Slashdot Mirror


Extinct Ibex Resurrected By Cloning

The Telegraph is reporting that for the first time an extinct animal has been brought back via cloning. The Pyrenean ibex, a type of mountain goat, was declared officially extinct in 2000, but thanks to preserved skin samples scientists were able to insert that DNA into eggs from domestic goats to clone a female Pyrenean ibex. While the goat didn't survive long due to lung defects this gives scientists hopes that it will be possible to resurrect extinct species from frozen tissue. "Using techniques similar to those used to clone Dolly the sheep, known as nuclear transfer, the researchers were able to transplant DNA from the tissue into eggs taken from domestic goats to create 439 embryos, of which 57 were implanted into surrogate females. Just seven of the embryos resulted in pregnancies and only one of the goats finally gave birth to a female bucardo, which died seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties, perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone."

238 comments

  1. No Problem... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    We can just patch the damaged or missing segments with frog DNA...

    1. Re:No Problem... by bearflash · · Score: 5, Funny

      And since they're all females, there's no way they can reproduce! I'm 100% certain that the Ibex will never escape this remote Costa Rican island

    2. Re:No Problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah "Ooh, aah", that's how it always starts. But then there's running and screaming.

    3. Re:No Problem... by ushering05401 · · Score: 2, Funny

      WTF, totally OT, but I just booted my computer and instead of the standard GNOME desktop there was some 80's style VR simulation with blocky structures representing the files on my computer. It's a good thing I know Unix, I was able to fly to the proper building to get my system back on line. Close call, though.

    4. Re:No Problem... by LOLLinux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, fsn was one of the cooler things that SGI created for IRIX.

    5. Re:No Problem... by ianare · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but we _want_ them to reproduce and to spread out as far as they can, within their historical range. Otherwise we might as well just leave them extinct.

    6. Re:No Problem... by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      Why? I thought they were just being cloned because it's cool.

    7. Re:No Problem... by dotancohen · · Score: 1
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    8. Re:No Problem... by p4ul13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well maybe not. As long as we're pouring on the Jurassic Park references, there was another line "your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."

      The animal has been extinct for a short time, but none-the-less the norm in northern Spain for the last 9 years has been to not have ibex. Reintroducing cloned ibex to the area might cause other issues that hadn't been considered.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    9. Re:No Problem... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Heh. R00T!!!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:No Problem... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Velocigoat's a pack hunter, you see...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    11. Re:No Problem... by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      And since they're all females

      We'll all be safe so long as they aren't clever girls.

    12. Re:No Problem... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember Pyrenean Ibex run at 10 m/s and they do not know fear.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    13. Re:No Problem... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our mutant zombie clone goat overlords.

    14. Re:No Problem... by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Well maybe not. As long as we're pouring on the Jurassic Park references, there was another line "your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should." The animal has been extinct for a short time, but none-the-less the norm in northern Spain for the last 9 years has been to not have ibex. Reintroducing cloned ibex to the area might cause other issues that hadn't been considered.

      What? Rise of Pan cults? Huge pent up demand for Ibex cheese? Fear of folks fanatical in their desire to have some Ibex horns?

    15. Re:No Problem... by awyeah · · Score: 1

      NEWMAN!!!!

      --
      Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    16. Re:No Problem... by madnis · · Score: 1

      We can just patch the damaged or missing segments with frog DNA...

      ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOGOAT!

    17. Re:No Problem... by ianare · · Score: 1

      How about this JP quote, then ?

      John Hammond: Condors! Condors are on the verge of extinction. If I was to create a flock of condors on this island, you wouldn't have anything to say!

      Dr. Ian Malcolm: No hold on, this is not some species that was obliterated by deforestation, or the building of a dam. Dinosaurs, uh, *had* their shot, and nature *selected* them for extinction!

      The ibex is _not_ a natural extinction : their habitat didn't change, we killed them off.

    18. Re:No Problem... by Faylone · · Score: 1

      All extinctions not involving supernatural forces are natural ones. Just because we shoot them all, it doesn't mean there wasn't a natural extinction.

    19. Re:No Problem... by ianare · · Score: 1

      They're not natural in the sense of 'man-made' vs 'natural'. Like plastic and skyscrapers. I don't see where the confusion is.

    20. Re:No Problem... by ndogg · · Score: 1

      OMG! I'm being chased by a goat! Go faster! Must protect this last patch of grass from my lawn!

      Damn it! I worked so frakkin hard on that lawn too!

      Why aren't we going faster?

      Because I'm already going the speed limit.

      Wow. I didn't even know goats could run 25 mph.

      Oh, never mind, it stopped at the neighbor's lawn.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    21. Re:No Problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God creates ibex. God kills ibex. God creates man. Man kills God. Man creates ibex.

      Ibex eats man, woman inherits the Earth?

    22. Re:No Problem... by adolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the confusion lies in the bizarre implication that we humans are somehow unnatural, as if no other species has ever hunted another to extinction.

    23. Re:No Problem... by LingNoi · · Score: 0

      Man is nature. We're not the only animal that have made another extinct and we won't be the last either.

    24. Re:No Problem... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of "tasty"... otherwise, what's the point?

    25. Re:No Problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please mod parent up. This story is almost a year old.

    26. Re:No Problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The animal has been extinct for a short time, but none-the-less the norm in northern Spain for the last 9 years has been to not have ibex. Reintroducing cloned ibex to the area might cause other issues that hadn't been considered.

