Slashdot Mirror


MIT Scientists Make a Polyethylene Heatsink

arcticstoat calls our attention to MIT research that has produced a version of polyethylene that can conduct heat away from computer chips. Polyethylene is the most widely used plastic. It's not clear how practical this research is for industrial-scale use, involving as it does an atomic-force microscope. The work is detailed in a paper published in Nature Nanotechnology this month. "The new process causes the polymer to conduct heat very efficiently in just one direction, unlike metals, which conduct equally well in all directions. ... The key to the transformation was getting all the polymer molecules to line up the same way, rather than forming a chaotic tangled mass, as they normally do. The team did that by slowly drawing a polyethylene fiber out of a solution, using the finely controllable cantilever of an atomic-force microscope, which they also used to measure the properties of the resulting fiber. This fiber was about 300 times more thermally conductive than normal polyethylene along the direction of the individual fibers, says the team’s leader..."

153 comments

  1. Plastic heatsinks? by cbope · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plastic heatsinks, just don't get them near heat!

    1. Re:Plastic heatsinks? by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

      All of a sudden Newegg's "counterfeit Intel i7" with its plastic "cooler" makes sense!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Plastic heatsinks? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like NewEgg accidentally shipped some top-secret prototype chips which us plebs didn't even know how to use. I suppose that was why they made them appear to be plastic toys, so that we'd never figure out how to interface to them. In reality, they have advanced plastic heat sinks (electrical insulators), and even more advanced plastic processors. There's a knock at the door, one mome

    3. Re:Plastic heatsinks? by ginbot462 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another one of you "knock at the door" types, as I was telling another person, they

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    4. Re:Plastic heatsinks? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Hasnt anyone considered that those "fakes" are actually highly advanced technology from the future that the International Time Police Force wasnt able to stop from leaking into the past?

      Think of it this way. If an 18th century intellectual found a microchip, he'd think it a just a weird little black rock. We just think those fakes are a weird little bit of plastic. Now we wait for the futuristic motherboard that will run them. I'll be going through the dumpster behind work in about an hour looking for them, feel free to join me.

    5. Re:Plastic heatsinks? by aquila.solo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dang, another one. I tell you, all these abductions are getting out of hand. It's about time we did something about Candlej

    6. Re:Plastic heatsinks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plastic heatsinks - "melt in your CPU, not in your hands" - sound like M & M :D

  2. Awesome by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

    What next, a chocolate teapot?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Awesome by RaceProUK · · Score: 3, Funny

      Milk or dark?

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    2. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make chocolate tea at least once a day. The teapot is porcelain.

    3. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Awesome by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Milk or dark?

      Why does everything have to be racial for you?!
      ...
      "by RaceProUK (1137575)" ...oh, I see, I didn't realize that was a profession across the pond. My bad.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    5. Re:Awesome by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In that case it would be a "chocolate tea pot" (note the space), since the qualifier "chocolate" is associated with the tea and not the pot.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. Article is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before anyone asks, the article is clearly wrong in the statement "The new process causes the polymer to conduct heat very efficiently in just one direction...", the heat moves along one dimensions, in 2 directions.

    1. Re:Article is wrong. by krnpimpsta · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes, I was really intrigued and confused, after reading the line:

      "The new process causes the polymer to conduct heat very efficiently in just one direction,"

      I was thinking, wow, is this even possible? If this is true, I think they've just created a material that could behave like a passive air-conditioner, heater, refridgerator, etc., while using NO power, ever. That alone must be breaking some serious laws of thermodynamics..

      "One dimension" or "one axis," would have been more appropriate than "one direction."

      --

      New webcomic updated on Sundays: HERE

    2. Re:Article is wrong. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Thermodynamics are overrated and inconvenient for science fiction. Fuck it, fuck relativity and causation! It's all too boring!

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    3. Re:Article is wrong. by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 0

      huh? surely you kid. How does one way heat removal break laws of thermodynamics? We already have such technology, and it is called a water tank. You connect a heat source to the bottom of a water tank, as it heats water on the bottom, the density of water in vicinity decreases and flow upward in one direction.

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    4. Re:Article is wrong. by quax · · Score: 1

      Very happy to see that this was immediately corrected by this AC comment. Thermodynamics does not allow for heat conductivity in just one direction. If such a material was possible it'll be simple to arrange it in such a manner that entropy spontaneously decreases e.g. having heat conducted one way towards a water reservoir. This accumulated thermal energy could than for instance be used to power a sterling engine making this a second class Perpetuum mobile.

    5. Re:Article is wrong. by Shin-LaC · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not wrong, it's just using a more technical definition of "direction" than the one you're used to. In the mathematics and physics I was taught, a vector has three attributes: a magnitude, which is a positive number; a direction, which is similar to a line, not a ray (eg north-south, not just north; the x axis, not just positive x; etc.); and a third thing which determines which way it's going along that direction (a single bit, basically); I'm not sure what this last thing is called in English, so let's call it sign, since you typically decide which way is positive and which way is negative along a direction, and then a signed number gives you both the magnitude and the sign.

      This definition of "direction" may seem counterintuive at first, but it's really quite useful, because in physics you often encounter things which have to do with a direction in this sense (as is the case with this new material). That also explains why the writers of the article used this definition.

      Note that you cannot simply use "dimension" in its stead. There are three dimensions in three-dimensional space (by definition), but infinite directions, so it's clear that they cannot be the same thing.

    6. Re:Article is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "That alone must be breaking some serious laws of thermodynamics.. "

      Only the funny laws of thermodynamics can be broken.

    7. Re:Article is wrong. by srussia · · Score: 3, Informative
      krnpimsta said:

      Yes, I was really intrigued and confused, after reading the line: "The new process causes the polymer to conduct heat very efficiently in just one direction,"

      You said:

      You connect a heat source to the bottom of a water tank, as it heats water on the bottom, the density of water in vicinity decreases and flow upward in one direction.

