Slashdot Mirror


Do You Hate Being Called an "IT Guy?"

An anonymous reader writes "The phrase 'IT' is so overused, I'm not sure what it means any more. OK, maybe it's an ego thing, but I spent a lot of years in grad school, lots of years getting good at creating software, and lots of years getting good at creating technical products and I don't want the same label as the intern who fixes windoze. I'm looking at a tech management job at a content company that is trying to become a software company, and they refer to everything about software development, data center operations, and desktop support as 'IT.' I'd like to tell the CEO before I take the job that we have to stop referring to all these people as 'IT people' or I'm not going to be able to attract and retain the top-tier talent that is required. Am I just being petty? Should I just forget it? Change it slowly over time? These folks are really developing products, but we don't normally call software creators 'product developers.' Just call them the 'Tech Department' or the 'Engineering Deptartment?'"

95 of 736 comments (clear)

  1. Can't see why this would matter. by koreaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't see why this would matter. Hopefully potential candidates will look beyond whatever their official job title is. I'd change it slowly over time.

    1. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by IrquiM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Me neither. It's just as stupid as if the finance people didn't want to be finance people anymore... Engineering department? That's where the engineers are - you know, the people who design hardware of different types

      And by the way - by writing "[...]don't want the same label as the intern who fixes windoze." you clearly have earned the same label.

      --
      This is blinging
    2. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by x2A · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's just not very descript, the connotations that the term 'IT' has attached are different to those of 'programmer', at least to myself, and I've no reason to believe I'm unique with that. IT in my experiences will tend to be more office/user facing; easing other peoples use of other peoples products, dealing with word processing, spreadsheets, all that kind of stuff. Programmers create the stuff that the people in IT use.

      Personally I find it easy to escape the label of 'IT' by not having a clue how to use Excel or Word leaving me very much being not the person to ask :-) System architecture, coding problems, no sweat, that stuff interests me, so that's the stuff I'm interested in being associated with. I don't look down on people who fix the office printers or get peoples mail clients working with their AV or whatever... I don't look down on teachers, but it doesn't mean I wanna be one or believe that calling me one is an accurate description.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    3. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Bent+Mind · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can't see why this would matter.

      I can. Where I work (as in most places I imagine), the IT department handles the network and helpdesk. IT also includes database administrators. While the database admins can write some really good SQL, they don't know jack about networks or computer maintenance. This is all fine and good. However, management doesn't know jack about IT. So we end up with a bunch of database administrators trying to run a network and maintain computers. And management wonders why everything is falling apart all of the time.

      Keeping the titles separate might help management make the distinction between the database guys and network engineers.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    4. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "IT guy" or "computer guy" or whatever. People need a generic term to describe people who work in some area they don't (or won't be bothered to) understand. "doctor" or "engineer" or "lawyer" just the same. A cardiac surgeon doesn't know much otolaryngology; an EE doesn't know much about steam turbines; a personal injury lawyer isn't going to be much help with your corporate takeover. It's easier to lump all of the people who do similar work together and refer to the whole group by a generic term - eg, "IT people" for all the computer-centric jobs, whether hardware, software, or support; eg, "lawyers" whether they're finance, liability, or contract. "IT people" should probably have descriptive titles for internal use, once the group gets large enough for division of labor and effort to be important, but you shouldn't get too upset if people outside the group just see "computer people."

    5. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by x2A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a reason why we don't refer to screwdrivers, circular saws and sanding machines all as "hammers". There is a reason why we have different words for "poisonous" and "tasty"... if you're not eating them, then just "berries" might be a sufficient description to you, but language evolves for a reason, we have vocabulary for a reason, description is important. Not understanding the different between two different terms shows you haven't been exposed to it. Not understanding that there could be important differences that may lie outside of what you've been exposed to show narrow mindedness. Personally, I'd rather go with the label of 'petty over my label' than that of 'deliberately ignorant', so I respect even the differences that I don't understand.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    6. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by war4peace · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I absolutely agree. My company has a large sales department. I refer to them as the "sales people" and they refer to us as "the IT people". Nobody's bothered. Why bother? It's like you are angry because you are a Texan and somebody from Taiwan calls you an American. "Oh, wait, dude, I'm not American, I'm Texan!" - now that's plainly strange :)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    7. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by The+Unusual+Suspect · · Score: 5, Funny

      That would be a good start. Then all you'd have to do is get them to understand the difference between a database and a network.

    8. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From what I've understood companies in the US are extremely tightfisted about giving information about employees, so you'd better take what little you get. If you were a DBA but all your resume says is "IT department" and that's all they'll confirm then you have an uphill battle just to convince them that you were in fact a DBA, and not the guy replacing broken keyboards and fixing paper jams who is now desperately seeking a new job.

      Of course there's such a thing as title inflation so too excessive a title will set off bullshit detectors, but there's no reason to sell yourself short either. I'm hardly a career ladder climber, but I would react negatively to a job title that would sell me short with my next employer. While it's not as bad here as in the US, the resumes do get screen by recruiting companies and HR and not having the title could lose me interviews before I even got to talk about what I've been doing.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by piquadratCH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A cardiac surgeon doesn't know much otolaryngology;

      That analogy would be correct if people wouldn't know the difference between Java programmers and C++ programmers. I'm pretty sure every cardiologist would feel a bit insulted if a patient wouldn't know the difference between him and a nurse. Nothing against nurses, every hospital would collapse without their work.

    10. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by AGMW · · Score: 2, Insightful
      True, and yet a cardiac surgeon is also a surgeon is also (at least in layman's parlance) a doctor. Do surgeons dislike being known referred to as "doctors" - HELL YES.

      I work in IT. I'm an IT Professional. Do I know anything about fixing windoze? HELL NO! Do people assume I know about PCs and wireless routers and (sheeze!) printers? Yep ... all the time!

      To the untrained eye IT is IT is IT. It's like wine tasting vs beer tasting. Until you expose yourself to the knowledge you just think they all taste the same, but it's not the fault of the ignorant (and I do mean "ignorant" and not necessarily "stupid"). It is an opportunity to enlighten them that IT covers such a wide range of knowledge and skills now (and the range of knowledge and skills is growing rather too fast for this old programmer!) that at some point there may well be a divergence, though where the split(s) may appear I don't know!

      Case in point: A couple of friends had a company that bought and sold second hand office furniture since before computers appeared on the scene. Not long after computers became de-rigeur in offices the company split because it recognised that "computers" were no longer just "office furniture" - one half taking JUST computers and the other half taking everything else ...

