Slashdot Mirror


How Much Is Your Online Identity Worth?

itwbennett writes "Answer a few questions about your personal Internet use, and a new tool from Symantec will calculate your net worth on the black market. You'll get three results: how much your online assets are worth, how much your online identity would sell for on the black market, and your risk of becoming a victim of identity theft. The tool is intended to raise consumer awareness about cybercrime, said Marian Merritt, Internet security advocate for Symantec. It's unlikely the average consumer would read an Internet Security Threat Report, she added, but a simply illustrated example might get the same point across. 'It's shocking how little value criminals place on your credit card,' she said."

199 comments

  1. This tool is intended... by BaCkBuRn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... to make more $$ for Norton. When will the shameless plugs ever end?

    --
    PRINT "Signature line broken."
    GOTO 1
    1. Re:This tool is intended... by sopssa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems its going really bad for Symantec, with all their stupid spammy marketing efforts..

      Just earlier we had this http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/09/04/1648254/Symantec-Wants-To-Use-Victims-To-Hunt-Computer-Criminals

      So now its not just bloat software, but they're going to spam us with stupid things? Instead of actually doing whats needed, lightweight and protective antivirus?

    2. Re:This tool is intended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When anyone can pose as you online, or accuse you of anything online, or invent anything about you that they want online, or post fake-ass complaints about individual people simply because they're angry at them on extortion sites like rip-off report... then your identity is worthless. You are always just one stalker or one angry upset person away from having your whole integrity and personality and trust destroyed online. And since Google will just as well rank some angry ex girlfriend or stalker or mentally unstable banned user of your own web site or anything else higher than your own content, you can't hide behind obscurity and hope that future girlfriends, boyfriends, family, friends, employers, and others won't stumble onto it and have no way to determine if the comments are from legitimate sources or deranged assholes looking to hurt you in the most destructive yet passive way they can... and all without any legal recourse.

      So what is your online identity worth? Pretty much nothing.

    3. Re:This tool is intended... by gnick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What I really liked about their plug was this (FTA):

      Cybercrime is now larger than the international drug trade...

      I don't have numbers, but my B.S. meter is going off the charts. I humbly request a definition of "bigger". If they mean that more people are affected by cybercrime than are directly involved in the international drug trade, then OK. But if you count even indirect supporters of the drug trade, that falls apart - They claim 10 million people were victims of cybercrime last year - You can't tell me that there are fewer than 10 million people supporting the illegal drug trade right now. No way. Even if they're talking about $$, I still call shenanigans - The drug trade is BIG money. If somebody has numbers contradicting that balance, please share, but that quote reeks of FUD.

      I realize that I'm demanding citations without providing any - It still sounds fishy.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:This tool is intended... by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your BS meter appears to be functioning correctly.

      Over eleven years ago (1998), the UN reported that "illegal trade in narcotics has a captive market of about 190 million addicts and users worldwide, and is estimated to be worth more than 400 billion dollars a year". (source)

      "No way" by one or two orders of magnitude, I'd say.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    5. Re:This tool is intended... by yuna49 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This idiocy seems to trace back to a woman who once worked for the Treasury Department and made this claim to a Reuters correspondent at a conference in Riyadh in 2005.

      http://threatchaos.com/2009/03/evolution-of-the-cyber-crime-exceeds-drug-trade-meme/
      http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=480

      In its PR release, Symantec justifies this claim with a footnote to "Source: US Department of Treasury."

    6. Re:This tool is intended... by Shotgun · · Score: 4, Funny

      What I really liked about their plug was this (FTA):

      Cybercrime is now larger than the international drug trade...

      I don't have numbers, but my B.S. meter is going off the charts. I humbly request a definition of "bigger".

      What they mean is that they weighed people affected by identity theft and those affected by drug crimes. Have you seen the state of crack or meth addicts lately? Those guys don't weigh nuthin', compared to the pizza eating geeks getting ripped off on the net.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    7. Re:This tool is intended... by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Phishing and social engineering never killed tens of thousands of Mexico's innocents.

    8. Re:This tool is intended... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have two different opinions on this. Yeah, it would be great if Symantec would sell it's top-tier security products to the public at affordable prices. I've only heard good things about it's enterprise software. The far less effective "solutions" that they sell to John Q. Public helps to ensure that malware writers can find a way to bypass security.

      BUT - the real question should be, "When is Microsoft going to REPAIR THEIR BROKEN SECURITY MODEL?"

      Yes, security is getting better with MS products. But, everything comes back to the fact that MS is designed more for convenience than for security.

      Why am I even bothering, though? If people take security seriously, they generally move to a unix-like system. If they don't take security as seriously as they take marketability and convenience, they stay with Windows. And, the world suffers losses to criminals all day, every day.

      Phhht. The fact is, few people really care if their identity is stolen. Their actions prove it.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    9. Re:This tool is intended... by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if by "Top Tier Security Products" you mean "Symantec Endpoint Security" (which is Symantec Anti-Virus Corporate Edition Version 11) I would have to disagree with you. I was a pretty ardent supporter of their product years ago. The Symantec System Center allowed for some pretty easy centralized management, updating, virus alerts, and installation of Client and Server AV. The fact is that nowadays it simply is not that effective at detecting and is almost completely worthless at cleaning Virus and Malware (They added "Support" for Malware somewhere around version 8.0 or 9.0) infections. The company I work for had a three year maintenance deal that is going to expire and I will look elsewhere. I really can't remember the last time that it actually helped me in any way.

      Symantec Endpoint Security also bogs down computers pretty well, especially if it is actively running a scan. Even on newer boxes it becomes frustratingly slow to do anything if a scan is running. Compare that to Nod32 which is barely noticeable when running an active scan and seems to do a much better job at detection and cleanup, although I have experience with it only on a few machines.

      Others may have different experiences but for me, even Symantec Corporate offerings are no longer very good.

    10. Re:This tool is intended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ... but that quote reeks of FUD.

      It's not even FUD, it's "shit someone made up".

    11. Re:This tool is intended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This fucker hacked my account or something and is pretending to be me; don't listen to a word he says. He is worse than Hitler!

    12. Re:This tool is intended... by progliberty · · Score: 1

      Giving us what we want..what they were intended to do, in a short and simple way? Come on. Why should Symantec be any different from MTV? They will give us what we don't want while riding on their past claim to fame.

    13. Re:This tool is intended... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      I know a couple of symantec employees or employees (from a different section to Norton) that refuse to use Symantec's security products, several of the free for home user products are better than Symantec products have ever been, and they've been that way for some time.

  2. Worth by sopssa · · Score: 1

    How Much Is Your Online Identity Worth?

    So we should all post it here for them to hack us? :)

    1. Re:Worth by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm still waiting for TFA to load, but TFS doesn't sound much like the headline.

      ----

      Ok, it loaded. It doesn't say much more than TFS. But I think its "online identity" thing is misleading; they're not talking about "mcgrew", they're talking about "McGrew"; in other words, your OFFLINE identity. After all, you don't log into your bank with a pseudonym.

