Slashdot Mirror


DARPA To Turn Humans Into Batteries

DARPA is working on a project that will convert energy from the human body to power a variety of military gadgets. From the article: "Obviously, our bodies generate heat — thermal energy. They also produce vibrations when we move — kinetic energy. Both forms of energy can be converted into electricity. Anantha Chandrakasan, an MIT electrical engineering professor, who is working on the problem with a former student named Yogesh Ramadass, says the challenge is to harvest adequate amounts of power from the body and then efficiently direct it to the device that needs it." If I remember the movie correctly, this didn't turn out so well for the humans.

183 comments

  1. Matrix Jokes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Appear after this comment

    1. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Shut the fuck up Neo..

    2. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by dintech · · Score: 2, Funny

      1984 wasn't supposed to be a guide book. Oh wait, I mean The Matrix...

    3. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by Rijnzael · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now what's really going to get you later on is, would people have made Matrix jokes if you hadn't said anything?

    4. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by capnchicken · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      A libertarian shat on my carpet once. Claimed the free market would sort it out. -Ford Prefect(8777)
    5. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by happy_place · · Score: 3, Funny

      Here's a joke from the Matrix's central core...

      Q. How many humans does it take to change a lightbulb?

      A. Humans don't change lightbulbs, they power lightbulbs.

      --
      http://www.beanleafpress.com
    6. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by capnchicken · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. Yes they would. It doesn't take an Oracle to predict slashdot, hell you can predict it with DB2! Zing!

      --
      A libertarian shat on my carpet once. Claimed the free market would sort it out. -Ford Prefect(8777)
    7. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by SiaFhir · · Score: 1

      My manager brought in cookies. I feel right as rain now.

    8. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Here's another joke about the Matrix core...

      Q: If humans are the batteries to supply energy to the machines, where do the humans get their energy to stay alive?
      A: Um..... er..... uh..... (runs away)

      Yeah. The Matrix is pure Fantasy fiction not science fiction. No way could that world exist in our reality. Maybe the Matrix machines feed the humans with Unobtainium (aka magic).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      The humans get their energy from the nutrient filled goo. DUH. Where do they get the nutrients for the goo you ask? From the dead humans! DUH.

      Obviously it's a depleting system with fewer and fewer humans to be gotten each time around. But one can also assume that when the sky was blacked out there was vegetation and vegetable and animal organics. The machines could have found a way to convert that into sugars (along with the other dead humans of course) and nutrients to feed the humans.

      There is quite a bit of organic energy already here.

    10. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      I thought it was pretty clear there was a tube running down Neo's throat. Wouldn't they just pump nutrients in that way? Or hell, since he had never been born they could be doing something similar to the umbilical cord.

      At any rate, it isn't at all vague. The humans get energy from 'eating', which means the machines are getting their electricity in the same way we're getting beef.

      You could make an argument that it isn't efficient enough, or something, but that would be forgetting both that this is future-tech and that this is a movie. What you seem to have done is attempted to claim that they ignored the fact altogether, where they clearly illustrated it - at least up to Hollywood standards.

    11. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    12. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by emocomputerjock · · Score: 4, Funny

      What other two Matrix movies?

    13. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by tibman · · Score: 0, Troll

      I thought 2 was ok.. but that part when they escape the trashed ship and he can somehow still "feel" the machines and somehow disables them. I was thinking.. WTF? how can he do that unless he is A) Still in the matrix. B) Wifi type deal in his head. I thought 3 would go into that but no.. pretty sure that was never addressed. Reminds me of Lost.

      The part with the Architect reminds me of the Hyperion book series.. where the TechnoCore AIs were trying to build an Ultimate Intelligence that had every variable accounted for and could literally see the future through the sum of current events. An AI God. How could you fight something that knows every thought you are capable of making.. could predict outcomes based upon synapse firing in your brain. Could touch your life in extremely subtle ways to create outcomes decades down the road. Of course in the books, the AIs were parasites of Humanity.. this DARPA project is a crude step in that direction, hah.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    14. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's a shame they never made any sequels... (hiding the bloody axe)

    15. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by drc003 · · Score: 1

      I believe the correct term is Bazingga!

    16. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by Thinboy00 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's it, time to call the Mythbusters!

      --
      $ make available
    17. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It's easy when you realize the truth. That there is no comment....

      dang clippy

    18. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by ThePlague · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can you get power from humans? Sure, but why would you specifically breed them for that purpose? I mean, really, nuclear would be a great deal easier, and provide much more power. So would burning coal. In either case, you don't need to set up an elaborate virtual reality to keep the fuel cells in line. Hell, even if you accept that bio-generated heat is an ideal power source, why not use cows? The VR would be a great deal simpler. Finally, even if for some bizarre reason humans are the only option, why even bother with a VR at all: just lobotomize them or induce a coma.

      That's one of the main reasons I was so disappointed in the sequels: they got way too mystical. What would have been better would be if it had been found out that the primary reason the matrix was made was not for power generation, rather computational power. A portion of each inhabitant of the matrix brain was used as hardware for the AI. In order to keep the brain functioning correctly, the VR had to be generated. It would also explain "The One"'s ability to hack the matrix: he could access the part of his brain that was being used to generate the matrix, giving him access to the fundamental underpinnings. In essence, a backdoor exploit. I personally think it would have been more satisfying and dramatic if the original teaser line "what is the matrix?" had been answered in the sequels as "we are the matrix".

