Slashdot Mirror


Linux Reaches 32% Netbook Market Share

christian.einfeldt writes "Linux netbooks have captured 32% of the global netbook market, says Jeff Orr, an analyst with consumer computer research firm ABI Research. The largest share of netbook sales is in the Asia-Pacific region, including Japan, Australia, and New Zealand, according to Orr. ABI's latest figures align with a statement by Dell executives in February of this year, to the effect that Linux netbooks comprised about 33% of Dell shipments of Dell Inspiron mini 9s netbooks. These data points cast doubt on claims by Microsoft that Windows XP has captured 98% of the netbook market (a figure Microsoft later revised to 93%). In an interview with DesktopLinux.com, Orr made clear that the 32% Linux netbook market share did not include either user-installed Linux or dual-boot systems, but was confined to just pre-installed Linux shipments."

64 of 389 comments (clear)

  1. Oblig Simpson Quote by ZiakII · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. 14% of people know that.

    1. Re:Oblig Simpson Quote by skine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!

    2. Re:Oblig Simpson Quote by aztracker1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And 80% of those netbooks running pirated windows in 3...2......

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    3. Re:Oblig Simpson Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would someone purchase a linux based laptop at around equal price as a windows one to go through the extra steps to avoid paying $7 for a Windows XP Home License ?

    4. Re:Oblig Simpson Quote by JohnBailey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why would someone purchase a linux based laptop at around equal price as a windows one to go through the extra steps to avoid paying $7 for a Windows XP Home License ?

      So insecure Windows fanboys can feel better about themselves..

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    5. Re:Oblig Simpson Quote by JohnBailey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they think at first that they will be fine with Linux. And they are not. Linux fanboys can continue claiming that it's Windows users that are deluding themselves, but they still won't see 30% of even their geek friends running Linux on their netbooks. Of the six Netbooks I saw my friends purchase, four came with Linux. None are running Linux as the primary OS now. I know, anecdoted v.s data, but I'm hearing the same all around.

      Thanks for proving my statement..

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    6. Re:Oblig Simpson Quote by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I guess parent was modded Troll by some fanboi who has never actually tried to *use* WPA2 while running Linux...?

      What's so hard about using Network Manager?

      WPA2 is right there under the "Wireless Security" tab.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  2. A view from Asia-Pacific by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I live in Australia, and find it quite rare to find Linux based netbooks in shops. They are available, but mostly from the more specialist retailers. Even then they only have very low specs.

    I just got back from Singapore, where I was hoping to pick up a cheap Linux netbook to use over there at a conference. Not only were prices similar to Australia for computer stuff, but virtually all the netbooks ran Windows. There were only a couple of places that I came across that offered Linux, and they were not cheap. They also seemed to be older models. I was disappointed.

    That said, anyone who is really interested in Linux would not be satisfied with the simplified versions that come with netbooks. If you are going to wipe the OS to install your own distro, then it doesn't make a great deal of difference what the original operating system is. Any cost savings for having Linux seem to be offset by the premium of buying such a rare beast.

    1. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Go to Officeworks, still half of their ASUS netbooks are Linux based. When the lovely sales assistant starts telling you about the evils of Linux, assure him you know what you're doing and head to the counter.

      Even then they only have very low specs.

      That's the point of a netbook.. and the reason why Linux is so popular on them.

      Of course, you'll probably want to nuke the "linux" on them and put Ubuntu on it.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you are going to wipe the OS to install your own distro, then it doesn't make a great deal of difference what the original operating system is. Any cost savings for having Linux seem to be offset by the premium of buying such a rare beast.

      I just don't want to put money in Microsoft's pocket for an OS that I have no intention of using. That would mean caving in to the worst kind of abusive monopoly.

    3. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by nhytefall · · Score: 2, Funny

      Debian, Ubuntu... same difference anyway :)

      obligatory, I use Ubuntu daily, and our shop is Debian...

