Slashdot Mirror


The Ignominious Fall of Dell

snydeq writes "InfoWorld's Bill Snyder discusses the ignominious decline of Dell, one akin to that of Computer Associates, leaving the company forever tainted by scandal and a 'shocking breach of faith with customers.' Dell's pioneering business model and supply chain helped make desktop computing ubiquitous, affordable, and secure. But years of awful quality control and customer service have finally caught up to the company in a very public way that will do irreparable damage to the company for years to come. 'What we've learned about Dell recently doesn't qualify as an understandable mistake. Only a rotten company sells defective computers and lies about it.'"

44 of 604 comments (clear)

  1. cough by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Only a rotten company sells defective computers and lies about it."

    Maybe the users are holding them wrong?

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not an apple fanboy, but this isn't the same class of issue.

      Now -- if Apple had been selling the iPhone 4G for four years and ignoring the fact that a statistically large number of them were suddenly dying of a known bad issue, then intentionally shipping out 'repaired' iPhones with -more- bad parts in them, then I'd agree.

      There's a lot of evidence to suggest that Dell not only knew about the cap issues beforehand, but that they intentionally misled a lot of customers about the problem and when they did fix them, they did so with more bad boards.

    2. Re:cough by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now you're assuming Apple cares about any product more than 2 years old. After all, they just cut support for first generation iPhones and iTouches, and those are just a hair over 2 years... I guess that's a better business model, though - planned obsolescence in 24 months.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's nothing.

      Microsoft killed Kin in a month.

    4. Re:cough by frosty_tsm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now you're assuming Apple cares about any product more than 2 years old. After all, they just cut support for first generation iPhones and iTouches, and those are just a hair over 2 years... I guess that's a better business model, though - planned obsolescence in 24 months.

      A hair over 2 years? The first iPhone model itself is 3 years old. Combine that with the expected life-span of a mobile phone to be 2 years (subsidized phone every 2 years), they aren't doing anything outside of the norm.

    5. Re:cough by KarmaKhameleon · · Score: 5, Funny

      "dude you're getting a dell"

      is that a threat?

    6. Re:cough by sortius_nod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the big problem is that people are focusing on just Dell. I've stated in a previous post that Lenovo had the same problems, they were aware of them but did nothing to recall or even stop selling the defective machines.

      The biggest problem is that consumers don't read tech sites before purchasing, which means they are beholden to the whims of the tech company they are buying from. If they choose to deceive customers it will only become apparent when it's reported by large media organisations.

      Look at what happened with the Xbox 360. The first generation were RROD devices and it took a class action law suit with major media reporting it before Microsoft changed their tactics. I have no doubt they were well aware of the problems well before the class action suit, yet still shipped defective products. It took 2 generations of Xbox 360 boards before the problem started to be resolved. Yes, they did do a lot to mitigate brand damage, but by that stage it was too little too late. Yes, I do own a 360, and I have had a RROD.

      The biggest problem is that these companies suffer no government backlash, the whole idea that "the market will sort itself out" is total bullshit. So long as companies are not heavily scrutinised after they are caught deceiving the public means they can just claim ignorance and move on. Even with harsh consumer protection laws (like here in Australia), the idea that you can lobby your way out of it sickens me.

    7. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The biggest problem is that consumers don't read tech sites before purchasing, which means they are beholden to the whims of the tech company they are buying from. If they choose to deceive customers it will only become apparent when it's reported by large media organisations.

      I think a bigger problem than that is information overload.

      I work for a small business. I used to build custom computers in the 90s but haven't felt it's been worth it in a long time.

      So what do I buy today for desktops? Dell? Lenovo? HP? Acer? something else?

      If I settle on Dell, which models? Inspiron? Dimension? Vostro? Studio? etc. Each of those branches has DOZENS of configurations and differences.

      Annoying.

      Say what you will about Apple, but their products lines are much easier to grok.

    8. Re:cough by ushering05401 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wait a second. It isn't like these iphone users chose knock off hardware and are now paying the price. The hardware was dictated by Apple and now the customers aren't getting critical security patches because Apple only wants to deal with their most current hardware configs? I would never buy Apple again if they did this to me... No fanboyism necessary.

    9. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I didn't say it was necessarily a good thing, I think it's an example of how Apple simplicity blows the competition out of the water.

