Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard To Require Real First and Last Names For Official Forums

An anonymous reader writes "Recently, Blizzard Entertainment implemented a Real ID feature for some of its current games and all of its future Battle.net-based games. Today, Blizzard announced that it intends to require usage of the real names of Battle.net posters for its StarCraft II forums before release, and for its World of Warcraft forums shortly before the release of World of Warcraft: Cataclysm. From the announcement: 'The first and most significant change is that in the near future, anyone posting or replying to a post on official Blizzard forums will be doing so using their Real ID — that is, their real-life first and last name — with the option to also display the name of their primary in-game character alongside it. These changes will go into effect on all StarCraft II forums with the launch of the new community site prior to the July 27 release of the game, with the World of Warcraft site and forums following suit near the launch of Cataclysm. Certain classic forums, including the classic Battle.net forums, will remain unchanged.'"

108 of 833 comments (clear)

  1. How does this work for those under 13? by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm assuming it's under the parents name for the account which should be a pleasant conversation at work when your boss asks you why you are trolling the warlock forum?

    --
    open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    1. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by poetmatt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just think - now you can find your favorite pornstar wow-players even easier!

    2. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by NecroPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Well, Bob, it's like this. Everyone in HR is playing Alliance, and trying to convince Blizzard that Locks are overpowered. You can't expect me to let them get away with that, now can you?"

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    3. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm assuming it's under the parents name for the account which should be a pleasant conversation at work when your boss asks you why you are trolling the warlock forum?

      Already laying the groundwork for the "it was my 13-year-old" excuse, I see. ;)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by UDGags · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the Real ID FAQ Will parents be able to control their child’s access to posting on the forums? Yes. When this change to the forums goes live, parents will be able to decide whether to allow their child to post on official Blizzard forums that use Real ID through Battle.net Parental Controls.

    5. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Funny

      why you are trolling the warlock forum?

      You can't fool me. Trolls can't be warlocks!

    6. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by cappp · · Score: 5, Informative

      A Blizzard employee went ahead and put his name out there as detailed on this site.

      In short, a little digging has found the guy's phone number, home address, the names and home address of his parents, his siblings' names, the valuation of his property, the name of his spouse, his facebook account, pictures of his home, pictures of him, his twitter account, his age, and so on.

    7. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by TheLink · · Score: 2, Informative

      Requiring a "real" First and Last Name is stupid. Not all countries have that convention.

      Requiring a name is not. Most people have at least one name, or they can come up with one.

      I think this recent article is relevant:

      http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/06/17/2347257/Falsehoods-Programmers-Believe-About-Names?from=rss
      http://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/

      Despite that, that article isn't really that useful in practice (it's useful for perspective). Yes some people don't have names (or names someone can type in repeatably), but they are unlikely to be the sorts posting on web forums (e.g. they are unlikely to be your users in most cases).

      --
    8. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Machtyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That link is classic. It's too bad it's not on the blizzard official forum. However, if it was, it would have been deleted forthwith. I'm sure Blizzard is fully aware of the gameriot thread by now, though.

      EPIC FAIL on Blizzard's part (I wonder how much of a decision this was of Blizzard or Activision). There are some really psycho people on WoW. I'd hate for someone to get hurt because of this issue.

    9. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 2

      It's pretty clear what will happen if Blizzard goes through with this:
      Everyone who doesn't want their real names publicized will stop posting on Blizzard's forums, and third-party forums will take off.
      Then, either Blizzard will revoke the requirement of displaying real names, or save a lot of money in hosting costs.
      I suspect the latter.
      Honestly, it is within Blizzards rights to require whatever they like (just not retro-actively) and this will give them less heavily trafficed forums with a lot lot less trolling and flaming.
      Those who care about their privacy will suffer, having to go to third party forums, but Blizzards forums will become a friendlier more open place that gets overloaded much less often.
      As much as I hate the required privacy breech required to post in future (And I won't be posting there myself) I can't really fault them on it.
      Sure, there'll be a few people who get stalked and such, but that really isn't on Blizzard, that's on the socially retarded few who do such stalking.. It's illegal (well, depending on if they go far enough to be a problem) and a problem for the authorities.
      Although I limit my personal exposure on the internet myself, I find it sad that I feel this is necessary. And I don't blame Blizzard for it.

      In an attempt to anticipate those who disagree (and I am sure there are many) I'll propose this:
      Blizzard adds an option to hide your personal information, and also an option to hide all posts from people who have chosen this option. They're smart enough to figure out a way to integrate this, and could probably take a few cues from the /. forums we're participating in now.
      Now, I know I'm being an insensitive clod, so feel free to correct me.

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
  2. Hmm.... by Pojut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Real first and last name? Full, no initial? Not sure what I think about that one, Blizzard...

    1. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know what to think of it.

      It is a horrible, horrible idea.

      You know that list of things every responsible parent teaches their children to never do on the internet?

      One of those things is to tell someone your real name.

      Blizzard is forcing them to in a way they are unlikely to notice first or are willing to do anyway because it is for all the new big games.

      Blizzard is going to expose the identities of millions of people, including children and adolescents publicly on the internet. They can then be exploited by anyone, including the "wonderful" guys over at 4chan, and worse.

    2. Re:Hmm.... by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My thought: Internet Detectives are going to have a field day with this. Got ganked by a Rogue last night? Search the forums for his character name, find his real name, figure out where he lives, and get him right back with harassing phone calls, pizzas, etc...

