Slashdot Mirror


Universal "Death Stench" Repels Bugs of All Types

Hugh Pickens writes "Wired reports that scientists have discovered that insects from cockroaches to caterpillars all emit the same stinky blend of fatty acids when they die and that the death mix may represent a universal, ancient warning signal to avoid their dead or injured. 'Recognizing and avoiding the dead could reduce the chances of catching the disease,' says Biologist David Rollo of McMaster University 'or allow you to get away with just enough exposure to activate your immunity.' Researchers isolated unsaturated fatty acids containing oleic and linoleic acids from the corpses of dead cockroaches and found that their concoction repelled not just cockroaches, but ants and caterpillars. 'It was amazing to find that the cockroaches avoided places treated with these extracts like the plague,' says Rollo. Even crustaceans like woodlice and pillbugs, which diverged from insects 400 million years ago, were repelled leading scientists to think the death mix represents a universal warning signal. Scientists hope the right concoction of death smells might protect crops. Thankfully, human noses can't detect the fatty acid extracts. 'I've tried smelling papers treated with them and don't smell anything strong and certainly not repellent,' writes Rollo in an e-mail. 'Not like the rotting of corpses that occurs later and is detectable from great distances.'"

248 comments

  1. This is nonsense by Rooked_One · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe for some bugs, but for those nasty caca roches, I get a bowl, wipe the top 4 inches around inside with vegtable oil then put whatever inside... coffee grounds, bananas... whatever... There are tons of dead ones in there but that doesn't stop more from coming. Also, cockroaches are cannibals.

    1. Re:This is nonsense by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe for some bugs, but for those nasty caca roches, I get a bowl, wipe the top 4 inches around inside with vegtable oil then put whatever inside... coffee grounds, bananas... whatever... There are tons of dead ones in there but that doesn't stop more from coming. Also, cockroaches are cannibals.

      Well, to be fair, your observations are from cockroaches that have lived in close quarters with humans and not those in nature. Notice that in the article, it's only Wired who suggests this would protect you from an infestation. The scientists say this may protect crops--which are in a more natural setting. And I think you would see a much higher success rate on cockroaches or wood beetles that live in the wild versus those in your home. Many animals behave very differently in their natural environment.

      Whatever the case, I'm really excited to see fatty acid extracts used instead of chemical compounds on the food that I eat. Especially for people that have small gardens of tomatoes and vegetables. I'd personally pay a small premium on my produce for crops grown and repelling insects with this technology.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Doesn't seem to work for flies, either. I work in a small pizzaria in small canadian hick-town and the flies get out of hand in the harvest season. I spend half an hour killing them with flyswatters akimbo. I sweep them up, but another half an hour later, new flies are examining the dead fly carcasses. Quite interesting.

    3. Re:This is nonsense by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      I was always led to believe that Cockroaches favourite food was dead Cockroach go figure.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    4. Re:This is nonsense by nameer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But fatty acid extracts are chemical compounds. And lets be clear, if they figure this out to the point that it works reliably, the next step is bring in the chemists and chemical engineers to figure out how to scale this up to industrial proportions. That will mean building the compounds in bulk, not extracting them from cockroaches. Which to be fair, is better for the roaches.

      --
      "Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?" --Pinky
    5. Re:This is nonsense by forgot_my_username · · Score: 1

      Maybe for some bugs, but for those nasty caca roches, I get a bowl, wipe the top 4 inches around inside with vegtable oil then put whatever inside... coffee grounds, bananas... whatever... There are tons of dead ones in there but that doesn't stop more from coming. Also, cockroaches are cannibals.

      And they make a tasty treat for the kids!

    6. Re:This is nonsense by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      half an hour later, new flies are examining the dead fly carcasses. Quite interesting.

      Joe? Are you alright? Joe? JOE?

    7. Re:This is nonsense by MBGMorden · · Score: 0, Troll

      It also seems to not jive with the currently understood mechanics of evolution. DETECTING such a stench would lead to a survival advantage, but actually emitting it is something done after death - so there is no natural selection at work to lead to the unification of a "death scent" to evolve towards.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:This is nonsense by MrMr · · Score: 3, Funny

      new flies are examining the dead fly carcasses
      And not the pizza's?
      Quite interesting.

    9. Re:This is nonsense by MadAnalyst · · Score: 1

      Maybe for some bugs, but for those nasty caca roches, I get a bowl, wipe the top 4 inches around inside with vegtable oil then put whatever inside... coffee grounds, bananas... whatever... There are tons of dead ones in there but that doesn't stop more from coming. Also, cockroaches are cannibals.

      Just a thought, but the presence of so much good stuff (emitting their own smells/pheromones) in your big bowl of food may overwhelm and/or mask the the negative impact of the fatty acid system. Their experiments seem to be on far more simplistic model systems free from interference.

    10. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly need one or more electrical trap lamps. Keeps the fly population down and you get bonus entertainment in the form of fly-exploding-into-gibs sound effects.

    11. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It certainly does jive with evolution as currently understood. There are plenty of examples where evolution has resulted in genes that don't help you directly, but help those around you. In the fairly common case that those around you are your relatives, and thus likely to share that gene, natural selection will still be pushing for it, because it is making others with that gene more likely to survive.

      There has been a lot of research done, for example, on why soldiers are willing to die for their community (death being pretty much the end of the line for your genes...). The answer is that he's protecting his parents, siblings, and children, who are going to propagate the heroism gene, while the cowardly guy who runs away and survives might get his relatives killed, thus lowering the number of copies of the cowardly gene.

      And before you say "but that's just human emotion!", no, mother bears will fight and die to protect their young. Lots of flocking birds have "lookouts" that will squawk when danger approaches, which statistically is going to cause the lookout to be a lot more likely to get eaten, but protects his flock. Most herd animals have group behavior where adults will ring the outside of the herd to protect the young at the center of the herd (even adults who don't have direct children, they're still willing to protect the presumably more distant relatives of the herd)...

      Remember, evolution is tied to genes, not individuals. And your genes are statistically tied to your community and your relatives.

    12. Re:This is nonsense by quadrox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you are completely wrong. Go read dawkins books, e.g. the blind watchmaker.

    13. Re:This is nonsense by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doesn't work for me either! My car's windshield and hood are plastered with dead insects. You would think that would warn other insects to stay away but no, after every road trip, there are just MORE bugs splattered on my car. I call BS.

    14. Re:This is nonsense by fracai · · Score: 1

      Evolution occurs on a species level, not an individual one. Also, evolution isn't "directed" towards anything. It's random mutations, and those which end up being more beneficial are the ones that stick around.

      In this case, it's entirely feasible to imagine multiple species developing a common scent that is avoided by all. It would after all improve the chances of survival for the _entire_ population. There are many species of insect and plant which have bitter tastes as well. Such features may not be beneficial at all to the individual plant, but to the population they discourage future meals.

      Then again, it may have simply evolved in a common ancestor to them all.

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    15. Re:This is nonsense by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Quadrox is wrong. The Anonymous Coward parent is right. The gp posting by AC exactly summarizes Dawkins' The Selfish Gene, second edition, with chapter 13 titled "Nice Guys Finish First" added. The line "Evolution is tied to the genes, not individuals" is the one sentence summary of that whole book.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    16. Re:This is nonsense by martas · · Score: 4, Funny

      it's Steve, you insensitive clod!

    17. Re:This is nonsense by JockTroll · · Score: 0

      "And they make a tasty treat for the kids!"

      Not as good as wasabi-laced sweets.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    18. Re:This is nonsense by bcmm · · Score: 1

      If you're moving faster than the wind, nothing is going to smell you coming.



      (Please somebody say WHOOSH!)

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    19. Re:This is nonsense by somersault · · Score: 1

      Plus a zingy alternative pizza topping!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    20. Re:This is nonsense by pisto_grih · · Score: 1

      Snaaaakkkkkee!

    21. Re:This is nonsense by Follier · · Score: 5, Funny

      A friend of mine would kill one roach, and stick it on a toothpick (or a "pike" as he called it) and stood it up on a bottle-cork at the entrance to a hole -- as an "example to the others!" He swore it worked.

      I just thought he was crazy. Apparently he was on to something.

    22. Re:This is nonsense by Jeffrey_Walsh+VA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Roaches have lived among humans for long enough that their natural eviroment is our home.

    23. Re:This is nonsense by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      It also seems to not jive with the currently understood mechanics of evolution.