    19. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by Shakrai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah. The Matrix is pure Fantasy fiction not science fiction. No way could that world exist in our reality

      They lost me in the The Animatrix when the Humans decided to "win" the war by blacking out the sun. Apparently the humans of the future don't need to eat.....

      For that matter, why didn't the machines just build a bunch of nuclear reactors?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    20. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I always thought that was weird myself. I came to the conclusion that it was a Hollywood dumbing down of whatever concept the book might have used. (The Matrix is based off of a short story or book, right?) My assumption is that in the real story, the Matrix was actually using human brains and imagination as computing power, not electrical power.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    21. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Obviously it's a depleting system with fewer and fewer humans to be gotten each time around.

      That's an understatement. It takes about 300 pounds of meat, per year, to keep a person alive. Or two corpses. The human population would quickly decrease, as you'd kill 2 for every 1 left alive.

      6 billion - kill 2/3rds of them
      == 2 billion - kill 2/3rds of them
      == 0.66 billion - kill 2/rds of them
      == 200 million - kill 2/rds of them
      == 74 million

      And so on.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    22. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by Shakrai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My Free TV streams 19 Mbps == 6000 GB/month per channel. No cellphone can do that. WHY kill off this excellent service??

      +1

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    23. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Wouldn't they just pump nutrients in that way

      I really wish people would THINK before they post. No sun == no plants == no nutrients to consume.

      Remember what happened to the dinosaurs when their sun was blotted out? That's what would happen to humans. Even if the machines fed 2 dead corpses per year to keep alive 1 human alive, the race would be almost extinct within a decade.

      A 6 billion population would have decreased to less than a million in ten years.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    24. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      It's body energy *combine with a form of fusion*, remember?

      Which sort of seems like saying that foot power, combined with a form of combustion, is what powers my car.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    25. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>They lost me in the The Animatrix when the Humans decided to "win" the war by blacking out the sun

      That was actually described in the very first movie (they said the humans blackened the sky and blotted-out the sun). I enjoyed that movie, but I immediately knew that it was an unsustainable culutre. Within ten years there'd be less than one million humans left. All the rest would have been killed and eaten.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    26. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So it just means that "real world" is actually still a "matrix".

      The idea that humans are batteries is just what Morpheus claimed. It may be true in the inner Matrix world, but may not be for the outer matrix worlds. Remember even in the first movie the question was asked: "What if when you woke up, you didn't know the difference between the dream world, and the real world?"

      My interpretation is the Oracle is trying to upgrade herself- she believes humans have something the machines don't.

      Think of the whole thing as a "hybrid/breeding program".

      Neo is likely at least partly a machine (and a special one). The Oracle gives Neo a cookie to add features/upgrades at critical moments.

      After each world iteration, Neo has a chance of becoming more human but crucially retaining the abilities of machines.

      Smith goes about merging with all the humans and other machines, including the Oracle (who still somehow retains enough of herself to prompt Neo), and Neo merges with Smith.

      If things go fine, the Oracle gets her upgrade...

      As the Architect said, the Oracle is playing a dangerous game.

      But life is dangerous :).

      --
    27. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone needs to tell DARPA that is was just a movie. Not real. Now, take the blue pill.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    28. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>using human brains and imagination as computing power

      Yeah because brains don't need to be fed. Oh wait. Yes, they do. The problem still remains of how to keep the human brains alive when there's no sun & no plants to feed them.

      BTW I never knew there was a Matrix short story?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    29. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      I had similar thoughts. And the twist would be the discovery that everyone had originally joined the matrix voluntarily, like in Vault 112.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    30. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by MistrBlank · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you gone back and watched the first matrix movie? It's really not much better than the other 2 movies. That said, I don't see why people pan the other two so bad.

      If anything, people miss that in the first movie, Neo realizes he's destined for greatness. The second movie ends on a such a terrible down note and neo realizes he's not destined for any kind of greatness, he's just doomed to a system. And in the final movie we have the crescendo

      If you pan the Matrix series... you really can't call yourself a fan of the original Star Wars trilogy, the acting in either trilogy isn't any better than one another and the story follows equivocally the same theme if not the SAME STORY (even down to the three fronted assault at the end). The only difference is in this trilogy Luke dies.

    31. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the first one is good, and presents a nice concept (the age old, "Am I a butterfly that dreams that I'm a human being...) in a nice package?

      And the non-existing sequels have no soul.

    32. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>What you seem to have done is attempted to claim that they ignored the fact altogether

      No actually I was saying the the world of the Matrix has about the same chances of happening, in real life, as Harry Potter. i.e. Matrix doesn't deserve to carry the label "science fiction"

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    33. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you tried watching Matrix: Dezionized? It's a fan edit with most of the Zion stuff edited out and the 2nd and 3rd movies combined. Pretty awesome.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    34. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      The second one wasn't that bad, but it was more of an action flick. Had it not followed the first Matrix movie I think people would have liked it. Had it been called something like Vampire Hunter NEO it would have been a great movie. Don't even remember the third.

    35. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, but don't forget that the machines were made by humans, who designed all of their code.

      Perhaps they gravitate toward humans sub-consciously?

      Wasn't covered in the movie that way, I don't think, but then I've worked pretty hard to purge the sequels from my brain.

    36. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      I really wish people would THINK before they post.

      You'd do well to do the same.

      No sun == no plants == no nutrients to consume. Remember what happened to the dinosaurs when their sun was blotted out?

