Slashdot Mirror


XCore's EduBook, a Netbook That Runs on AA Batteries

I'm typing this on a netbook with no hard drive, not using a chip from Intel or AMD, and powered by AA batteries. Eight rechargeable AAs, to be precise, in a bank of cells right where a Li-Ion battery would sit in a conventional laptop. The batteries charge in place, too (regulation prevents overcharging) meaning that the power cord is a simple three-prong-to-cloverleaf cord, no wall-wart required. It's the EduBook from Xcore (see that page for some photos of the internals, too), and it's a cool concept. Despite some warts, it's one of the most interesting things I ran into on the CES show floor last month (Xcore's Michael Barnes kindly supplied the laptop, straight from the display case). Read on for my review.
Yes, it runs Linux.
Before diving in to anything else, note that this is a laptop built for running Linux; the one I'm using is running Ubuntu 9.4 (Jaunty), and others that I played with briefly on the show floor were running instead Barry Kauer's lightweight (around 100MB by default) Puppy Linux. Though Puppy's quite a nice OS, I stuck with Ubuntu on the EduBook, because that's what I'm most used to.

Why 9.4, now nearly a year out of date? Because a few bits of stock Ubuntu caused hiccups, which Barnes blames on packaging goofs by Ubuntu. Xcore has tweaked the default drivers to get working two important subsystems -- networking and sound. (Puppy Linux apparently works on these fronts just as supplied.) Until I know that an upgrade won't result in a disconnected and mute machine, I'm sticking with what works. (Other distributions, including Ubuntu derivative Linux Mint, are reported to work well, too.)

Purpose, Philosophy, and Ingredients
The EduBook is what you might get if you gave the OLPC team a simpler mandate in their quest to provide laptops suitable for educational use: it's small, cheap to produce (currently, the retail price for this 512MB RAM/8GB SD version is about $200, depending on order size), fairly sturdy, modular, and upgradable — after a fashion. And like the OLPC project's XO, it's intended as an educational tool, and for distribution in places around the world where computers have long been too expensive to be common. To that end, the company's shipped machines (besides "quite a few" to the US, Canada and Mexico), to South America, Asia, the Middle East, and six countries in Africa (Nigeria, South Africa, Ghana, Tanzania, Ethiopia, and Uganda).

Modularity means the EduBook can be readily assembled inside or outside of an importing country, which can make a huge difference in the local price of a computer because of the vagaries of import duties and other taxes. Some countries charge higher import duties for importing un-assembled computer parts, though often the opposite is true. According to Barnes, "Indonesia now allows people to import computers with no tax. Thailand does as well. However, in both countries, they will apply taxes on the components if you bring them in as components. Both countries have programs where you can build in tax free zones and export but if you import the parts to assemble and sell locally, it is cheaper to buy it already assembled."

The machine's guts are made for flexibility. Unlike the all-in-one approach of Intel's Centrino line (incorporating wireless as part of a motherboard+processor package), the EduBook uses a x586 system-on-chip core (block diagram) to provide processor, video and 512MB of main memory, but farms out wireless and storage; for wireless hardware, there's essentially a USB slot and a niche carved out of the motherboard. That way, the latest and greatest wireless interface (or the cheapest and most readily available) can be added at assembly time, keeping the three external USB ports free. Any USB wireless device small enough to fit will do -- it just has to work with the OS. (The company also runs a development and support site for working with the quirks of running a slightly offbeat processor.)

The EduBook is upgradeable, but not user upgradeable. Instead, the parts are modular enough that new chip generations, larger SD cards, or improved wireless modules can be readily swapped in by the maker (or by local manufacturers) while preserving all the user-facing parts (screen, keyboard, ports).

For storage, there's another (internal) slot for an SD card — an 8GB card in my sample — presented to the system as an IDE device. No conventional hard drive (though it is possible to order one in place of the SD card) means that the EduBook lags even typical low-end netbooks for raw storage capacity, and SD cards aren't the speed demons that SSDs are. But this isn't a machine built for carrying a road-warrior's movie collection or sticking into a data-center rack, and XCore86 have snipped out probably the most common failure point for laptops. (And SD cards are easier to source and simpler to replace than hard drives.) In practice, and considering that the system-on-a-chip processor is also aimed at frugality rather than speed, it's hard to fault.

The outside of the case is typical (but tough-seeming) netbook: the only port on the back is the AC inlet to power the laptop and charge the batteries; on the right side of the chassis are two USB ports; on the left, one more USB port, along with ethernet, a VGA out (which I didn't test), microphone and headphone jacks, and a 10/100 ethernet port.

Facing the user is a perfectly nice, perfectly standard, 1024x600 LED-backlit display. A Pixel Qi daylight-readable one would be nice; maybe one will show up in a future iteration.

Fit, finish, feel
The input devices on a laptop with 9" screen are small, of necessity — but for me, even a small keyboard beats a touchscreen or thumbboard. The keyboard is of the "nearly full size" variety. The touch-pad, also constrained by reality (about 2.5" x 1.5") is smooth and responsive — perhaps too responsive. My hands aren't big, but I've still had some curse-inducing frustration and backspacing at typing on this.

One problem I have with touchpads generally (and most laptops are saddled with them) is that an inadvertent tap of the thumb while typing can lead to an accidental cursor jump or text swipe -- and suddenly you're typing in the middle of the wrong paragraph or wiping out a chunk of what's already been written, and scrambling for Ctrl-Z. On the EduBook, this happens far more frequently than I'd like, though it's teaching me slowly to keep my thumbs hovering a bit higher. In use, and knowing that this is a machine built for other than high-end multimedia use, the twitchy keyboard and pointer are my biggest complaints. Another nitpick: the trackpad's buttons work, but they're chintzy, and ever-so-slightly misaligned, catching the skin on my thumb slightly when I move from left button to right.

The case seems strong — a little brick-like, even, at slightly more than an inch thick. The bottom of the case (not metal, but heavy-duty plastic) features two large areas of corrugation for an additional bit of rigidity. I am skeptical of Barnes's claim that it compares well with the durability of the OLPC XO, but that's a very high bar: the sturdy case and solid-state storage sure make it seem more drop-safe than my 10" Asus Eee or most other laptops I've owned over the last 18 years.

What's missing
Going in, I knew this was a small laptop built for getting online and as a tool for school kids, rather than a high-end machine (in which case I'd have a different set of complaints). Taking the EduBook on its own terms, though, I'd like to see a few things:

- Better Battery life indicator. Though the reader can gather from an LED at the front edge of the case whether the machine is charged, charging, or drastically low on charge, it would be nice to have a better-integrated on-screen indicator for remaining battery life.
- An external SD card slot. After first dismissing such a slot as a novelty, owning two laptops with built-in SD slots has spoiled me for the convenience. And on a storage-lean device like the EduBook, its absence is notable. An external SD slot would make this machine a lot more flexible.
- An easier system to change the batteries. The bank of AAs lives behind a small door secured by a pair of small Phillips-head screws. It's a small thing, but one reason I like AA batteries as a power source is that if you really needed to, it would be cheap to buy a few hours' worth of power, or to keep a spare set of Eneloops or other charge-retaining rechargeables around. (No heavier than the wall-wart you don't have to carry.) On the other hand, the batteries aren't soldered in place, and carrying a mini-Phillips driver around is no great burden. And, since this is a device intended for schools and children, the company has no intention to make the batteries or other internals easier to get at. Having accidentally tried to recharge some alkaline batteries recently (in a wall-charger, not the EduBook), I concede this has some merit.
- Working Suspend/Resume. The great bugaboo of Linux laptops raises its head here, too; shutting the lid or selecting Suspend from the Gnome menu triggers the error message that "Suspend is not available on this computer." A shame, when power savings are part of the overall appeal.

Performance, and the Takeaway
The 2000ma batteries in my sample gave me between 3 and 3.5 hours unplugged; that's about an hour less than the best performance I get from my Eee laptop's 4-cell battery, but still a respectable netbook battery life (though falling behind the new generation of all-day machines). Charging (until the light on the case indicated a full charge) took between 4 and 6 hours.

Wireless performance was quite good at Seattle coffee shops and in hotel rooms in Las Vegas and Portland, but I've hit an odd hitch: it's finicky on the (Apple-based) network at my home — I can see a fairly strong signal, but sometimes can't connect. (Gremlins?) An ethernet port on the side means I'm not totally out of luck.

The practical outcome of using a processor that's proudly taking up the rear of the performance curve is that startup takes over a minute (I timed 1:05 from hitting the power button to the Ubuntu login prompt, and another 45 seconds to a Gnome desktop). The low-power chip means that it doesn't do Flash either (no Facebook Scrabble for you!), but using the EduBook for most Internet tasks, typing notes, creating scripts or other light programming, and even using The GIMP is acceptably, usably quick. But note: applications work fairly well once they've started, but that startup can be a bit painful; more than a minute for OpenOffice, for instance. A faster chip would be nice (and bumps to the processor speed are expected), but as a connection to the Internet with a real keyboard and a decent screen, capable of running standard versions of word processors, programming languages, graphics packages and more, it strikes me as less obviously innovative but more flexible than OLPC's machines. It's impressive to me that an x586 can run Ubuntu and Gnome as well as it does; though there are lots of promising developments in the world of non-X86 chips, too, right now X86 is still the target architecture for the bulk of Linux distros, including ones built for education.

All of this means that the EduBook is slow, but useful, not just in its intended classroom application, but as a knockabout netbook generally.

217 comments

  1. uhhhhh....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the times you run out of power and can find AA batteries but not an outlet?

    DUMB.

