Slashdot Mirror


Working Toward a Universal Power Brick For Laptops

An anonymous reader links to PC Authority with some hopeful news about untangling a persistent annoyance for laptop users — namely, the myriad power supplies called for by laptop makers: "'On a PC, an ATX power supply for example will screw into certain mounting holes, have a maximum size and shape, and will take a standard 3-pin "kettle cord" for incoming power. If it complies with these standards, the PSU will be able to bolt into any manufacturer's ATX case.' Laptop design, on the other hand, involves cramming a PC into a tiny chassis, which usually has its own thermal design and power distribution requirements. This has led to the somewhat bizarre situation where every manufacturer has its own laptop power supply design. It now appears that some of the major players in laptops are getting together to work on a standardized laptop power supply design. Not only are big players involved, but the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) has created a team to work on the power supply standard."

365 comments

  1. good. by B5_geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its about fracking time.

    Hey industry (Sony I am looking at you) repeat after me:

    Open standards help EVERYBODY!

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:good. by TechJag · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I have so many stupid power bricks... a world with only one type of connector? I can't even imagine!

    2. Re:good. by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's what we said about 20 years ago when we imagined the "connector of the future", which would allow you to drop the serial, parallel, centronic and other various connectors for a single one. A single connector for your keyboard, mouse, printer, scanner, external drives, etc.

      And then USB appeared. No longer did we have to mess with dozens of types of connectors! We only have to care about USB, USB3, FireWire400, FireWire800, eSATA, VGA, DVI, HDMI, DisplayPo... oh wait.

    3. Re:good. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Not only do i have a lot of stupid power bricks, but when i go somewhere for work i have to carry 2 laptops and 2 different power bricks...
      When i arrive, the client will undoubtedly have their own laptops but most likely they wont have compatible power to mine.

      If i could walk around with no power bricks and be sure that any laptop supply would be compatible things would be much easier. Even just carrying one brick instead of 2 would be a huge improvement.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:good. by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      USB3 is backward compatible with USB/USB2. USB failed to keep up with storage medium speeds, necessitating eSATA. USB was never intended to replace display connections.

      So nice try at painting USB as a failure, it really isn't. Thanks to USB you no longer have 2x PS2, 2x COM and 1x Parallel ports wasting space on your motherboard. Instead you have 6x USB, 2x Ethernet, and other smaller and much more useful ports to play with.

      But I'm sure someone could dig you up a motherboard that has all those clunky old ports on them, since clearly USB did nothing at all to help.

    5. Re:good. by CodingHero · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of a quote I saw somewhere:

      You find yourself in a maze of standards, all conflicting.

    6. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 5, Informative

      USB1,2,3 are pretty compatible. In one way only for USB3, but not totally different.

      FW400,800 are also compatible enough.

      eSATA is probably more of a niche product. Probably no one has this on their must-have!!1! list. It's marginally faster than USB2 for external drives only and few drives can steadily saturate a USB2 link at all. Until I'm not saying 480Mbps are enough for everyone, but enough to stop caring *that* much until SSDs become cheap enough to be an external commodity drive.

      VGA is simply kept in a zombie state by ignorant users and overcautious companies. Use cases are respectively "I don't see any difference between analog and digital video and that VGA-only TFT was 0,10 EUR cheaper" and "My laptop must work with the most ancient projectors, the most ancient of cabling and the most ancient of users. Therefore VGA is a must".

      DVI and HDMI are interchangeabled with an adapter available at 1000 eBay shops for less than 5 EUR incl. shipping. They're still gold plated, though.

      DisplayPort are electrically incompatible to DVI and HDMI, but no one notices, since the video cards adapt to it. Apple fans will probably mod me down to hell, but DisplayPort is the reinvention of the wheel. A sleek and stylish wheel of course, and we totally, absolutely needed another connector for digital video that is electrically incompatible with DVI and HDMI. Since we only had 2 digital video standards to choose from. Maybe one of our Appolytes can enlighten me, but to me, it has no substantial advantages over HDMI.

      Looking at the rest of the connectors on this Thinkpad, I spot 1 probably required Gb Ethernet port, 1 zombie Modem port that, since 3G internet, is probably never be used or needed again and 2 analog audio connectors in and out, that are as of yet indispensable.

      Ethernet will probably survive for several decades, since no one will want to replace all those hectoparsecs of wiring or carry around a USB-Ethernet dongle. Paranoid companies will not switch to even terabit WiFi, ever, since it's all so terribly insecure even with 16kB long keys.

      VGA will die in methusalem companies out 1 decade AFTER Internet Explorer 6. Since, you know, you could on one day meet the first data projector ever built and must connect to it lest the company be damned.

      FireWire is dying. Zealots are drawing their knives now, but it adds nothing to USB2 or 3.

      Same for eSATA.

      DisplayPort, Mini-DisplayPort, Micro-DisplayPort and DisplayPort9000 will probably survive with Apple hardware because of reason no. 1337.

      HTC, Apple or Sony could go on to invent anther standard for micro-, mini- and pico-USB, And micro-, mini- and pico-HDMI, maybe each in two versions called A and B.

      The MAFIAA will come up with a new copy protection scheme and cabling somewhere in the next decade, but that cannot stop the unification wave. They have HDMI with Gigabit Ethernet now, which is probably more versatile than sliced bread, but it still will have to compete with USB video.

      But in the end, the future has fewer connectors. One for power, one for everything else. USB is as Turing-complete as connectors go, if you excuse this analogy. Everything can then easier be adapted to use them instead of inventing a new format. With mass production lowering marginal costs to fractions of a cent, nothing exists that cannot be connected by some protocol driven over USB.

    7. Re:good. by pizzach · · Score: 1

      Or the fact if they were standardized they would be much much cheaper.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    8. Re:good. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      DVI can be adaptered to VGA, so there really is no reason for a pc to have a VGA port on it.

    9. Re:good. by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      >and few drives can steadily saturate a USB2 link at all.

      Not these days. Most modern hard drive can push upwards of 80Mbytes/sec, and over 100Mbytes/sec in some cases.

      Join the present. :)

    10. Re:good. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 3, Informative

      DisplayPort is royalty-free; HDMI isn't.

      DisplayPort is also more computer-oriented than HDMI, so it is more flexible about what kind of data streams it can carry. For example, the latest version of the standard supports carrying USB signals and a wider range of audio formats than HDMI supports.

      Also, DisplayPort wasn't invented by Apple. They just adopted it (except for their own connector) because it suited their needs better than HDMI.

    11. Re:good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      someone missed a "woosh".

      here, take this one:

      WOOSH!

    12. Re:good. by srw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Firewire has better latency than USB2 and is better able to sustain it's specced data rate. That is why it is still used in professional video and audio applications. Oh, and we also use eSATA for the same reason. (Yes, I work in that industry.) Other than that, I think you're pretty much right on.

    13. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      DisplayPort may be more computer-oriented than HDMI, but carrying USB signals doesn't wow me in the least. HDMI's latest standards in 1.4 can do that as well AND Gigabit Ethernet - and they didn't need to implement a totally incompatible format.

      A wider range of audio formats? Yes, but why? Really? 2 channels PCM, 5.1 channels DTS, 7.1 channel SDDS and then, what?

      Oh and the HDMI has royalties on it. Until the patents run out in 15 years, manufacturers will pay, what, 15 cents, per unit? I can really feel the pain there.

      If they need a computer oriented connection, use USB2,3,x - USB video will do fine.

      The rest is just reinventing the wheel combined with a nice inner platform effect.

      Maybe it's time for another law: "Every connector will evolve until it can read USB"

    14. Re:good. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Maybe one of our Appolytes can enlighten me, but to me, it has no substantial advantages over HDMI.

      To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a standard locking HDMI connector... just some non-standard (and expensive) hacks. As a result, applications where the connector cannot fall out are limited to VGA or DVI. As you imply, VGA needs to die, and DVI has bandwidth limitations, necessitating a second connection at high resolutions.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Those lying around in the bargain bin don't, but you're right, USB2 is hitting its limits there, making USB3 required soon.

      The higher speed will be noticed, but the real-world difference is probably not going to blow everyone out of their seats unless they do full drive image backups for a living.

    16. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      And a buggy can be made to roll without a horse.

      But our IT department will not believe that, ever.

    17. Re:good. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Every single thing you just said is absolutely correct.

      I must say, that when you said "Probably no one has this on their must-have!!1! list." regarding eSATA, you are half wrong. I do agree that most users don't, but I fucking love eSATA.

      SATA is fucking great, and it solved all the stupid issues that IDE caused, while allowing me to build modest servers with consumer-grade very cheap disks (I would have never put an IDE drive on a server, SCSI all the way, but SATA is nice enough. Throw a software raid in the deal, and you have a cheap server that works just fine). Now, eSATA is paradise because it allowed me to trash all my desktops and use only my laptop. I can connect any disk natively to my laptop, now, how amazing is that? Yes, I know USB isn't that much slower than SATA, but it is noticeable. But that's not the most important thing: you are not connecting your disk natively. That means you lose some very important functions, like debug messages, sleep modes, and more importantly, SMART.

      I usually connect ~10 different HDs to my machine every week. eSATA is the best thing ever.

      Leaving that aside, connector compatibility and standardization is a must. Apple has always been one of the worst offenders regarding compatibility, and they will continue to be incompatible because they want to be "different".

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    18. Re:good. by chronosan · · Score: 1

      DisplayPort isn't just an Apple thing, AMD/ATI is pushing it big time for Eyefinity, seeing as a single graphics card with DisplayPort can support more than just two displays (DVI/HDMI is limited to two by design, RAMDAC I think).

    19. Re:good. by chronosan · · Score: 1

      Not all DVI

    20. Re:good. by Cley+Faye · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not sure if I should respond to this post or the parent post, but modern graphic card doesn't have VGA port : like this (and it's already two generation behind what's current).

      And yet my display is connected through a VGA adapter.

    21. Re:good. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Open standards help EVERYBODY!

      They'd help consumers since they'd be able to choose a replacement power adapter from a large range of manufacturers instead of just one and would thus save money. They wouldn't help Sony since they wouldn't be able to overcharge for that replacement adapter.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    22. Re:good. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      DisplayPort are electrically incompatible to DVI and HDMI, but no one notices, since the video cards adapt to it. Apple fans will probably mod me down to hell, but DisplayPort is the reinvention of the wheel. A sleek and stylish wheel of course, and we totally, absolutely needed another connector for digital video that is electrically incompatible with DVI and HDMI. Since we only had 2 digital video standards to choose from. Maybe one of our Appolytes can enlighten me, but to me, it has no substantial advantages over HDMI.

      FWIW, Apple is just one of the supporters of DisplayPort (or mini-Displayport)...Dell and Lenovo both use it as well. So I don't think you really need to get flamed by Appolytes (like the term btw)

      On the otherhand, I bought a Dell Vostro small business computer in a packaged deal with a 23" monitor and the damn thing came with only a VGA port. THAT'S irritating.

    23. Re:good. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      We've warned you about the punishment for heresy before.

      signed

      Grand Inquisitor
      The IT Department.

      And take down that picture of Galileo. It's not funny.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    24. Re:good. by Lvdata · · Score: 1

      Not Entirely. DVI-A can be adapted, but DVI-D can not. Most computers and devices that output DVI-A have the extra analog pins. They are easy to spot as the 2 above and 2 pins below the flat connector. I have seen a LOT of displays that are DVI-D only and are missing the pins. You can see them on a monitor that lacks the capacity. Overall a dual DVI-A&D is better then a VGA+DVI-AD

    25. Re:good. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 2

      Find me something that can only do DVI-D output...

      Adaptering doesn't count.

    26. Re:good. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      I was talking about putting an adapter on an output socket. The socket on a monitor is not an output socket...

    27. Re:good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the great thing about standards - there are so many to choose from.

    28. Re:good. by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      There's actually a really good chance you can find a power brick that will work for both if you really want to. Search for universal laptop power supply and you'll probably find some good options. Amazon carries some and a hard-core electronics supply store will have even more options. Just check the voltages on your laptops first.

    29. Re:good. by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Doesn't HDMI have some terrible lag - something like 0.2 seconds or something? Maybe DisplayPort doesn't suffer from this.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    30. Re:good. by Spatial · · Score: 4, Informative

      eSATA is [...] marginally faster than USB2 for external drives only and few drives can steadily saturate a USB2 link at all. I'm not saying 480Mbps are enough for everyone [...] FireWire is dying. Zealots are drawing their knives now, but it adds nothing to USB2 or 3. Same for eSATA.

      I thought the same thing until I actually tested it. USB2 is very slow; it was probably a bottleneck ten years ago, let alone now.

      I have an external HDD with all three interfaces. How long do my backups take on each?
      eSATA: 2.2 hours (70 MB/sec, 560Mbps, limited by HDD)
      FW400: 3.8 hours (40 MB/sec, 320Mbps)
      USB2: 4.8 hours (32 MB/sec, 256Mbps)

      This is with a three-year-old 5400RPM 750GB model. In short, any old piece of crap can saturate USB2.

    31. Re:good. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      "My laptop must work with the most ancient projectors, the most ancient of cabling and the most ancient of users. Therefore VGA is a must".

      There's something to be said for VGA if you visit other companies. The projector there will always support VGA, so it's well worth the few square cm on the back of a laptop for a VGA connector.

      VGA has been around for ages and virtually everything supports it. In the meantime we've had DVI-A, DVI-D, HDMI, Light Peak and HD Base T.

      It actually seems like if I had a notebook without VGA I'd need to carry a converter with me. And HDMI to VGA for example is painful because the converter needs to support HDCP and also do D-A conversion. I.e. it would probably require power.

      Leave VGA Aloooone!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    32. Re:good. by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      You have to be careful about that. For example, the mini display port --> DVI adapters for Apple laptops don't pass the analog signal, requiring you to spend another $30 and carry two full adapters, rather than being able to use a cheap DVI --> VGA adapter.

    33. Re:good. by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless USB3 can do DMA transfers (i.e. without needing the CPU's direct involvement) Firewire will stay. Honestly the USB standard seems to be a step backwards to PIO days.

      It was a crap standard back when it was released, which is fair enough, as it was designed to replace serial, parallel and the PS/2 ports, all slow devices. It was never designed for connecting disks to (or anything faster than 12mbit/s), which is why it sucks at most high throughput tasks (despite the tacked on bit added to it in USB2 to help it along).

      The only thing on the horizon which I can see as being an improvement over Firewire (and a unifying connector for all) is Intel's LightPeak technology, but even that has the limitation of not being able to transfer power to devices through the same cable.

    34. Re:good. by cynyr · · Score: 1

      ... and few drives can steadily saturate a USB2 link at all. ... </quote>

      Really? i get 130MB/sec(output from dd; "1024000000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 7.88258 s, 130 MB/s") reads from my 1TB Seagate barracuda, wikipedia says max transfer of USB2 is 50MiB/sec looks like about half of what my drive can do, i've done this over 10GB, and 50GB transfers and it never gets below 100MB/s, so your USB2 is still to slow, and yes my drive can saturate it.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    35. Re:good. by Makzu · · Score: 1

      HDMI 1.4 has specs for an optional locking connector. http://www.hdmi.org/manufacturer/hdmi_1_4/automotive_connection.aspx

    36. Re:good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Types-usb_new.svg if you think USB is the magic answer!!!

      also, I'd like to see a laptop that needs less than 15 watts so that I could power it from my usb power adaptor in the car ...

    37. Re:good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one side benefit would be that it would not be possible to burn a mother board because I inadvertently plugged a 20 volts power supply into a laptop that wanted only 15 ...

      Yes, I've done it!

    38. Re:good. by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      I haven't played with USB3 yet, but USB2 has its issues:
      - still some compatibility issues
      - high CPU usage (higher than SATA and FW for sure)
      - lower throughput (again, esp. vs SATA and FW)
      - very glitchy hubs

      I really hope USB3 turns out better, but as far as I know Intel is already putting the finishing touches to its Apple-commissioned successor: Light Peak (http://www.intel.com/go/lightpeak/), and that one is targetted at everything, and should replace USBx, SATA, DVI/HDMI/DP, FW, even ethernet.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    39. Re:good. by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Psh! Manufacturers can't even standardize their own system's connectors. Only one who has managed to standardize their plugs is Apple. Which is funny since their adapters & connectors are by leaps and bounds FAR better than everyone else's. Everyone really just needs to cough up the licensing dough, and give Apple money. They got a great freaking design, works wonderfully, quick disconnects without ripping your system off the desk, and the jack itself is indestructible outside of something being jammed into it.

    40. Re:good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, one issue with HDMI and display port is that they slip out too easily. For production work, we need to use DVI or VGA simply because they can screw into the machine and stay there.

    41. Re:good. by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

      True but remember when all sorts of devices like printers came with a USB cable? Now most don't because USB is ubiquitous. I'd love to have a P/S standard that would treat laptop power supplies just like that. Assume the user has one, if not it's up to retail to sell them one, creates markets for "specialized" products (high durability, high power, ultra portable). Rather than pay for similar circuitry over and over again. I'm exceptionally bitter that I have to carry two *UNIVERSAL* power adapters to handle the four machines in use around my house (two laptops and two netbooks).

    42. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm talking about business notebooks. From Toshiba. Mandated by an enterprise-wide IT department that has only the CEO himself to fear.

      Like these

      http://eu.computers.toshiba-europe.com/innovation/series/Tecra-M10-Series/1056372/

      VGA only. Digital video is for heretics and hopeless perfectionists. A 1400x1050 image on an external projector is meant to be blurry and I like it that way.

    43. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you work, but mine doesn't slip out unless I want to.

      On a serious note, there's also lockable HDMI. But DVI is well enough. Two cables for video and audio is acceptable, at least compared to VGA blurring after several meters of cabling.

    44. Re:good. by Randle_Revar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Displayport has more video and audio bandwidth and much more aux data bandwidth.
      As a VESA standard, it is royalty-free.
      It relates much more closely to how modern digital displays are driven, allowing "Direct Drive Displays" and eliminating certain complexities in encoding/decoding DVI/HDMI.
      eDP is replacing LVDS internally in notebooks, and iDP may replace LVDS in smaller devices, these share silicon with standard DP.

      A lot of good detailed info here (start on page 16):
      http://www.displayport.org/cms/sites/default/files/downloads/DisplayPort_Technical_Overview.pdf
      obviously from VESA so it has some marketing stuff, but the technical details are right. They do omit the ability of HDMI 1.4 to run 100 Mb Ethernet, and HDMI's support of more color profiles.

    45. Re:good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Intel Light Peak
      http://techresearch.intel.com/articles/None/1813.htm .
      It will be nice to get rid of electrical connections completely.

    46. Re:good. by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Wait, which company do you work for? I want to make sure to never do business with them ever unless the CEO resigns and promises to wear a hat on his head for the rest of his life that says "asshat".

    47. Re:good. by mehtajr · · Score: 1

      DisplayPort has much higher bandwidth than DVI or HDMI (over four times single-link DVI and 1.7 times HDMI). DVI already can only drive a 30 inch display with a dual-link connection. DisplayPort doesn't have that problem. I imagine now that there's been a big push to get mobile screens up toward 300ppi resolution, there will be a push to do the same on laptop and desktop displays. Eventually, you'll need the bandwidth to deal with the extra pixels on large screens.

      Pushing for higher bandwidth connectors is a good thing. Otherwise, we'll trade VGA for DVI as the obsolete technology that won't ever die.

    48. Re:good. by adisakp · · Score: 1

      eSATA is probably more of a niche product. Probably no one has this on their must-have!!1! list. It's marginally faster than USB2 for external drives only and few drives can steadily saturate a USB2 link at all. Until I'm not saying 480Mbps are enough for everyone, but enough to stop caring *that* much until SSDs become cheap enough to be an external commodity drive.