      And not having them there may be causing all sorts of problems that we haven't yet recognised. There's no magic line that's crossed at the moment of extinction; promoting the numbers of an endangered species has exactly the same risks of unforeseen problems as reviving a recently extinct one. There's a big difference between acting responsibly and being so timid that you never do anything - everything has consequences, many of them unforeseen,

    27. Re:No Problem... by sentientbeing · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it.

      If the ibex population gets out of hand well just clone some sabre tooth tigers as predation pressure.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    28. Re:No Problem... by jplopez · · Score: 1

      Smart girl...

    29. Re:No Problem... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      but like Malcom pointed out, this IS an animal man made extinct by hunting and taking away its environment, 9 years is a blip in terms of ecosystems time line, like they weren't even gone.

    30. Re:No Problem... by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      I think the confusion lies in your bizarre implication that "natural" can only have one meaning, when clearly that's not the case.

      Oh, I see, adolf is trolling. Quelle surprise.

    31. Re:No Problem... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Trolling? Hardly.

      I'm just a creature of the Earth, as natural as like any other. I'm smarter, better at using tools, and can communicate complex ideas better than a lot of other animals, but that doesn't mean that either my existence or my actions are somehow unnatural.

  2. Call Dr Neil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jurassic Park!

    1. Re:Call Dr Neil by burner · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm thinking Jurassic Pork. Bring back some extinct hog species and grill 'em up!

      --
      MRSH-Recording device, corned beef sandwich with kraut, seafaring bird, and the foamy top of a beverage.
    2. Re:Call Dr Neil by happy_place · · Score: 1

      Actually ressurrecting a goat is not the same as bringing back a T-Rex. But hey, at least we'll be able to feed it, if we ever do bring back the dinosaurs...

      --
      http://www.beanleafpress.com
    3. Re:Call Dr Neil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I call Extreme Eating. I think we should have a reality show that follows this as a new niche hobby. Resurrecting extinct species for the sole purpose of consuming them as novelty food items. "Hey, pass me another of those delicious raptor ribs."

    4. Re:Call Dr Neil by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Jurrassic McRib sandwiches?

    5. Re:Call Dr Neil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmmmmmm, formerly extinct bacon, aaahlllgrrrllllghhrlll...

      Homer J. Simpson

  3. Don't worry! by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nature will find a way.

    Did we learn nothing from Jurassic Park?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Don't worry! by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      >> Did we learn nothing from Jurassic Park?

      The movie or the book?
      *ducks*

    2. Re:Don't worry! by JustOK · · Score: 1

      I didn't know there was going to be a test. I thought it was just for fun.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:Don't worry! by Aeros · · Score: 2, Funny

      the folk song

    4. Re:Don't worry! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Maybe we can have a "Coupon Day?"

    5. Re:Don't worry! by RealTime · · Score: 1
      --

      Yesterday it worked; today it is not working; Windows is like that...

    6. Re:Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This video contains content from Vevo, who has decided to block it in your country.

    7. Re:Don't worry! by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Yes: Don't rely solely on an electric fence to keep dangerous animals confined.:-)

    8. Re:Don't worry! by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nature will find a way, apparently, to do everything except avert the extinction in the first place...

      I think that should tell us something.

    9. Re:Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they should just have dropped an asteroid on Earth and covered the entire planet with ash to solve the Jurassic Park crisis.

  4. Anyone else read this as by Culture20 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "one of the goats finally gave birth to a female burrito"?
    'cause I sure did.

    1. Re:Anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's burrita to you señor!

    2. Re:Anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh. Now I have a picture of a fat man laying down underneath a goat giving birth to a burrito so it will fall directly into his mouth. Thanks for that.

    3. Re:Anyone else read this as by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I was confused how this might be a troll until I read one of the replies. I suppose I'm not hip to the new slang.

    4. Re:Anyone else read this as by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      Or worse: two goats, one (insert receptacle here).

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    5. Re:Anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fridge is that way dear sir. Subliminal messages are a beautiful thing!

  5. science! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    science!

    1. Re:science! by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1

      bad science! There is a reason it is extinct and once this has happened nature will not be reversed. Whatever they come up with, will not be the original species. It is gone forever.

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    2. Re:science! by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      And what is that reason and why won't nature be reversed?

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    3. Re:science! by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      bad science! There is a reason it is extinct and once this has happened nature will not be reversed. Whatever they come up with, will not be the original species. It is gone forever.

      You really are insane.

      Or were you joking?

    4. Re:science! by LingNoi · · Score: 0

      Whatever they come up with, will not be the original species. It is gone forever.

      Even if it has 100% of the same DNA? I'm not claiming this goat does, just that your statement is complete nonsense.

  6. Is it just me.. by VMaN · · Score: 0

    ...or does that quote sound like something Douglas Adams would write?

    1. Re:Is it just me.. by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      "...female burrito..."
      Let's see...
      "...which hovered in the air in much the same way that bricks don't."
      Nope. It's not just you. :)

  7. Did you see that Moive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't anyone see Jurassic Park? I for one welcome our new T-Rex overlords.

    1. Re:Did you see that Moive? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      When they found the first T-wreck, did they invent road pizza?

  8. Not exactly. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

    The mitochondrial DNA will not be from the IBX so what you have is still an hybrid.
    Maybe better than nothing but not really bringing the species back.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Not exactly. by Haxzaw · · Score: 1

      I wonder what will happen when the scientists manage to clone a few of these, from the same DNA mind you, and they inbreed with themselves so to speak. Can't be a very viable life form, but I'm not a geneticist.

