Slashdot Mirror


US Gov't Orders 73,000 Private Websites Offline

joeszilagyi sends this excerpt from TorrentFreak: "... according to the owner of a free WordPress platform which hosts more than 73,000 blogs, his network of sites has been completely shut down on the orders of the authorities. Blogetery.com has been with host BurstNet for 7 months, but on Friday July 9th the site disappeared. ... Due to the fact that the authorities aren't sharing information and BurstNet are sworn to secrecy, it is proving almost impossible to confirm the exact reason why Blogetery has been completely taken down. The owner does, however, admit to handling many copyright-related cease and desists in the past, albeit in a timely manner as the DMCA requires."

536 comments

  1. The fact is, US is just as bad as China by SquarePixel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who said US doesn't pull stunts like China? I think I've heard so many times on slashdot.

    US is just as bad. It's just for different interests (protecting the money and cash flow of huge corporations versus ensuring that the people in the country don't start bloody revolts).

    Twist it how you want to, but the fact remains that both countries act like assholes and US is in the same level.

    1. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference is, we are talking about the incident right now.

    2. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by johnhp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bah, that's such bullshit.

      China is *bad*. The U.S. is *bad*. But to say that the U.S. is "just as bad" is ridiculous and obviously false. Do even the most casual of checks about free speech rights in the US versus China, and you'll see how silly your statement is.

      For all of its many faults, the U.S. has generally outstanding freedom of speech. You can say all kinds of things here that would float anywhere else in the world. Just look at how Holocaust denial is treated in Europe. Or imagine how long someone like Alex Jones could operate in China, railing against the Chinese and thousands of real or imagines murderous conspiracies.

    3. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by rotide · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just putting this out there, but helping prop up failing businesses is not, at least in my opinion, as bad as oppressing your population's "right" to have access to otherwise publicly available information.

      I see where you are trying to equate the two, but they really are in two different leagues.

    4. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by SquarePixel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes you think the Chinese cant? Just because it's not on slashdot? They usually have their own sites because of language differences too. News also got around before the internet too, don't underestimate how much people can talk using normal means - especially in the Asian countries (where I have lived many times), where even little gossip goes around the really quickly. Just because you cant read about it on the usual news sites doesn't mean people don't know.

    5. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who said US doesn't pull stunts like China? I think I've heard so many times on slashdot.

      Idunno. For starters, in China, this guy would stand a good chance of being disappeared or shot.

    6. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by bigspring · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's a big difference between them sometimes requesting sites be taken down and trying to strictly control the flow of all information to their populace. Putting the US government's infractions against its people on the same level as China's is just plain incorrect.

    7. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GITMO, that name ring any bells for you?

    8. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll grant that the US does bad things, but when you say things like "just as bad" as China you're basically saying "I am viewing the world in an over-stark black-and-white manner and am thoroughly incapable of understanding nuance, and willfully oblivious to any differing *degrees* of badness".

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    9. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      take it easy on the solvent huffer, the subtle part of the brain is the first to melt.

    10. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by rotide · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Labeling people as enemy combatants and detaining them without trial sucks and is deplorable. I'd be at a total loss for what to do if I, or someone I cared for, was in that situation. But comparing what happens to a relatively small group of people (GITMO detainees) and what happens to the entire population of China (freedom of speech/access to information) are again, in two totally different leagues. I'm not in any way suggesting I support, let alone tolerate GITMO, but we're talking apples and oranges.

    11. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. The federal government doesn't have that right.

      In America, "disappearing" and "shot while resisting/fleeing arrest" are reserved for the local authorities.

    12. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by demonlapin · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm not aware of any US citizens who are, or were, detained in the camps at Guantanamo Bay. Are you? It would be quite an impressive story.

    13. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by SquarePixel · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But comparing what happens to a relatively small group of people

      You actually said it there. In China bad things only happen to really small group of people. Just like you seem to indicate about US.

    14. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by linzeal · · Score: 1

      The US imprisons more people for non-violent crimes than China. Who is the biggest dick now?

    15. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by johnhp · · Score: 0, Troll

      It was a typo. It happens. Btw, condescending remarks like yours make it impossible for anyone to love you, both physically and emotionally. I'll live with my occasional typos. You'll live with everyone hating you because you're a virgin prick.

    16. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This would make me think the Chinese can't. One of many. So, do you think it's all well and good to suppress discourse, so long as somewhere behind a locked door a couple people who trust each other thoroughly might take the risk of actually talking about something?

      Fuck you.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    17. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the US, you are free to criticize the US president publicly. In China, you are also free to criticize the US president publicly. See, they have an equal amount of free speech!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    18. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Why detain them all the way down there, when you can prosecute them in the states and still get a 99% conviction rate for anything even remotely linked to terrorism and get obscene amounts of jail time.

    19. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      It's the concept that's the problem, not the quantity. Even if there's suppression of free speech of just 1 out of 300 million, that's a problem.

      New York Times reporters are being thrown in jail for stories that they report. Things are getting exceptionally bad in the U.S. No we don't have free speech.

    20. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would float anywhere else

      Little slipups like this that betray your middle school education make it impossible for anyone to support you in reply comments btw.

      This is Slashdot. When was the last time someone supported the immediate parent in the comments? The only sorts of replies you're supposed to be posting here are condescending, smug criticisms of the parent's message. Or, if you're really desperate, don't have a leg to stand on, and yet still need some way to stroke your own ego to criticize the parent, an offhand comment implying that a typo utterly destroys any validity the poster had will do. Sort of like what you did.

    21. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Labeling people as enemy combatants and detaining them without trial sucks and is deplorable. I'd be at a total loss for what to do if I, or someone I cared for, was in that situation. But comparing what happens to a relatively small group of people (GITMO detainees) and what happens to the entire population of China (freedom of speech/access to information) are again, in two totally different leagues. I'm not in any way suggesting I support, let alone tolerate GITMO, but we're talking apples and oranges.

      The point is we are doing the very things we say we are against when other nations do them.

      If terrorists can drive the US government to abandon its principles and find clever ways to justify it, then that's a victory for those terrorists. It's a real shame, for they do not deserve any victory of any sort.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    22. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wake up, pal. You are nowhere near as free as you think you are. Your life is as constrained by our bullshit corporatist state as the Chinese are by their bullshit corporatist state. The only difference is that you are showered with a moronic brain-junk-food commercial pop-culture that has evidently convinced you completely that you are free and can express yourself freely and without limit.

      You're not. You are just as enslaved, censored, exploited, and brainwashed as they are. Beware, it is vastly worse than you imagine.

    23. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      outstanding freedom of speech? Only for those that agree with the government:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_You_Love_This_Planet

    24. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Who is the biggest dick now?

      I think you knew the answer before you said that... (you american have a soo-big penish)

    25. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should attack the substance, not the person nor their background, especially when both are mere assumptions. Further, if the content is something you would support, and you don't because of who the person is rather than what they say, what kind of bigot does that make you?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    26. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US isn't far from this. The US has a growing, power-hungry government that is apathetic to the wants of it's producers. I say producers because currently Democrats are in power in the US and they enjoy playing the role of Robin Hood -- which entails taking from those who produce and giving to those who don't. It makes sense for them as there are more poor people who much prefer a hand-out to a job, and garnering the 'poverty vote' keeps the people who want to be in power, in power. Poor people are consumers... they don't start businesses, they don't invest and they don't create jobs. They buy lottery tickets, cigs, cable TV, and tabloid magazines.

      Here-in lies a huge failure. The last person that should be in power, is the one who wants to.

    27. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wake up, pal. You are nowhere near as free as you think you are. Your life is as constrained by our bullshit corporatist state as the Chinese are by their bullshit corporatist state. The only difference is that you are showered with a moronic brain-junk-food commercial pop-culture that has evidently convinced you completely that you are free and can express yourself freely and without limit.

      Yes, and thank you for demonstrating above that he is right.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    28. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that because minor crimes also can get you shot in China?

    29. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      When the RIAA or MPAA is directly involved with putting people in GITMO, you'll have a point.

    30. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Who is the biggest dick now?

      Proof that given enough time and participants, all internet discussions eventually devolve into a dick-measuring contest.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    31. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by starfliz · · Score: 1

      who the hell cares? Are you saying losing half our rights will be ok because china is worse? what kind of illogical argument is that? how is this 'insightful'? haha absurdity is the norm I guess.

    32. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ArcherB · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Wake up, pal. You are nowhere near as free as you think you are. Your life is as constrained by our bullshit corporatist state as the Chinese are by their bullshit corporatist state. The only difference is that you are showered with a moronic brain-junk-food commercial pop-culture that has evidently convinced you completely that you are free and can express yourself freely and without limit.

      You're not. You are just as enslaved, censored, exploited, and brainwashed as they are. Beware, it is vastly worse than you imagine.

      So have the authorities shown up to send you to "reeducation camp"?

      No? Then STFU.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    33. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by linzeal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, they get sent to labor camps ( *cough* re-education camps ), which they have been thinking about shutting down. China is rapidly modernizing its justice system, so while they are attempting to practice a bit more parsimony when it comes to crimes the US in all but a few states has seen its prison population double or triple in the past few decades.

    34. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the standard argument for denying gay marriage. "Everyone can marry someone of the opposite sex." How come that never gets modded funny?

    35. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah just because a country conducts genocide on a single race of people. That is nothing we should hold against them. I mean its deplorable but much better than if the country conducted genocide on ALL of its people. Apples and Oranges.

    36. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who said US doesn't pull stunts like China? I think I've heard so many times on slashdot.

      US is just as bad. It's just for different interests (protecting the money and cash flow of huge corporations versus ensuring that the people in the country don't start bloody revolts).

      Twist it how you want to, but the fact remains that both countries act like assholes and US is in the same level.

      Funny. A few years ago when something like this happened, you saw the story and comments here say that Bush was the problem. Now we read that the US is the problem.

      Imagine if something like this happened a few short years ago. We'd be looking at a whole different story.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    37. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I find hilarious? The people who complain about being enslaved, like you, usually sound a lot more brainwashed than most everyone else.

    38. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't misunderstand, I don't think I'm all that free. Hell, if I start a business, I'll have assholes like you telling me all sorts of shit I can and can't do, because suddenly now I'm not a person with rights, I'm an eeeeevil corporatist fat-cat.

      However, it remains that unless I credibly threaten the life, safety or property of a person or group of persons (or represent harmful lies about them as facts, but I can offer the same as opinions), I can say whatever I want. I can prattle on about all the shit I hate about government or society at large with no fear that I will end up getting two hours in a show-trial and then the better part of a decade in prison like He Depu. I may not be as free as I'd like, but I know I'm more free than that poor man is.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    39. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      But comparing what happens to a relatively small group of people

      You actually said it there. In China bad things only happen to really small group of people. Just like you seem to indicate about US.

      If by "relatively small group of people", you mean all of them, then you are correct.

      I don't know how good you are at math, but let he help you out here:
      Population of China=1,324,655,000 (all blocked from receiving information, all are legal citizens of China)
      Population of Gitmo=~500 (none of which are US Citizens)

      So here's the hard math part:
      1,324,655,000 is greater than 500.

      That help?

      I'm not going to tell you that you are wrong. I'll let the numbers do that.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    40. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is cheaper in China to incarcerate someone (in a shallow, unmarked grave) than in the US (in a nice building with 4 square and cable access.)

    41. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US does it to other people. China does it to it's own people.

    42. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      The location is irrelevant. The scary thing is that in the US, the President can point his finger at a U.S. citizen, accuse them of being an "enemy combatant" and then throw them in jail indefinitely without trial. e.g. Hamdi, Padilla, and al-Marri

      http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2008/07/16/al_marri

      Even scarier is the fact that several court decisions have come down in favor of these monarch-like executive powers, and that many citizens actually support this nonsense.

    43. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by linzeal · · Score: 1

      In China they do forced labor, they work you to death, sometimes 17 hours a day for years on end.

    44. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      This is only a difference of degree. Once we accept this we are on our way to ending up like them.

    45. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by metrometro · · Score: 4, Informative

      > Who said US doesn't pull stunts like China?
      >> China is *bad*. The U.S. is *bad*. But to say that the U.S. is "just as bad" is ridiculous and obviously false

      Hey look, data!

      http://report.globalintegrity.org/China/2009

      http://report.globalintegrity.org/United%20States/2009

      Or does that ruin it?

    46. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So it is ok to do this only to non-citizens?

    47. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People finally figured out we only have one political party?

      Some people needed this lesson, I consider it a victory that they got it.

    48. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You will always have people telling you what you can and can't do. It's called 'society.' Rational adults realize that we have to make compromises in order to live together in peace and prosperity, while spoiled children continue to whine that no one is the boss of them. If you don't want people telling you what to do, you don't have to live in society. What you don't get to do is to have all of the benefits of living in a cooperative society, while paying none of the costs. That's called 'stealing.'

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    49. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Because I'm obviously joking, while those that say "Gays do have equal rights -- they have the same right to marry someone of the opposite sex that straights do" are not so obviously joking. Equating being against gay rights with being "pro family" ignores the basic fact that same sex couples can and do have children, and those children deserve to have the same benefits as the children of opposite sex couples. Finally, defining marriage as only being legal between one man and one woman appears to completely deny hermaphrodites, males with an extra X chromosome, and transgendered individuals any right to marry if you take a literal, scientific interpretation of exactly one male and exactly one female. Would Caster Semenya be allowed to marry ANYONE under current California law?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    50. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Check your tense there bucko .... "had generally outstanding freedom of speech". Given the idiocy of using military power to prop up business interests over recent issues, the old saw of "fighting to defend your right to speak things which I personally find abhorrent" is no longer possible.

      The US is not as bad as China (yet). Both will converge to similar corruption/suppression, they are simply approaching it from different directions.

    51. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Yes, that film was so well suppressed that it won an Academy Award. So, basically because the US government got upset and gave it a negative classification that actually increased its popularity... that's your argument against the reality of free speech in the US? So... how much time did the producers spend in jail? Oh, that's right, none.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    52. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      But non-US citizens were subject to extraordinary rendition while passing through the US and being shipped to be tortured by foreign countries they had no relation with. For me, this looks a lot like "being disappeared".

    53. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only sorts of replies you're supposed to be posting here are condescending, smug criticisms of the parent's message.

      Just what we expect from an Anonymous Coward, you teabagging fuckwit. Go suck at the corporate tit some more, all that typing must make you thirsty.

      (Am I doin it rite?)

    54. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Please, compare the number of Chinese immigrants to the US with the number of US immigrants to China. See the point?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    55. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holocaust denial is considered the joke it is by the vast majority of EU citizens and politicians. They chat regardless.

    56. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by rbanffy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When it comes to respecting civil rights, there is no such thing as shades of gray.

    57. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Or imagine how long someone like Alex Jones could operate in China

      That's actually a benefit of living in China.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    58. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Finally, defining marriage as only being legal between one man and one woman appears to completely deny hermaphrodites, males with an extra X chromosome, and transgendered individuals any right to marry if you take a literal, scientific interpretation of exactly one male and exactly one female. Would Caster Semenya be allowed to marry ANYONE under current California law?

      You raise a valid point. Why must marriages be binary? Sure it make property disbursment easier after a seperation but why not allow polygamy?

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    59. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by feynmanfan1 · · Score: 1

      what about looking at incarceration rates. U.S. is 760 per 100,000 while China is 119. Also look at Homicide rate per 100,000: U.S. 5.4 Iran 2.93 Incarceration rate per 100,000: U.S. 754 Iran 222 percent GDP spent on defense: U.S. 4.3% Iran 2.9% What is so good about the U.S. culture? Hypocrisy?

    60. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by easterberry · · Score: 1

      And what are the working poor and the middle class in this analogy of yours? Or are the people w

    61. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And grammar like yours betrays your inferior grasp of the English language. What exactly is your point?

    62. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      For starters, in China, this guy would stand a good chance of being disappeared or shot.

      Contrary to popular opinion, most "oppressive regimes" won't throw you in jail for grumbling about the government. They're more interested with suppressing people who can actually affect things - e.g. when information is published through mass media and can reach many people.

      There were and are some places where it's worse than that, such as Stalinist USSR or North Korea today. But China isn't one.

    63. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Rational adults compromise in terms of mutual consent, not tyranny, whether of the majority or otherwise. Ironic you should should trot out 'stealing' when you no doubt support the very thing, so long as you think it's done in some romanticized 'Robin Hood' fashion. As Cullen Hightower once said,

      There's always somebody who is paid too much, and taxed too little - and it's always somebody else.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    64. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meet the new puppet, same as the old puppet. The boss(s) never change. They are an infestation in every manifold of the upper echelons. Their time will come.

    65. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by elucido · · Score: 1
    66. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Idealistically, I have no problem with polygamy and consider it to be a cultural artifact that it is taboo in our culture, just like males but not females being allowed to bare their chests in public. However, the anecdotal evidence I have heard from women who have actually lived in polygamous cultures indicates that the practice causes a lot of bickering, hurt feelings, and abuse, so it definitely is not for everyone. In addition, many (especially younger women) may be coerced into plural marriages, or not really give fully informed consent. In short, not much is lost by refusing to legally recognize plural marriage in Western culture.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    67. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You kicked a dog 5 times, *I* only kicked a dog 3 times!

      Fuck you!

    68. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Yeah well, talk is cheap. Just try to act like a dissident, or try to defend yourself against an invading army, and you will be tagged as a terrorist. Say "Hi" to Castro for me...

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    69. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      If you don't want people telling you what to do, you don't have to live in society.

      Not really disagreeing with most of what you said, but that bit... I'm just not sure that's actually an option. How would you suggest going about it? There is no "free" land; nowhere one can hunt or homestead outside of a nation's rules; at least not that I'm aware of.

      I think the actual options are (a) live within the bounds society sets, or (b) put yourself in a position were society is likely to crush you like a bug.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    70. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, for one our ability to judge which is doing better in the freedom of speech department by not using useless strawman statistics that say nothing about free speech. But that is just off the top of my head and I don't have any useless random statistics to back it up.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    71. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We do compromise on the basis of mutual consent. If you like the deal offered to you by your country, you stay. If you don't, you take your business somewhere else. Just as with any business you can not just walk in, demand what you like, and refuse to pay. What, exactly, do you deem 'tyranny?' I'm guessing tyranny means 'anything I don't want to do,' right? Well, that is not how society works, you do not get to dictate terms to the majority who have already agreed how things will work. You get to take the deal we offer you, or leave it and find a better deal. It is not our fault if the deal you want is not available in the world marketplace of governance.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    72. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is plenty of free land where no one will bother you, it just does not happen to be very good land. That's property for you, though. Nothing to do with governments and countries, everything to do with private ownership of natural resources.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    73. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Why not allow polygamy?

      In a sane society, the criteria for an obligating bond such as marriage would be "informed consent" and nothing else. Informed itself is limited by the capacity to be informed, and so creates natural age, intelligence and species limits; consent is the legal line one crosses, and so should be witnessed and recorded by the state -- this is what creates the obligation portion of the bond and carries it over to inheritance, debt, and so on.

      But... we don't live in a sane society. We live in a society guided by rank superstition and goat-age desert morality, a condition exacerbated by a legal system that tries to solve very grey problems with black and white lines in the sand such as "age." So don't hold your breath for recognition of polygamy as a valid legal bond.

      On a more positive note, you can live together with any number of consenting adults you choose to and there are very few restrictions on that anywhere in the country. The downside consists of things like insurance, inheritance, hospital visiting rights -- the things that an official bond enable.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    74. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Burz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about the "nuance" of demanding "full-spectrum dominance" (full control) over the planet?

      Maybe some of us are *reacting* to the "over-stark black-and-white" world view espoused by the Pentagon.

    75. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "Hello, NASA? I'd like to reserve space on your next available rocket to Mars. I'll be needing a lot of room - There will be my own person, a lot of equipment for producing oxygen and other gases from the rocks, a lot of glass sheets for making a greenhouse, seeds, etc. I'll send you a complete list by email or fax, whichever you prefer."

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    76. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by butchersong · · Score: 1

      The two are not comparable. In one case you have a government suppressing its own citizens and in another you have a government jailing citizens of other countries it encounters on a battlefield. You may disagree with this many do but the fact is the US has a (somewhat the worse for wear) constitution and the government has no authority to treat its own citizens the way China routinely does. -Yes I know there was probably some US citizen member of the Taliban in Afghanistan that was picked up for some reason years ago but the point still stands.

    77. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Apples and oranges, eh? So I guess the over 2 million people ( not a very small group by any means) in American prisons deserve to be there?

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    78. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by lgw · · Score: 1

      Oh? How many Chinese citizens do you think died in Tiananmen square? Over the course of the cultural relovution?

      How many American citizens have been interred in GITMO? 1? 0? How many Americans have been shot for speaking out against their government, and their family billed for the bullet? How many mobile execution vans does the US need to keep up with an execution schedule to busy to meet with fixed facilities?

      Your irrational hatred of the US blinds you to the real problems in the world.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    79. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not everybody in Gitmo deserved to be there. That doesn't mean that nobody deserved to be there, just that the danger of the precedent is quite a bit less. What the US Government does with people taken overseas who are not US citizens is a great deal less worrying to me than what it does with US citizens on US soil; the Padilla case is the perfect example of something that really is troubling. Your statement,

      GITMO, that name ring any bells for you?

      was in response to this statement:

      For starters, in China, this guy would stand a good chance of being disappeared or shot.

      Do you really think that Gitmo is an example of how the US government behaves toward citizens? I don't. Does it mean that the US isn't perfect? Well, yes. Of course it's not. But we don't have desaparecidos, and I think that's a big difference.

      Also, to the pussies who modded me troll for my original response to h4rr4r (and whoever modded h4rr4r flamebait, too), I'm pleased to know we pissed you off. Whatever will I do now? This might cost me a tiny fraction of the enormous mountain of karma I've got.

    80. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Smooth+and+Shiny · · Score: 1

      I guess that whole "Due to the fact that the authorities aren't sharing information and BurstNet are sworn to secrecy..." part is considered talking about it now, eh?

    81. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by lgw · · Score: 1

      The first purpose of a government is to protect it's citizens against citizens of other nations. The fact that our government is hurting citizens of other nations is not immediate proof that it's doing anything wrong. The distinction is vital. Sort of like which end of a gun is pointed at you is a vital distinction, given the first purpose of a gun.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    82. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by moeinvt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd like to elaborate on your point about transfer of wealth from the PRODUCTIVE for the benefit of the UNPRODUCTIVE.

      You're entirely correct in the assertion, but you're wrong to include only the "poor" in the latter group.

      High paid government employees are also parasitic by nature. In addition, the transfer of trillions of taxpayer dollars into the banking and financial industry is a case of stealing from people who are actually producing for the benefit of people who aren't really producing anything. Don't confuse an overpaid bureaucrat or someone that shuffles money around all day with a "producer".

    83. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Uniquitous · · Score: 1

      outstanding freedom of speech? Only for those that agree with the government:

      Then please explain Glenn Beck's continued freedom, and the rest of his ilk. And for that matter, how did Olbermann survive the Bush years?

    84. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      There is plenty of free land where no one will bother you, it just does not happen to be very good land.

      Where?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    85. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by tombeard · · Score: 1

      Marriage between 2 people solves a lot of problems. If one is hurt the other can make decisions for the other. If one dies the property remains with the remaining spouse. Add an additional person and opportunity for conflict and the need for judgments is created. Additionally, polygamy like that practiced in the Middle East causes social problems. Male and females are very nearly equal in number so when rich old men buy multiple wives it drives poor men out of the "market". These young men become disaffected and may become terrorists or criminals since they have no hope of finding a permanent mate (of the opposite sex).

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    86. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>[He_Depu and other locked-up Chinese dissidents] would make me think the Chinese can't

      I just learned today that China is now fencing-in the poor. The government got tired of poor people stealing bread, so now it's erecting fences around the poor slum areas to keep them trapped. That reminds me of something - that Jessica Alba show. Fallen Angel or something. PLUS one of those DS9 time travel episodes where everybody was fenced in.

      Back to story: I'll be glad when we get third 'tard George DUH Bush out of power and replace him with that sexy Barak Obama. Then these censorships of websites will stop.

      (someone whispers in my ear). Oh. So Barak Obama IS the president? Huh. Well I guess that makes it okay then.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    87. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that the same founding fathers that insisted on the principle of separation of church and state still allowed the legal and religious definitions of marriage to commingle. The two need to be completely and permanently separated. Register with the state to receive the legal benefits of marriage for yourself and your family. Perform a religious ceremony in your church of choice to receive the religious benefits of marriage. One does not require the other; the two can be completely independent.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    88. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Informative

      In a sane society, the criteria for an obligating bond such as marriage would be "informed consent" and nothing else.

      Some cultures, such as our own, also use marriage as an institution to shore up child rearing efforts. Ergo tax benefits for married couples and for merely having children. You're painting it with entirely too simple a brush, probably simply to support your position, but there it is.

      Next, juxtapose:

      Informed itself is limited by the capacity to be informed, and so creates natural age, intelligence and species limits

      with

      We live in a society guided by rank superstition and goat-age desert morality, a condition exacerbated by a legal system that tries to solve very grey problems with black and white lines in the sand such as "age."

      So you reject the laws made by anyone that used to subsist off of goats outright. Strange, but okay. Next you assert 'natural limits' and yet deny the law the right to arbitrarily define them. Also very odd. Would you advocate a one-time assessment, or merely an ad-hock application of the law at the whim of the arbiter? I think the age 'line' works as sort of a compromise. You know once you've hit it, and everyone else does also. I think it sort of 'just works'. Why don't you?