      IT will split into different factions just as "office furniture" did when it makes sense for it to do so.

      So, what would be a good way to split it up then? Development vs Maintenance? Software (you write stuff to run on H/W) vs Hardware (you build things to run the S/W) vs Repairer (you know how things work and so can configure/fix things & you can talk to real people and so act as an interface between the annoying Users and the equally annoying S/W and H/W people) ...

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    11. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Dumnezeu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a reason why we don't refer to screwdrivers, circular saws and sanding machines all as "hammers"

      Yes there is such a reason and that's because they're not "hammers" an "tools," which is why we don't call them "hammers" but we call them "tools." And while we're at it, please hand me that "toolbox." No, not that "screwdrivers-and-circular-saws-and-hammers-box" just the "toolbox." Thanks.

      --
      Yes, it's sarcasm. Deal with it!
    12. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Nursie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hi there,

      I'm a software engineer. Take your funny definitions of what is and what isn't engineering somewhere else.

    13. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by invisibastard · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some of these people think the server is a "CPU" or a "Hard Drive". I get calls where they say "the internet is down" because they somehow deleted the IE icon. They don't even know how to use the address bar in their browser, they type the url into one of the 10 search toolbars they've installed. You face the wrath of god when you delete their Weather Bug crapware. "my weather doesn't work, the it guy broke it"

      If I talk Java or C++ their eyes glaze over as they pretend to know what I am talking about. Never underestimate the stupidity of people. I say that as a stupid person.

    14. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by invisibastard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hope he lets us know how "telling the CEO" works out for him. Most CEO's seem to genuinely appreciate an applicant educating them and assuming they don't understand an issue.

      When I was in charge of hiring, I hated applicants. They assumed I had nothing better to do than listen to them ramble on endlessly. I barely had time to use the bathroom most days, let alone get lectured on semantics.

    15. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A cardiac surgeon doesn't know much otolaryngology; an EE doesn't know much about steam turbines; a personal injury lawyer isn't going to be much help with your corporate takeover.

      Comparisons:

      • IT guy: helpdesk guy through to ph.d. who works with high-end clusters.
      • Health guy: orderly through to highly specialized surgeon.
      • Electric stuff guy: from the guy who moves crates of PCBs through electricians through to EE.
      • Law guy: Secretary at law firm through to top tier lawyer who's spent his/her entire career specializing.

      Now, don't you think those on the right side of the above descriptions would frown own being referred to as health/electric stuff/law guy if the terms had the meanings I gave them above? And for "IT guy" that's exactly how the term is commonly used, the guy who gives you a new keyboard when you spill coffee on it gets referred to as an "IT guy" and so do your senior developers and sysadmins, guess why they're grumpy about it...

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    16. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      Except for us Prius driving Austin Texans. We prefer to be called "star child". Now pass the aromatherapy candle.

    17. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by pthisis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's where the engineers are - you know, the people who design hardware of different types

      Please don't give credence to professional engineering societies who try to fetishize the word "engineer".

      Engineers are also people who adjust the mix levels of audio recordings. Or dig ditches for the military. Or drive trains or fire trucks. Or keeps the radio equipment running.

      Or engage in the (IEEE-recognized, for what little that's worth) field of software engineering.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    18. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by gtall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, good luck with that. The only view of computers they see is the screen, keyboard, mouse, and if they are really sophisticated Power Users, a USB stick. They are now considered experts by those Upper Management (UM) that fear to even gaze upon a computer and have their secretaries print out their emails for markup and reply. The UM will gladly turn to these experts since they are all Business School Product and speak the language of widgets, product, cash-flow, and will fondly recall bits of Buzzword Bingo Lingo thereby bonding together, circling the wagons, pointing their spears outward to repel attacks by those technical people that actually know enough to make the tech work. So Joe-Big-Software-Company-Product-Specialist walks in the door. The Big Cheese (BC) must see him/her because this is a Mission-Critical Performance of the Forward-Looking Synergistic Kind. BC gets sold a box of shiny buttons, after convening meeting with the Power Users who all agree the BC has his finger on the pulse of the company and not inserted into his oval office. A Deal is commenced which will Galvanize the Future, Coalesce the Ineffable into that which may be Effed, and ceremoniously inflicted on the people who actually make the tech work. After the giggles subside, and the tech people find out PUs, UMs, and BC are serious, darkness falls upon their faces for they know whom the bell will toll when it fails to Bring Forth a Fountain of Fundamental Change and costs a serious arm and leg.

      Errr...not that I have no fondness for PUs, UMs, and BCs...I have some...somewhere...it was just here a minute ago...

    19. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      haha! You're just a software engineer? I'm a supreme senior software analyst advisor head of the developmental engineering analytics division!

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    20. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by digitalhermit · · Score: 2, Funny

      People call me a tool all the time.

    21. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a reason why we don't refer to screwdrivers, circular saws and sanding machines all as "hammers". There is a reason why we have different words for "poisonous" and "tasty"... if you're not eating them, then just "berries" might be a sufficient description to you, but language evolves for a reason, we have vocabulary for a reason, description is important. Not understanding the different between two different terms shows you haven't been exposed to it. Not understanding that there could be important differences that may lie outside of what you've been exposed to show narrow mindedness. Personally, I'd rather go with the label of 'petty over my label' than that of 'deliberately ignorant', so I respect even the differences that I don't understand.

      Normally, I'd agree with you. I'm a big fan of using the appropriate words for the appropriate things. It frustrates me to no end to see people appropriating words for their own purposes and completely mis-using the English language.

      However, "IT" is more of a generic label than a specific title. It refers to an entire department - just as "HR" does. Not everyone in HR is a manager... Nor do they all do the same job... Nor are they all on the same pay grade... But they're all in HR.

      Same thing goes for Marketing, or Sales, or whatever. They indicate a department, or a general function within a company, not a specific job title or duties.

      So this guy doesn't like being called the "IT Guy"... Well, that is a bit vague... I would assume his official title would be more along the lines of "IT Manager" or "Network Technician" or "Software Developer" or whatever... But he'll still be working in the IT department - as his work is at least vaguely related to Information Technology.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    22. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by thered · · Score: 3, Funny

      >There is a reason why we don't refer to screwdrivers, circular saws and sanding machines all as "hammers".

      All tools are hammers, except screwdrivers and they're chisels.

