Slashdot Mirror


Recomputing the Sky

An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft has unveiled the largest and clearest image of the night sky ever assembled. This so-called 'TeraPixel' sky map was generated with the help of some of Microsoft's latest HPC and parallel software assets. Quoting: 'Compared to the old sky image, the TeraPixel version is much more refined. With all the artifacts, seams and inconsistencies processed away, it looks like a true unified image of the sky above. It's like going from Super Mario Brothers on 1985-era Nintendo consoles to Halo 2 on Xbox 360s.'" You can view the image at Microsoft's WorldWide Telescope site — it requires the Silverlight plugin for Windows or Mac. No word at the site about Linux or whether Moonlight works there.

205 comments

  1. Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's like going from Super Mario Brothers on 1985-era Nintendo consoles to Halo 2 on Xbox 360s

    Oh, I see what you did there. Here, let me try:

    It's like going from gaming on Windows 1.0 in 1985 to 1985-era Nintendo consoles

    Or what about

    It's like going from a red ring of death on an XBox console to Gran Turismo 3 on a Playstation 2

    Oh and I also enjoy that you used your Space Act Agreement with NASA to "make planetary images and data available via the Internet to the public" and also promote the download and installation of silvercrap. Can't do something for the public without advertising and pushing proprietary software on people, can we? I hope Google gets the chance to do this with HTML5.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Golly, I'm just glad to have it in terms I can understand!

    2. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by silverpig · · Score: 1

      Glad I'm not the only one who noticed this :)

    3. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      Besides, it was Halo 3 on the 360. Halo 2 came out on the original X-Box. These guys don't even know their own products.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    4. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      You may wish to loosen your aluminum foil hat. Halo 2 came out for the original Xbox and multiplayer for on the 360 was recently turned off. If they mentioned Halo 3 or Halo: Reach (Coming Fall 2010, reserve your copy now!), you might have something there.

    5. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Besides, I'd rather play Super Mario Brothers (even on 1985 era equipment) than Halo 2 any day.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by Tom9729 · · Score: 1

      It's not much of an ad considering Halo 2 is an older original Xbox game that you can pickup used for ~10 USD.

      Also: http://www.google.com/sky/

    7. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backwards compatibility means you can play HALO 2 on an XBOX 360!

    8. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't do something for the public without advertising and pushing proprietary software on people, can we? I hope Google gets the chance to do this with HTML5.

      Can't make a comment on Slashdot without pushing Google and free software on people, can we?

    9. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is not written by Microsoft.

    10. Re:Even Baking Ads Into Their Analogies by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Product placement - It's not just for TV or the movies.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  2. Getting ready for the MS bash by capnchicken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So this looks like a really cool thing that MS did, so I'm going to wait in wide eyed anticipation at how the slashdot community is going to trash it because it's from Microsoft and not Google (or at least be more overly critical of it). I do hope I'm wrong though.

    --
    A libertarian shat on my carpet once. Claimed the free market would sort it out. -Ford Prefect(8777)
    1. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by pmontra · · Score: 4, Informative

      They should have done it with JavaScript and JPEGs instead of using Silverlight, which doesn't work on my Linux.

      Good enough as first bashing? .-)

    2. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is a cool thing, yes. It is, however, NOT cool that it requires Silverlight to view. There's no reason it should require that.

    3. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      While the concept is cool, and I don't care who did it, you really have to try to make a website look that bad in firefox.

    4. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by capnchicken · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, that'll work, though I'm sure Miguel is probably working on fixing that right now. ;)

      --
      A libertarian shat on my carpet once. Claimed the free market would sort it out. -Ford Prefect(8777)
    5. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by pinkushun · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I hope you're wrong too :-)

      Oh wait... the source material from the SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) runs the hardware with the help of... drum roll... Linux (ref page 24)

      BAM!

    6. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by gauharjk · · Score: 1

      I agree this is really awesome. Microsoft has done some revolutionary things in the past, like giving away the TCP/IP stack Internet Explorer 4.0 for free when these products were very expensive and would have hampered the growth of Internet. I have silverlight installed, but it it really worth an extra addon? I hope HTML 5 becomes a web standard soon so that people don't have to depend on these innumerable addons and the web becomes truely platform neutral.

    7. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Playing devil's advocate -- it's pretty trivial to make a Silverlight interface to pan and zoom around a giant image like this. It's less trivial to do the same thing with, say, JavaScript or Flash.

      This is one of the handful of things that Silverlight does really well.

      Because of that, I wouldn't be surprised if this project was less a "We've got this cool thing, what Microsoft technology can we push with it?" and more "What's a thing we could do that would really show off a strength of Silverlight?"

    8. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Wow you're not kidding. Mere incompetence really can't explain away that degree of fuckupedness.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    9. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Playing devil's advocate -- it's pretty trivial to make a Silverlight interface to pan and zoom around a giant image like this. It's less trivial to do the same thing with, say, JavaScript or Flash.

      Only until someone writes a Javascript library that does it. Then it becomes trivially easy to do it in Javascript.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I see already the bashing because they don't support competitor platforms. I guess that's fair enough, but - can I get Google's Sky Maps on my non-Android phone (Symbian)? Or where are the calls to run on Linux phones there, such as Maemo? Everytime we get a "For the Iphone" app, do we get versions for other platforms (even when they're not written by Apple)?

      And at least MS can say they're writing something that's supported by 90+% of the market, which obviously doesn't apply for Iphones or Android, and they're not even the biggest (Symbian is).

    11. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know where Microsoft got that TCP/IP stack from, right?

    12. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by c0lo · · Score: 1

      So this looks like a really cool thing that MS did, so I'm going to wait in wide eyed anticipation at how the slashdot community is going to trash it because it's from Microsoft and not Google (or at least be more overly critical of it). I do hope I'm wrong though.

      Hope, huh? Niiice, juuuiiiicy!
      Speaking of my hopes, I had hoped for years to see a better OS from MS, and more fair play towards FOSS (and I must admit that MS mimicked them quite swell lately). The coolness of the sky (seen in silverlight) doesn't bring me any benefits, thus the efficiency of this coolness... well... is sooo cool is that's close to 0K. (how's that for a trashing :) ).

      To be fair: I'm equally happy I'm living in a "year of Linux on desktop" for quite a some years - looks like a "perpetual year" now.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    13. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by tibman · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't harp on Android or iPhone when silverlight cannot be run on any existing Windows Mobile phones. As far as i can tell, only one phone (S60) can run silverlight and it's made by Nokia.