      A correction on your remarks. You obviously have not tried the difference between eSATA and USB2. eSATA is orders of magnitude faster. USB2 tops out at about 25-30MB/s for reads and writes. With an SSD, you can hit 280MB/s on eSATA which is around 10X faster. Even with a fast HD, you can hit 120MB/s on eSATA which is 4X faster (2 binary orders of magnitude faster than USB2.0). Plus USB2.0 seems to chew up CPU time and drive operations can't be queued so using USB2.0 for large drive operations brings your system to a crawl while eSATA works pretty much as fast as an internal drive.

      I could support your remark if you compared USB3.0 to eSATA. There are already reviews of USB3.0 external cases which show performance similar to eSATA plus actual support for "removing" the drives. eSATA hot swap support sucks -- usually requiring you to have the drive connected at boot -- hot plugging eSATA is a very "iffy" combination of controller, drive, and OS all behaving according to nice and magically rare parameters.

    49. Re:good. by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      The motherboard DVI-D output on the HTPC my friend just built. Of course, he didn't know that until he had already bought and put it together about a month ago. This means he can't hook it up to his TV (still SDTV) with analog component cables, and had to buy a powered adapter to convert.

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    50. Re:good. by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I've got a USB headset (for my VOIP phone @ work). No reason that you have to have the audio jacks, but those connectors are simple and small, so most people don't think of it as wasted space. They can be wired in any free spot, probably easier than replacing them with a single USB port. Also, headphones are cheap and would actually cost more if they had to switch to USB.

      So, they aren't REQUIRED, but keeping them is really easy.

    51. Re:good. by spazdor · · Score: 1

      I play games on an HDMI-connected monitor, and I can assure you that this is not the case.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    52. Re:good. by spazdor · · Score: 1

      From the Light Peak page:

      Optical technology also allows for smaller connectors and longer, thinner, and more flexible cables than currently possible

      This is the opposite of what I thought I knew about fiber optics. Can anyone explain in detail? How can an optical cable be made more flexible(and still work) than a copper one?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    53. Re:good. by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      My bad. Here is more info (one reply said HDMI is decoded in milliseconds):

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1696034&cid=32669672

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    54. Re:good. by treeves · · Score: 1

      It has an advantage to any company that makes DisplayPort-to-HDMI adapters that you need because no TVs have DisplayPort inputs on them!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    55. Re:good. by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Looks like the lag is associated with TVs, which might be doing some internal processing and enhancing to the signal before putting it onto the screen - for TV and movie watching, this is presumably not a big deal.

      But I can't imagine a TV manufacturer building this sort of functionality without some sort of low-/no-latency bypass function. Xbox owners would riot.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    56. Re:good. by mtmra70 · · Score: 1

      If 90%+ of the computers used in a building are VGA and 90% of the modern projectors you buy today have VGA, it only makes sense to use VGA as the interconnect. Especially since VGA (5 wire RGBHV) is the only computer video signal cable you can pull unterminated through a 150' of 3/4" pipe without amplification and still get a perfectly usable 1024x768 signal out of it after you slap some mini high-res connectors on it.
       
      I would love to go digital at work (I'm the on-site AV guy which has supported 100+ conference rooms for 7 years) but it would first require IT to convert every laptop in the company to one with a displayport/hdmi port and then for me to figure out how the heck I'm going to get that digital cable through 50' of conduit in all of my conference rooms.

    57. Re:good. by jackbird · · Score: 1

      ...but cheap-ass $300 desktops are being sold in 2010 with only VGA ports.

    58. Re:good. by jackbird · · Score: 1

      damn. I mean only VGA ports.

    59. Re:good. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Does the open standard make your components needlessly expensive for the consumer?

      I propose something slightly different. Instead of forcing all manufacturers to conform to a standard power supply design specification, which may increase costs and decrease reliability, instead, encourage the manufacturers to publish full power supply specifications and allow third party vendors to produce multi-device power bricks that are switchable into various modes. Consumers who have a desperate need to cut down on the number of bricks they possess will be willing to pay for such devices. Or, the hardcore among us can use these specs to build our own such power supplies.

      I do not want to pay extra costs and have potentially decreased reliability unless I have a choice. Give me a choice, not a one-size-fits-all compromise which is sure to cater to only the lowest common denominator, dragging down quality for everyone.

    60. Re:good. by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless USB3 can do DMA transfers (i.e. without needing the CPU's direct involvement) Firewire will stay. Honestly the USB standard seems to be a step backwards to PIO days.

      As somebody who is currently writing Linux device drivers for some extremely bizarre hardware which is capable of DMA, I can only say... "Hurrrgh?"

      What does DMA have to do with the USB3 wire protocol? DMA is a function of the host controller. If you want DMA capability, then put it in the controller. What on earth does this have to do with the wire signaling? Asking whether USB3 can do DMA is like asking if TCP/IP supports Microsoft Outlook.

      But I haven't read the USB3 spec. Perhaps it's a schizophrenic combination of physical specifications and host endpoint specifications, in which case I wonder what the hell somebody is smoking?

    61. Re:good. by Smidgin · · Score: 1

      Perhaps by being thinner? If you're comparing a copper cable that can carry equivalent data, it could be a fair bit thicker and thus less flexible. That's the only possible way I can think of that fiber could be considered more flexible.

    62. Re:good. by Atario · · Score: 1

      DVD burning types have known this for years. Burning a full DVD over a USB2 connection? Better not go higher than 12X, if you want to avoid underruns.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    63. Re:good. by Calinous · · Score: 1

      analog-and-digital DVI can be converted to VGA (but - let's say - digital only DVI as found on AMD's integrated graphics can not (at least not using the passive, "free with any video card" adapter.

    64. Re:good. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Excellent... too late, but excellent :)

      Also, does it really lock? Their web site still says this:

      The HDMI licensing authority is actively evaluating solutions for a locking connector, but in the meantime, fixes are available.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    65. Re:good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The advantage DisplayPort has over HDMI is one of bandwidth. You can already buy computer displays these days with resolutions which HDMI is incapable of supporting. HDMI was developed for televisions, where 'High Definition' is worse than we could get on PCs 10 years ago. You can go from DisplayPort to HDMI over a $10 adapter cable. It also supports, but doesn't require, all the same idiotic DRM madness that HDMI uses.

    66. Re:good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, you're pretty much right. No modding down, but here's the enlightenment you mentioned:

      Why DisplayPort? Roughly twice the bandwidth of HDMI (hdmi - 1920x1200 pix, dp - 3840x2400 pix), and the open spec can be implemented by anyone without royalties. Size.

      Why Firewire? Isochronous real-time data transfer. Low latency. Maximum bus saturation. Peer to peer communication. Supplies up to 45w power. More. FireWire is losing ground in consumer products (no surprise - consumers are generally dumb), but USB will never be able to replace it in pro applications since USB can't guarantee bandwidth. I'm betting (hoping) LightPeak will be able to replace it (as well as USB, DP, HDMI, eSATA, and all the other connectors). One interconnect to rule them all!

      There are more details to both of these - a quick trip to wikipedia will provide a great deal of info on them.

    67. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      VGA degrades visibly after more than 20-30 meters. However, as with all analog signals, it degrades gracefully, just blurring out.

      Digital video usually degrades later, but with a bang.

      Anyway: digital video can be transferred pixel-perfect for maybe 300m or more using the right equipment.

      Example: any of these, if you have doubts:
      http://www.gefen.com/kvm/dproductlisting.jsp?listingCategory=Extenders&productType=dvi

      Be prepared to spend about 600 USD for flawless 1080p video over 30-50m or 1600 USD for the same - in fiber optics over 2km.

      That is a steep price, but peanuts for a high class conference room, where the projector alone usually costs more than twenty grand.

      I mean, who on Earth would equip a state-of-the-art meeting and conference room with a 20.000 USD projector, 5.000 USD remote-control system and 300 chairs costing upward of 100 bucks each and then chicken out on a digital video link to live with blurry VGA instead?

      We've done that on our conference rooms: With a good VGA-DVI scaler and a cheap DVI switch, we can connect every laptop currently in existence. DVI/HDMI/DisplayPort laptops can connect directly, VGA laptops are connected by a 2m extreme-quality analog cable and then converted to digital. After that, it's all digital, running 30-50m through the conduits. We did fiber optics, because of all the high-voltage cables running along them. Was 2000 EUR per room including fiber optical cable, DVI switch remote and installation. With all active components inside grounded metal boxes by default and only fiber cabling outside, is also very resistant to video eavesdropping, even TEMPEST attacks, ground loops, lightning strikes etc. - and most of all 100% immune to cell phone interference.

      Today, we would probably also do USB 2.0 and audio over the optic cabling along with the video, adding even more coolness to that solution.

      As projectors came down in price, there's enough resources freed to do quality cabling. Small fonts and spreadsheet lines getting lost in fuzz are optional these days. I don't miss buzzing cellphone interference on video/audio presentations...

    68. Re:good. by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean the wire protocol, I was referring to the entire standard as a whole. DMA was not part of the USB2 spec, while you could probably design a bespoke controller that did DMA it wasn't exactly part of the standard.

      DMA also helps with transfers, which is why Firewire can be considered the superior standard when it comes to high speed applications and/or bulk transfers. USB was not designed for that, hence why it never had a DMA controller specced in from the beginning.

      I actually had to write some device drivers to allow remote DMA and Firewire was the only commodity system that allowed this feature. If you know of another one let me know.

    69. Re:good. by mtmra70 · · Score: 1

      A 20,000 USD projector and 300 chairs is not a "conference room", that is an auditorium/event space which has a much higher budget to begin with. Also, 20,000USD will get you a sweet Christie projector, which BTW, has VGA inputs.
       
      Sure, if money wasn't a concern digital would be the way to go, but when you have 10,000-15,000 to spend on all audio/visual equipment for a 30 person conference room, good-bye digital. For your run of the mill conference room that is showing PowerPoint all day long, there is nothing wrong with a 1,500 USD NEC 3,000 ANSI lumen projector receiving it's signal over 5 wire MHR cable.

    70. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      For our run-of-the-mill conference rooms that *are* showing Excel and Powerpoint all day long, we surely spent enough on digital cabling. We put all the wires in conduits, from the table around the walls through the server room and from there to the ceiling. 20-50m depending on the layout of that particular room.

      Money saved from not having to tear up the walls, floors and ceilings and rebuilding half the room went into digital cabling for the insane lengths needed to re-use existing conduits. Minus construction, plus fiber means no practical difference in total costs. But saved maybe a week and a lot of dirt.

      Since then, we have been enjoying perfect, razor-sharp images.

      Sure, analog video with a surface mount conduit would have cost 1.000 bucks less and look only a bit shabby and only a bit fuzzy.

      During all those meetings, employees looking at even slightly fuzzed thin lines and serifs transfers a message: "we are sacrificing workmanship to lower costs". That's what our competitors can do - we won't.

      Or to use a car analogy: "The best or nothing."

    71. Re:good. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I guess my question is, why is the physical layer defined in the same specification as the host interface? I suppose there are some points of crossover, such as being able to guarantee bandwidth during the DMA operations, but I thought USB already provided bandwidth guarantees upon request. I wish I could draw a Venn diagram here to explain what I mean. Imagine that circle A is the host software environment and OS kernel, circle B is the host side of the controller interface, circle C is the hardware/physical layer. Circle A and B overlap, circle B and C overlap, circle A and C do not overlap. It seems like DMA exists within the overlap of circles A and B, and should not depend on what is inside circle C, at least not much.

  2. Who cares about the power brick by Pojut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I want laptop internals to be standardized, which would help upgrades be much more bearable (and, in some cases, make them possible).

    1. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The power supply is a good start. Just hope that they also can take a bite at the batteries which are incredibly expensive related to what they actually contain.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Moridineas · · Score: 0

      Simple question -- why?

    3. Re:Who cares about the power brick by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Upgrades and replacements. Currently, there's a limited number of components that can be replaced. I think memory, hard disk and sometimes the wireless card. That being said, upgrades are pretty dumb as the laptop has to be designed to deal with the energy dissipation and battery life in mind from the start.

    4. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Dr.Merkwurdigeliebe · · Score: 1

      Aren't laptops lifespans something like only 2-3 years? I think the idea of standardizing an external interface to a laptop, in this case it's power, has merit and should be looked into. However, different laptop manufacturers have different specs for products they want to create. If we standardize them, I feel that the laptop industry would homogenize and nothing would be unique. which means no one could innovate.

      --
      I'm a student. I write iPhone apps.
    5. Re:Who cares about the power brick by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would really restrict innovation if they did that.
      And let's be honest they pretty much have standardized the parts you tend to upgrade the most.
      1. Ram.
      2. Hard drives.
      3. wifi cards.
      What else do you want standardized?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Shin-LaC · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the power brick

      I do. Well, not for laptops, since I use Macs, but for cell phones and the like, sure.

      I want laptop internals to be standardized, which would help upgrades be much more bearable (and, in some cases, make them possible).

      They're already standardized. SATA HDs, SODIMM RAM, etc.. If you want to upgrade your CPU or your GPU, just find something that's compatible with the bus/chipset your motherboard is using, desolder/rip out the old one, and solder the new one in. Replace the BIOS as needed. I don't want my laptop to be 1 cm thicker just because you need a slot or a socket to do upgrades.

    7. Re:Who cares about the power brick by bami · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Graphic cards.

      Most laptops have stupid Intel graphic chips that bolt onto the motherboard, but some laptops connect the graphics card to the motherboard using a MXM connector (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_PCI_Express_Module).

      I'd really hope that gets standardized, since it's being one of the most important components in a computer nowadays, with graphical acceleration not only for games but for example Photoshop, or all the nice CUDA things you can do with it.

    8. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between being different for a technical reason and being different because you want to make more money selling accessories.

      Apples magnetic connector is an interesting example of a technical reason for being different, and I support that.

    9. Re:Who cares about the power brick by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      So it is easier for 3rd party manufactures to make less expensive power bricks because they won't have to resign them for almost every laptop on the market, only for different power requirements. In the end, this will save the consumer money, and space. If I only had have one laptop charger plug in my wall, it would cluttered my desk area as I have 3 in their now.

    10. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      That's my thought...these things are so custom designed, that I would think requiring eg a discrete video card module with a standard connector would really limit case size, heat dissipation (as you said), and general advancement of laptop state of art.

      When average laptops are $1000, how many people are going to spend $200 to upgrade a video card in 2 years when they could get a whole new (much better) laptop for not much more?

    11. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Hey, I've got no problem with power connector standardization (though like others here I think the Apple Magsafe beats just about any other connector I've seen)...

      The post was in reply to somebody saying "I want laptop internals to be standardized"

    12. Re:Who cares about the power brick by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That certainly used to be true, but these days there is less of a reason for upgrading. My current laptop is almost 4 years old, and doesn't really feel slow most of the time. I still occasionally use the one that it replaced (I usually leave it connected to a projector for playing iPlayer stuff and music, and for settling arguments at parties), and it is around 7 years old.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:Who cares about the power brick by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That would really restrict innovation if they did that."

      Well-designed form factors did the opposite for desktops.

      The standard PC form-factors fostered component innovation because development could be devoted to specific components with the assurance that they would have a standard "home" and a large potential market.

      That FREED them to compete on performance, which reinforced the value of standard form factors, and is why you can select from any number of standard PC cases today.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    14. Re:Who cares about the power brick by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      oh wow, Whoops. Clearly I got confused. Laptop internals will never been standardized, though I would appreciate the ability to upgrade video cards universally in laptops.

    15. Re:Who cares about the power brick by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      That would really restrict innovation if they did that.
      And let's be honest they pretty much have standardized the parts you tend to upgrade the most.
      1. Ram.
      2. Hard drives.
      3. wifi cards.
      What else do you want standardized?

      To be honest, I find myself needing to use a rogue power brick for my laptop a LOT more than I need to worry about swapping out the ram / hdd / etc.

      I borrow a power brick all the time if I'm hopping from building to building and a meeting goes from a scheduled 15 minutes to a long 2 hours.

      For example: one place I worked in the past had a couple of different models of laptops around. If you were traveling (even to another building) and forgot your brick, finding someone with a compatible brick was a p-i-t-a.

      Ram and HDD changes -- MAYBE once or twice during the life of the laptop.

    16. Re:Who cares about the power brick by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Aren't laptops lifespans something like only 2-3 years?

      I still have a 6-year-old iBook G4 sitting on a shelf in my stereo cabinet. I use it (with a Logitech DiNovo Mini wireless keyboard) for piping digital video or watching DVDs when my PVR is busy doing something else. I now use a late-2006 MacBook.

      Both of these machines were handed down from my wife as part of her upgrade cycle, and they still work well for me, although I use Linux on my desktop boxes. Since OS X offers a typical *nix environment from a terminal window, I can swallow other aspects of their business model that are less palatable.

    17. Re:Who cares about the power brick by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      MXM is already a standard, that's kind of the point. Just don't expect to see it on low-end smallish laptops, as there simply isn't enough space for the modularity.

    18. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I don't want my laptop to be 1 cm thicker just because you need a slot or a socket to do upgrades.

      How about two versions of the laptops. The small, thin ones are not upgradeable, but if I buy a laptop that weighs 6kg and has a 19" monitor and two hard drives then it should also have replaceable CPU and GPU. Especially since manufacturers sometimes offer stupid options, like a laptops with fast CPU but crap GPU or a laptop with good GPU but crap CPU. I could buy whichever and replace the crap part, or I could buy a laptop with a cheaper video card and CPU and upgrade them a few years later, instead of buying a laptop that has the best CPU and GPU so that thoy wuld last longer.

    19. Re:Who cares about the power brick by gutnor · · Score: 1

      Restrict innovation ?

      It would only restrict innovation for the current market. It would open other markets like laptop powerstrip, addon for car/home, ...
      That would not restrict innovation more than when they decided to normalize home voltage and frequency and electric plugs.

    20. Re:Who cares about the power brick by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Won't ever happen.

      Graphic cards get hot. Laptops have limited cooling capacity.

      So even with a standard connector, some models of graphics cards wouldn't work with some models of laptop, because those laptops couldn't handle the excess heat.

    21. Re:Who cares about the power brick by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I want laptop internals to be standardized, which would help upgrades be much more bearable (and, in some cases, make them possible).

      Well, it would never happen and you'd probably never want it to. Indeed, ten years ago, they tried something like that with video cards so you could swap them out and upgrade your laptop. Trouble is that by time you want to upgrade your video card, you'll want to upgrade the rest of it. You probably think that you want that but you are essentially asking for a beige box laptop. If they were to do that, the components would have to be able to fit the least common denominator. All your laptops would be huge and bulky and make the laptops of ten years ago look slim. It would be crap for a laptop due to size, weight, and other things that make people want laptops rather than a full size computer.

      Meanwhile, other companies, like Apple, Lenovo, HP, and anybody else who typically makes custom computer cases will put more and better engineering and parts into a computer to get better performance, weight, size, or some other spec out of their laptops than would be possible with standardized parts. Then we'd be right back where we are today. Standardized parts, for the most part are a pipe dream as far as laptops go, because the design criteria for laptops pushes towards custom builds that will be better than one with standard parts.

    22. Re:Who cares about the power brick by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Graphic cards do get hot, including those that are already built into laptops. From that point of view there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to replace your current module with a modernized one that fits into your laptops cooling envelope. There are a number of other reasons why having replaceable components in a laptop is not as straightforward as with a standard ATX desktop PC; which is, after all, the other extreme, built to be user serviceable and customizable.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    23. Re:Who cares about the power brick by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      From that point of view there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to replace your current module with a modernized one that fits into your laptops cooling envelope

      And since it has to fit into the cooling envelope, then you can't have completely standard graphics cards.

      You'd end up with a situation like this:

      This nVidia card can fit in Thinkpad model yyy, zzz and qqq. If you have a model aaa, you need this nVidia card. If you have one of these 6 models of Dell, you need this card, but you need this one if you have one of these other 6 models.