      Now all we need is for 4Chan to implement the same policy.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Hmm.... by rxan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

    4. Re:Hmm.... by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My thought: Internet Detectives are going to have a field day with this. Got ganked by a Rogue last night? Search the forums for his character name, find his real name, figure out where he lives, and get him right back with harassing phone calls, pizzas, etc...

      Or they...
        - Track him down and set his house on fire.
        - Find his workplace and tell his boss/coworkers that he's a pedophile/rapist/etc.
        - Find their SO and tell them the same as above.

      It's sickening the amount of things that could follow through from this action and just one remark. The whole RealID thing is a problem in the first place for transgender folks who don't want others to know their legal names, but all of the above listed reasons.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    5. Re:Hmm.... by JSombra · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aye got to agree, real dumb idea. If i still played this would kill me posting on the boards instantly, especially as my real name has a rather unique spelling which afaik only one other person in the world has. Thus making it pretty easy to track me down or for business contacts to see what I am doing in my private time

      Really dumb on Blizzards part too, how long before some nut job trackssome kid down down for ganking them in game and then does them harm. Because this is forced public disclose on the official support channel you can bet your ass that not only will blizzard get sued but they will also probably lose such a case in many countries if it went in front of jury, especially if a child is involved

      Someone has not thought this through

    6. Re:Hmm.... by osu-neko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      People who read your Facebook page are less likely to be mad than people who you gank and corpse-camp in Stranglethorn Vale.

      Well, for most people anyway... don't know what's on your Facebook page specifically...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    7. Re:Hmm.... by m.ducharme · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh come on, most of those children and adolescents are 4chan.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    8. Re:Hmm.... by Haffner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      facebook profiles are created with that intention. You are making an account that is you. No one makes their orc warlock thinking it is really who they are. (I'm preparing for contradictory comments below).

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    9. Re:Hmm.... by butterflysrage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and for 99% of the time that is fine... but there have been actual MURDERS over starcraft rankings in Korea. OK, so some whacked out arena junkie you knocked out of getting their ________ Gladiator title finds your real name, looks at the post you made about your crappy ISP, figures out your timezone and region based on your posting schedules and camps out a few houses... wouldn't take long to figure out which house had a hardcore wow-head in it... load up the shotgun and get his title back.

      There are precious few pros and a whole wack of cons to this idea.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    10. Re:Hmm.... by kent_eh · · Score: 4, Funny

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      Not everyone.
      not that my "A. Guy" profile is used for much more than looking at other people's public stuff, but still...

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    11. Re:Hmm.... by kage.j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I happen to indulge in world of warcraft from time to time, and let me tell you this...

      I've posted on the forums a total of maybe 3 times...ever.

      If you don't want to show your real name, then just don't use the forums. You can get support in-game or over the phone.

      And parents that want to protect their children: Disable realid (forum) access in the parental controls panel.

      --
      he demonstrated by A plus B minus C divided by Z that the sheep must be red, and die of the rot
    12. Re:Hmm.... by a+whoabot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You actually don't have that choice, unless you infringe their terms, which say, "You will not provide any false personal information on Facebook, or create an account for anyone other than yourself without permission".

    13. Re:Hmm.... by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "They can then be exploited by anyone, including the "wonderful" guys over at 4chan, and worse."

      Some people need to be hit over the head with a hammer so they will take security seriously. That situation would make a nice (lulzy) "hammer".

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    14. Re:Hmm.... by LambdaWolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      But Facebook is intended for communicating with people whom you already know in real life.

      Pretty much every forum on the Internet that is (unlike Facebook) meant for communicating with strangers allows anonymity; the WoW forums are about to become the only exception I can think of. And users generally want it this way, gaining anonymity at the cost of occasional trolling and such. So either Blizzard knows something that every other forum and their users don't know, or they're making a massive mistake. I give Blizzard a lot of credit as game designers but something tells me it's the latter.

      --
      "This algorithm runs in constant time. Come on, 2,147,483,648 is a constant..."
    15. Re:Hmm.... by Bakkster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blizzard is forcing them to...

      At the risk of making the stale old 'they aren't holding a gun to your head' argument, I find the word "force" to be pure rhetoric. It's not even the game itself, just the official forums for the game, which is both optional and has alternatives. It's rather trivial to avoid giving your name if you don't want to.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    16. Re:Hmm.... by mujadaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OH NOOOOO
      I HAVE INFRINGED FACEBOOK'S TERMS

      They're much better about rejecting fake names than they were 2 years ago, but it's not hard to get around that, if you try.

      Sorry, I have to laugh again. Ooooooo, I've infringed Facebook's terms, noooooooo.../giggle

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    17. Re:Hmm.... by TruthSauce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's pretty interesting that a couple of random phone calls "Mr xxx is a pedophile" would pretty much destroy most people's lives.

      Doesn't that underscore a fundamental breakage in our social system?

    18. Re:Hmm.... by genner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blizzard is forcing them to...

      At the risk of making the stale old 'they aren't holding a gun to your head' argument, I find the word "force" to be pure rhetoric. It's not even the game itself, just the official forums for the game, which is both optional and has alternatives. It's rather trivial to avoid giving your name if you don't want to.

      Real ID is required to use the friends list in game.

    19. Re:Hmm.... by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's pretty interesting that a couple of random phone calls "Mr xxx is a pedophile" would pretty much destroy most people's lives.