      When your average person goes to buy a Mac, they have two basic choices. (discounting Mac Mini and iPad)

      1) Get a laptop
      2) Get a desktop

      If they want a laptop, they have two choices:

      1) Get a cheaper laptop (Macbook)
      2) Get a more expensive laptop (Macbook Pro)

      Each of which has ~3 main configuration

      If they want a desktop, they have two choices:

      1) Get a cheaper system (iMac)
      2) Get a more expensive system (Mac Pro)

      Each of which has ~3 main configuration.

      The systems are labelled clearly (ie Macbook vs Macbook Pro). There are clear differences between them, and they scale from a low end computer at ~$900 to a very high end computer at $4000+ bucks. Apple systems are also rough in the upselling category--each upgrade has that one feature that makes it JUST worth having!

      Like I said, compare that to Dell where when looking at business desktops alone there are: Vostro, Optiplex, Inspiron, Studio, XPS, AlienWare and Precision all of which have probably dozens of configurations and models, some VERY different from each other. There are some stupid choices, like you can't (or couldn't) get Windows 7 64-bit on many of the Optiplex line, when you could on the Vostros, even though Vostros are supposedly the inferior quality machine. What gives? It took me hours of reading to figure out which Dell was the best (and then the pricing differential and lack of 64-bit os license made me pick a Vostro).

      Again, say what you will about Apple / "The Party" but their product lines should be required reading for the other PC makers...

    10. Re:cough by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      there is no such thing as an "iTouch"

      But there is such a thing as an "iDouche". You are one.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by jbeach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it might be a bit early for "Dell is the Devil".

    --
    The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
  3. -shrug- by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really is there any PC maker that is 100% great and excellent? I'm sure that Dell's faults aren't any worse than HP, Toshiba's, Gateway's, or any other major maker of PCs.

    About the only way you can make sure you get decent PC hardware is to build it yourself or have enough knowledge to sub in and out parts if need be.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:-shrug- by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      About the only way you can make sure you get decent PC hardware is to build it yourself or have enough knowledge to sub in and out parts if need be.

      Really? Would you know about the "Deathstar" drives or faulty caps or Intel's math bug or nVidia's process problems or Creative's bus noise or every odd compatibility problem? Reality is that the PC has been changing at breakneck speeds, and it's a reason why they call it breakneck. In almost every other business, staying with the old model is just fine if the new one isn't ready. In the PC industry that's suicide, might as well throw yourself off a cliff and try to fly than wait for certain death.

      We'll see stability when the ten year old computer is no more different than the ten year old car. Unfortunately that'll also be the day Moore's law is dead and computers have hit the ceiling. Personally I prefer the situation as it is now, as long as I have proper backups all else can be replaced. You can get a new, fully functional 1001PX nettop for about $240, at least that's what I paid for one (+VAT). Now I know that's still a lot of money for many, but to many it's not and there's always used laptops for less.

      Yes, it sucks and nobody likes it but a 95% reliable cheap notebook beats a 99% reliable expensive one, and ~100% doesn't exist when you add in real world accidents not even a ToughBook would survive, like say house fire or getting stolen. You know, IBM tried this strategy in the 80s, PCs built to top tolerances and top durability and they ended up grossly overpriced and people bought clones and if they failed people threw them out and bought another clone still for less than the IBM. They are exactly as robust as the market wanted them to be, which is to say not very.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  4. Hyperbole much? by JesseL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone here care to name a PC manufacturer with a spotless record of turning out nothing but quality, or who has always been 100% up front about dealing with legitimate manufacturing problems?

    They've all turned out crap and they've all reliably concerned themselves with their own bottom lines first and foremost. It doesn't excuse Dell, but I can't really see why they need to be singled out either.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    1. Re:Hyperbole much? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I built a linux firewall out of a cardboard box, spare parts, and duct tape.

      That's nothing. I built a nuclear reactor out of an old refrigerator, bits and pieces purchased at the local Home Depot and Radio Shack, and spare parts from a 1976 Toyota pickup.

      It works fine, but I have a hell of a time getting fissile material. Those nice young Russian guys say they're going to deliver as soon as my check clears. I'm going to put the waste materials in my mother-in-law's basement, which should be safe, since there's a concrete foundation. I cleaned out a corner next to the washing machine and I plan to stack the cardboard boxes there for the next 50,000 years.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, actually RTFA'd and you know what? This article is shit - its premise is shit. The faulty cap story was news in 2005; people got their systems replaced. It was a blip. And you know what? 5 years later Dell is still with us. Snyder is running a beat-up here and I think it's off base.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  6. Whatever by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We got greedy."