      I couldn't get the risk assessment tool to load at all. Since I don't do any business on the internet (I even used a paper check mailed to Canada for my domain when I had a web site) I don't think I'm at much risk at all. I'm more at risk of somebody going through my trash.

    2. Re:Worth by gnick · · Score: 1

      I'm more at risk of somebody going through my trash.

      I think people really underestimate dangers like that. We had a secretary who refused to use her purchase card over the Net (phone only) - Presumably the same with her personal cards. Why would you trust the integrity of some random voice on the other end of the phone more than an automated system? Not to mention trusting business owners to responsibly take care of your digits instead of leak them (intentionally or negligently)? I just take comfort that my liability is low on the cards I use and try not to let the dangerous numbers leak.

      I think my biggest liability right now (barring kidnapping for ransom or some random thing like that) is somebody stealing my wife's SUV...

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:Worth by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Hello, my name is JW Smythe. Steal my identity. :)

          Just kidding. I ran through their tests. "... In the underground economy, you're really worth about $150.00. And that's on a good day.

          Your entire digital life could go on the auction block for as little as $0.53, whether you like it or not."

          Sucker. Someone could buy my identity $150? Hell, I'll sell it to 'em for $100, if I can get a fresh one to replace it. :) I suspect most folks got higher numbers.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Worth by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Considering how dangerous SUVs are; more people die per 100,000 miles in an SUV than any other vehicle because of their non-unibody construction, lack of crumple zones, top-heaviness, poor handling and braking due to their weight, and considering how much it costs to fill one, if anybody steals her SUV they're doing you both a favor.

      I was thrilled when the Evil-X bought an SUV!

    5. Re:Worth by FerociousFerret · · Score: 1

      After all, you don't log into your bank with a pseudonym.

      Really?? I certainly do. My bank allows me to set up my login ID as anything I want so it isn't attached to my real name.

    6. Re:Worth by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I'm more at risk of somebody going through my trash.

      There's a reason people buy paper shredders.

    7. Re:Worth by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>I suspect most folks got higher numbers.

      I got $1495 with "as low as" $75

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:Worth by gnick · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you were in the cross-hairs when I suggested that a more practical solution for her might be a station-wagon, you'd have bought her whatever she wanted too! Still, at this point we're in that golden zone where having it stolen would suck for both us and the criminal.

      Still, most credit cards hold a liability of about $50 for the user, typically waived by the issuer in the case of fraud. Why do we sweat that when we've got at least $10k parked overnight in our drive-way. Sure, it's easier to steal CC#'s en masse, but as an individual I just do due diligence and don't sweat it.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    9. Re:Worth by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Actually a minivan would have been best -- they're the safest on the road. But I agree, there's no arguing with a woman who knows what she wants.

      And about the CC, that's a great point and why I don't use a debit card any more. If someone sees you punch in the PIN and steals it, you have to eat the loss. I found that out by having mine stolen, cost me a ton of money. CCs are safe, debits aren't.

      As to the car, well I still owe the bank so it's insured with full coverage, although it would still cost me a lot more than a stolen credit card.

    10. Re:Worth by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      that's funny - I usually treat the minivans i see as the most dangerous. Usually driven by chatty soccer moms in their own little world.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:Worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It always give the same result. It will say "You are at X amount of risk" or whatever, but the paragraph always says "You have the kind of data out there that the thieves just love to get...". Even if you check no for everything.

    12. Re:Worth by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I probably cheated a little. I'm out of work. No income. No bank accounts. No valid credit cards. If someone stole my identity, they'd probably pay me, out of pity. Hell, a pick pocket would complain because he'd just get the $0.42 and some lint from my pocket.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    13. Re:Worth by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      I don't think the cost is the money alone.

      I think the credit score hit from "lost card" is the ugly part. Yes they'll shut it down etc, but then they tag you with a Scarlet Letter that can take years to get rid of.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    14. Re:Worth by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>there's no arguing with a woman who knows what she want

      Yes there is - "Fine. You can have your SUV [or Lexus or Acura], but I'm only paying the first $20,000. Anything beyond that you'll have to earn yourself." After a few months struggling to earn that extra ~$10,000 to buy her precious SUV, she'll have a change of heart and go with a more practical car.

      I drive a car that cost me a mere $14000 (new but last year's model). Why should she get a car that costs over twice as much??? I'm willing to go up to $20000 (plus tax), but see no reason to spend more than that.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    15. Re:Worth by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Yeah but chatty soccer mom will be safe while she rolls-over your sedan. Hence minivans are safer (for her).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    16. Re:Worth by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Chatty soccer moms in their own little world are dangerous in any vehicle, but they and you are more likely to survive a crash if she's in a minivan rather than an SUV.

  3. Not working for me. by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Funny

    I used this tool, but it didn't turn out so well. The first question was, "To calculate your worth, please provide your SSN and online banking username and password." Unfortunately, when I clicked "Next", it's lagging and I can't get through to the next part...

    1. Re:Not working for me. by Sl4shd0t0rg · · Score: 2, Funny

      This post should be rated funny, not informative. The tool, while pretty lame, never asks for SSN or banking info.

    2. Re:Not working for me. by psybre · · Score: 1

      LOL Are you sure your browser wasn't pointed to symantec.crkr4u.nl?

      ~psybre

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor. -- d474
    3. Re:Not working for me. by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funny as your comment was intended, I stopped the questionary when it asked how much my total bank accounts were worth.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Not working for me. by baomike · · Score: 1

      All I got was a little yellow circle the kept going around and around ... .
      Slashdotted perhaps?
      or just a microsoft specific site?

    5. Re:Not working for me. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Just a big honking Flash app. Took about a 3 minutes to load on my 18 Mbps connection.

      Ran fine on FF/Linux, but I too stopped it once it asked what my bank accounts etc. added up to.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:Not working for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, mine asked my gender and age and that was more than I was willing to give out, so I made up stuff. Honestly, it sounded more like a marketing survey than an honest attempt to inform me.

    7. Re:Not working for me. by Ironica · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the point I stopped at also.... though I originally was looking at it just to see if it asked for a bunch of stuff you shouldn't just put into a form online, and then it said "Your risk is HIGH, because you never should have told us all this!"

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    8. Re:Not working for me. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      One meeeelion dollars!

    9. Re:Not working for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Needs scripting and cookies alloed. Otherwise it gets stuck in an infinite loop.

    10. Re:Not working for me. by fyoder · · Score: 1

      When I tried it all I got was a picture of a laptop, and to the right the words "the more ways bad this quiz to assess". I'm thinking, 'Yoda, lay off the sauce'. Or maybe it just doesn't work with firefox on linux.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    11. Re:Not working for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever happened to lying about how much you're worth? It's normal when drawing up a prenuptual agreement.

  4. Pfft! No problem... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks to a messy divorce 4 years ago, my credit rating probably still sucks to the point that even an ID thief would be ashamed to use it.

    Go ahead, try and get a credit card with it - you'll hear laughter that would compete with an insane asylum on Bath Day...

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Pfft! No problem... by anglico · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm in the same boat you're in, I always joke with my friends that if they did steal my identity they would probably feel sorry for me and actually deposit money in my accounts.