      You do, of course, realize that this happened to 'humans' as well at that exact same time, do you not? You're not a creationist, I don't think, because you're making dinosaur arguments. So if it killed ALL LIFE on earth, do we assume that the whole primordial-ooze thing just started from scratch?

      No. We don't. We know that 'no sun' wasn't what happened. Only 'little sun', and anyone who studies even a tiny bit of biology understands that some forms of life need more of it than others.

      Please don't be such an ass about 'not thinking' until you're ready to lead the way yourself.

      That's what would happen to humans. Even if the machines fed 2 dead corpses per year to keep alive 1 human alive, the race would be almost extinct within a decade.

      A 6 billion population would have decreased to less than a million in ten years.

      1) And if they fed them bacteria? Or some other substance? It wasn't exactly Big Macs, to be sure, but your imagination is way too limited here. Things can live in adverse environments. Look at the 'shrimp' found under the Antarctic ice. Not much light down there, either. Not to mention that photosynthesis is assumed to have evolved from something that didn't even possess it previously.

      2) What if the robots only required 'less than a million' to operate, and grew the remainder once that operation was established?

      Again, your attitude is way too harsh for someone with such huge gaps in their position.

      You could just say "I didn't like the show" if you want. That's totally cool. Calling people stupid simply for not agreeing with you is why I object.

    37. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      >>>What you seem to have done is attempted to claim that they ignored the fact altogether

      No actually I was saying the the world of the Matrix has about the same chances of happening, in real life, as Harry Potter. i.e. Matrix doesn't deserve to carry the label "science fiction"

      Okay... But then nothing else does, either, and the label no longer has any use. It isn't as if Star Trek is any more or less accurate.

    38. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The problem still remains of how to keep the human brains alive when there's no sun & no plants to feed them.

      Sun, no. Plants, maybe. Basically, you'd have giant nuclear powered vats where yeasts, algae, bacteria, plankton, etc are grown and pumped into the feeding tubes.

      BTW I never knew there was a Matrix short story

      Since the idea of Hollywood actually originating a decent story is preposterous, I came to the conclusion that they based the movie on a short story like they have for so many other SF movies. However, after puttering around on Wikipedia, I don't think it was a short story.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    39. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    40. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by FrigBot · · Score: 1

      Well I thought the Matrix movies were all pretty good, and that the first one was one of the best movies ever made. There were a few moronic parts, like in the second one when that old chancellor guy was talking to Neo about how old men don't make points anymore. What the hell is that supposed to mean? Made no sense at all. Generally, sequels are never as good as the original and the Matrix trilogy was no exception to that. But they weren't horrible. The second and third movies were really one movie, split into two, just like Kill Bill.

      Anyway you guys are right, that they should have left the part in where human brains were jacked into the matrix mainly for the purpose of providing computing power. Makes more sense than the food-thing.

    41. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by tibman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like that interpretation. I can see the higher biological and technological beings desiring traits in each other.. but with no way to obtain them while staying purely what they are. Your hybrids would be feared by both sides.

      I wouldn't want my jeep to have temper tantrums but having tires that grew like fingernails would be wicked. Get into a fender bender and just feed it some aluminum cans for a few days. Of course i think at that point i wouldn't be telling the jeep what to do, it would probably be commanding me around to feed it more aluminum cans.

      I like your interpretation though. Looks like i was modded troll for some reason.. possibly for mentioning an AI god?

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    42. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Do.

      Not.

      Agree.

      Say they ONLY need a million people to sustain themselves - or 10 million, whatever. Harvest ALL organic matter on the planet, how long would that last on a 2 people per "battery" per year? Nuclear power would still be fine, it would just be a supplementary source...

      Sure it's all fiction, but just the assumption of "all people are used this way" seems to be quite narrow minded. Use 10 million, use the other 6-8 odd billion to "feed" them for thousands of years + all other organic matter on the planet (probably another few tens of thousands if not hundresd of thousands of years).

      By then the sky would have probably cleared up sufficiently.

    43. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why you were modded troll. Don't let it bother you too much... Well might be cool if you manage a +5 Troll :).

      Anyway, I'm not the first to interpret it that way. I got a few of the ideas from someone else on Slashdot.

      But it could be the Wachowski actually thought of stuff like that, and intentionally don't "nail everything down". As you can see the 3 movies don't really conflict with my interpretation (which isn't that daft in my biased opinion). And I'm sure other interpretations might work reasonably well too.

      So on the surface the matrix movies might seem stupid, but they might not actually be that stupid... ;).

      --
    44. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by floop · · Score: 1

      The 3rd one is where Coppola's daughter gets killed and everyone in the audience applauded.

    45. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by alaeth · · Score: 1

      Whoa.

      --
      Sig goes here.
    46. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>>>No sun == no plants == no nutrients to consume. Remember what happened to the dinosaurs when their sun was blotted out?
      >>
      >>You do, of course, realize that this happened to 'humans' as well at that exact same time, do you not?

      Amazing. Absolutely amazing. I didn't think it possible for someone to be that dumb. *Humans didn't exist in the time of dinosaurs.* The only things that survived were little mouse-like mammals and dinosaurs (which eventually birds). Anything as big as a human being starved due to lack of sun, and lack of food.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    47. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>But then nothing else does, either,

      Actually there are lots of stories that could carry the name Science fiction, because they could exist in the real world. Like Robert Heinlein's "The Roads Must Roll" about a future where people travel on giant escalators instead of in cars.

      The movie "A Boy and His Dog" by Harlan Ellison was also firmly rooted in reality, and could happen (someday).