    1. Re:uhhhhh....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, for the cheap

      DUMBASS

    2. Re:uhhhhh....... by travisb828 · · Score: 1

      The name of the product is the Gecko EduBook. It is targeted for classroom use. If you are going to pass out 20 of these things to a classroom of students you are not going to have power cords running all over the place. You can buy AA batteries in bulk, and they are super cheep. It will cost around $1.79 to replace batteries in one of these things.

    3. Re:uhhhhh....... by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ***for the times you run out of power and can find AA batteries but not an outlet?***

      More for the times you left the charger in Dayton, or the charger pins don't match the wall plug, or the $#@(*& charger just won't work for no very obvious reason. You really can get AA cells just about anywhere.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    4. Re:uhhhhh....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can also easily break or rust off the battery connectors swapping them in and out all the time.

    5. Re:uhhhhh....... by Urza9814 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This reminds me of the time when I was in Nuremberg and the batteries for my camera died.

      I ran into some random shop and managed to get a new pack of AAs without even needing to speak the language (I speak _some_ German, but I have no clue how to say 'AA batteries')

      So, say you're in some random city outside and the batteries die. Where do you plan on plugging in? Sure, a laptop is a bit different than a camera, but still. You can't plug in everywhere. You _can_ usually find batteries everywhere. What if you're taking a 12 hour flight? Sure is nice to have extra batteries to switch out in such a case (I carry a spare for my laptop in such occasions). Or if you're on a train? Or even a coffeehouse without public outlets or where the public outlets are all in use or far away.

      Let's see, this week alone I've been in the following situations where I would _like_ to be able to charge my laptop but no outlet was available:
      Running a table for a student organization on my campus. There are no outlets where they place the tables, and I can't exactly just move. And hell, in the summer we do those things outside.
      Attending a meeting. Yes, there are outlets in the room. Two of them. No, there weren't any open chairs near the outlets.
      Hosting a meeting. For some reason they didn't think to install a power outlet anywhere near the VGA input for the projector...
      Just sitting outside doing work.

      And this is on a college campus, where everyone has laptops with them damn near all the time. What about third world countries, which is what this laptop is really _designed_ for? You really expect children in a third world country to have access to a power outlet absolutely everywhere that they go?

    6. Re:uhhhhh....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry your camera died, but just following orders was no excuse.

    7. Re:uhhhhh....... by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      You don't swap them in and out all the time. TFA says the batteries can be charged in-place, so there's no need to remove them unless some kind of situation arises.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    8. Re:uhhhhh....... by Mage66 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't use Alkaline batteries, only NImH rechargeables or a LIon battery pack. So, you won't be replacing batteries for $1.79 a set. But a $13 set of AA Rechargeables (bought in bulk) is a lot cheaper than a $50 - $100 proprietary battery pack, and a available easily from multiple sources.

    9. Re:uhhhhh....... by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Well, Since NImH AAA batteries run at the same output as Alkaline AAA batteries, there is nothing to say you could NOT run them on Duracells.

      You just can't plug the thing in with the Alkalines installed.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    10. Re:uhhhhh....... by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Argh, AA batteries, not AAA. Please excuse my typos.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    11. Re:uhhhhh....... by Mage66 · · Score: 1

      It's not recommended to use Alkaline batteries. You're welcome to try... It wouldn't take long at $5 a set of 8 to exceed the cost of the unit. For $13 in bulk, one would have a set of batteries that could be reused for a long while.

    12. Re:uhhhhh....... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      You really expect children in a third world country to have access to a power outlet absolutely everywhere that they go?

          Likewise, do you really expect children in a third world country to be able to run down to the 7-11 and pick up 8 new AA batteries? Remember that whole "$0.50 feeds this child for a week". Hmmm, batteries for my laptop for a few hours, or food for the next three weeks. That becomes a pretty tough decision, where batteries won't win.

          I will agree with you, it's been nice to be able to swap batteries in my camera on demand. But then again, I've been in civilized parts of the world when I wanted new batteries. It doesn't take going to a starving country to find batteries difficult to acquire. On a few cross country road trips, we didn't bring enough AA batteries, and stopped at tiny gas stations in the middle of nowhere. Like areas where it's 100 miles between exits with anything resembling civilization, and even that is just a gas station with an old generator powering it, because there's no way the power company will run 100 miles of wire for one store.

          Usually you do ok with the shelf life of batteries in most stores. There are places that may sell a set of batteries every decade. Sometimes we'd get the batteries, and be on our way before we put them in the camera, just to find out that they were well beyond their shelf life.

          That's in the luxurious United States of America, where we have paved roads almost everywhere, and you won't find entire cities of people starving. Ya, I don't expect they can just buy more batteries when they want. But, batteries may be more accessible than power outlets.
         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    13. Re:uhhhhh....... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you could add one more battery and be able to then swap out all of the batteries one at a time without losing power.

    14. Re:uhhhhh....... by Dr.Altaica · · Score: 0

      Well, Since NImH AAA batteries run at the same output as Alkaline AAA batteries

      NImH batteries are 1.2 volts alkaline are 1.5. 12 - 9.6 = an extra 2.4 volts it wasn;t designed for.

    15. Re:uhhhhh....... by Calinous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you say "AA" battery in Romanian?
            R6
      How do you say "AA" battery in German?
            Mignon

    16. Re:uhhhhh....... by j35ter · · Score: 1

      NImH batteries are 1.2 volts alkaline are 1.5.

      12 - 9.6 = an extra 2.4 volts it wasn;t designed for.

      Sure, but most electronics today is equipped with a regulator. Also, under load, the Alkaline go rarely over 1.3V

      --
      Delta-Mike November Bravo Tango
    17. Re:uhhhhh....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Remember to smuggle a little screwdriver onto the plane for the battery compartment

    18. Re:uhhhhh....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mignon

      I think you would be much more likely to be understood in Germany if you said "Ah Ah Batterie" rather than "Mignon" - reduces the risk of getting a steak instead...
      Or you can simply hold up one of the things and grunt - the unambiguous language of shopkeepers worldwide :)

    19. Re:uhhhhh....... by Grayputer · · Score: 1

      Airport + plane ride, Kids in car, field work, ...

    20. Re:uhhhhh....... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No worries, alkaline batts have a nasty voltage drop at any real load, you would be lucky to get 1.35v out of them.

  2. Hurray for LandFills! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop. Why not power a car with them? The energy density sucks.

    The only 'convenient' thing about them is when you can't get power, you could possibly get new ones at any store. Then what when that set goes dead? Trash? People in developing countries have little regard for the environment.* So

    And what type of AAs are they going to be? NiMH? NiCad?

    I can get 999+ pictures out of my SLR on one LiOn charge. When I power it with an external grip using 8 AAs (which take up 4x the space) I may get 1/3 of that.

    I know you guys hate Apple for it, but there's a reason they're getting 8 hours out of a 17" laptop. It's because they threw away all the 'packaging' crap that comes with normal batteries and only packaged the 'energy storing' part.

    *I don't know if this is because of their nature or because the structure isn't setup. When I went to Rural india there was TRASH everywhere. AAs in the gutters. Because there wasn't anywhere to throw stuff away. That and every single thing was individually packaged. Shampoo came in a 5Rs 'sampler' sized package. Everything. So there was litter everywhere.

    1. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you RTFA, the thing gives you an option of using AAs, or Li-ion, as you see fit.

    2. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you RTFA

      If I do that how the hell am I supposed to formulate a semi written out thought and get it submitted so it doesn't just look like I'm yelling out FIRST POST, without paying for it of course.

    3. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by toastar · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know you guys hate Apple for it, but there's a reason they're getting 8 hours out of a 17" laptop. It's because they threw away all the 'packaging' crap that comes with normal batteries and only packaged the 'energy storing' part.

      So when it explodes you get more bang for your buck.

    4. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, but if you RTFA, then you can make witty retorts to FIRST POSTS which get modded up in a shower of karma. Without paying, either.

    5. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by ducomputergeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have an older consumer digital camera made by sony that had rechargeable batteries that were AA's. Worked extremely well as long as I owned the camera. The nice thing was in a pinch, say a long day of pictures or forgetting to recharge the batteries, I could run into any store and grab a pack of AA and keep on going. Granted, only got about 3 hours of shooting time on 2AA's, but it was handy.

      I imagine this would be the same way, some kind of rechargeable that are in the same form factor as AA and then you can pop in AA's in a pinch.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    6. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the entire review is similar to an E3 announcement from Microsoft that 'We would like to announce that a gaming console we have kept totally secret so far uses AA batteries in its controller!"?

    7. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by schon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop. Why not power a car with them?

      Last time I checked, a laptop wasn't an automobile.

      And by your logic, AA batteries are a "horrible" way to power *anything*.

      AAs are a horrible way to power a TV remote. Why not power a car with them?

      AAs are a horrible way to power a phone. Why not power a car with them?

      AAs are a horrible way to power a portable device. Why not power a car with them?

      See how stupid it sounds?

    8. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that AA's suck as a battery choice, but they do also come in Lithium.

      I've been using these in my old hp 3.1 megapixel camera, these last longer than any other AA I've used, it may help you the next time you have to use AA's.

      http://www.energizer.com/products/hightech-batteries/lithium/pages/lithium-batteries.aspx

    9. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Korin43 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're right, batteries are a terrible idea! We should be powering our laptops with gasoline engines!

