Slashdot Mirror


Earliest "Writing" On 60,000-Year-Old Eggshells

New Scientist reports on research published in PNAS (abstract here) about what may be the earliest writing yet discovered, on eggshells dated to 60,000 years ago. "Since 1999, Pierre-Jean Texier of the University of Bordeaux, France, and his colleagues have uncovered 270 fragments of shell at the Diepkloof Rock Shelter in the Western Cape, South Africa. They show the same symbols are used over and over again, and the team say there are signs that the symbols evolved over 5,000 years. This long-term repetition is a hallmark of symbolic communication and a sign of modern human thinking, say the team. [Another researcher is quoted:] 'Judging from what we know about the evolution of art all over the world, there may have been many [written language] traditions that were born, lasted for some time, and then vanished. This may be one of them, most probably not the first and certainly not the last.'"

214 comments

  1. The inscription by bl8n8r · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mmmmmmmm.... bacon

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:The inscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wrong wrong wrong, it's the prehistoric form of 'best before' date written in an ancient numeral system (similiar to roman numerals).

    2. Re:The inscription by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 1

      they had ramen noodles back then?

    3. Re:The inscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      no no no no... it says "First Post!"

    4. Re:The inscription by should_be_linear · · Score: 2, Funny

      It if fragment of lonegr text, and says "Even if they never come back to this planet again, these flying cars are positively coolest thing _ever_".

      --
      839*929
    5. Re:The inscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw c'mon people. It's obvious. It said "First Post"

    6. Re:The inscription by roxteddy · · Score: 1

      Also discovered: These symbols developed over time into the lion we know today

  2. The writing says by click2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The writing says

    Best Before: Birth of Christ

    --
    I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    1. Re:The writing says by click2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or "I came first" signed by a chicken

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    2. Re:The writing says by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 5, Funny

      The rooster came first. Then left, not realizing what he had started. Said he'd call, but never did...prehistoric bastard!

    3. Re:The writing says by ryantmer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Or "I came first" signed by a chicken

      I feel like I can sympathize with this chicken... I too have that problem.

      --
      Whatever it is, it's notablog.
    4. Re:The writing says by dogsbreath · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is an ancient symbol for "Organic Free Range Omega".

      The first marketing campaign.

    5. Re:The writing says by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      Or "First Post"

      Damn you!!

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    6. Re:The writing says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prehistoric MAGNIFICENT bastard, thank you very much! -- Foghorn Leghorn

    7. Re:The writing says by pubwvj · · Score: 0

      Oh, he called alright. He calls every morning at 4 am. Wakes me up. Or did. Until I taught the rooster not to crow. Delicious.

  3. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ooga Booga Farms"

  4. The amazing human journey by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In 60,000 years we've progressed from scratching symbols on eggshells and shitting in caves to producing electronic television shows like "Jersey Shore" and "The Hills." How far we've come.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:The amazing human journey by anss123 · · Score: 1

      Well, people back then had 10% bigger brains than we do now. They lacked convenience such as tame animals and modern grain so they had less time to sit around pondering - thus maybe they needed to be smarter than we are now.

      Then as life got easier (with plant and animals changing to accommodate us) we lost some intelligence in favor of easier births.

      We'll never know but it's possible isn't it?

    2. Re:The amazing human journey by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still shit in a cave, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:The amazing human journey by lordmetroid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, all research points that they had a lot more spare time, meats of various kinds is a very energy dense food item, grain production requires a whole lot of work for piss porr nutritional values in comparision.

    4. Re:The amazing human journey by anss123 · · Score: 0

      Actually, all research points that they had a lot more spare time, meats of various kinds is a very energy dense food item, grain production requires a whole lot of work for piss porr nutritional values in comparision.

      Doubt that. Hunting take much time and energy and is an all year round activity - you can't store it unless you have salt - while grain harvesting take ~3 weeks and can be stored indefinitely as long as you keep it dry.

    5. Re:The amazing human journey by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I always suspected that the theme of the lost "golden age" present in many creation myths is a faint echo of the change from a pure hunter-gatherer existance, where, given a low population density, food was abundant, to a settled farmer existance with high population density and the resulting resource shortage and long days of hard work. Those myths have a long oral tradition - it would not surprise me if this theme reaches back to the neolithic revolution. Interestingly, the loss of the golden age is often closely coupled with flood myths. This, too, points to a neolithic origin - memories of the floodings accompanying the end of the last ice age.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    6. Re:The amazing human journey by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      Grain storage would have been a problem mice would be able to get into the storage and shit all over the place thus making 3 weeks of harvesting a waste of time.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    7. Re:The amazing human journey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, people back then had 10% bigger brains than we do now. They lacked convenience such as tame animals and modern grain so they had less time to sit around pondering - thus maybe they needed to be smarter than we are now.

      Citation needed, the earliest anatomically modern human was dated to almost 200,000 years ago, that's almost 140,000 years before the find in TFA. Also part of the definition of "anatomically modern" is that it conforms to the range of variation of the skulls in the living population. Futhermore one of the characteristic features of an AMH skull is a large forehead with more space for an enlarged brain.

    8. Re:The amazing human journey by anss123 · · Score: 0

      They were able to build sufficiently mouse proof storage even back then - they weren't entirely stupid you see ;)

      Making a hut out of mud and grass that won't fall apart at the first sign of rain is impressive actually. Probably needed frequent repair though.

    9. Re:The amazing human journey by anss123 · · Score: 1

      Here: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/cromagnon.html

      Cro-magnon: 1600cc (Ice age humans, ca 30 000 years ago)
      Us: 1400cc

      So our ancestors had 12.5% larger brains.

    10. Re:The amazing human journey by anss123 · · Score: 1

      So our ancestors had 12.5% larger brains.

      Meant: May have had 12.5% larger brains, brain size probably vary a lot :)

    11. Re:The amazing human journey by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always suspected that the theme of the lost "golden age" present in many creation myths is a faint echo of the change from a pure hunter-gatherer existance, where, given a low population density, food was abundant

      Huh? The population density was low because the carrying capacity was low, precisely because food was scarce. The subsequent explosion in the human population (still ongoing for the most part) indicates we have been in an unusual transitory period where food has been plentiful, due to agriculture.

    12. Re:The amazing human journey by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily a contradiction. Yes, carrying capacity was low and the hunter-gatherer lifestyle can't support the population a farming lifestyle can. However, the hunter-gatherer's were adapted to it and led a comparably comfortable life. I remember reading a study about the !Kung-bushmen, who live as hunter-gatherers under extremely scarce conditions and still have more free time - in that case time purely for social interaction - than any farmer can dream of.

      The immense population growth of farming societies probably quickly drove the hunting and gathering tribes to near-extinction, for example by gobbling up the land for agricultural use, which became useless for the hunter-gatherers. I still hold the conviction that the life of an early hunter-gatherer was possibly more easy than that of an early farmer. While farming increased the carrying capacity of the land greatly, it also led to a less diverse diet and by that to malnutrition, as well as to a higher incident of disease due to the increased population density. Furthermore, the change to farming led to the rise of organizational hierarchies, of politics and probably of religions - keeping track of the date to identify planting season etc. was a major job of most early priests. The increase in organization of society led to loss of freedom - there are no landless serfs in hunter-gatherer societies. Control over land ownership, over irrigation and finally, over knowledge gave rise to despotism on a scale that never could work in a hunting tribe. Higher population density does not equal higher quality of life. It is all this which I think might be reflected in the idea of the lost golden age.