    2. Re:Not exactly. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The first generation IS a hybrid, but then you implant that with extracted DNA, and so forth so that after several generations you get something that is pretty much equivalent to the extinct species. Problem is, the process can take a hundred years. I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Not exactly. by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But if they have skin samples, then they do have the mitochondrial DNA. We just don't have the ability to replace that part of the cell structure. Yet. Another problem is that the specimen is female, meaning there is no Y chromosome, so we could never create a male.

      At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species (from enough donors to form a not-completely-terrible breeding population) and storing it away somewhere.

    4. Re:Not exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that this is something that can be easily fixed by inoculating the cells with a healthy dose of metaclurians.

    5. Re:Not exactly. by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first generation IS a hybrid, but then you implant that with extracted DNA, and so forth so that after several generations you get something that is pretty much equivalent to the extinct species.

      How will that recover the mitochondrial DNA? What they need to do is to replace that as well, not just continue implanting the chromosomal DNA. Eventually we may learn how to do that, but we can't do it yet.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Not exactly. by LordOfTheNoobs · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_DNA

      Mitochondrial DNA is separate from the DNA of the host organism. It is inherited through the colony of mitochondria living in the egg the mother forms. No Ibex mother, no Ibex mitochondria. The mitochondria reproduce without interference from the hosts nuclear DNA. I don't know that this qualifies the animal as a hybrid, but as an environment its cellular flora have been replaced.

      --
      They're there affecting their effect.
    7. Re:Not exactly. by Aeros · · Score: 1

      well if you think about it isn't that how life supposedly happened?

    8. Re:Not exactly. by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      Well they might not have been all that tasty, but you got a lot of meat from one kill. So laziness of man might have driven their extinction instead.

    9. Re:Not exactly. by Aeros · · Score: 2, Funny

      better trademark the name 'Mammoth Burgers' and 'Mammoth Steaks' now then so your grandkids or great-grandkids will be wealthy!

    10. Re:Not exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was supposed to be a reply to Locke2005. Whoops.

    11. Re:Not exactly. by BluBrick · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!

      Logic dictates nothing of the sort. It could be that mammoth meat tasted terrible, but a mammoth tusk was the standard price for a blowjob.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    12. Re:Not exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *midichlorians*

      For the love of [diety], man! If you're going to start a Star Wars flame war, at least spell it right!

    13. Re:Not exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species...

      After you.

    14. Re:Not exactly. by ianare · · Score: 1

      I guess it could be a hybrid in a very strict sense, but generally 'hybrid' means mixing of nuclear DNA. The mtDNA doesn't really control anything, even the mitochondria themselves are mainly controlled by the nucleus. It's a very handy way of determining maternal ancestry, but makes no real difference in behavior or appearance, at least when considering two very closely related species as is this case.

      If these trials are successful, genetic researches in the future would see an abrupt change in the mtDNA (and be able to trace the 'new' ibex lineage back to a specific domesticated goat), but I don't see that as a problem for the wild status of the animals, nor any change in their behavior.

      I would be far more concerned with the break in parenting continuity. With no adults, how will the kids learn how to avoid predators, where the best grazing is, how to live in a herd, and perhaps most importantly - how to secure a mate ? Almost all mammals learn a great deal about the world from their parents and pass that on to the next generation. No amount of genetic manipulation can bring that back.

    15. Re:Not exactly. by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      Hey, there is NOTHING lazy about hunting something the size of an African elephant with wooden spears! Especially if they likely traveled in herds. That is serious teamwork and commitment. And it's more likely that, having to eat 300 lbs of veggies a day during the ice age might have done them in!

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    16. Re:Not exactly. by dkh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are many species without a Y chromosome. Guppies (the aquarium fish) for example. The diff between female and male guppies is X X vs. X null.

      Humans are headed in this direction, slowly, because the human Y chromosome is non-recombinant and does not repair itself when errors or mutations occur. Whether that means males are defective or just more efficient is still up for debate.

      --
      My office has been taken over by iPod people.
    17. Re:Not exactly. by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      The ability to transfer mitochondria is definitely possible, and has been for over a decade- see here for instance, where it was performed between two species of mice. I doubt they bothered with the process though, for several reasons. Mitochondrial transfer has an admittedly low success rate, and of course nuclear transfer has a low success rate, so that to produce a viable clone with both procedures would be extremely difficult. The mtDNA also has a higher mutation rate than nuclear DNA due to the reactive oxygen species the mitochondrion cranks out. It might be that there isn't much meaningful interspecies variation between the mtDNA of extinct ibex and the living egg donor, especially in relation to intraspecies variation.

      Also, the mitochondrial DNA in most mammals is about 17,000 base pairs. The average mammalian nuclear genome is a few billion base pairs. The nuclear DNA represents over 99.99% of the total DNA, and given that I'd assume domestic goat mtDNA to have at the very least a 98% concurrence with Pyrenean ibex mtDNA, you'd be looking at a variability consistent with the overall error rate of DNA. The preservation, cloning, and IVF steps likely swamp interspecies mtDNA variation as an overall source of genetic error.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    18. Re:Not exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naaah! They just tore up the flower beds and spice patches something nasty. And wandered through the village after frolicking in the trash dump. Or went for a trunkful of water, after waking up in the middle of the night. They brought it on themselves, really.