      List of phones/browsers/os support: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silverlight#Operating_systems_and_web_browsers

      Most applications cannot run cross-OS, but the web is supposed to be os neutral. In many cases a program can be made to work with multiple OSs but there's no way a program can run on everything. The web isn't supposed to be that way. Each browser is supposed to use the same standards so that everyone sees the same stuff reguardless of OS/browser used. I guess i'm trying to say that android apps aren't listed on the iphone store.. because that would be stupid. But websites can be accessed by all browsers.. there isn't a windows-only internet that runs parallel to the other-OSs internet.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    14. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the flamebait mod. I actually thought this was quite funny. My computer sucks. Posting to undo the mod...

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    15. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by hedwards · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Um, they didn't give the TCP/IP stack away, they borrowed it from BSD. In other words, they gave away something that they had been given and which other people could've easily gotten from the original source. I'm not really sure why MS should get any sort of credit for that.

    16. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I agree this is really awesome. Microsoft has done some revolutionary things in the past, like giving away the TCP/IP stack Internet Explorer 4.0 for free

      If "giving away" a TCP/IP stack is your idea of revolutionary, I'd like to point out that (A) TCP/IP stacks have an integral part of every workstation-class operation system since the early 1980s and (B) you're not giving Microsoft enough credit (at least sufficiently early credit), since TCP/IP for Windows for Workgroups (3.11) came out in mid-1994, coinciding with Win NT 3.5 (which also had a native TCP/IP stack).

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    17. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there is plenty of FOSS on codeplex I actively use to develop on their platform, and before you say that they don't allow GPL v3 ... well here:

      http://restarts.codeplex.com/

      I think they have been playing nicer with FOSS in recent years and they have been producing better OSs, but as usual YMMV.

      To be fair: their motives are certainly not altruistic.

    18. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Playing devil's advocate -- it's pretty trivial to make a Silverlight interface to pan and zoom around a giant image like this. It's less trivial to do the same thing with, say, JavaScript or Flash.

      (looks down at arrow, ctrl, +, and - keys)
      Uhh... you need extra software to do what now?

    19. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Replying to undo my original Troll mod, because I feel that that may have been a bit harsh.

      * Internet Explorer is a browser, not a TCP/IP stack.
      * There were several stacks before, but Winsock was the first common stack for windows. It predates IE4 by two years, and is not the work of Microsoft.
      * MS should have implemented proper networking from the get-go, and arguably already in their DOS offerings, instead of peddling their proprietary crap on top of what they always, and short-sightedly, looked at as just a standalone system

      * Lastly, and arguably, "hampering the growth of the internet" by keeping MS users off it might have saved the rest of us quite a few headaches.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    20. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't they release the Feynman Lectures a while back to get people to install it? Very cool also, but a thinly veiled attempt to get people to install Silverlight.

    21. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Its been several years since Google Maps made an appearance with that functionality, and still I have yet to see a decent third party library that can do it for my own projects.

    22. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Pretty weak to be honest.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    23. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Meaning that they have already got a library for this build in? Or is it something that you can only do because Silverlight has [please insert silverlight exclusive technology here]?

    24. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      Since you are not yet marked as troll, and play is still suspended at The Open, I'll waste a few characters on your post.

      Microsoft has done some revolutionary things in the past, like giving away the TCP/IP stack Internet Explorer 4.0 for free when these products were very expensive and would have hampered the growth of Internet

      MSIEv3 was such a gigantic piece of refuse that Netscape dominated the market and all were quite happy with that. MSIEv4 was sufficiently acceptable and insidiously integrated/promoted as to gradually build marketshare. Microsoft had no option but to give MSIEv4 away if they wanted to have a measurable presence in user land.

      The idea that MSIE (any version) is somehow some great gift to mankind is vomit-inducing. Real reasons are offered here.

      Have we already forgotten the anti-trust lawsuit over this very issue? Gates the extinguisher has become Gates the Rockefeller? Sickening.

      --
      I come here for the love
    25. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google it: Open Layers.

      One big image, 5 minutes cutting it up and resizing it with a script, and a few more minutes implementing it. A couple hours, max, with proper storage and such.

      Trivial or not, this sort of thing HAS been done in JavaScript and there ARE libraries. This seems like a fancy and unnecessary tech demo at best and further Silverlight lockin at worst.

    26. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      I'm very happy that they've helped make something like a better image of the sky available. What I don't like is Microsoft's habit of taking something like that and packaging it up in bullshit proprietary formats that you can only access if you abuse their shit software. Yeah, I think I got that right. I don't like Microsoft's software, I don't like their business tactics, and I don't like their insistence that everyone use their software. I'll use their software when I think it's right for the job. Right now, I'm running XP in a VMWare Player session hosted on my Ubuntu-loaded laptop to perform my medical transcription job since I can't trust Windows to be secure. So, no, I don't care that Microsoft took this project, one that would obviously benefit the public good, and tied it up in proprietary bullshit. Everyone can view TIFF images, and GTK is portable across platforms. Is there a problem with this open arrangement? I can only imagine the pricetag that will end up associated with it.

    27. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      To deliver 800 GB worth of stitched-together composite images to users in a fashion that doesn’t result in them dying of old age before they can identify and zoom in on a portion worth seeing up-close?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    28. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Meaning that they have already got a library for this build in?

      Essentially, yeah -- this kind of zooming is a built-in function of Silverlight. They call it Deep Zoom and here's a bit of an article about it with some code/markup examples linked if you're curious.

      Here's another interesting example of the concept in action -- obviously you'd need Silverlight or Moonlight to view it.

      None of this is anything you couldn't do with another technology -- it's just that Silverlight makes it fast/easy to throw together as a developer. I've never had a project that would make a particularly good use of this feature (or Silverlight at all, actually), but a giant map of the sky is pretty much the perfect case for it.

    29. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      You at least give a viable reason for disliking Silverlight. Most of the commenters just seem to hate it because it's Silverlight. Why they don't make a Linux version of it is beyond me, they really ought to.

      Now to play devil's advocate: I don't see why Silverlight garners so much more hate than Flash around here. Both are pushed using the same tactics and neither is really open. Flash has just been around longer.

    30. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      Playing devil's advocate -- it's pretty trivial to make a Silverlight interface to pan and zoom around a giant image like this. It's less trivial to do the same thing with, say, JavaScript or Flash.

