Slashdot Mirror


Home Phone System That Syncs To Computer?

An anonymous reader writes 'In comparison to the advanced technology in today's smart phones, the standard home phone is painfully backwards. My current setup is a Panasonic system that has 4 cordless phones over one base station. Setting the time on one phone changes the time on all the phones; however, this is not the case for the phone book. Each entry must be manually copied (pushed) to each handset. Is this as far as home phone technology has come? What I would like is a phone system that I could sync to my computer so I could update the phone book over all the units (if not sync with Address Book or Outlook), keep a log of caller IDs, or even forward me new voicemail notifications. Does anyone know if such a system exists?'

405 comments

  1. no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    next question.

  2. Re:no. it does not. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > next question.

    Ok, I'll bite. Does this seem like a business opportunity to anyone?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  3. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's a "landline"? :-)

    1. Re:Huh? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "What's a "landline"? :-)"

      It's the line that always works. A lot of us live in places that still have very poor cellular signals. Most adults have landlines so I'll assume you're young. I'm not knocking your choice, but don't assume that everyone can do without one.

    2. Re:Huh? by kurt_harlan · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the /. sarcasm . . .

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define young. Actually we're in our mid-to-late-30s. And, I do have a landline (sorta) if you count VOIP. I was half teasing. We recently switched it to an extremely minimal VOIP plan. We pretty much use it for the occasional incoming call and nothing else. Only reason we didn't dump it entirely is that number's good for giving out to people you don't want to give your cellphone number to, like church directories or other organizations you belong to that need some way to contact you.

      But its so much easier just to use the cell for all outgoing calls, since it has all my phone numbers, is with me everywhere, etc - all the reasons being discussed in the post. And where I live, my cell signal has always been much better than my landline ever was - for some reason our landline always had extremely poor quality calls. VOIP fixed that at least.

      A surprising number of adults our age are dropping their landlines altogether and going cell-only, at least among people I know. I expect a day will come where we decide we don't need ours, too.

    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the people I know are in their thirties. Not one of them has a land line.

    5. Re:Huh? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      It's a primitive form of VoIP.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Never had a job where you mattered eh?

    7. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Landline? I live on the open sea you insensitive clod.

    8. Re:Huh? by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a landline in my house. It has an answering machine [1] attached to it. Attached to the answering machine is a telephone [2] with a spiral cord [3] connecting the handset to the base. No seriously. On the side of the handset there's a volume knob [4] and a switch that selects between "Pulse" and "Tone" [5].

      [1] An answering machine is an ancient device that records incoming messages onto a "cassette tape".

      [2] A telephone is a device that connects via a "landline" to the switching station or the operator or something like that.

      [3] A spiral cord is a strange cord that is perpetually tangled. Used to connect a telephone base to the handset.

      [4] A volume knob is an analog electric device that increase or decreases the volume of the earpiece speaker.

      [5] Pulse dialing used a series of pulses to generate the digits in a telephone number. Many phones had a place for a "label" where one could insert a written (or typed) phone number list.

      God. I feel old.

    9. Re:Huh? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I agree; I'm the same way. I'm 35, and I only know one guy with a landline, and he's extremely resistant to change (he doesn't even have a cellphone).

      However, I live in a large metro area, where cellular availability is ubiquitous. If I lived someplace rural, my story might be different. Since I hope to get out of the city in 5-10 years and work at home as a consultant, I hope cellular and broadband availability has improved by then. I'll probably just have to make sure I choose a location that's good for those things.

    10. Re:Huh? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      When Hurricane Agnus hit my home, the phone was the only thing that still worked. It allowed my mom (female parental unit) to call the electric company and request reconnection for our house.

      The phone system is simple but robust. And if the three-strike law happens, and my high-speed internet gets cut off by the MAFIAA, the phone line may be my only avenue for connecting to the internet (50k dialup).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    11. Re:Huh? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It is something your phone company forces you to pay for so you can get ADSL or cable. If you plug a handset into it, you get harassed by loads of telemarketers trying to sell you what ever the current scam of the month is. In Britain at the moment it is debt write-off scammers.

    12. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It allowed my mom (female parental unit)

      Hey! Slashdotters know what a mom is. She's the one who owns the basement.

    13. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...and Jeeze! I've been having problems with my 1947 Raytheon AN/PRC-6 hand sets... sun flares, jammers on the grassy knoll?

    14. Re:Huh? by FrigBot · · Score: 2, Funny

      We didn't get a touch-tone phone in the house til I was in about grade 10. That was maybe 13 years ago. In junior high school I had this flyer-delivery route and you were supposed to confirm that you did all the deliveries at the end of every day by going through this touch-tone menu they had set up. Well we had a pulse-dialing push-button phone, so that's what I used. I don't think it ever worked with their system. But nobody ever complained. Another wierd thing was how we often didn't get most of the flyers delivered somehow, and they ended up getting burned in the firepit in the backyard. Wierd how that happened. I think they kept sending me too many. The other funny thing was nobody ever complained about that either. I wonder why.

      Anyway, yeah I'd go for a cordless phone computer syncing thing. Then I could get a flyer route again to pay for it.

    15. Re:Huh? by mseidl · · Score: 1

      It's how you get out of the matrix. Duh.

    16. Re:Huh? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      It's what you get your high-speed Internet over. ^^

      (TV cables included!)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    17. Re:Huh? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The sad thing is that VoIP is still primitive, at least in commonly available form. 10 years ago I really thought the Internet would wipe out traditional telephony. Paying an additional bill just because some of your data traffic happens to be voice? Remembering long numbers instead of names? The entire family sharing a single number? No integration with contact lists from e.g. Outlook or facebook? "Long-distance" fees? Caller-ID and conference calls as special, value-added "features"?

      It's really no different than email. Who would pay $25/mo for a single email account? And they pay extra to see the "from:" address, or send to multiple recipients, or to send to the next state over, or for a username that isn't just a 10 digit random number?

      And yet with Vonage, Comcast VOIP, etc, here we still are.

    18. Re:Huh? by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

      Actually, if a lot of you lived there, there would probably be better cell coverage :)

    19. Re:Huh? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you feel so old.

      My phone says 'Bell System Property, Not For Sale' on the bottom. And it'll outlast almost every phone newer than it.

      It is a touch-tone. That means, it has several transistors. In the touch-tone module, which is separate from the induction coil module.
       

    20. Re:Huh? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      For dealing with touch-tone services (aside from actual touch-tone dialing) when on a rotary dial connection, they used to (still?) sell external touch-tone generator boxes that you could hold up to the mouthpiece to generate the tones needed.

      I mess around with PIC microcontrollers. The "PIC Basic Pro" compiler has touch-tone functions, to easily enable you to write code and have the PIC output touch-tone frequencies. Touch-tones are one of those universal useful things now. Like 2600Hz, which I suspect (haven't checked) probably isn't anywhere as useful a frequency as it once was.

    21. Re:Huh? by masdog · · Score: 1

      Only reason we didn't dump it entirely is that number's good for giving out to people you don't want to give your cellphone number to, like church directories or other organizations you belong to that need some way to contact you.

      Isn't that what Google Voice is for?

    22. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a phone that doesn't drop calls.

    23. Re:Huh? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Our phone system did not survive Ike.

      Turns out 50% of the landlines are now at least partially fiber and no longer pull power from a central power station. Once the 4-6 hour backup batteries went, so did phone service.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    24. Re:Huh? by flink · · Score: 1

      I'm pushing 32 and the only reason I have a landline is that I needed a phone # to subscribe to DSL. The only outgoing calls I've ever made on it was to activate new credit cards since I only give out the number to people likely to spam me.

      I think that whether you rely on POTS says more about where you live than your age. Cell service in metro areas outside of clubs or movie theaters is pretty darn reliable. I've acquired more rollover minutes on my cell than I'll ever use since the primary way I communicate with people is through txt these days anyway.

    25. Re:Huh? by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      it's the thing that provides your ADSL broadband service. I don't use mine for anything else.

    26. Re:Huh? by amnezick · · Score: 0

      FPU = female parental unit?!?!? I always thought that stands for "floating-point unit".

      --
      mov ax,4c00h
      int 21h
    27. Re:Huh? by Rantastic · · Score: 1

      You seem to be confusing VOIP to POTS service with VOIP. Services like Gizmo5 and others offer free VOIP to VOIP calling across a wide variety of similar providers, let you use your choice of hardware and/or software, and only charge for bridging to POTS lines. VOIP is here now, it is very easy, includes presence and even video chat.

      --
      Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
    28. Re:Huh? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In Britain, only the phone company forces you to get it for ADSL. If you have an LLU line then you can get naked ADSL (no telephone) and the cable company doesn't require a telephone either.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    29. Re:Huh? by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Landline? I live on the open sea you insensitive clod.

      Better get a cordless phone then. :p

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    30. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 2 answering machines. The one in my phone is digital tapeless...and turned off. The one from Vonage is digital, works through their server, and emails a .wav file of messages to my email as attachments. So not every answering machine has a cassette tape (although my first one did).

  4. Re:no. it does not. by s.bots · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not really for personal use, unless you live in an area where owning a cellphone is prohibitively expensive and a landline isn't. I think the number of geeks that would fit this niche would be very small. Other than this case, I really think the landline is slowly going the way of the dodo as far as home users are concerned.

    However, being able to push something like this out to business and corporate clients may well be a viable opportunity.

  5. The Tech That Oughtta Be by 25thCenturyQuaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's a great question, and an even better request to broadcast to manufacturers. I have a 4 unit/1 base V-Tech cordless system at home that I love (rugged [survived a drop in a toilet and kept on working], battery life, etc), except for wishing that it did stuff that it doesn't. The feature tech isn't the difficult part, it's getting the manufacturer's attention so they know it's wanted.

    --
    My Human Gets Me Blues.
    1. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by rcolbert · · Score: 2, Funny

      survived a drop in a toilet and kept on working

      Given the relatively low cost of a replacement handset, I can assure you that 99% of all phone owners who drop a handset into the toilet never find out one way or another if the handset survived the experience. But it brings up a question. Do you often talk on the phone at home while using the toilet, and if so do you flush mid-conversation, wait on the toilet until the conversation is over, or (hopefully remember to) come back later to flush?

    2. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by natehoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously, he drops his in the toilet, thus ending the conversation and solving the problem gracefully.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Doesn't matter, he was talking shit anyway.

    4. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by natehoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Understandable. He was pissed off.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    5. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by natehoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dang, I just noticed. I wasted post number 30 million on a bad pun. Sorry about that, folks.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    6. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I once lost a phone (cell phone) when I was buckling my pants. I flushed the toilet, and then went to adjust my belt and shirt to make sure it wasn't bloused. A slight flick sent the belt slipping from the first beltloop and allowed the clip to which my phone was attached to slide right down the belt and hit dead center right as the toilet finished it's final surge in the flush sequence.

      No chance for saving that phone. Cancelled the service before some damned alligator ran up the charges calling his buddies in Louisianna.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    7. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Yeah but "He was pissed off" is the perfect slashdot message. What better way to celebrate post 30 million?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Hopefully he has enough tact to at least hit the 'mute' button while flushing.

    9. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by rcolbert · · Score: 1

      Don't feel too bad. It's already modded up to 4, so it clearly doesn't suck. But it reminds me of when you take your car in for service - I happen to have my odometer and trip odometer set to the same digits because, well a trip odometer is useless and I somehow just feel better when the two match. Anyhow, why in the world does the mechanic reset the trip odometer for you? It's almost as bad as my wife opening the microwave door early and letting the words 'p r e s s s t a r t' scroll repeatedly across the display instead of the clock. What was the question again?

    10. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Post 30 million -- congratulations.

      How many if we don't count goatse links or first posts?

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    11. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      Does the mechanic disconnect the battery? I bet that would reset the trip. Perhaps some of the diagnostics also reset it. I use the trip to track how far I've gone on the current tank of gas, so it's not _totally_ useless. You'd also hate the Nissan X-Trail (at least in the configuration I rented down here). It resets the trip every time you turn it off!

    12. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by FrigBot · · Score: 1

      I do it all the time, since it's a great way to get two birds stoned at once. A real time-saver. I sit and wait til conversation is over before flushing, sometimes. Depends on who it is - if it's just a guy friend talking about stupid stuff, flush. Otherwise, no.

      BTW, mod parent up - that's hilariously clever.

    13. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by Bai+jie · · Score: 4, Funny

      About 400.

    14. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by no1nose · · Score: 1

      That kicks ass!! Great pun and gratz on 30,000,000!

    15. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by standbypowerguy · · Score: 1

      Flushing is what the MUTE button is for!

      --
      This isn't the sig you're looking for... Move along.
    16. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by ukemike · · Score: 1

      it's okay the overwhelming majority of the previous 29,999,999 posts were either bad puns, five steps to profit jokes, or bad car analogies, so if you'd said something useful that would have been bad form.

      --
      -- QED
    17. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by slasho81 · · Score: 1

      Much better than "30M GET" posts, IMHO.

    18. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by RJFerret · · Score: 1

      Dang, I just noticed. I wasted post number 30 million on a bad pun. Sorry about that, folks.

      Pfft, that's 1110010011100001110000000 in binary, hardly a round number. Quick, get ready for post 33,554,432!

    19. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by SamSim · · Score: 1

      If anybody can find #19,000,000 I would be really interested. Currently it seems to be missing presumed dead.

    20. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by Graff · · Score: 1

      I happen to have my odometer and trip odometer set to the same digits because, well a trip odometer is useless

      A trip odometer is far from useless. It is incredibly useful if you get a little creative. One great use is as a simple efficiency monitor. I reset my trip odometer every time I fill the tank, then when I go to fill it I note the miles used since last fill and the gas it took to fill the tank. A simple calculation gives you the approximate fuel economy, great for monitoring the state of your car. You can easily notice any gross problems such as a fouled plug or a bad fuel injector through the fuel economy. Of course, some cars give you the fuel economy on-the-fly but a lot don't.

      Yes, you can do the same thing by difference on the normal odometer but that would require recording the old values and another calculation.

      You can also use it to monitor stretches during a trip, matching up against a Google maps printout to see when a turn is coming up. Another good use is a rest indicator, reset it at the start of your trip and when it hits a certain value pull over and stretch, then reset it and go again.

      The trip odometer is a convenience over the normal odometer. Use it often to save you bookkeeping and to provide you short-term information at a glance. It's certainly not going to make or break anything major but it can be a nice help.

    21. Re:The Tech That Oughtta Be by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It could be on somebody's journal entry. Next-to-impossible to find it, no doubt.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  6. The overkill solution by clutch110 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Time for overkill solution number 1:

    1) Buy a SIP to POTS adapter
    2) Install asterisk on your Linux server (You do have a Linux server right?)
    3) Create a web app, preferably Ruby on Rails, that connects to Asterisk over the management port and dials a phone number and rings it back to your home phone line
    4) Profit until the system breaks and the wife wrings your neck because she can't call to make her beauty salon appointment!

    Enjoy!

    1. Re:The overkill solution by 25thCenturyQuaker · · Score: 3, Funny

      But can an idiot grandma in a hurry figure out how to do that?

      --
      My Human Gets Me Blues.
    2. Re:The overkill solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this is Slashdot, so there is, in fact, no wife, and the profit never ends!!!

    3. Re:The overkill solution by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Or just get Google Voice and make your calls using the Web interface. No need for an address book in the phone at all, and Google's done all the hard work for you.

      Not as easy as a speed dial, but if you have a landline you might also be interested in saving the long distance charges...

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:The overkill solution by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Funny

      Time for overkill solution number 1:

      1) Buy a SIP to POTS adapter 2) Install asterisk on your Linux server (You do have a Linux server right?) 3) Create a web app, preferably Ruby on Rails, that connects to Asterisk over the management port and dials a phone number and rings it back to your home phone line 4) Profit until the system breaks and the wife wrings your neck because she can't call to make her beauty salon appointment!

      Enjoy!

      If you don't want to kill it that much, you could switch to a VOIP service for your home number. But your solution does have that cool Dr. Seuss/Rube Goldberg vibe, so don't let me discourage you.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:The overkill solution by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 1

      ... you might also be interested in saving the long distance charges...

      This is the obligatory "What are long distance charges?" post.

      In the event this had been a real post there would have been something of interest here.

    6. Re:The overkill solution by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 1

      2) Install asterisk on your Linux server (You do have a Linux server right?)

      Nope, FreeBSD. Next question!