    10. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I have a 4-cell charger that will charge 2200MaH Ni-MH cells in 15 minutes. Special cells, but damn, I can recharge a spare set in about a half hour. Not unreasonably priced back then. These were the IC3 cells. I can't find them any more, apparently Ray-O-Vac discontinued them in favor of hybrid cells, not the same thing...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    11. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happier if the LEFT OUT internal charger and gave it easy-open battery door. I have a battery charger for AA batteries, why would I want to carry one around all the time? I very much like the idea of ditching all these special-form batteries and their special chargers. I have a bunch of chargers for old laptops sitting in my junkbox. How many of those end up in landfill when people dump their laptop? A lot. This reminds me of Chinese who specified all phones use SAME charger very smart.

    12. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Daevad · · Score: 0

      Get rid of the batteries! Turn the lid into a solar cell. Third world schools don't have roofs, right? Plenty of free sunshine to run the thing.

    13. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Actually when you think about it AA batteries do kinda suck... At least non-rechargeable ones are a bad idea. It is a nice way to needlessly fill landfills with horrible chemicals. We should probably put some sorta tax on them tbh (like shitty incandescents), people would switch to liions or rechargeables without any issues.

      And yes I do realize there is some sort of rule about disposing batteries that is completely ignored in north america. My japanese prof actually asked the class one year wth we were supposed to do with them since she'd had a bag in her house filling for like 3years. Clearly it isn't effective.

    14. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      You can get AA form li-ion batteries. The advantages are many though. AA batteries are easily replaceable being everywhere. They are a very common standard so if you want so li-ion ones you can. Since they are so common they are cheap! And available in poor countries. This is not something that is so useful for you or me.

      But I think this type of design could eventually/soon get laptops under 100~150$ and that would be a very good thing for poor countries. By type of design I mean using as many common and flexible parts as humanly possible, and simplifying the design as much as possible. This allows people to repair it themselves for some parts. Replace broken parts with whatever they can find if compatibility is high (also good for upgrading). And people can more easily learn to do it. Look at poor countries and you'll see amazingly ingenious kluges. Jury-rigging whatever they have available to suit their purposes. Carts built from bits of fence, bicycle, table and an old motorcycle motor for example. Assuming this is going to continue, designing a computer that embraces it as much as possible will be successful.

      Side note: I think they should have dropped the SD card completely and had another USB slot instead. This allows for greater flexibility and simplicity. Stick a drive or USB stick in there, done. Probably more common than SD cards, more or equally portable as well. As well, the screen could be plugged into a VGA plug, might add 40c~1$ to the cost but if the screen breaks people could find a monitor in a dump w/e and get it working. (Keyboard has this functionality through USB already, plus KBs rarely break.) You could probably have the thing charge through USB as well. Technically you could probably design the CPU to use a USB stick as ram but that might be a little shitty (like 1/8th the speed lol). Either way I see the power of standards being underused here.

      BTW, everything I listed is the opposite of apple. So your suggestion was pretty friggen idiotic. An irremovable untouchable unmodifiable non-standard expensive ass machine is fucking retarded for this use.

    15. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 0, Troll

      Landfills? You still throw AA batteries in the landfill?

      I save mine up. Because we go on a backpacking trip to the BWCA (Boundary Waters Canoe Area) each year, and I like to pack in a whole heap of them to dump at the headwaters of the Brule River. Nobody ever seems to find them and the brook trout love using the piles of eroding battery cells as a place to hide.

      But if you don't do backpacking, it's okay to throw them in any nearby body of water. Don't use lead acid cells. The chemistry isn't as complex and interesting.

    16. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (opinion alert)

      Doesn't sound stupid to me. Batteries that are not rechargeable are whats stupid. You're stupid for using them, and companies are stupid for producing them. They create a ton of waste, have terrible energy storage, and are still pretty expensive. Why not power a TV remote with a small Li-ion battery? I personally wouldn't mind charging it every once in a while if it means never having to swap out the batteries again, and in the long run it would be much cheaper. Also, phones are already powered by various forms of rechargeable batters, so I'm not sure why you even mentioned them. Even devices that are much cheaper than a single rechargeable battery would benefit from rechargeable batteries. In the long run, the consumer would spend less money and there is always the bonus of creating less waste.

      As mentioned, rechargeable batters are more expensive than non-rechargeables but this can change with time and mass-production. They may even be harder to recycle and create more waste per battery (I don't really know and don't care enough to research), but you only need ONE set per device instead of a new set every time they die. That *has* to cut down on waste, pollution, and cost enough to tip the scales but again, I am not willing to research and am not an expert.

      To summarize, Non-rechargeable batteries are a horrible way to power anything. I whole-heartedly disagree with your post, and am sad that it got a +5 Informative mod when, at best, it should have been Interesting. In my opinion you should have been modded Troll because you are only instigating and not providing any more insight or information on the subject.

    17. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    18. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      There is, arguably, one major exception: Low drain devices.

      For high drain devices, the life of the battery will be overwhelmingly shorter than the life of the device. A computer that might get 4 hours on a charge might easily last 4 years. Primary cells would be an extraordinary waste, rechargables are the only way to go.

      For a low drain device, like a little slice of battery backed RAM, battery self-discharge could easily exceed load drain. This means that a modestly sized lithium primary cell will last a decade, no big deal. You are still an asshole if you make it completely impossible to replace such a battery(Solid block of epoxy or the llike); but requiring basic hand tools, or soldering, once a decade isn't exactly a huge burden. Particularly if it is for a device that usually has a 5 year lifespan.

    19. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      *Please* tell me you're being sarcastic...?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    20. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Calinous · · Score: 1

      One issue with rechargeable batteries is that they don't hold a load so well (higher internal discharge current) - so you put a set of batteries in your flashlight, and a couple of months from now when you need them, they're empty.

    21. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA

      If I do that how the hell am I supposed to formulate a semi written out thought and get it submitted so it doesn't just look like I'm yelling out FIRST POST, without paying for it of course.

      Do you hear that sound? That's the sound of enlightenment dawning.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    22. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      I use my laptop more than a flashlight though... And I think in 3rd world countries they'd use something that costs likely 90% of their net-worth quite a lot.

    23. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by hey! · · Score: 1

      AA is a form factor. It is a popular form factor for rechargeable NiMH batteries.

      Reading between the lines, this device has a battery pack made out of rechargeable AA batteries, which it recharges when it is plugged into AC. Just like a laptop really, except instead of an expensive Li ion battery it uses something cheaper like NiMH, and in a pinch you can throw any old AAs in, although you'll need a screwdriver to extract the "battery pack".

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    24. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Low self discharge NiMh cells are supposed to keep 80% of their charge for a whole year. They're also more robust cells than the higher capacity NiMh cells, so they'll keep their capacity longer and provide a better band for your buck in the long run.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    25. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Stop buying shitty old technology.

      NIMH LSD(low self discharge) solves this, sanyo eneloop or rayovac hybrid are two decent brands.

    26. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      The hybrids are LSD. Which is great for anything you want to power for a long time.

    27. Re:Hurray for LandFills! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      That is so wasteful! We should be using hydrogen powered laptops, and extracting the hydrogen from coal. It is clearly the more intelligent choice!

  3. Waiting for Recall by u19925 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Direct AC connection? 110-240V? I don't know about you guys, but I ain't gonna put that damn thing on my lap. This is a laptop. I have spilled coffee, juice, other drinks on my laptops. I don't want 240V shock on my private parts. I let my young kids to use laptop too and certainly wouldn't allow this one to them.

    1. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah, you're that person companies have to write stupid shit like: "Don't get in the bath with this laptop", for indemnity, and because you're retarded.

    2. Re:Waiting for Recall by maxume · · Score: 1

      Did the first couple of spills do any damage?

      Are you really that thirsty that you can't avoid dumping liquid on expensive electronics?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Waiting for Recall by PPH · · Score: 1

      No 12 Vdc power input? How do I run this in my car? Now I've got to buy an inverter.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Waiting for Recall by Tetsujin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Direct AC connection? 110-240V? I don't know about you guys, but I ain't gonna put that damn thing on my lap. This is a laptop. I have spilled coffee, juice, other drinks on my laptops. I don't want 240V shock on my private parts. I let my young kids to use laptop too and certainly wouldn't allow this one to them.

      Most likely the AC-DC power converter is sealed up. Take a look at a "wall wart" power supply sometime - do you see anywhere for liquid to leak in? Even my EEE's AC adaptor, which isn't sealed, also doesn't feature any openings into which liquid could readily flow.

      And then, what do you think this combination of liquid and voltage is going to do, exactly? Is the voltage going to follow the liquid's electrical path out of the abundantly ground-planed environment of the power supply and computer, and follow a path up your arms, through your heart, and then back down to the computer to get to a ground path?

      I'm not feeling too scared, really.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    5. Re:Waiting for Recall by Serenissima · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, if your kids do use this, spill a drink on it, and get shocked... Just tell them they're grounded!

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    6. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you to the moon of I had the points. I'm the guy at work who has to write that shit.

      "Can you help me? I spilled Coke all over my laptop."
      "Did your Coke scare the magic smoke away?"

    7. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You sound pretty current with the what's-what in parenting, but what if they resist?

    8. Re:Waiting for Recall by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hack it and install a DC power socket. Its only a cheap device after all. How about installing a three pin regulator while you are at it?

    9. Re:Waiting for Recall by djdavetrouble · · Score: 5, Funny

      How dare they conduct themselves in that fashion!

      --
      music lover since 1969
    10. Re:Waiting for Recall by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the current fad.

    11. Re:Waiting for Recall by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      Like these?

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    12. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. You ARE grounded.

    13. Re:Waiting for Recall by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Funny

      An Ohmage to Thomas Edison, if I relay correctly.

    14. Re:Waiting for Recall by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      I hope you realize that trying to cover from an idiotic remark by bragging about irrelevant degrees pretty much consigns you to ridicule.