    23. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by uglyduckling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Calling software development, network engineering, web design etc. all "IT" is a bit like calling HR, accounting and legal all "paperwork". I agree with the story author - the need to call everyone who produces or maintains software or hardware "IT" just shows how little most people understand the businesses they run and the people they employ. It's that reasoning that leads to (in small companies... hopefully) the pimply faced youth who reboots the servers being asked to design and deploy a mission-critical database because he 'knows about computers'. Your post typifies this: they're all "vaguely related to Information Technology" therefore they should be the same department? That makes no sense at all, and many companies get this wrong, wrong, wrong.

    24. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by hazem · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't look down on people who fix the office printers or get peoples mail clients working with their AV or whatever... I don't look down on teachers, but it doesn't mean I wanna be one or believe that calling me one is an accurate description.

      I once worked at a university (doing "IT" for the engineering school) and during one of the staff meetings, the management suggested that they could save money by having the computer science professors take over all the IT tasks in the school.

      Fortunately one of CS profs quickly suggested that the EE professors could fix wiring and changing light bulbs and the Civil Engineering profs could clean bathrooms and unplug toilets. The idea died almost quicker than it was born. But it belies the point of this article. Most people have no idea what "IT" even means and assume that if you can do one thing with a computer then you are automatically able to do all things.

    25. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Almonday · · Score: 3, Funny

      Way to keep it weird. ;-)

      As a native Texan (now living in Berkeley) I have to admit that my childhood conception of New England included every state north of Georgia.

      --
      Posterity, my posterior.
    26. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Calling software development, network engineering, web design etc. all "IT" is a bit like calling HR, accounting and legal all "paperwork". I agree with the story author - the need to call everyone who produces or maintains software or hardware "IT" just shows how little most people understand the businesses they run and the people they employ. It's that reasoning that leads to (in small companies... hopefully) the pimply faced youth who reboots the servers being asked to design and deploy a mission-critical database because he 'knows about computers'. Your post typifies this: they're all "vaguely related to Information Technology" therefore they should be the same department? That makes no sense at all, and many companies get this wrong, wrong, wrong.

      If this were a board dedicated to HR-related topics... Instead of IT-related topics... I'm sure we'd see people on here complaining that they don't like being referred to as an "HR guy." I'm also sure that you've at least once in your life referred to someone as "working in HR" or being "from HR" or having to go talk to "somebody in HR."

      Is it accurate? Is it specific? No... But it doesn't need to be.

      If your company is big enough to have an entire software department, I'm sure you get referred to as a "software guy" - because distinctions are usually made along departments rather than specific job duties. But if it isn't, if you only have an IT department, then that's what you're stuck with.

      Some places are big enough to have separate HR, accounting, and legal departments... Other places are not, and just refer to those duties as "administration" or "management."

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    27. Re:Can't see why this would matter. by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, I think most people understand the difference between an HR manager, accountant and lawyer, and they would have different job titles even if they were all in an administration dept. It's unlikely they would all be called 'administration guy' and be expected to deal with the same queries, unless it's a really, really small company, in which case it's fair enough and everyone is expected to be versatile. I don't think IT is given the same respect/insight, so I think the article author's point stands.

      Of course they'll have different job titles - just as I assume our "IT guy" is going to have some kind of official job title like "Senior Network Administrator" - but that doesn't really matter. We're talking about somebody who doesn't want to be called an "IT guy" even though he works in the "IT Department."

      HR is responsible for human resources... Accounting is responsible for money... Legal is responsible for all the legal mumbo-jumbo...

      So, where does payroll fit into things? Is that HR or Accounting?

      How about whoever it is that handles things like the hiring and firing procedures... Does that fall under Legal, or HR?

      I'm sure you've got people working in HR who have skillsets that more closely resemble folks in Accounting or Legal... Or you've got people who have duties that fall somewhere between the departmental lines... But you've still got to stick them on an organizational chart somewhere.

      So you get guys in HR who don't know the first thing about hiring or firing people... Who went to years and years of school to learn all kinds of neat accounting stuff... But they're still in HR, whether they like it or not. And they'll still be introduced as "Joe from HR" - even if they don't like the association with the people who fire you. And maybe they'll be asked about some benefit package during lunch, and they won't be able to answer, because they don't know anything about benefits.

      How does that differ from someone in IT who went to school for years and years to learn programming and has nothing to do with actually fixing a broken PC?

      It may very well be that your average human being doesn't understand the intricacies of IT work... May not understand the subtle differences between a DBA and a network administrator (they're both administrators, right?) But that doesn't really have much to do with organizational charts.

      If your company has an IT department, and you work in it, you're an IT guy. Just as you're an HR guy if you work in the HR department, and you're a Sales guy if you work in the Sales department.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  2. You have an ego problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're in IT. Deal with it.

    1. Re:You have an ego problem by dwarfsoft · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My wife happens to think that I spend too much time on the computer, and as I work in I.T. at work I shouldn't need to touch a computer when I get home. My "hobby" and "work" are the same... apparently. My work is actually maintaining servers, and my hobby is programming. I wish there were a way to explain to her the difference... *sigh*

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    2. Re:You have an ego problem by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Her understanding the difference between server admin and programming is irrelevant, and won't fix the problem: If your wife is telling you she thinks you're spending too much time at the computer, it's because she'd rather you spend the time with her, and were doing something romantic. Relationships work, and stay alive, on doing stuff together and having common interests.

      When was the last time you brought her flowers? (assuming she likes them, I do know a couple of women who don't). When was the last time you went out on a date? Was it planned, or did you get home in the evening and say "let's go out tonight"? When was the last time you stayed in, and had a quiet evening snuggling? When was the last time you went dancing, or to the theater?

      Getting married does not mean that you have to stop working at the romance side of things. You could probably earn yourself a week's worth of being left alone to program by taking her out on Friday. Try to do something romantic with her at least once a week, preferably more often, and you'll find that she stops feeling neglected, and will give you your time to do things like your hobby of programming.

      *sighs*
      Tara

    3. Re:You have an ego problem by sagematt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Daddy, why is there a woman in Slashdot?

    4. Re:You have an ego problem by Lordpidey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, my brother has a similar problem. He is a psychologist, and his wife thinks he shouldn't have to interact with anyone the moment he gets home.

      --
      Some people encrypt by using rot-13 twice. I prefer the more secure method of using rot-1 a total of twenty six times.
    5. Re:You have an ego problem by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      He wasn't really complaining, he was just boasting about being a male slashdot poster who's actually married.