      I'm just not sure it's true. ImageScope provides a workable flash interface to allow you to view 10,000 MPixel images just fine. It's not all that hard whatever you're writing it in. Pyramid tiled images make writing a front end pretty easy to be honest. I think the good work they've done is the image processing at the back end to get this data into nice shape in the first place.

      --

      jh

    31. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I have to say, I dislike them both equally. Flash because it has been around too long. Silverlight because it is really just flash again when the entire idea should have been replaced.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    32. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1
      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    33. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Statement of fact is not necessarily bashing. There is a difference between legitimate criticism and bashing. So no, that's not nearly good enough.

    34. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      From “arrow, ctrl, +, and - keys”, I get the impression he thinks you just give them a massive JPEG and let their browser handle the panning and zooming rather than using “extra software” such as a Javascript app or a Silverlight or Flash object.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    35. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by idontgno · · Score: 1

      The fundamental problem is this: users are still stupid, so we can't get past The September that Never Ended.. If we can do that, we can get past the "always Winter and never Christmas" phase, and geeks can cry out "Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of [Helsinki]!"

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    36. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by xlotlu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Playing devil's advocate -- it's pretty trivial to make a Silverlight interface to pan and zoom around a giant image like this. It's less trivial to do the same thing with, say, JavaScript or Flash.

      Actually you're trolling more than playing devil's advocate. There's a sh*tload of zoom & pan-enabled image viewing libraries, both in JS and Flash, all using tiles just like Silverlight -- try to google some.

      And for that matter it's trivial to DIY from scratch using canvas, which of course IE conveniently doesn't support, but that problem was solved too long ago. OpenLayers, which you might have seen at work at OpenStreetMap, includes a VML rendering backend, besides canvas and SVG.

      The really funny part about your "advocating" is that MS has an Ajax library that does exactly the same thing as its Silverlight counterpart: http://www.seadragon.com/developer/ajax/

    37. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Locutus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that Silverlight is probably _why_ they did it in the first place. Flash and standardized HTML5 are threats to Windows and without Windows Microsoft is history so Silverlight is the hammer, the night sky is but one nail. Is there an iPhone or Android app for that? I didn't think so but you can bet that when they ship the next new Microsoft phone software, they'll release one for it.

      20 years of watching these people operate points me to these kinds of conclusions.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    38. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with OpenLayers. I don't think it's as trivial to get running (and certainly won't look as smooth, if for some reason you care -- I don't, but maybe for a marketing campaign or something it could be seen as important) as the equivalent in SilverLight.

      YMMV.

      Frankly, there are about a million things a JavaScript-based solution will do better than SilverLight. You don't have to get your panties in a twist about the small, small number of things it currently does better.

    39. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if MS is involved and so is Linux then MS should be discredited just because?

      The fanboism is really getting old. It seems so odd to me that in a community that chants "Diversity drives innovation" there is so much close minded trolls who wave the banner. I guess it's too much to ask that you open your mind a bit about the technology and not be such a lemming to the politics behind it.

      Oh well, your loss.

    40. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And for that matter it's trivial to DIY from scratch using canvas, which of course IE conveniently doesn't support, but that problem was solved too long ago. OpenLayers, which you might have seen at work at OpenStreetMap, includes a VML rendering backend, besides canvas and SVG.

      How fast is it, though? Flash and Silverlight are hardware-accelerated for most users out there. Canvas is outright unsupported for most, and even for supported browsers, is not accelerated for most (i.e. Firefox).

    41. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Flash and standardized HTML5 are threats to Windows

      Windows has actually included Flash player (albeit an old version it) for a long time now. It also still works best on Windows in terms of performance. Why is it a threat?

      As for HTML5, how do you explain the drive to support it in IE9, then?

    42. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      Its been several years since Google Maps made an appearance with that functionality, and still I have yet to see a decent third party library that can do it for my own projects.

      In .se there are at least *two* competing yellow pages/map services (kartor.eniro.se, hitta.se) who pull it off, and are at least as stable than Google Maps. They've been around for many years. My guess is it's fairly well-understood technology by now, even if there are no third-party libraries (which Microsoft would never use anyway).

    43. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I can't see it because the ass hats made it proprietary, so take your big fat steaming pile of good will and go wallow in it. They gave me nothing, NOTHING! So don't gripe about me mentioning that they gave me nothing, because they GAVE ME NOTHING! They didn't do me any favors. What they gave me was a big giant glass of warm pee. You don't mind if I just grab it from the sides of the (dry) glass, and return it to them (and you) in the form of a splash do you? Well here it is anyway!

    44. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ESR, is that you?

      I can see you waking up every morning going:
      "Arg! Microsoft pissed in my cheerios AGAIN!!"

    45. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      No, you're not wrong. To put something like this on the internet, only accessible through the god-awful Silverlight, is kind of a slap in the face.

      We have HTML5 now, we don't need fuckin' Silverlight.

    46. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      The web is supposed to be open, but I don't see Silverlight any different or worse than things like Java, Flash, Quicktime.

      only one phone (S60) can run silverlight and it's made by Nokia.

      I don't know if you mean they only have one phone out supporting it yet - but S60 is a platform, not a single phone, and it's the biggest mobile OS. From your link: "Nokia has announced plans to make Silverlight for Mobile available for S60 on Symbian OS, as well as for Series 40 devices and Nokia Internet tablets."; S40 and S60 together would be about 40% of the entire phone market (with Android and the Iphones only being a few per cent in comparison).

      Yes, I take your point that the web was meant to be open, whilst applications weren't, but it hasn't turned out that way. There are many web-based things that make them only available on some platforms; and on phones, it used to be the case that there was a cross-platform standard for apps (J2ME) (until the Iphone came along and started fragmenting the market, because they can't even support J2ME).

    47. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by gauharjk · · Score: 1

      You really hate everything Microsoft, don't you? They are just like any other corporation, super aggressive and ruthless. Their OS monopoly helped businesses by standardizing operating platforms. Imagine a world with hundreds of different OSes and file-systems and incompatible hardware to deal with. Microsoft is not perfect, but has certainly made valuable contributions to the Computer Industry.

    48. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discrediting Microsoft isn't the mainline, but that Microsoft loves to benefit from other people's work, made open, while their own work is closed off.

      Few things grind us believers of Free more, than trying to open our minds to a company who tries its best to close it for us.

      Full disclosure: posting from a MS PC; I'm an open and honest hypocrite.

