85. Re:I don't get it.. by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Oh really? I had no idea it went downhill too!

      I'm comparing it with other cars on the same hill. With the same uphill parts, and the same downhill parts.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    86. Re:I don't get it.. by metaforest · · Score: 1

      The odd thing is that this orange goo has been qualified for use in Motorcycle racing body armor. Thats not something I'd expect from a gimmicky respin of Silly Putty.

      I suspect they still have some ridged material over the goo to keep it from abrading. Could be just Kevlar layers or some other flexible abrasion resistant material. It seems to me that the IP holder is being very careful not to let the cat out of the bag before they have a lot of licenses tied up. It might be that there is a whole class of related materials they want to develop.

      Anyhoo.... neat stuff.

    87. Re:I don't get it.. by lcllam · · Score: 1

      How did this thing get a patent again? It seems to do everything Silly Putty (tm) does.

    88. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and it's not orange.

      Although it may glow in the night.

    89. Re:I don't get it.. by Ambvai · · Score: 1

      "The effect is that low velocity impacts are passed through easily but high velocity impact causes the surface tension to rapidly increase and prevents entry."

      That sounds remarkably like a Holtzman shield, courtesy of Dune.

    90. Re:I don't get it.. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      You stopped poorly and didn't leave yourself an out. Not my fault you can't drive.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    91. Re:I don't get it.. by stupid_is · · Score: 1

      Indeed they are

      --
      -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
    92. Re:I don't get it.. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I remember back when trolling was actually an entertaining art that took skill, instead of just simple-minded ad homs.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    93. Re:I don't get it.. by Daravon · · Score: 1

      Fun fact. A Ford F150's trailer hitch is at the right level to go over the bumper, but under the hood, of a Ford Focus. This has the effect of hooking the radiator and putting it on top of the engine, instead of in front of the engine where it belongs. This makes a low speed crash (under 15 MPH) cost well over a thousand dollars to fix.

      --
      I traded all my mod points for these magic beans.
    94. Re:I don't get it.. by PPH · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, my Oldsmobile comes with pre-made hookup points for towing it.

      And I don't know where they are. Or whether you do either. So, when I'm driving by and you're stuck in the snow, I'll just have to advise you to call for that $100 tow. I'm not risking a law suite for pulling your high end car's frame apart.

      And I can't loan you my Hi-Lift jack either. Hook that to the bumper of a modern car and it'll bugger up the energy absorbing structures.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    95. Re:I don't get it.. by PPH · · Score: 1

      Rigid under tension is not the same as rigid under compression. Most SUV's are designed with hardened points for towing (tension) but they still have crush zones for accidents (compression).

      True. But the towing points are in the rear. The most critical crush zone is in the front (the direction of travel producing the greatest kinetic energy). Take a look at the winch kits necessary to attach a unit to the front of a car-based SUV. They look like a complete load bearing sub-frame. Which I'm sure destroys the 'crushability' of the front end. My truck's frame actually extends beyond the body, so the winch adapter is basically an I-beam that bolts to the frame rails with a slot for the winch cable.

      In fact, because of the size, the crush zones in an SUV are often larger and more effective than those in a smaller car.

      In a car-based SUV. Not truck based*. I'm admitting that, in the event of a frontal collision, my truck will probably survive whilst I will be cut in half by my seat-belt decelerating me. That's the breaks.

      *Do keep in mind that many trucks today are actually a hybrid of a car and truck. Not something I'd expect to tolerate rugged use.

      Overall, you are safer in an accident when you are in an SUV than when you are in a smaller car.

      I think the reason is: seating position. I have a photo somewhere of my Landcruisers, Porsche and RX-7 parked side by side. The bumper heights match within inches. But if you take a look at the occupant's position w.r.t the 'bumper line', in the sports cars, its about mid-torso. In the SUVs, its down below the passengers feet. So a low car getting hit by another low car puts passengers at more risk than an SUV getting hit by another SUV. Particularly when getting T-boned.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    96. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, SUVs are NOT safer, they just make our reptilian brains think we're safer. See http://www.gladwell.com/2004/2004_01_12_a_suv.html

      Just like cupholders. :-)

    97. Re:I don't get it.. by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Um yeah, That is why 99% of the products listed on the website are various types of armor (such as ski-suits that absorb the impact of the gate poles for people who ski competitively). It just isn't strong enough to absorb the impact of bullets, etc. Or at least they aren't talking about it.

    98. Re:I don't get it.. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Who's trolling, I just about guarantee I've got more miles with more different vehicle types under my belt than you, and I find your lack of skill typical amongst drivers.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    99. Re:I don't get it.. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Sure you do.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    100. Re:I don't get it.. by peragrin · · Score: 1

      If your hitting curbs while cornering you have already done some wrong and while a car may not flip it will be out of alignment and unsafe to drive.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    101. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely not true. I rolled my wife's Suburban doing only 30 mph. Another driver hit my rear passenger door doing 20-30 mph, pushed our truck sideways across 2 lanes of traffic and snapped the rear axle shaft when the driver rear tire hit the curb of the median. When the rear end fell onto the dirt of the median after going over the curb, it dug in and caused the truck to roll completely over. I unbuckled & crawled out the back window unharmed.

      I'm glad I was in the Suburban and not some little hybrid. The guy who hit me was driving a Ford E-350 work van loaded with tools & equipment. The passenger compartment of my truck was largely intact, with only some broken glass that made it past the side curtain air bags. Every single body panel on the truck except the rear end was damaged, but the inside was fine. The doors where he hit me crumpled and looked like I was hit by a dump truck; they were compressed at least a foot. But the inside looked normal as far as I could tell - the doors "crumpled" just like the front end would have in a head-on.

      My truck was totaled. I went out the next week and bought a new one.

    102. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done a 90 degree turn through an abrupt corner at about 60~65mph with a Ford Explorer.

      4 tire slide, would never do it again, but didn't roll. I have a feeling that it would take 75~80 to roll it.

  2. Re:I've got your goo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    But is it orange?

  3. I didn't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could ski uphill

  4. Could it be... by rcb1974 · · Score: 1

    flubber?

