Slashdot Mirror


Feds Ask IT Execs To Throw Away Cellphones After Visiting China

sholto writes "US intelligence agencies are advising top US IT executives to weigh their laptops before and after visiting China as one of many precautions against corporate espionage. Symantec Chief Technology Officer Mark Bregman said he was also advised to buy a new cellphone for each visit and to throw it away after leaving. Bregman said he kept a separate MacBook Air for use in China, which he re-images on returning, but claimed he didn't subscribe to the strictest policies. 'Bregman said the US was also concerned about its companies employing Chinese coders, particularly in security.'"

100 of 382 comments (clear)

  1. huh by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 4, Funny

    how much does data weigh? I'm sure the 1's are heavier than the 0's....

    1. Re:huh by thefear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Data may be weightless, but how about hardware key logging devices?

      --
      :(
    2. Re:huh by gzipped_tar · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is reported by the uptime command (system "load"). When the CPU is busy its weight increases; when you turn it off it weighs exactly zero. That's why they ask you to turn off your laptop when your airplane is taking off: to save oil by reducing weight ;)

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    3. Re:huh by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but only the 1's contain data. The 0's are empty.

    4. Re:huh by thefear · · Score: 3, Informative

      malicious hardware (however likely or not this may be).

      I would argue that it isn't all that unlikely. Keylogging devices can be cheaply purchased for consumers, and we already know of cases where China has broken into hotel rooms, stollen blackberry's, etc.

      I actually consider it unlikely that they WOULDN'T be installing keyloggers in the laptops of execs who frequently travel to china.

      --
      :(
    5. Re:huh by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now they know that we weigh them it wouldn't be that hard to cut the equivalent weight. There are plenty of internal struts that can be drilled, etc to make up for a lightweight hardware device.

    6. Re:huh by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you two keep arguing about 1s and 0s my monitor will fall through the desk. Type some spaces quick.

    7. Re:huh by Telecommando · · Score: 2, Funny

      You young punks are lucky.

      In my day we didn't have ones and zeros, we had to use l's and O's and we were damn luck to have them.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    8. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah you.

    9. Re:huh by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Filter error: Please use less whitespace.

          Sorry, man. You'll just have to buy a stronger desk.

    10. Re:huh by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      how much does data weigh? I'm sure the 1's are heavier than the 0's....

      In the punchcard / papertape era, it was obviously the other way around, 0s are heavier, 1s (punched out) are lighter.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    11. Re:huh by mweather · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or just add the additional features at the factory and skip the desoldering altogether.

    12. Re:huh by MadnessASAP · · Score: 2, Funny

      You had O's? We had to use the Q key.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    13. Re:huh by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Funny

      Allow me to be the first to say... "whooooosh"

    14. Re:huh by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Data may be weightless, but how about hardware key logging devices?

      That reminds me of a Cold War story I heard once upon a time. The CIA worked with a Xerox technician to secretly install a camera inside the machine(s) at the Soviet embassy. They got away with it for a long time because those old machines were so complicated that only a handful of people knew how they really worked.

      This is just the modern day equivalent. If your hardware is out of your sight even for a few moments it should be treated as though it was compromised. If it's worked on by someone that you don't trust implicitly then it should be treated as though it was compromised.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:huh by supernova_hq · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey cool, the hotel fixed all the scatches in my cellphone while I was having a shower. This calls for a BIG tip to housecleaning!

    16. Re:huh by Eevee · · Score: 4, Funny

      They knew the camera was there, but they were too overcome with joy that the copier wasn't constantly broken to care.

    17. Re:huh by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 5, Interesting

      An airplane builder had its proprietary metal reverse engineered by asian companies. They did a great job with security, so couldn't figure out how the metals got sampled. People can't just go scrape parts off a military airplane, especially when it's not built yet.

      They gave tours and you couldn't take pictures, but you could see planes being built.

      Turns out asians were using very soft-soled shoes. So while looking up and pointing, they pressed their feet down on metal filings, and when they drove away they had samples in their shoes, to be analyzed later.

      Sneaky bastards work in corporate espionage.

    18. Re:huh by natehoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, we had O. To do a "Q", you did an O, then backspaced and typed a comma over it.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    19. Re:huh by buswolley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I understand the concern but...all our computers are made in China anyway. How dow e know if the Hardware isn't betraying us already?

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    20. Re:huh by joocemann · · Score: 2, Funny

      China, a country, broke into a hotel room and stole blackberrys?

      please reword...