      So even with a standard connector, you could not have standard cards. Unless the cards are all engineered into a 'lowest common denominator' of cooling, which will result in the same underpowered situation we have today.

    24. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Dr.Merkwurdigeliebe · · Score: 1

      But that's my point - no one upgrades laptops. Or shouldn't, imo.

      --
      I'm a student. I write iPhone apps.
    25. Re:Who cares about the power brick by moonbender · · Score: 1

      The cooling envelope isn't a physical thing, it boils down to a number of Watts. A Thinkpad that comes from the factory equipped with a GPU with a maximum sustained heat output of, say, 40W could use any replacement module with a output of less than 40W. The same modules could be used in a Dell which comes with a thermal system which can handle 40W of heat.

      The heat thing isn't the problem here. Although the overall low capacity for both power storage as well as heat output of laptops make a replaceable graphics module less interesting, since the potential for improvement isn't all that big. (Still, replacing an old module with a modern one which includes stuff like H.264 or WebM acceleration would be nice.)

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    26. Re:Who cares about the power brick by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It did for desktops but that is because size doesn't tend to be part of the design criteria for a desktop.
      Cooling is a big issue on notebooks as is power use which really isn't an issue on most desktops.
      If you get a big high end notebook with MXM support you will have the option to swap video cards.
      Just do not expect find that feature on a small and or cheap notebook.
      You can get them if you really want.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    27. Re:Who cares about the power brick by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Oh I am all with you about the power brick. I was just wondering just what else one could make swapable on a notebook besides the powerbrick, Ram, Hard Drives, WifiCards and so on.
      Batteries would also be nice but packaging makes that a hard nut to crack for sure.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    28. Re:Who cares about the power brick by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "It did for desktops but that is because size doesn't tend to be part of the design criteria for a desktop.
      Cooling is a big issue on notebooks as is power use which really isn't an issue on most desktops."

      Both these considerations can be addressed by standard form-factors. Neither consideration requires a variety of solutions outside what a standard form-factor (which is different and to be distinguished from an exact design!) could offer.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    29. Re:Who cares about the power brick by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You don't think cooling is a huge variable here?
      It can be effected by so many things in a notebooks that it isn't funny.
      The batteries when they charge put out heat, drives, memory, video cards.
      It is far more of a mess than I think you understand.
      And if it was as simple as you think then a clone maker would be doing it and trying to take the market.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    30. Re:Who cares about the power brick by White+Shade · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I have a relatively ancient Pentium M based Dell laptop that's actually snappier, more responsive, and more fun to use than the brand new netbook I have as well. The netbook has a much brighter and clearer screen, and the intel graphics accelerator does make the UI look nicer, but in terms of overall performance, the dell absolutely smokes it, no contest, which is pretty frightening considering the relative age and generation level of each cpu...

      --
      ìì!
    31. Re:Who cares about the power brick by cgenman · · Score: 1

      What else would you upgrade or replace? The CPU needs a motherboard built for it, and the motherboard has to be form-fitted to the laptop. Same with northbridge, southbridge, and a bunch of other controllers. PCI / PCIE covers a lot of upgrade grounds.

      The graphics card really needs to become standardized, but there is movement in that direction already. Theoretically you could decide on a standard formfactor for optical disk drives. But those seem to be on the outs with laptops anyway. Really, unless you want to create a standardized motherboard formfactor for laptops, and are willing to accept laptops that are about twice as big to fit those, they're about as upgradable currently as they're likely to get for the next few years.

    32. Re:Who cares about the power brick by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Why would you upgrade a laptop? When it gets old get a new one. The only thing I bother upgrading is RAM and HDD and that's only because laptop manufacturers inflate the price so much. Still I'd rather not to if it was an option. Especially not if it made the computer any bulkier.

      Standardized non-removable components though I could agree on. We need to end driver hell.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    33. Re:Who cares about the power brick by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      My old ThinkPad is fairly modular. I've upgraded the RAM (256MB to 1GB), replaced the CD drive with a combo DVD / CD-RW drive. I can also upgrade the hard disk trivially. I use a PC-Card WiFi card, but there's also an internal mini-PCI slot that I could use instead.

      The only bits that I can't upgrade are the CPU and GPU, both of which are soldered to the motherboard, and the screen. I can replace the screen, but (as far as I know), no one makes better screens for that model. If I replace the motherboard, then I've basically replaced the entire machine, at which point there's actually not much point in upgrading, when I could buy a new laptop and just downgrade the old one.

      I'll probably 'replace' this one soon, at which point it will be the one that gets plugged into my projector (it's fast enough to play the HD iPlayer streams, which might be nice) and the old one will go to my mother. Even when I had a desktop, upgrading was more of a theoretical possibility than a practical one. Upgrading the CPU often required a new motherboard and RAM, upgrading the motherboard required a new graphics card, so you're really only keeping the case and hard disks, and eventually it's easier to simply buy a new machine.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    34. Re:Who cares about the power brick by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Oh I am all with you about the power brick. I was just wondering just what else one could make swapable on a notebook besides the ...

      Yeh, I realized after I posted.

      Had I expanded the grandparent stuff I would've seen that.

  3. Magsafe by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be nice if they all standardized on a magsafe interface. Although I doubt it would happen, too expensive.

    Regardless, this is great news. It would be very nice to have just 1 power brick for multiple devices.

    1. Re:Magsafe by tepples · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if they all standardized on a magsafe interface. Although I doubt it would happen, too expensive.

      If this comment is anything to go by, getting MagSafe on any non-Apple hardware before 2026 would cost half the market capitalization of Apple Inc.

    2. Re:Magsafe by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if they all standardized on a magsafe interface.

      I hope not, at least not the earlier incarnations of it. Apple forums are full of people complaining about problems with their MagSafe failing to charge, not working at all, etc. I had problems with mine - power brick wouldn't charge the machine after about two years. It was going to be $60 for a new one, but I cajoled the guy at the "genius bar" into letting me have one for free.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    3. Re:Magsafe by mlts · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Apple would come out ahead if they licensed it, like they did with IEEE1394 for 3-5 bucks a connector. The precursor of a magnetically held connector was used in existing products (Japanese hot pots), but how Apple revised it for a laptop, it is very useful.

      However, unlike IEEE1394, every MagSafe connector sold to a competitor may mean one less laptop sold to them, so I can see why Apple is not licensing it.

    4. Re:Magsafe by stonertom · · Score: 1

      All the MagSafe supplies I've owned broke after a few months after the pins got stuck into the plug.

      --
      Shameless plugs and inaccessible site design FTW! - www.mistletoestreetmusic.com
    5. Re:Magsafe by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Well, we can all work toward getting that price down, can't we??

    6. Re:Magsafe by merreborn · · Score: 1

      All the MagSafe supplies I've owned broke after a few months after the pins got stuck into the plug.

      I've had the same problem. Exposure to humidity can rapidly lead to corrosion, which causes the spring-loaded pins to fail. Then you've got no contact. I've had 2 or 3 magsafe connectors fail on me in this way in the last year.

      In some ways, this is the lesser of two evils; it's much better for the brick-end of the connection to fail, than the connector inside the laptop itself -- which is how my last HP laptop died.

    7. Re:Magsafe by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      There's no way in hell Apple would agree to license the Magsafe connector - it gives them a competitive advantage and let's them sell specialized cables for their hardware.
      However, it may be possible to create a similar connector using loopholes in the patent

      2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first and second connectors each comprise a corresponding element to align the first and second connectors in one orientation.

      8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first and second connectors each comprise two axes of symmetry such that the first and second connectors couple together in only two orientations relative to one another.

      If multiple orientations are permissible (e.g. a square/circular adapter) this might work around it.

      6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first contact comprises a metallic pin biased relative to the first face by a spring.

      Easy enough, don't use a spring.

      N.B. I don't know anything about patent law, so it's entirely possible that there are some major errors in my interpretation of the patent.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  4. Finally! by TwiztidK · · Score: 1

    I hate that I always have to buy a new power brick if one breaks even though I have dozens of the things from other laptops.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone 5
  5. About time by kent_eh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At work we have a fleet of assorted laptops, and regularly have to go on a scrounge to find a power brick for someone who is visiting from another location who either left their brick at the other office/hotel/home/car and is running low on power

    Or someone is issued a new laptop, and it only comes with one brick (which is semi-permanently tied to the docking station) and they need another for portable use. Why can't we use the one from their old laptop?
    Even if it's the same manufacturer, the voltage or connector don't match. WTF?
    If we need a second power brick, we don't reward the OEM with extra money. It's 3rd party for that (and usually cheaper too)

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    1. Re:About time by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      If we need a second power brick, we don't reward the OEM with extra money. It's 3rd party for that (and usually cheaper too)

      I bought a 3rd party power brick once. It made a high pitch whine, ran hot, and smelled like burning.
      I then bought an OEM power brick and wrote off the other as a cheap learning experience.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:About time by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Why don't we make the power brick small and actually build it enough INTO the laptop?

      "Silly question", you'll say, but please tell me all those use cases, where the user *can* save on bulk and weight of the power brick and benefits hugely from having the thing in a separate unit dangling along the cable?

      A short meeting?
      Surfing on the couch for a minute?
      Travelling between 2 company offices where you know is another power supply already there?

      Compare that to the other use cases:
      Travelling with notebook AND power brick AND cable in one large bag.
      Rolling and unrolling that cabling every time you pack up your gear for a longer stay.
      Have that brick drop to the floor when unpacking
      Forget that brick in the office on the way to the meeting-that-saves-the-company?
      Mix up two different bricks while packing up after a meeting with business partners?

      Make the brick smaller - look at Kensington aftermarket parts - and then include it in the laptop itself. Solves a ton of problems with no further regulation needed.

    3. Re:About time by rotide · · Score: 1

      Just pointing this out, but power bricks generally warm up and some get what I would consider "hot". My work issued Dell is already quite warm when you put it on your lap, I'd hate to see how warm/hot it gets with the heat from the proposed "built-in" power brick added in.

    4. Re:About time by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      At work we have a fleet of assorted laptops, and regularly have to go on a scrounge to find a power brick for someone who is visiting from another location who either left their brick at the other office/hotel/home/car and is running low on power

      Buy more standardized equipment, and you'll be amazed at how much easier life gets. I have fifteen different models of Dell laptops that have been in service here over the last decade and there have been a total of three, count them, three power brick designs--and the most recent two generations (D-series and E-series Latitude) are forward/backward compatible.

      Of course, if you don't have any standards (buy an HP this week, an IBM/Lenovo next week, Toshiba the next) you end up with the nightmare you're dealing with--and the power bricks become the least of your problems since the dissimilar systems are a support nightmare all their own.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    5. Re:About time by brusk · · Score: 1

      My 12" Thinkpad is very portable with an extended battery that gives it 8+ hours of power. I take it to go work in a library, cafe, on the train, outdoors, etc. for a long stretch, and really don't need or want the extra weight of a power supply. The cable to the brick also acts as an extension--I have about 10' of tethering to the wall when I plug in, including the cable from the brick, but I'd need an extra-long power cable to plug in that far away (as happens in some rooms). So no thanks.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    6. Re:About time by dwinks616 · · Score: 1

      Next time buy Lenovo. Where I work, the T60, T61 and T400 models in use all use the same power block, and that very same power block powers the docking station. That's 4-5 years now that Lenovo has had a standardized power supply and even uses the same one for docking station and laptop.

    7. Re:About time by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      My experience was exactly the opposite . The third party supplies had decent strain reliefs on the cables and were quite reliable, unlike the Apple crap-o-matics that shipped with the G3 iBooks.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    8. Re:About time by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Buy more standardized equipment, and you'll be amazed at how much easier life gets.

      You assume I have any choice in what corporate purchasing dumps on us. We are big enough that the right hand and the left hand aren't well acquainted. Add in power struggles between IT and the purchasing group.

      It seems that each bulk purchase (3-4 times a year) they go with a different vendor. Or a different "best available" model form the same vendor.
      from where I am sitting, I can see HP, Panasonic, Dell, and IBM laptops. And if I take a short walk, I can see different vintages of each brand.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    9. Re:About time by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

      "Silly question", you'll say, but please tell me all those use cases, where the user *can* save on bulk and weight of the power brick and benefits hugely from having the thing in a separate unit dangling along the cable?

      The use case where you don't want your laptop to catch on fire?

      Seriously though I suspect for most people 99% of their laptop usage involves taking it to and from home and work where they either have a power supply in both places or are reasonably comfortable that their battery will get them through whatever limited usage they may have at home. In between they want to be carrying as little as possible.
      Personally I have the brick that came with my laptop in the office and a travel brick from lenovopowertips.com that I leave at home unless I'm traveling. (I only wish there as a tip for a Nintendo DSi).

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    10. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find Dell to be pretty good about that, their age-old conectors tend to function perfectly with all of their laptops that I have encountered -- I've even gone so far as to permanently mount one on my repair bench.

    11. Re:About time by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Dell used to be pretty good about that. For about 8 years their old power adaptors would work with new machines (at degraded rates), and their new power adaptors would work with their old machines. It was a big reason to stay on dells: an abundant supply of power in any given room.

      They just changed their adaptor this past year. Now it is this hexagonal thingie that is only compatible with their new models. Damn.

    12. Re:About time by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      You assume I have any choice in what corporate purchasing dumps on us. We are big enough that the right hand and the left hand aren't well acquainted. Add in power struggles between IT and the purchasing group.

      I commiserate with you. The solution for us at our site was to simply take the responsibility from everyone else in the company who had a finger in the pie. It's worked well for almost ten years now--in fact, it worked so well that corporate couldn't ignore it, and now it's written policy for all sites (including scheduled replacement time frames, and standard configurations).

      You're probably bigger than we are (~10 sites in 6 countries, ~1000 employees) so may not be able to carry off such a revolution--in which case, I again commiserate with you.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  6. PC laptops have sucky power supplies and ports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's hope they come up with a connector that is robust yet small, tugs out under pressure, doesn't limit the minimum height of the laptop, and so on.

    I doubt Apple will sign up, their connector already does all of the above. Now this Dell one here which meets none of them on the other hand is a good candidate for such a scheme.

    Also - kill off the large bulky power supplies, and give us smaller, more convenient supplies. Oh, look, Apple are already doing that too.

    I think the power supply on my netbook is nearly as big as the netbook itself. WHY OH WHY!!!

    1. Re:PC laptops have sucky power supplies and ports by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I think the power supply on my netbook is nearly as big as the netbook itself. WHY OH WHY!!!

      Simple - making the power supply smaller, yet having the same power would make the power supply really expensive. There are some physical limits, for example the size of the transformer inside depends on the power (more power = bigger core), current (more current = thicker wires) and operating frequency (lower frequency = bigger core). If you want to increase the frequency, the switching transistors, rectifiers and the core of the transformer will be more expensive or your power supply will run much hotter. Since you do not want to have a fan on the power supply, it also has to be big enough to cool itself even if you place it wider side down (less area available to heat the air around the PSU) on a carpet (good heat insulation, so the power supply cannot transfer some heat to the floor) in a room that's 40C hot.

      And you still want to be able to use your netbook at full load while simultaneously recharging the battery, so the power supply cannot be made less powerful (for example so you can either charge the battery or use the netbook at full power).

  7. Here are the specs, no further deliberation needed by Ted+Stoner · · Score: 1

    One knob to set the voltage, probably between 15V and 20V. Maybe we hide the knob so it doesn't get adjusted accidentally. n amps of current max. 2.5mm or bigger jack size. There, specs all done. Build 100M of them and cut me my cheque.

  8. I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If every PC laptop uses the same plug, I would jump for joy. If it was an Apple style "magsafe" style connector I would get down on my knees and fellate each and every member of the standards committee. I've been griping for years now how the connector conspiracy is still going strong in the laptop space and what a pain it is to keep matching power cords to laptops.

    Also, a standardized connector would let third parties come in and start making accessories and replacement bricks for a lot less than the highway robbery prices that the brand names charge.

    Also, while they're at it, why not spec out a standarized battery compartment? Not everybody has to use it, but if all "regular size" laptops did, that would be a huge win. A standardized modular bay connector would be nice too. Not to mention a standardized docking adapter. It's like laptop manufacturers stopped caring about standardization after PCMCIA/PC-Card/Expresscard and have been more than willing to custom engineer everything every time. It's really annoying and the standardization efforts are long long overdue.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Don't stop at standardizing the connector - you need to specify wattage as well. Perhaps multiple classes so as not to burden netbooks and low power systems with adapters designed for 17" desktop replacements.

      I found out the hard way that you can't use Apple's older 60W adapters with the new Core i5/i7 MacBook Pro's, which come with 85W adapters (the reverse works fine and is fully supported). It used to be it would work, but charge very slowly - a fine tradeoff. Now with the new i5/i7's it confuses the hell out of the system management controller, and makes the system act as if it has no battery at all - it sleeps immediately if the AC is removed, even if the battery is fully charged. I found that out when I packed my wife's MacBook AC adapter by mistake - which is visually indistinguishable from the new 85W adapter.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    2. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by Krahar · · Score: 1

      Also, a standardized connector would let third parties come in and start making accessories and replacement bricks for a lot less than the highway robbery prices that the brand names charge.

      That's exactly the problem. The brand names are both in charge of choosing the connector design and of earning the income from selling their proprietary power bricks.

    3. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      If it was an Apple style "magsafe" style connector I would get down on my knees and fellate each and every member of the standards committee.

      If we ever needed proof Apple fanatics are promiscuous homosexuals (it's well known that no females ever visit this website), this is it.

    4. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The modular bay should be doable. A power connector, SATA, and USB on a connector would do it for just about anything that I can imagine in a docking bay outside of something super exotic.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by jemenake · · Score: 1

      If it was an Apple style "magsafe" style connector I would get down on my knees and fellate each and every member of the standards committee.

      Hear, hear. And, as a bonus, I'd cook them breakfast for a year if the brick actually was designed to have the cords easily wrap around it (like the Dell's did, although not so well lately, even better than the Apple ones). Granted, it isn't something that needs to be in the spec (like voltage, current rating, and connector dimensions), but it's still on my wishlist.

    6. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by jemenake · · Score: 1

      If it was an Apple style "magsafe" style connector I would get down on my knees and fellate each and every member of the standards committee.

      Hear, hear. And, as a bonus, I'd cook them breakfast for a year if the brick actually was designed to have the cords easily wrap around it (like the Dell's did, although not so well lately, even better than the Apple ones). Granted, it isn't something that needs to be in the spec (like voltage, current rating, and connector dimensions), but it's still on my wishlist.

      Oh, and one more thing: Some kind of light or indicator on the connector to indicate that the brick is plugged in (like the little dot on MagSafe connectors or the new "blue ring" on the Dells).

    7. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, a standardized connector would let third parties come in and start making accessories and replacement bricks for a lot less than the highway robbery prices that the brand names charge.

      You mean a third party like Monster Cable?

    8. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Also, a standardized connector would let third parties come in and start making accessories and replacement bricks for a lot less than the highway robbery prices that the brand names charge.

      That's exactly why I don't think it will happen on name brand PCs (Dell/HP/Lenovo). It's a great way to increase margins when someone wants an extra power brick and has to pay $80 for it. The fact you can't rely on your ability to buy a 3rd party brick that will work only helps that fact.

      In fact, my friend in the cubicle next to me has a very nice Dell desktop replacement laptop. He's been through 2 powerbricks (now on his 3rd) because the DRM/authentication in the bricks would fail and thus the laptop would refuse to draw full power, preventing it from playing games and running at a decent speed. So even if the connector is standardized... you still might not be able to use a 3rd party adapter.

      As for MagSafe, I love it. It's fantastic and I've tripped over the cord at least a dozen times in the last few years and it always pops off safely. I'd also assume Apple has some kind of patent and so no one else can use it.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    9. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 1

      DRM/Authentication? I've not heard of any such thing. Perhaps your friend is just getting replacements that don't meet the required wattage output the laptop needs for full power operation? I was borrowing a friends Dell Latitude D600, and it refused to go faster than 600MHz on power because the brick was an iGo brand replacement that was short about 15 watts. Those bricks don't have any fancy signaling electronics in them. They just supply power.