    7. Re:The overkill solution by Jay+L · · Score: 1

      You left out a few parts of the overkill solution:

      5. Excellent O'Reilly book on Asterisk
      6. RSS feed for NerdVittles / PBX-in-a-Flash
      7. Copy of VMWare Fusion because hey, why bog down the Linux server when you have a fast desktop?
      8. Subscription to TWO different SIP providers because you want to compare call quality
      9. iPhone to use until you get around to reading that Asterisk book ...

      hypothetically, I mean. I'd imagine. Pure conjecture, you understand.

    8. Re:The overkill solution by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Well, granted, but remember - the question was asked by someone who uses a landline.

      Some landlines include long distance services, but many companies actually still differentiate between calling your neighbor and calling someone hundreds of miles away.

      It's really old school, like, having, like, food you actually have to, like, cook in the microwave and stuff. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    9. Re:The overkill solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) Profit until the system breaks and the wife wrings your neck because she can't call to make her beauty salon appointment!

      I'm glad you injected the dose of realism in your comment. My previous IT dept switched the phone system to Asterisk.. it was a nightmare for everyone involved.

      Suggestion for IT people: you are good at computers, not telecommunications. Let the telephone company do their job, let your company pay them, and most importantly let them worry about fixing things when they go wrong.

    10. Re:The overkill solution by anexkahn · · Score: 1

      In case you don't have a Linux server (How Dare You) there is now a windows based asterisk:

      http://www.asteriskwin32.com/

      Or you could of course run asterisk in a virtual machine. using something like virtualbox: http://www.virtualbox.org/

      --
      Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
    11. Re:The overkill solution by Grishnakh · · Score: 0, Troll

      The question was also asked by someone interested in syncing his home phone with "Outlook". Since he doesn't mind wasting money on crappy email software when much better free software is available (remember, he's at home, not at work at a big corporation with an Exchange server), he shouldn't mind wasting money on long-distance charges too.

    12. Re:The overkill solution by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      You're not familiar with Google voice. When you dial online, it calls YOUR land line. Most landlines allow for unlimited free incoming calls.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    13. Re:The overkill solution by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>This is the obligatory "What are long distance charges?" post.

      It's what happens when you're in a hotel room, use their phone to make a call, and the friendly computer operator asks for your credit card. Long distance charges.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    14. Re:The overkill solution by monkeySauce · · Score: 2, Funny

      RTFM, Grandma!

    15. Re:The overkill solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      elastix comes on a boot cdrom and is so easy to set up a moron could do it. no need for books. elastix without tears is available as a PDF for those who like reading while installing.

    16. Re:The overkill solution by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. In my experience most people are happy when you lose their phone number.

      Or maybe that's just me.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    17. Re:The overkill solution by Etylowy · · Score: 1

      Um.. overkill you say? That's exactly what I did last week (used php, not ruby on rails).

    18. Re:The overkill solution by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I USE Google Voice every day. I know how it works, and that's how it saves long-distance charges for those who might have to pay them.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    19. Re:The overkill solution by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Rube Goldberg is my hero.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    20. Re:The overkill solution by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but P(A & B) = 0

      Where A = Linux Server, and B = Female company.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    21. Re:The overkill solution by pfleming · · Score: 1

      >>>This is the obligatory "What are long distance charges?" post.

      It's what happens when you're in a hotel room, use their phone to make a call, and the friendly computer operator asks for your credit card. Long distance charges.

      You mean like when you call the "Girls! Girls! Girls!" line or something else? Cause they charge you from home too.

    22. Re:The overkill solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could use FreeSWITCH with mod_event_socket.

  7. Regular phones are so backwards... by hey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... they work *all* the time.
    Personally, I would never replace my POTS phone with anything "high tech".

    1. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because nothing 'high tech' works all the time.
      Is your POTS phone a rotary one?

    2. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by value_added · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would never replace my POTS phone with anything "high tech".

      Unless you have an older model made by AT&T (bonus points if it's rotary and heavy enough to kill a horse), or use business-quality phones at home, chances are good that the quality and feature set of your home phone is "adequate" and not much more.

    3. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by tygt · · Score: 1
      Mine is. Red, too. We call it "The Kremlin Hotline".

      Of course, this is the phone that's in the garage... the other POTS phones in the house are wireless

    4. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by flyboyfred · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, we had a major storm that took our power out for four days. We had (and still have) one plain old corded phone, so we never lost phone service. Most people we tried to call, though, never answered because their cordless phones didn't have power. I think it's a good idea to have a corded phone around for such emergencies.

      --
      I might be indecisive, but I'm not really sure. What do you think?
    5. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't know about the parent, but I had a rotary phone forever. I loved it.

      It was over 30 years old, still worked, and most people I talked to always asked who my cell phone carrier was ("Your voice sounds really clear!").

      Additionally, the land line never went down. Power out? No Heat? Need to call someone to plow your out? Cell phone towers swamped with callers? Land line worked perfectly.

      The only reason I don't have one any more is the land line was going to cost me 10 more dollars than the cell phone and honestly, I'm a cheap bastard. I've also moved 3 times in 2 years, so I need a mobile number so that work and friends can get a hold of me.

      Even so, if I got roommates willing to split the landline again I'd get one in a heartbeat.

    6. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Hmm, you've never heard of Fairpoint, then. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    7. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by aphelion_rock · · Score: 1

      In the case of the great NE blackout 2003 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_Blackout_of_2003 or if the terorists get organised and start blowing up power stations then the humble POTS phone will be the only thing left working. Sometimes the more basic the technology the more reliable it is

    8. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I haven't had a POTS phone since 2002, and never missed it. In fact, I've never seen it NOT work since then. When the tornados tore through my neighborhood in March 2006, my phone worked fine. POTS phones were out for weeks.

      I really don't see much use for POTS phones, or for making them "smart" (which would only require a wifi or bluetooth connection to your PC, and a little software).

      Damn, dude, I'm 57, you must REALLY be old. Are you on the right site?

    9. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Too bad, because outside the cordless I have Cisco phones on a Asterisk box. works ALL THE TIME as well, and my VoIP service never goes down unless internet is out, and if internet is out, then POTS phone is out too. (DSL is screwy that way)

      the Cisco voip phones are incredible sounding.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      In the case of the great NE blackout 2003 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_Blackout_of_2003 or if the terorists get organised and start blowing up power stations then the humble POTS phone will be the only thing left working.

      Sometimes the more basic the technology the more reliable it is

      If power stations get blown up, why do you think they'd ignore telephone exchanges?

    11. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Additionally, the land line never went down. Power out? No Heat? Need to call someone to plow your out? Cell phone towers swamped with callers?

      Plow your *what* out? Because if it's what I'm thinking, I'm sure we could come to some kind of arrangement...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by ebh · · Score: 4, Funny

      More bonus points if the handset still smells like cigarettes even though no smoker has used it in 25 years.

    13. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      What's a handset? My phone has a bell-shaped device that I hold to my ear, and I speak into a horn in the base, you insensitive clod! - Image: http://atomsofjustice.com/BrassGoggles/candlestickphone.jpg

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    14. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Telephone exchanges are better hidden and have fewer vulnerable exterior parts.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    15. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, we had a major storm that took our power out for four days. We had (and still have) one plain old corded phone, so we never lost phone service. Most people we tried to call, though, never answered because their cordless phones didn't have power. I think it's a good idea to have a corded phone around for such emergencies.

      Why, did the local companies not know there was an emergency? Seems like it would be pretty obvious that if a major storm rolls through an area and takes out the power, it's an awfully big emergency. No need to call for help (that could in fact just delay it).

    16. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by maxume · · Score: 1

      It's really too bad that all those people died.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by FrigBot · · Score: 1

      Even more if it still has the sticker on the bottom saying it's property of the phone company. And more on top of that if you're still paying the phone rental fee.

    18. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by Wobble-U · · Score: 1

      I really REALLY want one of those. And I have a landline, so it can actually be used!

    19. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by dissy · · Score: 1

      Additionally, the land line never went down. Power out? No Heat? Need to call someone to plow your out? Cell phone towers swamped with callers? Land line worked perfectly.

      My home data and phone system can run for a good 24 hours on battery backups alone, and that is just until I switch on the generator.

      Just because the phone company has such hardware, does not mean you can't too if you want it.

      And if you don't want it, that is fine, just realize it is you choosing to have a non-working IP phone line, NOT that it is not possible.

    20. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      Actually in the US, phone companies pay a huge fine if their service goes down for any length of time. That's why the central office in each area has enough batter/backup generator reserve to keep the phones going for up to 6 days during a power outage.

    21. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by flyboyfred · · Score: 1

      The idea wasn't to report the outage. It was to still have communication during the outage. There were a lot of people who needed help removing downed trees and such, and having a phone to make and receive calls was important. Fortunately, we didn't have any damage. But if we had, we could have called for help. And what if we had a medical emergency and needed an ambulance? I didn't have a cell phone then, and I'm not sure how well cell service was working at the time.

      --
      I might be indecisive, but I'm not really sure. What do you think?
    22. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      The only reason I don't have one any more is the land line was going to cost me 10 more dollars than the cell phone

      If you discard all the nickel and dime features that get tacked on, you can maintain a landline for less than $10 a month in the US.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    23. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Most of the 'Bell System Property' telephone sets were sold-to-the-customer through long leasing arrangements after Bell stopped 'owning' them, so the warning doesn't apply anymore. And sticker??? My 'Bell System Property' phones have that stamped/embossed into the steel.

    24. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the World Trade Center fell down, the phone lines going through the basement only worked for 3 days. (Now it DID have tons of rubble on it, and no power.) Surprised all the phone co. guys I know.

    25. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by noahisaac · · Score: 1

      I have to agree (and I'm an asterisk administrator). If you have POTS lines, the best way to utilize them is with an old school analog phone. There is no combination that is more reliable, and if you have a good phone and your phone lines don't suck, the sound quality will be excellent. Connecting old school POTS lines to VoIP PBXs or even older digital phone systems is very often problematic. If you want to use a modern phone system, use (more) modern phone lines: BRI, PRI, or just go with direct VoIP connections.

    26. Re:Regular phones are so backwards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the last hurricane blew through this part of East Texas, the power was out for more than 24 hours. My cheap ass $5 phone worked and my fancy multichannel radio phone was just taking up space.

  8. It's called Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, it's called Asterisk, but it requires more than a box you buy at a retail store. You can share a phone book and click-to-dial (Asteridex) based on entries in MySQL. It supports about every feature you can think of for the phone, from wake-up calls to auto-forwarding. Get a VOIP trunk running SIP and you'll also pay far less for phone service. You still need a tiny server running Linux, some IP phones, or an analog card, but you'll have total control and all the features you want. Personally, I like FreePBX (http://freepbx.org), and there are even easier-to-setup versions such as the distro at http://nerdvittles.com/.

    1. Re:It's called Asterisk by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      I read this and remember the days of "64K" modems. Quite a few had PBX-ish capabilities. Guy should go dumpster-diving for a modem bank.

    2. Re:It's called Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called FreeSWITCH nowadays.

  9. Cost by ewoods · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The biggest reason this doesn't happen is cost. Those crappy phones you mention (I have similar setup) costs the manufacturer pennies to make. There's no fancy operating system, no connectivity with disparate systems, no pricey architecture, nothing fancy. In order to do what smart phones do, the cost would go up. Your smart phone isn't cheap, but the price is subsidized by the phone provider through deals with the manufacturer and built into the cost of the plan as a whole. Good luck, but I wouldn't expect it to happen any time soon because most people won't pay hundreds for a home phone system when they can get one that works with 4 handsets for $50.

    1. Re:Cost by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      You might think that a proper telco like AT&T might want to make a good wired-phone infrastructure, to stop the flight of people to cell phones, so they'd encourage the development of features like syncable phone books, and Internet-accessible voicemail (a la Google Voice) and things like that.

      Then you'd remember that AT&T bought out Cingular a while ago, so they probably make more money off your cell phones anyway, and they're just try to wring as much as they still can out of their existing infrastructure without spending any money to develop it further. (Also, you'd remember that AT&T is legendary for being slow and stupid and incompetent.)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Cost by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      How much would a wifi or a bluetooth chip set them back?

    3. Re:Cost by Sl4shd0t0rg · · Score: 1

      You might think that a proper telco like AT&T might want to make a good wired-phone infrastructure, to stop the flight of people to cell phones

      You mean by offering VoIP and IPTV services over their wired-phone based internet connection? They are with their Lightspeed/Uverse service which I am really happy with.

    4. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the best part, where AT&T decided that cell phones weren't where the money was at:

      1) AT&T sold their wireless provider to Cingular who was owned by BellSouth
      2) BellSouth bought AT&T
      3) BellSouth renamed itself to at&t

    5. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's at&t now and SBC/Cingular actually bought AT&T, not the other way around.

    6. Re:Cost by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Also known as DSL. Good example since the company uses the existing twisted-pair wires by upgrading from narrowband POTS to wideband DSL.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Also, you'd remember that AT&T is legendary for being slow and stupid and incompetent.)

      That's not nice. Wait a minute.... I work for AT&T you nosensitive blob (that's the meme, right?). Uh, how do I post aga

      (Also, you'd remember that AT&T is legendary for being slow and stupid and incompetent.)

      That's not nice. Wait a minute.... I work for AT&T you nosensitive blob (that's the meme, right?).

      What's with all those squigly lines and letters? Maybe it'll work this ti

    8. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having purchased the brand about a year ago with only 2 handsets (base counts as 1), I can tell you it cost me like $30 to get 1 more unit.
      They're not as cheap as you think.

      This is sorted inversely, and ignoring the crazy $200 Panasonic model, a 4-tupler costs $120 to $140 USD. Our unit cost around. I think I paid about $100 for the duplex originally, and it has come down in price. If I judge right by another coment someone made, they probably have self-propagating address books now if you pay for the new models.

      Maybe it is the brand that sucks... ;)

    9. Re:Cost by houghi · · Score: 1

      Probably nothing as they would charge for it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, some of the Siemens Gigaset DECT phones run linux on the handset. Essentially all the VoIP/Analog gateway appliances run linux, just like most DSL modems/routers, most of them already have web server installed.

    11. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On that note... try looking at what Polycom (http://www.polycom.com/) offers. They are expensive, but they tend to offer more features than you would expect a typical phone to have. Admittedly, they are geared to large business with significant telephony needs.

  10. Cybergenie by alatar_b · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.cygnion.net/ It did exist, and there are still some available out there if you look hard enough. It had some issues, the main one being lack of sales hampering the development of the technology any further, but it worked pretty well all being said.

    1. Re:Cybergenie by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      http://www.cygnion.net/
      It did exist, and there are still some available out there if you look hard enough. It had some issues, the main one being lack of sales hampering the development of the technology any further, but it worked pretty well all being said.

      I owned a CyberGenie, which was circa 2001 or 2002, something like that. If I remember right it was actually developed by Ericsson and then spun off as Cygnion just before they launched the product, where it died a pretty quick death during the dot.bomb. Seems like it was less than one year, but that was a while back and my memory is fuzzy. Required an always-on Windows system to run, and the wireless handsets had terrible range. An interesting concept, though.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  11. Not now, but 10 years ago by CaseyB · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Cordless Phone System

    You might be able to find one on EBay...

    1. Re:Not now, but 10 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had this and it's exactly what I thought of when I read the question.
      It was an awesome system... when it worked. It crashed Win98 frequently. And it doesn't work with anything but Win9x.
      Pretty cool system for it's time, but crippled by poor (read NO) Microsoft support and crappy software.

    2. Re:Not now, but 10 years ago by rabuksak · · Score: 1

      I'm somewhat ashamed to admit I actually owned that phone, and liked it.

      I've always been surprised to never see anything like it again, however. The handset itself was huge, but I recall the features worked quite well, both with calls made via the computer and calls made with the handset. Voice-dialing even worked well.

      MCPS Commercial

    3. Re:Not now, but 10 years ago by blackjackshellac · · Score: 1

      I threw this piece of crap out my front door (literally). This was the final nail in the coffin for Micro$oft for me, the reason I switched to linux on the desktop, in 1999.

      --
      Salut,

      Jacques

  12. My phone setup by flyboyfred · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a Panasonic phone system with 3 cordless handsets and one base station. It keeps all of the phone book entries centrally, so if you change it from one handset all get the change. Same with the caller ID log. No connection to my computer, but this sounds like most of what you're asking for. Maybe you just need a newer phone?

    --
    I might be indecisive, but I'm not really sure. What do you think?
    1. Re:My phone setup by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      What happens when the base station dies and needs to be sent in for service? Do you have an option of exporting and importing the stored information?

    2. Re:My phone setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cheapo AT&T 5-phone system from Costco automatically updates all handsets with any new phone numbers or caller ID lists.

      Well, it says "AT&T" on the phone -- I don't know who the *real* manufacturer of this is.