      Doesn't that underscore a fundamental breakage in our social system?

      Mob mentality/the overall hassle of it all/just enough to start rumors can be enough damage.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    20. Re:Hmm.... by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 5, Funny

      (I'm preparing for contradictory comments below).

      No you're not!

      --
      When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
    21. Re:Hmm.... by Bakkster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is a predicament, but more because they are trying to phase it in. This wouldn't be an issue if it were the way the game was when released, and those with an objection could simply not sign up to begin with.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    22. Re:Hmm.... by stonewallred · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Really? I have two facebook profiles. One with my real name, with very limited details, and one with a fake name where all my RL friends can find me. A google search brings up nothing about me, even though I was convicted of a felony 23 years ago, there are no pictures of me on the internet that I can find, and I use my real name for nothing, including my WoW account. My phone, cable and power bill are all in fake names, and I rent for cash from a former employer. My vehicles are registered to me, at a 10 year old address and my DL shows the same address. Which the banks also have as my permanent address. I use a PO box in the same county as my "official" address shows. Not everyone is willing to let the government or corporations track their where abouts and doings with ease.

    23. Re:Hmm.... by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      I have two Facebook accounts, both use fake names. Said names are based on anime characters I like. I've gotten tons of friend requests on them.... all from other accounts using anime characters names.

      So no, everyone does NOT give their real name out on Facebook. In fact I will never do so. Just because a lot of stupid people do it doesn't mean everyone does it.

    24. Re:Hmm.... by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The obvious solution to this, of course, is to not act like a dickhole.

      No, that's not the solution. There are people out there, and I'm sure you've encountered a few, that take any disagreement with them, no matter how polite as an attack on their person and respond like insane psychotics. (Which they probably are.) Being polite is certainly a good idea, but it won't protect you from the lunatics of the world who are either unstable or actively looking for reasons to get offended.

      Anonymity isn't just useful to protect the assholes of the world, it's also useful to protect the normal people from the assholes of the world.

    25. Re:Hmm.... by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Real ID is required to use the friends list in game.

      Are you talking about StarCraft? Because this doesn't look to be the case in WoW. You can use either the new RealID system, or the old friends system, or both.

    26. Re:Hmm.... by Flamora · · Score: 2, Informative

      Incorrect.

      Real ID is "required" to use cross-realm, cross-faction communication, and was designed to be used with people you already know and trust.

      However, there is nothing preventing you from using the pre-Real ID system of "/friends $CHARACTER_NAME".

    27. Re:Hmm.... by rainmouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Blizz admins just want to make sure all those bikini clad elf chicks they have been cyberlicking are actually females.

      An anonymous survey from the Daedalus project a few years ago (http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus/) quoted 40% of warcraft females are actually a female and with Blizards own stoppers preventing players from ever changing the real name the account was created with, I'm guessing theres going to be a lot of surprise transvestites popping up after the patch release.

    28. Re:Hmm.... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The whole "there's no smoke without fire!" mob mentality has destroyed more lives than we can ever keep track. These are the sorts of accusations that even being found innocent is still a form of "guilt", because people will always ASSUME that "there had to be a reason why they investigated such and such"...

    29. Re:Hmm.... by mujadaddy · · Score: 2, Funny

      When Facebook was just getting off the ground, I registered for an account. As Spispopd J. Spispopd ...

      Got the wife some mule Farmville accounts just recently, too. Last name? O'Confusion.

      Ooooooo, I've infringed Facebook's terms, noooooooo

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
  3. Re:trying to imagine... by qoncept · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you need some help? Everyone will know your real name.

    --
    Whale
  4. Lawsuit Incoming! by Nailer235 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wonder how long it'll be until someone finally tracks down a troll (in real life) and loots their corpse

    1. Re:Lawsuit Incoming! by lgw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mod me down to 0 since I'm not providing any actual information, please.

      If we did that sort of thing, the whole moderation system would collapse. You can, however, check the "No karma bonus" box, the post a 1 instead of 2.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  5. Jay and Silent Bob by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Images of the ending of Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back come to mind ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjWFZPJZTxU ).

    And those images are happy, indeed. :)

  6. I actually like this trend... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... with more and more people being forced to use their real names on the Internet, you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

    However, I do not personally like the idea of my first and last name being made public everywhere, which is why I have generally shunned Facebook and would not use this feature even if I wanted to.

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    1. Re:I actually like this trend... by selven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So you like other people not being anonymous, but you want yourself to still be anonymous? That kind of reminds me of this.

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems, and ensures an even playing field, since newbies' arguments are heard on the same level as those of our celebrities (at least in theory).

    2. Re:I actually like this trend... by Pluvius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... with more and more people being forced to use their real names on the Internet, you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

      However, I do not personally like the idea of my first and last name being made public everywhere, which is why I have generally shunned Facebook and would not use this feature even if I wanted to.

      So in other words, chilling effects on free speech are a good idea, but only if they're placed on other people?

      Rob

    3. Re:I actually like this trend... by II+Xion+II · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a horrible idea. Anyone with some basic Google searching skills can uncover a lot about people based on (presumably) their real name. For people such as myself with a name that is not so unique, it is not a huge issue. But for a lot of people who might have more uncommon names, such information can easily be used to find addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, social networking accounts, and other information. This is an identity theft and privacy nightmare. And given the ages and types of people who can play the game, I see it being very successfully exploited.

    4. Re:I actually like this trend... by BobMcD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, because trolls would never stoop to using fake "real" names.