      A Baluchitherium, now. That would be really neat! :)

      Frankly, though, this sort of news is getting to be a bit, er, repetitive.

    19. Re:Not exactly. by Macrat · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!

      Mmmmm. McMammoth sandwiches!

    20. Re:Not exactly. by owlstead · · Score: 1

      At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species (from enough donors to form a not-completely-terrible breeding population) and storing it away somewhere.

      I don't see the point. The main reasons that we don't have these animals any more is because we've destroyed their habitat. As long as we are not restoring or replacing those habitats, what use is it to resurrect the animals that used to live in it? I mean, do we want to have a zoo that keeps all the extinct animals? For what reason?

    21. Re:Not exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mitochondrial DNA is about one millionth the size of chromosomal DNA, so the species would still be 99.9999% recovered.
      Using the human genome as a guide, the chromosomal DNA has some 100 000 genes vs about 35 in the mDNA. That would mean 99.97% of genes recovered, the rest being from a very closely related species.
      We could sequence the mDNA extracted from the skin tissue. And I wouldn't be surprised if the difference in the coding sequence between both species is less than 10 point mutations.

    22. Re:Not exactly. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually current thinking is that they just went extinct for a number of natural causes like the ice age and predators.
      Very large animals in general are historically at high risk for extinction

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    23. Re:Not exactly. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      As long as we are not restoring or replacing those habitats, what use is it to resurrect the animals that used to live in it?

      That's obviously ridiculous, but it's not what I was thinking of. It isn't really that expensive or difficult to store the genomes indefinitely. Perhaps the remote possibility of being able to restore the extinct species will act as a motivator to restore the habitats they lived in. I don't think we should abandon hope just because we can't think further than a few years into the future.

    24. Re:Not exactly. by jfern · · Score: 1

      Seeing as this is an extinct subspecies, it shouldn't be a big deal to just take that from another subspecies.

    25. Re:Not exactly. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Getting a lot of meat from one kill does you very little good when you have no refrigeration. I was of course joking, almost all the large land mammals in North America went extinct about 10,000 years ago, which just happened to coincide with a new wave of immigration from Siberia. For herd animals, it is theorized that hunting techniques like driving the whole herd towards a cliff may have contributed to extinction, but for sabre tooths, cave bears, and giant sloths that almost certainly wouldn't have worked, so environment is a much more likely explanation.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    26. Re:Not exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, and many others, would still want them back. Maybe even more. Not for a blowjob, just for the humor of seeing the really slutty girls trying to carry around piles of mammoth tusks...

    27. Re:Not exactly. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      There were lots of deep-frozen mammoths in north-eastern parts of Russia which were eaten by locals even only some decades ago. AFAIR they said the mammoths were very tasty.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    28. Re:Not exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, and many others, would still want them back. Maybe even more. Not for a blowjob, just for the humor of seeing the really slutty girls trying to carry around piles of mammoth tusks...

      Carry around...? Your imagination needs fixing! As a quick remedy, I suggest surfing for porn with keyword "toys".

    29. Re:Not exactly. by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      I have heard that folk up that way did occasionally dig the woolly wonders out of the permafrost/glaciers/tundra and eat them but I hadn't heard any mention of how the meat tasted. Might I suggest though, that anyone who is prepared to eat centuries-old roadkill is probably just very fucking hungry and not really a reliable judge of gastronomic delights?

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    30. Re:Not exactly. by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

  9. Jurassic Park here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I want to know is will we ever be able to clone a dinosaur? A goat giving birth to a different kind of goat is ok I guess but what if there is no close relative to the extinct species you want to clone?

    1. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Alphathon · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could clone all the known intermediates all the way back and use them. It'd take a while though.

    2. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dinosaurs still exist. We call them "birds".

      In particular, they're the decendents of the clade Maniraptora, which includes velociraptor. Many are still remarkably similar to their ancestors -- for example, compare these reconstructed skull images of oviraptors with modern birds (for example, the cassowary)

      --
      As it says in the Constitution, Lenin is in my shower.
    3. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, so there's no bias due to the reconstructors knowing a) that there are theories that birds evolved from dinosaurs and b) what birds look like?

    4. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm. Dinosaurs don't exist. Birds exist. They share a common ancestor with dinosaurs, as do we.

    5. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2, Informative

      The common ancestor we share with the dinosaurs was not itself a dinosaur, but the birds started out as a branch of the dinosaurs. If you consider the word "dinosaur" to be a clade, then they are dinosaurs.

    6. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, but they are only far removed cousins of the cool dinosaurs.

      When the ancestors of cool dinosaurs diverged from the ancestors of birds they were all small lizards and had teeth(many genera seemed to have a tendency to lose them and evolve beaks though). Some maniraptoran birds became large enough and kept enough teeth to be cool, but none of them survived.

      BTW, even ratites have very advanced flight adaptations and aberrant skeletons for a dinosaur(even when comparing with maniraptora), any similarity is superficial. You could as well compare a kiwi with an echidna as they are both tetrapoda.

    7. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dinosaurs still exist. We call them "birds".

      In particular, they're the decendents of the clade Maniraptora, which includes velociraptor. Many are still remarkably similar to their ancestors -- for example, compare these reconstructed skull images of oviraptors with modern birds (for example, the cassowary)

      Obligatory xkcd:

      http://xkcd.com/155/

    8. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Rei · · Score: 1

      We do not share a common ancestor with dinosaurs. We are the descendants of synapsid reptiles, which were largely beaten out in the triassic by archosaurs (the ancestors of all dinosaurs, birds, and crocodilians).