      Dear Sir,

      We are writing to you in relation to views and opinions that you articulated in Slashdot post #29465417 on 18th September last. Saids view on the mechanics of evolution were found by the committee to be grossly nescient and incorrect, and moreover demonstrating of a grievously lack of creative and logical thinking on your part. In the words of one committee member, and I quote: "WTF?!".

      Following arbitration on the matter, the committee deeply regrets to inform you that your Geek Credentials and subsequent privileges have been placed in probation pending a completed review by yourself on the basics of the theory of evolution and its predictions. We regret to inform you that until such time as this review has been filed your access to association slide rules and soldering kits will be suspended and you will be restricted to playing only those table top games which restrict themselves to six sided dice. Moreover, while you may still retain them, use of association anti-wedgie underwear is also prohibited during this time.

      Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the latest popular science volume The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution by Richard Dawkins. It is hoped that your review can be swiftly completed by a enlightening study of this book and its replete examples. I await your reply and subsequent readmission to full membership with hopeful anticipation.

      Yours sincerely

      Dexter Cuthbert
      Chairman
      Membership Review Committee
      International Geek and Nerd Association

      P.S. We mean it about the underwear.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    24. Re:This is nonsense by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Maybe for some bugs, but for those nasty caca roches, I get a bowl, wipe the top 4 inches around inside with vegtable oil then put whatever inside... coffee grounds, bananas... whatever...

      So, what you're saying is that either the scientists are flat out lying when they claim this works for cockroaches, or that they're so incompetent that they can't even tell when an insect is avoiding some area due to an applied chemical? Really?

      Honestly, what the *fuck* is with Slashdotter arrogance? I mean, I've been around here a long time, but it just seems to be getting worse. Do you *honestly* think you're so much fucking smarter than these scientists that, based on a fucking pop-sci article and an abstract, you can invalidate their work with your silly little anecdote?

      I mean, seriously... what the fuck is wrong with you?

    25. Re:This is nonsense by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      Yea, I'll have the large peperoni with some of that new dead fly spice. (Joke!)

      Gotta keep that thing away from the food.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    26. Re:This is nonsense by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your understanding of evolution is incorrect. Evolution isn't something an animal "does" or even something nature "does". It's just the simple fact that ANYTHING that leads to better reproductive success will lead to more offspring and gradually replace animals that don't have that SOMETHING.
      Evolution is not hard to understand, it's just common sense once you understand it.

      Imagine two valleys separated by a hard to cross mountain ridge. In one valley some animals develop a random mutation that gives off a strong "death stench" when they die. Over time the other animals in the valley learn or evolve an aversion to this smell because staying away from things that kill you is an advantage.

      The animals in this valley will avoid certain contagious or dangerous deaths because of this aversion. They will prosper slightly more than the animals in the next valley that don't have this combination. Over a long period of time the population in this valley grows enough that they start migrating into the other valley and over a long time they dominate and replace the animals in the next valley because of their ability.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    27. Re:This is nonsense by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 1

      At all the mexican food restaurants here in Texas, they hang a (sealed) ziploc bag filled with water above the door. Somehow they believe that it repels mosquitos and flies. So many places do it, you'd think it would have to work, but I can't see how. Anybody have any ideas?

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    28. Re:This is nonsense by Nerdposeur · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It also seems to not jive with the currently understood mechanics of evolution. DETECTING such a stench would lead to a survival advantage, but actually emitting it is something done after death - so there is no natural selection at work to lead to the unification of a "death scent" to evolve towards.

      I don't know any more than you do, but here's a possible scenario: when bugs died, they emitted a slight odor as an accidental part of the decomposition process. Insect X is born with a gene that makes him dislike that odor, so he and his offspring avoid diseased corpses and are slightly less likely to die. But it's not foolproof, because the odor is slight.

      Later, one of those insects develops a "be extra stinky when you die" gene. Maybe it means he has more of a certain chemical in his exoskeleton, which bacteria like. It doesn't really help him survive, but it doesn't hurt him either. He has some offspring, and later dies. All his offspring avoid his corpse like crazy, and start doing the same for each other's corpses. Now that whole population is less likely than before to catch disease, and that particular gene keeps getting passed on.

      Think of the gene itself as an organism, with the actual insect being just a host. Would those organisms help either other reproduce? I think so.

    29. Re:This is nonsense by Evil+Shabazz · · Score: 1

      Whatever the case, I'm really excited to see fatty acid extracts used instead of chemical compounds on the food that I eat.

      Yeah, I can't wait to have dead roach slime smeared all over my food. That sounds much more appetizing. ;)

      --
      Down with the career politician! SUPPORT TERM LIMITS
    30. Re:This is nonsense by pwfffff · · Score: 0

      Bugs can't go under water. Duh.

    31. Re:This is nonsense by Quothz · · Score: 1

      At all the mexican food restaurants here in Texas, they hang a (sealed) ziploc bag filled with water above the door. Somehow they believe that it repels mosquitos and flies. So many places do it, you'd think it would have to work, but I can't see how. Anybody have any ideas?

      I believe the theory is that flies avoid it to avoid getting snapped up by the fish found in running water. Whether it works or not is still unclear but unlikely. One researcher says "no, under fluorescent or incandescent lighting", but surprisingly there doesn't seem to be much research.

    32. Re:This is nonsense by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Where do you think the fly carcasses wind up?

      Hint: those aren't peppercorns.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    33. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not accurate, smell molecules can also transfer or move through the air via osmosis and diffusion.

      For example, if there is no wind, things still smell..(or give off a smell, if you will)

    34. Re:This is nonsense by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      new flies are examining the dead fly carcasses
      And not the pizza's?

      They're examining the pizza's dead flies.

    35. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't seem to work for flies, either. I work in a small pizzaria in small canadian hick-town.

      Ah, I see that CCNA paid off!

    36. Re:This is nonsense by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think bulk breeding and crushing of roaches would likely be a fairly effective means of building these compounds in bulk (assuming, of course, that roaches have a decent amount of these chemicals in them). Paraphrasing and condensing from Wikipedia: In favorable conditions, one female roach can, in her one year lifespan, produce 300-400 offspring, and she only needs to be impregnated once to do so (though the eggs are only laid in groups of ~40 at a time). Aside from one or two commonly available nutrients, their gut bacteria synthesize all other nutrients required to live from whatever they eat, from wood to postage stamp glue to corn oil, so you can feed them otherwise worthless semi-edible plant matter as a form of accelerated composting.

      Besides, I think we can safely say that no matter how much of a threat we pose to the survival of other species (say, most of the world's fish stock), we're in no danger of running out of roaches. And aside from PETA, not a whole lot of people are going to protest a roach crushing facility that enables them to repel roaches. Just don't build it too close to people, or you'll get a whole NIMBY movement going.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    37. Re:This is nonsense by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Roaches have lived among humans for long enough that their natural eviroment is our home.

      Only a few types (maybe half a dozen to a dozen out of thousands or more species worldwide). Most roaches are still nature lovers.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    38. Re:This is nonsense by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this doesn't make any sense at all.

      Go kill a bug. Any bug.

      Then place it outside.

      Come back in a 30 minutes.

      Other bugs will be devouring it, most likely ants.

    39. Re:This is nonsense by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      What is the distance of the repulsive death-stench versus the attractive food-stench? No matter how repulsive the death-stench is, if it's only a few cm, then the roaches are drawn by the food, whereupon they get trapped before realizing "ZOMG dead roaches!"

    40. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Even if it did work, if you spray it on plants and it repels the all bugs (including bees) how on earth will any of it be pollinated?

    41. Re:This is nonsense by tuxedobob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you take your Cheerios with extra piss this morning?

      I found his comment pretty entertaining. Just wish I'd read it before moving out of my old apartment.

    42. Re:This is nonsense by Camann · · Score: 1

      It's too bad roaches are the only source of these... oh wait.

      --
      I can't believe you don't know what a Hasemalphaginnojinglanaporphomism is.
    43. Re:This is nonsense by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Whatever the case, I'm really excited to see fatty acid extracts used instead of chemical compounds on the food that I eat.

      You do realize that a fatty acid is a kind of chemical compound, right?

      Most pesticides are compounds found in nature. They're only synthetic in that, after we've discovered that they're useful as pesticides, we've come up with ways to mass produce them without involving growing fields of flowers (or whatever) and extracting the material from them.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    44. Re:This is nonsense by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when considering something with a relatively short as in wall time span generational span it could have evolutionary forces supporting it.

      Bug in community A gets a set of mutations that make it sink when it dies. It passes these genes on to other bugs in the community before death. There is not disadvantage after all.

