Slashdot Mirror


Dad Builds 700 Pound Cannon for Son's Birthday

Hugh Pickens writes "The Charleston Daily Mail reports that machinist Mike Daugherty built his son a working cannon for his birthday — not a model — a real working cannon. 'It looks like something right out of the battle at Gettysburg,' says Daugherty. The 700 pound cast iron and steel howitzer, designed to use comparatively small explosive charges to propel projectiles at relatively high trajectories with a steep angle of descent, has a 4-inch gun barrel that is 36 inches long mounted on a wooden gun carriage with two 36- inch diameter wheels and took Daugherty about two weeks to build at a cost of about $6,000. 'I've always been interested in the Civil War and cannons, so I thought it would be a good gift,' says Daugherty's 11-year old son Logan. Daugherty said he is not worried about the federal government coming to get his son's cannon because he spoke to the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and found it is legal to own such a cannon because it does not use a firing pin and is muzzle loaded so the government does not consider the weapon a threat. Two days after the family celebrated Logan's 11th birthday, father and son offered a field demonstration of the new cannon on top of a grassy hill overlooking Fairmont, West Virginia and on the third try, the blank inside the barrel went boom and a cannon was born. For a followup they popped a golf ball into the gun barrel, lit the fuse, and watched the golf ball split the sky and land about 600 yards away. 'Any rebels charging up this hill would be in trouble with a cannon like this at the top,' Logan says."

81 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. Perfectly Legal by savanik · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it is legal to own such a cannon because it does not use a firing pin and is muzzle loaded so the government does not consider the weapon a threat.

    He then continued to say, "Also, I use it to hunt deer."

    1. Re:Perfectly Legal by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you can hunt deer with a 4" cannon, more power to you. Most deer in West Virginia are killed by SUVs.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    2. Re:Perfectly Legal by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      With a 4" cannon, the number of deer you can hunt is limited only by the number you can get to stand side by side.

    3. Re:Perfectly Legal by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      They aren't mutually exclusive - what do you think he tows the cannon with?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Perfectly Legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i know you ment this as a joke here(i thoguht it funny), but seriously it does annoy me that people try to legitimize owning a long arm for hunting .

      the second amendment has 0 relevance to hunting, and 100% to having the ability to arm one self as an independent force separator from the federal government.

      A arm is a weapon not food gathering device(though it may be used that way). and is something every American has the right and in some capacities the duties to exercise.

    5. Re:Perfectly Legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you can hunt deer with a 4" cannon, more power to you. Most deer in West Virginia are killed by SUVs.

      Admittedly, it's a good way to get rid of SUV's. But, my god, what kind of cannon do they use to fire SUV's at the deer?

    6. Re:Perfectly Legal by Teancum · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...it is legal to own such a cannon because it does not use a firing pin and is muzzle loaded so the government does not consider the weapon a threat.

      He then continued to say, "Also, I use it to hunt deer."

      An interesting thought.... would this "gun" qualify for the muzzle-loading hunt? Due to the higher degree of difficulty in shooting with archaic guns and more limited range, several U.S. states offer special licenses for those hunters who hunt with a muzzle loading gun that often has extended dates and additional locations where you can hunt with those kind of guns.

      Seems a tad bit overkill, but wouldn't it be a sight to see on the opening day of the hunt?

  2. Safety first? by TheRealPacmanJones · · Score: 5, Funny

    First? Is it really a good idea to give an 11 year old a cannon. Even though you will tell him not to use it unsupervised eventually theres going to come a time where his friends say something like "cmon we will just shoot it once"...... and then before you know it they are invading a nearby neighborhood...

    --
    Don't try to be a great man. Just be a man, and let history make its own judgment - Zemfram Cochrane
    1. Re:Safety first? by characterZer0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You get about one shot every 2 minutes if you have four guys that know what they are doing, and you burn more than $10 worth of powder for ever shot. And the things are heavy. They will not get far.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    2. Re:Safety first? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cannons don't kill people. (Unless they run them over). Gunpowder and cannonballs kill people. Just don't let the son get ahold of the gunpowder and he'll be safe. The article doesn't say that he built any cannonballs at all, and you can't just buy them at your local Walmart.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    3. Re:Safety first? by TheRealPacmanJones · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cannons don't kill people. (Unless they run them over). Gunpowder and cannonballs kill people. Just don't let the son get ahold of the gunpowder and he'll be safe. The article doesn't say that he built any cannonballs at all, and you can't just buy them at your local Walmart.