      --
      As it says in the Constitution, Lenin is in my shower.
    9. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Rei · · Score: 1

      Of course, but they are only far removed cousins of the cool dinosaurs.

      You don't think the raptors were "cool dinosaurs"?

      BTW, even ratites have very advanced flight adaptations and aberrant skeletons for a dinosaur

      Yes, they are not "living fossils". But they are their direct descendants, and are overall quite similar in most regards.

      You could as well compare a kiwi with an echidna as they are both tetrapoda.

      Tetrapoda is a superclass. Maniraptora is a clade under the suborder Theropoda. Not anywhere close to equivalent.

      --
      As it says in the Constitution, Lenin is in my shower.
    10. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by foobarbaz · · Score: 1

      We do not share a common ancestor with dinosaurs.
      Umm, you might want to think about that statement for a while.

    11. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Rei · · Score: 1

      Poor phrasing. We do not descend from dinosaurs. Birds do.

      --
      As it says in the Constitution, Lenin is in my shower.
  10. It's ALIVE!!!!! by Yo+Grark · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won't goat you, I herd it's dead Jim.

    Ewe!

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:It's ALIVE!!!!! by dkleinsc · · Score: 0

      You're obviously kidding there.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:It's ALIVE!!!!! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      You must be gnu here.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:It's ALIVE!!!!! by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Just needs more RAM.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    4. Re:It's ALIVE!!!!! by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1

      ha ha, very punny.

    5. Re:It's ALIVE!!!!! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      this thread is turning into a three ring c.hircus, trying to capricorny joke

  11. Corrected title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pyrenean Ibex extinct... again.

    1. Re:Corrected title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... am I the only one, or did anybody else think this was an Ubuntu story about some dead Debian clone ..?

    2. Re:Corrected title... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      The Pyrenaen Ibix is still extinct!

    3. Re:Corrected title... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Argh. Didn't see that someone beat me to it. All mods to them...

  12. Intrepid Ibex by Xamusk · · Score: 1

    That a real Intrepid Ibex

    1. Re:Intrepid Ibex by selven · · Score: 1

      I knew it! The koala killed her! Now that poor beast only has 5 months to live before the lynx comes along...

    2. Re:Intrepid Ibex by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Hey! That is what I am runnin [NO CARRIER]

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    3. Re:Intrepid Ibex by grcumb · · Score: 1

      I knew it! The koala killed her!

      Well, you know what they say: Karmic's a bitch.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    4. Re:Intrepid Ibex by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but 8.10 isn't that old; "extinct" is hardly the right term.

  13. Como? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly does this story have to do with Spanish stock indices?

  14. A new first by Haxzaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, this Ibex became the first species to become extinct twice?

    1. Re:A new first by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the first clone to be the only one of its kind. ’Tis a grand day for clones!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:A new first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hhaha

    3. Re:A new first by Warhawke · · Score: 1

      Boba Fett is not pleased.

    4. Re:A new first by Eil · · Score: 1

      Not very intrepid if you ask me.

    5. Re:A new first by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that it was ewenique?

    6. Re:A new first by svtdragon · · Score: 1

      ...how intrepid of it.

      /ducks

  15. So when... by SirBigSpur · · Score: 1

    do I get me pet Mastadon?

    1. Re:So when... by SirBigSpur · · Score: 1

      EDIT do I get me a pet Mastadon? Typing fail

    2. Re:So when... by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mammoth fail. Tusk. Tusk. Tusk.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:So when... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Typing fail

      I just read the original with a pirate accent . Makes perfect sense.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    4. Re:So when... by Steffan · · Score: 1

      EDIT
      do I get me a pet Mastadon?
      Typing fail

      It's Mastodon

      Add spelling fail to your list

  16. What a coincidence! by greatica · · Score: 1

    "While the goat didn't survive long due to lung defects this gives scientists hopes that it will be possible to resurrect extinct species from frozen tissue."

    That was about how my 8.10 experience went too.

    1. Re:What a coincidence! by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Well, clearly it wasn't the LTS release of the clone ;-)

  17. Old story is old. by dougmwne · · Score: 1

    Why is this story from 11 months ago being reported by Slashdot as if it just happened? Could the reason be anything other than sloppy content gate keeping?

    1. Re:Old story is old. by LOLLinux · · Score: 1

      No, this isn't sloppy gate keeping. ScuttleMonkey is just a fucking retard.

    2. Re:Old story is old. by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      The original story was declared extinct. This story is the clone and, hopefully, will die a quick death.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    3. Re:Old story is old. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It’s lasted a lot longer than 7 minutes. New record!!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:Old story is old. by Conchobair · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll bet the good people at The Telegraph are wondering how a story published on 31 Jan 2009 made it back into the most viewed list.

    5. Re:Old story is old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dead clones lives longer on /. ?

    6. Re:Old story is old. by AnotherUsername · · Score: 1

      It is still interesting. I'm not sure if this is a duplicate, but if it is not, I don't see the problem with it being here. I had not heard anything about this until I saw the story in the rss feed, so for me, although it is old, it is still new to me.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    7. Re:Old story is old. by indeciso · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Aye, actually when I read the heading I felt some kind of a déjà vu... no wonder.