      Don't get me wrong, I am not saying all this is true, this is just a layman hypothesis of mine.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    13. Re:The amazing human journey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is also a fine example of modern society. You're no longer being chased by jesus riding a velociraptor, and yet you're still whining. Some people are never happy.

    14. Re:The amazing human journey by radtea · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't get me wrong, I am not saying all this is true,

      Good, because it's all false. Hunter-gatherer societies can in rare cases have more free time for social interaction, but everything we've seen of hunter-gatherer societies in the modern world gives the lie to every other aspect of your speculation.

      Hunter-gatherer societies are in general hierachical, war-like, mysogynstic, and rigidly bound by social mores that would make the Victorians look like libertines.

      Look at pre-contact Polynesian societies, for example: women weren't allowed in canoes, which is more extreme than even modern Saudi Arabia, where women are at least allowed to be passengers in the primary mode of transportation.

      Studies of non-agricultural North American native societies suggest that war-like violence was the primary cause of death amongst young men.

      Existing "stone age" Amazonian peoples have used gang rape as a means of social control in the past century (see the book "Anxious Pleasures" for an interesting ethnography of an Amazonian tribe, focused on sexual mores.)

      And so on. There is a wealth of detailed empirical data putting the lie to the whole "noble savage" "golden age" myth: modern, liberal, democratic, technological, market-oriented societies are the most peaceful, caring, inclusive, egalitarian, ecologically friendly cultures that have ever existed.

      We have problems because we still have people who are heirs to the sociopathic psychology of earlier times, both hunter-gatherer and agricultural, and we are so enormously successful that our very numbers have created problems that other peoples could only dream of.

      But don't kid yourself: this is the golden age, and if you're posting on ./ you're one of the "noble citizens" that future generations will look back on with envy and wonder. Kinda sad, ain't it?

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    15. Re:The amazing human journey by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      We probably shit outside the caves. Most of the time.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    16. Re:The amazing human journey by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doubt that. Hunting take much time and energy and is an all year round activity - you can't store it unless you have salt - while grain harvesting take ~3 weeks and can be stored indefinitely as long as you keep it dry.

      You doubt? Don't. Research shows that the transition to neolithic agriculture was accompanied by appearance of nutritional deficiencies, skeletal deformations (quern mill took its toll), severe dental problems and most likely by an increase of work having to be carried out daily from the average of three work hours to twelve work hours (per day).

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    17. Re:The amazing human journey by tresho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      pre-contact Polynesian societies, for example: women weren't allowed in canoes -- Those barbarians made their women swim to the uninhabited islands while the men got to ride in the canoes.

    18. Re:The amazing human journey by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Look at pre-contact Polynesian societies, for example: women weren't allowed in canoes [...]

      I wonder how then they reached the islands. Strong open-water swimmers, maybe?

    19. Re:The amazing human journey by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Errr... citation needed.

      It was pretty hilarious to go here and read in the first paragraph the exact opposite of what you just said.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    20. Re:The amazing human journey by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think I have to clarify something here - I am certainly not adhering to any "noble savage" theory here. I completely agree that from our point of view the quality of life and societal structure of hunter-gatherer societies are nothing desirable at all and with your assessment of the relative merits of our society compared to it. What I was arguing was that from the perspective of an early farmer, life has not really improved in the course of the neolithic revolution. I am not saying that there was a golden age we should strive to get back. I am saying that for the early neolithic farmer it might have looked that way, thus giving rise to the golden age myth present in so many cultures.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    21. Re:The amazing human journey by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Hmm, all that, as opposed to modern hierarchical, war-like, misogynistic, and rigidly bound by social mores that make Victorians look like libertines african farming communities?

      Good job on making things up. You apparently have someone convinced.

    22. Re:The amazing human journey by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      while grain harvesting take ~3 weeks and can be stored indefinitely as long as you keep it dry.

      I suppose it plants itself, and the ploughing and fertilizing is done by magic pixies?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:The amazing human journey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at pre-contact Polynesian societies, for example: women weren't allowed in canoes,

      I call bullshit. The Polynesians certainly didn't colonize just about every worthwhile island in the Pacific without women in their canoes.

      It's also improbable that we know much about "pre-contact" societies because we couldn't learn about them without contact. I can very easily believe that very shortly post-contact, women were forbidden from canoes to keep them off the ships of those filthy foreigners.

      Not that I believe in the so-called Noble Savage or that there was ever a Golden Age, but the above on Polynesians defies logic.

    24. Re:The amazing human journey by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It's obvious: They were created (by local deities) from the ribs of the male colonists after they had arrived to the island in question.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    25. Re:The amazing human journey by tresho · · Score: 1

      Larger brains = better thinking? Beyond a certain level in brain size, I doubt this is a valid rule. The 'best and the brightest' have repeatedly led their followers to doom and disaster. There is no reason to think the situation was that different 60,000 years ago. Maybe those big brains died out because they were too clever by 12.5%

    26. Re:The amazing human journey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at how the Lapita settled the Pacific, you'd realize that the idea of 'pre-contact' polynesian's not allowing women in canoes is absurd :)

      Hint: Over thousands of years they colonized every virtually every single island starting roughly from Taiwan to Eastern Island/Hawaii

    27. Re:The amazing human journey by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Life wasn't easy for hunter gathers, but according to Jack Potter (emeritus at UC Berkeley), ancient tribes spent fewer hours per day dealing with activities related to food/clothing/shelter/fuel than modern people do. Most people spend 8-12 hours a day (5 days a week) working/commuting for their job. Hunter gatherers would typically spend (according to Potter) 3-4 hours a day (6-7 days a week) on that stuff, giving them far more leisure time for cultural activities like story telling, dancing singing and religious stuff. Which, along towards your point, could explain the expanded brain capacity.

    28. Re:The amazing human journey by Unequivocal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Plus plus. The research I've read (disclaimer: grad school drop-out in Anthro) is that farming/agriculture permits higher density living -- more peeps per sq kilometer. It requires more time investment per person to get the same calories, but you can do it on much less land. It also permits more specialization (I make the ploughs, you raise the oxen, he plows the fields) in society due to logistic simplifications (we live close enough to each other to make the exchanges frequently), as well as the inherent monetization created by storable crops (he pays you and me with the barley he grows).

      Your point on nutrition in mono-crop societies is a good one too -- if you live on mostly barley, you might be getting the calories but not the nutrients that a family wandering from place to place eating varied roots, nuts, berries and wild game is getting.

    29. Re:The amazing human journey by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      He was making an argument (I think) about free time not spent tending to core food/shelter/fuel/clothing needs. You are making an argument (I think) about the values embodied in the use of the free time. Golden age can have many meanings I guess.

    30. Re:The amazing human journey by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the guy making the "values" case to your argument, but I think you've got a good point. I haven't heard anyone talk about creation myths (let alone eden myths) in the light of the transition from pre-agriculture to agriculture. (I studied Anthro in grad school before dropping out to start reading slashdot). :)

    31. Re:The amazing human journey by anss123 · · Score: 1

      Yes actually, it took some 2000 years before our ancient ancestors started planting seeds themselves. According to BBC or some other TV documentary anyway.