      Community B has not bugs with the "stench-of-death" genes.

      Some toxic plant or something enters the habitats of A and B; The bugs in A smell their dead friends and flee. The bugs in B continue eating and die. With B out of the way the A community expands into B's old territory and we have a population with "stench-of-death" genes pretty much everywhere.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    45. Re:This is nonsense by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Go on Henry, step on it !
      (oblig. Larson quote)

    46. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ants eat dead stuff, and flies look for dead animals to lay their eggs on.

    47. Re:This is nonsense by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Yeah but they're not nerve toxins like many pesticides..

    48. Re:This is nonsense by NikLinna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bugs killed by violent crushing and bugs that die of starvation or age probably emit different chemicals. A few months back I read about how bees carry their dead out of the hive, and identify them by similar chemical markers. If the researcher dabbed a live bee with the chemical, its sisters would drag it "kicking and screaming" out of the hive and would not let it back in. :-)

    49. Re:This is nonsense by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know I'm being pedantic, but am I the only person on /. that knows the word is "jibe", not "jive"?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    50. Re:This is nonsense by Ajaxamander · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But fatty acid extracts are chemical compounds.

      Please tell this to as many people as possible... substitute "wood" "air" "table salt" and "sugar" as needed. I'm getting really tired of this anti-"chemicals" attitude that's sneaking into everyone's mindset.

    51. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha! You got roaches.

      Please do not move in next to me!

    52. Re:This is nonsense by ca111a · · Score: 1

      I smell BS. Here, fixed that for ya :)

    53. Re:This is nonsense by Evil+Shabazz · · Score: 1

      Whoosh...

      --
      Down with the career politician! SUPPORT TERM LIMITS
    54. Re:This is nonsense by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      It may take longer than half an hour for the decomposition process to release these fatty acids.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    55. Re:This is nonsense by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read up a little and another idea is that the bag acts as a fisheye lens, showing any movement in the area. This makes the fly nervous as it looks like something moving near them.

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    56. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new flies are examining the dead fly carcasses
      And not the pizza's?
      Quite interesting.

      Ok Steve, its your turn to play dead. Joe, go look interested in dead Steve, that will leave the rest of us time to eat that pizza that just came out of the oven.

    57. Re:This is nonsense by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      The new pizzas came later, but, interestingly enough, they also examined the dead fly carcasses.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    58. Re:This is nonsense by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      It also seems to not jive with the currently understood mechanics of evolution. DETECTING such a stench would lead to a survival advantage, but actually emitting it is something done after death - so there is no natural selection at work to lead to the unification of a "death scent" to evolve towards.

      Unless the other bugs that will be doing the detecting happen to be the dead bug's offspring. Which is likely considering that many bugs don't travel very far in their lifetimes so are probably have a good chance of sharing the same food supply and running into grandpa's corpse.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    59. Re:This is nonsense by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn hippies.

    60. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work for me either! My car's windshield and hood are plastered with dead insects. You would think that would warn other insects to stay away but no, after every road trip, there are just MORE bugs splattered on my car. I call BS.

      You just need to slow the velocity of your vehicle so that it is less than the velocity of stench....

    61. Re:This is nonsense by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like the cut of your jib, sir!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    62. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which makes one wonder what would happen if the entire hive were drenched in it.

    63. Re:This is nonsense by nameer · · Score: 1

      Are you sure ?

      --
      "Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?" --Pinky
    64. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same observations. In my sticky traps roaches will crawl over their dead comrades in attempt to get the bait.

      Ants sure seem to detect dead roaches, because they will be swarming all over a carcass literally within an hour of its death.

      Maybe its a certain type of death that forces them to emit the fatty acids? Or a certain organ they need to be extracted from?

    65. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sigh... let's all say it at once. Evolution works on populations not individuals.

    66. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's OK, as long as you're traveling faster than your wind.

    67. Re:This is nonsense by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Minds are chemicals.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    68. Re:This is nonsense by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Great Simpsons/Starcraft reference. :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    69. Re:This is nonsense by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      There may be some fatty acids that can act as neurotoxins but it's pretty unlikely these are. There are drinks that contain caffeine but that doesn't mean that my orange juice does.

      Of course it's possible that by co-incidence they're neurotoxins but it's pretty unlikely.

      These are just used by other insects as a sign that an insect died nearby, and the idea isn't for them to be used as an insecticide.

    70. Re:This is nonsense by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      My orange juice does contain caffeine, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  2. Prolly not going to work. by amn108 · · Score: 0

    Just like any other method, it will not work, because nature has a knack of finding a way out. Mosquito sprays, shark repellants - all that does, is bring about mutations in species, so that the supposed repellant can be overcome with ease. Results are repellent-insensitive mosquitoes, sharks impervious to ultrasound etc.

    1. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mosquito sprays, shark repellants - all that does, is bring about mutations in species, so that the supposed repellant can be overcome with ease. Results are repellent-insensitive mosquitoes, sharks impervious to ultrasound etc.

      Bollocks. Can you provide a single reference to a shark repellent which was proved or convincingly demonstrated to be effective and any evidence of a subsequent mutation that caused that species to be immune?

    2. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      It's called Evolution if there is any kind of advantage (Which outweighs any disadvantages) to the mutation it stands a chance of progressing and becoming widespread. Hence viruses that are immune to most variants of penicillin and bugs that are immune to pesticides. One must say that this doesn't always track though see http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~kyperry3/Blue_Fugates_Troublesome_Creek.html although this involved a very small population who were cognescent.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    3. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Can you provide a single reference to a shark repellent which was proved or convincingly demonstrated to be effective

      Freakin' lasers?

    4. Re:Prolly not going to work. by dintlu · · Score: 1

      Nature doesn't have a knack for anything, it's a dumb process.

      But you're kind of right - if the reproductive advantages a species of insect gains from living in human dwellings outweighs the reproductive advantages of an aversion to "Death Stench," insects unaffected by this odor will fill the niche.

    5. Re:Prolly not going to work. by bheekling · · Score: 1

      Does this mean we'll never have sharks with frickin' lasers?

      --
      "..."
    6. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's called Evolution if there is any kind of advantage (Which outweighs any disadvantages)
      Sort of. Any advantage that outweighs a disadvantage and allows for more procreation stands a chance. The procreation bit is key.

    7. Re:Prolly not going to work. by icebrain · · Score: 2, Informative

      It doesn't surprise me that penicillin (an antibiotic) doesn't work too well against a virus. That's not a mutation.

      Perhaps you meant bacteria that are immune to penicillin (which, in many cases, are the result of stupid people insisting on trying to treat viral infections with antibiotics).

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    8. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      oops sorry my mistake must cut down on liquid lunch :)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    9. Re:Prolly not going to work. by CxDoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      All viruses are "immune" to antibiotics.

      --
      "Blah blah blah." - [citation needed]
    10. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Yup already acknowledged my mistake to the other reply

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    11. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honest to God question: been spending time with my 9-month old sister; she's to take a teaspoon of amoxicillin 3 times a day... (forgot the dose exactly, either 250mg each or the whole bottle was 250mg), supposedly to treat her "cold" - isn't a "cold" actually a virus? Just curious, struck me as quite odd.

    12. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Hatta · · Score: 3, Informative

      The very high degree of conservation of this trait across species suggests that there are already strong selective pressures to maintain it. Selective use of this stuff is not likely to counter that. Also most evolution happens through frequency shifts of alleles already present in the population, not through creation of new alleles by mutation. Given the long evolutionary history, there may not be many non-functioning alleles for this trait to promote. Mutations are random and infrequent, and most are lethal. It could be many, many years before a suitable mutation arises.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Creedo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dry Land?

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    14. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Quothz · · Score: 1

      Bollocks. Can you provide a single reference to a shark repellent which was proved or convincingly demonstrated to be effective and any evidence of a subsequent mutation that caused that species to be immune?

      This demonstration is pretty darn convincing. Right? And sure enough, a later mutation came along with immunity. One day science will give us* bat-catshark repellent, but until then, I'm staying clear of any body of water larger than I can comfortably drink.

      * And by "us" I mean "those of us who dress up light a creature of the night to strike fear into the hearts of criminals".

    15. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Quothz · · Score: 1

      isn't a "cold" actually a virus?