      He was talking about conduction. You're talking about convection.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    8. Re:Article is wrong. by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Read up on Maxwell's Demon. I think the key piece you are missing is that this would be passive heat removal.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    9. Re:Article is wrong. by barocco · · Score: 2, Funny

      Prime example of why scientists can never be successful in business: as soon as s/he finds a potentially tremendously profitable idea, s/he questions whether certain laws would be broken.

    10. Re:Article is wrong. by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      Damn straight! And to prove my solidarity...

      *whips a cloth off a table* I present my PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE! Now with plastic cooling for more efficient operation.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    11. Re:Article is wrong. by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      No; you too are wrong. The key missing point is a fiddle. And, possibly, an improbable wager. Then we will know if the material will perform as expected, or if it will run afoul of 'the demon'.

    12. Re:Article is wrong. by jank1887 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just for argument's sake, the jury is still out on 'thermal rectification'. The key is just that you can't ignore certain parts of entropy generation that will exist in such a device. Here's an abstract link from a young professor at UC-Riverside, currently getting a DARPA Young Investigator Award.

      Solid-State Thermal Rectification With Existing Bulk Materials
      http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3089552

      As long as the system results in a net entropy increase, some versions of the theory say its possible.

    13. Re:Article is wrong. by quax · · Score: 1

      Intriguing. Thanks for the link.

    14. Re:Article is wrong. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      How would this be any different than the little spiny things in the light bulb with one dark side and one shinny/white side using heat difference to spin. You're not generating perpetual motion, you'd be using energy from the environment, it'd just resemble perpetual motion in that you'd wouldn't directly see the energy you'd just see a cold spot and a hot spot.

      That said, i don't believe it to be possible, but not on any laws i know.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    15. Re:Article is wrong. by steveb3210 · · Score: 1

      Lisa, In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

    16. Re:Article is wrong. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I do that every day.

      I invented a great new media center PC! It breaks about 78 US laws and 107 international laws.

      In fact watching a movie on it will get you the Death penalty in 6 states!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:Article is wrong. by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Sign" is in fact how I normally hear it in english.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    18. Re:Article is wrong. by Xiph1980 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having a material direct heat in 1 direction doesn't necessarily result in a perpetuum mobile. If said material only conducts heat from point 1 to point 2 if t1 > t2, and doesn't direct any heat in any direction if t1 t2, then it wouldn't break any law of thermodynamics.

      --
      Manuals are your last resort only
    19. Re:Article is wrong. by quax · · Score: 2, Informative

      The little spiny thingy is a perfectly "normal" heat engine in that it exploits a thermal heat difference that is created by an influx of energy from an external source i.e. the photons that heat up the dark side.

      The difference with a ideal uni-directional heat conductor is that it allows to create the heat imbalance out of thin air i.e. without putting in additional energy the entropy of the system is lowered. The wikipedia article that I linked to explains this in a bit more detail:

      A perpetual motion machine of the second kind is a machine which spontaneously converts thermal energy into mechanical work. When the thermal energy is equivalent to the work done, this does not violate the law of conservation of energy. However it does violate the more subtle second law of thermodynamics (see also entropy). Such a machine is different from real heat engines (such as car engines), which always involve a transfer of heat from a hotter reservoir to a colder one, the latter being warmed up in the process. The signature of a perpetual motion machine of the second kind is that there is only one heat reservoir involved, which is being spontaneously cooled without involving a transfer of heat to a cooler reservoir. This conversion of heat into useful work, without any side effect, is impossible, as stated by the second law of thermodynamics. In contrast, a hot reservoir inside an internal combustion engine is created by a spark igniting fumes which contain stores of chemical potential energy. The temperature of the fumes increases above that of the surroundings. This is not a perpetual motion machine since the increase in temperature is a result of the release of a finite available amount of chemical energy, which is always much less than the total heat energy and mass-energy contained within the system. As explained by statistical mechanics, there are far more states in which heat distribution is close to thermodynamic equilibrium than states in which heat is concentrated in small regions, so temperatures will tend to even out over time, reducing the amount of free energy available for conversion to mechanical energy.

    20. Re:Article is wrong. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You connect a heat source to the bottom of a water tank, as it heats water on the bottom, the density of water in vicinity decreases and flow upward in one direction.

      Yes because that's also the direction of the heat gradient vector. Put a refrigerator at the bottom, and you'll soon find that the transfer of heat is now reversed.

      If heat could only transfer from the bottom of the tank to the top, and if the top of the tank was much hotter than the bottom but heat was not transfered to the bottom, then that would be transferring heat in one direction, in the sense meant by the GP, and would violate thermodynamics.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    21. Re:Article is wrong. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      The magnitude and direction are multiplied together. If the sign is negative, the result is that the direction is negated (opposite): not the same direction anymore.

      There are three dimensions in three-dimensional space (by definition), but infinite directions, so it's clear that they cannot be the same thing.

      There are infinitely many ways to align those three dimensions. So yes, “dimension” would be correct terminology.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    22. Re:Article is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comments about Georgia and soul stealing are clearly off topic.

    23. Re:Article is wrong. by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there will ever be such a thing as a heat superconductor... Man I am ignorant.

      --
      ...
    24. Re:Article is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, Steorn invents the Miniature Ferris-Wheel. Venture Capitalists Pile On.

    25. Re:Article is wrong. by Shin-LaC · · Score: 1

      There are infinitely many ways to align those three dimensions. So yes, “dimension” would be correct terminology.

      There are infinitely many *alternative* ways to define three base dimensions, but you can have infinitely many directions within the *same* vector space. Not the same thing.

    26. Re:Article is wrong. by quax · · Score: 1

      True.

    27. Re:Article is wrong. by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      Before anyone asks, the article is clearly wrong in the statement "The new process causes the polymer to conduct heat very efficiently in just one direction...", the heat moves along one dimensions, in 2 directions.