    32. Re:The amazing human journey by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      My grandfather built a house out of mud bricks back in the 30's (with sheet metal roof). It's still in use, though over the years, indoor plumbing, electricity, in floor heating and now wireless networking has been added to it. My daughter grew up in that house, up until last year when we built a new house a couple miles down the road. 3 generations raised in there is pretty cool.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    33. Re:The amazing human journey by Snotboble_ · · Score: 1

      So that's what you call your parents' basement..? ;o)

      --
      Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;umount;sleep
    34. Re:The amazing human journey by anss123 · · Score: 1

      Pretty cool. Didn't know mud bricks had any hope lasting that long. I presume you kept them from getting wet somehow.

    35. Re:The amazing human journey by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Well, it's central New Mexico, on the wet side of the Sandia Mountains. Originally, it was plastered with basic mud plaster on top of mud bricks. This would work by flaking off when it got too wet and keep the bricks underneath from getting moist. Since the 50's or 60's, it's been plastered with modern stucco plaster on wire lathe. And each year in spring, we have to go around and break away the loose stuff and patch it. Not near as bad as the mud plaster days, though.

      What's interesting is that there's an uncapped wall of adobe bricks that was put up in the 50s, with no plaster, nothing on top and, while it has a melted look to it now, it's still standing. I wouldn't recommend leaning on it but it's amazing how long just plain mud has lasted.

      Still, the way to keep mud walls strong is dry top and keeping the plaster up. At least we're not using cow manure plaster like they used to do, way back when.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    36. Re:The amazing human journey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TL:DR

    37. Re:The amazing human journey by anss123 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, cow manure. It is amazing (and revolting) what shit can be used for.

    38. Re:The amazing human journey by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Bah, they just wasted time sitting around complaining "Man, I wish someone would invent writing so we would have something to read around here!" and talking about sports.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    39. Re:The amazing human journey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people view the story of Caine and Abel as a metaphor describing the shift from hunter-gatherer culture to a agricultural one.

    40. Re:The amazing human journey by Stupid+McStupidson · · Score: 1

      In 60,000 years we've progressed from scratching symbols on eggshells and shitting in caves to producing electronic television shows like "Jersey Shore" and "The Hills." How far we've come.

      In which direction?

    41. Re:The amazing human journey by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If it's growing wild the by definition it's not agrigultural. That's the gathering part, the complement of hunting.

      Did you factor the tasks I mentioned - plus building granaries as you mantioned later - into your three week estimate?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    42. Re:The amazing human journey by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or they were preferentially hunted by zombies.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    43. Re:The amazing human journey by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Those barbarians made their women swim to the uninhabited islands while the men got to ride in the canoes.

      Two swallows could carry a woman, strung between them on a vine.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    44. Re:The amazing human journey by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Hunter-gatherer societies are in general hierachical, war-like, mysogynstic, and rigidly bound by social mores that would make the Victorians look like libertines.

      I'm intrigued by what you say here because of a fascinating article I read in National Geographic several weeks ago about the Hadza people. They're one of the last few "modern" hunter-gatherer societies that are left in the world. No true political hierarchy, no religious beliefs, no tribal war, and so on. The journalist mentioned specifically about how much leisure time they have, and was quite jealous.

      A very worthwhile read.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    45. Re:The amazing human journey by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Didn't know mud bricks had any hope lasting that long.

      Various structures build of mud brick have survived in Iraq, Iran, Pakistan (Harrapa, Mohendro-Daro, spelling mistakes invented here!) and parts of the Andean coast for thousands of years with no maintenance over most of the last few thousand years. With reasonable maintenance ... they'd be (potentially) immortal. As, to be honest, building in practically anything but wood would be.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    46. Re:The amazing human journey by anss123 · · Score: 1

      It's not my estimate, comes from the documentary uh... "Stories from the Stone Age" IIRC and I belive it was 3 weeks for one person to feed a family for a whole year.

    47. Re:The amazing human journey by pubwvj · · Score: 0

      Actually, your early farmer theory is all wrong too. I farm much like early farmers and life is not as hard as you imagine. I also know all about hunting-gathering and can do it but would much rather farm. Farming is much easier and very useful for getting through the winters.

      Additionally, city folk of today are very confused about basic life. We really do both hunting, gathering and farming. It isn't a one or the other situation. That is an illusion from your modern office cubicle world.

      As to high population density, you're thinking urban. There's a lot of country side out there without many people that you city folk don't seem to be aware of. Good.

    48. Re:The amazing human journey by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, research and studies are one thing. But some guy - not an ordinary guy, a guy on the internet - has doubts.

      Don't know how many farmers you know. I know a few and none of them take 49 weeks vacation per year.

      They're obviously doing it wrong, but anss123 (985305) is going to put them right and send them a postcard from Stockholm.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Very well hidden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Easter eggs!

  6. More images by Concern · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wish in articles like these they presented more of the source images, and in higher resolution. The small sample they provide is beautiful, but to the layman appears as a kind of meandering, simple decoration. Of course the claims are limited: communication via graphic art is distinct from communication via modern written languages.

    It's interesting to imagine the first lonely human writers at the dawn of written language - how many wrote things only they themselves could understand, before coincidence formed the first community of proto-literate people? How much of this early writing was just the smooth flow of art - abstract or representational - into more concrete meanings relevant to the every day lives even of the illterate?

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    1. Re:More images by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For the earliest forms of "writing" I suspect there were no "lonely" writers. The earliest forms likely being one step away from pictures, if they simply explain it to the other members of their group then it's pure memorization. Some languages (e.g. Chinese) are still like this, with specific symbols representing a word or concept instead of representing sounds or syllables. The written form of Chinese is mostly the same across the country, while the spoken language differs; the symbols have nothing to do with the pronunciation, they simply express the concept.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    2. Re:More images by grimJester · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to imagine the first lonely human writers at the dawn of written language - how many wrote things only they themselves could understand, before coincidence formed the first community of proto-literate people? How much of this early writing was just the smooth flow of art - abstract or representational - into more concrete meanings relevant to the every day lives even of the illterate?

      Are you really asking about the ratio of
      a) Written languages invented fully formed, spread when several individuals who had invented a written language met by accident
      and b) Written languages evolved from simple symbols?

      I'd say the ratio is about the same as animals created from scratch vs. evolved from simpler ones.

    3. Re:More images by anss123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The written form of Chinese is mostly the same across the country, while the spoken language differs; the symbols have nothing to do with the pronunciation, they simply express the concept.

      Does this means that people that can't talk to each other can write instead? Convenient then, no need to learn multiple languages.

    4. Re:More images by amplt1337 · · Score: 2, Informative

      the symbols have nothing to do with the pronunciation, they simply express the concept.

      Not quite. There's actually considerable phonetic information encoded in Chinese characters. They've just kept their original shape as the phonetics of the language shifted -- the written language is separately conservative from the spoken one. It's a process which we Anglophones should be familiar with -- but then, *cough*, ploughing through these kinds of rough waters, one is often inclined to keep one's unconsidered beliefs...

      In any event, Chinese characters are typically formed of combinations of smaller characters, which typically still have either semantic or phonetic meaning (or both). They are not arbitrary.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    5. Re:More images by daremonai · · Score: 5, Funny
      I wish in articles like these they presented more of the source images, and in higher resolution.

      Unfortunately, they can't; early humans had established a 70,000-year copyright period. And their DMCA takedown notices come by club and bone-tipped arrow.