    49. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by Locutus · · Score: 1

      Windows does _not_ include Flash, OEM vendors have deals with Adobe to load it on Windows preloaded computers. _That_ is why it is a threat, it has almost 100% Windows distribution, it is a development API Microsoft does not control, and Adobe supports it on nearly all platforms. Threat, threat, and threat. dah

      on HTML5 and IE9, Microsoft will do what they've always done, tweak their implementation one way or another so it's still somehow tied to Windows or their controlled technology via codecs, or whatever.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    50. Re:Getting ready for the MS bash by xlotlu · · Score: 1

      All I can say is a subjective "smooth enough". And it's been actually supported for quite a while by all major browsers except IE. And IE9 will come with hardware-accelerated canvas (it was covered on /. not long ago), and Firefox has it partially working in trunk.

  3. Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by Svenne · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nope. Doesn't work.

    --

    Slagborr
    1. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, I haven't got Linux installed on my netbook yet, but even so I still won't be able to use it; I'm not installing Silverlight, Moonlight, or anything except maybe Bud Light.

    2. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horrible slowdown and no sky visible. Good job team Microsoft!

    3. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't appear to be compatible with silverlight version 4.0.50524.0 either, I get "This page requires Silverlight 3." So apparently I need to downgrade to view it.

    4. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by vegiVamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You keep well away of all the other inferior products, and then you go for american 'beer' ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    5. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You need to put quotes around "american" as well as "beer"; AB is now owned by Europeans (and see another poster's comment).

      Actually, my favorite beer is Killian's, my favorite American beer is Sam Adams. Sadly, in most bars here you're stuck with AB and Miller products, and in the rest of them you pay twice as much for imports as you do for "domestics", and more for "american" beers as you do in the dives I drink at, which have a more interesting clientelle anyway.

    6. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      There is no bad beer. :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by AltairDusk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bud Light, the very worst example of American beer, the very worst in the world ever

      Clearly you've never had the displeasure of drinking Natty Ice (Natural Light Ice) or Beast Ice (Milwaukee's Best Ice). Actually Beast in general is just awful but both of those will make Bud Light seem like beer of the gods.

    8. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take Bud Light over Silverlight any day. That aside, this seems like a typical Microsoft way to poison the water with their "we also do that" copycat brand of swill that they pass off as software.

    9. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Clearly you've never had to drink Bud Light.

    10. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Clearly you are too picky!

      Bud light might be watery, but I'm not exactly offended by the taste of water. Even Coors or Michelob Ultra is drinkable, albeit worthless and not really worth the time.

      Then again, there are some leftover bottles of Miller Light in my fridge from a party... and they are not exactly disappearing quickly. Last night I almost reached for one, but had a root beer instead :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Cheap humour at the expense of integrity: that's my specialty.

      I really just don't understand Bud Light. The guys from work often go to a bar that has 60 beers on tap, but the locals always drink Bud Light. How is it that popular? I'm also confused that no-one considers it effeminate to drink light beer.

    12. Re:Moonlight 3.0.40818.0 on Linux here by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm Belgian, where Stella Artois^W^WInterbrew^WInbev^WAnheuser-Busch InBev originated.

      From where we're standing, they're mostly a brazillian company by now, and the quality of their beers has steadily worsened, McDonalds-style.

      At some time, they tried to move production of Hoegaarden, our most famous (though not best) white beer to another brewery in Jupille, totally disregarding how local ingredients make up the character of your beer. The attempt miserably failed, of course, with roughly half of the batches they brewed being simply undrinkable, while the rest was way below par as well; and this lead to a shortage of the beer in shops for months on end. In the end they had no choice but to return to the original site.

      The people in charge have absolutely no clue about what it takes to make a beer, or what factors influence the brew. Bad though Bud may already be, expect it to get worse in the coming years.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  4. Seems... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

    With all the artifacts, seams and inconsistencies processed away

    It seems the seams are gone. Excellent! I'll have to see how this compares to Google Sky. I'll bet I'll still prefer NASA's closeups from their Picture of the Day Gallery, though.

    1. Re:Seems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all the artifacts, seams and inconsistencies processed away

      So is that a mothership at RA: 06h39m27s, Dec: -13:23:13? Certainly looks like a (very big) artifact to me.

    2. Re:Seems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really hate to say this.

      The Microsoft WWT product is superior to Google Sky in quite a large number of ways. Like it's handling of the north celestial pole.

      I've had chats with the lead developers of both products at the last two ADASS meetings. The WWT is far more serious. Google Sky seems largely an afterthought, inappropriately leveraging longtime-buggy Google Earth code. This is the unfortunate downside of open source. Without strong management and resources, a product can languish.

      Now, it's shameful that Microsoft would lock out Linux, but it's not surprising.

      On the lighter side, the WWT demonstration at last years' ADASS was absolutely hilarious. Over four days of presentations, almost all done on Macs and linux laptops, there was exactly one blue-screen. The audience was merciless.

    3. Re:Seems... by ShounenSuki · · Score: 1

      Part of that... whatever it is can also be seen on Google Sky.

    4. Re:Seems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no astronomer, but I think that's a reflection/image of the mirror supports. Same reason (and direction) as the cross star pattern. Interesting that it's also on Google Sky. I guess it's just different processing of the same data.

  5. Beware... by openfrog · · Score: 1, Troll

    'Compared to the old sky image, the TeraPixel version is much more refined.

    This makes one remind of an old practice of theirs: Embrace, Extend and Extinguish...

    Scary!

    Is the project set to be completed in 2012, by any chance?

    1. Re:Beware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, they can't take the sky from you.

    2. Re:Beware... by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's FOX's job.

    3. Re:Beware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Agent Smith says is true.

    4. Re:Beware... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Is the project set to be completed in 2012, by any chance?

      Coincidentally, that's my retiremnt date. I hope I'm not a replicant, and if I am, I hope I never meet Harrison Ford!

    5. Re:Beware... by iPhr0stByt3 · · Score: 1

      Woot - FireFly reference

    6. Re:Beware... by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Like that ever stopped them from trying.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    7. Re:Beware... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      You're probably not living anywhere near a large city, are you? I mean, the night sky is probably there somewhere near those very faint dots I can see when there are no clouds.

    8. Re:Beware... by Locutus · · Score: 1

      watch them try though.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  6. From Nintendo to MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's like going from Super Mario Brothers on 1985-era Nintendo consoles to Halo 2 on Xbox 360s
     
    Classy, they just had to get that one in there. Of course Halo 2 isn't seamless on the 360, you can't use its online features and it doesn't work in wide screen format.