      On a more positive note, you can live together with any number of consenting adults you choose to and there are very few restrictions on that anywhere in the country

      In the United States this is largely false. You cannot live together with more than a handful of people from different families in basically any area with zoning laws. Check your statutes for the exact details, but around my home town, the limit is five people and only two of which may be adults. Otherwise, people would be turning residential neighborhoods into frat houses, etc...

    89. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fact is that in USA if they have suspicion that you are a terrorist they can get you to Guantanamo bay, torture you , and your civil rights doesn't matter, so that USA freedom is just a big lie. In freedom countries terrorist are judged as any other criminals.

    90. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Your life is as constrained by our bullshit corporatist state as the Chinese are by their bullshit corporatist state.

      Yeah except we (the US and EU) have a Constitution/Lisbon Treaty that protects us from the Dickhead Politicians. They are basically chained by it. And as for the corporations, killing them is as easy as stop buying their products. Your dollar is your vote, and if you withhold your vote, then the corporation goes bankrupt. As happened with Circuit City.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    91. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the US President criticizes YOU!

    92. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 0

      Compromise by tyranny is paradoxical, and thus your argument fails to hold any water. And I don't see how you could read from his statement about 'stealing' that he somehow "supports" it. Methinks youre just a troll.

    93. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      "blocked from receiving information" is a really, extremely loose standard.

      Have you seen the full JFK assassination file? Because I haven't. Their website says the last of it can be held until 2017, so I'm guessing (unless you're Barrack Obama) that you are blocked from receiving information by your government as well.

      As far as dissidents being shot by the government, well, in recent US history we have Ruby Ridge, Waco, etc. It is sort of rare, but it does happen.

      When it comes to 'relatively', and once you factor billions vs millions, I do wonder which government has actually killed more people, as a ratio. I'm not confident what the result would be, but it would be interesting to see someone actually do the math.

      I'm not going to tell you that you are wrong. I'll let the numbers do that.

      Please do let us know once you have that completed.

    94. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you believe in treating people exactly equally, regardless of race or gender?

      What are your opinions on scholarships offered exclusively to members of a specific gender or race? Or 'affirmative action' programs?

    95. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      Uhm, it is one site for a presumably limited duration the facts of which are sealed pending a court case.

      The 73k sites are only hosted by the main site, and I'd bet the majority of them are dead anyway.

      This is a far far cry from China.

    96. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      "The point is we are doing the very things we say we are against when other nations do them. "

      I agree with you: it stinks and we should fight it.
      But the point is that it's not representative of how Western governments operate. We must fight it yes, we must defend freedom yes, but we must also recognise how good we have it -- anything less is to ignore and belittle the achievements of our forefathers, and downplay the benefits of a free society. Western governments are not authoritarian by any reasonable stretch of the word. Let's be intellectually honest and keep it that way!

    97. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Even scarier is the fact that several court decisions have come down in favor

      If it makes you feel any better, several are from circuit courts, who aren't supposed to go around reversing the USSC once it has spoken.

    98. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have more criminals per capita is all that says.

    99. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      A grammatist?

    100. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular opinion, most "oppressive regimes" won't throw you in jail for grumbling about the government. They're more interested with suppressing people who can actually affect things - e.g. when information is published through mass media and can reach many people.

      So you're saying that grumbling's OK in China, as long as you don't do it in the presence of other people?

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    101. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by migla · · Score: 1

      Idunno. For starters, in China, this guy would stand a good chance of being disappeared or shot.

      Or both.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    102. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by mrops · · Score: 1

      So Ironic, right of 73000 blog owners just got trampled and you still think you can say whatever you want.

    103. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by PaladinAlpha · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We're deep enough into this thread where this may not be read, but allow me to offer my view.

      Marriage has been for years a way to ensure an equal distribution of males to females. Attraction develops from ancient rites of selection which favored those that were stronger, faster, and more likely to survive. However, as a requirement for society to develop, we suddenly need "experts" in various fields not directly connected to survival -- i.e. the person good at farming may not be "attractive", the person who knows how to predict the weather may not be "attractive", and so forth. We'll call these "beta mates", and under a non-rigorous system they would simply never mate, and therefore have much less reason to participate in society -- depriving it of their expertise.

      There is another factor, as well. Historically, it has been shown that in unstructured environments, a greater number of females mated than males. The deduction to be made is that females will flock to a male they consider attractive, accepting the presence of other mates in exchange for the higher attraction and potentially stronger offspring. That we don't see this as often nowadays is precisely because of the point I'm about to make:

      Structured monogamous marriage is a method of distributing males and females equally, and provides all mates ("alpha" and "beta") with a reward for participating in society -- the "alphas" benefit from the additional expertise brought by the "betas", and the "betas" have a very high chance of successful mating. This was for quite some time enforced through arranged marriage, and I would even make the argument that arranged marriage is what made civilization possible.

      Polygamy would lead, ultimately, to alpha flocking again, and greatly reduce the encouragement for beta experts to contribute meaningfully to society. I would further argue that we have begun to see the effects of this in the USA with the considerable reduction in the sanctity of marriage and a (I would postulate) corresponding drop in technological leadership worldwide.

    104. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Otter+Popinski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When it comes to respecting civil rights, there is no such thing as shades of gray.

      Whew! I guess we don't need the Supreme Court anymore.

    105. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Constitution rights doesn't apply to non-US citizens.
      If you're here to attack the country and are not a part of it, a trial is a courtesy, not a right.

    106. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Informative

      "blocked from receiving information" is a really, extremely loose standard.

      Have you seen the full JFK assassination file? Because I haven't. Their website says the last of it can be held until 2017, so I'm guessing (unless you're Barrack Obama) that you are blocked from receiving information by your government as well.

      No, but I've seen countless documentaries on it blaming everyone from the CIA to Castro. How many Tienanmen Square documentaries do think are aired on China TV?

      As far as dissidents being shot by the government, well, in recent US history we have Ruby Ridge, Waco, etc. It is sort of rare, but it does happen.

      Ruby Ridge was bad. But Waco? This guy was holding hundreds hostage and attempted to burn down the building around them. The US Gov't screwed it up pretty bad, but they did have a court order that allowed them to enter. They should have just tried knocking first instead of kicking the door in.

      When it comes to 'relatively', and once you factor billions vs millions, I do wonder which government has actually killed more people, as a ratio. I'm not confident what the result would be, but it would be interesting to see someone actually do the math.

      Unless you are considering the Civil War, the US gov't has not killed millions. Besides, the GP was comparing Gitmo to China. For starters, there are no US Citizens at Gitmo. Next, those at Gitmo are accused of terrorism. Those in China have not been accused of anything except living in China.

      Please do let us know once you have that completed.

      Again, the GP was comparing Gitmo to China. Please explain to me how the population of Gitmo is greater than the population of China. Also, see my paragraph above where I explain how those are Gitmo are accused of being terrorist vs the "crimes" the population of China has committed.

      Seriously? Do honestly believe that those in the US are as oppressed as those in China? Before you answer, consider I am in the US, reading and replying on an open forum accusing the US government of doing something bad. I think that alone should prove my point.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    107. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Informative

      I object to the use of the term 'battlefield'. Italy, for example, was not at any time within the scope of any legal operation[1]. I think that this term romanticizes things a tad, don't you?

    108. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>>You will always have people telling you what you can and can't do. It's called 'society.' Rational adults realize that we have to make compromises in order to live together in peace and prosperity,
      >>>

      The problem is that most adults are Not reasonable. It is why I can't marry a man. Or smoke marijuana later tonight while watching SyFy Channel. Or have more than one wife. Or show a topless woman on broadcast TV (but Jack Bauer torturing people is a-okay). Or let my daughter drink beer, even if I am German and it's part of our culture. Or let my lawn "go natural" with wildflowers, but instead must have a monoculture grass, or else face fines from the city.

      The other adults have placed non-reasonable and illogical restraints upon me. So basically your entire premise of "reasonable adults can tell other adults what to do" is flawed. The adults are not reasonable - they are oftentimes tyrannical.

      Therefore I submit it is wiser to follow this simple rule: "No man has a right to physicall harm his neighbor - and that's all the government should restrain him." - Thomas Jefferson. i.e. Marry a guy. Have two wives. Let your kid have beer. Smoke marijuana while watching topless Amanda Tapping stroll around the Stargate. These are victimless acts and should not be outlawed. That's called FREEDOM and liberty. I think that's the best philosophy to follow.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    109. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Well, now, let's not go slinging around generalizations. It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye...

      Do you assert that none of them deserve imprisonment? If not, how can for fairly assert that the parent is stating the opposite?

    110. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called 'stealing.'

      No, it's not! It's called 'society infringement'!

    111. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      The point is we are doing the very things we say we are against when other nations do them. If terrorists can drive the US government to abandon its principles and find clever ways to justify it, then that's a victory for those terrorists. It's a real shame, for they do not deserve any victory of any sort.

      The last time we had a citizen who would've gone to Gitmo had he been a foreign citizen, he ended up getting a trail, and mirandized, just like any citizen. Remember Faizel Shazad?

      Sorry, but none of our values have been sacrificed. Citizens of the US are still citizens, and get treated as such.

    112. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      We respect the civil rights of our citizens. Faisel Shazad got a trial like any citizen. He got mirandized. He wasn't thrown in Gitmo and left to rot.

      Principles, upheld. Unlike China, where their targets are all their own citizens.

    113. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Incarceration rate per 100,000: U.S. 754 Iran 222 percent

      Maybe the difference can be explained by those women stoned to death?
      (don't worry, it's now possible they dismiss the stoning and hang her instead)

    114. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      What are the concrete religious benefits of marriage? Other than keeping your fellows-in-religion from ostracizing you?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    115. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful


      There is plenty of free land where no one will bother you, it just does not happen to be very good land.

      Where?

      Antarctica. Plenty of tiny desert islands no one wants. Anyplace no one from the government ever goes, like most of Alaska. Go, build a log cabin, hunt and gather your food, no one will bug you to do anything. Look at the Unibomber, dude was a wanted criminal and he lived in the wilderness for decades unmolested. Don't tell me someone who wasn't in the business of mailing bombs to people couldn't do it for a lifetime.

      But the thing is, this argument is besides the point. Let's say I want a diamond encrusted flying pony, and I want to spend $5 on it. I go into Wal-Mart and demand a diamond encrusted flying pony. They laugh at me, so I get mad and say they are taking away my rights to a diamond encrusted flying pony. As there are no diamond encrusted flying ponies anywhere else, Wal Mart has an obligation to sell me one.

      You want a diamond encrusted flying pony, and you are demanding that your country provide you with one at the cost you want to pay for it. Your rational is that you can't buy a diamond encrusted flying pony anywhere else, and you can't find one just lying around, and you deserve one, so they have an obligation to sell you one at a price you find convenient.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    116. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      How many American citizens have been interred in GITMO? 1? 0?

      Is this a competition to see which government hates its own citizens the most? Why treat non-US citizens as unworthy of the same rights as US citizens?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    117. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Alsee · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Moral of the story:
      When you get the moron asshat out of power things better without the world turning into a magical candyland.

      Thanks for your rightwing input, it was oh so insightful and oh so helpful.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    118. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, but I've seen countless documentaries on it blaming everyone from the CIA to Castro. How many Tienanmen Square documentaries do think are aired on China TV?

      So as long as any information is divulged, your standard is met? Because that's still way too biased for my tastes. You are, however, tacitly acknowledging the point that both governments withhold information deemed prudent. Your only objection then, would be to the degree.

      That's fine, but you'll have to go back up and redefine your position...

      Ruby Ridge was bad. But Waco? This guy was holding hundreds hostage and attempted to burn down the building around them. The US Gov't screwed it up pretty bad, but they did have a court order that allowed them to enter. They should have just tried knocking first instead of kicking the door in.

      Yeah, most people don't really know the true story either, so don't feel too bad.

      The real sequence of events was that the ATF did knock first, and there was a conversation in front of the house. We'll never know who shot first, but somehow those trained government agents went from a tax stamp violation to shooting people in a matter of minutes.

      Look into it. It was almost certainly worse than you realize.

      Unless you are considering the Civil War, the US gov't has not killed millions.

      Well that is an interesting point, but no I don't think that this would be appropriate in a discussion of recent history. Neither would the Chinese culture revolution, but I don't think you've brought that up specifically.

      No, what I meant was, a ratio of three million people would net a MUCH larger sample once factored against two billion people. 'Guantanamo and Tienanmen Square' itself may indeed be 'apples and oranges' but 'Chinese oppression and US oppression' is 'apples and crab apples'.

      Again, the GP was comparing Gitmo to China.

      That's nice. There's a greater topic, though, with more posts in it than only the one that supports your point. Take, for example:

      Twist it how you want to, but the fact remains that both countries act like assholes and US is in the same level.

      That's comparing countries, of which Guantanamo would be only one isolated example. So depending on how far up the conversation you're willing to go, one of us is off topic.

    119. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've never seen a more breathless defense of the lynch mob.

    120. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      People finally figured out we only have one political party?

      Some people needed this lesson, I consider it a victory that they got it.

      This.

    121. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And what justifies the massive land grabs governments make, claiming ownership and domain of large swathes of land unused, uncultivated, lying bare? Because they said so?

      Your paternalistic liberal views can justify anything from genocide to censorship. Your argument could be used to justify Jim Crow laws in the old South. You are living proof of just how thuggish, violent, and controlling democracy can be. Demanding strict obedience and conformity, where the only right is numbers and might. Disgusting.

    122. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 0, Troll

      Agree with you,as far as your limited analysis goes. But what is harm? Let's say I live in Libertopia, and have a farm. Well, my rich, mean neighbor wants my farm because my soil is perfect for growing his prize orchids. But I refuse to sell. So he buys up all the land surrounding mine. He says he'll shoot me if I come onto his property. And he'll shoot anyone coming to visit me. Or sell me food. After all, it is his property and he is harming no one by refusing them entrance. Completely legal in Libertopia, where all the government does is protect people and property from 'harm.' It's not his fault if I starve to death, right?

      Down the street, we have the quaint town of Ramblesnatch, with picturesque old buildings and clean, unspoiled vistas. Lots of people in Ramblesnatch make their living off of tourism, which is quite popular due to the unspoiled vistas and quaint old buildings. Unfortunately for Ramblesnatch, that mean old rich neighbor wants to put up a garbage boiling plant and a new high density pig farm right next door. It's his land, he can do what he likes, right? It's not his fault if everyone in Ramblesnatch loses their jobs because of his choices, they can't tell him what to do and what not to!

      You see, freedom means more than just 'I get to do what I want and you can't stop me unless I'm physically hurting you.' Freedom is only a valid concept within a society which creates it. Outside of society, there is no freedom, only power. Only when you live in a group does the concept of freedom become meaningful.

      Freedom is a contract entered into by individuals. Individuals agree that they will protect certain rights. The individual gets a benefit, but at a cost, as with any contract. They must refrain from abridging others freedoms, as defined by society (meaning, the contracts between individuals, which is all society is) and they must protect others whose freedoms are being abridged. That is the cost you pay for freedom: you are limited in what you can do in certain ways, in exchange for not being limited in other, more valuable ways. I certainly like the freedom to swing my arms around wherever I please, but I value the freedom from getting punched in the face more.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    123. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you are considering the Civil War, the US gov't has not killed millions.

      I think you're forgetting about a few wars.

      WWI, WWII, Korea & Vietnam to start. Then there's the last decade or so in the middle east...

    124. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you don't want people telling you what to do, you don't have to live in society.

      Where exactly? There's no place on earth not claimed by a country. There's no property in this country not claimed by somebody, including public property. And even though it's called public property, I can't just take a piece of it and put up a homestead and call it my own. And even if I did own it, I'd still be bound by all laws and building codes and zoning regulations and whatever else regulations. Besides, what claim could I have on any other land? It's on this land that I was born so by birthright this is the one I have the most claim to, even if I don't recognize the society running it. That I was born into this nation is not a choice, what denies me the right to cut out my own patch, raise my own flag and declare independence? Well the constitution paragraph 1 says the nation is "indivisible" ( 1. Kongeriget Norge er et frit, selvstændigt, udeleligt og uafhændeligt Rige. Dets Regjeringsform er indskrænket og arvelig monarkisk.) Who decided that? Men from 1814 that are long since dead, and the constituency is mostly drawn by borders created by vikings a thousand years ago.

      I'm not trying to go off on some anarchistic rant here, I'm just trying to point out that no you don't have a choice and a lot of it is not cooperative but rather quite arbitrary and full of historical luggage. Today, people in Washington DC decide federal law that applies in California thousands of miles away. It's almost as detached as London deciding colony law even though there's some representation, you can still be overruled by a bunch of people thousands of miles away. And if you think they could just peacefully secede, dream on. In Africa there are still country lines drawn with rulers on a map as the colony powers divided the continent between them. Look at all the separatist groups all over the world, there's only one thing keeping nations from crumbling as bits and pieces decide to become independent and that is pure application of force, either military or otherwise. The closest thing you got are certain occupant areas like Freetown Christiania where around 1000 occupants have made some partially independent mini-state but the government is trying hard to "normalize" the area which in practice means forcing them into the confines of the nation state again. One person or even a handful of person would stand no chance, neither would these if push comes to shove. For real independence you need thousands of men with arms, which really only creates a difference society you want out of. You can opt out of living with other people and become a hermit, but you can't really opt out all the way.

      That's called 'stealing.'

      Congratulations on a worse abuse of words than the MAFIAA.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    125. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by tombeard · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's right. We don't keep citizens at Gitmo, we lock them up in the Charleston Navel Station or the Bagrum air base. Or we ship them to helpful eastern European countries where they mysteriously disappear or commit suicide.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    126. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      There are none... that is the point. You can keep your "Sanctity of marriage" all you want, but the Church should not be deciding who gets the State's benefits. You separate them and the problem is solved.

    127. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by GSloop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your argument while technically true devolves to:

      Well Jimbo axe murdered, in cold blood, 100 people and I only murdered one, so we're really a lot different.

      Sure, different in that Jimbo in a quantitative sense is worse.
      But in a qualitative sense, you're really just the same. [I'd probably be willing to say there's some qualitative difference [between US and China gvmts] too, but I think it's a lot less than most would argue it is.]

      What we [the US] has done with Gitmo, Torture, Illegal Wiretaps/Rendition etc - is truly horrific. We don't have any [or much] qualitative difference as to "why" we did it, we just have a smaller pool of people we've done it to.

      So, I have a hard time feeling a lot more secure with the US than with China - the only difference is there's at least some check on the government by the people - as long as I'm in a group that's not viewed as "terrorist" I would be difficult to torture or send to Gitmo - the public would decry it.

      But the government would be glad to do it once the "cost" [in PR] is reduced.
      So, all they have to do is demonetize you or your group and ergo - you get tortured, sent to Gitmo [Bagram] etc.

      They [the US Gvmt] certainly doesn't appear to have any moral qualm about doing it, only about the cost. And that doesn't make them much different in a moral sense than the Chinese gvmt.

      Cheers
      -Greg

    128. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      Well, there are plenty of places you can go. You can even build your own island. But that is besides the point. Just because you can not find the deal you are looking for anywhere else, does not mean you can dictate to others that they must give you the deal you want. Your 'where else can I go' argument is akin to arguing that I should be able to walk into a store and demand they sell me what I want, at the price I want, because no one else is willing to.

      So, perhaps you can't reasonably opt out of society. You can't opt out of the capitalist system, either. You can't opt out of paying for the things you get. This is a fact of life, and fair.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    129. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by GSloop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess I missed the part in the constitution that says it only applies to citizens?

      So torture, as long as we only do it to non-citizens is just fine - we've not sacrificed our "values?"
      Jailing people in cages, without charges, without trial, picking the judicial venue at our convenience when we do offer a trial [No trial if we can't convict you, millitary tribunal if we can't convict you with real evidence] or regular civilian trial if we have good evidence] - as long as we do that to non-citizens, it's all well and good? We haven't sacrificed our values?

      I don't know what your DAMN values are, but that's certainly sacrificing mine and those in the constitution we should respect.

    130. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No need. It's called commercial pop-culture. The beauty of it is that everyone gets it beforehand, like you, practically from birth.

      You don't see what is right before your eyes. You think that being able to post drivel on blogs is a showcase of freedom. We have among the worst education, medical care, and retirement policies in the industrialized world yet you exclude it from the discussion. We have a deep recession thanks to tyrants and their politician-minions, and you exclude it. We are fighting "The War on Drugs" and "The War on Terror" for the sole purpose of having tyrants loot our society side-by-side with drug traffickers and the financiers of Sunni Islamic terrorism, and you exclude it. We happily allow immigrants to come in and work as slave labor, then do everything to punish them and deny them services they have already paid for via the taxes withheld from their paychecks, and you exclude that as well from the discussion. But Oh My! We can post whatever we want on Slashdot and HuffPost and thousands of other forgettable sites! That proves we are free!

      Wake the fuck up.

    131. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What justifies the massive land grabs that individuals make, claiming ownership and domain of large swathes of land, even if they were in use by others previously? Because they said so?

      Your simplistic libertarian views demonstrate that you have only a glib, self serving, and superficial understanding of what freedom means. Freedom is a contract between individuals where both people give up something they value less in order to gain something they value more. As such, freedom is something that is defined by society, not individuals. Individuals, by themselves, have only power. Freedom is a moot concept outside of society. Inside society, it is always a trade off, and it means something far more than "I get to do whatever I want and you can't tell me what to do."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    132. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I've never seen a more self serving and superficial definition of 'freedom.'

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    133. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No, it's okay so long as you do it in presence of few enough people. Family, coworkers etc would generally be okay. If you go on a crowded street and start shouting, then, yeah, you'll have issues.

    134. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      If you don't want people telling you what to do, you don't have to live in society.

      Where does one go then? Last time I looked, the national boundaries of all countries combined extended to all livable land.

    135. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Who said US doesn't pull stunts like China?

      I'm not happy about what "the authorities" (TFA is not clear on which authorities) did, shutting down these sites.

      But comparing shutting down sites that were streaming copyrighted material without permission with shutting down political dissent is kind of a stretch.

      And why would anyone want crappy streaming videos when you can download high quality HD copies of those same videos at eztv or TPB or one of the hundreds of torrent trackers?

      US is just as bad.

      Oh, come on. You know better than that. Even the worst crackdown on copyright infringement doesn't really compare to locking up thousands of dissidents. Don't you worry that by making crazy comparisons you weaken a position on horrible laws like ACTA? People who haven't take a position one way or the other on this issue would read your statement and say "Are all the anti-ACTA people as loony as SquarePixel who says that shutting down sites engaged in illegal behavior is the same as running down protesters in tanks? If so, I want no part of their insanity".

      If we're going to have any chance of stopping the worst abuses of the nexus of corporate power and government enforcement, we can't afford to go around sounding like drooling idiots.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    136. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by LilGuy · · Score: 1
      For all of its many faults, the U.S. has generally outstanding freedom of speech. You can say all kinds of things here that would float anywhere else in the world. Just look at how Holocaust denial is treated in Europe. Or imagine how long someone like Alex Jones could operate in China, railing against the Chinese and thousands of real or imagines murderous conspiracies.

      Yet that isn't the point here. The point is that thousands of blogs were taken down under the hush of silence. No one speaks about why and no one is allowed to. That is the issue here.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    137. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      I've responded to this question twice in this thread already, so just keep reading, m'kay?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    138. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What you don't get to do is to have all of the benefits of living in a cooperative society, while paying none of the costs. That's called 'stealing.'"

      No, that's called "Native Status"

    139. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      So, perhaps you can't reasonably opt out of society. ...This is a fact of life, and fair.

      In what particular way is the inability to opt out of society 'fair'? Fair to whom? Was it unfair that people left England for the New World, when they wanted to opt out of English society? Would it be unfair for people to leave for Alpha Centauri and opt out of Terran society?

      It may not currently be reasonably possible to opt out of society, but never mistake something being inevitable for it being 'fair'.

    140. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      A factor you are failing to consider. Homosexual marriages may be "new" but long term monogamous Homosexual relationships are not, and they have been around far longer that most people give them credit for.

      The "Sanctity" of marriage has nothing to do with the sex of the participants, it is about the commitment to stay together, to pledge oneself to another for all time. Where the sanctity is lost is when one or both participants decide that the vows they made, sworn before all that they hold sacred, are not worth the effort and sacrifice needed to keep them.

      I have known many Homosexual couples who have been together, and faithful to each other, for 20+ years. How is that level of commitment any different than that shown in a "Traditional" marriage that has lasted the same amount of time?

      Also, the national divorce rate hit 50% long before the USA started its decline in technological leadership.

    141. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by andr00oo · · Score: 3, Funny

      the person who knows how to predict the weather may not be "attractive"

      You might be watching the wrong News Channel

    142. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the religious benefits, but there are tangible benefits to having a ceremony and making a public declaration of a contract before witnesses. When times get hard, those same witnesses will encourage the parties to work through their differences rather than doing the instinctual "cut and run". Pastors can be effective marriage counselors, if they refrain from trying to advise couples what specific sex acts God does and does not approve of (don't laugh, I've personally seen people do exactly that). Being member of a congregation does have tangible benefits as well -- from what I've seen, being a Mormon means never having a shortage of people willing to help you move!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    143. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually i'd say the usa is a little worse about it all. We are the king of hypocrisy.

      The us wont actually admit to shutting anything down. While still claming this is the greatest country ever.

      go us. we're number 1!