    10. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, as long as the voltages are the same, you can use a higher wattage power supply on a smaller device without problems. The device will only take what amperage it needs.

    11. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was an Apple style "magsafe" style connector I would get down on my knees and fellate each and every member of the standards committee.

      Hear, hear. And, as a bonus, I'd cook them breakfast for a year if the brick actually was designed to have the cords easily wrap around it (like the Dell's did, although not so well lately, even better than the Apple ones). Granted, it isn't something that needs to be in the spec (like voltage, current rating, and connector dimensions), but it's still on my wishlist.

      Wrapping cords tightly with winds under a certain radius will damage them over time, causing failure after long-term use (although I guess with Dell laptops, that's already expected).

      What's wrong with the velcro wraps that let you choose how wide to make your loops anyway? Velcro wraps take a little extra time, and some additional care when packing/unpacking -- this is something most laptops would appreciate.

    12. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by MBCook · · Score: 1

      That's why I put "authentication" in there. It's not an ideal choice of words, I wasn't sure what else to call it. All three bricks have been from Dell, the official brick for that laptop. But they get mad (for some reason) and decide to stop reporting that they can meet the wattage requirements after running for a few minutes and the computer shuts down because of it. He's been through a motherboard replacement to try to fix this problem as well. It's been good for a while, but it has a habit of running for a few months before conking out again.

      But any validation that gets put in can easily mean pulling the ink cartridge bit where non-genuine OEM parts can be locked out, even when they may be perfectly fine. So 3rd parties have to license the chip from the OEM, so the OEM can still keep prices artificially high.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    13. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      I can't remember the exact text I saw on a dell, but here is a link that gives a little more information. http://en.community.dell.com/support-forums/laptop/f/3518/p/19245866/19385119.aspx

      On the laptop I was trying to troubleshoot the universal power adapter would not charge the battery with the laptop off and would halt on boot with a message stating that the battery would not charge because the power supply could not be identified. After hitting F1 the computer would boot but the battery would not charge.

    14. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they could clobber the idiots while the rest of us buy identical stuff from real competitors.

      As it stands now, I can buy a $50 Lenovo brick (which lasts about one year), or a $25 no-name with amazon reviews featuring phrases like "electrocuted" and "caught fire."

      As an aside at least the Lenovo bricks have a purely mechanical cord which is easy to insert and pops out surprisingly easily if snagged. It's nowhere near Magsafe, but I was still impressed.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    15. Re:I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by Brownian+Motion · · Score: 1

      I want a mag safe adapter to be the standard, with one addition: add an optional light peek connector. Then the standardized docking connection IS the standard power supply. Though you could still use a cheaper, power-only mag safe adapter when needed.

  9. Well... by rainmayun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Good luck getting Apple to play along. While I prefer their design, I doubt they'd even license out the spec to other manufacturers.

    1. Re:Well... by TwiztidK · · Score: 3, Informative

      At present, Apple won't license their "MagSafe" connector to anyone.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone 5
    2. Re:Well... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Still, its not like Apple HAS to play along. Essentially if everyone else jumps on board, wouldn't it take away from Apple's value if its the ONLY laptop without the interchangable power brick?

      Who am I kidding, they'll tote it as an exclusive feature.

    3. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      they'll tote it as an exclusive feature.

      You mean tout.

      You're the one who has to tote the thing around.

    4. Re:Well... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      They will, and they'd be right to do so. The MagSafe connector is the first power connector I've used on a laptop or phone that didn't suck. The older Mac ones were terrible (really easy to deform or short by accident). The one on my ThinkPad fits so tightly that I managed to throw the laptop across the room when I tripped over it (in IBM's defence, it didn't suffer any ill effects as a result of this, and continued the compile job it was running with only a brief pause). The MagSafe connector is easy to connect - you can plug it in either way around - and it comes out easily if you catch the cord.

      The only thing wrong with it is that, in Apple's implementation, the connection between the cable and the MagSafe plug is fragile. If they're going to design a standard connector, they need to make it better than Apple's one. Making it better than Lenovo or Sony's connector is trivial, but still a step backwards. Getting Apple to license the MagSafe connector, and then attaching it to the power lead in a less-braindead way would be perfect.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Well... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      At present, Apple won't license their "MagSafe" connector to anyone.

      Indeed. But from my experience, there are times when life might be easier without it. Yes, it does prevent breaking things if you yank too hard on the cable, and that's cool. But unless it (and the socket) is quite new, it doesn't always make a good connection. And as time goes by, the magnetism loses some of its mojo and the plug develops an annoying tendency to fall off the computer if you so much as look at it sideways.

      On balance, I think I preferred the physical plugs Apple used with their iBooks.

      But there are a couple of little things Apple did get right with both models: the fold-out "arms" on the transformer for stowing the cable neatly, and the orange/green light on the plug that tells us at a glance whether or not the battery is charged. These features are so simple and obvious, they should be commonplace.

    6. Re:Well... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The connection between the cable and MagSafe was fragile, but the newer versions are a lot more sturdy...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:Well... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      My only complaint about the MagSafe connector is that it doesn't survive being plugged into an apple.

      When I say "apple", I mean the red delicious variety.

      My son has ruined several component power cords by plugging them into various types of fruit.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    8. Re:Well... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't understand what aspects, exactly, of the "magsafe" connector Apple actually possess exclusive rights to.

      Deep fat fryers, possibly among other appliances, have been using magnetic breakaway cords for decades to avoid the hazards associated with people snagging cords and being rewarded with a hot oil bath. Surely, using this principle in DC cabling can't qualify as novel...

      Is it the palendromic, connect-either-way bit?

    9. Re:Well... by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you certain? I've seen similar tearaway connectors on deep fryers.

    10. Re:Well... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      I have a deep fryer with a similar kind of connection (two contacts and a magnet in the middle). Is it ever a pain in the ass, I have clean the contacts weekly to keep it working.

    11. Re:Well... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the connection system was already widely used, and apple somehow managed to patent using it for a laptop... Apple is good like that.

    12. Re:Well... by phoenix321 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Unless all standard connectors can glow in a different Trademark Brand Color, Apple will oppose it.

    13. Re:Well... by gutnor · · Score: 1

      Yeah a real bugger

      On a similar note, it does not resist deep frying, not even with clean oil !

    14. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then use any of the dozens of different magnetical power connectors that have been around for decades /me taps his trusty Presto Kettle Cooker

    15. Re:Well... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Would you rather have a decent chance of dumping a tank of hot oil if someone knocks the cord? Or, by extension into the laptop realm, have a decent chance of your $$$ laptop going flying when some nincompoop trips over your power cord in the library/living room/airport?

    16. Re:Well... by TwiztidK · · Score: 1

      You are correct in your assumption. Apple's patent specifically mentions being used in a power adaptor for a laptop computer.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone 5
    17. Re:Well... by srw · · Score: 1

      and the orange/green light on the plug that tells us at a glance whether or not the battery is charged.

      Grrr... I know I'm in the minority, but I hate the orange/green light used on so many electronics. I'm red/green deficient and it falls EXACTLY in my dead zone. I really, honestly, can't tell the two colours apart... even if they're right beside each other.

    18. Re:Well... by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I doubt others would want the Apple design as it provides a continuity that limits profits. For instance, the inputs to the brick are all the same. Therefore if I lose a power cord, I can just use one of the input adaptors from another apple product. This includes the iPad, the Airport express, most everything. For products that do no use this design, a simple two prong cord is used that can be picked up anywhere. Compare this to my HP power supply which uses this weird cord that means I will probably have to replace the whole thing if I lose a $2 cord. In other words, if other manufacturers wanted to, they could already at least standardize the inputs. They haven't, which means the lack of standards provides some benefit.

      Beyond this is the expense of the power supply. While Apple has the ability to absorbs such costs, and MS based computer mostly does not have such leeway. People expect such computers to be cheap, and MS as shown a lack of willingness to lower prices to reflect that need, preferring the OEMs to bear the brunt. A universal power supply is going to be expensive. If people are going to use it everywhere, then it must be able to meet a range of power requirements, otherwise people are going to fry their laptops. While this is not a severe technical issue, just include some circuitry in the laptop and a communication channel to the power supply, it will add costs to the laptop and power supply.

      Right now Apple can charge more per watt for an power brick than most others, so they can supply a descent power brick. Also, for equal performance, the power brick has to supply less power, so the brick is actually cheaper than most others. A universal brick will cost more. Unless we get away from MS, which wants $90 for OEM retail Windows 7 Home, for a computer that costs $100 to build, I doubt we will be spending a great deal of money improving the brick.

      But all this might be moot. The UBS port seems to working as they de facto standard for any device that requires less than 15W of power. Give the direction of the market, we may see more of these devices, and manufacturers that do not charge over USB will be identified as outliers.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    19. Re:Well... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, they could use a different design. And instead of using a magnet like Apple does, they could use a solenoid electromagnet.

      When power is supplied to the cord, and the computer is charging or powered on, the computer 'turns on' the electromagnet.

      A sensor on the cord itself is designed to trigger a circuit to cut power to the electromagnetic, if tension on the cord is detected beyond a certain threshold.

      The computer should also be given a 'pin' to send a signal to turn off the magnet if desired; for example, the computer is off and fully charged, it would make sense to mechanically disconnect the power to the line in, and to mechanically disconnect the battery, in order to conserve electricity once it is off and fully charged.

    20. Re:Well... by kf6auf · · Score: 1

      In academia, it seems like 80% of faculty/researchers already have Apple laptops, which essentially means that only the people with >5 year old Powerbooks or iBooks don't have interchangeable power bricks (which isn't that many). Thus, I expect most Apple customers wouldn't care (or even notice) if HP, Dell, Toshiba, Lenovo, and Sony moved to using a standard connector.

      But maybe in a corporation this would be different.

    21. Re:Well... by moonbender · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Off the top of my head: Filter the light to transform the difference in color into a difference in intensity. E.g. if you covered the orange/green light from the extension cord with an orange semi-transparent tape, the light would be bright when the laptop is charging and dim when it's not. Should work, right?

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    22. Re:Well... by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or use rubber prong locks like Sony Ericsson phones. Or velcro. :-D There are alternatives to magnets. The most important things in a standard design, IMHO, are:

      • High efficiency with low standby current. Must be able to supply significantly multiple voltages upon request, depending on whether the computer is charging or not.
      • No penetration. All contacts should be surface (pressure) contacts. As soon as you have a prong going into a hole, there's the possibility of damaging the machine by yanking it at an angle. The design should be such that if anything gets damaged, it is the cord.
      • Low breakaway force. The force to detach from any angle should be less than the inertial mass of the computer plus friction against a potentially slick surface like a glass table. (Translation: the connector must not be recessed significantly into the side of the machine.)
      • Sufficiently large connector to grasp easily while the computer is sitting on a desk. You should not feel the need to pull the cable by the wire because the connector body is too short to grasp easily.
      • Replaceable cord. Replacing an eighty dollar power supply because a two dollar piece of wire breaks or frays is idiotic. Put a plug on both ends. Problem solved.

      I disagree with your suggestion that the computer unplug itself when fully charged and turned off. Between the self discharge rate, the standby power fed to the logic board used for soft power, and the power used by the battery's management board, the battery drains slowly over time even when the machine is off. The exact rate varies. If you leave a battery for a year or two, it can get down to such a low voltage that the charge circuit will refuse to charge the cells, at which point your battery is a brick. (Been there, done that more than once.) The computer disables its own charge circuit when the battery is charged and reactivates it when the battery falls below a threshold level. There's no need to take away its ability to do so just to conserve a tiny amount of power.

      Besides, that shouldn't save a significant amount of power anyway if the adapter is designed correctly. You're talking about the difference between an occasional short trickle charge initiated by the machine and a longer trickle charge when the person plugs it back in later to top up the last few percent on the battery. If you really want to reduce the power load, push for rules about how much standby power the machine can draw while plugged in, thus making that moot.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    23. Re:Well... by Moridineas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. But from my experience, there are times when life might be easier without it. Yes, it does prevent breaking things if you yank too hard on the cable, and that's cool. But unless it (and the socket) is quite new, it doesn't always make a good connection. And as time goes by, the magnetism loses some of its mojo and the plug develops an annoying tendency to fall off the computer if you so much as look at it sideways.

      I've had the exact opposite experience. I have a going on 3.5 year old MBP and the Magsafe works perfectly. Have not had any falling out problems, any loss of magnetism, etc.

      On balance, I think I preferred the physical plugs Apple used with their iBooks.

      and I HATED that connector. I had a Powerbook I used for just about 3 years. I would have kept using it except I went through a power cord a year. The connector being round spun around and caused shorts in the wire. The first power cord I had literally sparked and caught on fire with it just sitting on my desk! (that one was replaced for free). The rest of the laptop still works fine but I have to position the power cord juuuuust so, to get any power at all. As a result of it constantly losing electrical input, I also had to go through two batteries in 3 years.

    24. Re:Well... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Great. You've just designed a 'smart' $28.95 power cord.

    25. Re:Well... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      I love Slashdot.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    26. Re:Well... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming you don't use your laptop right next to your deep fryer?

      Seriously, the conditions a fryer plug is exposed to, and the conditions a laptop plug is exposed to, should be two completely different things. The power connection on my MacBook seems to be holding up just fine after a couple of years of use, but there's no way in hell I'd want it (or any other part of the machine) to spend any time in my kitchen.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    27. Re:Well... by boxwood · · Score: 1

      the little light on mine doesn't seem to work properly, and I'm on my second adaptor. A lot of times its plugged in and working fine, but the light is off. If I unplug it and plug it back in it comes on, but I've gotten used to ignoring it.

    28. Re:Well... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about if other manufacturers made oil cooled laptops that were also useable as deep fat fryers?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    29. Re:Well... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I dunno about that, but he does like Macs.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    30. Re:Well... by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      Is it the palendromic, connect-either-way bit?

      That may be part of it, but it seems that the magnetic nature of the connector is the key component. All the abstract mentions is the magnetic attraction between the plug and the receptacle, not the layout of the pins. I haven't tried plowing through the legalese of all 57 claims to see if the layout is considered.

      Apple's patent cites a fair number of other patents, many of which also cover magnetic connectors in different applications. So yeah, it's been done before, but there's something (rather, 57 somethings) which are considered to be significant deviations from earlier designs.

      U.S. patent number 7,311,526 for those of you playing at home.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    31. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also I have a portable Panasonic CD player from 2003 with a magnetic connector -3 years prior to Apple Magsafe.

    32. Re:Well... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, that would be glorious although I suspect they would become somewhat more messy to transport (and good luck getting it on a plane).

    33. Re:Well... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      First, Apple isn't nearly as consistent as you think. The newer Airport stuff uses a standard two or three prong cord, as does the new Mini, IIRC; the old Mini used a brick with an adapter that looked somewhat like a FireWire 400 connector, but with two rounded ends instead of one. The desktops use a normal power cord. The iPod/iPhone/iPad use a dock connector (that plugs into a USB port). The laptop models each have a separate model of power supply associated with them (45W, 60W, and 85W for the MacBook Air, MacBook, and MacBook Pro, respectively), though the biggest charger works for any of them (and the smaller chargers will work with the larger machines as long as you don't mind the battery not charging and possibly draining slowly while you use the machine).

      Second, I've never heard of somebody replacing a $300 laptop because a power supply broke (except when the power supply connector broke off inside the machine or damaged the machine's connector in some way). Maybe replacing the whole machine makes sense for products that cost $20 (where the charger costs almost as much as the device). For more expensive stuff, people usually take it to their nearest dealer or Radio Shack or whatever and ask somebody to find them the right power supply. Or by the "whole thing", did you mean the power supply?

      The lack of standards does, however, provide a slight benefit for some products in that instead of being able to buy anybody's power adapter, they usually end up buying one from the manufacturer, which means that there's no real competition in the cost of power supplies, and thus manufacturers can charge way more than they could otherwise get away with. With standardized power, the computer manufacturers' power supplies would be competing purely on price and reliability with cheaper power supplies from a dozen manufacturers, and nobody would buy the more expensive supplies from the computer manufacturers unless they conferred some significant advantage (low noise for audio work, for example). In the long term, that could lead to a race to the bottom, both in terms of cost and quality... or not, depending on how much the computer manufacturers care about the quality of the products they sell.

      Finally, most computer power supplies already have some logic for controlling the power supplied, even if that just means disabling the output in the event of a short (to prevent fires) or disconnect (to reduce standby current). It should not be that hard to use a simple sense line trick with varying resistance values to indicate the desired supply voltage (with high resistance being low voltage to avoid equipment damage in the event of any sort of cable or connector problem) and then use that information to set the output voltage of a variable DC-DC converter. Could be done with just a handful of components. That's a heck of a lot simpler than adding a communication protocol over the wires. For that matter, you could make the cable have a larger connector on the end towards the power supply, then provide different cables for different machines, depending on their requirements, with different connectors on the other end, etc. Then, you wouldn't have to carry the sense pins through the cable at all.

      Alternatively, if you standardize on a single supply voltage (say 18VDC to accommodate charging large batteries), it would not be at all difficult to do a DC-DC conversion in the device itself to step that down as needed. This seems like a more likely design for a universal brick anyway.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    34. Re:Well... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Considering that's how much the average retailer charges for simple USB cables anyways, it seems like an improvement, $28.95 isn't a bad deal compared to what you pay nowadays for laptop power connectors (usually, it costs over $60 today to buy a power cord for your laptop).

    35. Re:Well... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      No achievable amount of 'reduction' of standby power is satisfactory, it is still a significant waste, when you multiply by the number of laptops in operation or forgotten on the charger.

      If you neglect your laptop with a battery plugged into it unattended for a whole year (which is a bit dangerous), then you deserve whatever happens. For the average user, once the unit charges up, small amounts of re-charging are just wasteful.

      The LiON batteries used in laptops lose over 1/3rd of their capacity in a year's time under theoretically ideal conditions. So for most users, 1 to 1.5 years is actually how long it will be before the battery needs replacement anyways.

      I disagree with your suggestion that the computer unplug itself when fully charged and turned off. Between the self discharge rate, the standby power fed to the logic board used for soft power, and the power used by the battery's management board, the battery drains slowly over time even when the machine is off.

      That's why there should be a mechanical disconnect for the battery as well, to mechanically switch off the battery and its onboard circuitry, so it stops leaking charge, and the user has to manually 'turn the battery back on'.

      It "slowly drains" because the battery has onboard circuits which are being powered -- in other words, 'standby power' is what causes the drain.

      Anyways, I am not suggesting it be required that computers unplug themselves but that it be required to be an option that the computer can unplug itself, for whatever reason: in other words, if the hardware requests it, based on the user's preferences.

    36. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What world are you living in?

      Targus (and others) already offer universal power supplies for laptops, and they are often about the same price or cheaper than the manufacturer bricks. If they, or someone else, make a completely standard brick, it will LOWER the cost of the brick by volume of manufacture. I would be very surprised if this wasn't already happening for smaller manufacturers.

      Addressing some of your complaints:

      My Fujitsu laptops always used the freely available Figa-8 power cord to connect mains to the brick, and I've bought replacement power cables in several countries (easier to buy the cable than futz with a converter plug). Apple use a fancy plug, but the brick's socket is still Figa-8. So are the bricks of several other manufacturers.

      My work-issued Dell laptops use that clover-leaf connect to connect main to the brick, and that used to be harder to find, but it's much easier now.

      The other cable from the brick is usually wired to the brick, and usually ends with a barrel connector - that's a standard, too (although the diameter varies).

      All the bricks I've used in the past 10 years have been universal voltage (typically rated 90V to 240V). Means they work all over the world.Cheaper for the manufacturer, because they can use the same brick no matter where they sell the unit.