    6. Re:More images by Sique · · Score: 1

      Does this means that people that can't talk to each other can write instead?

      Yes. A Korean might be able to read a chinese newspaper without knowing a single word in any Chinese language.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    7. Re:More images by Group+XVII · · Score: 1

      There's no evidence of earlier hominids playing with even simple decoration, afaik. If we interpret these repetitive designs through what we know about epigraphy rather the study of modern written languages, the claims are less limited.

    8. Re:More images by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does this means that people that can't talk to each other can write instead? Convenient then, no need to learn multiple languages.

      Yes, that is true. Mandarin and cantonese writings will be comprehensible to each other, but not the spoken language. It is not something that is very unusual. China formed into a large empire 2500 years ago and established an enduring bureaucracy. The Mandarins (palace officials) collected data from the vast empire and established common writing systems. But local languages adopted the symbol-meaning map but kept their own pronunciation. Eventually minor dialects died out leaving behind just two large spoken language systems.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    9. Re:More images by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The written form of Chinese is mostly the same across the country, while the spoken language differs; the symbols have nothing to do with the pronunciation, they simply express the concept.

      Does this means that people that can't talk to each other can write instead? Convenient then, no need to learn multiple languages.

      Yes - actually, funny anecdotal story about things like that. A friend of mine went and travelled the world and he said one of the most interesting quirks about China is that everyone knows the symbols, but not the words.

      So - when you are in lets say Germany, and you are looking for a Coffee shop, and you ask the person next to you - and they speak German not English, but you don't know the German word for Coffee. You might use words like Café, and so on and so forth, speaking to the person using different words to get your meaning across.

      In China, whenever someone comes across a word they don't know (and it happens quite frequently) - they hold out their hand, and use the index finger of their opposite hand to draw out the symbol of the word you are looking for. This works so well because their symbols mean the words instead of the sounds.

    10. Re:More images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In university, I was part of the Chinese Cultural Club. At every meeting there was a chalkboard where anything said in Chinese was written down for the benefit of those who didn't speak that particular dialect.

    11. Re:More images by Concern · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the question I was getting at. You could be exactly right. Although I could just as easily imagine a solitary memory aid to a gifted individual growing in lonely complexity. Perhaps again and again - before the aggregation of people brought such folks into contact with each other, and their ideas began to intermingle. Then again, the need for this kind of memory aid is supposed to be associated with the growth of agriculture and the consequent increase in the complexity of human society. Perhaps more sophisticated writing and more sophisticated writers meeting each other followed quickly.

      The more canonical record postulated by professional archaeologists has us going from clay tokens to tokens with markings - to markings - made on the clay tokens - now tablets. But of course, we can only infer from what evidence survives. It seems unreasonable to imagine we have a very meaningful part of the physical evidence.

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    12. Re:More images by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      In order to produce art it seems that you'd need a community around you. Without a community it would be difficult to find the time to do anything beyond mere surviving....

      Or maybe not.. It could be that there are long periods of inactivity -- sitting around waiting for the rain to stop or last night's meal to digest -- punctuated by moments of actual survival. Maybe game was super plenty.

      In either case, I like to think that those first human artists were not so different from those today.

    13. Re:More images by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think he meant speakers of different languages (Mandarin, Cantonese, Wu, ect) within China, not neighboring countries. They use an alphabet, Hangul, in Korea, which is not the Chinese characters, Hanzi. Same way with Japan. Their borrowed Chinese characters many times have different meanings (although they might be able to pick out some meaning here and there), and they also rely on a syllabary, Kana, in their wringing. Chinese has left major linguistic marks on neighboring languages like Korean, Japanese, and Vietnamese (which is written with a form of the Latin alphabet, they could no more understand Chinese characters than your average English speaker), but you can't read Chinese on the virtue of knowing them.

    14. Re:More images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say the ratio is about the same as animals created from scratch vs. evolved from simpler ones.

      Yeah ok, you won't be so smug once I unleash this fearsome new animal I've been creating from scratch.

    15. Re:More images by Concern · · Score: 1

      No. I'm ruminating about what it was like for an intelligent person's fiddling with ink or clay carving to take on some of the characteristics of writing. How it happened, how it looked, whether it was a solitary development, and if so, how often it happened?

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    16. Re:More images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The small sample they provide is beautiful, but to the layman appears as a kind of meandering, simple decoration.

      Oh dear no! We should limit all of science to only what the dumbest layman can understand! Then and only then no one will feel excluded or uncomfortable. Let's just dumb down EVERYTHING! Oh wait, for the most part we already have...

      Please, let's not do to science what Windows has done to computers.

    17. Re:More images by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Yes; in Larry Gonick's excellent "Cartoon History of the Universe" I recall a bit where the Chinese scholar is trying to persuade the European to adopt Chinese script for their language. It's an interesting idea, everyone could keep speaking their native language but all written communication would be understood by everyone.

    18. Re:More images by Concern · · Score: 1

      That's another great question. I have the idea that it was both. For many I'm sure survival was a 24 hour a day job. For others, human intelligence probably opened up staggeringly easy shortcuts to calories, to which the natural world would take many years, or decades, or centures etc. to adapt.

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    19. Re:More images by anss123 · · Score: 1

      I imagined Chinese as a sort of "universal" writing language where anyone that wrote using Chinese's characters would be able to make themselves understood regardless of them writing French, German, etc.

      Grammar would be a problem though.

    20. Re:More images by anss123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Intriguing idea but I suspect it would be somewhat like reading Babelfish translated text. Metaphor, grammar and even context (words that have different meaning depending on context) translates badly.

    21. Re:More images by Adelbert · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to a tentative theory mentioned in Ancient Egypt: A Very Short Introduction, it's possible that the early Ancient Egyptians heard about the technology of "written languages", and then got their top scientists onto replicating the concept, in order to try to correct the economic and military disparity that would result from being illiterate in a literate world.

      I'm not sure how well accepted this hypothesis is, but I find it an intriguing idea. It certainly fits in with the behaviour of nations today, as they scramble to try to replicate nuclear technology, say, or high quality Internet search engines.

    22. Re:More images by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Very unlikely that any Korean will be able to read and fully comprehend any Chinese paper based solely on the use of Chinese characters in the Korean language. That said, it's certainly possible to learn to read without ever learning the sounds of the characters.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    23. Re:More images by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      The Korean usage of the Chinese characters definitely carries the same meaning as the Chinese usage of the same characters. As I understand, so does the Japanese usage of the characters, though I've never studied Japanese formally to be certain about that.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    24. Re:More images by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The small sample they provide is beautiful, but to the layman appears as a kind of meandering, simple decoration.

      Indeed. Without some further explanation, the images look like these could simply be something like decorated eggs. Lots of cultures have done it over many millennia, and the patterns you often see are quite complex. My grandmother used to make a Russian/Ukrainian form of them, and she clearly "evolved" patterns of lines by varying those made by her mother and other women in her community.

      I'm not saying the researchers don't know what they're talking about. Just from the description of "repetitive patterns" and the images, it's hard to see the difference between language and decoration in this case.

    25. Re:More images by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      There are still many characters used in Japanese that are interchangeable with Chinese. However, because of the extensive use of hiragana and katakana the number of traditional characters Japanese can recognize is far smaller than what Chinese can identify, so Japanese may struggle a bit more. Certainly some meanings have changed but there are still many shared characters. It's not foolproof but a Chinese speaker can manage quite well using only writing, and I've seen quite a few examples of this firsthand. Korean is another story given how different their writing system is.