  7. Where's the JPEG? BMP? PNG? ANYTHING? by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are there normal image files we can download? I'm not installing Silverlight just to see pictures...

    1. Re:Where's the JPEG? BMP? PNG? ANYTHING? by butterflysrage · · Score: 0

      Astronomy pic of the day: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    2. Re:Where's the JPEG? BMP? PNG? ANYTHING? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I believe he meant normal image files of this “TeraPixel sky map”, not just any picture of the sky in general.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:Where's the JPEG? BMP? PNG? ANYTHING? by butterflysrage · · Score: 0

      I looked at it, most of the pics are of a similar quality to APOTD. Just splice in a large amount of black space between them and the occasional white pixel and you basically have what MS put out.

      If you want to look at cool stuff, look at APOTD, if you want to look at cool stuff surrounded by black void, look at the MS thing.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  8. I can view the image? by benwiggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can view the image at Microsoft's WorldWide Telescope site — it requires the Silverlight plugin for Windows or Mac.

    These two statements appear to contradict each other.

    If it requires Silverlight, then I can't view it, because I don't want that cock on my computer.

    1. Re:I can view the image? by HBI · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Same here. Not installing that garbage.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    2. Re:I can view the image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. I switched to Mac OS X to stop using Microsoft products. Free or not, I'm not installing SilverLight.

    3. Re:I can view the image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really stuck it to the man!

      I installed silverlight, enjoyed what they had to offer for free and then uninstalled it.

      Have fun with your zealotry.

    4. Re:I can view the image? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The problem is, if you're running Windows, uninstalling something sometimes doesn't completely uninstall it (unlike Linux, on which Silverlight won't run but when you uninstall something it's gone; I don't know about Mac but I would guess that they're not like MS, nobody is). And I'm not going to run Ghost just to use Silverlight, which AFAIK isn't used by anyone but MS. Hell, Flash is bad enough, I don't need two of them.

  9. So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    every other day, news from microsoft. none of them relate to o/ses. so what ? ms has dropped its core business ?

  10. If mixing metaphors were illegal... by Minwee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's like going from Super Mario Brothers on 1985-era Nintendo consoles to Halo 2 on Xbox 360s

    You mean the sky it gets a whole lot easier, starts holding your hard and tells you which stars to look at?

    Or can we now look at the old night sky on our mobile phones using emulators, now that the new night sky is filled with nerd-raging teenaged frat boys?

    1. Re:If mixing metaphors were illegal... by tuffy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps it means the new sky can be enjoyed only until Microsoft decides to pull the plug on its servers.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:If mixing metaphors were illegal... by leuk_he · · Score: 2, Funny

      No it means you can no longer collect stars. That is a security vulnaribility that was solved in HALO.

    3. Re:If mixing metaphors were illegal... by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      Damnit! I just wasted my last mod-point! That is not only funny but a bit insightful!

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    4. Re:If mixing metaphors were illegal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halo 2 on the 360? Oh, they must mean that it's an upscaled and fuzzy image with occasional graphical glitches.

    5. Re:If mixing metaphors were illegal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      starts holding your hard

      I am a little apprehensive about asking, but holding your hard what?

  11. Do Want Image. Do Not Want Website. by Maarx · · Score: 1

    Alright, I'll ask what everyone is thinking:

    1. How big would it be as one giant image file?
    2. Where can I download the .TORRENT for it?
    3. How do I configure my Windows 7 desktop to randomly pan the image?
  12. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's now clear where M$ is headed to

    Yes, trolling slashdot nerds to install silverlight to view the image out of uncontrollable curiousity.

    Someone at M$ is now chuckling while you sell your soul clicking "install silverlight plugin": trolled hard.

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  13. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Not a chance in hell...

    *sigh*

    Guess I’ll just have to be satisfied with the images from TFA:

    Image before/after integrating images from mosaic
    Screenshot viewing horsehead nebula

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  14. It's interesting where a lot of the time went by idontgno · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to TFA, one of the major bottlenecks was just copying files:

    Just transferring the final 1,025 files (802 GB total) off the cluster took 2.5 hours using a 1 Gbps link.

    They must have been using Vista Explorer pre SP-1 to do the file copy.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    1. Re:It's interesting where a lot of the time went by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They must have been using Vista Explorer pre SP-1 to do the file copy.

      Hmm? Transferring 802 GB over a 1 Gbps link is going to take 1.78 hours as a bare minimum and assuming you lose some time on the overhead and don’t necessarily have 100% of the network’s bandwidth available to you the whole time, 2.5 hours doesn’t seem terribly long.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:It's interesting where a lot of the time went by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I guess slashdot ate the <joke> tags there. It might have helped

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:It's interesting where a lot of the time went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    4. Re:It's interesting where a lot of the time went by owlstead · · Score: 1

      That's the bare minimum if you are using 1 GB = 8,000,000,000 bits. Which is unlikely since they are probably using Explorer to do the file size calculations as well.

      So basically, that would be approx. 1.91 hours or 1 hour 54 minutes as a bare minimum. Normally, however, you can safely divide by 10 to get the maximum speed in MB instead of bits at the ethernet level (I'm assuming similar efficiency for 1 Gbit/s as for 100 Mbit/s here).

      So that would mean 802 GiB would take 2 hours and 23 minutes. So they've achieved about 7 minutes overhead. Sounds about right for a well performing network.

    5. Re:It's interesting where a lot of the time went by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That's the bare minimum if you are using 1 GB = 8,000,000,000 bits.

      Actually I was using 1 gigabyte = 8 gigabits. Then divide by 1 Gbps to get seconds, then by 3,600 to get hours.

      So yeah, I had forgotten that 1 Gbps = 1,000,000,000 bits per second but 1 GB = 1,073,741,824 bits.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    6. Re:It's interesting where a lot of the time went by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it, it's nice to see people make the case for the GiB notation unknowingly :)

  15. BSOD by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

    Blue Sky of Death

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:BSOD by md65536 · · Score: 1

      Mommy, why is the sky flashing red?

      Back before you were born, dear, the sky worked reliably. Like Super Mario Brothers on 1985-era Nintendo consoles.

  16. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Help me understand how installing a free broswer plugin distributed by Microsoft, in order to view a single image on a web site, constitutes selling my soul.

    --
    "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
  17. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My initial reaction to seeing mention of silverlight was "well damn..." If I were running Windows, I still would not install silverlight. So now I am here seeking to find if anyone has ripped the data accessible through silverlight and converted it or made it available in some other way.