      --
      0100010001101001011001 0100100000011010010110 1110001000000110000100 1000000110011001101001 0111001001100101
    4. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Huh? That's weird...I also live in Australia and was going to post that I'm not surprised that APAC seems to be a successful market for these Linux netbooks. The Linux netbooks are displayed quite prominently (along with the Windows ones of course) in quite a few retailer. JB Hifi springs to mind ... the one near my place has the linux netbooks right there on the ends of the aisle ... actually ~more~ prominently placed than the Windows ones now that I think about it.

      Must be one of those things that varies depending on the particular store and demographic. The area I live in is quite 'young and techy' so perhaps the Linux netbooks do well here compared to other places in Australia.

    5. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      FWIW, I find Australians don't like tinkering with technology and are bit insecure.

      Have you actually been here or are you just speculating about foreign places out of your ass in typical American fashion?

      I remember reading somewhere that Australians buy a larger per capita number of Macs than other countries and my informal personal observations align with this. :-(

      Ah. I see it's the latter. Global market share for Mac is around 9.3%. In Australia its about 5.3% Here's a new tagline for a company you may have heard of:

      "Google - Dispelling arsehole-originated facts since 1998."

      --
      I hate printers.
    6. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by GF678 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even then they only have very low specs.

      That's the point of a netbook.. and the reason why Linux is so popular on them.

      Who said netbooks needed to be low spec? The same people who thought netbooks would only be used for browsing and light typing?

      Netbooks are simply small computers. They should have the capability to do whatever we want with them - this argument that netbooks are destined to only be low spec is short-sighted.

    7. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by DarkofPeace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with the low spec comment. When I was looking for a netbook, the only way to get the extra ram or larger harddrive was to buy the windows version. Just because I like linux does not mean I want it only on the cheapest hardware.

    8. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Netbooks are nothing but the lowest end of laptops. Feel free to disagree, but please provide a link to a high-end "netbook" with it.

    9. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by GlassHeart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who said netbooks needed to be low spec?

      For now, physics. Small form factor means small battery, which means the CPU can't be too power hungry.

    10. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who said netbooks needed to be low spec?

      Microsoft. Who only licenses XP Home for use on machines below a certain screen size and spec. I think there may be some restriction on Windows 7 Starter Edition as well.

      I know the conversation is "who needs Windows on netbooks?", but it's still at 68% :P

            --- Mr. DOS

    11. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Informative

      My Eee PC 1005HA has a slightly slower CPU but twice as much RAM and disk as my 4 year old Latitude D800 which was pretty high end back then. It runs three times as long on one battery charge. Firefox feels about the same (although the wireless driver still has hiccups in Karmic) and OpenOffice feels faster on the netbook than MS Office on the laptop although it takes longer to start. evince definitely feels snappier than Acrobat Reader under XP.
      The display size is the only major drawback. A netbook with 1920x1024 would be cool although I'd need to have my glasses tuned up more often.

    12. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by fyoder · · Score: 2, Informative

      That said, anyone who is really interested in Linux would not be satisfied with the simplified versions that come with netbooks.

      That's true of the Aspire One anyway. The graphical environment that came with mine was a joke compared to even xfce. Prior to that I figured claims about people exchanging Linux netbooks on mass for XP were exaggerated, but on seeing it I had to wonder. If my only choice was that or XP, even I'd want XP, and I'm a registered fanatical Micro$oft basher. Fortunately it wasn't difficult to put xubuntu on it.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    13. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by mysidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just find a netbook that is equal or better than a "laptop", and you'll have proven that Netbooks aren't low-end laptops, since you have a laptop with even worse specs than a Netbook :)

    14. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that's the point. He can't choose what operating system he wants to have without jumping through hoops. He is being responsible and jumping through those hoops in an effort to change the current system - which is a very responsible thing to do, as propagating the current system when you disagree with it is laziness.

    15. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by mjwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Netbooks are simply small computers.

      There is small, cheap and powerful.

      You can only pick two. Netbooks are small and cheap, if you want small and powerful then you aren't looking for a netbook.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by mjwx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just got back from Singapore, where I was hoping to pick up a cheap Linux netbook to use over there at a conference. Not only were prices similar to Australia for computer stuff, but virtually all the netbooks ran Windows. There were only a couple of places that I came across that offered Linux, and they were not cheap. They also seemed to be older models. I was disappointed.