    21. Re:huh by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Power supplies, computers, phones, etc. All stamped with 'made in china'.

      Everything down to the component level is produced there. If they wanted to bug them they could do it at any point during manufacture.

    22. Re:huh by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps he's talking about a secret band of mafia cutlery?

    23. Re:huh by Darth+Cider · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, the Soviets did that. Here's an old George Will column relating the tale. The subject of the column is Soviet industrial espionage.

    24. Re:huh by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is. There was a story a few months ago about the Department of Defense using router hardware sent to them with onboard hacks.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    25. Re:huh by LanMan04 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, bugged/compromised hardware coming out of China is most definitely a concern.

      TRUST ME, people in high places in the Fed Gov look into this stuff on a regular basis.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    26. Re:huh by JAlexoi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      US had to import and inspect bricks to USSR, just because they were once provided with bricks each containing a microphone! Can you imagine a building made of those bricks!

    27. Re:huh by Stradivarius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would require a massive conspiracy, like none we have ever seen.

      Not really, all it would require is a few people in the right places in a couple of high-market-share manufacturers. If you built something into the tools used by those manufacturers, it could be transparent.

      Also, you don't need to own every device. You could choose to target critical infrastructure devices - say a router, switch, DPI equipment or whatever. Something that handles lots of traffic and thus is well-positioned for either intelligence collection or denial/disruption of service.

      Apple, Dell, etc. are not so incompetent in their QA that they would not know that the hardware is somehow phoning home.

      Maybe it only phones home after receiving some sort of signal (such as a predetermined sequence of packets, packets with certain formatting, etc). QA testing is unlikely to uncover something like that, and even if they do may have a hard time reproducing it (which may make them less likely to pursue it).

      The sum of the worlds nerds are not so dumb that they would not notice all hardware phoning home.

      As above, it doesn't have to be all hardware, nor so stupid as to phone home regularly, or even without receiving an activation signal. That would attract unnecessary attention.

      Also, if you're targeting infrastructure devices, they handle so much traffic that it seems possible one could slip in some extra transmissions out without notice.

      It is too expensive to bug every machine, natural competition would favor companies who do not install this extra stuff.

      Competition favors those with the most capability for the lowest price. An intelligently designed surveillance or disruption module would not degrade capability during normal operation. It would be a sleeper agent until triggered.

      The marginal cost of another copy of software is zero. And the initial development cost would likely be picked up by the intelligence agency, not the company that was infiltrated. So the presence of such equipment would have no effect on competition.

      And if the company management was aware of the operation, they could even be given secret subsidies by the government to make them more competitive in the marketplace by artificially lowering the cost of their products. This would help ensure success of the trojan.

      China would face political ruin by trying to pull a stunt like this if it was discovered that they were spying on the world.

      How would anyone know the software was government-created, and not just one of the many unfortunate cases of malware infections we've seen at OEMs in the past?

      I'm not saying China or anyone else is necessarily doing any of this stuff. But it wouldn't surprise me. Nations do a lot worse in the world of espionage.

    28. Re:huh by hackingbear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or more likely, they acted as if they didn't know, but just passed fake document over the machines to fool the enemy.

    29. Re:huh by dave562 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I submitted a story here about a year or so ago about Maxtor hard drives with compromised firmware that were made in China. It never got picked up. Go figure.

    30. Re:huh by nazsco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. install phoning home hardware on all devices
      2. disable them by default
      3. enable them with some radiation or other mean (just like erasing an EPROM with utraviolet light)
      4. wait for key people to arrive under your control so you know their devices. turn on homming components.
      5. ???
      6. profit!

    31. Re:huh by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Holy shit, I had no idea that you could look up old newspapers on Google. Thanks a bunch man.

      Also, George Will is one badass motherfucker. Almost as badass as Paul Mulshine.

    32. Re:huh by FreakstaXIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There was also a story about them using lenovo computers on CIA networks to get data (it was all unclassified) thats what started the fear about the routers and what not, so they started looking and thats what they found

  2. Industrial espionage? by jmpeax · · Score: 5, Funny

    Symantec Chief Technology Officer Mark Bregman [...] was advised to buy a new cellphone for each visit

    Yes, heaven forbid China learns the secret of bloated antivirus software that ignores state-sponsored keyloggers.

    1. Re:Industrial espionage? by mrdoogee · · Score: 4, Funny

      What a coincidence! I advise people to buy new software after every Symantec install!