    2. Re:Pfft! No problem... by Mythrix · · Score: 1

      Double win if they deposit money from your ex' accounts!

    3. Re:Pfft! No problem... by sheehaje · · Score: 1

      I up the same creek as you...

      In fact, if my online identity was worth anything, I'd probably sell it myself...

    4. Re:Pfft! No problem... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase Iago, "Who steals my identity steals trash."

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Pfft! No problem... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      So you're that annoying pirate singing fuck in those freecreditreport.com commercials... ;)

  5. How much? They'll tell you how much. by Romancer · · Score: 1

    It's worth as much as Symantec tells you it's worth!

    Ha!

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:How much? They'll tell you how much. by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This was just a way to sell their software. When I said I had a "security suite" to protect my accounts they rated me as "low risk" but when I changed the answer to "no security" than they rated me high. I'm surprised they didn't have an instant popup to sell me their program.

      This is just like the insurance companies who make it sound you'll be run-over by a car or hit by a falling ladder, as soon as you step outside your home. Exaggerating a person's risk is a scam to get your money. That's all it is. "Oh yeah you need to buy this, else you will be SCREWED!!! Hahaha." "OMG I'll take it!" "A wise decision madam."

      Ch-ching.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:How much? They'll tell you how much. by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      Actually they totally undervalued me and hurt my feelings. I guessed that if someone were to "steal my digital life" as they put it, they'd make off with around two grand before they were stopped. I was informed that I'm only worth 645 dollars. :/

      Damn you, Symantec! I am not a number!

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    3. Re:How much? They'll tell you how much. by titten · · Score: 1

      This was a little like going through the Total Perspective Vortex.
      $21.93 is what my online identity is worth.

    4. Re:How much? They'll tell you how much. by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      This was a little like going through the Total Perspective Vortex.

      $21.93 is what my online identity is worth.

      That's odd. Mine came up with the same amount. I didn't even fill in close to legitimate numbers (They might be listening...), and I was told I am worth $21.93. I think it's all bullshit and they're just giving a random number.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    5. Re:How much? They'll tell you how much. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>they'd make off with around two grand before they were stopped. I was informed that I'm only worth 645 dollars. :/

      Correct. The "guy" pays $645 for your information and he scores about $2000 using it. So around $1300 profit minus expenses like gasoline, renting a place to atash the stuff, and so on. It wouldn't make sense for the guy to pay $5000 for your data if he's only netting $2000 stolen, would it?

      I had my credit card number stolen one time, and somebody in California bought $3500 worth of stuff at Walmart. I had been traveling and I suspected the girl behind the Motel 6 desk had collected and sold my number. I don't know how much the scammer paid that girl but if it was around $1500 (Symantec's estimate), then he "earned" $2000 profit overall. Not bad.

      See it's not about "your" value. It's about the value to the scam artist and how much he thinks he can get with that data.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:How much? They'll tell you how much. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      %21.93 is probably a default value for the "average" person. If the computer crunches your dollars and finds you're essentially worthless, rather than say "you're worth $0.00" it defaults to the national average. (IF PERSONVALUE >>$21.93 THEN PRINT PERSONVALUE; ELSE PRINT "$21.93"). For me the minimum value was around $75 and maximum value was about $1500.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  6. Worthless... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Symantec will calculate your net worth on the black market

    I went there and it told me I owed it money...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Worthless... by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Is it worth if you owe money, or are worth zero?

    2. Re:Worthless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was told I was worth $1,000i. I'm afraid that if I took the test again, I would end up owning $1 million dollars, so I left it were it was.

    3. Re:Worthless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, will they pay me for my identity?

  7. Slashvertising at its best. by jittles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This tool is nothing but a giant slashvertisement, though I suppose that should be obvious. It was a complete waste of time. Oh and I'm worth $31 online if anyone wants to buy me ;o)

    1. Re:Slashvertising at its best. by HogGeek · · Score: 1

      This is now slashBay, and my bid:

      $.01

      Am I in the lead?

    2. Re:Slashvertising at its best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only useless and an advertisement but unclear. The question about whether you have antispyware (Windows Defender), antiphishing (in both IE 8 and Outlook 2007) and a two-way firewall (Windows Firewall can do both inbound and outbound) made no sense because anyone with Vista or Win 7 and all the updates could answer "Yes" to that question. It's silly because they meant "do you have Symantec Internet Insecurity or McAfee whatever".

    3. Re:Slashvertising at its best. by InlawBiker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm beginning to wonder if Slashdot shouldn't tag stories as "paid placements." This is a ridiculously obvious marketing piece.

    4. Re:Slashvertising at its best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same story is a "sponsored" link on Digg right now.

    5. Re:Slashvertising at its best. by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh and I'm worth $31 online if anyone wants to buy me ;o)

      You'd better be a damned good looking female, I never paid more than $30 and she had to be pretty hot for that kind of money ;)

    6. Re:Slashvertising at its best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - this thing is a few megabytes of flash crap that does nothing useful except advertise. BarnumWare, pure and simple.

    7. Re:Slashvertising at its best. by Thoughts+from+Englan · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you were renting - jittles specified buying

      --
      That was supposed to be "Thoughts from England" ... Oh well.
    8. Re:Slashvertising at its best. by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Oh and I'm worth $31 online if anyone wants to buy me ;o)

      You'd better be a damned good looking female, I never paid more than $30 and she had to be pretty hot for that kind of money ;)

      Well looking at the smiley, she has a hole instead of a nose. I cannot decide for you whether that's worth more than $30.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    9. Re:Slashvertising at its best. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I saw the right parenthesis as a chin, and the o as a mouth. I guess I have a dirty little mind.

  8. Not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just ran the numbers, and considering

    - My 4 digit Slashdot ID
    - My online bank account who's login and password match my GMail account
    - My original ICQ number
    - My ownership of the domain, hardknocks.edu (The School of Hard Knocks)
    - My World of Warcraft account(s)
    - ... and my 5 digit Counter-Strike source SteamID

    I come in at just over 9,000 dollars!

    1. Re:Not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ~> whois hardknocks.edu

      This Registry database contains ONLY .EDU domains.
      The data in the EDUCAUSE Whois database is provided
      by EDUCAUSE for information purposes in order to
      assist in the process of obtaining information about
      or related to .edu domain registration records.

      The EDUCAUSE Whois database is authoritative for the .EDU domain.

      A Web interface for the .EDU EDUCAUSE Whois Server is
      available at: http://whois.educause.net/

      By submitting a Whois query, you agree that this information
      will not be used to allow, enable, or otherwise support
      the transmission of unsolicited commercial advertising or
      solicitations via e-mail. The use of electronic processes to
      harvest information from this server is generally prohibited
      except as reasonably necessary to register or modify .edu
      domain names.

      You may use "%" as a wildcard in your search. For further
      information regarding the use of this WHOIS server, please
      type: help

      No Match

      Nice try, though.

  9. For some reason I do not trust.. by scsirob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .. articles that use links to "everyclickmatters.com" and such.

    Maybe using this tool is not such a smart idea?!?

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:For some reason I do not trust.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. articles that use links to "everyclickmatters.com" and such.