      Right, the article isn't talking about a heat diode.

    28. Re:Article is wrong. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      There are infinitely many *alternative* ways to define three base dimensions, but you can have infinitely many directions within the *same* vector space.

      Both of those are correct, and neither is contradictory to what I said.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    29. Re:Article is wrong. by Mashdar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I said this elsewhere but I'll say it here too:
      Thermal bias != Maxwell's Demon.

      The second law does not require that heat flow from hot to cold, only that there is a net increase in heat. Obviously this requires an external energy source, though. And the water example is not a thermal bias, no, but it is a neat case. The water actually DOES transmit heat through a vertical column much faster in an upward direction via convection, than cooling (which is only aided by convection under 4C, which is an inflection point in the T/D curve for water). In steady state the water will approach thermal equilibrium, but the rate at which equilibrium is reached is vastly different depending on the direction of the thermal gradient.

    30. Re:Article is wrong. by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm, it's not often I make a joke that I myself do not get...

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    31. Re:Article is wrong. by f3r · · Score: 1

      Direction!=sense (two senses for each direction). Example North-South is a direction, northwards is a sense. That's a difference between colloquial and scientific languages. (i.e. you can tell a friend "I'm heading direction north")

    32. Re:Article is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      abstract link from a young professor at UC-Riverside

      Ooh... If only the author of that abstract were a "distinguished but elderly" scientist, we could all take him at his word for what is possible.

    33. Re:Article is wrong. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Thermal bias != Maxwell's Demon.

      The second law does not require that heat flow from hot to cold, only that there is a net increase in heat.

      Good point!

      And the water example is not a thermal bias, no, but it is a neat case.

      Eh, I guess. Heat moving faster in one direction than the other due to convection isn't very surprising.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    34. Re:Article is wrong. by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Don't get them wrong..SOMETHING is being used up. You know the energy it took to build those fibers? It's being eroded away. Eventually heat flow will return to normal for both sides.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    35. Re:Article is wrong. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Speaking of both being correct, the notion of a vector's direction can be considered both in the context of the line the vector follows combined with its sign, or separate.

      For example if you define your vector in terms of 2d polar coordinates, Theta is your direction, and the magnitude could be positive or negative. It's just usually we define the direction of a vector such that its magnitude is positive.

      You can also obviously refer to the sign-independent sense of direction as the dimension since you can obviously define a set of dimensions such that one of them is the line the vector is on. However you probably wouldn't refer to it that way if you've already defined your coordinate system, since otherwise saying "in one dimension" would imply that the vector is parallel to one of the pre-defined axis.

      Long story short, pretty much every poster in this thread has used the terms correctly. The only people who are wrong are those who say someone else was using it wrong for not using it their way, because there are multiple ways to use these terms.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    36. Re:Article is wrong. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Example North-South is a direction

      That is linear movement along one axis / in one dimension. It is not a direction. “Direction” is the way you are headed. You may be able to go forward or backward along that line, but forward and backward are always distinct.

      If your direction is north, you’re situated along the north/south axis, but if you have a positive velocity then you’re moving toward the north. If your direction is south, you’re on the same axis, but positive velocity indicates that you’re moving toward the south — a distinct direction from before. Your axis of movement is the same, but the sign of your velocity is opposite. By a similar token, a heading of 90 degrees is not the same as a heading of 270 degrees. Yes, a positive velocity at a heading of 90 degrees is equivalent to a negative velocity at a heading of 270 degrees, but they have to be distinct directions for the positive/negative velocities to make sense.

      Yes, you can map all movement along an axis to movement in one direction: movement in one sense is positive velocity and movement in the other sense is negative. But that’s one direction, and if you chose the opposite direction as your reference, the sign on your velocity would flip. So you have one axis, and two directions, and two possible senses (signs) for velocity no matter which of the two directions you choose as a reference.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    37. Re:Article is wrong. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That’s true; positive/negative movement in one direction would equal forward/backward movement along one axis. However, in some cases, it makes no sense to speak of negative movement, and this is definitely one of those cases. Heat never moves backward: it always moves from hot regions to colder ones. So the assumption that the movement is always positive is a sensible assumption, and saying that the material only allows heat to pass in one direction is clearly the wrong way to describe what it does.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    38. Re:Article is wrong. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I will certainly agree that while the phrasing in the summary is correct if interpreted a certain (valid) way, it was a poor choice of words because it gives the wrong impression when interpreted the way that most people, even the scientifically minded, would take it in context.

      Also, I think it's quite possible that whoever wrote that copy was not aware of the nuances we're discussing, and that "direction" in the sense they meant it is the one where the statement is simply wrong. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    39. Re:Article is wrong. by jackchance · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was really intrigued and confused, after reading the line:

      "The new process causes the polymer to conduct heat very efficiently in just one direction,"

      I was thinking, wow, is this even possible? If this is true, I think they've just created a material that could behave like a passive air-conditioner, heater, refridgerator, etc., while using NO power, ever. That alone must be breaking some serious laws of thermodynamics..

        One dimension" or "one axis," would have been more appropriate than "one direction."

      While this also seemed the most intriguing part of the post, it doesn't have to violate thermodynamic laws. A ratchet basically does this. So if you could create a ton of tiny ratchets out of polymers you could in theory create something that "conducts" heat in one direction. A diode conducts current in one direction......

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    40. Re:Article is wrong. by krnpimpsta · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty intriguing idea too, but also in theory it is impossible to get energy out of that because the ratchet will actually slip due to its own thermal energy an average things out.. assuming a long period of time and all parts of ratchet being at thermal equilibrium. If the ratchet is at a lower thermal state then you really just have a miniature heat engine that extracts energy from the thermal difference, which becomes equalized. Source: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_ratchet?wasRedirected=true .. my apologies for the rambly runon post.. typing from my phone

      --

      New webcomic updated on Sundays: HERE

    41. Re:Article is wrong. by RobVB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It wouldn't break any laws of thermodynamics. Say it only allows heat transfer from A to B.