      The only thing we need to standardise is the voltage that the brick supplies. 12V might be a good choice, given that it's one of the required voltages inside the PC. Other voltages might be suggested to reduce the current in the cable from the brick to the laptop. Given that it was possible to produce a standard for airline seat to laptop power, it should be easy enough to get agreement of this.

      I think your big problem is imaginary, and I find it astonishing that you are blaming this imaginary problem on Microsoft!

    37. Re:Well... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      MagSafe is one reason I wouldn't recommend any other brand of laptop. I doubt their patent would hold up in court though as you're talking a very obvious idea (although other manufacturers seemed to be oblivious..). That and the nice interchangable/replacable power cord are great features.

      Of course the power supply still could be better. Why isn't the cord that connects it to the computer also replaceable? A couple built-in USB ports capable of charging an iPad would be handy. And why must the brick be in the middle of the cord where it's practically always going to be in the way? An interchangeable cord on the PC side would allow for a nice short cord or a nice long cord (for when using the short plug on the outlet side) as an option.

      Now if only Apple would communicate with itself and make all other connectors magnetic. Magnetic USB and iPod dock connectors would be a good start.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    38. Re:Well... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting Apple to play along. While I prefer their design, I doubt they'd even license out the spec to other manufacturers.

      Nor do they follow established standards. I took my portable HDD, MP3 Player, Phone and Camera on holiday with me last month. I also took 1 cable for data transfer and charging (with the exception of the camera, thanks Canon please add USB charging to your next Ixus model). From this information, do you think I own any Apple products. I've decided to standardise my electronics, if it does not use a standard USB/Mini/Micro plug it does not get purchased and I'm thinking of cutting the MiniUSB out of that list. One cable to rule them all.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    39. Re:Well... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      My wife is really good at abusing things. Instead of snapping off the connector, she just places the power cable under the computer forcing it to make a 180 degree bend with a radius of about 0.5 centimeters. Every time I see this I obsessively straighten it out. I point it out, she goes "Oh, hmm, you're right about that..." then just does it again :-) At least it's the cable that will eventually die, not the power connector on the laptop. But believe me, that thing will be destroyed at some point.

    40. Re:Well... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That sort of thing is hardly limited to Apple.

      Take Dell laptops. For some time they have used a charger with a data pin so that the laptop can tell what type of charger is connected to it. At first you would just get a warning at boot such as "65W charger detected, battery will not be charged unless you get a 95W one" or simply "unknown charger, battery will not charge." The latest models, particularly the XPS line, will actually turn themselves off if you use the "wrong" charger.

      Some models of HP laptops down-clock the CPU to the minimum speed if they don't detect a genuine HP charger.

      The only reason they do it is to force you to buy their own chargers rather than much cheaper copies or universal chargers.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the deal. Apple could play along depending on the direction of the design. As you know, Apple already had USB chargers for their low power devices long before that standard was established. If a universal laptop PS design leaves the tail off (the cord between the brick & the laptop) and lets a manufacturer attach the tail of their choice, provides for a dual voltage supply, interchangeable AC prongs, and is at least 100 watts (or more - a large capacity universal would be fine, just because you have 100+ watts available doesn't mean the laptop has to use it), then we'll have a winner.

      Right now Apple has the best laptop PS design on the market. Theirs is significantly smaller than competitors, is 85 watts, dual voltage, with interchangeable AC socket tips (for use around the world), has pop out ears for winding the cord up, and the best part is the 'magsafe' connector at the end of the tail.

      I have to deal with AC adapters for Apple, Dell & HP laptops at the office. I curse the Dell & HP bricks every time I have to use one. They are big and bulky so they don't fit in the laptop bags very well. Don't even get me started about power cords being yanked when someone trips over them. If you use a laptop plugged in, someone will trip over the cord. This is especially true if you're at home and you have kids. Apple did not have the 'magsafe' design years ago - they do now, and it's probably one of the best thing they've ever done for laptops.

      As a consumer, I would not endorse, support, or purchase a universal laptop PS if it did not provide for interchangeable 'tails'. Being a MacBook owner, I've come to appreciate the 'magsafe' connector and would never buy another laptop (made by anyone) without some sort of break-away power connector.

    42. Re:Well... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No achievable amount of 'reduction' of standby power is satisfactory, it is still a significant waste, when you multiply by the number of laptops in operation or forgotten on the charger.

      It should take about the same amount of power whether you move the battery from 99% full to 100% full a dozen times or from 88% to 100% once, give or take (ignoring nonlinearity in the battery's charge curve, which I'm not familiar enough with to comment on). The device is going to drain power when it's off whether it is plugged in or not. So the only significant difference you make by unplugging should be whether the power use is spread out over a few weeks or all at once when the user plugs the computer back in.

      So for most users, 1 to 1.5 years is actually how long it will be before the battery needs replacement anyways.

      That may have been true for older Li ion batteries, but I have Li ion batteries that are about 3 years old that provide nearly the same run time that they did when they were new, and I still get acceptable run times out of batteries that are over 5 years old. AFAIK, lithium ion batteries lose capacity primarily due to charge cycles, not decay over time. Either way, 1.5 years is a gross underestimate, and getting farther removed from reality with every passing year as battery chemistry improves.

      That's why there should be a mechanical disconnect for the battery as well, to mechanically switch off the battery and its onboard circuitry, so it stops leaking charge, and the user has to manually 'turn the battery back on'.

      What you're asking for isn't practical. There's a charge circuit built into basically every lithium ion pack that drains the battery very slowly. The circuit is there to protect against overcharging, but drains power over time. You probably don't want to disconnect that from the battery because that device also stores information about the number of charge cycles on the battery and the power curve exhibited in previous discharge cycles---information that is crucial to avoid overcharging the batteries and to prevent your computer from suddenly shutting down without a low battery warning. I suppose someone could redesign that part to use flash instead of RAM, but doing so would greatly increase the complexity of the component, thus increasing the cost and the size, while decreasing the reliability. And every time you disconnected it, you'd be taking away its ability to monitor the discharge rate, which would diminish its ability to do its job. (Yes, the self-discharge rate for Li ion cells is small, but it is nonzero.)

      If you were to limit that suggestion to just disconnecting it from the computer, that might be practical, but it would still be adding a failure-prone device into your power path. And because most laptops use the main battery with a capacitor instead of a clock battery, you'd have other problems, too.

      Either way, it seems rather silly to complain about standby power from switching power supplies on laptops that draw a tiny fraction of the power of all those transformer-based wall warts for your USB hub, your cell phone, your flashlight charger, etc. You're focusing on a single grape on a high branch when there's a whole cluster hanging right at eye level.... We should ban non-switching power supplies in consumer goods first, *then* start looking at ways to squeeze that last tenth of a percent out of computer gear....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    43. Re:Well... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      --information that is crucial to avoid overcharging the batteries and to prevent your computer from suddenly shutting down without a low battery warning. I suppose someone could redesign that part to use flash instead of RAM, but doing so would greatly increase the complexity of the component

      Um, RAM is too unstable for such things. Bit errors in RAM are common due to solar events; we could not trust Li-ION cells too much if their safety relied on the robustness of a simple piece of RAM.

      Instead, Li-IONs have safety circuit controllers that measure voltage during charging as well as pressure in the cell, and can perform a cut off in case of overcurrent or overheating..

      A cell is charged, when the right voltage is read. A cell is discharged also, when a certain voltage is read.

      Even with such simple logic, the circuit is prone to failure if the user exposes it to static electricity

      As for information used to monitor the discharge, and determine when you are about to need to poweroff due to lack of remaining capacity, that can be stored on the laptop's hard drive, which is persistent storage..

  10. Not for my laptop by davebarnes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "a standard 3-pin "kettle cord" for incoming power."

    Not for my Apple MacBook.
    I understand the desire for a standard brick, but I do not want to give the magnetic connector on my MacBook.

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
    1. Re:Not for my laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry.There'll appear a standard-to-magsafe adapter in no time.

    2. Re:Not for my laptop by thue · · Score: 1

      Nobody is going to force Apple to follow the standard.

      On the other hand, nowhere does it say that the standard could not be MagSafe.

    3. Re:Not for my laptop by hedwards · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can blame Apple's "Think Different" approach to things. (Though oddly ironic in that it's misspelled) It's been their brand for sometime to do things differently even if it's not a good idea. Think hockey puck mouses and single button at that. Fortunately they've ditched that, but Apple does seem to have an at times pathological need to be different.

      I don't think that completely standardizing the plug is a great idea, what I'd like to see is for them to decide on how the polarity is expressed, sort of like how power outlets generally do. And for the cord that plugs into the brick to be one design. Preferably 3 pronged. And have a different size and color for the notebook end depending upon voltage.

    4. Re:Not for my laptop by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      He was referring to the cord that plugs into the wall receptacle and delivers AC power to the power brick, not the DC output from the brick to the laptop.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    5. Re:Not for my laptop by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Your MacBook isn't an ATX desktop.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:Not for my laptop by lxs · · Score: 1

      I think nobody suggests using that particular connector on a laptop (although the AC side of the brick will probably sport that one or the two prong figure eight version)

      Slight nitpick in the writeup, the plug that fits into an ATX PSU won't fit on a kettle. That one has a slightly different shape (even though the prongs are the same) and is made from heat resistant material.

    7. Re:Not for my laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for my non-apple laptop either. If you RTFS you'll notice the kettle cord they mention is for desktop power supplies.

    8. Re:Not for my laptop by rsborg · · Score: 1

      [Apple] ...seem to have an at times pathological need to be different.

      You know, given their current market capitalization as the 2nd most valued company in the US, I think that their striving for competetive differentiation has worked out well for them. Note, their desire isn't pathological, or they'd still be on PowerPC, and using Apple Desktop Bus.

      Still think they wouldn't license MagSafe unless they got a significant premium... which might be possible once they finally make an iOS data hub... right now, iOS devices require OSX (or windows) devices to sync.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    9. Re:Not for my laptop by hb253 · · Score: 1

      OK, this one is new to me (and I've been around computers since the late 70's). WTF is a kettle cord and why is this the first time I've ever read/heard of a power supply cord being called a kettle cord??????

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    10. Re:Not for my laptop by guruevi · · Score: 1

      All Apple laptop power bricks have not a 3-pin kettle cord but the smaller (unpolarised C7) 2-pin cord and that has historically stayed the same. The great thing (historically) about Apple's power bricks is that within a certain era they all use the same connectors regardless of model. I have a bunch of iBook's, PowerBook's (PowerPC) and they all come with the same connector meaning I can have a power cord laying around in each of my couches and they will all charge. The same with their newer MagSafe connectors, they all work the same from 13" MacBook to 17" MacBook Pro regardless of build.

      Dell on the other hand seems to have a different power plug requirement for just about any model in their arsenal with historically some really, really bad designs (like the one where the plug had 2 wire pins which so easily got bent and broke off that I ended up soldering a couple of laptops to their power bricks). The latest power brick from a Toshiba computer that I had to install uses a kettle-cord plug and the power brick alone weighed 3 lb, it was the hugest power brick I've ever seen. Even a Mac Mini has a smaller power brick.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    11. Re:Not for my laptop by pauljlucas · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can blame Apple's "Think Different" approach to things. (Though oddly ironic in that it's misspelled)

      Actually, it's not misspelled. It's intentionally not "Think Differently" because they're not telling you how to think. They're telling you what to think.

      Analogy: For a car ad campaign, I might say things like, "When you think of this car, think sleek, think bold, think power." Just as "think sleek" is short-hand for "think [about something that is] sleek," "Think Different" is short-hand for "think [about something that is] different."

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    12. Re:Not for my laptop by moonbender · · Score: 1

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=kettle%20cord

      I had never heard of it either but "standard 3-pin" cord is pretty clear.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    13. Re:Not for my laptop by moonbender · · Score: 1

      The 3-pin cord in TFA is referred to in the context of desktop ATX power supplies. My Samsung netbook also uses a C7 connector between the wall and the power brick, it seems to be a fairly univeral plug. Very useful when you're going abroad, particularly since with modern power supplies you don't have to worry about input voltage.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    14. Re:Not for my laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Think Different" is no more wrong than "Think Big". You wouldn't say "Think Largely".

      It's not suggesting HOW to think, but WHAT to think about.

    15. Re:Not for my laptop by Arivia · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, kettle and PS3 cords are perfectly happily interchangeable. So is my laser printer.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    16. Re:Not for my laptop by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      It's the standard 3-prong power cable that you use with most PCs and printers. I imagine they're called "kettle cords" because they're also used for some high-amperage devices like electric tea kettles.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    17. Re:Not for my laptop by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, nowhere does it say that the standard could not be MagSafe.

      Indeed not; in fact, I'd imagine Apple would love it to be MagSafe - just think of the patent licensing fees.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    18. Re:Not for my laptop by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      ... decide on how the polarity is expressed...

      Yet another thing that MagSafe gets right.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    19. Re:Not for my laptop by JJman · · Score: 1
      Errr... The quote is:

      "An ATX power supply for example will screw into certain mounting holes, have a maximum size and shape, and will take a standard 3-pin 'kettle cord' for incoming power."

      I mean, seriously, can't you even fully read the first line of TFS?
      I'm sorry I don't mean to flame, and I love my Apple products (MagSafe HELLS YEAH!), but the quote is talking about the standard for desktop power supplies.
      Also, I somehow suspect that Apple will never adopt this standard. Rest easy my friend, your MagSafe is safe.

    20. Re:Not for my laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly misunderstand. The MagSafe connector is the DC connector. The "kettle cord" is the AC connector. The AC connector on the MagSafe bricks is the standard Figa-8 connector (dressed up in a fancy surround, but Figa-8 underneath.

      I don't know who modded your response as Insightful, but they don't deserve mod points!

    21. Re:Not for my laptop by hedwards · · Score: 1

      MagSafe is one thing, but their refusal to license their DRM back when they were using it to cement the iPod as the premier MP3 player definitely violated antitrust regulations.

      They didn't get to the top in a competitive way any more than MS got to the top of the OS market by playing fair.

    22. Re:Not for my laptop by rsborg · · Score: 1

      MagSafe is one thing, but their refusal to license their DRM back when they were using it to cement the iPod as the premier MP3 player definitely violated antitrust regulations.

      WTF? Are you serious? Apple makes products, and sells music that works on their products (only)... that's not a problem since you can buy a CD or digital music from almost any other source and it works on the player or other music players. You're bonkers if you think that mandated licensing of DRM is a good thing or should be required.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    23. Re:Not for my laptop by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Not really, if that's the case then it's even more wrong. If you pay attention to their message it's that people should be thinking differently. That Macs are for those that dance to the beat of a different drum, not just hipsters that are buying into something because it's different.

    24. Re:Not for my laptop by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am serious. That was a serious antitrust violation. And had we had a DoJ that took such things seriously they would've been smacked for it. Using ones dominant market position to harm others or artificially lock other players out is definitely a violation of antitrust regulations in the US.

  11. Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by zmollusc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Then we can just connect straight to car batteries.
    Easy peasy charging in the car.
    12V sealed lead acid motorcycle battery in your pocket for when the li-ion is failing after a year.
    The broken-screen laptops we use as headless servers could have UPS for cheapness using old car batteries.

    It would be awesome!

    PleasePleasePlease!

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    1. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think most computers can run on only 12V, you are in for a sad surprise

    2. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by mk2mark · · Score: 1

      Also, unless the car is turned off the voltage regulators on car alternators mean you're getting closer to 14v

    3. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think most computers can run on only 12V, you are in for a sad surprise

      There's nothing in a garden variety desktop computer that requires more than 12 V. The only reason they require 100-240 VAC in is because that's what happens to be in the wall socket. The power supply does not deliver any voltages above 12V.

      Why would a laptop be any different?

    4. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by lxs · · Score: 1

      DC-DC converters can turn +12V into any voltage and polarity you want.

    5. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Migraineman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ugh, automotive power is nasteee. Nominally 14V, unless it's cold outside, at which point it'll be closer to 18V. The ignition system will dump spikes into the rail that regularly approach 30V. Anything connected to the automotive supply is supposed to handle long excursions to 36V, and short excursions to 72V.

      Beyond that, there usually isn't much "extra" power available for non-factory devices. I recently had the displeasure of installing an AC inverter into a Chevy Venture minivan. The alternator was groaning under the load, which was less than 400W. Had to keep a foot on the throttle to increase the idle speed or we'd discharge the battery. We had about 1kW of equipment, but could only run about half at any given time (the stock alternator is only rated for 90A at 12V.)

    6. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Informative

      12VDC - Not gonna happen.

      Modern (beefy) laptops want about 70W when running, about 100-120W when running and charging. Pulling more than about 80W from a 12V lighter socket won't happen - most lighter sockets now-a-days are about 8 amps, and because the lighter socket is such an atrocious interface you really get about 11V at that current if the engine is running, so you are looking at about 80-90W.

      Even if you do as I have done and use manly power connectors (e.g. Anderson PowerPole) pulling more than 10A means seriously thick wire for any length.

      That's why many modern laptop power supplies run 18V or so - that extra 50% voltage means 2/3 the current at the same load, and 4/9ths the losses in the wire (for a given thickness of wire).

    7. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      The highest voltage in a desktop PC is 12V, others can be made using DC-DC converters that are pretty efficient and negative voltages (-5V and -12V) are low power and can also be made using DC-DC converters.

      There are ATX power supplies that take in 12V so you can use the PC in your car, or make a cheap on-line UPS (A 12V battery and a charger powerful enough to power the PC and charge the battery at the same time) since you do not need the (expensive) inverter.

      Laptops usually use higher voltages than 12V, but those are most likely used to power internal DC-DC converters which convert them back to 3.3V, 5V and 12V. This is done so that the battery can be of higher voltage and a DC-DC converter can be used to stabilize the voltage as the battery is discharged and the voltage decreases. For example, my laptop uses 19V DC input, but the battery is only 14.8V.

    8. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      They certainly can, but that is what I am hoping to do away with. I reckon a length of wire would be cheaper.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    9. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      "Beyond that, there usually isn't much "extra" power available for non-factory devices."

      That would depend upon the make of the vehicle and what alternator is installed. My car has a 120A alternator standard with an optional 200A alternator.

      Of course, being a Panther platform, they expect that you just might add some extra lights, radios, and other things to the car....

    10. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please, electrical gods, make it 12V

      Not going to happen. Laptops use 12V internally, which means the battery will be higher voltage than that (much higher in fact) and you need a supply voltage that is several volts higher than the battery to charge it, and higher still to be able to charge it while powered-on and running, too.

      The standard is ~20V, which isn't bad. Connect two car batteries in series and you get 24V. Throw in a handful of diodes to clean-up the power a bit, and they'll also drop a few volts, to the point it should be safe to use.

      12V sealed lead acid motorcycle battery in your pocket for when the li-ion is failing after a year.

      I love car batteries for stationary uses. They're just so dirt cheap, and are so large they have tons of power to offer. For mobile uses, however, there's good reason we use NiCd, NiMH, and LiIon. A lead-acid battery would weigh a ton. But more than that, it'll still only power the device for a fraction as long as any other type of battery. They just don't have remotely the energy density of LiIon.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprised you drive a wannabe cop car.

    12. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by zx-15 · · Score: 1

      OMG 8 cylinders with body on frame that thing might as well have a beefy alternator as it needs some excuse for burning so much fuel.

    13. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Actually, it probably burns about what your van does - at least, I get as good if not better mileage than most of my friends' vans.

    14. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      What happened to the idea a number of years back of moving cars to, what was it, 48v or somesuch?

    15. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by zx-15 · · Score: 1

      But it's not a van.

    16. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by pehrs · · Score: 1

      Unless cars where you live are built significantly different from cars here I am pretty sure you are wrong.

      The cigarett lighter is an ISO 4165 plug, and is is 12v, 16Amp max. It may be underfused to 8 amp, but that is something I have never seen.