    144. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      To clarify, I'm not saying that the inability to opt out of society is fair. I'm saying that getting only what you are willing to pay for is fair. Living in society comes with a cost. You do not get to dictate what the cost is. Other people get to tell you what to do, that's part of the cost. If you don't like it, you are free to shop around for something you like better. But, if you can not find something you like better, you do not get to simply take what you like without paying for it.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    145. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picked up on a battlefield? Is that black humor? If by battlefield you mean the planet earth then yeah, they were picked up on the battlefield.

    146. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      And they were talking about it on Blogetery.com a week ago...

    147. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      I shouldn't feed trolls, but I'll point out these points: the neighbor would be physically preventing the land owner from moving to public property (roads have always been an exception); and if the town didn't own the land, they were profiting from the state of land belonging to someone else thus had no right to expect it to remain the same.

    148. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Antarctica

      Now you're just being ridiculous. If you suggest someone go elsewhere, you have to have somewhere that it is practical, possible, for them to go. Otherwise your suggestion is bullshit; which I think is the case here.

      Desert Island

      Again, you know of one that isn't some society's claimed property, and therefore subject to the rules of that society, and is large enough to support habitation? Where? Be specific.

      Anyplace no one from the government ever goes, like most of Alaska

      No. This is just squatting on an existing society's property. Doesn't solve the problem (and will probably cause others.)

      diamond pony

      strawman. I said you either comply with society, or it crushes you. Nothing in your pony exposition addresses that either way.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    149. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      What makes you think I was trolling? Please, try to find something in the above post which is inflammatory, and not something I actually believe.

      So, we agree that the absolute rights of the property owner must be abridged when they infringe on another's rights. Good. Nobody gets to just say 'you can't come on my land no matter what!' and society always has an overriding interest in it's member's property.

      My town example was pretty simple. They do own the town land. But not the land five feet away where the garbage distillery and pig farm will be located. A true libertarian would claim the town has no rights to tell the pig farmer what to do. I say, hogwash. They can form an agreement which says, if you want to build in our town, you follow our rules. Like you have to build buildings that do not destroy the positive externalities we have created, such as the quaint look and unspoiled views. These extranlities are a source of income from the town, and the would-be pig farmer is destroying them.

      I am trying to show that 'harm' is a nebulous concept, and I think I have shown that it is more than just getting punched in the face. Even without guns, weapons, or violence, someone can harm you substantially. Economic coercion is real, it is initiation of force against someone else, and it harms people. So, we have a right to say, 'hey, you are harming me., Stop.' The question is, what do you consider harm? For most libertarians, harm is only something that happens to them or those they care about. If it happens to someone else, why, that person is just a whiner who wants a free ride from society, and their idea of 'harm' should not be respected.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    150. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      So, perhaps you can't reasonably opt out of society. You can't opt out of the capitalist system, either. You can't opt out of paying for the things you get. This is a fact of life, and fair.

      Ah, but you can opt out of life, and thus escape society, the capitalist system, and paying for things. This is also a fact of life, and fair. And, it seems like that's the real goal of some of the folks who want out of "society". And that makes me sad, because we have ways to treat depression. Just smoke some weed! Oh wait... Now back to opting out of life again.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    151. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Some cultures, such as our own, also use marriage as an institution to shore up child rearing efforts.

      That's just a fantasy. Kids from intact marriages just as often come out horribly; kids of single parents, and sometimes no parents, just as often come out just fine. There's all manner of mixed results both ways -- there's no evidence at all that marriage is doing us any favors in the child-rearing department. Kids need love, education, healthcare -- they don't need parents that are mired in an unhappy marriage, and quite often, the latter works strongly against the actual needs. Our society isn't using marriage to "help kids" at all. If anything, it uses marriage against them by decimating the financial position of both parties when they become tired of one another, which in turn materially disadvantages the children; and forces the kids to live in an atmosphere of discomfort - or even hate - until the pressure of the bad marriage overcomes the inappropriate and harmful social pressure. if the married parties can't face those pressures, then instead, we have a household full of people who don't want to be around one another. Good job. Not.

      you assert 'natural limits' and yet deny the law the right to arbitrarily define them

      If this is too difficult for you to understand - that informed consent isn't consequent to an exact age, but instead to a complex set of interrelated understandings -- then you're an ethical cripple. The basis of liberty is informed consent. Informed consent requires understanding the issue(s) at hand. Not being 16, or 18, or 21. It is absolutely possible to be 30 years old and completely unable to give anything even remotely resembling informed consent; it is absolutely possible to be 13 years old and be able to give it, in detail and at length. Every law that says "at age so-and-so" inevitably directly harms people on both sides of the line it draws, and every such law is a demonstration of a failure to legislate competently.

      Would you advocate a one-time assessment, or merely an ad-hock(sic) application of the law at the whim of the arbiter?

      Generally speaking, I advocate qualifying for making particular decisions before you're called on to actually make them. Just as you must pass a driving test before we let you on the road, I would have you pass a test on sexual issues before you were allowed to engage in sex. I would have you pass a test on how the federal government works before you were allowed to vote in a federal election or referendum. I would have you pass a test on known consequences and the general immediate physiological effects of drinking, before you were allowed to drink or purchase alcohol. I would have you pass a test on the constitution before you were allowed to stand for office. Etc.

      I would no more want my kids to be involved in matters sexual before they were well educated about them and competent to decide if they should be involved, than I would have an "electrician" in my house who doesn't know why we have a neutral line, or why a secondary breaker box isn't grounded, or what electrical phase means.

      I see absolutely nothing wrong with qualifying people based on their actual capabilities, because we are not all equally competent in any particular matter or matters. Not created that way, don't grow up that way, can't be educated to be that way, and will likely never be that way even under the most optimistic genetic rewiring schemes. The law... the draw an age line in the sand idea... is stupid. It's not a "compromise", it's an act of idiocy that does not reflect the actual realities we face, and it does constant harm of significant nature up to and including completely destroying people's lives.

      In the United States this is largely false. You cannot live together with more than a handful of people from different families in basica

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    152. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by hedwards · · Score: 1

      There's a reason for that Bush was doing things which the country at large really wouldn't have approved had they really understood what was going on. In this case it's hard to say without information exactly what the problem was. But considering how the Republican party was tripping over itself to rubber stamp pretty much whatever damned foolish thing Bush wanted to do, there's good reason for the change. Obama for all his faults isn't a dictator nor does he handle the Presidency in any way analogous to one.

    153. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, on Slashdot, that's called "infringement" because society would still be there whether or not the person in question paid, so nothing is lost.

      And of course we're pretending that "stealing" is a technical term in the first place, again because this is Slashdot.

    154. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      You know once you've hit it, and everyone else does also. I think it sort of 'just works'. Why don't you?

      Thanks to growth hormones in our livestock, 12-year-olds look like the 18-year-olds of my youth. So, no, "everyone else" does not also know, based on physical characteristics anyway. So I don't think it "just works". Making 18 years the age of consent has contributed to destroying our society; I have a female relative something like 5 generations back (+/- 100 years) who married at 13. Our bodies have not evolved much at all since then, especially not pushing puberty off by 5 more years.

      So, we're forcing "physical adults" to still be "incapable children" when their bodies are fully capable and are in fact being urged to do the deed by their very hormones, which are expressing this urgency because they "know" (even if the individual doesn't) that the individual can die at any time, so it's best to start reproducing as soon as physically able -- see "The Selfish Gene". (Yes, I know that there are other concerns like the ability to support one's self; I'm just talking about the physical aspects, like you were.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    155. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Hi, I never know when someone adds me as a friend, so I'm letting you know that I loved your analysis, and just subscribed to your newsletter. :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    156. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take it you disagree with the American War of Indepedance then? As they did exactly the opposite of what you recommend when faced with a world that did not offer the governmental option they wanted?

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    157. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      In the US, a dissident post on a message board may be deleted. In China, the poster gets deleted. Big difference =p

    158. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Archades54 · · Score: 1

      History has shown many have lived in cooperative society without paying many of the costs. "Draft" dodging via wealth n power, Affording decent lawyers or even going as far to use corruption to get around laws, using the courts and large amounts of money to win a war of atrocity against someone in a courtroom because they cannot afford to pay the legal costs to continue the fight.

      Society evolved and grew up with the weak being stood on, survival of the fittest, the strong take power and oppress others, always have and for the short term future probably always will.

      Maybe that's just human nature, or maybe it's the law of nature itself. The good thing is that part of our human nature as a species that is social is to help out those in need at times and hopefully we will evolve socially to allow more of it vs chasing greed.

      Maybe when science gets to a point where we can interface the biology with cybernetics to access all of our emotions, keep us happy, then no one will care if they are oppressed as they can simply be happy. If you had the chance to do boring manual labour work but had a way to make it the most fun you'll ever have then you'd be a fool not to choose it.

      The thing people hate about America with this is that they claim how bad censorship is for other countries etc but do it themselves apparently. Just like the cries of "land of the free" and hypocrisy's where free health-care is apparently the devil. If you put forth your country as the ideal free peaceful democratic society then expect people to call you out more for when you fail to live up to it.

      The fact that the reason these sites were taken down is still a secret just enforces doubt. Just like in my country (Australia) our blocklist for the censorship is going to remain a "secret" for the good of the people? History again proves secret reasons that things are banned or even people locked up for them usually come with oppression.

      --
      If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
    159. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but have you ever lived life... on weed?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    160. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      He wasn't talking about homosexuality, or divorece. He was responding to a post suggesting polyamory would be beneficial to society.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    161. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the US, Russia, or some other country decides it wants to claim that land you live on (maybe there's oil there, etc) they'll just send some guys to boot you off. They'll say "US soil, get off" and you're back to square one.

      In the end, Might is Right and the only rights you have are the ones you are powerful enough to defend yourself, or clever enough to convince someone else to defend for you.

    162. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holocaust denial isn't a very good example to bring up, not because of the emotive aspect, but because it's a historical event.

      We are discussing current happenings which will have an effect on immediate future happenings.

      Using (ironically!) the "Hermann Goering" defence does not help your case!

    163. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      To be fair, we can't be sure he didn't just get beaten to death by the police or corporate hitmen for saying that, so he may have proven himself right.

    164. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when me and my buddies are out performing our duty, get shot at, and in turn return fire and overtake an objective, taking prisoners, what are the prisoners. They are from no declared Army, so POW is not actually true, but I think of them as one, and we treat them as one. We are still at war so, they are still POW's. So did we bring back every prisoner from WWII and give them a trial, no, did we provide for them, unlike our enemy who do not provide there pow's? Does a POW have rights for a trial under the Constitution? All this falls back to the Geneva Convention in the end. Just a lesson to those who get to sit at home while soldiers go out there serving under the Elected President of the USA, if you are getting shot at, you shot back or you die. Enemy Combatants are basically, non uniformed soldiers, and that is why we are the US have uniforms, not pick up what you want. The enemy can come in many forms, Men 18-80+, Women, and Children. You will never know what it is like to have a 6 year old run around the corner, grenade in hand and throw it at you and your buddies. That 6 year old is now the enemy, and if you are lucky and alert, you can neutralize the threat before he takes out a whole squad, either way, you will be scared, you will have regrets, but you will remember, at that moment, they where the ENEMY, trying to kill you. This is like no war we have ever been in, the enemy might bring you a meal Monday, and try to kill you Tuesday. GITMO is a POW camp, it was just renamed to be PC. I think every one that says, they have rights to, does not understand, that is under the laws of war, not the laws of our state. If we followed the law's of where they were captured, they would be dead. As for: "I'd be at a total loss for what to do if I, or someone I cared for, was in that situation." go and talk to a WWII vet, maybe someone you know, ask what it was like in a WWII POW Camp in Germany or Japan, or just look it up, these guy's are in the Hilton in comparison, they get food, water, shelter, medical, respect of there spiritual rights and human rights to live, and we don't even force them to do there own laundry, that is even better than a US prison, or at least as the movies show it. Even in battle, after capture, we protect them, provide them top of the line medical care in the OR next to the man he just tried to kill. If you want to know the cost of "FREEDOM", serve in the military. We are so free in this country, that we even allow a protests at the funerals of a US Service Members killed in the line of duty, disrespecting the family and friends of the fallen, but it is freedom that we protect.

    165. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. You are not allowed to discuss this topic. You must now report to detention room 3 to await your execution. Please move along quietly.

    166. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! One example that you keep repeating. What about those who were indeed thrown in gitmo and left to rot? What about them?

    167. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't buy it. By that reasoning, wouldn't the most conservative communities (e.g. where divorce is illegal) be the technological leaders?

    168. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by arth1 · · Score: 1

      China is *bad*. The U.S. is *bad*. But to say that the U.S. is "just as bad" is ridiculous and obviously false. Do even the most casual of checks about free speech rights in the US versus China, and you'll see how silly your statement is.

      There are no absolutes. How bad USA and China looks depends on your point of view. From a point of view close to the US, the US is far better than China. But from the point of view of someone who's culturally as far from the US as they are from China, the two may appear very similar.

      From my point of view, Red China of yesteryears was indeed far worse. But China has turned into a capitalist system that struggles with many of the same kind of human rights issues as the US, including mass disenfranchisement (albeit on a smaller scale than the US, where 20% of the adult population aren't allowed to vote), capital punishment, children's rights violations, imprisonment without the right to counsel, the right of corporations trumping the rights of individuals, religious persecution (although in China, it's the theists that are prevented from holding office, while in the US it's the atheists), censorship (why do you think Wikileaks is hosted outside China and USA?), and many other issues that look fairly similar from an outside viewpoint, no matter how different they may look from a US (or Chinese) point of view.

    169. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Did you even read the links you posted?

      A sampling:

      • Wei Jingsheng - passing military secrets
      • Zeng Jinyan - suspected of harming state security
      • Hu Jia - inciting subversion of state power
      • Gao Zhisheng - disturbing public order
      • Bao Tong - revealing state secrets and counter-revolutionary propagandizing
      • Shi Tao - illegally supplying state secrets to overseas organizations
      • Wang Bingzhang - spying, terrorism

      Get accused of those here in the U.S. and your ass will be in jail without a trial just like it would be in China.

    170. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Not quite that depressed. Yet; the wars (on foreign soil and in our brains) are taking their toll, though.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    171. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans crack me up. The argument above, as I'm reading it, is that you are free to do whatever you want, provided everyone (or at least the majority) says that's OK. That ain't freedom; that's permission, arbitrarily assigned.

      On reading your Declaration of Independence and your Constitution (find documents, both), the point I get from it is that freedom is absolute, and the government (and "society") is fundamentally consensual.

      Of course, that all went by the wayside in the '30s, when Roosevelt threatened to stack the Supreme Court in order to get his New Deal passed - suddenly things were deemed constitutionally legal which never had been (for good reason) previously, ie minimum wages, unions, etc.

      My country is probably worse by half, but we don't proclaim ourselves the "land of the free", because we understand irony better than those in the Excited States...

    172. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      It isn't exactly glowing praise about your freedoms if the best you can come up with is "we aren't quite as bad as China".

      Draconian copyright laws and giving too much influence to corporations seems to be the problem in the USA, vs plain old fashioned political repression in China.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    173. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You will always have people telling you what you can and can't do. It's called 'society.' Rational adults realize that we have to make compromises in order to live together in peace and prosperity, while spoiled children continue to whine that no one is the boss of them. If you don't want people telling you what to do, you don't have to live in society. What you don't get to do is to have all of the benefits of living in a cooperative society, while paying none of the costs. That's called 'stealing.'

      "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." - Declaration of Independence

    174. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      The USA government is likely going to make a profit on most of the bailouts. They were loans not grants. Your average bureaucrat is not over paid. I can't argue about Wall Street's excesses, but a functioning banking system is a necessary part of a healthy free market market.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    175. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If terrorists can drive the US government to abandon its principles and find clever ways to justify it, then that's a victory for those terrorists.

      Terrorist 1: Alahu! We've succeeded in furthering the power of the US government!
      Terrorist 2: Time to celebrate!
      (US politicians break out wine and champagne)

    176. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Living in society comes with a cost. You do not get to dictate what the cost is. Other people get to tell you what to do, that's part of the cost. If you don't like it, you are free to shop around for something you like better. But, if you can not find something you like better, you do not get to simply take what you like without paying for it.

      Actually, that's what people do when the costs forced upon them becomes too high. Most don't abandon their land, they declare their independence. They opt out of both the costs and the benefits, if they don't need anything from the society they depart from then they don't owe that society anything. I may not have the lands to build your own state or the armies to defend it, but why shouldn't I have the same right? You can not justify forcing a cost on me by virtue of me getting some benefits that have also been forced upon me. I would flip it around and say it's far more likel you are being charged for a product you never ordered.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    177. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, fuck YOU asshole. And fuck your mother for not teaching you proper language skills shitface. Fuck your whole family in all holes horsefuck.

    178. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Eil · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. I say we should still be blaming Bush for this kind of crap.

    179. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by jesset77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For most libertarians, harm is only something that happens to them or those they care about. If it happens to someone else, why, that person is just a whiner who wants a free ride from society, and their idea of 'harm' should not be respected.

      Meh, Libertarians have been getting a lot of flack along this line recently, and I think it's unwarranted. For example, Show me where's the heterosexual libertarian who won't argue in favor of Gay Marriage? If they are heterosexual, then they will never utilize this freedom themselves.

      At the core of it, Libertarian's specific concerns can be recodified in spun-speak as "this social agreement causes harm to our society and produces no measurable benefit; why are so many citizens resisting it being repealed?"

      If you're concern about Libertarian viewpoints is that they too frequently dismiss externalities then, speaking as a registered member of the party for 15 years I will agree that this is a problem worth chatting about. But I must also counter that most opponents we face in conversation defend virtually any incumbent policy without re-evaluating or even being able to enumerate the externalities which prompted them.

      In short, just about any law on the books was probably a good idea at the time. But times change and people are great at forgetting why things were set up a certain way. Every now and then we do have to come by and audit the legislative hacks. Libertarians accomplish this by arguing for policy which foundationally presumes personal liberty (which, while selfish, is readily quantified), and counting each compromise from this simplistic ideal as an expense which must be countered by an equal or greater benefit. Alright, I can't swing my arms in every direction but at least I won't be struck. Alright, I can't build on this strip of land but it's a communally owned "road" that will bring me more benefit than anything else I would have built there myself. Etc.

      And sure, this theme varies all the way down to the hard line anarcho-capitalists, but the intent is the same. Libertarians believe that we should start from personal liberty and then abridge that only to explore greater social benefits.

      --
      People willing to trade their freedom of expression for temporary entertainment deserve neither and will lose both.
    180. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Punk+CPA · · Score: 1

      Well, except for the part about harvesting your organs, maybe...

    181. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit! Now I want a diamond encrusted flying pony!

    182. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Machtyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the TEA parties and the Daily KOS prove that people in the US are free to express themselves anyway they want. Corporations still have to sue those that they think are defaming them... that is, they can't automatically jail that person or group.

      Stating that the US has the worst education is incredibly wrong. It may not be the best, but look around, visit the world, where are many of the worlds innovations made? Right here in the US. Stating that we have the worst medical care is completely wrong. The medical care that the US population enjoys is completely top-notch. You may disagree with the methods of compensation for that medical care, but the care is received quickly and is the best anywhere. I don't know about retirement policies. Personally, what I save is what I use should I not die before I stop working. Should I be so dependent upon some organization to pay me for non-work? Only if I can create a sweet contract for myself.

      But Oh My! We can post whatever we want on Slashdot...That proves we are free! Well, yes, actually. Your name won't be discovered. Your IP address, while recorded, won't be used to track you down. You'll not end up in some forgotten prison as a political prisoner for posting inanity. And you'll be able to defend your right to post whatever crap against whatever company you want.

    183. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. The U.S. Constitution does not protect us from "Dickhead Politicians", not even close. The "Dickhead Politicians" swear a solemn oath to "support and defend" (Senators and Representatives) and to "preserve, protect and defend" (President) the Constitution. The Constitution is just words written down, it does nothing. What *does* protect us from "Dickhead Politicians" should be the other branches of government, which in the case of the Supreme Court sometimes occurs. The only other protection we "the people" have is demanding that the "Dickhead Politicians" stop violating their oaths of office and that they stop creating laws that create problems or make existing problems even worse. The economic disaster this country is experiencing was caused by these "Dickhead Politicians", either by laws that created or made existing problems worse OR through neglect (not doing a damn thing to correct existing problems at all). And now, these same "Dickhead Politicians" that created or exacerbated the problem(s) by direct action, or inaction, are telling the U.S. tax payer that WE (not them) have to pay more collectively in taxes to clean up THEIR mess. This is injustice on a massive scale and why more responsible representatives and senators are just going along with it, makes no sense at all.

    184. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For one, the definition of marriage in a communal property state includes that everyone in the marriage owns 100% of the property. Yes, that's 200% of property split evenly. So in the case of death of one person, the other is the 100% owner, with no need for a will or probate or such. With three people sharing the same property, there are issues of, say, one person running up a significant debt and the others can be held responsible for it. Or if you can marry more than one person, why can't they marry more than one person? So that your two wives each have two husbands, and thus the husbands of your wives would own 100% of your property, even though they have no association with you directly. Not that there's anything too hard to figure out about it, but there'd need to be some serious cleaning up of the law.

      And the practical nature of it was that rich males would have a harem, and women would never marry more than one man. This ended up causing some cultural issues as the rich men would get the attractive women, and the poor men would be left without options. I've heard it argued that the sexual frustration of such cultures is one of the things that feeds men into suicide bombing. And I think that such a plan would face opposition where people would point out that women could have harems and that groups of gay men could all marry each other and such. Just letting two marry seems like a massive hurdle, but to let an entire gay village get married would probably be an even harder sell.

    185. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      Nah...but his credit score just mysteriously dumped, the license numbers for all of his home software was just purged from their manufacturer's computers, and 4 gigs of child porn just appeared - equally mysteriously - on his work computer.

      We skin cats differently here.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    186. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by tsotha · · Score: 1

      The other difference is the owner still has all his internal organs.

    187. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      Hey look, data!

      http://report.globalintegrity.org/China/2009

      http://report.globalintegrity.org/United%20States/2009

      Interesting site. Very cool.

      I became skeptical when I saw the U.S. ratings for executive and legislative accountability. On the surface, I think the numbers are fair. However, our adversarial two-party system, driven by sound-byte-reactionism, leaves the effective accountability far below the on-paper accountability. With congressional approval ratings running below 25%, we have an incumbency rate above 90%. That cannot jibe with a high accountability level.

      Overall, I think the site is excellent. Its objective is outstanding. However, I think that the accountability metrics demonstrate a significant lack of consideration of (or at least inability to accurately reflect) pseudo-integrity.

    188. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by mikerz · · Score: 1

      If it were as easy as "go somewhere else" then government wouldn't matter and it would be like a subscription you can pay; it's easy enough to move to another community, but to move elsewhere in the world? Where is there a place not ruled by arbitrary law punishable by arbitrary levels of coercion?

      To an extent tyranny certainly does mean being forced to do anything you don't want to do -- this is a key difference between society and government. In fact, that's why the federal government of the US was originally set up to be both voluntary and restricted to fundamental rights.

    189. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Oh great, so we get to bitch about it and still it is all the same. People can link all the sites they like, when I was in China the people were bitching about stuff just like here. It is no different. They even have links to cases where we have been stopped from bitching.

      The only real difference between the east and the west is that in the west people do not realise that the press is propaganda and in the west people "think" they are free to say what they like.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    190. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey ladies, there's three of us, two of you. Looks like you're giving it up in spun's world. We've 'already agreed how things will work'.

      That's why we live in a constitutional republic, not a democracy. And that's why we get up in arms over tyranny-- which really means the state taking more authority than they are authorized in The Constitution. If you want to call that whining, and yourself a 'rational adult', we'll see you in November.

    191. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am responding to all, you are all retarded,

      Fact China, USA, have guns

      Fact you don't

      fact you do what you are told because they have guns and you don't want you, your family and friends to die

      FACT

      Get real get used to it

      Shut up be quite don't make waves

      because they will kill you, your family, your friends and your city/town

      Shut up

      you didn't speak out with LBJ and now it is way way way way way way way way to late

      Shut up stay in your homes do as your told

      again they will kill you, your friends, your family your city/town

      BE QUITE DO AS YOUR TOLD

      YOU AMERICANS ARE SO GOOD AT IT NOW
      SHUT UP and let the rest of us fight the battles you have already conceded and imposed by your cowardice on us through your STALINS

    192. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I don't think we want anything from anyone.

      In a free country, people can choose to live as they wish, even communists like the Shakers. Love socialism? Free association. Think it works great? experiment, wonderful. No skin off my ass. In your world, we don't. End of argument, your little world is completely intolerant of the free.

      Your concept of 'rights' includes demanding someone else provide you with something, which points out your cluelessness from the start.

    193. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Your dollar is your vote, and if you withhold your vote, then the corporation goes bankrupt. As happened with Circuit City.

      No, the name simply disappeared. And from the ashes... Best Buy! Most corporations are well diversified, enough to sustain itself when a small part becomes gangrenous and needs to be amputated. You can bankrupt Circuit City, but their holdings in Procter & Gamble or British Petroleum, for example, will insure nobody will lose their mansions. And if the constitution protects us from from "Dickhead Politicians", why do we have so many of them, protecting their corporate backers? Unfortunately the constitution doesn't protect us from Dickhead Voters. My vote is my vote. My dollars are pretty worthless

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    194. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Do you assert that none of them deserve imprisonment?

      Nope.. About half, maybe two thirds...