      Well, they'll find it very difficult to do that unless they figure out a way to spoof the same name on their credit card.

      FYI, you can buy 'Game Time Cards' with cash at every big-box store in the United States.

    5. Re:I actually like this trend... by butterflysrage · · Score: 2, Informative

      ok, we know John Smith, we can find out their region by looking at their server, a look at their post times and we can guess what time zone they are in, a reference to a specific ISP and you can get mighty close to knowing who a person is.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    6. Re:I actually like this trend... by breakfastpirate · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Only about 12 people in the United States have my last name. If I tell someone my full name, I might as well just tell them my social security number. Names aren't always as anonymous as you'd think...

    7. Re:I actually like this trend... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe if you hurried up and buffed us already it wouldn't take until 3AM.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    8. Re:I actually like this trend... by kent_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because trolls would never stoop to using fake "real" names.

      Well, they'll find it very difficult to do that unless they figure out a way to spoof the same name on their credit card.

      FYI, you can buy 'Game Time Cards' with cash at every big-box store in the United States.

      At the moment you can.
      And not everyone lives a convenient distance from a "big-box store in the United States"

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    9. Re:I actually like this trend... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems, and ensures an even playing field, since newbies' arguments are heard on the same level as those of our celebrities (at least in theory).

      <sarcasm>Yes, because there's no such thing as ad hominem attacks on slashdot.</sarcasm> With sock puppet accounts and other trickery I'm not sure that it's so even either, on top of those that just want to trash about and destroy any real discussion. But what you don't get on a real name forum, is honesty. And before you all go constitutional on me, it's perfectly rational to not tell everybody everything. Friends, family, employers, the general public, nobody except the government is obliged to treat me the same. You might say that if I do nothing wrong, I should have no problems with sharing it with the world but that is not true. There has been, is and will be unjust laws, individuals and societies that are bigoted and intolerant. That I in principle should not be punished for something does not mean that I won't be in reality.

      It is not an either-or that there should always be anonymity or there should always be identification. I see them both as important but different tools. The anonymity in gathering a community, talking to others who feel the same way, making people comfortable with themselves and letting them know they're not alone. Those that identify themselves first are the spearheads, those that gives names and faces to those people. It does not matter how good the cause is, being a spearhead is hard. If you walked along Gandhi himself you'd still risk arrest, imprisonment or being beaten up by soldiers. You can not expect everyone to be willing to sacrifice everything, some must lead and the rest will support you up to a point. Not everyone wants to be a maryr, they just seek to live their own life as they see morally sound and get away with their way of pursuing happiness.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:I actually like this trend... by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      never ONCE has it or should it ever affect your work.

      Except, of course, for that time when your boss was considering you for a promotion but chose the other candidate because he doesn't play that "stupid kid's game" in all his spare time.

      True story: I moved to a new town and started a new job working at a management level with a few other degree-level pros and also a large group of high-school and GED level workers. I joined an online dating site and set one of my preferences to be for at least college level education. Some of the ladies at work checked out my profile (you can hide your name, but not having a photo means no views), and it got quickly spread that I was "against" only having high-school level education. Oh, well, right? Well, then I got transferred to work under an older supervisor with "only" a high-school diploma who'd gotten his current position by working for 30+ years in the industry. Yeah, lot of fun working under someone who believed the rumors that you don't think people with only high-school level education are worth anything. Maybe it shouldn't happen, but people judge you both on what you do online and what you're perceived as doing online. That's just the way the world works. Forcing people to use their real names will have many effects, but one big one is that it will cause many thinking people to simply not post anymore, good or bad posts.

    11. Re:I actually like this trend... by gilleain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are IIRC only 3 of me on earth. Mostly because my ancestors changed the spelling of their name to sound less German when they immigrated, but they didn't know enough English for it to make any sense.

      And no, my user name is not even remotely related to that name.

      Well, if we're playing the "who was the rarer name" game, then I probably win. I only know of one other person (on the internet) with my first name.

      ...and yes, that is also my slashdot username :)

    12. Re:I actually like this trend... by Windwraith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe not Bob Smith, but Abdul, Jose or Pierre will have a tough time. Racism exists.

  7. Triumph of the Marketroids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, we've got a whole generation of Failbookers who believe in attaching everything they do in real life to their real name... and we've got a game. If we can get people to divulge their real names to us, we can trivially cross-reference that with the data that Zuckerberg's already mined for us, and one outer-join later, money falls from the heavens.

    What the consumer actually wanted - the ability to be The Real Them on Failbook, and Someone Completely Different while gaming - doesn't enter into it. *sigh*

    My answer to this is the same as my answer to Failbook: a strange game, and the only way to win is not to play.

  8. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now you bastards will know how it feels

    - Johnathan Doe

  9. Now so bad. by snarfies · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fortunately, my real name actually is KÖRGULL THE EXTERMINATOR, so I won't be needing to change my battlenet ID.

  10. Everquest didn't have forums by Selfbain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the old EQ days (I know it's still around but who cares these days), all the forums for the game were run by the fans because there were no official ones. I have a feeling this change will cause similar forums to rise in popularity and Blizzard will accomplish little other than losing control of the conversation and pissing off their users.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
  11. Re:Reduced server useage by ildon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    5. People stop posting legitimate, intelligent useful feedback because they value their personal privacy more than a video game.
    6. Without the constructive feedback, issues without the game go unnoticed or unreported for longer periods of time.
    7. These issues compound and add up making the game less fun, but it becomes more difficult to quantify why the game is less fun without this feedback.
    8. Subscriptions slowly drop off and the game trickles away and dies.
    9. Long term loss of profit for short term, nearsighted gain.