    2. Re:Industrial espionage? by demachina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm wondering if Symantec will be closing down their China Development Center in Bejing since Symantec has been developing security software in China for a few years now. Don't know how you reconcile these draconian security concerns with having a major development center in said country... developing security software for use in the west.

      It is interesting how the Obama administration seems to be much less accommodating to the Chinese than the Bush administration was. The Bush administration bent over backwards for China and all the multinationals that wanted to move all their operations, R&D, jobs, capital and IP in to the hands of the Chinese though the Chinese government is still basically the same one which was an bitter adversary 30-40 years ago and against whom the U.S. and U.N. waged a never concluded war in Korea.

      Its amazing how all the Chinese had to do was create a free economic zone on their southern coast, declare profit and capitalism OK there, and use the flashing dollar signs as a snare to get the west to unilaterally capitulate economically and politically without a shot being fired.

      --
      @de_machina
  3. Manufacture by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure glad that the laptops and cellphones in question weren't MADE in China in the first place...
    Oh, wait..

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    1. Re:Manufacture by bheekling · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you think it would go undetected for long if thousands of cellphones and laptops made in China, Korea or wherever had a hardware sneak-chip installed?

      Do you think it would be worth the effort to seed just a few of those thousands for some possible marginal gain? (Also keep in mind that specialized changes wreak havoc on an assembly line's schedule)

      Much easier to just target the fish directly.

      --
      "..."
    2. Re:Manufacture by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you think it would go undetected for long if thousands of cellphones and laptops made in China, Korea or wherever had a hardware sneak-chip installed?

      For the sake of argument, yes. It would be entirely feasible for EVERY unit of a certain (or any) product to have a 'sneak chip' installed, it could very easily be 'baked in' to the IC designs used.
      I believe (meaning I don't have a link to evidence :( ) that an attack has been demonstrated using this exact method, whereby a certain bit pattern on a certain bus triggered malicious behaviour.
      There was also a real case in the UK whereby chip-and-pin credit card readers (used in retailer's POS setup) had a 'sneak chip' built in at the factory by unscrupulous agents. (I am aware that this both supports the 'it could happen' and the 'it would be detected quickly' arguments.)
      Just to be clear, I'm not expressing any Anti or Pro Chinese sentiment here, but it seems somewhat ironic to be concerned about what "The Chinese" might do to compromise one's hardware, when that same hardware was designed and manufactured by "The Chinese" in the first place!

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    3. Re:Manufacture by WinterSolstice · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In a word? YES.
      It would require actual competence to detect a piece of hardware that essentially did nothing until activated and simply sat on a motherboard. Do you know if there are extremely detailed inspections done on every piece of circuitry brought into country X from country Y? I know for a fact that in a certain very large defense company I worked for lots of "surprises" were found on a regular basis. Typically things like parts that were different from the specs, insects, and on occasion completely incorrect assemblies.

      The funny part was these nearly all made it past QA and into the finished products, only to be discovered when something failed.

      So based on that, I'd say that *if* someone were choosing to do something like this, it would be fairly easy to sneak it past the level of moron that would typically be doing these inspections.

      Tinfoil hats aside - the real trick is getting the data back off again. It's trivial to convince a cell phone (for example) to record conversations while appearing off. The trick is to get to the data without anyone noticing, while you're in a foreign (possibly hostile) nation. I'd think someone would notice if a cell phone was constantly 'phoning home'.

      Doing this with a laptop would also be trivial, but I would hope that the firewall filter would catch outbound connections to unusual sites?

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    4. Re:Manufacture by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Screw the phone.. the cell towers are all made by the chinese anyway (Round here Huewei make most of them).

      And the DSL connections, and the routers connecting them to the internet..

  4. Worthless by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The same outsources plants that produce the goods just do a second run at night to produce grey market versions. Microsoft found this out after finding perfect counterfeit copies of their software that were only distinguished by having serial numbers that were never activated in their database, the plants that were producing packaging and holograms for their official packing were making exact duplicates for the counterfeiters.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  5. PCs and phones *are* made in China by pmontra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about using phones and notebooks manufactured in China? Is that ok or do we have to assume they are bugged-at-factory? Are the US starting to move their production lines back to home?