    1. Re:Could it be... by boliboboli · · Score: 1

      flubber?

      I have a visual of a laptop bouncing higher and higher and higher. 6lbs of PlayDoh might work better.

    2. Re:Could it be... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Old news actually. They have been selling the stuff in blue at thinkgeek for years: http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/cubegoodies/5ac8/

    3. Re:Could it be... by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

      Personally when I read the blurb I thought of the car scene in Demolition Man with the foam. Here's a video if you don't remember.

    4. Re:Could it be... by morghanphoenix · · Score: 1

      Oobleck!

  5. typo, as seen on tv by stiller · · Score: 1, Informative

    First of, it's 3do (three-dee-oh): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D3o
    3DO was a video game company and console: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_3DO_Company
    This product, as applied to laptop cases, was recently pitched on Dragon's Den (BBC): http://www.bbc.co.uk/dragonsden/entrepreneurs/jasonroberts.shtml

    1. Re:typo, as seen on tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks like the dyslexia is contagious today.

    2. Re:typo, as seen on tv by OrangeTide · · Score: 0

      I like how you sounded it out wrong too. Did it hurt when you fell off your high horse?

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:typo, as seen on tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of, it's 3do (three-dee-oh): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D3o

      Everyone clear now?

      Wow.

    4. Re:typo, as seen on tv by rvw · · Score: 4, Informative

      First of, it's 3do (three-dee-oh): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D3o

      Sorry, but it's d3o!

    5. Re:typo, as seen on tv by laejoh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lexdysia you mean!

    6. Re:typo, as seen on tv by stiller · · Score: 1

      Damn it, I messed up the correction! Still modded Informative though, I guess nobody cares...

    7. Re:typo, as seen on tv by Kreigaffe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Misinformation is still information, after all.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    8. Re:typo, as seen on tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I put the sex in dyslexia!

    9. Re:typo, as seen on tv by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      Damn, I was hoping I could call it "trey-doh", and get a patent for a device that presses it into lines of different shapes.

    10. Re:typo, as seen on tv by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I think you meant to say lysdexia.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    11. Re:typo, as seen on tv by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Dyslexics Untie!

    12. Re:typo, as seen on tv by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Either way, it sounds like C-3P0 and R2-D2 decided to have a baby.

      (Hopefully George Lucas won't read this post; I don't think the world needs a 'Baby Droids' show)

    13. Re:typo, as seen on tv by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Well, he meant to make that joke, but he's dyslexic.

      Sam

  6. Re:I've got your goo! by isama · · Score: 1

    I hope not! :) And I'd hate to find out!

  7. Aha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this is what they're doing with all that left over building sand from the stagnating construction industry.

    1. Re:Aha by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      No California's on fire, it's part of the stimulus package;)

      If JPL burns down it'll cost a lot to build a new one.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    2. Re:Aha by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Put it out with Kool Aid

      --

      I can't load this thing, its locked.

  8. I'm a little bit skeptical. by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Impact resistance is complicated, but there's parts that are very, very simple. Let's say you drop your laptop from five feet up. When it hits the ground, it'll be going at a certain velocity (I am currently too lazy to calculate it) with a certain amount of momentum. That velocity and momentum will go into crushing the impact point against the ground. If the impact point is forced to decelerate rapidly, and is a small enough point, it'll be subject to a huge amount of force. Boom, shattered plastic.

    Now we add padding. The thing about padding is that it doesn't actually reduce the velocity or momentum in any way (in fact, unless it's literally weightless, it *increases* momentum.) It also doesn't change the basic physical requirements - that momentum will get absorbed somewhere. Guaranteed.

    There's two ways the padding helps. First, it lets your dropped object decelerate more slowly - instead of having to go from fall to stop in a tiny distance (namely, the amount your laptop plastic deforms without permanent damage) it goes from fall to stop in a much larger distance - the distance that the padding can be compressed. (Plus the plastic deformation.)

    Second, it provides - potentially - a larger impact zone, distributing the force more equally over the plastic of the laptop. A force that would shatter a corner may not do much at all distributed over a few square inches.

    The first part, unfortunately, has some very basic physical limits. If the padding is an eighth of an inch thick, it will provide, at most, an eighth of an inch of extra speed reduction. There is just no way to improve this until you fit your shock absorber with little rockets and sensors to determine when it's about to impact the ground.

    The second part is a lot more theoretically capable, but also a whole lot harder to solve. The ideal situation is a material that somehow deforms at the impact spot in exactly the manner that lets it stop at its maximum deformation point, without any extra jerks or impacts, while simultaneously spreading the impact over the entire surface of the protected item.

    That is a damn hard thing to accomplish. If he's succeeded in it, or in anything remotely like it, I'm impressed.

    The press releases seem to feel that d3o is absolutely fantastic for human garments, where the fabric has to be malleable until the impact occurs. That's quite different from electronics protection, where malleability is simply not an issue, and I'm not convinced that it will make the changeover smoothly.

    We'll see.

    --
    Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    1. Re:I'm a little bit skeptical. by gringer · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is just no way to improve this until you fit your shock absorber with little rockets and sensors to determine when it's about to impact the ground.

      A bit like this, perhaps?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgXXCSlt7uI

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
    2. Re:I'm a little bit skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And protecting bones is easier than protecting heads. They don't say anything about contre-coup.

    3. Re:I'm a little bit skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If the padding is an eighth of an inch thick, it will provide, at most, an eighth of an inch of extra speed reduction.

      Speed reduction is not measured in inches.

      The idea is that the "impulse" (the change in momentum) is spread out more evenly over the eighth of an inch, so that the maximum force *at any single point in time* is reduced.

    4. Re:I'm a little bit skeptical. by anotherhappycamper · · Score: 1

      Way cool!!! I want one but google is coming up blank. Anyone know where they sell Levonos?

    5. Re:I'm a little bit skeptical. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Stuff like this has been around for a while. I got some stuff back in '03 called Crazy Aaron's Thinking Putty or something like that for stress relief. It has many of the same physical attributes of this d3o stuff, and even moves/shapes the same way when not-firm. I'd make a ball from it and throw it against the wall, or punch the ball. It was great stress relief for the time (I spent a lot of time on the phone for support). Within a certain threshold, it was/is malleable, but hit it and it's very firm.