      Nice try

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    195. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      So right, in the West you can scream about issues all you want. If people start taking notice the strange stuff starts to build up fast.
      Your phone is tapped, credit issues, strange visits by 'lost' tradespeople, audits.
      In China its the Laogai system that kicks in, in the west you sell out, are bought off, drop out, are redirected to safer topics or have your public/private life explored. The old joke about freedom of speech and Americans having freedom after speech seems to just be that in the US the system is a bit more creative in how they get you and when.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    196. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      Despite all the efforts of the establishment to eat into the free speech rights on individuals in the US, US is still better than a LOT of places when it comes to freedom of speech.

      Speaking as an Indian, I know for a fact that my life would be in grave danger if I started a blog documenting all the corruption going on in India (something I have been wanting to do and have been working on). I have been working on getting a friend of mine to host a site for me outside India so that the Indian government won't be able to take down the site as well, in case they turn against me.

      Well, one may point out a few examples where people have been targeted for doing something similar in the US, but I can assure you that it is a LOT worse in places like India.

      And in countries like China and Russia, it is actually even worse than in India. In Russia there is a very high likelihood that you will be killed if you speak too much against the establishment. In China, you will probably end up in jail for a long, long time.

      So for those who live in the US, please be a little bit more thankful for what you have and instead of getting distracted with all the shiny gadgets and the stupid debates about right vs left, please do try and protect what is remaining of the rights that you have.

    197. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is cheaper in China to incarcerate someone (in a shallow, unmarked grave) than in the US (in a nice building with 4 square and cable access.)

      Right, it is a really nice building, a place to rest your torn and weary rectum after getting your fudge packed deep and then drenched with buckets 'o' tainted cum.

    198. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do compromise on the basis of mutual consent. If you like the deal offered to you by your country, you stay. If you don't, you take your business somewhere else. Just as with any business you can not just walk in, demand what you like, and refuse to pay. What, exactly, do you deem 'tyranny?' I'm guessing tyranny means 'anything I don't want to do,' right? Well, that is not how society works, you do not get to dictate terms to the majority who have already agreed how things will work. You get to take the deal we offer you, or leave it and find a better deal. It is not our fault if the deal you want is not available in the world marketplace of governance.

      I deem "batch intrusions" on the legal rights of all Americans (that includes you). It's no big deal that O is completely off the reservation bullying & demanding things he has no moral, ethical or legal reason to take. He's a traitor, period. He promised transparency, we got none. He's eviscerating our economic infrastructure while inviting current enemies to come and live here. I can't wait until a terrorist kills one of your family members. Maybe then you will gain the appropriate sensitivity about keeping your rights. You believe you are entitled to entirely too much. I blame your parents for not teaching you the difference between reality & where you exist.

    199. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If our government violates the deal that gave them power, it is not for the freedom loving people to leave, it is for the tyrants to leave-or to fertilize the tree of liberty.

    200. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Attraction develops from ancient rites of selection which favored..."

      No, no, no, no, no, no. Have I emphasised that enough?

      Our genetic make up dictates what we will find attractive and how much we will value different factors. One such factor is status. The signs of status may be different in different societies and so, as we grow up we will learn to recognise those different signs. But status is still one of the core factors driving many. It's built in.

      Some of the variation in humanity is harmless but does not progress humanity as efficiently as others (homosexual relationships for example. I don't mean to judge them, just to say they don't produce children though individual same sex relationships may provide other advantages). Some relationships will produce lots of offspring with an approach to life which will prove successful in the current environment and those will flourish. Some will be attracted to all kinds of strange and perverse objects, practices, animals... and their genetic line will die out rapidly.

      What you *want*, is as much a result of centuries of natural selection as what you look like. You may think you have made a decision but you have no more made a decision to marry that girl than a bee has made a decision to collect honey, a bear has made a decision to sleep for the winter or most people have *decided* to have relationships with the opposite sex. That's just the way that all those years of natural selection made things turn out.

      Strange isn't it. We are what we are through natural selection, yet we *feel* as though we are free to choose. Spooky.

    201. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Takes one to know one!

    202. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by nobodie · · Score: 1

      No, you ALL don't get it. We can discuss things here in China, in Chinese, on public blogs and in public forums. BUT we will get flamed by the "wu mao" (roughtly translated to "50 centers") who are paid to find blog posts like that and flame them out of existence, sort of a denial of opinion attack by just doing a rush limbaugh/ glen beck thing where they argue that you are totally wrong/ bad/ retarded/ but not in those words in the Chinese equivalent of that degree of badness. When it gets actually translated literally it doesn't sound "so bad", but it is. And they swarm your blog comment section and hack your site and generally make you want to quit. But they are NOT the government, just evil minions of the powers that be.

      Now, that should sound more familiar to you in the US (it calls to mind SJN Vaughn's columns which can pretty much be considered flamebait for microsoft fanboys) and there is a similarity. But it is analogous, not reflective. Just as most Americans care little about most issues discussed on slashdot, most Chinese could give a rat's ass about the issues that Americans think should be important to them. Shit like freedom, they have the freedom to go to a hospital for almost free and stay until they are healthy. They have the freedom to go to a dentist in that hospital for almost free dental care as well (they don't because the idea of dental care is still just catching on; I am getting a root canal right now at an expensive (20 times the cost at the chinese hospital) Japanese dental franchise for a total cost of 700 dollars US: two canals, post, xrays, multiple visits, antibiotics, and the lookalike crown) My first root canal was total Chinese: 10 us dollars, but no novocain. I am a wuss in my dotage.

      Anyway, you can't judge China by western standards, as I tell my students, if they think they can understand the US from TV shows and movies they are crazy. Sit down at your TV and imagine your world was what you are watching on TV: crazy or what. They have the freedom to watch Sex and the city and the freedom to not understand it.

      I love crying in the wilderness almost as much as crying in my beer

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    203. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Hell, if I start a business, I'll have assholes like you telling me all sorts of shit I can and can't do, because suddenly now I'm not a person with rights...

      True enough - you will in fact be two persons with rights https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Corporate_personhood

    204. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The business analogy does not work. We are not just "customers", we are also "shareholders" of our country. So it's actually our duty to improve the deal offered by it. And we certainly can have free exchange of opinion about how to do that.

    205. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by forebees · · Score: 1

      And what justifies the massive land grabs governments make, claiming ownership and domain of large swathes of land unused, uncultivated, lying bare? Because they said so?

      Hmmm. I'm not quite sure what you are trying to say here. If you can't vote, then sure, there's nothing you can do about it. If you think voting changes nothing, then there is no argument that will convince you and I suggest you move to a dictatorship and settle down - you obviously don't need the vote or any ability to influence the government under which you live.

      In short, the land is owned by the community - not you - and the government, voted in by the community, holds it on behalf of the community. You may not like what they do with it (and sometimes I don't either) but you need to work to change their minds and support those who think similarly. If you have a political environment in which many people don't vote (USA, Britain and other such places) then sure, you've got a hard road to hoe. Nonetheless, there are so many examples of how change has been brought about by voting and political agitation, that there's no need to quote them here.

      Your paternalistic liberal views can justify anything from genocide to censorship. Your argument could be used to justify Jim Crow laws in the old South.

      This comment is completely and utterly contradictory. I don't know what passes for liberalism where you live, but you appear to confuse dictatorship of a party or junta with liberal values of equality, freedom of speech and other such weirdly liberal things as freedom of association, the rights of workers and the poor and so on. Liberal views have never justified anything you suggest here. Freedom from slavery was a 'liberal' 'humanist' movement which was opposed by those who opposed liberal views.

    206. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      If they ever do that, let me know, okay?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    207. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      A small minority of people seem to believe as you do that Obama has trampled the constitution. I don't, but I just have ask, where were you during the Bush years?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    208. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      No, I don't demand that someone provide me with anything. I just demand an equitable distribution of rewards for the work that is done.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    209. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      Whiners call anything they don't like tyranny. Where were you during Bush?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    210. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Express your opinions all you like. I, and the rest of the majority, will be here to dispute them.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    211. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      Just because you don't like the deals that are available does not give you the right to dictate terms. For example "if it were easier to buy a Mazeratti, then Yugos wouldn't matter so much."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    212. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you've been arguing with conservatives. They defend the status quo. Liberals like to change things for the better. But we don't agree with libertarians about what makes things better. Liberals also agree that we should start from basic liberty and only abridge that to explore greater social benefits.

      You sound more like a social anarchist than a libertarian. Are you American? The American Libertarian party is the anarcho-capitalist party. In Europe, Libertarian just means 'anarchist' in general. I have no problem with European libertarians, in fact, I am an anarcho-syndicalist who believes in democratic control of the means of production.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    213. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      I support any individual or group's fundamental right to leave any union. For instance, the civil war was not justified on the grounds of preserving the union. It was only justifiable on the grounds of ending slavery. I would love it if the red state leaches who take more in federal subsidies than they pay in taxes left the union and formed their own country. God DAMN! would I love watching them fail miserably and beg to be readmitted.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    214. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by mikerz · · Score: 1

      Exactly! but you could attempt to negotiate, in your example. The argument of "if you don't like it, move elsewhere" is incomplete.

      The necessary relationship of government and society is that society implicitly supports its government even in the case of deep tyranny. If you "decline" the "offer" in the case of government, you will be incarcerated, have your property taken away or possibly killed (in sharp contrast to negotiating to buy something -- which is based on mutual consent). But the action taken is reflective of the society -- law means nothing if it is not carried out by someone.

    215. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      I became skeptical when I saw the U.S. ratings for executive and legislative accountability. On the surface, I think the numbers are fair. However, our adversarial two-party system, driven by sound-byte-reactionism, leaves the effective accountability far below the on-paper accountability. With congressional approval ratings running below 25%, we have an incumbency rate above 90%. That cannot jibe with a high accountability level.

      It's a bell curve, not a set score based on set criteria.

      Relative to the rest of the world, the US has an extremely high rating for executive and legislative accountability. That doesn't mean the accountability is particularly good, it just means it is better than most everyone else's.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    216. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US is a Fascist state. Everyone is going to understand this in the coming days as the government continues to harden their stance against the citizens and more government dominance touches every aspect of living in the US.

    217. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      The USA government is likely going to make a profit on most of the bailouts.

      Yes, the government will, but they stole the money to make the loans from the taxpayers, and they won't be giving it back.

      This is a mobster robbing from the local shops (hey, it's not stealing! It's for "protection"!) in his territory so he can make loans to compulsive gamblers. Yeah, the mobster is going to get the loan back. If he doesn't, he'll break the gambler's legs and then double the interest. But the people he stole the cash from won't be seeing a dime of that profit.

      From the government's perspective, TARP was free money that they'll get even more back for. It's a 150% "return" on their "investment". Even now, when they have money they could be giving back (most of it is actually just money they have planned to steal but haven't gotten around to yet, but hey, details!), they want to find another use for it instead. It's so much bullshit I can't stand it.

      Your average bureaucrat is not over paid.

      Most of the bureaucrats are unnecessary. By definition that makes them overpaid by whatever it is that they are making.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    218. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      You might want to take a better look at history, my friend.

      The United States of America is the only country in the history of the world that defeats another country's military in war, and then leaves. Every other country in history - including all European countries - have been conquering nations.

      The US generally attempts to make sure the local government is at least friendly to the US before it leaves, but this is not always so.

      In other words, if you judge the US by its behavior, it does the exact opposite of what you describe, and it is the only country in the history of the world who behaves that way.

      No other country can say that. Period.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    219. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      Don't misunderstand, I don't think I'm all that free. Hell, if I start a business, I'll have assholes like you telling me all sorts of shit I can and can't do, because suddenly now I'm not a person with rights, I'm an eeeeevil corporatist fat-cat.

      No.... It means that your business is recognized as having no driving principle other than profit and that, left to it's own devices in that singular pursuit, your business will very likely behave in a manner that is not in the interests of the citizens the government ostensibly serves. The right thing for the government to do then, is to regulate that business so that such negative impact on the citizenry is minimized. Our government's failure to carry out this fundamental responsibility of late has had colossally bad consequences recently. The banking collapse and BP's killing of the Gulf of Mexico are two shining examples of the amoral pursuit of profit and the inevitable sequelae if ever there were any.

    220. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      It's a mangled Half Baked quote.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    221. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure how you arrived at that conclusion, based on what I wrote I think anyone would conclude the exact opposite. We took our business elsewhere, thank you King, you're not needed anymore. Not that we ever had a valid contract with nobility in the first place.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    222. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Jawnn · · Score: 0, Troll

      And what justifies the massive land grabs governments make, claiming ownership and domain of large swathes of land unused, uncultivated, lying bare? Because they said so?

      Well... Yes, actually. It's called "eminent domain". It used to be used where the "seizure" was demonstrably "for the public good". Of course, if you were the one on the losing end, it still pretty much sucked, but there was, at least, that "greater good" rationale. Of course, since the SCOTUS ruled on Kelo v New London, even that rationale no longer exists. Just so there's no misunderstanding, in ruling for New London, the conservative-packed Supreme Court to a giant dump on the Fifth Ammendment (the "takings" clause, specifically).

      So tell me, where do "Real American" conservatives like yourself stand on this issue?

    223. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can I go if I don't want to be controlled by a government? The moon? Since WWII and probably before, it has not been possible to just get on a ship and move to somewhere you can be free, unlike the people on the Mayflower or Homo sapiens walking out of Africa. This is not your fault, but I can't do anything about it either. I don't think the majority of people were consulted when the US was founded. Former European colonies may have had referenda for independence, but I don't think more than a handful of people were asked to draft the constitutions and laws of those countries.

      If I have no money and no skills, I can't just pack up and leave my country, even though it is a basic "human right" - I need to send forms and photos and all that rubbish to organisations in my country to get a passport, and organisations in other countries to get a visa. Say I'm an American. I don't want the product (Obama's policies), and a group of bureaucrats in another country has stamped my application after giving them a load of cash. Those bureaucrats were chosen by a hereditary King/Queen or appointed by a small committee that was elected by 51% of people (with less than half the population actually voting). So I get to leave the US. You know what - I can't just refuse to pay this year's tax bill. Uniquely in the world, even after I have left forever, I STILL HAVE TO PAY

    224. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by e9th · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The vote was 5-4. All the "conservative" justices voted for Kelo, all the "liberal" justices for New London. Kennedy, often the swing vote, chose to side with the liberals on this one.

    225. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by lgw · · Score: 1

      It's not so much about citizens and non-citizens (also I dont think a government has much of a duty to protect people who don't pay taxes to support it), but people who shot guns at US troops while not wearing a uniform, vs people who didn't. I don't care much for the rights of brigands or pirates.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    226. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Best Buy didn't come out of Circuit City. CC bankrupted and disappeared forever.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    227. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      That was kind of a joke...

      CC disappeared in name only. Where did the execs go? Did they just vanish also? Or were they absorbed back into the corporate netherworld, still practicing their voodoo?

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    228. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      The American Revolution was an example of mutual consent? The revolutionaries didn't "take their business elsewhere", they shot the storekeeper and took his stuff, at exactly the terms they dictated.

      Personally, I'm fine with that, as I don't believe in the moral authority of monarchy. I think revolution against a tyrannical government is a perfectly moral reaction. But in your post, you say:

      you do not get to dictate terms to the majority who have already agreed how things will work.

      That seems to me to be rather fatalistic - "whatever is, is meant to be". If you disagree with the system, don't try and change it - leave. That's probably an apt discription of the Pilgrims, but not of later Americans.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    229. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      actually, in MOST states, the law is either moot on allowing your daughter to have a beer, and in many states (I think it's 19) there are specific exemptions allowing a parent to give alcohol to their child (I know NY is one of them)

      "Contrary to popular belief, since the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984, few states specifically prohibit minors' and young adults' consumption of alcohol in private settings. As of January 1, 2007, 14 states and the District of Columbia ban underage consumption outright, 19 states do not specifically ban underage consumption, and an additional 17 states have family member and/or location exceptions to their underage consumption laws."

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    230. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Name any that are American. Oh, right, you can't.

    231. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      When it comes to freedom, I see free speech as more of a minimum than a maximum.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    232. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      What? I never said I was a "Real American" conservative. Who the hell are you to call me that?

      And I'm not talking about eminent domain at all. I'm talking about the very act of claiming ownership and rule over undeveloped places. If I land on the moon and built a house can I claim the exact opposite end of the moon my territory even if I don't go near it? Is it legitimately mine if I go and kill anyone who tries to set up shop there?

    233. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      In short, the land is owned by the community - not you - and the government, voted in by the community, holds it on behalf of the community. You may not like what they do with it (and sometimes I don't either) but you need to work to change their minds and support those who think similarly. If you have a political environment in which many people don't vote (USA, Britain and other such places) then sure, you've got a hard road to hoe. Nonetheless, there are so many examples of how change has been brought about by voting and political agitation, that there's no need to quote them here.

      But what justifies, for example, the government claiming an entire forest as its own, or other undeveloped and untouched land,

      spun claimed that we're free to move to Antarctica as "unclaimed land" (I'm not sure that land is all unclaimed) but that's no more to the point than saying we're free to move to the bottom of the ocean or the moon or at the bottom of the volcano to live. What justifies governments claiming ownership of land that goes untouched by them? Why can't people decide to settle on virgin soil and make their own government there? Why can't the Amish (and I am not advocating that lifestyle) have their own, for example, amish country on their own farmlands?

      This comment is completely and utterly contradictory. I don't know what passes for liberalism where you live, but you appear to confuse dictatorship of a party or junta with liberal values of equality, freedom of speech and other such weirdly liberal things as freedom of association, the rights of workers and the poor and so on. Liberal views have never justified anything you suggest here. Freedom from slavery was a 'liberal' 'humanist' movement which was opposed by those who opposed liberal views.

      That's the face of liberalism in the American sense of the word, nowadays, though; "You will obey because we told you to, because we decided it, and because it was some majority of us, you will recognize this as freedom, no matter what is being done to you." Liberals do not recognize or believe in tyranny of the majority, because they believe majority opinion IS freedom. That is exactly what spun here is saying in the first place.

    234. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you certain they are for different reasons? ;)

      I think piracy is a means to an end. It's an excuse to crack down on a number of things, and the free flow of information is a big one. It's a means to control the scope of media. It isn't even about profits anymore. It's about maintaining control over all information by a small cabal of "well connected" (to the government) companies. Basically to keep the current paradigm; outwardly a democratic republic, and inwardly a virtual state monopoly of information, art, literature, education etc. Obviously, it's not 100% in that direction, but it's headed there more and more all the time. The big labels are all in collusion with DC, and for example, most major news agencies have been shown to recieve "helpful advice" from the Pentagon to shape their news cycles.

      The big threat to state power in the 21st century are blogs, independant music (why ASCAP is going after Creative Commons), youtube investigative journalists, or anything of that ilk. The copyright thing is a means to re-harness control over these mediums so as to restore the "well connected" monopoly that has been dominating these industries for several decades, but has started to disintegrate. Freedom is budding in an era of authoritarian alarmist politics. Schemes like this are a last ditch attempt to literally force their way upon a mostly unwilling population. History shows where that will end up, however.

    235. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      OIC! Thanks, haven't seen it yet. Added to the queue. :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    236. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (stands up and pumps fist in air and yells) REVEREND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    237. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      It's a bell curve, not a set score based on set criteria.

      From the site:
      "...performance on an absolute scale of 0 to 100 in these categories. ... For comparison to other countries, the distribution of all scores is reperesented by the darker gray background of each category."

      Don't get me wrong -- I'm not a hater. I'm still here because I think this is the best foundation to work from. However, I think we do have some issues that need to be addressed. While this site has an excellent objective and at first glance is doing fantastic work toward their goal, it is important that we who would take this nation to even greater levels not blind ourselves to our challenges.

      We have a practical accountability problem, despite our official on-paper accountability. Not an insurmountable one, and perhaps our competitor nations are not doing better. Still, claiming we score over 80/100 on legislative, and over 90/100 on executive and budget -- on an absolute scale -- runs the risk of fostering continued lack of attention.

    238. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? Just wait till the bill comes due. Hope you enjoyed the ride while it was still fun,.

    239. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by TimothyDavis · · Score: 1

      Demanding a diamond encrusted pony is a bit different than demanding that 'society' not take your money away.

    240. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake up, pal. You are nowhere near as free as you think you are. Your life is as constrained by our bullshit corporatist state as the Chinese are by their bullshit corporatist state. The only difference is that you are showered with a moronic brain-junk-food commercial pop-culture that has evidently convinced you completely that you are free and can express yourself freely and without limit.

      You're not. You are just as enslaved, censored, exploited, and brainwashed as they are. Beware, it is vastly worse than you imagine.

      That's funny, during the Bush years I took part in a small protest in Washington, D.C. and the military didn't show up with tanks and crush anybody. Hell, we never even saw a cop, nobody asked us to move along, nobody took down our names, other than a few people who stopped and picked up the pamphlets we were handing out, which included the phone number and address of our closest office location.

      It was almost as if we had some kind of right to peacefully assemble to protest or something.

    241. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And what justifies the massive land grabs governments make, claiming ownership and domain of large swathes of land unused, uncultivated, lying bare? Because they said so?

      Yes.

      Take a situation with no government, for example. If I'm using some land for something, I might say I 'own" it. But I don't REALLY own it, I'm just using it... it's not like I can pick it up and carry it away, or hide it, or stick it in a cave, or anything else that will allow me exclusive control/use of it. If someone else comes along and says that they own it, it's just words unless they actually DO something with it... such as putting their own stuff their or kicking me out. So ultimately, the 'ownership' of a piece of land is defined solely by your ability to physically control and/or defend that land from others.
      Government's role is pretty much the same- the government 'owns' all the land, because they are the ones who are defending it. Saying they 'own' it without being able to control or defend it is, again, simply words... and anybody who wishes to use it and ignore their claim of 'ownership' can freely do so. At least until the 'owners' show up with force at their side. The primary role of the government is to provide a means for common defense- this way a group of landowners can have shared defenses, allowing them all more time to use their land, and with their collective might also comes the ability to defend against larger and more numerous opponents.

      Consider a situation where a private person decides they don't want a 'government' controlling them. Technically, they are free to abandon the protection of the government and "go it alone", or even convince some other people to do the same. But once they have abandoned that protection, the government is no longer under any obligation to protect them or help them out in any fashion at all. And in most cases, the governments aren't going to just sit by idle- after all they have a VERY large stick, and if they come to take control of the land back you're pretty much screwed.

      You are living proof of just how thuggish, violent, and controlling democracy can be.

      This has nothing to do with any particular system of government, this is a simple fact of life. ALL government operates from the fundamental position of Might, unless you happen to be living in a Utopian Fantasy Land where everybody smiles all the time, nobody is ever in need of anything, and handjobs are free.

      The REAL problem here is that you are operating under an assumption of what "right" really means. Ultimately, the only "right" is Might itself, and those who have it and use it are 'right' and those who don't are 'wrong'. Even if you choose to believe in God as being the ultimate master of 'right' vs. 'wrong' this still applies- unless 'God' enforces his definition of 'right' at some point (in this life or "the next") that definition is irrelevant.

    242. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ignores the basic fact that same sex couples can and do have children

      I notice you carefully chose the phrase "have children", which is vague. Gay couples can certainly raise children, but they are physically unable to produce children. And don't give me any of that B.S. about using sperm donors or surrogate mothers- both those methods rely on someone of a different gender getting involved in the process which means the offspring is not a product of the couple. And yes, it is also true that some heterosexual couples are also unable to produce offspring.

      and transgendered individuals

      For the record, I have absolutely nothing against anybody's sexual preference, who they 'marry', or what they do with their bodies. But stop using the term "transgender", as it implies that someone was able to somehow turn themselves into the opposite sex. In reality, "transgender" is a purely cosmetic difference, nobody (currently) has any capability to change genders, which makes it no different than getting a boob job, a penis enlargement, or other 'plastic surgery' procedures.

      "Gays do have equal rights -- they have the same right to marry someone of the opposite sex that straights do" are not so obviously joking.

      Most people I have heard say this in person are making a joke, or being sarcastic, or expressing disgust by means of a joke. It is a somewhat valid point, however. If you examine cultures in history such as the Greeks, the Japanese, or others which are VERY inclusive of "being gay", you will find that "marriage" was still reserved for reproductive purposes and limited to a heterosexual relationship. So if you view marriage from a traditional point of view (i.e. that the function is reproduction) then you will find that YES, homosexuals DO have the same right to reproduce as anybody else, which DOES include entering into marriage with someone of the opposite sex. Or to put it another way, even if you state publicly that you are homosexual, there is nothing in the law which can prevent you from marrying and producing a child with a person of the opposite sex.
      Yes, I realize that this isn't really what most people mean when they express such a statement, but it does expose the real problem with the whole "debate": until we can agree on a specific definition and role that "marriage" is supposed to play in our society, we really can't resolve the current situation. Many people believe the purpose of marriage is still solely to produce offspring, other people believe it should only be used to govern property rights & inheritance, etc. and still others think it should encompass both.
      My personal belief is that the government should only care about the latter, and that there is no reason for them to call it marriage in the first place, or to define who gets to 'marry'. Throw the government out of "marriage' entirely- instead setup Civil Unions as a binding contract that is gender-blind and sexually neutral, under government control so that property, heredity, etc. can be regulated. Leave "marriage" and the whole "love and commitment and family" aspect to the private sector... under NO authority, and outside all regulation and government control. With such a setup, any couple would be granted identical treatment in the eyes of the law, for all practical, non-religious, non-"moral", purposes... and would allow anybody to call themselves 'married' to whomever they choose. But this will NEVER happen- the religious groups want to force their version of "morality" on everybody else, and the pro-gay groups want to force their version of "morality" down the throats of the religious groups. Make no mistake, this has nothing to do with "marriage", which is just a word, it's simply about forcing your opinions on others.