      I regularly charge and use my macbook pro with an inverter when on roadtrips. I usually drive an old Chrysler Voyager.

    17. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      "ISO 4165 plug, and is is 12v, 16Amp max"

      Yes, if your goal is to heat an element within the plug to light a cigar(ette). Oh, you actually wanted the watts to LEAVE the socket as electrical energy, not heat? Sorry, 16A @12V is dreaming - that's real world experience, not specmanship dreaming.

      "...but that is something I have never seen. [...] I usually drive an old Chrysler Voyager."

      And that is likely why you've not seen it "underfused" - I've seen plenty of late model vehicles, and 8A was probably the LARGEST fuse I saw on the lighter socket.

    18. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      It was 3x13.8V (42V give or take), and the intent was to make doing things like integrated starter/alternator (wherein the starter motor is also the alternator, is permanently engaged to the engine, and can act as a "mild hybrid" assist to the engine).

      It failed because:
      1) They found that the "mild hybrid" idea didn't work worth a hoot - not enough benefit to offset the cost.
      2) The established infrastructure of 12VDC for cars meant you'd HAVE to have a downconverter to supply 12VDC (just as the Prius has such a converter to take the 300VDC traction battery down to 12VDC for accessories).
      3) The jump to designs like the Prius and other hybrid designs.

    19. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      My bike battery is 16AH, so an hour and a half for my laptop? Or am i missing something?
      I am about six stone overweight so another stone of battery is not much of a problem.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    20. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Skapare · · Score: 1

      My netbook has no trouble running on 12V DC. Tell me what inside a full size laptop needs a higher voltage in a way that cannot be converted by a DC-DC converter (which, BTW, can also convert up). Of course, I'd expect the laptop to use a couple more amps. My ham radio gear uses more amps than a laptop ever should ... at the same voltage.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    21. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Skapare · · Score: 1

      70 to 120 watts? OMG! WTF! No wonder so many male geeks have burned their ... oh ... uh ... junk.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    22. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laptops use 12V internally, which means the battery will be higher voltage than that (much higher in fact) and you need a supply voltage that is several volts higher than the battery to charge it, and higher still to be able to charge it while powered-on and running, too.

      You do realize it is possible to BOOST voltages (DC-DC conversion) from a lower voltage to a higher voltage?

      For example, PDAs, or industrial computers may have 5V or 12V interfaces (including power supplies), but the battery may be 3.6V.

      It isn't true that the battery voltage of the device must be higher than the highest voltages used in the device. LCD displays and backlights use thousands of volts... doesn't mean the battery needs to be thousands of volts.

      Look up what boost converter is.

    23. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Interesting, thanks for the info

    24. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You do realize it is possible to BOOST voltages (DC-DC conversion) from a lower voltage to a higher voltage?

      Of course it is... But that introduces added losses, and is considerably more expensive than a simple regulator (for lowering voltages).

      Honestly, if you want to be pedantic, you should complain to the GP that he can buy a car adapter for his laptop...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  12. Re:Here are the specs, no further deliberation nee by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're making a standard, why not settle on a voltage level and stick with it? Adding a knob is just asking for people to set it wrong and fry their laptop. If you absolutely must have multiple voltages for some reason, then design the brick such that it automatically chooses the correct one. Plus a knob is a moving part, and will break.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  13. Re:Here are the specs, no further deliberation nee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those already exist, but you've completely missed the point. That's not a standard, that's one that can adjust to many standards. And if you handed one of those to someone and told them it was a standard laptop power supply that would work with any laptop, they'd probably do some pretty serious damage unless it happened to be set on the necessary settings for their current laptop.

  14. Wake up European Union and other Governments by tessellated · · Score: 1

    Smelling another lawsuit opportunity?

    Really, I had (and continue having) to struggle with the mobile charger situation for years...
    lately, I finally consider buying myself a netbook and now this!

    Good to see lobbying going in proper directions.

    --
    'When the Going gets Weird, the Weird turn Pro.' - Hunter S. Thompson
    1. Re:Wake up European Union and other Governments by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Smelling another lawsuit opportunity?

      Why? Didn't the EU force (or at least tried to) cell phone manufacturers to standardize the power connector on the phones to micro USB and the voltage to 5V (so it's compatible with USB)?

  15. Non-standard form-factors = planned obsolescence by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Laptop makers have NO REASON to standardize.
    The ideal consumer product is shitcanned at point of purchase by a delighted customer (toilet paper comes to mind).

    Desktop PC form-factors made maintenance, part sourcing, and upgrading easy, but didn't help kill off old PCs.

    Notebook makers OTOH can count on the failure of key components such as batteries to render their products "beyond economical repair". Combine that with low prices and crap build quality, and you have the recipe for repeat sales. (Good to foster performance upgrades, not so good for economy and ease of maintenance.)

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  16. I half agree by name_already_taken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If every PC laptop uses the same plug, I would jump for joy. If it was an Apple style "magsafe" style connector I would get down on my knees and fellate each and every member of the standards committee. I've been griping for years now how the connector conspiracy is still going strong in the laptop space and what a pain it is to keep matching power cords to laptops.

    Ok, no on the blowjob thing; you don't know where those committee members have been.

    The "magsafe" connector is better than anyone who hasn't used it realizes. Not only does it "break away" nicely and easily, but it also means you don't have to use any effort to plug the thing in. I just get the connector within an inch or so and the magnet pulls it into place. I've just dangled the cord near my MacBook Pro and it will snap into place by itself.

    The strain relief on the Apple connectors sucks - it's basically nonexistent, so they can fail there, but if they fixed that (pretty easy) then it would be perfect.

    Also, while they're at it, why not spec out a standarized battery compartment?

    Because it's a silly idea. Even cars don't have standardized batteries. Ok, they do, but there are something like 20-30 different standardized car battery types.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:I half agree by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Even cars don't have standardized batteries. Ok, they do, but there are something like 20-30 different standardized car battery types."

      That's another way to sell overpriced batteries, and wasn't so pronounced until the last couple of decades. IAAM (I Am A Mechanic).

      They DO have standard connections (side post, top post, etc) and voltages, facilitating much wider interchange than is listed in vendor literature.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:I half agree by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It's not really silly. In fact, standardizing the batteries would be easier than standardizing the "bricks", because bricks are rated for varying voltages and, perhaps more importantly, for varying maximum loads. You don't want to lug around a Dell XPS size brick to use with a Airbook, and the opposite wouldn't work. Batteries, OTOH, support higher loads through increased numbers. Further, laptop batteries are almost universally identical within their custom-molded casings to begin with, in a shape similar to a standard AA battery. Again, the main variant is the number of cells.

      The variance in battery case form factors is almost certainly to drive sales of "custom" battery packs. The only argument I see in favor of differentiation is that it prevents ignorant users from populating their battery bays with incompatible battery types, but we already have that with NiMh/NiCad/Alkaline, and people seem to handle it okay in the majority of cases.

      As for car batteries, the sizes may vary, but they have nearly universal connectors and voltages, so there's that. Also, the form factor isn't as relevant as much as the fact that a replacement fits in the compartment and provides enough current to run the starter motor.

    3. Re:I half agree by SamAdam3d · · Score: 1

      To some point, we're already standardized on the magsafe standard. At most of my friends houses, if I bring my laptop over I can borrow an apple power supply, because someone in the house has a mac laptop made in the past 4 years. Wattage doesn't matter that much; I just don't play games when I borrow a smaller supply.

      --
      I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. - Douglas Adams
    4. Re:I half agree by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Even cars don't have standardized batteries. Ok, they do, but there are something like 20-30 different standardized car battery types.

      Really? Do you mean electric/hybrid cars or regular ones? If regular ones, then I have only seen two versions of the batteries, with the only difference being the polarity. Sure, there are different capacity versions available, but usually more than one version works in a given car (bigger batteries may not fit in the compartment while smaller ones may not be able to provide enough power to start the car).

      As for laptops, most of them use standard Li-ion cells with a controller chip, you could make the cells replaceable or even standardize the controller chip so the laptop could use different batteries.

      An example where this was done right is the standardization of alkaline and NiMH batteries - if a device uses these batteries, it most likely needs AAA, AA, C, D or 9V batteries depending on the size and power of the device. In most devices you can use rechargeable NiCd or NiMH batteries instead or alkaline ones. It's not like every TV remote control needs a special kind of battery that is made only by the manufacturer of that remote control.

    5. Re:I half agree by Above · · Score: 1

      20-30 different laptop batteries would represent standardization over the current situation.

      Standard doesn't mean 1, it can mean a set. I'm happy keeping AA, AAA, C and D batteries around, I can deal with 4. It's every one different that's the problem.

    6. Re:I half agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The strain relief has been fixed in the last couple of generations. The Macbook Air Magsafe design where the cable is not perpendicular to the jack is now used on all Macbooks.

  17. power adapters in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    something that i wish all mobile electronics manufacturers would do is implement a common standard for power (battery recharge) connections ... with about a dozen different cell phones in the house over the years, each new cell phone has its own stupid connector. some of the samsung and LG phones have those wide connectors that are easy to bend/break, and if they fail, it's an expensive replacement. an older kyocera phone plus some older nokia phones have a simple power jack (the typical positive on centre, negative sleeve) ... perhaps mini USB for all mobile devices that run off 5V or less? then adaptors could be exchanged as needed. No need to take a dozen wall warts on a trip just to recharge Nintendo DS, PSP, cell phone, GPS and so forth ... one would suffice for all.

    laptop manufactures make stupid power connector types as well. Dell changes theirs on a regular basis. my acer netbook has the simple power jack, that's easily repaired or replaced if it fails. Dell's are non-standard and are expensive to find replacements. doesn't have to be the magnetic kind like Apple has (cool but expensive), just a simple easy to source connector that you can find at radio shack if it gets bent or broken.

    if all manufacturers agreed upon a standardized power connector for all mobile electronics, life would be so much simpler.

    1. Re:power adapters in general by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      Most mobile phones made in the last couple years have moved away from proprietary connectors and toward using micro USB as a charging interface.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    2. Re:power adapters in general by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10274953-94.html

      Looks like industry is moving in that direction. I thought Mini USB was going to win out but looks like Micro USB is the future.

  18. Don't stop with laptops! by Confucius+II · · Score: 1

    Don't stop with laptops! I have a box of anonymous, Chinese-made power adapters for a bewildering array of rechargeable devices at my home. None of these power adapters have the name of the manufacturer of the actual device, so they get lost. Standardize down to four or five types and I'll be happy. My laptops have different power bricks even when two of them are made by the same company. It's nuts!

    1. Re:Don't stop with laptops! by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      Honestly even if every device maker simply wrote the name of the product clearly on the power brick, and all power bricks/transformers and their devices specified the voltage, current, and polarity, we'd be in a better place.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    2. Re:Don't stop with laptops! by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      None of these power adapters have the name of the manufacturer of the actual device, so they get lost

      Here's a tip: Invest in some sticky labels, and some form of writing implement.

      But you're right - it's insane the number of different adapters I have sitting in boxes all over the place.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    3. Re:Don't stop with laptops! by tji · · Score: 1

      Even simpler, use a silver Sharpie.

      But, I have two other issues:

      - I have devices I am no longer using because the P/S failed and I cannot get replacements. Some have odd currents/voltages, and are impossible to find. If the device is not being made any more, it's really hard to find replacements.

      - Too many wall warts. A universal Power Supply with configurable tips & voltage/current that could power multiple devices would simplify many things.

  19. Battery by Ren.Tamek · · Score: 1

    Fuck the power brick, those are easily and cheaply replaced and rarely ware out. Laptop batteries are constantly needed for the machine to function away from a desk, and lose their capacity very quickly. How about a common housing and voltage for those? You could have like 5 standard shapes and sizes, ranging from small to large for different sized laptops. Every dell 15 inch is about the same size, shape, and colour (black) as a toshiba 15 inch, an asus 15 inch etc.

    --
    "If you want a vision of the future, Winston, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever." - George Orwell, 1984
  20. Maybe it's because .. by AftanGustur · · Score: 1
    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    1. Re:Maybe it's because .. by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative

      That article says nothing about standardization. It indicates the power supplies have to meet certain efficiency standards. That's all.

    2. Re:Maybe it's because .. by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      This is also a good thing - but it's also something completely different.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    3. Re:Maybe it's because .. by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      "sel" "warez"? Really? Is this what we've come to?

  21. Standardise This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My laptop requires 11A/20V, try standardising that. It's literally the size of a house brick.

    1. Re:Standardise This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11A/20V???

      Does it have a deep fryer attachment or something?

    2. Re:Standardise This by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      That could be easily done. For example, your laptop could have more than one power connector, so you could use multiple of the standard adapters to achieve the power required or buy one big adapter that can power your laptop alone, or a few smaller laptops.

      If the power adapters are standardized in such a way that they only differ by their current it would still be much better than it is now. ATX power supplies are standard in their size and connectors, but you can still buy a 300W or 1kW power supply depending on your needs.

  22. Before you get too excited. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a huge grain of salt:

    According to Taiwanese industry news site Digitimes these kinds of solutions may soon be superseded. It now appears that some of the major players in laptops are getting together to work on a standardized laptop power supply design. This includes the big branded players ASUS and Acer as well as the OEM manufacturers like Quanta and Compal, which are responsible for a lot of the non-brand name laptops available on the market.

    Basically it's just four Taiwanese OEM manufacturers (Yes ASUS is just as much an OEM as a brand name) trying to lessen the cost of manufacture by making the laptop power supply a commodity item. While this would be a good thing for all involved, I wouldn't start rejoicing until Foxconn expresses an interest and of course Dell, Apple, Lenovo, etc.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    1. Re:Before you get too excited. by Marcika · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a huge grain of salt:

      According to Taiwanese industry news site Digitimes these kinds of solutions may soon be superseded. It now appears that some of the major players in laptops are getting together to work on a standardized laptop power supply design. This includes the big branded players ASUS and Acer as well as the OEM manufacturers like Quanta and Compal, which are responsible for a lot of the non-brand name laptops available on the market.

      Basically it's just four Taiwanese OEM manufacturers (Yes ASUS is just as much an OEM as a brand name) trying to lessen the cost of manufacture by making the laptop power supply a commodity item. While this would be a good thing for all involved, I wouldn't start rejoicing until Foxconn expresses an interest and of course Dell, Apple, Lenovo, etc.

      Yea right, just some OEM manufacturers... LMGIFY:

      "Quanta Computer Incorporated (TWSE: 2382) is a Taiwan-based manufacturer of notebook computers and other electronic hardware. It is the largest manufacturer of notebook computers in the world. Its customers include ACER, Alienware, Apple Inc., Cisco, Compaq, Dell, Fujitsu, Gateway, Gericom, Hewlett-Packard, Lenovo, Maxdata, MPC, Sharp Corporation, Siemens AG, Sony, Sun Microsystems, and Toshiba.[...] It is estimated that Quanta had a 33% worldwide market share of notebook computers in 2005."

    2. Re:Before you get too excited. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      An OEM is still an OEM regardless of their size. They take their marching orders from their customer. Quanta (like ASUS) does act as an ODM and sell laptops that are rebranded. I suspect most of those wound up being the lower cost HP models and the bulk of Acer.

      Acer did reportedly drop Quanta in favor of Compal (the other large Taiwanese OEM/ODM) for their Aspire One line in Oct 2008. This seems to indicate that cost is the main influence Quanta has with its partners. This would also highlight the desire for a standardize power supply, since it would allow for lower priced hardware.

      Also the press release dropped a lot of well known computer company names but did not make a distinction between those that purchased ODM machines and those who purchased component assemblies like LCD screens.

      The lower end laptops do have very similar traits and this would definitely make it easier to standardize on a power supply for the growing netbook market. However, I still don't see any evidence that this would quickly go up to the higher end models which tend to be designed inhouse by the brands themselves and usually have unique power / form factor requirements.

      This is why I cautioned about getting too excited...

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    3. Re:Before you get too excited. by CubicleView · · Score: 1

      If your dell power brick fails you can replace it with one of the new (and presumably cheap) standardized power bricks with a small converter.

    4. Re:Before you get too excited. by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Asus and Quanta make laptops for Dell, Compaq, Apple, and Sony. These OEMs basically make most of the laptop computers out there on the market today. When they get behind an initiative, it's a big step because they are the ones making all of the little laptops. Of course, Dell, Apple, etc. don't have to follow but it's a big step anyway.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    5. Re:Before you get too excited. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. I just think there's a long road ahead. More political than technical, but still..

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  23. Housing only? by Itninja · · Score: 1

    Given the broad power requirements for laptops (netbooks to pimped out gaming machines), how could it be standardized? If there were some kind of variable transformer, would it have to manually set when switching systems?

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Housing only? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Apple currently has two for all of their laptops. A higher power slightly older one, and the current lower powered ones.

      Its not hard to do and considering the cost to manufacture difference between the lowest power output requirements and the highest are almost undetectable, running one production line makes more money for everyone, even if they're putting over powered PSUs out with little low usage laptops.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Housing only? by tepples · · Score: 1

      considering the cost to manufacture difference between the lowest power output requirements and the highest are almost undetectable, running one production line makes more money for everyone

      The transformers designed for 17" desktop replacements are also physically bigger to carry with your 10" netbook.

    3. Re:Housing only? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Look at desktop power supplies. All ATX power supplies output the same voltages, have the same connectors and are the same physical size, but you can get a more powerful one if you have a lot of hard drives and/or multiple video cards or a cheaper less powerful one if your PC does not need that much power.

      The laptops could be the same - all power supplies output, say, 24V and have the same plugs but are of different power and the power requirement is clearly labeled on the laptop, so if my laptop needs 100W, I can use a 100W power supply or a 150W one. Very powerful laptops (that need more current than the plug can handle) could have multiple connectors and use multiple smaller power supplies or one big that has multiple connectors.

      For example, let's say the standard plug can handle up to 7A (=168W at 24V), but the laptop needs 300W (12.5A at 24V). It could have 2 power connectors (any laptop that needs this much power will be big enough) so it an be connected to 2 power supplies (at least 150W each) or one 300W PSU that has three connectors. That 300W PSU could be also used to power 2 laptops provided their total power requirements do not exceed 300W.

      Also, a very powerful laptop could have an internal power supply and a 220V connector. Those laptops are usually big and heavy enough to fit the power supply inside.

  24. power cord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fix the problem on pc laptops of the power cord port wearing/loosening/becoming jiggly from the strain of the cord getting hit etc. the apple magnetic thing is a perfect solution to this problem.

  25. That's a sore topic for me. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

    Also, a standardized connector would let third parties come in and start making accessories and replacement bricks for a lot less than the highway robbery prices that the brand names charge.

    You know, a lot of folks complain about our "throw away" culture. It's cost prohibitive to get something fixed and sometimes it's cheaper to buy new than to fix it - if you get it fixed. And the manufacturers want it that way. They want you to buy new and throw way the old one to boost their sales. It's fucking ridiculous that a laptop battery costs over $100 when they get them for under $10. The cells inside are just off the shelf stuff that they put in their own package to keep them from being interchanged - including Apple.

    Screen goes out: that'll be $200 for the screen and $125 minimum for labor plus S&H. After it's fixed, who knows what else will crap out.And it doesn't have to be so expensive. I understand labor and S&H, but the ridiculous markup on parts?

    I can buy a new one for less than $400. WTF?

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  26. But not wattage. by markdavis · · Score: 1

    Although they could standardize on a laptop connector (size, shape, polarity) and brick connector (the mains), and even voltage, the one thing they won't be able to do is standardize on a size. Laptops/netbooks vary greatly in their power requirements. I, for one, don't want to have to carry around a huge 80+ watt brick, simply because that is the standard and my netbook only needs a tiny 30 watts.

    Still, I welcome ANY type of standardization... right now it is really crazy. At least most of the phones (at least smart phones) have finally standardized on micro-USB connectors and standard USB power levels.