  18. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Exactly, its so boring, been done, throwing cpu time at a project just feels very dull propaganda.
    "look we have big boxes now and they are powerful ..."
    Thinking back to the Simpsons AABF02
    No, no. To attract the top grads, we'll need to host a computing stunt. A picture that showcases our cutting- edge technology.
    A "sky map", sir?
    [gasps] Yes, brilliant! That's just the kind of far-out gimmick we need.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  19. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by TheLink · · Score: 1

    They want you to install Silverlight to view it.

    --
  20. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because Microsoft insists on re-inventing the wheel so that they can force people to use Microsoft(TM) wheels.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  21. Halo 2 on Xbox 360? by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry to be the dick-ish correctionist, but isn't the proper analogy, at least Halo 3 on 360? Halo 2 was an Xbox 1 game from 2004.

    And yes, Grizzly Adams did have a beard.

  22. Reversi by tepples · · Score: 1

    GP said "gaming on Windows 1.0" and what games were those?

    Reversi. Even Solitaire wasn't around until Windows 3.

  23. first company to..... by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    They will be the first company to throw a chair at the moon.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  24. Cool, but still some artifacts. by Hozza · · Score: 1

    Well, the image is really cool, I'll give it that.

    The "Quotes" from TFS are all from the author of TFA. If you want to see what the real description of the work, best look here http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/terapixel/default.aspx

    There's still some artifacts left though, have a look near (seriously overexposed) Sirius for a ghost of the telescope pupil (the thing that looks like an alien solar sail) (Constellations -> Canis Major)

  25. Any cross ports? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Would a kind soul with silverlight installed view it, make screen captures in jpg and upload it for everyone to see?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  26. Google Maps by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it's pretty trivial to make a Silverlight interface to pan and zoom around a giant image like this.

    Yet Google managed to pull off Google Maps in JavaScript.

    1. Re:Google Maps by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      With the resources of Google. Pretend your the engineer tasked with making this. "Hey, boss, we can spend 3x the time writing in in Javascript so its compatible with all browsers or use our inhouse Silverlight tech to get it done faster. What should we do?"

      Of course, they didn't have this conversation. It went: "build this in silverlight and let me know when its done."

    2. Re:Google Maps by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Except, now that the idea of doing it in Javascipt is out, anyone can figure it out. The math's simple. The database is easy to set up. Any undergrad CS major should be able to cobblestone it together as a project within a week or two.

      Now setting it up to make sure it can handle a /. DDOS may be another matter...

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    3. Re:Google Maps by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yet Google managed to pull off Google Maps in JavaScript.

      "Managed" is the correct word here. Do a simple test:

      1. Go to Google Maps. Zoom in and out and pan around; observe the smoothness (or lack thereof) of transitions.

      2. Go to Silverlight-enabled version of Bing Maps (http://bing.com/maps/explore). Do the same thing.

      3. Compare the results & post them here in a follow-up.

      So far as I can see, the biggest deal there is the ability to scale images quickly, and that is due to hardware acceleration of graphics in Silverlight. You could probably get the same effect with accelerated canvas or SVG in a browser that supports it, but the majority still do not, so...

    4. Re:Google Maps by Atzanteol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google:
      There's some latency as the site fetches images and scales images. Overall works pretty well.

      Bing:
      The site asks me to download and install Silverlight.exe which doesn't work on my operating system.

      Perhaps I'm not as easily impressed as you?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    5. Re:Google Maps by tepples · · Score: 1

      Hey, boss, we can spend 3x the time writing in in Javascript so its compatible with all browsers or use our inhouse Silverlight tech to get it done faster. What should we do?

      Whatever doesn't involve turning away half your potential customers.

    6. Re:Google Maps by vbraga · · Score: 1

      Even if just like I'm not running Windows and Silverlight is an annoyance - I'd really wish to be able to see Project Tuva website without rebooting - your answer is, well, substandard.

      Deep Zoom is very well done and it would be very difficult to implement something similar in JavaScript. Would not be impossible, tough. Give credit where credit is due.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    7. Re:Google Maps by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1

      Whatever doesn't involve turning away half your potential customers.

      Linux desktop users are generally not "potential customers" of Microsoft, and are an extremely tiny market compared with Windows and Apple desktop users. This thing is actually available to about 97% of web surfers.

    8. Re:Google Maps by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's not available to web surfers who don't have either A. silverlight or B. membership in the Administrators group.

  27. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    If I need and OS, I run Linux.
    If I need a browser I run Chrome.
    If I need to see the sky, I open my eyes!

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  28. Re:Is a trap! by bytesex · · Score: 1

    Weren't they behind this whole 'reconstruct a 3D world from a lot of 2D pictures found on Google' a while ago as well ?

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  29. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

    It's not even distributed by MS. That's even worse than Flash.

  30. Why This Sucks by InsertCleverUsername · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please select your response from the following /.-approved categories (check all that apply):

    This project sucks because...
        [ ] Microsoft is evil
        [ ] They totally stole this idea from
        [ ] They've never done ANYTHING original or noteworthy
        [ ] EVERYTHING they do is about hurting consumers
        [ ] did this 100 times better 10 years ago
        [ ] Microsoft killed my family and made me watch

    --
    Ask me about my sig!
    1. Re:Why This Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [ ] The project itself sounds fine; the blatantly obnoxious part is how they couldn't resist using it as a weasellish backdoor excuse to (unnecessarily) force users to install their Silverlight runtime in order to see it.

      Hope that's approved. :-(

    2. Re:Why This Sucks by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Please select your response from the following /.-approved categories (check all that apply):

      [X] I don't want to install Silverlight
      [X] I'm using Linux, you insensitive clod!

      Would the Singularity please hurry the hell up?

      No. It's not going to happen, period.

    3. Re:Why This Sucks by md65536 · · Score: 1

      [ ] Microsoft killed my family and made me watch, but the video required Silverlight

  31. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

    every other day, news from microsoft. none of them relate to o/ses. so what ? ms has dropped its core business ?

    After the over saturation of articles back when Windows 7 came out, I am glad to have the opportunity to read about anything else.

  32. Silverlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, my aversion to Silverlight has so far only kept me away from a couple microsoft sites and some video site. I think it might have been something on MSNBC. Notice a pattern? Does anyone but Microsoft actually use Silverlight?

    1. Re:Silverlight by lintux · · Score: 1

      Several airlines use Silvershite on their routes page. :-(

  33. By extension... by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    Can we cover the outside of commercial airliners with cheap cameras, use computers to stitch the panoramas together, and then give passengers a zoomable, pannable picture of the sky and ground to look at?