    1. Re:PCs and phones *are* made in China by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I read the article, and I stopped when it became clear that this information comes from Symantec. Your favorite over-paranoid, FUD-spreading company.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:PCs and phones *are* made in China by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The NSA has already expressed concerns over this. I don't know if this ever got turned into policy, but there are still chip fabs in the USA and Europe and I think Dell still makes PCs in Texas, so it is possible that government contracts require US-made computers containing US-made components. Of course, it only takes one compromised component to compromise the whole system...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:PCs and phones *are* made in China by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure it IS a good idea to throw away any cellphone or laptop that has any Symantec product installed.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  6. Related story by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's almost impossible to tell whether additional software has been installed unless you either 1) diff your HDD (hard and time consuming) or 2) weigh the laptop and see if any data has been added. The government is, for once, correct and providing helpful information.

    More on this topic at this old Slashdot story.

    1. Re:Related story by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not necessarily. A keyboard controller chip with keylogging software will weigh exactly the same as a keyboard controller chip without keylogging software.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  7. The real story by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real story in the article should be "CTO of world's largest Windows security software company uses a mac."

    1. Re:The real story by Jason+daHaus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also that he doesn't let his IT department near his laptop. Thats a level of distrust that, as an IT guy, drives me absolutely bonkers.

    2. Re:The real story by mbone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds sensible to me.

  8. Orginal date of warning? by NoYob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm just curious. Isn't it a bit of a coincidence that this warning comes out when there is a growing trade dispute with China happening now? We have been using China as our factory an major offshoring partner for quite a few years and now there are warnings.

    --
    It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
  9. Re:Horse, close the barn door! by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's the thing...

    If EVERY laptop and cell phone phoned home to China to give away secrets, somebody is gonna notice. REAL quick.

    They need to more selectively target folks if they want to actually be able to get away with hacking a machine to send them secret data.

  10. Re:Chinese Coders? by bheekling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not racial profiling, it's (current or previous) nationality profiling, you know, the information that's visible on your passport?

    --
    "..."
  11. What about Chinese nationals? by bezenek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    (The following discussion is based on real experiences and is not meant to profile people, but to state facts.)

    This is really ridiculous. If the Chinese want to steal our technology, all they have to do is to contact several of the thousands of Chinese nationals who are working in the US until they find someone who needs money or other help for their family back in China.

    One company I worked for had a Chinese national who was not allowed to work on part of a project because it was protected technology. The same person could have dropped the entire project onto their iPod and carried it out the door, but did not.

    The ethics problem is represented by an experience I had while at an American research university. A Chinese faculty member met with the Chinese students in order to tell them in America, cheating and other ethical breaches are not considered a good way to get ahead. This suggested certain cultural differences which should not be used to discriminate, but need to be recognized because of the risks involved.

    -Todd

    --
    Omne ignotum pro magnifico.
    1. Re:What about Chinese nationals? by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... all they have to do is to contact several of the thousands of Chinese nationals ...

      History shows that approaching US Nationals with enough money can also have the desired affect.

    2. Re:What about Chinese nationals? by xplenumx · · Score: 4, Informative

      The ethics problem is represented by an experience I had while at an American research university. A Chinese faculty member met with the Chinese students in order to tell them in America, cheating and other ethical breaches are not considered a good way to get ahead. This suggested certain cultural differences which should not be used to discriminate, but need to be recognized because of the risks involved.

      While I certaily wasn't at that talk (and I suspect that neither were you), I'm willing to bet that you don't completely understand what the talk was about. I'm on the faculty of a top tier reserch insitution conducting immunological research - I've had several Chinese graduate students, have sat on the international admissions committee, and have given the talk that you describe to our new Chinese students. The problem isn't one of ethics, but one of culture. The Chinese don't regard plagiarism the same way we do - in fact, the educational system encourages it in a way as it is an honor, of sorts, to 'plagiarize' your mentor. Additionally, a lot of these students don't have confidence in their english, so whey they write they occassionally take an idea from another article and copy it verbatim thinking "that's exactly what I was thinking, and I don't have to worry about incorrect english" - in most cases, there is not an intention of deceit. The Chinese certainly have their issues (admitting mistakes and nationalism), but I wouldn't call them unethical.

    3. Re:What about Chinese nationals? by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      A Chinese faculty member met with the Chinese students in order to tell them in America, cheating and other ethical breaches are not considered a good way to get ahead.

      They are, however, considered invaluable in *staying* ahead once you get there.