      Singapore is the most western city in Asia, what else can you expect.

      Kuala Lumpur on the other hand, I found plenty of Linux laptops and desktops around. The Linux variant was often about 50 Ringgit cheaper then the Windows model. Try Low Yat Plaza in KL.

      A few in Bangkok as well but for the most part machines will just have a pirate copy of windows installed in Thailand, especially when a copy goes for about 70 Baht (that's the price for farang, Thais pay less).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    17. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I thought a netbook was by definition a low-end, portable laptop used only for browsing and light typing. You know, a "net" book...

      Microsoft's marketing team is trying to push that definition because otherwise they'd have to lower their prices.

      AU$180 for an OS, plus AU$350 for an Office suite is a marginal value proposition for an average priced (AU$1000) desktop computer. On a AU$300 netbook, it makes no sense at all.

      In reality, netbooks are at least as capable as mainstream business machines from just a few years ago. They have no problems running the same software and, given a large external screen, would make very useful low-cost business machines. The prospect of businesses realising that scares the shit out of Microsoft.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    18. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody is reading the numbers right. Mac doesn't exist outside of the USA and like one other country... Linux is much more widespread in comparison anyway. The problem is in the USA Apple and Microsoft have dominated the OS market so everybody gets this impression that Linux is this little thing that shouldn't be developed for. It isn't. It has a larger user base than Mac. The increase in Apple's Mac market share is significant only because it doesn't exist outside the states! The whole world is a much more interesting market than just the states despite the significance of the US market.

    19. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by zaivala · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the ASUS-Xandros which came on my Eee PC 901 had a bit longer battery life... but Ubuntu 9.10 Netbook Remix has more than enough added usability to make it worth it, and accurately reports battery data... I'm getting about 5.5 hours on a charge.

    20. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by hweimer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That said, anyone who is really interested in Linux would not be satisfied with the simplified versions that come with netbooks. If you are going to wipe the OS to install your own distro, then it doesn't make a great deal of difference what the original operating system is.

      Not quite true. If it comes with some variant of Linux preinstalled then you know that all hardware components will work right out of the box, even if you install a different distro. No hassle with obscure drivers or poorly supported devices like the much-dreaded winmodems.

      --
      OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
    21. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by MrMr · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you don't like to upset anyone, you must have a hell of a time introducing yourself mr. Lands.

    22. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wasn't the whole point of a netbook to put in components that draw as little power as possible to enable a smaller form factor at a longer uptime for the simple tasks most people want to do? If you want a small, powerful device that's a subnotebook.

      Of course, in the domain of portable computers there is a plethora of ill-defined and somethimes trademarked terms that ensure nobody knows what anyone else is talking about - als The Register commented on earlier this year. In twelve months "netbook" and "notebook" may very well be synonymous.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    23. Re:A view from Asia-Pacific by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it comes with some variant of Linux preinstalled then you know that all hardware components will work right out of the box, even if you install a different distro.

      If you "know" that then you're wrong. I'm still kicking myself for not getting as much detail as possible on what drivers were running on my AspireOne before I installed Deb stable on it. The basics all work fine but there are driver issues with wireless and the webcam, and I think something's up with USB in general.

  3. Whilst I'd love this to be true ... by baileydau · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here in Australia you are quite hard pressed to purchase a netbook with Linux pre-installed.

    I got my original eeePC 701 with Linux, but my newer S101 *had* to come with Windows. At the time the only machine I could find with Linux was a single Acer Aspire One unit. However my wife had her heart set on the S101 ...

    It now has openSUSE (currently 11.2) installed and everything Just Worked (TM), but that wouldn't be included in anyone's statistics (except mine).

    Speaking of statistics, I RTFM, and I couldn't actually see where / how they came up with this statistic. Did I miss something??