    243. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      I'm glad somebody finally said this. Unfortunately, Slashdot seems to have turned into a "what's the government doing for us" rather than a "what are we doing for ourselves" type of place in the last 5 or 6 years (possibly longer).

      And everyone around here was saying how Obama was going to fix it all and that he couldn't do any worse than Bush. Wake the fuck up is right.

    244. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by countach · · Score: 1

      They're not talking about it on those 73000 blogs, and how long we can remain talking about it here remains an open question.

    245. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      If you're here to attack the country and are not a part of it, a trial is a courtesy, not a right.

      And if the assholes at the top incorrectly THINK you're here to attack the country because your father's brother's nephew's cousin's former room-mate once had dinner with a guy whose sister once dated some crackpot religious fanatic's estranged niece?

      THAT is what a trial is for. The "because we said so" approach to evidence and "kill them all and let Jesus sort 'em out" measure of guilt has no place in any society that claims to be civilized, much less so in one that bills itself as the greatest bastion of "freedom", "righteousness" and "democracy" in the world.

      The whole "at least we're not quite as bad as China/Iran/DPRK" attitude suggests we've really let our standards plummet.

    246. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You say that as if you think that rich men don't get a lot of different pussy, even if they are married... Tiger Woods stands as a shining example that the tradition of Alpha male having a lot more opportunity to mate is alive and well.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    247. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      Demanding that society give you the exact deal that you like, for the price you feel like paying, is like demanding a diamond encrusted pony. Good luck with that.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    248. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Rational adults compromise in terms of mutual consent, not tyranny, whether of the majority or otherwise

      How exactly would this work, in terms of structuring a society? I can't imagine a society where every single member agrees on all aspects of that society. People are gonna disagree, often in mutually exclusive ways. Not to mention, what do you do, renegotiate everything every time a new member of society reaches legal age? How do you build a society that doesn't involve some level of coercion?

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    249. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by spun · · Score: 1

      The fact that other governments do not want you does not give you the right to dictate terms to our government.

      Just because I do not like what any establishment is offering, does not give me the right to dictate terms to the establishment I am currently in. What is on offer here is what is on offer, and the fact that you can not buy your diamond encrusted flying pony in any other establishment does not mean that this establishment is infringing on your rights by not offering you one at the price you want to pay.

      You see, life does not cater to you, and your rules are your own. They do not automatically apply to others. As the song goes, you can't always get what you want. So what?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    250. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by keatonguy · · Score: 1

      Calm down, you're both right. China is oppressive and stifling to all free speech, yes. But the US isn't some paragon of human rights either. Fact is, to some degree or another, we're all under the boot of a manipulative, self-interested authority (or a dozen). What the hell good does it do to bicker with each other about the semantics?

      --
      If you aren't angry, you aren't paying attention.
    251. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      If you like the deal offered to you by your country, you stay. If you don't, you take your business somewhere else.

      This is exactly why the Founders wanted the States to have far more power than the Feds and why the Feds were limited to enumerated powers and the States weren't. If you don't like what your State is doing, you can pick up and move to another State. It's far easier to move to another State than it is to move to an entirely different country. Plus, most every other country in the world is far worse than the US.

      A State, like California, can fuck up big time and everyone will just start leaving until the politicians wake up and fix what they've broken. It doesn't effect any other state. If the Feds do it, it screws everyone.

    252. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      Exactly! but you could attempt to negotiate, in your example. The argument of "if you don't like it, move elsewhere" is incomplete.

      The necessary relationship of government and society is that society implicitly supports its government even in the case of deep tyranny.

      Wrong! Society supports its government until it becomes tyranical, then it changes its government either by voting or revolting. We revolted once and a lot of blood was shed. Let's pray we don't have to revolt again!

    253. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      The difference is that in the US, accusations like that have to backed up with something. In China it is done on false testimony and hearsay in show trials that, ironically, are frequently closed to the public, not to mention the charges are vague to begin with. (And damn near everything the PRC/CCP does is classified as a 'state secret'. The 'state secret' Shi Tao revealed was nothing more than a warning to the Chinese press not to make mention of the Tiananmen Square Massacre on its anniversary.)

      Zeng Jinyan 'harmed state security' by documenting her life on a blog while searching her husband, Hu Jia, who had been 'disappeared' by Chinese authorities for AIDS and and environmental activism.

      Dr. Wang Bingzhang's 'espionage and terrorism' were nothing more than he had founded political parties in opposition to the CCP. For this he was sentenced to life in prison.

      Gao Zhisheng was 'disturbing public order' by being a successful human rights lawyer. In the US a charge like that would mean you were involved in a drunken brawl. In China it means you're defending peoples' human rights. Yeah, the US and China are so similar.

      You are further ignoring their treatment. Bao Tong served his full sentence for his role in the events leading up to the Tiananmen Square Massacre, but then was forced into house arrest without trial or charges for any additional crime. To this day all his communications are monitored, his visitors screened, and he is followed by agents at all times. When his friend and fellow reform advocate Zhao Ziyang died, he was not only barred from the funeral, but also both he and his wife were beaten by agents for even trying to attend. His wife was hospitalized for three months as consequence. He was refused access to medical care because he refused to remove a flower from his clothes that symbolized his mourning for his friend.

      Once you can find me cases like that in the US sometime in the last fifty years, come back and let me know.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    254. Re:The fact is, US is just as bad as China by Burz · · Score: 1

      The United States of America is the only country in the history of the world that defeats another country's military in war, and then leaves.

      Oh really? Then why are we constantly hearing about "American interests abroad"? Those business interests got there largely with the backing of the US military.

      And that part about leaving is hilarious. Building military bases around the entire planet is not 'leaving'.

  2. National Security? by wiggles · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only reason I can think of for this kind of government censorship is if there is some national security related issue with the blogs on this site. I wonder if it's related to those Russian spies they caught recently? A terrorist plot? I'm sure we'll find out soon enough....

    1. Re:National Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason I can think of for this....

      Try harder..

    2. Re:National Security? by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      I would tend to think so.

      Since those pesky Reds were hosting 'AllofMp3.com'

      So I am sure that these "bloggers' were simply mentioning that fact. Ere-go the U.S. had to use Operation "Mop and Glo"to get rid of any mention of the website.

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    3. Re:National Security? by bsDaemon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They probably seized some equipment as evidence in an investigation and the numbers are just grossly over-inflated for sensationalist reasons. Seizing a couple of servers that have 10,000 customers each isn't the same thing as "ordering the sites off-line" -- it's seizing the hardware in order to protect chain of evidence and integrity of the data seized. It's still kind of a dick move, but I'm not really going to take the bitching of people who seem to be perfectly willing to watch movies but don't want to pay for them.

    4. Re:National Security? by wiggles · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about you try harder?

      Whenever you hear about this kind of thing happening due to a piracy sting, the government brags about how they made the world safe from pirates. They're all too eager to pat themselves on the back for a job well done.

      The secrecy surrounding this takedown makes me think this is something much more than a piracy crackdown.

    5. Re:National Security? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ere-go

      This is a classic example of trying to write something you've heard spoken, but never seen written. Which, by the by, you're supposed to avoid.

      Incidently, you were looking for "ergo".

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:National Security? by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only reason I can think of for this kind of government censorship is if there is some national security related issue with the blogs on this site.

      You know what? No. To hell with "National Security". If that card was being pulled appropriately then it might be justified, but these days, the powers that be have decided that they can pull "National Security" out when they do ANYTHING and get a free pass. We can lie, cheat, steal, and piss on the Constitution so long as it's a matter of "National Security"!

      Like the boy who cried "wolf!", and I don't care if the wolf really is chewing on National Security's nuts right now. The excuse is falling on deaf ears at this point.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:National Security? by Kepesk · · Score: 1

      I'm considering my personal blog to out-of-country hosting. I'm dubious about anything that subverts that many expressions of free speech.

    8. Re:National Security? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Note that the article about the shutdown is being hosted on Torrentfreak.com. That might give some clues.

    9. Re:National Security? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      In some cases it'
      s their only move. The dick part id the wonder not having any information coming straight from the authorities. Even a 'We can't llak about it' would be something. For all we know, the government had nothing to d with it.
      Doubtful, but the people running it could be lying.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:National Security? by atamido · · Score: 1

      This was my thought, but who hosts tens of thousands of customers on a cluster that can't handle a box or two being removed?

    11. Re:National Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The secrecy surrounding this takedown makes me think this is something much more than a piracy crackdown.

      Either that or Uncle Sam finally went full retard and now considers piracy and terrorism to be equal.

    12. Re:National Security? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      They probably seized some equipment as evidence in an investigation and the numbers are just grossly over-inflated for sensationalist reasons. Seizing a couple of servers that have 10,000 customers each isn't the same thing as "ordering the sites off-line" -- it's seizing the hardware in order to protect chain of evidence and integrity of the data seized. It's still kind of a dick move, but I'm not really going to take the bitching of people who seem to be perfectly willing to watch movies but don't want to pay for them.

      If yours is a legitimate business that was sitting beside these filesharers, it would be roughly the same thing. They're not being told why their site is offline, nor when to expect it to come back up. It would seem that, in order to protect the rights of the innocent bystanders that they would order the server imaged, rather than shut down and the staff gagged.

    13. Re:National Security? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      The same cheap, fly-by-night operations that trafficers in child porn, for-pay pirated material, phishers and spam lords favor? I don't know anything about this outfit though. Never heard of them until today.

  3. In other news, by skelterjohn · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Government shuts down one private website.

  4. This is just the beginning. by the+roAm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mark my words. This is only the beginning of high-profile shutdowns.
    The nest has been stirred and the wasps are now out in full force.
    There is, however, a light at the end of the tunnel.
    You cannot get by with stuff like this without angering a lot of people.
    Enough angry constituents and things will start to change.

    Lets just hope for the best as that's all we can really do.

    --
    ~The roAm
    1. Re:This is just the beginning. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Informative

      "A government source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, suggested that the websites in question may have had links to child porn, utility hacking guides, and terrorist activity. They could not say exactly due to the ongoing investigation."

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:This is just the beginning. by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Is this really any different than the police closing down a pawn shop for fencing stolen goods? A business owner has the responsibility to ensure that the people he deals with are legit. If not then he gets shut down.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    3. Re:This is just the beginning. by electron+sponge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They forgot "weapons of mass destruction" and "baby-cooking recipes".

    4. Re:This is just the beginning. by the+roAm · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference. A fencing operation being held from a pawn shop is wholeheartedly illegal as it implies full cooperation of the shop owner with the actual criminals while in this case the site admins always responded to law enforcement in a timely fashion in order to shut down illegal blogs.

      --
      ~The roAm
    5. Re:This is just the beginning. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

      Enough angry constituents and things will start to change.

      No. From what I see, all the sites were allegedly related to copyright infringement.

      Your typical constituent won't give a shit. They will be told that the sites engaged in illegal activity and as far as they're concerned, law enforcement is always right, honest, and fights for Truth, Justice and the American way.

      You sir or madam, have way too much faith in The People.

      Now, if Rush, Hannity, Beck or O'Reilly were to get all pissed, then you'll see people in the streets saying "Save those sites, lower our taxes, stop Obama from spending and stop killing babies!"

      Yes, I'm extremely cynical. The other day, I talked to a woman who was terrified that all her money was going to be worthless because the US dollar was going to collapse! She heard from "reliable" people who know!

      Guess who those people in the "know" were. She also wanted to put her life savings into gold because of someone who's advertising some sort of gold company.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    6. Re:This is just the beginning. by the+roAm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "The People"
      Look ladies and gentlemen, a libertarian.

      --
      ~The roAm
    7. Re:This is just the beginning. by linzeal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it is more like shutting down an entire city because a pawn shop is selling stolen goods.

    8. Re:This is just the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lets start with the title. "US Govt orders 73,000 private websites offline". TFS corrects this to ONE website that happens to be a free blog host. If we care to move on to the summary (and after that, I'm not sure it's worth it) we see that the "copyright violation" theory is just speculation based on the fact that they'd had copyright complaints before. If the US Government was in the habit of shutting down sites based on copyright complaints, there would be a hell of a lot more then one host going down. We have to move to TFA this time to find out that a perhaps more relevant set of complaints is child pornography.

      Even if you disagree with shutting down the entire blog host over that, "major blog host shut down over possible child pornography connections" is a *completely* different story then "73,000 private websites shut down over copyright complaints".

    9. Re:This is just the beginning. by pnewhook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the pawn shop was allowing the sale of stolen merchandise it doesn't mean every customer was a felon. But if the police shut down the site due to repeated violations, legitimate customers would also not be allowed to go there. Exactly the same with this website service.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    10. Re:This is just the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hoping does nothing, act

    11. Re:This is just the beginning. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 4, Funny

      MMMMMMmmmmmmm, baby... The other, other white meat.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    12. Re:This is just the beginning. by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      It was the cooked baby receipts that really got them.

    13. Re:This is just the beginning. by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Yes and I'm sure the pawn shop owner would always cooperate with the police too, but when they are gone he continue to accept the money, no questions asked.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    14. Re:This is just the beginning. by Courageous · · Score: 1

      I'm more interested in what claimed legal authority they are using to do this.

      I question that they hold the authority.

      C//

    15. Re:This is just the beginning. by linzeal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cooking the baby robs you of essential nutrients. Try the raw unadulterated version by just tenderizing it with a hard back version of The Origin of Species and serve with a wedge of lemon.

    16. Re:This is just the beginning. by RayMarron · · Score: 1

      I agree - this title is easily top-10 in Slashdot's history of misleading/inflammatory article titles.

      (And that's a damn big list to get to the front of! ;) )

      --
      ON DELETE CASCADE
    17. Re:This is just the beginning. by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1

      child porn, utility hacking guides, and terrorist activity

      Well, that narrows it down.....except opposite.

    18. Re:This is just the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A government source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, suggested that the websites in question may have had links to child porn, utility hacking guides, and terrorist activity. They could not say exactly due to the ongoing investigation."

      GOVERNMENT? ANONYMOUS? Oh well, now we are cooking.

      "A non-government source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, suggested that the websites in question may have had links to free speech, utility security guides, and learning ebook activity. They could not say exactly due to the ongoing investigation."

      Oh, btw, just in case you're wooshing, the source IS ME.

    19. Re:This is just the beginning. by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      > You cannot get by with stuff like this without angering a lot of people.

      And what will they do? Armed revolt? Civil war? Vote Republican?

    20. Re:This is just the beginning. by Spectre · · Score: 1

      Nice. "websites in question may have had links to ..."

      That says nothing.

      Another TRUE statement:
      "The websites in question may have been cleverly disguised nuclear warheads."
      They weren't, obviously, but the statement is still true.

      Another TRUE statement:
      "The websites in question may have had links to documents purloined from the global elite documenting their collusion with key government officials."
      Wow. Really?! Finally, proof.

      "child porn ... terrorist activity"
      What? No drugs? Kind of missed a key "excuse card" didn't you?

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    21. Re:This is just the beginning. by pspahn · · Score: 1

      This is why you always defer the receipt when they ask, "do you want your receipt?" It's a cleaner paper trail that way.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    22. Re:This is just the beginning. by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      No, not really. Read the thread - this hosting business was located on, apparently, one dedicated server... so when if you need to confiscate said server and make sure nobody can access it to destroy anything, you have to take the entire server offline. You can't just take part of the server offline.

      This isn't like closing an entire city becuase of a pawn shop, it's more like closing an entire floor of offices because you need to keep some of the offices from being tampered with, and you don't know who has keys to what offices.

      What you are describing would be accurate if they got the parent "host" that provided the dedicated server... but they didn't, they got a sub-host who was running on one server.

    23. Re:This is just the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that is cyber-warfare? This is cyber-warfare!

    24. Re:This is just the beginning. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      You can't fit 73,000 people of maybe a handful of buildings around the world. I'm not certain either the pawn store or office floor analogy is apt, but if this was taking physical possession of 73k people's cars instead of data there would be no doubt of the violation of numerous civil rights. Why should data be treated differently than any other possession?

    25. Re:This is just the beginning. by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Only if said people decided to all park their cars in the same garage, right?

      How would you deal with the problem? I'm not sure data is really analogous to physical property. And most people argue that it most definitely is not when we talk about pirating and DRM... but then in situations like these, data physical property is an apt analogy, somehow.

      (I am condemning my own office-floor analogy with that, too.)

    26. Re:This is just the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grepped TFA, and I couldn't find this quote.

    27. Re:This is just the beginning. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I know it says nothing. I didn't see that list anywhere, I just made it up. My post is responding to the one above, where theRoAm said people would stand up against this sort of thing.

      My point is that if that starts to happen, the response would be as above. You're right, I missed drugs.

      I note that since I'm modded informative and everyone actually believed me it would actually work.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    28. Re:This is just the beginning. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No. It's like a pawn shop got closes for breaking the law, and while the investigation was ongoing you could go claim your pawn ticket.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:This is just the beginning. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt that the hosting company were holding people's data to make loans to them. When people pay you for hosting, you are purchasing a service like a storage locker, as I said above its like they found something criminal in one storage locker and than took everyone's stuff from all the storage lockers.

    30. Re:This is just the beginning. by bonch · · Score: 0, Troll

      Soon they won't even need those reasons. They'll just say "This site has been shut down for purposes of net neutrality."

    31. Re:This is just the beginning. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      They forgot "weapons of mass destruction" and "baby-cooking recipes".

      Wow, the site was infested with Muslims and Atheists? Damn! No wonder they took it down.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    32. Re:This is just the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is more like a rented storage. They found contrabant in one and now they are searching all other storage boxes also regardless of the ownership.

    33. Re:This is just the beginning. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      You're missing the fact that individual had established their own points of presence on these servers.

      Remove 'pawn shop' and insert 'strip mall', and maybe you're a bit closer.

    34. Re:This is just the beginning. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      You can't find the quote because I made it up. My point is that if the government was to say something like that, then everyone would roll over and say, "Oh, then it's okay."

      The parent post to mine said that people would get outraged. I pointed out, and rather effectively I must add, that public opinion could be easily swayed by a nothing quote from someone who just wanted to put corporate interests ahead of what you used to call The First Amendment.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    35. Re:This is just the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And say before the tenderizing action: "It's about survival of the jocks, baby!"

    36. Re:This is just the beginning. by KPexEA · · Score: 1

      Not Exactly. All the other stores in the same strip mall would also be shut down too. Just because they have the same landlord.

    37. Re:This is just the beginning. by Jave1in · · Score: 1

      No, its more like shutting down a shopping mall because of organized crime running in some of the stores.

    38. Re:This is just the beginning. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      "baby-cooking recipes"

      Interesting idea, but I think that even recipes tailored to babies' limited cookery skills is unlikely to succeed. Though they rarely burn food, that's usually because they don't know how to turn the cooker on.

      Perhaps these recipes are along the lines of "Chew rusk until soggy. Spit out. Serve.", but technically that's not "cooking".

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    39. Re:This is just the beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's more like shutting down eBay because it is selling stolen goods.

      In meatspace, it's more like shutting down a shopping mall because one of the tenants was selling child porn in amongst the magazines.

    40. Re:This is just the beginning. by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      "I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee or a ragout."
        - Jonathan Swift, A Modest Proposal

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    41. Re:This is just the beginning. by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

      Doesn't rhyme and the meter is all over the place. I give it a 4.

    42. Re:This is just the beginning. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Is this really any different than the police closing down a pawn shop for fencing stolen goods?

      In every way. A pawn dealer looks at every single item that comes into his store. A company that hosts 71000 sites can't read and check every single page on it. And the pawn dealer pays for the goods and them sells them himself. The only thing a host sells is webspace and advertising. They aren't acting as middlemen.

    43. Re:This is just the beginning. by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      "A government source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, suggested that the websites in question may have had links to child porn, utility hacking guides, and terrorist activity.

      Google has links to all those things. Why isn't it shut down?

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    44. Re:This is just the beginning. by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Even if you disagree with shutting down the entire blog host over that, 'major blog host shut down over possible child pornography connections' is a *completely* different story then '73,000 private websites shut down over copyright complaints.'"

      But "US Gov't Orders 73,000 Private Websites Offline" is guaranteed to get more eyes on Slashdot's advertisers. Hey, if it works for Fox News...

    45. Re:This is just the beginning. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Refer to my earlier post, which is the one right above yours.

      I made up the quote to show how easy it would be to have people not rise up against random website shutdowns.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  5. "History of Abuse" by daveatneowindotnet · · Score: 1

    Like the history now being created of seizing private property without due process that may or may not actually reside outside of American sovereignty?

  6. What about this website called youtube.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    youtube.com has thousands of videos with infringing content. They must get slammed with DMCA claims.

    1. Re:What about this website called youtube.com? by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      YouTube has money, they are owned by Google, which is a big supporter of this administration.

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  7. Sieg Heil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <in best German voice>
    Seize Heil! Seize There! Seize Everywhere!

  8. I'm nervously waiting... by linzeal · · Score: 1

    One day, maybe soon, the US or some other country that likes to project its policies with force will kill someone in a data center during one of these raids or will bomb a data center in a foreign country.

    1. Re:I'm nervously waiting... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      bomb a data center in a foreign country

      The U.S. government has been doing similar stuff to controversial TV and radio broadcasters for a while now. The internet is just a logical extension.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:I'm nervously waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking genius dude, seriously. This would make a great plot.

    3. Re:I'm nervously waiting... by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      > will bomb a data center in a foreign country

      Data-centers and would be the first thing I would go after. It's about as bad as bombing someone back to stone-age...

  9. Sounds familiar... by ceraphis · · Score: 1

    Does this have anything to do with the filesharing websites they were messing with recently?

  10. get by with stuff like this without angering a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Endless nation building and the war on drugs continues.

    What makes you think a few pirate takedowns are going to stir the wasps?

  11. The Fact Is You're Out of Your Mind by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Twist it how you want to, but the fact remains that both countries act like assholes and US is in the same level.

    Oh my. There differences are many. For starters, the quantity blocked in China versus what could be considered blocked in the United States. In the United States, this sort of thing happens in isolated cases for criminal reasons and the end result is that the website might be vindicated. Point me to one case in China that ended up where the government was wrong. I'm waiting. At least YouTube was vindicated by the government against Viacom. There's some semblance of justice in the United States with regards to blocking websites. In China, it's a bizarre "unharmonious" label or anti-PRC speech that gets you blocked (and oftentimes worse than that).

    I could not disagree more with your analogy.

    I'm guessing users were trading child porn or the owner wasn't handling his taxes correctly. His user name in the forums is a marketing site between the US and Canada. I'm guessing he could have been pulling down big ad money and not reporting it correctly between the two countries. Hosting websites is a business and businesses always get into trouble. When there's money involved, there's lawyers. And with lawyers come lawsuits and with lawsuits come temporary injunctions.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Fact Is You're Out of Your Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope and Change! W000t.

      You all voted yourselves into the great void of Marxism/Communism. Freedom has been lost, polished off by Mr. Obama himself.

      Good luck over there.

    2. Re:The Fact Is You're Out of Your Mind by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing users were trading child porn

      Possibly, but that would be clearly individual hosted sites not the whole block.

      or the owner wasn't handling his taxes correctly. His user name in the forums is a marketing site between the US and Canada. I'm guessing he could have been pulling down big ad money and not reporting it correctly between the two countries. Hosting websites is a business and businesses always get into trouble. When there's money involved, there's lawyers. And with lawyers come lawsuits and with lawsuits come temporary injunctions.

      Highly unlikely. Tax issues don't get you a gag order. If you're having tax troubles, they audit you and take you to court or seize assets.

      If he's under as tight a gag order as he seems to be saying, he probably received a NSL. If so, chances are pretty good (according to the oversight committee) that its been issued either incorrectly or as a way to avoid pesky things like the correct paperwork. An organized child porn ring might get this type of gag order in order to pursue members that they have yet to identify - but just the closing of the site is sufficient warning to them anyway.

      Blanket takedown of the whole business not individual sites screams arbitrary and excess - exactly the kind of thing you expect to see with a NSL.

    3. Re:The Fact Is You're Out of Your Mind by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Possibly, but that would be clearly individual hosted sites not the whole block.

      All of the hosted sites were hosted on a single physical server. That means, to remove access to the evidence, you have to take the entire server - otherwise, someone may still have access to it and remove the data you're looking for.

      Blanket takedown of the whole business not individual sites screams arbitrary and excess - exactly the kind of thing you expect to see with a NSL.

      The only reason his whole business is down is because his whole business was run on a single server.

    4. Re:The Fact Is You're Out of Your Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I didn't think it possible to waste something of which there is an infinite supply, but there they are... wasted ones and zeroes all over the place.

    5. Re:The Fact Is You're Out of Your Mind by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm guessing users were trading child porn or the owner wasn't handling his taxes correctly.

      I mostly agree with your post. However, there is one thing I want to add. My inclination is that there is a good reason for these websites to be shut down. However, I am not willing to take the government's word that they had a good reason. I want to know the reason. If I agree that it was a good reason, all's well. If not, well then it depends on how many other people also think it wasn't a good reason.
      Basically, my point is that this event is not on its face evidence of the government doing something wrong. It is something to take note of and demand an explanation from the government. They don't need to provide the explanation tomorrow or next week, but by this time next month, we should know what happened and why. Maybe not the details, depending on what the reasons for this were, but at least an explanation of the reason for this action. Under certain circumstances the details and evidence supporting the reasons can remain under wraps pending court cases.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    6. Re:The Fact Is You're Out of Your Mind by the_womble · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing users were trading child porn or the owner wasn't handling his taxes correctly

      Either of those would have lead to criminal prosecutions.