      I also have a pair of Impact Gel shoe inserts. They work in much the same way, though they are a different type of material. On impact, they get hard. They help markedly with heavy walking on hard materials.

      I think stuff like this has been around for quite some time. This company is just taking the same basic thing, putting it in a brand-recognizable 'container', finding a good application for it and marketing it up the wazoo. Kind of like Apple does with all their products.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  9. just need orange food coloring.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://recipes.wikia.com/wiki/Magic_mud

    1. Re:just need orange food coloring.. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      BTW, I did something similar using custard powder (Which is basically just cornstarch + colouring) and it worked just as well.

      Just put custard powder in a bowl then add a small amount of water. It's great fun to play with.

  10. great by Dayofswords · · Score: 1

    now you can protect your ipod from yourself

    --
    Someday we'll hit the human carrying capacity. And the band will just play on.
  11. I saw this on TV months ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot always seems to be the slowest site to break news.

  12. Silly Putty? by LS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And this differs from Silly Putty how?

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:Silly Putty? by supernova_hq · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is very similar to silly putty except that it does not "run" when left sitting on a table. The last thing you want your armor to do is pool around your waste.

      My guess is they somehow increased the stiffness of it at the low-velocity stage.

    2. Re:Silly Putty? by EnglishTim · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is very similar to silly putty except that it does not "run" when left sitting on a table. The last thing you want your armor to do is pool around your waste.

      I don't think you'd want your waste to pool around your armour, either...

    3. Re:Silly Putty? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 0

      It's more expensive. And isn't silly :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    4. Re:Silly Putty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I don't want your waste anywhere near my pool

    5. Re:Silly Putty? by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      I don't think you'd want your waste to pool around your armour, either...

      That's called passive deterrence.

    6. Re:Silly Putty? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      And this differs from Silly Putty how?

      Exactly - it's just another viscoelastic. The viscosity vs. flow rate curve is different, but the concept is the same as silly putty.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    7. Re:Silly Putty? by SammyIAm · · Score: 1

      Ah good, I was hoping someone would make the Silly Putty link.

  13. Goes hard on impact? by jsse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't that something every man wanted? Sounds like a perfect material for condom!

    Though I'd worry orange penis would turn off sex desire.

    1. Re:Goes hard on impact? by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd worry orange penis would turn off sex desire.

      You gotta lay off the Cheetos when you're surfing pr0n....

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    2. Re:Goes hard on impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though I'd worry orange penis would turn off sex desire.

      Those Oompa Loompa tanning salon clients don't seem to share your worry.

    3. Re:Goes hard on impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect for a condom

      We don't know if it's porosity, therefore we don't know if it would be good as a johnny.
      But, it might be good as a pocket pussy.

    4. Re:Goes hard on impact? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Aussie translation: Munchie munchie twisties.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:Goes hard on impact? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Isn't that something every man wanted? Sounds like a perfect material for condom!

      wait, you've used one before, right?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:Goes hard on impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though I'd worry orange penis would turn off sex desire.

      It's well known fact, that orange color rises appetite, so...

  14. BullGOO by IAmKidding · · Score: 0

    GOO is shit in indian language!!!!

  15. Old News by SJ2000 · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Old News by adamchou · · Score: 1

      hell, i learned this in my high school science class. just add corn starch to water.

    2. Re:Old News by Ma8thew · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you have a huge mess. But this goo retains and will return to its original shape.

  16. They've...created Gak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember seeing this on nickelodeon.

  17. These fluids are sometimes also called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Tixotropes. They have been around for a long time, and you can even make them using standard household ingredients (homemade silly putty f.e..)

  18. Armorgel from Snow Crash? by Fex303 · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anyone else of the armorgel in Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash?

    Liquid that hardens on impact, mostly used in body armor, looks like gritty jello... Certainly sounds like the same kinda stuff.

    I hope Stephenson's getting a cut. So many things from that book have come to pass that I'm getting worried about an insane Aelut showing up with a nuke...

    1. Re:Armorgel from Snow Crash? by Barny · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he should get a cut for describing non-Newtonian fluids...

      Good foresight, yes, getting a cut of something that has been around for a LONG time, no.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:Armorgel from Snow Crash? by alop · · Score: 1

      OMG, I was thinking the same thing. Google Earth is the biggest example. As for Raven... I'd be more worried about people on board airplanes with glass knives.

      Seriously, that book has had a profound impact on modern technology, albeit mostly unacknowledged.
      Earth -> Google Earth
      Stringers -> Bloggers
      MetaVerse -> ?? Second Life ?

      Look for ArachnoFiber around the corner

      --
      --alop
    3. Re:Armorgel from Snow Crash? by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Does this remind anyone else of the armorgel in Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash?

      I think Niven did it first in one of his Ringworld books.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
  19. cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My professor in engineering mechanics showed me a sample of a material with very similar color and characteristics sometime around october '08. Now I know, where I can get a sample for goofing around ;)

    However, this won't protect your precious harddisk. It works very well for protecting humans, mainly because it adapts to the form of the pressing surfaces (aka your head and a wall) and then distributes the pressure over a bigger area. It does almost nothing though for the rate of deceleration - face it, your notebook, falling from the table goes from v^2=2*g*s (s= table height, let's say 0.8m)=4m/s to zero in about - well, let's say 1mm as this stuff gets rigid very quickly. This makes it face a deceleration of 8000g. Hell, let's say 5mm and it's still 1600g. Nope, this won't save your harddisk as they're rated for 300 to 500g in every direction and a lot less when active. Thinking about it, it seems like a good idea for the notebook to come apart on impact, as this might give your harddisk another few millimeters for controlled deceleration and thus keep it withing mechanical specs.

    In other words: Yes, the surface of your precious Macbook will be scratchfree after the fall, the harddisk will still be toast.