  12. What a sham! by yoshi_mon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While a lot of people have gone on and on about how using real names will promote more civility and better discourse, something I seriously doubt is necessarily true, that is no where near the real reason Blizzard is forcing RealID.

    It's a means to open up their TOS to allow dataminers access to a vast swath of information. Cha ching! Add to that anyone in game using RealID that then links up friends list? Cha ching! Even more information to datamine. And of course anyone who has played WoW knows that they log damn near everything. You can bet that gchat, party chat, officer chat, raid chat, general chat, trade chat, and every other channel that you type a letter in will be up for datamining. Cha ching!

    It's all about the money people. Cloaked in a flag of good intentions.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    1. Re:What a sham! by seanalltogether · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Data mining players on blizzard isn't nearly as meaningful as you're making it out to be. Blizzard employees have stated on previous occasions that the amount of data they generate is monumental and trying to mine it is so impractical they just throw it all away. This is the reason they can't even catch people cheating by rewinding battlegrounds sessions. Data mining a place like facebook is far more valuable because the connections between people are easily confined and contain stable links. Data mining the complex interactions that take place in a gaming system are impossible on a system wide scale, the best you could do is pick a handful of players and try to make sense of the avalanche of data they generate.

    2. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nonsense. First, Blizzard already has the real name associated with an account. If they want, they can already do all that data-mining you're so concerned about. The publishing of the RealID names on the forum are completely unrelated to this.

      Second, the forums only show your name. Not what characters you belong to. Not even what server you play on (disclaimer: you do have the option to associate with a character, but its not on by default).

      So how is any of this not just tinfoil hat ravings?

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    3. Re:What a sham! by yoshi_mon · · Score: 2, Informative

      How? You a Blizzard shill?

      http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?sid=1&topicId=25626349382

      There is one of the better posts on Blizzards own forums as to why publishing someones 1st and last name, in association with other details, is a (TM) very bad thing.

      Yes they can already sell off what data they have but not without their users going wtf!? But when RealID becomes the norm well then it's no wonder Joe Bob Jones is getting targeted ads for snickerdoodles. His forum posts, linked with Facebook and all the rest that I talked about, said that he might like them!

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  13. Only idiots post with real name by junglebeast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) Did Blizzard ever stop to think that many (most?) people play their games as an ESCAPE from real life?

    2) Anything on Blizzard forums goes on Google, and comes up in search results. That means anybody who uses their forums is going to be labeling themselves, forever after, as a nerdy computer game player to future employers, dates, etc...which is not something that is looked upon positively by many people. I would certainly discriminate against potential employees if I saw that they were a WoW geek.

    3) People sometimes have bad days, say things they regret later...on a forum this is all saved forever. Luckily only the people who know their forum name can find it. So you protect your hidden identities more securely than you protect your email passwords. Blizzard aims to make all those mistakes unforgivable.

    There is nothing that is possibly worth saying on the Blizzard forums that is worth sacrificing one's anonymity for.

    1. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Divide+By+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny
      Sir or madam, I respectfully object to the title of your most recent post. I have found using my real name to be an uplifting experience.

      Respectfully,

      Divide B. Zero III, Esq.

      --
      Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
    2. Re:Only idiots post with real name by mickwd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear Sir,

      There must be some mistake. I know for a fact your line terminated with the first Divide B. Zero. Obviously, some kind of error has happened.

      Regards,

      C. P. Unit

  14. While I do agree I still dislike it in general by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I mean I completely agree, that if you remove the anonymity you'll remove a lot of the asshole factor online. People are much bigger pricks when they don't think it can come back to bite them. So it would remove a lot of that.

    However it would also discourage people form sharing thoughts as freely. If I had to use my real name on Slashdot, I wouldn't post nearly as much. I'd make sure to restrict it only to things I was comfortable with all current and future employers seeing. I wouldn't want to screw myself out of a job because I posted something that someone disagreed with.

    As it stands though, a pseudonym allows me to do that. It isn't true anonymity, with a bit of sniffing around you could easily come up with who I really am. However it means that a simple search for my real name will not come up with any of this. That is enough to keep it form being a problem. Just removing the direct connection is all I need.

    Over all, I think it is good to have things that way. I like to be able to freely share my thoughts online, and I'd like to think some people find it valuable (on Slashdot people seem to at least sometimes as I do get modded up). I wouldn't want to have to restrict some of those because of the worry of retribution. I can only do that so long as I can have a small barrier between my real and online identity.

    1. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I had to use my real name on Slashdot, I wouldn't post nearly as much. I'd make sure to restrict it only to things I was comfortable with all current and future employers seeing

      I've said this on here before, but I was once employed by such an employer. They wanted complete editorial control over each and every one of their employees very thoughts. They even went so far as to consider firing employees wouldn't agree to vote the way the upper management thought was 'right'.

      If your comments on Facebook, etc, ever caused such an employer to pass you by, then those comments did you a favor. Trust me. It is better to not get the job than to have to replace it because you're not ideologically compatible.