  3. Grammar Nazi to the Rescue! by Phat_Tony · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think you're going to help attract a lot of talented engineers by changing the nomenclature to the "'Engineering Deptartment."

    That aside, I think "Software Engineer," "Software Architect," "Analyst," "Lead Developer," and such are common titles for people who are creating things with software, as opposed to "IT's" tech-support implications.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:Grammar Nazi to the Rescue! by cheesybagel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In my experience when lay people say "IT" they usually mean tech-support and cannot conceive of any other job. Which is why I do not like being called an IT person, since programming is nothing like it.

    2. Re:Grammar Nazi to the Rescue! by moronoxyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Strangely enough, my experience is exactly the opposite: When I say that I work in IT, people instantly assume that I'm a programmer, and it takes some time for me to make them understand that I don't know Jack about that.
      (Well, I do a little PHP and C at times, but that doesn't make me a programmer.)

      But yes, "IT guys" is the correct term for all of us: Programmers, admins, security specialists, tech support

  4. Petty? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds pretty petty to me. I have no problem at all with IT and don't see why anyone would. I don't care what my job's called as long as it interests/challanges me and provides a monthly paycheck. If you're that hung up with titles, I'd suggest your problem lies closer to home.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Petty? by ls671 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What do you mean ?

      John Doe,
      Senior Artificial Intelligence Architect, Coordinator, MSc, PMP, PO,
      CBAP, PhD, MBA, Senior Rocket Scientist.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    2. Re:Petty? by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly there are a lot of business functions with rather generic names.

      Human Resource... Are these the guys who keep track of your sick days or are they the ones who analyses all the people in there jobs and makes sure each one is the right fit and is being compensated for their work, and that their home/work life can stay balanced.

      Marketing... Are these guys the ones who do cold calls to the customer during dinner. Or are they the ones who do a lot of work to figure out who their target market is and crate a plan where people who would want the product know about it.

      Janitorial... Do they just empty trash cans and vacuums the floor, or do they do the plumbing electricity and landscaping and all the things to keep the building in running operation.

      Management... Do they just make sure you do what their boss tell them to make you do. Or are they part of the decision process and work on the direction of the company and come up with ways of improving the business in their section.

      Finance... Do they just make sure they are bringing in more money then they are spending. Or are they tracking/investing and controlling the flow of money in the organization.

      IT like any job really covers a wide area from rather low end jobs to high end jobs.

      In reality IT has a lot of titles with in the group, and each group has its own rage in them too... Support, Administration, Software Development, Software Architecture, Hardware design... CTO, CIO... When I post on a Resume I don't say I am an IT Guy I say I am a Software Developer or a Software Architect (I am kinda in the middle professionally) I havn't seen to many jobs looking for IT Guys... However after you are hired you may be called such outside of IT... Just as you call them Marketing Guys or HR Guys...

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  5. GOOD GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did the submitter forget his Twitter account password? Is his navel so big that he can't help but gaze into it?

  6. I'm not an "IT guy". by jcr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm a software developer. In my experience, "IT" is a term used by non-engineers as a catch-all for "that which my English degree failed to equip me to understand". Kind of like when they say "microchip".

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  7. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my view of the industry when someone says IT I think of the technical support, admin and sys planning teams. The ones who make the systems work and keep working.

    Programmers and the such, I put in the developers group. Graphic designers, html jockeys or software developers. The ones who make what people see on their desktops look pretty.

    You dont call someone who washes your car and gives it a bit of a polish a mechanic would you?

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
  8. I'll let you by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    call me Sue if you'll give me a job.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  9. Get over yourself IT guy by Niobe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Like it says

  10. Quality Control by lewko · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just call them the 'Tech Department' or the 'Engineering Deptartment?'" [sic]

    The spelling Deptartment just called. They need more budget.

    --
    Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  11. Information Technology (IT) by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Information technology (IT), as defined by the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), is "the study, design, development, implementation, support or management of computer-based information systems, particularly software applications and computer hardware."

    IT deals with the use of electronic computers and computer software to convert, store, protect, process, transmit, and securely retrieve information.

    You ARE in IT.

    However, it's the equivalent of calling a Brain surgeon a Doctor

    Or referring to a Nuclear physicist as a scientist.

    It is kind of vague. Sometimes being more specific is good, as it points out people's specialty more.

    1. Re:Information Technology (IT) by doghouse41 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I expect Accountants get tired of it too (Wait! You mean the girl who looks after the petty cash isn't interchangeable with the CFO?)

    2. Re:Information Technology (IT) by psnyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's more like calling a brain surgeon, "medical staff", since that can apply to interns and support staff in the same way as IT.

      You're right, but I also see his point.

  12. it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    the job will be out-sourced soon, anyway.

  13. What's in a name by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I graduated there was the programmer, technical designer, conceptual designer and analyst ladder to climb. And I tried it.

    The you realize the tunnel view you get when following such a path. And after a couple of years of having tried to adopt a fancy name -senior consultant, senior anything- I resolved to name myself that what defines me. If people ask I'll tell them I'm a programmer. Doing well for years with a lovely family, a very good income and a sports car that turns heads. But still a programmer.

    I can develop products -which is much more than coding-, I can look through the organization and suggest improvements and I can tell anyone paying me he's brilliant. Still I'm a programmer.

    Mainstream will never be able to keep cracks charlatans so don't set your hopes too high on job titles.

    Consider job titles at Google. Naming Vint Cerf an Internet Evangelist is a way of telling the world that job titles don't really matter and that the substance matters way more.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  14. It matters to future employers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Potential employees are probably more worried about future employers/their resumes, and it's not unreasonable of them to do so.

    Frankly, a respectable-sounding title is one very cheap way for employers to compensate their employees that costs the company absolutely nothing yet is of material benefit to the employee. It's one reason nearly everyone in sales and marketing is a "director" or "head" of some tiny sliver of a given institution's sales/marketing operation. "Director, Central California Sales," "Head of E-marketing Business Development" etc. You're more likely to attract ambitious, driven people if your position comes with a nice title. These are also the sort of people who will work very hard for you, because they're hungry for advancement. Of course, they also are likely to leave the company as soon as a better offer comes along. But I'd rather get 3 years of work from a ambitious employee than 10 years from a just-getting-by timecard-puncher.

    1. Re:It matters to future employers by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course if a company does hand out titles too much then you'll end up with a situation like this. Me I don't call myself an "IT guy" as I am quite happy being what I am-A PC fixit guy and system builder. I look at it no different than electrician or plumber. Folks break machines, or need new machines, so they come to me.