    4. Re:What about Chinese nationals? by Shotgun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the point you both want to get at is that you shouldn't judge other people by your standards of ethics and morals. As long as they conform to their own standards of ethics or morals, it wouldn't be right to call them unethical, no matter the differences between your standards and their standards.

      So, if another culture finds it acceptable to force pre-teen girls into prostition rings, it wouldn't be right to call it unethical? How about if their culture allowed for the slaying of a girl that "embarrassed" the family? What about a culture that abandons their old or sick?

      I'm sorry you've been overcome by so much political correctness, but moral relativism is bullshit. I have a moral compass, and I'm not ashamed of it. I choose not to deal with people or companies that purposely lie, cheat and steal. I will not make excuses like "things are done differently where they come from." If they do things like that there, then they are liers, cheaters and thieves. If it is a cultural thing, then it is a nation of liers, cheaters and thieves.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  12. OTOH, DHS Might eliminate the issue as well.... by atlmatt36 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For all the barking of the agencies, it's obvious they haven't encountered the treatment I and my colleagues have encountered re-entering the US from abroad only to have laptops have the data examined, and that data be copied for "further analysis" or even the laptop confiscated for an undetermined amount of time. It's just a matter of time before other countries make the same advertisment about travel to the US.... What's the old saying (Kettle calling the Pot black).

    1. Re:OTOH, DHS Might eliminate the issue as well.... by D+Ninja · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the old saying (Kettle calling the Pot black)

      Actually, Pot started it. He called Kettle "black" first. It devolved into a war shortly thereafter when the Broiling Pan took sides and the Colander started screaming for legal recourse. Fortunately, Cheese Grater and Can Opener continued to get along. Then, of course, there was the scandal where Dish ran away with Spoon, but that's another story...

  13. Re:One word... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not paranoia if they really are out to get you. And we have plenty of evidence that the Chinese really are. Actually, the intelligence agencies probably just forgot to say "because we're doing all this stuff to their top executives when they visit us".

  14. whats the point? by Coraon · · Score: 2, Funny

    The US border guards are just going to swipe the laptop and smart phones at customs anyway.

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  15. Re:Not Worthless by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not all that surprising. British companies used to be advised not to talk business on the plane to France, because the French intelligence agencies were placing bugs in the headrests and giving sensitive information to French companies.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  16. This Sounds Familiar by Logical+Zebra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember the Cold War, when the Soviets were 10-foot-tall super soldiers who could read your mind and fart atomic infernos out of their asses? Everything was thought to be a commie conspiracy.
    Is this happening again, but now we are instead fearing the Chinese?

    --
    I have a bad feeling about this...
    1. Re:This Sounds Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Soviets:
      1) never matched the US economically, achieving military parity or superiority only in ground forces and nuclear delivery systems
      2) never had a true deep water navy, and no full year ocean access
      3) their population never exceeded the US, and they needed troops to keep Poland, Hungary, East Germany in check

      The Chinese:
      1) are projected to exceed the US economically in the next 10-15 years
      2) have 2000+ miles of access to the Pacific ocean
      3) have a raw population exceeding 3 times the US, its urban population is about 1.5 times the US total population

      I would say they need not reach 10-foot-tall and read minds to become a problem for the US.

  17. Good for China by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If everyone who visits China buys a new cellphone and laptop for the trip...
    Where were those cellphones and laptops likely manufactured? China...
    China stands to make quite a profit from people doing this.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  18. Good luck with that. by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's pretty hard to bug something at manufacturing time, since you usually don't have a clue as to who it's being shipped to. It can be done, but odds are you'll end up bugging a lot of 19 year old teenage girls going off to college instead of corporate execs.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Good luck with that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...odds are you'll end up bugging a lot of 19 year old teenage girls going off to college instead of corporate execs.

      Either way, you win.

    2. Re:Good luck with that. by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      Still, just embed some code in the bios that boots into a keylogging management screen when you hold down s-c-r-e-w during boot. That way, you don't need to modify anything, you just need to turn it on when you happen to gain access to the hardware of an interesting person.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Good luck with that. by ciroknight · · Score: 2

      Yeah, nobody would ever notice that. Nobody ever audits or reloads BIOS code. BIOS chips are just packed with extra room for code and even more, they have vast swaths of writable RAM for storing tons of keylogging data, a tiny insignificant fraction's worth that actually would be useful to a foreign intelligence agency (which has to be filtered through to find anything on your ridiculously huge Echelon-scale supercomputing network).