      Yeah, enteroviruses. The cold used to be from rhinoviruses, but they got merged.* It's likely her doctor was concerned about opportunistic infections - such as pneumonia - and gave her antibiotics preventative-like. (In my opinion, doing so is usually overreacting, but I'm not a medical-type doctor and, if I were, I don't know anything about your sister. So do what the nice doctor tells you.)

      * The recession impacts everything. I definitely didn't expect it, but then I never studied microeconomics.

    16. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Well you're sort of right. It's not "any advantage" it generally has to be a fairly substantial advantage simply because there's usually a whole hell of a lot more of any species without a new mutation than with a new mutation. Survival rates have to be a noticeable improvement to overcome that disparity.

      So for instance, sharks are very unlikely to ever evolve to be resistant to repellent because while eating humans would be better than not if the shark was hungry, humans are not a major part of the shark diet even as is so there probably will never be a large enough survival increase from having that mutation.

      On the other hand, human food is a fairly large part of the diets of household cockroaches. Not having access to this food source would probably drastically decrease the cockroach's lifespan. This would mean that if a mutation occurs it might provide enough pressure to evolve the species itself. Presuming of course that the disadvantages of losing this aversion(which presumably has a very strong survival benefit since it is universal) don't overcome the survival advantages of human food, and of course that the right mutation happens to happen.

    17. Re:Prolly not going to work. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Results are repellent-insensitive mosquitoes, sharks impervious to ultrasound etc.

      That is not how evolution works. If the process doesn't kill or prevent the species from passing on their genes or gives the resistant ones an edge over the non-resistant then it does not cause the resistance to become species wide.

      The reason we see resistant bacteria is because we are basically performing complete genocide in the process and therefore only the resistant ones survive.

      If made a shark repellent that killed all the sharks in the ocean, then yeah... The only sharks left would be resistant to that.

      But if a repellent doesn't kill sharks then its not going to cause such a thing.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    18. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      She has an ear infection too, heard that rumor floatin' around earlier.

  3. Perfect bug repellent? by halbert · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this be the perfect bug repellent? I guess they don't emit the fatty acids when you squash them, or people wouldn't still get bugs in there houses. :-)

    --
    LOAD "SIG"

    RUN "SIG"

    1. Re:Perfect bug repellent? by danking · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well I think you would have to leave it around for it to start rotting, I assume most people clean up the squashed roach after they squash it.

  4. I wonder if this is why they ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... quit coming to my roach motel.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  5. Worse smell than a Seppo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was hard to imagine, but it looks like there is something out there more repugnant than a Seppo!

  6. if you build it by Rooked_One · · Score: 2, Funny

    we will come! :) We don't care if other people build it either

    -Mister cockroach.

  7. Smelling death by spgass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article says humans cannot detect the fatty acid extracts, but I wonder if this theory expands to mammals. After getting a couple of squirrels with my tube trap, squirrels now seem afraid to enter. My wife thought they might "smell death"

    1. Re:Smelling death by confused+one · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bob the squirrel saw his cousin Sammy go in there. He saw what happened to Sammy. Bob does not want to end up like Sammy.

      As an added reminder, essence of Sammy remains in the trap. Sammy juice. Yuck.

    2. Re:Smelling death by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      I'm curious if insect death scent freaks out mammals. If it doesn't, this might be a good repellant for homes with pets (which rules out a number of poisons that the pets might ingest).

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    3. Re:Smelling death by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Humans are also afraid of dead human. The interesting thing here is that bugs have a universal death scent.

      However, bugs evolve very quickly, and I imagine that some will develop an immunity to this fairly quickly if we do any sort of widespread deployment.

    4. Re:Smelling death by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      Why yes. Yes, mammals can smell death. Decomposing flesh releases specific chemical compounds that (in different concentrations and with different chemical contexts) also make that "stinky-feet smell," I believe my HS chem teacher told me it was butyric acid but I can't be bothered to look it up.

      This one, you can smell too (if it's there). Or if you want to try it, just leave some liver lying around for a week uncovered. You'll smell it. Trust me.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    5. Re:Smelling death by metaforest · · Score: 1

      Rodents do things like defecate and urinate when captured. They also release other chemical scents that seem to be connected to fear and death. I have seen the same thing with rat traps.

      My process evolved during a 1 year stint as a grounds keeper for a small motel. Here is the progression:

      I used peanut butter to trap a rat using a traditional spring-bale trap. After removing the victim I reset the trap and put it back in the high traffic area. No further rats trapped. Even moving the trap to other areas had no effect.

      Washed trap in bleach. Re-baited with peanut butter. No further rats trapped after 2 days. Moving the trap did help a bit. Managed to get one more kill.

      Re-baited washed trap with cheddar cheese. Successful trapping that night.

      Washed trap and re-baited with beef jerky. Successful trapping that night.

      Washed and re-baited with swiss cheese. Successful trapping that night.

      Continued with this process using multiple traps until it was apparent that the population was dropping. Tried changing washing chemical, and purchasing fresh traps. I was concerned that the bleach might be acting as an association.
      Campaign ended when I couldn't get any hits on any imaginable bait on two week intervals for over 3 months.

      Carefully cleaned former high traffic areas and watched for droppings.... No further rat activity seen for over 3 months.

      Just so PETA types don't get on my case.. This trapping campaign was carried out within a two story building, not in outdoor areas. No animals other than rats were trapped. (This surprised me! I expected to get mice too.)

      Conclusions: Dead rats do tell tales! They communicate with their living peers by "fear and violence and blood" scents left on the trap. The specific food used as bait is avoided by peers who encountered the "murder scene." Due to how mobile rats are during their active periods, I am assuming that all of the rats in a population can be expected to encounter the "murder scene" before the night is over. There were a few exceptions early on as I discovered the process that allowed rats to avoid traps. This leads me to think that a few rats may have missed the memo, and got nailed for being out of the loop.

      I'm sure that there is probably someone out there who's going to find a document confirming my observations. Don't bother. I know it works, and it seems obvious to me. At the time I was doing this I had no internet access and had never before been tasked with trapping rats.

      Cheers.

  8. Sharks, too by Das+Auge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The same thing works on sharks. I watched a Discovery show where they got the sharks into a feeding frenzy, dropped some of the repellent (dead shark material) into the water, and all of the sharks took off in seconds.

    Thinking about it, I doubt very much that humans millennia ago smelled dead human and though, "Hey, I wonder what killed him. I'm going to go see."

    1. Re:Sharks, too by travdaddy · · Score: 1

      Thinking about it, I doubt very much that humans millennia ago smelled dead human and though, "Hey, I wonder what killed him. I'm going to go see."

      I guess we have now evolved to that point? Or maybe past it, "Hey, I wonder what killed him. I'm going to go see, and we'll base a CSI episode off of it."

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    2. Re:Sharks, too by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Now we can just use youtube!

    3. Re:Sharks, too by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really. It takes a lot of practice to overcome revulsion of the dead. There is nothing that smells quite as bad like a dead person, even a fresh one has a smell that will tie your stomach in a knot. My fiance is a mortician and it took her quite some time to get over the smell. It still creeps me out when I end up having to wait on her at the funeral home.

    4. Re:Sharks, too by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It still creeps me out when I end up having to wait on her at the funeral home.

      Anything good on the winelist ?

    5. Re:Sharks, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do serve a nice chianti. :P

    6. Re:Sharks, too by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Not really. It takes a lot of practice to overcome revulsion of the dead. There is nothing that smells quite as bad like a dead person, even a fresh one has a smell that will tie your stomach in a knot.

      A lot of dead shit and piss themselves. Unfortunately I have seen my share of freshly-dead, and the only thing that really kept disgusting me was the shit. Even the smell of fresh blood was easy to get over.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  9. The only good bug is a dead bug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Join the Mobile Infantry and save the Galaxy. Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?

    1. Re:The only good bug is a dead bug. by DoubleParadoxx · · Score: 1, Funny

      That was on TV last night. You've got to love a movie where you have nuclear grenade launchers, but you fight armies of the Zerg with M16s and knives instead of nuking them from space.

  10. I smell.. by digitalderbs · · Score: 1

    ...an insect repellent.

  11. Bring out your dead ! by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your anecdote does nothing to invalidate the article's data.

    It makes sense for any animal to avoid a site where its own are dead.

    It's the same category of reflex that makes us want to throw up when someone pukes (being social animals we often eat together), that makes us universally find some smells offensive (pretty much always originally attached to something potentially toxic), etc.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
    1. Re:Bring out your dead ! by bcmm · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It makes sense for any animal to avoid a site where its own are dead.