    3. Re:My phone setup by ModifiedDog · · Score: 1

      Likewise (but 4 handsets). Model is this one: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16876101289

  13. CLX475 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a Uniden CLX475 ... it does pretty much everything you ask ...

    http://www.uniden.com/products/productdetail.cfm?product=CLX475-3

  14. Depends. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good old fashioned POTS stuff has its advantages(phones, even wireless ones, are incredibly cheap, you can carry the signal over cable of virtually arbitrary crappiness); but sophistication isn't really one of them. Even DECT gear, while ostensibly some kind of standard, is little more powerful or interoperable than the old-school proprietary RF linked wireless phones.

    If you want power, you really want VOIP phones(even if you end up using a copper POTS line to dial out, though you can often save money by using a SIP provider). Voicemail sent to your email, speech to text, configurable menues, contacts lists that connect to LDAP/AD backends, the whole deal. Unfortunately, VOIP hardware tends to be substantially more expensive than the old POTS stuff(unless you count software VOIP clients running on hardware you already have) and need proper modern data connections(either wired or wireless ethernet, usually).

    1. Re:Depends. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Good old fashioned POTS stuff has its advantages(phones, even wireless ones, are incredibly cheap, you can carry the signal over cable of virtually arbitrary crappiness)..

      If you define "carry the signal . . ." to mean sound quality gets worse and worse the crappier the cable gets. There's some pretty craptacular wiring out there. I have had to pull out all the POTS wiring in a house ("quad" cable spliced with anything convenient: scotch tape, bandage tape, nothing . . . all hooked together in a bizarre ring/star/daisy chain hybrid group loop disaster ) because I couldn't understand anybody and vice-versa..

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Depends. by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Instead of VOIP phones dialing out of POTS, you can also get the features the OP wants by going the opposite way. For example I have simple DECT phones hooked on a Thomson VOIP DSL router, which router can have a unified address book, call logs etc. Obviously this is solution is dependent on having a DSL+VOIP provider in your area.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    3. Re:Depends. by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Heh. I've got a short run of CAT5 going from phone box outside to a rafter in my attic, each wire spread out, stripped, and wrapped around a nail. Then CAT3 from the nails to the phone jacks in the few rooms that have a landline phone. Voice quality is no issue.

      My DSL on the other hand is CAT5 from the phone box outside up into the attic down thru a wall to a wall plate. And I get constant disconnects due to "timeout waiting for PADO" which apparently is due to too much noise on the line.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:Depends. by ericfitz · · Score: 1

      A good old wired POTS phone will work even if the power is out at your house. No UPS necessary.

    5. Re:Depends. by Sandbags · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pots hardware, a generic VoIP provider, and a google voice number... Done.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    6. Re:Depends. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It is certainly possible to have wiring so ghastly that POTS won't work; but POTS works(and a fair percentage of the worlds POTS systems are in fact working right now) over cable so bad that even 10mb ethernet would drop packets like a juggling monkey on diazapam.

      In principle, I'm sure, a sophisticated ethernet-like system with substantial amounts of DSP sauce on each end and clever compression algorithms could outperform your basic analog telephone system over truly awful cables; but such a system doesn't actually seem to exist in practically useful form and ethernet certainly isn't it.

    7. Re:Depends. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Heh. I've got a short run of CAT5 going from phone box outside to a rafter in my attic, each wire spread out, stripped, and wrapped around a nail. Then CAT3 from the nails to the phone jacks in the few rooms that have a landline phone. Voice quality is no issue.

      My DSL on the other hand is CAT5 from the phone box outside up into the attic down thru a wall to a wall plate. And I get constant disconnects due to "timeout waiting for PADO" which apparently is due to too much noise on the line.

      Sounds pretty sophisticated to me. Nails! In my day we had to make our own. But seriously folks, the "quad" of which I wrote is untwisted wire in a jacket, arranged in a diamond pattern when looking at a cut end, hence the name "quad". Provides no noise immunity at all, and coupled with the ground loops induced by multiple signal paths, you could barely hear a thing. I agree: baseband analog voice is pretty resilient, but my old wiring was suitable for nothing more demanding than a doorbell. Maybe a thermostat if you really pushed your luck.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    8. Re:Depends. by Albanach · · Score: 2, Informative

      My Siemens Gigaset A580 IP phones can load and export their directory in vcard format - it should be trivial to script something to automatically sync this via their web interface.

      They can handle six voip providers and have a POTS connection.

      Couldn't ask for more in a set of phones.

  15. Re:no. it does not. by Curtman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, I'll bite. Does this seem like a business opportunity to anyone?

    Anyone who is worried about this kind of thing should already have an asterisk server which could do this for all phones, not just the cordless ones. And yes, its a huge business opportunity.

  16. Why are you so backwards? by idrumgood · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why on earth are you still using a landline? A mobile phone will probably be cheaper, you can take it with you anywhere (even in your home), and most of them can sync with your computer contacts (or even your contacts in the cloud).

    1. Re:Why are you so backwards? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      What if I don't want to have to take my phone with me everywhere around the house? It's bad enough having to remember to take it whenever I head out...

    2. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Carik · · Score: 1

      Because my cell phone doesn't work when:

      1) I'm in my house. (AT&T, Verizon, or Sprint... I haven't tested anyone else.)
      2) The battery runs out.

      Also, my land-line is cheaper than most cell-phone plans, and the phone is more comfortable to use.

    3. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mobil phones connect you to a person and landlines connect you to a place. When you don't know who to talk to you call a place and ask them to help find the right person.

    4. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can't separate your cell phone from your body? What exactly is your point?

    5. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      My landline kept working during a 5 day blackout. My cellphone barely lasts a day without recharging.

      My landline has great sound. My cellphone is mediocre.

      My landline rings loudly enough to hear anywhere in the house. I can usually hear my cellphone when it's in my damn pocket, barely.

      My landline might be "primitive", but it works.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe both AT&T and Sprint offer femtocells that you can set up in your house to give you pretty much perfect cell phone reception. I haven't used one myself but you just plug it into your router and it takes care of the rest. I think you might have to register your phones with the devices itself, which is probably a good thing, you don't need every iphone user in the surrounding area to be using your internet bandwidth.

    7. Re:Why are you so backwards? by idrumgood · · Score: 1

      Um... no? Mobile phones and land lines connect you to the exact same thing. I can call the local JC Penny from my mobile phone and talk to a person who will help me find the right person. Have you ever used a phone before?

    8. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      When you use a landline phone, you don't need to limit the length of your calls, you don't need to check the time of day nor the day of the week, and you don't have to be afraid that your battery will stop working while you're talking to someone.

      And don't assume that a cellphone is less expensive. Have you seen cellphone contracts in Canada? It's crazy.

    9. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Then don't take it with you around the house... Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you must.

    10. Re:Why are you so backwards? by ewilts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why on earth are you still using a landline? A mobile phone will probably be cheaper

      Mobile phones are a lot of things, but being cheaper isn't one of them. We talk to Canada for over 1000 minutes per month. I can easily afford to pay for my Qwest landline with unlimited calling to Canada for just those long-distance charges. Any time you get into many minutes for multiple people, cell phone plans start to suck.

      --
      .../Ed
    11. Re:Why are you so backwards? by b0bby · · Score: 1

      People with kids who are old enough to be home alone for a while, but not old enough to have their own mobile phone, still need landlines. That's in addition to all the other valid reasons people are listing here.

    12. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      A mobile phone will probably be cheaper

      I'd like to see that.

      you can take it with you anywhere

      And then people bitch when you don't take it anywhere, and they can't contact you.

      most of them can sync with your computer contacts

      I'm just fine with writing numbers on the little card attached to my phone.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Because some of us live in backward countries (*cough* CANADA *cough*) where a cellphone is ludicously over-priced.

    14. Re:Why are you so backwards? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Why on earth are you still using a landline? A mobile phone will probably be cheaper, you can take it with you anywhere (even in your home), and most of them can sync with your computer contacts (or even your contacts in the cloud).

      My landline is free (included with DSL, they're desperate to keep subscribers), whereas my mobile costs me $15/month.

      The cordless phone works perfectly everywhere in the house, whereas the mobile only works in certain magic spots (they tell me this is a normal consequence of living way up in a high-rise).

      The landline has crystal clear quality at all times, whereas the mobile is compressed and ugly even under the best of circumstances.

      The landline lets me use any number of nice, easy-to-hold phones with great speakerphones, whereas the mobile only lets me use tiny little things that are impossible to rest on my shoulder while using my hands for anything.

      The landline integrates perfectly with my Asterisk VoIP setup at no cost, whereas the mobile requires me to pay $0.04/minute when I route calls to it.

      The landline + VoIP arrangement lets me call almost any country I need to at piddling charges ($0.00-$0.02/minute); the mobile is $0.05/minute at best for international calls and skyrockets upward from there for certain destinations.

      A good landline phone costs $40 and a good VoIP phone costs $200. A good mobile costs $600.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    15. Re:Why are you so backwards? by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

      Um... no? Anyone at a house or an office with a land-line can answer it. Who can answer my cellphone when it's in my briefcase that I left in the car?

    16. Re:Why are you so backwards? by maxume · · Score: 1

      That's a terrible one, a mobile phone sitting on a desk isn't really any different than a landline (except it might be more expensive, but probably not if it is a second line on a parent's account).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:Why are you so backwards? by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Where the hell do you live that a cell phone costs $600?

    18. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is where VOIP comes in handy. I use Skype as well as Google Voice for my international calling. Google Voice is showing real promise in terms of features ... we'll see how it develops.

    19. Re:Why are you so backwards? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Mobile phones are a lot of things, but being cheaper isn't one of them.

      Depends where you are, and where you are calling to. Most mobile phones are cheaper to call other mobile phones on the same network, and in my case, my mobile phone has cheaper international rates than my home phone - to the point where it isn't even worth setting up VOIP for international calls any more, I just use my mobile.

    20. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talk to Canada and you're wondering why someone is backwards? Rewind that just a little bit....you talk to Canada? Why, that's almost like another country.

    21. Re:Why are you so backwards? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Where the hell do you live that a cell phone costs $600?

      I said "a good mobile". I can get one for $30, but it will have one feature (alarm clock or maybe calculator if I'm lucky).

      Phones cost about the same everywhere. You can get them subsidised by your carrier in some markets, but not here, where $15 buys all the phone service that most people need:

      • about 400 outgoing domestic or international (selected destinations) voice minutes or 500 SMS,
      • unlimited incoming calls and SMS
      • outgoing calls $0.04/minute after that
      • tack on unlimited 3G data for another $15
      • group as many lines together as you like as a "family" for unlimited free calls/SMS/MMS between them.

      It would take them over 3 years to recover the full cost of the phone before the first penny went to paying for the phone service. Hence I pay $600 for that $600 phone. Well worth it; in the long run it's cheaper than paying exorbitant monthly service charges.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    22. Re:Why are you so backwards? by sparky81 · · Score: 1

      How can you have a kid old enough to be left alone but not responsible enough to be trusted with a mobile?

    23. Re:Why are you so backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Page plus cellular - $40/mo for unlimited calls
      Rebtel (probably a million other services, too) - calling to canada for 1.5 cents/minute = $15
      ------
      $55 /mo for all your mobile phoning and all your calls to canada.

    24. Re:Why are you so backwards? by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Okay... and since we're comparing that to a landline phone, exactly how much of that do you get with a landline?

      My phone has both an alarm clock and a calculator. It's a Nokia 6015i. Five years ago, when I bought it, I think I paid maybe $50 for it. Your other reasons for having a landline make sense, to be sure, but the way you're comparing the prices is a little skewed, is all.

    25. Re:Why are you so backwards? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Fair point, I do not get all these PDA functions and HSDPA whatsits from my landline phone, I'll scratch that from my revised version of this argument to be trotted out in a later Slashdot thread.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  17. Not For Consumers by KBlommel · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Unfortunately, no such beast exists in the consumer market. For businesses, definitely.

    The problem is, home phone systems are quickly becoming extinct. The market for an advanced home phone system may have been there 5-10 years ago, but not today. Cell phones have become so prevalent that most people under the age of 30 don't even get home phone service anymore. Landline subscribers for all major phone companies keeps going down year after year.

    Investing R&D into an advanced home phone system would be equivalent to investing in a sharper color VHS technology. There's no point. This problem isn't the answer you wanted to hear, but it's the truth.

    1. Re:Not For Consumers by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      True, not as a standalone component. But as part of some sort of centralized, combined home system it makes sense. Voice dialing from anywhere in the room with the call moving with you from room to room means being able to use both hands while talking (without a stupid Borg bluetooth headpiece). Combine it with skype and TV and you've got video chat. Combine it further with a camera and you have a baby monitor that you can check on with PiP on the TV (Jesus. Would mean someone would actually use PiP). I can think of all kinds of applications, but like you said, a standalone advancement of landline-like phone technology doesn't make sense. That said, there must be enough of a market for non-cellphone home-phone usage for Verizon, Comcast, etc. to put effort into their VoIP product (I know, it's part of the marketing strategy of getting your floor wax and dessert topping from one location, but it's still an offering that plenty of folks take.)

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    2. Re:Not For Consumers by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Would mean someone would actually use PiP

      I use PIP all the time, mostly nowadays the PIP provided by my XS32 hard drive/DVD recorder (my TV also has PIP). I'll be watching(or mostly listening depending on how much of my attention is in the PIP) something on the recorder while skimming my To Do list on a Tivo in the PIP, or skimming through a Tivoed recording.

      Even before I had Tivos, I'd use PIP all the time so I could watch something on videotape and use PIP to find out when the commercials were over for the thing I was watching live were done. (At most I had 2 VCRs at once.)

    3. Re:Not For Consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 29-year old daughter got her first ever landline phone but only because in her new condo, the door buzzer only works through a landline phone!

  18. Asterisk? by _Hiro_ · · Score: 1

    I have at least one friend who set up Asterisk for their home system, and got SIP phones where hardware phones are needed, and put software phones and headsets on all the computers.

    http://www.asterisk.org/
    http://www.trixbox.org/

    I've not played with the free (as in beer) solutions, but the semi-free business versions (Trixbox, Digium) do support a shared speed-dial list. Plus you gain intercom, paging, music on hold, etc.

    --
    -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
    1. Re:Asterisk? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Asterisk would definitely do it. You can get SIP instruments for under $100 each. Power over Ethernet switch with 8 powered ports isn't too expensive and eliminates the need for wall warts at all your extensions (Assuming you get PoE capable phones). Migrate or replace your home phone number with a VOIP service, they're not that expensive, might even come with an incoming fax line.

      P.S. Grandstream phones relatively are cheap. You can get executivey, businessy, or homey type models. They can import your XML phonebook from your server, you can remotely manage the extensions with a web interface. What's not to love, except for the not-wireless part? Probably wifi SIP phones too, but I've never checked.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Asterisk? by _Hiro_ · · Score: 1

      Looks like these would fit the bill:

      http://www.voipsupply.com/ip-phones/wi-fi

      --
      -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
  19. Well, yes, there is. by dkuntz · · Score: 1

    Generally, that type of functionality is provided with an actual PBX (either analog line, digital line, or VoIP service).

    Of course, the core system can be pricey (the analog or digital cards... VoIP service isnt), and the phones generally range from $99 to over $500.

    You would use Asterisk (or one of it's various incarnations), and any compatible SIP phone (Aastra, Cisco, Snom, etc). Some are 100% wireless (using wifi), some are wired, but come with an optional wireless phone.

    So, yes, it can be done, but all depends on how much money or effort you want to put into it.

    --
    OMG... I have a sig?
  20. Re:no. it does not. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really think the landline is slowly going the way of the dodo as far as home users are concerned.

    My landline phone, never needs external power or batteries. It never has problems when the "tower" is overloaded with people trying to make calls. By LAW, it can always call 911 from any phone jack in any house. I never have to deal with "are you there? you're breaking up" nor deal with "ATT|Verizon|Sprint|T-Mobile has crappy coverage at my house..." related issues. I have a $5 corded phone from Walmart for emergency use and a cordless phone (requires external power) for normal use. Maybe as a society we're becoming too dependent on continuous sources of electricity.

    And yes I've been without power to my house for days on end (ice storms in the Northeast). Light's didn't work but my home phone worked fine.

  21. Our VTech phones have a common phonebook, etc. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    We purchased an $80 VTech cordless phone system around three years ago (three handsets, one base station, and two other charging stations), and it seems to keep both its caller ID records and its phonebook data in a central location. If you make an entry on one unit, it shows up immediately on all three.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  22. Try this bluetooth 2 line POTS phone - I Love it. by geaux · · Score: 1

    It has bluetooth that you can used with a standard headset AND copy your contacts from your mobile. Pretty slick. Panasonic 2-Line DECT 6.0 Expandable Digital Cordless Answering System (KX-TG9381T) https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002KF21FK/ref=oss_T15_product

  23. A similar thought... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at Skype headsets for a while, but I wanted something that would work without being connected to a computer, and would work with my existing panasonic 4 station system. Verizon had some great ideas in their Audrey-like home phone station, but cost-wise and lockin sort of kept me away.