    1. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by silanea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In other words: Yes, the surface of your precious Macbook will be scratchfree after the fall, the harddisk will still be toast.

      So? A new harddisk is cheaper than a new laptop. And since you diligently maintained your backups...

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    2. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Does this apply to harddisks with parked heads, or just those in use? The macbook has had accelerometers for years to autopark the heads if you drop it. I expect that they've made it onto windows machines now as well. Does this change the problem, or or does the deceleration still kill the disk?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    3. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Bazar · · Score: 1

      HD's can cover about 20g while in use. So as long as there are no sudden jerks, its fine for even mobile use.
      When the drive heads are parked, its about 200-300g. Which is enough for small falls, and large jerks.

      For all the talk about HD's being protected, its actually the casing and the motherboard that stands to benefit. Hell, newer laptops have the HD bay easily accessible for HD replacement.
      But if the case is damaged, then the whole thing needs to be repaired. A laptop with a a damaged power socket, or broken wifi antenna/wire isn't easily fixable.

      --
      To avoid criticism; Say nothing, Do nothing, Be nothing.
    4. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Ma8thew · · Score: 5, Funny

      Continuing their history of innovation, my MacBook parks the heads of its SSD during a sudden drop. Beat that Dell.

    5. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That math is assuming a completely rigid laptop, is it not? I have never seen a rigid laptop. Most laptops have a little bit of shock absorption for the hard drives. Combine that with the added protection and it may be good enough. What would the g-forces be without the silly putty?

    6. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by metlin · · Score: 1

      Makes a (I was going to say solid) case for a solid state drive, eh?

      I mean, the more you decrease your moving parts the better.

    7. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure IBM introduced the 'park the heads when dropped' tech for their thinkpad.

    8. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Mia'cova · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be clear, I meant IBM invented/introduced it before apple started buying hard disks featuring the tech.

    9. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > So? A new harddisk is cheaper than a new laptop. And since you diligently maintained your backups...

      Mod parent WAY up. It might be irrelevant for netbooks and cheap notebooks from Best Buy, but if you're talking about a kilobuck+ Macbook or high-end performance notebook, the hard drive isn't just one of its cheapest components... it's also one of its few components that can be easily replaced by end users, with a part that's readily-available even in small towns, often on sale, and frequently would result in improved performance over the original part. Try buying a new Thinkpad keyboard, Macbook case, or Dell motherboard at Best Buy on Sunday afternoon at some city in the midwestern US with a population of ~500k living within a fifty-mile radius. Hell, with the possible exceptions of Silicon Valley, Hong Kong, and Akihabara , I doubt whether there's anyplace you could walk into a retail store and buy stuff like that at all, let alone on a weekend.

    10. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Continuing their history of innovation, my MacBook parks the heads of its SSD during a sudden drop. Beat that Dell.

      Marked informative? SSDs don't have heads to park.

    11. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your solid state disk has a head on it? Wow, Apple sure is innovating, adding moving parts to their solid state disks!

    12. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To Everyone who modded parent as "informative":

      WHOOOSH.

    13. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      informative? that made me laugh

    14. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is his modded "Informative"?? SSDs don't have magnetic heads (or any other mechanical parts) that need to be parked!

    15. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by temojen · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can order most of these parts from Dell and Lenovo if your laptop or it's damage is not covered by warranty.

    16. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by darthflo · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking a lot of effort may be going in just the opposite direction. Most of the people spending (justified) kilobucks on notebooks tend to either be enthusiasts or companies equipping key employees.

      For the former, not having that favourite toy/tool/device some work is done on sometimes probably sucks quite a bit but won't really cause any monetary impact through missed deadlines or similar. They may be gamers, Apple customers or Bloggers. Lots of pretty, high-powered models to go around, probably the likes of Macbooks, Dell XPS' and similars.

      Very few of those folks will buy next-day on-site warranty. Most can do the wait until stores are open again and get the device repaired/replaced then. Those who can't tend to be able to hack together some kind of solution or find a replacement that's Good Enough. All of those would probably favour indestructible notebooks with easy-to-replace hard drives, but my guess is this isn't where the money is:

      The latter group do (some|lots|all) of their work on their notebook. On the road there may be days worth of unsynced (and thus un-backupped) data lying around on their hard drive. Losing that would bring problems to their company. Lots of Thinkpads, Latitudes and HP gear around here, of which lots will have 24-hour on-site replacement or better. That category is where lots of the money's at. They get the new safety upgrades first and in the most complete fashion. For example, current ThinkPads get a (very fucking hard) plastic shell, containing at least a display roll cage, a roll cage for the system portion containing, once again, another roll cage for the (vibration-dampened) hard drive. Of course the devices get more robust, but the focus lies quite clearly on the hard drive. Essentially it's a deal along the lines of "Smash it with a sledge hammer, burn it in a fire, then drive over it (twice; once to slice open the tires, then to get that beautiful metal-on-metal sound): your data is still fine and inside another shell within 24 hours". It's the difference between a toy (screw the data, replace the drive) and a tool (screw the shell and save the data), and tools are what money is made with.

    17. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by darthflo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hard Drive Active Protection System; around in ThinkPads since about 2003.

      Sudden Motion Sensor; Macbooks since 2005.

    18. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an Apple innovation. Intel and Western Digital (and even some Seagate) hard drives do the same...

    19. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be irrelevant for netbooks

      From what I can tell, netbooks are currently the most popular place to replace the mecanical fragile harddrive with more durable flash. If this is irrelevant for netbooks, it's because the storage is (often) one of the more durable parts - not because it's cheap. Flash storage with this goo could lead to a fairly durable solution to portable computing.

    20. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      My professor in engineering mechanics showed me a sample of a material with very similar color and characteristics sometime around october '08. Now I know, where I can get a sample for goofing around ;)

      When I was doing physics demos for a living, we made similar stuff out of water and corn starch. The best demo we managed was to take a big rubbermaid container and fill it about ankle-deep with the stuff, which took maybe 4 kilos of corn starch and about 10 liters or so of water. Then we'd take a small kid from the audience and have him take his shoes off and jump in the container and stomp his feet as fast as he could. As long as he did that he was standing on top of the material as if it were sand. Then we'd have him stop and he'd sink, quickly, to the bottom. Like 'glup!' and his feet were through the liquid. Then one of us would grab him by the chest and lift him up and shake him and the container would still be stuck to his feet, until we stopped, at which point it'd fall off onto the floor. It was not our most spectacular demo but it was close.