      In neither case is there is good reason for keeping it secret. You are effectively saying "I trust the government to only use their power properly so there is no need for trial before punishment". If you believe that, why not apply the principle more widely and abolish the right to a fair trial in all cases?

  12. was there a court order? by a2wflc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or can I post copyrighted material to a political site I disagree with and give some gov't agency an excuse to take it down without a court order? I'm sure they'll admit they were wrong after 11/2 and let the site back up.

    This looks like a different scenario with multiple violations by the site owner, but it's a bad precedent if there is not a public court order listing the violations. There are ways to get a court order very quick with little evidence for a "critical mater" that they claim this is.

    1. Re:was there a court order? by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please post objectionable material to slashdot and get it taken down... I'm losing far too much productivity at work from reading and posting on this site!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:was there a court order? by Rand+Race · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yea. The 1st Amendment violations here pale in comparison to the 4th, 5th and 6th Amendment violations. No warrant? Check. Deprived of property without due process? Check. Specifically NOT informed of the accusations levied against them? Check.

      Hell, they just need to quarter some troops in this guy's house and they'll have shitcanned half the Bill Of Rights in one case.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    3. Re:was there a court order? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Warrants are used for entry and seizure of property. He didn't "own" any of the things the company was hosting for him: the hosting company had a right to terminate him as a customer on a moment's notice. And they did.

      Really, the only major issue is not being informed of the accusations against him or his clients. But it sounds like the plan is to inform him shortly.

    4. Re:was there a court order? by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

      the hosting company had a right to terminate him as a customer on a moment's notice. And they did.

      Not only that, but they refunded his money!

    5. Re:was there a court order? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No warrant?

      unknown. BTW, the hosting service would get the warrant.

      Deprived of property without due process
      Unknown.

      "Specifically NOT informed of the accusations levied against them? "

      No one has been accused of anything.

      so calm down.
      I don't know whats going in, but here is a scenario.

      Russian spies host material on that site.
      The government finds out and gt a warrant.
      Warrant is served to the hosting company, but since it's national security, they can't talk about it.
      Law enforcement begins forensics.

      Nothing violating any constitution rights in the speculative scenario

      I chose Russian spies because of the news, but it could be terrorist plans. While the terrorist will get us does gt taken to far, the fact of the matter is there are actual terrorist groups trying to kill you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:was there a court order? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yeah, and quickly. Ether something very nasty is about to happen and that want everything clear before then, or they have really good customer service.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:was there a court order? by Katchu · · Score: 1

      Oh. Oh. And take away his gun.

      --
      Keep Doing Good.
    8. Re:was there a court order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No warrant? Check.
      It seems the server is owned by the webhosting company and the customer rents it for dedicated use. Warrants will go to the webhosting company, not the customer.

      Deprived of property without due process? Check.
      The customer violated the webhosting company's ToS. In the ToS it states the server may be terminated without prior notice and they are not responsible for any data loss that may occur. The customer has to agree to the ToS contract for services.

      Specifically NOT informed of the accusations levied against them? Check.
      The accusations will be included with the warrant given to the webhosting company.

    9. Re:was there a court order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, they just need to quarter some troops in this guy's house and they'll have shitcanned half the Bill Of Rights in one case.

      Great line, lol.

    10. Re:was there a court order? by Maestro4k · · Score: 1

      Warrants are used for entry and seizure of property. He didn't "own" any of the things the company was hosting for him: the hosting company had a right to terminate him as a customer on a moment's notice. And they did.

      The hosting company told him they weren't allowed to give him his data. So it's been seized by the government, they're the only ones that could order the hosting company not to give him a copy of his data. And no, it's unlikely that the hosting company simply didn't want to bother doing so, they'd just have said that (every hosting company I've dealt with has policies where they don't have to give you a copy of your data if you're terminated for TOS violations, although most of them will still do so).

      It's very unusual for a domain to be taken down like this. Even in cases of definite, repeated long-term copyright violations the government doesn't order the site taken down, order the hosting company that they can't give the customer a copy of the data and also order them to not tell the customer why they took it down in the first place (beyond a "we had no choice"). Even the recent domain seizures the US government did against sites that were streaming new-release movies illegally they got warrants for. And the court gave them the power to seize the domain names as well as the servers in those cases.

      Here there's apparently no warrant and a seal of secrecy The whole thing sounds like one of the FBI's national security letters, which they don't have a very good track record on using correctly.

  13. Re:get by with stuff like this without angering a by the+roAm · · Score: 2

    You seem to not understand that we're the ants and the powers that be are the wasps.

    --
    ~The roAm
  14. Freedom by Voulnet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where is your Freedom of Speech when you need it? Or is the American Freedom of Speech subject to the approvals of big corporations?
    Not any different than freedom of speech that is subject to approval of governments.

    1. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he IS free to talk about it.

      Just not on the venue which got seized.

      For reasons we don't know, but if we had an interest in the property, then we could inquire through the courts about it.

    2. Re:Freedom by elucido · · Score: 1

      Well, he IS free to talk about it.

      Just not on the venue which got seized.

      For reasons we don't know, but if we had an interest in the property, then we could inquire through the courts about it.

      He can talk about it from behind a jailcell.

    3. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom of speech doesn't extend past the government and in no way is protected when talking about a business. This is a server owned by a business so it can be squelched, removed, etc at any time especially if there is something illegal going on.

      Why do you think the moderators at slashdot can do whatever they want, when they want and you can cry freedom of speech all day till you're blue in the face? Because your speech isn't protected here. Same goes for a blog.

    4. Re:Freedom by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Just not on the venue which got seized.

      Yep. You still have Freedom of Speech. Go out on your front lawn and yell your lungs out. Print out pamphlets, and hand them out downtown. All OK.

      Buy a Ham radio set off eBay, and broadcast your political line. Oops, sorry, the government regulates the air, and can order Ham operators off the air. They government controls broadcast medium.

      Now the Internet stuck a weed up their ass: it is like a broadcast medium, but the government doesn't control it . . . yet. That is why they are taking the first step with Internet Kill Switch. A finer granularity will follow.

      We are lucky that the Internet grew so fast, that they didn't have time to regulate it. Otherwise, we would all be lining up for Internet Web Site Licenses.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Freedom by geekoid · · Score: 1

      We all still have our freedom of speech. In fact, we using it right now.

      Something illegal is going on that involves the servers.
      The needed to seize them.

      Anyone with back ups of there data could put it on a different site.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Freedom by Voulnet · · Score: 1

      Yes but the problem is you are using it now, can you be sure to be using it tomorrow?

    7. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So sad! More boo-hoo-hooing from the Republicans. Suck it up dipshit. We won and we're going to kick your asses. You and Sarah Palin can suck me.

  15. whole story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It sure sounds like we're getting the whole story here, yes sir.

  16. It's a culture thing by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What you have to understand about China is that their government is an expression of their religious philosophies. They believe that social order is a moral expression, and something worth dying for:

    In Confucianism, human beings are teachable, improvable and perfectible through personal and communal endeavour especially including self-cultivation and self-creation. A main idea of Confucianism is the cultivation of virtue and the development of moral perfection. Confucianism holds that one should give up one's life, if necessary, either passively or actively, for the sake of upholding the cardinal moral values of ren and yi.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confucianism

    In America, we have a culture that values liberty, which has become quite distorted in modern times. We've also retained some very puritan ideas, which is why nipples are somehow more offensive than gun violence. More recently, our only main moral metric has become profit.

    This instance illustrates the point perfectly. Mose Chinese, if begrudgingly, accept the government's right to censor their speech so that the social order is maintained. Most Americans accept the government's right to censor free speech in the interest of profit.

    So, if you want to stop the march to DRM and the loss of basic rights in the face of corporate rights to profit, you're going to have to convince fellow Americans that profit isn't the only thing that matters. Good luck with that.

    1. Re:It's a culture thing by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

      I have yet to figure out how to use mod points, or even if I have any...but if I did, I would mod this up. Well-spoken.

    2. Re:It's a culture thing by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      This is probably the most lucid thing that is going to get written on this topic. We should just censor everything else from this point forward.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:It's a culture thing by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1

      Genesis made a really good song about this...I think it was called "Land Of Confucian." Check it out.

    4. Re:It's a culture thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puritan ideas? The Puritans didn't believe anything from the waist up was off-limits. The nipple thing is not an outgrowth of puritanism.

      And saying our main moral metric is profit is blatantly flaming. It's absurd.

    5. Re:It's a culture thing by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you have to understand about China is that their government is an expression of their religious philosophies.

      Whose philosophy do you support in this picture?

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d8/Tianasquare.jpg

    6. Re:It's a culture thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you have to understand about China is that their government is an expression of their religious philosophies. They believe that social order is a moral expression, and something worth dying for:

      Anyone who mentions power (in this case, the power of the government to impose order) and morality is unqualified to speak about either. The sort of power that can be used to compel people to do things can't be moral, just as those who claim to be moral lose their morality when they attempt to impose it through force.

    7. Re:It's a culture thing by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      So, if you want to stop the march to DRM and the loss of basic rights in the face of corporate rights to profit, you're going to have to convince fellow Americans that profit isn't the only thing that matters. Good luck with that.

      Or convince them that DRM hurts profits... that's a much easier idea to "sell".

      Which gets you freedom. heh. Freedom is profitable.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    8. Re:It's a culture thing by copponex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Puritan ideas? The Puritans didn't believe anything from the waist up was off-limits. The nipple thing is not an outgrowth of puritanism.

      The anti-sex attitude of the Puritans is also described by historian John Demos. He reports that throughout the seventeenth century, the Puritans in Plymouth Colony had "a steady succession of trials and convictions for sexual offenses involving single persons. 'Fornication,' in particular, was a familiar problem." Demos says the punishment for fornication was "a fine of ten pounds or a public whipping - and applied equally to both parties."

      Although the Puritans had serious and even pathological hang-ups about pleasure, they were into violence. Calvin's Geneva beheaded adulterers. Religious dissenters were hanged, decapitated, or burned at the stake. Christopher Hitchens describes Calvin as "a sadist and torturer and killer, who burned Servetus (one of the great thinkers and questioners of the day) while the man was still alive."

      http://www.humanismbyjoe.com/Puritans_dark_Side.htm

      Obviously, we haven't kept all the Puritan ideals. But anti-sex and pro-violence attitudes remain.

      And saying our main moral metric is profit is blatantly flaming. It's absurd.

      What other value system do you governs the vast majority of our actions? Feel free to give examples.

    9. Re:It's a culture thing by copponex · · Score: 1

      I didn't say I agreed with philosophy. And if you look at what I just posted, I hope you'll join me in stating that government use of violence is almost never justified - even if it's the American government committing acts of violence, and even if they claim it's for self defense.

    10. Re:It's a culture thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or China is a blatant oligarchy, as our own country is mostly. Though ours is through laziness and stupidity.

      Violence is easily explained by right and wrong.
      Nipples are a, shall we say, touchy topic. Right and wrong here are more difficult to explain to little ones.
      Really tired of this "problem" people have with the US. It's fairly logical and straightforward.

      Note: I've not insulted you except to say you're wrong about China.

    11. Re:It's a culture thing by copponex · · Score: 1

      Shit.

      What other value system do you think governs the vast majority of our actions? Feel free to give examples.

    12. Re:It's a culture thing by stimpleton · · Score: 1

      Whose do you support in this one?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

      --

      In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    13. Re:It's a culture thing by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

      What you have to understand about China is that their government is an expression of their religious philosophies

      I'm afraid you're putting the ox behind the cart: the Chinese government is actually using the religious philosophy (in this case Confucianism) but only *after* over-controlling the Chinese society. The Chinese government always kept a tight grip on the society while switching the reasoning (and the methods of keeping their Chinese citizens into defense) but jumped through several (and ultimately mutually exclusive) ideologies, philosophies and goals.

      To say the Chinese government is an expression of their religious philosophies is completely baseless. The Chinese government is an expression of the Chinese Communist party, and it was like that for the last 60 years. And throughout their governing, the Chinese Communist leaders (just like the leaders of the Communist (Bolshevik) party of the Soviet Union) went through different phases, projected different goals and used different ways of rationalizing their undemocratic grip to power.

      Nowadays yes, the unofficial (but prevalent) *rationalizing* has many things in common with Confucianism. Tomorrow? Nobody knows.

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
  17. I would like to help, but why kid myself by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    I hate to sound pessimistic, but what good is a letter to my Congressman when some media conglomerate can afford to pay lobbyists to throw hundreds of thousands of dollars into his reelection campaign? I can't even afford to buy him Springsteen tickets.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:I would like to help, but why kid myself by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      Dude, the Founding Fathers fought against the British and had NO CHANCE...YET THEY WON. They certainly didn't have your attitude.

    2. Re:I would like to help, but why kid myself by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, they had an excellent chance. They had a larger standing army already in place, established supply lines, strong native support, and an established local political structure.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:I would like to help, but why kid myself by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      The point was that your defeatist attitude won't get anything done.

      There is a grassroots movement that is gaining steam and you should jump on board if you don't like the way things are going.

    4. Re:I would like to help, but why kid myself by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      There is? Where are the roots? Are the shoots still below the surface or what? (Or do you mean the Tea Partiers?)

    5. Re:I would like to help, but why kid myself by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It's not defeatist, its realist. If you want to get something done in Washington today, the old "Write your Congressman, have a protest rally" thing is a terrible way to go about it. It's just a waste of time in an age of record-breakingly expensive political campaigns, insane levels of lobbying, and a Supreme Court that just made it okay for corporations to throw as much money as they like at politicians.

      If you want to change something these days, you need money and lots of it. Raise money, hire a lobbyist, and arrange for fundraisers for the politician you want to support your cause. THAT'S how you get it done if you want action in Washington.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:I would like to help, but why kid myself by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rand Paul and the other libertarian Tea Partiers are just being used by the Republican establishment. The second Republicans are back in charge, they'll purge the party of libertarians and anything related to *individual* rights will be quickly shunted aside (only corporations and the wealthy will have the government "off their back"). Paul is just a dupe.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:I would like to help, but why kid myself by Ryokos_boytoy · · Score: 1

      Those days are gone. The people are completely stripped of power. We are all slaves, every last one of us. There is nothing the "powers that be" wouldn't do to maintain their power. And I mean nothing. They would burn every baby on the planet if they could make another 1/2% on their money. Hope, faith and optimism are for children and fools.

      But you know what, don't listen to me. Go out and work towards a better world. I hope you succeed were every single human before you has failed.

      --


      If you don't say anything, you won't be called on to repeat it. -- Calvin Coolidge
  18. Too Slow, Slashdot by Revotron · · Score: 5, Informative

    This happened about a week ago. The owner of the single server (that's right, it was all on one single server, with no backups) posted to WebHostingTalk.com to complain because BurstNet wouldn't violate the government's order to keep quiet.

    The authorities ordered BurstNet to take the server offline for what appeared to be very, very serious violations. Based on BurstNet's demeanor and seriousness when asked about the issue, it could be anything from national security to child porn. BurstNet also appears to have been hit with a gag order, as they've only made one (perhaps two) public comments on the situation, and absolutely refuse to make any more announcements.

    Don't take my word for it - read up on the situation at the original WHT thread (which is now closed).

    1. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "apparently very serious"? come on, we all know how hosting companies piss on their pants the moment the fbi knocks the door. they oftne do WHATEVER they're told to do without a warrant. So it could be practically anything. Regardless, the poor guy isn't going to see his server in years. If he wants to know what's going on he should have said he has backups and is going to put the site back online momentarily, then the authorities would have probably tried to contact him.

    2. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on exactly what kind of services this guy was offering, my guess is someone was using it to transfer child pornography or classified materials. If he allowed FTP access, it would be as simple as sharing the login info to other people in the group sharing the illicit material and uploading it. It's already apparent that the owner wasn't bothering to see what was being uploaded to this server, if he had received multiple DMCA notices and didn't bother keeping any sort of back up, so it would have been easy enough to pull off.

    3. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      After reading that thread at webhostingtalk, I'm going to guess the Patriot Act was invoked. It has that air about it. If it was child porn, would Burst be facing an obvious gag order from the government?

      The server operator sounds incredibly clueless. Did it never cross his mind that offering free hosting to 70,000+ accounts might put him in the position of hosting material that might violate some laws?

      This doesn't sound like the usual copyright-infringement case; it looks much more serious than that.

    4. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahah.

      this guy is the biggest fucking idiot i have encountered in a long long time.

      idiocy of this order demands swift and mighty retribution. nail him to the wall.

      no back ups, and page after page of the idiot whining about the same thing, unable to *get it* that LE had seized his shit for something on his machines that was clearly *very* illegal.

      moron.

    5. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by whatajoke · · Score: 1

      The authorities ordered BurstNet to take the server offline for what appeared to be very, very serious violations.

      Does it mean that authorities had a warrant from a judge? If they did, then I don't see what the hullo bullo is about. If they did not have a warrant and still were able to shut down the web site, then democracy in USA is screwed.

    6. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If it was child porn, would Burst be facing an obvious gag order from the government?

      I agree, if it was kiddy porn we'd have 8 DAs, 12 prosecutors, 52 cops, and a janitor all parading before the press for having busted a kiddy porn ring please vote for me think of the children.

      National security is just about the only topic that can convince the government to shut the hell up, mostly because they can drive more fear by staying silent than they can by announcing that they busted some sexy russian spy who was undercover sizing up the neighborhood barbecue grills.

    7. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by Revotron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course there's going to be hullabaloo - it's a Slashdot story that contains multiple instances of the words "government", "DMCA" and "takedown". That's enough for anybody to form their own opinion without even finishing the summary.

    8. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by Revotron · · Score: 1

      Gag orders aren't limited to PATRIOT act invocations.

      Gag orders are often put in place to prevent the spread of information that might cause interference with an ongoing investigation. For instance, if Blogetery knew what the authorities were investigating, they may or may not destroy additional incriminating evidence.

      Not saying that's the case at all, as Blogetery's owner is certainly innocent until proven guilty, but when they're dealing with cybercrime they often don't let things slip because another bust may be right around the corner.

    9. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

      The shutdown apparently had something to do with content posted to the server by unidentified third parties. A number of people in that thread have made a big deal about how the guy is responsible for all content posted to his server, which strikes me as bullshit. Is Slashdot liable for whatever people write here? Is Google liable for what people post on blogger.com? For what people post on YouTube?

      I can understand authorities and hosting providers doing everything possible to shut down and determine the origin of infringing or illegal material, but the notion that the guy should be liable for content he didn't post and wasn't aware of is simply ridiculous. It is the hosting providers prerogative to shut down the website for whatever reason, but it makes as much sense as shutting down all of Slashdot due to somebody using it to leak classified government documents.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    10. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by Revotron · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to be a mere service provider and be protected by certain laws, but what the Feds would really investigate is whether he's playing an active role in the hosting and distribution of illegal material.

    11. Re:Too Slow, Slashdot by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to be a mere service provider and be protected by certain laws, but what the Feds would really investigate is whether he's playing an active role in the hosting and distribution of illegal material.

      Active role? You might as well say any role. I doubt the Feds distinguish between active and passive here. I am not even sure I can distinguish between them when it comes to servers.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  19. yeaaah by unity100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    in china government orders your site down, because they dont like it.

    in usa private people and companies order your site down, because they dont like it. they just need to use an excuse for invoking dmca.

    the only difference is, there is a storefront in usa, and people think they are 'free'.

    1. Re:yeaaah by johnhp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In China, if you say the wrong things, you can be arrested and then executed. That simply does not happen in the US. There IS a definite difference.

      Don't take me for some cheerleader of the US. I'm horrified by other abuses, like warrantless wiretaps and rendition... but that has nothing to do with a real China vs. US rights comparison.

    2. Re:yeaaah by unity100 · · Score: 1

      yeah. so whats the end result ?

      in one, your life ends, in the other, you live under a system in which you are not allowed to speak, while being supposedly free. in one, everything is straight, it is repression, in the other, there is the freedom of illusion.

    3. Re:yeaaah by KlomDark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell that to JFK. // Oh wait, you can't

    4. Re:yeaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in china government orders your site down, because they dont like it.

      And it stays down. And you stay in jail.

      in usa private people and companies order your site down, because they dont like it. they just need to use an excuse for invoking dmca.

      And it has the **possibility** of going to court, and coming back up. No jail time involved, possibly a fine for copyright issues though...

      the only difference is, there is a storefront in usa, and people think they are 'free'.

      And jail.

    5. Re:yeaaah by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      you can be arrested and then executed.

      Ah, so that's how they keep their prison population lower than the US! I knew it had to be something.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    6. Re:yeaaah by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

      Based on TFA, it would appear this may be more than a copyright issue. A comment from the host, "this was not a typical case, in which suspension and notification would be the norm" suggests that it was not DMCA related.

    7. Re:yeaaah by geekoid · · Score: 1

      no. It needs to violate an actual law, not because someone happens to not like it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:yeaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right; In the US, if you say the wrong things, you can be COVERTLY arrested and then vanished.
      Actually, this happens in China too.

    9. Re:yeaaah by unity100 · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, the 'possibility' of going to court. the courts in which the one with more money gets more justice, all in 'free' and free market fashion.

      so what happens in the end ? it stays down. period. at least, in china, there isnt a storefront and a facade.

    10. Re:yeaaah by unity100 · · Score: 1

      no. i can just find and acquire an ambiguous patent or copyright vaguely relevant to your content and then shut you down with it.

    11. Re:yeaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, uh, now that the President has made it clear that he has the right to assassinate any American citizen by whom he feels threatened, there may be functional difference, but there's no longer a theoretical difference. Some might say that it's only a matter of time, now that the rules have been made clear, and apparently accepted by the people.

    12. Re:yeaaah by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How true. In the US, if you say the wrong things or talk to the wrong people, you can just be labelled a terrorist, sent to Gitmo, and tortured for a while:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Saleh_Kahlah_al-Marri

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    13. Re:yeaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      In China, if you say the wrong things, you can be arrested and then executed. That simply does not happen in the US. There IS a definite difference.

      To play devil's advocate here, you have cases like Ruby Ridge & the Waco Branch Dividians Seige where you can argue that in the US they don't even bother arresting you before they execute you.

      There's also been numerous cases of law enforcement breaking into the wrong house on a drug/guns/whatever bust and killing totally innocent people because of it. It's happened often enough that there's really no good way to excuse it. Yes mistakes happen, but when mistakes result in the government basically murdering innocent people, there's something seriously, seriously wrong. After it happens once there should have been changes made to make damn sure it never happened again. And yet it keeps on happening.

      And of course you yourself brought up warrantless wiretaps & rendition. You also have the ultra-secret national security orders that the PATRIOT act gave us, and then this story we're posting comments on where someone's entire domain was taken down and the ISP's not allowed to tell him WHY. I'm willing to bet that whatever the reason turns out to be it won't be a national security issue, so the ultra-secret nature of the take-down will be totally unfounded.

      So, execution of innocents, murder of people without even bothering to arrest them first, domestic spying, torture, refusing to even tell you what you're accused of (and not charging you for it)... it's starting to sound pretty bad isn't it? I wouldn't personally class the US up there at China levels, but there are certainly plenty of things they do wrong enough to make the comparison not totally unfounded. And to be perfectly frank, all the things the US does wrong worries me a lot.

      Posted AC because I wasn't kidding about that worrying thing. I'm scared to criticize my government openly any more.

    14. Re:yeaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lot more subtle than that here. Say the wrong thing and your home will draw 50 building code violations and/or your kids will be placed in foster care on some pretext.

    15. Re:yeaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In China, if you say the wrong things, you can be arrested and then executed. That simply does not happen in the US. There IS a definite difference.

      Hey, have you ever tried staging a peaceful protest at a Republican National Convention?

    16. Re:yeaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to read your own dribble. He's being held in the Continental US (!= Gitmo) because he was arrested on American Soil.

      So stricktly speaking, to be labeled a terrorist and sent to gitmo, you must be:

      1) Captured on the battlefield outside the US.
      2) Not a US citizen.

      Insightful my ass. Typical Chimpanzee like attention to detail is more like it.

    17. Re:yeaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, the Federal government & its hacks invoke Patriot Act, DCMA, protection laws, and the myriad of other laws that have stripped even the STATES themselves, besides individuals of freedoms that 50, nay 20, or 10 years ago we took for granted. China has loosened its control of citizens while the USA has increased its control & imprisonment its of citizens.

  20. Unlikely it's simple link-to-copyright-infringment by tobiah · · Score: 1

    DMCA already provides a clear path to dealing with infringing material, and there's no good reason to keep an anti-piracy action secret. That's the sort of thing authorities and overlords like to advertise. I bet we'll hear all about the terrorist blog network the quick-thinking government agents shut down once the dust settles.

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  21. This is just pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Lets just hope for the best as that's all we can really do.

    That's the American, can-do, revolutionary spirit of our founding fathers! In fact, I think that's written somewhere in the Declaration of Independence. "When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, just hope for the best, as that's all we can really do."

    Have a revolution or don't. Don't pretend there's nothing you can do.

    1. Re:This is just pathetic. by elucido · · Score: 1

      Lets just hope for the best as that's all we can really do.

      That's the American, can-do, revolutionary spirit of our founding fathers! In fact, I think that's written somewhere in the Declaration of Independence. "When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, just hope for the best, as that's all we can really do."

      Have a revolution or don't. Don't pretend there's nothing you can do.

      They tried revolution in the 60s. Look at the results.