      Maybe using this tool is not such a smart idea?!?

      My thoughts exactly.

    2. Re:For some reason I do not trust.. by Quothz · · Score: 1

      .. articles that use links to "everyclickmatters.com" and such.

      Maybe using this tool is not such a smart idea?!?

      Precisely what I wanted to say. Add in the fact that symantec.com doesn't have a link to it that I was able to find, and it sounds pretty phishy. I also note that Symantec has no press release regarding this tool on their press releases page, and Merrit's Symantec page makes no mention of it.

      This sounds like a clumsy hoax to me.

    3. Re:For some reason I do not trust.. by rhsanborn · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's on their front page. It's called "Deny Digital Dangers". It links to every click matters.

    4. Re:For some reason I do not trust.. by Quothz · · Score: 1

      It's on their front page. It's called "Deny Digital Dangers". It links to every click matters.

      Ah, thanks. I checked out the other "deny digital dangers" button, which leads to their store, but not that one. Foolish of me, to think that two links with (almost) identical labels would go to the same place.

      So I guess it's legit. It seems kind of poor form for a self-described Internet security company to encourage people to run apps on random domains without clearly confirming the site's authenticity, tho'.

    5. Re:For some reason I do not trust.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. articles that use links to "everyclickmatters.com" and such.

      Maybe using this tool is not such a smart idea?!?

      Precisely what I wanted to say. Add in the fact that symantec.com doesn't have a link to it that I was able to find, and it sounds pretty phishy. I also note that Symantec has no press release regarding this tool on their press releases page, and Merrit's Symantec page makes no mention of it.

      Press release. And on the Symantec, Norton and Norton today homepages the central Flash banner links directly to everyclickmatters.com .

  10. CC # Worth? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    'It's shocking how little value criminals place on your credit card,' she said."

    No, if it were worth more, there'd be more value in stealing it. You want its value to a criminal to be zero, the chance of being caught to be infinite, or both.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:CC # Worth? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      'It's shocking how little value criminals place on your credit card,' she said."

      No, if it were worth more, there'd be more value in stealing it. You want its value to a criminal to be zero, the chance of being caught to be infinite, or both.

      Actually a chance of 100% is absolutely sufficient.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:CC # Worth? by Malc · · Score: 1

      It's shocking how little value CC companies place in the security of their cards, and make it so easy for criminals.

      I've recently been a victim of identity theft and fraud.

      I have a CC with MBNA Canada. Somebody called up and said the card was lost or stolen. All MBNA confirmed was my DoB, then they allowed this person to change the address on the account, issue a new card, and a order a new PIN.

      Maybe the same person went to Sears. Sears Canada only requires that you to have an existing CC before they issue you one. If they'd bothered checking with Experian or Transunion, they would have discovered a fraud victim alert. What's more, they issue a temporary card that can be used in the store for a day. So now I have to waste time on the phone, and completing paperwork, etc to say it wasn't me who spent $1,500 on a Toshiba laptop.

      Home Depot Canada, are just as bad. Perhaps the same person got them to issue a CC to me. They won't tell me over the phone the details, but apparently there were transactions, again, on an unactivated card.

      I called Toronto Police. They don't take fraud reports over the phone. Typical of their lazy arsed existence. I'd just moved to the UK before this all happened, so I can't exactly go in person.

    3. Re:CC # Worth? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered, how is credit history handled internationally for private citizens? Does a UK employer just pull your US credit score, google for what a "good" score is, and base it off that? How does bankruptcy, etc affect your (I assume) nonexistant credit score in the UK/EU? Could you just rack up huge CC bills, declare bankruptcy in the US, and move to the UK without any effect on your credit?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:CC # Worth? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      UK employers very rarely do credit checks, and if they do, it would be a UK credit check which would show no history. The credit agencies in the UK don't give you scores, they just give you data which you can use to create your own score.

    5. Re:CC # Worth? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      I called Toronto Police. They don't take fraud reports over the phone. Typical of their lazy arsed existence. I'd just moved to the UK before this all happened, so I can't exactly go in person.

      Will they do it by fax? When my husband's debit card was stolen from the US Mail before it ever arrived, and mysteriously activated by someone else, he was able to have the PD fax him the forms and then fill them out and fax them back, instead of driving 200 miles to the city that the fraud happened in.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    6. Re:CC # Worth? by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      It is pretty much separate from one country to the next.

      If you declare bankruptcy in the US then you actually get a high credit rating there as a result because the agencies know that you can't declare bankruptcy on them for several years. If you turn around and move to a foreign country you will have no credit which isn't exactly a good thing when you're trying to buy or rent a house, buy a car, etc.

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    7. Re:CC # Worth? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      actually, it's the same thing with US credit agencies. FICO is just a defacto standard for some scoring.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:CC # Worth? by Malc · · Score: 1

      That's funny: if you go to Experian.co.uk, there's a link right there on the home page to check your credit score...

    9. Re:CC # Worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't have credit score in Sweden, so I would assume it is likewise in some other parts of the world.

      Why would an employer have access to my credit rating anyways? That concept is rather alien to me. On the other hand, we have to turn in our SSN to show that we really are who we say we are all the time. In one way I think this makes identity theft a lot easier, on the other hand when an electronics company are sending me a TV (that hasn't been payed in cash) they are free to refuse to send it to any other address than my registered address, so that also makes the benefits of stealing my identity weaker.

  11. Now I can look up.... by nettamere · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how much those black market names I was about to buy are really worth. Fantastic!

    --
    xxxxxxxxxx
    It's your mess. YOU clean it up!
  12. Symantec by sexconker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Someone thinks they're relevant?

    Even if their tools did a good job at estimating my risk, convincing me to buy, and then covering my digital ass, the fact is that the vast majority of identity theft still occurs from dumpster diving, intercepted/misdelivered mail, and the waitress taking your credit card out of site.

    If Symantec sold a good cheap shredder, or sold carry-to-table card readers to restaurants, then I'd give a fuck.

    1. Re:Symantec by houghi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If Symantec sold a good cheap shredder, or sold carry-to-table card readers to restaurants, then I'd give a fuck.

      I used to work in a restaurant and we had a carry-to-table card reader. One of the waiters still was able to do a double swipe with many of them. Took about a month before we realized he was doing it.

      My idiotic boss decided not to press charges against the thieving bastard and just cut his losses and pay the customers back. Idiots. Both of them.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Symantec by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      What scares me more is that there are that many people that don't even do a cursory glance at their credit card bill. WTF?

    3. Re:Symantec by houghi · · Score: 1

      They did and that was the reason it took about a month.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  13. Not an advertisement, no way by BertieBaggio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gotta love leading questions:

    Do you currently have a complete security software solution that includes spyware protection, antiphishing technology and a two-way firewall (BUY CO- ER, NORTON®!) installed on the personal computer you use most often?

    Yeah, it's just a tool to raise awareness (BUY NORTON®!), indeed. Just a natural question, placed at the top of a page and taking up a lot of eye-space. It helps determine if we should give you the sales routine. No, it helps determine if how much a criminal would value your identity. No, uh... what were we trying to do again?