      This message brought to you by thixotropy, rheopecty, dilatants, and shear thinning. (Did you know that synovial fluid and semen are both thixotropic? I didn't until I read about it a bit.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    21. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait wait, parks the heads of it's SSD? That's one mighty unique SSD you've got there... Unless of course you meant HDD.

      SSDs don't have heads.

    22. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      The best demo we managed was to take a big rubbermaid container and fill it about ankle-deep with the stuff, which took maybe 4 kilos of corn starch and about 10 liters or so of water.

      If that's the best you could do, you're a piker. My sister likes to watch The Ellen DeGeneres Show, and told me about a demo of this they did about a year or so ago. Their tub of Oobleck was about the size of a bathtub, and they had an adult from the audience running back and forth over it.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    23. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by hankwang · · Score: 1

      (s= table height, let's say 0.8m)=4m/s to zero in about - well, let's say 1mm as this stuff gets rigid very quickly. This makes it face a deceleration of 8000g. Hell, let's say 5mm and it's still 1600g.

      You are mixing g units (9.8 m/s^2) with SI units (m/s^2). The number of g's during deceleration is simply the ratio of fall height to deceleration distance. For 0.005 m, you get 0.8 m/0.005 = 160 g, which is something that a parked hard disk should be able to handle.

    24. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSD = Solid state & no moving parts... I have a flash drive (form of SSD) that went through the wash & dryer... still works w/no problems... Also, they don't have heads:P

    25. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "my MacBook parks the heads of its SSD during a sudden drop."

      "heads of its SSD"

      "SSD"

      "Dental plan."

    26. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Were you dropped on your head as a child? The GP clearly mentioned walking into a retail store.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    27. Re:cool stuff, but not for this purpose by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      "My sister likes to watch The Ellen DeGeneres Show,"

      Your sister eh? Sure.......

  20. Tech21 iBand tested on video by andylim · · Score: 3, Informative

    We have a video test of the iBand that shows how d3o works and features a drop test. http://recombu.com/news/tech21-iband-serious-impact-protection-proved-on-video-_M11064-1.html

    1. Re:Tech21 iBand tested on video by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      How does that protec the internal components from rapid deceleration?

    2. Re:Tech21 iBand tested on video by DaveGod · · Score: 1

      The phone has a flash drive.

    3. Re:Tech21 iBand tested on video by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      True, but the HD isn't the only thing that can be shock-sensitive.

      My comment was more on the lines of the summary/article on slashdot mentioning "Laptop" and VERY few laptops having only an SSD.

  21. Beagle by DeBaas · · Score: 1

    Should have covered the Beagle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beagle_2 ) in that stuff

    --
    ---
  22. Oblig. Quotation: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "His uniform is black as activated charcoal, filtering the very light out of the air. A bullet will bounce off its arachnofiber weave like a wren hitting a patio door, an excess of perspiration wafts through it like a napalmed forest. Where his body has bony extremities, the suit has sintered armorgel; feels like gritty jello, protects like a stack of telephone books."

    1. Re:Oblig. Quotation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, yes. The Deliverator is my hero.

    2. Re:Oblig. Quotation: by alop · · Score: 1

      Deliverator is my Hiro. :)

      --
      --alop
    3. Re:Oblig. Quotation: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hiro is Snow Crash's Protagonist.

    4. Re:Oblig. Quotation: by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did you see the video someone else posted of the stuff turned into a fabric? Looks even better than that. The guy is wearing a sweater and gets someone to whack him on the elbow with a snow shovel. Then they put a toque made of the stuff on a watermelon and hit it with a hammer.

      No need to just do the "bony extremeties."

  23. Box by jbatista · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great! Good thing my boxing gloves are orange, no one is going to notice it. Hehehehe...

    --
    My sig is better than your sig.
  24. BAD SUMMARY..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0

    "The amazing material is soft and malleable like putty, but the substance becomes solid instantly after impact."

    -It's useless it if it turns solid AFTER impact. The article states that it turns solid DURING impact. "AFTER" and "DURING" are two different things.

    Either way, I'd like to know what happens when it is subjected to the prolonged temperatures of systems in the field. Will it it keep its intended state and shape, or will it ooze out all over the place?

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  25. Re:I've got your goo! by uolamer · · Score: 1

    Billy Mays here! ... but if you call now we'll send you 3 for the price of one!

    --
    s/©//g
  26. ThinkGeek has this? by STFS · · Score: 4, Informative

    The behavior of this stuff sounds a bit like the Smart Mass Thinking Putty I have from ThinkGeek.com.

    --
    You don't think enough... therefore you better not be!
    1. Re:ThinkGeek has this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up Crazy Aaron's puttyworld. THat's apparently where ThinkGeek get's their stuff

    2. Re:ThinkGeek has this? by coolsteve · · Score: 1

      The behavior of this stuff sounds a bit like the Smart Mass Thinking Putty I have from ThinkGeek.com.

      Are you sure it's the same thing? I mean, the stuff on ThinkGeek isn't orange...

    3. Re:ThinkGeek has this? by STFS · · Score: 1

      I'll give you a hint. The answer can be found somewhere in the first 8 words of my post: "The behavior of this stuff sounds a bit like..."

      --
      You don't think enough... therefore you better not be!
    4. Re:ThinkGeek has this? by coolsteve · · Score: 1

      Eeek... I was just trying to be silly... I didn't mean to offend you. My apologies.

    5. Re:ThinkGeek has this? by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      Completely different material as Smart Mass shatters from rapid impact where d3o simply becomes rigid.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    6. Re:ThinkGeek has this? by STFS · · Score: 1

      oooh... cool... so how "rapid" does the impact have to be???