      Just because you dont have cannonball doesnt mean you wont put anything vaguely round into the cannon to see if it will shoot. I know I would have done that if I had a cannon growing up.

      --
      Don't try to be a great man. Just be a man, and let history make its own judgment - Zemfram Cochrane
    4. Re:Safety first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      With that sort of attitude, it's no wonder your dad never built you one.

    5. Re:Safety first? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... guys that know what they are doing

      That made me think of Blackadder III, Duel and Duality:

      Blackadder frantically reads instructions during duel with cannons:
      "Congratulations on choosing the Armstrong Whitworth four pounder cannonnette. Please read the instructions carefully and it should give years of trouble free maiming."

    6. Re:Safety first? by mustafap · · Score: 2, Funny

      >I know I would have done that if I had a cannon growing up.

      yea, my brothers head would have definitely gone in there.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    7. Re:Safety first? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is safety first. If my 11-year-old child were to come across a potential attacker while walking the streets alone late at night, I wouldn't want the attacker to be the only one with a 700 lb cannon.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    8. Re:Safety first? by D+Ninja · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They will not get far.

      If there is one thing I have learned - never, ever, underestimate the ingenuity of a group of kids who really want to get something accomplished. If they want to move a cannon, they'll move a cannon.

    9. Re:Safety first? by BlueStrat · · Score: 2, Informative

      High proof rubbing or cleaning alcohol sold in American drug stores won't work because there is a deliberate retardant added to spoil its value as an explosive. Perhaps a good thing, but if you need to make one of these weapons you should use some old fashioned moonshine or something home-made.

      Easy solution: "Klean-Strip S-L-X Denatured Alcohol" widely available at home improvement and paint supply stores in pints and gallons. I use it as a shellac thinner when finishing the tweed covering on vintage-style guitar amplifiers I build.

      As for black powder, I used to make the stuff based on a recipe from the World Book Encyclopedia. The Salt Pieter I purchased from a local drug store (it is a heart medication that is now off the shelves due to ATF concerns) and for the carbon I used Kingsford briquettes. Sulfur came from the home chemistry set and I found other sources after my initial experiments.

      There are many ways to skin this boom-cat without requiring one to obtain substances that are heavily-restricted.

      "Explosives and Propellants from Commonly Available Materials": http://thedisease.net/functions.php?PHPSESSID=04dba15555551856435582268479ee3c&arcanum=explosives/Common_Materials.pdf

      "CIA Field Expedient Methods for Explosives Preparations": http://thedisease.net/functions.php?PHPSESSID=04dba15555551856435582268479ee3c&arcanum=explosives/CIA_FEMFEP.pdf

      "Composite Rocket Fuels": http://thedisease.net/functions.php?PHPSESSID=04dba15555551856435582268479ee3c&arcanum=explosives/Composite_Rocket_Fuels.pdf

      "Deadly Brew-Advanced Improvised Explosives": http://thedisease.net/functions.php?PHPSESSID=04dba15555551856435582268479ee3c&arcanum=explosives/Deadly_Brew.zip

      "Guide to Homemade Detonators": http://thedisease.net/functions.php?PHPSESSID=04dba15555551856435582268479ee3c&arcanum=explosives/Ragnars_Detonators.pdf

      "Home and Recreational Use of High Explosives and Homemade C-4": http://thedisease.net/functions.php?PHPSESSID=04dba15555551856435582268479ee3c&arcanum=explosives/HARUOHE.zip

      "Home Workshop Explosives": http://thedisease.net/functions.php?PHPSESSID=04dba15555551856435582268479ee3c&arcanum=explosives/Home_Workshop_Explosives.zip

      "Improvised Explosives: How to Make Your Own": http://thedisease.net/functions.php?PHPSESSID=04dba15555551856435582268479ee3c&arcanum=explosives/Improvised_Explosives_Lecker.zip

      Much more here: http://thedisease.net/?ejaculate=library&your_poison=Explosives

      This stuff is highly dangerous. Don't blame me if you put somebodies' (or your own) eye out, or earn the nickname "Stumpy"!