      Except for cannibals which are so hard to kill that whatever happened to the dead one was probably just bad luck. Like, for example, roaches. IIRC, their attraction to the smell of their own dead is pretty well documented.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    2. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Rooked_One · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah I see your analogy about the puking part... I won't go anywhere someone has puked unless i'm really messed up... so given all the chemicals that i've sprayed in my garage, good chance they are probably tripping their antennae off.

    3. Re:Bring out your dead ! by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have ants where I live, and I've experimented by killing and collecting dead ants, then crushing them and spreading the juices around.

      The ants don't care about their own dead, apparently. I find trails of ants all the time where dead ants are scattered along the trail. It doesn't deter them one bit...

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    4. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have ants where I live

      I would hope so, unless you are posting from the ISS ;)

      The ants don't care about their own dead, apparently

      Actually a lot of ants will collect their dead. It's really quite amazing to watch too.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, that convinces me. The anecdote that you're not quite sure you've recalled correctly sure outweighs this report from scientists. Kudos!

    6. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahah. Nice.

    7. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've lived places without ants. Despite its name, I've never seen an ant in Antarctica.

    8. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Alcoholist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's what I do for ants, works better than any of those nerve agent poisons. Plain old diatomaceous earth (diatomite, silica powder, kisselgur, etc...) Some farmers use it to protect grain and stuff, but it works on ants and other crawly pests too. You put it in places where ants like to run around, like say, the base of a door, along a foundation or on top of an anthill. It kills some of them, injures others but they seem to hate it so much eventually the colony gives up and moves away from your house.

      --
      Bibo Ergo Sum.
    9. Re:Bring out your dead ! by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      Hmm, thanks. I hate to hurt living beings if I can avoid it, so if I can get them out of my food supply while killing as few as possible, that would rock. (For the record, I still eat beef.. but see the work of Temple Grandin for butchering farms.)

      Where's the most inexpensive place to find it in a retail store? And online?

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    10. Re:Bring out your dead ! by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      Here's what I do for ants, works better than any of those nerve agent poisons. Plain old diatomaceous earth (diatomite, silica powder, kisselgur, etc...) Some farmers use it to protect grain and stuff, but it works on ants and other crawly pests too. You put it in places where ants like to run around, like say, the base of a door, along a foundation or on top of an anthill. It kills some of them, injures others but they seem to hate it so much eventually the colony gives up and moves away from your house.

      That's also about the only way to get rid of bedbugs.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  12. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, please...This research-at least as reported by Hugh Pickens above- sounds so flawed! (That's not to say that parts of it are not valid). Have you ever watched ants coming by to pick up their dead? The arrogance!

  13. Folklore by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Several gardening experts claimed that grinding up bugs and spraying them on crops would repel bugs, but field tests have shown no special results. Perhaps this only works in confined spaces like were cockroaches live.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Folklore by Abcd1234 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, given that these scientists actually, you know, ran experiments by using the scientific method to test their theory, I think I'll trust their results over your claims, thanks.

    2. Re:Folklore by BeardedChimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By sprinkling the bugs over a large area you will quickly dilute the fatty acids. It's very possible that if they take the compound and produce it in large quantities that this approach would work.

    3. Re:Folklore by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The effect might also be limited to how and when the death smell occurs. If you have already dead bugs and grind them up, there may not be any release of the fatty acids. If you are killing live ones and then spreading them, that might release enough of fatty acids. Also the confined spaces might also increase the concentration of fatty acids and the concentration might have a role as well. After all death occurs for insects in nature all the time. A large concentration might trigger a response whereas a smaller one might just be normal for bugs.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:Folklore by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Ive heard this actually works, but not as a repellant, rather as a homemade insecticide. The theory is that any species has some individuals that are infected with disease, so you spread the disease around. I've seen it done with aphids. Collect a pile of aphid covered leaves, drop into a blender with some water and a little soap and make a dead aphid smoothy. Strain and spray all over the affected plants. Instant aphid epidemics as the pathogens are distributed over the entire aphid infestation.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    5. Re:Folklore by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      For aphids, just use the water and soap. I use that all the time. (Sometimes I put in a little canola oil to, but soap works fine)

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  14. Nothing eats dead bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because such things might really be attracted to this "repellent."

    1. Re:Nothing eats dead bugs? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Most species of predators target live prey. It might be an evolutionary tactic to avoid diseased prey. There are scavenger species in nature but they are fewer in number and not many for insects. Typically scavenging insects are left for things like molds, fungi, etc due to scale.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  15. Good for democracy by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    I vote we hose down K Street with it. We'll have a representative democracy in under 5 minutes!

    1. Re:Good for democracy by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      Thanks. If I see my congressman surrounded by lobbyists in gas masks, I'll know who to talk to.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    2. Re:Good for democracy by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Alas, there would be no effect. You forget that Washington power brokers are not just vermin, but undead vermin.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  16. Crops by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How are they going to use this for protecting crops? If ants are repelled, wasps and bees will be, too, and there goes your pollination.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    1. Re:Crops by T+Murphy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It creates a niche market for bee gas masks. Brilliant business strategy, I say.

    2. Re:Crops by Gorath99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      How are they going to use this for protecting crops? If ants are repelled, wasps and bees will be, too, and there goes your pollination.

      Still useful (if it really works) for protecting fruit though. Once the blossom is gone and the fruit starts to develop, pollination is no longer an issue.

    3. Re:Crops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This could be still usefull for crops that are self pollinating. Not every crop needs bees.

    4. Re:Crops by Inda · · Score: 2, Informative

      That not what self pollinating means though. Pollen still needs to be transfered from one flower to another. It's just that the flowers can be on the same plant.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    5. Re:Crops by Kirijini · · Score: 4, Informative

      How are they going to use this for protecting crops? If ants are repelled, wasps and bees will be, too, and there goes your pollination.

      Corn is pollinated by wind. I'm not going to bother to find sources for each kind of corn, but here's links for maize (American corn), wheat (European corn), and barley barley. (I guess that link only indicates that Barley self-pollinates, not pollinates by wind. whatever.) Rice is also wind-pollinated.

      Potatoes don't need to be pollinated at all.

      Therefore, if a product is developed from cockroach juice, it might be most useful for these kinds of crops. Note that "cereals" and "roots and tubers" are the 1st and 3rd most produced type of crop.

    6. Re:Crops by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Yes,
      but the process of attaching the masks may hurt the bees' knees.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    7. Re:Crops by whikket · · Score: 1

      Not ants. Ants eat dead things so they will be attracted. But, yeah, there go your wasps and bees.

    8. Re:Crops by EdIII · · Score: 1

      That not what self pollinating means though

      Sheesh. I know right? You would figure everyone on Slashdot would know what self pollinating means.

    9. Re:Crops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MONSANTO

  17. The oil could seal the stench... by dsginter · · Score: 1

    Oil is a remarkable sealant - something to keep in mind. I don't have a cockroach problem but, here in Michigan, the wolf spider (and various other species scare the bejebus out of me (ever hear a 12 year old girl scream?) so I have discovered that eucalyptus oil is handy to keep them at bay.

    --
    More
    1. Re:The oil could seal the stench... by maxume · · Score: 1

      How big have you seen them? I'm also in Michigan, and I don't think I have ever seen (in the wild, knew someone with a tarantula) a spider any bigger than a half-dollar coin (and that was probably an extreme example).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:The oil could seal the stench... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn some basic chemistry!
      Oil is a remarkable good *solvent* for organic matter like the compounds in question. So oil would definitely *not* seal the stench of long chain fatty acids.

    3. Re:The oil could seal the stench... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering that too! I don't remember ever seeing a wolf spider of any size in the state, and I'm a native Michigander.

    4. Re:The oil could seal the stench... by dsginter · · Score: 1

      The biggest that I saw was about 5 inches across (Independence Oaks in Clarkston) but, normally, they are less than half of that size. I had a couple in my house recently - only about 1.5 inches - and they are QUICK.

      ***shudder***

      --
      More
    5. Re:The oil could seal the stench... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I've got a 10 incher myself, and I can assure you I'm not quick.

    6. Re:The oil could seal the stench... by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      there are 12 year old girls on /.??

      which part is more surprising??

    7. Re:The oil could seal the stench... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever hear a 12 year old girl scream?

      Not since June 25th

    8. Re:The oil could seal the stench... by oatworm · · Score: 1

      For me, it's been 19 years.