    However, on a brighter note: I guessed a criminal could buy me, er... buy my online digital e-identity (or whatever they call it) for $20. They say I could go for as little as $11.29. Obviously I didn't take bartering into account.

    PS: BUY NORTON®!

    --
    If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    1. Re:Not an advertisement, no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope there product sells for less than $11.29, or else it would be a very bad investment.

    2. Re:Not an advertisement, no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my online digital e-identity (or whatever they call it)

      The generic term is edentity (the hyphen got lost in the late 90s). If you favor a certain OS it's iDentity, gdentity, Kdentity or MSIdentityâ.

    3. Re:Not an advertisement, no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, meto!!! I guess it could have something to do with the fact that I cannot click any of the answers from my 64 bit Linux desktop, and had to accept the defaults:(

  14. Online Banking is the DEVIL! by Strike+Fiss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Do you pay bills online? No? Can you VIEW bills online? No? Well...then that just means the hackers will try harder! BUY NORTON NOW!!!"

    Brilliant marketing. It's a shame this power can't be harnessed for good.

    1. Re:Online Banking is the DEVIL! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      It's the lack of shame that makes it possible in the first place

  15. This is advertising FUD, not a useful tool by petes_PoV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Norton Online Risk Calculator, unveiled within a microsite to coincide with the launch of Norton 2010,

    All it does is make people anxious about unmeasurable quantities of unknown worth, arbitrarily estimated in an obscure manner with no basis in fact or reality. Treat it like astrology not security.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:This is advertising FUD, not a useful tool by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      arbitrarily estimated in an obscure manner with no basis in fact or reality. Treat it like astrology not security.

      You meant 'economics', not 'astrology', right?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:This is advertising FUD, not a useful tool by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      What's the difference?

    3. Re:This is advertising FUD, not a useful tool by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      econ can actually make useful predictions. Still, it's hard to do econ research, as manipulating large populations is frowned upon if you aren't making money off them.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:This is advertising FUD, not a useful tool by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Astrology is an asinine system of beliefs grounded in observable aspects of celestial bodies.

      Economics is an asinine system of beliefs grounded in the human concept of "weath."

      --
      +1 Disagree
    5. Re:This is advertising FUD, not a useful tool by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      All it does is make people anxious about unmeasurable quantities of unknown worth, arbitrarily estimated in an obscure manner with no basis in fact or reality.

      You know what the worst part is?

      That this might actually get through the thick skulls of the directors of the company I work for and might actually make a difference where reasonable argument has consistently failed.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    6. Re:This is advertising FUD, not a useful tool by Jstlook · · Score: 1

      You meant 'astrology', not 'economics', right? ...

      --
      ---jstlook ---For that is the way of Elves, for they say both yes AND no, and mean every word of it. --- J.R.R.T.
    7. Re:This is advertising FUD, not a useful tool by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      i tend to do that with most symantec products

  16. Finally an independant price point tool! by burtosis · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was totally overpaying for all that black market info. I went to my dealer and showed him the link, now I save 30%! Thanks Geik^H^H^H^H Symantec!

    1. Re:Finally an independant price point tool! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a Cavem^H^H^H^H^H basement dweller you insensitive clod

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Finally an independant price point tool! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I can delete a word with fewer keystr^W button presses than you!

  17. Love the videos! by DogDude · · Score: 1

    At the end of the little marketing "quiz", it asks you if you want to "allow" or "deny" criminals to "steal your identity". Mine wasn't worth all that much, so I said "allow. The videos that follow are quite creative...

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Love the videos! by glyneth · · Score: 1

      LOL they are. Though the Bank of Nikolai stole from Steve Martin's Fred's Bank bit.

  18. Market Forces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's no shock how little credit card info is worth when it costs so little to retrieve. It's not about the ultimate value that can be attained with it. What's more, easy access to lots of cards means it makes much more sense to skim a lot of accounts, rather than gut one golden goose.

  19. Didn't seem to do much by six809 · · Score: 1

    A completely black page?

    Oh, wait, do I need to whitelist something in noscript for that? Pass.

    1. Re:Didn't seem to do much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking moron.

    2. Re:Didn't seem to do much by Shag · · Score: 1

      I get a completely black page with a little yellow circling thing.

      I think it's stealing everything off my drive. :)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  20. WTF are those buttons... by robot256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was humorous up until the last page, where it said, "Your entire digital life could go up for auction for as little as $21.39" and then had two big buttons, ALLOW and DENY. Are they ASKING if you want to auction your identity on the black market? And who in their right mind would click on either one of them? Very suspicious, but obviously just an advertisement for Symantec's crappy products. Long live ES-ET for actual bloat-free protection.

    1. Re:WTF are those buttons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh.

    2. Re:WTF are those buttons... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > And who in their right mind would click on either one of them?

      The same idiot who would answer any of their questions truthfully.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:WTF are those buttons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I clicked on "ALLOW" for the hell of it, and it went to a little movie clip or something (my computer's sound was off, so I couldn't hear what they were saying); looked like a bunch of "cybercriminals" discussing something. Probably shows them selling your identity if you "ALLOW" and shows them being foiled when you "DENY". I'm a-guessin'.

    4. Re:WTF are those buttons... by marciot · · Score: 1

      I clicked Allow to see what it would do. The videos were quite funny and a good easter egg.

  21. It's shocking how little... by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The writer understands anything.

    IT IS GOOD THAT CRIMINALS DO NOT PLACE A HIGH VALUE ON OUR CREDIT CARD INFORMATION.

    That basically means that the info is not all that dangerous. It means criminals are afraid of getting caught if they use it, so why spend all that much for it. If the criminals were sure they could get away with it and all they needed was the info, that information would go for a lot higher.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:It's shocking how little... by drijen · · Score: 1

      The writer understands anything. IT IS GOOD THAT CRIMINALS DO NOT PLACE A HIGH VALUE ON OUR CREDIT CARD INFORMATION. That basically means that the info is not all that dangerous. It means criminals are afraid of getting caught if they use it, so why spend all that much for it. If the criminals were sure they could get away with it and all they needed was the info, that information would go for a lot higher.

      This is not true, and a very silly conclusion.

      In reality, credit cards are worth very little, because they are a dime a dozen (pun intended). Furthermore, the amount of profit that can be gained from a credit card number is very small compared to the amount of profit gained, by say...a World Of Warcraft account, or an SSN for actual identity fraud.

      Why would you take a $2,000 credit line on a card, when you can take a $100,000 mortgage in someone else name?

      In the future, please remember: "A conclusion is the place where you stopped thinking."

    2. Re:It's shocking how little... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a WoW account is worth more than a $2000 credit limit credit card? I fail to see why.

      There are two likely reasons why a CC# is worth little. Both reasons come under supply and demand.

      Either we have supply outstripping demand, or we have low demand. Given fraud figures, I would tend to think the reason is supply outstripping demand. So I agree with your dime a dozen remark, but little else in your post.

    3. Re:It's shocking how little... by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Er, no, its because there's plenty of supply, and its rather low risk to obtain a CC number. This is why coke or pot is so expensive, the supply is not up with demand, and its fairly high risk to produce and sell the drugs.