    2. Re:This is just pathetic. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      They tried revolution in the 60s. Look at the results.

      Yep, we lost our women to the corporatists.

  22. What are you gonna do about it? by elucido · · Score: 1

    Nothing. You will do nothing about it because you can't do anything about it.

    Submit to Uncle Sam or go to jail.

  23. Fascism is coming by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This didn't start with Obama either. This is ingrained in our society, and accepted by many in the name of national security. That's a very grave mistake. Books like "The Federal Mafia" have been banned, and New York Times reporters have been silenced by being thrown in jail. It is very troubling that this trend continues, and everyone should be protesting it.

    1. Re:Fascism is coming by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Could you define fascism for us? I seems to have various meaning to different people.

    2. Re:Fascism is coming by Jeian · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Banned" is a bit of a stretch.

      "The Federal Mafia is a book written in prison[18] by Schiff. In the book, Schiff contended that the income tax system and Internal Revenue Service were illegal. On August 9, 2004, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an injunction issued by a U.S. District Court in Nevada under 26 U.S.C. 7408 against Irwin Schiff and associates Cynthia Neun and Lawrence Cohen, against the sale of this book by those persons.[19] This prohibition does not extend to other sellers of the book. The court rejected Schiff's contention on appeal that the First Amendment protects sales of the book, as the court found that the information it contains is fraudulent.[20]

      Schiff, Neun and Cohen are currently barred under the preliminary injunction from selling or advertising material advocating nonpayment of tax, preparing a tax return for others, and from otherwise providing assistance or encouragement to others in violating tax law. Schiff and his associates are additionally required to provide a copy of the injunction to each of their customers, to post it on their website, and to provide the government with a customer list.[21]

      Schiff and his associates have responded by giving the book for free on their website.[22]"

    3. Re:Fascism is coming by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      A political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. (Taken from m-w.com)

      In my words - The exact opposite of individual liberty. So in this case, the forcible suppression of opposition is what I'm referring to. I'm assuming that the blogs oppose the regime, and not giving the government the benefit of the doubt.

    4. Re:Fascism is coming by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, such a horrible ban. Oh wait, it's not banned at all, but the author is in fact a crackpot.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:Fascism is coming by elucido · · Score: 1

      This didn't start with Obama either. This is ingrained in our society, and accepted by many in the name of national security. That's a very grave mistake. Books like "The Federal Mafia" have been banned, and New York Times reporters have been silenced by being thrown in jail. It is very troubling that this trend continues, and everyone should be protesting it.

      Even if the feds are a mafia, they are a legal mafia.

    6. Re:Fascism is coming by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      If the government can ban fraudulent speech(even though it's not), then we don't have free speech.

      Why should they have to bar anyone from advocating nonpayment of tax? People don't have to listen. They'll go to jail just like he did if they don't file a supposed "voluntary" return.

      Why don't we see them going out and barring sales of the Ginsu Knife?

    7. Re:Fascism is coming by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      Why is the author a crackpot? For being bold enough to stand up for what our Founding Fathers fought for. They shed blood over way lower taxes. Would you prefer that we were still under British rule?

    8. Re:Fascism is coming by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No it's not, and you are being stupid. your knee jerk reaction to post this is directly cause by you using the headline to confirm your irrational bias.

      Nothing illegal or even wrong seems to have happened.

      Read up o the facts, then think.
      After that you can post something worth discussing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Fascism is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascism is *not* coming.

      It's already here.

      Look at how the military is glorified, and the notion of "my country right or wrong" prevails.

    10. Re:Fascism is coming by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's not that he advocates nonpayment of tax. That's legal. It's that he states that non-payment of tax is legal. The government's stance is that is illegal legal and/or tax advice, and as such, falls under regulations against fraudulent professional advice.

      If the government can ban fraudulent speech(even though it's not), then we don't have free speech.

      Why the parenthetical? Are you saying that someone's opinion can trump the law (as in a false opinion that tax is illegal makes tax illegal, even though the courts have ruled on this and all three branches are in agreement that it is legal)? You seem to be confusing the issues by adding in your personal opinion about whether tax is legal.

      Why should they have to bar anyone from advocating nonpayment of tax? People don't have to listen. They'll go to jail just like he did if they don't file a supposed "voluntary" return.

      Again, you are arguing two things at once. Returns are always voluntary. If you wanted to send them a check for what you owe without the return, they'll accept it and you'll not get in any real trouble, other than they'll probably audit you repeatedly. But your apparent issue with "voluntary" or whatever are coloring your argument. It's not that he gives an "opinion" about the weather. He's stating specific legal and tax advice, and that advice is such that it will likely end up with someone in jail. Having a book saying "here's why I believe that the tax was passed illegally and we need to get the government to recognize that so we can fix these problems" is one thing. But to state "It's a legal fact that the Amendment authorizing tax was improperly ratified, and so no one has to file an income tax return" is considered fraudulent legal or tax advice and as such, is banned to prevent people from mistakenly following that advice.

      Why don't we see them going out and barring sales of the Ginsu Knife?

      Why don't we see them going out and banning the sale of assault weapons? Oh wait, they have, more than once, made bans on weapons they considered to be constructed with no legal use in mind (like sawed-off shotguns). And no 2nd Amendment claim will get you out of jail when you are arrested making and selling such banned weapons, no matter what your opinion on those laws are.

    11. Re:Fascism is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it's happening under Obama.

    12. Re:Fascism is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was representation they shed blood over, not taxes. Learn some history you fucking moron.

  24. Submit to Uncle Sam or go to jail. by elucido · · Score: 1

    Just like in China, if you don't submit to the government you shall be punished.

    1. Re:Submit to Uncle Sam or go to jail. by Uniquitous · · Score: 1

      Is there such a thing as an opt-in government? I don't think China and the US have a lock on enforcing governmental supremacy within said government's borders.

    2. Re:Submit to Uncle Sam or go to jail. by elucido · · Score: 1

      Is there such a thing as an opt-in government? I don't think China and the US have a lock on enforcing governmental supremacy within said government's borders.

      No you can't opt-in. You are born in the USA or China and you are a subject of the USA or China.

    3. Re:Submit to Uncle Sam or go to jail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there such a thing as an opt-in government? I don't think China and the US have a lock on enforcing governmental supremacy within said government's borders.

      No you can't opt-in. You are born in the USA or China and you are a subject of the USA or China.

      You can however opt-out once you are an adult, that is you can legally renounce your US citizenship. Although doing so before you leave the US territory would make you both stateless and a de facto illegal alien, so it probably isn't a good idea to do it unless you are already in the process of emigrating elsewhere. Finally, renouncing US citizenship is usually an irrevocable action, so make damn sure you thought it through properly.

    4. Re:Submit to Uncle Sam or go to jail. by elucido · · Score: 1

      Is there such a thing as an opt-in government? I don't think China and the US have a lock on enforcing governmental supremacy within said government's borders.

      No you can't opt-in. You are born in the USA or China and you are a subject of the USA or China.

      You can however opt-out once you are an adult, that is you can legally renounce your US citizenship. Although doing so before you leave the US territory would make you both stateless and a de facto illegal alien, so it probably isn't a good idea to do it unless you are already in the process of emigrating elsewhere. Finally, renouncing US citizenship is usually an irrevocable action, so make damn sure you thought it through properly.

      Do you know anyone who has done this? Did they live to tell about it?

    5. Re:Submit to Uncle Sam or go to jail. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      The parent is missing quite a lot of facts.

      You are a citizen of the State _AND_ of the united States. You can Renounce your united States citizen and still keep your State Citizenship. The capitalization difference between united States and United States is IMPORTANT; the Founding Fathers knew of this differences when they wrote the Declaration of Independence and specifically used the phrase "united States of America".
      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Us_declaration_independence.jpg

      Yes, I know people who have successfully legally opted out Federal Citizenship (and by extension of all Socialist Slave Programs), and never had to legally pay taxes again. Personally, I wouldn't waste years in the sovereignty movement, when it won't really matter in the long run. e.g. Good luck going in debt as you try to educate ignorant judges of this fact, researching the 3 types of U.S. definitions, fighting banks who can't understand the concept that you can still own assets even though you don't have a SSN, trying to get people to understand that the Constitution means shit since you never _signed_ it (_ALL_ contracts must be agreed either written or orally for them to be legally binding), etc.

      Ownership is mostly a myth these days anyways. You used to truely own your own land, via allodial title, but the governement didn't like it that you didn't have to pay for the privelege (tax) to use your own land, so that was quickly abolished last century.

    6. Re:Submit to Uncle Sam or go to jail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      You literally win the dumbest comment on slashdot award for today.

    7. Re:Submit to Uncle Sam or go to jail. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Awww, did I confuse your itty bitty brain using such big words as Allodial Title...

      http://www.google.com/search?q=allodial+title

      Yup, guess Texas and Nevada must be dumb for allowing "Allodial Title"...
      http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071205134703AA2nVPJ

      > You literally win the dumbest comment on slashdot award for today.

      Too bad you are still a loser... but then again I shouldn't respond to anonymous cowards who have to resort to Ad hominem without adding anything interesting, informative, or insightful to the discussion at hand.

  25. Submit or go to jail. by elucido · · Score: 1

    You can blame it on culture. You can blame it on trends. It's really as simple as the people who have the power will do anything to keep the power. They will make as many laws as they have to, they will trample as many civil liberties as they have to, because they function as a mafia.

    You are either with them or against them. Submit or go to jail.

  26. Unless content was illegal per se this is wrong by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Are we talking about information-material that is illegal to posses per se such as child pornography or material which is not illegal for the average American to possess at all?

    If the former then I can see why this is an extraordinary case but I can't see why the people responsible haven't been arrested already.

    If the latter then it's extraordinarily stupid and un-American to use law enforcement in such a heavy-handed, hush-hush manner.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Unless content was illegal per se this is wrong by bannable · · Score: 1

      There is also the possibility that it falls under any of the various national security provisions which allow for secret warrants such as this.

      --
      "If you see a man on a horse, he is likely an enemy. Kill the man and eat the horse."
  27. Power, Profits, Control, Submit or Jail. by elucido · · Score: 1

    They who want the power, the profits, the control over all information and intellectual property, will do anything to get it. It's a war for information control. It's a war you as a civilian cannot win. It does not matter if you are a civilian artist (you'll get pimped by the system), it does not matter if you are a civilian consumer (you'll be forced into submission or jail.)

    The rules to this game are simple. Submit or jail.

  28. Submit or Jail is the new game. by elucido · · Score: 1

    If you are a civilian, you have one of two options. You can either submit, or you can go to jail. That is the game. The owners who made the rules designed it so that you only have two options. It does not matter whether or not you are an information producer or information consumer, if you are a producer you have to submit to being pimped and treated like their property. You are going to be forced to whore yourself out to the highest bidder. If you are a consumer you'll have to submit to some of the most draconian anti consumer laws on the planet.

    Just like in the 60s, those who don't submit will go up against Cointel Pro. You want to start a militia? You want to rebel? Not going to be an option. The only option is to submit or go to jail. Choose your option wisely because they can always change the game later to submit or die.

  29. Bull... why be anonymous about it? by elucido · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anytime you hear stories from anonymous government sources and anonymous agents, it's bullshit. Anybody who really works for the government and who really has something to say, will be able to say it on the record or provide authentic documents to back up what they are saying.

    Otherwise it's as simple as someone wearing a suit and tie with a fake badge telling people they work for the government. Anybody can say this, anybody can talk like this, I see it on Alex Jones all the time. Thats when they call it a conspiracy theory, and I'm calling it a conspiracy theory in this instance.

    1. Re:Bull... why be anonymous about it? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Go educate yourself in some fairly recent history, then come back...

    2. Re:Bull... why be anonymous about it? by elucido · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Go educate yourself in some fairly recent history, then come back...

      Where are the documents? Without documents theres nothing to report.

    3. Re:Bull... why be anonymous about it? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      In the case of Deep Throat, the stuff the unnamed source wasn't only not 'bullshit' but it brought down a president.

    4. Re:Bull... why be anonymous about it? by elucido · · Score: 1

      In the case of Deep Throat, the stuff the unnamed source wasn't only not 'bullshit' but it brought down a president.

      That was then, this is now.

  30. Submit to Uncle Sam or else. by elucido · · Score: 1

    You, and others like you, have no alternative. You can submit to the authority of the US government or you can be assassinated in a way which looks like natural causes by secret agents who have the legal authority to assassinate terrorists.

    What this means is there is no option to rebel. There is no option to protest beyond mere words, and even words can get you put in jail in this environment.

  31. subject line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Could you at least get the heading correct. Government didnt shut down 73000 web sites but shutdown one with 73000 blogs.

  32. They can kill people already. by elucido · · Score: 1

    Why would they have to kill someone in a raid when they can kill someone with the flu, or with something which will look like natural causes? You underestimate the abilities of the government. They have biological weapons, this means viruses of all sorts which can kill in all kinds of ways without a trace or shred of evidence so that it's completely deniable. The same legal authority which allows the government to conduct raids and trample free speech is the legal authority which allows them to assassinate American citizens. It's the law that if you are considered to be a terrorist, it's open season on you.

    Once the government declares you fair game, they'll put the green light on you and whoever takes you out will become a millionaire. Fortunately it's still expensive for them to do this so they don't have the ability to kill millions of people, but it should be common knowledge that the US government has the power to assassinate American citizens.

    The proof is here:
      http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/04/07/can-the-u-s-government-assassinate-u-s-citizens-based-on-secret-evidence/

    http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/07/assassinations

    1. Re:They can kill people already. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Lol, if they have a lethal virus and they release it and cause an epidemic they are going to be found out pretty quickly. There are at least 10,000 labs in the US alone that could check the genes in a virus or bacteria. A bullet and being thrown into a blast furnace works much better.

    2. Re:They can kill people already. by elucido · · Score: 1

      Lol, if they have a lethal virus and they release it and cause an epidemic they are going to be found out pretty quickly. There are at least 10,000 labs in the US alone that could check the genes in a virus or bacteria. A bullet and being thrown into a blast furnace works much better.

      Not if the virus is specifically designed to target the immune system of the person they want to kill. You forget that viruses can be harmless when they infect one person with a type of DNA, but completely destroy the immune system of another person with different DNA. When you consider that the government knows which method of attack is likely to kill the different people, you can see that even an ordinary flu can be deadly if it infects the right person at the right time.

    3. Re:They can kill people already. by elucido · · Score: 1

      Lol, if they have a lethal virus and they release it and cause an epidemic they are going to be found out pretty quickly. There are at least 10,000 labs in the US alone that could check the genes in a virus or bacteria. A bullet and being thrown into a blast furnace works much better.

      Also found out by whom? Who is supposed to do anything to find anything out when the government does it? If the government does it then it's legal and theres nothing to find out. That means there would be no investigation.

      Even if the virus tactic doesn't work they could just hang someone with a noose and claim they committed suicide.

    4. Re:They can kill people already. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      You know how much that would cost and how many people would be involved? Assassinations that involve 100's or even 1000's of highly paid and prominent biochemists, genetic engineers and lab techs are not going to be secret for long. Brain meet bullet/arrow/rock is a tried and true method for killing someone quietly for a reason.

    5. Re:They can kill people already. by elucido · · Score: 1

      You know how much that would cost and how many people would be involved? Assassinations that involve 100's or even 1000's of highly paid and prominent biochemists, genetic engineers and lab techs are not going to be secret for long. Brain meet bullet/arrow/rock is a tried and true method for killing someone quietly for a reason.

      How hard is it to keep secret if each one of those scientists are threatened with death? They may even have specific viruses for specific races and family trees. There is no thing to stop our government or other governments form targeting specific families.

    6. Re:They can kill people already. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      If they can't keep the stuff coming out of groom lake or drone strikes in Pakistan secret, which are SAP programs, what makes you think they can do any better with anything else? The US does not threaten entire families because someone is working on a SAP program, this is not North Korea.

  33. mod parent up by bannable · · Score: 1

    Finally some real info.

    --
    "If you see a man on a horse, he is likely an enemy. Kill the man and eat the horse."
  34. Here's the article, there are three by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the wikipedia article, there are three Americans that were held at Guantanamo...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_detainees_at_Guantanamo_Bay

    1. Re:Here's the article, there are three by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If you'd care to read your own article, only one of the three was ever held at Gitmo, and he was not taken in the US, but "in the field". Still, more than I was able to come up with.

  35. The only freedom left is the freedom to submit. by elucido · · Score: 1

    Free speech is a myth.
    Human rights is a dream.
    Freedom isn't real.

    The meaning of these three sentences is very simple. Every human on planet earth must submit to the authority of Uncle Sam or they shall be punished with jail or death.

    Fortunately the US government has not decided on mass assassinations, but the authority exists under the law to make every living person submit under the threat of death.

    http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/07/assassinations

    This means it's no longer an option to disobey the US government. If you disobey then you'll go to jail. If you disobey in the wrong way, you may be declared a terrorist and then you go to jail and get tortured in jail. If you fight by with physical force you can be declared as an enemy combatant and then you can get assassinated.

    All of the evidence against you can be kept secret. The fact that you were assassinated and didn't die in a freak accident can be kept secret. The game is submit or go to jail. And sometimes even if you submit you still go to jail if you piss too many people off.

  36. Welcome to the Police State by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the "War on Drugs", law enforcement has been doing this since the mid 80's. Maybe this is just the next logical step?

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  37. Not DMCA by PPH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I doubt it was over copyright or illegal content issues. If it was, the justice dept would have tripped over itself to make an example of this evil hosting service. A very public example.

    The whole secrecy thing, together with taking down 73,000 blogs, makes me think that they were targeting a few (perhaps only one) page. But they don't want us to know which one. So take them all down and it will be difficult to tell. Grab a copy of the archives while they're still up. There could be some interesting reading in there someplace.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  38. They better hope its child porn. by elucido · · Score: 1

    This happened about a week ago. The owner of the single server (that's right, it was all on one single server, with no backups) posted to WebHostingTalk.com to complain because BurstNet wouldn't violate the government's order to keep quiet.

    The authorities ordered BurstNet to take the server offline for what appeared to be very, very serious violations. Based on BurstNet's demeanor and seriousness when asked about the issue, it could be anything from national security to child porn. BurstNet also appears to have been hit with a gag order, as they've only made one (perhaps two) public comments on the situation, and absolutely refuse to make any more announcements.

    Don't take my word for it - read up on the situation at the original WHT thread (which is now closed).

    If it's national security and they fight back they could get killed, or snatched up and beaten/waterboarded. Or they could just be arrested without charge and put in prison.

    So nobody is going to mess with the government. The best and only option in this situation is to keep your mouth shut, call your lawyer, and hope that it can be sorted out within the legal system.

  39. This is just a demonstration... by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 1

    Agreed,

    I think this is just a demonstration of what the proposed "Internet-Kill-Switch" would be operated like. Information getting out of hand? Turn it off.

  40. Fascism may be coming, But your examples are BS by cmholm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Claims of parent to support "Fascism is coming"...

    - Books like The Federal Mafia have been banned: No.
    - NYT reporters have been silenced [...] in jail: "reporters" == Judith Miller, who got to do a couple months in the can to ponder the meaning of "contempt of court". She's not the first, and won't be the last.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    1. Re:Fascism may be coming, But your examples are BS by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      The Federal Mafia was first published in 1980. Amazon.com was founded in 1994.

      The media is(or should be) a balance of power. If the government can throw a reporter in jail for not testifying against her sources, then the balance of power shifts to the government. Now the government can do whatever it wants unchecked because all they have to do is throw anyone in jail who calls them out. Clearly we do not have a free media.

    2. Re:Fascism may be coming, But your examples are BS by cmholm · · Score: 1

      Y'know, there were a boatload of fringe books that were hard to find prior to commercialization of ARPANet. That a book chain didn't think it worth their while to carry - say - Palladin Press' full catalog in a store !== "banned".

      Re: "the government" throwing a reporter in jail... that's a pretty broad brush. Care to provide some context? Was it at G.W. Bush's order? Cheney's? The Director of the FBI? The CIA? The Attorney General? No, it was by a judge hearing a criminal case, compelling a witness under supenae to testify on whom she saw breaking the law. A reporters' privilege to protect sources, isn't (yet) an absolute right, but it's getting there.

      --
      Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    3. Re:Fascism may be coming, But your examples are BS by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Federal Government. Whatever law she supposedly broke contradicts the First Amendment which clearly states "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of the press". The judge was incorrect with his decision.

      There is no interpreting that amendment. There is nothing in there about national security. Her time in jail is a violation of the constitution.

      I responded previously about the Schiff book and Jeian helped me out with the wiki entry.

    4. Re:Fascism may be coming, But your examples are BS by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's not really a rebuttal, Fascism was here for most of the last decade. Xenophobia, ultra nationalism, tribalism, fear mongering, urging voters to vote down their own interests, corporatism, that's definitely a legitimate basis for asserting fascism. It's also very similar to the Republican party over the last decade.

    5. Re:Fascism may be coming, But your examples are BS by cmholm · · Score: 1

      As my headline suggested, my response wasn't intended as a rebuttal of the overall thesis, merely the parent's evidence for it.

      --
      Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    6. Re:Fascism may be coming, But your examples are BS by cmholm · · Score: 1

      I understand the intent of the First Amendment. It doesn't give a reporter carte blanche in a criminal matter. If her source was merely passing along evidence of a crime ("Joe Blow told me someone is blowing the cover on a CIA agent"), she'd have been on solid ground. Unfortunately, the source was suspected of breaking Federal law by the act of stating what Ms. Plame did for a living ("Joe Blow told me Valerie is a CIA agent"), and neither the trial court, the appeals court, nor (AFAWK) the Supreme Court was buying the First Amendment argument.

      Frankly, while I support the general idea that a reporter should be able to protect his/her sources, this dynamic is likely never to be settled. On the one hand, an inability to adequately investigate important issues. On the other, a free pass from ever being called as a witness to any crime, no matter how heinous.

      --
      Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  41. Get a goddamned clue you spoiled brat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you claim the US government is as bad as the Chinese government, you have absolutely no fucking idea what actual dictatorship is like. Such statements are typical of those who've never had their reality meter forcibly calibrated by actual oppression and are too lazy to calibrate it themselves by learning some history.

    I'll tell you what... Go to the US, talk about Bush's crimes, and see what happens. Go to China, start telling the truth about Tiannanmen Square, and see what happens.
     

  42. Very interesting... by warGod3 · · Score: 1

    As the IPBFree forums were also shut down earlier this week with the only information I have seen regarding it was from a Twitter account...

    From Twitter: (Apparently Tomlough and several of the other people were part of IPBfree Admin or whatever):
    tomlough@nands__ Sorry, everything on iPBFree has gone.
    less than 20 seconds ago via web in reply to nands__
    @AmandaFurukita Unfortunately I can't divulge the reason for legal reasons. We really are sorry for the damage to your communities.
    half a minute ago via web in reply to AmandaFurukita
    @piositweet Most of us are always doing new stuff on the web we'll let you know what we're doing if you're interested
    1 minute ago via web in reply to piositweet
    @Gamerx20 A lot of iPBFree stuff is compatible with IF, none of it is compatible with ZB. People will be more familiar with IF or jcink
    2 minutes ago via web in reply to Gamerx20
    @Gamerx20 Well, that's a matter of opinion
    7 minutes ago via web in reply to Gamerx20
    @Xiahfied Sorry, it's all gone forever.
    8 minutes ago via web in reply to Xiahfied
    @shimy88 We're really sorry, it's all gone forever.
    8 minutes ago via web in reply to shimy88
    @QuarantineRP Thank you
    12 minutes ago via web in reply to QuarantineRP
    @Aymbuh Thanks for using iPBFree. If it weren't for the users, there would have been no point in iPBFree.
    12 minutes ago via web in reply to Aymbuh
    @Gamerx20 We can't. Some staff members will work on new projects, but iPBFree as a site and a group is dead.
    13 minutes ago via web in reply to Gamerx20
    @Gamerx20 You will need to find a new host, yes. iPBFree won't return.
    19 minutes ago via web in reply to Gamerx20
    @znewscast All I'll say is that we had no choice in the matter. We'd never choose to let our users down like this.
    20 minutes ago via web in reply to znewscast
    @znewscast Unfortunately I can't divulge the reason for legal reasons
    29 minutes ago via web in reply to znewscast
    @shimy88 iPBFree management team. Trust me, we know how bad this is for everyone. We didn't have the option of letting people know first.
    31 minutes ago via web in reply to shimy88
    @yasminyu_x That's not the reason. We didn't have any arguments, all the rumours are wrong.
    39 minutes ago via web in reply to yasminyu_x
    @miyachan11 We'd have liked to but we weren't able to do so in the circumstances.
    about 1 hour ago via web in reply to miyachan11
    If you need to RT: iPBFree is gone forever and it's not possible to retrieve anything. We're exceptionally sorry, it wasn't planned.
    about 1 hour ago via web
    @MrHorror Not sure, I haven't tried.
    about 2 hours ago via web in reply to MrHorror
    @MrHorror You might have some lack with Google but otherwise there's nothing we can do I'm afraid. (And all the rumours I've seen are wrong)
    about 2 hours ago via web in reply to MrHorror
    @BGgourmet Unfortunately we weren't able to
    about 2 hours ago via web in reply to BGgourmet

    I'm sorry, but something stinks about this...