    Everyone's going to wireless or VoIP - there's not going to be any more innovation in the home phone arena. And in the commercial VOIP arena, this already exists in $500 desktop units.

    1. Re:A similar thought... by scott666 · · Score: 1

      OOMA is what you're looking for. http://www.ooma.com/products

      --
      Thank you for helping us help you help us all.
  24. Re:no. it does not. by Phoenixlol · · Score: 1

    you never know... here,

  25. ISDN? by pavon · · Score: 1

    I see many posts recommending switching to VoIP and using Astrix. I have no experience with setting up an ISDN system, however it seems like they do everything he is asking, and he would have less to rewire going that route. Are there any simple, reasonably priced ISDN PBX boxes that would work well for this?

    1. Re:ISDN? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      ISDN is on the way out. It's still used for office phone systems that need a lot of lines, and it seems to be popular among people who wear lederhosen, but other than that it's a dead end.

      One reason is that the hardware and the service are extremely expensive.

      VoIP can get you the same functionality (except for the reliability, which can be excellent with ISDN) for pennies on the dollar.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  26. Hand-crank phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad has a hand-crank phone.

    It's not live but it has instructions to rewire it to bypass the crank and hook it to an American phone line.

    I'd love to see this hanging off my VoIP router!

    One ringy-dingy, two ringy-dingy

  27. Re:no. it does not. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. After Katrina, I was living 'on the run' so to speak..and just had my cell phone.

    I've since settled, and I've never really seen the need to get a landline again. I just keep my cell as my main phone. I have considered though...since I live in a multi-story house, to getting one of those phone systems that will connect via bluetooth to your cell phone, and all the other handsets throughout the house, will go through your cell phone. That would make it more convenient so that I don't either have to carry my phone up/down stairs with me....or just leave it on the other floor and miss calls.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  28. Re:no. it does not. by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 1

    Actually it does seem silly that cordless phones couldn't be 'synced' with a local computer.
    My Logitech remote can do it, and has cool features, why couldn't the cordless phone.
    it wouldn't even have to be all that complicated (I've seen some people mentioning asterisk).

  29. Why not "converge" to mobile with wifi? by giladpn · · Score: 1

    Many mobile handsets on the market have wifi abilities. This means - when you are at home - they can talk with your home wifi router to do home-based calling rather than using the cell network.

    Quite separately, many of these mobiles also have the ability for software installations that will sync your mobile phone with your contacts, calendar and email. I use an app called "RoadSync" - they have a website, google them. It works pretty well for me.

    The combination of these two separate abilities means:
    - You can use mobile sets also as your home phone without paying cellular prices.
    - When they are on your home wifi net, you are also using less intense radiation
    - You are fully sync-ed with your email contacts and calendar

    The drawback is that mobile sets can be a bit more expensive then home cordless phones. You need to research the features and prices.

  30. It's called Android.Put #s into gmail contacts FTW by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    When my wife got an Android phone, do you know how she put people's phone numbers into it? By editing their phone number in her gmail contacts. I'd say that's pretty damn synced. She never entered a single number into her phone, and me, never having used it, and not having a cell phone myself [and thus not savvy with them], could still figure out how to call someone in about 3 seconds.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  31. Works with Siemens dect by Xerfas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    SIEMENS GIGASET S680 BLUETOOTH DECT PHONE http://www.cordless-phones.uk.com/cordless-phones/digital-cordless-phones/siemens-gigaset-s680-phone easy to program, easy to use. I have worked with Siemens dect systems when I worked with Siemens HiPath 4000. Most new dect phones got sync to PC that I have used.

  32. I remedied some of this with VoIP .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I got rid of my regular land line, and went with "Phone Power", a cheap VoIP provider out of Calfornia. (Only $14.95 per month if you're willing to sign a 2 year contract with them, and you get unlimited calls to anywhere in the USA for that price.) I'm sure there are many other inexpensive choices as well. (I was previously using "AT&T Callvantage", but that one is going away so I had to switch services. It cost more like $25 a month anyway.)

    A nice side-effect of switching my service to VoIP is, I can centrally create a list of "speed dial" numbers on their web site, and all phones in my house use them. (They're all dialed with the * and then a 2 digit number.) Additionally, Phone Power does a "virtual 2nd. line" feature that could come in handy. Basically, a second phone jack on the terminal adapter they ship you can be configured as the "virtual" number. So when you're on a phone in the house that's running off the primary jack of the adapter, and a second call comes in, it will ring the phone(s) on the second jack and allow someone to answer it without interrupting your original conversation. Alternately, you can take the call yourself on the primary line by clicking over, in the typical "call waiting" manner. By the same token, even though phones on both jacks will present themselves as being the same phone number, you can make 2 simultaneous outgoing calls with both of them.

    A caller ID log is also maintained on their web site for you, and you can even click on a call in the log to add it to a "block" list. (Once blocked, future incoming calls from that number either get immediately routed to your voice mailbox, or they get an immediate busy signal ... your choice.)

    The voice mailbox feature can essentially be "disabled" if you still prefer using a traditional answering machine, by telling it to wait an "unlimited" amount of time before calls are transferred to it once your number starts ringing. But if you do opt to use it, it's pretty powerful too. You can have copies of your messages emailed to you as .WAV sound file attachments, for example. And by setting up "advanced call routing", you can create a whole sequence of phone numbers that a call will ring before going to voicemail. (This might prevent someone NEEDING to leave you voicemail in the first place, if you have, say, a cellphone ring simultaneously with your home number.)

    I used to care if my land line phones had certain features, but now, I've realized VoIP renders most of it pointless duplication.

    1. Re:I remedied some of this with VoIP .... by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 1

      I got rid of my regular land line, and went with "Phone Power", a cheap VoIP provider out of Calfornia. (Only $14.95 per month if you're willing to sign a 2 year contract with them, and you get unlimited calls to anywhere in the USA for that price.) I'm sure there are many other inexpensive choices as well. (I was previously using "AT&T Callvantage", but that one is going away so I had to switch services. It cost more like $25 a month anyway.)

      I too had Callvantage. I added T-Mobile's @home VOIP to my cellphone plan for $10/month. It doesn't have all the features that Callvantage had, but the price is right and ultimately I expect to wean myself off the landline anyway.

  33. trixbox & Polycom IP Series phones by Dragon_Eater · · Score: 1

    You can run the server software ( Free ) on any older machine and the phones are nearly open source with the options they have.

    The Phone can be expensive but any unit ( phone, cell, PC etc) that can run SIP based telephone calls will interface fine.

    For example I have a HTC Dream with android and the SIPDroid app works very well.

    Links:
    http://www.trixbox.org/

    http://www.polycom.com/

    http://www.sipdroid.com/

    --
    They kinda taste like tasty wheat . . . . kinda . . .
  34. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My horse, never needs gasoline or battery power. It never has problems when the "highway" is overloaded with people trying to go to work. By NATURE, it can always get me home from any bar in any area. I never have to deal with "you need an alignment" nor deal with "FORD|CHEVY|DODGE has crappy dealerships near my house..." related issues. I have a $5 leather whip from Walmart for emergency use and leather saddle from Walmart (requires external buckle) for normal use. Maybe as a society we're becoming too dependent on continuous sources of transportation.

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. Re:no. it does not. by Sl4shd0t0rg · · Score: 1

    Microsoft had a 900 MHz phone a little over 10 years ago that did this and it worked really well for me until it was no longer supported when Windows 2000 came out. You can read about it here here.

  37. partial solution by sribe · · Score: 1

    Doesn't do anything about synching the phone books, but logging caller id, forwarding voice mail to email, remote access to voice mail: PhoneValet.

  38. Re:It's called Android.Put #s into gmail contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you even RTFS?
    The OP clearly mentions that he wants this kind of functionality in POTS, knowing that it already exists in most smartphones.

  39. Contemporize, man. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    My phone does all the stuff you want. And it has no wires. And nobody asks, "Is Bobby home?" when I answer it. It keeps an extensive callerID history on board and a full accounting of all incoming and outgoing calls is available online. I can synchronize my contacts and calendar with the computer. Got voicemail notification and everything.

    Land lines are dying. The chances of seeing major integration improvements are slim to none so, if you're stuck on the idea of keeping a land line, just start looking at what's out there right now and buy the best you can afford. There's no point in waiting because it's not going to get any better.

    1. Re:Contemporize, man. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "nobody asks, "Is Bobby home?" when I answer it"

      And you have no idea that your kid's circle of friends changed dramatically about two months ago.

    2. Re:Contemporize, man. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      I'm way ahead of you in two ways.

      1) Who do you think gets Bobby's phone bill once he is old enough for a phone?

      2) I don't have kids.

      And before you say, "You shouldn't give kids cell phones", realize that there's no way to AVOID kids having cell phones if they want them. They can go to Walmart and buy a prepaid cell phone for $10 on sale, $15 regular. Refills available at any 7-11. Then you'd REALLY know nothing about who they're calling and who's calling them.

      Of course, even if you give them a trackable communications device, there's no guarantee that they won't go get an untainted phone anyway.

  40. 30 seconds of Google by bensode · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    "Keep at least 3-6 full bottles of hard alcohol on hand, a 2 week resignation notice,..." - Poetmatt
  41. Re:no. it does not. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    no.

    DECT phones already auto copy their phonebook to each other. At least quality ones do.
    I have 6 cordless phillips DECT phones and when you add a number to one, they all have it.

    Now create a PC to DECT gateway, they has a very light saleability at around $19.95

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  42. For home phones there is OOMA by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    look into ooma.com. besides their zany bussiness model (buy the voip console, get free basic phone service) they seem to be offering a lot of what you are asking for as add-on services( $110 per year). I own one and can say they do work as well as any other voip.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:For home phones there is OOMA by trex31 · · Score: 1

      I second Ooma. Their Ooma Telo handset is supposed to come out any day now, and I don't think there's another phone on the market that can match its features.

  43. My smartphone is my home phone by frank249 · · Score: 1

    I finally realized that we did not need a home phone since everyone in my house had their own cell phone. My Blackberry uses my wifi network when I am at home and for $15/month I have have unlimited local and long distance through the Rogers talkspot plan. Now I don't miss any calls since there is only one number to reach me no matter where I am. I even have a bluetooth handset phone that automatically connects when I am in the house. Its great not having to answer the phone and find out the call was for my kids.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  44. Re:no. it does not. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most people dont want to pay hundreds for a cordless phone. THAT is why.

    My Engenius cordless has a 2 mile range (real 2 mile range not fake marketing crap) and it cost me $325.00 for a single handset+basestation and antenna. I have never met another person that owned an engenius phone because of the cost.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  45. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it does. Here's my business plan:

    1. Invent smart land line system.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

  46. My Panasonic Phone Does This Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a panasonic cordless 4 handset model that will copy phonebook entries from one handset to another - it's a function that is buried in the "Phonebook" options menu on the handset.

  47. Unidean CLX475 or CLX485 by tradjik · · Score: 1

    I own a set of Uniden CLX485s. Basic base station with expandable handsets. I have the 485 which includes color screens. They come with a USB cable and a program that will pull contacts from Outlook with a little configuration (contacts with many numbers require mapping to home/office/mobile). Once imported you can set personal ringers and pictures for each one up to the storage limits. My only issue was the battery died and I never got around to ordering new batteries, then a woot deal came along and I got newer Uniden phones (that lack Outlook sync) So they are out there, but I don't know how much support they still get:
    http://www.uniden.com/products/productdetail.cfm?product=CLX485
    http://www.uniden.com/products/productdetail.cfm?product=CLX475-3

  48. Google Voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just keep your contacts in your Google account and use Google Voice. Works with SIP (Gizmo5), POTS, and cell phones. Additionally it delivers SMS and voice mail messages (transcribed) into your email so you no longer have to deal with additional places to check messages.

  49. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It may not have problems when the tower is overloaded, but it will when the circuits from the CO are. Can call 911 or use the phone during a storm should something actually break the line going to your house. You still will have to deal with crappy coverage because people that call you will be using their cell phone. Thanks for playing.

  50. Re:no. it does not. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    I really think the landline is slowly going the way of the dodo as far as home users are concerned.

    And yes I've been without power to my house for days on end (ice storms in the Northeast). Light's didn't work but my home phone worked fine.

    My phone lines would always get pulled down by the same tree branch that killed my power, you insensitive clod! But other that that, POTS is still very reliable. However, since I don't have POTS anymore, I guess that extra reliability wasn't that valuable to me, at least compared to the cost of a cell plus a landline.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  51. very good advance phone system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verizon has a phone service called IOBI ... it does all you ask plus it takes your voice mail and changes it to text ... you link with another service from Verizon (Wireless) called the Hub and it will do everything but brush your teeth and comb your hair

  52. Microsoft Cordless Phone by joeflies · · Score: 1

    It was a product that was just a little ahead of its time for the home market, but it never really took off. Cool in concept, being able to listen to voicemail on pc or the phone. If I remember correctly though, the downside for why I didn't buy one was that I wasn't leaving the computer on all day back then. Microsoft Cordless Phone

  53. Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asterisk would be your best bet - especially now with the GUI that can be used to set this up. One would also need some sort of SIP trunk - unless you buy a nice expensive PCI card for your asterisk box.

  54. Microsoft Cordless Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might be able to find one of these on ebay...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyevPhRoboE

  55. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! Don't buy from Microsoft?

  56. Re:no. it does not. by mafian911 · · Score: 0

    Someone please mod this up. I couldn't agree more.

  57. Re:no. it does not. by nsayer · · Score: 1

    Must really chafe you to no end to see all those "Pedestrians, Equestrians and Bicycles prohibited" signs on the highways.

  58. Pots? by toastar · · Score: 1

    If you got rid of your POTS how do cook?

    1. Re:Pots? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I got a chuckle, thanks.

      Erm, I guess I can cook with a toastar.

    2. Re:Pots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PANS, duh!

    3. Re:Pots? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      With his personal area networks.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  59. E.T. phone home by flahwho · · Score: 1

    Certainly this would be a great opportunity for VOIP phones, which is a market waiting to either grow: where we'll see everyone back to Land-line style phones in their homes (not likely to happen) or bite the dust: the mobile phone world has taken over as the preferred method of consumer communication, leaving the 20-somethings saying stuff like "what's a land-line?".

    What's an E.T?

  60. Landline abandonment by cdrguru · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see lots of people deciding they don't need a landline any more. Well, for a single person or in the case where everyone in the house has a cell phone, that can work. It works better when your wireless carrier has a WiFi component to their plan - although since they lose money by the fistful on these I would expect either the carrier or the plan to disappear.

    But what happens when you have a three-year-old child? Going to get them a cell phone? I don't think so. And while you can teach a three year old to dial 911 calling from a cell phone may not be anywhere near as easy or helpful. In a house the GPS chip isn't going to work so well, so your phone isn't going to know where it is. Meaning that the fire department doesn't know where to go.

    Landline phone service is also just plain more reliable. If you live in an area where there are weather-related power outages, which is just about anywhere, you can't assume that the cell tower infrastructure has much battery backup - some have none at all. Contrast this with the landline Central Office which when the batteries start getting low fires up the generator to keep dial tone available. I have had no electricity from the power company for more than 24 hours after an ice storm, before there were cell phones. After a few hours a cell phone would be a paperweight under these circumstances.

    Why do you need a land line? Children. Emergencies. Power outages. Maybe you don't care now, but you very well might in the future.

    And one thing to consider. If enough people drop land lines, they will disappear entirely. Try, just try to find a pay phone outside of an airport or train station today. Nobody needs them, unless your cell phone dies and you need to call someone like maybe a tow truck. Good luck, because pay phones have been declared obsolete. So now there is no alternative. Land lines might be declared obsolete as well - in which case good luck teaching your young children how to dial out on your Blackberry.

    1. Re:Landline abandonment by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I have considered keeping an old cell phone on a charger & showing the kids how to use it to dial 911 in case of emergency; I still keep a landline because it's much more likely that they'll need to call me than 911. An old cell phone isn't a bad backup, though maybe not for a 3 year old. Of course a 3 year old isn't going to be home alone anyway.

    2. Re:Landline abandonment by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course a 3 year old isn't going to be home alone anyway.