    8. Re:Old story is old. by dougmwne · · Score: 1

      In that case, I suggest that the /. editors pick a few of the science and technology events from here and repackage them as if they just happened. I've not heard of most of these, therefore they are new to me.

      This just in! The USSR's Venera 7 is the first spacecraft to land successfully on Venus and transmit data back to Earth!

    9. Re:Old story is old. by suso · · Score: 1

      Dude, it says right in the beginning was send via the telegraph. So obviously it took some time for the 150 baud connection to load the website. I for one think its awesome that Slashdot is searching on all mediums in order to discover news for us nerds.

    10. Re:Old story is old. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn’t know... I’m not dead.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  18. Nice try by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

    But I would suggest that next time a species is down to 30 members, get samples from ALL of them. For all they know, this last one may have had some genetic defect, and pulling DNA from her eye probably didn't help her.

    1. Re:Nice try by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      Or, how about cloning them while they're still alive?

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    2. Re:Nice try by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Hindsight is 20/20 they say.

      We haven't really been cloning all that long and as such, planning out how to best disassemble species as they become extinct isn't standard practice yet. They're still writing the RFCs, they haven't even been commented on yet, its gonna take a few tries to get it figured out.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:Nice try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making this too complicated... if there are 30 members left, quickly do it the old fashioned way! Fuck "like animals"!

    4. Re:Nice try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this was not a triumph
      i am making a note here
      big fail

  19. Finally! by RileyBryan · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for YEARS for the chance to eat extinct animals! T-Rex Burgers, Bald Eagle Sandwiches, Dodo Egg Omelettes, Saber-toothed McNuggets! Yummmm!

    1. Re:Finally! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Bald Eagles aren’t extinct.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Finally! by RileyBryan · · Score: 2, Funny

      But they are off the menu...

    3. Re:Finally! by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      You might want to re-check the status of the Bald Eagles.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    4. Re:Finally! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Bald eagle is not extinct. in fact it's not even endangered. You can eat them. Hell they are almost a pest here in Michigan.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Finally! by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but that's because they taste too much like spotted owl.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Finally! by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about the Spam, Spam, Spam, Bald Eagle and Spam?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    7. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is how the fuck is the Canadian Goose still on the endangered list. Seriously if those fuckers aren't at or beyond their pre-endangered levels now I'd hate to see what those levels are like when they are no longer endangered.

    8. Re:Finally! by operagost · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, they're not even threatened. Only the migratory bird treaty keeps you from your omelets.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:Finally! by operagost · · Score: 1

      They're not endangered, but the USA and Canada have a stupid migratory bird treaty that protects them. Stupid, as in "millions of crows are on it too" stupid.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Finally! by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      But they are very stringy, unless you boil them.

  20. Evil clone by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Recognized by the goatee

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    1. Re:Evil clone by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Recognized by the goatee

      Better than the goatse I suppose.

    2. Re:Evil clone by ianare · · Score: 4, Funny

      The normal method fails here, after all they're _goats_

    3. Re:Evil clone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are three cloned goats behind three doors, two of them are evil clones, you pick one door and Monty Hall sayszzzzzzzzzZZZZZ

    4. Re:Evil clone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recognized by the goatee

      Whew! For a minute there I thought you said, "Recognized by the goatse."

  21. Genetically identical... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    He said: “The delivered kid was genetically identical to the bucardo. In species such as bucardo, cloning is the only possibility to avoid its complete disappearance.”

    Except, I suppose, for the defective lungs?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    1. Re:Genetically identical... by reverseengineer · · Score: 2, Informative

      It turns out that many clones are genetically identical, but not epigenetically identical. DNA methylation errors are common in nuclear transfer clones, and are thought to be responsible for at least some of the defects that often occur in clones. In particular, some imprinted genes important for normal growth and development may end up with two silenced copies instead of the expected one silent and one active, leading to effects from congenital organ defects to an increased risk of cancer. Curiously, some of the important developmental genes that can experience this situation in most mammals are not imprinted in primates. At least from a technical perspective, it might be easier to clone humans than goats.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:Genetically identical... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That’s the thing. All the cells in your own body, despite having directly descended copies of your original DNA, will possibly contain a variety of mutations – they aren’t even genetically identical to all the other cells in your body.

      If you take one of those mutated cells, extract its DNA, and use that as the starting DNA of a new embryo, is it accurate to say that embryo is genetically identical to yourself? – it began with a cell that was genetically identical to one or more of your cells, it’s true, but it’s not genetically identical to all of your cells or likely even the majority of them and that single-celled embryo will introduce mutations of its own as it divides and forms a new multi-celled organism.

      In the end, you’ll have a mutated version of the original DNA, which was already a mutated copy of the DNA from which the original was formed initially. So is it genetically identical? Well, yes... except for the mutations. Which was my point.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  22. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally Sarah Palin can ride a T-rex like jesus did.

    1. Re:lol by LOLLinux · · Score: 1

      That's important when she's up in Alaska and keeping an eye out on Russia.

    2. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget about the Dinosaur,
      Sarah Palin can ride me all night long.

    3. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She'd have to be able to find your micropenis under the mountains of fat rolls first, wouldn't she?

  23. "the goat didn't survive long due to lung defects" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Let them go gracefully. Leave nature alone. Haven't we done enough?"

    George Carlin

  25. Taking Orders? by DorkRawk · · Score: 2, Funny

    1 dinosaur, please!