    26. Re:More images by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I worked for a Japanese man who regularly read a Korean paper although he had no knowledge of the Korean language (except insofar as it overlapped with Japanese). The paper was written using Chinese characters.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    27. Re:More images by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      In some cases, the Japanese usage is to equate the character to a Japanese word that sounds the same as the Chinese word that was originally associated with the symbol (from whichever Chinese language the Japanese first came into contact with).

      But mostly, the Japanese use is the same as the Chinese, so yes, it would be mostly readable...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    28. Re:More images by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      While technically true (the same way an English speaker could read a French newspaper without knowing a word of spoken French), written Korean is totally different than written Chinese. So I'm not sure why you selected those two...

    29. Re:More images by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      Sadly this cannot be conveniently used in more different western languages (I believe you will find most Chinese dialects have shared grammatical standards), because word order and grammatical standards are based on spoken language.

    30. Re:More images by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      If spoken Chinese is anything like spoken Japanese (the written languages are almost the same - loosely speaking), then the problem may not be that people don't know the words so much as the fact that the words are ambiguous.

      In Japanese (as in Chinese) the vocalization of a symbol has nothing to do with the appearance of the symbol, as the symbols are ideograms and are not phonetic. (Japanese also has two phonetic alphabets that work just like any writing system most /. readers already understand.) There are many cases of homonyms in the language, but they are of the sort that can lead to more confusion than homonyms typically do in English.

      Most of the time the correct meaning of a word is obvious from context. However, when there isn't much context a verbal conversation can easily be ambiguous. In this case people will often resort to tracing letters on their hands/etc.

      I'm certainly open to additional insight from native speakers of either language. :)

    31. Re:More images by chronosan · · Score: 1

      Maybe single characters may have similar meaning, but the compounds are vastly different. For example, the characters for letter mail (tegami) in Japanese mean toilet paper (literally hand paper) in Mandarin.

    32. Re:More images by Sique · · Score: 1

      The Korean I know did it. And she never learned any Chinese.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    33. Re:More images by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's also worth mentioning that different Chinese languages (Cantonese, Mandarin) have different grammar. Thus when a Cantonese speaker learns to write, they have to learn completely different rules of grammar for writing.

      --
      Qxe4
    34. Re:More images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/9062/56613036.png
      http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/9918/37977165.png
      http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/3168/65378241.png

    35. Re:More images by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      I guess it could be possible, until relatively recently many Koreans used Chinese script, and a lot of historical documents are written it in, but I think that most Koreans, probably younger ones in particular, don't know much Chinese. I have no idea how similar their usage is; every time I see Korean, it's written in Hangul. If you look at the Korean Google news, you see almost no Chinese characters; the only ones you do see are the name of a city in Taiwan. I'm not Korean, so I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that nowadays, while they do learn some Chinese characters in later grades of school, it is not widely used, probably not widely well known, and anything that is left is on the way out.

    36. Re:More images by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Written Chinese has heaps of grammar. It's a language, after all. If you tried to use Chinese glyphs to write texts using French, German etc. grammar, it would end up like The New Guide of the Conversation in Portuguese and English...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    37. Re:More images by ZoobieWa · · Score: 1

      Hear hear! Can anyone find images with better res? I'm trying.

    38. Re:More images by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Yoda uses completely different grammar, yet we are able to understand him. For the most part, it wouldn't be a problem.

    39. Re:More images by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      I like to think that those first human artists were not so different from those today.

      Hm. I am a poet, and therefore an artist. Are you saying that I still shit in a cave ?

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    40. Re:More images by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      Unless this is the evidence... Earliest known Easter Eggs?

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    41. Re:More images by tresho · · Score: 1

      Written Chinese has heaps of grammar. That is a side issue. What is remarkable is that people who speak mutually unintelligible dialects can use their own written language to make themselves clear to someone else who is literate in his own written language. That's a breakthrough. Which is easier, to learn to read & write a foreign language, or just to memorize several thousand characters with whatever written grammar the Chinese use? Is there a point for a literate Chinese to learn another Chinese dialect, or do they tend to rely on writing? I wonder if knowledge of any spoken Chinese language is necessary to become literate in Chinese, or could a student cut to the chase and simply learn the ideographs and the written grammar associated with them?

    42. Re:More images by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      But we're sorta' heading there with symbology. Driving, computers, basic food/shelter/medical aid symbols are now fairly universal. I mean, who doesn't hate that Apple symbol with the bite taken out of it?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    43. Re:More images by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      How do *you* pronounce waistcoat?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    44. Re:More images by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      obviously they all say:

      FIRST POST!!

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    45. Re:More images by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      It would sound funny as hell (since the grammar would be out of whack), but you could assign English words and makewords to Chinese characters. It's entirely possible to learn the written form without learning any spoken form. Since the symbols represent concepts and words, not pronunciation, you could call them anything, as long as you associate that sound with the correct concept. The grammar would be the sticking point; by reusing English pronunciation, you'd probably have a hard time keeping the grammar straight, but if you can deal with that, you'd be fine.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    46. Re:More images by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yoda also uses simple sentences, composed by a scriptwriter in a way that was meant to be understood, so it is not hard to understand him the first time. Complex grammar can be very difficult or impossible to understand if you don't know the rules (because the meaning can change if the rule changes. A simple example is "man bites dog" which completely changes meaning depending if the subject comes after the verb, as it does in many languages. If we changed it to, "man dog bites" it's impossible to know what it is unless you know the rule).

      Of course, Hong Kong speakers manage to do it, so it isn't too hard, but it is not trivial either.

      --
      Qxe4
    47. Re:More images by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      That's funny, unwanted mail in the US has the same name as a canned processed meat like product. I could see how toilet paper would be appropriate most of the time.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    48. Re:More images by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing "Correctly" isn't the answer you're looking for here?
      : )

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    49. Re:More images by anss123 · · Score: 1

      I mean, who doesn't hate that Apple symbol with the bite taken out of it?

      I've heard some religious think Apple is in league with the devil cause of that symbol - quick google - Darwin kernel and chmod 666. Hehe.

    50. Re:More images by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Oh, let's not let Noah Webster and other madmen get involved with a friendly discussion. Next thing you know, we're all using French pronunciations.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    51. Re:More images by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      I actually quite enjoyed the novel...

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    52. Re:More images by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      In China, whenever someone comes across a word they don't know (and it happens quite frequently) - they hold out their hand, and use the index finger of their opposite hand to draw out the symbol of the word you are looking for. This works so well because their symbols mean the words instead of the sounds.

      This also helps because in Chinese (Mandarin) there are SO MANY homophones that people speaking to one another frequently need to disambiguate what they are saying by indicating characters in the way you describe.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    53. Re:More images by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Sadly this cannot be conveniently used in more different western languages (I believe you will find most Chinese dialects have shared grammatical standards), because word order and grammatical standards are based on spoken language.

      Hinder communications, this does. Prevent them, it does not. It just makes everyone sound like Yoda to the other dialects.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    54. Re:More images by solferino · · Score: 1

      The two included quotes and your own comment are linguistic rubbish. Sorry to be so blunt. You have been upvoted because people love hearing these kind of stories about the 'mysterious' Chinese script.