      If A is warmer than B, energy (heat) will flow from A to B (from warm to cold), decreasing A's temperature while increasing B's. This process decreases energy while increasing entropy, making it perfectly "legal" according to the laws of thermodynamics.

      If B is warmer than A, nothing happens, or, perhaps more realistically, the heatsink now acts as a thermal insulator and only allows a very small amount of energy to go from B to A. It would be hard (read: impossible) to make it work perfectly, just like it's impossible to make a perfect thermal insulator.

      So maybe something that literally only allows heat flow in one direction is impossible in practice, I don't see why you couldn't make something that has a (much) greater thermal conductivity in one direction than the other. It exists for electronics, why not for heat?

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    42. Re:Article is wrong. by IICV · · Score: 1

      Lulz can neither be created nor destroyed, but can only be transferred along the meme-flux?

      It would explain why old jokes get less funny over time, I guess.

    43. Re:Article is wrong. by jonadab · · Score: 1

      That would violate a lot more than just thermodynamics. Universal entropy, conservation of energy, the fundamental economic problem... throw it all out the window.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    44. Re:Article is wrong. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Actually I have to change my stance. There has been a good argument made in this thread that a "thermal diode" wouldn't violate thermodynamics any more than an ideal insulator would (and we assume ideal insulators in models all the time without creating perpetual motion machines).

      The real violation is when you have two regions of equal temperature, and you move heat from one to the other without spending more energy than what you're moving, creating a heat differential out of nothing and decreasing entropy. A one-way thermal conductor would still only move heat from a high region to a cold region, so it only works if you already have a potential across the conductor (much like an electrical diode), and only results in increased entropy.

       

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    45. Re:Article is wrong. by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Soul stealing is never off-topic!

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    46. Re:Article is wrong. by shentino · · Score: 1

      The scary thing is that if corporate media whores get their way unfettered that might actually come true.

    47. Re:Article is wrong. by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > There has been a good argument made in this thread that
      > a "thermal diode" wouldn't violate thermodynamics

      A diode, in the sense of not passing anything in either direction when the potential goes the wrong way? Okay, sure, but that's not what the other post seemed to be talking about, or if it was I misunderstood it.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  4. Can't it degrade over time? by madhatter256 · · Score: 1

    Plastic degrades over time, especially in a smoker's environment.... As the plastic expands and contracts as it heats up and cools down, respectively, won't that mess up the polymer chain and make it loose its effectiveness??

    --
    Previewing comments are for sissies!
    1. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      In theory, it would expand and contract mostly along the length of the fibres, meaning the wear rate would be much lower. Then again, IANAMS (I am not a materials scientist)

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    2. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      make it loose its effectiveness??

      They include a tiny wrench to tighten it every so often. The first users are suggesting that you should regularly tighten up effectiveness every 400 hours of running.

      MIT researchers are currently trying to counteract this self loosening, you may be able to use loctite

    3. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would the plastic cool down?

      Wait, you say you turn off your... oh I see.

    4. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think he meant loose, as in "loose the dogs of war", rather than loosen. It looses its effectiveness on the heat, maybe? And as it loses its effectiveness it can no longer loose its effectiveness.

    5. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think he meant loose, as in "loose the dogs of war", rather than loosen.

      That phrase you're looking for is "let loose the dogs of war".

      The verb in that quote is "to let loose", not "to loose".

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      "let loose the dogs of war" can be reworded to "to let the dogs of war loose"
      Either way, both "let" and "loose" are verbs here.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    7. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by lawyer+boy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the phrase is "Cry "Havoc!" and let *slip* the dogs of war. Julius Caesar Act 3, scene 1

    8. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's a mistranslation from the original Klingon :)

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    9. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's lose the dogs of war

    10. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "let loose the dogs of war" can be reworded to "to let the dogs of war loose" Either way, both "let" and "loose" are verbs here.

      "To let loose" is the unconjugated verb. Regardless of how you order the words, the verb (and there is only on in that phrase) is "to let loose". This is an example of a compound verb, which, in most cases, is a combination of two other verbs. It's important to note that when a compound verb is used, you cannot consider the verbs to be independent, as additional meaning is given by the compound form. Yes, "to let" and "to loose" are both verbs in general. But when parsing that that phrase, they cannot be considered verbs by themselves. The verb is "to let loose".

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    11. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      According to dictionary.com, line 22 under "verb" for loose:

      22. Chiefly Nautical. to set free from fastening or attachment: to loose a boat from its moorings.
      24. to shoot; discharge; let fly: to loose missiles at the invaders.

    12. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      I did some internet checking and it seems we are both wrong, but to be fair, you were more correct than I. Almost everything you said was right, except "to let loose" isn't a compound verb. It is a verb phrase. A compound verb is when you use multiple verbs separated by commas. Here's the links I read:
      http://www.chompchomp.com/terms/compoundverb.htm
      http://members.cox.net/lenco1/grammarpractice/verbs/vphrase.htm

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    13. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Plastic degrades over time, especially in a smoker's environment....

      Yes, we definitely need to consider this when creating new technology or using it in new ways...

      Commander Riker: Data, we need to reverse the polarity of the deflector dish to push away the incoming antimatter nanoparticles, which threaten the ship with destruction!

      Data: But Commander, that has never been tried before, and we do not know what will happen when the reverse-polarity charge conduits come in contact with Ensign Tenneson's tobacco smoke in Engineering Compartment 15-D.

      Commander Riker: You have a point Mr. Data. Abandon ship! Everyone to the life boats!

    14. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      g'ah, split infinitive.

    15. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by shentino · · Score: 1

      English is like a data protocol with such a big shitload of grammatical integrity checks and redundancy that most of the time you can be understood quite well even if you mess it up.