    End of the story. No, seriously. Most companies in this industry have sunk not because their product or brand sucked, or the economy went bad, etc.; Most die because of bad management. Anyone remember Northgate computer systems? Very promising company. If it had maintained its profile it would be bigger than Dell today, but corporate mismanagement torpedoed it during the 90s -- during a period of economic growth and a huge upswing in computer sales.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  7. its never been about by nimbius · · Score: 4, Informative

    hardware reliability or quality, arguably. I just filled out a Purchase order for ~1mil. in dell hardware. all our megacorp cares about is how good is the corporate support, how fast to return parts arrive, how big is the discount.

    uptime and scalability are all our concerns. for us to care about dell lying would be calling the kettle black.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  8. Commerce IS deceit by sgage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's face it, all corporations are deceitful sacks of s**t. That's the norm for business these days. Presumably it wasn't always like this, but nowadays it's the way it is. Lie, cheat, spin, whatever it takes. If that doesn't work, pretend ignorance and innocence going into the lawsuit. This is modern capitalism.

  9. And you're surprised? by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been telling my customers for years about how wonderful the hardware that dell uses is. And by wonderful I mean you buy one, hope you get a year out of it, then buy another. I have a stack of Dell/HP/All other junk machine motherboards all with puffed caps. Kind of Makes my job much easier. Customer calls and says thier pc is crashing or wont start. I ask what brand, they say dell, and I know right away what to look for. 2 seconds to open the machine. 2 more seconds to see the puffed caps. 2 minutes explaining why and what happened. 5 minutes later I have a check to build them a new pc. You know. I guess I love dell.

  10. Dell did this to themselves by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There cultural values fell by the wayside years ago. The bottom line became the end all and be all of everything. They outsourced everything they could, getting rid of every non-Indian employee they could. Does it come as any surprise that a company that would sell out it's own employees would also sell out their customers?

    They got rid of their greatest asset, their people, and with it also got rid of the ethic that made them what they were. Dell was a very hard working hungry company, full of hard working people. Get rid of the hardworking people and you get rid of the hardworking ethos.

    You can't outsource ethics. When damage control becomes more important that quality control your company has lost it's way.

  11. Nobody cares by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful
    HP sold defective PCs, IBM sold defective PCs, all have had their class action cases and they're over, and nobody cares.

    The fact is, the consumer doesn't buy reliability. The consumer buys emotional factors, and brand perception, and a good marketer can make the consumer buy any garbage whatsoever.

    This is not the end of Dell. Nobody will remember this in a few months, any more than they remember HP and "pretexting" when they buy a printer or a PC.

  12. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by oldhack · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's despicable. Why would you RTFA?

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  13. This is spot on... by citking · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work in higher ed in the state of Wisconsin. We, of course, have a purchasing contract (a mandatory one no less). Because of this, I've been working with Dell (ordering PCs and doing warranty replacements) for a long time now.

    In the past, even just 3 years ago, Dell would bend over backwards for us. We got waived on the fees and got waived through the "exams" for warranty parts replacement certification. We could also could get spare parts on hand for PCs. Lastly, we got huge discounts for the UW System and for personal purchasing. Now, however, our sales rep is forcing us to take these stupid, 2 hour exams for replacing parts. We are, of course, overworked and understaffed and I have no time in my week to sit down and "learn" how to replace RAM or swap a power supply. Yet Dell will not budge. When I questioned our sales rep on this he became irate and downright pissy with me.

    But, that point is moot really when one looks at the atrocity that is the DOSD (Dell Online Self Dispatch) that replaced the Warranty Parts Direct site. Before my certs expired I needed to get a new DVD R/W drive. I had to scroll through lists and lists of parts, many of which were printer parts, server parts, plastic bezel pieces, etc...things that had nothing to do with the service tag of a standard desktop system.

    Dell has hit bottom. Their customer service is shit, their tech support is horrible, and the issues with the bad caps was pretty much the last straw (it's OK to have bad components; the bad part is how they tried to cover it up). I'm done with Dell. I won't recommend them to anyone now.