    1. Re:By extension... by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      commercial airlines fly at 500mph, so a bunch of cameras interfering with aerodynamics is kind of a deal breaker.

      you might be interested in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_Observatory_for_Infrared_Astronomy

  34. and of course the by nimbius · · Score: 1

    only thing that comes to mind is discourse with clippy as he asks, "Its looks like you're rendering a terapixel image of the earths night sky. Would you like to use a template?"

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  35. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by somersault · · Score: 1

    Actually, I was about to click until I read the silverlight thing. I can wait. Or I could get my coworker to install it.. hmm.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  36. Re:Is a trap! by tibman · · Score: 1

    yeah, it's certainly not for use in science / research / serious stuff. It's possible that's the thing is so stupid big that there isn't a good way to view the data. But without access to the actual images, it's an "ooo neato" click-through type deal.

    Would be neat to map the image onto a room floorplan and print the image out on a plotter as wallpaper. Or somehow import the image into kstars?

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  37. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because Microsoft insists on re-inventing the wheel so that they can force people to use Microsoft(TM) wheels.

    You mean Microsoft(TM) Wheel(R) Series 7, which will go end of support next month, don't you?

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
  38. Transition by vilemike · · Score: 1

    It's like going from Super Mario Brothers on 1985-era Nintendo consoles to Halo 2 on Xbox 360s

    So it's worse?

    1. Re:Transition by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      No, it just means space isn't actually fun anymore, it's all serious and "realistic" now.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  39. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I need to see the sky, I open my eyes, diet for 2 years so I'm light enough to stand, have a bath to clean off the years of accumulated feces, sweat, filth and dead skin that have accumulated on my body, scrape the grime off the window of my mom's basement only to realise it's been boarded up, try to open the door only to realise it's locked, email the cops to get them to unlock my mom's basement, receive no response, manage to break down the door using improvised explosives fashioned out of dried feces and cleaning products, find out that sometime in the last decade my mom's house has been abducted by aliens and the being now feeding me through the laundry chute is actually a robotic maid, open the door and realise I'm flying through space, but the view is way more awesome than this M$ shit!

    FTFY

    --
    which is totally what she said
  40. Cognitive dissonance by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

    Oh crud. I hate Microsoft, but this is kinda cool.

    Wonder if it'll work under Wine?

    1. Re:Cognitive dissonance by idontgno · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm sorry, no amount of alcohol (of any type) will make Silverlight attractive enough. It goes waaaaay past beer goggles ugly.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Cognitive dissonance by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Not even Alcohol 120%?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  41. Wallpaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would make a pretty sweet wallpaper.

  42. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by iPhr0stByt3 · · Score: 1

    It's core business these past 5 years has been it's Office products. But the OS is still next in line.

  43. Re:Is a trap! by abigor · · Score: 1

    To be fair, Silverlight runs on OS X as well. Between that and Windows, that covers probably around 98% of the world's desktops, which isn't too bad.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Ah, sweet basement!!! by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    Anything that saves me from walking outside and looking up at the sky and being around nature is progress!

  47. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by godefroi · · Score: 1

    Yeah let's use Adobe(TM) wheels instead. They're much much better.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  48. This... is really cool. by Petersko · · Score: 1

    For real - that's pretty cool. No digs, no anti-MS stuff. I think it's great.

    In their hearts I think most anti-MS people on slashdot already acknowledge the fact that they've been out-eviled recently. The day of MS as the root of all IT nastiness has come and gone. They just need to say it out loud.

    1. Re:This... is really cool. by lintux · · Score: 1

      > In their hearts I think most anti-MS people on slashdot already acknowledge the fact that they've been out-eviled recently. The day of MS as the root of all IT nastiness has come and gone. They just need to say it out loud.

      What I (and many others in this thread as you probably saw) actually thought was "Wow, Microsoft is doing something that is actually cool, where's the catch?"

      My question was answered by the end of the article: This is just another miserable attempt to get the Silverlight market share percentage above 1%. Using a "making universe data publicly available, even. :-(

      Yup, still evil.

  49. Analogy permission revoked by Micahsa · · Score: 1

    Halo 2 was released for the original Xbox. Halo 3 was the first in the series released on the xbox 360.

    1. Re:Analogy permission revoked by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is a subtle reminder that the Xbox 360 can run Xbox games, unlike certain other consoles :)

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
  50. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, Apple also has pretty much forgotten about OS X and that they have a Mac Pro line -- which hasn't been updated in 15+ months. Pro users of desktop OSes must be an endangered species.

  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. Re:Is a trap! by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    This is why I love Wolfram Alpha:

    Assuming a 1200 DPI printer:

    Search: 1 trillion pixels / 1200 pixels per square inch

    Input interpretation:
    (1000000000000 pixels)/(1200 pixels/in^2 (pixels per inch squared))

    Result:
    8.333x10^8 in^2 (square inches)

    Unit conversions:
    537633 m^2 (square meters)

    Comparisons as area:
    ~~ 0.87 x total floor area of the Pentagon (~~ 620000 m^2 )

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  53. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds neat. But not neat enough to install Microsoft Flash, MeToo Edition.

  54. A good name - MS Sky .NET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft really should call it Microsoft Sky .NET.

    (You know you really want to.)

  55. Clear Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly with all the light pollution this is the closest most people in urban areas will ever get to seeing the night sky.

  56. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, trolling slashdot nerds to install silverlight to view the image out of uncontrollable curiousity.

    Someone at M$ is now chuckling while you sell your soul clicking "install silverlight plugin": trolled hard.

    It already worked on me when Microsoft put a series of Richard Feynman lectures online. Alas, Moonlight is too "advanced" to load the app. T_T

    And I'm not getting trolled all the way into installing a MS operating system!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  57. Requires Silverlight? Yeah you can shove that by StuartHankins · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Interesting until I saw it required Silverlight. Microsoft is getting really desperate trying to find a way to push Silverlight, so they throw a lot of money into research or science but bada-bing the requirement is you must use their software. It's not altruism when the planned result is sales of your product, it's an investment.

    I already have Flash and that's bad enough, thank you, I don't need two companies competing for who can screw me the hardest.

    1. Re:Requires Silverlight? Yeah you can shove that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, a company using their own product is a sure sign of desperation. I can only imagine what your responce would have been if they didn't use their own product.

      *cough*troll*cough*

    2. Re:Requires Silverlight? Yeah you can shove that by md65536 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a company using their own product is a sure sign of desperation.