    1. Re:Taking Orders? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      I'll second that.... ...but make mine medium well, please. With cole slaw and a baked potato.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  26. Extinct? I saw one last year. by sciurus0 · · Score: 1

    $ lsb_release -c
    Codename: ibex

  27. Next up? by jcr · · Score: 1

    Wooly mammoth? Dodo? Passenger pigeon?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Next up? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Firesign theater...

    2. Re:Next up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wooly mammoth coexisted with giant ice-flows for years, and our ancestors thought they were tasty. I smell a recipe for climate-change free beef.

    3. Re:Next up? by californication · · Score: 1

      Albert Einstein.

    4. Re:Next up? by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      >> Wooly mammoth? Dodo? Passenger pigeon?

      Republicans that believe in smaller government?

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    5. Re:Next up? by Gerafix · · Score: 1

      Seriously? A Dodo? Passenger Pigeon? I'll take one Audrey Hepburn please.

  28. too easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    second goat!

  29. first a sheep, next Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using bloodstains from the shroud of Turin, Jesus will be cloned. All herald the second coming. Hallelujah, the missiles are flying!

  30. Oblig. by bcong · · Score: 1

    John Hammond: "All major theme parks have had delays. When they opened Disneyland in 1956, nothing worked!"

    Dr. Ian Malcolm: "But, John. If the Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists."

  31. Yo dawg by dandart · · Score: 0

    yo dawg/goat/fish, i herd u liek cloning so i put a goatfishcat in ur manbearpig but i eated it

  32. Patching DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do DNA patches come out on Tuesdays????

  33. We need to clone Ted Williams next. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sox need a power hitter. I'd imagine that fans would underwrite the entire expense of the cloning operation.

  34. yesh... by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

    no, no, no, no, no!

    try this :
    "This just in, Pyrenean Ibex still extinct." </Chevy Chase>

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  35. Nothing new here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As mentioned before, this is not an exact clone. The only thing this story proves is that they can create a hybrid animal (nothing new there) and that the researches who did this were dishonest about the product (nothing new there) and that the news media is full of a bunch of dolts with little desire or propensity for actual journalism (nothing new there either). The only thing that was created was 7 minutes of suffering.

  36. OMG Can it be so? by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

    I for one, welcome our newly extinct Ibex Clone overlords.

  37. Human cloning and estate taxes by caffeinefiend · · Score: 1

    Cloning is becoming more and more advanced. Human cloning will probably be achievable within the next 20 years. How long until Republicans back human cloning as a way to avoid estate taxes???

    1. Re:Human cloning and estate taxes by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      They’ll never succeed... the Democrats will have cloned people voting for them who haven’t even been born yet.

      “Hey Bob, did you get that next rack of embryos out of the freezer? Okay, knock that test tube against the ballot here... great, definitely looks like a dimple on the punchtab. We both know who he meant to vote for, hehehe.”

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  38. Weird Al by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to fry up an eagle, just to see...
    Fry up an eagle, use the colonel's recipe...

  39. Carnivorous jumping goats, that's just great! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    heh, I mis-read it as Piranha Ibex at first. I figured it must be a plot by PETA to let the little buggers fight back.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  40. This is old news... by cyberjock1980 · · Score: 1

    The article linked is dated January 31, 2009. At least the article is dated this year...

  41. Y2K Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They became extinct in 2000 because their coding only allowed for 2 digits for the year.

  42. iBex... iDoDo... iSlate! by VoxMagis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't you see? It's a marketing ploy by Apple!

    --
    -- I really need to bleed off some of this /. karma.
    1. Re:iBex... iDoDo... iSlate! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Nah, we had our Apple “article” for today. You can expect the next one tomorrow. Regular like clockwork.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:iBex... iDoDo... iSlate! by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Don't you see?

      I don't.

  43. Not necessarily by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...which died a seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties, perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone.

    I have a goat herd and trust me when I say there doesn't have to be any flaws in the DNA to lose a baby. I've seen them still born, born too frail to stand up and get colostrum from mom, seen them live for a couple days and then die for no apparent reason. There's a reason goats have babies two and sometimes three at a time. The loss rate can be high, even under ideal conditions. The breed difference could account for it. Maybe the original breed had a slightly longer gestation period than modern goats.

    Back in the day I used to help a vet implant zebra embryos in horses. The take rate was a bit higher than that experiment, but we had more embryos to work with. 10% was a pretty good rate for implants and there's a lot of data on horses.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Not necessarily by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      So statistically, if they keep working at it and try a few hundred more times, they should get lucky with a few ibex kids that survive infancy. Though I suppose it would be better if they had DNA from a few different specimens in order to establish a breeding colony with some genetic variety.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  44. The question on everybody's mind... by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

    Was it Intrepid?

  45. Begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the goat wars have.

  46. kind of cruel by poached · · Score: 1

    It's like this episode of the simpsons, treehouse of horror XII where Bart casts a frog into a frog/man hybrid and it was a "sin against nature".

    I feel like the Ibex that was only alive for 7 minutes probably felt about the same.

    Can't we just leave the extinct alone? Some mistakes can't be corrected.

    http://en.sevenload.com/videos/qMVhCUs-Simpsons-Harry-Potter-spoof

  47. Is it an intrepid ibex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may well be slashdot's favourite animal.

  48. mammoth next by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    please, please, pretty please

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  49. Frankenstein by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 0

    It's pronounced FRAHNkensteen!!!!

  50. Damn radiation. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

    Nuclear transfers, no wonder the poor thing died soon after.