      Star Trek? Star Wars? No. Pure fantasy. Which is fine if you like fantasy but it no more deserves the label "science fiction" than does Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    48. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Amazing. Absolutely amazing. I didn't think it possible for someone to be that dumb. *Humans didn't exist in the time of dinosaurs.* The only things that survived were little mouse-like mammals and dinosaurs (which eventually birds). Anything as big as a human being starved due to lack of sun, and lack of food.

      So you're purporting an evolutionary path between mice and hominids? What's your source?

      Besides, 'as big as a modern human' is irrelevant, and if you're going to call me dumb you ought to at least acknowledge that.

    49. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting opinion, but you're certainly in the minority.

    50. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Basically, you'd have giant nuclear powered vats where yeasts, algae, bacteria, plankton, etc are grown

      Possibly but then that means the machines don't need humans. They can just use the nuclear electricity directly. And there's probably tons of coal and natural gas plants generating electricity too.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    51. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I realize you just spoiled it, but I can't find anything like that at IMDB (nor netflix). Is that the real name?

    52. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Possibly but then that means the machines don't need humans.

      You're missing my point. In the (hypothetical) book/short story, humans are providing computational power, not electrical power.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    53. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      True enough, but that is ignoring the millions of years of stored up solar energy in the form of other plants and animals. Plus one can assume the machines of the future have a nearly 100% efficient system and reuse their own waste heat.

      You estimates of the amount of meat it takes, are they for a motionless human in a vegetative state or a real human that moves, grow muscles, etc?

    54. Re:Matrix Jokes ... by SigersonLTD · · Score: 1

      So, this doesn't concern anyone.... :)

  2. Simple by 0racle · · Score: 2, Informative

    the challenge is to harvest adequate amounts of power from the body and then efficiently direct it to the device that needs it

    You combine it with a form of fusionm duh.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Simple by Kepesk · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is great. I generate tons of sweat when I go biking; can I use that to power one of those water-powered digital clocks?

    2. Re:Simple by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      They'd be billionaires if they could figure out a way to harvest energy directly from FAT.

  3. No AI yet. by Silviiro · · Score: 1

    So who is going to take over if we don't have AI yet?

    1. Re:No AI yet. by CDigglesworth · · Score: 1

      Al Gore

    2. Re:No AI yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Al Gore or AI Gore?

      Dammit, I need serifs!!! At least we don't have to worry about A1 Gore.

    3. Re:No AI yet. by Vantharion · · Score: 1

      Google is skynet.
      I have had a T-shirt that has that phrase on it for three years now.

    4. Re:No AI yet. by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Is he the one who eats us with a dash of steak sauce?

  4. THERE IS NO SPOON! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tasty wheat, etc.

  5. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DARPA turned us into generators.

    1. Re:No by JustinRLynn · · Score: 1

      DARPA turned us into generators.

      Technically correct is the best kind of correct.

      And it has been done before, starting 240 years ago.

    2. Re:No by badran · · Score: 1

      It has been done way way before that....

      Think slaves, row-boats...

      We are alive, hence we are able to store energy that can be used later....

  6. The truth is... by mikerubin · · Score: 1

    There is no spoon

    --
    I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
    1. Re:The truth is... by FeepingCreature · · Score: 1

      Heh.
      You liar.

    2. Re:The truth is... by dkh2 · · Score: 1

      There is no spooning in prison

      There, fixed that for you

      --
      My office has been taken over by iPod people.
  7. The obligatory comment on The Matrix by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

    Are we going to build it... or already part of it? Which pill to take?

    --
    I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    1. Re:The obligatory comment on The Matrix by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Take all of them. Some will give you wild hallucinations about an impossible future and extreme paranoia. Some will make you passive and very compliant to the reality you are in. What could possibly go wrong with that combination?

          [/me takes a fist full from the pill jar]

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  8. Take the red pill. ;) by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    If you take the blue pill you will stay in the matrix so it can use your electricity.

    But be warned "leaving the Matrix can be traumatic"

  9. Half Life vs Matrix vs Skynet by badran · · Score: 1

    So how will our future look like....

    or will it just be 1984ish..... or maybe we will part of the brave new world...

    At least for now Idiocracy is winning... Even on /.

    1. Re:Half Life vs Matrix vs Skynet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep it down, Coppertop.

    2. Re:Half Life vs Matrix vs Skynet by maxume · · Score: 1

      Meh, much of 1984 is based on the false premise that language can be (successfully) prescribed, and Brave New World is at least as much biting social commentary about government eugenics programs that actually existed at that time as it is a warning for the future.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Half Life vs Matrix vs Skynet by thijsh · · Score: 1

      Yeah the Idiocracy part might be true, because as we know every smart Slashdotter never has sex, and never reproduces... But every dumb Slashtroll also never has sex, and never reproduces...
      errrr... Wait a minute, from an evolutionary perspective Slashdot should not exist, like the eyeball!!! Am I going blind now or am I blind already and delusional to think I could read Slashdot?

    4. Re:Half Life vs Matrix vs Skynet by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      We're not going to have Brave New World as long as the war on drugs lives.

      --
      $ make available
    5. Re:Half Life vs Matrix vs Skynet by slick7 · · Score: 1

      We're not going to have Brave New World as long as the war on drugs lives.

      Remember who's fighting this war, the DEA (Drugs to be Enforced Agency)
      Besides, the true power is ATP. When the utility companies figure out a way to meter it, they will have a way to charge you for living.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  10. Such a wonder! by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    That Seiko watch I had about 10 years ago must have been from the future since it was able to power itself from a human battery. So far, no sign of them taking over the world either.