    15. Re:Waiting for Recall by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      My favourite of all time was on a flexible keyboard:

      It cannot be putted into the oven and putted on the fire to roast

      Good job I have a large oven, otherwise I probably couldn't even fit turkeys or my keyboard in it.

    16. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I know the feeling. I hold degrees from Columbia and Yale, and love spilling drinks on electronics all willy-nilly. Sometimes I'll touch the terminals on a few fully-charged caps just for the hell of it.

      A few of my EE buds kept insisting it was a bad idea, but I looked them all straight in the eye and said, "The hell I won't! I hold degrees from Columbia and Yale!" That shuts 'em up, right-quick. Damn EE's.

    17. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then again, I'd be upset in his situation, too. The guy replying to him is a tool and a troll, not Insightful.

      Accidents happen. Not wanting 240V applied across your testis isn't unreasonable.

    18. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I am not sure about it being sealed. When outside, the adapters are sealed because there is plenty of ventilation to cool it. When inside a computer, it may not be sealed. I have opened hundreds of devices and haven't found one having sealed power AC to DC converter inside.

    19. Re:Waiting for Recall by Adriax · · Score: 4, Funny

      You show them what little capacitance for suffering their antics you have, and induct them into a local orphanage.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    20. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Recently, I received shock from my iron even though it had a ground pin (I was not ironing, so I was trying to test, if it was hot enough). When I opened it, I found that the ground wire was broken and live wire was touching the metallic case. This was just at the place where it was receiving 3 pin input. So even if the AC to DC converter is sealed, you may not be safe.

    21. Re:Waiting for Recall by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your comment sparked an interest and I just couldn't resist replying.

    22. Re:Waiting for Recall by westlake · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're that person companies have to write stupid shit like: "Don't get in the bath with this laptop", for indemnity, and because you're retarded.

      Remember what home power tools were like before GFI and double-insulation?

      How easy it was to set yourself up for a severe electric shock?

      Fast-forward to 2010 and you will see maybe 20 or 30 electrocution deaths a year. Use a Ground-Fault Circuit-interrupter With Every Power Tool

      It is always easier to re-design the machine than the user.

    23. Re:Waiting for Recall by Redon · · Score: 1

      Yup. Agreed. Actually this guy brought up a point I did not see myself, namely that I rarely hold anything plugged directly to the power grid against any part of my body for extended amounts of time while holding a cup of liquid over it, and perhaps it's a good thing I don't.

    24. Re:Waiting for Recall by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're that person companies have to write stupid shit like: "Don't get in the bath with this laptop", for indemnity, and because you're retarded.

      So this cute little laptop was taking a bath, and I wandered by and thought "Damn! I'd like to get into the bath with that laptop". So I undressed and hopped in and .... KAPOW! Electric shock!

      Doesn't anyone else think that when they see "Don't get in the bath with this laptop"? Someone? Anyone at all?

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    25. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems you all are missing something: 8 1.5 V cells = 12 V DC. This happens to be the most common electrical power source on the planet. It is in virtually every automobile, and most boats (talking working and fishing here...not just pleasure yachts). Also most solar and wind electrical generation systems are 12 V DC.

      It should be very east to clip on to the + and - battery terminals and hook into a 12 V battery system.

    26. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I was busy watching Transformers 2 and giving my dog the Shocker. What's the conversation about again?

    27. Re:Waiting for Recall by corrie · · Score: 1

      Serial jokes are so lame

    28. Re:Waiting for Recall by Philip_the_physicist · · Score: 1

      Indeed, some people don't like them, but there's much less resistance when you tell them in parallel.

    29. Re:Waiting for Recall by heitikender · · Score: 1

      Same power got me flowing. Say, we're done a full circle with these now, aren't we?

    30. Re:Waiting for Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just because you're well educated doesn't mean you can't be an idiot. I've know plenty of smart people that are completely stupid.

    31. Re:Waiting for Recall by Inda · · Score: 1

      What sort of backward country do you live in that doesn't use "trip switches" (RCD)?

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    32. Re:Waiting for Recall by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean, "watt if they resist?"

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    33. Re:Waiting for Recall by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      They're using NiMh cells with 1.2v nominal voltage.

      8 * 1.2v = 9.6v

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    34. Re:Waiting for Recall by sowth · · Score: 1

      That just shows you have to watch which companies you buy from. If they insist upon outsourcing to the absolute lowest bidder which does no quality control, then you will get problems like this.

    35. Re:Waiting for Recall by sowth · · Score: 1

      "But it was so sexy with its power saving abilities! I couldn't help myself! I'll never cheat on you again!!!1 I swear!"

  4. Very interesting except... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Should I be scared that the default country for the order form is Thailand?

    1. Re:Very interesting except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that 8 AAs is dreadful. No thanks. I'll keep my Macbook Air, you guys can keep your 3rd world rubbish.

    2. Re:Very interesting except... by chilvence · · Score: 1

      Why should you be, all American electronics already come from Asia anyway :P

    3. Re:Very interesting except... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I don't mind the electronics coming from Asia. I just don't want my credit card number floating around a hacker network in Asia.

    4. Re:Very interesting except... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Good plan. You'd never run into problems with your credit card number on American networks. Oh ya. Wasn't it Best Buy and TGX that both got caught sending cc info via unencrypted wireless?

          Stay safe, play in the US. Be sure you email your name, address, date of birth, SSN, bank account info, and all your credit cards to hacker@i.promise.not.to.steal.your.identity.us

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:Very interesting except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, are you often irrationally scared by foreign cultures?

    6. Re:Very interesting except... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      NorhTec (the manufacturer) is a Thai company, about 3km away from my condo in the Software PArk building. I'm not surprised that the default country is Thailand. Why are you?

    7. Re:Very interesting except... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Thanks!!! People on Slashdot are SO helpful!!!

      I also sent in my mothers maiden name, plus all of my checking account numbers and routing codes!

      Now, I'm off to install comet cursors!!!

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  5. It runs XP by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

    One thing that review did gloss over, but which is right there in TFA, among the first things listed.

    "It can support Microsoft Windows XP."

    So Linux is one of the options for this thing (they actually list a bunch of distros that work, apart from the one they specifically designed for the thing), not the only option.

    Given the cries of how OLPC had sold out when they said they're going to support XP, I thought it would be kinda relevant...

    1. Re:It runs XP by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't start with windows then they aren't paying a windows tax so who cares?

    2. Re:It runs XP by westlake · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't start with windows then they aren't paying a windows tax so who cares?


      Where the Windows install = sales the seller cares a lot.

    3. Re:It runs XP by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      If I'm going to put windows on it I'm better off just spending $30 more and getting this with a intel atom, one gig ram, 160gb hard drive and windows 7.

      drop the price to $100 and I'll consider it

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    4. Re:It runs XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EduBook is primarily aimed at the market space of the Classmate and the OLPC XO. However, a lot of Linux people have bought it because it is a very modular system that allows them to repackage the EduBook for special projects. The $199.95 prices is a suggested end-user price but the goal is to allow dealers and distributors to buy in volume and be able to offer at special discounts -- particularly to teachers and students.

      The EduBook is sold either as a kit or fully assembled so that it can be imported into countries that offer incentives for local assembly. The assembled price for 10,000 units is $145.00 and the price for the kit version is $135.00. At 100,000 units (which is the typical quantity for the OLPC, the price is $99.95.

    5. Re:It runs XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is a result of running a "x586 system-on-chip" (FTFS) - why would someone design a machine using AA batteries and not use an ARM processor?

    6. Re:It runs XP by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      Which is a result of running a "x586 system-on-chip" (FTFS) - why would someone design a machine using AA batteries and not use an ARM processor?

      please mod parent up... it rightly deserves it and I ain't got mod points...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    7. Re:It runs XP by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      And it indicates how far behind Microsoft is falling.

      All they have to offer for a computer like this is an OS that is almost a decade old. It's not that the hardware is low spec. Not at all. Only the "hard drive" is actually slow in there. I still think these small, cheap, relatively low specced devices are going to be a major part of the computer market in the near future.

      The competition on the other hand has products that are fully up-to-date available.

      I have never been a fan of MS but for a company that size with such enormous influence on computing, it's still kinda sad.

  6. I got one of these! by hatten · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got one of these, and I were very surprised that it was covered here! I certainly don't think the case is very sturdy, a few millimetres plastic was easy to crack, and I've done that. I've got some evil pixels on the screen too after dropping it once. I got mine with ubuntu, but I managed to thrash X and have not taken my time to fix it, I use it on daily basis exclusively with vim, but being the CLI junky I am I almost like it more that way than with a gui. I carry it around for all my lessons in school and I'm very happy that I bought it. A little weird thing with it is that the usb ports are upside down, no clue if that's a feature or something stupid =p A big downside for me was that it is i586, something I didn't think off when buying it, meaning that distros such as Arch Linux won't run on it natively.

    1. Re:I got one of these! by Haxzaw · · Score: 1

      Informative? I would have modded it funny, but after rereading it, I think you are serious. Exclusive vim use? Like it more than GUI? Use it for school lessons, with vim? OK, I'm sorry, I'm being a bit to rough on vim.

    2. Re:I got one of these! by MathiasRav · · Score: 1

      A big downside for me was that it is i586, something I didn't think off when buying it, meaning that distros such as Arch Linux won't run on it natively.

      I was about to suggest for speed, why not use Arch+dwm? Your post covers it slightly, but what about installing dwm in Ubuntu, or in another i586-native Linux distro? My laptop is getting old, and after neither Windows XP nor Ubuntu ran acceptably fast, I switched to Arch and dwm, and while boot is only slightly faster, time to login is basically nil, since it's as simple as 'su user -e startx' in inittab. timothy is complaining about Gnome startup times ... so fix it!