    Seriously, though, even if they perfect the technique and the beasties survive, and apart from the mitochondrial issue that's been posted already, you'd still have to manage to clone a sufficiently diverse population for it to become self-sustaining again. I doubt there's many extinct species for which we've got several dozen different DNA samples in good condition.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  51. So, this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jurassic Park should have been a lot shorter?

  52. This story was brought back by cloning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extinct Pyrenean Ibex Cloned - February 1, 2009.

  53. Resurrected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First species to become extinct, twice.

  54. I like the way you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds fun, but how's that going to help the ibexes?

  55. Old Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone take notice this article was published almost a year ago?

  56. For seconds, I nominate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's next, Salvador Dali ? No, wait. That would be Andy Warhol first, surely. Then, maybe, 5 to 15 Dali's - set in a country town in Spain. Or, if you're feeling jolly - in Switzerland - WTH.

  57. dodo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I nominate the dodo, talk about THE perfect animal for factory farming. To a dodo in every pot.

    1. Re:dodo by jcr · · Score: 1

      As I recall, they were hunted to extinction for their plumage. Haven't seen anything to indicate whether they were good to eat.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  58. Hmm by d_54321 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what ibex tastes like

  59. Can fix it later. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    [The nuclear DNA is so high a percentage etc. that a DNA-only transplant might be considered a full reconstruction.]

    Also: They can always clone the mitochondrial DNA into something suitable (like goats again) and later harvest eggs with the right mitochondria, insert DNA from members of a wrong-mitochondira reconstruction, and produce new clones with both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA of the species to be recovered.

    Fly in the ointment might be if the co-evolving mitochondrial and nuclear DNA had diverged sufficiently between the egg donor and extinct species that the communication between the cell and the mitochondria is hosed and you can't get a viable reconstruction with nuclear DNA only. But this communication is sufficiently simple and conserved that this seems unlikely. You start from a host egg of a closely-related species to avoid a vast number of similar potential screwups between the donor egg's existing machinery (or the host mother's biology ditto) and the implanted DNA's version of the same systems, any of which might make the effort fail. The mitochondria are just one more of the donor's systems (which happens to have its own DNA.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  60. Speaking of horses... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Back in the day I used to help a vet implant zebra embryos in horses.

    Speaking of equines, I'm hoping this will be tried with Quaggas for the extinct DNA donors.

    Zebras are essentially a striped wild donkey that is essentially not domesticable. Quaggas were an apparently a close relative that domesticated just fine and were quite useful. But they were allowed to go extinct in the mid 1800s, when the wild ones were hunted to extinction and contact with other parts of the world led the farmers who used quaggas to switch to other equines (think "fad").

    Ought to be reasonably easy to pull this with zebras or donkeys for the egg donors and hosts, reconstructing the lost species (for potential breeding and mule-making programs later). There's already a project to "breed them back" from the plains zebra (which they are really a variant of) and there are 23 known stuffed-and-mounted specimens.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  61. Old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did no one else remember this story from a year ago?

  62. Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm, wtf? http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/02/01/1657215/Extinct-Pyrenean-Ibex-Cloned , did a small search on "Ibex". This is not news, this is oooooold and already posted.

  63. 45 million year-old beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and you can't have enjoy Jurassic Pork BBQ without a cool, frosty glass of 45 million year-old beer:

    http://g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/689566/Ancient_Yeast_Still_Makes_Beer.html

  64. Incompatible Gestation Periods by red_flea · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Goat gestation period are around 150 days.
    Ibex is around 165 days.

    Even if you take a healthy Ibex mother and remove the fetus after 150 days, it will have similar lung disability. Lungs being the last thing to develop in a fetus, if you chop off the last few days of fetal development, you're sacrificing lung function. They won't work at 100%, and they'll be way more sensitive to any agitation. It seems to me like a better approach would be to find an animal with a equal OR LONGER gestational period. I don't mean for Ibexes in particular; it just makes sense for any mammal. Try a mountain goat: 180 day average gestation period. Just make sure you bust the little guy out two weeks early.

    If humans go extinct and you implant human DNA into a bonobo, you're putting something that takes 280 days to cook into an oven with a 230 day timer. No, it won't be fully cooked when the thing dings - the lungs especially. Premature human babies do survive that young, but we've had a long time and lots of money poured into finding ways to make that happen.

  65. Awesome by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link! I found these instructions to build fsv... worked for me on Ubuntu 9.04.

    http://sectio-aurea.blogspot.com/2008/12/3d-file-system-viewer-building-fsv-on.html

    Very cool! XD

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    1. Re:Awesome by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      I should mention that compiz should be turned off to prevent graphical glitches when running this, as is common with many 3D apps.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  66. Apparently not by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Heck, here on /., we keep repeating the same dead jokes. And they keep propagating even with ppl screaming for ppl to quit redoing the same item. Not different than in JP.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Apparently not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we keep repeating the same dead jokes."

      pete and repete were in a boat, pete fell out. who is left in the boat? repete. pete and repete were in a boat...

  67. Robb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isnt this sort like kinda how windows was created? Like being a clone then fighting the odds and then being born only to breathe all weird.

  68. Ubuntu? by littlem · · Score: 1

    Isn't Extinct Ibex the next Ubuntu release?

  69. Are you sure it's not a penguin? by LordHatrus · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is one Intrepid Ibex for sure. Maybe they spliced in some penguin DNA? *wink*

  70. And it's tasty too! by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    I'm just saying....

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.