      It's a great plot for a novel, Dan Brown, but to get that to work on the scale proposed (getting literally every machine out of China with the software), it's just not feasible.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    4. Re:Good luck with that. by snspdaarf · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...odds are you'll end up bugging a lot of 19 year old teenage girls going off to college instead of corporate execs.

      Either way, you win.

      Until the restraining order kicks in.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  19. Such respect for IT! by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe I'm taking this a little personally because I'm an IT guy. I dunno. But I do know I'd rather not work in IT for a large, tech-based company where the CTO is quoted publicly as saying: "I don't let my IT department near my laptop".

    Anybody else have a WTF moment when they saw that? Or is it only me?

    1. Re:Such respect for IT! by mc+moss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe he just has sensitive material about his company on the laptop. I've seen people in management who don't let anyone in the company, even IT, look at their laptops and it isn't because they think the IT department is incompetent or have no respect for them.

  20. Re:Chinese Coders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Thing is, the Chinese have this whole "for the mother country" thing going on, so it's a sensible precaution."

    And Americans don't? Americans practically invented RSI with all that damn flag waving they do, you sir are a racist.

  21. Re:One word... by ryanov · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't they have a right to know how their money is spent? ;)

  22. Not a problem in the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since in the US they'll take your phone and laptop, MP3 player and any other good stuff and demand to see your company documents if they think there's something nice in there.

    PS the US has used Echelon to get Boeing a european contract by finding out the figure they had to bit under to get the contract.

    This didn't require a cell phone either, so throwing away your cellphone isn't necessary there either.

    So much nicer being spied on by the US government. You don't have to buy new kit all the time, just accept the espionage.

  23. The reverse holds true by ironicsky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a non-American citizen I feel the reverse holds true. When I enter the USA from Canada I should bring a seperate bare-bones, no thrills cell phone and an empty laptop. Because if the TSA decides that they want to snoop through my electronics there is no telling what information they are pulling out, government created spyware being installed, or some sort of magical chip that transmits everything I am doing back to them.

    See, Conspiracy theories work both ways... No more fear mongering, okay? Lets play nice kids.

    1. Re:The reverse holds true by dissy · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a non-American citizen I feel the reverse holds true. When I enter the USA from Canada I should bring a seperate bare-bones, no thrills cell phone and an empty laptop. Because if the TSA decides that they want to snoop through my electronics there is no telling what information they are pulling out, government created spyware being installed, or some sort of magical chip that transmits everything I am doing back to them.

      See, Conspiracy theories work both ways...

      I know you said all that in jest, but you are more right than you suspect. And the situation with DHS and the TSA is very close to that (Other than installing hardware.. though the law does explicitly allow them to, even if they don't do it now)

      That isn't a conspiracy or paranoia, its a well proven fact.

    2. Re:The reverse holds true by mce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. For us - we're an EU company - it is official company policy to take only empty PCs across the US border (in either direction).

  24. Re:They must be that good. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pick your pocket while you're waking down the street, copy the contents across into a trojaned version, and then slip the replacement back into the victim's pocket. Or, if that's hard, tell them they dropped their phone and hand it back.

    It's also a good idea to make sure you turn your phone on at the airport before you get on the plane to China. When a phone registers with a new cell, it passes on the ID of the last cell it was affiliated with (to allow routing tables to be updated). MI6 was wondering a few years ago how the Russians were able to spot their people so easily, until they realised that they were turning off their phones at the headquarters in London when they went in and then not turning them back on again until they stepped off the plane. As soon as they turned them back on, they broadcast a nice little message to the cell tower at the airport saying 'the last place I went to was very near the MI6 building' which was flagging them for extra surveillance.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  25. Re:Horse, close the barn door! by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Agreed. I was alluding to the fact that since execs outsource to China then China would already know many corporate secrets. Grey market goods often come from the same plants that make authentic goods.

  26. The weight of those bits adds up! by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

    US intelligence agencies are advising top US IT executives to weigh their laptops before and after visiting China as one of many precautions against corporate espionage.

    This is very good advice, as it would instantly catch the loss of weight if any data was stolen from the laptop. You hear of data theft all the time, and all it takes is something low-tech like a scale to detect it.

  27. Re:Horse, close the barn door! by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why the bugs are only activated when they detect an integer overflow error in any document called "personal finances.xls". With this method, they can be sure they're on an American executive's computer.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  28. Re:Horse, close the barn door! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    15-25? Try 5. On many laptops you could get to a good access point right under the easily-removable keyboard.