    16. Re:Can't it degrade over time? by shentino · · Score: 1

      Crap I lost...

  5. Maxwell demon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transferring heat in just one direction? So, we can finally boil kettle on an ice cube?

    1. Re:Maxwell demon by RaceProUK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While it's not the same technology, wouldn't a Peltier device achieve that?

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    2. Re:Maxwell demon by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      While it's not the same technology, wouldn't a Peltier device achieve that?

      No, a Peltier device requires input non-heat energy. No laws of thermodynamics violated. It's just a less efficient heat pump (compared to refridgeration).

    3. Re:Maxwell demon by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      Good point :)

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  6. so you make it in lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    strings or strands and you could have a material that doe sin fact act as you say BUT yes in between would need insulation's
    this however could be a much more efficient way to make homes with

  7. Dimension, Not Direction by camperdave · · Score: 2, Informative

    The new process causes the polymer to conduct heat very efficiently in just one direction, unlike metals, which conduct equally well in all directions.

    I think they mean in one dimension, not direction. The plastic will conduct heat longitudinally a lot better than laterally, but it will conduct heat longitudinally equally well both to and fro. If they ever come up with a material that only conducts heat in one direction (a thermal "diode", if you will) then that solves our energy woes.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Dimension, Not Direction by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      [...] If they ever come up with a material that only conducts heat in one direction (a thermal "diode", if you will) then that solves our energy woes.

      And the destruction of the Earth! BWAHAHAHAHA!

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    2. Re:Dimension, Not Direction by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    3. Re:Dimension, Not Direction by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Don't ruin a kdawson story with elementary physics, party pooper. This! Is! Slashdot!

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    4. Re:Dimension, Not Direction by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      If they ever come up with a material that only conducts heat in one direction (a thermal "diode", if you will) then that solves our energy woes.

      Well they would have invented a Maxwell demon at the same time.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    5. Re:Dimension, Not Direction by Zerth · · Score: 1

      If they ever come up with a material that only conducts heat in one direction (a thermal "diode", if you will) then that solves our energy woes.

      And prevent anyone from ever having to endure a warm soft drink. Or hot beverages with the tiniest heat source, given enough time.

      Alas, physics.

    6. Re:Dimension, Not Direction by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that I actually see a biased thermal potential as totally demonic. Granted I don't see any real-world possibility for it (what is a thermo-phyllic material?), but a thermal bias is not an entropy-beating system if the net thermal change is positive.

    7. Re:Dimension, Not Direction by shentino · · Score: 1

      I think the second law is a good thing, really.

      Getting a cold drink is nice but I don't think I want absolute zero material going down my throat, thankyouverymuch.

  8. that explains the heat sink with the new i7 by gbrandt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everybody thought it was plastic, but it was just new technology. Now we just have to wait for an announcement on how to mount those crazy i7's

    1. Re:that explains the heat sink with the new i7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess we'll have contact newegg. It's not like them to leave out such details.

    2. Re:that explains the heat sink with the new i7 by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Everybody thought it was plastic, but it was just new technology.

      Uh Duh. New technology is always plastic, then brushed aluminum, then glass. Rinse and repeat.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    3. Re:that explains the heat sink with the new i7 by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I have a plastic bottle of Pepsi here that says exactly the opposite.

    4. Re:that explains the heat sink with the new i7 by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Pepsi is not new technology. EXTREME energy drinks are, hence they come in brushed aluminum cans.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    5. Re:that explains the heat sink with the new i7 by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Woosh!
       
      When Pepsi was new technology it came in glass bottles. Then, they moved to aluminum cans. Now, they're in plastic.

    6. Re:that explains the heat sink with the new i7 by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      It's a single contact pad. That new socket LGA-1 is surely amazing.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    7. Re:that explains the heat sink with the new i7 by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      And obviously they're behind because they haven't yet moved on to brushed aluminum.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  9. Not sure how "green" this really is... by ArtFart · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Polyethyline is made from petroleum, a resource that's going to be increasingly scarce over the coming decades, and the process no doubt releases some significant CO2 and pollutants. It would seem by comparison there's quite an ample supply of old beer cans and airplane carcasses available for recycling.

    1. Re:Not sure how "green" this really is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, We just bomb another shithole then, nobody cares, I want my cores cool.

  10. Is it a crystal polymer? by La+Gris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If all polymer molecule strings are all oriented the same, is it a crystal?
    This setup may show interesting optical properties as well. It's amazing research really, with processing matter at that atomic scale control. Being able to buildup matter that precisely will reveal all new dreamed uses. I really hope this will go forward as discovering industrial processes of controlling matter buildup arrangement at an atomic scale in mass-production.

    --
    Léa Gris
    1. Re:Is it a crystal polymer? by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      Since there's at least some variability, it might be best to characterize it as having a "high degree of crystallinity." Polyethylene oriented in this way sounds a lot like the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers marketed as Spectra and Dyneema. Those are made by an extrusion process called gel spinning, and the polymer chains also have a high degree of crystallinity and parallel order. I don't know if the oriented nature of gel-spun UHMWPE fibers is quite at the same level and provides the same thermal properties as ones made by drawing them out with an AFM cantilever, but they might be "good enough," considering that gel spinning is a scalable industrial production method while cantilever drawing is a "very careful scientist" sort of method.

      The cantilever drawing method does remind me of making nylon in freshman chemistry lab- you mix hexamethylenediamine and sebacoyl chloride together, and you can carefully pull out a nylon fiber with a stirring rod. Slightly less precise product though.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:Is it a crystal polymer? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Straight from Wikipedia, “A crystal or crystalline solid is a solid material, whose constituent atoms, molecules, or ions are arranged in an orderly repeating pattern extending in all three spatial dimensions.”