    1. Re:Such a wonder! by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Those watches have been around since the disco days, for about 40 years or so.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  11. Human Hamster Wheel? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1
    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  12. Question by xednieht · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is mankind so obsessed with harvesting energy from the rarest sources in the universe? Why not start with the most abundant sources?

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
    1. Re:Question by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because doing that would make farting both a socially acceptable behavior and a viable industry.

    2. Re:Question by thijsh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because even without the malaria health-risks mosquito's are way to hard to milk...

    3. Re:Question by Exitar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because harvesting energy from stupidity isn't a trivial task.

    4. Re:Question by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Think wearables. Batteries are heavy and inefficient and need periodic access to a power supply to recharge; that limits how long you can go on using your various toys, especially if you're way out in the wilderness on some mission or other. If you can draw power directly from the wearer's body, then you can greatly improve the usefulness of his electronic augmentations.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so insightful. Granted the efficiencies on solar cells have come a long way in the past decade, why we don't see more focus on solar, geothermal, wind, and wave, and nuclear everywhere is beyond me.

      Oh wait, theres that black shiny shit that sells like gold shiny shit and western countries will keep buying it! And Old Money Willakers & Trust is just happy as a clam as long as they oil industry stays afloat (no pun intended), keeping their trust funds large and in charge. And where the money is, the power is.

      Now I remember.

    6. Re:Question by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      You know I always wondered how hard it would be to make a gadget that syphoned off blood, metabolised the sugar and then popped the blood back into the body.
      Instant slimming aid and heat pack! No-one need ever be overweight again.
      What could possibly go wrong?

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    7. Re:Question by fataugie · · Score: 1

      But ....there's an endless supply!

      --

      WTF? Over?

    8. Re:Question by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Then how do you explain the United States Congress? ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Question by fataugie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wearables? You mean like babies and midgets? Where do you plug in?

      --

      WTF? Over?

    10. Re:Question by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      At what point did you deduce that humans were rare energy sources?

      We've already started with abundant energy sources - Oil and Gas, and now Solar and other green projects are taking off. DARPA is always trying to do the next big thing - in this case, efficiency through a closed energy system.

    11. Re:Question by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Because the problem isn't generation, it's storage. And, as it turns out, everytime I want to use a battery powered device, there I am!

      Also, as poor a power source as a human is, I'm already wasting enough power to power some things.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    12. Re:Question by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      At what point did you deduce that humans were rare energy sources?

      Probably at the point he realized there is an entire universe out there.

    13. Re:Question by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      When he figures out how to get the energy out of Dark Matter or the Vaccumm of space - I'll jump right on board and ask why we're wasting our time.

    14. Re:Question by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Because in out most immediate vicinity all the hydrogen is, shall we say, already in use. Alas, there's no hydrogen mines in them thar hills.

    15. Re:Question by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of solar, vast quantities of hydrogen, or even H3? Not to mention the polithera of different radiation everything is bathed in?

      I don't know if you're being snarkey or just can't see the forest for the trees. The reality is, we are completely surrounded by bountiful energy sources just waiting to be tapped. Given that this is about research, it is a legitimate question to ask why we are working so hard to research one of the least abundant and low quantity, sources of energy when so many others with potential exist.

      To be clear, I'm not saying the research is without merit. Nonetheless, the op's question is legitimate.

    16. Re:Question by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      But we do have solar power, and engines that run on hydrogen, etc etc.

      The idea is that harvesting energy has to be practical - and one of the ways to do that is to reduce the transportation costs. There are millions of asteroids and planets out there but their distance from where they would be used is too far to be practical. Same with anything floating out in space - its not practical to launch something up there to harvest it.

      As far as whats here on Earth: We have come up with ways to harvest solar energy and use available resources on the planet - we are having trouble finding ways to make it all balance with the environment though. Covering the planet in solar collectors would leave nothing for plant life and end up killing us in the log run. So at what point do we stop? We do not have a set limit for the amount of energy we need. The more energy we harvest, the more we figure we have to burn.

    17. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clouds

    18. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what Slashdot is for?

    19. Re:Question by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Left turn, meet you.

      The idea is that harvesting energy has to be practical

      This is research, which is clearly noted in the article and I even made purpose to specifically mention it. As such, pretty much everything in your post is off topic.

      As for solar and whatever, you're ignoring the fact that by in large, they are themselves not currently practical. And, they have been barely explored compared to their hypothetical limits.

      So once again, I must refer you back to the validity of the op's comment. Its a perfectly valid question as it pertains to research. With so many other viable sources of energy which potentially will scale dramatically better (or hell, just scale) in dire need of research, the op's comment is excruciatingly valid.

    20. Re:Question by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      But we've already researched those!

    21. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... we are the most abundant source on the planet. There are 6.6 billion people and we are 90% water, which conducts most forms of energy better than a lot of other conductors.

    22. Re:Question by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Actually, for a _human_, getting energy from a human isn't a half-bad idea. As someone once said, "wherever you go, there you are." You may not have plugs, you may not have batteries, but there's a very high chance that you have a you. On the other hand, the idea of planting other people and using them as batteries is so stupid that I was almost unable to keep watching the movie at that point.

    23. Re:Question by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      But we've already researched those!

      No...we...haven't. They require lots more research. I strongly urge you to look more into it. What appears to be possible with solar, versus what we've already done and/or accomplished, appears to only be the tip of the iceberg.