  7. SD slot??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SD slot??? WHY??? How about just a USB reader and a USB port on the machine?

    Then you can use SD, CF, microSD, xD, miniSD, MMS,...

    I wonder about those batteries, mind. 2000mAh from four? They're making 3200mAh now.

    Mind you, compare this against a Psion 3a.

    1. Re:SD slot??? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      As an embedded solution, an SD PHY would allow for the addition of Wifi pretty easily.

    2. Re:SD slot??? by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      SD slot??? WHY??? How about just a USB reader and a USB port on the machine?

      Then you can use SD, CF, microSD, xD, miniSD, MMS,...

      If you look at the pictures: the SD slot is internal. It's one of the options for primary storage. I can only hope the thing has a very good SD card interface... The reason they included this slot is to provide a cheap way to configure the machine with solid-state storage. SD cards can't compete with good-quality SSDs, but it's very cheap to add an SD slot to a machine, the SD cards themselves are cheap and easy to find, and it doesn't take much physical space inside the machine.

      I own a EEE 901 - personally I find the built-in card reader quite convenient. IMO it beats dragging around a USB accessory, at least in cases where I'm just dealing with one memory card format. (It's actually very rare these days that I have to deal with anything other than SD - though I do sometimes travel with a USB card reader just in case.) I like that even if I forget to bring a card reader with me, my 901 can read SD cards for me... Other netbooks are even more handy in this regard, as they feature multiformat readers...

      I honestly wouldn't want to run a machine like this on AA's, and I'm not sure that having that capability is worth the trouble - but I do kind of like that they threw that feature in there. I can imagine a couple years down the road having trouble finding a replacement battery for my 901 (well, Asus uses the same battery pack in other models, so maybe I've got a while before that would be a problem) It's kind of nice that this machine uses "off-the-rack" li-po batteries instead of proprietary packs, and the AA fallback option is interesting... Reminds me of my old TRS-80 model 100, actually. :) I've seen tons of old laptops at flea markets - rendered not only obsolete but fairly useless as well as a result of the batteries having gone. Meanwhile, I was using my model 100 to type up reports in the late 1990s. The idea of a machine like this being genericized to the point where replacement batteries can be found anywhere is really appealing - even if the machine is very weak by today's standards.

      Overall, I'd say the machine is pretty much junk. XD But it's fun junk, like the way the original EEE 7 and 9 inch models were fun junk. When they mention an internal USB slot it makes me think that they've got hobbyists in mind as much as anything... Netbook hackers just love an internal USB slot. :) ...Though it does seem that you need that slot for wi-fi, so maybe not?

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    3. Re:SD slot??? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      "Reminds me of my old TRS-80 model 100, actually. :) "

      I was just going to say that it sounded from the summary that someone had finally reinvented the "Model T" (as it was affectionately known). These probably won't have the mechanical longevity of those, however.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:SD slot??? by Mage66 · · Score: 1

      You can also use a 2.5" Laptop HDD or an SSD in the same form factor or interface. As far as I have been able to find out, there is a lot of flexibility in options.

    5. Re:SD slot??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the web site:

      > Internally, there is a SD socket which can be used as a low cost boot or storage device. There is also space for a 2.5 inch hard disk. Externally there is another SD socket. that can be used for transferring data from mobile phones, digital cameras or other devices.

      Perhaps you could use the external SD socket as, well, an external SD socket.

    6. Re:SD slot??? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      From the web site:

      > Internally, there is a SD socket which can be used as a low cost boot or storage device. There is also space for a 2.5 inch hard disk. Externally there is another SD socket. that can be used for transferring data from mobile phones, digital cameras or other devices.

      Perhaps you could use the external SD socket as, well, an external SD socket.

      I did see that - but the review seems to contradict that information (actually, the reviewer specifically complained that there's no external SD slot...) - I'm not sure which bit of info to believe, honestly. <shrug> doesn't matter really.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  8. Performance compared to Atom? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    Form factor is almost irrelevant here. What matters is the following:

    1) Can XCore continue to improve the SOC with higher clockspeeds and features?
    2) Can the XCore86 CPU compete performance-wise with Atom?
    3) For almost $200, how do they intend to compete against existing UMPCs from makers like Asus?

    This EduBook is cute, but the question remains whether this SOC can truly compete against the Atom+US15W in the marketplace. Getting a free device because you're some hotshot Slashdot editor isn't quite the same thing as comparison shopping for the right solution.

    1. Re:Performance compared to Atom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xcore86 is the same as a Vortex86 which use to be manufactured by SiS but now is done by DMP. It is slow....

  9. $199 too high! by jbridges · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can buy a Lenovo S10 with 1GB of ram, 1.6Ghz CPU and 160GB harddrive for $249, and that includes WinXP.

    The AA batteries sounds interesting, but since all the netbooks come with a battery, and they are cheap enough to buy an entire new netbook with new battery when anything breaks or wears out.

    If this unit was $150 or less, it's slow CPU and AA battery power might make sense. But at $199 it's not worth it.

    1. Re:$199 too high! by Weezul · · Score: 2, Informative

      Two big reasons you're wrong. First, that $50 discount might be essential for many poorer kids, even in the U.S. Second, that $50 puts downward price pressure upon other netbooks.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    2. Re:$199 too high! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      The price is determined by what they can get for it, which is determined in part by the price of the Lenovo. If they don't sell enough the price will come down.

    3. Re:$199 too high! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and this apparently doesn't do Flash (even though its x86) - thought I wager that might just be Timothy being retarded.

    4. Re:$199 too high! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised at how many people will go out and by a Laptop simply because its $199. They don't care what it runs, how fast it runs, or even battery life. They want a computer they can carry around that they can plug in somewhere, and use it to type up stuff while they watch TV.

      And a $199 desktop, while probably more powerful, is too clunky to carry around, especially when you add the monitor on top of that.

    5. Re:$199 too high! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is about damn time. Using standard rechargeable AA would be awesome. Right now, each laptop, netbook, and mobi has unique and expensive to replace battpacks, cords, and warts that have to be specially ordered instead of purchased off the shelf. You could replace AAs easily and inexpensively. Hopefully this will start a new open power revolution.

    6. Re:$199 too high! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy an entire new netbook for $249 instead of eight rechargeable AA cells at $2 each? You must be made of money.

    7. Re:$199 too high! by westlake · · Score: 1

      The price is determined by what they can get for it, which is determined in part by the price of the Lenovo. If they don't sell enough the price will come down.

      But not by much.

      You have to meet the costs of production and distribution. You have to show a profit. Your distributors have to show a profit.

      WalMart shed all its Linux inventory.

      When product doesn't sell, it may just be because no one wants to buy. Even at the deep discount price.

    8. Re:$199 too high! by jbridges · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except four things:

      The $199 price does not include WinXP. The $250 Lenovo S10 price does.
      The $199 price does not include 1GB of ram (only 512mb). The $250 Lenovo S10 price does.
      The $199 price does not include 160GB harddrive (only small flash drive). The $250 Lenovo S10 price does.
      The $199 price does not include batteries (AA or otherwise). The $250 Lenovo S10 price does.

      What does the $199 unit cost with a copy of WinXP Home, 1GB of RAM, a 160GB harddrive, and a supply of AA batteries?
      A lot closer to $250 than you imply.

      (and you have the much slower CPU in the AA battery unit)

    9. Re:$199 too high! by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The "netbook" price MS charges for XP is $8 in volume. At that price it's inclusion or not doesn't mean much to the price.

    10. Re:$199 too high! by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe they made a deal with Microsoft. Such deals have been common in the past.

      And as you're a well-known Microsoft advocate here (employee?) I wouldn't expect you to mention something like that, or even imply it.

    11. Re:$199 too high! by Mage66 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the $199 price includes the computer, ac cord, 8gb SD Card loaded with WattOS Linux, 512mb of RAM, Wireless and the batteries. IF you are buying direct from Nohrtec and in quantity. If you are buying from a distributor, they will have to make a profit and will unbundle things to make room for that.

    12. Re:$199 too high! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $199 price does not include WinXP. The $250 Lenovo S10 price does.

      That only matters if you want XP. If you don't, an XP license is of absolutely no value to you.

    13. Re:$199 too high! by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Not everyone wants XP. Why does anyone would want to use an eight year old OS?
      RAM is cheap
      A flash drive may be preferable on a device like this
      AA batteries are cheap.
      AA batteries are easy to replace if you run out.

    14. Re:$199 too high! by norhtec · · Score: 1

      The OEM price for Windows XP in the US is $38.00 with the license sticker and $36 without. They do have special prices if the order comes from the Ministry of Education in developing countries. Maybe Dell and HP get $8.00.

    15. Re:$199 too high! by norhtec · · Score: 1

      Flash does run. Flash animations work and Flash enabled websites work . None-the-less, YouTube video do not play smoothly. There is a discussion on the "www.deviceonchip.com" website on allocating CPU to video and less to sound to improve this.

    16. Re:$199 too high! by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A small, fast flash drive is preferable to a big slow hard drive. I know, because someone at work bought one of the newer EeePCs with a 160Gig drive and it was basically unusable until we swapped in an expensive flash drive as a replacement. Until the extra money was spent on it, my 4G Eee was much better, even if I do have to manage my use of the system drive very carefully.

      Since I'm posting, the AA batteries are a HUGE advantage. I've refused to buy any digital camera that doesn't take AAs for ages now and the result is that the last three cameras I've bought are all still perfectly usable. Meanwhile, I'm onto the second battery for my Eee (which I effectively got by buying an entire 2G Eee fairly cheap), and my early digital cameras (which I spent quite a bit on) are glorified paperweights. There are some very, very nice rechargeable AA options out there and some seriously good chargers. I've invested in some of this stuff and would love to be able to use it with my netbook.