      Aligning the polymer molecules in one dimension is not enough. They would have to be aligned in all three dimensions.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:Is it a crystal polymer? by CorporateSuit · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know if the oriented nature of gel-spun UHMWPE fibers is quite at the same level and provides the same thermal properties as ones made by drawing them out with an AFM cantilever, but they might be "good enough," considering that gel spinning is a scalable industrial production method while cantilever drawing is a "very careful scientist" sort of method.

      Well, I have a solution for that. Swap out all the CAPTCHAs on major sites for a webcam peering into an electron microscope that allows a person to draw out the polymer molecules with the cantilever. A week or two, tops, and you'll have someone who's created a bot that can do it perfectly.

      Another, similar way is to have Blizzard do the same thing, except using it as a substitute for a CAPTCHA, for every molecule they pull, they get 1 silver piece added to an account of their choice. You'll get the same results, except the bot will speak Chinese.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  11. Thermal conductivity by MartinSchou · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since neither the summary nor the article has been kind enough to expand on "300 times more thermally conductive than normal polyethylene", I figured I'd look it up.
    Thermal Conductivity of some common Materials:
    Polyethylene HD: 0.42 - 0.51 W/mK
    Aluminium: 250W/mK
    Copper: 401 W/mK

    Best case scenario: 153 W/mK or 61% as conductive as aluminium, 38% as conductive as copper. Not exactly impressive for a heat sink

    1. Re:Thermal conductivity by Lueseiseki · · Score: 1

      Best case scenario: 153 W/mK or 61% as conductive as aluminium, 38% as conductive as copper. Not exactly impressive for a heat sink

      Maybe they're not as conductive, but polythylene is much, much, cheaper.

      No crackheads are going to steal polyethlene from peoples' homes like they do with copper wiring.

    2. Re:Thermal conductivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The heat transfer in not by usual thermal conduction, but by an effect involving atomic-force microscope. Therefor the thermal conductivity values are not valid.

    3. Re:Thermal conductivity by LWATCDR · · Score: 0

      I wonder if it might not make for a very good insulator? If it is 300 times as conductive in one dimension is it 300 times less in the other?
      If so it could make a very good insulator. You put sheets of it in your wall and it conducts well along the edges but the face would act as in insulator.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Thermal conductivity by jank1887 · · Score: 4, Informative

      don't forget the rest, though:

      Density:
      copper: 8.96g/cm3
      aluminum: 2.7 g/cm3
      silicon: 2.33 g/cm3
      AluminumNitride (high thermal conductivity insulating ceramic, k~160to190W/mK): 3.33g/cm3

      LDPE and HDPE: 0.92-0.97 g/cm3.

      So, you're getting a factor of 2-10x in weight savings. Tell that to a aerospace designer and he'll make it work. It's also a cheap material (well, feedstock's cheap. and normal PE is cheap, especially relative to copper these days). Who knows how expensive this stuff might be if they can make more than single fibers.

    5. Re:Thermal conductivity by eggnoglatte · · Score: 1

      Also, I imagine the 1D heat conductivity has got to be useful for something. It really sounds more like a solid block of heat pipe than a generic heat sink.

    6. Re:Thermal conductivity by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      The number that gets dropped in the abstract is 104 W/mK. The highly oriented polyethylene fiber Dyneema has a listed thermal conductivity of 20 W/mK, so this figure would represent a significant advance from the polyethylene fibers currently out there. As you can also see, the "service temperature" for Dyneema tops out at 100C and it melts at about 150C. This new PE fiber with a higher degree of crystallinity would likely bump those numbers up slightly, but it would still be unsuitable for very high temperatures.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    7. Re:Thermal conductivity by Alastor187 · · Score: 1

      Since neither the summary nor the article has been kind enough to expand on "300 times more thermally conductive than normal polyethylene", I figured I'd look it up.
      Thermal Conductivity of some common Materials:
      Polyethylene HD: 0.42 - 0.51 W/mK
      Aluminium: 250W/mK
      Copper: 401 W/mK

      Best case scenario: 153 W/mK or 61% as conductive as aluminium, 38% as conductive as copper. Not exactly impressive for a heat sink

      You are assuming that pure aluminum is used for design. I work in the aerospace industry and the electronics chassis/heatsink we develop are usually made of alloy aluminum (6061 for machined parts and 5052 for sheet-metal).

      The thermal conductivity for 6061 and 5052 around 160 W/mK and 140 W/mk, respectively. So this new material would have approximately the same single axis conductivity as an aluminum 6061 heatsink but at a fraction of the weight.

      If this material were readily available today, I can think of several applications were I could use this material.

    8. Re:Thermal conductivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not just weight that's an issue for the aerospace designed
      sure it's 2-10x lighter for the same volume, but if you need 2-10x more of it to cool equivalently then you've still got a problem

    9. Re:Thermal conductivity by Zerth · · Score: 1

      It would be awesome for moving heat between layers, as it wouldn't heat the surrounding components as much as a metal via.

  12. Could Help Cheapen Up Spacecraft by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This material could be another boom material for the spacecraft industry. Some of the heavier hardware on any given space payload is the thermal control system. Using a combination of heat pipes and surfaces coated in various colors of paint for heat control can add a significant amount of weight to a spacecraft. If this material can be added as a thermal layer to the MLI layers that are tacked onto the outside of a spacecraft, it may go a long way in reducing and simplifying the thermal control subsystem of the given payload. In fact, since it is a simple plastic, it should be significantly lighter than various metal contacts and conduction paths within a spacecraft that are used today.

    The single dimension (not direction) transfer mechanism could also be very useful. If you can ensure that heat will move along only a single axis, you have a bit more freedom in placing sensitive components in and around your conduction paths within your spacecraft. All in all, this could be a really useful material, if it can ever be scaled up for use in industrial applications. Here's hoping.

    *crosses fingers*

    1. Re:Could Help Cheapen Up Spacecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget some of that metal is for rad hardening.

  13. Of course when plastic is exposed to heat... by Orga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course after being exposed to heat for a couple minutes the material transforms back into a chaotic tangled mass since the polymer molecules are only lined up the same way when at a lower temperature with less molecular volatility.