      How much of your power comes from solar. Exactly. More research is required.

    24. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer milking rats with transplanted lungs myself.

    25. Re:Question by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      How much of your power comes from solar. Exactly. More research is required.

      That's not a problem of research, thats a problem in application.

      You can spend billions on research but if no one ever deploys the solution, no one will use it.

      We have solar panels, solar panels work, the problems we run into mostly are that they are expensive and fragile.

  13. I'm Not Fat! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a D Cell battery!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I'm Not Fat! by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      He ain't heavy, he's SLA!

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    2. Re:I'm Not Fat! by badran · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about a 3R12.

    3. Re:I'm Not Fat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      <Sgt.Gunny>With that size son you're a giant d-bag battery!</Sgt.Gunny>

    4. Re:I'm Not Fat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanna marry a Double-D cell chick!

    5. Re:I'm Not Fat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many volts from a DD ?

  14. Meta by yogidog98 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Insert witty, esoteric Matrix quote here.

  15. using heat energy by nopainogain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    if they target heat energy from human bodies, i can think of 3 or more realistically 10 ex girlfriends who wont have anything to worry about!

  16. Holy shit...I guess I DID take the red pill... by moxley · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Holy shit...I guess I DID take the red pill...

    Now...where's Trinity..I have a job for her...

  17. A Kind of Fusion by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    Do they have it yet?

  18. I don't know by geekoid · · Score: 1

    anything that results in me learning Kung-Fu in 10 seconds might be worth it.

    Anyways, I hope a practical device for charging personal carry device while walking comes out of this. I would like to charge my phone while walking into work.

    Actually, even if it was a device that looked like a know brace, but generated power while walking would be ok place to start.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I don't know by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, how do you go about trying to type "knee" and then end up with "know"?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:I don't know by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you must hbave a knee to know.

    3. Re:I don't know by kuzb · · Score: 1

      on Friday July 16, @07:34AM

      I'm going to go ahead and say insufficient coffee

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    4. Re:I don't know by maxume · · Score: 1

      That's in your timezone...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  19. average human is 75-watt light bulb by peter303 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Auditorium A/C designers know that - about one watt per kilogram resting, triple that when aerobic. Many portable electronics devices can run off a few percent of that energy. It would be nice to capture that energy mechanically, thermally, or chemically.

    1. Re:average human is 75-watt light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A number of people I know are not quite that bright..

    2. Re:average human is 75-watt light bulb by nightfire-unique · · Score: 3, Funny

      Auditorium A/C designers know that - about one watt per kilogram resting, triple that when aerobic. Many portable electronics devices can run off a few percent of that energy. It would be nice to capture that energy mechanically, thermally, or chemically.

      Sir, what exactly do you have in mind? :)

      Instruction manual told you to put the anode where?!

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    3. Re:average human is 75-watt light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      average human is 75-watt light bulb

      Unfortunately many humans are much dimmer than that.

    4. Re:average human is 75-watt light bulb by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I calculated it out as closer to 100 watts once upon a time. A 2,250 kilocarolie a day diet works out to 9,414,000 joules. Divide that by 86,400 and you get an average of ~109 joules per second. Since a joule is the same as a watt second that's a greater energy requirement than a 100 watt light bulb.

      Of course the GI system isn't 100% efficient at digesting food and the actual energy output changes based on activity but it's still pretty amazing to consider the amount of energy that your body requires in order to remain functional.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:average human is 75-watt light bulb by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      75 watts resting, triple that while exercising. Your mistake was assuming a constant wattage.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re:average human is 75-watt light bulb by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I didn't assume a "constant" wattage. I was calculating out the average. Obviously the requirements change based upon your level of activity.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:average human is 75-watt light bulb by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was obvious that you were calculating the average. However, you were correcting someone who was pointing out that human beings are a 75 watt lightbulb, and in the comment clearly added the condition "at rest". And a 225 watt lightbulb during aerobic.

      You can use those two numbers to come up with a guesstimate of activity level as a function of GI tract efficency (assuming a boolean activity level), which would be nifty.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:average human is 75-watt light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Auditorium A/C designers know that - about one watt per kilogram resting, triple that when aerobic. Many portable electronics devices can run off a few percent of that energy. It would be nice to capture that energy mechanically, thermally, or chemically.

      Make a device that converts vibration to electricity and attach it to the wrists of 15 years old boys. We will have energy forever.

    9. Re:average human is 75-watt light bulb by peter303 · · Score: 1

      Tour de France guys exceed 500W in sprints. Power-meters are currently training device and drug detection device.

  20. Even after you're gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall a few Universities had gotten research grants to develop gadgets and batteries that would run based on the chemicals that are released upon death. The idea was that when a soldier was slain, their body would naturally power a GPS device to assist in body recovery.

    So combine that work with this, and you have electronics running even when the heat and movement power is no longer available.

  21. kinetic energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't keeping front-line troops fed-up a problem already? I mean the guys that ave to carry their own food. Harnessing energy from their movements will just increase their food requirements further.

  22. Energy out without more food? by Drethon · · Score: 1

    I wonder if any of these energy gathering methods work without eating more food to gather this energy...

    1. Re:Energy out without more food? by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      The real question, is will the heat capture make you hotter or cooler?

      Will the "Motion Capture" just slow you down.

      In theory the waste heat is just going somwhere, and whether it evaporatoes off you or goes into a good capture system it might make you feel cooler.