      Unless the responsible adult is having a heart attack/stroke/seizure and the tyke has to call 911 for them.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Landline abandonment by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Unless the responsible adult is having a heart attack/stroke/seizure and the tyke has to call 911 for them.

      Which probably happens once a year or less in the USA.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Landline abandonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cancel your landline, but leave the phone plugged in. 911 still works.

      [captcha: "worked"]

    5. Re:Landline abandonment by japhering · · Score: 1

      I see lots of people deciding they don't need a landline any more. Well, for a single person or in the case where everyone in the house has a cell phone, that can work. It works better when your wireless carrier has a WiFi component to their plan - although since they lose money by the fistful on these I would expect either the carrier or the plan to disappear.

      Loose money ?!? You've got to be kidding! They make money by the fist full with almost no over head on their end. The customer either pays extra for a wifi enabled phone and/or a home base station (the base stations run $100-$150) plus the customer pays another $15-$30 a month to use the bloody thing. If the customer is using the base station, then all the traffic goes over the network providers network.. not the phone company network. In the long run, the wifi system actually reduce the amount of traffic of the phone network.

    6. Re:Landline abandonment by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      If it's a mobile, you should really be dialing 112, since that works *anywhere*.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    7. Re:Landline abandonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In which case you have ICE#1 set to 911.... and have trained them (As easily as using some of the fancier land-line-phones) how to press the 1 key and send...

    8. Re:Landline abandonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 3 year old isn't old enough (yes, I have one sitting beside me) to know when it's appropriate to call 9-1-1. Sorry, bud.

    9. Re:Landline abandonment by Big+Hairy+Goofy+Guy · · Score: 1

      REALLY? I didn't know it worked in the US!

      Does it work in South American and Asia too?

    10. Re:Landline abandonment by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      For mobiles, yes:

      112 (one-one-two) is the emergency telephone number in:
                * the European Union member states,
                * the Colombia (South America), and
                * worldwide on GSM mobile networks and their more modern equivalents.

      Source

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    11. Re:Landline abandonment by houghi · · Score: 1

      But what happens when you have a three-year-old child? Going to get them a cell phone? I don't think so. And while you can teach a three year old to dial 911 calling from a cell phone may not be anywhere near as easy or helpful. In a house the GPS chip isn't going to work so well, so your phone isn't going to know where it is. Meaning that the fire department doesn't know where to go.

      The tree year old must be supervised by a grown up who can use a phone. "But what if the grown up can't call for whatever reason?" Tough. I would not rely on a tree year old to save my life. If it happens, great. If not, I die. People die all the time. It is not that big a deal.
      But hey, it is your money and if you want to pay the company a monthly fee just so your three year old can safe your life, please do.
      Unfortunatly I can't give up my landline, because that would mean I won't have ADSL anymore and cable is not an option for me.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Landline abandonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cro Magnon is right 28 years ago I was a 5 year old with a deadish grandmother (heart attack while babysitting) in the house.

    13. Re:Landline abandonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good reminder cdrguru!

      I would add that the cost is also not the same on mobile, especially for people calling you!

      In France calling a mobile costs typically 0.25 euro/minute, while calling a land line costs typically 0.04 euro/minute.
      The sad thing is that it's one person deciding to cut their land line, and another paying the outrageous cost of calling a mobile ...

      DECT on a land-line is also much better for health regarding radiations. A wired land-line is even better for health!

      The sound quality on land-lines are so much better than mobiles!

      If you're going to have an Internet connection in your house, why not also have a land-line on it???

      Now I understand that operators want to remove land-lines because they make so much more money on mobiles. In fact France Telecom even has a plan whrere they remove your land-line in exchange for free calls in the evening on your mobile. Then they make money on your friends' bills calling your mobile...

    14. Re:Landline abandonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the 3-year-old who will have a hard time dialing out on a cell phone. Kids pick up the new tech easily. It's Grandma who's gonna be baffled.

    15. Re:Landline abandonment by frank249 · · Score: 1

      I have abandoned my landline and don't miss it one bit. As for teaching a 3 year old to dial a blackberry, that is not a problem as their are bluetooth handsets that are exactly the same as as POTS handsets except that they connect to a cell instead of a landline.

      If the power goes out I will just charge it in my car from time to time. Moreover when the power is out I will not only still have voice but also email and internet where the everyone else's computers are the paperweights. In this day and age, internet access is essential and my blackberry keeps me connected everywhere all the time wether I am at home or on my boat.

      I think eventually smartphones will eventually replace not only POTS but also home computers. As soon as they figure out a way to connect my blackberry to my monitor, external hard drive and keyboard I will not need a home PC anymore.

      --

      Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    16. Re:Landline abandonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahah!

      Just a bit of background.
      I work for a large Telco in Australia.
      I log faults on PSTN lines (boring old copper POTS)
      I also work with VoIP

      I regularly see lines that will not work for PSTN until they are repaired.
      These same lines regularly work for ADSL.

      See, ADSL is a radio signal. POTS is a circuit. A phone line is 2 wires.
      If the line is partially broken, or shorting (water, damage), POTS wont work.
      ADSL will usually work if there is only 1 wire that makes it all the way from the exchange to the socket.

      I have seen a working ADSL line that was partially unjumpered in the exchange meaning only 1 wire was connected.
      The other wire had capacitance in the thousands (microfarads) and insulation in the hundreds of ohms.
      This indicated that the line was saturated in a pit of water.

      Admittedly of the 3 modems tried, only the ancient Siemens 4200 worked. It held 3mbit for 3 days until it was fixed.

      Now on to VoIP.
      While VoIP *can* be used anywhere, each of the numbers is provisioned as a landline. Therefore it has a fixed address that is updated in the emergency services databases.

  61. A Chain of Problems, Asterisk is not the Answer by mpapet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having set up Asterisk a couple of different places AND attempting to integrate most of the things discussed, I can tell you there are a whole chain of problems.

    a phone system that I could sync to my computer so I could update the phone book over all the units
    Meaning a single address book shared/synced at all phones? You would need phones with *some* kind of open client interface. Of which, there are exactly zero.

    (if not sync with Address Book or Outlook),
    Please, dear Lord. No. This is another binary jail. But it looks like you want your home computer's Outlook client to be somehow involved. Which, is another programming mountain to climb separate from the first feature.

    keep a log of caller IDs
    This, Asterisk can do. A more flexible solution requiring some coding is Freeswitch. As others have mentioned, you have to plug the POTS line into your PC. Is there a GUI that can render the results to meet your satisfaction? Maybe.

    or even forward me new voicemail notifications.
    Asterisk and Freeswitch can do this too. But, there are numerous details that drive people away. Do the hard/soft phones you end up using have ways to implement call forwarding? How about controlling call forwarding at the server only? Is there a GUI available to meet your standards of usable? I haven't worked with Asterisk in a long time though maybe there are prettier ways of doing things now.

    Dog forbid you want to integrate your mobile phone into the fray.

    BTW, there's a whole forest of patents on voicemail notification alone. Even *if* something was made, it probably violates patents. http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=98808

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:A Chain of Problems, Asterisk is not the Answer by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You would need phones with *some* kind of open client interface. Of which, there are exactly zero.

      Really? I have a Trixbox running with 10 or so Cisco 7940s connected to it that do everything over SIP and HTTP+XML.

      Directories, call logs, daily lunch menu specials for the local restaurent pulled from an RSS feed, flavor of the day at Goodberry's, even a game of Zork. You can download Java apps to the phone if you'd like, but theres no need.

      I'm not sure what you want that is more open than SIP, HTTP and XML. Its even reasonable well documented if you can use Google. Not every phone is like this, but the number is certainly well above the zero that you claim.

      Please, dear Lord. No. This is another binary jail.

      OMG BINARY ONLY EVIL OMG

      Seriously, get the fuck over it. Its trivial to find outlook plugins to sync with XML files on a server. WebDAV to the rescue. There have been utilities to get data in and out of Outlook for 10 freaking years at least. Hell, even it will do CSV export for pretty much everything on its own.

      Asterisk and Freeswitch can do this too. But, there are numerous details that drive people away. Do the hard/soft phones you end up using have ways to implement call forwarding? How about controlling call forwarding at the server only? Is there a GUI available to meet your standards of usable? I haven't worked with Asterisk in a long time though maybe there are prettier ways of doing things now.

      Yes, the SIP standard has a way to signal forward and transferrin, multiple lines, all sorts of things far more advanced than anything you have in your home right now, including your cell phone. Yes, a generic ISO install of Trixbox has a user portal UI just as good as anything I've seen on a commercial provider short of Google Voice. I too have not kept up with Asterisk, but I'd be surprised if it wasn't better now than it was a couple years ago.

      Dog forbid you want to integrate your mobile phone into the fray.

      BTW, there's a whole forest of patents on voicemail notification alone. Even *if* something was made, it probably violates patents.

      Really ... not hard ... out of the box configuration of Trixbox will let you forward calls under different conditions to another phone (your mobile, office, whatever, setup as many rules as you'd like), or call your mobile when you get a voice mail, or SMS you or email you. You aren't going to get a little voicemail icon on your cell phone because thats tied to the provider. If you want, have the call forwarded to your cell and let that voicemail handle it. Otherwise just have it SMS you when you get a message in. I don't think anyone is really concerned with getting patent trolled for this stuff, people have been doing it for years, and digium supports it.

      Seriously, have you even installed any of the complete free PBX solutions? Asterisk is a tiny part of the equation. Sure it does the call routing, but thats a small part of the process.

      I've setup more than one Trixbox and the hardest part is getting used to the warped world of teleco thinking to me. The only real problems I hard were working out the proper SIP or IAX config. I had multiple providers so I could get unlimited calls in both directions for a few bucks a month so it was a non-trivial setup, but I was paying like $15 every three months for unlimited US calling AND Fax to Email (not through my own PBX, the provider offered a deal for $2/month for a 1800 fax to email service that I snapped up)

      The main problem you have with Trixbox is it makes it so that anyone think they know what they are doing. A bit like Windows 'admins' think because they can point and click that they are sysadmins. You'll run into a lot of knowledgeable people who know Asterisk, FreePBX and all the other components of the system who shun Trixbox users because

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:A Chain of Problems, Asterisk is not the Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (if not sync with Address Book or Outlook),
      Please, dear Lord. No. This is another binary jail. But it looks like you want your home computer's Outlook client to be somehow involved. Which, is another programming mountain to climb separate from the first feature.

      actually, for the case of a lone Outlook instance it's relatively easy to interop with it using the provided DLLs in .NET. I'm not just speculating, I've done exactly this.

      on that note, even exchange isn't that hard to deal with. Granted, it's not as easy as "give me my data in xml", but it's not completely impossible to do it either.

      also, I'm aware that by claiming anything other than microsoft murdered my dog I'm going to get modded down, so go ahead.

    3. Re:A Chain of Problems, Asterisk is not the Answer by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      I was going to say the same thing. I've been in the VoIP business for over four years now, starting with Cisco 79xx phones and now primarily working on Polycoms, and the whole time I've been able to easily perform every single task this guy wants to do. The Polycoms even do literally everything with XML, so writing import/exports for their data is trivial. Want a new global directory entry? Just add it to 000000000000-directory.xml. Want it only on one phone? Add it to -directory.xml. Easy as pie.

      That said, for home use any kind of actual VoIP system (as opposed to a box you point at a hosted provider like Vonage or myself) is way overkill. I'm in the industry and don't even do that, it's a waste of my time.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    4. Re:A Chain of Problems, Asterisk is not the Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Meaning a single address book shared/synced at all phones? You would need phones with *some* kind of open client interface. Of which, there are exactly zero."

      But that is what you use asterisk for! Either build your own or use the build in Directory function.

    5. Re:A Chain of Problems, Asterisk is not the Answer by MrPhilby · · Score: 1

      I was going to say the same thing but I was going to be a little bit funnier.

  62. Re:no. it does not. by multisync · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But your horse needs food, shoes, shots and exercise. Not to mention a stable to sleep in and a field to run around in. I'll bet once the gp paid his five bucks at Walmart and plugged the phone in to its jack, he never had to do another thing to maintain it.

    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
  63. my base phones do this by Sandbags · · Score: 1

    For the life of me I can't remember the brand, but I got it at Sam's club. I'll see if I can note it later tonight and enter it here as a reply to this comment (if i remember) Its 4 phones (supprots up to 6), 1 base station, 3 chargers, 8.1GHz. Phone calls can be transfered between handsets easy, room to room pager functions, 2 phones can conference even miles from the base station (handy on long car trips with multiple cars trying to stay in touch).

    most importantly, it has 2 nice features i think you're in the market for:
    1) entering a new contact on any phone is automatically replicated to others, as well as management of caller-ID history too (clearing history on 1 phone clears it on all, including numebr by number or clear all).
    2) items in caller-ID can be added to one of 2 calling lists: phone book, or "blocked calls" The blocked call feature is what I really bought it for. Up to 40-50 numbers can be added to the list. (including by name or number). Calls from that number ring once, then the phone sends a busy signal back down the line and the phone stops ringing. This is great for keeping collection scams at bay; those guys who call asking to sell you warrantys for your car, and Portfolio Recovery Associates (scammers trying to collect debts that are no longer on record).

    Granted, if you have a google voice number, all this is irrelevent, since you can call google and remote dial any favorite from there, and it;s blocked call featre is far superior as is their call screening option, but this base station is awesome if you still have a landline or VoIP line at home...

    --
    There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  64. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't trust a phone that I don't have to manually crank.

  65. Re:no. it does not. by Sl4shd0t0rg · · Score: 1

    The phone worked really well which isn't really a suprise when you consider their reputation for well made hardware (mice, keyboard, etc) until the Xbox 360 came out years later. The voice recognition was amazing and it used the addressbook on my computer, supported multiple mailboxes, synced with the computer clock, etc. How was I to know that they would kill it by not supporting it with Windows 2k?

  66. Easy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a Cybergenie.

  67. The Siemens SL785 does (some) of what you want by hirschma · · Score: 1

    See:

    SL785 on Amazon. It is the only cordless phone on the market that has some semi-smartphone features.

    You can push .vcf cards to the phone via Bluetooth (I exported from Google, and pushed my entire contact list in one go). Alternately, you can use the optional software to sync a handset with Outlook via USB or Bluetooth.

    Once one handset is updated, you can push the entire phonebook to any other handset.

    The phones themselves are very pretty and well made, and work great as phones. They can also display photos, and you can use your own custom ringtones. The handsets can (or claim to) use Bluetooth headsets, too, but I've yet to have one work well (something off with the bluetooth radio in the handsets).

    Very, very pricey compared to other phones, however.

  68. Re:no. it does not. by WRX+SKy · · Score: 1

    I think you missed the point there...

  69. Limited Markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about http://www.comcast.com/homepoint/

  70. Inexpensive Office System aka A Key System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you want is a small system that comes with a KSU- key switching unit and has PBX like functionaltiy as well. You may find today they come with integrated voice mail or a out of the box solution. You may find them used and of course more pricey especially anything wireless but they do the job.

          One of my faves, the Norstar system by Nortel, which I believe now integrates VoIP with Fiber trunking if needed.

  71. Try OpenPeak by JoshDM · · Score: 3, Informative

    Open Peak

    It is as though they took an iPhone and applied it to a workplace telephone system.

    1. Re:Try OpenPeak by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Cool but not for sale apparently.

    2. Re:Try OpenPeak by JoshDM · · Score: 1

      A little originally failed research on my part reveals OpenPeak is an OEM.

      Distributors include 02 selling "The Joggler" in England and Verizon calls theirs "The Hub". Apparently Telefonica and Swisscom distribute them as well.

    3. Re:Try OpenPeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While OpenPeak looks nice I'd place them firmly in the "Vaporware" camp. Their web site is similar to what it was two years ago (the main difference being the switch to Atom as their processor of current choice) and there is still no indication of pricing or availability.

      I'd just like to see the Apple Home Phone (hPhone?).

    4. Re:Try OpenPeak by adageable · · Score: 1

      Looks like the verizon variant didn't last that long, either. http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-09/the-verizon-hub-has-been-discontinued/

  72. Go Analog by megamerican · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Invest in a $5 phone book. Write once, works with everything.

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    1. Re:Go Analog by Kleppy · · Score: 0

      You still run into the problem of bringing in a piece of paper with a new number of it and the book doesn't update itself. Who can ever find a pen(cil) when you need it anyways?

    2. Re:Go Analog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backing it up is tedious and sorting the thing by birthdays takes some time too. Then there's the dual location access problems and no matter how I attach it I can't get autodial to work ...

    3. Re:Go Analog by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I find it doesn't work too well with multi-user simultaneous access, and the sync features are positively primitive.