      --
      You don't think enough... therefore you better not be!
  27. Re:I've got your goo! by Kooty-Sentinel · · Score: 1

    Too early man, too early. That guy made my night everytime my earsdrums nearly broke everytime his commercial came on.

    --
    Your evaluation period for Productivity 1.0 has ended. Please purchase more coffee to continue using this product.
  28. Can only be described as... by subreality · · Score: 5, Funny

    what can only be described as an orange goo

    Around here, we're a technically savvy group with relatively high IQs. You can describe it as a highly viscous non-newtonian fluid containing enough long-chain polymers or waxes to prevent it from flowing freely when at rest, and most of us will get it, and the rest will be able to look it up.

    Assuming you're trying to describe it to a bunch of first graders, you can also describe it as "orange silly putty", and it'll be a hell of a lot more accurate than "orange goo".

    Raise the bar, people.

    1. Re:Can only be described as... by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      Orange goo is fine, and a lot shorter. Thank you very much.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    2. Re:Can only be described as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You are assuming (falsely) that the people who discovered this know what it is that they found.
      "Hey Fred, check out this organge goo I made yesterday!"

    3. Re:Can only be described as... by subreality · · Score: 2, Funny

      You people modded me funny? It's intended to be serious.

  29. Ringworld by chthon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Larry Niven and Ringworld, anyone ?

    1. Re:Ringworld by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0, Troll

      No thanks, I just ate.

      Seriously, though, what are you going for here? Just throwing out random sci-fi books? I don't remember anything like this material in Ringworld, for what it's worth. Ringworld had an near-indestructible glass-like material, a room-temperature super-conductor, and some sci-fi super-glue.

      Maybe next time you could provide a little more detail, like six words instead of five? And drop that fucking annoying ", anyone?" meme while you're at it, then you could conserve a word and not sound so dumb.

    2. Re:Ringworld by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Would two words do? Impact armour.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    3. Re:Ringworld by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I kind of wanted the *original poster* to point out what the flying fuck he was talking about, since he's the one who made that excessively useless and annoying post. For all we know, he hasn't even read the damned thing, he's just making shit up. Now you've ruined that little experiment.

      I don't remember there being anything about "impact armor" in the book, but I'll take your word for it, I guess.

    4. Re:Ringworld by Ambitwistor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Impact armor was in Ringworld Engineers, not Ringworld.

  30. Obligatory refference... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who instantly thought of the "securefoam" stuff in the copcar in Demolition Man ?

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    1. Re:Obligatory refference... by DemonBeaver · · Score: 1

      Or of the mixture of the two chemicals in Grim Fandango?

      --
      This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (STFU)
    2. Re:Obligatory refference... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Wait... you mean you got past the pigeons on the ceiling in that game ?

      Mmmm, do I want to figure out how to make a 12 year old game run on Linux just to finally settle the score with those stupid skeleton birds...

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  31. Egg drop by xplenumx · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here's an example of a similar non-newtonian fluid protecting an egg from breaking after being dropped:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMmhNbj4K68

    The protection has less to do with absorption reduction than a distribution of force.

  32. Size queens... by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course. They evolved to be that way, to maximize their fitness in an environment full of size queens.

    Yes, because never in our history (cough, Great Pyramids, cough) have we humans ever been accused of having inadequacy issues.

    Somehow I think this "evolution" started well before someone thought to take a truck and bolt a "trunk" on it.

    1. Re:Size queens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the wasteful SUVs were parked in the dessert (or bottom of the sea) and left for a millennium or two, I'd call THAT progress!

      Just because we are naturally nomadic hunters and gathers doesn't mean we need to take our entire "encampment" belongings with us to 9-5 office hours and back again. I'd just as readily accept that as "devolution".

    2. Re:Size queens... by gailrob · · Score: 1

      "Somehow I think this "evolution" started well before someone thought to take a truck and bolt a "trunk" on it."

      Actually SUV's are Minivans with Trunks. Trucks by design have a seperate cab from the bed and that resulted in too many complications when trying to design SUVs. So the solution was to take a minivan and convert it by giving the front of it a "truck look" to make it appeal to men.

      Basically the SUV was designed for people who have lots of kids but are too insecure to buy the minivan to accomodate them.

    3. Re:Size queens... by espiesp · · Score: 1

      This comment is such rubbish I can't hardly stand it, despite the fact that it has nothing to do with the topic...

      Take some of the largest and most offensive SUV's on the American market. They are all based entirely off of a Truck platform, from the Frame to the drivetrain to the forward cabins.

      Only recently have we seen these "Minivan" based SUV's you speak of. And those are less offensive as they do get better mileage than their truck-like forefathers. And judging from your attitude towards Minivans I'm guessing they are morally acceptable - but an SUV that is basically a Minivan that doesn't LOOK like a minivan (but probably has performance very similar to), is evil? WTF.

      Bottom line there is a place for these SUVs. I agree they are not meant to be in the hands of every soccer mom. But they do serve a purpose for somebody that needs some certain utilities of a truck (trailer hauling, plowing) but still need to transport more than two or three people comfortably.

      I'm all for environmentalism, but stupid people really need to keep their mouths shut if they don't know what they are talking about.

    4. Re:Size queens... by Nick+Number · · Score: 1

      If the wasteful SUVs were parked in the dessert (or bottom of the sea) and left for a millennium or two, I'd call THAT progress!

      When you find a bowl of ice cream big enough to park an SUV in, let me know. I'll go get my spoon.

      --
      Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
    5. Re:Size queens... by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, because never in our history (cough, Great Pyramids, cough) have we humans ever been accused of having inadequacy issues.

      Actually, Lin Yutang accused us of it quite eloquently ;)

      A man seeing a hundred-story building often gets conceited, and the best way to cure that insufferable conceit is to transport that skyscraper in one's imagination to a little contemptible hill and learn a truer sense of what may and what may not be called
      "enormous."

    6. Re:Size queens... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      dude you're reading too deeply into this chill the fuck out and relax people arent devolving because certain people drive a certain type of car

    7. Re:Size queens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are You suggesting, that SUV-s might be of extra terrestial origins?