  15. You are not now nor have you ever been anonymous o by r6_jason · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've posted this else where today, might as well post it here. People are up in arms over this one, most people seem to think that they are safe and/or anonymous behind their chosen internet handle. However this is not the case. As a TF2 server Admin I have seen many trolls get blown away when their personal info is posted in response to their trolling posts. Just by Googling the Handle some people use, you can start to gather pieces of personal information, email, phone numbers, real names, places, jobs, etc can be found in a matter of minutes, one piece of information leading to another, which leads to another, and so on until you have a complete picture of someone. You are not now nor have you ever been anonymous on the internet. With this change, adults will be expected to act as adults. If you don’t want the public to know what you are up to, don’t post it on the public internet, it seems rather simple to me.

  16. What about WoW Armory by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this going to tag a character on WoW Armory with the Real ID user name of the account holder?

    It'd be awesome to find the names of an entire guild.

    Worst damned idea ever Blizzard.

    1. Re:What about WoW Armory by Godai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Names on the forum are not connected to a character unless they choose to. So, none of what you're talking about applies unless someone wants to make that possible.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    2. Re:What about WoW Armory by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And when Blizzard started this Real ID was only going to attach a real name you friended for cross-faction/game/realms.

      Then few weeks into that they announce it's going to the forums.

      Sure it's not connected to a character unless they choose too, here is an example of how that's broken.

      Guild X is posting LF guildies and Guild X's recruiting officer puts up the post and uses their real name but no character. So you see Tammy.Jo posted it. You hop on WoW and ask someone in Guild X who their recruitment officer is and now you have Tammy.Jo's real name and character names.

      Now, how long before blizzard shifts this tagging characters and Real Names into Armory?

      It's a dumb idea all the way around.

  17. Blizz forums by space_jake · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you've ever been to the Blizzard forums then you'd know nothing of value was lost.

  18. My name is.. by BigJClark · · Score: 2, Funny


    You insensitive clod! My name really is Leroy Jenkins

    --

    Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
  19. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No trolls here.

    Hey, if you're browsing at -1, that's your problem, not Slashdot's.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  20. Internet Anonymity is good! by rotide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Imagine for a second a 42 year old lonely man (with very little social skills) playing World of Warcraft and he learns that Night Elf Rogue is actually a girl. They chat for a while and become friendly online. He starts to fixate and fantasize that those trips helping her level her alt are "dates" and eventually he falls in love with her. Or at least her character and voice.

    Fixation turns into obsession and after a couple failed attempts to woo her into a real life relationship, she turns him down (hell, he's a creeper).

    He gets upset and from the personal information he has gathered over their time "together" he is able to locate her using her _real_ name that Blizzard forces you to use (not a fictional "eName" you make up to give out on the intertubes to remain anonymous). Fill in the rest with your imagination.

    Or, someone harasses you in game and you look to take revenge. Ninja looters, stealing quest mobs/items, kicking you from group/raid, etc. Maybe they simply want to threaten you (which already happens [NSFW] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUOI7BTmmk0 [NSFW]).

    Of course, this can happen anywhere with any site that shows real names (facebook, etc). But forcing people to drop their anonymity is a bad thing overall. How many children play Blizzard's _games_ of which are going to be forced to link their, or more likely, their parents names to their account and be seen? It's not that hard to track someone down when you know their approximate location and their last name.

    I guess the short is, anonymity can be bad. People act like punks and you have to put up with it from time to time, I know, it sucks. But the good part is, little Johnny potty mouth won't have to potentially pay with his life. Hopefully he learns to grow up on his own without someone like the chick from the link I posted above hunting him down.

    1. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Burnhard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes! This is the point. Anonymity is pretty much the foundation stone of identity security. I know it sounds kind-of obvious, but there it is.

  21. The children! by Rydia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like how slashdot commenters love to use "won't somebody think of the children?!" as a device for sarcastic mockery of various Internet policies. Then this happens, and we get a thread full of ...

    "But ... won't somebody think of the children?!"

  22. There are no girls on the internet... by Brandee07 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If there are no girls on the internet now, there won't be any ever once this goes into effect.

    There's no quicker way to be harassed, stalked, and otherwise massively annoyed by EVERYONE than to reveal that you are in possession of TWO X chromosomes, instead of the internet norm XY configuration.

    And the absolute last thing I want is random assholes that I've pissed off on my server to Google my name, of which the first result is the staff listing on my current employer's website, and then start sending nasty emails to my boss.

  23. Not for me by nege · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I think that overall this is a good thing for the Blizzard forums (as well as other changes they are making according to TFA, including rating up and down on posts), it completely removes my desire to post on their forums. I don't troll as a rule (but I can't say it’s never happened), but my last name is so unique that finding me on the Google is already ridiculously easy (my first and last name - all of the first page is me). I don't need prospective employers knowing about my gaming habits, and even less so prospective dates. Not that I go out of my way to hide these things from people, but I don't want it popping up as a matter of course just because someone googles my last name.

  24. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No trolls here.

    Hey, if you're browsing at -1, that's your problem, not Slashdot's.

    It's a shame that GP was modded down, because he proves a good point like many others who are modded down just because someone with mod points is unhappy with their opinion.

    Trolling is a problem here still, and I'll probably be modded as one.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  25. Re:trying to imagine... by butterflysrage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what has me worried is that I rarely disclose that I'm female in WoW except to my guild... when other people find out they tend to be less than mature. I would rather not face a barrage of /tells and real_id friend requests from the "plz cyber?" crowd.