  18. How does this play into natural selection? by Chameleon+Man · · Score: 0, Troll

    Am I missing something, or does the evolutionary process in developing this not line up? I was always under the impression that individual species were in constant competition with each other (with the exception of living in a society where symbiotic relationships occur). Accounting for natural selection, how can the "death stage" be improved generation by generation when the species that develops this ability is...well...dead?

    1. Re:How does this play into natural selection? by ledow · · Score: 1

      Because you're simply placing too much emphasis on natural selection being somehow performed with a destination in mind.

      Evolution is mostly accident. The fact that the fatty acids inside a dead corpse happen to put off others has nothing to do with those creatures benefiting from it - it's just the way fatty acids smell when a living thing dies. And any sensible living thing might well benefit from detecting a unique odour that only occurs around rotting corpses so that it can steer clear of the area - the danger might still be present and/or a rotting corpse isn't particularly a good thing to smother yourself in.

      However, my question would be more along the lines of: if it's a universal smell, why don't humans smell it... and are vultures and other carrion-eaters put off by it?

    2. Re:How does this play into natural selection? by Chameleon+Man · · Score: 0

      Okay, I understand now that the smell itself is flagged by the animals as a warning sign. It was a genuine question I had, yet some begrudged slashdotter felt the need to mod me as a troll...

    3. Re:How does this play into natural selection? by noundi · · Score: 1

      Okay, I understand now that the smell itself is flagged by the animals as a warning sign. It was a genuine question I had, yet some begrudged slashdotter felt the need to mod me as a troll...

      Well this is the most common mistake people make about evolution. There is no "divine intervention" so there is no purpose, however I wouldn't call it "accident". It's much more like a filter.

      You have 3 cockroaches, one is dead and two are living. One of the two living is fat and hates the smell of other dead cockroaches. The other is thin and doesn't get bothered by the smell of dead cockroaches. The dead cockroach was killed by an airborne disease. The fat cockroach stays away while the thin cockroach doesn't care. The result? The thin cockroach dies from the same disease, thus the genes of the fat cockroach get passed along, making the chance of future cockroaches being fat and repellant to the smell of other cockroaches much higher than if both had lived. Thus nature has selected.

      50 years later this strain of cockroach has migrated to a more difficult terrain. Offspring is never a copy, but an alternation, and every now and then the fat cockroaches get thin offspring. Now 2 cockroaches both feel repelled by the smell of a dead cockroach, except one is thin and the other is fat. The terrain requires mobility in order to survive so naturally the fat cockroach dies and the thin lives on to have offspring of its own. Now the strain is generally thin and is generally repelled by the smell of dead corpses. As time passes new dangers and threats emerge, and old ones disappear. During this entire period the species are filtered to only sustain those fit enough to live.

      So it's not an accident, it's a filter. If you are adapted well enough to pass it you may, if not then you get stuck and so does your genes. As a side note there was a study done in the 70's, I think, where a scientist bred 12 generations of mice and had their tails cut off. The result? Nothing, the new mice kept having the same type of tail that their ancestor had. So we don't evolve as peers, we evolve as species through death.

      --
      I am the lawn!
  19. Especially good, because.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    An obvious reason why pest traps may be less effective is if the dead pests emit a smell that makes others stay away.

    If you spread this smell around, it will make pests stay away - but if it comes a point they develop "immunity" to it, it will also greatly increase the effectiveness of pest traps.

  20. Great... by Gage+With+Union · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the solution to live cockroaches on my floor is dead cockroaches?

    As someone living in a gentrifying neighborhood, any chance this works on hipsters?... (some ground up Converse All-Stars and stovepipe jeans?)

    1. Re:Great... by secretcurse · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, the one nice thing about hipsters is that they have some level of reasoning. Just nail one to the front door with a sign that reads "no Pabst" and you shouldn't have to deal with any others.

      --
      I'm using all of my mod points to mod ancient memes down. Please join me.
    2. Re:Great... by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe you would actually have to grind up the hipster.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you would actually have to grind up the hipster.

      OK, so what's the downside?

    4. Re:Great... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      I find your ideas fascinating, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    5. Re:Great... by amohat · · Score: 1

      Try grinding up on the hipster, that usually works.

  21. Slashdotters stench by MaGGuN · · Score: 2, Funny

    What sort of stench does slashdotters emit that predominantly serve as a warning signal to females? And why is there no research on it?

    1. Re:Slashdotters stench by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rotting pizza and the smell of coding for 36 hours in a hot room without a bath, maybe?

    2. Re:Slashdotters stench by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      This is technically called "desperation", but oddly enough is sometimes called "the stench of death" by some women.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  22. bedbugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do they work on bed bugs?

    cause so far, the only practical three ways to kill em are

    -acid
    -hot steam
    -ddt

  23. Universal? by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 0

    Hrm....just how "universal" is this signal if humans can't detect it?

  24. Nice by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing something of this nature from Planet Earth in which certain groups of insect actually have "grave yard" section in their colony where they put their dead.

  25. Gah! The bad grammar kills me! by mistermocha · · Score: 1

    "were repelled leading scientists to think..."

    WTF!?

  26. Funny Footnote by jchawk · · Score: 1

    Image: Flickr/bensheldon. Note: This photo was chosen from a disturbingly large volume of dead cockroach images on Flickr.

    Every once in a while the internet totally redeems itself. :-P

  27. Thanks, Slashdot by thered2001 · · Score: 1

    Just the stuff I want to read over breakfast.

    --

    If your only tool is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.

  28. Welcome to Joe's apartment by Tautitan · · Score: 1

    it's our apartment too We've been around for a hundred billion years and we'll be here long after you!

  29. Is this why Raid's days may be numbered? by Stormbringer · · Score: 1

    All the time I spent vacuuming out dead roaches from my computer cases... wasted. If I'd mashed them flat instead, obviously I'd have had a lot fewer live bugs to eliminate from my code as a result.

  30. RAID's days may be numbered by Elwar123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this why there's an article today that RAID's days may be numbered?

    1. Re:RAID's days may be numbered by leromarinvit · · Score: 1

      Repellant Array of Insect Death?

      --
      Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
  31. interesting results by martas · · Score: 1

    This is really interesting, especially considering the potential application for protecting crops. I have 2 concerns though:

    1) How quickly does the substance dissipate? Would a farmer have to spray the every time it rains/there's a light breeze?
    2) How long before some bugs say "ah, screw the smell, i'm hungry, dammit!" Some insects might evolve to sacrifice their natural defense from disease for the sake of a good meal, thus making the process useless... Thankfully there aren't really a whole lot of diseases that affect both insects and humans, what with us being in an entirely different phylum and all...

    1. Re:interesting results by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Fire is one of the few diseases that affects both phylums be careful!!

  32. Sorry, not true by Opportunist · · Score: 0

    Proof: Kill a single ant...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. No shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall that insects secrete pain pheromones for such purposes. I'm not a scientist and I never studied biology past high school so how exactly is this news to anyone?

  34. We need that skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since nobody can smell the corpse of the US economy, and we keep sleepwalking into the future of fossil fuel depletion and The Great Die-Off. See you in the FEMA camps chumps!

  35. Is this new? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A few decades ago, Edward O. Wilson proved that ants mark their trails with scent by removing their organs individually and smearing them around. Eventually he found one that would cause them to follow the trail, and would demonstrate his discovery by writing his name in ants.

    I heard a recorded lecture where he told this story, and he also mentioned that they discovered the "dead ant" smell that would signal the colony that "this one is dead, go put it on the pile." When they put the scent on a live ant, the other ants would carry it off to the pile, ignoring the fact that it was squirming the whole way there. And until the stinky ant cleaned itself off enough, they would keep putting it back every time it left the pile.

    1. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      [...] And until the stinky ant cleaned itself off enough, they would keep putting it back every time it left the pile.

      That's awesome. I can use ants to keep any insect a prisoner?
      Muhahahaha! Mosquitoes, the day of reckoning has come!!

    2. Re:Is this new? by Brother+Seamus · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...they discovered the "dead ant" smell that would signal the colony that "this one is dead, go put it on the pile." When they put the scent on a live ant, the other ants would carry it off to the pile, ignoring the fact that it was squirming the whole way there...

      Later made into a major motion picture.

    3. Re:Is this new? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Funny

      A few decades ago, Edward O. Wilson proved that ants mark their trails with scent by removing their organs individually and smearing them around.

      Damn, those are some masochistic ants.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...proved that ants mark their trails with scent by removing their organs individually and smearing them around

      What happens when the ant runs out of organs to smear about? Triple A?