    8. Re:Size queens... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Basically the SUV was designed for people who have lots of kids but are too insecure to buy the minivan to accomodate them.

      The Chevy Suburban has been in continuous production since 1934, with similar vehicles being made by GM and other manufacturers having been made at least 10 years prior. There weren't too many minivans back then.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    9. Re:Size queens... by mattack2 · · Score: 2, Funny
    10. Re:Size queens... by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which is why you should look at the Bagger 288 instead.

      Then mentally transport it, and tear down the little contemptible hill.

    11. Re:Size queens... by lennier · · Score: 1

      Let's just say that it wasn't a crash with an asteroid that killed the dinosaurs.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    12. Re:Size queens... by sartin · · Score: 1

      it wasn't a crash with an asteroid that killed the dinosaurs

      Of course not. God killed the dinosaurs so we would have gas for our SUVs.

      On topic addition: this orange goo sounds like oobleck with dye. My son made that from corn starch and water for his fourth grade "let's ease the kids back into school" science project last week.

  33. It's Oobleck, dummy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be any more obvious??

  34. Too bad about the drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the real problem with dropping a laptop or iPod going to be the head inside the hard drive? I don't think the orange goo would help with that.

  35. Wait a second by Voyager529 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...So some guy puts cornstarch, water, and orange food dye in a Ziploc bag around his laptop and it makes headlines?!?!?

    1. Re:Wait a second by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, "cornstarch" that doesn't flow at room temperature and can be turned into a fabric.

    2. Re:Wait a second by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      ...I supposed that information was in the article, wasn't it?

  36. Re:I've got your goo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But is it orange?

    Who cares what color it is? The real question on my mind is: Does it run Linux?

  37. In other news... by kpainter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft announces that Steve Balmer is getting his office redecorated. All the furnishings are to be coated with a new high-tech orange "goo". No reason was given as to why.

    1. Re:In other news... by bluesatin · · Score: 1

      Surely that would make the chairs do MORE damage to the object they're hitting .. oh wait, never mind.

  38. Re:I've got your goo! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe his mate had a bad case of diarrhea?

  39. Yay! by BigSes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trip Hawkins cheers as a typo makes 3DO relevant again for the first time in 15 years.

  40. are we sure by Minion+of+Eris · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say.
  41. No, not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    before apple started buying hard disks featuring the tech.

    Except for Apple's technology is a 3-axis accelerometer on the motherboard, not on the HD.

  42. Laptop hard drives have active drive protection by Fencepost · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's worth noting that many laptops now have "active drive protection" by some name - basically accelerometers detect drops and immediately park the heads of the drive - hopefully before the end of the fall.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  43. Re:Obligatory reference... by DemonBeaver · · Score: 1

    Actually, the pigeons are after the packing foam. They are easily defeated with a cat and a baguette! I believe you want to figure out how to make that game run, if only because it's absolutely amazing... and I am sure there is a relatively simple solution

    --
    This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (STFU)
  44. Cool, I can finally get a motorcycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember a game called Road Rash for the Sega Genesis?

    Having briefly owned a motorcycle, I had to get rid of it until the day where I could buy the crash-proof jumpsuit like the guy on Road Rash had where he could survive even head on collisions with cars.

    But now, the world is mine.

  45. Impulse and shear by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    It is very simple: By using an initially soft substance, it adsorbs some implulse (shock) while molding to the proper shape to distribute the shear forces over the greatest area. It is like a custom-made bike helmet that forms for the particular impact. The greater and more evenly you distribute the impact, the greater chance all your components will survive.

    You can make your own non-Newtonian fluid with corn starch and water. It'll flow through your fingers slowly and when you hit it, the long chain starch molecules interlock making it hard. It was also on Mythbusters. Play with it and see what you think.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  46. Awesome! The future! Whers my Taco Bell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its like that stuff in demolition man!

  47. d3o - not 3do. by gaiageek · · Score: 1

    According to the article it's d3o - not 3do. That was a gaming console.

  48. Karatand! by oren · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Get a (thick?) glove fill with the stuff. Possibly have the external layer contain some inserts... You can now break sticks and stones - and bones - with impunity. The original concept and the name "Karatand" appear in "Stand on Zanzibar" by John Brunner. It seems you can use 3do as an approximation: http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=1745

    1. Re:Karatand! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Hell, it's even better than the concept. Karatand plastic relaxes over several seconds. This stuff relaxes as soon as the impulse is over

  49. It's d3o not 3do by REALMAN · · Score: 1

    It's d3o not 3do according to the website you linked.

    --
    - A Frog in a pond utters an azure cry. -
  50. Another thing Larry Niven already "invented." by TheFaithfulStone · · Score: 1

    Now we need gravity polarizers and transfer booths! Pass on the organ banks, I think.

  51. thixotropic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. Some comments by arete · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what this Orange Goo does, and I haven't read TFA. But I want to comment on your comment:

    1) Most electronics are not made with incredibly strong surfaces and shells. If you were to encase your electronics in a perfectly fitting thick walled steel cradle, you'd reduce all events (esp a floor hitting a corner) into only the shock (G force) leaving out the impact (concentration of force on the surface of the device) Both of these parts of an impact are damaging. The fundamental momentum-limit you discuss only applies to the shock, which is most likely to damage internal parts.

    2) Some crazy materials can do a surprisingly good job of momentarily pretending to be that idealized steel case. I presume the egg-video above shows that.

    3) Typical elastic padding will not spread the momentum distribution out EVENLY over the time it takes to decelerate that 1/8". So even the shock part can be improved.

    4) Don't forget that in addition to momentum, you must satisfy the conservation of energy equation, too. The most common way to do this is to bounce, and at least some of this energy gets converted to heat in each material that compresses. Dissipating more energy is also valuable.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  53. Re:I've got your goo! by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    "But is it orange?"

    Yep, and it's 3 yrs old. Moving on.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  54. Re:I've got your goo! by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

    As long as it's not Little, Yellow, Different...