    17. Re:$199 too high! by jbridges · · Score: 1

      A small flash drive may be preferable in an extra toy computer. For for those who use a netbook as a primary, 8GB (or less) is a joke.

      I have the Lenovo with 160GB, and the harddrive is acceptably quick.
      In fact the whole machine feels faster than my top of the line Thinkpad from a few years before.

      The only thing that really drags on the Lenovo S10 is the 1.6Ghz Atom processor. Given that the $199 AA battery machine uses a MUCH slower processor, I think it would be far less acceptable as a primary machine, even if it had the same 160GB harddrive.

      And I do agree on AA batteries for cameras, I try to use them exclusively. But the power demands of a netbook make me less enthusiastic about them in that platform.

    18. Re:$199 too high! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I wonder if using gnash would help.

    19. Re:$199 too high! by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Eh, the problem with AAA and AA batteries is the form factor. Round is not a good shape for a compact product like a cell phone, mp3 player or camera where smaller, slimmer and sleeker is often a key virtue.

      I finally gave up looking for MP3 players that run on AAA or AA batteries. I can get something with better battery life that is 1/2 the thickness of the thinnest of AAA-powered MP3 players if I go with a built-in flat battery. The same thing goes for the digital camera that I have, which uses a 3/16" thick square battery pack (that can be swapped). As a result, the camera is a hella lot thinner and lighter then if it used AA batteries.

      Now, for a notebook/laptop, the AA battery size is not a big issue, except for all the space lost due to the roundness of the package. Basically, we need a set of standard, squared off batteries. But the modern markets are so disjointed that it's unlikely to happen.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  10. Re:Woah. by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Insightful

        That's gotta be one of the longest press releases (written to be an review) that I've seen in a long time.

        I wonder what it costs to have your ad run on the front of Slashdot as a story these days.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  11. Charging AAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    AAs are typically charged in series by in-device chargers. That is significantly worse than single-cell chargers because small differences in the capacity of the single cells result in over-charging which kills the batteries. Li-Ion batteries on the other hand are always charged individually because they are actually dangerous when overcharged.
    There isn't a good reason to use AAs for a device which goes through one charge in a matter of days, especially when an unsophisticated charger is used. What we really need is a standard Li-Ion rechargeable battery format.

    1. Re:Charging AAs by luther349 · · Score: 0

      it has the option for other battery types. but this is geared to education and long term cost matters. but i agree AA is not the way to cut battery cost not due to any other reason other then life span. AA rechargeable last around a year. li ions last 5 to 10 years if cared for. the the cost of replacing the AA batters 5 times before the li models needs replacement is around the same cost.

    2. Re:Charging AAs by luther349 · · Score: 0

      for those that cant add pack of 4 from walmart 5$ you would need 2 packs so you do 8x5=40$ per 5 years on AA battery. avg cost on li ions over 5 years 40$ for a new oem 3 cell witch all this laptop probably would need. but the other things do look good. having the prosser removable and replaceable make upgrading this system very cost efficient.or even repairing it in the case of prosser failer.

    3. Re:Charging AAs by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > There isn't a good reason to use AAs for a device
      > which goes through one charge in a matter of days

      Depends where you're shipping the things.

      For someone living in the developed world, you're probably right.

      But AA is the single most standard, widely-available battery form factor in existence by a WIDE margin. They're more common than the next four most common form factors (C, 9-volt, AAA, and D) combined. You can get AA batteries absolutely EVERYWHERE, including places where you can only get Coca-Cola sporadically. The things are easier to find than T-shirts.

      For a computer that you're going to replace in three years, this is unimportant. The built-in lithium-ion battery will last the life of the device. So for most of the slashdot crowd, yeah, the appeal is just not there.

      But for a device that you want to be able to keep using well past the five-year mark, it can be VERY important. Four years after you buy the thing, the particular model of lithium-ion battery it came with is often no longer available even in the US.

      Now, I'm not entirely sure the EduBook really qualifies as such a device. I mean yeah, they say they're shipping them to Nigeria, but how MANY of them are they really shipping there, honestly, and how many of those that they do ship to Nigeria are going anywhere beyond Lagos or Port Harcourt? And how useful would the devices even be in the middle of nowhere? Internet access can be pretty hard to find in the rural third world, and when you can find it it ain't free. How useful are these things without the internet? So maybe they're fooling themselves on that count.

      But if it were the kind of device that would be distributed to the rural third world, running on AA batteries would be a major plus. It's a pretty big deal for cheap AM/FM receivers, for instance.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  12. I have a very similar machine from 1983 by laing · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Somewhere in the bottom of one of my closets is a TRS-80 model 100. It also ran off 4 AA batteries. It sported a LCD display which could do 8 lines of 40 characters each and was likely the last computer that Bill Gates actually wrote any software for.

    See here for more info.

    1. Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983 by wcbsd · · Score: 1

      *Sigh*

      I learned to program on a Sinclair ZX81 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zx81), which weighed about a pound and could run on 9VDC (though the only battery-powered versions were homebrew). It's amazing that we've come this far...

      Did anyone else love that the icon for discontinued products on XCore's site is a rotary phone?

    2. Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TRS-80 m100 (and the improved 102) are boss.

      Used one to take notes for a few years before the glut of horrid little netbooks - 20 hours of battery life, plus built in MS basic and it can function as a simple serial terminal too. If you have a parallel port printer still, you can even use a motherboard parallel port adapter to print.

      Nevermind it has the best @#$! keyboard ever put on a laptop. Period. If a bit loud. It also doesn't mind being dropped.

    3. Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983 by vlm · · Score: 1

      I also had a model 100. Its important to note that the FOUR AA batteries literally lasted weeks. Perhaps 50 hours of continuous use? I know I went thru a set of batteries every month or so. Also the ancient static ram drew enough current in sleep mode to drain the batteries in about one year.

      This thing drains its EIGHT AA batteries in the traditional laptop 3 hours or whatever. Lame.

      My palmIII ran for weeks on two AAA, my ipod touch runs about one day per charge.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. EduBook uses twice as many batteries for only 4 to 6 hours. With the Model 100 you got at least a week out of alkalines.

      Yes, sure the EduBook does a lot more, but the headline got me excited that maybe were were finally going to exceed or at least equal the power usage of the late, great 100. (Note to youngsters - read the wiki link above. This thing came out only two years after the best portable was a 12 kilo suitcase. It had a real keyboard, ran on AA's, and did telnet as VT-52. I used mine into the early 90s. It's one of the best pieces of kit ever made. Play with one if you get a chance.)

    5. Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983 by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Yes, but your Model 100 doesn't run Linux.

      (I have a 102, and it was a great machine to learn machine language on, and hardware interfacing... I still have it a few feet away, for hardware interfacing and stuff)

    6. Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983 by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, 4 AA cells can do wonders with an 8 x 40 coarse pitch B&W LCD screen with a refresh rate that barely kept up with it's 300 baud modem (maybe it was a 1200, mine is buried somewhere in the junk pile) and everything essentially in ROM.

      You do realize that your watch is more powerful than that computer?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a watch?

    8. Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983 by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that we could exceed the power efficiency of the Model 100, with extreme prejudice no less, I just don't know that such a device would find a market.

      With low power LCDs(or e-ink, if you can handle the refresh) we should be able to easily get lower power drain and higher resolution, as long as we don't spring for a backlight.

      As for processing power, I can hardly imagine how little power a 2.4MHz 8051 and 32Kbytes of RAM would consume if fabbed on a modern process.

      The biggest power drain by far would be a real modem or the ability to speak proper RS-232. Compromise on that(either make it USB, which is modestly power hungry; but offers 2.5watts of bus power or go with one of the crazy low-power wireless chipsets used in embedded designs. The nRF24L01+ or similar isn't fast; but it'll run for over a year on a 20mm lithium coin cell) and there will be no problem.

      If there were, in fact, a confirmed market for a modern take on the Model 100, they could probably produce one that simply never needed its batteries replaced, the system could just have piezo elements in the keyboard, harvesting energy from your keystrokes, along with a few ultracaps for the periods when you weren't typing. Or, for the easier but less imaginative route, you could simply fill the space in the original case size that would be saved by the move to a modern circuit board with a solid slab of lithium primary cell. That could easily last until self-discharge killed it, which would give you a decade plus. The trouble would be finding buyers for such a limited device. Most people like color screens, and full motion video, and sound, and whatnot, more than they hate charging.

    9. Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983 by hey! · · Score: 1

      So?

      This kind of reminds me of the initial reaction many people had to the Wii, which was that it was not very impressive. But it's often not the computational power (or rendering power) of a system that matters as all the stuff that goes around it, the software and user interface hardware. It all has to fit together to provide a useful (or entertaining) user experience.

      The computer used on Apollo 11 is less powerful than most cheap digital watches these days. That doesn't mean that you can navigate a dumb spaceship to the moon with your watch. A lot of stuff went around those primitive CPUs to make things happen.

      I've worked with scientists and other field workers who don't necessarily have access to a wall socket every few hours. One of the big pains we had was when Palm stopped powering their devices with AAA. We used to be able to send people into the field with one of those big shrink wrapped blocks of AAAs, and we'd know there wasn't going to be any issue with power. The PDA became a lot more powerful, but not really any more useful for our purposes. Removable storage was a huge plus, but switching to expensive battery packs wasn't so great from our standpoint. Some of the people I worked with resorted to buying expensive solar panels, which are great in the bush if you can afford them and if they don't get stolen. An AAA powered device with an SD slot would have been perfect.