    --
    "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
  43. Here's a time saving summary by NiteShaed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's a time saving summary of about 90% of the posts here today for those who don't feel like doing them one by one:

    I haven't the vaguest idea what actually happened here, so I'm going to go ahead and assume that the fascist/conservative/liberal/communist/megacorps/illuminati/mole-people have usurped our freedom once again by taking down a half a billion websites that hosted nothing but honest discourse that they, the aforementioned fascist/conservative/liberal/communist/megacorps/illuminati/mole-people don't want YOU to read. Clearly, the U.S. is as bad as China/Soviet Russia/Somalia/Cuba/The Romulan Empire/The Sith/Microsoft, and any ideas that you live in a free society stem from the idea that you're stupid and just another sheeple being led about by the nose by THE MAN. If, somehow, it turns out that the server in question was hosting Child Pornography/Snuff Films/how-to guides to build Nuclear Weapons/Disney Movies, you can safely assume that those things were just planted in order to steal your freedom, except that you didn't have any, so it's just there to steal your imaginary sense of freedom. Since this sense of freedom was imaginary, it's just Imaginary Property anyway, and couldn't have been stolen from you in the first place, so really, nothing of value was lost. I know all this because years ago I threw out my TV because it only showed mindless pablum like American Idol, and worse yet, they make you watch ads, so now I download American Idol on Bit-torrent instead and watch it on my computer, which is inherently better than watching it on TV, so I'm smarter than you. Something about Old People In Korea, Natalie Portman Naked and Petrified, and Hot Grits. In conclusion, in Soviet Amerikkka, websites view you, and this is probably all Steve Jobs' fault.

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    1. Re:Here's a time saving summary by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Those damned mole-people.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:Here's a time saving summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was wonderful kudos to you NiteShaed!
      -Litha-

    3. Re:Here's a time saving summary by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      I told you it was them all along!

      And Natalie Portman Naked, yeah...

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  44. My server is disguised as a nuclear warhead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My server is disguised as a nuclear warhead you insensitive clod!

    Size DOES matter!

    My server:

    outside view

    inside view

  45. SquarePixel has a valid point by Burz · · Score: 1

    The people targeted by Chinese crackdowns is also relatively small.

    But perhaps you are referring to the number of people who are subject to or potentially targeted by said policies: In that case, it is approximately 80% of the Muslim world that is subject to US policies of invasion, puppet governments, torture, indefinite periods of imprisonment and out-of-the-blue extra-judicial killings.

    China may still have more people than the Muslim world, but the scale is definitely in the same league.

  46. US government forgotten their first amendment? by grahammm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are modern day blogs not much closer to the 'press' at the time the US first amendment was passed than are today's corporate media conglomerates? So is taking down a site containing so many blogs not interfering with the freedom of the press - which is something the US constitution prohibits their government from doing?

    1. Re:US government forgotten their first amendment? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Blogs do not have the journalistic integrity that "the press" had and generally still does have. Granted, mainstream journalism is slowly sliding down to match the blogosphere's integrity and journalistic standards, but they aren't quite there yet.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:US government forgotten their first amendment? by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      I'd agree that your computer owned by you on an Internet connection you purchased and maintain is analogous to a printing press. Your blog on a computer hosted by someone else who has entered into a specific contract with yet another entity (the hosting company) doesn't qualify in my mind. If you decide that your information is sufficiently important, and perhaps sufficiently controversial, that it might raise someone's hackles, host it yourself and deal with the political and legal consequences that might follow. Placing your content on a server owned by some random guy with 72,000 other people doesn't suggest to me that you think your speech is worth protecting.

      Hosting blogs is probably conceptually closer to publishing a magazine. If you write an incisive article on the misadventures of some government agency and publish it in a magazine where someone else has posted a picture on page 37 of some eight-year-old sucking a guy's dick, do you really think the authorities are going to be worrying about your First Amendment rights when they show up at the magazine publisher's offices with a warrant? Hosting providers are treated rather akin to common carriers when it comes to copyright infringement (via the DMCA take-down procedure). But I don't think that should absolve the provider of all editorial responsibilities any more than it would if he or she were publishing a print magazine with multiple independent contributors.

      Mr. Blog-Hoster seemed to think he could just sit back and collect his AdSense revenues without taking any responsibility for the material he was hosting. I think that's nuts.

  47. oh so if china is a bit worse thats ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    really
    so if i cut off your head thats bad
    and just cause i didn't do that and cut off your arms legs and penis leaving you barely alive able to do nothing thats better and justifies it all?

    degrees of stupid are more like the truth here. THIS will really piss off a lot of legit people and make them now question more and more the need for any copyrights

  48. Two possibilities by russotto · · Score: 1

    One: This is a national security letter under USA PATRIOT
    Two: Burstnet is full of shit, canceled these guys for reasons of their own (which might include dealing with government investigations) and is deflecting blame to the government.

    Either one is bad, but at this point I'm not ready to blame the government completely as passing the blame for unpopular decisions to some unreachable authority is one of the oldest ones in the book.

  49. Can't you see...!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's the only SANE one left!!

  50. US govt job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hello....we have over 30 million people in this country illegally right now, but the Federal government is busy taking down 73,000 private websites.
    Here are the possibilities
    1. They specifically reviewed the content of over 73,000 private websites and took action.
    1a. The manpower required to do that would be significant and could much better be used to actually secure our nation.

    2. They specifically reviewed the content of a few sites, and arbitrarily and unfairly downed tens of thousands of innocent private sites, cutting off their right to free speech and conduct private business.
    2a. The federal government asserted powers it does not have and unjustly deprived US citizens of their rights under the Constitution.

    3. They reviewed nothing and acted solely on information provided to the UNCONSTITUTIONAL Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator Victoria Espinel by DRM proponents.
    They directed action at sites ALLEGEDLY "offering unauthorized movies and music", last month U.S. authorities targeted several sites they claimed were connected to the streaming of infringing video material.

    Wait a minute. They "claimed" the sites were "connected" to the streaming of "infringing video material". Last time I checked, our judicial system maintained that we are innocent until proven guilty, the federal government was PROHIBITED under the Intelligence Oversight Act from spying on its citizens, and the US Federal government cannot run around shutting down businesses on nothing more than the speculation of competitors. WTF?!

  51. i2p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Many personal websites are primarily to be viewed by extended groups of friend (meatspace or cyberspace). They could benefit from a bit of anonymity, personal control over their hosting, and freedom from dependance on a third party. I know that the freenet, diaspora, and tonika guys think that. But, this is a really great opportunity to point out the strong progress in speed and usability made by the I2P community over the last year. They offer a simple java program that when installed connects you to an anonymous network overlay in which you can irc, email, and publish websites from your machine. It also supports torrent and mule activity. Check out useable cipherspace that feels like the internet before AOL joined at geti2p dot net !

  52. Society? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Society" is only an abstraction. In reality there are only individuals. As long as everybody respects everybody else's rights, no compromises are necessary. What gives some individuals the right to tell others what to do?

    1. Re:Society? by spun · · Score: 1

      Good question. You see, me and a bunch of other individuals, collectively known as the citizens of the United States, have decided on what we will allow, and what we won't. That's our business, and here you come, demanding we do things your way.

      What gives you the right? Some imaginary ideal that you, and only you, have about your personal rights? Yeah, well I think It's my right to be provided with hookers and blow, so jump to it and go get me some!

      If you don't like the deal that we, as individuals forming a group known as 'American Society' are offering you, that does not give you the right to dictate terms to us. You can take the deal, or leave it. Or even take the deal and try to change the deal, as allowed by the deal. But you don't get to just dictate terms, if we say something is the law, you follow it or suffer the consequences. That's life, kid, and maybe it seems unfair, but only if you insist on looking at everything through the lens of your own self importance.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:Society? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>if we say something is the law, you follow it or suffer the consequences

      Unless the law violates either the US or the local State Constitution. Or the Bill of Rights of same. Then that law is nullified.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Society? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      To summarize spun's viewpoint,

      "if we don't like them niggers, kikes, spics, 'n queers, and if there are more of us them those gosh-darned vermin, then by golly we can treat 'em however we want, GOD BLESS AMERICA (YEE-HAW!)

    4. Re:Society? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if we say something is the law, you follow it or suffer the consequences

      Unless the law violates either the US or the local State Constitution. Or the Bill of Rights of same. Then that law is nullified.

      Not nearly often enough. There are plenty of unconstitutional laws on the books.

      For example, the First Amendment says nothing about obscenity. It's only through "interpretation" that the Supreme Court says "when they wrote that the freedom of speech and the press shall not be infringed, they really meant freedom of NON-OBSCENE speech and press."

      It's not about law; it's all about who has the money and power.

    5. Re:Society? by spun · · Score: 1

      To summarize spun's viewpoint,

      "if we don't like them niggers, kikes, spics, 'n queers, and if there are more of us them those gosh-darned vermin, then by golly we can treat 'em however we want, GOD BLESS AMERICA (YEE-HAW!)

      Hardly. We have a constitution that says we can not do that. If we didn't, I would have to fight to change that, using the agreements we have in place on how to change things, or leave. Please use better arguments, I bore easily.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:Society? by spun · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, yes. That is the case. Unless we get two thirds majority and a bunch of states to make it a Constitutional Ammendment.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    7. Re:Society? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      And if the majority wanted to amend the constitution to persecute these groups, and did so, they'd have your blessing.

    8. Re:Society? by spun · · Score: 1

      How so? We have a constitution for a reason, I do not support a tyranny of the majority when it infringes basic rights.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    9. Re:Society? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      How can you say that, and this, at the same time:

      >>Your simplistic libertarian views demonstrate that you have only a glib, self serving, and superficial understanding of what freedom means. Freedom is a contract between individuals where both people give up something they value less in order to gain something they value more. As such, freedom is something that is defined by society, not individuals. Individuals, by themselves, have only power. Freedom is a moot concept outside of society. Inside society, it is always a trade off, and it means something far more than "I get to do whatever I want and you can't tell me what to do."

      ?

      Freedom is equated with rights; since you deny individual freedom, you must reject individual rights, including "basic rights." Either you're trolling or your views are murky and undeveloped.

      You even claim that the government has a right to arbitrarily claim land as its own, and rule people on it, and the only recourse for people is to live on unclaimed land in places inhabitable like Antarctica or the moon.

      In addition, the world governments have claimed that Antarctica is basically a zone for scientific research; oil drilling, etc, is not allowed there. So even if they don't touch Antarctica, they can decide what to do there, and even if someone could they likely couldn't start their own nation there. But that's OK with you, I'm sure; what's important is obedience to the world's governments, so long as they are something labeled "democratic."

    10. Re:Society? by spun · · Score: 1

      I don't deny individual rights. Rights are agreements between individuals, or they mean nothing. Without the agreement to defend and uphold the right, "right" is just a word. Individuals have rights if they can negotiate for those rights. Any attempt to fix rights as natural or God given is simply an appeal to authority. It might convince someone to honor that right, but it is only because they are3 convinced that it becomes a right.

      Government is just a group of individuals. If an individual can claim land, then by definition, so can a government. You can't claim someone else's land, even if they are not using it. Ever hear the song, "This Land is My Land?" Yeah, well, just like any other corporation, we claimed this land. If you are a citizen, it's your land too, and you can attempt to change the rules about it through the channels we have agreed to. If you don't want to do that, or you aren't a citizen, you can always fight us for it.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  53. Storeage Unit = More Apt by linzeal · · Score: 1

    The owners of these websites were not selling their data to this service and coming back every day trying to buy it back. It would be more like a storage unit is found to have dead body in it so they open up everyone's storage lockers and take everything as evidence.

    1. Re:Storeage Unit = More Apt by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      It would be more like a storage unit is found to have dead body in it so they open up everyone's storage lockers and take everything as evidence.

      You're close, but still not quite there.

      It's like the guy was running a storage service out of a warehouse, and a dead body is found in it. So the police take everything in the warehouse as evidence - which includes everyone else's stuff because they are simply in separate bins in the warehouse.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  54. Shuts down *sites*? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like they shut down a host, which just happens to have a lot of sites.. Tons of collateral damage but i don't think the goal was to shut down 73k sites.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  55. Welcome to freenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Freenet: "free" web hosting that can't be taken down or blocked without permanent removal or disruption of a majority of nodes on the network. Making Freenet itself illegal would be legally very difficult in any society that has "free speech".

    Bonus: Like torrents, the more popular content on Freenet is, the faster it can be fetched. So Freenet pages are immune to the /. effect.

    Drawback: Freenet only stores and retrieves data, so all pages are static [scripting not allowed for security reasons, HTML and CSS are also white-list filtered]. This is fine for a blog, or art gallery site.

    http://www.freenetproject.org/

  56. Restrictions on consenting adults living together by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Actually there are lots of places with restrictions on how many unrelated consenting adults can live together. It's mostly college towns and beach towns, trying to keep away rowdy young people, but sometimes it's just anti-slum zoning. That obviously doesn't apply to people living in separate apartments, but some places limit those as well.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  57. Welcome to "net neutrality" by bonch · · Score: 0, Troll

    We'll see how long that lasts when the government has the wonderful power of net neutrality to regulate Internet traffic and censor discussion to help "prevent economic terrorism" or "preserve national security."

  58. Pot, let me introduce you to kettle... by copponex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, you think America doesn't call in the troops to maintain order. I think you're flatly wrong.

    WWI Vets protesting during the Great Depression? Call in the troops! Miners striking for better wages? Call in the national guard! College kids causing a ruckus over the Vietnam War? Keep your finger on the trigger. Got some colored people demanding rights? Send in the secret police to take them out.

    Apparently you have also forgotten about the Civil War. Whether the crisis (or the injustice of slavery) could have been solved without the military, who knows. But America has shown it's willingness to kill it's citizens in order to keep the Union together.

    Now, what's even more revealing, is that American investment in China went up after the Tiananmen Square incident because it proved that China could keep it's population in line. Not long after they murdered their citizens in the streets, we were lining up for their cheap communist labor. So much for our value system.

    America has many more freedoms than China, but every state has a will to survive that is larger than the value of a few of its citizen's lives. America just has much better PR about that fact.

  59. State, Religion, and Republicans by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When it's possible for a government to couch new laws in terms of right and wrong and when the People are blinded enough to accept such terms, freedom suffers. When freedom suffers enough. Bad Things happen. I don't care if it was Russian spies, free dealing child pornographers, or Assassinations R Us: there is no justification for silencing speech. and as for Terrorism, I'm not even going to dignify that excuse.

    Whether the State can loose and bind
    In Heaven as well as on Earth:
    If it be wiser to kill mankind
    Before or after the birth-
    These are matters of high concern
    Where State-kept school men are;
    But Holy State (we have lived to learn)
    Endeth in Holy War.

    Whether The People be led by the Lord,
    Or lured by the loudest throat:
    If it be quicker to die by the sword
    Or cheaper to die by vote -
    These are the things we have dealt with once,
    (And they will not rise from their grave)
    For Holy People, however it runs,
    Endeth in wholly Slave.

    Whatsoever, for any cause,
    Seeketh to take or give,
    Power above or beyond the Laws,
    Suffer it not to live!
    Holy State or Holy King -
    Or Holy People's Will -
    Have no truck with the senseless thing.
    Order the guns and kill!

    Saying -- after -- me:--
    Once there was The People - Terror gave it birth;
    Once there was The People and it made a Hell of Earth.
    Earth arose and crushed it. Listen, O ye slain!
    Once There was The People - it shall never be again!

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:State, Religion, and Republicans by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " there is no justification for silencing speech. "

      And there was no silencing of free speech.

      "and as for Terrorism, I'm not even going to dignify that excuse."

      Is that because you would be wrong? or that you or stupid? or that you didn't understand what I wrote.

      Or do you really think there are no terrorists?

      finally, MacDonoahs* song doesn't belong here. You might want to understand it's context a little better.

      *probable misspelled. It's been a while since I read Kipling.

      I

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:State, Religion, and Republicans by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      When it's possible for a government to couch new laws in terms of right and wrong and when the People are blinded enough to accept such terms, freedom suffers.

      Ok, if "right and wrong" are not the basis for law, what is the basis for law?

      The whole purpose of law is to regulate right and wrong. That's why they exist. If you're using them for something else, you're a fucking tyrant.

      For a blatant example, the only reason we have a law against murder is because we, as a society, believe murder is wrong. If it is not wrong, then there is no reason to have a law against it, and you're making illegal a perfectly OK activity.

      All laws are opinions of right and wrong. Period. The idea that they should be otherwise is ludicrous.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  60. It's different 'cos it's CHINA, yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's different 'cos it's CHINA, yeah? Just get with the program, dude. When countries waterboard US soldiers, it's called torture, but it's aggressive interrogation when the US does it BECAUSE IT'S THE US!!!!

    Or are you with THE TERRORISTS!!!

  61. Don't feel sorry for this guy by cjjjer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Based on some searching (wayback and webhostingtalk) this guy has been booted from two other hosting companies since 2008.

    See the ongoing thread @ http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=964013

    1. Re:Don't feel sorry for this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. after reading through the entire thread you linked to I get the distinct impression that most of the posters are hosting providers trying to cover their asses.

      They also seem never have received multiple bogus DMCA complaints.

      The "Under the penalty of prejury" part of the USA DMCA law doesnt seem scare people that dont like away from inventing a bogus legal firm just to use the takedown
      notice to silence you.

  62. Non, let me introduce you to sequitur by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    So, you think America doesn't call in the troops to maintain order.

    Did I say that? No. We were talking about China and their allegedly oh so philosophical government.

    1. Re:Non, let me introduce you to sequitur by copponex · · Score: 1

      Did I say that? No. We were talking about China and their allegedly oh so philosophical government.

      I said their government was an expression of their philosophy, but of course their government is philosophical. Every government carries a philosophy. Disagreeing with it doesn't make it disappear, and frankly, when you look at Saudi Arabia or Columbia or Iraq in the 80s, our allies have had much more repressive governments than China currently has. I was just pointing out than American exceptionalism in this case is a total crock of shit, as it usually is.

    2. Re:Non, let me introduce you to sequitur by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Every government carries a philosophy.

      So did Videodrome. That's what made it dangerous. :-)

      I was just pointing out than American exceptionalism in this case is a total crock of shit, as it usually is.

      *shrug* OK. Nothing special about that. Hey, dude, I'm practically an anarchist at this point. I don't trust anyone in politics to give me the correct time of day. Living here in California didn't help. Our legislature is actively and openly hostile to anyone with functioning neurons. There's been a few accidently recorded "private" conversations where it's clear they have given upeven the barest pretense of serving anything but their own egos and bank accounts.

  63. A Clue! by tobiah · · Score: 1

    The owner of the single server (that's right, it was all on one single server, with no backups) posted to WebHostingTalk.com ...

    Has anyone from "the government" (state, fed, department?) contacted Blogetery.com's owner? I bet BurstNet just messed up and lost the server, and are feeding him a line.

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  64. For all the people saying the "West" doesn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    disappear people.

    Where the hell is Julian Assange?

    Where the hell have the secure uploading options for wikileaks gone?

  65. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for rescuing my hope for humanity. POTD, YWTI; Wheaties, breakfast of champions.

  66. Oh really? by Guppy · · Score: 1

    What you have to understand about China is that their government is an expression of their religious philosophies. They believe that social order is a moral expression, and something worth dying for:

    This interpretation rather conveniently ignores the PRC government's long suppression of Confucianism. Its rehabilitation is something quite recent:

    "I think he [Qin Shihuang] killed too few Confucian scholars. All those Confucian scholars were indeed counter-revolutionaries." -Chairman Mao

  67. Don't force us to choose between music and fascism by mykos · · Score: 1

    I'll take less movies and music over a complete loss of individual rights.

    Also: http://mschaut.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/fascist.jpg

  68. Marriage as economic force by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Historically, marriage is about property -- a commitment for the combined wealth of the participants (the couple, their extended family, the tribe) to stay together.

    Marriage for love was remarkable in the ancient world: not unknown, but neither the norm.

    Related note: Peter Farb argues (in Man's Rise to Civilization) that the incest taboo reflects economic reality: cultures that outbreed tend to accumulate more wealth (through marriage and other combinations) than cultures that inbreed.

    --
    -kgj
  69. I question the timing by leereyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't recall the Bush administration being so keen on enforcing copyright law, and I don't recall them being so brazen, yet at the same time secretive about it.

    "The authorities" shut down an entire site and refuse to tell the owner why?

    Prior to the ascension of The One, the leftysphere and MSM (but I repeat myself) would have been all over this, proclaiming the birth of the Bush Police State.

    Yet now all I hear is some grumbling from the same fringe kooks who think copyright law is invalid to begin with.

    I have to suspect that this action may be a trial balloon. I have to suspect that in the future, websites that host content that the regime finds objectionable will also be subject to arbitrary termination, and for equally mysterious reasons.

    Tyranny depends on information control. It isn't easy to control what people think, but it is easy to control what they think ABOUT if you control what information they have access to.

    How long before the Drudge Report gets taken down? (I am engaging in hyperbole there, but you get the point).

    Wasn't this supposed to be the new era of transparency? Well it is, transparent evil.

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:I question the timing by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Prior to the ascension of The One, the leftysphere and MSM (but I repeat myself) would have been all over this, proclaiming the birth of the Bush Police State.

      Hey man, he got a Nobel Prize for Peace! You don't get a Nobel Prize for nothin!

      Oh wait...

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  70. Prior restraint by Animats · · Score: 1

    This is a major First Amendment issue. Where's the court order? I don't care what they were doing, there's no excuse for doing this without legal process. Judges are available 24/7 for emergencies.

    Also, it doesn't help the Government that they got BurstNet to do their dirty work. Anything the U.S. Government is constitutionally prohibited from doing directly, they cannot do through a private party.

    1. Re:Prior restraint by ne0shell · · Score: 1

      The court order was served on the party who owns the server, the network connection and the IP space. There is no legal requirement for notification to the person leasing those items. If the investigation turns up something the owner of blogetry will be notified with a search and arrest warrant at his home / office. When someone has some kind of proof the server was taken down due to some agency opposing written content on one of the sites, then you can start screaming "first amendment issue". According to Google there was a huge amount of pirated material being posted on blogetry sites. If we're going to make wild guesses about what brought on this event I'd lean towards that. (Especially given the data center suspension notice mentioned abuse as the specific reason for take down).

    2. Re:Prior restraint by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      This is a major First Amendment issue. Where's the court order? I don't care what they were doing, there's no excuse for doing this without legal process. Judges are available 24/7 for emergencies.

      You might try reading. It's a great thing to do - in fact you find out all sorts of things when you read!

      Like the fact that a court order and gag order was issued to BurstNet to remove the single server this guy was hosting everything on.

      That's how the law works. You have to get a warrant to take evidence from the people who actually own it not the schmuck renting the equipment. And hey guess what? They did!

      Dumbass.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  71. Don't fall for the "freedom" angle on this one by ne0shell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is not the "government oversteps boundaries chasing torrent users" story the site owner is doing his best to promote... The company provided "free" and pay for upgrade blog hosting which attracted numerous DMCA complaints. Unfortunately, the site owner had no content control system in place at all other than waiting for his datacenter to send DCMA notices. Imagine his surprise when after getting quite a few of these that someone decided there was a pattern of willful / negligent violations of copyright and filed a lawsuit. If this is what happened the "victims" all seem to be the last people in the entire World to know you cannot host pirated content on a US located server. If you do, there is a real risk that some agency will come and take your server away to be examined eventually and the owner of said server will face civil as well as criminal actions. In all honesty that's a best case scenario at this point as the other possibilities involve Federal offenses (child / beast / etc porn, tax evasion, hacking / phishing and so on). Now we have individuals who were hosted by blogetry complaining because the un-named agency did not leave the server in place and handle things on a site by site basis. What rock have these people been living under for the past four years or so??? Given the fact this sort of thing happens on other free blog hosting sites (the hosting of pirated material, not the sudden transfer of servers from datacenter to Quantico) it's pretty obvious that there is something more serious involved here or that the site owner was allowing a great deal of pirated material to be posted. Those other providers all have some form of internal content monitoring / abuse department as well as treating their clients seriously with hosting on hardware they own, connections they own and IP space they lease direct. Blogetry was using the least expensive, rent a server plan from a hosting provider datacenter. (At that level you can get maybe 6 DCMA notices before suspension if they're "liberal" about that sort of thing). So far the owner has blamed the datacenter he was leasing servers from (mostly because they refused to disclose information the law enforcement agency told them not to) and now it seems he's blaming the US Government. Why can't he point that finder where it belongs (inwards)? I'd advise the torrent community and e-freedom folks to keep some distance from this one. There's a huge chunk of data still missing here and regardless, this is not the poster boy for torrent user's rights we want or need.

  72. Time for prompt inspection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It appears from looking at google cache that only the top domain has been take down. I think cached links still lead to live blogs.

    Concerned citizens should scan them promptly before somebody decides to take them down.

  73. As to land by nu1x · · Score: 1

    Antarctica is illegal to own, even if you had the technical means to live there, I don't think you could. IIRC, it is only legal for certain countries explicitly for purposes of science.

    And all the little islands are already taken, except maybe 3-4, which are unfeasible, and if you would as much as be seen frolicking on the soil of some tiny island of some say African or South american nation, they would send some military boats and remove you asap, by all means, without much forethought.

    There are people who would want to band together, to form a new nation - it is not as easy as it sounds.

    --
    I have nothing to lose but my bindings.
  74. source of the joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adapted from a typical Soviet political joke from the communist era:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_political_jokes#Armenian_Radio

  75. Burst Isn't reliable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burstnet is known to pull the plug fast, I host my blog with http://beyondhosting.net and I've not had any problems... http://blog.undecim.org/

  76. You think like a ReThuglican Jew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think like a ReThuglican Jew!

  77. In other words: by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

    OBEY! SUBMIT! CONSUME!

    --
    Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!