    --
    Ever stop to think ... and forget to start again?
  4. I'm having trouble with this number. by pecosdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've tried and I've tried to find an Athlon Neo system WITHOUT Windows and I flat can't do it. Sure, a lot of the Intel ones have Linux, but even most of those have Windows on them. Seriously, if I can't find an Athlon Neo system without Windows it's not telling me people want to buy the Linux versions, it's telling me they "settle" for Linux, and I don't like that.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  5. Hard to find Linux Netbooks in Japan by putaro · · Score: 2, Informative

    All the ones I see in the shops are running Windows. I've even tried asking and got a blank look. Rinikusu? Nan desu ka (what's that)?

    1. Re:Hard to find Linux Netbooks in Japan by KamuZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check the Sharp Netwalker, Linux loaded.

      http://kakaku.com/item/K0000054614/

    2. Re:Hard to find Linux Netbooks in Japan by Idou · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have seen the Netwalker from Sharp at every major electronics store that I have gone to in Tokyo recently (http://www.sharp.co.jp/netwalker/). It exclusively runs Ubuntu and is one of the smallest and cheapest netbooks you can get in a store.

      Then there is always the Dell website. You can get even cheaper mini 10s from there. I have purchased 2 such machines for friends and family as return gifts (Okaeshi). Doubt either know they are running Linux, but they are plenty happy to have a convenient webbrowsing/Skyping machine.

      I would say there is quite a bit of activity recently in this space in Japan, if you know where to look.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    3. Re:Hard to find Linux Netbooks in Japan by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it was an obscure comic or huge monster they'd know. :-(

      "Run!! RINIKUSUUUUU~"

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    4. Re:Hard to find Linux Netbooks in Japan by JAlexoi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well... A giant penguin coming out out the sea, is a lot more logical, than godzilla :-D

  6. I wonder if many install Windows themselves by RichardDeVries · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a Linux user myself, but I just installed XP on a common desktop box tonight and it was painful. Wifi, sound didn't work out of the box, you have to wait ages for all of the updates and SP's to download and install, reboot far too many times and then you have a empty OS almost without useful apps. Some things were hard to get working (Radeon driver installer throwing errors, Wifi driver refusing to work).
    I wonder how many 'average' users would get XP, Vista or 7 working on a desktop, let alone a netbook.

    --
    Error 001
    Security Scan and Virus Detection do not work with your operating system.
    1. Re:I wonder if many install Windows themselves by RichardDeVries · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Presumably 7 would be more manageable for common users to install on recent hardware than an OS that's eight years old.

      If true (and I think it is), great! Still, why isn't there any research on this? If I were a netbook manufacturer, Microsoft, Apple or Mark Shuttleworth I would be VERY interested to learn how many of those who purchased my computer or OS are sticking with the default setup. Win7 might be easier to install, but I still don't see my dad buying or pirating a Windows disk and installing it himself. Do netbook buyers give Ubuntu a try before changing to Windows? What makes them decide to keep or ditch it?

      --
      Error 001
      Security Scan and Virus Detection do not work with your operating system.
    2. Re:I wonder if many install Windows themselves by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm a Linux user myself, but I just installed XP on a common desktop box tonight and it was painful.

      I totally agree with this. I have done a number of installations on hardware that pre-dated XP-SP3 using an XP disk with SP3 streamed in. Lots of hardware is not supported. I have even come across a laptop where the standard sound driver from the chipset manufacturer will work -- as long as you don't want to use the built-in speakers. The last install I did left me with a system with no working NICs. I ended up booting into Linux so that I could download the Windows network drivers onto the system.

      After installing XP, you then have to install some applications, update it multiple times to get all the updates. Most Linux installs are way easier.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:I wonder if many install Windows themselves by RichardDeVries · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since you don't seem very technical,

      I am fairly technical, but not seeming it sounds like a compliment to me. Since you don't seem to be able to read, I'll repeat that the error occurred during installing, not launching. Thanks for the tip, though.