    4. Re:It's shocking how little... by Spaceman+Spiff+II · · Score: 1
      I disagree. We can't tell anything from the price alone, simply because it's so cheap to harvest identities.

      Whether it's dangerous and there are few criminals, or it's easy and there are plenty of them, the fact that it it costs essentially nothing to set up phishing websites and the like and the info can be sold for anything means people will continue to enter the market to supply the information.

      So the price will be driven down regardless of the demand level, obscuring whether the price needs to be low to attract criminal buyers, or whether there's tons of criminal buyers who all want a piece of the action.

      --
      I understand that life's not fair, just why is it never unfair in my favor?
    5. Re:It's shocking how little... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The writer understands anything.

      IT IS GOOD THAT CRIMINALS DO NOT PLACE A HIGH VALUE ON OUR CREDIT CARD INFORMATION.

      That basically means that the info is not all that dangerous. It means criminals are afraid of getting caught if they use it, so why spend all that much for it. If the criminals were sure they could get away with it and all they needed was the info, that information would go for a lot higher.

      It's nothing to do with that. Cards are cheap because they're easy to get. You can speculate as to why but you can't conclude much of anything just from them being cheap.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  22. Tim Is Bought And Paid For. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Timothy is obligated to run these Slashverts, otherwise IT World stops sending him the free laptops, smart phones, and what not.

    1. Re:Tim Is Bought And Paid For. by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Timothy is obligated to run these Slashverts, otherwise IT World stops sending him the free laptops, smart phones, and what not.

      In this case perhaps it's a free version of Symantec, no? My anger at him has turned to pity...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  23. Can I use this to earn money? by petes_PoV · · Score: 5, Interesting
    By making up online personas and then selling them? Norton reckoned my online worth was $32 - just by clicking on my age range and taking all the other default values. That's about $32 for 30 seconds work. I could do that for a living. It's just a pity that Norton haven't taken this to it's logical conclusion and offered to join up people with onlibe identities and the (other) people who would pay for them.

    Of course, if they did, they'd find that:

    * there was almost no-one willing to pay for this

    * they would pay nothing like the Norton valuation

    and therefore expose the complete and utter BULL behind this mind-numbingly DUMB idea. I'd even be happy for Norton to take a 10% finders fee - I'd still make a pile.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Can I use this to earn money? by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      Wow, I like this idea. Maybe we can call it Facebook for Phishers?

    2. Re:Can I use this to earn money? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe you could just call it Facebook.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Can I use this to earn money? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      This is probably part of the reason the value of black-market CC info is "shockingly" low - 95% of what you get is probably fake. But that's the black market for you.

    4. Re:Can I use this to earn money? by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
      Yes, exactly right.

      Someone I used to work withg came back from lunch looking very pleased with himself (and not for the usual reasons!). As he had been accosted by a market researcher in town, who had offered him a chocolate bar in return for divulging his password. Like any sound-minded individual he immediately consented, made up a "password" on the spot and told the young lady that was his password. Got his chocolate and went on his way.

      Later, when the report was published, it turned out that a "shocking" 70% of the people interviewed would "sell" their password for a cheap bar of chocolate (the comparison with 30 pieces of silver was never far away). The more surprising thing was that 30% of the interviewees didn't have the wit, or maybe the dishonesty to do what everyone else had, and just make a completely untestable claim that an arbitrary word was their password.

      I would suspect that a large proportion of "credit card" information is, like cold calling data, either made up and sold by weight, or is old, obsolete data that's years out of date and includes old, canceled card details, voided personal information and addresses that were moved away from years ago. That's the real reason it's sold so cheap - it's all bogus and the real mugs aren't the people who's details are traded, but the suckers who buy it.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    5. Re:Can I use this to earn money? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Sir, you just made my evening a little funnier.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  24. What do I win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $695 on a good day. Do I get a cookie?

  25. Is it $0.43 or $100? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Informative
    I filled out the questions and got this at the end

    ...you guessed that a cybercriminal could buy you for $1.00. In the underground economy, you're really worth about $100.00. And that's on a good day. Your entire digital life could go on the auction block for as little as $0.43...

    So is my information worth $100.00 or is it worth $0.43? It doesn't seem like they have a clue, but then this is Symantec we are talking about, so I guess we already knew that.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    1. Re:Is it $0.43 or $100? by qoncept · · Score: 1

      Were you ever very good at answering story problems? What about multiple choice?

      A. $0
      B. $100
      C. $.43
      D. Between $.43 and $100

      --
      Whale
    2. Re:Is it $0.43 or $100? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Cool! I'm worth $650. (I thought I was worth $50.)

      Maybe I can sell my own info online and make some bucks?

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    3. Re:Is it $0.43 or $100? by rhsanborn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It means the criminal would expect to get about $100.00 out of your identity, but they won't pay $100.00 to try and get that value. They have a significant risk, including many identities that just don't work out, and the risk of getting caught. So, they'll only buy the opportunity to use that identity for $0.43.

    4. Re:Is it $0.43 or $100? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Yes, but their wording contrasts the $100.00 to the $1.00 that I guessed a cybercriminal could buy my info for, which is designed to cause me to think "oh my info is worth more than I thought it was." When in fact it is worth less than I thought it was (I guessed $1.00, they say $0.43).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:Is it $0.43 or $100? by tool462 · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming their equation looks like this:
      $value = $large_number * rand() + $symantec_license_cost

  26. Enter your SSN, credit card number, and mother's.. by billlava · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Enter your SSN, credit card number, and Mother's maiden name, fill out a short survey about which online sites you use most frequently, and we will calculate your online net worth!

  27. Dokken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The commercials for Norton 2010 featuring Dokken are hilarious! Too bad I'm at work and IT blocks youtube here, but check 'em out for a good laugh!!

  28. A Marketing Ploy, me thinks by realsilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree it's important to understand how to keep your information protected, but this sounds like the newest method of selling you the latest and greatest upgrades to Symantec's software. We have seen scare tactics in the News media to get you to watch their stations for the news and weather by over-sensationalizing the headlines or the topics to be covered.

    Just the other day, the news eluded to the next hurricane that formed with this dire sounding report about keeping you informed. What the news failed to mention was that the particular storm was just off the coast of Africa and it's path was keeping it in the ocean off the coast of Africa.

    It's not that I don't believe Symantec isn't touching upon an important topic, it's just the method by which they are choosing to report the data to the consumer.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:A Marketing Ploy, me thinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. My worth? by Mr.Fork · · Score: 1

    Hmm... after doing the report, I'm worth -$42 (that's a negative) and they're demanding my presence be eliminated from the net. It also had 'End of Line' when I finished. What does 'End of Line' mean? :)

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
    1. Re:My worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      42, combined with eliminating your presence from the net,
        simply means that the programmers read Douglas Adams and watch Red Dwarf.
      This is news?

    2. Re:My worth? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Apparently they've also seen Tron once or twice.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  30. What's it doing during the download? by Animats · · Score: 1

    If you visit that site, it spends about thirty seconds running a "preloader". Yet the actual quiz comes from another site and is trivial. What's going on in there?