    This, friends, is the real reason behind the famed Apple design of no user serviceable parts. Not to save weight, not to give Apple a few measly bucks for battery replacements but to prevent FOREIGN ESPIONAGE. Think about that that when you drop your Dell and 12 little plastic panels pop off.

    You Windows folks aught to be shot as spies.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  29. Re:Horse, close the barn door! by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2

    I'm sure folks who share certain secrets with a partner in China who is doing their outsourced work already know that their is already a laptop in china 'all the time' with those secrets on them. No need to wait for a US exec to come over.

    The point of this policy is to keep other secrets that haven't been shared, out of China and away from danger.

  30. Possible to assemble a "Made in USA" system? by joeslugg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At the risk of being slightly OT, I'm thinking about several comments noting that these systems were made in China to begin with, so it got me thinking.
    If a ridiculous set of circumstances arose where certain organizations banned the use of computers "made in China", is it possible to obtain/assemble a system that's "made in the USA"? Or "made in <NATO_member>"?

    I'm just wondering if there's a way to source all the parts domestically and what it would cost. I'm guessing the answer is "impossible", but I'm curious if anyone knows about it.

  31. Re:Horse, close the barn door! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're falling into the same trap that got the electronic voting people. It is not at all obvious if an electronic device has a backdoor function. You can change the software to react to a complicated trigger sequence, or worse, you can change the hardware to do it. Unless you deconstruct the device to the point of rendering it unusable, there is no way to reliably detect "sleeper" functions. This is especially dangerous if the bug is in all devices and not just a few "interesting" ones, so that comparisons between devices don't show any deviation.

  32. Re:Chinese Coders? by Sancho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    America has that same childish and ignorant "for mother country" thing going on as well

    If we had international laws, policies, standards of living, etc. I'd agree with you. As we don't, I don't see a problem with wanting to take care of our own. International espionagers aren't going to share information--they only want to take it.

    It's similar to the prisoner's dilemma. We'd probably all do better overall if we all worked together. China's not going to work with us, though, which means that if we just give them the technology, we're the suckers.

  33. Re:Chinese Coders? by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You say "sensible precaution", I say "blatant xenophobia/racism". The only reason people are worried about any of this to begin with is that America has that same childish and ignorant "for mother country" thing going on as well.

    Plus the fact that China uses its technical workers for both industrial and political espionage quite frequently, and has been caught doing it several times.

    It really disturbs me that in 2009 such hatred and bigotry is still the norm and is spouted, not only without consequence but to rave reviews and record ratings, on Fox News and right-wing pseudo-fascist radio programs. We need to realize that all of these boundaries we have set up are simply arbitrary, artificial constructs that have NOTHING to do with reality.

    To quote the great poet Bill Hicks, "I hate patriotism! It's a round world the last time I checked."

    The reason I distrust China is precisely BECAUSE they are too "patriotic"/nationalistic; they're even worse than the US I think in this regards, hell they're still mad over the OPIUM WARS. It has bred a very "us vs. them" mentality (obviously, some of it is understandable because of the country's history) that I think is a hell of a lot more dangerous to us and the world than the communism was.

    Just as a side note, Hicks was kind of overrated.

  34. Re:Not Worthless by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not all that surprising. British companies used to be advised not to talk business on the plane to France, because the French intelligence agencies were placing bugs in the headrests and giving sensitive information to French companies.

    And I'm quite sure that MI5 (or whoever) did/do spy on non-British companies to give British ones an advantage (or at least I hope so :P)
    This is one of those examples of "war morality"; whereby "us doing X to them" is fine, but "them doing X to us" is completly unacceptable and a sign of cowardice and various other undesireable traits.

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
  35. Re:Chinese Coders? by countvlad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And that's the way it should be. "Society" shouldn't be the religion of the 21st century, punishing us for our success and demonizing us for our humanity, all the while demanding we tithe to a new God.

    Self interest is why we're alive. It's why we have kids, it's why we fall in love, and it's why we go to work. Why isn't it good enough for a law-abiding, hard working citizen to live his or her life without the new original sin that is a "debt to society" for thier success? Maybe if everyone was more concerned about how they live *their* lives and less concerned with how their neighbors are living their's the world would be a better place.