    --
    "This food is problematic."
  14. My company builds stuff in China by Trip6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone who outsources manufacturing of any kind has faced this problem. Component suppliers provide defective parts to factories, and when the first parts that contain a defect not seen before arrive, incoming QC hasn't seen the defect yet and so might not test for it. The parts are then used, and if the defect allows the product to pass inspections and burn in, you now have your supply chain infected with product containing the bad part. The consequences of the bad part range from outright consumer danger (e.g. exploding batteries), to shortened product life resulting in expensive warranty repairs and a damaged brand reputation, to very little impact resulting in just a few consumers experiencing annoying problems.

    Once you learn of the bad part and the consequences, you're like the CDC (center for disease control). You have to find out how bad the outbreak is, what the return rate is, how much of the supply chain is infected, what the consequences of the failure are, and then decide what should be done about it.

    If the failure rate is below, say, 10% and the consequences non-life-threatening, you will likely do nothing and deal with it in the repair channels, and make a running change to your incoming QC processes and manufacturing lines. If there is extreme personal risk you might have to do a recall, and you probably have to suspend your entire supply chain until the root cause is found and everything from raw materials to subassemblies to product in transit to store inventories to consumer's products is fixed.

    In this case, Michael Dell was more than likely in the CDC meeting, and data was probably presented that pointed to the fact that a recall wasn't necessary. However, it looks worse than that, and Dell is being painted as a greedy tyrant who shipped bad parts knowing full well he did so.

    I guarantee this is NOT the whole story, and there was some serious gray area involved at Dell as to what to do about this issue. More than likely, this was a calculated risk that the problem would not turn out as big as it is.

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
    1. Re:My company builds stuff in China by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They care about this-quarter-now and screw-the-future precisely because publicly-held companies are legally beholden to their shareholders first and foremost, and if they don't do their best to provide a return on shareholders' investment, then they're in legal trouble of a different sort.

      This is why I say the stock market is the root of corporate evil -- because if you're a public company, you're obligated to too many shareholders who don't give a damn about your customers or your future, so long as you give them a dividend check TODAY.

      The owner of SAS software said flat out he would not go public because of this. He didn't want to be forced to do the wrong thing for his company or his customers, solely because the shareholders (and the laws that protect them as your primary lienholders) demand it.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  15. He should just dismantle the company and give the by bsane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He should just dismantle the company and give the proceeds back to the shareholders.

  16. Former Senior Support Analyst for Dell... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 4, Informative

    A good example of some of the things going on at Dell go like this.

    I was hired as Basic Server Support tech.

    I was given extra training to take over the graveyard shift from headquarters in round rock.

    It was moved to Oklahoma City.

    After several months we had done well as a team and were offered Gold level support,
    but we would need to apply for that job.

    I did apply and I got the position and the night crew became gold level support.

    After just a few weeks the platinum crew was so swamped they started dumping
    their calls on us and we were required to take them.

    We got a few days training and were thrown to the sharks
    taking calls way over our heads with little to no prior experience
    in the advanced server software arena.

    The customers were guaranteed MCSE trained technicians.

    Needless to say that is not what they were getting.

    Customers were furious and launched into a tirade over the idiocy,
    and I did not blame them a bit.

    To me this was breech of contract and fraud.

    I brought this up in a meeting and was shouted down.

    I decided at that point to leave the company.

    At the end of the one year I had been there, over
    half the ppl working for server support had quit.

    1 year after I left my team of 26 only had 3 original members.

    The upper management at Dell was THAT bad.

    Michael Dell came off his long term vacation and
    tried to correct the course of the company, but
    the damage had been done and he was lied to as well.

    It took him time to work thru all the lies and he fired
    a lot of ppl for various reasons.

    Some of the low to middle management were actually
    good ppl, such as my eventual manager.

    He didn't like what they were doing, but he had left
    his prior job and had to make this work or lose his
    house, his car, and likely his wife.

    Fun times...

    I keep in touch with some of the ppl still working there,
    and after I quit things got better once Mr. Dell could
    cut through some of the lies.

    I do not think the company will fully recover and it
    cannot compete with Asian companies that do not
    have all the government regulations, fees, taxes,
    and red tape to deal with.

    That and they can get workers to work for below minimum wage.

    Like most US businesses it is hard to compete on uneven ground.

    Good Luck to you all !