  73. Vonage by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Vonage keeps track of all numbers you dialed or called you, along with voicemail you can dial into, access via email, or access via their web interface.

    I don't know about updating phone books for cordless phones, but since I switched to Vonage I have better control over my voicemail and list of phone numbers via the web interface and it emails every voice mail entry to my address along with a speech to text of the message.

    Vonage uses a CAT5 Ethernet connector and then any POTS phone. As long as you have the Internet with an Ethernet port (Like a Wireless hub with Ethernet ports in it) you can use the Vonage box. Plus it has free Long Distance to the USA and 60+ foreign nations. My wife and brother-in-law use it to call family in Thailand for free. About $33 a month after taxes.

    The other thing is Google Voice but that is still in beta testing.

    The thing is cordless POTS phones never caught up with cell phones yet, but that is a good business to get into and develop smart POTS phones that sync up phone lists, etc.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Vonage by Virtucon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree but I also have privacy concerns with Vonage. Granted POTS service has records of the same information. It's just a bit disquieting to get voicemails via E-Mail. Now they're on some third party server which now the Feds say isn't protected by the 4th Ammendment. Also, Vonage is sketchy when it comes to your voice conversations across the 'net. I've asked what they do to insure the privacy of those conversations, granted now all POTS service traverses packet switched networks once they're beyond the LEC but then again those are in dedicated trunks. It's just too damn easy to decode a SIP session and now it's a party line.

      There are Asterisk like solutions that are small form factor that I've considered but now getting the SIP trunking to work is a question.. I could use Skype and peer with it but then again, I guess
      I'll just keep a basic POTS service for the alarm, and my Thermos, oh and this Red Stapler..

      I think I'll just go back to two cans and some waxed string. At least I could "see" man in the middle attacks on my conversations.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  74. Two in a row. by flahwho · · Score: 1

    After posting i went window shopping (with firefox/ubuntu) for voip/skype type phones. Seems there are many phones out there that would have features similar to what you are looking for, with the exception being it isn't a land-line phone, it's a VOIP phone.
    But they do:
    Sync to your pc for VM, Contacts, logs, etc.
    many are expadable to 4-8 handsets
    http://www.google.com/products/catalog?hl=en&safe=off&q=skype+handset&cid=6368542560501381677&sa=title#p
    if you're worried about power, get a UPS. if you're worried about 911, it's no different than mobile 911 really.

    If you're worried about living in your moms basement, well...

  75. Re:no. it does not. by ryanov · · Score: 1

    I have a land line and, aside from a major installation problem initially, have never had an outage in 2 years. I can't say the same for my cellular.

  76. Re:no. it does not. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    One of the true ironies of the tech world: Microsoft, by definition a software company, usually sells pretty good hardware; it is their software that leaves much to be desired. I really like their keyboards and mice, people say this phone was good, and even the Timex/Microsoft watch worked.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  77. the real answer by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    Cordless phones don't have robust computers; cell phones do. Adding features, such as address list synchronization, is a thousand times easier to do using Java (on a smartphone) than it is to do using PIC microcontroller assembly (on a cordless phone).

    You want cordless phones with cell phone features? Expect to pay $400 for your set of four, rather than paying $60 for the set you currently have.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:the real answer by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Robust?

      I must be using the wrong cellphones.

  78. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you've always been lawful good, so you've never had any alignment problems with your special horse...

  79. Re:no. it does not. by ciaohound · · Score: 2, Funny

    He has no horse sense.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  80. Not cordless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is not a cordless variant AFAIK but check out www.aksysnetworks.com for a unique PSTN/P2P VoIP hybrid that does all of the synchronizing, auto attendant, voicemail to email etc features without a centralized server.

  81. Re:no. it does not. by Mr+O · · Score: 1

    Too dependent on continuous sources of electricity? The corded phone you use requires electrical power; it just gets it over the phone line instead of the power line. The phone company still needs to work to supply that power with batteries, generators, etc, and it is still subject to failure. You are still depending on a continuous source of electricity; it's just a different source.

  82. GV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it's called "Google Voice"

  83. Cybergenie does all you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But its a little outdated. I ran my home and small biz office on it for years

    http://www.cygnion.net/

  84. Re:no. it does not. by cschepers · · Score: 1

    My workplace used to have an Engenius cordless.. it was awesome. It worked all around our campus (three different warehouse-sized buildings) without a hiccup for years. Finally died after being dropped too many times.

  85. There are better phones out there... by neowolf · · Score: 1

    I have a Phillips DECT system with four cordless phones and one base. Almost all setup options are replicated between the phones almost instantly, including the phone book, which allows for custom ring tones for individuals (similar to a cell phone). The only option that isn't duplicated, which I like, is the default ringer and ring volume- which can be set by phone. So- the phone in the bedroom doesn't have to have the same loud ring as the one in the Kitchen or Den. I don't see any reason to get more sophisticated than that, unless you want one of those new carrier-linked Internet connected phones (from Comcast and Verizon, for example), which basically give you standard "smart phone" capabilities in an inconveniently wired package.

    If you want to go for overkill- do what I did once and I know others have suggested: Set up an Asterisk-based PBX server and buy display phones for it. You can also use SIP adapters with regular or cordless phones, but you will have to compromise on some of the functionality. For example- you can get Caller ID and basic voicemail notifications on a standard phone/cordless display, but that's about it. You can pick up new office-style display phones pretty cheap (around $100) on eBay.

    I had an Asterisk setup like I described for awhile, but eventually got tired of it. Having a computer running 24x7 for the server (even if it is just a laptop) is wasteful, as is running network cables everywhere I wanted a phone. It also seemed like I was constantly troubleshooting problems with it- one phone liked dropping offline for no apparent reason no matter what I did, and one of the SIP adapters I used was flaky. You don't want an unreliable phone system.

  86. Re:no. it does not. by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone use landlines at home any more? I know two people who do. They are both very old, and are struggling with the move from rotary dialing to tone dialing. I don't think they would be the least bit interested in this.

  87. Re:no. it does not. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    I've had 2 outages on my land line in the last 10 years, but I have never had an outage on my cellphone.

  88. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just listed a lot of advantages that are irrelevant to most people. You're covering situations that are so rare (overloaded tower, 911) that almost never come up, and even when they do come up, they end up not mattering anyway. The battery thing is the only one that matters, and most people manage to come up with countermeasures. I can stock extra batteries for a year, more cheaply than the cost of a single month of the cheapest landline service.

    And yes I've been without power to my house for days on end (ice storms in the Northeast). Light's didn't work but my home phone worked fine.

    When my power's out, I have so many problems that I don't care whether my phone works or not. That's like saying "if an asteroid hits my house, my tractor is safe because I park it at my brother's house." Sure, your tractor is safe, but you're dead. Sure, you can make phone calls, but there's nothing to say but "yep, it still sucks over here. no power."

  89. Phonebook? by mirix · · Score: 1

    My western electric model 500 supports a phonebook push just fine... it comes in the mail once a year.

    I don't understand how you'd use the phone with the phonebook *on* it though? How would you pick up the handset?


    now get off my lawn.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
  90. Meridian 9617 could have some of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you could find some of the "Nortel Meridian 9617 USB 2-Line Telephone" phones you could do some of what you want... just not cordless-ly... Unfortunately it was too ahead of its time and Aastra killed it after buying the technology from Nortel.

  91. Do we need this? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 0

    A phone is a phone. Well I can agree with it being wireless I don't see the need for much else. An answering machine is useful also, so all we really need in a home phone is a answering machine and wireless capability, that's it. Anything else would be useless or pointless in a home phone system.

  92. Re:no. it does not. by neowolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason people have moved away from land line phones isn't necessarily because they feel cellular or VoIP technology is that much better- it is because of the phone company monopolies on wired service and their ridiculous pricing and rules structures that don't seem to have changed much since the 50s (other than the price going up every year while their level of customer service drops).

    Why on earth would I want to pay $30/month for a basic phone line, with no Caller ID, Call Waiting, or Voicemail, and I have to pay for long distance on top of it?! For that same money- I can get a nice Cellular or VoIP plan with, at a minimum, Caller ID, Call Waiting, Call Forwarding, 3-Way Calling, AND Voicemail, plus unlimited or dirt-cheap long distance.

    Based on the stability of my DSL connection, I really doubt a land line would be much more reliable in adverse weather or other conditions either, at least for where I live. I have a friend who lives down the street who's land line goes dead several times a year, and it takes an average of 18 hours to get it fixed each time. For power failures- my phones, network, and VoIP equipment are on a nice big UPS that will keep them running for close to two hours- plenty of time to deal with an emergency, or at the very least- call the power company.

  93. Re:no. it does not. by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    I don't know how it works in the US, but here in France my home ADSL box, which I sue for internet acces + phone + TV, supports SIPS over ethernet or wifi: I can automatically redirect all my phone calls to a PC of my choice (including, firewall permitting, my work PC when I'm at work), or to a SIPS wifi mobile phone.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  94. Re:no. it does not. by wgoodman · · Score: 1

    use Astrix. all those capabilities already exist.

  95. Re:no. it does not. by Vlobulle · · Score: 1

    My landline isn't powered any more, DSL signal only.

    It would cost 10 euros a month to have it connected to the phone network/power grid.

  96. Re:no. it does not. by wgoodman · · Score: 1

    stupid trusting of spell check.. It's Asterisk.
    http://www.asterisk.org/

    for even better computer integration there is HUD as well.
    http://www.hudlite.org/downloads.htm

  97. Re:no. it does not. by DarthBart · · Score: 1

    By LAW, it can always call 911 from any phone jack in any house.

    That's assuming your line hasn't been disconnected physically (either through a line cut or the telco cutting your pair due to non-payment/disconnect request). I can take the cell phone I had "disconnected" because I no longer needed it and still dial 911 on it, even though it is currently roaming onto Verizon (it is a Sprint-native phone).

  98. Re:no. it does not. by C_L_Lk · · Score: 3, Informative

    You've met one now - I've got the antenna on a small pole on the back of my house extending it about 10 feet above the roof line. I have a spare battery I charge with it in the base as well and always carry the phone and spare battery with me -- it works from my house all the way to my office - as well as all over my neighbourhood. I have it connected to an analog digium card in my asterisk pbx. It's nice having access to my home phone and free voice over IP calls from anywhere within 3-4 km of home, and the phone isn't much bigger than the old "candybar" style cell phones of the late 90s/early 2000 vintage.

  99. Wellll yes by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

    If you just want to track that stuff, get a magic jack. It does keep track of those things. Rather nicely too. Of course you have to leave a computer on all the time but you expected that.

  100. Re:no. it does not. by monkeySauce · · Score: 2, Funny

    it can always get me home from any bar in any area.

    Yeah, but if you get cited for too many RUI/RWI's they can impound your horse or at least issue you a pink saddle to publicly shame you.

  101. land line phone never needs external power? by astar · · Score: 1

    So I have what I call a landline phone in the house. But the telco has fiber to the house. The telco no longer much likes copper. So the install requires power to run the fiber interconnect. I guess not very much. I talked to guy and I guess it was maybe 2.5 milliamp.

    Here is something sort of interesting. To deal with legal requirements they need enough battery backup to run 4 hours. This telco puts in power backup for maybe a week. They put in two power units. Rual area, lot of elderly. But I once had it actually exceed that time and go out because of power issues in the house.

    Anyway, look at a traditional copper wire based phone. The CO has big batteries! That is why your phone does not seem to require batteries.

  102. Siemens by pix · · Score: 1

    Siemens Gigaset.....will allow you to copy phone book from handset to handset....supports bluetooth for headphones and syncing address book with PC

  103. Siemens Gigaset by dUN82 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am using a Siemens Gigaset system along with a Siemens M34 USB dongle, which allows you to manage directory form your PC and Skype etc, but you have to do it via outlook, which is painful as well. Personally, I found google contacts to be the most useful across platforms that can be a feature for home telephone that can be further explored. There are later Gigaset phones that allow you to simply copy your sim contacts from your mobile phone to your home phone or batch send it via bluetooth, but I found Siemens phones are not very popular in the US, which it strange because I found Gigaset phones are far more superior in call clarity, os friendliness and have better industrial design and build quality, and runs on standard AAA batteries instead of those battery packs.

  104. Re:no. it does not. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    Aside from being tremendously hilarious, this makes me wonder if it's possible to get a DUI on a horse.

  105. tkcid for Caller ID... by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 1

    Same here. Panasonic 5.8 ghz with 1 base and 1+4 cordless handsets. I use http://home.comcast.net/~rickrich1/sw/tkcid.tar.gz (Linux) plus a Zoom modem for my Caller ID. Also has "Blow Them Off" or "Play SIT tones". Uses gnome for a GUI.

  106. Port your number to GV by dUN82 · · Score: 1

    btw, yeah, if you are looking for something that does EXACTLY everything you need is a google voice number and port your home phone number when you sign up...

  107. How about Vonage Contact Center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vonage subscibers have access to something called "Contact Center".

    This allows you to dial into a web-based contact book. Update your contacts and they're available for all phones in the house, regardless of what kind of phone you have.

    For voice-activated dialing, all you have to do is dial *44 from your Vonage phone, say the name of the person you want to call, and Vonage Voice Activated dialing will make the call for you.

    I've been using this for a few years now and love it.

  108. Re:no. it does not. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    "My landline phone, never needs external power"
    What is this amazing source of limitless power you speak of? Yes, your phone draws power. It draws it from the phone line. By LAW, all cell phones must always be able to call 911 with or without a sim card, with or without service. Go take any cell phone whether you've paid for it or not, it will call 911.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  109. Re:no. it does not. by Chyeld · · Score: 1

    I don't own a cell phone, so my only line is a land line. AT&T here likes to play games with the DSL, even though you can get 'dry' lines with no other service, they charge as much as with, so I go for it.

    On the other hand, the last time I had a conversation lasting longer than 3 minutes outside of work and on a phone was long enough ago I can't even remember it. If someone wants to talk to me (and I want to talk to them) it's electronicly via IM or email or other such methods.

  110. My solution by Eil · · Score: 1

    Tack up a sheet of phone numbers on the fridge

  111. Re:no. it does not. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "I don't know how it works in the US, but here in France my home ADSL box, which I sue for internet acces + phone + TV, supports SIPS over ethernet or wifi: I can automatically redirect all my phone calls to a PC of my choice (including, firewall permitting, my work PC when I'm at work), or to a SIPS wifi mobile phone."

    You have either headsets, or speakers/mikes at every computer in your house? Even laptops?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  112. and google voice on a pda by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    Install google voice application on a wifi pda, it will give you chat+voip+robust phone number list that follows to cell phones, work, etc. Thus no longdistance (nationwide) and cheapeast international rates.
    I don't know that asterisk is that hard. I downloaded trixbox.org CD, and stuck it in a old PC with a digium adapter, it rebooted and I had a phone system. The sweet thing is it does the land line, also with google voice, and my old school dell axim, the google voice application with bluetooth headset, and a voip application. You then got everything on one device.
    I used this at a small office, added some dialing rules and a UPS. It was almost too reliable, we would lose either VOIP, or a analog line and it would realize this and route around it. It wouldn't be until we were getting busy phone line complaints from outside, or a long distance bill that I would realize qwest had screwed up our lines, or the VOIP carrier had issues.

  113. Re:It's called Android.Put #s into gmail contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now Google has the phone numbers of all your wife's friends. But that's another story...

  114. Re:no. it does not. by datapharmer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Get a web developer
  115. huh.. by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm at home with an exchange server under my desk.

    you can get one home for as little as 1299 right now at dell-

    it comes with 5 user or device licenses- each of which includes an outlook seat

    enough for my family/pcs

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:huh.. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Since you could easily set up a low-power computer to be a mail server for around $200 and run Linux on it for free, that seems like a giant waste of money. I guess you probably don't mind paying extra for long-distance either.

    2. Re:huh.. by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      An Exchange server does a lot more than a Sendmail script.

      Not that I am a big advocate, but it just does.

    3. Re:huh.. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Like what? Provide calendaring? Big deal. If you just need email and calendaring for a family of 4 or 5, you can just use Google Calendar and GMail, or a postfix server and Thunderbird if you really want your email local. Hell, you don't even need your own email server; you can just use Gmail and download it with a local client if you hate webmail.

      I'm sorry, but I fail to see what Exchange offers a group of 5 people (not an organization of 10,000) that is worth any money at all when there's so many free alternatives.

    4. Re:huh.. by Anomylous+Howard · · Score: 1
      I assume assume that running one's own Exchange server at home provides to a professional Exchange administrator the opportunity to tinker with and hack at an Exchange server at home rather than at work where bosses tend to frown upon such activities.

      P.S.