  36. Re:Chinese Coders? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe you are referring to citizens of the People's Republic of China which are not all of the same race. So to call it racial profiling is inaccurate. It would be more accurate to call it nationalism profiling. It is clear from the replies you have received so far that racist/nationalist bashing is en vogue so here goes my karma. There is no way to guarantee safety 100% of the time but to ignore the fact that a foreign government that, while not openly hostile, is known for its intense dislike of your countries policies would be derelict. So basically I agree with what I think you were trying to say but not what you said.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  37. Re:Horse, close the barn door! by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Knowing the math issues and stability in excel 2007, almost anyone could activate that...

  38. Re:Chinese Coders? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Assassin's Mace, anyone?

    While few people recognize it as such, China is waging war against the west. And, they are claiming victories every day, because we have trouble just spelling "asymmetric warfare". I wonder if that recto-cranial insertion so common in Washington and on Wall Street have anything to do with it?

    I recognize that the Chinese government is "waging war" on the west in order to become the next century's superpower. This does not mean that we ought to resort to xenophobia and racism to "beat" them. That is completely back-asswards and will only serve to give them more ammunition against us.

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  39. Here's a long shot... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How are you going to detect a 15g to 100g logging circuit that's more than likely (if there was malicious espionage intent) designed to fit or mount into current hardware and not be detected on a scale that's accurate down to 0.5 pounds.

    Here's a long shot... how about using a postal scale that's accurate down to a gramme? Do you think there might be one in the mailroom?

  40. Re:Chinese Coders? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To be fair China is still a Command economy that let's "Capitalism" play because it's a useful way to get people to work harder.. they are a long way from the idea of "Free Markets". This is where it's not a "round" world.. The Chinese government has their eye on the 50 year game and is more than willing to tie up all of a natural resource... and throw people in jail when the "free market" price goes up.

    While the US punishes "intervention" by state banks in places like Japan and Korea for making sure their chip makers don't go under, China is stacking the deck on a NATIONAL level for resources... setting prices that corporations are allowed to SELL to China for.. and nobody is really stopping them. Just last week China "decided" they weren't going to be exporting any more rare earth metals (needed for high power magnets in electronics) They just issued a directive it wasn't allowed to be exported anymore....for any price. Back in 2007 one of the things that knocked US auto makers on their butts was China using scrap US steel instead of imported ore. It nearly doubled the price of scrap here (ironically bought with trade surplus dollars no less!) and made it even harder to complete with Asian companies... it was the straw that caused a good deal of the auto maker meltdown earlier this year. China manipulates their currency by not allowing dollars to be converted into Chinese money except for specific state-sponsored investments, and they don't allow US companies to take their Chinese profits OUT of the country either. It sets up a situation where they pile up money in US banks to buy US resources... but US companies can't pull their capital profits OUT of China...

    China is playing the long game, highly protectionist and stacking the deck with our own money and resources against us. It's economic "war" played at the highest level and the US government has no grasp that the "invisible hand' won't save them.

  41. Re:Chinese Coders? by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 3, Funny

    No - you, sir, have no clue about Americans. Americans are in it for themselves, bar none. Any social interest arising from an American economic activity is merely an unintended side-effect of a self interest the executor couldn't turn into profit.

    aptly said by those who renamed "french fries" to "freedom fries"

  42. Re:How much does a 1 weigh? by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, this is silly, because TFA is talking about re-imaging laptops before/after. That would imply malware/spyware being surreptitiously installed, but that won't change the weight directly.

    Re-imaging the laptop if a hardware keylogger has been installed wouldn't have any effect either (but could possibly be detected by weighing).

    So you're saying that weighing is silly because it won't protect against software keyloggers (would need to re-image), and re-imaging is silly because it won't protect against hardware keyloggers (would need to weigh to do that). Your conclusion is then that one should do neither (rather than the very obvious both)? Really?

    Yeah, I don't wear a belt because suspenders are fully adequate, and I don't wear suspenders because a belt is good enough. Yet for some reason, my pants keep falling down. :)

    You go on to point out that there are other attacks which can't be prevented or detected by weighing or re-imaging, which is a very valid point, but does that really mean one shouldn't bother doing anything at all? If you can't have perfection, just give up and kill yourself? If someone with the power and sway of the Chinese (or US) government really wants to get you, chances are they probably can, but if they're just looking for targets of opportunity that may prove useful, making yourself less of a target is probably a very good idea!

  43. Re:Proof, please by thefear · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any link that supports your claims?

    -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/mobile/08/07/20/0745236.shtml

    But I was relying more on personal experience then what the internet says.

    --
    :(