      Please have a read of The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy by John DeFrancis before you go spouting any more such stories.

    55. Re:More images by dawnpatrol1623 · · Score: 1

      This is actually a common misconception about Chinese, and it has obscured a lot of debate about writing systems. The truth is that all forms of written language are based on sounds, and Chinese is no exception (although it's a much bigger pain in the ass than an alphabetic system). I highly recommend "Visible Speech" by John DeFrancis which propounds and defends this thesis.

    56. Re:More images by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Of the hundreds of Koreans I know, most don't know enough Chinese characters to read a Chinese paper, though they could certainly get the gist of some of the articles.

      Korean usage of Chinese characters has always been somewhat limited and is getting moreso over the last 15 years or so. Most Koreans only know a couple hundred Chinese characters at best. Certainly not enough to fully understand the written language, but enough to get along with a generally vague idea of a lot of what is there.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    57. Re:More images by pubwvj · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Disney DMCA: Forever Minus A Day.

  7. Mmm Eggs by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    It probably says something like, My Eggs, Hands Off.

    1. Re:Mmm Eggs by deander2 · · Score: 1

      you joke, but if you had read the article, you would have known that this is exactly what they think it might have meant. =P

    2. Re:Mmm Eggs by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Maybe if, in spring, you found the one with the special mark, you got an extra prize?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  8. The writing's on the wall..... by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    Did it make any more sense than current txt spk?

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  9. Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kilroy will be here

  10. Just unfound ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... Easter eggs. What's the big deal?

  11. I hope by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

    I hope no one was walking on those eggshells.

  12. Shopping List by wjousts · · Score: 5, Funny

    Turns out it was a shopping list. First item on the list? Eggs.

    1. Re:Shopping List by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then what came first? The shopping list or the egg?

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Shopping List by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Dude! You just blew my mind!

  13. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It said "we chuck spears, yo".

  14. This article was from PNAS, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PNAS jokes practically write themselves!

  15. Vinca by dargaud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are several proto-writings, such as the Vinca script which are fascinating, but also hotly debated.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  16. Re:FP by AndrewNeo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is misread this into something along the lines of, "Beware of Chuck Norris"

  17. Ancient traditions by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Funny

    They show the same symbols are used over and over again, and the team say there are signs that the symbols evolved over 5,000 years. This long-term repetition is a hallmark of symbolic communication and a sign of modern human thinking, say the team.

    Indeed, this is quite true and the tradition continues. It's hard to imagine our forebears scratching symbols in eggshell and that one day it would lead to us scratching symbols in kornshell. The shells then were quite fragile, barely able to withstand an errant pointer. A misplaced hash would lead to a shell escape. And don't even get me started on bash. When the ancients were using eggshell, there were many competing mediums. Deer horns and bits of pottery, jade, flecks of obsidian -- they were all prettier and easier to work with. Today it's the same -- there's ruby and perl and a host of others -- but kornshell, and its ancestor eggshell, will always have a place in my heart,

    1. Re:Ancient traditions by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm sure the Gnu that came along and Bashed the Eggshells must have been considered not user friendly.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:Ancient traditions by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      This is the funniest comment I read on /. in a long, long time ! Almost choked on my wine while reading it.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  18. I have examined the shells... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have examined the shells, and have been able to decipher the images. It reads...

    VERY FIRST POST.

  19. Likely meaning... by trurl7 · · Score: 1

    F1RST SKR4TCH!

    The pink one says "ZOMG, Z3BR4Z!"

    1. Re:Likely meaning... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      No hot gritz?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:Likely meaning... by trurl7 · · Score: 1

      I think the shells were already sufficiently "petrified"...

  20. What does it say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably: boil egg in water for 10 mins.

    I'm assuming it's chicken eggs but perhaps they were eating some other egg (duck, turtle, etc) back then?

  21. Re:FP by krou · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wouldn't be surprised if they were warning each other of Chuck Norris 60,000 years ago.

    --
    'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
  22. Unfortunately, the original code was lost... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    when the first paleolithic software writer retired and the sandstone media deteriorated. Given the evidence, the original program probably had something to do with viewing naked women. More research into naked women is continuing.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  23. In other news ... by krou · · Score: 1

    In other news, a preserved skeleton of a a giant prehistoric rabbit-like creature was found in the Diepkloof Rock Shelter in the Western Cape, South Africa.

    --
    'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
  24. Shells are old, but how old are the markings? by B.Stolk · · Score: 1

    Ok, I understand they can carbondate the shells.
    However, how did they date the markings?
    They may be 300 yrs old.
    Especially considering bushmen were still carving shells recently.

    --
    http://www.stolk.org/tlctc
    1. Re:Shells are old, but how old are the markings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can look at the context. If the artifacts around it also belong to that general time period, you can be fairly secure in the carbon date.

    2. Re:Shells are old, but how old are the markings? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      So you're positing that primitive cultures would conduct archaeological digs in order to find ancient egg shells to write on, rather than using the shells of eggs placed conveniently on the ground by contemporary birds.

      Interesting.

      Hey, since it was one of the archaeologists who made this discovery that pointed out that bushmen still carved shells recently, I bet he could test out this hypothesis.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Shells are old, but how old are the markings? by tobiah · · Score: 1

      I believe they look at the carvings in a microscope and examine how much erosion has occurred since the marks were made.

      --
      "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
    4. Re:Shells are old, but how old are the markings? by B.Stolk · · Score: 1

      Interesting, although it sounds like a very imprecise method: equating microscopic erosion to age.

      --
      http://www.stolk.org/tlctc
  25. What's even more interesting is... by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    ...the handwriting is on the inside of the shells.

  26. God made Man by jamesyouwish · · Score: 0, Redundant

    this can't be true man was made by good only a few thousand years ago

    1. Re:God made Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly. There is a reason "scientist" is close to "satanist". Some people seem to get their jollies from driving people away from God. I just don't get it.

  27. High-res photo... by kirill.s · · Score: 2, Informative

    We need some better pics.
    From home it looks now, my best bet is that it's just an ornament of some sort.

    This looks somewhat better than the pics in the summary link. (Or have I not found the good ones?)

  28. I suspect ancient "Einsteins" were possible by peter303 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    By an ancient Einstein, I mean someone who develops as significant piece of technology in a single generation. Like fossils in evolutions, this could be so fast that it was not saved in the archeologic record. Two Examples:
    Egyptian pyramids went for stacked sand-walled mastabas to full-blown monsters in less than a century. This was attributed to creativity of Imhotep. (also credited with inventing columns in architecture).

    The idea of purely phonetic alphabet seen to arise instantly in the archeological record in Ugarit 3400 years ago. It was adapted to Phonecia, Greece, Isreal, Rome etc. Most previous writing systems had combination of pure ideographs and phonetic syllables- ideographs borrowed because they sound like other works (like people do in charades).

    1. Re:I suspect ancient "Einsteins" were possible by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Egyptian pyramids went for stacked sand-walled mastabas to full-blown monsters in less than a century. This was attributed to creativity of Imhotep. (also credited with inventing columns in architecture).

      If this guy really did all that is attributed to him, then he was even more impressive than Einstein and Co. Just reading his wikipedia bio sends shivers down my spine. It's like learning that the old guy of 10000BC (the movie) is for real.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  29. writing on egg shells last longer than Disk Drives by goffster · · Score: 2

    Or for DVD's for that matter

  30. Roc hunting game by lymond01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Thag! We finally managed to climb to the great bird nest in level 3 peak. There was a mini-game! Look at the writing on this egg!"