    1. Re:What's it doing during the download? by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Must be cloud based. Talking to servers on the clouds takes a lot longer, as clouds are farther away than earth-based servers.

    2. Re:What's it doing during the download? by Tha_Big_Guy23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you fill out the quiz, and at the end, you elect not to protect yourself, you get to watch a video. At the end of that video if you choose not to protect yourself, you get another video, and yet another follows that. That, is what it's doing in the background. Downloading video. Personally, the Shopping Network video scared me.

      --
      If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
    3. Re:What's it doing during the download? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > What's going on in there?

      The only real way to determine the worth of something is to sell it. So they download a trojan that steals your identity and sells it on the international automated identity market and then reports the amount so that they can tell you what your identity was worth.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  31. $1.23? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'You Believe your online value is $100 and you guessed
    a cybercriminal could buy you for $9001. In the underground
    economy your really worth about $180 and thats on a good day.

    Your entire digital life could go on auction block for as little as
      $1.23, whether you like it or not'

    but i so wanted to be worth OVER 9000!

  32. Apparently I'm priceless by IBBoard · · Score: 1

    I've found a way to make yourself priceless - use the official build of Flash, but do it from Firefox on openSuse! Everything else Flash-based works fine for me, but I can't get past the first page of this "advert masquerading as a tool" because I don't have any boxes to select my gender or age! I can see the lists, just no checkboxes, and clicking in the rough areas doesn't help either. I take that to mean that theives can't steal my details and therefore my details are priceless :)

    1. Re:Apparently I'm priceless by ohsmeguk · · Score: 1

      Same here! Linux FTW

    2. Re:Apparently I'm priceless by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      use the official build of Flash, but do it from Firefox on openSuse! Everything else Flash-based works fine for me, but I can't get past the first page of this "advert masquerading as a tool" because I don't have any boxes to select my gender or age!

      Yeah, I've been noticing this more and more with Flash on Linux lately. I think it has to do with websites designed for Flash 10. I think Adobe has decided to screw the Linux crowd and release a version of Flash 10 for Linux that doesn't behave the same as it does on Windows.

      Thanks again Adobe!

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    3. Re:Apparently I'm priceless by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      I've created a bug report for this issue.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    4. Re:Apparently I'm priceless by grahammm · · Score: 1

      I do not even see the lists, just the questions. But I can click on 'next' and see the questions, but again no answers, on the subsequent pages. Running official flash on FF 3.5.2 on Gentoo. I tried using the Chrome beta (with plugins enabled) but it just timed out loading the quiz.

  33. How could theives hack my accounts? by jrhawk42 · · Score: 1

    I can't even access my accounts most of the time! How are much luck are they going to have? "Sir this is ABC Bank we saw some suspicious activity on your online account today. Apparently you logged with all the correct information, and didn't get locked out. Due to the suspicious activity we're going to lock your account."

  34. You think someone would pay cash for my identity? by jeremyl · · Score: 1

    You mean I can get some cold hard cash for my online identity? This site only tells me how much I can get for it... where do I actually sell it?

  35. Hmm... by Trieppo · · Score: 1

    Let's see what the database says here: "NULL".

  36. My Fool-Proof Identity Theft Defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay my ex-wife to mess up my credit report. This prevents any identity theives from opening accounts in my name.

    She only charges me a couple grand a month for the services too -- so its quite a bargain.

  37. How to increase your value by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    Just use some RIAA lawyers to calculate the value of your "digital life".

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  38. BS by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Besides all the loaded questions and unquantifiable results the fact is much of the stuff being asked for is insured.

    So sure they might pay 22$ to get at my stuff, but from my perspective if they steal money from my credit card it is insured against identity theft, so basically they are stealing from the bank, not me as the bank will reimburse me. I have had it happen to me before.

    This is really just a stupid thing to sell their software, which really wouldn't help all that much anyway. Not being foolish is part of it.

    The WORST case I have ever heard of was a couple went on vacation, and some asshole stole their identities, and actually sold their 400k home out from under them. Brutal eh? However is this their fault, or that of the stupid bank? In this case I would also think that it would be much like if someone stole your car and sold it. The person with the stolen car wouldn't be the loser, it would be the person that bought the car. In this case the bank controls the sale, as they hold the mortgage, so likely there is some responsibility there as well.

    1. Re:BS by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > The person with the stolen car wouldn't be the loser, it would be the person
      > that bought the car.

      Same for the incident you describe.

      > In this case the bank controls the sale...

      No they don't.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  39. Worthless by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    It said the world would pay me $1000 to go away. :-(

  40. FUD by gavron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Telling me how much I'm worth on the black market of identity theft begs the question of whether HOW SECURE AM I FROM IDENTITY THEFT and does nothing more than add FUD to the identity theft discussion.

    If you don't want your identity stolen, the right way to do that is to PREVENT YOUR IDENTITY FROM BEING STOLEN, not buy more software that may or may not patch more holes in the software you already have.

    Social networking sites aren't the problem. People who freely give out confidential information are the problem.
    Your computer isn't the problem. How you use it to make it easy for others to take your confidential information is the problem.

    Norton can't fix all the malware problems, and they can only do so AFTER they see the malware (either in concept or in the wild). Too often that's many many days after the problem is already too late. Their suggestions to use firewalls do nothing to prevent spyware installed through any number of known windows/adobe/vendor-of-the-day-hole from stealing your data in real time and delivering it where it will be used immediately to drain your accounts.

    Use linux. Use FireFox. Use anonymizers. Don't store passwords anywhere other than your head.
    Don't use Windows. Don't use Internet Explorer or Outlook. Don't keep all your passwords in the browser.

    Here's an excellent example of a "strong password checker" that is in fact TERRIBLE: http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/checker.mspx
    Hint: try aaaaaa$A There are two problems with this "strong password checker". The first is it assumes a password CANNOT be strong unless it has elements of letters, numbers, and either special characters or uppercase letters. The second is it assumes that at 8 characters a password containing members of those sets is strong, and that at 14 characters it is "the best". This implies that aaaaaaaaaaaa$A is a stronger password than "You'llneverguessmypassphrasebutI'llrememberit!"

    Norton needs FUD so they can sell more of their products.

    We as /. readers don't like FUD. Not from SCO, not from MS, ...and not from Norton.

    Stop the FUD when you see it.

    E

    1. Re:FUD by ittybad · · Score: 1

      Stop the FUD when you see it.

      "Be vewwy vewwy quiet, I'm hunting wabbi...." BANG! FUD Stopped.

      --
      No single raindrop believes it is to blame for the flood.
  41. Answer a few question about online account values? by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    Nice try Symantec. Nice Try.

  42. OMG by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am so scared now I was asked a whole bunch of questions about how every single person in the world uses the internet, from online banking to facebook, and now Symantec has told me I'm a MEDIUM risk and criminals are out to get me!!!!!!!!!

    I guess I should buy their software right away! SAVE ME SYMANTEC, SAVE ME!!!!