      There's just no possible way for any government to stop anyone from making something that goes "boom" by restricting or banning anything that *can* be made/combined to go "boom". It's an even more stupid and self-defeat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    10. Re:Safety first? by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The follow up of that is that if they want a cannon, they will get a cannon. Whether dad gives it to them as a birthday present and teaches them how to use it safely, or they build one out of old plumbing they scavenge for that abandoned house and blow their hands off.

  3. You'll shoot your eye out, kid by Zen+Hash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Though Daugherty said he is still stunned that he had to get clearance from the NSA for the archaic artillery piece

    Why would he need clearance from the NSA?

    --
    Here I sit, all broken hearted.
    Came to poop, but only farted.
    1. Re:You'll shoot your eye out, kid by petrus4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would he need clearance from the NSA?

      Because the American government has known, probably since Reagan, that its' constituents have genuine grounds for overthrowing it, and that it is therefore reasonably possible that they could someday try...and that they must therefore be prevented from trying at all costs. ;)

    2. Re:You'll shoot your eye out, kid by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      and that they must therefore be prevented from trying at all costs. ;)

      Hence the development of reality TV:

      Future Thomas Jefferson: Yeah, I'm really sick of paying 50% of my income in taxes. Let's overthrow the Government! Are you with me?
      Future George Washington: Yeah, the revolution! To arms! Call out the unorganized militia! We're with you to the bitter end!
      Typical American Citizen #1: Yeah! I hate taxes! Down with the Governmen.... hey isn't American Idol on tonight? Can we do the revolution tomorrow?
      Typical American Citizen #2: We can't do it tomorrow, the Amazing Race is on. How about next Wednesday?
      Future George Washington: *puts gun to his own head and squeezes the trigger*

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:You'll shoot your eye out, kid by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      More like Roosevelt and the 1934 National Firearms Act - it was the start of "You can't have weapons that the police have."

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:You'll shoot your eye out, kid by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "What weapon do the police have that you can't?"

      Fully automatic machine guns and carbines.

      Rifles and shotguns with barrels or overall length below a certain amount.

      Magazines that hold more than X cartridges, depending on the state.

      Tasers and pepper spray, again depending on the state.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  4. Cost? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article didn't say it cost $6000, but that it would be worth that. It would be hard to spend $6000 in materials for a Civil war era cannon that you build yourself.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Cost? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 3, Informative

      By the time of the Civil war, cannon were mostly cast iron. (at least by the end) The article says that it was made of iron and steel. It's possible to build a backyard forge and melt old auto parts into a cannon, I know several blacksmiths who are capable of it. (although the guys I know mostly do decorative stuff)

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    2. Re:Cost? by ndege · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I see one person who has never priced bronze in quantity.

      You are entirely correct that bronze is expensive. Keep in mind, however, that the cannon is made from cast iron and steel.

      I thought about responding with, "Well, I see one person who has never priced helium in quantity."

      Seemed about as relevant.

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
    3. Re:Cost? by KC7JHO · · Score: 2, Interesting

      iforgeiron.com One of the most popular blacksmith hangouts. Give it a try, is the BEST stress relief ever.

  5. Not a threat by XanC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So we can only have stuff as long as the government doesn't find it threatening?

    Oh, I see this guy's on the Union side. Maybe they're worried about him pointing it at Baltimore's civilians and making demands, as the Union army did.

    1. Re:Not a threat by scorp1us · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can assure you Baltimore is not a state.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:Not a threat by scorp1us · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well as a native and current Baltimoron, I don't discount your account. I was hoping to be modded funny. But anyway, yes, it would have been very embarrassing for the capitol of the Union to be residing in a confederate state. It is said that Maryland wasn't given much choice in the matter on what side to be on.

      But lets be honest, everyone traveling through Baltimore gets fired on. A tradition we carry through with even today.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  6. Cannon Are Fun by Toad-san · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My kid brother, the machinist, made a scale replica of the 24 pounder long guns on the USS Constitution (Old Ironsides). He didn't cast iron; he machined it from a solid piece of modern steel (so it was WAY stronger than the originals).

    Then he made a scale carriage, machined (because it was so hard) from seasoned timbers from an old dock being disassembled.

    It was 1/4 scale, as I recall. When fired using modern muzzle loader powder (and totally guessing at the charge), it shot a beercan filled with cement about a quarter mile :-)

    He sold it eventually to a collector, but what a cannon that was!

    1. Re:Cannon are fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So let me get this straight, your uncle blew a hole in your tailgate with his wad?

    2. Re:Cannon are fun by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm... so is he trying to build some sort of redneck technical there?

    3. Re:Cannon are fun by natehoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, he blew a hole in his own tailgate with his wad. THAT, my friend, takes talent.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Cannon are fun by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you know that tailgates for many late model trucks are made of fiberglass?

      I didn't.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    5. Re:Cannon Are Fun by Ksevio · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, Steel is the way to go.

      My uncle made a cannon for fun (he works in a metal shop) that we took to the local shooting range. They had some wooden spools setup for targets, but the lead balls we fired at them made a neat hole through them and embedded in the gravel hill behind. I can only imagine how far it would have gone had we aimed it higher.

  7. traitor by methano · · Score: 5, Funny

    This kid lives in Charleston. Why is he talking about shooting at rebels? What has the South come to? Where is the adult supervision?

    1. Re:traitor by MaerD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, bloody Tory. Acting all hoity toity with their tea and putting Union Jacks on everything. Just can't accept that we showed King George what's what over 200 years ago.

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    2. Re:traitor by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not? It's *West Virginia*. WV got carved out of Virginia for the express purpose of having the natives shoot at rebels.

    3. Re:traitor by plopez · · Score: 4, Informative

      The West Virginians saw the Secession for what the sham it was; protecting the property (slave holding) rights of the rich tidewater plantation owners while forcing the poor (the working class and dirt farmers) to fight for them. The south had the draft before the North. After Bull Run, the militias were effectively drafted for the duration. Unless you were a rich plantation owner in which case you were considered too important for the economy and released from service.

      The West Virginians being dirt farmers themselves, and a bit ornery, seceded from Virginia and joined the Union as their own state in 1863.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    4. Re:traitor by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...Because, of course, secession was evil and illegal when the South did it, but good and legal when the West Virginians did it.

      --
      Revive the Constitution.
    5. Re:traitor by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But, er, didn't the West Virginians *refuse* to secede? To put it another way, your comment would be accurate if the WVs had seceded *and formed their own country*. But they didn't. They essentially just stayed with the union.

          - AJ

  8. Training the boy to be a manly man by presidenteloco · · Score: 2, Funny

    just so there's no risk he turns into a girlie man.

    Every boy needs to learn that you have to have a big cannon and wield it with authority should any dispute come up.

    (Warning: Failure to recognize sarcasm is the eighth deadly sin, specially in a world of manly men.)

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Training the boy to be a manly man by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Funny

      But are those manly men men in tights?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  9. Rebels? by MiniMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Any rebels charging up this hill would be in trouble with a cannon like this at the top,' Logan says

    Anyone else have an image of Stormtroopers firing one of these, relieved that they finally have a better weapon than those blasters?

  10. Re:My dad gave me arsenic to play with by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've never gotten over the childhood trauma of seeing a naked child smelling of bacon fat running around in the woods in the middle of nowhere.

    No one would believe me, they put me through years of therapy. I still cringe when I smell bacon.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  11. Re:Wow, news for nerds by Zen+Hash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is totally OT.

    Not necessarily. It's just geared more towards history, or even engineering, nerds than computer nerds. I'm willing to bet any 11 year old kid who's a civil war buff gets picked on as much as the rest of us did in school. At least until he gets a 700lb cannon...

    --
    Here I sit, all broken hearted.
    Came to poop, but only farted.
  12. Famous last words in the article by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daugherty said his son is very mature and would be able to handle the responsibility of owning a piece of artillery.

    "He's a good kid. One thing about my son he has a great respect for guns and weapons, so he will not be firing this anytime soon without an adult present."


    I'm sure that's all true. Unlike Mr. Daugherty, I actually do remember being 11 years old. I also remember not doing a very good job of thinking of the consequences of my actions. So we'll all wait for the day when 1 or 2 years from now when this "good kid" and his friends fire this cannon at other people or nearby property and cause damage that they are held accountable for.

    1. Re:Famous last words in the article by Unending · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I had a compound bow at the age of 7 and was using it without supervision within 6 months.
      At no point between the age of 7 and now have I ever used a projectile weapon irresponsibly.
      I think it is completely possible for this 11 year old to be responsible enough to own and use a cannon.
      Do I think this is the norm? No not at all, I didn't trust most of my friends to use my bow without supervision until I was maybe 12, but to just write this kid off because of your own irresponsibility is not fair.

    2. Re:Famous last words in the article by quatin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the first thing a 11 year old kid thinks about when he gets a cannon is load it and shoot it at the neighbors, there's something fundamentally wrong with the kid. I could understand the consequences of my actions by the time I was 11. I may have been irresponsible with little things, but certainly not killing people or blowing up a house.

  13. Err, no by LizardKing · · Score: 5, Funny

    That title should read "Dad Builds 700 Pound Cannon for Himself, Under The Cover of His Son's Birthday".

  14. Nice gift by bickle · · Score: 3, Funny

    What a charming and delightful way to relive one of the darkest chapters in our nation's history. :P

  15. Re:That's Interesting... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course, there's been at least one successful revolution... google the battle of athens, tenn.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  16. Re:That's Interesting... by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait until a cannonball punches through your roof into your living room and then get back to us.

    --
    25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  17. NSA??? by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Though Daugherty said he is still stunned that he had to get clearance from the NSA for the archaic artillery piece

    Why would he need clearance from the NSA?

    I'm calling "bullshit" on the NSA bit. The NSA is a bunch of spys and technology geeks. They would have little interest in a Civil War-era black powder cannon. From the NSA web site "The NSA/CSS core missions are to protect U.S. national security systems and to produce foreign signals intelligence information."[http://www.nsa.gov/about/mission/index.shtml]

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
    1. Re:NSA??? by misexistentialist · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's what they want you to believe. In reality the NSA ensures the integrity and authenticity of Civil War reenactments.

    2. Re:NSA??? by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm willing to bet it's a typo for NFA, or National Firearms Act, which is the purview of the Convenience Store (aka BATFE). It classifies stuff as firearms and "destructive devices".

      What's miserable is that the default stance on anything that remotely goes "Bang" is "Sorry, that's not allowed.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:NSA??? by cawpin · · Score: 2, Informative

      A few corrections:

      1. You can build 1 firearm PER YEAR without a manufacturers license. Any more than that and you need the proper license and permits.

      2. The bit about the rifle cartridges is incorrect. The only firearms considered destructive devices are those over .500 caliber; again shotguns are excluded. This is because there is no real definition of rifle caliber versus pistol caliber. I have a handgun chambered in .308 Winchester, for example.

      3. The legal barrel length, federally, for a rifle is 16", not 16.5". Most manufacturers leave about 1/8" more just to be safe. There is also a short barreled shotgun stamp; the barrel length requirement for shotguns is 18".

      In addition, the only "permission" required for a SBR is the tax stamp. You can build one yourself. You just have to get the SBR stamp before assembly, or in some cases even acquiring the barrel. One example of the second case is the AR-15 platform. If you have a barrel under 16" you either must have a pistol receiver or a receiver registered as a SBR.

      Fixed that for you. ;-)

  18. "Daddy" by Cornwallis · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I want a thermonuclear device."

  19. Cannon are fun by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife's uncle builds and shoots them. Years ago, he competed with his cannon, in both round shot and rifled competitions, with self-cast balls and "bullets" (I forget the correct name for them). These days he just does it for fun.

    You do have to be careful with them, though. Last year (2008) on the fourth of July, he took his small (2.5") cannon down to the city park like every year, to fire it as part of the city's early morning festivities. That went well, and on the way back he decided to stop off at my house and wake us all up, since my kids usually go down to the park. Unfortunately, he forgot to lower the tailgate of his pickup truck before touching off the powder. It blew an 8-inch hole through his tailgate. The cannon didn't have a projectile loaded, just gunpowder and a wad, but the force mangled his tailgate.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  20. Liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'I've always been interested in the Civil War and cannons, so I thought it would be a good gift,'

    Translation"

    'I've always been interested in the Civil War and cannons, so I really got it for myself even though I won't know it until my son drops his interest in it.'

  21. Re:That's Interesting... by fifedrum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Technically, yes. There's nothing in the constitution that denies Bill Gates the right to own a nuclear weapon is there? Nothing even close. I suppose you can interpret the private ownership of WMDs to be unconstitutional because of their definition of mass-destruction, thus by their existence in private hands violating other citizen's right to liberty.

    And now to nitpick; The Civil War was hardly a bitch-slapping. It was the single bloodiest event in US history, out classing (in sheer destruction) all other wars thus-far combined.

    It could have fallen on either side at many different stages of the war. Had Davis pushed into Washington first-thing, it would have been over before it started (as DC was relatively undefended) Or had Lincoln's generals not been a bunch of screw-ups etc. And, of course, the almost million dead between direct conflict, starvation, disease etc again, a little more than a bitch slap.

    Now, whiskey rebellion, fine, or even prior to that when Massachusetts or Maine threatened to secede, or Delaware considered joining the Confederacy, or (as in an above post, MD) those were mere bitch-slaps. Man, those whiskey rebellion dudes really were push-overs.

  22. awesome by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    a troll from 1861

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  23. This American Life episode by cetialphav · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a really great episode of This American Life here: http://www.thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?sched=734 that is relevant to this story. Act 1 has Sarah Vowell (a liberal anti-gun person) whose father is a gunsmith who built his own cannon. She tells about going out with him to fire it for the first time.

  24. Re:Wow, news for nerds by DarthBart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lighten up, Francis. Just because the cannon doesn't run Linux doesn't mean its not cool.

    But still, imagine a cluster of these things.

  25. Re:Legal? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Historically, Americans are just very distrustful of our government. That's why the founders had to put the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution to get the people to support it enough for ratification. It's also why it's hard to get stuff like government controlled healthcare passed here.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  26. What? by NerveGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean that somewhere, someone has NOT taught their son to be a pansy, and fear anything that has any remote chance of hurting someone? Oh, the horror! The next thing you know, he'll let the kid have his own POCKET KNIFE, for crying out loud. Won't someone please... THINK OF THE CHILDREN????

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  27. Re:Legal? by quatin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BATFE itself is not rational. They've declared a shoe string a machine gun, they've declared double barrel shotguns machine guns, they've declared broken guns machine guns, they prohibit felons from buying .22lr derringers, but allow them to own .50cal muzzle loaded rifles. 90% of gun laws serve no practical purpose, but are knee-jerk reaction laws to show that a certain politician is "making America more safe" when election time comes around.

  28. True cannon story. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Funny
    This is only vaguely related to TFA, but hey, it's Idle.

    A while back I was working at a place that had both engineering and manufacturing, and I mostly hung out with the engineers but I worked on some of the manufacturing equipment so I met a lot of the manufacturing people. One guy looked like an 80's stoner, black jacket, long hair, bad teeth, you know the type. I'd never talked to him. One day, apropos of nothing, he walked up and handed me a thick sheaf of papers and said "I thought you'd enjoy this." It was plans for making a homebuilt mortar, similar in size to the cannon in TFA (but with a much less pretty and detailed carriage.) It was machined out of a piece of solid 6" thick steel stock. It's actually a pretty cool design, although my metal lathe can't manage something that big. But ever since, I've wondered if I have "CLOSET ANARCHIST" written on my forehead, that makes people who don't know me walk up and volunteer stuff like this, since this wasn't the only time that's happened.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:True cannon story. by natehoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone please mod parent +1 for using the term "apropos of nothing" correctly, and another point for correct spelling of same. (light applause)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  29. Re:Legal? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh, come on now. Most 11 year olds have access to much more dangerous stuff. The Stove, the Parent's Prescription Pills, the Family Car. I know a girl, who at around 10 or 11, stole her parent's car. They even called the cops on her and she was arrested.

    A cannon just seems dangerous, but mostly it's just a heavy piece of cast iron that sits there.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  30. Re:Wow, news for nerds by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "General Grant, the Rebs have broken through our lines! What are we going to do?"

    "Calm down, Colonel. Get the Beowulf Battery on line."

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  31. Re:Wow, news for nerds by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "But still, imagine a cluster of these things."

    Why imagine it - there are plenty of movies with them.

    Although with cannon, it's called a "battery".

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  32. Obligatory by qmaqdk · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    My UID is prime. Hah!
  33. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms? by GeckoAddict · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anytime you need to get permission from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms for a Birthday present, you know it's going to be the best birthday ever.

  34. Re:Wow, news for nerds by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you don't understand what an awesome nerd accomplishment building your own Civil War cannon is ... you really don't have any business calling yourself a nerd.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  35. Re:Wow, news for nerds by lorenlal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I couldn't disagree with you more. There are plenty of gun nerds.

    Also: What was the first thing you thought when you saw the article?

    Chances are it involved having one of these yourself, firing it, or possibly analyzing it. If so, then this article did indeed interest you. I, for one, welcome my beowulf cluster of muzzle loading cannon overlords, possibly running Linux...

  36. A battery by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hear that they're often loaded with a salt, and frequently used in bar fights.

  37. Succession isn't the issue by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slavery is profoundly wrong and no action taken to promote or sustain it can be considered moral.

    Succeeding or not succeeding is not essential moral issue. How else did the US or Texas come about if not for succession?

    But the Civil War was only about states' rights insofar as that meant their right to join a new country when a president was elected from a newly formed abolitionist party who threatened to infringe on the state "right" of slavery.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  38. Re:That's Interesting... by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Informative

    So if the local police have fully automatic M4 carbines, I should be afforded that same right, to the limit of my pocketbook.

    For the most part you can own a fully automatic M4 carbine. Civilians with the appropriate tax stamp (essentially a $300 fee to the BATF) can own a fully automatic weapon so long as it was made prior to 1986. Thing is the government really considers a specific part to be the gun - usually the receiver, but you can also get a registered fully auto sear for an M16/AR15 as well. If you pay the stamp for it (and the going price of about $8k to $10k for the part) then you can install it in an otherwise brand new AR15 carbine and have a select fire machine gun - it's just expensive. For older guns if you have a registered receiver then the 1986 law only applies to it. You can have a gunsmith or machinist remake and outfit the entire gun with new parts as long as the receiver is still intact, and you're good and legal.

    You see that often with government regs where some simple part is legally the item. Airplanes are much the same. The registration plate for example is considered an airplane, so you'll see people paying thousands of dollars for an original Piper J3 Cub's plate alone, simply because it's not too hard to rebuild one of those old planes from scratch, but getting it registered as anything but an experimental is hard with a homebuilt plane. Attach that nameplate to your replica though and now it's legally considered to be the same old plane that the plate came from.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  39. Life Lesson by IonOtter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My father was part of the Revolutionary War Re-enactment Militia back in the 70's, and we used to raise merry Hell with our cannon. I can remember firing Quaker Oatmeal canisters full of sand (puff rounds) several hundred yards out to sea off Cooper's Beach in the Hamptons.

    One time, they did a parade in Sag Harbor, but the village wouldn't let them fire the cannon. It was only a 2-pounder, but they still wouldn't let them fire it. They were afraid it would break the windows in some of the historic buildings, which admittedly, are several hundred years old. Well, they held off until the very end of the parade, then fired it anyway. No damage, scared the HELL out of the judges and the crowd loved it.

    However, now the gun had to be cleaned.

    Dad and Walter took it to the end of the pier and got ready to clean it, when dad noted that the bore was the exact same diameter as a "D" cell battery. Walter noted the same thing, and in a few minutes, they'd charged the cannon and rammed a D-cell down the bore.

    Now...a cannon with just a wadding load makes a huge "BOOM" with a big cloud of smoke. Very showy, very flashy. The gun rocks back a little, and that's it.

    However, a cannon with an actual round in it makes a sound not unlike a Howitzer from those old WWII movies. A kind of "PAH-WOOOM", followed by the sound of ripping canvas heading down range. The smoke cloud is much narrower, and oh yeah? The cannon jumped it's blocks and went flying down the pier like a scalded cat. Probably scared the bejabbers out of a few baymen that day.

    Dad was already hopping in the truck, Walter was chasing after the cannon before it rolled off the pier, and they both threw it in the back and took off before the cops could come.

    They cleaned it at home this time.

    --
    [End Of Line]