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  26. Re:trying to imagine... by Godai · · Score: 2, Informative

    By default it does not associate any post with a particular in-game character. So while they'd know you were female on the forums, there'd be no way to know that any given character belonged to you unless you choose to do so.

    --
    Wood Shavings!
    - Godai
  27. Good Luck With That by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only thing Blizzard is really able to "require" is that the names in the First Name and Last Name boxes on the site. That does not necessarily have any relationship to "real" first or last names. Even paying for the service can be done with someone else's credit card. So... Good Luck With That. Some will comply. Others will not.

  28. Re:trying to imagine... by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But that's still backwards - my forum persona should be associated with my in-game character, not my real ID. Imagine for a moment this was some sort of role-playing game ... nah, too much of a stretch. For Starcraft, there have already been real life shootings in Korea - this isn't going to help things.

    Why shouldn't I seperate my online persona(s) from my real life identity? What problem is Blizzard trying to solve here? I make it a point to avoid any forum identity that could be easliy traced back to my real name, because stuff comes back to haunt you. Do you really want somehting you said 20 years ago in some gaming forum to come up in a job interview?

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  29. Re:trying to imagine... by kg8484 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A female playing WoW?

    I put on my robe and wizard hat

  30. What a stupid, irresponsible thing to do. by CodePwned · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In short, this is being done by a ton of really bad people on the forums. This cannot be being proposed by the upper leadership as this has all sorts of legal implications.

    If you have a problem with your forums, on such a large scale... it's EASY to fix.

    Step 1:
    Implement a ranking system. People can give you positive or negative bumps to your posts (think karma here). The longer someone holds an active rank the more "bump" they give to people. You have to be a member of the forum for at least 1 month before you can bump at all, and then give it a progressive growth scale of the strength of their "bump". (1-6 months: 1pt, 7months to 2 years: 5pt, 2+ 10pt).

    Additionally, provide some incentive for activity on the forums by offering discounts of productions/services by maintaining a high activity and in good standing at certain intervals. For example "You've been active on our forums for over 6 months with a great rank! We want to thank you for contributing to our community by offering you 25% off any of our old games... or a $5 credit on your next bill!". The overall cost to blizzard is dirt cheap.

    Step 2:
    Ensure that someone has to been active (logging in) to keep their rank or they start over. You can figure out that time table

    Step 3:
    If a user gets below a certain rank they are auto silenced. They cannot post anymore but can submit for a review of their "silencing" in case of some exploitation. This is highly unlikely since to even bump you have to be a member for quite some time.

    BENEFITS
    - Trolls get silenced pretty damn quick
    - The community monitors itself with minimal administrative intervention
    - You get certain individuals who become leaders in the community from their rank
    - People feel rewarded for contributing

  31. Re:trying to imagine... by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the only positive thing Blizzard will get from this is less traffic on their official forums.

    I can only hope that Blizzard will catch on to the outrage of this. I won't stop playing, but I'll stop using their forums. All of those useful posts I've made in the past will no longer continue to happen, including anything I've said that was inflammatory. The good posts I've made outweigh the ones where I put up bounties on people on my faction, trashed someone, etc.

    I'll be posting on Elitist Jerks or some other forum for anything involving my class or endgame content. For discussing realm matters, I just won't post anymore.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  32. Depends by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In a case like that, sure. Though actually in a case like that I'd make sure to get myself fired over a voting issue and then sue the fuck out of them. The voting booth is a pretty sacred right in the US and termination over it would be bad cause in every jurisdiction I'm aware of.

    However what I'm worried about is a case of people who generally aren't like that, they aren't the "Everyone must agree with us in every way," sort, but that they happen to see something that they decide makes them say no.

    You hear about this all the time, people post Facebook pictures of themselves at a wild party in university and find it hurts jobs later. It usually isn't that the folks doing the hiring are Puritans or anything, they are just dumbasses. They did the same kind of shit themselves when they were young but have conveniently forgotten about it. They think "Well this sort of thing doesn't reflect well for our company," and give the person a miss.

    In my case, what I might be worried about is that I've posted stories about my work environment. Now I've never named my employer, mostly because that comes too close to making it too easy to identify me, but still. I'm not worried now, I work for a public institution and thus I have a right to do it (HR specifically says so) as the tax payers have a right to know. But at some time in the future I go for another job and maybe that company thinks "Well we like the guy, but he talks about his employer online. We really don't want that, have to give him a miss."

    I just find it better that there is a barrier between my real name and what I post online. Not a strong or impenetrable one, but one that if you Google my name, you do not get results of what I've said in forums.

  33. I see you, You see me by Herkum01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, then be sure to let us, the users know the REAL NAMES of the moderators, business managers, sales staff, marketing gurus of your business and I am sure that openness will be embraced by all!

    1. Re:I see you, You see me by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Informative

      EVERYONE that posts on the forums will have their RealID exposed, even employees. At least one of the GM/Devs already revealed her name. Also, most of the employees are named in the game manuals (those things we dont read), including the GM mentioned.

      --
      Good-bye
  34. Joe Generic is still anonymous by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People with very common names will not be impacted in the same way that people with less common names. Real names are non-unique. How does this help? cf. TSA "no-fly" list.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Joe Generic is still anonymous by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, I bet a lot of WoW freaks will legally change their name to their avatar's name. That should be fun.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  35. Re:In Blizzard's defense by somaTh · · Score: 2, Funny

    His point is that, unless you're trying to read the trolls/flamebaits, you won't.