      I think the reason the word "IT" rubs this guy the wrong way is it is a catch all phrase, but as far as I know it has always been, but that is why most are not JUST an "IT Guy" but a programmer, engineer, or guys like me that actually do "fix windoze". Oh yeah and bite me on the fix windoze remark. I'd love to see this turkey spend some time trying to get rid of a seriously nasty infection where he can NOT wipe the thing because they have data shotgunned all over the damned drive, or get to see a nasty pron bug that spews crap like bukkake all over the damned screen be the first thing HE had to look at first thing in the morning. You know, nobody respects the plumber either until their toilet is clogged. May your family get rootkitted!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:It matters to future employers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just from a developer: I think I really appreciate the "fix Windoze" people (if they know what they are doing), because I sure wouldn't want to do it. That's why I don't like to have "IT" used a catch-all, it means that during jobs searching you often have to sort out manually those jobs that are not relevant to you (how many developers are looking for and admin job and the other way round?) and even worse, as a developer with a bit of a more mathematical and OS-design background you also have to look at the "Research & Development" job openings for some countries. It really is quite a mess, and I just can't help the feeling that in many cases for the HR department everyone from the scientific supercomputing guy to the one switching out the graphics card they are all "computer guys" which obviously makes as much sense as lumping the guy cleaning the toilets together with the one making sure the air is clean in you chip manufacturing area.

    3. Re:It matters to future employers by JackieBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For non-degree holders, titles are given instead of raises.

      It makes us feel important and costs nothing.

    4. Re:It matters to future employers by clifyt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Frankly, a respectable-sounding title is one very cheap way for employers to compensate their employees that costs the company absolutely nothing yet is of material benefit to the employee."

      I'm dealing with something very similar...I have had a decent title for YEARS that accurately described my position, and the HR Fucks decided that they needed to reclassify me. Works with computers? IT Guy. WTF? No no no no no...I have advanced degrees in psychology and statistical knowledge...yes I maintain the servers simply because EVERYONE ELSE GOT LET GO OR DIDN'T REHIRE AFTER THEY LEFT (and honestly, I was much better at this than they were anyways), but my main job is to accurately figure out how to classify and assess situations.

      Yet, I'm IT Guy because they needed a hole to fill and other staff members were upset that I was competent enough to do my job and help out with the other.

      Simple title would go a long way with motivation...these days when they ask me to do something that requires thinking outside of this, I tell them "My Title Says I'm Paid To Push The Fucking Button And Nothing More"...ego? Yes...but I'm not paid to tell them how much of my ego will be doing as little as posible (regardless of the fact that my actual training means I could write a treatise on this).

    5. Re:It matters to future employers by Weezul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell them federal law says they must pay you overtime with an IT title. It's not actually true, only real IT workers get overtime by law, developers only get overtime when the company is being nice. But surely HR perceives their titles as being correct. So either you are eligible for overtime or HR must admit they are lying about your title.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    6. Re:It matters to future employers by hazem · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your situation sucks.

      You need to find a way to do just your academic work, or seriously, find another job. What they're doing to you will stifle you until you really just want to die.

      It's not worth it.

      I'm in a similar boat. I showed a capability to do databases in my current job and have been doing that more than the job on my title, and have built quite an interesting system that does a certain job really well. Now we actually want backup and I see why they were content having me do it. Our IT dept is finally providing 2 people to do the job, but both are paid far more than I am (I even got/had to interview one of them). It's one thing to be praised and told I'm one of the smartest people in the company (even in front of other people), but really, I'd like to be paid like I'm one of the smartest people in the company.

      Luckily for me, a very interesting job just came up in the system and I've been working all weekend on my resume (instead of that database).

      Good luck. You deserve better, but you'll have to demand better and be willing to leave for another job. They'll pay you as little as possible and shit on you as much as you'll let them.

    7. Re:It matters to future employers by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually I 1.-Insert Live XP cd (no risk of infecting media) 2.- copy data 3.- tell them they are gonna lose their programs (which they NEVER have the discs for) 4.-wipe

      But occasionally you get those that just WILL NOT let you wipe the drive. I had one guy come in with well over 1000 bugs. I told him I would have to wipe the drive, he said no. I said it would cost $500 for me to remove that many infections, and even then I could make no guarantees, he cut me a check right there. So, being one of those that still believe the customer is always right even when he is wrong, I did the work. You have to realize that sometimes you just can't wipe.

      Oh, and as for your "recover their data" part? BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Do you have any idea how many times I have had to deal with asking customers MULITPLE times if they had any "weird" places they kept data, only to have them say no and later come back with "oh by the way..." I even had one moron who kept important data in the recycle bin! So now if I gotta wipe I tell them "name anything you wanted backed up RIGHT NOW" you don't name it, it is gone" because they act like it is a "magic box" and that after a full wipe and reinstall I should be able to push a couple of buttons and that file they left in C:/Windows will just magically appear. That is why I'm glad I don't do much virus cleaning anymore, and stick to building and selling. Cleaning bugs is the worst part of PC repair. I'd much rather sell new builds and off lease office machines, thank you very much.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:It matters to future employers by mrzaph0d · · Score: 2, Insightful

      spews crap like bukkake all over

      hey, lets not get our fetishes mixed up here..one of those is just wrong, the other one is hot!

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    9. Re:It matters to future employers by Bengie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use to have a student(full time during breaks, part time during school) position where I worked with ~6 other students to manage Faculty computers. Don't let the "student" part bother you, we had full control of about everything.

      Nasty bug didn't want to go away? All the faculty knew you put your data files in your "My Documents" folder because that was the only directory we backed up on the network. We had a VERY high computer turn over, so if it wasn't in "My Documents", you'd have to wait EXTRA time to get it recovered from the full back-up we did before transferring your image. It was your fault for putting data in the wrong directory and we typically had better stuff to work on than pulling your old HD image and sift through to find your crap "shot gunned". They learned fast if not when we first warned them.

      So, with a general understanding by the faculty to put your data in a single local.

      Step 1 - Reimage the computer. This image had almost ANY program they could every want/use/need
      Step 2 - Wait 15-30min for the computer to boot up for the first time and connect to AD(active directory) and patch itself
      Step 3 - restore back-up files over gigabit network
      Step 4 - return computer
      Step 5 - Enjoy, your computer is clean.