      I found it very hard to type "professional Exchange administrator"

    5. Re:huh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever thought about Technet? You could stretch that dollar a bit further. But remember, you are "testing", heh.

  116. Landline? by kheldan · · Score: 1

    You mean people still use wired telephone service? I dropped wired service three years ago as the waste of money that it is and I have no regrets. Unless you have DSL for broadband internet access, or your work/business requires you to have it, or you live somewhere where there is no cell service, I see no reason to have wired telephone service anymore.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  117. It's Been Done. by jolieodell · · Score: 1

    It's been done, at least to a certain extent. Buzzeromatic. From a post I wrote about them on ReadWriteWeb: http://www.readwriteweb.com/readwritestart/2009/09/filter-your-front-door-buzzero.php Apartment-dwellers, rejoice. Seattle-based startup Buzzeromatic is letting you take control of your own front door in a way that's smart and flexible. The premise is simple: Using Twilio's VoIP API, Buzzeromatic allows subscribers to grant access to visitors, allow delivery folks to leave voice messages,and create passwords for frequent guests, all from a web interface with SMS commands for when users are on the go. And yes, there's an app for that: The team told us their fully functional iPhone application is in the hopper. Co-founder Andres Krogh told us that he and a friend bootstrapped their startup. "The only reason we're able to pull it off is because of the explosion of commodity VoIP APIs like Twilio lately that make it somewhat cost effective." Users can customize their building buzzers' behavior from the web interface at any time. Krogh explained, "You can set up passwords for folks to let themselves in with, or have it call a bunch of numbers until it finds you (similar to Google Voice), or both. You can also let people leave voicemails at the door, if all else fails." They feel the password function will be particularly useful for those who have party guests or others, such as family members or a cleaning service, who need to be granted regular access to a user's apartment. Access can also be narrowed to a particular time of day; for example, your maid's password would only work during the day, but your pizza delivery guy's password could grant him access any time between noon and midnight.

  118. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can also do that to stop them from raping the horse.

  119. Re:no. it does not. by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, he should have made a car analogy.

  120. Re:no. it does not. by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is doing a lot with their communications server. Unified Communications doesn't directly apply to the at home scenario as you need a server. But it's pure gold for the corporate world. I kinda love being able to manage phone calls to my PC, get emails for missed calls/voicemail, redirect calls, set my status (away, busy, on the phone, in a meeting, etc), and manage an address book integrated contact list. Since it's an IP based network, my phone plugs connects over the wired network. I can move it around and still keep my phone number. It's really pretty nice. I can log in with Communicator from any PC and place calls from my work number, etc... Nice to get still get my work calls routed to my laptop while I'm out of the country traveling. If I had to use my cell, I'd end up with a huge bill. It's good stuff. If they're able to integrate this with windows mobile ala skype and provide a server for home users, it'd really dominate.

  121. Re:It's called Android.Put #s into gmail contacts by timbck2 · · Score: 1

    I do the same thing with my iPhone - both with contacts and with my calendar. And it goes both ways - entries I make in my iPhone contacts or calendar appear in my Gmail contacts or Google calendar almost instantly.

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  122. Re: Electricity - It does a corded phone good by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    You may not have to supply your corded phone with electrical power, but the phone company darn well does, -48vdc as I recall. Phone substations have gigantic batteries and generators. I think these locations can go no longer than 48 hours without diesel fuel resupply.

    And landlines sure can get overloaded just like cell towers. I several times after hurricanes have gotten the message "All lines are currently in service, please try your call later. Message 0939843 (made the message number up)"

  123. Home Zone? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Everybody here has a mobile phone with home zone function.

    But of course, I have a better setup:

    I have a little server, with a asterisk system, and a ISDN card. so i connected the ISDN-card to the landline, and asterisk to VoIP. which gives me a bi-directional gateway (Yes I secured it!), which i mostly use, to save money, by leaving the server running while away, and calling it over the internet via VoIP. letting me do local calls in all of the country for "free" (flatrate at home, WLAN in the hotel) while I'm far away, traveling. It also works in the other direction, if I happen to be online.

    I also have a self-written answering machine script that acts like a butler, taking calls for me. Because the "conversation" is so short, it works. It can even greet known people with their names! And I can set it to away messages, right with all the other protocols in my instant messenger. It even works as a "phonewall", optionally only answering in: a) callers not in the blacklist, a) those, and non-anonymous callers, b) non-blacklisted callers in my phone book, c) non-blacklisted callers in a category of my phone book or c) nobody :)
    People in the blacklist get the same message that they would get, if the number wouldn't exist. So it is perfectly stealthy.
    My phone does not even ring. :D

    And I get nice logs of everything.
    And a mail when I receive a call. (Or a fax, if that ever will happen ^^)

    Aaaahhh... good times for a geek! ^^

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  124. Open Source Options by anthm · · Score: 1

    We have an Open Source project called FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ that allows you to do this sort of thing with any computer running Windows MAC or most UNIX. It can be paired with traditional phones with a small analog adapter or a hardware telephony card from Sangoma http://www.sangoma.com./ But you could just get a software phone for free as well and play around with it.
     

  125. Re: Really... by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    Without reading your links, it doesn't shock me that you can get a DWI on a bicycle, but it does shock me on a horse for some reason. My argument to the judge would be, I wasn't driving, the horse was. I can't endanger someone additionally by being intoxicated on a horse, versus sober on a horse. It'd be pretty hard to get a horse to do something s/he thought was dangerous just because you were intoxicated, unless you trained it like a police horse to trample someone on command.

  126. Re:no. it does not. by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    No, but i've got them on my main home PC, on my work PC to which I redirect my home calls in case I'm spending the Evening/WE at work, and on my mobile for free outgoing calls over wifi.

    I'm sorry, I thought I was kinda answering your question.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  127. Re:no. it does not. by Sillygates · · Score: 1

    However, being able to push something like this out to business and corporate clients may well be a viable opportunity.

    Microsoft already makes it. http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/microsoft/office-communications-server-2007-public-beta-launches.asp

    The phonebook syncs to Exchange/Office Communicator, and you log in via active directory on the phone.

    --
    I fear the Y2038 bug
  128. Re:no. it does not. by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

    I'll bet once the gp paid his five bucks at Walmart and plugged the phone in to its jack, he never had to do another thing to maintain it.

    Like pay the phone bill? Surely not.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  129. Regular phones are so reliable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it interesting the call for broadband to be an utility without the corresponding call for reliability.

  130. Re: yeah... by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    Have you ever tried to approach a power plant or large infrastructure? They generally have guard stands (commonly armed now) and large buffer zones. On the other hand the first tier telephone network buildings in my area stick out like sore thumbs and are 30 feet away from the main thoroughfare.

    Now you may have a point about the network operations center and the larger switching loctations for the phone network, but I still wouldn't bet that a criminal (notice I don't say terrorist) could figure out how to find one.

    Side note, even using the word 'terrorist' to describe someone breaking the law to inflict fear gives the idiot sociopath power and creates fear in others. You should strive to declaw them by just calling them common criminals.

  131. Yes it exists by agulliford · · Score: 1

    The Siemens Gigaset SL78H does most of the things you say. You can sync to your PC, have a text message sent to your mobile whenever someone leaves you a voice message, sync the address book to other handsets or to your mobile via bluetooth. http://gigaset.com/

  132. Panasonic has one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Panasonic KX-TG5776S allow you to upload an addressbook as a .csv file from your PC using a USB cable.

  133. Two solutions! by bluecap · · Score: 1

    Timothy, your question does carry a hint of mac-centricity. So I'll give you two options for that platform which might both interest you even in combination. I've known Phlink for several years and the Siemens solution is new: 1. Siemens DECT phones now allow synching with the Mac's address book via bluetooth. http://gigaset.com/shc/0,1935,hq_en_0_171451_rArNrNrNrN_parent%253A171447,00.html and 2. OvoLab's excellent Phlink allows you to perform all kinds of phone automation even (or maybe unfortunately) without being a VoIP solution. Here you can use in-built workflows, apple script or develop automator flows to your heart's content for calling, accepting/rejecting/logging calls, answering machine recording, notification, faxing, etc. http://www.ovolab.com/phlink/index.php Enjoy!

  134. Re:It's called Android.Put #s into gmail contacts by cattrain · · Score: 1

    They aren't out yet, but there are some android home phones coming.
    NIMble Android desk phone
    T-Mobile Android home phone

  135. tmine's from costco by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    panasonic kx-tga9341t, 5 handsets + base for $100!-) shared phonebook/msgs/cid, plus talking cid:-) my only complaint is the tcid is often hard to understand (it speaks the name, not the number, can't be switched)-: and u can't screen the incoming msgs on a handset, only on the base.

  136. Re: Really... by Chyeld · · Score: 1

    Horses are not omniscient. It really isn't that hard to construct a scenario where your 'inability' to lead a horse would lead to the endangerment of property or lives.

    - Suppose you lose control of the horse and it starts galloping down a crowded sidewalk, or worse, starts bucking.
    - Suppose you try to cross the road and it (because it wasn't bred to look both ways) steps in front of traffic. Deer aren't the only animals that'll freeze when headlights hit them.
    - Suppose you pass out on the horse while it's walking you home and you slip off and hit your head/into the river/a passing car.

  137. Siemens Gigaset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Siemens Gigaset S685 IP that
    1) has import/export on base station that then replicates out to handsets
    2) has bluetooth on handsets for contacts sync

  138. Going the Asterisk route would be EXPENSIVE:( by irieken · · Score: 1

    I love Asterisk as much as the next guy, but it DOES NOT SOLVE THE PARENT's problem on its own... The original poster wanted a way to sync phonebook directory and view call logs. Asterisk can do the call logs, but VOIP phones and an auto-configuration system is really needed for shared/distributed directory. Unfortunately, that's where the cost starts going up.

    PBX In A Flash, combined with an assortment of Aastra or Polycom VOIP stations (cordless also available) gets my vote; there are modules for PBXIAF (FreePBX modules) that allow for phone configuration and centralized directory updates. Yay for free software. Unfortunately, good entry-level SIP VOIP phones are still around $200 a piece, and I doubt that the original poster expected to shell out $800 just to get his phonebook shared between his phones.

    Add another $200 if he wants the ability to use his existing landline (entry-level Sangoma card).

  139. Siemens Gigaset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siemens Gigaset handsets have the functionality to sync with Outlook. I'm not sure if it's automatic or manual, but it might be something to look into. The more advanced sets support both traditional and VoIP telephony, aswell as having numerous handsets making numerous calls over.

  140. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asterisk sounds great, until you get tot he part where you need their $400+ comm card....

  141. UPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pots hardware, a generic VoIP provider, and a google voice number... Done.

    And a UPS, so that when the power goes out you can still call out in an emergency.

    1. Re:UPS? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      yea, got that too, but I had it on the POTS line back in the day anyway. I got tired of digging through the closet with a flashlight to find the old generic line-powered POTS phone everytime the power went out...

      I have 1 base station, 6 handhelds (7 phones including the speakerphone in the base). It, the VOIP modem, and the router are on an older 1000AVR UPS. It runs for about 6 hours when the power is out, however, I actually unplug the router and modem when i don;t need it so I've made it as long as 2 days without juice and still had VoIP. Even if that's dead, the 2500AVR unit I have running the 2 PCs upstairs ought to still have some nice juice since it auto kills the PCs after 5 minutes, but has a 40 minute runtime at my current load. That might add another full day to the phones if I moved it.

      Also, it should be noted, POTS also goes down now if there's a regional power outage in most parts of the world, since it's all on fiber now once its more than about half a mile from your house... POTS is equally as unreliable as cable... The VoIP runs over DSL, so it's equally as reliable as POTS (cable reliability varies). The old school pots lines running all the way back to a regioal station are long gone. It;s digital most of the way now, and it will go down. (last 3 outages we had, phopnes were out for 2 of them. Fortunately, they only lasted about 30 minutes each).

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  142. Re:It's called Android.Put #s into gmail contacts by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

    iPhone does the same thing with Google contacts. I can enter them in gmail and they show up on my phone, or enter them on my phone and they show up in gmail.

    --
    Gone!
  143. Re:no. it does not. by Jawn98685 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Mod parent down, please.
    While all of the points made therein are true, the inference, that one can always depend on a corded phone and a pots line, is false. Last fall, here in Houston in the days (weeks, in some cases) following Hurricane Ike, man POTS customers learned this first-hand. The reasons for the failure of POTS lines were several: Wind and/or wind-blown debris took down overheard lines Rain (flooding) damaged underground lines and infrastructure Utility power failed, first taking out battery powered distribution equipment and then when the CO's generators ran out of fuel, everything connected to that CO went dark.

    Perhaps more importantly, most calls for help did nothing more than tie up already overloaded emergency services call-takes and dispatchers who, for several of the early hours of the storm could only inform the callers that emergency services were not responding until conditions were safe enough.

    Now, granted, this is an extreme case, but I should point out that my cell phone worked throughout the event. The carrier's network suffered from congestion for a while, until they got the word out that texting would be a more reliable away to contact those one needed to contact. The analog phone line has it's place, but it is, in most cases, not the panacea the parent would have us believe.

  144. Cordless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a line line is great, especially with more people in the house.
    As for the virtual phone book, most cordless phones I've seen recently (ie the past five years) have included a feature to push all contacts to other phones on the same line. Maybe it's time to upgrade the phone rather than add a computer system to the works?

  145. Step 1: Buy a new phone by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Yours seems antiquated. My 4 handset Panasonic system has a shared phonebook - add a number to one, it shows on all instantly. Also it sets its own time off of the phone network.

    Step 2 would be to switch to a VOIP provider that can give you all of the call logging and other things you talk about. We have Vonage but any VOIP provider has all that stuff, and more.

  146. Re: Really... by MagiTEK360 · · Score: 1

    You can get a DUI for riding a horse. At least in Australia A guy in Northern Territory thought he was clever riding his horse home from the pub while drunk. Got pulled up and ticketed for it. http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2009/08/30/80091_ntnews.html

  147. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is this their that you speak of? Look around and you'll find them much cheaper, and they work just fine.

  148. Re: Really... by plover · · Score: 1

    Horses are not omniscient.

    In other words,

    "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him think."

    Thanks, I'll be here all the week. Try the fish.

    --
    John
  149. Re:no. it does not. by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've had 2 outages on my land line in the last 10 years, but I have never had an outage on my cellphone.

    Never had a dropped call? Never got the "redial, network busy" tone? Never got a "Call failed" displayed on the face of the phone? Those are outages.

    --
    John
  150. Re:no. it does not. by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tit is because of the phone company monopolies on wired service and their ridiculous pricing and rules structures that don't seem to have changed much since the 50s

    This shows that capitalism works when not tampered by a monopoly.

    The same companies that we buy the land line service from are also doing the cell phones service. The difference is the amount of competition.

  151. Re:no. it does not. by Pax681 · · Score: 1

    here's the real question though.........

    how do you stop an AC raping his own hand perpetually?

  152. Re:no. it does not. by Firehed · · Score: 1

    You jest, but all of the urban sprawl isn't doing us any good - and our easy access to transportation is the biggest enabler. All of the green hippie bullshit aside, we'd do well to get off of our fat asses to walk or bike to the local store, but it's just not practical in most locations because everything is so spread out.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  153. Possible Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came across this once, but I haven't really researched far into it. There's a system that was at least once sold by a company named CyberGenie. It's a landline phone, and it does connect to your desktop PC to transfer your phonebook, at least. It may have further capabilities worth looking into.

  154. Home Phone System sync with Computer by bnordan2 · · Score: 1

    One exists right now and is very simple to setup, you can also buy it at a local electronics store. It is the iPhone + MobielMe + Mac computer. You can sync wireless, automatically and both directions between all the components. Works great for me.

  155. Well look at you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A landline you say. Gosh haven't had one of those for many years, I applied for one six months ago, but I'm told that in my area they are out of capacity and can't offer me one at this time. This happens to be in Sandton, Johannesburg, which incidentally happens to be the premier business hub of the whole of Africa. To say I'm pissed off would be an understatement. I'm paying ~$50/mo for a crappy internet service which at that price offers 3.5 GB traffic per month. I can't even download that much in a month because the connection is so shit. 9 times out of 10 a page load fails. I've had it up to HERE with this bollox, and i'm going in to their head office next month with a grenade.

  156. Skype phone by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    Would a Skype phone do the job? Okay, so IP telephony doesn't have the reliability of a fixed land line, but for everyday use it should be fine.

    Skype can:
    - on my computer, access my contacts list in Outlook
    - keep a list of recent events (calls and conversations)
    - do voicemail
    - do call forwarding

    My question is:
    Are there any Skype phones that can talk to a contacts list on some specified computer? (I assume not.)

  157. Cybergenie by cygnion by RudySolis · · Score: 1

    I got one of these years ago, messed with it for a bit but never really took full advantage of it. Not sure what types of products they have now-a-days but it might be worth looking into...I know voicemail was stored on the computer with remote retrieval and you could set up different mail boxes for different users and ppl would press a number for who they wanted to talk to and i think only their handset would ring. Been awhile tho so I'm not positive.

    www.cygnion.net

    (I've got a slightly used older model I could probably part with. I know the headset battery needs replaced because it was never really used and put in my closet years ago.)

    1. Re:Cybergenie by cygnion by RudySolis · · Score: 1

      I did a little more follow-up after I posted (stirred my interest again). Apparently the company is defunct, but you can still pick up their items very inexpensively compared to original pricing. It does have Outlook integration and from the looks of their forum still followed by end-users. (I'm going to d/l their software and see if its better than what I have...and found that replacement batteries are $9.00 so I'll probably pick one of those up too since we're going back to POTS ($10 a month hard to beat) now that AT&T CallVantage is going away and Vonage horrible customer service prohibits me from using their service.) Here is a posting from the site about the CyberGenie:

      Easy to use...quick installation...ideal for home or office.

      Cordless phone system: Supports up to two separate phone lines
      No additional wiring needed! Uses regular analog phone lines.
      Expandable system--up to 10 cordless handsets
      Up to 20 private mailboxes: Add users quickly and easily.
      Music on hold
      Caller ID
      Hands-free headset compatible
      Logs all inbound and outbound calls
      Centralized communications: Combines voicemail, e-mail, faxes and memos into a personal mailbox.
      Customizable greetings for each phone line
      Call Options: Set up conference calls, transfer calls, or route to a private users' voice mail.

      The CyberGenie is a multi-line, multi-user, expandable PC Cordless Phone System that uses your personal computer to manage all of your communications. It's like having your own personal assistant to handle calls, voice mails, faxes and e-mails. CyberGenie also easily recognizes your spoken commands through its unique sophisticated software, giving you a whole new range of benefits right at your fingertips! It's ideal for small offices and home offices providing the flexibility and messaging capabilities found in more expensive business phone systems.

  158. Microsoft Cordless Phone System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Cordless_Phone_System

  159. Maybe consider Google Voice? by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    What I would like is a phone system that I could sync to my computer so I could update the phone book over all the units (if not sync with Address Book or Outlook), keep a log of caller IDs, or even forward me new voicemail notifications. Does anyone know if such a system exists?

    Are you in the US so Google Voice is available to you?

    Do you have computers or mobile web access near your four phones? Contacts happily live there and can serve both your landline as well as mobile phones.

    It keeps a log of caller IDs. It keeps a log of Voicemails, SMS, recorded, placed, received and missed separately from the history off all of those.

    It forwards not just notifications, but the voicemails themselves, as well as transcribing them to text (sometimes poorly, sometimes amazingly).

    There are additional great features beyond what you asked for as well. (It's free, it permits free calls in the CONUS.)

    To make an outgoing call, I can simply click call a contact. On my mobile, select a contact and call. I can choose if I want to connect via landline or my cellphone. In a moment, whichever will ring for me, I pickup and hear the ringing until they answer.

  160. Re:no. it does not. by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 2, Funny

    an horse analogy is LIKE a car analogy

  161. Fritz!Box by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Well there's the Fritz!Box series of DSL routers with telephony functions. Towards the landline they support ISDN and that old quasi analog system used in some developing countries. It runs Linux and is fairly hackable. It also supports preety much all DECT GAP handsets even with a sampling rate of 16 kHz.

    1. Re:Fritz!Box by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      It even syncs your phone phonebook with your online adressbook. (Unfortunatly not Outlook or any sensible standard, but the contact lists of some european freemailers)

      The other functions like email or rss reading on your phone.. well.. I yet have to find a use for them.

      Hey AVM hear this: I need sync to google contacts!

      --
      bickerdyke
  162. Re:no. it does not. by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Well I guess in the US the problem is also that phone connections were horribly bad. When I listen to call-in radio shows from the US I'm often shocked to hear how bad phone calls sound.

    The rest of the world is used to bit-transparent PCM connections with a delay of just a few samples even on the cheapest providers. That's _way_ better than VoIP or cellular networks.
    And ISDN also typically is far more reliable than even DSL. Under bad conditions DSL usually breaks far quicker than ISDN.

  163. Re: Really... by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 1, Funny

    Try the fish.

    "You can lead a fish to water, and you can make him (or her, I didn't check) sink." There, tried the fish.

  164. Check out Casabi by scsurfer · · Score: 1

    Check out www.casabi.com. They offer a home phone system with most of the features the original author was looking for.

  165. Home phone system that syncs to computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you need something like this:
    http://www.buy.com/prod/thomson-ge-dect-6-0-28128ee2-cell-fusion-cordless-phone-1-x-phone-line/q/loc/101/listingID/30432828/204212006.html?adid=17653
    It's Outlook-compatible and can be used with bluetooth-enabled cell phones.

  166. Re:It's called Android.Put #s into gmail contacts by ajlisows · · Score: 1

    Most smart phones will have a similar capability. I have a Windows Mobile based phone and Exchange at work. My contacts are stored on the Exchange server and sync when changed. If I want a new contact, I can put it in through Outlook instead of using the phone. I'm pretty sure I could do something similar with google (My phone syncs my google calender) but I use the Exchange stuff because I need it set up anyway.

  167. It's a Waste of Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in the industry and don't even do that, it's a waste of my time.

    That's the general point the reply was making to begin with.

  168. Re:no. it does not. by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

    I only get dropped calls when I'm on a train and it goes out of coverage area. A landline wouldn't be an option there anyway. I've never had a network busy tone or call failed display ever.

  169. I use a Du@lphone that synchronises easily by weeble · · Score: 1

    It connects to the network via ethernet cable and synchronises time via a time server, it can obtain a full addressbook via my skype account.

    If I want to make a call I can choose to make the call via skype or via the land line, similarly it will receive calls both through the landline and skype.

    If you do not want to use skype you could just consider it an application to edit your addressbook. I can have multiple handsets on the same base station and they all update simultaneously.

    Using skype it is much closer to cross platform than something that is tied to Outlook or some other Microsoft application.

    --
    Slashdot Beta should die a painful death.
  170. Re:no. it does not. by somersault · · Score: 1

    being able to push something like this out to business and corporate clients may well be a viable opportunity.

    Which is why you can get commercial digital PBX phone systems with built in address books.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  171. Sipgate ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi folks
    I am using a VOIP acount in Germany from sipgate.com
    This thing just works, is cheap AND is free of charge.
    Have fun

  172. Defect or Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The separation of phone books between handsets is a feature, not a defect. Our home office handset stores business numbers, the bedroom handset stores personal numbers, and the teenager's handset stores her friends'. Who wants to paw through dozens of 'jef's, 'bif's, and 'sean's to find 'law office'?

  173. Anonymous Privacy Maven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called Skype!

  174. A related question... by Myshkin · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't my horse drawn buggy come with a mp3 player?

    Can I get a Betamax VCR that does HDMI?

    Your landline phones aren't getting updated technology because they are themselves outdated technology. They may not be entirely obsolete at this point, but don't expect to get technological advances into them on a regular basis.

  175. Re:no. it does not. by WildBlue · · Score: 1

    Hand him a keyboard...

    --
    Life is a Game. Play to Win.
  176. Re:no. it does not. by Pax681 · · Score: 1

    ah but they can still type with one hand :P

  177. fancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...My current setup is a Panasonic system that has 4 cordless phones over one base station.

    Ooh, fancy. I'm styling a Western Electric 302 myself.

  178. ADSI but little documentation by obtuse · · Score: 1

    ADSI is Analog Display Services Interface, an interface standard for extending the interface on analog phones. So there are phones that support a standard interface as mentioned in the first point above, they're just hard to find. With an ADSI phone and an Asterisk server, you oould just conceivably do this by bringing in your landline to Asterisk and then back out to your analog sets with whatever additional info you chose. Manufacturers don't really talk about whether their phones are ADSI compliant, and there's very little documentation on ADSI. I personally gave up on this project because of the difficulty of finding a cheap ADSI phone, and the cost of going analog-VoIP-analog.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  179. Technology going backwards by AYeomans · · Score: 1

    > I feel old
    First phone I remember was fully equipped with voice recognition. No buttons or dial, very minimalist styling, you just picked up the phone and spoke the number you required.
    We've gone a long way in 50 years.....

    --
    Andrew Yeomans
  180. Re:no. it does not. by multisync · · Score: 1

    Paying the bill maintains his phone service, not the phone.

    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
  181. Re:no. it does not. by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    Of course your landline phone needs external power. Do you believe in magic?

  182. Bluetooth sync with cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vtech has a phone that can sync all of you contacts from you cell phone. Then sync your contact manager with your cell through google.
    http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/29/new-vtech-cordless-can-download-cellphone-address-books-over-blu/

  183. Re:no. it does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you never call a cell phone, you certainly have to deal with "are you there? you're breaking up" ! :)

  184. Home Alarm System by djrosen · · Score: 1

    What about home alarms? I am not going to pay ADT/Brinks/CompanyNameHere $35 a month when I can get a local alarm monitoring company to perform the same service for the same price per quarter ($12.99 per month). They don't offer VOIP or cellular connectivity. There monitoring centers are just as widespread as ADT's so the argument about using a local company in the event of widescale issues are irrelevant. Plus, my company requires me to carry a cell so they pay for it and Im not going to carry another personal phone, thats just silly.

  185. I have those same phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are actually pretty decent. Yes it would be nice to have downloadable ringtones and a USB interface on the base, but let's be honest--how much did you pay for them?

    OK, NOW do you expect them to be über fancy? I didn't think so. But they are better than you realize. The address book being for each phone is a *feature* (the phone in my wife's office has her contacts, the one in my office has mine, and the one in the bedroom has friends & family. Hellooooo, not all of us live alone).

    I spent 60-70 USD about 2 years ago and I just expected them to be decent phones. The caller ID display is bonus (now that I have an ooma and get caller ID), the phones survive drops pretty well, they use normal AAA (rechargable) batteries so I was able to replace the batteries in the heavily used office phones with higher rated cells, the interface is not too complex (important for non-geeks like my wife and 7-year-old).

    Buddy look. If you want a fancy phone you have to *buy one*. Don't expect to pay 64.99 for 4 phones plus digital answering machine and get a damn iPhone. ooma has some snazzy new phone that goes with their new base station. That might be what you want, check it out. It does cost more for 1 phone than the Pannys do for 4, but hey, that's up to you. Make a better choice this time.

  186. Re: Really... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    Yes, but there's countless stories of horses returning to camp/home from battle with their wounded (or dead) riders - or no riders at all.

    I'd feel more comfortable hopping on a horse that knew the way to my house than trying to drive.

    Horses are like chaffeurs that poop a lot.

  187. Re: Really... by Chyeld · · Score: 1

    You ever wonder if the reason those stories are told is because 9 out of ten of the horses just wandered off with their rider, never to be seen again?

  188. voip from whence? by Oo.et.oO · · Score: 1

    whom do you go through for voip?

    1. Re:voip from whence? by C_L_Lk · · Score: 1

      Two providers - les.net and AtlasVoice - one for incoming, one for outgoing respectively.

  189. Re:no. it does not. by alexo · · Score: 1

    But your horse needs food, shoes, shots and exercise.

    One shot usually suffices.

  190. Re:Well, yes, there is. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    You can get analogue PBX systems with half a dozen phones on eBay quite cheaply (well, you could a few years ago). Most of these have an RS-232 port on the main box and you can control it via that. Lots of companies replaced them with SIP-based infrastructure and sold off the old systems very cheaply.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  191. Re:no. it does not. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Well, yeah, we do, for two reasons.

    Reason one: Verizon bundles the land line with internet and cable TV. Not having the land line means buying the other two ala carte, which is about the same total price. The land line is essentially free.

    Reason two: Cellular service sucks at our house. Even though I can see the pole from my front yard, (about two blocks away) I get barely one bar in the living room.

    Reason two a: Since I'm on call 24/7 and often work from home, the lack of reliable voice communications is unacceptable.

    Reason two b: If a member of my family calls 911 on the land line, the operator automatically gets our address. If they call on the cell phone, precise location depends on dodgy satellite reception.

    Reason two c: Wife makes long calls to her friends and families, hates talking on cell phone.

    There's actually a (minor) third reason: When we were allocated our phone number 20 years ago, we got a number ending in double zero, which in this area is usually reserved for businesses. I could transfer that number to a cell phone, but that inevitably starts an argument over whom is going to give up their current cell phone number.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  192. An Asterisk setup seems to be what you want by BrianCarlstrom · · Score: 1

    What I would like is a phone system that I could sync to my computer so I could update the phone book over all the units (if not sync with Address Book or Outlook)
    My trixbox Asterisk system at home does this halfway (http://carlstrom.com/trixbox/). For my Cisco phones, I generate an XML phone directory from my Emacs BBDB contacts database which is then served to the phones over HTTP. Unforunately my Hitachi Wi-Fi phones have to have the directory synced via USB, even though all other settings can be set via a web server. Certainly there other other options for Wi-Fi VoIP handsets that probably won't have this problem.

    keep a log of caller IDs
    Asterisk keeps a CDR (Call Details Record) database with that information

    or even forward me new voicemail notifications.
    I haven't bothered setting it up, but Asterisk systems can forward voice mail as email. I do have web access to the sound files, but largely just access via the phone handsets.

    Does anyone know if such a system exists?
    I believe that you can have what you want from an Asterisk based system, but the hardware isn't cheap. The computer to power it doesn't have to be anything special though, I use an old discarded 450MHz Dell box.

    I'll note that I am strange and use my Asterisk system with a POTS connection, just using VoIP inside the house. My wife insists on it for emergency power-outage 911 reasons

  193. Re:no. it does not. by Dahan · · Score: 1

    In the US, POTS calls are digitized at the central office at an 8kHz sampling rate, 8-bit mu-law samples. With the exception of mu-law vs. a-law, that's the same as what's used in, e.g., Europe, and the difference has no noticeable effect on sound quality--either way, it's still bandlimited to 4kHz (actually 3.6kHz). The callers on radio call-in shows in other countries don't sound any better than the ones in the US. And while doing the ADC at the phone is certainly nice, it doesn't have any significant effect on sound quality (unless you have an actual fault in the phone line that's introducing hum or static, in which case ISDN wouldn't work either). And yes, I had an ISDN line and ISDN phone back in the late '90s to early '00s and am very familiar with how a end-to-end digital call with no compression sounds. I liked it for its call control features (buttons to answer different lines, conference, hold, etc...), not because the sound quality was any better.

  194. Re:no. it does not. by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Well, but you also have that weired in-band signalling for your numbers so it takes you _ages_ to dial a number.

    I guess part of the quality advantage is that ISDN-phones use piecoelectric or dynamic microphones which sound _far_ better than the carbon mikes used in analog phones.

  195. Re:no. it does not. by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    Well I guess in the US the problem is also that phone connections were horribly bad. When I listen to call-in radio shows from the US I'm often shocked to hear how bad phone calls sound.

    The rest of the world is used to bit-transparent PCM connections with a delay of just a few samples even on the cheapest providers.

    The US uses 8-bit -law G.711 encoding with 8KHz samples, much of the rest of the world uses 8-bit 8KHz A-law G.711. I'd be pretty surprised if you noticed the difference. Sometimes telcos will use G.726 ADPCM, but this is done across the whole world.

    That's _way_ better than VoIP or cellular networks.

    That statement needs a lot of qualification because in many cases it isn't true. Cellular networks use GSM or AMR-NB codecs, which are indeed lower quality then G.711 (although full rate AMR-NB is only marginally worse than G.711). VoIP, on the other hand, has a much wider choice of codecs, with Speex and AMR-WB, to name just two, providing a much better quality then G.711.

  196. Siemens Gigset by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1

    I've got a Siemens Gigaset which connects to POTS and has SIP capability. You can download and upload the address book (slow) to each phone using a web control panel. I also have a SIP account, you can generally get these to email you voicemail.

    It syncs to a NTP time server and has a reasonably flexible dial plan which you can use to control which calls use SIP and which go via your landline. It also displays the local weather info on each handset. Unless you go for a full blown Asterisk setup a Gigaset is probably a good second.

  197. Solutions Available - there's just a cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As noted in other posts, there are plenty of Panasonic, Siemens and Uniden models that allow you to share/update the directory across handets & base. Siemens has the Gigaset SL785 that will allow you to share addresses from your pc through USB or Bluetooth.