    Sadly, though, he had to feed a troll to make it. Now I'm offtopic. :/

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  36. Great Idea by tiny69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think posting a person's real name is a great idea. I'd never get embarassed by having my real name associated with some lame username that I picked over 10 years ago.

    --
    Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
  37. Re:Reduced server useage by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Go die in a fire.

    --
    RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
  38. Re:trying to imagine... by kitanai · · Score: 2, Funny

    You actually get that? I'm female and play WoW, and those episodes have been so few and far between it wasn't worth worrying. Although my guild leader did want nekkid pics.

  39. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why shouldn't I seperate my online persona(s) from my real life identity? What problem is Blizzard trying to solve here?

    The Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory. People are less likely to act like an asshole if they don't have anonymity to hide behind. The only people who will be idiots any more are those who are idiots already.

    Another example of a game using real names is iRacing, though real names are used throughout the game, instead of just on the forums. Again, the idea is to discourage anti-social behavior (intentional wrecking, profanity, etc), and this is part of their aggressive policing against griefers. In this case, such a prevention is especially necessary for a racing game of this type. I don't frequent the Blizzard forums, so I'm not sure if there are enough douchebags there to justify such measures.

    I make it a point to avoid any forum identity that could be easliy traced back to my real name, because stuff comes back to haunt you. Do you really want somehting you said 20 years ago in some gaming forum to come up in a job interview?

    In that case, either:
    1) Don't be a jack-ass on the Blizzard forums.
    2) Don't use the Blizzard forums.

    That said, I've given my screen name which I've used for the last decade as part of a background check for an interview, so I'm well aware of the issue. However, nothing I said in the past (I've said a lot of stupid stuff) was an issue. If it is a concern to you, don't use the forums (it's an optional part of an optional game you play, you can deal with it), or simply police your behavior before it is recorded for all posterity on the Intertubes.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  40. Re:trying to imagine... by tacarat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I make it a point to avoid any forum identity that could be easliy traced back to my real name, because stuff comes back to haunt you. Do you really want somehting you said 20 years ago in some gaming forum to come up in a job interview?

    In that case, either: 1) Don't be a jack-ass on the Blizzard forums. 2) Don't use the Blizzard forums.

    That said, I've given my screen name which I've used for the last decade as part of a background check for an interview, so I'm well aware of the issue. However, nothing I said in the past (I've said a lot of stupid stuff) was an issue. If it is a concern to you, don't use the forums (it's an optional part of an optional game you play, you can deal with it), or simply police your behavior before it is recorded for all posterity on the Intertubes.

    It'd be safer to do the second option. While your first suggestion is good, times change. What's fine now may not be 20 something years down the road (or even next week). Today's upright, model citizen can be dragged through the mud later on without any misspeaks if future interpretations or values change enough.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  41. Re:trying to imagine... by thirtybelow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is that the degree to which anyone is deterred will be determined by how concerned they are about their online image. People with careers and families will be even more cautious, and probably less like to contribute to a discussion. 13-y.o. dickheads will go right on being dickheads, because they have nothing to lose and it will be several years before they are in any position to worry about an online reputation. So, people who are most likely to say something worthwhile are the most likely to be silenced by lack of anonymity.

  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. Re:trying to imagine... by nschubach · · Score: 2, Informative

    My guess is that they will link it to a name on a Credit Card account.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  44. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sympathize with Blizzard's desire to want to make the forums a more constructive and friendly environment,

    I haven't been on the Blizzard Fora for years, but my last experience of it was a few years up until they finally killed of the last forum for Diablo I.
    I can tell you exactly what Blizzard could have done to make that forum more constructive and friendly. They could have actually dropped in once in a while to moderate it.

    There was a group of a dozen or so forum regulars who had been there essentially since forever. These people were a very close-knit group, and esentially saw the forum as their own.
    Anyone new who dropped in and said, well, really anything was immediately treated to a spiel about how the regulars expected them to behave (over and above the actual rules of the forum), and woe betide aynone who said anything which the regs disapproved of, or told them what they though of 'extra' rules.
    Anyone who dared to argue with them, or the accepted wisdom of the forum, or tell them that they were wrong would bring the whole wrath of the pack down on themselves. They would then usually be accused of being 'defensive'.
    In short, the forum regulars were self-appointed moderators, who used a general barrage of unpleasantness to drive out anyone who they disapproved of. Most newcomers quickly realised that it wasn't worth hanging around and were never heard from again. Personally I hung around just to prove that I wasn't going to be beaten by them.

    Now, the point of my telling that story is this. That could have been snuffed out YEARS before the forum was finally killed if a few Blizzard people had occassionally dropped in and swiftly dealt with the people who were under the false impression that it was their forum. A user with a blue username saying "This is our forum, not yours. You do not own, run or moderate it; please stop acting like you do" sufficiently early on might have stopped it entirely and prevented these people from getting too big for their boots.

    --
    FGD 135
  45. Long Story short... by thatbloke83 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Blizzard just lost my subscription. I WAS going to re-activate my WoW account and purchase Cataclysm when it came out. Unless these changes are reversed, I'm not going to do that. I do NOT want my real name associated and easily searchable by my in-game actions. I might as well name all my in-game characters as my real name and be done with it, because that is what will happen anyway.

  46. Re:Finally! by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

    A way to differentiate between the real girls and the guys playing female characters

          Yes I am sure Leslie, Alex and Sam will turn out to be just what you dreamed of...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.