      However, when you put an electrical load on an electrical system in your car, it calls on the Alternator, which drags down the available horsepower of the engine, fuel effienciency, etc. Even with frictionless bearings, the magnets are taking work out of the system to convert it to energy.

      There was a proposal to use some kind of springs to absorb the up and down motion in soldier's packs to create energy, maybe thatwork is already going on and is easier to absorb, wheras the alternator/AC in your car isn't trying as hard unless you tell it to, or the compressor kicks off a cooling cycle.

    2. Re:Energy out without more food? by maxume · · Score: 1

      If the goal is convenience, it doesn't really matter.

      (and the ratio between watt-hours and kilocalories is 0.86, so it isn't as if watt-scale devices are going to double your energy budget)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Energy out without more food? by maxume · · Score: 1

      1 horsepower translates into about 745 watts. Even if your alternator really sucks, it isn't going to be a big deal.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  23. What? No Stillsuit references by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

    I hear the maintenance of the foot pumps can be a problem, but otherwise they're quite stylish.

  24. Here's my solution by david.emery · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you want (a) power; (b) biometric identification; (c) biological status/health monitoring, consider the Rectal Thermocouple... This will normally generate substantial additional power in combat as an added benefit. :-)

    1. Re:Here's my solution by mlmll · · Score: 1

      You must be Mr Ramadass, aren't you ?

  25. Terrible implications by srealm · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, so humans become mobile power sources.

    I really don't want to see a guy on the side of the road with wires shoved up his arse trying to jump his car to start because his battery is dead.
    *clench* "Try it now!"

    That said, I guess the BDSM scene can now do something useful after attaching the alligator clamps to their nipples.

  26. Pffff by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    If they can't get us to fission spontaneously, i'm not at all impressed.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  27. What we really need ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    ... is a way of using chemical energy supplied by the body to generate electricity. And to make it a bit more challenging, harnessing this energy must not harm the body in question.

    A patent on that would be a license to print money.

  28. Dear DARPA by confused+one · · Score: 1

    Someone send these people a copy of The Matrix please. Include a nicely worded letter telling them to pay attention to the subplots....

  29. form of fusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fine. As long as they don't combine the energy with a form of fusion, we're safe.

  30. mine? by S-4'N3 · · Score: 1

    When can I get my stillsuit?

  31. That's just great... by Aaron.SD · · Score: 1

    Now I'm going to have to down 5-hour Energy Drinks just to listen to my iPod!

  32. usgs reports off during 'banker's hours' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine if your 'battery' needed to power, say, st. louis, for a few seconds? see you on the other side of it?

    not much doubt about the usgs seismic reporting machine being FUDged just by looking at the day to day pattern.

  33. Wrong direction for soldiers? by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Aren't soldiers already complaining about the weight of all of the junk they have to carry? Devices that take away their mechanical energy, or reduce the temperature difference between them and the surrounding environment, seem like a good way of making things harder.

    Maybe they won't have to carry all of the extra batteries, which will help. But power-generating shoes are inherently mushy and feel like running through mud, as is all of the other ways of generating power from human movement. It's not free energy.

    1. Re:Wrong direction for soldiers? by david.emery · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe they won't have to carry all of the extra batteries, which will help.

      Seriously*, you've hit a significant advantage. The normal 'basic load' of batteries is 30 days, from what I remember, and carrying those batteries around, particularly in Ranger/light infantry/Special Ops units is a tremendous drag. Whatever technique gets used, though, has to account for the fact that light infantry soldiers spend a lot of time being still (because what moves can be seen, and what can be seen will be shot...), so either you need some technique to store the power or you need something that can generate some amount of power when the soldier is not moving.

      * for humor on this topic, see my other post ;-)

    2. Re:Wrong direction for soldiers? by unknownroad · · Score: 1

      Some technique to store the power... you mean, like a battery?

  34. Is the MATRIX coming? by stanlyb · · Score: 1

    Somebody watched too many sci-fi movies..... or maybe the Matrix is the new reality?

  35. Pre-Matrix joke... by PatHMV · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dura-cell is PEOPLE! (said in best Charlton Heston voice)

    1. Re:Pre-Matrix joke... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Get your CLAWS off me you damn, dirty robot!

  36. Sharing the workload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it means the Duracell bunny can have a day off then I'm all for it.

  37. kid stuff by Goldsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If these guys were serious about powering implants, they'd be using ATP or glucose. Heat and vibrations are nice, but a few more steps down the thermodynamic pipeline.

    Plus, the good piezoelectrics are not exactly made of bio-friendly metals.

  38. Reminded of kinetic watches by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

    Kinetic watches have been around for quite a few decades. Not sure about thermal though.

    Hope we see civil appliances soon.

  39. The biggest problem by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    Is that evolution has selected for a very efficient biological machine. If you are going to harness energy from movement, then you're going to require additional energy, in for the form of biological consumables, which have to be stored, transported an prepared. By extracting energy from the organism, you have to make the assertion that the organism can obtain its own fuel easier than you can. At 100w/sqm, and efficiency rates of 14%, You're looking at 3.5w per backpack of solar collection. Can your body output 3 watts? In nearly every example, its better to give the electronics their own source.