      Actually, which ever admin setup the Active Directory Polices knew what he was doing. We very rarely got malware issues and few people needed us to install stuff for them. In the 4 years of working there, I can count on my two hands how many times I saw malware infections and that's for somewhere around 500 faculty. Faculty also did not have Admin privs by default.

      I know, people thinking "No admin privs?! They'd be calling all the time to get installed"

      Nah... We had a program that only power users on that computer could use, which the owner was a power user. The owner would run this small in-house program and it would prompt for their password and a reason must be provided, This program would log their reason and then they would log off then log back on. Now their an admin for 2 hours and their background is forced(you couldn't even change this background after the fact) to this deep-red with a LARGE warning that said something along the lines of "WARNING!!! YOU'RE ADMIN, you're responsible for any changes". At the end of those two hours, they would forcibly get kicked off and next logon was non-admin and their background restored.

      If someone abused their admin-elevated privs, they could get their temp-admin privs revoked.

      And don't think you could get around the local admin account. Our standard image had an in-house root kit that managed the Local Admin password. It was a random 20 chars changed nightly per computer(every computer had a diff random 20 chars). Even if you loaded one of those All-In-One boot disks that let you change the password for admin, the root-kit changed it right back when the computer started back up. The password was created client side and uploaded to a central server via an encrypted connection.

    10. Re:It matters to future employers by mrbcs · · Score: 3, Funny
      I got out of the business for the same reasons. Users are basically idiots and most shouldn't have computers. That and I'm too lazy to learn Vista or seven now. It was fun for about a decade... people just drive me nuts now. Even had a guy tell me he couldn't get his email. What program do you use?... wait for it.... notepad... AHHHHHHH!!!!!

      / now they can all just get off my lawn

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    11. Re:It matters to future employers by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      occasionally you get those that just WILL NOT let you wipe the drive. I had one guy come in with well over 1000 bugs. I told him I would have to wipe the drive, he said no. I said it would cost $500 for me to remove that many infections, and even then I could make no guarantees, he cut me a check right there.

      I can't really complain with that -- though I don't know I'd have the balls to ask for $500, as I don't work with windows enough to have good instincts about where to look.

      Oh, and as for your "recover their data" part? BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Do you have any idea how many times I have had to deal with asking customers MULITPLE times if they had any "weird" places they kept data, only to have them say no and later come back with "oh by the way..." I even had one moron who kept important data in the recycle bin!

      So image their drive?

      Seriously, it's a bit unprofessional to lose data, ever.

      So now if I gotta wipe I tell them "name anything you wanted backed up RIGHT NOW" you don't name it, it is gone"

      They won't be able to. Hell, I wouldn't be able to, unless you could back up my entire home directory.

      Now, what you can do is say "If you aren't ABSOLUTELY SURE, pay me $x more so I can store an image of all your data. That way, you won't lose ANYTHING until you tell me you're absolutely sure."

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    12. Re:It matters to future employers by xystren · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obligatory IT Crowd Reference:

      Roy: "We are just a bunch of drugeons to them. Drugeons I tell you.."
      Moss: "And if drugeons was a word, that's what we would be."

    13. Re:It matters to future employers by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Theda Bara was the IT girl, and she didn't mind the title.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  15. I am a software engineer by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    IT guys are the scumbags who put desktop remote control software on my suse workstation. They are the reason I keep rootkits (ie, system rescue CDs) in my desk draw, and why most of the guys I directly work with run gentoo.

    These are the people who solemnly told me they would improve my WAN latency issue by compressing the link. When I said that won't work they said they could always put two compressors in series.

    When they replaced my Dell desktop with an equally crappy ASUS or something they replaced the Dell branded logitech keyboard and mouse with an ASUS branded logitech keyboard and mouse on the grounds that using the wrong type of peripheral might cause "incompatibilities".

    Since they stopped supporting POP and SMTP I now have to use outlook inside windows inside vmware, except there used to be outlook web access which stopped working last weekend so I logged a call with the helpless desk and they got the whole story (running firefox on suse, etc) then they had to get me to give them the version of IE I had there (stuffed if I know why). So they didn't fix it (Exchange server cant authenticate me for some reason) and escalated it a few times then the second or third level guy called me back and asked if I had thought of restarting firefox. When I said yes he asked if I had restarted my system (said so, I had an import or ten on the go at the time). This after I had given them the error message which came back from exchange.

    I wish I could sack these idiots. In theory they work for my organisation you know, but they seem to have their hooks in us.

    1. Re:I am a software engineer by xous · · Score: 3, Informative

      Someone seems to have confused someone who can turn on a computer with a competent technician.

      The people you speak belong in a call center reading a script to AOL users.

      How do these people get these jobs?

    2. Re:I am a software engineer by agnosticnixie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a few colleges in a similar situation where it seems basically students who know how to manage with computers will avoid their college helldesk like the plague. Leading to getting, well, people who get taken on"do you want to work in IT?" "what's IT?" "you're hired!"

    3. Re:I am a software engineer by x2A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assuming an unsaturated link, you are of course correct. With a saturated link, or with highly compressable data, light compression can make a difference. Of course it can't increase the speed of light, so I'm still gonna get annoying lag when pressing a key in my ssh client to my server in the states, but tunnelling my smtp/imap/sql/etc connections through that compressed ssh link does make a noticable difference, even with me only using 1% of my available bandwidth.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  16. Self-important Douchebag by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The phrase 'IT' is so overused, I'm not sure what it means any more.
    It means "information technology".

    OK, maybe it's an ego thing, but I spent a lot of years in grad school, lots of years getting good at creating software, and lots of years getting good at creating technical products and I don't want the same label as the intern who fixes windoze.
    What's wrong with that? Are you really so shallow as this? (Don't answer) I can understand wanting some sort of prestige, but not liking something because the proles get to have it too is one of the worst features of human nature, and it's something that used to get trained out of non-upper-class Americans. Is it really that irritating to be in the same industry as the intern who fixes "Windoze"[sic]? From urbandictionary.com: douchebag "An individual who has an over-inflated sense of self worth, compounded by a low level of intelligence, behaving ridiculously in front of colleagues with no sense of how moronic he appears."

    How does the following passage make you feel? Does it make you feel comforted or outraged?