    1. Re:But not wattage. by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Then make it 3 standardized classes with different (and downward-compatible) connectors:

      A for 20V, 2A
      B for 20V, 5A
      C for 20V, 10A

      Maybe add higher connectors in that fashion, but notebooks needing more than 20V*10A=200W are rare enough. You need a jet-engine-powered fan to put off those 200W of heat anyway, so carrying around a special brick does not add more nuisance to it.

    2. Re:But not wattage. by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Still, I welcome ANY type of standardization... right now it is really crazy. At least most of the phones (at least smart phones) have finally standardized on micro-USB connectors and standard USB power levels.

      I've been sticking to Motorola phones and Canon cameras my last few generations of purchases for just this reason. Both just use a standard mini-usb connection for data (and charging for the Motorola phones). It is nice to only need one cable for my phones and cameras to sync with my computer, and only one charger for my work and personal phones (which works because each one lasts long enough on a charge that I can alternate days).

      Cameras are another device that seem to breed incompatible connectors for no particular reason. Hell, even a single manufacturer would often use a multitude of different connections on different models (Sony was the worst; I think for four or five different Sony point and shoots we had at work there were at least three different cables required). Some standardization in batteries (and chargers) would also be appreciated...

    3. Re:But not wattage. by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I, for one, don't want to have to carry around a huge 80+ watt brick, simply because that is the standard and my netbook only needs a tiny 30 watts.

      They could be standard in everything except power, so you can have a smaller power supply for your netbook, but if you go somewhere you can use a bigger power supply that's available there and not have to carry yours at all. Or if you also have a bigger laptop and want to take them both, then you can just take the bigger power supply.

    4. Re:But not wattage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure three is enough to cover the issue. As amperage increases, the cost of the supply goes up exponetionaly. Larger components cost more and are less efficiant, requireing more comonents, costing more. A ten amp supply at 20V cost around $50, or up to $100 if it needs to be light weight, smaller heat-sink reduces weight at cost of even larger and more expensive compoents. I don't like haveing to keep a supply for each device I own, while I can appreciate that the supply for my netbook is no where near as costly.

  27. Magnetic connector by Trevelyan · · Score: 1

    It does not have to be the Apple one, but I do hope that its a magnetic connector. Anyone who has tripped on their power cord* will likely hope so too.

    *The power cord is really the only cord left and the only one I have tripped on; luckily I have never brought my laptop to the floor.

  28. It would be good but Listen To Users!! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    We do NOT like those stupid replaceable tips. Those things come off and get misplaced. Instead, I would rather see replaceable DC power cords. Even if they are more expensive, I would much prefer to see a solid cord as they tend to be more durable and contain nice features like lights at the end of the cable. (Have you seen the new Dell E series power supplies? The blue light at the end not only looks nicer but gives clear indication that power is likely working at that end of the wire!)

    Like most people, I am willing to pay more if the damned thing works well.

    Now if all laptop makers were to agree on amps and voltage outputs, I would be a little surprised. There are netbooks and notebooks and depending on the notebook whether the processor is a heavy power load or the machine itself is just huge or whether it will be supporting a port replicator or docking station, these variables present a wide range of situations that require diverse ranges of power supplied. However, if the only variable were amps, then I'd be okay with that just as I would be okay with more expensive replaceable DC power cords.

    1. Re:It would be good but Listen To Users!! by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the new Dell E series power supplies? The blue light at the end not only looks nicer but gives clear indication that power is likely working at that end of the wire!)

      I am so sick of blue LEDs. The brick for my Precision m6400 has one of those and it drives me nuts at night because it is far too bright. Why is it every time someone puts a blue LED in a power indicator they use super bright LEDs? (I'm referring to you, Dell, and you, HP!) or power switch (the brightly-lit blue button on my printer) It really annoys me so I usually paint over the blue LEDs with blue or purple nail polish to cut the brightness way, way down. I haven't done that to the m6400 yet - I either put a cloth over the table or unplug it, but I really need to. It's really obnoxiously bright. At least if the indicator were on the brick I could just turn the brick over to eliminate the annoyance. But NOOO,

      I like blue LEDs. I really do. I just hate that like the blink tag, HDR imagery, and vocoder abuse, they are just way, way overdone. Want to use a blue LED? Great. Make it a sane brightness please. That's all I ask.

      There are so many things lighting up my bedroom at night it's sometimes hard to fall asleep. I disconnected my A/V receiver to eliminate that light, have the rarely-used VCRs unplugged, and my DVD recorder's and blu-ray player's display brightness turned down as low as they will go. I have most of the LEDs in my mini-tower PC chassis disconnected, and am thinking of soldering resistors in series with the remaining LEDs. Before I upgraded to a laser optical mouse, I had painted the front of my IntelliMouse with purple nail polish to block the massive amount of light it shines.

      As far as "power at the end of the wire" is concerned - you can tell when the laptop is on and charging, or if the laptop won't power up, use a volt meter. It really is that easy! Besides, those power supply connectors have been gaining a reputation for falling apart.

      What I would like to see is better placement of power connectors - or if vendors could get Apple to license their mag-safe connector, to use that, and have multiple power ports on the laptop.

      If Apple will not license mag-safe

      I'm putting an option out for free use. Because it is suggested here out in the open it is prior art so it cannot legally be patented. On the bright side this means that those vendors who adopt it don't have to pay licensing fees.

      Anyway, you could have a connector with a pinout similar to Apple's design. However their key innovation is magnetism. How about a couple of very small nubs at either end of the connector, which have a sphere on the end. The receiving jack has e-clips in the holes/slots which will hold the connector snugly enough that it will remain connected when picking up the laptop, but if you trip over the cable, the tension will be low enough that the cable will release. It's a mechanical lock but designed so that the retainer clips have only enough tension to hold the connector in place during normal use - and the reason I suggested slots was it would allow freedom of movement during a violent shock (tripping over the cable), allowing it to release without hanging up on the receiving hole. It would be self-centering by shaping of the rail which comprises the connector itselt; it could be a pyramid or trapezoidal shape with the connectors running down either side. Also, this connector may have a nice blingbling blue LED but it has to be a sane brightness; it should not be a flood light that keeps me awake at night.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:It would be good but Listen To Users!! by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I really like all of what you said. Magnetic coupling is definitely needed. I might go so far as to suggest "electro-magnetic coupling" not only as a means of getting around the Apple patent, but also as a means of proving/indicating that power is getting to the tip. I am sure other, similar, electronic devices to could employed to create a safe-breakable connection as well... I just can't think of many.

      And as for blue LEDs? Oh yeah... lights up my rooms at night. On one external USB hard drive unit, I actually had to open it up and install some sheets of paper to dull the glow. It was seriously and blindingly bright. I wanted to have some indication of normal functioning, but not THAT much.

      Hopefully the gadget making world will get over their super-bright-blue LED thing soon.

  29. Scalper by tepples · · Score: 1

    You mean tout.

    No, Ticketmaster are touts.

    1. Re:Scalper by imakemusic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes because they tout, i.e. flaunt, the tickets.

      Tout: advertize in strongly positive terms; "This product was touted as a revolutionary invention"

      Tote: Lug: carry with difficulty; "You'll have to lug this suitcase"

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    2. Re:Scalper by ricosalomar · · Score: 1

      Tout == Kvell
      Tote == Schlep

    3. Re:Scalper by nabsltd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't seem to find the "+1 Yiddish" mod. I guess that'll be added to the 3.0 discussion system.

  30. At last... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Considering that the internal components of laptops are largely standardised, its pretty alarming that manufacturers still use all kinds of different connectors and voltages...

    On the other hand, the Apple magsafe connectors are pretty neat (and has saved me a few times) and noone else seems to have copied them yet...

    Even on desktops you quite often get non standard power supplies on pre-assembled machines, they tend to be the lowest quality units too so you can't just buy a normal ATX replacement once the proprietary one dies.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:At last... by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      My guess on the Apple connectors is that they can be licensed out for a fee. Considering the margins on notebook computers these days, nobody is going to reward Apple for their engineering talent on that connector by licensing it from Apple.

      Of course we all know that Apple should just give it away so everyone can benefit. After all, wouldn't that be the nice thing to do?

      Wouldn't surprise me if Dell patented their connector and power-supply sensing as well.

  31. Re:planned breakage by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

    One thing that happens to my parents is that the connector gets wiggled so that the plugin disconnects from the motherboard. The motherboard is layered so that it cannot be soldered. Basically, the laptop is toast because the connector won't consistently provide power to the motherboard. It would be SO easy for manufacturers to solder the connector to a tiny inexpensive and easily replacable seperate board and then have internal wires that lead to the motherboard inside, but they rightly figure that the connector won't go until a year or so. This has happened to two laptops of theirs so far ( about once a year ) and they are on their third.

    --
    ...
  32. Just like they did with cell phones.... by Tmack · · Score: 1
    Yeh, and how did that go? Cell phones were going to centralize around mini-usb, a bunch did, but to retain the market in power supplies, and to keep their customers aggravated and maintain their image as sadistic bastards, there are still plenty being made with proprietary connectors. Even Blackberry has decided it missed its power supply revenue, switching (for no reason) to micro usb instead of mini usb, forcing existing BB owners that upgraded to newer phones to get yet another type of USB cable, and more new and different supplies that look almost the same as the old ones but dont fit. Sure, there are adapters, but most only work for charging, not actual USB, and most are sold by the shady cell-phone vendors, the ones that will sell you the adapter for $0.50, but charge $10 S/H for something you could stick in an envelope and send first-class mail.

    Anyway, back on topic, even if they standardize, it wont last long. One brand will see an opportunity to get more $$ and slightly change the plug so only their brand will fit, keeping everything else in the supply the same (think Dell power supplies for desktops). Vendor lock-in is an old practice, and wont go away, even if they say it might.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    1. Re:Just like they did with cell phones.... by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      I actually don't have a problem with Micro USB... it's a standard, and you can get cheap cables from Hong Kong off of eBay for less than $3 including shipping. My Kindle uses one, and I wanted an extra cable, so that was easy enough. But most Blackberries are pretty thick, makes you wonder why they went to Micro, which is primarily to save on device width.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    2. Re:Just like they did with cell phones.... by Morty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Micro-USB is not just about size, it's actually the official replacement for mini-USB. micro-USB is designed to handle more disconnect/reconnect cycles than mini-USB, so it's better even if your devices are large enough to not need micro-USB. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Mini_and_Micro

      I also grumbled about replacing my mini-USB chargers, but at least it's standard-for-standard. I now have two connectors to deal with (some devices still on mini-USB, some devices on micro-USB) as opposed to a mess of proprietary connectors.

  33. Re:Non-standard form-factors = planned obsolescenc by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know.. Cell phone manufacturers were in the exact same camp. Until China decided no Cell phone could be sold in China without a Mini or Micro USB power adapter. Suddenly, darn near every cell phone now has one..

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  34. IBM/Lenovo has been doing this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've had a series of thinkpads over the years, and there have been exactly 2 power supply types. Pre-T60, everything worked with the 16V adapter. Everything since the T60 has worked with the 20V adapter. (yes, everyone grumbled when the 20V adapter came out, but you can't roast a turkey with 16V)

    I don't get the fetish everyone has with the magsafe. Using laptops exclusively for the last decade I've had the power cord tugged on hard enough to cause a problem exactly 0 times. What are you all doing? draping your power cord across the hallway?

    1. Re:IBM/Lenovo has been doing this for years by ExtraT · · Score: 1

      I don't get the fetish everyone has with the magsafe. Using laptops exclusively for the last decade I've had the power cord tugged on hard enough to cause a problem exactly 0 times. What are you all doing? draping your power cord across the hallway?

      It's the gospel of Saint-Jobs: that magsafe thingy is pretty much the only really well-designed feature of macbooks - the rest is just pretentious expensive posturing.

  35. Re:Here are the specs, no further deliberation nee by mlts · · Score: 1

    If a standard voltage can't be used, how about a sense pin so the PSU can send 5 volts, 12 volts, or another standard? If the sense pin receives no signal, then send the lowest voltage so it doesn't fry any components.

    I agree on the knob. This would bring many incidents of Joe Sixpack thinking it is the volume control for Jane Wine Cooler's laptop, flip it to a higher voltage and fry the machine. The few things that a user has to fiddle with that might cause immediate electric over-voltage death of a device, the better.

  36. Computer Reaor Industry by helix2301 · · Score: 1

    A lot of people in the PC repair industry are going to be happy about this. Now they will not have to have a bunch of universal power adapters hanging around.

  37. Re:Non-standard form-factors = planned obsolescenc by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Agreed, but you forgot one thing. Brand specific accessories are also a great way to increase commitment. It's not just your phone, but it's your regular charger, your portable charger, your handsfree set, the data transfer cable and so on making sure that when you lose a phone, you buy a new one from the same brand. You don't see quite so much of it with computers, though Apple has generally used it a lot particularly on things like iPods. If you have an AirPort, Time Capsule, AppleTV etc. chances are much higher you'll buy another Mac than if you don't.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  38. As long as incompatible ones use diff. connectors by sirwired · · Score: 3, Informative

    Twice now I've had IBM/Lenovo laptops that use the same connectors as their predecessors, yet have increased wattage requirements that make the old supplies risky to use. I remember when our office transitioned from 600's to T20's. So many people were re-using the plug-and-voltage-compatible supplies and burning out the power regulators on the system board that IT started putting bright green stickers on every machine warning you that you should only use the higher-power supplies.

    Again, from T60 -> W500's... increased wattage requirements, same voltage and connector. While this one isn't burning out laptops, the older bricks run HOT.

    SirWired

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. How about eliminating the brick for some sources? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    The power supply is already in control of the charging. And it has its own computer, which takes advice from an application on the laptop. Why not treat the input as a raw supply input to a switcher and be intelligent about using it? Then you would just need an adapter cord, not an additional brick, for a number of sources.

    For instance: If the laptop's power supply could:

      - Operate (run the laptop and/or charge the battery) on voltages from 11.75 to 14
      - Survive overvoltage spikes and noise.
      - Shut down the load on the external source (and continue running on internal batteries if appropriate) when the voltage drops to a point that indicates 25% charge on the battery (so you don't damage it and can still start the vehicle engine if it's in good repair).

    you could plug it directly into a 12V vehicular supply. No brick - just a cord with a fused cigarette lighter plug on one end and a laptop power connector on the other.

    Input voltage sensing could even let the power supply take a guess at what's connected and do something safe until the power control application gave it advice. Portable solar panel? Aircraft EmPower (15V DC version)? 24V semitractor electrical system? (12 and 24V nominal home renewable energy systems could be handled with essentially the same algorithms as vehicles - perhaps with a tweak to the shutdown setpoint or debouncing algorithm.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  41. Aftermarket adapters by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Or the other gotcha they like to do. Your expensive OEM brick dies, you buy an aftermarket one, plug it in and it says "cannot determine adapter type, machine will function but not charge. Please connect a (insert type) adapter".

  42. Micro-USB is fine with me... by sirwired · · Score: 1

    I don't think Micro-USB was an evil plot; the connector is sturdier, and takes up less space inside the phone. Plenty of vendors are using it: my Moto does, as does my wife's Nokia, BB, etc... it isn't exactly tough to find cheap 3rd-party chargers and cables. Good 'ol monoprice has cables starting at $0.68, and perfectly fine car chargers for $1.53.

    SirWired

  43. Re:How about eliminating the brick for some source by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    While we're at it:

    Why not run and/or charge from power-over-ethernet? Then if you're plugged into a LAN that provides it (and your laptop doesn't eat too much to be fed that way) you don't need a separate power connection.

    And accept a slow rechage from a GSMA mini-USB standardized cellphone charger. Handy if you're on the road and making light use of the laptop - or lost the main line-power brick. (Lets the laptop be a client on another machines USB hub, too.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  44. Dell practically has, already by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    Recently,Dell seems to have done this, at least internally. My 4 year old Inspiron uses the same plug as my Wifes 1 year old Inspiron uses the same plug as my daughter's 4 month old Vostro. The only real change between them is the wattage - I briefly had a Dell Studio 15 that had a 90 Watt PS instead of the 65 watters that the other laptops use, and other than a warning about not being able to run at "full speed" because of insufficient power, it worked fine.

    I returned the Studio 15 because of terrible lockups under Windows 7 and Fedora/64, and am now waiting for my Dell Precision, so we'll see if they are the same... but it's obvious that Dell is standardizing where possible.

    Do realize, however, that standardizing power has a split advantage - on one side, a standard power plug means that yours will work everywhere. On the other side, it also means that nifty innovations like "plug-less" power becomes more difficult to accept. Personally, I'd like to see a power plug much like Apple's that's magnetic and that simply pulls off when yanked too hard from any direction so that we don't have power plugs that wear rapidly in highly mobile lifestyles.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  45. Not just Sony or Apple or... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    It's not just about one company. Really, seeing in the summary the the ATX given as some kind of universal thing makes me smirk. Sure, it works like that if you build your own PC or get a beige box built for you by some mom and pop shop. But try upgrading a Dell or a HP or a few others, and you may or may not have a nasty surprise. Off the top of my head one even went as far as to reverse two pins on the connector, so you instantly fry the mobo or the source if you try replacing either yourself. And non-standard size PSUs are more common than you'd think.

    So basically if it'll be anything like the PSU situation, well, you'll have notebook power supply that so standard that it works in everything except a brand name notebook. Opps, wait, that's almost all notebooks.

    Honestly, good luck in trying to get most big companies to play nice with standards, unless they're fighting uphill against a de facto monopoly. Then they'll want open standards all right, so they can get access to the fat juicy pool of users in that guy's walled garden. But otherwise, they each want you in their own walled garden and are not going to put a big fat hole in the wall, which is what an open standard is to walled gardens.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  46. Itchy and Scratchy Land by Twinbee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was an episode of the Simpsons called "Itchy and Scratchy Land", and from that episode, there was a map with an attraction named "Unnecessary Surgery Land".

    Hence I coined the phrase UWS or "Unnecessary Work Syndrome" for things exactly like this, where every manufacturer spends thousands or even millions of dollars to come up with their own special version of say... the power brick.

    I'm not sure if open source is appropriate all the time, but open standards are such a no-brainer, it hurts.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    1. Re:Itchy and Scratchy Land by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The problem is the ratings. If you have a notebook that requires 110 watts to power the seven USB connectors, GPU, three fans and the 17 inch display and you plug in a common 65 watt power supply you are going to have (a) a fire or (b) a blown fuse and a non-functioning power supply.

      So manufacturers have strong motivations to make sure that you can only connect the proper power supply to the computer. If it was possible to connect the wrong one, people would do it. If there was a fire the manufacturer (not the idiot that did it) would be blamed. In the US, the manufacturer would also be sued and likely lose. Allowing idiots to start fires is not viewed very well by juries. We must protect our idiots as they may be important political or business leaders someday.

      So it is obvious - require all notebooks to use the same rating power supply. That isn't going to go over very well with Alienware or a number of other desktop-replacement companies that have notebooks with enourmous power requirements. It would also be silly for netbooks to have to use the same larger power supply.

      Now a standard connector based on ratings might work. But there are still going to be 10 different connectors because not everyone is going to go to the trouble that Dell did.

    2. Re:Itchy and Scratchy Land by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I suppose like you say, around 5-10 ratings. Perhaps 20, 30, 45, 65, 90, 120, 160, 200 wattages would be an example of that.

      By the way, isn't it possible to simply have a power supply which is capable of switching between a range of wattages? I know that even my desktop cooling fan has three speeds (and therefore 3 wattages).

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    3. Re:Itchy and Scratchy Land by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      That's nonsensical.

      A 200W power supply isn't outputting 200W all the time. It can output up to 200W, if whatever is hooked up to it wants that much. And the reason it says 200W on it is that much above that something overheats and it dies horribly. But there's absolutely no issue with connecting a 20W load to it.