    Oh, wait - the cost of their subscription fee over 10 years is less than what they say I am "worth". Or are they the criminals telling me what I'm worth to them? I'm so confused now...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  43. Only works in IE. Lesson: Symantec Software by ktappe · · Score: 1

    Since the very first page of the questionnaire has radio buttons that overwrite each other in every browser but IE, any thinking user should conclude if Symantec can't even author a website you shouldn't trust them with your PC's internet security.

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  44. I am worth a peso! by antdude · · Score: 1

    It said I am worth a peso. [grin]

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  45. Selling your e-soul by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    Dude, nobody's gonna pay you $32 for the 30-second questionnaire. But somebody might pay that much for all the information you said you have (credit cards, bank accounts, contact lists, birthdate, address, medical records, brokerage accounts, retirement accounts, debit cards).

    My online value of $10,000 is worth $675, for which a criminal might pay $80. The difference between $675 and $80 accounts for the risk that the information is bogus, that the credit cards will be closed before they're used, that the whole process is illegal, and profit.

    Now if you want to actually sell all your passwords, bank account numbers, and credit card numbers for $32 then go for it. If you want to sell fake passwords and numbers then good luck. Try that a few thousand times and you might get your fingers/legs/neck broke.

  46. Help me! by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

    I'm stuck on the last screen of the survey as it says ...

    "Your entire digital life could go on the auction block for as little as $21.96, whether you like it or not."

    Then it gives me 2 buttons I could click ... Allow or Deny?"

    Which one should I choose?!?!?!?

  47. Re:Only works in IE. Lesson: Symantec Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works fine in firefox.

  48. Re:Only works in IE. Lesson: Symantec Software by I_Wrote_This · · Score: 0

    An alternative view is that Symantec only reckon you are at risk if you use IE and that if you are using something else then you're already safe and hence of no interest to them?

  49. I *know* I'm vulnerable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the shitload of comments I post on slashdot every day, how can I not be?

  50. an article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are advertisements getting slashdotted?

  51. I thought I was worth $50 on the black market... by cthulhuology · · Score: 1

    and they said I'd only go for $11.29! I mean, I'm not even worth half of what I thought I was. I feel insulted and emasculated. Damn web form just took my balls!

  52. Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely nothing.


    On a side note, I find it a little amusing that I have to allow scripts from "72.32.208.229", a site I know absolutely nothing about, to (unsuccessfully on my Linux machine) enter personal information for no good reason on "everyclickmatters.com", which in turn claims to be a part of Symantec, although I'd need to do a WHOIS to be sure. Great user education there... Apparently cargo cult security is enough to comfort most people, requires no changes in user habits, and Symantec is happy to sell it.

    OTOH, am I seeing things or is that a terminal screen pictured on that laptop? Apparently that's what scary hackers use.

  53. Just a marketing gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is just a way to sell their software. One of the question they should ask is "Are you using Linux?"

  54. Re:Only works in IE. Lesson: Symantec Software by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    Any thinking user would have figured that much a long time ago...

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  55. Actual net worth doesn't matter by eccenthink · · Score: 1

    I entered all the same information twice; one claiming all my online accounts had $0 in them and another claiming I had $99,999,999 (the largest number you can input). Both said I was worth $32. I then went back and said I didn't have an online brokerage account or an online 401k. This caused them to calculate my worth at $12. I then tried saying I had no online accounts; not even an email. That said I was worth $0. I then said I only had an email. That raised my value to $0.10.

    So, regardless of how much money you say you have this calculator is entirely dependent on what type of accounts you have online.

  56. Re:Only works in IE. Lesson: Symantec Software by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Since the very first page of the questionnaire has radio buttons that overwrite each other in every browser but IE, any thinking user should conclude if Symantec can't even author a website you shouldn't trust them with your PC's internet security.

    If you aren't using IE you probably are too savvy to buy the product they are selling too. They're not losing anyone who would have bought it.

  57. Viral Marketing from an Anti Virus Software Corp. by herojig · · Score: 1

    So now slashdot is supporting another viral marketing campaign, and from an anti-virus software company. That's really funny. Thx for the laugh-of-the-day.

    --
    I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
  58. Re:Viral Marketing from an Anti Virus Software Cor by smchris · · Score: 1

    Some of the skits aren't that bad. The fact that the "determine your risk" button is dead with my default Opera 10 on Debian I think of as Symantec's way of being more truthful than they intended.

  59. Drink Ovaltine by Hut_tuH · · Score: 1

    felt like that kid with decoder ring in the movie "A Christmas carol".... eagerly decoding the secret message, only to realize it was just a damn commercial.

  60. I found a bug in the flash tool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I clicked on the test, and just kept clicking the next arrow until it told me my risk. Finally, a screen shows Accept or Deny. I don't know what the question was... but I hadn't entered anything worthwile, so I clicked Accept. It then drops a frame inside the current frame with all the top buttons nested inside the window where the questions were, so the top 4 or 5 large buttons had duplicates directly below them.

  61. Re:I thought I was worth $50 on the black market.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to break it to you but that $11.29 is in Zimbabwe dollars ;-(

  62. jack pot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sweet... i'm worth 650$ online. i can't get that much for my car and clothes. together. how can i sell me for 650$ is what i want to know.

  63. offtopic - index by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    p.s. re: your sig, I hate the index too.
    I ran a drive reader that saves to a text file, then any of the wordprocessors can slam through that and find the items. Index can't stand my style of batch&archive because all those broken links makes it grumpy.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    1. Re:offtopic - index by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      I just don't like the fact that when I browse down the front page and I open up one after another to several tabs, it locks up Firefox AND IE8.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  64. Re:Steal! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Can people be their own copyrights?
    "You, JW Smythe, born ____ at ____ time at _____ location" are a unique work. Copyright applies the moment a New Work comes into existence. The penalty for *infringing* on your identity is $1.2 Million!!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  65. Symantec, really now... by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Yes, Symantec, I'm really going to activate Javascript and run Flash just to look at, judging from what others have posted here, is idiotic advertising....

    Anyone who has ever tried to uninstall their products already knows enough to run away from this idiocy...

  66. I am worth by furby076 · · Score: 1

    $1,750 on a good day but as low as $32.94.

    Some safety tips
    1) If you don't know it, don't use it
    2) If you must purchase use a credit card (not debit card, not direct checking accuont)
    3) Different passwords for different sites (even groups are fine...e.g. your bank password is OK for your brokerage password, but not for your porn site password)
    4) Anti spyware softwre, anti-virus software - all set to high security levels
    You all know this but basically that is the crux of security
    --------
    Scuba Engagement

    --

    I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  67. Re:Steal! by Zenaku · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately the copyright goes to the creator of the work, not to the work itself. You probably owe damages to your parents for unauthorized use of your identity.

    --
    If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
  68. Re:Steal! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        Actually, JWSmythe is a fictional creation to which I use the persona online. Since the persona does not have a SSN, birth certificate, drivers license, etc, it may be a bit harder to get away with identity theft. :)

        Now, my real name, John W. Smith, could be (c) my parents. Oh wait, that's another fictional creation. :) I've used enough fake names online, that I tend to forget what my real name is. It brings a whole new meaning to the concept of a John Doe subpoena.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.