    "What's great about this country is that America started the tradition where the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest. You can be watching TV and see Coca-Cola, and you know that the President drinks Coke, Liz Taylor drinks Coke, and just think, you can drink Coke, too. A Coke is a Coke and no amount of money can get you a better Coke than the one the bum on the corner is drinking. All the Cokes are the same and all the Cokes are good. Liz Taylor knows it, the President knows it, the bum knows it, and you know it."
    --Andy Warhol

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Self-important Douchebag by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ha! You call *him* self-important?

      Well you could have called me King of Computing; Lord Protector of Communication Infrastructure; Suzerein of Anything That Might Break; and Keeper of the Secret of Setting Digital Watches.

      I'd have answered to Patron Saint of Lost Files or The Last Best Hope of the Desperate Cubicle Dwellers.

      I don't play that role any longer, but when I did, I had no doubt I was important to *other* people. They turned to me when they were in doubt or trouble, and I and I sent them away feeling like they had some control over their lives. I kept things running smoothly, and when somebody did something really stupid I helped them get back on track.

      Now doing those things made me feel pretty damned important. I could be proud, sometimes even arrogant, but I knew my business and took it seriously. I made the people I worked with see my job as important too, *and that made them happier customers.*

      Any young guy in the business who does his job well is entitled to pat himself on the back, because people don't give the IT guy respect just because he deserves it as a human being. Oh, no. Left to their own devices, they'll see him as an extension of the machines they work with and treat him accordingly. You've got to understand for most people that means abusing the machinery.

      You've got to establish a zone of respect around yourself so you can do your job. You've got to be mentally tough. You deal with a lot of angry, pissed off people, and beneath that anger is the customer's fear of failure, guilt over lousy planning, and shame over not knowing how everything works. You've got to project confidence and self-respect, otherwise when you need the people you work with to act rationally, they won't.

      And you've got to exact respect from people. When you *do* not only *you* will be happier, your *customers* are happier too. Nobody wants to rely on somebody they don't respect.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  17. Re:I swear by stjobe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, you're in IT.

    Sorry you don't have a shiny title to distinguish yourself from the lowly CPU-fixers and computer janitors, but there you go.

    You're in IT. Face it. You're in IT. No way around it, might as well say it with me: You're in IT.

    --
    "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  18. Titles before substance by 1s44c · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you really value titles before substance?

    'IT Guy' isn't a term of abuse, why should you care if people call you that?

    Do they value you in your current position? Of so great, if not fix it or leave. Either way being called an 'IT Guy' is not worth worrying about.

  19. Member of Technical Staff by argent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's THE title at Bell Labs. If it's good enough for Dennis it's good enough for me.

  20. Anyone think of South Park after the summary? by hagrin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Don't call me IT Guy, IT Buddy. Don't call me IT Buddy, IT Friend."

  21. I don't work in IT, but.... by NoPantsJim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It drove me nuts being in college and meeting "IT" majors. I would ask them questions like what they like to program in or what kind of Linux they use, but anything I asked beyond the technical skills required to setup a standard home Linksys router was met with a blank stare and an explanation of how good they are with anti-virus and firewalls. It made me wonder why as an aviation major I knew ten times more than any IT major I ever met.

    1. Re:I don't work in IT, but.... by NoPantsJim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh wow, did you go to Purdue too?

      Not so much that it seemed like the IT major was designed specifically for CS dropouts, but I noticed that most CS dropouts did end up there.

  22. Nothing wrong with ego ;) by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, there's nothing wrong with ego. I, for one, always wanted to be called The High Priest Of The Sun. But then the barstards switched from Sun to IBM servers :p

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  23. It could be worse by atmurray · · Score: 2, Funny

    Try doing a PhD concerned with the hardware implementation of pretty hardcore mathematics for wireless communications and have someone refer what you do to be "IT". Without trying to sound like some form of zealot, the best thing I did was switch to a Mac. Not because it is a superior environment or anything, but because when someone has a Windows problem I feign ignorance and say "sorry, not sure, I don't use Windows these days".

  24. IT Guy ? by erica_ann · · Score: 5, Funny

    yup, specially when the client realizes I am a woman, not a guy :)

    1. Re:IT Guy ? by erica_ann · · Score: 2

      Oh.. How could I have grown up for 30 odd years and never knew this! Thanks for the Enlightenment..

        As far as Enlightenment goes though.. I prefer using Enlightenment (or other WM's) in GNOME and KDE

      I really thought I was a female all these years..

    2. Re:IT Guy ? by erica_ann · · Score: 3, Interesting

      LOL An IT-Guy.. Ah well I have been at this since what.. 97 or so? Worked out in the field with telco guys, programmed routers, firewalls, linux boxes, fixed windows... data recovery.. so I am used to the guy thing. it IS a male dominated field.. so I accept it and go with the flow. Specially gaming ;)

      And, I prefer the intelligent geek IT guy myself ;)

  25. Yes, I do. But people don't call me one. by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I am a systems architect. I've been a systems architect on and off for 25 years. During that time my job title has included Engineering Director, CFO, Systems Manager and CIO, depending on the size of company I've worked for.

    Would you call someone who designs aircraft engines a mechanic? Would you call someone who designs central heating boilers a plumber? Would you call someone who runs a team working on ALU design at Intel an electrician?

    My point is that nowadays IT is actually a trade, and mostly attracts the sort of people who in the past would have become plumbers, electricians and mechanics. Which is not to knock them, because these are essential and valuable trades, but basically they implement what other people have designed and specified. Programmers who are not just coders, systems designers, user interface designers - these are creative professions.

    In the UK we have a terrible tradition of confusing professionals with tradesmen, caused by our emphasis on "administrative" skills. We've just had the Government dismiss their principal expert on drugs because he dared to disagree with the irrational "omg smelling cannabis kills you I need a stiff drink or five before I can go back to work" culture of the Government and the Civil Service. In a properly organised world we would sack the Government for lying to us, but in the mind of the Govt., Prof. Nutt's status is about that of a plumber. The point is that you go to tradesmen for advice on implementation of what you want to do, but you go to professionals to tell you what to do in the first place. You somehow need to get back to that position (I say you. I hope to retire in 5-6 years; then it will be someone else's problem. For now, I am quite happy being a software architect, because that is actually what I do.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Yes, I do. But people don't call me one. by GuyFawkes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, and you have the same hierarchy within an engineering / machine shop, within a hospital, within a building services company, within electricians shops, on board a ship.... you name it.

      What ***___IS___*** different now is that back in the old days the only route to being top dog was to work your way up through all the other levels and disciplines.

      Now you just take a degree course in engineering and get to be a manager put in charge of people who, for example, use a hacksaw every day of their lives, even though you yourself have never even held one.