    "Let me see that..."

    [You are in a clearing. A small cabin sits to the east. A dark forest is to the north. Impenetrable bushes are to the south and west. Choose the blue egg to go east. Choose the red egg to go north.]

    "Oooh...Dark forest sounds cool. Open the red egg!"

    [It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.]

    Both cavemen frown.

    "Not very original. This just happened to Grok yesterday."

  31. It says... by goffster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get viagra cheap at mongo's monster med madness sale!

  32. you're confusing your programming mediums by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    clearly, by evidence of the broken eggshells, we're talking about a primitive IRC eggdrop

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggdrop

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  33. I know what it said! by WheelDweller · · Score: 0

    "Don't fear, closed-minded scientists- I saw the big bang, and God wasn't there. No need to worry." :>

    Funny how the "open minded" snap shut when you tell them the dataset resides in the Bible...won't even look. Discredited source, though they have no answers.

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  34. Typo In Headline & Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like there's an extra 0 in both the headline and summary.

    1. Re:Typo In Headline & Summary by Group+XVII · · Score: 1

      ?? What they are saying is that around about 60,000 years ago a tradition of engraving existed which lasted about 5,000 years.

  35. The symbol loosely translates to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grade A Large

  36. Re:FP by play_in_traffic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hello World

  37. Big govenment even back then by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    They are most likely mandated 'best before' dates.

  38. Re:FP by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 5, Funny

    why do you think there's only "fragments" left? Chuck Norris was there .

  39. Scientific hubris! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    "This may be one of [the writing traditions], most probably not the first and certainly not the last."

    I appreciate the "probably" on this being the first, but certainly not the last? Well I think it's a little presumptuous to assert that! I wouldn't be surprised if in ten years this scientist is eating crow because it turns out this was the last form of writing!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  40. Prior art for wineglass charms? by clyde_cadiddlehopper · · Score: 1

    >The eggshells were probably used as containers, and the markings may have indicated either the shells' contents or their owner.

    --
    Obi-Wan: "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were sudden
  41. I Dunno by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Considering that, 60,000 years ago, humans simply did not live in large groups, I have a hard time believing that writing would have been invented. Writing, initially, required pretty much a dedicated group of scribes (or possibly, in China, some sort of priestly class). Writing seems to have evolved in every place it was developed as a response to the needs of a large urbanized society.

    Note that hunter-gatherer groups have often used symbols (like petroglyphs and pictograms), but these are not writing systems. I am extremely dubious of these claims.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re: I Dunno by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Considering that, 60,000 years ago, humans simply did not live in large groups, I have a hard time believing that writing would have been invented. Writing, initially, required pretty much a dedicated group of scribes (or possibly, in China, some sort of priestly class). Writing seems to have evolved in every place it was developed as a response to the needs of a large urbanized society.

      I'm skeptical too. I think writing AWKI was always invented as a bookkeeping system for state or temple taxes, or re-invented to imitate nearby prestigious societies that already wrote.

      The notion of a solitary Einstein inventing writing for his own use is just absurd.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: I Dunno by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      In China, the earliest writing seems to have centered around certain mystical rites. In Sumeria it was most definitely economic in nature; bookkeeping, taxes and the like. I'm not so sure about Meso-America, since there's a lot of difficulty with the Olmec script, but in general it seems to have dealt more with accounts of kings and political interplay between elite groups, so may have served a ritual-political purpose. There is still considerable debate about whether Sumerian writing influenced Egyptian writing, or whether Egyptian writing is in fact one of the very few examples of a wholly independent writing system.

      But one thing all these early literate civilizations had in common was urbanized, stratified societies with relatively complex economies and governing systems, which must have been the impetus for the invention of writing to begin with. A society, to my mind, must reach a point where oral and/or pictographic systems become completely inadequate to the task of recording what the society views as key information. Particularly as it refers to economic and political matters, accuracy and permanence are key, and writing delivers this.

      What possible impetus would there be for hunter-gatherer groups sixty thousand years ago? I hate to use the term "simple societies", because it sounds pejorative, but one cannot deny that hunter-gatherer groups rarely exceed a few dozen individuals, and their economy is such that it does not make the kind of specialization that has developed writing everywhere we know it developed likely, or even useful. Let's face it, it takes about five years to make a kid completely functionally literate, and during that period their economic output is greatly decreased. I suspect with adults literacy takes even more effort to achieve. Literacy is damned expensive from an economic point of view, and while the benefits more than outweigh the costs, you have to have a society large enough to essentially support a group that can dedicate themselves to learning to write.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  42. No matter how minimalistic, this *is* amazing. by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps these symbols were still far from forming a structured script. Still, from the article it seems that they were used for communication, which is the main goal of writing. The reason why this is amazing is clear when you put it into the context of humankind 60.000 years later: we STILL have tribes that have no concept of writing, and in some countries analphabetism is affecting large swaths of the population.

    That reminds me of Civilization, when you "find Writing in scrolls of ancient wisdom". Who knows how much of such "ancient wisdom" was lost and then re-developed only to be lost again, during these past tens of millennia. In fact, a lot of the engineering and science developed during the Apollo program, with the passing of Wernher von Braun and some of his colleagues, can well be considered lost. Sorry for the digression.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:No matter how minimalistic, this *is* amazing. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Writing is a specific form of visual communication. There are earlier ones (like petroglyphs). These are not writing systems. The information pre-literate and proto-literate systems could record was very limited, whereas full writing systems essentially can express any idea efficiently and with a high degree of accuracy.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:No matter how minimalistic, this *is* amazing. by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Who knows how much of such "ancient wisdom" was lost and then re-developed only to be lost again, during these past tens of millennia.

      All of it, and remove the word "ancient". The (multiple and discrete) dinosaur space programs were a huge success, but everything that didn't escape Earth orbit was subsumed into the strata millions of years ago after each of their extinction level events.

  43. Before the last "wipe" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was the species before the last cleanup of the Matrix.

  44. They should come here by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    This long-term repetition is a hallmark of symbolic communication and a sign of modern human thinking, say the team.

    So that explains the constant duplicate Slashdot stories!

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  45. Oh please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's nonsense. Progress is real.

    Take computing: when I started in the digital world (PDPs) it took hours to do anything useful on a computer. Now it takes hours to do anything useful but we have a lot more pixels.

    1. Re:Oh please... by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I find it takes more hours to do anything useful, but I can goof off in so many more ways and do so quickly.

    2. Re:Oh please... by tresho · · Score: 1

      that's nonsense. Progress is real. That's for sure. I was born naked, soaking wet & ignorant, now look at me.

    3. Re:Oh please... by dogsbreath · · Score: 1

      Yes, back then I had to get off the sofa to channel surf.

      Progress is real.

  46. hmm by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Would not surprise me, I'm sure independent writing systems popped up all over the place then died out. One example would be Inca khopu knot-tying notation. Woo, that anthropology degree finally came in handy.