  55. Karma, the best protection for laptops. by herojig · · Score: 1

    My then new MBP fell from chair back height, as it slipped out of my bag somehow:), landed on one corner, then the next, then flopped on the floor flat. I was sitting in the chair at the time and felt it go, and in my lame rush to save it, I knocked over a glass of water on the table that spilled ice and fluid on the now grounded Mac. My only thought was "well, that's toast, as I picked up the dented and soaking wet laptop. After drying off and saying a few mantras, I hit the power button. It booted right up and has been running fine now for over a year. I conclude that karma is the best protection.

    --
    I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
  56. Sounds like therapy putty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This stuff has been around for years, in different "stiffnesses" as therapy putty. It's a plasticy clay like amorphous solid that will run over time, but shatter if stuck with sudden force. (just like glass, only runnier) It also produces a little heat on impacts. THe chunks then melt back together.

    Had some of the stuff to work my hand muscles after a car accident for recovery. It comes in all sorts of bright colors; usually the color indicates how stiff the material is.

    Seems like a clever idea to use it as a shock absorber. One of the drawbacks though is that it becomes softer the hotter it gets.

  57. There's One Catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Warning: Pregnant women, the elderly, and children under 10 should avoid prolonged exposure to Happy Fun Ball.
            * Caution: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds.
            * Happy Fun Ball contains a liquid core, which, if exposed due to rupture, should not be touched, inhaled, or looked at.
            * Do not use Happy Fun Ball on concrete.
            * Discontinue use of Happy Fun Ball if any of the following occurs:
                        o itching
                        o vertigo
                        o dizziness
                        o tingling in extremities
                        o loss of balance or coordination
                        o slurred speech
                        o temporary blindness
                        o profuse sweating
                        o heart palpitations
            * If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.
            * Happy Fun Ball may stick to certain types of skin.
            * When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be returned to its special container and kept under refrigeration. Failure to do so relieves the makers of Happy Fun Ball, Wacky Products Incorporated, and its parent company, Global Chemical Unlimited, of any and all liability.
            * Ingredients of Happy Fun Ball include an unknown glowing green substance which fell to Earth, presumably from outer space.
            * Happy Fun Ball has been shipped to our troops in Saudi Arabia and is being dropped by our warplanes on Iraq.
            * Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
            * Happy Fun Ball comes with a lifetime warranty.

  58. Weaponized goo (Re:Ringworld) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Punks, thugs and spooks have been waiting for this since John Brunner's Stand on Zanzibar.

    Make innocuous-looking gloves out of it. Then you can slug someone on the jaw without breaking your knuckles. Karate-chop any body part without dislocating your hand bones.

    100 quatloos says it'll show up as a weapon within 18 months.

  59. Just Remember... by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    The armor may protect you from impacts, and it might even help a little with the deceleration?

    But if you hit something hard enough, nothing can protect your internal organs from going *skwish* against your ribcage. Or your brain against your skull, for that matter.

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:Just Remember... by sowth · · Score: 1

      But it is fun to try.

  60. Re:I've got your goo! by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

    AHHAHAHA im so happy mod points are being donated to irrelevant contrived and unfunny "does it run linux jokes" posted by ACs you are all wonderful people stay beautiful

  61. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it blend?

  62. Impact Armor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Louis Wu wore it in Ringworld Engineers.

  63. The company is d3o not 3do... by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

    3d0 is a failed gaming console.

  64. downhill bike pads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got 661 3DO bike pads for knees and elbows. I was skeptical at first that they'd perform better than the hard shell armour I've used before them, but a lot of bike park trips this summer have proven them to be quite field worthy. They're not magic, but considering how flexible they are and the fact they don't feel like they'd provide much protection I'm convinced after a few high speed impacts. I'd love an jacket made of the stuff, too bad it'd probably cost $750+ since knees costs $100.

  65. Re:I've got your goo! by drseuk · · Score: 1

    If it is his future's bright.

  66. +2 Mail of Silliness by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Wonderful (and rather hilarious)! --Somebody actually found a use for the stuff. . .

    When "Silly Putty" was first invented, they thought, "Oh please! There has GOT to be something this is useful for!" That was fifty years ago, give or take. They tried fitting the solution to every problem they could think of, but it turned out to an overwhelming task. The best they could come up with was to sell it in plastic eggs.

    (I got that little history tidbit from the slightly less abridged version which was printed on the reverse side of a piece of cardboard my Silly Putty egg came packaged in).

    Looks like somebody finally managed to work how to sell the stuff for real. They just mixed in some orange dye, changed the name and used the word, "Military" in the ad copy. And they're probably charging hella-serious money for the end result, too. Whatever. That's probably how I'd go about it as well.

    --And contrary to what somebody pointed out elsewhere, I suspect that this Orange Goo would lose shape and run if left standing. But the goop as these people are selling it is contained in another fabric of some sort, rather like air is to bubble-wrap. --If the keychain sample pictured in the article is anything to go by, that is.

    So. . , cute.

    You know it's an interesting day when somebody solves a 50 year-old marketing dilemma with orange dye and a some PVC sheets.

    -FL

  67. So where does one buy that stuff... by Ekuryua · · Score: 0

    The question I'm now wondering is where to find this material in raw form... From what I'm seeing it's way more efficient than the usual easy-to-find non-newtonian fluids. Would make some great material to use in various DIY situations.

  68. Feels like deja vu by michaelleung · · Score: 1

    I think I saw this in Popular Mechanics. I could be wrong though.

  69. Patent link by gringer · · Score: 1

    If anyone's interested in a link to a US patent for this stuff, here it is:

    http://www.patentstorm.us/applications/20050037189/fulltext.html

    From my brief read, this looks like it's a dilatant sealed inside a foam/gas matrix. The patent refers to Dow Corning catalogue number 3179. The datasheet for that suggests it's a pink compound, not orange:

    http://www.dowcorning.com/applications/search/default.aspx?R=7753EN

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  70. Video Demonstration by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

    Here's a youtube video of this material being demonstrated on a show in Japan:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JceDaEMIHKE

    It has about the consistency I imagined but the transition to solid happens much more completely than I would have thought.

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  71. Name by Metabolife · · Score: 1

    It's d3o. Not 3do.