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:Former Senior Support Analyst for Dell... by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm glad you're keeping alive the tradition of epic poetry :D

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  17. Oh My... by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A whole new generation gets to learn how business works. A company starts and is nothing, why should people buy from it? So the company focuses on quality, low prices and customer satisfaction. People like the company so much they swarm to it. Over the years the company grows larger and larger. Eventually they have capped out their market share, they can grow no more. This is a problem in our growth driven society. We believe that any company that is not growing is failing. So the owners of the company have to grow in other ways, they have to give less to the market they already have... and try to get the market to pay more despite getting less. First the sacrifice from within... departments are cut, benefits are cut, employees are given quotas that grow daily until they are doing so much work they can barely focus on any one thing at a time. Eventually the company realizes it can't cut anymore from within and still function, so it starts looking for cheaper suppliers. Bonuses are given on a yearly basis so an executive can come it, buy tons of faulty components, get his bonus and be gone before the shit hits the fan. Eventually the company is so distrusted by the public they are relegated to a brand name sticker wall-mart sticks on junk it bought from some 3rd party. But the big wigs at the company walk away with their wallets over flowing, open a new start up... rinse and repeat. It's the same with nearly every American business.

  18. Re:Even then you don't know by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The court documents disagree with your last statement regarding Dell. The problem here isn't that there were defective computers, it was the Dell sold them knowing they were defective, then cycling around to blaming the customer when they did break. And this isn't about Mini10's or anything like that.. this is about Optiplexes... which is a staple of small to medium-sized businesses. I am not angry that Dell sold defective computers (that is the capacitor maker's fault really.) I am angry at Dell because they lied about it and blamed users. That is dirty pool in anyone's book. This is about the capacitors failing, but that is just the half of it.

    From the article linked to this one:

    The documents were connected to a lawsuit filed by Web hosting service provider Advanced Internet Technologies (AIT) against Dell in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina on Nov. 1, 2007. AIT sought $75,000 and punitive damages from Dell for breach of contract, fraud and deceptive business practices.

    So they WERE found guilty of fraud and deceptive business practices on a small scale with AIT. And so it balloons into a shitstorm even Michael Dell can't sweep under the rug. This is about far more than lemons....

    --
    It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  19. Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by lalena · · Score: 5, Informative

    People on this site should know that if you buy from Dell, you get it from their Small / Medium Business site.
    US tech support & they come to your house to fix the computer within a day or two.
    The bonus is that I think the computers are cheaper. If you try to get a powerful PC from Dell, their home models usually force an overpriced under powered video card on you. Good video cards are very expensive from Dell. The Business site allows more choices. It lets you get a good PC with no video card. If you don't need one, use on-board video. If you do need one, get it from newegg.
    Note: I do build and overclock PCs, but sometimes if you need something simple it is hard to beat Dell's < $300 computers. I also go with them for the very small form factor PCs and sometimes check out their Refurb Site for Previously Ordered New (returned - not refurb) PCs to see if they have exactly what I am looking for.

  20. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Skapare · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem is that, back then, Dell lied to their customers about the problem. Then when Dell found out the truth about the problem, they just kept on lying. Lots of those computer actually did not get fixed or replaced. At least half didn't, and apparently most didn't. Dell NEVER did a recall. They should have. People lost money, lost data, lost business, all for Dell's bottom line. Some people never have even found out. Dell told them it was some other problem, that was in the "customer caused" category. People bought some other computer (maybe from Dell, maybe elsewhere), and just didn't deal with it anymore, at a loss.

    Once Dell sends every one of those customers a whole new computer that doesn't have any problems for 3 years, then I'll change my tune about Dell.

    Disclosure: my employer bought me a Dell laptop in November 2009. It died in April 2010. I got a new one, now. It's been 3 months and it is still working. I have no idea for how long. I don't trust it.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  21. Not in the Business school I attend by RobertinXinyang · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have one semester, out of four, left on my MBA. I have never heard anyone say, "it is the ethical duty of a business owner to return maximum profit to the shareholder, as reported in quarterly statements."

    If it were said, and it were not being said as an example to be torn apart, I would expect any of the instructors, or fellow students, to tear such a position to shreds. It may fit your notion of what is taught in Business School; but, it is not what is actually taught in Business School.

  22. Re:Even then you don't know by smash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Thing with Dell is, they seem to go out of their way to blame your use of the product in cases like this. I dealt with the capacitor issue, and we ended up getting sent a stack of about 20 GX260 motherboards to replace ourselves (we were on a remote mine site and couldn't have a dell tech come out every time one died).