      I understand the reporters used m100s for years after much more powerful laptops existed for similar concerns about being caught without power. I imagine the keyboard must be fairly good to inspire that kind of loyalty too. Maybe cheap lousy keyboard technology hadn't advanced so far in those days.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  13. Re:Woah. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's the most brazen Slashvertisement I've ever seen. The editors(writers, whatever) could have at least tried to obfuscate it into an article and offload the interested onto the actual website.

    I'm still trying to decide whether to be disappointed that the editors no longer care, or happy that they're being more honest about blatantly slashvertising.

  14. Wow. by Cryacin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think we'll reach a new Slashdot low today where people won't even read the summary!

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:Wow. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Troll

      We already passed that point when moderators stopped reading the comments.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. Did they name it the XCore Edubook by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2, Funny

    because critics would have lambasted the "XCore E8"?

    1. Re:Did they name it the XCore Edubook by tool462 · · Score: 1

      I'm personally more excited about the XCore System. Guaranteed to get the bugs out!

  16. Re:Woah. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    For me it is an unusually interesting slashvertisement so I think it belongs on the front page.

  17. Is that really a good idea? by SendBot · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "There is no bulky power adapter. The power supply is built inside the Gecko so that all you need to carry is a power cord."

    I've had enough ATX power supplies and laptop power adapters go bad... one of the latter even threw sparks and smoke. Never damaged the actual computer, and they were all easy to replace.

    The power adapter for my netbook is smallish, but bigger than I'd want embedded inside my netbook. And what about RF noise? What about safety? Sounds crazy, but I've had a waterfall (from a leaky roof) open right up on me while using a computer before. Once I even used a faulty laptop that shocked me when using it, annoying but not deadly.

    1. Re:Is that really a good idea? by luther349 · · Score: 0

      agreed. bad laptop power supply's can generate alot of heat. even good ones do. this is why they put them on the on the outside of the system.

    2. Re:Is that really a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fully agree with you that power supply inside the laptop is not safe. Even when outside, I usually place my adapters on surface which don't burn and conduct electricity. Better be safe than sorry.

    3. Re:Is that really a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I even used a faulty laptop that shocked me when using it, annoying but not deadly.

      I should hope not. The undead don't post on Slashdot.

    4. Re:Is that really a good idea? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Toshiba made laptops like this for years. I don't recall it being a problem for them, I DO recall it being very convenient.

      I think I have a Satellite 100CS with Win95 on it around here somewhere like that...

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  18. I have one too! by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

    I loved it. I'm sure it still works. I also have the acoustic (300 baud) coupler for the built-in modem.

    Also, there's the Newton.

    Some day maybe 2 week battery life will be back.

    1. Re:I have one too! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I loved it. I'm sure it still works. I also have the acoustic (300 baud) coupler for the built-in modem.

      For a moment there I thought you were talking about the edubook.

  19. kinda expensive by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    I did RTFS, and even went to their site
    - $200 is a lot, there's netbooks for $250
    - the datasheet lists an external SD slot, the summary says there aren't any ?
    - available with up to 1 gig RAM
    - optional "real" batteries instead of 8xAA
    - Vista certainly not supported, otherwise they would say so.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:kinda expensive by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      MSRP. Bulk orders can get down to $99, which the OLPC was aiming for but never achieved. Quite impressive, really.

  20. Oh boy. This IS the future. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Soon on Slashdot, we will not longer be discussing laptop computers because they are going to be as ubiquitous and cheap (as in 'Toys R Us' cheap) as the humble pocket calculator.

    My Dad's first calculator cost $300 and it took a full pack of AA's and it had glow-y red numbers inside tiny light bulbs or vacuum tubes or something. And it came with a power cord. And it was the most exciting thing in the world! If there had been an internet back then, there would have been feverish discussion and hardware hacks and all kinds of 'boy' chatter regarding it and other devices competing for the same market.

    But nobody talks about pocket calculators much these days. We've solved them. They're done. They work perfectly, and most of the time the build-quality is somewhere between "Fischer Price" and "Dollar Store G.I. Joe reject".

    This is the second computer on a chip I've seen this week. ARM had an even smaller system which out-powered the one in this article by many orders of magnitude, all destined for the same market.

    Yeah, it's kind of cool that portable computers are about to be Capital-S SOLVED; that we'll have long battery lives combined with high computing power in a small form-factor, all for $29.95 (or less). Great. Computers are going to be no more exciting than a new binder, pencil case and protractor set. -And probably about as durable, because stuff that lasts doesn't make money. Welcome to the Industrial Age.

    Sigh.

    So stop and look around. These are the last of the, "Good old days". Breathe it in, folks. It's never going to be the same again.

    Of course, I'm sure we'll all find something new to get geeky about. Maybe radio-control cars will come back into vogue. Who knows?

    -FL

  21. What's missing? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    An IBM mouse nub thingy... The only way to fly.

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:What's missing? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's ok, you can call it a clit mouse if you want.

  22. Costs more than an EeePC, and isn't as fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I purchased an Asus 900 model for $180 over six months ago that runs an intel atom at 1.6 GHz and has 1GB of RAM with a 4GB SSD, all for less than this slower model that has a higher cost and runs a smaller subset of the available software. Can somebody explain how this machine is worth the money?

    1. Re:Costs more than an EeePC, and isn't as fast by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Durability. Serviceable parts. Swappable components. Designed for the education market in developing countries. Cheaper than the OLPC in bulk.

    2. Re:Costs more than an EeePC, and isn't as fast by maitas · · Score: 1

      I also payed 150 USD for my 900A, but it was refurbished on Ebay. A new one is 350 USD and that is what you need to compare this laptop against.

  23. Drivers open source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if the drivers for the GPU and other stuff are open source? I would hate to buy one and not being able to upgrade to the newest Ubuntu version due to some closed blobs.

  24. Re:Woah. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure it's a "slashvertisement" as much as it is a "press release from a company that seems practically tailor made to appeal to slashdot".

    Runs linux? Check. Oddball underdog processor? Check. Not in general availability yet? Check. A few interesting wrinkles on the popular-but-now-somewhat-dated netbook concept? Check.

  25. website is so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u have to wonder how good the product is
    they put like, 2 nanoseconds of thought into the web page - you have to wonder if the same lazy, screw the user attitude is in their engineering dept
    and i'm not just talking lack of glitzy useless flashcrap either;

  26. Not interesting. by saccade.com · · Score: 1

    Wireless (WiFi) should be built in. Otherwise you're guaranteed a configuration headache to use a feature that should work right out of the box. Built-in camera is pretty much expected on these machines too. And, quite frankly, I'll stick with the "proprietary" battery packs that give another 2-4 hours of run-time, thanks.

    1. Re:Not interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everywhere you go, someone complains about something. It's either "proprietary battery this" or "stupid AA's that"... what the hell. Can't please everyone, I guess.

  27. Nyarlathotep? by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

    Is that you???

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
  28. Re:Oh boy. This IS the future. by mrfrostee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My Dad's first calculator cost $300 and it took a full pack of AA's and it had glow-y red numbers inside tiny light bulbs or vacuum tubes or something.

    Those were Nixie Tubes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixie_tube

    And it was the most exciting thing in the world! If there had been an internet back then, there would have been feverish discussion and hardware hacks and all kinds of 'boy' chatter regarding it and other devices competing for the same market.

    We mostly talked in person back then, but it was just as exciting.

    But nobody talks about pocket calculators much these days. We've solved them. They're done. They work perfectly...

    Why can't I find one as good at being a calculator as my nearly 30 year old HP-15c?

  29. Have to know... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    DId you JUST change your signature to what it says now, or is that entirely coincidence...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Have to know... by Serenissima · · Score: 1

      Nope, that's been my sig for a while now :D

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  30. Big Deal! by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    My Bluetooth-enabled Tandy Model 101 runs on four AA batteries.

  31. Using CLI at school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sir! Ill make a bet you will not get laid this semester! ;-)

    1. Re:Using CLI at school? by hatten · · Score: 1

      I don't even have a girfriend! How the hell am I supposed to get laid!

  32. Re:Hurray for ...cars! by zogger · · Score: 1

    6831 cells, form factor 18650-common industry standard for small devices, slightly larger than an AA, more storage and higher voltage (just for reference)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battery_sizes#18650

    Tesla roadster battery pack system

    http://www.teslamotors.com/display_data/TeslaRoadsterBatterySystem.pdf

    So it almost is being done with cars like that..close enough. They use some fancy wiring and cooling for the Tesla though...

    You have good points on trash and packing though. That's a big price people pay for a lot of things today, then it just turns to junk instantly. My non favorite is blisterpacks. I keep aviation snips handy just for dealing with those things. They *are* good packaging, but a pain to open and then how to dispose of them cleanly?

      Sometimes I wish they had an area right outside the checkout lanes where you could open your purchases, and they had a recycle bin sitting there for the packaging junk. Or just have lockable generic packages with clear covers to see what is in there. You pay for the item, it gets unlocked right then after ring up, they retain the packaging and it goes to the back where the next item-whatever that item might be that could fit in it, gets placed in there, then back out to the shelf.

  33. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be there, done that... with half the batteries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80_Model_100

  34. Well... by rinoid · · Score: 1

    I'd still be using my Newton if I thought AA batteries were the best way to go.

    1. Re:Well... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Agreed. AAA batteries in my Palm III are the way to go.

      My Newton has a broken battery door. If you look closely, you'll notice some rather 'elegant' design in the battery door of the early Newton. So elegant that it's broken on probably every example still in existence. Apple just doesn't do good battery compartments. They don't even try any more.