      I could tell you uncounted real world stories in engineering like this, guys who have literally never held a spanner, but have a degree in hydraulic engineering, designing hydraulic machinery that LITERALLY cannot be made, due to elementary mistakes like insufficient room between unions to fit the spanner to secure said unions, etc etc etc.

      This is why all these type think they are better than the "workers", because they lack clue #1 about the workers actual daily job and skills.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
    2. Re:Yes, I do. But people don't call me one. by cowscows · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're a pet peeve of mine ;)

      I design buildings for a living, and in my field, the job title "architect" is pretty highly regulated. I have a masters degree in architecture and over 4 years of experience practicing, yet I can't refer to myself as anything containing the word "architect" or else I face potential legal issues. To use the word "architect" in my job description, I have to be licensed, which requires 3 years of internship work, then passing a bunch of licensing exams. And then continuous education credits as well as yearly fees for pretty much the rest of my life.

      My gripe isn't with you, it's just silly how the architecture profession has gone to all of this trouble harassing the newcomers to its profession, yet at the same time allowed other fields to take the term "architect" and hand it out almost arbitrarily.

      OK, I'm done.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  26. Deptartment by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One thing is certain: Referring to any group as a deptartment (or worse, a deptardment) will not win favor with anyone, top-tier talent or not.

  27. You could try something like... by GravityStar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Software Engineering
    Hardware Engineering
    Support
    Operations
    Development

    Now, combine:
    Database engineering
    Database operations department
    Desktop support
    Deskside support
    Network Operations
    Network Engineering
    ECM (Enterprise Content Management) Developer

    Need I go on?

  28. You're just being petty by Zilch · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...get over it. It's the same in any industry. If you work in hospitality, you could be a bellhop, a cleaner or a hotel manager. The guy who comes to fix your laptop probably thinks you're an arse too. (I tend to think that about anyone who spells Windows with a 'z'). Also you probably have an over inflated opinion of your job (most people do). For example, all the 'IT Architects' I work with just see 'Code Monkey' jobs as roles to be shipped off to India.

  29. I can sympathize by unkiereamus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, I'm an EMT, I'm trained to save lives.

    There are people who are walking the earth today who, were it not for me, would be dead. Not "I was a member of a team", not "If I hadn't been there, someone else would." because of me.

    And yet I am referred to by a huge number of people as being an "Ambulance Driver".

    Now, I don't see what's so degrading about being referred to as an "IT guy", but if it bothers you, then by all means try to change it. Speaking from my experience as a person who is exceedingly inept at the whole office politics thing, though, I'd suggest not putting that forth as a demand of taking the job, that sort of thing (I've come to find out), tends to make people think you're...well...a pain in the ass.

    (Unkie) Reamus

    --
    I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
  30. It doesn't matter that much by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find those that are worried about their title are generally those who obtained a degree and think that anything less than the title of their choice is offensive because they take their degree far too seriously or people who, for whatever reason (ie no degree or just stupid) don't feel qualified for the job and want a excellent job title to reaffirm they're doing their job right and it will help when they're caught out and need to be find a job elsewhere.

    We already have numerous title for someone who does programming. Too many in fact and it's because of those two types mentioned above or companies wanting to avoid paying a decent wage by giving you a title that is hard to compare to other titles.

  31. Dialect by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Informative

    Briefly adding my own $0.02:

    In Britain, 'IT' seems more acceptable to be used as a catchall for anything computer-related. In the US, many narrow the definition to helpdesk support, and the personnel responsible for the ongoing operation of anything computer-related. Developers and architects are separate (with DBAs and a few other positions hanging somewhere in the void between) --- I'm not sure if this is a regional distinction in the US, primarily because personnel in these fields tend to move around quite a bit.

    Frankly, they're both valuable professions. I've worn both hats, and it's a bit of a shock to make the switch from one to the other, as both fields evolve and change so rapidly that it's very difficult to stay current in both. That said, I can easily understand why one would want their job title to accurate reflect their duties!

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  32. Stupid question, badly phrased (are you trolling?) by pondlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So apparently you want to be taken more seriously, but you decide to drop "windoze" into your question? Do you really think that the people who hand out jobs - and titles - care about your personal prejudices? As a professional, if the best solution for your company is "Microsoft`s platform" then you deliver it, you don't spend time complaining about how no one respects you because your proposal to migrate Visual Studio to vi isn't taken seriously. If it makes sense, make a business case for it and argue for it, but if the guys upstairs decide against it then either shut up or get out. This is what happens every day in Sales, Marketing, Production, Finance etc., but you seem to believe that IT is different.

    If you're so obsessed about a job title then insist on it your contract. As some people say, that may make sense if you're concerned about your next job, but how bad is this job if you're already thinking about the next one?

  33. Stop being pretentious and get over IT by grapeape · · Score: 2, Informative

    My first IT job was as a basic programmer on the TRS-80 back in the 80's when I was a kid (unique situation where the grown ups had no idea what to do with it but the company thought they needed to do inventory on a computer). Since then I have been called a Web programmer, router jockey, network engineer, NTAC, consultant, etc... The most offensive to me is Engineer, not for me but for those that really are engineers, I have no engineering degree and dont operate locomotives so I qualify for neither. I work in IT, I do alot of things. IT changes so often that there is no box to really put into it as a title description. IT Person works just fine.

    I've really never understood the obsession with cool titles, I have worked with others who thought they had to have some goofy title as if it somehow made them royalty. As long as you get a paycheck and are treated with a fair amount of dignity does it really matter?

  34. who has the ego problem here? by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful

    *sighs*

    Right back at you.

    I actually broke my mod point to post this- do you understand how arrogant it is that you feel a)you understand the problem based on one or two sentences, b)you are qualified to give advice on the subject, and c)that it's your business to do the analysis and hand out advice? Nevermind that apparently "you spend too much time in front of the computer" somehow turned into:

    • "you do not buy her flowers"
    • she wants flowers
    • they do not spend enough time together
    • she wants to spend more time with him
    • she feels neglected
    • he doesn't do enough romantic things
    • he doesn't know how
    • men are responsible for doing all the romantic things

    Half of which is a bunch of misandry. Here's a big cluebomb for you: they liked each other enough to get married. I think one or both of them has been doing something right.

    Seriously- Whisky, Tango, Foxtrot.

  35. mrfisma by mrfisma · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only IT people and drug dealers refer to their customers as "users."