    However, their handling of the E6500 and E6400 overheating and down-clocking problems has been appalling. They were sold as a high performance laptop, and dell's first question was what software I was running. I'm in an air conditioned office, using a "high end" laptop, it shouldn't fucking matter what software I am running. Despite sending through details of the mass problems people experienced on the internet, and listing the service tags of basically the entire first batch of E series machines we purchased, dell were "unable to replicate" the problem. I had to do a bunch of testing and send through snapshots of what i was seeing to get them to acknowledge that the problem even existed despite massive background info available from unhappy customers on the internet who were also ignored by Dell. Turns out there was a motherboard rev, hence they could not replicate on their newer machines.

    Just recently we ordered about 10 more E6500s, all of which have constant network drop outs. The quality control really has gone to shit.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  23. Wait, what? by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't be a fucking moron and write shit that isn't true.

    [looks at slashdot user ID] Yeah, you're new here.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Wait, what? by mortonda · · Score: 4, Funny

      [looks at slashdot user ID] Yeah, you're new here.

      you all look the same to me...

    2. Re:Wait, what? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That'll be your eyesight going, grandpa.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  24. They're all rotten, then by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then I guess they're all rotten.

    Dell: Numerous examples. I have one of them, the otherwise excellent XPS M1330 that has a defective nVidia 8400M GPU.

    Apple: Numerous examples (including right now - iphone). The various iBook motherboard defects also come to mind.

    nVidia: The afore-mentioned 8400M remained in production long after nVidia discovered the defect. They kept the defect secret for as long as possible, then when forced to admit it continued selling the faulty part without any warning for users and refused to talk about any arrangements they might've made with individual OEMs for RMA/warranty.

    Acer: Frequently sells shoddy hardware and yells "la la la la" loudly when told about it. I have one of those, too, an Acer laptop with a fairly powerful GPU and a cooling subsystem for a basic one, so if you actually use it the GPU overheats and the machine crashes.

    Hell, the list is basically endless. Everyone does it, because the consequences are small compared to the profits. Unless that changes, it'll keep on happening, too.

  25. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it is considered a lot worse for an innocent man to go to jail than for a guilty man to go free.

    I guess you didn't get the memo. Warrants are passe, especially within a few hundred miles of the nation's border; you can be arrested (anywhere in the country) for carrying large amounts of money (and they'll confiscate it, and you won't get it back); and of course, once convicted of anything at all, you're a permanent member of the new underclass. Not to mention that "innocence" is highly correlated with how much the defendant spends on lawyers.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  26. Re:Even then you don't know by JDeane · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked as Dell telephone tech support, I can honestly say they DO know about the issues. Nice big red screen pops up when you call them that says "Do not read this to the customer" it contains a full description of the issue your having 99% of the time. (The E6400's where funny as hell.... and no your not crazy and yes Dell knows about the issue.) Oh did I mention this screen pops up right after we ask "Can I have your service tag number".

  27. Re:Ok, name another... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now you're assuming Apple cares about any product more than 2 years old.

    What other cell platforms are getting significant updates after two years?

    The difference is that Apple just posted 65 critical patches to iOS, half of which allow arbitrary code execution. So you're not getting those now-published and officially acknowledged holes.

    And Apple holds your actions illegal if you attempt to fix them yourself.

    So it's not just the open publishing of security patches that won't be fixed for old phones, but legally prohibiting the owner from fixing those patches on their own.

    Yeah, they won't support it, and legally restrict you from supporting yourself!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  28. Oh, now, please. by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thank you for all the helpful citations and examples. Oh, wait, you don't give a single one, you stereotypical, paranoid fruit loop.

    Are you familiar with the website "Google"? It's really kind of neat. For instance, watch this:

    Google: "Money confiscated"

    Very first result:

    Headline: Federal Appeals Court: Driving With Money is a Crime
    Lede: Eighth Circuit Appeals Court ruling says police may seize cash from motorists even in the absence of any evidence that a crime has been committed.
    Link: http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/12/1296.asp

    Isn't that awesome the way that works? You just type in the thing you want a reference for, and there it is. Tech is cool, eh? Also, I assure you that the other matters I referred to... references are just as easily located.

    So... if you really wanted those answers, they're right there to be found. Or, you could have asked politely (or even tersely, such as "Cite?") Instead, you wasted time calling me names. Interesting approach. Not likely to get you want you ask for in the general case, just so you know. I just did it to show what an idiot you are, considering that you took the time to call me unjustified names.

    Next time think first, type second. Like "Why would he write that..." google... "oh." Or just ask politely. Then you won't have your butt handed to you so neatly packaged.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.