      --
      Error 001
      Security Scan and Virus Detection do not work with your operating system.
    4. Re:I wonder if many install Windows themselves by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm a Linux user myself, but I just installed XP on a common desktop box tonight and it was painful. Wifi, sound didn't work out of the box, you have to wait ages for all of the updates and SP's to download and install, reboot far too many times and then you have a empty OS almost without useful apps. Some things were hard to get working (Radeon driver installer throwing errors, Wifi driver refusing to work).
      I wonder how many 'average' users would get XP, Vista or 7 working on a desktop, let alone a netbook.

      XP is dated now, and its built-in "let me search the Internets" driver thingy doesn't really work (in all my time using XP - which is since it still said it's "Whistler" - I haven't seen it find anything even once). Hence the installation hell you describe.

      Starting with Vista, this changed a lot. First, a lot of drivers was baked into the base OS (XP was distributed on CD, Vista on DVD - a lot more free space on the latter for the drivers). This means that, most likely, wireless will work out of the box.

      Once it gets any sort of network connection, then things really get going. The ability to search for drivers on the Net was integrated into Windows Update, and it really works this time - normally, after you first boot into Vista/7, you'll get (apart from the usual bunch of security updates, "Live Essentials", and Silverlight) a list of drivers that it thinks are needed for your hardware. So far in all my experience it was both correct and complete - at least I haven't noticed any hardware not working, and I haven't installed a single driver manually in the last two years or so (had to install software for my network printer/scanner combo though, which is because it is a tray app to which the scanner sends output).

      With early Vista, the bigger problem was that, while it would happily download drivers for you, the drivers themselves were often crap and resulted in system instability (video drivers especially - I've seen spectacular graphic glitches from both NVidia updates on my desktop, and ATI updates on my laptop). This was mostly ironed out in the first year after Vista release, however, and by the time 7 got here it's all kosher.

      So the only problem you're likely to get with 7 is installing it on hardware that's not fast enough for it. It runs a speed test during installation, though, so I suspect it will warn in that case.

    5. Re:I wonder if many install Windows themselves by RichardDeVries · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Thanks for calling me a troll and the people who modded me uninformed. I think what caused the 'insightful' was:

      I wonder how many 'average' users would get XP, Vista or 7 working on a desktop, let alone a netbook.

      I didn't say that installing Linux was easy. It's painful as well, and when something doesn't work, you usually have a BIG problem that's not solved by installing a few drivers. I know that. Still, I'd expect the commercial OS'es to have better install routines. Commenters above you tell me Windows has improved in that regard since XP and I believe them. On the other hand, I'm very impressed with e.g. Ubuntu. I've installed it on a couple of very different systems and It Just Works (R, TM etc.) most of the time. That wouldn't impress me if it was a Redmond OS, but it does when it's a community effort. The same feeling causes me to be a bit more forgiving when it comes to installing a Linux distro.
      By the way, saying "tweaking and recompiling everything" sound like trolling to me.

      --
      Error 001
      Security Scan and Virus Detection do not work with your operating system.
  7. Re:Oh really? by HeadSoft · · Score: 3, Informative

    Name me a Linux based professional audio workstation on par with Pro Tools, Cubase, Sonar, Logic, Mixcraft, Tracktion, Reaper, etc., and doesn't require me to spend DAYS trying to get low latency drivers to work.

    If you mention Audacity, that shows how little you know about serious audio work, or how your audio editing needs are of elementary quality.

    I run FL Studio 9 in Wine and it works fine. Perhaps you could get Pro Tools, Cubase, etc. working this way as well, and spend the extra $100 you saved on new gear for your studio.

  8. Re:Oh really? by Mprx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ardour is the only Free software DAW suitable for any serious work. It uses JACK, which is an excellent low-latency audio routing system, but actual audio playback on Linux depends on the ALSA backend, which varies in quality depending on your hardware. Check the Alsa SoundCard Matrix for details. Recent Linux kernels have reasonably low latency by default, but for very tight latency requirements you might need a custom kernel configuration or patches.

  9. Re:Oh really? by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Insightful
    And you think that lack of a professional audio workstation proves that Linux isn't ready for the desktop? If so, I've got some late-breaking news for you: only a vanishingly small percentage of computer users need something like that. I'm sure that if enough people needed something like that there'd be a developer working on it.