    1. Re:Of course when plastic is exposed to heat... by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

      Temperature is the problem. As long as the material stays within its specified operating range, it can carry quite a bit of heat.

      By analogy, aluminum will melt if you get it hot enough, (temperature) but it can carry a lot of current as long as it stays below that range. In fact, as the electrical conductivity tends to decrease at higher temperatures, it may be a better analogy than I had originally thought.

  14. What about therm interface Re:Thermal conductivity by La+Gris · · Score: 1

    Even if 61% of aluminum axed conductivity would have some uses, a heat sink need to have good interfaces with the heat source and with air or other transfer medium. this heat sink example is really inaccurate. Considering if expectations are for moving heat from one place to another, with limited scatter dissipation, the most efficient method is by having a mechanically moving medium (liquid coolant).

    --
    Léa Gris
  15. Competitive, but still not better than by metamechanical · · Score: 1

    This fiber was about 300 times more thermally conductive than normal polyethylene

    Since I couldn't find in TFA the ACTUAL measured conductivity, I turned to the internets:

    Using data from the first source I found, at its highest, HDPE's thermal conductivity is 0.51 W/mK. So this material's thermal conductivity in that dimension is about 153 W/mK, or about 3/5 that of Al (250 W/mK), 3/8 that of Cu (401 W/mK), and between 1/6 and 1/15 that of diamond (900–2,320 W/mK, according to wikipedia.

    So all in all, while this is very fascinating research (and I enthusiastically encourage them to continue exploring this avenue), I'm not optimistic about practical applications for computers (at least in the remote future). They would at least have to double the conductivity, while at least matching aluminum's cost - a feat that may be too difficult to overcome.

    --
    If I had a nickel for every time I had a nickel, I'd be richcursive!
    1. Re:Competitive, but still not better than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and between 1/6 and 1/15 that of diamond (900–2,320 W/mK)

      A very apt comparison since I only use diamond heat sinks for my gaming machines.

      So all in all, while this is very fascinating research (and I enthusiastically encourage them to continue exploring this avenue), I'm not optimistic about practical applications for computers (at least in the remote future). They would at least have to double the conductivity, while at least matching aluminum's cost - a feat that may be too difficult to overcome.

      The ability to direct the heat flow can make up for a somewhat lower conductivity for many applications, and can also allow for layouts and applications which wouldn't work with metal heat sinks.

    2. Re:Competitive, but still not better than by metamechanical · · Score: 2, Informative

      and between 1/6 and 1/15 that of diamond (900–2,320 W/mK)

      A very apt comparison since I only use diamond heat sinks for my gaming machines.

      Diamond is widely considered to be one of if not the most thermally conductive material available. This comparison was included because for those familiar, it is a handy reference. It was as if, because your arms are too short to touch the ceiling, you believe it doesn't matter how high it is.

      On a side note, there actually IS diamond thermal paste available for sale! Huzzah.

      The ability to direct the heat flow can make up for a somewhat lower conductivity for many applications, and can also allow for layouts and applications which wouldn't work with metal heat sinks.

      Since the primary issue with metal heat sinks is generally getting the heat wicked off of them, I'd be more apt to consider Finite Element based Thermal Analysis when designing my heat sinks, instead of considering a non isothermal material. That is to say, the problem probably isn't with your material, it's probably with your airflow.

      --
      If I had a nickel for every time I had a nickel, I'd be richcursive!
    3. Re:Competitive, but still not better than by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      In it's current state, I'd use it for standard electronics.

      Routers, cable modems, etc. Those are encased in plastic already. Making the plastic thermally conductive instead of drilling holes in it for air circulation could be a huge improvement.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  16. Name? by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1, Funny

    Did they name it Pam?

    --
    I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
  17. Already been done... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    May be not as effective, but apparently marginally saleable. the user experience so far has been terrible but that's the way it is with any new technology.

    Now, to make working CPUs out of lead. Solomon's Gold to the rescue!!! Moore's law will be salvaged by modern alchemy!!!

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  18. Re:What about therm interface Re:Thermal conductiv by metamechanical · · Score: 3, Informative

    The problem with that is that most likely, the interface for the Polyethylene heat sink would be worse than for an aluminum one; The Polyethylene molecule is vastly more complicated than the Aluminum atom, and not nearly as mobile once cast (and would be just as likely to capture little insulating pockets of air, etc.). Even if the Polyethylene molecules on the end could "mold" to the interface, there is not guarantee they wouldn't flop over and become insulating - an Aluminum sink "molded" to the interface wouldn't care, as it's isothermal.

    --
    If I had a nickel for every time I had a nickel, I'd be richcursive!
  19. Sure, but... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you make a leisure suit out of this polyethylene? I usually have problems with overheating myself whilst I'm displaying my disco dancing finesse!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  20. Similar to a Niven superconductor by John+Whitley · · Score: 2

    Lovely, another case of life imitates sci-fi. This development reminds me a bit of the superconductors in some of Larry Niven's books (esp. the Ringworld series). In addition to being an electrical superconductor this material was also a thermal superconductor -- and was used as a sort of sci-fi super heatsink on a few occasions. It was mostly represented by ultra-strong threads, and occasionally a woven cloth IIRC.

    1. Re:Similar to a Niven superconductor by thms · · Score: 1

      And, this is where this material really would really fit into the Ringworld canon, <spoiler> the puppeteers toppled the Ringworld civilisation ([d]evolved humanesque Pak which seems scarily advanced to them) by introducing a "superconductor plague", i.e. some microscopic lifeform that ate this superconductor. Seems actually possible now with such an organic material which could probably be anaerobically metabolised.</spoiler>

  21. Is it electrically conductive? by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Generally, plastic is not electrically conductive. Which makes it good for mounting electronics. But it is also not heat conductive. Which makes it near worthless for mounting.
        A non-electric conductive, but heat conductive material would be very useful. Especially if it is CHEAP. It could be used to distribute heat in buildings and not just on circuit boards.