    It is important to note that enery isn't "wasted" it is expended. And to put anything on yourself to collect it, is going to up your expenditure of energy. DARPA is essentially trying to strap windmills onto aircraft... (which doesn't work, because they add weight and drag)
     

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:The biggest problem by TouchAndGo · · Score: 1

      This was exactly my thought. The energy being produced is there for a reason, if you're going to begin siphoning it off to power other things your body is going to need to generate more. You're not making it materialize out of nowhere

  40. ramdatass... by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    Thats an inspiring name,

    I want to move to India and change my name to Youshoud Ramdatass.

    - Dan.

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  41. Most abundant? by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Nobody has had much success using Hydrogen as a source of energy.

    Maybe try the next most abundant thing in the universe? That one certainly flows freely on Earth.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  42. How many KiloCalories if you burn a human? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I'm not trying to troll here. Has anyone done the calculation for the number of kilocalories produced when an average human burns? Like how many litres of water could be raised to boiling from this process?
    That might be an interesting number to bring out in discussions like these.

    1. Re:How many KiloCalories if you burn a human? by tpwch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Its a pretty easy calculation. According to google an average non-overweight human is about 15% fat and 18% protein (the protein number varies a bit depending on the source, but lets use 18% for this calculation).

      A gram of fat is 9 kcal and a gram of protein is 4 kcal for a person. Not sure if there is anything else in the human body that would store energy, the carbohydate amount is small enough that its neglegible.

      So a person weighing 75 kilos would have 155 250 kcal in his body. I imagine that when burning that however a lot of the energy would be lost to evaporating the water in the human body.

      --
      Posted by a Debian GNU/Linux user
    2. Re:How many KiloCalories if you burn a human? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you should always dry your human bodies completely (up to a year in the sun) before burning them.

  43. powered combat armor / en by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    powered combat armor / ESP / KI based weapons.

    For years the GOV has had solders with EPS powers doing top secret stuff.

  44. Humans where used for CPU power but the boss by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Humans where used for CPU power but the hollywood bosses cut that part.

  45. Battery size by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some men are AAA, some are lantern batteries.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  46. Leak? by Virmal · · Score: 1

    So we are batteries that (take periodic) leak(s)?

  47. Non-matrix jokes... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    Appear after this comment.

  48. not so rare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cause chances are you always have a body with you....besides...we're not talking about making power somewhere in the universe..we're talking about making power on Earth...where Humans...for better or worse...are far from rare.

  49. Theme Music by Dakman · · Score: 1

    by 2050 embedded devices will allow us to immerse ourselves in a sea of not just visual data, but also computer-generated sounds and sensations.

    Want theme music in your life? There's an app for that.

  50. The original idea was better by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 1

    The humans get their energy from the nutrient filled goo. DUH. Where do they get the nutrients for the goo you ask? From the dead humans! DUH.

    Obviously it's a depleting system with fewer and fewer humans to be gotten each time around. But one can also assume that when the sky was blacked out there was vegetation and vegetable and animal organics. The machines could have found a way to convert that into sugars (along with the other dead humans of course) and nutrients to feed the humans.

    There is quite a bit of organic energy already here.

    The original idea was that the matrix was a distributed system using human brains as nodes. That's why the humans were jacked in. When you think about it that way, the whole movie becomes at least two times better.

    The hollywood people decided that would be too confusing to the audience, and thus the reason for the humans to be hooked in became a thermodynamic WTF.

    1. Re:The original idea was better by dissy · · Score: 1

      Well, if you use the 4th movie in the series (The Anamatrix), parts 2 and 3 (The renascence stories, its a 2 parter) addresses all of that.

      The humans picked a fight with the AI. The AI fought back and of course won.

      We took their main power source (The sun) so they turned to other power sources. (Us)

      So unfortunately yes, the failings of that plot line are valid complaints.

      This plot/story of that 4th part is pretty much directly from the minds of the Wachowski's and their crew (writters and stuff)
      Hollywood didn't even want to put that on the big screen....

      I'm no authority on the story, but the original comics everyone claims the movies were based on was a power management problem more so than a VR simulation. The VR was just the machine version of prison camps for us.

      If you haven't seen it and are interested, I do highly recomend the anamatrix! It fleshes out parts of the story that had to be cut or broken from the first 3 movies.

      part 1 and
      part 2
      (Each part is ~10 min)

      Enjoy

  51. turn humans into batteries??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehehe that's almost as ridiculous as turning iPhones into phones!

  52. Self Winding Humans by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    We used to have self winding watches now they want self winding soldiers. Next they will want land mines that gather solar energy and store it in such a way that a powerful explosion takes place over and over again.

  53. Methane. Lots and lots of methane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking for myself, and the asphyxiated co-workers in nearby cubes, I can assure that the human body has a lot of potentialrr. I only wish I knew if the correct pronunciation was "meh-thane", or "mee-thane".

  54. TANSTAAFL by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

    Energy taken out of the system has to come from somewhere. Some energy, sure, can be "harvested" without effort on part of the human host - temperature differences, compression energy while walking, the sort of thing that can't be avoided.

    Any power generation on a significant scale, though, will cause the person generating it effort. Like, say, a bicycle generator, or winding up an alarm clock. Even something passive, like putting an induction generator (think: "shake powered flashlight") on your belt will add to the weight you carry, the inertia you have to overcome. More effort on your part.

    1. Re:TANSTAAFL by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      So put 'em on fat people. Kill two birds with one stone. Fat jiggles more than muscle anyway.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
  55. Redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Matrix calling Neo. Come in...

  56. Batteries? We ain't no stinkin' batteries! by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

    We're frickin' generators dammit!

    If the energy is coming from vibration that's mechanical energy, not chemical.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..