    I can't count how many times I've seen opposition to Linux from short-sighted, narrow-minded people like you who think that their tiny little niche is the be-all and end-all of computers and any OS that doesn't revolve around whatever specialist program they need is out and out trash.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  10. interesting they would pick the dell mini 9... Arr by bombastinator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Funny that their favorite computer is the Dell Mini 9. It's not a very advanced machine, to the point that it een got discontinued once.
    They brought it back though because it is very popular for the single reason that it has a reputation as being the most hackintoshable netbook there is. This implies that a lot of these netbooks are running more MacOS than linux.

  11. Re:This Just In: by pecosdave · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my case it's not paying the money, it's who the money goes to. I don't want Microsoft taxing computers - it's philosophical.

    Another reason I want to find a system with Linux pre-installed is when I wipe it and put my distro of choice on there, if it was sold with Linux chances are I can make all of it work with Linux. There's still a lot of crappy software based hardware out there that practically requires Windows to work, or requires so much effort and maintenance to work/keep working in Linux it's not worth messing with.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  12. Dell Mini 9 by dancingmad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many of those Mini 9s ended up getting OS X installed on them? That was the only reason I was planning on getting a 9 and since the Windows version costs more, the Linux version is a no-brainer.

    Being sold on the machine and being kept on the machine are two different things.

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  13. My experiences by GF678 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some people say "Yay! Linux on netbooks means more mainstream acceptance!" From what I've seen however, this isn't the case. Linux netbooks, from what I've encountered, are

    * Generally more expensive than their Windows counterparts (with identical specs)
    * Running some dodgy Linux distro that does nothing to help sell the benefits of running Linux and only provides headaches
    * Often simply not available

    With this being the current situation, I don't see there being anything to be proud of. Yes, it's better than several years ago when Linux wasn't available anywhere mainstream. That doesn't mean things are going well either.

    1. Re:My experiences by ath1901 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some statistics to back it up.
      Pricerunner.se lists 320 netbooks out of which 11 run linux. Only 1 is sold in more than 5 stores. Most are sold in only 1 "non-mainstream" stores.

      One year ago, the linux acer one was on display everywhere, same with the eee. The blue linux aa1 was about $140 cheaper than the blue windows aa1 (I know, because I bought one).

      Now, the linux machines are almost non-existant and more expensive.

      About the dodgy linux distro, acers linpus version sucked! I didn't realize how much it sucked until I installed CrunchBang with the Kuki kernel. Suddenly, the temperature control was better, the boot up faster and the overall responsiveness was better (not to mention the layout, repositories, programs etc). It now feels like a real computer!

      I could rant about it for hours but the short version is: The acer linux was pure crap. Portuguise amateurs (the magnificent Kuki people) did it better.

      I love my linux acer but it doesn't run the OS that came with it. If I had to buy a new one, I'd have to pay the M$ tax.

  14. What KIND of Linux? by srothroc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article: "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this year will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating system"

    That's pretty vague. Are they including those pre-boot/fast-boot linux distros that seem to be all the rage? I'd hardly count that as a "linux netbook" since the primary OS is still Windows.

    1. Re:What KIND of Linux? by Gudeldar · · Score: 4, Informative
      I realize I'm posing on Slashdot but I thought we at least read TFS here.

      In an interview with DesktopLinux.com, Orr made clear that the 32% Linux netbook market share did not include either user-installed Linux or dual-boot systems, but was confined to just pre-installed Linux shipments

      Just to clarify in case that isn't clear it DOES NOT include pre/fast boot installs (which would be dual boot systems).