      Yes, they used their own product, and they used Linux software too [citation needed]. Funny, they mention how they did it with the help of Microsoft assets, but they didn't mention the Linux stuff. This "story" contains ads for "microsoft HPC assets", for xbox 360 (it's so subtle you may have missed it), and for Silverlight.

      But it's not that they're tooting their own horn enough to make them blind, it's that they're using this to push a product that nobody wants.

      *cough*troll*cough*

      Do you have a case of cough due to trolled?

  58. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adobe wheels at least function properly on my Linux car

  59. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it is. Adobe(TM) wheels already work on my Linux(TM) trike, Windows(TM) trike, BSD(TM) trike and my Mac(TM) trike.
    And I don't want to change wheels just for the sake of changing wheels so I can use Microsoft(TM) wheels until they change the bolt pattern so I can only use them with a Windows(TM) trike or only buy Microsoft(TM) hubcaps.

  60. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have them, though. Why do I need two sets of wheels?

  61. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    every other day, news from microsoft. none of them relate to o/ses. so what ? ms has dropped its core business ?

    Win7 is still selling really well - how's that for news? But it's the boring kind of news that geeks aren't bothered about, so you don't hear much about it here.

    Oh, and did you miss the recent Win7 / Win2008 R2 SP1 beta?

    And it's just a tad too early for news on the next major release, given that it has only been a year since the last RTM. Give it some time to cook.

  62. Rolls For Sure (TM) by EXTomar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please make sure you only buy products labled "Rolls for Sure(TM)" to avoid compatibility issues. That way when we abandon "Rolls For Sure" after a year, you know without a doubt you will need to rebuy all of your previous wheels.

  63. Re:Is a trap! by tibman · · Score: 1

    haha, how ridiculous would that be. Every inch of wall and ceiling covered with a non-repeating wallpaper.

    I think our plotter does color at 600x600dpi but the result would still be an impossibly big print at full res. Not to mention the insane cost of HP ink required for something like that. 4 catridges are 1000$ easy.. did some napkin math and got ~153k$. A really nice printer would be worlds better.. but i guess some things just can't exist in hardcopy form. I'm sure the trees are happy about that.

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  64. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by unity100 · · Score: 1

    oh gee. 'win 7 is still selling well'. that is news. so, this is an innovation. also, sp1 beta, is another innovation ! its just great ! apparently ms havent forgotten its core business ...

  65. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what exactly do you expect? A major OS release every year?

    apparently ms havent forgotten its core business

    That's right, it's a business. The success of a business is defined by how much money it's making, not by how quickly you change your product...

  66. Celestia Works! by carn1fex · · Score: 1

    For people interested in this sort of thing you should check out Celestia! Yes, it is open source. http://www.shatters.net/celestia/

    --

    ---------

    No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

  67. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by unity100 · · Score: 1

    yeah and what they have done with their o/s up to this point has been successful. there are no problems or complaints at all.

  68. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there are plenty of tickets in the bug tracker (though I haven't seen it), but can you show me an OS for which there are no known issues? Need I link to a couple of favorite bugs on Launchpad (in some cases, surviving 3-4 major releases) to make a point?

    As a side note, the whole point of service packs is to address problems. But you were talking about innovation before, and insisted that it has nothing to do with that...

    So I repeat the question: what exactly do you expect from Microsoft with respect to Windows in this case?

  69. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by unity100 · · Score: 1

    oh gee. for a second, i thought the 'anything has issues' bullshit might not come my way. but, even you, have done it.

    i dont have the time to make a list of how disastrous microsoft oses have been compared to others in the past 5 years. all is in slashdot, and probably, you already know a lot of them. so spare me the effort.

  70. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    oh gee. for a second, i thought the 'anything has issues' bullshit might not come my way. but, even you, have done it.

    I can't do any better so long as you persist at claiming that something is wrong with Windows 7 without specifying what exactly it is, sorry. A reply to a vague accusation is inevitably going to be just as vague. I would be happy to discuss specific issues

    i dont have the time to make a list of how disastrous microsoft oses have been compared to others in the past 5 years. all is in slashdot, and probably, you already know a lot of them. so spare me the effort.

    See, the problem is that all that is on Slashdot in practice are a lot of posts like yours which basically boil down to "Windows sucks" without telling why. And almost every time I ask what exactly the person is unhappy about, they can't coherently explain it. Many actually run Linux or OS X, and have last seen Windows in 2K (or even 9x) days. Many parrot the same old claims about "flawed security model", but, again, when asked about what the flaws are, cannot explain, or tell things which are factually incorrect and trivially disprovable. In very few cases I've actually got meaningful and informative responses that specifically explain the issues - I can quite literally count such responses over 7 years I've been on Slashdot on my hands.

    About the only exception to this was the early (pre-SP) Vista period, where the OS was indeed seriously messed up. Though again most people have took the very real symptoms, and came up with some quite insane conspiracy theories to explain them (like the aforementioned DRM, or huge parts of OS rewritten in managed etc). In any case, this isn't 2007 anymore, so when we're talking about Windows, it's Win7 now, not Vista.

    So, please. If you want to continue a meaningful discussion over technical matters, please do so by being more explicit about what your issues with Windows are, and why do you believe it to be so inferior compared to competing products (don't forget to specify who those are, by the way - 'cause I've already seen some people bring up iPad there, for example!). If this is strictly about ethical issues of Microsoft corporate behavior and business model, I can definitely understand that, but then you should clearly say so.

  71. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by unity100 · · Score: 1

    let me see. lack of innovation ? facelift, bells and whistles instead of usability ? how about innovating in them, instead of a skymap ? you are aware that putting out an os which works as best as only your earlier os, without providing any noticeable functionality. oh, of course, other than complying with drm and whatnot support demands from private interests ....

  72. Re:So, o/s business is pretty much past tense now by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    let me see. lack of innovation ? facelift, bells and whistles instead of usability ?

    So Win7 was not more usable than Vista or XP, in your opinion?

    Also, where do you draw the line between "bells & whistles" and "usability" (because I suspect that's what your claim of "no usability improvements" is based on)?

  73. I'll be happy to oblige. by Kepesk · · Score: 1

    Astronomy! Now brought to you by needlessly proprietary corporate software. Get your Microsoft-branded asteroid today!

  74. Re:It's now clear where M$ is headed to! by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Because helping silverlight grow is a good way to help kill the web which makes you about as bad as someone who worked on the holocaust.