    5. Re:Is this new? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

      Well played, sir. :)

    6. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Later made into a major motion picture.

      Cute. The difference is that the scented ant was so dumb it was probably just squirming as it tried to figure out how to put itself in the pile.

    7. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But, I'm not dead!"

  36. anything for C++? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any such stuff out there for my dll libraries? I would sure like to keep the bugs out of those...

    1. Re:anything for C++? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dll libraries

      Score:-1 Redundant

    2. Re:anything for C++? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes -- kill Windows and all the bugs will run away.

  37. effects on household pets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what is the effect on normal household pets (i.e., dogs, cats, etc.)? This could be the key that permits it or prevents it from entering most households?

  38. Less nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe for some bugs, but for those nasty caca roches, I get a bowl, wipe the top 4 inches around inside with vegtable oil then put whatever inside... coffee grounds, bananas... whatever... There are tons of dead ones in there but that doesn't stop more from coming. Also, cockroaches are cannibals.

    Got a roach problem? Cheap boric acid, sold in plastic bottles everywhere. Don't dump it, pour it, spoon it. Don't waste time preparing mixtures of food and boric acid. Snip the top off of the plastic top. Tip the bottle a little bit, and squeeze. Practice until you can create clouds of fine particles floating in the air. Globs and clumps of white powder do you no good at all - you want a very fine cloud to float out, so that it can settle and coat everything.

    Get rid of kids and pets for a couple days - some people say this stuff is bad for them.

    Proceed to walk all around the house, puffing powder into every corner, nook, crevice, and cranny. Don't forget to crawl under the sink, behind the toilet, behind doors - everywhere. Get the cracks between window frames, behind mirrors, closets, every where! Got a crawlspace under the house? Get down there and puff away. Don't forget the attic, if you have one. Powder the water heater, and the cubby hole that it stands in. (gas heater? this stuff isn't flammable, but for safety sake, you might turn the gas off for a few hours) Get under and behind appliances like microwaves, refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers and dishwashers.

    Perhaps most importantly, puff this stuff into all cracks between baseboards, paneling, corners of rooms, door frames. If you can get a tool behind a baseboard or panel, pry it out slightly to puff dust behind it.

    I've cleaned out unbelievable infestations in repossessed mobile homes. They don't come back! Three or four of those 1 pound bottles will take care of the largest single wide mobile home, I've used six in doublewides.

    If no one is actually living in the home, there's no need to "clean up" right away. Leave everything like it is, so that if you've missed anyplace, those cannibal roaches come out to consume the dead.

    When it is time to clean up - just sweep and mop floors. There's no need to vacuum the dust from inaccessible places. Just leave it to aid in prevention of future infestations.

    For ten dollars or less, you can accomplish what the high dollar pest control companies cannot.

    NOTE: Dusting for roaches may be less effective in the moist basements inhabited by geeks.

    1. Re:Less nonsense by CityZen · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Get rid of kids and pets for a couple days

      At first I thought you were talking about another useful side-effect of the boric acid.

  39. Uncalled for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Admittedly some of us at the office don't always take showers, but "death stench" is a bit uncalled for. Besides, if you guys would spend more time on your unit tests, maybe we QA testers would have more time to attend to our hygiene.

  40. Re:Bill Mays Here!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new CPU BUG REPELLANT!!!

    Just smear this copy of Windows ME on your monitor and you can repel Windows VISTA!!!

    Buy now and get your very box of grid squares!!!

  41. For a real human-detectable dead insect stench by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step on an earwig.

    1. Re:For a real human-detectable dead insect stench by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step on an earwig.

      Only if it's still in your ear!

  42. Bad plan, darlings. by girlintraining · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This will have the same problem in twenty years on crops and pesticides that we're having in antibiotics today: It'll lose effectiveness over time. No matter how you cut it, sooner or later a living organism will find its own survival compels it to attempt to cross the barrier. And when it survives, it will pass its genes onto its progeny. Eventually there will be a gene that pops up where this "universal" stench impulse is suppressed, and it will populate wildly.

    The problem here is capitalism doesn't care -- only protecting high value targets would be the sensible precaution, but why only do that when can make millions, even billions, for a few years until the resistance is developed? And nevermind the ethical implications of short-circuiting a natural defense mechanism -- we might give cockroaches and other insects, that make up a significant amount of the biomass, the ability to spread diseases on a massive scale, since they aren't afraid of their dead anymore.

    Oops.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by inviolet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem here is capitalism doesn't care -- only protecting high value targets would be the sensible precaution, but why only do that when can make millions, even billions, for a few years until the resistance is developed? And nevermind the ethical implications of short-circuiting a natural defense mechanism -- we might give cockroaches and other insects, that make up a significant amount of the biomass, the ability to spread diseases on a massive scale, since they aren't afraid of their dead anymore.

      That may be the very thing that prevents the bug population from ever developing a resistance to this. Any group that does, will be exposed to the perils that they were once protected from (via their aversion to the smell).

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    2. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by Novae+D'Arx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, this actually might work out: 1) Use the repellent for X seasons, until no longer effective due to the bugs losing their fear of dead bugs. 2) Spread a known (bug-only!) disease the next Y seasons, until no longer effective due to the bugs regaining their fear of dead bugs. 3) See 1) Actually, the same would theoretically work with antibiotics - have the FDA remove all, say, penicillin-based antibiotics from the market (except special cases, like where someone is allergic to every other antibiotic, or the only thing a specific bacteria is susceptible to is penicillin-based drugs) for a few years. Studies show that bacteria quickly lose resistance to antibiotics (at least in the lab) when no longer routinely exposed - it takes more energy to produce the resistant proteins/plasmids, and the resistant bacteria are quickly outcompeted. Cycle in/out 1-2 major groups like this every few years, and the "superbugs" that have people so freaked out will be susceptible again. There, I solved that problem - 1 billion dollars, please. I'll take local checks. Really, it's simple. Use evolutionary genetic patterns to our advantage - it's like hacking for the biosphere! ...Cue: "what could possibly go wrong" here...

    3. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by RudeIota · · Score: 1

      That doesn't *have* to necessarily be true.

      It could make sense that insects would evolve out of this oleic acid immunity behavior, but at what cost? Would ants no longer carry their dead? Would roaches no longer avoid disease stricken roaches? Etc...

      In a way though, you've contradicted yourself. To summarize, you said through natural selection, insects will evolve around avoiding oleic acids because their survival depends on it. Your argument afterward is that diseases that will spread on a massive scale as a result which I'm thinking would have a far worse result.

      How would natural selection be able to allow this immunity of "stinky" oleic acid if it results in the death of those insects that require it? Or more broadly, why would evolution develop a particular trait which allows the thriving success of a species at the nearly imminent cost of its survival? I'm sure there are examples, but mathematically speaking, it would be like sacrificing your Bishop to take a Pawn. *does not compute*

      Sure, not being able to feed on our crops will further limit the size of insect populations, but the species will survive. I'm sure there would be exceptions and those exceptions will be met with another form of insecticide or repellent and so on.. as has been done for many centuries.

      So, in short, I'm sure the absolute *survival* of many insect species does not *depend* on our crops. It's a big planet and not insects need to stick to a strict diet of corn, soybeans etc... Sure, the population may have to be reduced, but so is the "S" curve of life.

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    4. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      The problem here is capitalism doesn't care -- only protecting high value targets would be the sensible precaution, but why only do that when can make millions, even billions, for a few years until the resistance is developed?

      And if the technology was only used to protect 'high value targets', you would probably use that fact as 'evidence' that "capitalism doesn't care".
      Sell millions of units at $1 each and people scream "the corporations are trying to get rich by flooding the world with their crap!". Sell a few hundred for $100 each and they scream "they don't care about the poor, the greedy bastards!". Universal blame.

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    5. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by raddan · · Score: 1

      And nevermind the ethical implications of short-circuiting a natural defense mechanism -- we might give cockroaches and other insects, that make up a significant amount of the biomass, the ability to spread diseases on a massive scale, since they aren't afraid of their dead anymore.

      Sure, but the presence of and behavior resulting from this organ is an advantage to that animal. If it were not, it most likely would not be present in the first place.

      Animals that are "naturally selected" to eat crops that are treated with this chemical thus gain an advantage (more food) at the expense of another (death avoidance). It may turn out that these new bugs are worse off than their "natural" counterparts, and are either an unsuccessful breed, or can only survive in niche ecologies. If they cause the spread of disease, so what? They all die off. Problem solved.

      We inadvertently select certain animal traits all the time, just by being here. Sewers, for example, harbor all kinds of animals that are different from their natural counterparts. Not to mention the animals and crops that we select for intentionally, like horses (which no longer even have a natural counterpart) or maize (which doesn't even remotely resemble its wild type).

    6. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's an evolutionary tradeoff. By not being afraid of their dead, they expose themselves to other infections.

    7. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you miscalculate and kill off an unreasonable amount of insects, the ecosystem could just be plain fucked.

      Also, because this is a repellent and not a poison, I've got a feeling we're gonna be seeing an increase in insect population after a few months of using these poisons. Possibly less around human dwellings, but far more in the wild.

    8. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      This sounds reasonable. I wonder if that's a component of the government mind control that is couched as "flu shots"?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  43. The new SlashDot Channel #5 by ShadowXOmega · · Score: 0

    ... its the very essence of a Slashdotter in the morning...
    Irresistible....

  44. Pollinators by stickrnan · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the smell also repel pollinators as well?

    This sounds cool. But I wonder if it would backfire.

  45. Call me a skeptic by daveywest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems like bunk to me. I've cleaned some very nasty rentals, and I've removed roach grave yards by the pound. Every roach I've ever seen doesn't bat an eye at eating their departed comrades.

  46. When can we buy this "death mix"? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing this would be a pretty non-toxic bug deterrent as it wouldn't need to kill them, just fool them into thinking the sprayed area was deadly. So you could spray it into areas containing food items. As someone who recently had a pest infestation, I'd welcome this. (Double infestation, actually. Termites which were only found when we called an exterminator to examine the beetle larvae we found all over our house. Those wound up being pantry pests.)

    Another thought occurs though, if the "death mix" becomes commonly applied in a pest control setting, how long until the bugs learn that the "death mix" in human households doesn't mean actual death? Would the death mix's effectiveness decrease? Bugs with a lesser "death mix" aversion might actually gain a survival advantage (more exclusive access to food sources) and thus multiply more. Would our commercializing the "death mix" result in evolution rendering it ineffective?

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    1. Re:When can we buy this "death mix"? by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I suspect that this has already happened in domestic cockroaches and other common pests. Probably in the federal government too.

  47. Perhaps the compounds decay? by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    My guess would be that these compounds which repel the insects probably decay after a few hours or days? At which point,the other roaches come back and chow down?

  48. Behold! RMS' secret bug-repellant formula! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  49. Don't say universal until tested on the midgie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The common Scottish Midgie is not affected by anything so far and I doubt this will work either!

  50. Geeks are insect experts by millwall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't it cute to note that so many /. geeks are now also apparently insect experts

    1. Re:Geeks are insect experts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      becuase if there was one thing we slashdotters needed to have in order to gain popularity with the opposite sex, was insect knowledge. great.

    2. Re:Geeks are insect experts by cifey · · Score: 1

      /.ers repel women alive or dead. Maybe women smell something we can't. Perhaps there is an industrial application for woman repellent?

      --
      Hello Cruel World
    3. Re:Geeks are insect experts by indros13 · · Score: 1

      digg

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    4. Re:Geeks are insect experts by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Perhaps there is an industrial application for woman repellent?

      I was going to say gay bars, but thought better of it. Women make up, like, half their customers.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  51. Pine Beetle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This could be VERY improtant to the Canadian forest industry. As of today the Pine Beetle is devouring the Canadian forest in norther BC and interior. If this works to some extent hopefully we can contain the pine beetle and save our pine trees...

    1. Re:Pine Beetle by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Not just in Canada. All over the North American continent. I was recently in Rocky Mountain National Park and the rangers told me that it's an epidemic in all the national parks but there wasn't much they could do about it.

      Incidentally there was a strategy that they were trying to develop that involved other scents. Apparently when a pine beetle first attacks a tree they emit a pheromone that attracts other beetles. After the population reaches a certain point on a tree, the beetles stop emitting that pheromone and instead emit a repels other beetles to signal that the tree is fully occupied.

      Unfortunately that strategy was only in infancy stages and there wasn't enough production of such pheromones to implement widely.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  52. A scanner darkly by Mathness · · Score: 1

    Fatty acids? That is great news for all the overweight junkies, now they will be paid to do drugs and given free acid while on work at the farms! ;P

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  53. Trouble with crustaceans by pHalec · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, finally there's a way to get these damn lobsters off my crops!

  54. I could smell them by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

    When I was very young I lived on a house with a cockroaches problem (the memory of the sound when you step over a crock without shoes is never going to go away). I could without a doubt tell if a drawer had a dead crock in it. The odor was very strong and repugnant to me. I don't remember smelling the same odor ever as an adult so the capacity to detect it may go away as you age.

    1. Re:I could smell them by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      There's a definite "cockroach infestation" smell that is hard to describe. It can be quite strong in really bad infestations.

      Knowing the smell from other random smells you get in other people's living quarters can help you pick an apartment that doesn't come with "roommates".

  55. Rather simple actually... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    All bugs emit a certain smell when they die. Some bugs find that smell repulsive, some don't.
    One of those two will remove themselves from the "death area" and later have offspring.

    It is not the trait that they smell bad when they die that is transmitted, but the trait that said smell is repulsive.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  56. Aren't some insects stimulated by this? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

    I thought that crushed wasps and hornets, for example, give off a smell that causes their brothers (wait- actually sisters, right?) to go into attack mode.

        - AJ

    1. Re:Aren't some insects stimulated by this? by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      I thought that crushed wasps and hornets, for example, give off a smell that causes their brothers (wait- actually sisters, right?) to go into attack mode.

      - AJ

      And all this time I kept a dead wasp on the gear lever surround in my car as a 'warning' to other wasps not to come in...

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
  57. They avoid it like... what? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

    'It was amazing to find that the cockroaches avoided places treated with these extracts like the plague,' says Rollo

    I worry about what will happen if we all do actually get the plague. Where will these health-conscious cockroaches go?

    - Alaska Jack

  58. Oleic Acid *Attracts* Ants by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    I learned this while watching an episode of Nova... An individual who had spent the better part of his long career researching ants applied oleic acid to a living ant. Surrounding ants swarmed it and began to carry it toward the nest (as ants supposedly do with their dead). If this is the case, this obviously isn't the end-all solution to repelling insects that the summary makes it out to be. I also imagine ants aren't the only insects that come back for their dead. I found some supportive information of my claim here.

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  59. Coincidentally... by BigSes · · Score: 1

    If you play WoW for more than 12 hours straight, your body begins to emit the same odor.

  60. Home parasites by Nephrite · · Score: 1

    Will it work on bed bugs? On mosquitoes? Houseflies?

  61. What about the Scottish Midge? by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1
  62. Bright bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how exactly did a dead bug pass on its evolutionary genius to the next generation?

  63. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanna put that inside my application. Then it would be BUG FREE!

  64. Across species? by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    The scent of a dead cockroach might repel other cockroaches. But throw a dead hooker in a ditch and see how fast the bugs congregate.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  65. Household Spray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spraying crops is fine for the farmers, but what about New Yawk apawtment house dwellas? Don't they desoive to have their apawtments sprayed, too, for cockroaches?

  66. No CSI:Caveman by Dareth · · Score: 1

    What no CSI:Caveman edition? How primitive!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  67. An example to the others by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine would kill one roach, and stick it on a toothpick (or a "pike" as he called it) and stood it up on a bottle-cork at the entrance to a hole -- as an "example to the others!" He swore it worked.

    Your engaging anecdote has inspired me to make an illustrated example.

    --
    -kgj
  68. Only for so long... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the "human repellent" of Count Dracul. (The source of the Dracula and Vampire legends. You can thank him for Twilight.)
    He just put a huge load of humans or heads on poles around his castle.

    But just like the cockroaches will get used to it, and learn the difference (albeit slowly) between real dead and fake dead bugs, so did the humans in Romania.
    Dracul's dead was not pretty. Not even by his standards. ^^

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  69. Very interesting by ShecoDu · · Score: 1

    That is very cool, does it run on windows?

  70. So does plain old kerosene by rkinch · · Score: 1

    Plain old kerosene and other hydrocarbons are very effective repellants, also being very toxic to the critters. One wonders if this "discovery" was compared for relative effectiveness of these cheap substances. Uncle Al Schwartz has talked about this bug-death-smell-as-repellant for years.

  71. Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, from what I could gather from the headline, just keep a dead guy in the server room and your code will be free of bugs!