  35. Prelink? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    That would accelerate startup times of programs. (But at the expense of RAM, if not properly done.)

    One question: If the chip forces you to use Linux anyway, then why did they not use a ARM chip, and save even more energy?
    There are so many easy-to-solve problems in this one, that it boggles the mind.
    Batteries: Use a normal lid. Maybe with a locking mechanism. But not with screws.
    SD: cut a opening in the case, and you have a SD slot.
    WLAN: Same thing. Just make it so it has one smooth surface with the case, when the stick in inserted. And offer a way to eject it / pull it out. (A mechanical button will do.)
    etc. :/

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Prelink? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      It's a 586 (that's why the SoC is called "XCore86"). You can put XP on there if you want to.

  36. No suspend/resume is a dealbreaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Suspend/resume is hard to get right. It didn't work on the XO for quite a while, and then when it finally was a supported feature it could trash the external SD card. (That bug was squashed several months later, wasn't it?) There are potential problems with devices on USB (like the wifi in in this EduBook). I think the XO-1.5 redesign included several changes for the purpose of better enabling suspend/resume. (And the XO also had the audacious goal of supporting micro-naps with near-instant resume to really extend battery life, which unfortunately they never achieved.)

    Really, having no suspend/resume is just a total dealbreaker for a laptop that isn't chained to the classroom wall. Plus it's an indication of a not-well-tested product IMHO.

  37. Throwable netbooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >and they are cheap enough to buy an entire new netbook with new battery when anything breaks or wears out.

    Sorry, but 300$ isnt cheap enough for most people.

    ANd what you are saying is that new netbooks come with a battery already and when it wears out you can just buy a new one?

    Nice.

  38. Re:Oh boy. This IS the future. by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 1

    Why can't I find one as good at being a calculator as my nearly 30 year old HP-15c?

    xcalc -rpn on a linux smartphone?

    I still use my 23+ year old HP-15C at home, though.

  39. Solar? by AVryhof · · Score: 3, Interesting

    12 Volts, 1.2 watts .... my eee needs 36 watts (12V * 3A = 36 watts) according to the power adaptor.

    For 31.65 + s/h I can make this Solar powered

    http://www.altestore.com/store/Solar-Panels/1-to-50-Watt-Solar-Panels/Kyocera-12W-12V-Mini-Solar-Panel/p718/

    I can see the application in this.

    1. Re:Solar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Eee probably draws about half the power adapter is rated for. My Aspire One's power adapter is 19v, 1.58A for 30 watts, but under full load and maximum brightness, I was only able to get it to draw 14 watts maximum. Any wart that is always drawn to its maximum capabilities is a dead wart. A wart that is rated for 30 watts and is drawn for 15 watts maximum puts out a lot less heat than one rated for 15 and drawn for 15.

    2. Re:Solar? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      That 1.2W is only for the Xcore processor.

      The LCD is backlit, and likely by itself uses more than the rest of the device. Much more. There is your problem to get this solar powered, and your problem to get that battery life issue solved (solved: >24 hours normal use on a single charge).

  40. Re:Oh boy. This IS the future. by indiechild · · Score: 1

    Even among pocket calculators there's a huge variety of different devices. Some are for complex scientific work, others are just for adding up your weekly grocery expenses. Surely the complex scientific calcs are going to continue to evolve, just like laptop computers will continue to evolve. Either that or they'll be replaced by all-in-one devices like smartphones running specialised software.

    I agree with the gist of your post, I think we'll see more and more "appliance" type computers which will be so simple to use that they'll be like everyday appliances which anyone can use intuitively. At the same time we'll definitely continue to see "real computers" which are customisable and hackable, though the market for these will no doubt be smaller, since most consumers just want something which works out of the box.

    Rest assured there'll always be something geeky for people to play around with.

  41. Re:Woah. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    Plus, as far as slashvertisements go, I don't terribly mind when it's a company that will probably end up bringing technology to thousands of kids who've never touched a computer (much less owned one).

    It's OLPC minus the bureaucracy.

  42. Re:Oh boy. This IS the future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quoth the GP:

    ...stuff that lasts doesn't make money. Welcome to the Industrial Age.

  43. Re:Woah. by Larryish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Regardless... I am in love.

    Seriously.

    This machine specs out like a lady at my parents' house, and a slut in the bedroom.

  44. axioo pico by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    This looks exactly like the Axioo's Pico. Is it done by the same company? Are these the factory rejects or something?

  45. Nice Review by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    I liked that review. It was interesting enough for me to read it in full, and you seems to have covered everything I wanted to know, with no uncalled for overhyping or bashing.

    One minor gripe I have, not necessarily with your review per se but in general:

    Sure, GNOME and OpenOffice.org take a long time to start up, and Flash runs like molasses unless you have a beast of a CPU, but let's not hold that against the devices. It's the software that makes it that way. Every time a low-power device is introduced, people note that it doesn't run $heavy_software_of_choice speedily. Well, of course not. That software was developed so that it runs passably on the fastest generation of desktop hardware.

    Imagine not, what the experience could be like running heavy software on faster hardware. Imagine what the experience could be like running lighter software on the same hardware.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Nice Review by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it seems odd anyone would dump a full Ubuntu on this thing when Xubuntu or the like would be a much better fit.

    2. Re:Nice Review by Mage66 · · Score: 1

      the unit comes with WattOS which is a version of Ubuntu made for low powered netbooks.

  46. Best of both by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    This is hardly revolutionary technology the Sony MZ R700 MiniDisc walkman came with a rechargable battery and a charging circuit so you can charge it from the wall wart. The best part is that its an AA battery, so not only can you swap it out for a standard AA in a pinch you can also stick any other rechargable AA in and use that/recharge it internally. And that came out in 2001 and is the tiniest most amazing piece of electronics i've ever laid hands on, I bought a "new" one off ebay just a couple of weeks ago.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    1. Re:Best of both by neurovish · · Score: 1

      This is hardly revolutionary technology the Sony MZ R700 MiniDisc walkman came with a rechargable battery and a charging circuit so you can charge it from the wall wart. The best part is that its an AA battery, so not only can you swap it out for a standard AA in a pinch you can also stick any other rechargable AA in and use that/recharge it internally. And that came out in 2001 and is the tiniest most amazing piece of electronics i've ever laid hands on, I bought a "new" one off ebay just a couple of weeks ago.

      Hooray for obsolete technology. Good to see that I'm not the only one still clinging to my minidisc and getting laughed at by all my ipod/phone toting friends when they see it. I always like the Sharps better though, they don't feel as fisher price.

  47. Re:Woah. by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Michael Barnes' company, NohrTec, is about 3km from my Bangkok condo, and I appreciate what he tries to do. All of his products are very FOSS-friendly. He even had a special version of Puppy Linux for his old MicroClients (I own one, and it runs Ubuntu 9.10 perfectly). There aren't that many companies out there designing hardware specifically for Linux and low-poer requirements, and he probably deserves more exposure than he gets. He certainly deserves as much as Pandora and the like get.

    The XCore86 is a rebranded Vortex86MX from Taiwan. He's also using it in the Gecko Surfboard, which is going to make a great thin client.

  48. Re:Woah. by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

    This machine specs out like a lady at my parents' house, and a slut in the bedroom.

    Sir, I salute your ability to find a way to add innuendo to common computer specifications.

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
  49. Re:Oh boy. This IS the future. by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    Or any of the dozens of HP emulators available for almost every platform that has two transistors to rub together... I use Free42 on my n810. (Yeah, I know, it's not technically an emulator, but you'd never know that it wasn't running actual HP ROMs.)

    Though I also have the 25 year old HP-15C that got me through an EE degree, as well as a 42S and a 16C that I acquired later. They all work great and see almost daily use. Especially the 16C which is, without question, the best damn programmer's calculator ever made.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  50. AAs for laptops, I remember the TRS-80 Model 100 by awtbfb · · Score: 1

    AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop.

    Actually, the old TRS-80 Model 100 from the early 80's ran on AA batteries. There was some merit to being able to run down to the corner store when you were in a bind. Yes, I used to use one of these. It was a damn cool computer at the time.

  51. Re:Oh boy. This IS the future. by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 1

    Soon on Slashdot, we will not longer be discussing laptop computers because they are going to be as ubiquitous and cheap (as in 'Toys R Us' cheap) as the humble pocket calculator.

    Intel and Microsoft disagree with you on that. They're doing everything they can to keep regular laptops costing around $500. Both companies have restrictions on the hardware that can be put into a netbook. Manufacturers who don't follow the rules miss out of preferential pricing deals which essentially prices them out of the market.

    The only real hope for $100 netbooks is ARM + Linux. You can bet your life that Intel and Microsoft will do everything possible to derail the ARM train.

    --
    "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
  52. Re:Oh boy. This IS the future. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    The only real hope for $100 netbooks is ARM + Linux. You can bet your life that Intel and Microsoft will do everything possible to derail the ARM train.

    This is true.

    And the other side of the argument should also make note of 3D videos and increasingly realistic games which will no doubt require further development of chips and video hardware. I imagine that computers will continue to evolve and draw excited Wows from the audience of tech geeks.

    But we are still definitely on the cusp of a vast plateau. Laptops as we currently know them are about to become something very different. Laptop guts from 5 years ago looked very much like those of today. That's about to change dramatically, and that change will have an unpredictable ripple effect.

    Heck, that by itself is rather exciting, now that I think about it!

    -FL

  53. Re:Oh boy. This IS the future. by Agripa · · Score: 1

    I recently replaced my HP48g with an HP50g and have no significant complaints. Even better, it takes 4 x AAA instead of the 48s 3 x AAA.