  15. Re:This Just In: by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "31% of Netbooks Running Pirated Windows"

    TFA claims: "In many of these markets, the $15 to $25 price differential compared to Windows XP makes all the difference." I have a really hard time believing that anyone who has the $400 to buy a netbook will decide to save $20 by buying one without Linux and then installing a pirated copy of Windows. Installing any OS on a laptop is a total pain, and often results in a system with all kinds of problems, like power management and sound that don't work. This is completely different from the situation we used to have about 4 years ago when Fry's was selling desktop Linux boxes for $200, while the cheapest Windows box they sold was $450. Sure, for a 55% discount, a lot of people are going to be willing to do their own install of a pirated OS. A ton of that definitely happened back then, and AFAICT that's actually why Fry's stopped selling cheap Linux machines; people would botch the Windows install and then try to return the computer.

    If I was really going to believe this article, I'd need to know what the country is that is bringing the average up to 32% -- by buying significantly *more* than 32% of their netbooks with Linux. TFA says it isn't China. Several Australian slashdotters says it's not Australia. Are there massive Linux sales in India, for example? Seems unlikely, given that most of the Indian tech support people I've talked to don't even seem to understand what Linux is.

    Another thing I'd need to see in order to believe this article is independent confirmation of the price differential in this mystery country. It's very rare in in the US for Linux machines to sell for significantly less than comparable Windows machines. This is partly because OEMs get huge amounts of money from software houses for loading their crapware onto Windows boxes, and this offsets most or all of the cost of Windows.

  16. 98% of Statistics are lies by slater86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One would assume that 32% of Dell's sales does not equal 32% of the Market or is that an inconvenient truth for the story

    --
    When people ask if I'm an optimist, I say "I hope so". --Bill Bailey
  17. Re:Oh really? by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Funny

    Windows: Because a Netbook was made for running Cubase!

    That giggling sound is the average Windows laughing at you. Although they aren't sure why they're laughing because they don't really know what you're talking about.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  18. Re:Oh really? by featurelesscube · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm so tired of hearing this 'no professional level music tools on linux' rubbish. Try Ardour. You can even use VST plugins if you really want to (though I wouldn't, too many are rubbish). I've been a recording engineer for close to twenty years and I find the only barrier I have to using it professionally is uninformed bigotry from ProTools users who regard themselves as the centre of the universe. Also, if it taking you DAYS to get jack working, you are definitely doing it wrong or your computer is from Mars.

  19. Re:Put me down for 2 netbooks upgraded to linux. by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not that hard to go back to a traditional desktop. Disable Netbook Launcher and Maximus in Startup Applications. Enable show_desktop in apps->nautilus->preferences in gconf-editor, then set up your panels. You can even keep the netbook-launcher icon and start the launcher when you want it.

  20. Re:Put me down for 2 netbooks upgraded to linux. by sc0ob5 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yes but if he "owns" it is it illegal to download it?

    Serious question..

  21. Re:Oh really? by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its been said before, and Ill say it again-- Wine Is Not an Emulator. And its not just a tagline-- many things run near- or better-than- native speed-- I had World of Warcraft running on a dualboot, vista / ubuntu system. The vista system got 1/2 the FPS in directx mode than ubuntu, reading off of an NTFS partition using OpenGL and Wine.

    In case thats not clear-- Vista, running its native graphics API on its native filesystem type, got 1/2 the FPS of a linux distro using the "secondary" API, a non-native filesystem, and so-called "emulation".

  22. Having a free OEM OS is actually a good idea by somecoffeemug · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was travelling in China a year ago. I bought an Asus EEE pc there, and without asking me the salesperson started to install a pirated version of Windows. I was quite surprised when I discovered what he was doing; and he evenmore so, when I explained to him that I wanted Linux on the computer:) And this is actually a good thing. Having a free Linux OS pre-installed, gives the customer the ability to choose what OS he/she wants to install, without donating money to Microsoft, Apple, or some other OS manufactorer, which he/she doesn't want to use.

  23. Re:One. by jo42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clueless one, go visit http://www.mydellmini.com/forum/mac-os-x/ to see hundreds of Dell Minis running OS X...

  24. Re:Oh really? by featurelesscube · · Score: 2, Interesting

    wrong. If you are a pro a large comfortable room full of outboard gear from respected manufacturers is a must. Plugins are beloved of the 'bedroom' crowd who can't afford real equipment.