  47. Turn the eggshell upside down by Naked+Jaybird · · Score: 1

    577345993

  48. I saw a study on this... by sean.peters · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... and as I recall, the results were that hunter-gatherers were better nourished (both in terms of just calories and the various essential nutrients) than earlier farming populations... on average. The trouble was that excursions from the "average" were a lot bigger for the hunter gatherers.. it was quite literally feast or famine. So although the H-G populations got more nutrition over the course of, say, a year, they were also more likely to starve to death during the lean times. Agriculture was, comparatively, a sure thing, which is why most groups took to it. But the move wasn't without cost - for one thing, you ended up having to work a lot harder to be successful at agriculture, as someone pointed out above.

    1. Re:I saw a study on this... by anss123 · · Score: 1

      The thought that humans 60 000 years ago may be smarter than us today amused me. I've not read any study on the subject and the larger brain thing is just something I've heard with a foot note that larger != better tacked on.

      I do suspect that an agricultural lifestyle with husbandry requires more synapses than a nomadic hunter lifestyle since wolfs, bears, etc, can manage the latter, but it would still be amusing if the OP's joke was correct in that we've gotten dumber since then (Hey, when you regularly face down grizzlies with only a stick you need smarts :).

    2. Re:I saw a study on this... by dargaud · · Score: 1, Troll

      The thought that humans 60 000 years ago may be smarter than us today amused me

      Well, I have some doubts. At the start of agriculture you'd starve on the 1st winter if you were stupid. Or as a hunter you'd get torn to pieces pretty fast if you were stupid. Now if you are stupid you can still find a good lawyer to help you get rich by spilling hot coffee on yourself. Idiocracy indeed.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    3. Re:I saw a study on this... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that you can go to Africa or South America today and you can still find hunter-gatherers and subsistence farmers living side by side.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    4. Re:I saw a study on this... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      The thought that humans 60 000 years ago may be smarter than us today amused me.

      I am sure that the dolphins are amused by the opposite idea.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:I saw a study on this... by Saroful · · Score: 1

      The thought that humans 60 000 years ago may be smarter than us today amused me. I've not read any study on the subject and the larger brain thing is just something I've heard with a foot note that larger != better tacked on. I do suspect that an agricultural lifestyle with husbandry requires more synapses than a nomadic hunter lifestyle since wolfs, bears, etc, can manage the latter, but it would still be amusing if the OP's joke was correct in that we've gotten dumber since then (Hey, when you regularly face down grizzlies with only a stick you need smarts :).

      Either smarts or cajones the size of grapefruit.

    6. Re:I saw a study on this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      either way, they seem to have had something to be jealous of.

    7. Re:I saw a study on this... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Yes, but try doing that where there is a harsh climate. You'll find the hunter-gatherers are all gone, and all that remains is farmers. Why? Because it is a lot easier to survive the winter by storing up foodstuffs, than it is hunting it.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:I saw a study on this... by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Well, in your scenario, the lawyer also gets rich. And he gets paid every time. So you may end up supporting the stupid, but the (presumably above average intelligence) lawyer is also making out like a bandit. As are all the defense lawyers. And unlike the plaintiff, the lawyers are more likely to be smart enough to hang on to their money. So the logical end result is not an Idiocracy, but a population with an unnatural bent for rules and laws.

      Or we could recognize that the effects of a handful of people winning the unjustified lawsuit lottery won't outweigh the billions of other moderately intelligent people succeeding more often than their less intelligent counterparts.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    9. Re:I saw a study on this... by jameskojiro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bullshit: Eskimoes, FTW!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    10. Re:I saw a study on this... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Touche. However, I'm guessing that reason for that is that there is no practical growing season in the arctic.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:I saw a study on this... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's almost as easy to steal foodstuffs that other people have stored.

      Hunter-gatherers are usually fitter, stronger, and more proficient with weapons, but agriculture allows greater population density. History seems to indicate that it's numbers that count.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  49. Walking on egshells... by poly_pusher · · Score: 1

    *CRUUUNCH* WTF DUDE!... That was my hunting/gathering thesis paper. Watch where you're walking and what did I say about bringing your club inside the cave!

  50. Ia! Ia! Cthullu ftahgn! by ILoveWilliamHague · · Score: 1

    Ia! Ia! Cthullu ftahgn!

    --
    "Only the Conservative Party will Keep The Pound!"
  51. So, you write your shopping list on the old stuff? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    So, you write your shopping list on the old stuff?

    Hope you never run out of toilet paper.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  52. actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually the inscription was strangely written in mirror-image and read "HELP! GET ME OUT OF HERE!"

  53. No, Mmmmmmmm.... Calcium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The inscription: Made by a kind of insect or worm that liked the calcium in the shell.

  54. Re:Universal Writing by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    Yes, its essentially a universal writing system for all Chinese speakers from what I understand. There is the caveat that there was an old system for writing that was traditional, and there is now a newer simplified system that requires less symobols etc. From what I understand not everyone knows the old system, so some things that are older may be somewhat unreadable to modern readers.
    "Chinese" actually comprises 5 language groups I believe (Mandarin, Cantonese, Han, Wu and something else), and well over 1 million dialects, but a newspaper printed anywhere in mainland China can be read anywhere in mainland China regardless of what languages the reader speaks. Its an incredible feature generally speaking, and I presume has contributed to the overall cohesiveness of the Chinese people throughout history. It does suffer from the fact that to use it you need to memorize thousands of written symbols, rather than just our 26 for the English alphabet. I believe I recall reading that by the time a student is in grade 7, they have memorized around 10,000 Chinese characters.
    I know its possible to type in Chinese but I have no idea how its possible to be honest.
    Grammar should not be a real obstacle as all Chinese languages have a very simplified grammar from what I understand

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  55. Earliest writing ? by eulernet · · Score: 1

    The only thing I see is vertical segments.

    I suppose this is some sort of primitive way to count objects, like an abacus but written on eggshells, since they didn't know paper at this time.
    There are a lot of segments, and they probably didn't have an advanced mathematical system to represent large numbers.

    How can the searchers deduce it's some undecipherable writing ? This is a mystery for me.

    1. Re:Earliest writing ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's the earliest known bar code...

  56. All your cave... by zawarski · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...are belong to us.

  57. Easter Eggs by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    I don't know about writing, but it's got to be the earliest example of Easter Eggs, both literal and metaphorical. IMO, they should also win Best Hiding Spot, since it took 60,000 years to find them.

  58. When is a symbol deemed 'writing' or 'art'? by howzit · · Score: 1

    It is a well documented fact that the San (Bushman) marked individual ostrich eggshell containers as proof of ownership. These were mostly used as water containers and buried in areas where there is no surface water for long periods of time (eg the Kalahari Desert). The San have been doing this for, quite literally, time immemorial and, indeed, do so to this very day. It must also be remembered that the ostrich eggshell is NOT 'fragile'. They could store water for hundreds of years if the opening was sealed with fibre and melted bees-wax. Far longer than any wooden, skin or earthen-ware container would. Also, in a cave deposit, OSTRICH eggshell will outlast pottery, even bone, only stone will survive longer than Ostrich eggshell. So when is a symbol of ownership deemed to be 'writing' or 'art'. Are we to now say these inhabitants weren't illiterate? The Howiesons Poort shelter gives it's name to a specific tradition that corresponds with the European Mesolithic (in South Africa called the Middle Stone Age), which goes back to 80,000 years BP. That's a LONG time ago!

  59. Just decoration? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    To me that looks like decorative patterns. Like on vases, terracotta or Easter eggs.
    But of course that does’t sound as sensationalist...

    My guess: The transition is smooth. There is something for every point between our written language and a simple scratch in the ground.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.