  22. AFM is a slow probe by Heshler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AFM = Atomic Force Microscope, which is a tiny cantilever that probes a surface down to the atomic scale. I highly doubt this process is high throughput enough to service the electronics industry.

    1. Re:AFM is a slow probe by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 1

      Right, but the key part of the article was heat and stretch. There are other ways that this can be done to a plastic. Ever see fresh noodles be made by hand, by a master noodle chef?

      The chef starts with a large amount of dough, and draws it out, "bouncing" it on the work surface covered with flour. He/she then folds and twists it upon itself and repeats the process many times: 1 very thick noodle, 2 thick noodles, 4, 8, 16, 32... you get the idea. 10 folds and twists give 1024 noodles (often it's folded upon itself twice at a time, to yield 1, 4, 16, 64 noodles). The flour and gluten content in the dough prevents the individual noodles from coalescing. It's an amazing process to watch. Dragon's beard candy is made in a similar fashion, with sugar.

      I wonder if a similar technique could be applied here.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
  23. Sounds like Spectra® Fiber to me by DismalTroll · · Score: 1

    There must be something special about this polyethylene. The process of drawing out fibers that have molecular directionality has already been done with Spectra® Fiber. I never considered using the stuff as a heat sink. There must be something special with their treatment.

  24. So no heat diode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn it, here I was all excited at the prospect of a heat diode.

    1. Re:So no heat diode? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It’s called a refrigerator, and it requires energy from an outside source.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  25. Re:What about therm interface Re:Thermal conductiv by wikdwarlock · · Score: 1

    Actually, the interface between $HOT_SURFACE and $HEAT_SINK is usually coated w/ some sort of thermal grease to mitigate interface insulating effects. That little tube of goop that you use w/ your brand new ThermalTake heat sink fills micro voids w/ thermally conductive goo for both the processor and heat sink interface surfaces. Typically, a metal-to-metal interface is still mostly voids because you can only polish them so flat and smooth before you're using semiconductor grade (and cost!) processes and materials to get rid of that last bit of roughness. Or, you can press them together so firmly that they weld together, but again, this is not an economical approach and it's not good for the potentially delicate guts of the part which has the $HOT_SURFACE.

    So, for what it's worth, I suspect that the molecular complexity of polyethylene vs copper isn't the real issue. And the "flopping over" of the polyethylene fibers isn't an issue because the FA explains that they're drawing the fibers w/ an AFM cantilever and thus already straight and tensioned. Now, how you make a block of the stuff and slap it onto something hot, that's the _real_ issue.

    --

    "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
  26. A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is fast and bulbous, got me?

  27. heat sink by __aavqan3009 · · Score: 1

    They work great with the processors from Newegg!

  28. original article by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

    Original Paper (Subscription Required)

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
  29. Heat Diode by mrops · · Score: 1

    What they basically built is a heat diode of sorts.

    1. Re:Heat Diode by clone53421 · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, they did not.

      They built a material that allows heat to flow along one axis. It can go either way through it, but only in that one dimension.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  30. Maxwell's Demon by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    You're probably right, but it's not what the article says ("one direction"). One can always hope that Maxwell's Demon will eventually be sighted...

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    1. Re:Maxwell's Demon by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      You’re right, it does (probably incorrectly) say that. However note that a “heat diode” would not violate any laws of thermodynamics as long as heat is flowing from a warmer region to a cooler one (i.e. not Maxwell’s demon). In fact, any fluid (gas or liquid) will act like a heat diode... due to convection, heat will dissipate more quickly and evenly if you heat it from the bottom than if you heat it from the top. With no added energy from anywhere except the addition of heat at that one location, it allows heat to flow up much more readily than it allows it to flow down.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  31. Sounds somewhat like Polaroid film by pclminion · · Score: 1

    I'm not too clear on the manufacturing details here. But the material itself sounds a lot like the original Polaroid film (not the photographic kind, the polarizing kind), which is a type of plastic polymer, impregnated with iodine, which has been stretched in one dimension to align the polymer molecules along that dimension. The iodine atoms are able to conduct electrons between themselves, effectively forming "wires" which absorb radiation polarized along the direction of the molecules. I wonder if a block (as opposed to a sheet) of such a material would also conduct heat along one dimension. Things which conduct current also conduct heat well.

    I suppose the devil is in the details, and the real accomplishment here is not the alignment of the molecules, but the ability to do so throughout a block of material instead of just a thin sheet. But what if you just made a bunch of sheets and stacked them up to make a block?

  32. Of Devils and Deamons by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    No, no, no. Demons are chaotic evil, Devils are lawful evil, totally different things. DnD has taught me that much, at least. There's no indication that any of the demons in the band mentioned in that song were of the variety spoken of by Maxwell!

    On the other hand, Maxwell's Demon brings order (law) to chaos. Maybe Maxwell misspoke and was talking about a devil?

    *Sits down to think on the subject*

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  33. Interesting, but.... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    Okay, so drastically improving the thermal conductivity of a plastic is pretty neat, but can they— using similar molecular alignment methods —take materials that are already good heat conductors and make them EVEN BETTER heat conductors? The idea of a metal that only conducts heat in one direction and does it VERY WELL has interesting prospects.

    If they can get a means of mass production to the point where it achieves the desired results more often than not, they could test the heatsinks after production and bin them by performance. As long as it performs better than the unmodified base material, it'd probably be worth it to the performance PC market. (And small high performance heatsinks are always desirable in a lot of industries.)

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  34. Re:Thar she blows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have some flies. Quite a lot in fact. But they can accommodate plenty more.

  35. Cheap thermoelectric component by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great news! Now we just need them to apply it to the various Thermo-Electric converters mentioned on slashdot earlier to create self-charging laptops!