    4. Re:Itchy and Scratchy Land by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Doh. Of course, you're right. Then, the only reason would be to have lighter PSUs for those that don't need the extra power. Something more like 3 different sizes would be more sensible than 10.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  47. Not a kettle lead. by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 2, Informative
    I see lots of people refer to the IEC C14 connector as a 'kettle lead' For one, it won't plug into a kettle - there is a notch. Secondly the kettle lead is likely to have a 13amp fuse in the plug, and computer should have a 5 amp in the plug. The proper name for a kettle plug is the IEC C14.

    The kettle leads are also rated to work at higher temperatures, which is one of the reasons you can got from kettle to pc, but not from pc to kettle.

    Also, do you guys in the US have kettles? I'm sure I've read many times that your electricity is too weak to power a kettle , here in the UK we can get 3KW kettles which will boil a couple of litres of water in a minute or so.

    1. Re:Not a kettle lead. by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1
      Hey idiot! the name for the plug connector on a kettle lead is the C15....

      yeah thanks for that

    2. Re:Not a kettle lead. by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      Our electricity may not be sufficient to run a 3KW appliance, but at least we don't kill any where near as many of our citizens by electrocution. Our plugs are almost begging to be touched, yours are rubber coated halfway up, so in theory you can never touch a lead while it is live, yet yours is still many times more dangerous. I'll use the stove to boil my water.

      BTW, we also fuse our branch circuits way back at the entrance to the home at 15 or 20 amps. You nutcases run mains current through the whole damn house. I still get 24KW for my whole house, I just can't use it at all one outlet.

      Oh..... and no one has ever gone into a rage after stepping on a plug that someone left on the ground in the US. Those plugs you guys have are freakin' sharp and have a nasty tendency to fall pointy side up.

    3. Re:Not a kettle lead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try different countries and you will find they don't all use fuses or indents in the plug
      in australia we can use iec cables from a computer to power a kettle and probably faster too

    4. Re:Not a kettle lead. by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      With a mains RCD which has been required for over 15 years as part of electricial regs, the risk of electrocution is moot.

  48. "bizarre"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the heck is "bizarre" about power/heat/space/weight/cost optimization in a portable computer/any device know to man?

  49. Re:planned breakage by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    Either the build quality has dropped recently (after I bought my current laptop) or your parents have special abilities that let them do it. Basically I have never seen the power connector come off the motherboard of a laptop, or at least have bad connection. The plug from the cable, sure, but not the socket.

  50. Missing option: built-in power supplies by Thomasje · · Score: 1

    I have fond memories of my Compaq Armada 7790. Among its many virtues was a built-in power supply. If it had used the standard power cable used on desktop PCs (and just about everything else with a detachable power cable) it would have been perfect, although theirs wasn't too hard to get either (it was not some completely nonstandard Compaq-only plug). Not having the brick to deal with makes a big difference in terms of convenience.

    1. Re:Missing option: built-in power supplies by godrik · · Score: 1

      well the AC to DC converter usually generates a lot of heat that I would prefer OUT of the laptop. Moreover, it is usually (fairly) heavy too so I would rather NOT carrying it when I am on the go.

    2. Re:Missing option: built-in power supplies by ekhben · · Score: 1

      It does mean you're carrying around that extra weight all the time, and your laptop has to accommodate both the extra size of the brick and the extra heat generated by it.

      I'm gonna add to the masses praising Apple's laptop bricks. The magsafe connectors are great, but as a relatively frequent international traveller the swappable pins are a massive boon.

  51. Re:As long as incompatible ones use diff. connecto by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    If over loading the brick causes damage to anything other than the brick than the system is designed poorly.

    The simplest solutions is to have the laptop simply ignore the supply if its not enough. Dell detects underpowered supplies on our laptops at work and will refuse to boot. My MacBook will detect the lower wattage version of the supply its supposed to have and warns me that its ignoring it for charging or something like that.

    Since power requirements at this point are going to go lower rather than higher, the simple solution is to pick a wattage thats good for pretty much all laptops now, add 15-20% to it for possible unexpected jumps in the near future, and forget about it.

    Laptops are going to use less and less power over time now, they are plenty fast enough.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  52. now to... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    get the industry to back some kind of standardized board shape for laptops also. I think shuttle had some designs that they showed of recently for that use. That or some kind of standardized sizes for the various sub-boards like cpu+ram, GPU and IO.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  53. They've gone too far! by TheSync · · Score: 1

    I really got P.O.ed when I went to Tokyo and forgot my Dell laptop power supply. This is the one with the hair-thin center connector (that is probably carrying way too many amps for something that thing) rather than a "traditional" coaxial power connector. I went all over Akihabara, where you usually can find anything electronic, and couldn't find the connector (I was ready to buy another power supply and solder on the connector). I was lucky I could "borrow" power from time to time from another Dell laptop sucker at my conference.

    The Apple mag-safe connector is weird, but I'll admit it provides a useful feature (plus there are Apple stores all over the place). That Dell laptop power supply connector was designed for one thing: having to buy a Dell laptop power supply.

    1. Re:They've gone too far! by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      I find this somewhat hard to believe. For the last 8 years or more Dell has standardized on two power supplies with a single connector. The 65 watt and 90 watt supplies - together with software to make sure that if you connect the 65 watt power supply to a computer that needs the 90 watt one it will degrade gracefully.

      So basically, anyone with a Dell notebook needs only a single type of power supply. You found it difficult to find a replacement in Japan? These are sold on Ebay from China they are so common. I have left mine in various places but never have I run into a situation where someone didn't have one lying around - usually from an older Dell notebook that wasn't being used.

      Dell is halfway there already to having a standardized power supply and has gone the extra mile to make sure that plugging the wrong capacity one in doesn't result in a fire or a blown fuse.

      Kensington also sells a "generic" power supply often available for as little as $20 with a Dell connector in the box. If all you need is the 65 watt version, this is probably the most common power supply on the planet right now.

    2. Re:They've gone too far! by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      I'd vouch for this. I bought an Inspiron in 2003, and now at work we got a bunch of Latitudes that we ordered in 2008-09 with the EXACT same power adapters. Even their docking stations just take the 90W adapter and that's that.

  54. Re:planned breakage by adam.dorsey · · Score: 1

    There was a series of Dell Inspiron laptops (8400? 8500? maybe 5000 series) that had the most ridiculous power connector. It was this big beefy cylinder, with a big beefy cable, where the receptacle on the motherboard was soldered on by three tiny tiny pins. Not even a big thick ground shield solder connection to help handle the physical stress. After a few months the connector would physically come off of the board requiring an RMA to Dell. A friend had three laptops go bad (once I resoldered the connector for him, worked like a charm till it came loose again) before Dell said they wouldn't replace the motherboard anymore. He eventually got them to send him a newer model with the same specs, even took the same power connector, and the problem disappeared.

    --
    You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
  55. Not a good choice by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    There is no communication between the powersupply and laptop. The smart move would be add at least a comm link between these 2 so that interesting new approaches can be taken.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  56. Re:Using a projector by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    "My laptop must work with the most ancient projectors, the most ancient of cabling and the most ancient of users. Therefore VGA is a must".

    Well, yes. When I go somewhere to deliver a presentation, I use whatever projector the convention provides. I need to make whatever kind of connection the projector can accept. My old Powerbook was good in that regard: I could buy (terribly overpriced) adaptors for TV-out, VGA, DVI, whatever, and connect to just about any projector. But VGA was by far the one I used most.

    DVI-I to VGA adaptors are, of course, perfectly fine... Basically as long as the analog signal is there (i.e. it's not DVI-D)...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  57. Good ol' Coaxial power jacks! by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    I had a Powerbook for several years (still do, actually, I just don't use it any more) - and one of the things I really liked when I switched to a EEE 901 was the power cord... 12V, with a good ol' 2.5mm coaxial power jack.

    Now, this connector is nothing fancy - it doesn't project the laptop or the cord from someone tripping over the cord, things like that. But it's a simple, long-standing standard connector. I can buy one at Radio Shack.

    "Why would someone need a replacement connector?" you might ask? Remember I said I owned a Powerbook? Between my wife and myself we probably owned a total of five of those old, pre-Magsafe Apple laptop power adaptors, and every damn one of them has failed. I've repaired a couple of them more than once, only to have them break again. For me, the idea of being able to simply read the damn specs and connect a suitable power source is just lovely.

    Of course, apart from the "Magsafe"-type breakaway that everyone expects these days, there's another reason laptop manufacturers generally don't go in for such a simple solution: they want to protect the idiots who don't understand current ratings, keep them from hooking up their laptops to a 300mA adaptor or something stupid like that. They don't want these people going into Radio Shack, buying the wrong wall wart, pairing it with the "M" adaptaplug and killing the adaptor, or the laptop, or both. But for me, being able to get a power connector for my laptop just about anywhere is grand.

    If the laptop manufacturers out there work out a common standard connector for laptop power bricks, that could still be nice, as the connector type will be common enough that I could at least buy the connector, or a cheap cord with the connector on it, should I need to fix something or rig something up... But there's something fabulous about having a laptop with a power connector that's really common and accessible... Even if the manufacturers come up with a new standard connector, as long as it's a new standard it still won't have that kind of ubiquity.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  58. All I want is a better jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine, standardize, but at least design both the plug and jack in a manner that is SOLID and will standup to the occasional accidentaly tugging or just plain weight of the cord due to gravity. Just Google for laptop power jack problems and we see pretty much every manufacturer has issues. The jack loosens from the motherboard and causes arcing and charging issues and ultimately stops working altogether.

    Having had to re-solder such a power jack multiple times, I can tell you the design of these things is retarded. They are held on to the mobo by nothing more than short little tabs and the 2 power anodes with solder. And accessing this jack to re-solder requires taking an HP Pavillion completely apart.

  59. Re:Non-standard form-factors = planned obsolescenc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laptop makers have NO REASON to standardize.

    At which point the EU steps in and mandates it, and then everyone benefits. They did this with USB plugs and mobile phone charging (though I think China also mandated it).

    At the very least standardize on the plug into the laptop so we can have a fixed number of power bricks between the wall and the laptop. You can have whatever you want internally, but the plug on the laptop needs to work with any manufacturer's brick (perhaps have 3-4 variations for different power needs).

  60. Hadn't really found anywhere to post this . . . . by Gollum · · Score: 1

    I recently bought an HP 6730b laptop on auction. I took it out of the container, and turned it on (without attaching the power supply). It's pretty snappy, and seems to be in good nick.

    Perfect for my mother, I thought.

    I plugged the charger in, and started installing Ubuntu. Good God! It's taking an AGE to even go through the POST, never mind running the OS. Shit! And the auction specified no returns if the OS has been changed! Now what?

    Xorg is taking 80% of the CPU, just moving the mouse around. WTF!?

    Long story short, it turns out it is the aftermarket power brick that is to blame. Unplug it, run it on battery, works like a dream. Plug it in, and it all goes to shit.

    Check the voltage on the brick - all according to spec.

    Looks like it is time to get a genuine brick for my mom.

    My only thought is that the laptop is spending more time cycling between power saving (C3?) states that it actually does executing the instructions it has been given. Can anyone explain this behaviour better?

  61. HDMI with Gigabit ethernet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I checked the HDMI 1.4 standard, it only included 100Mbps ethernet, not gigabit.

    For fewer connections, check out HDbaseT - power (100W), ethernet (100Mbps, upgradable to 1Gbps), and HD audio video over standard cat-6 cables.

  62. Computers in the kitchen cabinets by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Back in the early 90s, a friend of mine used to keep his computers in the kitchen pantry, next to the stove, and run long cables into the living room for the monitors and keyboards. It let him keep things quieter, back when PCs were loud and some Sun machines were very loud, and he didn't bake very often anyway...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Computers in the kitchen cabinets by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Why not be a normal person and use a closet? To many jackets?

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    2. Re:Computers in the kitchen cabinets by billstewart · · Score: 1

      Too cheap an apartment :-) The kitchen closet was the closest one, and I don't think they had one in the living room.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  63. Cheap 2-prong input cords were great by billstewart · · Score: 1

    My work laptops for the last N years were Toshibas and IBMs, and both used a cheap 2-prong cord to feed the power brick. You could buy them for $2 or so at Fry's as "Panasonic boom-box power cords", and it meant that I could leave them permanently plugged in under my desks at work and home, carry a couple of spares in my car and briefcase, occasionally forget one at a hotel or customer site and not care, etc. And most of the bricks that didn't sue that cord have used the (US) standard NEMA cords that all other computer equipment uses. (Now I've got a Dell at work, which uses a three-prong cord, and I haven't found a cheap source yet, but between enlightened equipment policies and incompetent repair people, I've got a couple of extra power bricks, so I don't need to carry them around very often.)

    But no, a standardized power supply would only be expensive if it's using some specialized Intellectual Property, i.e. if they pay Apple enough to use the cool magnetic coupler. Otherwise there's no reason they won't be sold for $5 by no-name Chinese companies, and if they're more expensive because they're oversized, they'll still only be $10.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  64. kettle cord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who calls it that... the technical term is molex

    1. Re:kettle cord by Skapare · · Score: 1

      You mean this molex?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:kettle cord by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure he was talking about an IEC C13 or C15. The C15 is a true kettle cord, and it will plug into a computer, so a lot of people think it belongs there. Most computers actually take a C13, but the C15 exceeds its specifications and can be used in place of a C13.

  65. Power Over Ethernet doesn't provide enough power by billstewart · · Score: 1

    (Insert some lame joke about how YOU can have POWER over Ethernets, bwahaha, or about how in Soviet Russia, Ethernets power You.....)

    PoE only provides 15.4 watts - it's not enough. And you end up needing a bunch of power equipment back in the switching room anyway, which you're buying at Cisco prices instead of No-Name-Netbook mfr prices, and if you've got PoE on your desk, it's because they've talked your boss into buying an IP Phone, which already wants that power.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  66. I can haz 12 volts back? by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure there's some technical reason that laptop makers keep increasing the voltages they use rather than increasing the available current at the old voltage - my current Dell wants 19. 5v, and my previous IBM wanted 20. But it really would be nice to have 12 volts again, so I could power the laptop from my car, or my portable car jump-starter battery, or from those 12-volt solar panels, as opposed to my current combination of 12Vdc-to-120Vac inverter and laptop power cord. You might want a surge protector in line, to avoid problems when you're starting you car, but you shouldn't need more than that.

    Anybody know if we can get back to 12 volts?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:I can haz 12 volts back? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      It's because the power dissipated in the wires is proportional to the square of the current. And the dissipation manifests itself as heat. That means, if you increase the current, you have to make the wires thicker and heavier and also improve the cooling which is also heavy.

      If you want to increase the power available to the laptop's components, it's much better to increase the voltage.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  67. Spare power bricks are really useful by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It's annoying that manufacturers are gratuitously incompatible with each other. It's really convenient to have one power brick at work and one at home, so I only need to drag one along if I'm traveling somewhere, and there's no reason it needs to be a $90 fancy proprietary brick as opposed to a $10 generic brick.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  68. It has a real name, you know by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

    > standard 3-pin "kettle cord"

    You mean an IEC C13/C14 connector?

  69. Re:Using a projector by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

    Of course we need a fallback for the ancient projectors available in ancient conference hotels for insane daily rates from the inflated future.

    It's just nice to have a small set of passive adapters (digital video to VGA and DVI to HDMI or vice versa) to be able to actually use a digital video input on the projector if it has one - and to slightly push those ancient conference hotels into preparing to phase out VGA. Slowly, decade-slowly, of course.

    The difference in video quality is worth it, at 720p resolutions and above, with the usual long cable runs we routinely have on conferences and meetings.

  70. Re:Here are the specs, no further deliberation nee by Ted+Stoner · · Score: 1

    Agreed, users would screw up the knob - that's why I said the knob maybe should be hidden. It's there only for "backwards compatibility". Going forward with new products and the new standard, we lose the knob, lower costs and all are happy. For machines running less than the set voltage an internal voltage regulator can adapt, since the voltage should be close. Best to use the standard voltage however and not transfer any extra electricity into heat.

  71. This will never fly, accessories are big $$$ by freeschwag · · Score: 1

    Why, because the accessories market is a billion dollar enterprise. Can I get the same standard connector deal on cell phone power connectors too (this topics been tackled on /. a few times if I recall.) For example: WTF, why did they flatten the standard microUSB from Razor ver 1 to Razor ver 2?Not like the new one was uber thin and needed that flatter connector, but sure as shit, I had to buy a new car adaptor, and unless you get a cheap chinese knockoff on eBay those things sell for an assraping $30-50 in the ATT (Anal sTreTching) store.

    --
    Tweet, tweet, all id10t's out of the gene pool, open swim is over.
  72. Re:Non-standard form-factors = planned obsolescenc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you depict it as if it were an evil conspiracy. Actually I think they are more "lucky" than "evil" like the media companies and their copyright DRM bullshit.

    The reason they have to use nonstandard parts is that the customers won't buy anything that is a millimeter larger or a nanosecond slower than the competition.

    Overpowered nonstandard parts packed tight like some German sausage aren't exactly a recipe for long term durability.

    The large and slow bottom of the barrel "crap" they sell to dumb customers is actually stuff you can be running a server off after 10 years. If their parts were standardized and easily replaceable, I would rather get one of those than a MacBook Air 3.Oh.

    I have been ripped off by every maker with high end laptop models and the whole portable workstation bullshit. They are durable as long as you keep the CPU usage at 1% and only use the 3D card for composition. Start building software, encoding videos, or playing games and they are gone for good.

  73. 12V DC standard would be great by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... but even more important is a single voltage.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  74. The only reason this doesn't exist today... by Brian+Recchia · · Score: 1

    ...is because companies can sell extra chargers at inflated prices. Just about all laptops charge via the same spec'd power brick, they just all use different plugs.

    When was the last time you saw a laptop charger that didn't output somewhere around 16.5-19 volts at 5 or less amps? In fact, since Apple's probably one of the worst offenders when it comes to having proprietary designs, I pulled the charger for my 17-inch MacBook Pro out of the wall and looked at it: "16.5-18.5V 4.6A max," it says.

    The same thing has gone on with cell phones forever and has only begun to be fixed in the last two or so. Pretty much all charge via 4.5-5 volts and draw less than 2 amps, usually 0.5-1.

  75. Donny Kurnia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Handphone Industry have standarized charging outlet since 2009. It's about time it also came into laptop industry.

  76. Greenplug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The greenplug guys want to take this further and have one power supply for pretty much everything. I hope they succeed.

  77. Good theory by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    I really don't want ONE supply to charge all laptops because it would have to be big and bulky to support the most demanding ones. One in each of several power classes could be nice though. For example, I have a laptop that takes 1W from a little wall wart plug (OLPC XO-1), one that takes 65-95W and has an adapter for each, and I've worked on one that even takes 150W and had an adapter like an XBox 360!

  78. Re:Power Over Ethernet doesn't provide enough powe by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    PoE only provides 15.4 watts - it's not enough.

    From your own reference:

    The IEEE 802.3at-2009 PoE standard, also known as PoE+ or PoE plus (ratified September 11, 2009), provides up to 25.5 W of power[5]. Some vendors have announced products that claim to comply with the new 802.3at standard and offer up to 51 W of power over a single cable by utilizing all 4 pairs in the Cat.5 cable.

    The laptop I'm using now has a 75W brick, which can charge and run it simultaneously. So it might take half again as long to charge if off, and might not charge very fast at all if it were running. But that would still be better than running on batteries if I forgot (or didn't carry) the brick.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  79. Re:Power Over Ethernet doesn't provide enough powe by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Even 51W isn't enough to run a full-sized computer and monitor, but that's using all four pairs for power, and 25.5 certainly isn't enough. And most of the PoE that's deployed is either standard 15.4 watt stuff or pre-standard Cisco proprietary PoE which is even lower power. Basically the 25.5W stuff is mostly going to let you run a VOIP phone with a fancier display.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks